Mechanical ecology is an emerging interdisciplinary field at the intersection of biomechanics and field ecology. The development of ever smaller and more powerful portable devices for measurement and data acquisition has boosted the number of biomechanical field studies in recent years, shedding new light on often neglected, but crucial factors influencing mechanical aspects of plant ecology. This Special Issue showcases recent scientific and technological advances, and highlights the importance of considering the mechanical aspects of plant ecology, as well as putting biomechanical mechanisms into a biologically relevant real-world context.
‘there is an underlying world with which life must contend’
All matter, including life on Earth, is subject to the rules of physics. Physical forces govern processes at all scales from atoms to ecosystems, and considering these forces is essential for a comprehensive understanding of plant ecology and evolution (Box 1). For example, the increasing frequency of severe weather events as a result of global climate change leads to ever higher mechanical stresses on plants and the soil that supports them (Ummenhofer and Meehl, 2017; Rädler et al., 2019), but how plants cope with such dramatic changes, which mainly occur in evolutionarily irrelevant time scales, is largely unknown (e.g. Onoda et al., 2010; Heredia-Guerrero et al., 2018; Johnson et al., 2019). Mitigating the immediate effects of these extreme weather events therefore requires an integrative understanding of the physical factors influencing natural vegetation and crops in order to understand plant responses to increasing mechanical stresses, but also the potential of plants to mitigate the effects of climate change-induced alterations of weather patterns. The unprecedented challenges of our time—climate change, habitat and biodiversity loss, food security for a growing world population, and accelerating loss of arable soils to erosion—require increasingly innovative and interdisciplinary approaches to solve (Glamann et al., 2017; Middendorf et al., 2020). This Special Issue explores one such interdisciplinary approach: the very promising and timely fusion of biomechanics and ecology (Box 1).
Box 1.
A multitude of physical forces act upon plants, and the resulting mechanical stresses have shaped both the overall growth forms and the composite cellular materials of extant plant species. Stems and branches must be strong enough to resist bending and buckling under the plant’s own load. Moreover, wind gusts and waves shock-load plants with extremely high forces that can cause catastrophic breakage or uprooting. The impact forces of raindrops and hailstones may appear insignificant in comparison; however, their effect is amplified by the concentration of force on a very small area, as is demonstrated by the erosive power of rain. Waves and tides both cause strong cyclic loading in opposite directions, while rain and hail impacts cause characteristic damped oscillations of the affected plant part.
However, mechanical forces not only pose the risk of tissue damage; they can also contain valuable information, and plants have evolved a multitude of mechanosensory structures and mechanisms to exploit this information source. A growing body of evidence shows that plants sense mechanical stresses in expanding cells walls and integrate this information with other factors such as morphogen gradients to establish polarity in developing tissues and coordinate cell divisions and organ differentiation. Microvibrations caused by the chewing mandibles of insects alert plants of herbivore attacks and kick-start biochemical defence pathways. Electrostatic forces not only function as signals for pollinators, but have also been shown to directly aid pollen transfer between flower and bee.
Biomechanics is an engineering–mathematics-based approach to understanding biological questions and processes (Vogel, 1988). It has its roots in zoological, biomedical, and sports science, but the impact and popularity of plant biomechanics is rapidly growing. This is evidenced by the emergence of several dedicated conferences (e.g. the International Plant Biomechanics Conference), and by multiple special issues in journals, including two in JXB over the past decade (in 2019, Plant Biomechanics: Force, Form, and Function; and in 2013, Plant Biomechanics and Mechanobiology). Plant ecology, however, is traditionally looking towards chemistry and physiology to explain responses of plants to biotic and abiotic stress factors, and climate change research focuses largely on the effects of rising temperature, increasing frequency and severity of droughts, elevated CO2 availability, and decreasing soil fertility on natural vegetation and agricultural crops (Pareek et al., 2020). Mechanical aspects of plant ecology thus remain poorly studied to date, and plant biomechanics is still largely confined to the lab; however, the key to fully understanding the impact of mechanical factors is to research them in the field, under natural conditions (Bauer et al., 2020; Niklas and Telewski, 2022).
From the obvious (e.g. wind, waves, and impacts from rain and hail) to the more obscure (e.g. gravitational and electrostatic forces, and microvibrations), mechanical factors affect virtually every aspect of plant life (Read and Stokes, 2006). In this issue, Niklas and Telewski (2022) explore how mechanical constraints and trade-offs played a key role in shaping modern plants as they transitioned from marine to terrestrial environments and colonized the vertical growth space, competing for light. They show how plant material properties and growth responses to mechanical loading evolved over time to allow them to grow taller and resist increasing mechanical loads; however, increasing height comes with additional challenges for water transport which may conflict with the demands for structural reinforcement (Baer et al., 2021). Lianas, epiphytes, and epi-parasites circumvent this conflict by largely foregoing structural reinforcement and instead relying on other plants for vertical support; here, the crucial mechanical adaptations are for secure attachment to the host tree, as shown for passionflowers and mistletoes in this issue (Klimm et al., 2022; Mylo et al., 2022).
Attachment (or lack thereof) is also crucial for plant–insect interactions such as plant carnivory, herbivory, and pollination (Whitney and Federle, 2013). Mechanical factors control the timing of pollen release (Nelson et al., 2012; Timerman and Barrett, 2021; Vallejo-Marin, 2022) and, very recently, the act of pollination itself has been shown to rely on attractive forces between flowers and bees with opposing electrostatic charges—prompting the launch of the subfield of electrical ecology (England and Robert, 2021). Electrostatic charges not only promote the movement of pollen between flower and bee, they also function as advertising signals alongside colour and scent. While the discovery of electroreception in bees changed our way of thinking about pollination in recent years, the mounting evidence of sound perception in plants may well cause similar ripple effects in the near future (Khait et al., 2019). That plants can sense gravity has long been known and is evident from gravitropic growth responses (Moulia and Fournier, 2009; Bérut et al., 2018; Sierra-de-Grado et al., 2022). In this issue, Gallep and Robert (2022) move on to challenge our understanding of the regulation of circadian rhythms by linking them to fluctuations of gravitational forces as a result of the lunisolar tide cycles.
With regard to our initial focus on increasing mechanical stresses as a result of changing climate and weather patterns, the most obvious mechanical demand for plants is damage resistance to the forces of hail, wind (Gardiner et al., 2016), and waves (Koehl, 2022). Several articles in this issue explore the response of leaves to mechanical loading and impacts. Mimi Koehl (2022) provides a comprehensive overview of the adaptations and responses of marine macroalgae and seagrasses to the extreme mechanical loads in their wave-swept habitats. Burnett and Gaylord (2022) complement this ecological perspective with a more technical viewpoint on the frameworks, methodologies, and challenges of measuring wave forces and exposure in the field. Moving to terrestrial ecosystems, Langer et al. (2022) investigated the detailed responses of petiole, lamina, and the interjacent transition zone of peltate Pilea piperomioides leaves to wind loading in unprecedented detail. Interestingly, they found clear differences in the biomechanical properties of each component, but no adaptive plasticity in the form of thigmomorphogenetic acclimations in response to prolonged wind exposure. Lauderbaugh and Holder (2022) and Roth-Nebelsick et al. (2022) both apply a biomechanics approach to the detailed characterization of leaf responses to rain drop impacts, while Lenz et al. (2022) integrate the biomechanical interaction of leaves with rain into the broader ecological and physiological context. They add to previous calls for performing biomechanical measurements on naturally growing plants in the field (Bauer et al., 2020), pointing out the shortcomings of purely correlative field studies on the one hand, and of the extrapolation of lab results to the field on the other hand. Taking biomechanical measurements out into the field is undoubtedly challenging, but modern advances in measurement technology open up unprecedented opportunities. New low-cost instrumentation and fully customizable modular set-ups allow autonomous data collection in the field, often over extended periods of time (Kwok, 2017; Oellermann et al., 2021, Preprint; Burnett and Gaylord, 2022). Almost ironically, the pioneers of ‘field biomechanics’ were often marine biologists, despite the sea and the tidal zones being undoubtedly amongst the most challenging environments to which one could take measurement electronics (Bell and Denny, 1994).
If we master the challenges of combining experimental and theoretical approaches from engineering and physics with ecological field experiments, we will not only have a real chance to improve our understanding of the physical demands on plants and their adaptive responses to these demands (Niklas and Telewski, 2022), but we might even be able to tap into plants’ potential to mitigate the effects of climate change and tackle the great challenges of the 21st century. Understanding how plants interact with wind, waves, and precipitation can inform forestry planning and programmes aimed at preventing or limiting erosion and stabilizing coastlines in times of rising sea levels and more frequent storm surges (Denny, 2021). Elucidating the mechanical resilience of plants to damage from abiotic impacts (hail, rain, and wind) or herbivore and pathogen attacks can inform crop breeders of traits to select for, eventually creating more resilient crops that produce higher yields and need fewer pesticides. A more comprehensive understanding of the factors underlying plant–insect interactions can help to conserve pollinator networks and predict challenges for vegetation regeneration due to effects of climate change and anthropogenic disturbance on pollination and seed dispersal.
Seeing the growing scientific interest in mechanical ecology on both sides of the Atlantic and the breadth of research and topics leaves us with a ‘buzz’—an excited anticipation of things to come over the next decade. Mechanical ecology in the sense of field biomechanics truly feels like an interdisciplinary field on the cusp of fully taking off. This Special Issue, along with dedicated conference sessions at the most recent SICB (2022: S10 Integrating ecology and biomechanics to investigate patterns of phenotypic diversity: evolution, development, and functional traits) and upcoming SEB (2022: Mechanical ecology—taking biomechanics to the field) meetings, certainly attests to the timeliness of the topic.
Funding
UB is funded by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship (UF150138).
References
- Baer AB, Fickle JC, Medina J, Robles C, Pratt RB, Jacobsen AL.. 2021. Xylem biomechanics, water storage, and density within roots and shoots of an angiosperm tree species. Journal of Experimental Botany 72, 7984–7997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bauer U, Poppinga S, Müller UK.. 2020. Mechanical ecology—taking biomechanics to the field. Integrative and Comparative Biology 60, 820–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bell EC, Denny MW.. 1994. Quantifying ‘wave exposure‘: a simple device for recording maximum velocity and results of its use at several field sites. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 181, 9–29. [Google Scholar]
- Bérut A, Chauvet F, Legué V, Moulia B, Pouliquen O, Forterre Y.. 2018. Gravisensors in plant cells behave like an active granular liquid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 115, 5123–5128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burnett NP, Gaylord B.. 2022. Flow, form, and force: methods and frameworks for field studies of macroalgal biomechanics. Journal of Experimental Botany 73, 1122–1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Denny M. 2021. Wave-energy dissipation: seaweeds and marine plants are ecosystem engineers. Fluids 6, 151. [Google Scholar]
- England SJ, Robert D.. 2022. The ecology of electricity and electroreception. Biological Reviews 97, 383–413. doi: 10.1111/brv.12804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gallep CM, Robert D.. 2022. Are cyclic plant and animal behaviours driven by gravimetric mechanical forces? Journal of Experimental Botany 73, 1093–1103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gardiner B, Berry P, Moulia B.. 2016. Wind impacts on plant growth, mechanics and damage. Plant Science 245, 94–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glamann J, Hanspach J, Abson DJ, Collier N, Fischer J.. 2017. The intersection of food security and biodiversity conservation: a review. Regional Environmental Change 17, 1303–1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heredia-Guerrero JA, Guzman-Puyol S, Benítez JJ, Athanassiou A, Heredia A, Domínguez E.. 2018. Plant cuticle under global change: biophysical implications. Global Change Biology 24, 2749–2751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson SD, Ryalls JMW, Barton CVM, Tjoelker MG, Wright IJ, Moore BD.. 2019. Climate warming and plant biomechanical defences: silicon addition contributes to herbivore suppression in a pasture grass. Functional Ecology 33, 587–596. [Google Scholar]
- Khait I, Obolski U, Yovel Y, Hadany L.. 2019. Sound perception in plants. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 92, 134–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klimm F, Schmier S, Bohn HF, Kleiser S, Thielen M, Speck T.. 2022. Biomechanics of tendrils and adhesive pads of the climbing passion flower Passiflora discophora. Journal of Experimental Botany 73, 1190–1203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koehl MAR. 2022. Ecological biomechanics of marine macrophytes. Journal of Experimental Botany 73, 1104–1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kwok R. 2017. Field instruments: build it yourself. Nature 545, 253–255. [Google Scholar]
- Langer M, Hegge E, Speck T, Speck O.. 2022. Acclimations to wind loads and/or contact stimuli? A biomechanical study of peltate leaves of Pilea peperomioides. Journal of Experimental Botany 72, 1236–1252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lauderbagh LK, Holder CD.. 2022. The biomechanics of leaf oscillations during rainfall events. Journal of Experimental Botany 73, 1139–1154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lenz A-K, Bauer U, Ruxton GD.. 2022. An ecological perspective on water shedding from leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany 73, 1176–1189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Middendorf BJ, Prasad PVV, Pierzynski GM.. 2020. Setting research priorities for tackling climate change. Journal of Experimental Botany 71, 480–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moulia B, Fournier, M.. 2009. The power and control of gravitropic movements in plants: a biomechanical and systems biology view. Journal of Experimental Biology 60, 461–486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mylo MD, Hofmann M, Balle F, Beisel S, Speck T, Speck O.. 2022. Biomechanics of the parasite–host interaction of the European mistletoe. Journal of Experimental Botany 73, 1204–1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nelson MR, Band LR, Dyson RJ, Lessinnes T, Wells DM, Yang C, Everitt NM, Jensen OE, Wilson ZA.. 2012. A biomechanical model of anther opening reveals the roles of dehydration and secondary thickening. New Phytologist 196, 1030–1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niklas KJ, Telewski FW.. 2022. Environmental–biomechanical reciprocity and the evolution of plant material properties. Journal of Experimental Botany 73, 1067–1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oellermann M, Jolles MW, Ortiz D, Seabra R, Wenzel T, Wilson H, Tanner R.. 2021. Harnessing the benefits of open electronics in science. arXiv 2106.15852. [Preprint]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Onoda Y, Richards AE, Westoby M.. 2010. The relationship between stem biomechanics and wood density is modified by rainfall in 32 Australian woody plant species. New Phytologist 185, 493–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pareek A, Dhankher OP, Foyer CH.. 2020. Mitigating the impact of climate change on plant productivity and ecosystem sustainabilitly. Journal of Experimental Botany 71, 451–456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rädler AT, Groenemeijer PH, Faust E, Sausen R, Púčik, T.. 2019. Frequency of severe thunderstorms across Europe expected to increase in the 21st century due to rising instability. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science 2, 30. [Google Scholar]
- Read J, Stokes A.. 2006. Plant biomechanics in an ecological context. American Journal of Botany 93, 1546–1565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roth-Nebelsick A, Konrad W, Ebner M, Miranda T, Thielen S, Nebelsick JH.. 2022. When rain collides with plants—patterns and forces of drop impact and how plants respond to them. Journal of Experimental Botany 73, 1155–1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Timerman D, Barrett SCH.. 2021. The biomechanics of pollen release: new perspectives on the evolution of wind pollination in angiosperms. Biological Reviews 96, 2146–2163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sierra-de-Grado R, Pando V, Voltas J, Zas R, Majada J, Climent J.. 2022. Straightening the crooked: intraspecific divergence of stem posture control and associated trade-offs in a model conifer. Journal of Experimental Botany 73, 1222–1235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ummenhofer CC, Meehl GA.. 2017. Extreme weather and climate events with ecological relevance: a review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 372, 20160135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vallejo-Marín M. 2022. How and why do bees buzz? Implications for buzz pollination. Journal of Experimental Botany 73, 1080–1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vogel S. 1988. Life’s devices: the physical world of animals and plants. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Whitney HM, Federle W.. 2013. Biomechanics of plant–insect interactions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 16, 105–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

