In the paper by Cummings et al. (“Development and assessment of a brief screening tool for psychosis in dementia,” Alzheimer's Dement. 2021; 13:e12254. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12254), errors occurred during the preparation of the paper for publication, requiring the following corrections.
First, the numerical value for each row in the DRP3 rating assessment scale on p. 3 was inadvertently omitted. The text of the first item has also been corrected to begin, “There are no circumstances…” rather than “DRP3™ screen are no circumstances…”. The correct scale reads:
| 0 = | There are no circumstances in which a YES/+ on the reference item would result in a YES on the DRP3 question |
| 1 = | In some circumstances, a YES/+ on the reference item would result in a YES on the DRP3 question |
| 2 = | In most circumstances, a YES/+ on the reference item would result in a YES on the DRP3 question |
| 3 = | In all or nearly all circumstances, a YES/+ on the reference item would result in a YES on the DRP3 question |
Second, in Figure 2, the confidence intervals extended past 0 and obstructed the text on the y‐axis. The correct figure, with confidence intervals ending at 0 on the left‐hand side, appears below.
FIGURE 2.
We regret the errors.