Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Feb 7;17(2):e0263690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263690

Value of C-11 methionine PET/CT in patients with intracranial germinoma

Yong-Jin Park 1, Ji Won Lee 2, Hee Won Cho 2, Yearn Seong Choe 3, Kyung-Han Lee 3, Joon Young Choi 3, Ki Woong Sung 2,*,#, Seung Hwan Moon 3,*,#
Editor: Pierpaolo Alongi4
PMCID: PMC8820606  PMID: 35130327

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of C-11 methionine (MET) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in patients with intracranial germinoma (IG).

Material and methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 21 consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed IGs and eight patients with intracranial non-germinomas (INGs) located in a similar region. Clinical characteristics, imaging findings, and tumor markers such as α-fetoprotein (AFP) and β-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) were used as clinical variables. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tumor-to-normal tissue (T/N) ratio, and visual scoring of tumor were used as MET PET parameters.

Results

All IGs were well visualized on MET PET with a three-grade visual scoring system. In addition, SUVmax of IGs was higher than that of INGs (P = 0.005). Pre-treatment (Pre-Tx) T/N ratio was significantly correlated with pre-Tx serum HCG (P = 0.031). Moreover, MET PET parameters showed significant associations with tumor location, sex, KRAS variant, and symptoms.

Conclusion

MET PET/CT could be a useful diagnostic tool in patients suspected of having IGs. In addition, the MET avidity of tumor is a potential surrogate biomarker of HCG, which has been used as a diagnostic marker for IGs. Tumor MET parameters also had significant differences according to tumor locations, sex, symptoms, and KRAS mutation. However, MET avidity of tumors had no significant prognostic value.

Introduction

Intracranial germinomas (IGs) originate from totipotent germ cells and usually occur in children and young adults [1, 2]. They are the most common type of intracranial germ cell tumors (GCTs) and account for 0.5–2.1% of all pediatric primary brain tumors [3]. IGs are potentially malignant in behavior, and can infiltrate normal brain tissue as well as spread through the whole of the central nervous system (CNS) [4]. However, these lesions are highly sensitive to radiotherapy or/and chemotherapy, and are potentially curable without complete surgical resection [57]. Given that these tumors have a highly favorable treatment response and delayed treatment can cause more severe neurologic complications, early and accurate diagnosis is essential for better clinical outcomes in patients with IGs. Clinical diagnosis and staging of IGs are based on symptoms, tumor markers such as α-fetoprotein (AFP) or β-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and brain and spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [8]. AFP or HCG values beyond a certain threshold in either the serum or cerebrospinal fluid suggest the presence of these specific tumors. However, on the basis of experience from previous clinical studies, the defined thresholds can vary according to clinical scenario [8]. MRI is more sensitive than computed tomography (CT) and thus is considered the imaging modality of choice. However, in some cases of basal ganglia germinomas, it was difficult to detect the tumor lesions because the lesions in basal ganglia only show subtle signal change, no mass effects, and nonspecific radiological findings on MRI during their early stages [7, 911]. Therefore, an additional biomarker reflecting the tumor characteristics would improve diagnosis and management of these tumors.

C-11 methionine (MET) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT has potential as an additional imaging tool for brain tumors [12]. Methionine easily crosses the intact blood-brain barrier via the neutral amino acid transporter and is incorporated into active tumor [10]. In a previous study on the distribution of MET in mouse malignant tumor models, MET uptake was mainly by viable cancer cells, and MET uptake by macrophages and granulation tissues was low [13]. Previous studies and case reports in patients with IG using MET PET have mainly done research on basal ganglia germinomas [3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14], and described that MET PET is useful for early detection of basal ganglia germinoma without overt mass formation, assessment of treatment response and residual tumor, and monitoring for tumor recurrence [3, 6, 7, 10]. In previous studies, patients with basal ganglia germinoma presented only with hemiatrophy without any obvious mass formation on MRI, and the studies explained that MET PET was valuable for detecting the precise location of the tumor [10, 11]. In another previous study in IGs, it elucidated the characteristic MET and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET findings in 10 patients with IGs and reported that MET is more useful for tumor contouring and treatment planning because MET has better image contrast than FDG [9]. However, due to the rarity of IG, the value of MET PET/CT for this disease has not yet been fully investigated.

In the present study, we evaluated the value of MET PET/CT in patients with IG. We investigated associations between MET PET parameters and clinical variables such as tumor markers, tumor location, tumor size, symptoms, and other clinical factors. In addition, the MET PET findings of IGs and intracranial non-germinoma (INGs) that develop in pineal region, sellar-suprasellar region, and basal ganglia were compared, and the prognosis of IG was also investigated.

Materials and methods

Patient selection

We reviewed the electronic medical records of 1,685 patients who underwent MET PET/CT at Samsung Medical Center from December 2013 to May 2020. Among these patients, 66 consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed IG were first identified. From a total of 66 patients, 45 patients who did not undergo MET PET/CT before or after treatment were excluded. Finally, 21 patients were enrolled in this study, and pre-treatment (pre-Tx) and post-treatment (post-Tx) MET PET/CT images from the 21 patients were used for analysis. Of the 21 patients, 20 patients had one IG, while one patient had two IGs, located in pineal region and sellar-suprasellar region.

To compare the MET uptake of IGs with INGs, we searched the electronic medical records to identify pathologically confirmed INGs in the same region during the same study period. Eight patients with INGs located in pineal region, sellar-suprasellar region, or basal ganglia were this study. Final analysis included 22 IG lesions in 21 patients and eight ING lesions in eight patients.

The present study was approved by the institutional review board (2020-11-060-002). The need for informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study and the anonymous clinical data were analyzed. All processes performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of institutional review board of our medical center and with the declaration of Helsinki 1964 and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

C-11 methionine PET/CT scanning protocol

Study patients fasted for at least 4 hours, and then an intravenous injection of MET was given. The injection dose of MET was 6.0 MBq/kg (162 μCi/kg). When pediatric patients needed to be sedated, their vital signs were monitored during sedation. After 20 minutes of MET injection, patients underwent MET PET/CT scan using a Discovery STE PET/CT scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA). The entire brain was imaged. CT scans were performed via continuous spiral method using a 16-slice helical CT, and acquisition parameters of CT images were 120 kVp, 50 mA, rotation time 0.8 second, helical thickness 3.75 mm, helical interval 3.27 mm, pitch 1.75:1, and beam collimation 10 mm. After performing CT scans, PET scans were performed for 7 minutes/frame, and PET images were reconstructed using an iterative three-dimensional reconstruction method (20 subsets, 2 iterations). Acquisition parameters of PET images were 128 × 128 × 48 matrix with 2 mm × 2 mm × 3.27 mm voxel size. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) were calculated by adjusting for the injection dose of MET and body weight of patient. Advantage Workstation VolumeShare 7 (AW 4.7, GE Healthcare) was used for co-registration of CT and PET images.

Analysis of C-11 methionine PET/CT images

Advantage Workstation VolumeShare 7 (AW 4.7, GE Healthcare) software was used to measure PET parameters. In patients with IG, the mean durations between pre-Tx MET PET/CT and the start of treatment were 8.5 days (median: 1 day), and the mean durations between the end of treatment and post-Tx MET PET/CT were 12.1 months (median: 13 months). Of 22 IGs, 17 (77.3%) were biopsy performed prior to pre-Tx MET PET/CT, while the remaining five (22.7%) were pre-Tx MET PET/CT followed by biopsy. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were manually drawn by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians on MET PET/CT images to delineate the exact contours of IGs with reference to non-contrast CT images of PET/CT and contrast images of MRI. Maximum SUV (SUVmax) and tumor-to-normal tissue (T/N) ratio on pre-Tx and post-Tx MET PET/CT images were measured. The T/N ratio of IG was defined as SUVmax of IG divided by mean SUV (SUVmean) of normal frontal cortex [9]. The SUVmean of the normal frontal cortex was measured using spherical VOI.

Pre-Tx and post-Tx MET uptake of IGs was evaluated by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians using a three-grade visual scoring system. Grade 1 (negative) indicated that MET uptake was indistinguishable from normal brain tissue, and grade 3 (positive) indicated that MET uptake was markedly higher than background uptake and clearly distinguished from background uptake. Grade 2 (weakly positive) indicated that MET uptake was neither grade 1 (negative) nor grade 3 (positive). Therefore, in the visual grade 2, the MET uptake was slightly higher than background uptake and vaguely distinguished from the background uptake. Examples of the visual scoring system are shown in Fig 1. Enhancements in IG were investigated on conventional CT and MRI, and calcifications in IGs were investigated on conventional CT.

Fig 1. Examples of the three-grade visual scoring system for IG.

Fig 1

(A) A case of visual grade 1 was a 24-year-old male patient with pineal germinoma and was post-Tx MET PET/CT images. Tumor size was 9 mm, and post-Tx SUVmax and T/N ratio were 1.52 and 1.10, respectively. The MET uptake of tumor was indistinguishable from that of normal brain tissue. (B) A case of visual grade 2 was a 13-year-old male patient with left basal ganglia germinoma and was post-Tx MET PET/CT images. Tumor size was 12 mm, and post-Tx SUVmax and T/N ratio were 2.26 and 1.85, respectively. The MET uptake of tumor showed slightly higher MET uptake than that of surrounding normal brain tissue. (C) A case of visual grade 3 was 23-year-old male patient with pineal germinoma and was pre-Tx MET PET/CT images. Tumor size was 19 mm, and pre-Tx SUVmax and T/N ratio were 3.97 and 3.45, respectively. The MET uptake of tumor was distinctly higher than that of surrounding normal brain tissue. IG, intracranial germinoma; post-Tx, post-treatment; MET, C-11 methionine; PET, positron emission tomography; CT, computed tomography; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value; T/N, tumor-to-normal tissue; pre-Tx, pre-treatment; SUV, standardized uptake value.

In this study, 22 IGs were located in the pineal region, sellar-suprasellar region, and basal ganglia. During the same study period, eight pathologically confirmed INGs in the pineal region, sellar-suprasellar region, and basal ganglia were enrolled and analyzed. The eight INGs included two cavernous angiomas, one glioneuronal tumor, one low-grade astrocytic tumor, one low-grade glioma, one immature teratoma, one langerhans cell histiocytosis, and one mixed germ cell tumor. The differences in the SUVmax and T/N ratio of the 22 IGs and eight INGs were investigated. Tumor locations, SUVmax, and T/N ratio of eight INGs are presented in S1 Table.

Clinical variables and PET parameters

In the present study, age, sex, leptomeningeal seeding, symptom variables, and tumor markers were clinical variables. The symptom variables consisted of headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, visual impairment, polydipsia, polyuria, short stature, one-sided weakness, clumsiness, dysarthria, weight loss, and xerostomia. The tumor marker variables consisted of pre-Tx CSF AFP, pre-Tx serum AFP, pre-Tx CSF HCG, pre-Tx serum HCG, post-Tx CSF AFP, post-Tx serum AFP, post-Tx CSF HCG, post-Tx serum HCG, Δ CSF AFP, Δ serum AFP, Δ CSF HCG, and Δ serum HCG. The difference in the variables pre-Tx and post-Tx was described as Δ in this study. The tumor markers were measured within three days of MET PET/CT scans. In addition, tumor location, tumor size, enhancement on CT and MRI, and calcification on CT were also clinical variables. Tumor locations consisted of the pineal region, sellar-suprasellar region, and basal ganglia.

The associations of PET parameters with clinical variables were also analyzed. PET parameters consisted of pre-Tx T/N ratio, pre-Tx SUVmax, post-Tx T/N ratio, post-Tx SUVmax, Δ T/N ratio, and Δ SUVmax. Clinical variables and PET parameters of IG are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1. Characteristics of 21 patients with IG.

Number of patients (%) Median (range)
Age (years) 16.0 (6–32)
Sex Men/women 15/6 (71.4/28.6)
Recurrence 1 (4.8)
Death 1 (4.8)
PFS (months) 31.0 (0–77)
OS (months) 31.0 (0–77)
Treatment CTx + RTx 20 (95.2)
CTx + RTx + OP 1 (4.8)
Leptomeningeal seeding 5 (23.8)
Symptoms Polydipsia, polyuria 7 (33.3)
Headache 6 (28.6)
Visual impairment 5 (23.8)
Nausea, vomiting 4 (19.0)
Dizziness 4 (19.0)
Short stature 3 (14.3)
One-sided weakness, clumsiness 3 (14.3)
Dysarthria 1 (4.8)
Weight loss 1 (4.8)
Xerostomia 1 (4.8)
Tumor markers Pre-Tx serum AFP (IU/mL) 1.2 (0.5–5.7)
Post-Tx serum AFP (IU/mL) 0.7 (0.5–5.8)
Δ serum AFP (IU/mL) 0.5 (0–2.9)
Pre-Tx CSF AFP (IU/mL) 0.5 (0.5–1.5)
Post-Tx CSF AFP (IU/mL) 1.3 (0.3–0.8)
Δ CSF AFP (IU/mL) 0.0 (0–1.2)
Pre-Tx serum HCG (mIU/mL) 1.2 (0.4–36.9)
Post-Tx serum HCG (mIU/mL) 0.7 (0.4–12.1)
Δ serum HCG (mIU/mL) 0.7 (0–36.5)
Pre-Tx CSF HCG (mIU/mL) 3.7 (0.6–220.9)
Post-Tx CSF HCG (mIU/mL) 1.3 (0.4–2.8)
Δ CSF HCG (mIU/mL) 2.0 (0–219.4)

IG, intracranial germinoma; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; CTx, chemotherapy; RTx, radiotherapy; OP, operation; pre-Tx, pre-treatment; AFP, α-fetoprotein; post-Tx, post-treatment; Δ, difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; HCG, β-human chorionic gonadotropin.

Table 2. Characteristics of 22 pathologically confirmed IGs.

Number of patients (%) Median (range)
Location Pineal region 9 (40.9)
Sellar-suprasellar region 10 (45.5)
Basal ganglia 3 (13.6)
Tumor size (mm) 18.0 (8.0–44.0)
Enhancement on CT and MRI 22 (100)
Calcification on CT 13 (59.1)
Visual grade Pre-Tx—1 0 (0)
Pre-Tx—2 0 (0)
Pre-Tx—3 22 (100)
Post-Tx—1 16 (72.7)
Post-Tx—2 6 (27.3)
Post-Tx—3 0 (0)
PET parameter Pre-Tx T/N ratio 2.8 (1.6–5.2)
Post-Tx T/N ratio 1.1 (0.6–2.1)
Δ T/N ratio 1.8 (0–4.2)
Pre-Tx SUVmax 3.5 (2.1–7.6)
Post-Tx SUVmax 1.7 (0.8–2.6)
Δ SUVmax 2.1 (0–5.8)

IG, intracranial germinoma; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; pre-Tx, pre-treatment; post-Tx, post-treatment; PET, positron emission tomography; T/N, tumor-to-normal tissue; Δ, difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value.

In addition, eight (38.1%) of 21 patients with IGs underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS), and 11 gene variants were discovered: KIT, KRAS, NRAS, TERT, APC, PTPRD, KMT2C, KMT2D, RUNX1, PTCH1, and PIK3CA, and the association between these 11 genetic variants and PET parameters was also investigated.

Statistical analysis

IBM SPSS statistics software version 27.0 for Windows (IBM Corporation. Armonk, NY, USA) was used for analysis in this study. Independent T-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the continuous variables between two groups. When comparing continuous variables among three groups, Kruskal-Wallis test was employed because continuous variables did not have a normal distribution. In post hoc testing, Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni’s method was used to compare the PET parameters of two different tumor locations, and a significant difference was defined as a P value less than 0.016. The correlation of two continuous variables was analyzed using Pearson correlation and Spearman correlation.

The prognostic significance of PET parameters and other clinical variables related to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards regression models with enter method. PFS was defined as the time from the date of chemotherapy initiation to the date of documented progression or last clinical follow-up. OS was defined as the time from the date of chemotherapy initiation to cancer or treatment-related death or last clinical follow-up.

Using graphs of MedCalc statistical software version 20.009 for Windows (MedCalc software, Ostend, Belgium), comparisons of pre-Tx SUVmax and pre-Tx T/N ratio between 22 IGs and eight INGs located in pineal region, sellar-suprasellar region, and basal ganglia were presented. In addition, comparisons of pre-Tx SUVmax and pre-Tx T/N ratio between IGs located in the pineal region, sellar-suprasellar region, and basal ganglia were presented.

Results

Characteristics of 21 patients with 22 IGs

A total of 21 patients with IG were enrolled. The patient group consisted of 15 men (71.4%) and 6 women (28.6%), and the median age of patients was 16.0 years. Of the 21 patients, one (4.8%) relapsed after treatment and died undergoing additional surgical treatment, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. The other 20 (95.2%) did not experience recurrence after chemotherapy and radiation therapy. All patients were managed by the same chemotherapy regimen and subsequent radiotherapy as initial treatment, and one patient who relapsed was given a changed treatment regimen after the relapse. Five (23.8%) of 21 patients had leptomeningeal seeding at the time of initial diagnosis. A total of 21 patients complained of 10 symptoms during initial diagnosis before treatment. Seven (33.3%) had polydipsia and polyuria, and six (28.6%) had headache. Five (23.8%) had visual impairment, and four (19.0%) had nausea, vomiting, and dizziness. Three (14.3%) had short stature and one-sided weakness, and one (4.8%) had dysarthria, weight loss, and xerostomia. Median pre-Tx serum AFP, CSF AFP, serum HCG, and CSF HCG were 1.2 IU/mL, 0.5 IU/mL, 1.2 mIU/mL, and 3.7 mIU/mL, respectively. After treatment, AFP and HCG showed a decreasing tendency. Characteristics of 21 patients with IG are presented in Table 1.

Of the 22 IGs, nine (40.9%) were located in the pineal region. Ten (45.5%) were located in the sellar-suprasellar region, and three (13.6%) were located in the basal ganglia. The mean size of IGs was 21.1 mm, ranging from 8.0 mm to 44.0 mm. All IGs showed enhancement on CT and MRI, and 13 (59.1%) exhibited calcification on CT. Before treatment, all IGs were visual grade 3. After treatment, 16 (72.7%) were visual grade 1, and six (27.3%) were visual grade 2. Mean pre-Tx T/N ratio was 3.0, and mean post-Tx T/N ratio was 1.2 (Table 2). Two representative cases in which the MET uptake of IG was significantly decreased after treatment are shown in Fig 2.

Fig 2. Non-contrast CT, MET PET, and fusion images of two representative cases in patients with IG before and after treatment.

Fig 2

(A, B) The first case was an 11-year-old boy, and the patient experienced headache, polydipsia, polyuria, and growth hormone deficiency before treatment. The primary tumor was located in the sellar-suprasellar region (white and black arrows). Before treatment, pre-Tx SUVmax and pre-Tx T/N ratio were 4.91 and 4.38, respectively. After chemotherapy and radiation therapy, post-Tx SUVmax and post-Tx T/N ratio decreased to 1.62 and 1.27, respectively. The visual grade was three before the treatment and decreased to two after treatment. (C, D) The second case was a 14-year-old boy who experienced headache before treatment. The primary tumor was located in the pineal region (white and black arrow heads). Before treatment, pre-Tx SUVmax and pre-Tx T/N ratio were 4.95 and 3.96, respectively. After chemotherapy and radiation therapy, post-Tx SUVmax and post-Tx T/N ratio decreased to 1.52 and 1.15, respectively. The visual grade was three before treatment and then decreased to one after treatment. CT, computed tomography; MET, C-11 methionine; PET, positron emission tomography; IG, intracranial germinoma; pre-Tx, pre-treatment; SUVmax; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value; T/N, tumor-to-normal tissue; post-Tx, post-treatment; SUV, standardized uptake value.

MET uptake of IGs

All IGs were well visualized on MET PET in this study, as indicated by their visual grade 3 score on pre-Tx scan. In addition, SUVmax of IGs were significantly higher than that of INGs (P = 0.005). T/N ratio of IG showed a higher tendency than that of ING, but no statistically significant differences were found (P = 0.222) (S1 Fig).

Significant correlations between tumor MET uptake and tumor markers

Significant correlations between PET parameters and HCG were identified in this study (Table 3). Pre-Tx T/N ratio was significantly correlated with pre-Tx serum HCG (P = 0.031). Δ T/N ratio was significantly correlated with Δ serum HCG (P = 0.014) and Δ CSF HCG (P = 0.010). Δ SUVmax also showed a significant correlation with Δ CSF HCG (P = 0.048). However, no significant correlation was observed between PET parameters and AFP.

Table 3. Significant correlations between PET parameters and HCG.

PET parameter Tumor marker P value
Pre-Tx T/N ratio Pre-Tx serum HCG 0.031a
Δ T/N ratio Δ serum HCG 0.014b
Δ CSF HCG 0.010b
Δ SUVmax Δ CSF HCG 0.048b

PET, positron emission tomography; pre-Tx, pre-treatment; T/N, tumor-to-normal tissue; HCG, β-human chorionic gonadotropin; Δ, difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value.

aAccording to Spearman correlation.

bAccording to Pearson correlation.

Tumor MET uptake and clinical variables

In the present study, significant differences were identified between PET parameters according to tumor location. There were significant differences in pre-Tx SUVmax (P = 0.021) and pre-Tx T/N ratio (P = 0.037) depending on tumor location (Fig 3). On post hoc analysis using Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni’s method, significant differences in PET parameters were identified between the basal ganglia and other tumor locations. The size of basal ganglia tumors was an average of 28.6 mm with a median of 30 mm. This was relatively large compared to tumors located in other regions, which averaged 19.8 mm with a median of 18 mm. However, tumor MET uptake of basal ganglia tumors was relatively lower than others.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Comparisons of (A) pre-Tx SUVmax and (B) pre-Tx T/N ratio between IGs located in pineal region, basal ganglia, and sellar-suparsellar region. Pre-Tx, pre-treatment; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value; T/N, tumor-to-normal tissue, IG, intracranial germinoma. aAccording to Kruskal-Wallis test. bAccording to post hoc analysis using Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni’s method.

Significant differences in tumor MET uptake were identified according to clinical variables (Table 4). Pre-Tx T/N ratio differed significantly according to sex (P = 0.023), short stature (P = 0.012), and the presence of one-sided weakness and clumsiness (P = 0.005). Pre-Tx SUVmax also differed according to sex (P = 0.001) and one-sided weakness and clumsiness (P = 0.001). In this study, eight of 21 patients (8/21, 38.1%) underwent NGS, and 11 gene variants were found. Of the 11 gene variants, a significant difference in PET parameter was identified according to the presence of KRAS mutation. Three out of eight patients (3/8, 37.5%) who underwent NGS were identified as the presence of KRAS variant. The pre-Tx SUVmax of patients with KRAS variant was significantly higher than that of patients without KRAS variant (P = 0.036).

Table 4. Significant differences in PET parameters according to other clinical variables.

PET parameter Clinical variable P value
Pre-Tx T/N ratio Sex 0.023a
Short stature 0.012a
One-sided weakness, clumsiness 0.005b
Pre-Tx SUVmax Sex 0.001a
One-sided weakness, clumsiness 0.001b
KRAS variantc 0.036b

PET, positron emission tomography; pre-Tx, pre-treatment; T/N, tumor-to-normal tissue; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value.

aAccording to Independent T-test.

bAccording to Mann-Whitney U test.

cOf the 21 patients with intracranial germinoma, only eight underwent NGS.

MET uptake of IGs and prognosis

In the present study, only one out of 21 IG patients (1/21, 4.8%) died after relapse. There was no significant association between PET parameters and prognosis. Univariate analysis showed that nausea, vomiting (P = 0.034) and dizziness (P = 0.034) were independent predictive factors associated with decreased PFS. Neasea, vomiting (P = 0.034) and dizziness (P = 0.034) were also independent predictive factors associated with decreased OS. In multivariate analysis, there were no significant predictors associated with PFS or OS.

Discussion

We demonstrated that IGs are well delineated on MET PET and higher MET uptake is exhibited in these tumors compared with INGs in similar locations. These findings support that this modality may have a diagnostic role in patients suspected of having IGs, especially for localizing tumors and guiding biopsy. In addition, we identified significant associations between tumor MET uptake and clinical variables. MET PET parameters showed significant associations with tumor location, sex, symptoms, KRAS variant, and HCG.

With conventional neuroimaging such as MRI, early diagnosis of IGs may be difficult due to their slow progression, subtle signal changes, or the absence of a space-occupying lesion, particularly when the tumor is in the basal ganglia [6, 10, 13]. Many different types of tumor can occur in the sellar-suparsellar region, and all of which show similar morphological findings and signal changes on MRI. Therefore, the differential diagnosis of sellar-suprasellar tumors is frequently difficult [9]. Moreover, residual abnormalities caused by tissue necrosis after treatment occasionally mimic residual or recurrent tumor in basal ganglia germinomas [10]. Difficulty diagnosing and evaluating the treatment response may lead to poor prognosis [10]. Some difficult cases of IG cannot be diagnosed by conventional MRI, in these cases, PET imaging could be considered [9]. In a previous study of 10 patients with IGs, the IGs could be detected by FDG PET, but tumor-to-background contrast was poor due to FDG uptake by the nearby normal brain tissue [9]. In most of all cases, the FDG uptake of the tumor was intermediate between FDG uptake of the normal white matter and normal gray matter. On the other hand, almost all of IGs could be visualized on MET PET, therefore, MET is considered to be a good radiotracer for detecting IG. In most of all cases, the IGs showed intense MET uptake than the normal white matter and gray matter [9]. Compared to FDG PET, IGs showed relatively low SUVmax and relatively high T/N ratios in MET PET [9]. For these reasons, MET PET is considered useful for tumor localization, tumor contouring, and treatment planning. Previous studies and case reports in patients with IG using MET PET have mainly done research on basal ganglia germinomas and described that MET PET is useful for detection of basal ganglia germinoma without mass effects, differential diagnosis of patients with progressive hemiparesis and hemiatrophy on MRI, assessment of treatment response and residual tumor, monitoring for tumor recurrence, and locating a precise biopsy target [3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14]. In another previous study in IGs, it elucidated the characteristic MET and FDG PET findings of 10 IGs that develop in basal ganglia, pineal region, and suprasellar region [9]. Unlike in previous studies, the present study conducted research on MET PET findings in more patients with IG, and also analyzed the association between MET parameters and clinical variables including tumor makers, tumor locations, symptom, and NGS data. In addition, in the present study, the MET PET parameters of IGs and INGs were compared, and the prognosis of IG was also investigated.

In all cases in the present study, the tumors showed markedly higher MET uptake than normal white matter and gray matter tissue. Prior to treatment, all tumors were visual grade 3, confirming that MET PET was useful for detection of IGs. This result is in line with a previous study in that the tumors were well delineated on MET PET [9]. We calculated mean T/N ratios for each visual grade to identify how different each visual grade is quantitatively. The mean T/N ratio of visual grade 3 was 2.98, and the mean T/N ratios of visual grade 2 and 1 were 1.72 and 1.06, respectively. This means that visual grade 3 was approximately three times higher than background, and visual grade 2 was approximately lower than twice the background. It was also confirmed that visual grade 1 was similar to background. In addition, when we compared pre-Tx SUVmax and pre-Tx T/N ratio among IGs and INGs located in the pineal region, sellar-suprasellar region, and basal ganglia, SUVmax and T/N ratio were higher in IGs. Statistically significant difference was identified in pre-Tx SUVmax (P = 0.005), but no statistically significant differences was identified in pre-Tx T/N ratio (P = 0.222). Furthermore, significant differences in tumor MET avidity were identified according to location. MET PET parameters of basal ganglia germinomas were relatively smaller than those of pineal germinoma and sellar-suprasellar germinomas, while no significant differences were identified between sellar-suprasellar tumors and pineal tumors. These results may be related to whether the patients underwent biopsy prior to pre-Tx MET PET/CT. Of 22 IGs, 17 (77.3%) were biopsy performed prior to pre-Tx MET PET/CT, while the remaining five (22.7%) were pre-Tx MET PET/CT followed by biopsy. Previous studies reported that inflammation may occur due to biopsies in tumors [15, 16], and MET uptake may increase due to the inflammation [1719]. In all three basal ganglia germinomas in this study, biopsy was not performed prior to pre-Tx MET PET/CT. On the other hand, in 17 (89.5%) of 19 pineal and sellar-suprasellar germinomas, biopsies were performed prior to pre-Tx MET PET/CT. In addition, in this study, mean T/N ratio was high at 3.13 when biopsies were performed prior to pre-Tx MET PET/CT, whereas mean T/N ratio was low at 2.49 when biopsy was not performed prior to pre-Tx MET PET/CT. Therefore, one of the reasons why MET avidity of pineal and sellar-suprasellar germinomas were higher than that of basal ganglia germinomas is possibility of biopsy-induced inflammation. However, in order to confirm this, future MET PET studies in more patients with IG are needed.

Tumor MET uptake was significantly correlated with HCG, but no significant correlation was identified with AFP. GCT can secrete measurable oncoproteins such as HCG and AFP in serum and CSF [4]. Thus, HCG or AFP secretion has been used as a diagnostic marker for intracranial GCT [4, 20]. However, in pure germinomas, only HCG is secreted while AFP levels are normal in serum and CSF [4]. In the present study, the 22 pathologically confirmed IGs consisted of 18 pure germinomas (81.8%), three germinomas with granulomatous reaction (13.6%), and one germinoma with syncytiotrophoblasts (4.6%). This was consistent with previous studies of the physiology of germinoma, suggesting that MET parameters are potential surrogate markers for HCG in IGs.

In this study, tumor MET uptake also varied significantly according to sex. Women had a significantly higher pre-Tx T/N ratio and pre-Tx SUVmax than men. It is unclear why the sexual difference in tumor MET uptake exist. There is no obvious elucidation for it [21, 22]. It might be related with male predominance of basal ganglia germinoma. As in previous studies in which basal ganglia germinomas had male predominance [21, 22], all three basal ganglia germinomas were observed in men in this study. The lower tumor MET uptake in men might be due to the higher proportion of basal ganglia tumor in men. However, despite excepting three basal ganglia germinomas, significant difference was observed in pre-Tx SUVmax (P = 0.006), and marginal difference was also observed in pre-Tx T/N ratio (P = 0.064) between men and women in this study.

Signs and symptoms are mainly influenced by tumor location, tumor size, extent of tumor involvement, and type of endocrine dysfunction [4]. In this study, there were significant differences in MET PET parameters depending on the presence or absence of these symptoms. Significant differences were identified according to short stature and one-sided weakness, clumsiness. Patients with primary tumors in the sellar-suprasellar region present with a prolonged history of polyuria, polydipsia, growth failure, hypocortisolism, precocious puberty, and hypothyroidism [4]. Patients with acquired endocrine deficiency due to sellar-suprasellar disease usually do not recuperate completely and are dependent on hormone replacement therapy for the rest of their life [4]. In this study, all sellar-suprasellar tumor-bearing patients had symptoms and signs, and three had short stature. Patients with short stature exhibited significantly different PET parameters from those without short stature. Patients with basal ganglia germinomas frequently present with gradually progressive cognitive impairment and hemiparesis [3]. In this study, all patients with one-sided weakness and clumsiness had a tumor located in the basal ganglia. Unlike sellar-suprasellar tumors, as mentioned earlier, basal ganglia tumors have a relatively larger size than others despite relatively low MET uptake. Considering that tumor tracer uptake generally tends to be proportional to tumor size, this result is quite unexpected and the reason is unclear. It will be necessary to confirm this finding in further studies.

In addition, a significant difference in pre-Tx SUVmax between patients with KRAS variant and patients without KRAS variant was observed (P = 0.036). In CNS GCTs, exome sequencing revealed that KRAS and KIT pathways are frequently mutated [4]. KRAS is one of a group of genes involved in the complex signaling pathway called the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway, which regulates cell growth, division, survival, and death [23]. MET reflects proliferative activity [24]. Therefore, an association between MET uptake and the KRAS variant is reasonable. Pre-Tx SUVmax of IGs is a potential surrogate marker for KRAS mutation in pediatric brain tumors.

In the present study, MET avidity of tumors did not have significant prognostic value. This was probably because the treatment outcomes of IGs are highly favorable [4]. Long-term survival rates between 79% and 90% have routinely been attained [25]. In our study, only one of 21 patients (4.8%) relapsed after treatment and died. Because of the excellent prognosis of IGs, the size of the present study was insufficient to assess the discriminative prognostic value of MET parameters.

In previous studies, MET and FDG were mainly used as PET radiotracers in patients with IG. However, in brain imaging, FDG is known to have worse tumor-to-background contrast than MET [9]. In case of MET, the use of MET in medical centers without an on-site cyclotron is restricted because MET has a short radioactivity half-life (20.4 min) [26]. For easy and accurate PET imaging of IGs in more medical centers, future studies are needed for PET radiotracers with better image contrast than FDG and longer radioactivity half-life than MET.

This study has some limitations. First, this was a single-center study with a small number of patients and a retrospective design. Therefore, our results should be verified through future multi-center study involving a large number of patients with a prospective design. Second, in 16 patients (72.2%), biopsies were performed prior to pre-Tx MET PET/CT, and it is possible that the MET parameters of tumor are accompanied by biopsy-induced uptake. Third, MET uptake may be underestimated due to partial volume effect of small lesions less than 2–3 cm in diameter [27]. In the present study, the mean size of IGs was 21 mm (median 18 mm), and several lesions could be affected by partial volume effect.

Conclusion

MET PET/CT has diagnostic value in patients with IGs. In addition, MET avidity is a potential surrogate biomarker of HCG, which has been used as a diagnostic marker for IGs. Tumor MET parameters also had significant differences according to tumor locations, sex, symptoms, and KRAS mutation. However, MET avidity of tumors had no significant prognostic value.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Tumor location, SUVmax, and T/N ratio of pathologically confirmed eight INGs located in pineal region, sellar-suprasellar region, and basal ganglia.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig

Comparisons of (A) pre-Tx SUVmax and (B) pre-Tx T/N ratio between 22 IGs and eight INGs located in pineal gland, pituitary gland, and basal ganglia during the same study period.

(DOCX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIP) (No.NRF-2019R1F1A1060353) (SHM) and the Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital Research Fund (YJP). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Phi JH, Wang KC, Kim SK. Intracranial Germ Cell Tumor in the Molecular Era. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2018;61(3):333–42. Epub 2018/05/11. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2018.0056 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5957323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang H, Zhang P, Fan J, Qiu B, Pan J, Zhang X, et al. Determining an Optimal Cutoff of Serum beta-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin for Assisting the Diagnosis of Intracranial Germinomas. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147023. Epub 2016/01/16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147023 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4714805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee J, Lee BL, Yoo KH, Sung KW, Koo HH, Lee SJ, et al. Atypical basal ganglia germinoma presenting as cerebral hemiatrophy: diagnosis and follow-up with 11C-methionine positron emission tomography. Childs Nerv Syst. 2009;25(1):29–37. Epub 2008/08/21. doi: 10.1007/s00381-008-0674-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Osorio DS, Allen JC. Management of CNS germinoma. CNS Oncol. 2015;4(4):273–9. Epub 2015/06/30. doi: 10.2217/cns.15.13 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6088312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ram N, Batool S, Mushtaq N. A Case Report Emphasizing the Importance of Early Diagnosis and Management of Intracranial Germinoma. Cureus. 2020;12(11):e11721. Epub 2021/01/05. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11721 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7772154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fujii Y, Saito Y, Ogawa T, Fujii S, Kamitani H, Kondo S, et al. Basal ganglia germinoma: diagnostic value of MR spectroscopy and (11)C-methionine positron emission tomography. J Neurol Sci. 2008;270(1–2):189–93. Epub 2008/03/29. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2008.02.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sudo A, Shiga T, Okajima M, Takano K, Terae S, Sawamura Y, et al. High uptake on 11C-methionine positron emission tomographic scan of basal ganglia germinoma with cerebral hemiatrophy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(9):1909–11. Epub 2003/10/17. . [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Murray MJ, Bartels U, Nishikawa R, Fangusaro J, Matsutani M, Nicholson JC. Consensus on the management of intracranial germ-cell tumours. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(9):e470–e7. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00244-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Okochi Y, Nihashi T, Fujii M, Kato K, Okada Y, Ando Y, et al. Clinical use of (11)C-methionine and (18)F-FDG-PET for germinoma in central nervous system. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28(2):94–102. Epub 2013/11/26. doi: 10.1007/s12149-013-0787-4 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3926980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kawai N, Miyake K, Yamamoto Y, Nishiyama Y, Maeda Y, Kageji T, et al. Use of 11C-methionine positron emission tomography in basal germinoma: assessment of treatment response and residual tumor. Childs Nerv Syst. 2009;25(7):845–53. Epub 2009/03/20. doi: 10.1007/s00381-009-0841-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kawai N, Miyake K, Nishiyama Y, Yamamoto Y, Miki A, Haba R, et al. Targeting optimal biopsy location in basal ganglia germinoma using (11)C-methionine positron emission tomography. Surg Neurol. 2008;70(4):408–13; discussion 13. Epub 2008/02/29. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.04.010 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Phi JH, Paeng JC, Lee HS, Wang KC, Cho BK, Lee JY, et al. Evaluation of focal cortical dysplasia and mixed neuronal and glial tumors in pediatric epilepsy patients using 18F-FDG and 11C-methionine pet. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(5):728–34. Epub 2010/04/17. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.070920 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kubota R, Kubota K, Yamada S, Tada M, Takahashi T, Iwata R, et al. Methionine uptake by tumor tissue: a microautoradiographic comparison with FDG. J Nucl Med. 1995;36(3):484–92. Epub 1995/03/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fukuoka K, Yanagisawa T, Watanabe Y, Suzuki T, Matsutani M, Kuji I, et al. Clinical interpretation of residual uptake in 11C-methionine positron emission tomography after treatment of basal ganglia germ cell tumors: report of 3 cases. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015;16(4):367–71. Epub 2015/07/04. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.PEDS14458 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gnainsky Y, Granot I, Aldo P, Barash A, Or Y, Mor G, et al. Biopsy-induced inflammatory conditions improve endometrial receptivity: the mechanism of action. Reproduction. 2015;149(1):75–85. Epub 20141027. doi: 10.1530/REP-14-0395 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hobson J, Gummadidala P, Silverstrim B, Grier D, Bunn J, James T, et al. Acute inflammation induced by the biopsy of mouse mammary tumors promotes the development of metastasis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139(2):391–401. Epub 20130529. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2575-1 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4038002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bascuñana P, Hess A, Borchert T, Wang Y, Wollert KC, Bengel FM, et al. (11)C-Methionine PET Identifies Astroglia Involvement in Heart-Brain Inflammation Networking After Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(7):977–80. Epub 20191205. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.236885 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7383078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nakajima R, Kimura K, Abe K, Sakai S. (11)C-methionine PET/CT findings in benign brain disease. Jpn J Radiol. 2017;35(6):279–88. Epub 20170418. doi: 10.1007/s11604-017-0638-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ito K, Matsuda H, Kubota K. Imaging Spectrum and Pitfalls of (11)C-Methionine Positron Emission Tomography in a Series of Patients with Intracranial Lesions. Korean J Radiol. 2016;17(3):424–34. Epub 20160414. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.3.424 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4842861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Takami H, Fukushima S, Fukuoka K, Suzuki T, Yanagisawa T, Matsushita Y, et al. Human chorionic gonadotropin is expressed virtually in all intracranial germ cell tumors. J Neurooncol. 2015;124(1):23–32. Epub 2015/05/23. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-1809-y . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang Y, Zou L, Gao B. Intracranial germinoma: clinical and MRI findings in 56 patients. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010;26(12):1773–7. Epub 2010/07/29. doi: 10.1007/s00381-010-1247-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hao S, Liu B, Tang J, Jia G, Zhang Y, Ma Z, et al. Germinoma of basal ganglia in female: case report and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2009;25(5):613–7. Epub 2008/12/17. doi: 10.1007/s00381-008-0769-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu P, Wang Y, Li X. Targeting the untargetable KRAS in cancer therapy. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2019;9(5):871–9. Epub 2019/10/28. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2019.03.002 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6804475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Minn H, Clavo AC, Grenman R, Wahl RL. In vitro comparison of cell proliferation kinetics and uptake of tritiated fluorodeoxyglucose and L-methionine in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Nucl Med. 1995;36(2):252–8. Epub 1995/02/01. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Reddy MP, Saad AF, Doughty KE, Armstrong D, Melguizo-Gavilanes I, Cheek BS, et al. Intracranial germinoma. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2015;28(1):43–5. Epub 2015/01/02. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2015.11929183 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4264708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Isohashi K, Shimosegawa E, Kato H, Kanai Y, Naka S, Fujino K, et al. Optimization of [11C]methionine PET study: appropriate scan timing and effect of plasma amino acid concentrations on the SUV. EJNMMI Res. 2013;3(1):27. Epub 20130415. doi: 10.1186/2191-219X-3-27 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3637362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Okamoto S, Shiga T, Hattori N, Kubo N, Takei T, Katoh N, et al. Semiquantitative analysis of C-11 methionine PET may distinguish brain tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis even in small lesions. Ann Nucl Med. 2011;25(3):213–20. Epub 20101228. doi: 10.1007/s12149-010-0450-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Pierpaolo Alongi

28 Dec 2021

PONE-D-21-34801Value of C-11 methionine PET/CT in patients with intracranial germinomaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Moon,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR:

The article is of scientific interest and original to evaluate the role of [11C]methionine PET/CT in patients with intracranial germinoma (IG). 

Please follow the reviewers comments, with particular attention to the semiquantification analysis reporting SUV values and the improvement of the scientific language. Any significant similarity or difference with other similar article should be discussed more estensively as the limitations of the study.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 11 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Pierpaolo Alongi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf  and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

3. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

The article is of scientific interest and original to evaluate the role of [11C]methionine PET/CT in patients with intracranial germinoma (IG).

Please follow the reviewer's comments, with particular attention to the semiquantification analysis reporting SUV values and the improvement of the scientific language. Any significant similarity or difference with other similar article should be discussed more estensively as the limitations of the study.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is a very well written paper and deserves only minor changes.

The discussion should be implemented with a comparison with FDG.

The figure legend of fig. 1 should be expanded including also the corresponding T/N ratios and tumor sizes.

Both images should incorporate a color bar.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript aims to evaluate the role of [11C]methionine PET/CT in patients with intracranial germinoma (IG). The topic is certainly of interest to readers, as the literature on it is scarce, but the paper needs to be profoundly improved before being considered for publication.

First of all, the language used should be modified in some cases as it does not sound very "scientific" (for example, page 3 line 54 "situation" could be substitute by "clinical scenario" or something similar).

The introduction section is bare, and many sentences should be further explained (e.g. Why are the tumors occurring at the basal ganglia not easy to distinguish? Or what is the usefulness of MET PET already demonstrated by previous studies?).

In the "Materials and methods"section it might be interesting to add the days between biopsy and PET/CT; do you think the uptake could be influenced by a recent biopsy, bearing in mind that the tracer accumulates where inflammatory changes occur? Furthermore, what does "MET uptake was markedly higher than background" mean? Did you measure the SUV? If so, how many times did the SUV of the lesion have to be compared to that of BKG to be defined as "markedly higher"?

As a final consideration, the sentences regarding study limitations and conclusions are too short and should be improved and the discussion might also include what the future of IG imaging may be, as 11C- needs an on-site cyclotron.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Natale Quartuccio

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 1

Pierpaolo Alongi

25 Jan 2022

Value of C-11 methionine PET/CT in patients with intracranial germinoma

PONE-D-21-34801R1

Dear Dr. Moon,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Pierpaolo Alongi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The manuscript has been significantly improved now and can be considered for publication on PLOS ONE.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All the comments have been addressed correctly by the authors. I have no further concerns about the manuscript.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript has been significantly improved now and can be considered for publication on PLOS ONE.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Natale Quartuccio

Reviewer #2: Yes: Priscilla Guglielmo

Acceptance letter

Pierpaolo Alongi

28 Jan 2022

PONE-D-21-34801R1

Value of C-11 methionine PET/CT in patients with intracranial germinoma

Dear Dr. Moon:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Pierpaolo Alongi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Tumor location, SUVmax, and T/N ratio of pathologically confirmed eight INGs located in pineal region, sellar-suprasellar region, and basal ganglia.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Fig

    Comparisons of (A) pre-Tx SUVmax and (B) pre-Tx T/N ratio between 22 IGs and eight INGs located in pineal gland, pituitary gland, and basal ganglia during the same study period.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES