Abstract
Background and Aim:
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogenic microorganisms have become a global problem in ruminants as a result of the intensive use of antibiotics, causing the development of resistance among gut microbiota. The antibiotic-resistant microorganisms can be transferred from diseased animals to humans. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of MDR Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. isolated from cattle, buffaloes, sheep, and goats suffering from respiratory signs, diarrhea, and mastitis and to screen the antibiotic sensitivity of selected isolated bacteria. It also detected antibiotic-resistance genes by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), produced green gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) using plant extracts (Artemisia herba-alba and Morus alba), and evaluated the antimicrobial activities of these biosynthesized nanoparticles on selected pathogens (E. coli and Salmonella spp.).
Materials and Methods:
MDR E. coli and Salmonella spp. were investigated using fecal samples (n=408), nasal swabs (n=358), and milk samples (n=227) of cattle, buffaloes, sheep, and goats with or without clinical signs, including respiratory manifestations, pneumonia, diarrhea, and mastitis, from different governorates in Egypt. E. coli and Salmonella spp. were isolated and identified on selective media, which were confirmed by biochemical reactions and PCR. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing against 10 commonly used antibiotics was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Antibiotic resistance genes blaTEM, blaSHV, blaOXA, and blaCTX−M were detected by PCR. The antibacterial effect of the biosynthesized AuNPs was evaluated by MIC and well diffusion assay. The biosynthesized AuNPs were also characterized by ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
Results:
Among all fecal samples, the prevalence of E. coli was 18.4% (183/993) and that of Salmonella spp. was 16.7% (66/408), as determined by cultural and molecular tests. All isolates of E. coli and Salmonella spp. were 100% resistant to ampicillin (AM) and amoxicillin and highly resistant to cefoxitin and AM-sulbactam. The total rate of resistance genes in E. coli was 61.2% (112/183), while that in Salmonella was 63.6% (42/66) for pathogens isolated from ruminants with respiratory manifestations, pneumonia, diarrhea, and mastitis. Among the resistance genes, blaTEM had the highest prevalence rate in E. coli (25.9%, 21/81) while blaSHV had the lowest (9.8%, 8/81) in fecal swabs. AuNPs were successfully synthesized using aqueous leaf extract of A. herba-alba and M. alba as bioreducing agents. TEM analysis showed particle size of 10-42 nm for A. herba-alba and M. alba AuNPs. The biosynthesized AuNPs showed antibacterial activity against MDR E. coli and Salmonella spp.
Conclusion:
Rapid and accurate diagnostic methods are the cornerstone for effective treatment to reduce the risk of antimicrobial-resistant pathogenic microorganisms. This is particularly important for overcoming the increasing rate of MDR in ruminants with respiratory manifestations, pneumonia, diarrhea, and mastitis. This can be complemented by the development of AuNPs synthesized in an environmentally friendly manner AuNPs using natural plant extracts for the treatment of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms.
Keywords: Escherichia coli, gold nanoparticle, multidrug-resistant, ruminant, Salmonella species
Introduction
The prevalence of multidrug resistance (MDR) is increasing among various pathogenic bacteria worldwide, leading to antimicrobials no longer being effective for controlling infectious diseases [1]. MDR bacteria are a global problem in ruminants due to the intensive use of antibiotics as growth promoters and for the prevention and treatment of disease [2,3]. The presence of resistant pathogenic strains in dairy cattle, calves, beef cattle, sheep, goats, and feedlot animals constitute the primary reservoir of zoonotic pathogens. Emergent strains of MDR bacteria can be transferred from ruminants to humans through food consumption (meat and milk), or through direct or indirect contact with animals or their waste in the environment [4]. Escherichia coli strains isolated from animals are resistant to commonly used antibiotics, which acquire resistance through horizontal gene transfer or gene mutations. They are a major cause of foodborne infections and commonly inhabit the gastrointestinal tract of animals and humans [5]. Salmonella is commonly responsible for enteric bacterial infection of large and small animals, but such infection is more severe in infants from the first 2 weeks to 3 months of life. E. coli and Salmonella species are among the most common and economically damaging pathogens causing diarrhea in neonates of animals used by humans for food [6].
Globally, the β-lactam antibiotics (cephalosporin, carbapenem, and penicillin) represent about 60% of all antimicrobial agents used in animals. Their habitual abuse has led to the development of resistance to beta-lactam groups [7]. The recent emergence of MDR E. coli poses a major threat to public health, which is mainly attributed to extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs). These enzymes can destroy various β-lactam antimicrobial agents and are encoded by specific ESBL genes, such as blaTEM (encoded for penicillin resistance), blaKPC (encoded for carbapenems resistance), and blaCTX (encoded for cephalosporin resistance). The emergence of MDR virulent E. coli has become a global health concern [8,9]. Most of the β-lactam resistance in Salmonella is provided by horizontally acquired β-lactamases. However, many other bacteria have intrinsic ampC, blaTEM, blaCTX-M, blaIMP, blaVIM, blaKPC, blaSHV, and blaOXA [10]. MDR strains such as Salmonella spp. and E. coli are not susceptible to many antibiotics, so alternative treatments using green nanoparticles (NPs) are required to eliminate them [11].
The green synthesis of NPs has attracted substantial interest among scientists. Plant extracts are a promising tool for the green synthesis of NPs, given their convenience, ease of use, environmentally friendly nature, and the minimization of the harmful biohazardous effects of chemical and physical methods, along with the avoidance of toxic chemicals and dangerous by-products. Green-synthesized NPs have biocidal effects against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria that cause different diseases in animals [12,13]. Moreover, antibiotics selectively target bacteria, while gold and silver NPs exhibit fairly broad-spectrum activity. AuNPs act by destroying the cell membrane or by inhibiting the binding of tRNA to the small subunit of the ribosome, leading to the suppression of protein synthesis [14]. It has also been reported that NPs display effective inhibitory activity against resistant strains such as ampicillin (Am)-resistant E. coli [15]. Given their stability and antibacterial activity, synthesized gold NPs (AuNPs) are promising for biomedical applications [16]. Effective treatment of MDR bacteria requires the rapid and accurate diagnosis of their presence using phenotypes, along with molecular methods to detect the presence of resistance genes [17]. A number of novel approaches for the use of green NPs to combat bacterial resistance are currently available [18].
The present study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of biosynthetic AuNPs developed using a mixture of Artemisia herba-alba and Morus alba leaf extract against MDR E. coli and Salmonella spp. isolated from ruminants (cattle, buffaloes, sheep, and goats) with clinical signs including respiratory manifestations, pneumonia, diarrhea, and mastitis.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
All methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Well-trained experts conducted the handling of animals and experimental procedures. The handling of animals and all protocols were approved by the Animal Ethics Review Committee of National Research Centre, Egypt, under approval number #19-149#.
Study period, area, and sample collection
The study was conducted from December 2019 to March 2021. A total of 358 nasal and 408 fecal swab samples and 227 milk samples were collected from cattle, buffaloes, sheep, and goats in different governorates in Egypt (Monofia, Giza, Beni-Suef, Alexandria, Siwa, and Marsa Matruh). This included animals with or without clinical signs, including respiratory manifestations, pneumonia, diarrhea, and mastitis. Nasal swabs were collected (n=358) from cattle (n=38), buffaloes (n=40), sheep (n=155), and goats (n=125). Meanwhile, fecal samples (n=408) were collected from cattle (n=52), buffaloes (n=116), sheep (n=135), and goats (n=105). Moreover, milk samples (n=227) were collected from cattle (n=54), buffaloes (n=36), sheep (n=62), and goats (n=75). Nasal and rectal/fecal swabs collected in sterile sample tube contained sterile saline or PBS. The samples were transported in ice box and stored between 4°C-8°C for up to 72 hours after collection and milk sample was divided into 2 aliquots: the first was plated fresh for bacteriological culture, to isolate and identify E. coli and Salmonella., While, the second milk sample was frozen at −20°C for bacteriological culture, and DNA extraction for molecular diagnosis. All samples were subjected to detect resistance genes.
Isolation and identification of E. coli
All samples (358 nasal swab, 408 fecal swab, and 227 milk samples) collected from cattle, buffaloes, sheep, and goats with clinical signs including respiratory manifestations, pneumonia, and diarrhea were placed on peptone water broth (Oxoid, UK) as pre-enrichment for bacterial growth, in accordance with the methods described previously [19]. A loopful of culture inoculate was streaked on MacConkey (Oxoid) agar. Pink colonies obtained from MacConkey agar that was indole-positive were considered positive for E. coli and maintained at −20°C in 20% glycerol brain heart infusion broth for further confirmation and characterization by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antibiotic susceptibility testing, in accordance with a previous study [20].
Isolation and identification of Salmonella spp.
Fecal swabs were collected from cattle, buffaloes, sheep, and goats with clinical signs including respiratory manifestations, pneumonia, and diarrhea (n=408) and pre-enriched on BPW (Oxoid), incubated at 37°C for 16 h. One milliliter of inoculum was transferred into selenite cystine broth (Oxoid) after pre-enrichment, as described previously [21]. A loopful of inoculum was also plated onto xylose lysine deoxycholate (XLD) (Oxoid) medium and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Each colony with a black center from XLD was inoculated in brilliant green agar (Oxoid) and incubated. Triple sugar iron, urease, and citrate tests were performed for the confirmation of Salmonella spp. and further confirmation and characterization were carried out by PCR and antibiotic susceptibility testing, as described previously [22].
DNA extraction by different methods
DNA extraction was carried out by different heating methods (boiling, microwaving, and heat block). Briefly, a pure colony collected from freshly grown culture was initially placed in an Eppendorf tube containing molecular-grade water (100 mL) followed by mixing gently through vortexing. Subsequently, the mixture was heated for 10 min, cooled for 10 min, and centrifuged for 10 min at 1400 rpm. Finally, the supernatant was collected as the source for the genomic DNA for PCR and stored at −20°C until further use.
The PCR reaction was carried out in a final volume of 25 μL with 12.5 μL of master mix (2×) (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 4 μL of genomic DNA (50 ng/μL), 1 μL of each primer, and 6.5 μL of nuclease-free water. After amplification, PCR products were subjected to gel electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose, followed by staining and visualization with 0.25% ethidium bromide solution and an ultraviolet transilluminator. A DNA ladder (100 bp; Promega) was used to assess the sizes of the PCR amplicons.
Molecular confirmation of isolated E. coli and Salmonella spp.
Isolated E. coli and Salmonella spp. were confirmed by PCR targeting an E. coli (LTI) gene and a Salmonella genus-specific (fmA) gene, as shown in Table-1, in accordance with a previous study [23].
Table 1.
List of primers used for detecting E. coli and Salmonella spp.
| Isolated bacteria | Target genes | Primer sequence (5ʹ→3ʹ) |
|---|---|---|
| Salmonella spp. | fmA | (F) 5 -CCT TTC TCC ATC GTCCTG AA-3, (R) 5 -TGC TGT TAT CTG CCT GAC CA-3 |
| E. coli | LTI | (F) 5-AGCAGGTTTCCCAC CGGATCACCA-3, (R) 5-GTGCTCAGATTCTGGGTCTC-3 |
E. coli=Escherichia coli
Antimicrobial sensitivity test (AST)
The isolated E. coli and Salmonella spp. were subjected to AST using the disk diffusion technique, in accordance with the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [24,25]. The testing involved 10 commonly used antibiotics, including three groups: A quinolone group (levofloxacin: LEV [5 μg/disk] and ciprofloxacin: CIP [5 μg/disk]); a beta-lactam group (amoxicillin: Ax [25 μg/disk], Am [10 μg/disk], cefoxitin: CX [30 μg/disk], imipenem: IMP [10 μg/disk], cefotaxime: CTX [30 μg/disk], and Am/sulbactam: SAM); and an aminoglycoside group (gentamicin: CN [10 μg/disk], [20 μg/disk], and amikacin: AK [30 μg/disk]), following the disk diffusion method described previously [25]. Finally, the zone of growth inhibition was compared using standards provided elsewhere [26] to identify the resistant isolates. Isolates showing resistance to three or more different classes of antibiotics were defined as MDR [27].
Detection of resistance genes in MDR E. coli and Salmonella spp. isolated from diseased animals by PCR
The status of bacteria with multidrug resistance against beta-lactams (Am, Ax, Am/sulbactam, and CX) as determined by AST was further confirmed by the detection of resistance genes (blaTEM, blaSHVm, blaOXA, and blaCTX−M) using PCR, in accordance with a previous study [28], using the resistance gene primers listed in Table-2.
Table 2.
Oligonucleotide primers of β-lactamase resistance genes of isolated E. coli and and Salmonella spp.
| Genetic resistance factors | Genes | Primer sequence (5ʹ→3ʹ) | Size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| β-lactam genes (bla) | blaTEM | F: ATG AGT ATT CAA CAT TTC CG R: CCA ATG CTT ATT CAG TGA GG |
1080 |
| blaSHV | F : TTA TCT CCC TGT TAG CCA CC R: GAT TTG CTG ATT TCG CTC GG |
768 | |
| blaOXA | F: ATG AAA AAC ACA ATA CAT ATC R: AAT TTA GTG TGT TTA GAA TGG |
813 | |
| blaCTX−M | F: -ATG TGC AGY ACC AGT AAR GT R: -TGG GTR AAR TAR GTS ACC AGA |
544 |
E. coli=Escherichia coli
Preparation of A. herb-alba and alba aqueous leaf extracts
The preparation of leaf extracts was carried out in accordance with a previous study [29]. A. herba-alba and M. alba leaves were washed using double-distilled water, air-dried, and then each dried plant was ground separately into a fine powder. Briefly, 10 g of powder from each of A. herba-alba and M. alba was dissolved in 100 mL of double-distilled water in a conical flask. The solution was boiled at 70-80°C for 15-20 min in a water bath. The solution was then filtered at room temperature (25oC) and stored at 4°C for further analysis.
Biosynthesis of AuNPs
AuNPs were synthesized using A. herba-alba and M. alba leaf extracts. Specifically, 10 μL of A. herba-alba and M. alba leaf extract (v/v) was mixed with 90 μL of 1 mM aqueous solution of gold chloride (HAuCl4) and left at 25oC to react. After 20 min, a change in the color of the solution from yellow to purple/red was identified, which signified the reduction of Au3+ to Au0 NPs. The resulting AuNPs were incubated at 25oC for 24 h and then purified by centrifugation at 10080 x g for 15 min. The pellet was purified by several washes in distilled water and then transferred to a Petri dish for drying overnight at 30°C.
Characterization of AuNPs
The wavelength with maximum absorption of the obtained NPs was measured by UV-spectra. The size distribution and shape of the colloidal AuNPs were studied by SEM and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
Antimicrobial assay for AuNPs
The antimicrobial activity was analyzed using the agar well diffusion method [30]. The samples were maintained in broth and subcultured in a Petri dish before testing. First, 100 μL of A. herba-alba and M. alba AuNPs were loaded into each well on Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar plates. These plates were subsequently sealed and incubated face upwards in an incubator at 37±0.2°C for 24 h. The appearance of a clear/white area around the wells was recorded and measured (in millimeters).
Growth of bacteria at different concentrations of biosynthetic AuNPs
E. coli and Salmonella suspensions (0.2 mL) were inoculated into corresponding tubes containing 1.5 μL of different concentrations of A. herba-alba, M. alba, and A. herba-alba+M. alba AuNPs, and 1.5 μL of MHB. To these test tubes, 1 μL of phenol red indicator solution was added. Tubes containing inoculum alone served as positive controls and tubes with different biosynthetic NPs+nutrient media served as negative controls. Test tubes with only MHB served as a blank control. The tubes were incubated at 37°C for 24 h and were observed for changes in color and pH.
Statistical analysis
SPSS software version 20.0 (IBM, USA) was used to analyze the data. Frequency and mean were estimated using descriptive analysis.
Results
Prevalence of E. coli and Salmonella spp. in investigated animals
Isolates of E. coli and Salmonella spp. from animals with respiratory manifestations, pneumonia, diarrhea, and mastitis were identified and characterized based on their morphology, biochemically identified, and confirmed by molecular assays. The bacteriological analysis included microscopic analysis. In this analysis, the bacterial isolates that were Gram-negative bacilli of moderate size and produced pink colonies on MacConkey agar were designated as E. coli, while the black-centered colonies on XLD were designated as Salmonella spp. All E. coli isolates were identified by biochemical tests, showing positivity in catalase, lactose fermentation, indole, and methyl red tests. They were also negative in cytochrome oxidase, Voges–Proskauer, citrate utilization, H2S production, and urease tests. The bacteriological analysis and molecular assays showed positivity for E. coli in 18.4% (183/993) of all samples. The prevalence of E. coli was 5.02% (18/358) from nasal samples of the different animals, while it was 19.8% (81/408) from fecal swabs and 37% (84/227) from milk samples. Meanwhile, the total prevalence of Salmonella spp. in fecal swabs collected from different animals was 16.17% (66/408). In fecal samples, the highest prevalence of Salmonella spp. was 26.9% (14/52) in cattle, while the lowest was 10.34% (12/116) in buffaloes, as shown in Table-3.
Table 3.
Prevalence of E. coli and Salmonella spp. in different animals.
| Samples | Species | No. of samples | E. coli | Salmonella spp. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
| +ve | % | +ve | % | |||
| Nasal samples | Cattle | NS (n=38) | 2 | 5.2 | ||
| Buffaloes | NS=(40) | 2 | 5 | |||
| Sheep | NS=(155) | 6 | 3.8 | |||
| Goats | NS=(125) | 8 | 6.4 | |||
| Total | 358 | 18 | 5.02 | |||
| Fecal samples | Cattle | FS=(52) | 11 | 21.1 | 14 | 26.9 |
| Buffaloes | FS=(116) | 22 | 18.9 | 12 | 10.34 | |
| Sheep | FS=(135) | 23 | 17 | 22 | 16.29 | |
| Goats | FS=(105) | 25 | 23.8 | 18 | 17.14 | |
| Total | 408 | 81 | 19.8 | 66 | 16.17 | |
| Milk samples | Cattle | Milk=(54) | 16 | 29.6 | ||
| Buffaloes | Milk=(36) | 16 | 44.4 | |||
| Sheep | Milk=(62) | 21 | 33.8 | |||
| Goats | Milk=(75) | 31 | 41.3 | |||
| Total | 227 | 84 | 37 | |||
| Total isolates | 993 | 183 | 18.4 | 66 | 16.17 | |
NS=Nasal swab, FS=Fecal swab, MS=Milk sample. E. coli=Escherichia coli
Detection of beta-lactam resistance genes by PCR
The isolated E. coli (n=183) and Salmonella spp. (n=66) were screened by PCR to detect antibiotic resistance genes. The total resistance to E. coli and Salmonella spp. detected by PCR was 61.2% (112/183), for beta-lactam genes in E. coli and Salmonella was 63.6%. (42/66). The highest percent of blaTEM resistance genes had the highest prevalence, which was present at a rate of 25.9% (21/81), while the lowest rate was for blaSHV, present at a rate of 9.8% (8/81), as shown in Figures-1 and 2.
Figure-1.

Detection of beta-lactam resistance genes by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). EFS=Escherichia coli isolated from fecal samples. ENS=Escherichia coli isolated from nasal swabs. EMS=Escherichia coli isolated from milk samples. SFS=Salmonella spp. isolated from fecal samples.
Figure-2.

Prevalence of beta-lactam resistance genes in different samples. EFS=Escherichia coli isolated from fecal samples. ENS=Escherichia coli isolated from nasal swabs. EMS=Escherichia coli isolated from milk samples. SFS=Salmonella spp. isolated from fecal samples.
Biosynthesis of A. herba-alba and M. alba AuNPs
The successful biosynthesis of A. herba-alba and M. alba AuNPs was achieved by adding a mixture of A. herba-alba and M. alba leaf extract to an aqueous solution of gold chloride (HAuCl4). This was indicated by a change in the color of the solution from yellow to purple/dark red and dark brown, signifying the reduction of Au3+ to Au0 NPs (Figure-3).
Figure-3.

(a and b) Observation of the color changes confirming AuNP formation in the reaction mixture at different time points from left to right: Pale yellow, light pink, light red and dark red, dark brown, and purple. The successful biosynthesis of Artemisia herb-alba and Morus alba AuNPs was achieved by adding a mixture of A. herba-alba and M. alba leaf extract to an aqueous solution of gold chloride (HAuCl4), as indicated by a change in solution color from yellow to purple/dark red and dark brown, signifying the reduction of Au3+ to Au0 NPs.
Ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) spectral analysis
The reduction of aqueous HAuCl4 ions during the reaction with A. herba-alba and M. alba extract was followed by UV–Vis spectroscopy and modification using spectrophotometry/96-well ELISA reader (ODs).
Characterization of A. herb-alba and M. alba AuNPs using TEM
Antibacterial effect of biosynthetic AuNPs using well diffusion assay.
Discussion
Antibiotics are widely used in animals at subtherapeutic doses to promote growth, and for the treatment of disease, resulting in the development of microbial resistance against these agents [31]. The current study determined the prevalence of virulence genes, namely, the beta-lactam resistance genes blaTEM, blaSHVm, blaOXA, and blaCTX−M, in E. coli and Salmonella spp. isolated from nasal and fecal swabs and milk samples of cattle, buffaloes, sheep, and goats with clinical signs including respiratory manifestations, pneumonia, diarrhea, and mastitis. It also evaluated the inhibitory effects of AuNPs synthesized using A. herba-alba and M. alba leaf extracts. Our results demonstrated that E. coli was present at a rate of 5.02% in nasal samples, 19.8% in fecal samples, and 37% in milk samples, as shown in Table-3. These results are in agreement with a previous study conducted by Amat [32]. E. coli is known to be a common opportunistic pathogen that causes several types of infection, causing diarrhea, mastitis, septicemia, and respiratory manifestations. In this work, the lowest positivity rates for E. coli were 3.8%, 5%, 5.2%, and 6.4% from nasal swabs of sheep, buffaloes, cattle, and goats, respectively (Table-3). This finding is in agreement with the previous studies [32,33] that found that E. coli was present at a low rate of 4.22% in healthy and diseased animals with respiratory signs. In addition, it was reported [34] that the rate of bacteria in the bovine nasopharyngeal tract was very low compared with the rates at other anatomical sites [35]. Another study explained the presence of virulence genes in extraintestinal E. coli [36]. The finding in the present work of the pathogenicity of E. coli isolated from nasal swabs of ruminants with respiratory signs may be associated with the inhalation of a number of bacteria from the environment [37]. The findings of the current study (Table-3) indicate that E. coli was detected at the highest rates of 25/105 (23.8%) and 11/52 (21.1%) from fecal swabs of goats and cattle with diarrhea, while Salmonella spp. were identified at the highest rate of 14/52 (26.9%) from fecal samples of cattle. These findings are in agreement with a previous study of Das et al., [38] who found E. coli at a rate of 30% in cattle in Egypt but conflict with the results with Zeedan et al. [39]. Moreover, in another study, E. coli was identified in both diarrheic sheep and goats (34.7% and 30.7%), while Salmonella species were found at a rate of 3.6% in sheep and 2.6% in goats in Saudi Arabia [40]. Furthermore, in fecal samples collected from cattle in India, it was reported as 19% [41].
The observed variations in the prevalence of pathogenic bacteria in ruminants with clinical respiratory signs, diarrhea, and mastitis may be due to the studies focusing on different geographic areas, along with variations in animal management, in agreement with the previous studies [40,42]. The highest rate of positivity for E. coli in fecal samples and milk rather than in nasal swab samples (Table-3) may be due to the commonly found pathogenic E. coli in animal feces and shedding in manure or dung into the soil, leading to intense contamination with bacteria [43]. The highest rates of positivity of E. coli were 16/36 (44.4%) and 31/75 (41.3%) from milk samples of buffaloes and goats, respectively, as shown in Table-3, in agreement with many previous studies [44-46]. The inappropriate treatment of animal disease may thus cause the transmission of E. coli and Salmonella spp. The misuse of antibiotics in the veterinary field to prevent and control bacterial diseases in animals may have led to the development of resistance against these agents [47].
As shown in Table-4, E. coli and Salmonella spp. were 100% resistant to Am and Ax. In addition, both isolates were highly resistant to CX and Am/SAM, at rates of 86.4% and 81.8% for Salmonella spp. and 87.4% and 82.5% for E. coli. Meanwhile, both isolates were highly susceptible to IMP, cefotaxime, LEV, CIP, gentamicin, and amikacin, which are in agreement with the previous reports [38,48]. Isolated MDR E. coli with resistance to Am, Ax, Ax-clavulanic acid, and cefotaxime harbor the blaTEM, blaCTX, and blaKPC resistance genes in Egypt. In addition, in a previous study [49], Salmonella spp. were isolated from livestock animals in South Africa with high rates of resistance to Am and Ax-clavulanate (64% and 63%, respectively). Am and Ax are intensively used for treating different animal infections in cattle, sheep, and goats [50].
Table 4.
Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of E. coli and Salmonella spp. isolated from clinical samples of different animals.
| Antibiotic class | Antibiotic | Salmonella spp. (n=66) | E. coli (n=183) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||
| S | R | S | R | ||
| Beta-lactams | Ax (25 μg) | 0% (0) | 100% (66)* | 0% (0) | 100% (183)A |
| Am (10 μg) | 0% (0) | 100% (66*) | 0% (0) | 100% (183)B | |
| Fox (30 μg/disk) | 13.6% (9) | 86.4% (57) | 12.56% (23) | 87.4% (160) | |
| IMP (10 μg/disk) | 87.9% (58) | 12.2% (8) | 93.5% (171) | 6.5% (12) | |
| CTX (30 μg) | 84.8% (56) | 15.2% (10) | 84% (154) | 15.8% (29) | |
| SAM (20 μg) | 18.2% (12) | 81.8% (54) | 17.48% (32) | 82.5% (151) | |
| Quinolones | LEV (5 μg) | 90.9% (60) | 9.1% (6) | 96.1% (176) | 3.8% (7) |
| CIP (5 μg) | 89.4% (59) | 10.6% (7) | 91.2% (167) | 8.75% (16) | |
| Aminoglycosides | CN (10 μg) | 81.8% (54) | 18.2 (12) | 87.4% (160) | 12.56% (23) |
| AK (30 μg) | 83.3% (55) | 16.7% (11) | 93,.4% (171) | 6.55% (12) | |
Ax=Amoxicillin, Am=Ampicillin, Cx=Cefoxitin, Fox, IMP=Imipenem, CTX=Cefotaxime, AM/SAM: Ampicillin/sulbactam, LEV=Levofloxacin, CIP=Ciprofloxacin, CN=Gentamicin, AK=Amikacin, MET=Methicillin,
Salmonella spp. isolates (n=66) (100% R)=(42 highly resistant isolates+24 isolates with low resistance) A: E. coli isolates (n=183) (100% R)=(113 highly resistant isolates+70 isolates with low resistance), E. coli=Escherichia coli
On farms, antibiotics tend to be administered to all animals during the treatment of different diseases, which promotes antibiotic resistance and has harmful effects on the intestinal microflora of healthy animals. Other antibiotics such as fluoroquinolones and beta-lactams are used as growth promoters on farms, leading to bacterial resistance in Salmonella spp. and E. coli [49-51]. Therefore, antibacterial agents should only be used in the veterinary and health sectors following accurate diagnoses, along with the routine application of AST [52]. Overall, in this study, resistance genes were found in E. coli at a rate of 61.2% and in Salmonella at 63.6%, as shown in Figures-1 and 2, which is in agreement with a previous study [53] demonstrating rates of resistant E. coli and Salmonella spp. of 60% and 50%, respectively, in the developing countries, they showed a resistance rate >50%. Among the resistance genes, the highest rate was found for blaTEM (21/81, 25.9%) in E. coli fecal swabs, while the lowest was for blaSHV (8/81, 9.8%) in E. coli nasal swabs, as shown in Figures-1 and 2. The high resistance may be due to the excessive use of antibiotics, in agreement with a previous study of Ogunrinu et al. [54]. The prevalence of blaCMY-2 was 38.88% by Dong et al. [55]. The high prevalence of beta-lactam degrading genetic determinants may be due to the widespread use of extended beta-lactams such as Am and Ax for treating infections in cattle [48,55]. A possible explanation for the findings is that the feeding of animals on foods mixed with antibiotics as growth promoters has increased the rate of bacterial resistance [49]. blaCMY-2 is involved in cell wall synthesis and membrane transport activity. The blaTEM-1 and blaCMY-2 resistance genes in bacteria cause the degradation of beta-lactams and extended beta-lactams, which could explain their association. blaTEM-1 and blaCMY-2 are located on transferable plasmids [57].
Antibiotic resistance is mediated by genetic elements through different mechanisms, leading to the escape of bacteria from the effects of antibiotics [58]. A previous study by Awosile [59] found that the beta-lactam (blaTEM-1 and blaCMY-2) resistance genes encode enzymes that degrade beta-lactam antibiotics by hydrolyzing the beta-lactam ring. This is in agreement with our study that showed phenotypic resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics in E. coli and Salmonella spp. through the blaTEM, blaSHV, blaOXA, and blaCTX−M resistance genes.
The successful biosynthesis of A. herba-alba and M. alba AuNPs after adding a mixture of A. herba-alba and M. alba leaf aqueous extracts was indicated by a change in solution color from yellow to purple/dark red and dark brown, signifying AuNP formation (Figure-3). This was due to phytochemical substances in the aqueous extract, which are responsible for the creation of a coating on the AuNPs, as described previously by Abdel-Kareem and Zohri [60].
The formation of AuNPs was confirmed by UV spectrophotometry at a wavelength of 520-570 nm based on surface plasmon resonance (SPR), as shown in Figure-4, and reported by Sundararajan and Kumari [61]. Synthesized AuNPs produced using Pogostemon benghalensis showed local SPR bands at 535-538 nm and 510-560 nm. In addition, the AuNPs were further characterized by TEM and micrography, demonstrating that they were small and spherical, with small and large aggregations and an average size of ~10-42 nm, as shown in Figure-5a-c. The spherical AuNPs can form at the beginning of the reaction, which then aggregates together due to the presence of a large amount of reducing agents in the biomass. This is in agreement with a previous study by Sundararajan and Kumari [60] in which different sizes of Pityriasis alba AuNPs were prepared and shown to have average sizes of 20.65 and 36.05 nm. This finding is also in agreement with the previous studies [61,62] that found that phytochemicals can effectively stabilize smaller AuNPs with an average size of 7 nm. As shown in Figure-5d, AuNPs were confirmed by selected area electron diffraction analysis. The micrograph showed spherical AuNPs in clear lattice fringes with bright circular rings corresponding to 5 to 1 nm planes. Different sets of spots could be identified from this diffraction pattern, as shown in Figure-5d. AuNPs similarly showed strong intensity at the 5-50 nm plane, with four concentric rings being observed in the AuNPs, indicating their crystalline nature. A. herba-alba and M. alba AuNPs had the maximum inhibitory effects on E. coli and Salmonella spp. with highest inhibition zone diameter and minimum inhibitory concentrations of 23 mm and 3.125 g/mL, respectively, for E. coli. This may have been due to the thin wall of the peptidoglycan layer in Gram-negative bacteria, which allow AuNPs to easily enter the cytoplasm, as shown in Figures-6 and 7. These results are in agreement with the previous studies [62,63] in which it was described that AuNPs have antibacterial activity. The antibacterial effects of A. herba-alba and M. alba AuNPs with different concentrations were higher than A. herba-alba and M. alba leaf extract against MDR E. coli and Salmonella spp., as shown in Table-5. This is the first study on the biosynthesis of AuNPs using a mixture of A. herba-alba and M. alba leaf extracts, the effects of which may be due to their flavonoids, tannins, and polyphenolic compounds. This composition can explain their strong reducing activity to promote the formation of NPs. Finally, A. herba-alba and M. alba AuNPs have antibacterial effects against MDR E. coli and Salmonella spp. that are resistant to traditional antibiotics.
Figure-4.

Ultraviolet spectra for Artemisia herb-alba and Morus alba AuNPs of different sizes and colors in colloidal solution. Strong resonance at 520-570 nm is clearly seen and arises due to the excitation of surface plasmon vibrations in the gold nanoparticles. The formation of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) was confirmed using an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 520-570 nm based on surface plasmon resonance. The findings showed that the concentration and utilization of A. herb-alba and M. alba leaf extracts facilitated the production and strongly affected the optical properties of the AuNPs.
Figure-5.

TEM micrographs of Artemisia herba-alba and Morus alba gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) of different sizes and shapes. A histogram of their distribution is shown in (a), with colloidal AuNPs being small and spherical, while aggregations have an average size of ~10. (b) The agglomeration of AuNPs was lower than the last one and the particle size was between 12 and 20 nm, showing almost spherical and separated particles. (c) Particle sizes were between 20 and 42 nm, with a rod-like appearance. The results suggest that the appearance of smaller particle size synthesized with large size nanoparticles is due to mixing aqueous extracts of A. herb-alba and M. alba.
Figure-6.

Evaluation of the inhibitory effect of Artemisia herba-alba and Morus alba gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) by well diffusion test. (a) Salmonella spp. and (b) Escherichia coli showing inhibition zone diameter of 16 and 23 mm, respectively.
Figure-7.

The inhibitory effect of biosynthetic Artemisia herb-alba and Morus alba gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), showing antibacterial activity against isolated bacteria. The inhibitory effects (IZD and MIC) of A. herba-alba and M. alba AuNPs on Salmonella spp. were 16 mm and 6.25 g/mL, and those on Escherichia coli were 23 mm and 3.125 g/mL, respectively. IZD: Inhibition zone diameter, MIC: Minimal inhibitory concentration.
Table 5.
Growth of bacteria in different concentrations of plant extracts and biosynthetic AuNPs
| Name | 10 μg/mL | 20 μg/mL | 40 μg/mL | 60 μg/mL | 80 μg/mL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. herb-alba and M. alba | - | - | - | + | + |
| A. herb-alba and M. alba AuNPs | + | + | + | + | + |
| +ve control* | + | + | + | + | + |
| -ve control** | - | - | - | - | - |
Positive control (+ve)=Color change (red to pale yellow) indicating growth of E. coli and Salmonella,
Negative control (−ve)=No change in color (red) indicating the absence of growth of E. coli and Salmonella. E. coli=Escherichia coli, A. herba-alba=Artemisia herba-alba, M. alba=Morus alba, AuNPs=Gold nanoparticles
Conclusion
Bacterial resistance is one of the most important threats to animal health in the 21st century, with bacterial cells developing resistance to one or more different antibiotics. Our study demonstrated the prevalence of MDR E. coli and Salmonella spp. isolated from different ruminants suffering from respiratory signs, diarrhea, and mastitis. The total rate of resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics in E. coli was 61.2%, while that in Salmonella was 63.6%. AuNPs were successfully biosynthesized using a mixture of aqueous leaf extracts of A. herba-alba and M. alba. They exhibited a particle size of 10-42 nm and exerted antibacterial effects on MDR E. coli and Salmonella spp. Alongside efforts to overcome the increasing rate of MDR bacteria in ruminants through several options, including improved animal hygiene and sanitation, as well as rapid and accurate diagnosis, NPs as alternative therapeutic agents are vital for effective treatment. Finally, NPs are the most promising strategy to overcome microbial drug resistance.
Authors’ Contributions
AMA, AAA, ESI, and GSGZ: Designed the experiment and carried out the laboratory work. AAG: Contributed to the laboratory work and participated in drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge National Research Centre, Dokki, Egypt, for facilities and funds (Project No # 12020231 #).
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Veterinary World remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliation.
References
- 1.Prestinaci F, Pezzotti P, Pantosti A. Antimicrobial resistance:A global, multifaceted phenomenon. Pathog. Glob. Health. 2015;109(7):309–318. doi: 10.1179/2047773215Y.0000000030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Acharya K.P, Wilson R.T. Antimicrobial resistance in Nepal. Front. Med. 2019;6(5):105. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Abdalhamed A.M, Ghazy A.A, Zeedan G.S.G. Studies on multidrug-resistance bacteria in ruminants with special interest on antimicrobial resistance genes. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2021;9(6):835–844. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zalewska M, Błażejewska A, Czapko A, Popowska M. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in animal manure-consequences of its application in agriculture. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:640–661. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.610656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pavlovic S, Kotur N, Stankovic B, Zukic B, Gasic V, Dokmanovic L. Pharmacogenomic and pharmacotranscriptomic profiling of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia:Paving the way to personalized treatment. Genes. 2019;10(3):191. doi: 10.3390/genes10030191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Muktar Y, Mamo G, Tesfaye B, Belina D. A review on major bacterial causes of calf diarrhea and its diagnostic method. J. Vet. Med. Anim. Health. 2015;7(5):173–185. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Leung M.C. Synthesis and Development of Antibiotic Adjuvants to Restore Antimicrobial Activity Against Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens (Doctoral Dissertation) 2019 [Google Scholar]
- 8.Saliu E.M, Zentek J, Vahjen W. In vitro conjugation kinetics of AmpC, broad spectrum and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli donors and various Enterobacteriaceae recipients. BMC Microbiol. 2020;20(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01787-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Okpa B.O, Gberikon G.M, Aguoru C.U, Ogbonna I.O. ESBL production and multidrug resistance of Salmonella serovars isolates in Benue state. Am. J. Mol. Biol. 2020;10(3):200. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Minakshi P, Kumar R, Ghosh M, Brar B, Barnela M, Lakhani P. Application of polymeric Nano-materials in management of inflammatory bowel disease. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2020;20(11):982–1008. doi: 10.2174/1568026620666200320113322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shukla A.K, Iravani S. Green Synthesis, Characterization and Applications of Nanoparticles. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 2018 [Google Scholar]
- 12.Patil P.M, Bohara R.A. Nanoparticles impact biomedical waste management. Waste Manag. Res. 2020;38(11):1189–1203. doi: 10.1177/0734242X20936761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gabrielyan L, Badalyan H, Gevorgyan V, Trchounian A. Comparable antibacterial effects and action mechanisms of silver and iron oxide nanoparticles on Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70211-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Subramaniam J, Murugan K, Panneerselvam C, Kovendan K, Madhiyazhagan P, Dinesh D, Kumar P.M, Chandramohan B, Suresh U, Rajaganesh R, Alsalhi M.S, Devanesan S, Nicoletti M, Canale A, Benelli G. Multipurpose effectiveness of Couroupita guianensis-synthesized gold nanoparticles:High antiplasmodial potential, field efficacy against malaria vectors and synergy with Aplocheilus lineatus predators. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016;23(8):7543–7558. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-6007-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yadav B, Tyagi R.D. Development of molecular methods to detect and control emerging drug-resistance pathogens. In:Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2020:377–419. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ruddaraju L.K, Pammi S.V.N, Guntuku G.S, Padavala V.S, Kolapalli V.R.M. A review on anti-bacterial to combat resistance:From the ancient era of plants and metals to present and future perspectives of green Nanotechnological combinations. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2020;15(1):42–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2019.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Perera A. Escherichia coli (E. coli) O157 and Non-O157 among Ruminants in Peninsular Malaysia:Pathogenicity, Antibiotic Resistance, and Survival Under Sub-Lethal Stress Conditions (Doctoral Dissertation, Monash University) 2015 [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tanih N.F, Sekwadi E, Ndip R.N, Bessong P.O. Detection of pathogenic Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus from cattle and pigs slaughtered in abattoirs in Vhembe district, South Africa. ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:195972. doi: 10.1155/2015/195972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Abdalhamed A.M, Zeedan G.S.G, Zeina H.A.A. Isolation and identification of bacteria causing mastitis in small ruminants and their susceptibility to antibiotics, honey, essential oils, and plant extracts. Vet. World. 2018;11(3):355–362. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.355-362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tawyabur M, Islam M, Sobur M, Hossain M, Mahmud M, Paul S, Hossain M.T, Ashour H.M, Rahman M.T. Isolation and characterization of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. from healthy and diseased turkeys. Antibiotics. 2020;9(11):770. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9110770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Abdel-Raheem W.R, Abdel-Raheem S.M, Al-Marri T.M, Alaql F.A, Fayez M.M. Isolation and identification of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) Escherichia coli from minced camel meat in Eastern province, Saudi Arabia. Thai J. Vet. Med. 2020;50(2):155–161. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Islam M.K, Kabir S.L, Haque A.Z, Sarker Y.A, Sikder M.H. Molecular detection and characterization of Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp. isolated from broiler meat in Jamalpur, Tangail, Netrokona and Kishoreganj districts of Bangladesh. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2018;12(32):761–770. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing:Sixteenth Informational Supplement No. M100-S20. 30th ed. CLSI, United States. 2012 [Google Scholar]
- 24.Moghadam M.N, Naderifar S, Zolfaghari M.R, Amel Jamehdar S, Hashemi M. Pattern of antibiotic susceptibility and detection of CTX-M-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) in urinary isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae in Mashhad. Daneshvar Med. 2020;19(5):29–36. [Google Scholar]
- 25.King T.L, Schmidt S. Assessment of three indigenous South African herbivores as potential reservoirs and vectors of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2017;63(3):44. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vázquez-López R, Solano-Gálvez S, León-Chávez B.A, Thompson-Bonilla M.R, Guerrero-González T, Gómez-Conde E, Martínez-Fong D, González-Barrios J.A. Characterization of gene families encoding beta-lactamases of gram-negative rods isolated from ready-to-eat vegetables in Mexico city. High Throughput. 2018;7(4):36. doi: 10.3390/ht7040036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zeedan G.S.G, Abdalhamed A.M, Ibrahim E.S, El-Sadawy H.A.F. Antibacterial efficacy of green silver nanoparticles against bacteria isolated from calf diarrhea. Asian J. Epidemiol. 2018;11(2):65–73. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Azman A.A, Nadiah N, Rosandy A.R, Alwi A, Kamal N, Mohd R. Antimicrobial Activity and LC-MS data comparison from lichen Parmotrema praesorediosum in Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia. Sains Malays. 2021;50(2):383–393. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Argudín M.A, Deplano A, Meghraoui A, Dodémont M, Heinrichs A, Denis O, Roisin S. Bacteria from animals as a pool of antimicrobial resistance genes. Antibiotics. 2017;6(2):12. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics6020012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Algammal A.M, El-Sayed M.E, Youssef F.M, Saad S.A, Elhaig M.M, Batiha G.E, Hozzein W.N, Ghobashy M.O.I. Prevalence, the antibiogram and the frequency of virulence genes of the most predominant bacterial pathogens incriminated in calf pneumonia. AMB Express. 2020;10(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-01037-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.de Oliveira-Filho R.D, de Azevedo Moreira R, Nogueira N.A.P. Biological activities and pharmacological applications of cyclodextrins complexed with essential oils and their volatile components:A systematic review. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018;24(33):3951–3963. doi: 10.2174/1381612824666181120093634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Amat S. Development of Intranasal Bacterial Therapeutics to Mitigate the Bovine Respiratory Pathogen Mannheimia haemolytica. University of Calgary, Canada. 2019 [Google Scholar]
- 33.Santos A.C.M, Silva R.M, Valiatti T.B, Santos F.F, Santos-Neto J.F, Cayô R, Streling A.P, Nodari C.S, Gales A.C, Nishiyama M.Y, Jr, Carvalho E, Gomes T.A.T. Virulence potential of a multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli strain belonging to the emerging clonal group ST101-B1 isolated from bloodstream infection. Microorganisms. 2020;8(6):827. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8060827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hang B.P.T, Wredle E, Börjesson S, Sjaunja K.S, Dicksved J, Duse A. High level of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in young dairy calves in Southern Vietnam. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2019;51(6):1405–1411. doi: 10.1007/s11250-019-01820-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kates A.E, Dalman M, Torner J.C, Smith T.C. The nasal and oropharyngeal microbiomes of healthy livestock workers. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0212949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Abdel-Azeem A.M, Abo Nahas H.H, El-Azeem A, Ahmed M. Mapping fungal ignorance:Checklists of fungi and El-Ghareeb, fungal-like organisms known for Egypt in two centuries. Microb. Biosyst. 2020;5(1):115–119. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shabana I.I, Bouqellah N.A, Zaraket H. Investigation of viral and bacterial enteropathogens of diarrheic sheep and goats in Medina, Saudi Arabia. Trop. Biomed. 2017;34(4):944–955. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Das M, Deka D.K, Sarmah A.K, Sarmah P.C, Islam S. Gastrointestinal parasitic infections in cattle and swamp buffalo of Guwahati, Assam, India. Indian J. Anim. Res. 2018;52(12):1732–1738. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zeedan G.S, Abdalhamed A.M, Abdeen E, Ottai M.E, Abdel-Shafy S. Evaluation of antibacterial effect of some Sinai medicinal plant extracts on bacteria isolated from bovine mastitis. Vet. World. 2014;7(11):991–998. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sobur M.A, Sabuj A.A.M, Sarker R, Rahman A.T, Kabir S.L, Rahman M.T. Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. associated with dairy cattle and farm environment having public health significance. Vet. World. 2019;12(7):984. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2019.984-993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Abdalhamed A.M, Ghazy A.A, Zeedan G.S.G. Studies on multidrug-resistance bacteria in ruminants with special interest on antimicrobial resistances genes. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2021;9(6):835–844. [Google Scholar]
- 42.McKay S, Sawant P, Fehlberg J, Almenar E. Antimicrobial activity of orange juice processing waste in powder form and its suitability to produce antimicrobial packaging. Waste Manag. 2021;120(2):230–239. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.11.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lindsey R.L, Garcia-Toledo L, Fasulo D, Gladney L.M, Strockbine N. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for identification of Escherichia coli, Escherichia albertii and Escherichia fergusonii. J. Microbial. Methods. 2017;140(8):1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Titilawo Y, Obi L, Okoh A. Antimicrobial resistance determinants of Escherichia coli isolates recovered from some rivers in Osun State, South-Western Nigeria:Implications for public health. Sci, Total Environ. 2015;523:82–94. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ali E, Islam M.S, Hossen M.I, Khatun M.M, Islam M.A. Extract of neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf exhibits bactericidal effect against multidrug-resistant pathogenic bacteria of poultry. Vet. Med. Sci. 2021;7(5):1921–1927. doi: 10.1002/vms3.511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Novais A, Liu X, Antimicrobials R, Liu X, Thungrat K, Boothe D. M. Objective:The aim of this study was to explore the occurrence and molecular characteri zation of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL), plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase (pAmpC) and carbapenemases among ESBL-producing multidrug-resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli from dogs and cats in the United States. Methods:Of 2443 E. coli isolated from dogs and cats collected between August 2009. Genet. Acquir. Antimicrob. Resist. Anim. Zoonotic Pathog. 2018;203(2018):130–139. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mthembu T.P, Zishiri O.T, El Zowalaty M.E. Molecular detection of multidrug-resistant Salmonella isolated from livestock production systems in South Africa. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019;12(2019):3537. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S211618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chamlakhorn W, Phuektes P, Khang-Air S, Angkititrakul S. Prevalence, genetic characterization, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from meat goats in the Northeastern region of Thailand. Vet. Integr. Sci. 2021;19(3):363–378. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pribul B.R, Festivo M.L, Rodrigues M.S, Costa R.G, Rodrigues E.C.D, de Souza M, Rodrigues D.D.P. Characteristics of quinolone resistance in Salmonella spp. isolates from the food chain in Brazil. Front. Microbial. 2017;8(2017):299. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bourély C, Fortané N, Calavas D, Leblond A, Gay É. Why do veterinarians ask for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. A qualitative study exploring determinants and evaluating the impact of antibiotic reduction policy. Prev. Vet. Med. 2018;159(2018):123–134. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bedkelabou A.E.P, Talaki E, Dolou M, Diouf A, and Alambedil R.B. Antibiotic resistance of enterobacteria (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp. and Salmonella spp) isolated from healthy poultry and pig farms in a peri-urban area of Lome, Togo. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2020;14(12):657–666. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhu Y, Lai H, Zou L, Yin S, Wang C, Han X, Xia X, Hu K, He L, Zhou K, Chen S, Ao X, Liu S. Antimicrobial resistance and resistance genes in Salmonella strains isolated from broiler chickens along the slaughtering process in China. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017;259(10):43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Giuriatti J, Stefani L.M, Brisola M.C, Crecencio R.B, Bitner D.S, Faria G.A. Salmonella Heidelberg:Genetic profile of its antimicrobial resistance related to extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) Microb. Pathog. 2017;109(7):195–199. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.05.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ogunrinu O.J, Norman K.N, Vinasco J, Levent G, Lawhon S.D, Fajt V.R, Volkova V.V, Gaire T, Poole T.L, Genovese K.J, Wittum T.E, Scott H.M. Can the use of older-generation beta-lactam antibiotics in livestock production over-select for beta-lactamases of greatest consequence for human medicine?An in vitro experimental model. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0242195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Dong N, Li Y, Zhao J, Ma H, Wang J, Liang B, Du X, Wu F, Xia S, Yang X, Liu H, Yang C, Qiu S, Song H, Jia L, Li Y, Sun Y. The phenotypic and molecular characteristics of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica subsp enterica serovar Typhimurium in Henan province, China. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020;20(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05203-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bush K, Bradford P.A. Epidemiology of β-lactamase-producing pathogens. Clin. Microbial. Rev. 2020;33(2):e00047–e00119. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00047-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Vrancianu C.O, Popa L.I, Bleotu C, Chifiriuc M.C. Targeting plasmids to limit acquisition and transmission of antimicrobial resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11(2020):761. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Awosile B.B. Antimicrobial Resistance Studies from Atlantic Canada with a Focus on Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporin Resistance in Dairy Cattle and Humans. 2017 [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rónavári A, Igaz N, Adamecz D.I, Szerencsés B, Molnar C, Kónya Z, Pfeiffer I, Kiricsi M. Green silver and gold nanoparticles:Biological synthesis approaches and potentials for biomedical applications. Molecules. 2021;26(4):844. doi: 10.3390/molecules26040844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Abdel-Kareem M.M, Zohri A.A. Extracellular mycosynthesis of gold nanoparticles using Trichoderma hamatum:Optimization, characterization and antimicrobial activity. Lett. Appl. Microbial. 2018;67(5):465–475. doi: 10.1111/lam.13055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sundararajan B, Kumari B.R. Novel synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Artemisia vulgaris L. leaf extract and their efficacy of larvicidal activity against dengue fever vector Aedes aegypti L. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2017;43(9):187–196. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2017.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sasidharan S, Pottail L. Anti-bacterial and skin-cancer activity of AuNP, rGO and AuNP-rGO composite using Hemigraphis alternata (Burm. F.) T. anderson. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020;25(2):101596. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Herrera-Sánchez M.P, Castro-Vargas R.E, Fandiño-de-Rubio L.C, Rodríguez-Hernández R, Rondón-Barragán I.S. Molecular identification of fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella spp. isolated from broiler farms and human samples obtained from two regions in Colombia. Vet. World. 2021;14(7):1767–1773. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.1767-1773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
