In this editorial, we present a short 5 min documentary-style film to explore how immersive distributed simulation can be used to engage members of the public in the experience of care in order to generate a wider discussion on what care means.
Traditionally, and more commonly, simulation in healthcare has been used for training, quality improvement and assessment purposes. Although this is an obvious and effective use of simulation techniques, little thought has been given to how simulation could be used beyond this.1 2 Furthermore, Kneebone3 argues that the current use of simulation has mirrored practice by restricting it to a clinical ‘insider’ frame, excluding patients, families, the public and even managers, commissioners, policymakers and other sectors from its purpose, design and implementation, although these perspectives are an essential component of clinical practice that could enhance current approaches to care. Current utilisation of simulation techniques and approaches often focuses on single elements of healthcare that mirror healthcare practices rather than looking to transform them, and with limited external involvement. However, we believe its application can be much wider than its current scope. By capitalising on simulations' main benefits (the ability to recreate realistic healthcare scenarios in a safe environment), we have been testing simulations' applicability for a range of objectives.
To date, we have used simulation approaches for a number of interventions relating to the following:
Direct patient care to engage with primary and secondary care stakeholders in developing new approaches to integrated care4–6; as a tool for multidisciplinary staff and patients to improve adolescent asthma care7; for the improvement of end-of-life care by multiprofessionals and patients in a hospital setting8 9; and to share the strengths and challenges of maternity care services across a borough of London.10
Patient and public engagement/involvement to engage with members of the public in the future of surgery and ethical-related issues11; as a tool for public and patient engagement in a new point-of-care diagnostic test12; to engage publics in coronary care procedures13; to engage parents in the avoidable hospital admissions of their unwell children and to engage at-risk teenagers in the care pathway of knife crime-related incidents.14
Education and engagement means as an intervention to educate and engage pharmacists (community and hospital) about integrated care and their role in implementing it15; as an intervention for educating and engaging general practice receptionists about integrated care and the importance of their role within the whole system16 17; and as a teaching module aimed at international healthcare managers to generate insight into the UK health system.18
These examples illustrate how we have used simulation imaginatively and innovatively to select, abstract and re-present elements of care for purposes such as testing and evaluating a new interventions effects on a care pathway; designing new models of care; problem-solving issues around the integration of care; considering care from the patient’s perspective in terms of time and sequences; comparing and contrasting healthcare with other sectors; engaging a variety of stakeholders (including patients and publics) in complex care issues and decision-making; and immersing patients, publics and staff in the healthcare experience and healthcare changes over time.
In the simulation presented in the film, we drew on the concept of distributed simulation (portable and low-cost simulation backdrops, props and equipment), and undertook eight immersive simulations across the UK: The Infirmary Medical Museum (Worcester), Glasgow Science Centre (Glasgow), Chelsea & Westminster Hospital (London) and the Royal College of Nursing (London). Each simulation consisted of a clinical encounter at a day surgery unit and a fine dining restaurant. The simulations were designed based on field observations undertaken by a social scientist at Heston Blumenthal’s three-Michelin-starred ’Fat Duck' restaurant and a day surgery unit in an inner London hospital. The observational frame used, aimed to identify and extract the principles of care from each setting to ensure accuracy during the simulation design process. While physically simple (recreating a restaurant through wall-papered backdrops, tables and restaurant paraphernalia, and a hospital day surgery unit through clinical backdrops, curtains and hospital equipment), the simulations were conceptually sophisticated. Smells (in the form of food and clinical disinfectant) and sounds (in the form of restaurant music and beeping monitors) were also simulated. Real waiting staff (trained by the Fat Duck team) and real clinicians (surgeons, anaesthetists and nurses) undertook their roles in the simulations which members of the public were immersed in for 10 min per setting. Once the immersive experience was complete, the public, waiting staff and clinicians were invited to take part in a discussion that compared and contrasted the different approaches to care and explored what was potentially transferable between the sectors.
This unorthodox use of simulation enabled us to engage with members of the public in the experience of care in two disparate but complementary settings, paving the way for an informed discussion on what care means, what are its main principles, what is transferable between the sectors and how can current systems and approaches to care be improved.
The short 5-min documentary presented provides a snapshot of how this unique use of simulation unfolded. The video can be accessed via https://vimeo.com/282084536.
Acknowledgments
With thanks to SimComm Academy for their support with the simulation events.
Footnotes
Twitter: @sharonmweldon
Contributors: SMW and RK contributed to the design. SMW and TK undertook the events. All authors have been involved in the final product.
Funding: This work was supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council, grant number: AH/R004749/1.
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethics approval: The study received approval from the Ethics Board of the University of Greenwich (UREC/17.1.5.12).
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
References
- 1. TEDx Imperial College. Why are we using simulation in healthcare all wrong? 2018. Retrieved from: 10.1186/s41077-016-0028-8 (Accessed 26 Oct 2018). [DOI]
- 2. Lamé G, Dixon-Woods M. Using clinical simulation to study how to improve quality and safety in healthcare. BMJ Stel 2020;6:87–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kneebone RL. Simulation reframed. Adv Simul 2016;1:27. 10.1186/s41077-016-0028-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Weldon S-M, Kneebone R, Bello F. Collaborative healthcare remodelling through Sequential Simulation (SqS): a patient and front-line staff perspective. BMJ Stel 2016;0:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Weldon SM, Kronfli M, Bello F, et al. How to design a sequential simulation (SQS) for a variety of objectives. BMJ Stel 2017;3(Suppl 2):A4–A5. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Imperial College Centre for engagement and Simulation Science. Sequential Simulation. 2016. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/engagement-and-simulation-science/our-work/projects/sequential-simulation/
- 7. Powell P, Sorefan Z, Hamilton S, et al. Exploring the potential of sequential simulation. Clin Teach 2016;13:112–8. 10.1111/tct.12391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Weil A, Weldon SM, Kronfli M, et al. A new approach to multi-professional end of life care training using a sequential simulation (SqS Simulation™) design: A mixed methods study. Nurse Educ Today 2018;71:26–33. 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Weldon SM, Kronfli M, Weil A, et al. A multi-disciplinary training programme for end-of-life care: a sequential simulation. BMJ Stel 2017;3(Suppl 2):A35–A36. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kronfli M, Weldon SM, Kneebone R, et al. Sequential simulation: a new approach to sharing challenges, opportunities and learning in maternity service delivery. BMJ Stel 2017;3(Suppl 2):A13–A14. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Royal College of Nursing. Time Travelling Operating Theatre. 2018. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhDoBQe1FKM
- 12. Huddy JR, Weldon SM, Ralhan S, et al. Sequential simulation (SqS) of clinical pathways: a tool for public and patient engagement in point-of-care diagnostics. BMJ Open 2016;6:e011043. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kneebone R, Weldon SM, Bello F. Engaging patients and clinicians through simulation: rebalancing the dynamics of care. Adv Simul 2016;1. 10.1186/s41077-016-0019-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Tribe HC, Harris A, Kneebone R. Life on a knife edge: using simulation to engage young people in issues surrounding knife crime. Adv Simul 2018;3:20. 10.1186/s41077-018-0079-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Weldon S-M, Ralhan S, Paice E, et al. Sequential simulation of a Patient Pathway. Clin Teach 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Weldon SM, Ralhan S, Paice E, et al. Sequential simulation (SqS): an innovative approach to educating GP receptionists about integrated care via a patient journey – A mixed methods approach. BMC Fam Pract 2015;16:109. 10.1186/s12875-015-0327-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Paice L, Marie Weldon S-M, Rahlan S, et al. Sequential simulation (SqS) of a patient journey: an intervention to engage GP receptionists in integrated care. Int J Integr Care 2015;15. 10.5334/ijic.2135 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Weldon SM, Kelay T, Ako E, et al. Sequential simulation used as a novel educational tool aimed at healthcare managers: a patient-centred approach. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning 2018;4:13–18. 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
