Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 7.
Published in final edited form as: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Feb 28;125:503–516. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.040

Epigenetics of the developing and aging brain: Mechanisms that regulate onset and outcomes of brain reorganization

Eliza R Bacon a,b, Roberta Diaz Brinton a,c,*,1
PMCID: PMC8989071  NIHMSID: NIHMS1789896  PMID: 33657435

Abstract

Brain development is a life-long process that encompasses several critical periods of transition, during which significant cognitive changes occur. Embryonic development, puberty, and reproductive senescence are all periods of transition that are hypersensitive to environmental factors. Rather than isolated episodes, each transition builds upon the last and is influenced by consequential changes that occur in the transition before it. Epigenetic marks, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, provide mechanisms by which early events can influence development, cognition, and health outcomes. For example, parental environment influences imprinting patterns in gamete cells, which ultimately impacts gene expression in the embryo which may result in hypersensitivity to poor maternal nutrition during pregnancy, raising the risks for cognitive impairment later in life. This review explores how epigenetics induce and regulate critical periods, and also discusses how early environmental interactions prime a system towards a particular health outcome and influence susceptibility to disease or cognitive impairment throughout life.

Keywords: Epigenetics, DNA methylation, Histone modification, Neurodevelopmental, One-carbon metabolism, B-vitamins, Puberty, Estrogen, Aging, Neurodegeneration, Perimenopause, Menopause, Andropause

1. Introduction

Transition states represent critical periods during development and aging when systems undergo significant changes. These “critical periods” are highly dynamic and may span several years, such as in the case of puberty and reproductive senescence (perimenopause in women and andropause in men) (Petricka and Benfey, 2011). The effects of these transition periods are also accompanied by a neurological component, suggesting that the two are intimately linked (Brinton et al., 2015). Brain development is a life-long process that is sensitive to both genetic and environmental factors. Perturbations that occur during critical periods can result in lasting epigenetic alterations that have the potential to lie dormant before playing out later in life (Dominguez-Salas et al., 2014; Gali Ramamoorthy et al., 2015; Bhandari et al., 2015; Gore et al., 2011; Rzeczkowska et al., 2014; Gabory et al., 2011).

Although a cell’s underlying DNA remains relatively unchanged throughout life, the epigenome is constantly changing. While a single epigenetic change may not result in an altered phenotype, accumulation of many changes over time has the potential to alter health trajectories and outcomes. With time and continuous exposure, diverse environmental insults can sensitize brain systems and increase the likelihood that a subsequent environmental trigger will induce a disease phenotype (Brinton et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2012). Dysregulation of the brain epigenome has been linked to a number of neurological dysfunctions and aberrant DNA methylation and histone modifications have been seen in Autism (Abdolmaleky et al., 2015; Berko and Greally, 2015), Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (Bennett et al., 2015; Herrmann and Obeid, 2011a; Marques et al., 2012; Mastroeni et al., 2010; Nagata et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2008), Schizophrenia (Brucato et al., 2014; Milekic et al., 2014), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Schmidt et al., 2011; Roth, 2014). In this review, we refer to epigenetics broadly, but focus mainly on DNA methylation and histone modifications, which are the best-characterized mechanisms of epigenetic regulation.

2. Methyl-donor molecules and one-carbon metabolism build and maintain the epigenome throughout life

Establishment, maintenance, and reorganization of the epigenome rely on the availability of methyl-donor molecules that are produced in the one-carbon cycle. One-carbon metabolism utilizes co-factors such as folate, choline, and various other B vitamins (B6, B12, riboflavin), to produce S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), the universal methyl-donor that provides methyl-groups used for DNA, histone, and other protein methylation (Fig. 1). Evidence of impaired one-carbon cycling, either due to decreased enzymatic activity or co-factor deficiency, is the accumulation of the intermediate molecule homocysteine (Hcy) (Herrmann and Obeid, 2011a; Tomizawa et al., 2015). Methyl-donor synthesis from Hcy relies on the bioavailability of the B vitamins (Fig. 1). Disruption of this process can result in epigenome dysregulation, setting the stage for long-term health consequences.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

One-carbon metabolism utilizes co-factors such as folate, choline, and various other B vitamins (B6, B12, riboflavin), to produce S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), the universal methyl-donor that provides methyl-groups used for DNA, histone, and other protein methylation. Impaired one-carbon metabolism results in loss of SAM production, an accumulation of homocysteine, and can lead to dysregulation of the epigenome.

Prevalence and severity of impairments associate with B12 deficiencies are largely determined by a complex series of interactions between genetic variants, nutrition, and lifestyle (de Bree et al., 2001; Refsum et al., 2006; Steegers-Theunissen and Steegers, 2003; Steegers-Theunissen et al., 2013). In particular, lifestyle factors such as smoking, and coffee and alcohol consumption have been linked to perturbations in one-carbon metabolism and elevated levels of Hcy (Refsum et al., 2006).

How these effects are mediated through epigenetics can be demonstrated in the agouti mouse model. Experimentally, the agouti mouse serves as an “epigenetic sensor,” allowing for easy visualization of epigenome perturbations. Hypomethylation of the agouti gene, which determines coat color, results in a yellow coated mouse. Conversely, animals that exhibit agouti gene hypermethylation are brown in color. Intermediate levels of methylation in the agouti gene result in a mottled coat, with the degree of methylation directly corresponding to mottle intensity (Jirtle and Skinner, 2007). Pregnant agouti mice fed a diet supplemented with one-carbon metabolites, such as FA, B12, and choline, give birth to mice with altered coat color, indicating that these molecules have the ability to directly influence DNA methylation patterns in the periphery (Cooney et al., 2002; Waterland and Jirtle, 2003; Rakyan et al., 2002). Furthermore, transgenerational effects that persisted to the F2 generation were observed (Cropley et al., 2010). Interestingly, these offspring were also less prone to obesity and other diseases (Waterland and Jirtle, 2003).

One-carbon metabolism and methyl-donor production remain vital to epigenetic maintenance throughout life, particularly during “critical periods” of transition. Despite this however, B-vitamin supplementation is only encouraged during pregnancy (and shortly after breastfeeding). Although an increased intake of folate during pregnancy has the potential to prevent the miscarriage and birth defects associated with deficiency, this practice has fostered an increase in individuals harboring genetic polymorphisms that compromise folate usage (Shea and Rogers, 2014). These individuals, in particular, may have an increased requirement for additional folate that may not be met during adolescence and adulthood and could predispose them to early neuroendocrine aging and cognitive impairments later in life. Just as all mothers are encouraged to increase their folate intake during pregnancy, B-vitamin supplements may be beneficial for young children (Hassan et al., 2019) and adolescents (Tomizawa et al., 2015; Kanani and Poojara, 2000) whose brains are still developing.

Complicating this discussion, however, are reports that folate supplementation may both suppress or facilitate progression of certain cancers, depending on the timing of administration (Baggott et al., 1992; Kim, 2004; Kotsopoulos et al., 2003; Song et al., 2000a, b). Furthermore, many scientists have begun to stress the importance of distinguishing between naturally occurring folates and folic acid, a synthetic compound that is added to supplements and fortified foods (Ulrich and Potter, 2006). More research is necessary to identify specific gene networks that are impacted by both methyl-donor deficiency and B12 supplementation at different stages of life and brain development, and how this relates to disease pathogenesis down the line.

3. Epigenetics regulate learning and memory

3.1. DNA methylation modulates transcription during learning events

In recent years, the epigenetic mechanisms that regulate learning and memory have been characterized. It is now widely accepted that DNA methylation regulates neuroplasticity, learning, and memory by playing a dual role in memory formation; serving as both a transient modulator of transcription during learning, as well as a static marker involved in remote memory maintenance (Creighton et al., 2020).

Memory formation during a learning event requires the coordination of transcriptional changes in a number of genes. Transcriptional patterns vary at different stages of memory formation and early perturbation can disrupt downstream events. For example, inhibition of transcription and protein synthesis during the first few hours after a learning event disrupts long-term potentiation (LTP), but not short-term memory.

Epigenetic modulators, such as and DNA methyltransferases (DNMT) and ten-eleven-translocation proteins (TETs), are abundant in neurons, where active methylation and demethylation occur during learning (Antunes et al., 2019). In vivo studies have demonstrated that treatment with DNMT inhibitors disrupts DNA methylation, resulting in altered transcription, LTP suppression, and impaired memory formation (Miller and Sweatt, 2007; Levenson et al., 2006).

The process of memory formation occurs in two distinct waves, where the first wave of altered transcription triggers the second. Included in the second wave of transcriptional changes are a number of genes that encode epigenetic modulating proteins involved in memory maintenance (Duke et al., 2017). It is during these events that DNA methylation influences memory by altering transcriptional outcomes that impact memory formation and maintenance within the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and amygdala (Miller and Sweatt, 2007; Duke et al., 2017; Holliday, 1999; Miller et al., 2010).

3.2. One-carbon metabolism is intimately linked to learning, and memory

Methyl-donor deficiency can impair the dynamic regulation of DNA methylation that is required to modulate transcription during learning and memory in neurons. Indeed, mice with methyl-donor deficiency show reduced memory consolidation, poor performance in novel object recognition memory tests, and differential methylation and expression of the glutamate receptor gene, Gria1, which is involved in synaptic plasticity (Tomizawa et al., 2015). In addition to one-carbon metabolites, fetal deficiency of other micronutrients have epigenetic consequences linked to learning and memory impairments that persist into adulthood (Tran et al., 2015). Iron deficiency is associated with reduced brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression in the hippocampus that is accompanied by a loss of DNA methylation, an increase in histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) binding, and decreased ribonucleic acid (RNA) polymerase II binding at the BDNF promoter (Tran et al., 2015), all of which are involved in learning and memory. However, these effects of iron deficiency can be reversed by choline supplementation during late gestation, further implicating one-carbon metabolism as essential for both neuro-development and long-term cognitive function.

4. Both maternal and paternal preconception environments impact offspring health via epigenetic mechanisms

4.1. Imprinting

Offspring health outcomes can be impacted prior to conception through non-genetic mechanisms such as epigenetic imprinting, which is established in parental gamete cells during the maturation process from the primordial germ line. Gamete imprinting primarily occurs in a sex-specific manner and ensures that certain genes are preferentially expressed from either the maternal or paternal allele. Immediately after fertilization, the embryonic genome experiences dramatic and widespread loss of DNA methylation and histone modifications. This eraser of epigenetic information is seemingly a “reset” for the newly created genome. However, some epigenetic information must be maintained from the original egg and sperm in order to initiate the subsequent reprogramming of the methylome. These retained epigenetic characteristics are referred to as being “imprinted” onto the new genome. Imprinting control regions (ICR) that survive reprogramming are retained through cellular differentiation and are ubiquitously present in the adult organism’s somatic tissues. Only primordial germ cells are exempt from the process of imprinting (Bartolomei and Ferguson-Smith, 2011; Luedi et al., 2007); this exemption ensures that sex-specific epigenetic patterns can be appropriately re-established in both male and female offspring during gamete maturation.

The imprinting process is particularly important in genes where a double dose is toxic (Gendrel and Heard, 2014; Lyon, 1998). For example, the insulin-like growth factor 2 gene (IGF2) is maternally imprinted by epigenetic markers and is transcriptionally silenced. In health offspring, only the paternal copy of IGF2 is actively expressed. Re-activation of the maternally inherited IGF2, due to loss of imprinting, can impact mitochondrial function in offspring (Bjornsson et al., 2007). Similarly, improper imprinting of the Insulin (INS) and Guanine Nucleotide Binding Protein (G Protein), Alpha Stimulating Activity antisense RNA (GNASAS) genes are associated with an increased risk in coronary heart disease in adulthood (Talens et al., 2012). Disrupted imprinting at fertilization has been associated with a number of cognitive and developmental disorders that emerge later in life, including schizophrenia (Brucato et al., 2014; Marsit et al., 2012), Angelman syndrome (Clayton-Smith and Laan, 2003), Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (Viljoen and Ramesar, 1992), Prader-Willi syndrome (Cassidy et al., 2000), as well as multiple types of cancers (Feinberg and Tycko, 2004; Feinberg and Vogelstein, 1983; Yuan et al., 2003; Feng et al., 2008; Cui et al., 2002; Nakano et al., 2006; Kuerbitz et al., 2002).

4.2. Paternal environment before conception influences epigenetic programing during spermatogenesis

It is now widely accepted that the paternal preconception environment plays an important role in the imprinting process, early embryonic development, and both long term physical and cognitive health of offspring. As studies investigating paternal environmental factors begin to accumulate, the epigenetic mechanisms driving offspring traits are coming into better focus. Not surprisingly, it is the continuous nature of spermatogenesis that allows for environmental interactions, that influence the testis and sperm epigenomes, to subsequently impact the epigenetic programing of offspring.

A number of animal studies have investigated the effects of paternal stress on offspring stress response and anxiety behaviors. Results are somewhat mixed, with some reporting offspring with reduced anxiety (Mychasiuk et al., 2013; Rodgers et al., 2013; He et al., 2016), blunted stress response (Mychasiuk et al., 2013; Rodgers et al., 2013; Dias and Ressler, 2014; Dietz et al., 2011; Gapp et al., 2014), and improved behavioral flexibility (Mychasiuk et al., 2013; Rodgers et al., 2013), and others finding a general increase in anxiety and depressive behaviors (Rodgers et al., 2013; Dietz et al., 2011; Gapp et al., 2014; Azizi et al., 2019). Changes in DNA methylation and/or gene expression patterns in various regions of the brain have been identified in offspring born to stressed fathers (Mychasiuk et al., 2013; He et al., 2016; Dias and Ressler, 2014). Many of these alterations occurred in a sex-specific manner, with male and female offspring exhibiting divergent neurological and epigenetic effects (Mychasiuk et al., 2013; Rodgers et al., 2013; Dietz et al., 2011; Gapp et al., 2014; Azizi et al., 2019).

A study investigating physical exercise found global decrease in hippocampal DNA methylation and improved spatial learning in male rat offspring. Curiously, the authors found no changes in sperm DNA methylation were detected, suggesting that alternative epigenetic mechanisms play a role in transmission, such as histone modifications or sncRNA (Rodgers et al., 2013; Beeler et al., 2019; Krawetz et al., 2011).

Although extensively studied by number of groups, the biological consequences of paternal alcohol use is complicated. Findings across studies are mixed in terms of learning and behavioral patterns, as well as incidence of affective disorders in offspring (Beeler et al., 2019; Nieto and Kosten, 2019; Finegersh and Homanics, 2014; Liang et al., 2014; Rompala et al., 2017). Similarly, observed epigenetic perturbations are not consistent across studies. These inconsistencies are likely due to differences in species, strain, experimental paradigms, and the technical methods used.

Undeniably however, EtoH is a known epigenetic modifier in both adult (Cervera-Juanes et al., 2017) and developing tissues (Garro et al., 1991). Animal studies have demonstrated EtOH-induced alterations in DNA methylation, histone acetylation, and sncRNAs in both testis and developing sperm cells. In humans, alcohol use can produce hypomethylation of typically-hypermethylated ICR in sperm cells (Ouko et al., 2009). Animal studies have similarly demonstrated decreased methylation at paternally imprinted genes in offspring of EtOH-exposed fathers (Liang et al., 2014). In addition to imprinting alterations, other non-imprinting changes have been observed (Chang et al., 2017). How these epigenetic changes directly impact offspring health and development are only beginning to be understood. A recent study by Conner et al. identified abnormal patterns of gene expression in offspring neocortex and subtle alternations in patterns of intraneocortical connections (Conner et al., 2020). Cognitively, both male and female offspring exhibited changes in sensorimotor integration, decreased balance, coordination, and short-term motor learning. Consistent with other studies(Kim et al., 2014), the authors observed a sex-specific increase of activity level in male offspring, a clinically relevant observation as the incidence of ADHD is increased in children born to alcoholic fathers (Knopik et al., 2005).

Several groups have begun to investigate other paternal factors. A recent retrospective clinical analysis revealed that non-allergic asthma was more common in offspring of fathers who either smoked, or had exposure to occupational welding, prior to conception (Mychasiuk et al., 2012). Paternal mental “enrichment” has been demonstrated to influence cognitive performance, reduce brain weight, and induce changes in global DNA methylation in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex of both male and female offspring (Mychasiuk et al., 2012). Finally, other studies have shown that paternal diet alters glucose metabolism and brain development of offspring (Anderson et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2013; Ng et al., 2010) and is associated with changes in DNA methylation, possibly mediated through one carbon metabolism (Kim et al., 2013).

Both B12 vitamin deficiency and gene mutations impacting one-carbon metabolism are associated with low sperm count and poor viability (Bezold et al., 2001; Boxmeer et al., 2009; Dhillon et al., 2007; Safarinejad et al., 2011). Preliminary animals studies demonstrate altered sperm DNA methylation patterns in males with methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) genetic variants, suggesting that perturbations in once carbon metabolism can directly impact epigenetic programing during spermatogenesis (Chan et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2001).

4.3. Maternal environment before conception influences the oocyte maturation processes and offspring health

The oocyte maturation process is period of epigenetic reorganization that is poorly understood but demonstratively sensitive to a variety of environmental factors, including alcohol(VandeVoort et al., 2015), endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs)(Susiarjo et al., 2013), diabetes (Ge et al., 2013), diet(Hou et al., 2016), as well as fertility treatments such as assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs)(Manipalviratn et al., 2009). It is likely that these factors influence maturation through epigenetic mechanisms (Steegers-Theunissen et al., 2013; Whitelaw et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2010). Improper or disrupted epigenetic patterns in the oocyte genome can lead to subsequent disturbances in embryonic epigenetic reprograming at fertilization, setting the stage for the offspring’s subsequent responses to environmental perturbations and influences epigenetic remodeling later in life. Indeed, preconception exposure to many of these factors have been linked to offspring neurological and health outcomes in both humans and animal models (Bhandari et al., 2015; Gore et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2010; Collier et al., 2020; Allen et al., 2006).

Although few studies have directly investigated the role of one-carbon metabolism and in regulating epigenetic programing in the maturing oocyte, one-carbon biomarkers in follicular fluid (FF) are associated with fertility, oocyte and embryo quality, and pregnancy outcome (Boxmeer et al., 2009, 2008a; Boxmeer et al., 2008b; Ebisch et al., 2006; Pacchiarotti et al., 2007; Jerzak et al., 2003). Increased levels of FF Hcy is associated with endometriosis, and subfertility in women (Ebisch et al., 2006). Animal models have demonstrated that impaired one-carbon metabolism leads to a reduction of FF methionine and SAM, and an increase in Hcy (Kanakkaparambil et al., 2009; Sinclair and Singh, 2007). In couples undergoing IVF or ICSI, those who adhere to a diet rich in B12 vitamins have increased chance of successful pregnancy (Twigt et al., 2012; Vujkovic et al., 2010). These evidences demonstrate the importance of one-carbon status prior to conception and suggest the involvement of epigenetic mechanisms in driving the effects preconception environmental factors have on offspring.

5. The embryonic environment and implications later in life

5.1. Early embryonic reorganization of the epigenome

Undeniably, early embryonic development is a period of dramatic change and cellular reprogramming. Although each differentiated cell has a unique epigenetic signature that cannot be easily reversed, successful reproduction requires a “reset” of this signature to allow for totipotency to be restored to a fertilized zygote. Genome-wide studies mapping the DNA methylation patterns of mouse oocytes, sperm, and fertilized zygote cells through early development provide evidence for two major epigenetic reprogramming phases during early embryonic development (Smith et al., 2012). Upon fertilization, the zygote undergoes global de-methylation of the genome. DNA methylation levels continue to drop during the first few rounds of cellular division before genome re-methylation begins and global levels stabilize. In contrast to somatic tissues, where high CpG-density is correlated with low DNA methylation, the early pre-implantation phase of a developing embryo is a period during which DNA methylation is differentially positioned and maintained (Deaton and Bird, 2011). During early development, non-CpG methylation and higher levels of hydroxymethylation have been observed (Kinde et al., 2015). Little is known about the regulatory role of non-CpG methylation and hydroxymethylation; however, this may suggest that the pre-implantation phase is highly plastic and hypersensitive to environmental perturbations that have an increased potential to influence the health outcomes of the developing organism.

5.2. Prenatal one-carbon status contributes to the developing epigenome, and impacts neurodevelopment and cognition

The critical role of B-vitamin micronutrients during embryonic neuro-development is well documented. Elevated maternal Hcy is associated with small gestational age and congenital heart disease (Verkleij-Hagoort et al., 2006). In humans, maternal folic acid (FA) and choline deficiencies are linked to neural tube defects (spina bifida) and an increased risk for autism (Barua et al., 2014; Gillberg et al., 1986; Suren et al., 2013; Tamura and Picciano, 2006). Furthermore, maternal FA status correlates with preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction and other congenital malformations in offspring (Herrmann and Obeid, 2011b). In rats, choline deficiency is linked to a reduction of neural progenitor cell proliferation and an increase in apoptosis in developing brain tissues (Albright et al., 1999a, b). Choline-deprived offspring also show diminished visuospatial and auditory memory that persists throughout life (Meck and Williams, 1999). Conversely, offspring of choline-supplemented mothers exhibit an accelerated rate of neurogenesis, a reduction in apoptosis (Albright et al., 1999a; Craciunescu et al., 2003), and an increase in visuospatial and auditory memory that is not subject to decline during normal aging, suggesting that supplemental choline in utero may protect against age-related cognitive decline later in life (Meck and Williams, 1997a, b; Meck and Williams, 1997c; Meck et al., 1988; Meck and Williams, 2003).

Other studies have further demonstrated the interactions of B-vitamins with epigenetic patterns and neurodevelopment in utero. Choline deficiency is associated with changes in the DNA methylation of genes related to the cell cycle (Niculescu et al., 2006, 2004), and maternal FA regulates DNA methylation in a sex-specific manner (Barua et al., 2014). Male offspring, of mice fed a high FA diet, exhibited reduced expression and methylation patterns of Ror2(receptor tyrosine kinase like orphan receptor 2) (Barua et al., 2014), a gene involved in neurogenesis and development of the neocortex (Endo et al., 2012). Conversely, female offspring from these mothers exhibited hypomethylation and over expression of the Mtap4 (microtubule-associated protein 4) gene, which plays a role in the central nervous system (CNS) and in microtubule-dependent transport (Tokuraku et al., 2010).

Sex specific effects of maternal FA were also observed in several health-related imprinting genes in the offspring. Female offspring of HMFA mothers showed altered methylation patterns in the Dio3 (Deiodinase, Iodothyronine, Type III) gene which has been implicated in insulin-related diseases. Males however showed no such effect in Dio3. Lastly, both male and female HMFA offspring demonstrated brain hypermethylation of several autism candidate genes, suggesting that maternal folic acid’s protective effects against autism is mediated through epigenetic mechanisms (Gillberg et al., 1986; Suren et al., 2013; Tamura and Picciano, 2006).

5.3. Epigenetic patterns established in utero remain sensitive to the postnatal environment

Environmental perturbations during embryonic development can result in epigenetic modifications that correlate with alterations in the gene expression profiles seen in many adult-onset diseases (Gali Ramamoorthy et al., 2015; Gabory et al., 2011). Adverse maternal environments, such as poor nutrition, substance abuse, diabetes, and poor mental health, can also have life-long consequences for offspring (Dominguez-Salas et al., 2014; Barua et al., 2014). Maternal under-nutrition is known to cause intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and low birth weight (Vieau, 2011). Conversely, maternal over-nutrition, as well as gestational diabetes, has been linked to macrosomia or high birth weight (Vieau, 2011). Both IUGR and macrosomia have been linked to an increased risk of adult-onset obesity and metabolic disorders (Curhan et al., 1996; Pettitt and Jovanovic, 2001; Ong, 2006). Moreover, the fetal programming of the hypothalamus, which controls food intake and energy expenditure, is also influenced by maternal nutrition. Over- or under- nutrition can negatively impact the hypothalamic appetite regulatory systems and predispose offspring to metabolic disorders in adulthood (McMillen et al., 2005; Bouret, 2009; Ross and Desai, 2014).

Mechanistically, the loss of the pancreatic and duodenal homeobox (Pdx1) gene expression in IUGR is associated with adult-onset diabetes. Under conditions of poor maternal nutrition during fetal development the histone deacetylase complex mSin3/HDAC is recruited to the Pdx1 promoter in the pancreas. The loss of the histone acetylation at the Pdx1 promoter results in the loss of the transcription factor binding required for Pdx1 gene expression (Pinney and Simmons, 2010). Postnatally, a loss of the activating histone mark on histone 3 (H3) lysine 4 (K4) tri-methylation (me3) (H3K4me3), and an increase of the repressive H3 Lysine 9 (K9) di-methylation (me2) (H3K9me2), are seen at the Pdx1 gene promoter. While at this point, repression is still considered to be “reversible,” the accumulating H3K9me2 marks soon recruit the DNA methyltransferase DNMT3A, which then methylates and permanently silences Pdx1 expression (Gabory et al., 2011).

Although IUGR does not immediately result in Pdx1 gene silencing through DNA methylation in utero, it establishes a chromatin state that is sensitive to further environmental impact, and raises the likelihood that the gene will be silenced later in life. This same principle can be applied to neurodevelopment, where the early environment can influence the likelihood of a particular cognitive outcome and modify the risk of neurodegenerative diseases later in life.

5.4. Toxic in utero exposures and negative health risks

EDCs are chemicals that can interfere with the endocrine system and produce adverse effects on development, health, and reproduction. EDCs are mostly synthetic and have been used widely in industry to produce plastics, pesticides, and oral contraceptive birth control. In recent years, EDCs have come under intense scrutiny as they have been linked to birth defects, behavioral issues, cancer, and immune system and metabolic dysfunction (Kim, 2004). EDCs are harmful to organisms both pre- and post-natally, and are able to disrupt proper genomic imprinting. Maternal exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) during late oocyte and early embryo development has been shown to modify gene expression in mouse embryos and placentas through the alteration of DNA methylation patterns and contribute to abnormal placental development (Kotsopoulos et al., 2003; Song et al., 2000a). The transgenerational effects of in utero EDC exposure are well documented (Bhandari et al., 2015; Gore et al., 2011; Susiarjo et al., 2013; Gore, 2008; Jandegian et al., 2015). Between the years 1958 and 1976, diethylstilbestrol (DES) was a common medicine given to pregnant women to prevent miscarriage. Both male and female offspring exposed to this chemical have been documented as having a dramatically increased risk for cancers and reproductive issues as adults (Hoover et al., 2011), and a number of studies have also observed third generation health risks (Blatt et al., 2003; Brouwers et al., 2006; Chantrain et al., 2009; Newbold et al., 2006; Ruden et al., 2005). Interestingly, these adverse health effects appear during puberty, suggesting that DES may alter the epigenetic mechanisms involved in puberty programming.

In animal models, prenatal alcohol exposure (PrEE) has also been linked to adiposity (Dobson et al., 2012), beta cell dysfunction, and glucose intolerance in adulthood (Chen and Nyomba, 2003). Neurologically, PrEE is associated with reduced brain weight and cortical length, abnormalities in intraneocortical circuitry, DNA hypomethylation of the neocortex and behavioral abnormalities (Bottom et al., 2020). Remarkably, co-administration of supplemental choline in alcohol exposed pregnancies successfully minimized or prevented many of these developmental abnormalities in offspring and experimentally reducing histone deacetylase expression has been shown to reverse glucose intolerance in alcohol-exposed offspring (Bottom et al., 2020). These experimental strategies highlight the potential for developmental disease intervention if the specific epigenetic perturbations can be identified (Yao et al., 2014).

5.5. Placental epigenetics

The placenta plays a critical role in development and facilitates nutrient and waste exchange between mother and fetus. Additionally, the placenta provides the fetus with protection and responds to maternal cues via epigenetic mechanisms regulating gene expression (Appleton et al., 2013; Gheorghe et al., 2010; Nugent and Bale, 2015). Epigenetic changes in the placenta, that occur in response to environmental perturbations, have the potential to alter long-term neurodevelopment and fetal programming (Nugent and Bale, 2015; Bale et al., 2010). These topics have been reviewed in detail by several groups, including Nugent and Bale (Nugent and Bale, 2015).

6. Puberty is a window period for long-term neurocognitive health consequences and is regulated by epigenetics

6.1. Pubertal timing and health outcomes

In mammals, initiation of puberty by activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) system relies on the functional organization of the hypothalamic GnRH neural network - a process that takes place early in development (Gore, 2008), suggesting that the transition to puberty is a process that begins in utero and is manifested later in life (Tena-Sempere, 2013). Timing of puberty varies between individuals as well as by sex, with females reaching sexual maturity earlier than males (McCarthy, 2013). Females are more likely to experience precocious, or early, puberty, while males are more likely to transition later (Rzeczkowska et al., 2014; McCarthy, 2013). The age of puberty onset can be modified by environmental factors, and is associated with multiple health and cognitive outcomes later in life. In girls, early menarche has been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, depression, eating and behavioral disorders, diabetes and obesity, as well as an overall increase risk of mortality (Rzeczkowska et al., 2014). Conversely, late menarche has been associated with a decreased risk of ischemic heart disease, but an increased risk of osteoporotic fracture (Rzeczkowska et al., 2014). In boys, initiation of puberty can be difficult to identify due to lack of a quantitative measurements, such as age of menarche in girls; however, age of voice breaking is commonly used as a qualitative measurement of puberty onset in males (Day et al., 2015). Early male puberty has been linked to an increased risk for testicular cancer, whereas late puberty has been linked to both biological and social outcomes such as depression and low self-esteem (Rzeczkowska et al., 2014; Day et al., 2015; Golub et al., 2008). In both sexes, it is difficult to determine whether mistiming in puberty directly causes the associated health conditions, or if these health conditions are due to the underlying factors controlling puberty onset in the first place. Nevertheless, the transition through puberty is a critical period when environmental factors can permanently alter developmental and health trajectories.

6.2. Onset of puberty onset is epigenetically controlled

As many as 106 distinct parent-of-origin alleles have been implicated in the regulation of puberty, suggesting that puberty is at least partly controlled by classic, Mendelian genetics (Perry et al., 2014). However, variable onset is present in monozygotic twins, as well as inbred rodent strains raised in similar environments, suggesting that epigenetics may be involved. Indeed, several groups have identified the KISS1 gene, which regulates puberty in all mammals, to be under epigenetic control (Lomniczi et al., 2013; Wyatt et al., 2013; Semaan and Kauffman, 2013; Garcia-Galiano et al., 2012; Roa et al., 2008; Tena-Sempere, 2008).

The initiation of puberty begins with the expression of KISS1’s protein product kisspeptin. Subsequent signaling through the Kiss1 receptor in gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons activates the neuroprotective and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axes. Mutations in KISS1, or its receptor KISS1R, can result in a failure to transition into puberty (Wyatt et al., 2013). Differential expression of KISS1 is thought to contribute to sex differences in the timing of puberty and in the secretion of Luteinizing hormone (LH) in adulthood (Semaan and Kauffman, 2013). Indeed, studies have found sex-specific differences in KISS1 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression as well as differences in DNA methylation along the KISS1 promoter (Semaan et al., 2012; Kauffman, 2009; Semaan and Kauffman, 2010). Furthermore, neonatal exposure to EDCs can alter the activation and function of the HPG axis (Tena-Sempere et al., 2000) and the timing of the hypothalamic expression of Kiss1 (Navarro et al., 2004, 2009), demonstrating how early environment can influence transition periods and health outcomes later in life.

Prior to puberty, the hypothalamus expresses the genes embryonic ectoderm development (Eed) and chromobox 7 (Cbx7), which bind to the KISS1 promoter and recruit polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) (Lomniczi et al., 2013; Wyatt et al., 2013). PRC2 is responsible for silencing the KISS1 promoter through chromatin reorganization by trimethylating H3 on lysine 27 (H3K27me3) (Lomniczi et al., 2013). At the onset of puberty, DNA methylation increases at the Eed and Cbx7 gene promoter regions. The increase of DNA methylation is accompanied by a decrease in the expression of the two genes, and a subsequent loss of their binding at the KISS1 promoter (Lomniczi et al., 2013; Wyatt et al., 2013). Loss of Eed and Cbx7 binding, resulting in a loss of KISS1 repression, is accompanied by an increase in transcription-activating histone marks, H3K4me3, H3K9ac, and H3K14ac along the KISS1 promoter (Lomniczi et al., 2013). Thus the KISS1-mediated onset of puberty is set into motion through the epigenetic silencing of repressive factors (Lomniczi et al., 2013). Over-expression of Eed or treatment with 5-azadine, a DNA methylation inhibitor, is able to block puberty in female rats, further supporting the role of epigenetic programming in the pubertal transition (Lomniczi et al., 2013).

Considering the complexity of puberty and the wide range of systemic changes associated with the transition, it is probable that epigenetic mechanisms are involved in orchestrating the cooperation of many gene networks during this period. A series of studies have demonstrated that epigenetic mechanisms directly regulate GnRH transcription, both in vitro and in vivo (Kurian and Terasawa, 2013; Kurian et al., 2010; El Majdoubi et al., 2000). During puberty, a rise in GnRH mRNA is accompanied by a change in the DNA methylation status of the gene promoter (Kurian and Terasawa, 2013). Additionally, specific patterns of histone modifications at the GnRH gene are associated with differential levels of transcription (Iyer et al., 2011). Immature GnRH neuronal cells, which do not yet produce GnRH, possess mostly repressive H3K9me2 histone marks along the GnRH gene, while mature GnRH neuronal cells possess permissive H3K9ac and H3K4me3 histone marks (Iyer et al., 2011).

Lominiczi et al. surveyed genome-wide changes in DNA methylation and RNA transcription across different points of the female puberty transition and found that several genes with changes in expression were involved in chromatin and histone modification (Lomniczi et al., 2013). Expression changes of many of these genes were also accompanied by changes in DNA methylation. However, hormones are also known modifiers of the chromatin landscape. Estrogen induces changes in KISS1 promoter histone acetylation, possibly contributing to the positive feedback that is involved in generating the preovulatory surge in females (Tomikawa et al., 2012). More research is needed to explore the details of the cause-effect relationship between epigenetic programing and hormone signaling during puberty.

6.3. Brain changes that occur during puberty are sex-specific

In addition to the maturation of reproductive tissues, puberty is a time of widespread maturation and reorganizational in the brain (Spear, 2013). White matter volume in the frontal and parietal lobes peak at puberty (and subsequently declines thereafter) (Giedd et al., 1999; Perrin et al., 2008; Pfefferbaum et al., 1994), the limbic areas finish developing (Isgor et al., 2004; Bock et al., 2014), and task-dependent brain activity changes (Adleman et al., 2002; Kwon et al., 2002). Many of these aspects of normal brain development require organizational augmentation that is dependent on the sex-steroid surge which occurs during puberty (Morrison et al., 2014). These changes often occur in a sex-specific manner and can be blunted by gonadectomy, highlighting the role of sex steroids in brain development and reorganization during this period (Ahmed et al., 2008; Sex On Brain European Research Group et al., 2013).

6.4. Environmental perturbations during puberty can have long lasting and sexually dimorphic effects, and are likely regulated by epigenetics

Alcohol use during adolescence is associated with an increased risk of alcohol abuse in adulthood (DeWit et al., 2000). Curiously, children who first used alcohol at ages 11–14 had the highest risk for developing alcohol disorders later in life (DeWit et al., 2000), while those who first used alcohol at an older or younger age did not carry this same risk. These findings indicate that ages associated with the pubertal window might be more sensitive to environmental perturbations. Indeed, periods of hormonal flux, such as puberty, pregnancy, and perimenopause, have been identified as hypersensitive to environmental perturbations (Brinton et al., 2015; Dahl and Gunnar, 2009; Morrison et al., 2017).

Curiously, onset of many neuropsychiatric disease symptoms often occurs during or immediately following puberty (Arborelius et al., 1999; Corbett et al., 2009; Moghaddam, 2002; Nestler et al., 2002; Walker et al., 2008) and adverse childhood experiences are predictive for affective disorders in women (Morrison et al., 2017). Dysregulation of stress neurocircuitry in the HPA axis is a key endophenotype observed across affective disorders as well as many other psychiatric diseases (Arborelius et al., 1999; Corbett et al., 2009; Moghaddam, 2002; Nestler et al., 2002; Walker et al., 2008).

The HPA axis, which regulates responsivity to stress, is further developed during puberty, under the guidance of the sex steroids. Furthermore, the impact that estrogen and testosterone have on stress reactivity is different in adult versus pre-pubertal animals (Foilb et al., 2011; Romeo et al., 2004a, 2013). It is now understood that stress neurocircuitry in the HPA axis is augmented by the sex steroids during puberty to elicit the reactivity response patterns observed in adulthood (Romeo et al., 2004a; Goldman et al., 1973; Lui et al., 2012; Romeo et al., 2006; Viau et al., 2005). In male rats for example, prepubertal animals take longer to recover from stress tests and demonstrate a prolonged stress response. In adulthood, testosterone reduces the stress response through mechanism that cannot be recapitulated through steroid treatment of prepubertal animals (Romeo et al., 2004a). Sex-specific differences in response to stress also exist. Female rats exposed to chronic stress during puberty have demonstrated blunted neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus and changes in hippocampal plasticity in adulthood (Barha et al., 2011). However, these effects were not observed in males.

Reorganization of the HPA’s stress neurocircuitry that occurs during puberty suggests the involvement of epigenetic regulation (Carey et al., 1995; Handa et al., 1994; McCormick et al., 2002; Romeo et al., 2004b). Similarly, chronic stress or adversity during puberty likely exploits epigenetic mechanisms to elicit adult neurobiological deficits (Morrison et al., 2014). Recent studies have begun to investigate these mechanisms. Chronic stress during puberty increases visceral pain behaviors in rats and leads to an increase in the DNA methylation of the glucocorticoid receptor and a decrease in the DNA methylation of corticotrophin-releasing factor in the amygdala (Tran et al., 2013). Additionally, exposure to estrogenic compounds during early puberty has been demonstrated to alter the population of neurons expressing estrogen receptor alpha in the female rat hypothalamus (Ceccarelli et al., 2007), implicating the importance of epigenetic-hormone crosstalk.

In addition to biological programing, behavioral and social development also occurs during early adolescence under the influence of pubertal hormones. Animal models have demonstrated that during puberty, the presence of sex steroids augments hormone-induced behavioral response patterns towards those observed in adulthood, in a sex-specific manner (Schulz and Sisk, 2006). Pubertal hormones also program sex steroid-independent behavioral responses in the adult brain, further implicating epigenetic-hormone interactions as a key player during this developmental period. Perturbations in the timing of hormonal flux in the adolescent brain are likely to have long-lasting consequences on adult social and reproductive behavior (Schulz and Sisk, 2006).

7. Epigenetic shifts during aging and reproductive senescence contribute to age-related diseases and cognitive decline

7.1. Normal aging

Only 20–30 % of the individual variation in average human life span can be attributed to genetic variation, implying that longevity is largely due to environmental factors (Herskind et al., 1996; Mitchell et al., 2001; Zampieri et al., 2015). At birth, monozygotic twins have nearly identical epigenomes. Over time however, their epigenomes diverge due to environmental interactions and spontaneous errors in epigenetic maintenance (Zampieri et al., 2015). At older ages, the epigenomes of monozygotic twins can be dramatically different, explaining why many have remarkably different medical histories and health outcomes (Zampieri et al., 2015; Feil and Fraga, 2011; Poulsen et al., 2007). This kind of alteration in epigenetic patterning is referred to as epigenetic drift.

In contrast to epigenetic drift, which is a seemingly random accumulation of epigenetic changes over time, there is strong evidence for the existence of an “epigenetic clock,” suggesting that many age-related changes in the epigenome may be “programmed” as a natural part of aging. Many groups have identified trends in DNA methylation that changes in predictable manners with increasing age (Horvath, 2013; Day et al., 2013; Weidner et al., 2014). In general, global DNA methylation declines with age, with region specific hypermethylation. Age related global DNA hypomethylation is mainly associated with repeating regions in the genome, such as Long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) and Alu elements (Bollati et al., 2009; Christensen et al., 2009; Jintaridth and Mutirangura, 2010; Heyn et al., 2013). Global hypomethylation results in the loss of chromatin regulatory proteins such as polycomb repression complexes and histone modifications which, subsequently, results in the global remodeling of chromatin and genome instability (McClay et al., 2014; Vijg and Dolle, 2007). However, DNA hypermethylation at CpG islands (CGIs) results in reduced expression in many genes involved in tumor suppression, genomic stability and repair, metabolism, cell differentiation and growth, and regulation of the immune system (Zampieri et al., 2015). Over time, accumulated changes in DNA methylation and gene expression in networks involved in age-related diseases predispose an individual to either susceptibility or resiliency to disease pathogenesis (Zampieri et al., 2015; Florl et al., 2004; Neuhausen et al., 2006; Shen et al., 2005; Siegmund et al., 2007).

7.2. Reproductive senescence and dysregulated GnRH signaling is linked to neurological disease pathogenesis in both men and women

In both males and females, reproductive senescence is not merely characterized by the loss of sex steroids, but instead is a function of both gonadal failure and hypothalamic-pituitary aging. The HPG axis, which is activated during puberty, is a negative feedback system in which pulsatile GnRH, produced in the hypothalamus, stimulates LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) production and secretion by the pituitary. LH and FSH stimulate estrogen and testosterone production in the ovaries and testes respectively. Systemic estrogen and testosterone then feedback onto the pituitary and hypothalamus and modulate GnRH, LH, and FSH production and secretion (Davis et al., 2015). The pituitary response to GnRH, and the gonadal response to LH and FSH simultaneously decline with age resulting in the diminished sex steroid production characteristic of menopause and andropause, and a loss of negative feedback resulting in increased GnRH, LH, and FSH production (Fig. 2) (Davis et al., 2015; Meethal et al., 2005; Bottner et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2010).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis is activated during puberty by the epigenetic silencing of repressive factors. Kisspeptin expression in the hypothalamus activates GnRH-releasing neurons that signal to the pituitary to synthesize and release LH and FSH. LH and FSH then stimulate estrogen and testosterone production in the ovaries and testes, respectively. During reproductive senescence, pituitary responsiveness to GnRH decreases and LH pulses become desynchronized leading to an impaired sex steroid production and a loss of negative feedback onto the hypothalamus and pituitary. Luteinizing hormone (LH), Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH).

LH and GnRH receptors are present in neurons throughout the brain, and changes in concentrations of these gonadal hormones during reproductive senescence have the potential to influence the structure and function of their neuronal targets. In the hippocampus, LH receptors are highly expressed (Meethal et al., 2005), and GnRH receptor concentrations increase with age and castration (Badr et al., 1989, 1988). Interestingly, increased LH levels are seen during the same time period that age-related cell cycle alterations and the upregulation of oxidative markers are observed (Nunomura et al., 2001; Ogawa et al., 2003).

In AD patients, increased levels of LH and GnRH are also observed in hippocampal pyramidal neurons (Meethal et al., 2005; Bowen et al., 2000; Short et al., 2000), suggesting that their altered signaling activity during reproductive senescence might be involved in disease pathogenesis. Indeed, LH has been implicated in the re-activation of mitotic signaling pathways seen in early AD pathogenesis (Harris et al., 2002; Mattson et al., 2004) and shown to promote the amyloidogenic pathway in amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing (Meethal et al., 2005), providing a direct link to the progression of AD pathology.

In the hippocampal pyramidal neurons, activation of GnRH receptors results in a long-lasting enhancement of synaptic transmission via glutamate receptors in CA1 & CA3 (Lu et al., 1999; Osada and Kimura, 1995). Normally, GnRH receptor activation is modulated by estrogen (Gore et al., 2004). The loss of estrogen negative feedback on the HPG axis, due to ovarian senescence, results in increased GnRH signaling that may play a role in driving neurodegeneration in AD (Wang et al., 2010; Badr et al., 1989, 1988). Conversely, men who have undergone GnRH agonist therapy for prostate cancer (which ultimately reduces LH production) show a decreased incidence of neurodegenerative diseases (Almeida et al., 2004; Gandy et al., 2001)

A series of studies have demonstrated that epigenetic mechanisms directly regulate GnRH transcription, both in vitro and in vivo (Kurian and Terasawa, 2013; Kurian et al., 2010; El Majdoubi et al., 2000). For example, during puberty a rise in GnRH mRNA is accompanied by a change in the DNA methylation status of the gene promoter (Kurian and Terasawa, 2013). Additionally, specific patterns of histone modifications at the GnRH gene are associated with differential levels of transcription (Iyer et al., 2011): immature GnRH neuronal cells, which do not yet produce GnRH, possess mostly repressive H3K9me2 histone marks along the GnRH gene, while mature GnRH neuronal cells possess permissive H3K9ac and H3K4me3 histone marks (Iyer et al., 2011). Better understanding of epigenetic control of GnRH expression patterns during aging may provide insights on how to clinically manage aberrant signaling pathways during reproductive senescence in the hopes of reducing negative neurological outcomes.

7.3. Epigenetic control of female reproductive senescence

The heritability of menopause timing is 44–66 % and similar to puberty, variability is present in monozygotic twins and inbred rat strains, suggesting that epigenetics and environmental factors are involved (Bennett et al., 2015). While recent studies have begun to compare the pre- and post- menopause epigenome, no studies have directly investigated specific epigenetic mechanisms involved in driving the transition itself.

In humans, menopause has been associated with accelerated epigenetic patterns of aging, including global hypomethylation (Levine et al., 2016) in blood and Repetitive Element DNA Methylation (Lu et al., 2018) (Fig. 3). Furthermore, women with an earlier age of menopause onset have been found to be “epigenetically older” than women with a later onset (Levine et al., 2016). The cause-effect relationship between epigenetics and menopause has been challenging to understand as differences in epigenetic patterns seen across the perimenopause transition consist of both age-related changes that initiate onset of reproductive senescence, as well as changes that occur as a direct result of endocrine status and loss of circulating sex hormones. Untangling these relationships are particularly important, as differential outcomes of menopause have been associated with a risk for neurodegenerative and autoimmune diseases (Fenichel and Sosset, 1997; Farage et al., 2012).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

In humans, menopause is strongly associated with the accelerated epigenetic patterns of aging in blood. Post-menopausal women are “biologically and epigenetically” older than pre-menopausal women of the same chronological age (hypothetically marked along each trajectory as “X”). Epigenetic changes prior to and during the perimenopause transition may provide an explanation for the age-related negative health and cognitive outcomes associated with early menopause.

Recently in our own lab, we demonstrated that neuroendocrine aging precedes onset of perimenopause and is directly regulated by DNA methylation and one carbon metabolism, using a rat model that recapitulates characteristics of the human perimenopause (Bacon et al., 2019). In the hypothalamus, the majority of age-related changes in gene expression occurred while animals were still cycling regularly, indicating that hypothalamic aging begins before the phenotypic manifestation of perimenopause. Alongside these transcriptional changes, we observed decline in global DNA methylation with both age and reproductive senescence. Interestingly, within the young, regularly cycling animals we observed two distinct populations with “high” and “low” global DNA methylation levels suggesting that individual animals appear to be aging at various rates, suggesting that individual epigenetic differences that are present before perimenopause onset predispose an individual toward a particular outcome (late vs. early menopause). To interrogate mechanisms driving these observations, we treated young, regularly cycling animals with the DNA-methyltransferase-1 inhibitor, 5-aza-20-deoxycytidine, and monitored DNA methylation over time via blood. Treated animals exhibited loss of DNA methylation and an accelerated transition to reproductive senescence, as characterized by loss of estrus cycling, compared to non-treated animals. Conversely, we also supplemented young, regularly cycling animals with methionine, a SAM precursor, displayed delayed onset of reproductive senescence, highlighting the role that one-carbon metabolisms plays in neuroendocrine aging. Finally, genome-wide epigenetic profiling revealed changes in DNA methylation in genes required for hormone signaling, glutamate signaling, and melatonin and circadian pathways, providing insight into the origin of perimenopause-associated neurological symptoms.

7.4. Menopause is associated with an increased risk for neurodegeneration in some women

Perimenopause refers to the transition into female reproductive senescence. Menopause, the completion of the perimenopause transition, is characterized by the exhaustion of oocytes, amenorrhoea, and the loss of circulating estrogen (Brinton et al., 2015; Harlow et al., 2012). Loss of estrogen during female reproductive aging has profound effects in nearly all tissues, including breast, bone, cardiovascular, and brain. Menopause in humans is also marked by an increased risk for stroke, coronary heart disease, and neurological dysfunction in some women (Rocca et al., 2012; Weber et al., 2014; Silva and Naftolin, 2013; Wellons et al., 2012). Although a majority of women have no long-term health consequences, many women experience neurological symptoms during and after the perimenopause transition (Brinton et al., 2015). Furthermore, early menopause has been associated with adverse cognitive outcomes later in life, and the loss of estrogen during the perimenopause transition is considered to be a risk factor for developing AD (Geerlings et al., 2001; Henderson and Sherwin, 2007; Rocca et al., 2011).

The neurological consequences of menopause have been largely attributed to the dramatic loss of circulating estrogen. Estrogen-centered therapies have been used to treat many diseases, including breast, uterine, and ovarian cancers, as well as neurodegenerative diseases. However, cellular response and sensitivity to estrogen has been shown to decline following long-term hormonal deprivation (Gibbs, 2000), and although hormone therapy (HT) has been proposed as a possible treatment in reducing the risk and symptoms of AD (Paganini-Hill and Henderson, 1994; Ohkura et al., 1994), to date no studies have shown HT to be beneficial once AD symptoms have already presented (Almeida et al., 2006; Gurney et al., 2014). Furthermore, recent meta-analyses have suggested that HT may actually worsen cognitive dysfunction if initiated too late (O’Brien et al., 2014; Winkler and Fox, 2013), suggesting that there may be a “critical window” after menopause during which HT may be effective in preventing negative neurocognitive outcomes. Non-clinical studies in rodent models have shown a similar age-related loss of estrogen sensitivity (Selvamani and Sohrabji, 2010; Suzuki et al., 2007). While estrogen promotes neurotrophic support in neonatal, glial cultures (Arimoto et al., 2013; Rozovsky et al., 2002), these effects are lost in “aging” glial cultures originated from older male animals or from middle-aged females with irregular estrus cycles - implying that these changes occur across both age and the perimenopause transition and somehow alter cellular properties and influence responses to estrogen (Arimoto et al., 2013).

The molecular basis for age- and perimenopause- related loss or dysregulation of estrogen sensitivity is poorly understood. However, evidence suggests that changes in estrogen signaling may originate from changes in the DNA-binding profiles of the ERs. The ability of a transcription factor to modulate gene transcription depends upon the accessibility of the target region in the DNA. Response to estrogen is context dependent and differs between tissues and cell type, suggesting possible epigenetic mechanisms (Arimoto et al., 2013; Bourdeau et al., 2004; Foster, 2012). Indeed, local chromatin structure governs the context dependent ER-DNA-binding by controlling access to binding sites along the DNA (Miranda et al., 2013). Epigenetic modifications that occur with age and across the perimenopause transition may inhibit the ability of ERs to interact with the appropriate target regions of DNA. Development of better technologies to combat estrogen-related diseases hinges upon a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind age-related dysregulation of estrogen signaling. Further exploration of these details will allow us to more clearly define, the “window period” for beneficial hormone therapy in the prevention of AD as well as other estrogen-related diseases associated with increased age, such as various kinds of cancer, cardio-vascular disease, osteoporosis, and insulin sensitivity.

7.5. Deficiencies in one-carbon metabolism during perimenopause links female reproductive senescence to age-related diseases

One-carbon metabolism has the potential to modify the relationship between sex hormones and methylation in a bi-directional manner (Ulrich et al., 2012), further contributing to the complexity of endocrine aging and related health outcomes. The efficiencies of one-carbon metabolism vary among individuals, and can fluctuate over time and with menopause status (Zeisel, 2009). Estrogen stimulates the expression of phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEMT), a gene involved in the endogenous production of choline (Resseguie et al., 2007). The loss of estrogen during menopause results in a decreased ability to produce choline and dramatically increases the need for exogenous choline intake. Demonstratively, postmenopausal women are much more sensitive to choline deficiency and are more likely to suffer from deficiency-induced fatty liver and muscle damage than are pre-menopausal women (da Costa et al., 2004, 2005). Conversely, dietary supplementation of folate has been shown to increase luteal progesterone levels in pre-menopausal women and to decrease the risk of sporadic anovulation (Gaskins et al., 2012), suggesting that folate may be able to regulate the initiation of the perimenopause transition through one-carbon metabolism.

Dietary differences in folate and other one-carbon metabolites, in addition to individual differences in sex hormone levels, may explain some of the individual differences seen in menopausal age, risk for cognitive impairment, and response to intervention therapies. Systemic decline in estrogen combined with nutrient deficiencies resulting in impaired epigenetic maintenance creates a hyper-plastic state that sensitizes the perimenopausal brain to environmental insults and modifies an individual’s health trajectory (Fig. 3).

Elevated plasma Hcy is observed in post-menopausal women (Hak et al., 2000), as well as in AD patients, indicating impaired one-carbon metabolism. High levels of Hcy are additionally associated with an increased risk for developing AD (Shen and Ji, 2015; Nazef et al., 2014), and impaired one-carbon metabolism has been linked to AD, Parkinson’s disease, and other psychiatric disorders (Lucock, 2000; Moat et al., 2004; Mattson and Shea, 2003; Kronenberg et al., 2009; Tangney et al., 2011; de Jager et al., 2012; Wald et al., 2011; Kronenberg et al., 2008; Nilsson et al., 2002; Clarke et al., 1998; Fuso et al., 2012, 2008; Lee et al., 2012). Coincidently, dysregulation of the epigenome in many of these same disorders are well established (Marques et al., 2012; Mastroeni et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2008; Lardenoije et al., 2015; Xu, 2015; Julien et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2009; Chouliaras et al., 2012). Thus, estrogen loss and impaired one-carbon metabolism, resulting in the dysregulation of the epigenome, provides a causal link between the perimenopause transition and a risk for cognitive impairment later in life (Fig. 3).

8. Conclusion

Brain development is a life-long process that is sensitive to both genetic and environmental factors. While the genetic code is mostly invariant, environmentally-induced epigenetic alterations that occur during critical periods in the brain can cause phenotypic changes that manifest later in life. While traditionally only associated with early brain development, “critical periods” occur throughout life: gamete formation, development in utero, puberty, and reproductive senescence are all periods of transition that are hypersensitive to environmental perturbations. Changes that occur during these sensitive periods are then able to influence subsequent critical periods. For example, choline deficiency in utero may lead to epigenetic patterns associated with aberrant glutamate signaling that leaves the pubescent brain hypersensitive to stressors which impair brain plasticity and increase the risk for cognitive decline later in life. Similarly, initiation of sexual maturation is tightly regulated by epigenetic mechanisms, and the transition through puberty is a dynamic process that is influenced by environmental factors. If early events in utero are able to alter the HPG axis to impact puberty onset, it is likely that environmental conditions during the pubertal transition continue to influence other still-developing brain networks. Alterations in histone modifications and DNA methylation are mechanisms by which environmental factors during puberty can sensitize the brain towards specific neurological outcomes and aging phenotypes later in life. Rather than being isolated episodes, each event builds upon the last and to manifests a phenotype that is the culmination of a complex series of events that begin in utero and progress throughout life.

Acknowledgement

Supported by NIH: National Institute on Aging, United States grants. PO1-AG026572 and R37AG053589 to RDB

References

  1. Abdolmaleky HM, Zhou JR, Thiagalingam S, 2015. An update on the epigenetics of psychotic diseases and autism. Epigenomics 7 (3), 427–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adleman NE, et al. , 2002. A developmental fMRI study of the Stroop color-word task. Neuroimage 16 (1), 61–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmed EI, et al. , 2008. Pubertal hormones modulate the addition of new cells to sexually dimorphic brain regions. Nat. Neurosci 11 (9), 995–997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Albright CD, et al. , 1999a. Choline availability alters embryonic development of the hippocampus and septum in the rat. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res 113 (1–2), 13–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Albright CD, et al. , 1999b. Maternal dietary choline availability alters mitosis, apoptosis and the localization of TOAD-64 protein in the developing fetal rat septum. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res 115 (2), 123–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A, 2006. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can 28 (3), 220–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Almeida OP, et al. , 2004. One year follow-up study of the association between chemical castration, sex hormones, beta-amyloid, memory and depression in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology 29 (8), 1071–1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Almeida OP, et al. , 2006. A 20-week randomized controlled trial of estradiol replacement therapy for women aged 70 years and older: effect on mood, cognition and quality of life. Neurobiol. Aging 27 (1), 141–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Anderson LM, et al. , 2006. Preconceptional fasting of fathers alters serum glucose in offspring of mice. Nutrition 22 (3), 327–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Antunes C, et al. , 2019. TET enzymes in neurophysiology and brain function. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 102, 337–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Appleton AA, et al. , 2013. Patterning in placental 11-B hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase methylation according to prenatal socioeconomic adversity. PLoS One 8 (9) p. e74691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Arborelius L, et al. , 1999. The role of corticotropin-releasing factor in depression and anxiety disorders. J. Endocrinol 160 (1), 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Arimoto JM, et al. , 2013. Age increase of estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha) in cortical astrocytes impairs neurotrophic support in male and female rats. Endocrinology 154 (6), 2101–2113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Azizi N, et al. , 2019. Parental pre-conception stress status and risk for anxiety in rat offspring: specific and sex-dependent maternal and paternal effects. Stress 22 (5), 619–631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bacon ER, et al. , 2019. Neuroendocrine aging precedes perimenopause and is regulated by DNA methylation. Neurobiol. Aging 74, 213–224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Badr M, Marchetti B, Pelletier G, 1988. Modulation of hippocampal LHRH receptors by sex steroids in the rat. Peptides 9 (2), 441–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Badr M, Marchetti B, Pelletier G, 1989. Changes in hippocampal LH-RH receptor density during maturation and aging in the rat. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res 45 (2), 179–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Baggott JE, et al. , 1992. Effects of folate deficiency and supplementation on methylnitrosourea-induced rat mammary tumors. J. Natl. Cancer Inst 84 (22), 1740–1744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bale TL, et al. , 2010. Early life programming and neurodevelopmental disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 68 (4), 314–319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Barha CK, et al. , 2011. Chronic restraint stress in adolescence differentially influences hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function and adult hippocampal neurogenesis in male and female rats. Hippocampus 21 (11), 1216–1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bartolomei MS, Ferguson-Smith AC, 2011. Mammalian genomic imprinting. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol 3 (7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Barua S, et al. , 2014. Single-base resolution of mouse offspring brain methylome reveals epigenome modifications caused by gestational folic acid. Epigenetics Chromatin 7 (1), p. 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Beeler E, Nobile ZL, Homanics GE, 2019. Paternal preconception every-other-day ethanol drinking alters behavior and ethanol consumption in offspring. Brain Sci. 9 (3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bennett DA, et al. , 2015. Epigenomics of Alzheimer’s disease. Transl. Res 165 (1), 200–220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Berko ER, Greally JM, 2015. How might epigenetic dysregulation in early embryonic life contribute to autism spectrum disorder? Epigenomics 7 (1), 1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bezold G, Lange M, Peter RU, 2001. Homozygous methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T mutation and male infertility. N. Engl. J. Med 344 (15), 1172–1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Bhandari RK, et al. , 2015. Effects of the environmental estrogenic contaminants bisphenol A and 17alpha-ethinyl estradiol on sexual development and adult behaviors in aquatic wildlife species. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol 214, 195–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Bjornsson HT, et al. , 2007. Epigenetic specificity of loss of imprinting of the IGF2 gene in Wilms tumors. J. Natl. Cancer Inst 99 (16), 1270–1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Blatt J, et al. , 2003. Ovarian carcinoma in an adolescent with transgenerational exposure to diethylstilbestrol. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol 25 (8), 635–636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Bock J, et al. , 2014. Perinatal programming of emotional brain circuits: an integrative view from systems to molecules. Front. Neurosci 8, 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Bollati V, et al. , 2009. Decline in genomic DNA methylation through aging in a cohort of elderly subjects. Mech. Ageing Dev 130 (4), 234–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Bottner M, et al. , 2007. Changes of expression of genes related to the activity of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone pulse generator in young versus middle-aged male rats. J. Neuroendocrinol 19 (10), 779–787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Bottom RT, Abbott CW 3rd, Huffman KJ, 2020. Rescue of ethanol-induced FASD-like phenotypes via prenatal co-administration of choline. Neuropharmacology 168, p. 107990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Bourdeau V, et al. , 2004. Genome-wide identification of high-affinity estrogen response elements in human and mouse. Mol. Endocrinol 18 (6), 1411–1427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Bouret SG, 2009. Early life origins of obesity: role of hypothalamic programming. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr 48 (Suppl 1), S31–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Bowen RL, Isley JP, Atkinson RL, 2000. An association of elevated serum gonadotropin concentrations and Alzheimer disease? J. Neuroendocrinol 12 (4), 351–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Boxmeer JC, et al. , 2008a. Preconception folic acid treatment affects the microenvironment of the maturing oocyte in humans. Fertil. Steril 89 (6), 1766–1770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Boxmeer JC, et al. , 2008b. Homocysteine metabolism in the pre-ovulatory follicle during ovarian stimulation. Hum. Reprod 23 (11), 2570–2576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Boxmeer JC, et al. , 2009. IVF outcomes are associated with biomarkers of the homocysteine pathway in monofollicular fluid. Hum. Reprod 24 (5), 1059–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Brinton RD, et al. , 2015. Perimenopause as a neurological transition state. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol 11 (7), 393–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Brouwers MM, et al. , 2006. Hypospadias: a transgenerational effect of diethylstilbestrol? Hum. Reprod 21 (3), 666–669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Brucato N, et al. , 2014. Hypomethylation of the paternally inherited LRRTM1 promoter linked to schizophrenia. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet 165B (7), 555–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Carey MP, et al. , 1995. The influence of ovarian steroids on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal regulation in the female rat. J. Endocrinol 144 (2), 311–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Cassidy SB, Dykens E, Williams CA, 2000. Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes: sister imprinted disorders. Am. J. Med. Genet 97 (2), 136–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ceccarelli I, et al. , 2007. Estrogenic chemicals at puberty change ERalpha in the hypothalamus of male and female rats. Neurotoxicol. Teratol 29 (1), 108–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Cervera-Juanes R, et al. , 2017. Genome-wide analysis of the nucleus accumbens identifies DNA methylation signals differentiating low/binge from heavy alcohol drinking. Alcohol 60, 103–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Chan D, et al. , 2010. Strain-specific defects in testicular development and sperm epigenetic patterns in 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase-deficient mice. Endocrinology 151 (7), 3363–3373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Chang RC, et al. , 2017. DNA methylation-independent growth restriction and altered developmental programming in a mouse model of preconception male alcohol exposure. Epigenetics 12 (10), 841–853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Chantrain CF, et al. , 2009. Neonatal acute myeloid leukemia in an infant whose mother was exposed to diethylstilboestrol in utero. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 53 (2), 220–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Chen L, Nyomba BL, 2003. Effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on glucose tolerance in the rat offspring. Metabolism 52 (4), 454–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Chen Z, et al. , 2001. Mice deficient in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase exhibit hyperhomocysteinemia and decreased methylation capacity, with neuropathology and aortic lipid deposition. Hum. Mol. Genet 10 (5), 433–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Chen KL, et al. , 2009. The epigenetic effects of amyloid-beta(1–40) on global DNA and neprilysin genes in murine cerebral endothelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 378 (1), 57–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Chen L, et al. , 2012. Detecting early-warning signals for sudden deterioration of complex diseases by dynamical network biomarkers. Sci. Rep 2, 342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Chouliaras L, et al. , 2012. Age-related increase in levels of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse hippocampus is prevented by caloric restriction. Curr. Alzheimer Res 9 (5), 536–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Christensen BC, et al. , 2009. Aging and environmental exposures alter tissue-specific DNA methylation dependent upon CpG island context. PLoS Genet. 5 (8), e1000602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Clarke R, et al. , 1998. Folate, vitamin B12, and serum total homocysteine levels in confirmed Alzheimer disease. Arch. Neurol 55 (11), 1449–1455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Clayton-Smith J, Laan L, 2003. Angelman syndrome: a review of the clinical and genetic aspects. J. Med. Genet 40 (2), 87–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Collier AD, et al. , 2020. Maternal ethanol consumption before paternal fertilization: stimulation of hypocretin neurogenesis and ethanol intake in zebrafish offspring. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 96, 109728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Conner KE, Bottom RT, Huffman KJ, 2020. The impact of paternal alcohol consumption on offspring brain and behavioral development. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 44 (1), 125–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Cooney CA, Dave AA, Wolff GL, 2002. Maternal methyl supplements in mice affect epigenetic variation and DNA methylation of offspring. J. Nutr 132 (8 Suppl), 2393S–2400S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Corbett BA, et al. , 2009. Comparing cortisol, stress, and sensory sensitivity in children with autism. Autism Res. 2 (1), 39–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Craciunescu CN, et al. , 2003. Choline availability during embryonic development alters progenitor cell mitosis in developing mouse hippocampus. J. Nutr 133 (11), 3614–3618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Creighton SD, et al. , 2020. Epigenetic mechanisms of learning and memory: implications for aging. Int. J. Mol. Sci 21 (18). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Cropley JE, et al. , 2010. CpG methylation of a silent controlling element in the murine Avy allele is incomplete and unresponsive to methyl donor supplementation. PLoS One 5 (2), e9055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Cui H, et al. , 2002. Loss of imprinting in colorectal cancer linked to hypomethylation of H19 and IGF2. Cancer Res. 62 (22), 6442–6446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Curhan GC, et al. , 1996. Birth weight and adult hypertension and obesity in women. Circulation 94 (6), 1310–1315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. da Costa KA, et al. , 2004. Elevated serum creatine phosphokinase in choline-deficient humans: mechanistic studies in C2C12 mouse myoblasts. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 80 (1), 163–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. da Costa KA, et al. , 2005. Choline deficiency in mice and humans is associated with increased plasma homocysteine concentration after a methionine load. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 81 (2), 440–444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Dahl RE, Gunnar MR, 2009. Heightened stress responsiveness and emotional reactivity during pubertal maturation: implications for psychopathology. Dev. Psychopathol 21 (1), 1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Davis SR, et al. , 2015. Menopause. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 1, 15004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Day K, et al. , 2013. Differential DNA methylation with age displays both common and dynamic features across human tissues that are influenced by CpG landscape. Genome Biol. 14 (9), R102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Day FR, et al. , 2015. Puberty timing associated with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and also diverse health outcomes in men and women: the UK Biobank study. Sci. Rep 5, 11208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. de Bree A, et al. , 2001. Lifestyle factors and plasma homocysteine concentrations in a general population sample. Am. J. Epidemiol 154 (2), 150–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. de Jager CA, et al. , 2012. Cognitive and clinical outcomes of homocysteine-lowering B-vitamin treatment in mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 27 (6), 592–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Deaton AM, Bird A, 2011. CpG islands and the regulation of transcription. Genes Dev. 25 (10), 1010–1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. DeWit DJ, et al. , 2000. Age at first alcohol use: a risk factor for the development of alcohol disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 157 (5), 745–750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Dhillon VS, Shahid M, Husain SA, 2007. Associations of MTHFR DNMT3b 4977 bp deletion in mtDNA and GSTM1 deletion, and aberrant CpG island hypermethylation of GSTM1 in non-obstructive infertility in Indian men. Mol. Hum. Reprod 13 (4), 213–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Dias BG, Ressler KJ, 2014. Parental olfactory experience influences behavior and neural structure in subsequent generations. Nat. Neurosci 17 (1), 89–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Dietz DM, et al. , 2011. Paternal transmission of stress-induced pathologies. Biol. Psychiatry 70 (5), 408–414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Dobson CC, et al. , 2012. Chronic prenatal ethanol exposure increases adiposity and disrupts pancreatic morphology in adult guinea pig offspring. Nutr. Diabetes 2, e57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Dominguez-Salas P, et al. , 2014. Maternal nutrition at conception modulates DNA methylation of human metastable epialleles. Nat. Commun 5, 3746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Duke CG, et al. , 2017. Experience-dependent epigenomic reorganization in the hippocampus. Learn. Mem 24 (7), 278–288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Ebisch IM, et al. , 2006. Homocysteine, glutathione and related thiols affect fertility parameters in the (sub)fertile couple. Hum. Reprod 21 (7), 1725–1733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. El Majdoubi M, et al. , 2000. Neuropeptide Y: a hypothalamic brake restraining the onset of puberty in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97 (11), 6179–6184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Endo M, et al. , 2012. Ror family receptor tyrosine kinases regulate the maintenance of neural progenitor cells in the developing neocortex. J. Cell. Sci 125 (Pt 8), 2017–2029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Farage MA, Miller KW, Maibach HI, 2012. Effects of menopause on autoimmune diseases. Expert Rev. Obstet. Gynecol 7 (6), 557–571. [Google Scholar]
  87. Feil R, Fraga MF, 2011. Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications. Nat. Rev. Genet 13 (2), 97–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Feinberg AP, Tycko B, 2004. The history of cancer epigenetics. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4 (2), 143–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B, 1983. Hypomethylation distinguishes genes of some human cancers from their normal counterparts. Nature 301 (5895), 89–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Feng W, et al. , 2008. Imprinted tumor suppressor genes ARHI and PEG3 are the most frequently down-regulated in human ovarian cancers by loss of heterozygosity and promoter methylation. Cancer 112 (7), 1489–1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Fenichel P, Sosset C, 1997. [Autoimmune precocious menopause: therapeutic consequences]. Contracept. Fertil. Sex 25 (7–8), 639–642. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Finegersh A, Homanics GE, 2014. Paternal alcohol exposure reduces alcohol drinking and increases behavioral sensitivity to alcohol selectively in male offspring. PLoS One 9 (6), e99078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Florl AR, et al. , 2004. Coordinate hypermethylation at specific genes in prostate carcinoma precedes LINE-1 hypomethylation. Br. J. Cancer 91 (5), 985–994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Foilb AR, Lui P, Romeo RD, 2011. The transformation of hormonal stress responses throughout puberty and adolescence. J. Endocrinol 210 (3), 391–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Foster TC, 2012. Role of estrogen receptor alpha and beta expression and signaling on cognitive function during aging. Hippocampus 22 (4), 656–669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Fuso A, et al. , 2008. B-vitamin deprivation induces hyperhomocysteinemia and brain S-adenosylhomocysteine, depletes brain S-adenosylmethionine, and enhances PS1 and BACE expression and amyloid-beta deposition in mice. Mol. Cell. Neurosci 37 (4), 731–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Fuso A, et al. , 2012. S-adenosylmethionine reduces the progress of the Alzheimer-like features induced by B-vitamin deficiency in mice. Neurobiol. Aging 33 (7), 1482 e1–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Gabory A, Attig L, Junien C, 2011. Developmental programming and epigenetics. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 94 (6 Suppl), 1943S–1952S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Gali Ramamoorthy T, et al. , 2015. Developmental programming of hypothalamic neuronal circuits: impact on energy balance control. Front. Neurosci 9, 126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Gandy S, et al. , 2001. Chemical andropause and amyloid-beta peptide. JAMA 285 (17), 2195–2196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Gapp K, et al. , 2014. Implication of sperm RNAs in transgenerational inheritance of the effects of early trauma in mice. Nat. Neurosci 17 (5), 667–669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Garcia-Galiano D, et al. , 2012. Differential modulation of gonadotropin responses to kisspeptin by aminoacidergic, peptidergic, and nitric oxide neurotransmission. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab 303 (10), E1252–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Garro AJ, et al. , 1991. Ethanol consumption inhibits fetal DNA methylation in mice: implications for the fetal alcohol syndrome. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 15 (3), 395–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Gaskins AJ, et al. , 2012. The impact of dietary folate intake on reproductive function in premenopausal women: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One 7 (9), e46276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Ge ZJ, et al. , 2013. Maternal diabetes causes alterations of DNA methylation statuses of some imprinted genes in murine oocytes. Biol. Reprod 88 (5), 117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Geerlings MI, et al. , 2001. Reproductive period and risk of dementia in postmenopausal women. JAMA 285 (11), 1475–1481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Gendrel AV, Heard E, 2014. Noncoding RNAs and epigenetic mechanisms during X-chromosome inactivation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol 30, 561–580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Gheorghe CP, et al. , 2010. Gene expression in the placenta: maternal stress and epigenetic responses. Int. J. Dev. Biol 54 (2–3), 507–523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Gibbs RB, 2000. Effects of gonadal hormone replacement on measures of basal forebrain cholinergic function. Neuroscience 101 (4), 931–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Giedd JN, et al. , 1999. Development of the human corpus callosum during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 23 (4), 571–588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Gillberg C, et al. , 1986. Folic acid as an adjunct in the treatment of children with the autism fragile-X syndrome (AFRAX). Dev. Med. Child Neurol 28 (5), 624–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Goldman L, et al. , 1973. Postweaning development of negative feedback in the pituitary-adrenal system of the rat. Neuroendocrinology 12 (3), 199–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Golub MS, et al. , 2008. Public health implications of altered puberty timing. Pediatrics 121 (Suppl 3), S218–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Gore AC, 2008. Developmental programming and endocrine disruptor effects on reproductive neuroendocrine systems. Front. Neuroendocrinol 29 (3), 358–374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Gore AC, Windsor-Engnell BM, Terasawa E, 2004. Menopausal increases in pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone release in a nonhuman primate (Macaca mulatta). Endocrinology 145 (10), 4653–4659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Gore AC, et al. , 2011. Early life exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals causes lifelong molecular reprogramming of the hypothalamus and premature reproductive aging. Mol. Endocrinol 25 (12), 2157–2168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Gurney EP, et al. , 2014. The Women’s Health Initiative trial and related studies: 10 years later: a clinician’s view. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol 142, 4–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Hak AE, et al. , 2000. Increased plasma homocysteine after menopause. Atherosclerosis 149 (1), 163–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Handa RJ, et al. , 1994. Androgen regulation of adrenocorticotropin and corticosterone secretion in the male rat following novelty and foot shock stressors. Physiol. Behav 55 (1), 117–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Harlow SD, et al. , 2012. Executive summary of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop + 10: addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging. Menopause 19 (4), 387–395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Harris D, et al. , 2002. Activation of MAPK cascades by GnRH: ERK and Jun N-terminal kinase are involved in basal and GnRH-stimulated activity of the glycoprotein hormone LHbeta-subunit promoter. Endocrinology 143 (3), 1018–1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Hassan Z, et al. , 2019. Brain susceptibility to methyl donor deficiency: from fetal programming to aging outcome in rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci 20 (22). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. He N, et al. , 2016. Parental life events cause behavioral difference among offspring: adult pre-gestational restraint stress reduces anxiety across generations. Sci. Rep 6, 39497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Henderson VW, Sherwin BB, 2007. Surgical versus natural menopause: cognitive issues. Menopause 14 (3 Pt 2), 572–579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Herrmann W, Obeid R, 2011a. Homocysteine: a biomarker in neurodegenerative diseases. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med 49 (3), 435–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Herrmann W, Obeid R, 2011b. Vitamins in the Prevention of Human Diseases. Walter de Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
  127. Herskind AM, et al. , 1996. The heritability of human longevity: a population-based study of 2872 Danish twin pairs born 1870–1900. Hum. Genet 97 (3), 319–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Heyn H, et al. , 2013. DNA methylation profiling in breast cancer discordant identical twins identifies DOK7 as novel epigenetic biomarker. Carcinogenesis 34 (1), 102–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Holliday R, 1999. Is there an epigenetic component in long-term memory? J. Theor. Biol 200 (3), 339–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Hoover RN, et al. , 2011. Adverse health outcomes in women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. N. Engl. J. Med 365 (14), 1304–1314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Horvath S, 2013. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 14 (10), R115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Hou YJ, et al. , 2016. Both diet and gene mutation induced obesity affect oocyte quality in mice. Sci. Rep 6, 18858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Isgor C, et al. , 2004. Delayed effects of chronic variable stress during peripubertal-juvenile period on hippocampal morphology and on cognitive and stress axis functions in rats. Hippocampus 14 (5), 636–648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Iyer AK, Brayman MJ, Mellon PL, 2011. Dynamic chromatin modifications control GnRH gene expression during neuronal differentiation and protein kinase C signal transduction. Mol. Endocrinol 25 (3), 460–473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Jandegian CM, et al. , 2015. Developmental exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) alters sexual differentiation in painted turtles (Chrysemys picta). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol 216, 77–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Jerzak M, Putowski L, Baranowski W, 2003. [Homocysteine level in ovarian follicular fluid or serum as a predictor of successful fertilization]. Ginekol. Pol 74 (9), 949–952. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Jintaridth P, Mutirangura A, 2010. Distinctive patterns of age-dependent hypomethylation in interspersed repetitive sequences. Physiol. Genomics 41 (2), 194–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Jirtle RL, Skinner MK, 2007. Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility. Nat. Rev. Genet 8 (4), 253–262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Julien C, et al. , 2009. Sirtuin 1 reduction parallels the accumulation of tau in Alzheimer disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol 68 (1), 48–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Kanakkaparambil R, et al. , 2009. B-vitamin and homocysteine status determines ovarian response to gonadotropin treatment in sheep. Biol. Reprod 80 (4), 743–752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Kanani SJ, Poojara RH, 2000. Supplementation with iron and folic acid enhances growth in adolescent Indian girls. J. Nutr 130 (2S Suppl), 452S–455S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Kauffman AS, 2009. Sexual differentiation and the Kiss1 system: hormonal and developmental considerations. Peptides 30 (1), 83–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Kim YI, 2004. Will mandatory folic acid fortification prevent or promote cancer? Am. J. Clin. Nutr 80 (5), 1123–1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Kim HW, et al. , 2013. Effects of paternal folate deficiency on the expression of insulin-like growth factor-2 and global DNA methylation in the fetal brain. Mol. Nutr. Food Res 57 (4), 671–676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Kim P, et al. , 2014. Chronic exposure to ethanol of male mice before mating produces attention deficit hyperactivity disorder-like phenotype along with epigenetic dysregulation of dopamine transporter expression in mouse offspring. J. Neurosci. Res 92 (5), 658–670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Kinde B, et al. , 2015. Reading the unique DNA methylation landscape of the brain: Non-CpG methylation, hydroxymethylation, and MeCP2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112 (22), 6800–6806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Knopik VS, et al. , 2005. Contributions of parental alcoholism, prenatal substance exposure, and genetic transmission to child ADHD risk: a female twin study. Psychol. Med 35 (5), 625–635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Kotsopoulos J, et al. , 2003. Dietary folate deficiency suppresses N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced mammary tumorigenesis in rats. Carcinogenesis 24 (5), 937–944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Krawetz SA, et al. , 2011. A survey of small RNAs in human sperm. Hum. Reprod 26 (12), 3401–3412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Kronenberg G, et al. , 2008. Folate deficiency induces neurodegeneration and brain dysfunction in mice lacking uracil DNA glycosylase. J. Neurosci 28 (28), 7219–7230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Kronenberg G, Colla M, Endres M, 2009. Folic acid, neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disease. Curr. Mol. Med 9 (3), 315–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Kuerbitz SJ, et al. , 2002. Hypermethylation of the imprinted NNAT locus occurs frequently in pediatric acute leukemia. Carcinogenesis 23 (4), 559–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Kurian JR, Terasawa E, 2013. Epigenetic control of gonadotropin releasing hormone neurons. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 4, 61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Kurian JR, Keen KL, Terasawa E, 2010. Epigenetic changes coincide with in vitro primate GnRH neuronal maturation. Endocrinology 151 (11), 5359–5368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Kwon H, Reiss AL, Menon V, 2002. Neural basis of protracted developmental changes in visuo-spatial working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99 (20), 13336–13341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Lardenoije R, et al. , 2015. The epigenetics of aging and neurodegeneration. Prog. Neurobiol [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Lee S, et al. , 2012. Dietary supplementation with S-adenosyl methionine delayed amyloid-beta and tau pathology in 3xTg-AD mice. J. Alzheimers Dis 28 (2), 423–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Levenson JM, et al. , 2006. Evidence that DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferase regulates synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus. J. Biol. Chem 281 (23), 15763–15773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Levine ME, et al. , 2016. Menopause accelerates biological aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113 (33), 9327–9332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Liang F, et al. , 2014. Paternal ethanol exposure and behavioral abnormities in offspring: associated alterations in imprinted gene methylation. Neuropharmacology 81, 126–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Lomniczi A, et al. , 2013. Epigenetic control of female puberty. Nat. Neurosci 16 (3), 281–289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Lu F, et al. , 1999. Activation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors produces neuronal excitation in the rat hippocampus. Chin. J. Physiol 42 (2), 67–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Lu S, et al. , 2018. Repetitive element DNA methylation is associated with menopausal age. Aging Dis. 9 (3), 435–443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Lucock M, 2000. Folic acid: nutritional biochemistry, molecular biology, and role in disease processes. Mol. Genet. Metab 71 (1–2), 121–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Luedi PP, et al. , 2007. Computational and experimental identification of novel human imprinted genes. Genome Res. 17 (12), 1723–1730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Lui P, et al. , 2012. Divergent stress-induced neuroendocrine and behavioral responses prior to puberty. Physiol. Behav 107 (1), 104–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Lyon MF, 1998. X-chromosome inactivation spreads itself: effects in autosomes. Am. J. Hum. Genet 63 (1), 17–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Manipalviratn S, DeCherney A, Segars J, 2009. Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology. Fertil. Steril 91 (2), 305–315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Marques SC, et al. , 2012. Epigenetic regulation of BACE1 in Alzheimer’s disease patients and in transgenic mice. Neuroscience 220, 256–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Marsit CJ, et al. , 2012. Placenta-imprinted gene expression association of infant neurobehavior. J. Pediatr 160 (5), 854–860 e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Mastroeni D, et al. , 2010. Epigenetic changes in Alzheimer’s disease: decrements in DNA methylation. Neurobiol. Aging 31 (12), 2025–2037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Mattson MP, Shea TB, 2003. Folate and homocysteine metabolism in neural plasticity and neurodegenerative disorders. Trends Neurosci. 26 (3), 137–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Mattson MP, Maudsley S, Martin B, 2004. A neural signaling triumvirate that influences ageing and age-related disease: insulin/IGF-1, BDNF and serotonin. Ageing Res. Rev 3 (4), 445–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. McCarthy MM, 2013. A piece in the puzzle of puberty. Nat. Neurosci 16 (3), 251–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. McClay JL, et al. , 2014. A methylome-wide study of aging using massively parallel sequencing of the methyl-CpG-enriched genomic fraction from blood in over 700 subjects. Hum. Mol. Genet 23 (5), 1175–1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. McCormick CM, et al. , 2002. Peripheral and central sex steroids have differential effects on the HPA axis of male and female rats. Stress 5 (4), 235–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. McMillen IC, Adam CL, Muhlhausler BS, 2005. Early origins of obesity: programming the appetite regulatory system. J. Physiol. (Paris) 565 (Pt 1), 9–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Meck WH, Williams CL, 1997a. Perinatal choline supplementation increases the threshold for chunking in spatial memory. Neuroreport 8 (14), 3053–3059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Meck WH, Williams CL, 1997b. Characterization of the facilitative effects of perinatal choline supplementation on timing and temporal memory. Neuroreport 8 (13), 2831–2835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Meck WH, Williams CL, 1997c. Simultaneous temporal processing is sensitive to prenatal choline availability in mature and aged rats. Neuroreport 8 (14), 3045–3051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Meck WH, Williams CL, 1999. Choline supplementation during prenatal development reduces proactive interference in spatial memory. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res 118 (1–2), 51–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Meck WH, Williams CL, 2003. Metabolic imprinting of choline by its availability during gestation: implications for memory and attentional processing across the lifespan. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 27 (4), 385–399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Meck WH, Smith RA, Williams CL, 1988. Pre- and postnatal choline supplementation produces long-term facilitation of spatial memory. Dev. Psychobiol 21 (4), 339–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Meethal SV, et al. , 2005. The gonadotropin connection in Alzheimer’s disease. Endocrine 26 (3), 317–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Milekic MH, et al. , 2014. Age-related sperm DNA methylation changes are transmitted to offspring and associated with abnormal behavior and dysregulated gene expression. Mol. Psychiatry [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Miller CA, Sweatt JD, 2007. Covalent modification of DNA regulates memory formation. Neuron 53 (6), 857–869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Miller CA, et al. , 2010. Cortical DNA methylation maintains remote memory. Nat. Neurosci 13 (6), 664–666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Miranda TB, et al. , 2013. Reprogramming the chromatin landscape: interplay of the estrogen and glucocorticoid receptors at the genomic level. Cancer Res. 73 (16), 5130–5139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Mitchell BD, et al. , 2001. Heritability of life span in the old order amish. Am. J. Med. Genet 102 (4), 346–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Moat SJ, et al. , 2004. Folate, homocysteine, endothelial function and cardiovascular disease. J. Nutr. Biochem 15 (2), 64–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Moghaddam B, 2002. Stress activation of glutamate neurotransmission in the prefrontal cortex: implications for dopamine-associated psychiatric disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 51 (10), 775–787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Morrison KE, et al. , 2014. Epigenetic mechanisms in pubertal brain maturation. Neuroscience 264, 17–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Morrison KE, et al. , 2017. Preadolescent adversity programs a disrupted maternal stress reactivity in humans and mice. Biol. Psychiatry 81 (8), 693–701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Mychasiuk R, et al. , 2012. Parental enrichment and offspring development: modifications to brain, behavior and the epigenome. Behav. Brain Res 228 (2), 294–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Mychasiuk R, et al. , 2013. Paternal stress prior to conception alters DNA methylation and behaviour of developing rat offspring. Neuroscience 241, 100–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Nagata T, et al. , 2015. Association between DNA methylation of the BDNF promoter region and clinical presentation in alzheimer’s disease. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Dis. Extra 5 (1), 64–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Nakano S, et al. , 2006. Expression profile of LIT1/KCNQ1OT1 and epigenetic status at the KvDMR1 in colorectal cancers. Cancer Sci. 97 (11), 1147–1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Navarro VM, et al. , 2004. Advanced vaginal opening and precocious activation of the reproductive axis by KiSS-1 peptide, the endogenous ligand of GPR54. J. Physiol. (Paris) 561 (Pt 2), 379–386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Navarro VM, et al. , 2009. Persistent impairment of hypothalamic KiSS-1 system after exposures to estrogenic compounds at critical periods of brain sex differentiation. Endocrinology 150 (5), 2359–2367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Nazef K, et al. , 2014. Hyperhomocysteinemia is a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease in an Algerian population. Arch. Med. Res 45 (3), 247–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Nestler EJ, et al. , 2002. Neurobiology of depression. Neuron 34 (1), 13–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Neuhausen A, et al. , 2006. DNA methylation alterations in urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Biol. Ther 5 (8), 993–1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Newbold RR, Padilla-Banks E, Jefferson WN, 2006. Adverse effects of the model environmental estrogen diethylstilbestrol are transmitted to subsequent generations. Endocrinology 147 (6 Suppl), S11–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Ng SF, et al. , 2010. Chronic high-fat diet in fathers programs beta-cell dysfunction in female rat offspring. Nature 467 (7318), 963–966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Niculescu MD, Yamamuro Y, Zeisel SH, 2004. Choline availability modulates human neuroblastoma cell proliferation and alters the methylation of the promoter region of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 3 gene. J. Neurochem 89 (5), 1252–1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Niculescu MD, Craciunescu CN, Zeisel SH, 2006. Dietary choline deficiency alters global and gene-specific DNA methylation in the developing hippocampus of mouse fetal brains. FASEB J. 20 (1), 43–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  207. Nieto SJ, Kosten TA, 2019. Who’s your daddy? Behavioral and epigenetic consequences of paternal drug exposure. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci 78, 109–121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Nilsson K, Gustafson L, Hultberg B, 2002. Relation between plasma homocysteine and Alzheimer’s disease. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord 14 (1), 7–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Nugent BM, Bale TL, 2015. The omniscient placenta: metabolic and epigenetic regulation of fetal programming. Front. Neuroendocrinol 39, 28–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Nunomura A, et al. , 2001. Oxidative damage is the earliest event in Alzheimer disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol 60 (8), 759–767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. O’Brien J, et al. , 2014. Postmenopausal hormone therapy is not associated with risk of all-cause dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Epidemiol. Rev 36, 83–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Ogawa O, et al. , 2003. Increased p27, an essential component of cell cycle control, in Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Cell 2 (2), 105–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Ohkura T, et al. , 1994. Evaluation of estrogen treatment in female patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Endocr. J 41 (4), 361–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Ong KK, 2006. Size at birth, postnatal growth and risk of obesity. Horm. Res 65 (Suppl 3), 65–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Osada T, Kimura F, 1995. LHRH effects on hippocampal neurons are modulated by estrogen in rats. Endocr. J 42 (2), 251–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  216. Ouko LA, et al. , 2009. Effect of alcohol consumption on CpG methylation in the differentially methylated regions of H19 and IG-DMR in male gametes: implications for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 33 (9), 1615–1627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Pacchiarotti A, et al. , 2007. The possible role of hyperhomocysteinemia on IVF outcome. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet 24 (10), 459–462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Paganini-Hill A, Henderson VW, 1994. Estrogen deficiency and risk of Alzheimer’s disease in women. Am. J. Epidemiol 140 (3), 256–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Perrin JS, et al. , 2008. Growth of white matter in the adolescent brain: role of testosterone and androgen receptor. J. Neurosci 28 (38), 9519–9524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. Perry JR, et al. , 2014. Parent-of-origin-specific allelic associations among 106 genomic loci for age at menarche. Nature 514 (7520), 92–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Petricka JJ, Benfey PN, 2011. Reconstructing regulatory network transitions. Trends Cell Biol. 21 (8), 442–451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Pettitt DJ, Jovanovic L, 2001. Birth weight as a predictor of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the U-shaped curve. Curr. Diab. Rep 1 (1), 78–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Pfefferbaum A, et al. , 1994. A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study of changes in brain morphology from infancy to late adulthood. Arch. Neurol 51 (9), 874–887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  224. Pinney SE, Simmons RA, 2010. Epigenetic mechanisms in the development of type 2 diabetes. Trends Endocrinol. Metab 21 (4), 223–229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  225. Poulsen P, et al. , 2007. The epigenetic basis of twin discordance in age-related diseases. Pediatr. Res 61 (5 Pt 2), 38R–42R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  226. Rakyan VK, et al. , 2002. Metastable epialleles in mammals. Trends Genet. 18 (7), 348–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  227. Refsum H, et al. , 2006. The Hordaland Homocysteine Study: a community-based study of homocysteine, its determinants, and associations with disease. J. Nutr 136 (6 Suppl), 1731S–1740S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  228. Resseguie M, et al. , 2007. Phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEMT) gene expression is induced by estrogen in human and mouse primary hepatocytes. FASEB J. 21 (10), 2622–2632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  229. Roa J, et al. , 2008. New frontiers in kisspeptin/GPR54 physiology as fundamental gatekeepers of reproductive function. Front. Neuroendocrinol 29 (1), 48–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  230. Rocca WA, Grossardt BR, Shuster LT, 2011. Oophorectomy, menopause, estrogen treatment, and cognitive aging: clinical evidence for a window of opportunity. Brain Res. 1379, 188–198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  231. Rocca WA, et al. , 2012. Premature menopause or early menopause and risk of ischemic stroke. Menopause 19 (3), 272–277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  232. Rodgers AB, et al. , 2013. Paternal stress exposure alters sperm microRNA content and reprograms offspring HPA stress axis regulation. J. Neurosci 33 (21), 9003–9012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  233. Romeo RD, et al. , 2004a. Testosterone cannot activate an adult-like stress response in prepubertal male rats. Neuroendocrinology 79 (3), 125–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  234. Romeo RD, Lee SJ, McEwen BS, 2004b. Differential stress reactivity in intact and ovariectomized prepubertal and adult female rats. Neuroendocrinology 80 (6), 387–393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  235. Romeo RD, et al. , 2006. Stress history and pubertal development interact to shape hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis plasticity. Endocrinology 147 (4), 1664–1674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  236. Romeo RD, et al. , 2013. The influence of puberty on stress reactivity and forebrain glucocorticoid receptor levels in inbred and outbred strains of male and female mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38 (4), 592–596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  237. Rompala GR, et al. , 2017. Paternal preconception alcohol exposure imparts intergenerational alcohol-related behaviors to male offspring on a pure C57BL/6J background. Alcohol 60, 169–177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  238. Ross MG, Desai M, 2014. Developmental programming of appetite/satiety. Ann. Nutr. Metab 64 (Suppl 1), 36–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  239. Roth TL, 2014. How traumatic experiences leave their signature on the genome: an overview of epigenetic pathways in PTSD. Front. Psychiatry 5, 93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  240. Rozovsky I, et al. , 2002. Estradiol (E2) enhances neurite outgrowth by repressing glial fibrillary acidic protein expression and reorganizing laminin. Endocrinology 143 (2), 636–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  241. Ruden DM, et al. , 2005. Hsp90 and environmental impacts on epigenetic states: a model for the trans-generational effects of diethylstibesterol on uterine development and cancer. Hum. Mol. Genet 14 (Spec No 1), R149–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  242. Rzeczkowska PA, et al. , 2014. Epigenetics: a new player in the regulation of mammalian puberty. Neuroendocrinology 99 (3–4), 139–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  243. Safarinejad MR, Shafiei N, Safarinejad S, 2011. Relationship between genetic polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (C677T, A1298C, and G1793A) as risk factors for idiopathic male infertility. Reprod. Sci 18 (3), 304–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  244. Schmidt U, Holsboer F, Rein T, 2011. Epigenetic aspects of posttraumatic stress disorder. Dis. Markers 30 (2–3), 77–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  245. Schulz KM, Sisk CL, 2006. Pubertal hormones, the adolescent brain, and the maturation of social behaviors: lessons from the Syrian hamster. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol 254–255, 120–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  246. Selvamani A, Sohrabji F, 2010. Reproductive age modulates the impact of focal ischemia on the forebrain as well as the effects of estrogen treatment in female rats. Neurobiol. Aging 31 (9), 1618–1628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  247. Semaan SJ, Kauffman AS, 2010. Sexual differentiation and development of forebrain reproductive circuits. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol 20 (4), 424–431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  248. Semaan SJ, Kauffman AS, 2013. Emerging concepts on the epigenetic and transcriptional regulation of the Kiss1 gene. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci 31 (6), 452–462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  249. Semaan SJ, et al. , 2012. Assessment of epigenetic contributions to sexually-dimorphic Kiss1 expression in the anteroventral periventricular nucleus of mice. Endocrinology 153 (4), 1875–1886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  250. Sex On Brain European Research Group, S., et al. , 2013. Effects of peripubertal gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist on brain development in sheep–a magnetic resonance imaging study. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38 (10), 1994–2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  251. Shea TB, Rogers E, 2014. Lifetime requirement of the methionine cycle for neuronal development and maintenance. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 27 (2), 138–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  252. Shen L, Ji HF, 2015. Associations between homocysteine, folic acid, vitamin B12 and alzheimer’s disease: insights from meta-analyses. J. Alzheimers Dis [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  253. Shen L, et al. , 2005. MGMT promoter methylation and field defect in sporadic colorectal cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst 97 (18), 1330–1338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  254. Short SM, Boyer JL, Juliano RL, 2000. Integrins regulate the linkage between upstream and downstream events in G protein-coupled receptor signaling to mitogen-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem 275 (17), 12970–12977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  255. Siegmund KD, et al. , 2007. DNA methylation in the human cerebral cortex is dynamically regulated throughout the life span and involves differentiated neurons. PLoS One 2 (9) p. e895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  256. Silva I, Naftolin F, 2013. Brain health and cognitive and mood disorders in ageing women. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol 27 (5), 661–672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  257. Sinclair KD, Singh R, 2007. Modelling the developmental origins of health and disease in the early embryo. Theriogenology 67 (1), 43–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  258. Smith ZD, et al. , 2012. A unique regulatory phase of DNA methylation in the early mammalian embryo. Nature 484 (7394), 339–344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  259. Song J, et al. , 2000a. Effects of dietary folate on intestinal tumorigenesis in the apcMin mouse. Cancer Res. 60 (19), 5434–5440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  260. Song J, et al. , 2000b. Chemopreventive effects of dietary folate on intestinal polyps in Apc+/−Msh2−/− mice. Cancer Res. 60 (12), 3191–3199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  261. Spear LP, 2013. Adolescent neurodevelopment. J. Adolesc. Health 52 (2 Suppl 2), S7–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  262. Steegers-Theunissen RP, Steegers EA, 2003. Nutrient-gene interactions in early pregnancy: a vascular hypothesis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol 106 (2), 115–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  263. Steegers-Theunissen RP, et al. , 2013. The periconceptional period, reproduction and long-term health of offspring: the importance of one-carbon metabolism. Hum. Reprod. Update 19 (6), 640–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  264. Suren P, et al. , 2013. Association between maternal use of folic acid supplements and risk of autism spectrum disorders in children. JAMA 309 (6), 570–577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  265. Susiarjo M, et al. , 2013. Bisphenol a exposure disrupts genomic imprinting in the mouse. PLoS Genet. 9 (4) p. e1003401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  266. Suzuki S, et al. , 2007. Timing of estrogen therapy after ovariectomy dictates the efficacy of its neuroprotective and antiinflammatory actions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 104 (14), 6013–6018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  267. Talens RP, et al. , 2012. Hypermethylation at loci sensitive to the prenatal environment is associated with increased incidence of myocardial infarction. Int. J. Epidemiol 41 (1), 106–115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  268. Tamura T, Picciano MF, 2006. Folate and human reproduction. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 83 (5), 993–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  269. Tangney CC, et al. , 2011. Vitamin B12, cognition, and brain MRI measures: a cross-sectional examination. Neurology 77 (13), 1276–1282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  270. Tena-Sempere M, 2008. Timeline: the role of kisspeptins in reproductive biology. Nat. Med 14 (11), p. 1196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  271. Tena-Sempere M, 2013. Keeping puberty on time: novel signals and mechanisms involved. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol 105, 299–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  272. Tena-Sempere M, et al. , 2000. Regulation of growth hormone (GH) secretion by different glutamate receptor subtypes in the rat. Amino Acids 18 (1), 1–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  273. Tokuraku K, et al. , 2010. Distinct neuronal localization of microtubule-associated protein 4 in the mammalian brain. Neurosci. Lett 484 (2), 143–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  274. Tomikawa J, et al. , 2012. Epigenetic regulation of Kiss1 gene expression mediating estrogen-positive feedback action in the mouse brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 109 (20), E1294–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  275. Tomizawa H, et al. , 2015. Methyl-donor deficiency in adolescence affects memory and epigenetic status in the mouse hippocampus. Genes Brain Behav. 14 (3), 301–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  276. Tran L, et al. , 2013. Importance of epigenetic mechanisms in visceral pain induced by chronic water avoidance stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38 (6), 898–906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  277. Tran PV, et al. , 2015. Fetal iron deficiency induces chromatin remodeling at the Bdnf locus in adult rat hippocampus. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol 308 (4), R276–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  278. Twigt JM, et al. , 2012. The preconception diet is associated with the chance of ongoing pregnancy in women undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment. Hum. Reprod 27 (8), 2526–2531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  279. Ulrich CM, Potter JD, 2006. Folate supplementation: too much of a good thing? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev 15 (2), 189–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  280. Ulrich CM, et al. , 2012. Metabolic, hormonal and immunological associations with global DNA methylation among postmenopausal women. Epigenetics 7 (9), 1020–1028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  281. VandeVoort CA, et al. , 2015. Transgenerational effects of binge drinking in a primate model: implications for human health. Fertil. Steril 103 (2), 560–569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  282. Verkleij-Hagoort AC, et al. , 2006. Maternal hyperhomocysteinaemia is a risk factor for congenital heart disease. BJOG 113 (12), 1412–1418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  283. Viau V, et al. , 2005. Gender and puberty interact on the stress-induced activation of parvocellular neurosecretory neurons and corticotropin-releasing hormone messenger ribonucleic acid expression in the rat. Endocrinology 146 (1), 137–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  284. Vieau D, 2011. Perinatal nutritional programming of health and metabolic adult disease. World J. Diabetes 2 (9), 133–136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  285. Vijg J, Dolle ME, 2007. Genome instability: cancer or aging? Mech. Ageing Dev 128 (7–8), 466–468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  286. Viljoen D, Ramesar R, 1992. Evidence for paternal imprinting in familial Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. J. Med. Genet 29 (4), 221–225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  287. Vujkovic M, et al. , 2010. The preconception Mediterranean dietary pattern in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment increases the chance of pregnancy. Fertil. Steril 94 (6), 2096–2101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  288. Wald DS, Kasturiratne A, Simmonds M, 2011. Serum homocysteine and dementia: meta-analysis of eight cohort studies including 8669 participants. Alzheimers Dement. 7 (4), 412–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  289. Walker E, Mittal V, Tessner K, 2008. Stress and the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis in the developmental course of schizophrenia. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol 4, 189–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  290. Wang SC, Oelze B, Schumacher A, 2008. Age-specific epigenetic drift in late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 3 (7) p. e2698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  291. Wang L, et al. , 2010. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor system: modulatory role in aging and neurodegeneration. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 9 (5), 651–660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  292. Waterland RA, Jirtle RL, 2003. Transposable elements: targets for early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene regulation. Mol. Cell. Biol 23 (15), 5293–5300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  293. Weber MT, Maki PM, McDermott MP, 2014. Cognition and mood in perimenopause: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol 142, 90–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  294. Weidner CI, et al. , 2014. Aging of blood can be tracked by DNA methylation changes at just three CpG sites. Genome Biol. 15 (2), R24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  295. Wellons M, et al. , 2012. Early menopause predicts future coronary heart disease and stroke: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Menopause 19 (10), 1081–1087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  296. Whitelaw N, et al. , 2014. Epigenetic status in the offspring of spontaneous and assisted conception. Hum. Reprod 29 (7), 1452–1458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  297. Winkler JM, Fox HS, 2013. Transcriptome meta-analysis reveals a central role for sex steroids in the degeneration of hippocampal neurons in Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Syst. Biol 7, p. 51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  298. Wyatt AK, et al. , 2013. Changes in methylation patterns of kiss1 and kiss1r gene promoters across puberty. Genet. Epigenet 5, 51–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  299. Xu X, 2015. DNA methylation and cognitive aging. Oncotarget 6 (16), 13925–13934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  300. Yao XH, Nguyen KH, Nyomba BL, 2014. Reversal of glucose intolerance in rat offspring exposed to ethanol before birth through reduction of nuclear skeletal muscle HDAC expression by the bile acid TUDCA. Physiol. Rep 2 (12). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  301. Yuan J, et al. , 2003. Aberrant methylation and silencing of ARHI, an imprinted tumor suppressor gene in which the function is lost in breast cancers. Cancer Res. 63 (14), 4174–4180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  302. Zampieri M, et al. , 2015. Reconfiguration of DNA methylation in aging. Mech. Ageing Dev [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  303. Zeisel SH, 2009. Importance of methyl donors during reproduction. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 89 (2), p. 673S–7S. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  304. Zhang S, et al. , 2010. Periconceptional undernutrition in normal and overweight ewes leads to increased adrenal growth and epigenetic changes in adrenal IGF2/H19 gene in offspring. FASEB J. 24 (8), 2772–2782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES