Skip to main content
Health Science Reports logoLink to Health Science Reports
. 2022 Sep 12;5(5):e825. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.825

Corrigendum

PMCID: PMC9468438  PMID: 36172299

In the article by Paukkonen et al., 1 Some of the values in Row 4 for high‐ and low‐activation patients were previously wrong. The correct Table 6 is shown below.

High patient activation Low patient activation p‐Value b effect size c p‐Value adjusted d High versus low patient activation a
Factor Mean (SD) Mean (SD) OR (95% CI) p‐Value
Having energy and motivation 3.7 (0.7) 3.1 (0.8) 0.001 0.674 0.028 5.39 (2.10–13.87) <0.001
Feeling sense of normality in own care 3.7 (0.5) 3.3 (0.5) <0.001 0.724 0.004 3.50 (1.50–8.17) 0.004
Having no fear of complications and additional diseases 2.3 (1.0) 1.8 (0.8) 0.029 0.443 0.340 3.84 (1.00–14.74) 0.050
Receiving support from physicians 3.3 (0.6) 2.9 (0.6) 0.001 0.687 0.006 5.46 (2.15–13.87) <0.001
Receiving support from nurses 3.6 (0.5) 3.1 (0.6) <0.0001 0.875 <0.001 6.40 (2.67– 15.35) <0.0001
Receiving support from family and friends 3.5 (0.6) 3.3 (0.7) 0.091 0.342 0.103 2.62 (1.16–5.92) 0.020

Note: Statistical significance recognized as p < 0.050. Bold are statistically significant.

Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.

a

Binary regression analysis with the dichotomous variable of self‐management perceptions: good (mean ≥ 3.5) versus others.

b

Used test is independent samples t‐tests. 

c

Used test is Cohen's d with interpretation: 0.2 small, 0.50 medium, and 0.80 large.

d

Adjusted with obesity, loneliness, and perceived health.

REFERENCE

  • 1. Paukkonen L, Oikarinen A, Kähkönen O, Kaakinen P. Patient activation for self‐management among adult patients with multimorbidity in primary healthcare settings. Health Sci Rep. 2022;5:e735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Health Science Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES