Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transl Res. 2022 Jun 21;250:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2022.06.012

Kidney Organoids: A pioneering model for kidney diseases

Murat Tekguc 1,2,3, Ronald C van Gaal 4,5, Sebastien GM Uzel 4,5, Navin Gupta 1,2,3, Leonardo V Riella 1,2,6, Jennifer A Lewis 4,5, Ryuji Morizane 1,2,3,4,*
PMCID: PMC9691572  NIHMSID: NIHMS1836446  PMID: 35750295

Abstract

The kidney is a vital organ that regulates the bodily fluid and electrolyte homeostasis via tailored urinary excretion. Kidney injuries that cause severe or progressive chronic kidney disease have driven the growing population of patients with end-stage kidney disease, leading to substantial patient morbidity and mortality. This irreversible kidney damage has also created a huge socioeconomical burden on the healthcare system, highlighting the need for novel translational research models for progressive kidney diseases. Conventional research methods such as in vitro 2D cell culture or animal models do not fully recapitulate complex human kidney diseases. By contrast, directed differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells enables in vitro generation of patient-specific 3D kidney organoids, which can be used to model acute or chronic forms of hereditary, developmental, and metabolic kidney diseases. Furthermore, when combined with biofabrication techniques, organoids can be used as building blocks to construct vascularized kidney tissues mimicking their in vivo counterpart. By applying gene editing technology, organoid building blocks may be modified to minimize the process of immune rejection in kidney transplant recipients. In the foreseeable future, the universal kidney organoids derived from HLA-edited/deleted induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines may enable the supply of bioengineered organotypic kidney structures that are immune-compatible for the majority of the world population. Here, we summarize recent advances in kidney organoid research coupled with novel technologies such as organoids-on-chip and biofabrication of 3D kidney tissues providing convenient platforms for high-throughput drug screening, disease modelling, and therapeutic applications.

Introduction:

The kidney is responsible for the regulation of fluid, electrolyte, and pH balance in the human body via plasma filtration, reabsorption of essential nutrients, and secretion of the metabolic waste (Minoru Takasato et al. 2015). The kidney is composed of more than 20 distinct cell types, that are necessary for its function to maintain homeostasis. While tubular cells have the capacity to self-repair after injury, repeated and/or severe renal injury cause irreversible damage to the kidney, leading to its dysfunction (Minoru Takasato et al. 2015; Coelho et al. 2018). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) constitutes a major global healthcare problem causing a heavy financial burden with its high prevalence in 13.4% of the global population and 35% of the people over 70 years (Hill et al. 2016; Gupta et al. 2022). In addition, CKD is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (Hill et al. 2016). CKD is directly or indirectly caused by many types of disorders including hereditary diseases, metabolic syndrome and chronic autoimmune/inflammatory diseases or as a cumulative result of drug-induced nephrotoxicity (Gupta, Susa, and Morizane 2017). Loss of functional units of the kidney causes progressive loss of renal function over time due to its limited regeneration capacity, leading to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), which requires patients to initiate renal replacement therapy.

There have been many efforts to create novel sources for kidney regeneration during the past decade. One approach is to derive kidney cells and tissues from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs). Detailed analyses of the embryonic origins of kidney lineages have enabled researchers to induce its differentiation process using pluripotent stem cells in vitro (Morizane et al. 2015; Taguchi et al. 2014). By mimicking signal cascades and growth factor stimulation of embryonic kidney development, directed differentiation protocols have been developed to generate kidney organoids that consist of segmented-nephrons and stromal cells (Gupta and Morizane 2021; Little and Combes 2019). These kidney organoids can now serve as a new tool for patient-specific drug screening and disease modeling. Coupled with CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, genetic kidney disease models are established with their isogenic control organoids, complementing animal experimentation (Forbes et al. 2018). Towards the ultimate goals of kidney regeneration, significant advances have been made in biomanufacturing organ-specific tissues at scale to overcome the challenge of large tissue fabrication in vitro (Skylar-Scott et al. 2019). Moreover, the generation of hypoimmunogenic hPSCs by genome editing may mitigate the immune rejection against the bioengineered organs. In this review, we summarize the recent advances in kidney organoids, disease models, and efforts that are underway to build transplantable kidneys that might revolutionize the care of patients with ESKD.

Kidney structure and development

Nephrons are the functional unit of the kidney, responsible for the production and excretion of urine via blood filtration and active transport. Each nephron consists of glomerular and tubular segments. Glomerular podocytes form filtration units with capillary networks integrated within the Bowman’s capsule, filtering blood to produce ultrafiltrate as primitive urine. Glomeruli are structurally continuous with the proximal tubules, loops of Henle, distal tubules, and connecting tubules/collecting ducts (Gupta and Morizane 2021) (Figure 1). After filtration of the renal blood from the glomerular capillaries through their highly fenestrated endothelium (Jourde-Chiche et al. 2019), this glomerular ultrafiltrate flows from Bowman’s space to the tubular lumens. Tubular cells are surrounded by peritubular capillaries, and 99% of the glomerular ultrafiltrate is reabsorbed from the tubular lumens to peritubular capillaries. The remaining portion is further subject to tubular secretion of ions and organic solutes, determining the final composition of urine (Gupta, Dilmen, and Morizane 2021; Rizki-Safitri, Traitteur, and Morizane 2021). Resorptive and secretory processes are facilitated by active transport in the tubular epithelial cells together with the peritubular capillary endothelia. Finally, urine produced by nephrons is collected to the bladder through the collecting duct and ureter.

Figure 1. The structure of a mature nephron unit.

Figure 1.

The upper schema designates each unit of a nephron with a different function. The glomerulus, composed of Bowman’s capsule and the glomerular capillary network, is responsible for the filtration of glomerular blood flow. The glomerular capillary network, formed by the afferent arteriole, is assembled into the efferent arteriole. The lower illustration shows the magnified microstructure of the glomerular filtration barrier, which is composed of glomerular fenestrated endothelial cells, glomerular basement membrane, and podocytes (visceral epithelial cells). The secondary foot processes of podocytes are attached to each other by intervening filtration slits forming the slit diaphragm. On the other hand, Bowman space is lined by the parietal epithelial cell layer. The ultrafiltrate, drained from the Bowman space into the tubules (proximal tubule, loops of Henle, and distal tubule), is further processed into the urinary output by absorption and secretion. The urinary drainage is finally transmitted into the collecting duct via the connecting tubule.

Kidneys originate developmentally from the intermediate mesoderm (IM). During the formation of the mammalian kidney, three distinct renal rudiments namely pronephros, mesonephros, and metanephros arise from anterior to posterior areas in the IM (Gupta and Morizane 2021). Pronephros, mesonephros, and the ureteric bud (UB) are derived from the anterior IM (aIM) whereas metanephric mesenchyme (MM) is derived from the posterior IM (pIM) (Figure 2) (Dressler 2009; Gupta, Dilmen, and Morizane 2021). While the pronephros and mesonephros spontaneously degenerate as non-functional structures, the Wolffian duct persists as the collecting duct of the metanephric kidneys (Freire, Ropelato, and Rey 2019; Saxen 1987). Although the previous literature pointed out the Osr1+ metanephric progenitors in the IM as the common ancestry of the MM and UB (Mugford et al. 2008), the subsequent lineage-tracing mouse studies demonstrated the distinct origins of UB and MM lineages. The UB, the caudal outpouching of the Wolffian duct, arises from Pax2+Osr1+ progenitors in the anterior IM while the MM is derived from Pax2Osr1+ progenitors in the posterior IM, that latter further differentiating into Osr1+Six2+Sall1+WT1+ nephron progenitor cells (NPCs) (Taguchi et al. 2014). NPCs give rise to segmented nephron structures through reciprocal induction with the UB (Mugford et al. 2008; Gupta and Morizane 2021). When invaded by the UB, the MM supports the extensive branching of UB tips through the secretion of glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), while the cap mesenchyme surrounding the UB tips undergoes a mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) via UB-derived Wnt signal activation (Xia et al. 2013; Dressler 2009; Costantini and Kopan 2010). The pIM-derived MM is composed of the heterogeneous cell populations of NPCs, stromal progenitor cells (SPCs), and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), which give rise to the nephron structures and their surrounding interstitial tissue (Figure 2). aIM-derived UB differentiates into the collecting duct network which is responsible for draining the urine to the bladder via ureters (Gupta and Morizane 2021).

Figure 2. The embryological development of kidney at different stages.

Figure 2.

The upper schema shows the formation of paraxial, intermediate, and lateral plate mesodermal layers, derived from the primitive streak as a result of cellular immigration along its craniocaudal axis. The lower illustration reveals the embryological stages of pronephros, mesonephros, and metanephros. Pronephros, mesonephros, and the ureteric bud (UB) are originated from the anterior intermediate mesoderm (aIM) whereas metanephric mesenchyme (MM) is derived from the posterior intermediate mesoderm (pIM). The lower right schema reflects the microstructure of MM- and UB-derived progenitor cells.

Differentiation of kidney organoid from hPSCs

Based on the knowledge of mammalian kidney development, protocols have been established to generate nephron kidney organoids from hPSCs (Gupta, Dilmen, and Morizane 2021; Gupta, Susa, and Morizane 2017). These protocols are based on the approach of “directed differentiation” whereby sequential treatment of growth factors is developed to follow the developmental stages of the kidney. Three-dimensional (3D) culture technologies enabled embryonic and adult stem cells to differentiate into kidney tissues by potentiating their self-organizing capacity to form multi-cellular tissues. Organoids derived from hPSCs serve as a novel tool for disease studies. In addition, organoids produced in 3D culture can be used as organ building blocks as they have similar basic structural and functional features exhibited by their native counterparts in the human body (Gupta, Dilmen, and Morizane 2021; Clevers 2016). In this section, we summarize the differentiation protocols of kidney organoids.

Taguchi et al. achieved a milestone in kidney developmental research by elucidating the distinct origins of ureteric and metanephric lineages (Taguchi et al. 2014). Nephron progenitor cells from both mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) were generated by directing their differentiation towards pIM-derived MM cells, which subsequently commenced their maturation into nephron epithelia when cocultured with mouse embryonic spinal cords. First, OCT3/4+ hPSCs were treated with BMP4 followed by activin A and FGF2 to shift their pluripotent status to the epiblast stage. Then, the differentiation was initiated by BMP4 and a glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) inhibitor, CHIR99021 (CHIR) to induce T+CDX2+TBX6+HOX11+ posterior nascent mesoderm (Bennett et al. 2002). The subsequent treatment of activin A, BMP-4, retinoic acid, and a moderate dose of CHIR progressed the differentiation into OSR1+WT1+HOX11+ pIM cells. They then applied FGF9 and a low dose of CHIR to induce SIX2+PAX2+SALL1+ MM cells. Finally, these MM cells were co-cultured with mouse embryonic spinal cords to induce tubular and podocyte epithelial cells.

Morizane et al. developed a rapid and efficient protocol with defined components, which generated SIX2+SALL1+WT1+PAX2+ NPCs with ~90 % efficiency from both human embryonic stem cells and iPSCs within 8–9 days (Figure 3) (Morizane et al. 2015). Furthermore, these NPCs were converted into PAX8+LHX1+ renal vesicles, which had the potential to self-organize into their in vivo counterparts; nephron structures including NPHS1+PODXL+ glomerular podocytes, LTL+CDH2+ proximal tubules, CDH1+UMOD (Uromodulin)+ loops of Henle, and CDH1+BRN1+ distal tubules in an organized and continuous manner (Morizane et al. 2015; Morizane and Bonventre 2017). The differentiation protocol was arranged according to two findings that the egression timing of mesodermal progenitors from the primitive streak determines the anterior-posterior patterning of the mesoderm (Deschamps and van Nes 2005), and the mesodermal precursors from the posterior primitive streak transform into lateral plate mesoderm instead of intermediate mesoderm (Iimura and Pourquié 2006). Posterior mesoderm progenitors leave the primitive streak later than the precursor cells of the anterior mesoderm indicating that the posterior intermediate mesoderm cells originate from the late-stage primitive streak. Based on this embryologic specification, high-dose and long-term CHIR treatment was applied together with the BMP4 inhibitor that suppressed the differentiation of lateral plate mesoderm components. During in vivo nephrogenesis, Activin A (TGF-β superfamily member) activates Hoxd11 expression, which stimulates the formation of pIM-derived metanephros (Gupta and Morizane 2021; Maeshima et al. 2003; Gaunt, George, and Paul 2013). Thus, after the removal of CHIR, activin A treatment was applied between days 4 and 7 to induce OSR1+WT1+HOXD11+ pIM cells which lacked aIM markers, PAX2 and LHX1 (Morizane et al. 2015; Taguchi et al. 2014). Next, SIX2+SALL1+WT1+PAX2+ NPCs were generated when pIM cells were treated with FGF9 for 1 or 2 days. Previous studies have shown that UB-derived Fgf9 and Fgf20 are necessary to maintain the stemness and survival of cap mesenchyme in mice (Barak et al. 2012), while UB-derived Wnt9b signaling supports the mesenchymal-epithelial transition of MM to nephron epithelial cells (Carroll et al. 2005). In addition, the induction of Fgf8 and Fgf9 by Wnt9b signaling was also reported (Karner et al. 2011; Carroll and Das 2013), referring to the interaction between Fgf9 and Wnt signaling during the reciprocal induction of MM and UB. To mimic the MET in murine NPCs as a result of this reciprocal induction by the UB-derived Wnt9b and Fgf9 signaling (Carroll et al. 2005), hPSC-derived NPCs were further exposed to a low-dose CHIR pulse together with the ongoing FGF9 following their transfer to 3D suspension culture and brief centrifugation in the ultra-low-attachment plates (Gupta and Morizane 2021). After the CHIR pulse, NPCs were transformed to PAX8+LHX1+LAM+ renal vesicles by day 14 of the differentiation, which is consistent with the previous finding that Wnt signaling is abrogated by Dkk1, a key downstream effector of Lim1 (Lhx1) gene during the renal vesicle formation (Potter et al. 2007). Finally, these renal vesicles spontaneously completed their MET in the absence of any additional factors by forming elongated epithelial nephron structures composed of NPHS1+PODXL+ glomerular podocytes, LTL+AQP1 (Aquaporin-1)+ proximal tubules, CDH1+AQP1+ descending loops of Henle, CDH1+UMOD+ thick ascending loops of Henle, CDH1+UMOD distal tubules, and CDH1+AQP2 (Aquaporin-2)+ connecting tubules (Morizane et al. 2015; Morizane and Bonventre 2017). The common main points of the differentiation protocols by Taguchi and Morizane included the induction of the late primitive streak or posterior nascent mesoderm with long-term WNT activation by CHIR and modified BMP4 signaling (further activation of BMP4 by Taguchi protocol, suppression of excessive BMP4 signaling by Morizane protocol), the differentiation of late primitive streak to pIM with Activin A, the maturation of MM by FGF-9, and the induction of MET in NPCs through transient activation of WNT signaling by either pulse CHIR treatment (Morizane) or coculture with embryonic spinal cords (Taguchi) (Taguchi et al. 2014; Morizane et al. 2015).

Figure 3. Directed differentiation of kidney organoids by the Morizane protocol.

Figure 3.

The timescale of this protocol indicates the temporal stages of the organoid development and the temporal supplementation of the differentiation factors. The lower left image (scale bar, 1 mm) by confocal microscopy shows DAPI+SIX2+ nephron progenitor cells (NPCs) at Day 9 while the lower right image (scale bar, 100 μm) clarifies the development of DAPI+Podocalyxin+LTL+CDH1+ nephron organoids at Day 21.

Although most researchers have performed suspension cell culture for organoid differentiation in low-attachment wells, Freedman et al. used a Matrigel sandwich method to generate kidney organoids in the 3D microenvironment via cavitated epiblast formation from hPSCs. Before starting directed differentiation, hPSCs were sandwiched between two layers of Matrigel, forming epiblast spheroids that contained a hollow lumen surrounded by monolayer epithelia. These epiblast spheroids were first treated with CHIR for 1.5 days and subsequently exposed to B27-supplemented media by a two-step protocol. After day 10, spheroids were transformed into convoluted tubular organoids which contained PODXL+WT1+SYNPO+ podocyte-like cell aggregates, LTL+ proximal and CDH1+ distal tubular structures, and CD31+vWF+ endothelial compartments (Freedman et al. 2015).

Takasato et al. was first to report the synchronous induction of the nephrons and collecting ducts from aIM progenitors, together forming a self-organizing kidney structure (M. Takasato et al. 2014). They modified the duration of initial CHIR treatment to co-induce both nephron and collecting duct lineages (Minoru Takasato et al. 2015). By using CHIR for 4 days, the optimal duration for the induction of MM together with UB, and subsequent application of FGF-9 for 3 days, they simultaneously induced MM- and UB-derived components including WT1+NPHS1+ glomeruli, LTL+CDH1 early proximal tubule (day 11), LTL+CDH1+ maturing proximal tubule (day 18), GATA3LTLCDH1+ early distal tubule, GATA3+CDH1+ collecting duct (Minoru Takasato et al. 2015). Although GATA3 was used to distinguish between distal tubules and collecting ducts, later studies indicated that GATA3 can also be expressed by the distal tubules and connecting segments of the nephrons (Combes et al. 2019), suggesting the necessity of different protocols to specifically induce UB lineages. Additionally, the same group reported that human kidney organoid-derived glomeruli (OrgGloms) cultured in 3D exhibited proper apicobasal polarization and high expression of podocyte-specific genes such as NPHS1, NPHS2, and PODXL in addition to their rich content of glomerular basement membrane matrices when compared to conditionally immortalized human podocytes cultured in 2D (Hale et al. 2018; Minoru Takasato et al. 2015). These polarized podocytes of OrgGloms expressed PODXL at the apical surface and NPHS1 and NEPH1 proteins on the basal side which are critical for the filtration function of the kidney (Solanki et al. 2021; Huber and Benzing 2005). These pioneering studies of kidney organoid differentiation opened new avenues to investigate kidney development and diseases, followed by numerous studies that utilized kidney organoids for disease models.

Disease models using kidney organoids

There are many challenges in using two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures and animal models for drug screening and disease modeling (Gupta, Dilmen, and Morizane 2021). Conventional monolayer cell cultures lack the tissue complexity and 3D biochemical and biomechanical microenvironments present in human organs (Duval et al. 2017). Although murine models are widely used to explore the pathophysiological mechanisms of the genetic or autoimmune/inflammatory diseases for the development of novel therapeutic agents prior to clinical studies in patients, there has been a growing concern for the translation of animal studies to humans. The published literature, which compared the differential gene expression profiles of mice and humans via various microarrays during the acute inflammatory responses, has shown that even though different etiologies of acute inflammatory disorders produce very similar genomic responses among different patients, these gene expression signatures in the patients are not correlated with the corresponding profiles in murine models (Junhee Seok et al. 2013). Furthermore, there have been growing ethical concerns for animal experiments due to the importance of animal welfare and rights, gradually limiting animal experimentation (Andersen and Winter 2019). Therefore, human kidney organoids are of great interest for disease modeling and drug screening owing to their potential to minimize these animal studies.

a). Kidney organoid models for tubular injury and fibrosis

Drug-induced nephrotoxicity, frequently documented among patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), has remained challenging during their ongoing treatment for the primary diseases, causing acute kidney injury (AKI) and CKD progression (Uchino et al. 2005). For this critical problem, human kidney organoids were tested for nephrotoxicity assays using gentamycin and cisplatin (Morizane et al. 2015). Gentamicin is a commonly used antibiotic which causes proximal tubular injury, while cisplatin, a chemotherapeutic agent used for a wide range of cancers, also induces dose-dependent proximal tubular damage (Whiting and Brown 1996; Morizane et al. 2015). Both drugs particularly damaged the proximal tubules of organoids as evidenced by the expression of kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) on the luminal surface of LTL+ proximal tubules (Vaidya et al. 2010). Interestingly, podocytes did not exhibit injury phenotypes as suggested by the absence of a DNA damage marker, γH2AX, when low doses of these drugs were used. This early work suggested that kidney organoids express drug transporters in a segment-specific manner whereby cell type-specific responses to varied drugs can be tested in the organoid model.

Gupta et al. recently developed an organoid model of kidney injury and repair by applying repetitive cisplatin exposure. This study demonstrated that kidney organoids arose from co-induced nephron and stromal progenitor cells, which led to the generation of segmented nephrons admixed with stromal cells. Given the presence of discernible kidney compartments, the authors histologically monitored intrinsic repair (reversible injury) versus incomplete repair (irreversible injury) throughout a protocol of repeated cisplatin exposure, analogous to cycles of chemotherapy (Sharp et al. 2018; Gupta et al. 2022). Following an initial 24 hour exposure to low-dose cisplatin, proximal tubules specifically manifest injury markers of DNA damage and KIM1, as previously reported (Morizane et al. 2015). Knowing that injured tubular epithelial cells compensate by proliferative expansion to preserve kidney architecture during intrinsic repair (Humphreys et al. 2008), the authors demonstrated the induction of intrinsic repair phenotypes of proliferation and dedifferentiation, as evidenced by the reactivation of kidney developmental genes, SOX9 and PAX2. Meanwhile, the DNA damage response triggered the elevation of homology-directed repair (HDR) protein, Fanconi anemia complementation group D2 (FANCD2). In a longitudinal study after the initial injury, the resolution of DNA damage by FANCD2 activation during the intrinsic repair phase terminated the proliferative phenotype with preservation of tubular structures reflecting the reversibility of the injury consistent with completed intrinsic repair. However, when the acute cisplatin injury was repeated biweekly for 5 treatments, incomplete repair phenotypes of tubular atrophy, myofibroblast activation, and interstitial fibrosis signified irreversible injury (Gupta et al. 2022). Loss of FANCD2 in DNA damaged tubules correlated with the transition from intrinsic to incomplete repair in kidney organoid samples. Mammalian single cell transcriptomic datasets of ischemic, obstructive, and immune-mediated kidney injury were interrogated to confirm the generalizability of tubular FANCD2 correlating with intrinsic repair, whereas human fibrotic biopsy samples suggested that tubular FANCD2 inversely correlated with incomplete repair. To extend beyond a correlation, a small molecule inhibitor that upregulates HDR was found to rescue FANCD2 in injured tubules, partially reversing tubular atrophy, myofibroblast activation, and interstitial fibrosis (Gupta et al. 2022). It was concluded that HDR is a mechanism underpinning intrinsic repair following tubular injury in this organoid model developed in the absence of the potential pro and anti-fibrotic effects of the immune system. Of note, the single cell analysis in this study suggested the myofibroblast transition from mesenchymal fibroblast populations in kidney organoids, which is consistent with a recent study in human kidney samples (Kuppe et al. 2021). In addition, another hierarchical single-cell transcriptional profiling model, generated through the multiple single cell RNA-seq datasets of human fetal kidney (HFK), has reclassified the component cellular identities, such as stromal and NPC-like cells within the published kidney organoid datasets (Wilson et al. 2022). As the HFK dataset grouped stromal cells into four subpopulations such as stromal progenitor cells (SPC), cortical stroma (CS), medullary stroma (MS), and mesangial cells (MesS), the organoid stroma was mainly composed of cortical stromal cells that are the origin of myofibroblasts.

b). Kidney organoids under the inflammatory condition

During acute kidney injury, repair, and fibrosis, immune/inflammatory responses play an important role in modulating intrinsic and incomplete repair. Lemos et al. used kidney organoids as a fibrosis model by exposing them to an inflammatory cytokine, IL-1β (Lemos et al. 2018). Kidney organoids treated with IL-1β developed tubulointerstitial fibrosis with αSMA+ myofibroblast activation and collagen deposition. IL-1β signaling through the IL-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4) promoted the upregulation of MYC downstream target genes, containing cell cycle regulators and glycolytic-proliferative transcriptional signature, which eventually led to the proliferation of kidney stromal cells (SCs) and their transdifferentiation into myofibroblasts, and the deposition of fibrotic matrices in kidney organoids.

The investigation of the immune system in laboratory mouse strains is significantly limited by the minimum genetic diversity and predominance of an immature immune system that resembles neonatal immune reaction in organs such as the kidney (Beura et al. 2016; Hamilton et al. 2020). Therefore, human organoids could better reproduce the microenvironment of the native kidney with its complex reciprocal interaction between T and B lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells (APCs), that involves antigen presentation and simultaneous expression of costimulatory molecules to activate antigen-specific effector T and B lymphocytes during adaptive immune response (Wing, Tekgüç, and Sakaguchi 2018). Kidney organoids may allow us to better understand the pathophysiology of immune-mediated kidney diseases such as auto-immune glomerulonephritis and enable drug testing for novel therapeutic strategies. A recent example is the investigation of high-risk apolipoprotein-1 (APOL1) variant genes in kidney disease, which is a leading cause of kidney disease in African Americans (Genovese et al. 2010). Using different combinations of APOL1 variants generated by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, Chun et al. demonstrated the role of interferon-gamma signaling that drove lipid accumulation and podocyte toxicity in kidney organoids with high-risk APOL1 variants, which could be reversed by inhibition of diacylglycerol O-acyltransferases 2 (Chun et al. 2022).

The kidneys are often involved in systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases with consequent deposition of antibody, complement, and/or immune complexes in glomeruli. Several studies pointed out the contribution of non-immune cells of the kidney in such immune-mediated glomerulonephritis. Interestingly, podocytes can function as antigen-presenting cells to induce CD4+ T cells and also CD8+ T cells via crosspresentation during both in vitro and in vivo settings, while proximal tubular epithelial cells activate the proliferation and cytokine production of CD4+ T cells when cocultured together (Goldwich et al. 2013; Breda et al. 2019). Furthermore, the presence of co-inhibitory receptors such as PD-L1 in kidney tubules suggests their potential role in actively controlling the immune response (Starke et al. 2010; Hakroush et al. 2021). The unique contribution of immune and non-immune cells to kidney injury and fibrosis in the organoid models deserves further investigation to clarify the complex interactions of these cells during immune-mediated nephritis. Further, autoimmune/autoinflammatory diseases that involve the interaction between epithelia and immune cells could be studied using kidney organoids in combination with genome editing technologies that can modify the genes of interests (Bar-Ephraim, Kretzschmar, and Clevers 2020). The effects of immunosuppressive modalities such as regulatory T cells or CTLA-4 immunoglobulin could also be tested in organoid models (Tekguc et al. 2021) for the future applications.

c). Kidney organoids for hereditary kidney diseases with tubulopathy

Adult-onset autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (PKD), the most common form of hereditary renal disorder with an incidence of approximately 1:1000 live births, is characterized by the formation of renal cysts derived from tubular epithelial cells, leading to the progressive loss of renal function in enlarged kidneys (Hoefele et al. 2011). This life-threatening disorder is caused by the mutations in PKD1 or PKD2 genes encoding polycystin 1 (PC1) and polycystin 2 (PC2) proteins, which form a heterodimeric complex to function in primary cilia (Bergmann et al. 2018). Freedman et al. introduced a PKD model by using gene-edited human kidney organoids (Freedman et al. 2015). Following the generation of PKD-mutated hPSCs by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, they demonstrated the formation and expansion of cyst-like structures in the tubular organoids differentiated from PKD1 or PKD2-mutants. Although ADPKD cysts arise predominantly from the collecting duct, the cysts in this study were localized in the LTL+ tubules (Freedman et al. 2015). In 2017, they found that PC1 protein was responsible for the adhesion of tubular epithelial cell compartment to the underlying extracellular matrix (ECM) microenvironment, which was required for the maintenance of the tubular shape and integrity. In addition, PC1 participated in the remodelling of ECM microenvironment, which eventually limited the cyst formation (Cruz et al. 2017). Therefore, it was shown that removal of adherent ECM components further promoted the cystogenesis of PKD-mutant/PC1-deficient organoids, especially in early stages of the disease. Furthermore, cAMP signaling was shown to induce the enlargement of cyst-like structures, contributing to the pathogenesis of PKD.

Nephronophthisis (NPHP)-related ciliopathy is a progressive fibrocystic kidney disease characterized by shrunken or normal-sized fibrotic kidneys with small cysts at the corticomedullary junction in contrast to PKD presented with huge cysts (Braun and Hildebrandt 2022). Histological findings are characterized by the disruption of the tubular basement membrane, tubular atrophy/dilatation, and interstitial fibrosis, eventually resulting in end-stage kidney disease (Forbes et al. 2018). Little et al. demonstrated the underlying pathology of NPHP in patient kidney organoids by comparing the organoids of an identified NPHP proband (PR) patient with its isogenic control organoids derived from their gene-corrected (GC) iPSCs. By using CRISPR/Cas9 technology, the GC iPSCs were originally obtained from the same NPHP PR patient with compound-heterozygous mutations detected in the IFT140 gene (Forbes et al. 2018). When kidney organoids derived from both PR and GC iPSCs were compared, PR organoid tubules exhibited shortened and club-shaped primary cilia, whose phenotype was rescued by the gene correction. Consistent with the downregulation of genes implicated in apicobasal polarity, cell-cell junctions, and dynein motor assembly, spheroid cultures demonstrated the apicobasal polarization defect in PR organoid tubules unlike GC organoids. However, the cystic kidney phenotype was not seen in this study, that might be due to the limitations of static organoid models. A recent study reported that cystic tubular cells derived from ADPKD patients performed basoapical fluidic pumping in the opposite direction compared to normal tubular cells, revealing the importance of hydraulic pressure in ADPKD pathophysiology (Choudhury et al. 2022). Therefore, novel approaches, which can simulate in vivo fluidic microenvironment, such as organoids-on-chip approaches can be used in the future to investigate the cyst formation in the ciliopathic organoids in the presence of fluidic shear stress (Homan et al. 2019; Gupta, Dilmen, and Morizane 2021). Nevertheless, this work showed an approach to correct patient mutations by CRISPR/Cas9 for generation of an isogenic control, which validated the ciliary pathogenesis in the PR organoids (Forbes et al. 2018).

d). Kidney organoid models for glomerulopathy

A glomerulus, a filtration segment of each nephron, comprises fenestrated endothelia, mesangial cells, podocytes, and parietal epithelial cells (Hale et al. 2018; Schell, Wanner, and Huber 2014). Podocytes, anatomically defined as glomerular visceral epithelial cells, form the glomerular filtration barrier with their foot processes (FPs) and the capillary endothelial cells (Ettou et al. 2020; Schell, Wanner, and Huber 2014; Hale et al. 2018). FPs create interdigitating structures with the adjacent podocytes, forming slit diagrams that prevent the leakage of plasma proteins from the circulating blood together with the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) (Figure 1) (Hale et al. 2018; Ettou et al. 2020; Dong, Pietsch, and Englert 2015; Grahammer, Schell, and Huber 2013). Podocyte injury and its structural alterations (e.g. foot process effacement) cause nephrotic syndrome that manifests massive proteinuria, severe edema, dyslipidaemia, leading to progressive loss of kidney function (Hale et al. 2018; Ettou et al. 2020; Wiggins 2007). In 2018, Little et al. isolated organoid-derived glomeruli (OrgGloms) expressing mTagBFP2 fluorescent reporter gene in their developing podocytes, and performed toxicity screening using doxorubicin (Adriamycin), a chemotherapy medication, at various concentrations (Hale et al. 2018). Doxorubicin induced loss of BFP2 signal in OrgGloms, the fragmentation and destruction of podocytes in a dose dependent manner.

The podocyte unique structures are supported by slit diaphragms proteins including nephrin, podocin, and synaptopodin (Ettou et al. 2020). Wilms tumor-1 (WT1), earliest podocyte marker during kidney development, is identified as one of the upstream transcription factors which regulate these podocyte genes (Morizane et al. 2015; Dong, Pietsch, and Englert 2015). To reveal the epigenetic transcriptional reprogramming by WT1, Ettou et al. performed genome-wide analysis of WT1 DNA binding and evaluated podocyte gene expression during the course of Adriamycin (ADR)-mediated injury in both murine models and human organoids. They demonstrated that WT1 is responsible for the maintenance of open chromatin at podocyte genes for their active transcription (Ettou et al. 2020). Although ADR-induced injury initially promoted an enhanced open chromatin state at WT1 target genes such as NPHS2 (Podocin) and SYNPO (Synaptopodin), the chromatin status was subsequently converted from active to repressive, downregulating podocyte genes. Hence, this study suggested that WT1 is the key transcription factor for podocyte survival during injury and the transcriptional reprogramming of podocyte gene expression can be a novel therapeutic target for CKD (Ettou et al. 2020). These two studies demonstrate that 3D human kidney organoids can be utilized to study podocyte injury induced by toxicants.

Notably, Little et al. also showed the application of kidney organoids to model the congenital nephrotic syndrome (CNS) caused by the mutations in NPHS1 (nephrin) and NPHS2 (podocin) (Hale et al. 2018; Trautmann et al. 2015). Scanning electron microscopy findings of the OrgGloms derived from the CNS patient carrying NPHS1 gene mutations pointed out the large hypertrophied podocyte bodies, while quantitative western blot analysis confirmed the significant reduction in both nephrin and podocin proteins in the patient derived-OrgGloms compared to the control group . A similar study using hiPSC-derived kidney organoids from a patient with NPHS1 missense mutation demonstrated the formation of impaired slit diaphragm (SD) in the organoid podocytes (Tanigawa et al. 2018). These NPHS1 mutant podocytes of the organoids were deprived of “pre-SD domain” structure, which was defined as the transit state of rod-like Nephrin protein shifting between the lateral and basal sides of podocytes. Genetic correction of this point mutation restored the nephrin expression, its phosphorylation, and the formation of lateral and basal nephrin+ pre-SD domains resulting in the generation of proper SD (Tanigawa et al. 2018). Both of these organoid studies modeling CNS revealed different aspects of the structural disruption caused by the nephrin mutation.

One study focused on another cell type of glomeruli, parietal epithelial cells (PEC) (Figure 1). Nishinakamura et al demonstrated PAX2 is indispensable for morphological maturation of PEC using kidney organoids and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs). Interestingly, PAX2 was found to be dispensable for in vitro nephron formation from human iPSCs. (Kaku et al. 2017). Not only human nephron progenitors (NPs) were formed from PAX2-depleted hiPSCs, but also they were able to become epithelialized to form glomerular and renal tubular structures. However, glomerular PECs remained to be columnar epithelia, lacking the ability to transform into the squamous morphology. Hence, they confirmed that human PAX2 protein is not required for the mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition of nephron progenitors to develop normal glomeruli and renal tubules, but indispensable for the normal differentiation of PECs (Kaku et al. 2017).

Research work discussed above demonstrate the utility of human kidney organoids for a variety of genetic kidney diseases (ADPKD, nephronophthisis-related ciliopathies, congenital nephrotic syndrome), developmental kidney disorders (PAX2 deficiency), drug-induced glomerular or tubular toxicity, and inflammatory cytokine-mediated renal injury. Patient-derived organoids can also be used for personalized drug screening to assess the therapeutic efficacy and side effects as preclinical trials. Although kidney organoids exhibit most of the structural elements of native kidney in vitro (Morizane et al. 2015; Morizane and Bonventre 2017), the formation of vascular network is limited in the static culture of organoids (Morizane et al. 2015; Homan et al. 2019). Organoids generated by Freedman et al. contained CD31 and von Willebrand factor expressing endothelial cords while organoids by Takasato et al. developed CD31+KDR+SOX17+ endothelial network (Freedman et al. 2015; Minoru Takasato et al. 2015). However, these studies have not observed mature vascularized glomeruli, yet. Only after subcapsular transplantation of the organoids into mice, host-derived vascularization induced glomerular and peritubular neo-vasculogenesis (van den Berg et al. 2018). Development of vascularized kidney organoids would improve the organoid disease models for translational studies.

Optimizing kidney organoid models

Kidney organoids offer a novel platform for drug screening, disease modeling, and regenerative tissue engineering, since they contain key cell types that self-assemble into the desired nephron-like subunit microarchitectures (Morizane et al. 2015; M. Takasato et al. 2014). However, kidney organoids differentiated under static culture conditions lack the microvasculature needed to facilitate both filtration and reabsorption in vitro (Homan et al. 2019; Lee et al. 2021). Recently, Homan and Gupta et al. (Homan et al. 2019) demonstrated that subjecting kidney organoids to flow during their differentiation leads to a substantial upregulation in their endothelial progenitor population, which promotes the formation of a pervasive microvascular network and enhances organoid maturation. Specifically, under flow, the vascular invasion of podocyte-rich clusters is observed along with primitive foot process formation and an upregulation in key glomerular markers (Homan et al. 2019). Concomitantly, vascular wrapping of proximal tubular segments is enhanced under flow that leads to improved polarity, ciliation, and upregulation of key proximal tubule markers (Homan et al. 2019). The importance of flow during kidney organoid differentiation was also highlighted by a recent study from Lee et al. who demonstrated the improved sensitivity to a nephrotoxicant in kidney organoids cultured under flow (Lee et al. 2021). However, to date, the ability to address and perfuse the organoid microvasculature from larger vessels has yet to be demonstrated.

Creating kidney organoids with a perfusable vasculature in vivo can be achieved by implantation into mice (Van Den Berg et al. 2020; van den Berg et al. 2018; Bantounas et al. 2018; Xinaris et al. 2012; Ryan et al. 2021; Low et al. 2019; Tran et al. 2019) or chick chorioallantoic membranes (Garreta et al. 2019), where host vascular integration ensues leading to both organoid maturation and/or rudimentary filtration. Organ-on-chip methods may allow organoids to mimic these native processes in vitro through vasculature recruitment from a nearby endothelialized channel or integration with prepatterned vasculature (S. Zhang, Wan, and Kamm 2021). For example, Nashimoto et al. demonstrated that placing tumor spheroids between endothelialized channels induced vasculature sprouting and fusing leading to perfusable microvasculature between the tumor spheroids and channels (Nashimoto et al. 2020). While Zhang et al. 3D printed a vascular scaffold that was subsequently seeded with cardiomyocytes to produce vascularized cardiac tissue (Y. S. Zhang et al. 2016). While these are encouraging in vitro demonstrations, neither of these approaches have been extended to kidney organoids. Moreover, we posit that vasculature recruitment may offer a better approach, since it mimics in vivo vascularization of kidney organoids (S. Zhang, Wan, and Kamm 2021).

Once perfusable, vascularized kidney organoids are obtained in vitro, the next crucial step will be the introduction and integration of a collecting duct system that allows for primitive filtrate removal. Current differentiation protocols that yield MM-derived cell populations lack UB-derived collecting ducts (Combes et al. 2019; Morizane et al. 2015; M. Takasato et al. 2014). However, when embryonic MM and UB populations are combined in vitro via core-shell assembly, one observes the formation of a hierarchal collecting duct system (Ganeva, Unbekandt, and Davies 2011; Unbekandt and Davies 2010). As an example, Tanigawa and Tanaka et al. have demonstrated this for murine iPSC-derived kidney organoids by combining induced MM, UB and stromal populations (Tanigawa et al. 2022). The assembly of murine ESC-derived NPs, UBs, and stromal progenitors resulted in the generation of organ-like kidney structure, which comprise nephrons with multiple types of stromal cells accumulated around branching UBs (Tanigawa et al. 2022). However, to our knowledge, this has yet to be achieved in human kidney organoids.

The ability to achieve filtrate drainage in kidney organoids in vitro is important for two reasons: (i) absent this capability, filtrate accumulation will lead to hydronephrosis in vascularized organoids (Yokote et al. 2015) and (ii) filtrate collection is essential for functional assessment. At present, fluorescent probes can be used to study filtration and transporter processes (Freedman et al. 2015; Van Den Berg et al. 2020; Jansen et al. 2016), while micropuncture techniques enable filtrate composition to be assessed in individual tubules (Burg et al. 1966; Wearn and Richards 1924). To generate kidney organoids with an open collecting duct or ureter, one can draw inspiration from kidney development and in vitro vasculature recruitment models. We hypothesize that such organoids might be generated by embedding them within an extracellular matrix in vitro that contains an open nephric duct, produced for example by bioprinting, from which a UB arises and invades a surrounding MM.

Engineering kidney tissues

By further advancing kidney organoids into functional models, one can unlock their potential as building blocks for engineering kidney tissue for therapeutic use. Several 3D bioprinting methods enable the fabrication of human tissues using organoids or multicellular spheroids as building blocks (Skylar-Scott et al. 2019; Goulart et al. 2020; Daly, Davidson, and Burdick 2021; Ayan et al. 2020; Lawlor et al. 2021). For example, Lawlor and Vanslambrouck et al. created two-dimensional, kidney tissue sheets composed of closely printed lines of IM cells that fuse together and further develop over time. The resulting kidney tissue demonstrated correctly segmented nephrons, including proximal tubules that exhibited albumin uptake (Lawlor et al. 2021). Another promising method to generating vascularized human tissues, known as sacrificial writing in functional tissue (SWIFT), was recently developed by Skylar-Scott and Uzel et al. (Skylar-Scott et al. 2019). This method involves printing branched vascular networks within a living tissue matrix comprised of densely cellular, organoid building blocks. By embedding a perfusable vasculature within these tissues, one can overcome the nutrient diffusion limitation that gives rise to core necrosis and fibrosis in organoids with diameters above ~500 μm, resulting in a large viable tissue (S. Zhang, Wan, and Kamm 2021; Skylar-Scott et al. 2019). Since SWIFT biomanufacturing is broadly applicable, this method would enable the construction of vascularized kidney tissues using organoids as organ building blocks. In the future, the large scale production of the vascularized kidney tissues from hundreds of thousands of organoids within these engineered tissues will ultimately enable the generation of engineered organ-like structures of kidney containing 1 M+ nephrons akin to human kidneys (Nishinakamura 2019; Bertram et al. 2011).

Kidney organoids to overcome post-transplant immune rejection

Kidney transplantation is currently the optimal treatment for ESKD patients; however, rejection of the allogeneic kidney transplants by the host immune system is a major obstacle, leading to graft loss (Leonardo V. Riella, Djamali, and Pascual 2017; Han et al. 2019). Rejection is caused by an immune response against the transplanted organ, driven by the recognition of the transplanted kidney tissue antigens as foreign bodies by the host immune system. Immune rejection of the transplanted graft is classified as hyperacute, acute, and chronic rejection, based on the histopathological features and the time frame of the rejection process following the transplantation (Abbas, A.K., Lichtman and H., Pillai 2012). In the course of xenotransplantation from pigs or nonhuman primates to humans, both hyperacute and acute humoral or acute cellular rejection would be evoked by the circulating antibodies, complement, neutrophils, natural killer (NK) cells, T cells, and macrophages (Lu et al. 2020). Hyperacute rejection (HAR) is characterized by extensive thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) (Abbas, A.K., Lichtman and H., Pillai 2012; Lu et al. 2020), mediated by multiple factors including pre-existing IgM/IgG alloantibodies of the recipient to the porcine carbohydrate epitopes (Galα1–3Galβ1–4GlcNAc: α1,3Gal epitope), complement activation, and the hypercoagulable state (Ganchiku and Riella 2022; Yang and Sykes 2007). Recently, two studies attempted to overcome the hyperacute rejection by knocking-out α−1,3-galactosyltransferase enzyme and modifying multiple genes associated with complement, coagulant, and immune regulation in the setting of porcine kidney xenotransplantation to brain-dead human recipients (Porrett et al. 2022; Montgomery et al. 2022). However, it is still unclear if those gene editing can prevent TMA in humans for the long-term. In contrast, this hyperacute rejection does not constitute an obstacle for the possible transplantation of human iPSC-derived kidney organoids as human kidney tissues do not express α1,3Gal epitope.

Acute and chronic rejection involve damage to both the graft parenchyma and blood vessels, mediated by alloreactive T cells and alloantibodies against the human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) expressed by the donor organs and/or donor APCs (Heemann and Lutz 2013; Abbas, A.K., Lichtman and H., Pillai 2012; Wehmeier et al. 2017). HLAs are the predominant target of the immune system based on its great heterogeneity and polymorphism between individuals (Montgomery et al. 2018). The degree of HLA mismatch between donor and recipient correlates with the graft survival as the presence of higher mismatches is associated with a significant higher risk of graft failure (Williams et al. 2016). With the future advancement of 3D-biofabricated kidney structures derived from HLA-edited hiPSCs via CRISPR/Cas9 technology, it is conceivable to generate immune-tolerant kidney tissues with manipulated HLA molecules, which enhance the compatibility between donors and recipients, thereby reducing the risk of acute and/or chronic rejection responses. This novel approach may also dampen the need and dosage of current immunosuppressive agents such as calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine, tacrolimus), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, and T cell-depleting induction therapy (Cooper 2020; Pascual et al. 2018). Furthermore, enhancing the expression of coinhibitory receptors on kidney cells may provide an additional protection against the immune response to suppress rejection (L. V. Riella et al. 2012), which might translate into the ultimate personalized therapeutic strategy in transplantation.

Recently, Cowan et al. generated hypoimmunogenic hPSCs using the CRISPR/Cas9 system by ablation of HLA-A/B/C and HLA class II, and overexpression of inhibitory signals such as PD-L1, HLA-G, and CD47 to suppress T cell, NK cell responses, and macrophage engulfment (Han et al. 2019). However, overexpression of checkpoint molecules like PD-L1 bears the risk of malignancy by promoting tumor escape from the immune surveillance (He et al. 2015). In another study, Hotta et al. developed immune compatible iPSCs by preserving HLA-C, inhibitory for NK cells, in the absence of HLA-A/-B and CIITA [major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II transactivator essential for the transcription of class II HLA genes] (Xu et al. 2019). Consequently, twelve HLA-edited (HLA-A- and -B-deleted and HLA-C-retained) iPSC lines could serve as immunologically compatible iPSCs for nearly >90% of the world population (Xu et al. 2019), thereby enabling the generation of universal kidney organoids as building blocks, which can give rise to immune-compatible organotypic kidney structures in the future. Overall, the development of these broadly compatible kidney structures may allow a larger scale and cost-effective therapeutic strategy as an alternative to the generation of patient-specific kidney organoids.

Current limitations of kidney organoid models

Kidney organoids offer a tremendous opportunity for the future medical applications, such as generation of immune compatible bioengineered kidneys for the growing demand from CKD patients. However, this unique technology comes with its own restrictions. When a previous study compared the maturation status of organoids directly differentiated via the Morizane and Takasato protocols by using the single-cell transcriptomics of fetal and adult kidney cells, they demonstrated that the organoids by both protocols gave rise to mostly immature cell types at early differentiation stages (~26 days) with respect to their adult counterparts (Wu et al. 2018). Even though the epithelial cell types of the adult kidney and kidney organoids correlated well, organoid-derived cells tended to express developmental genes. Efforts need to be made to extend the organoid culture for further maturation. In addition, the single-cell transcriptomics suggested the protocol differences. Morizane protocol appears to induce more matured nephron epithelia than Takasato protocol according to Wu’s study. Although it is difficult to have a definitive conclusion due to batch-to-batch variations, further improvements on the current protocols should also be considered. Furthermore, it is essential to improve the current methodology for the evaluation of functional assessment of kidney organoids, which are building blocks for the in vitro bioengineered kidneys (Rizki-Safitri, Traitteur, and Morizane 2021). Therefore, the organoids from established protocols should be tested to confirm the recapitulation of normal kidney functions such as glomerular filtration, tubular reabsorption/secretion, and production of erythropoietin and angiotensin II hormones.

Conclusion

The kidney functions as a critical organ maintaining the homeostasis of body fluid and electrolyte status by effectively removing the metabolic waste products. Acute kidney injury or progressive chronic kidney disease may result in renal insufficiency with serious systemic complications in the patients, who eventually need to undergo renal replacement therapies such as dialysis and transplantation, thereby leading to a high socioeconomical burden in the healthcare system. Conventional research techniques remain insufficient to fully recapitulate the kidney physiology and pathogenesis underlying the complex kidney diseases. Thus, the development of directed differentiation protocols, which simulate in vivo nephrogenesis, enabled the generation of in vitro 3D kidney organoids from hPSCs. Even though the application of patient iPSC-derived kidney organoids advanced our understanding of the kidney maturation, injury, and repair, we still need to facilitate the maturation of glomerular vascularization and incorporate collecting duct system into organoids by modifying the current organoid protocol with additional novel techniques such as 3D-bioprinting and organ-on-a-chip. The ultimate technology of organoids-on-chip may provide the better translational utility for disease modeling and drug screening, potentially replacing the animal models in the future.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the following funding that supported this work:

NIH DP2EB029388 award (R.M.)

NIH U01EB028899/DK127587 grant (J.A.L., R.M.)

NIH UC2DK126023 grant (J.A.L., R.M.)

NIH UH3TR002155 grant (J.A.L., R.M.)

NWO 019.201EN.005 grant by Dutch Research Council (R.C.G.)

Wellcome Leap HOPE program (L.V.R, J.A.L., R.M.)

All authors have read the journal’s authorship agreement and that the manuscript has been reviewed by and approved by all named authors. Authors thank the lab members of Riella, Lewis and Morizane labs for insightful discussion, Kenichi Kobayashi for his supervision during kidney organoid generation, and Annie Moisan, the HOPE Program Director at Wellcome Leap, for interactive discussion about the generation of in vitro 3D kidney tissues derived from immune compatible organoid building blocks.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest

All authors have read the journal’s policy on disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. J.A.L. and R.M. are co-inventors on patents (PCT/US2018/036677) that are assigned to President and Fellows of Harvard College and Mass General Brigham. J.A.L. and R.M. serve on the Scientific Advisory Board of Trestle Biotherapeutics, which has licensed technology from their labs. J.A.L. is a cofounder of AcousticaBio and serves as a scientific advisor for Autodesk, Azul3D, Desktop Health ( a subsidiary of Desktop Metal), Mooji Meats, and Trestle Biotherapeutics. S.G.M.U., and J.A.L. are inventors of the SWIFT biomanufacturing method and have filed a patent on this work.

References

  1. Abbas AK, Lichtman Andrew, and Pillai Shiv. H.. 2012. “Cellular and Molecular Immunology” 7th ed. (Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; ). [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen Monica L, and Winter Lucile M F. 2019. “Animal Models in Biological and Biomedical Research – Experimental and Ethical Concerns.” An Acad Bras Cienc 91 (1): 1–14. 10.1590/0001-3765201720170238.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayan Bugra, Dong Nyoung Heo Zhifeng Zhang, Dey Madhuri, Povilianskas Adomas, Drapaca Corina, and Ozbolat Ibrahim T.. 2020. “Aspiration-Assisted Bioprinting for Precise Positioning of Biologics.” Science Advances 6 (10): 1–17. 10.1126/sciadv.aaw5111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bantounas Ioannis, Ranjzad Parisa, Tengku Faris, Edina Silajdžić Duncan Forster, Marie Claude Asselin Philip Lewis, et al. 2018. “Generation of Functioning Nephrons by Implanting Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Kidney Progenitors.” Stem Cell Reports 10 (3): 766–79. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bar-Ephraim Yotam E., Kretzschmar Kai, and Clevers Hans. 2020. “Organoids in Immunological Research.” Nature Reviews Immunology 20 (5): 279–93. 10.1038/s41577-019-0248-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barak Hila, Sung Ho Huh Shuang Chen, Jeanpierre Cécile, Martinovic Jelena, Parisot Mélanie, Bole-Feysot Christine, et al. 2012. “FGF9 and FGF20 Maintain the Stemness of Nephron Progenitors in Mice and Man.” Developmental Cell 22 (6): 1191–1207. 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bennett Christina N., Ross Sarah E., Longo Kenneth A., Bajnok Laszlo, Hemati Nahid, Johnson Kirk W., Harrison Stephen D., and MacDougald Ormond A.. 2002. “Regulation of Wnt Signaling during Adipogenesis.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 277 (34): 30998–4. 10.1074/jbc.M204527200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Van Den Berg Cathelijne W., Koudijs Angela, Ritsma Laila, and Rabelink Ton J.. 2020. “In Vivo Assessment of Size-Selective Glomerular Sieving in Transplanted Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Kidney Organoids.” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 31 (5): 921–29. 10.1681/ASN.2019060573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. van den Berg Cathelijne W., Ritsma Laila, Avramut M. Cristina, Wiersma Loes E., van den Berg Bernard M., Leuning Daniëlle G., Lievers Ellen, et al. 2018. “Renal Subcapsular Transplantation of PSC-Derived Kidney Organoids Induces Neo-Vasculogenesis and Significant Glomerular and Tubular Maturation In Vivo.” Stem Cell Reports 10 (3): 751–65. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.01.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bergmann Carsten, Guay-Woodford Lisa M., Harris Peter C., Horie Shigeo, Peters Dorien J.M., and Torres Vicente E.. 2018. “Polycystic Kidney Disease.” Nature Reviews Disease Primers 4 (1). 10.1038/s41572-018-0047-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bertram John F., Douglas-Denton Rebecca N., Diouf Boucar, Hughson Michael D., and Hoy Wendy E.. 2011. “Human Nephron Number: Implications for Health and Disease.” Pediatric Nephrology 26 (9): 1529–33. 10.1007/s00467-011-1843-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Beura Lalit K., Hamilton Sara E., Bi Kevin, Schenkel Jason M., Odumade Oludare A., Casey Kerry A., Thompson Emily A., et al. 2016. “Normalizing the Environment Recapitulates Adult Human Immune Traits in Laboratory Mice.” Nature 532 (7600): 512–16. 10.1038/nature17655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Braun Daniela A, and Hildebrandt Friedhelm. 2022. “Ciliopathies.” [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  14. Breda Philippe Christophe, Wiech Thorsten, Meyer-Schwesinger Catherine, Grahammer Florian, Huber Tobias, Panzer Ulf, Tiegs Gisa, and Neumann Katrin. 2019. “Renal Proximal Tubular Epithelial Cells Exert Immunomodulatory Function by Driving Inflammatory CD4+ T Cell Responses.” American Journal of Physiology - Renal Physiology 317 (1): F77–89. 10.1152/ajprenal.00427.2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Burg M, Grantham J, Abramow M, and Orloff J. 1966. “Preparation and Study of Fragments of Single Rabbit Nephrons.” American Journal of Physiology 210 (6): 1293–98. 10.1152/ajplegacy.1966.210.6.1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Carroll Thomas J., and Das Amrita. 2013. “Defining the Signals That Constitute the Nephron Progenitor Niche.” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 24 (6): 873–76. 10.1681/ASN.2012090931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Carroll Thomas J., Park Joo Seop, Hayashi Shigemi, Majumdar Arindam, and McMahon Andrew P.. 2005. “Wnt9b Plays a Central Role in the Regulation of Mesenchymal to Epithelial Transitions Underlying Organogenesis of the Mammalian Urogenital System.” Developmental Cell 9 (2): 283–92. 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Choudhury Mohammad Ikbal, Li Yizeng, Mistriotis Panagiotis, Vasconcelos Ana Carina N, Dixon Eryn E, Yang Jing, Benson Morgan, et al. 2022. “Kidney Epithelial Cells Are Active Mechano-Biological Fluid Pumps.” Nature Communications 13 (1): 1–13. 10.1038/s41467-022-29988-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chun Justin, Riella Cristian V., Chung Hyunjae, Shah Shrijal S., Wang Minxian, Magraner Jose M., Ribas Guilherme T., et al. 2022. “DGAT2 Inhibition Potentiates Lipid Droplet Formation To Reduce Cytotoxicity in APOL1 Kidney Risk Variants.” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN 33 (5): 889–907. 10.1681/ASN.2021050723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Clevers Hans. 2016. “Modeling Development and Disease with Organoids.” Cell 165 (7): 1586–97. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Coelho Silvia, Cabral Guadalupe, Lopes José A., and Jacinto António. 2018. “Renal Regeneration after Acute Kidney Injury.” Nephrology 23 (9): 805–14. 10.1111/nep.13256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Combes Alexander N, Phipson Belinda, Lawlor Kynan T, Dorison Aude, Patrick Ralph, Zappia Luke, Harvey Richard P, Oshlack Alicia, and Little Melissa H. 2019. “Correction: Single Cell Analysis of the Developing Mouse Kidney Provides Deeper Insight into Marker Gene Expression and Ligand-Receptor Crosstalk.” Development (Cambridge) 146 (12). 10.1242/dev.182162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cooper James E. 2020. “Evaluation and Treatment of Acute Rejection in Kidney Allografts.” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 15 (3): 430–38. 10.2215/CJN.11991019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Costantini Frank, and Kopan Raphael. 2010. “Patterning a Complex Organ: Branching Morphogenesis and Nephron Segmentation in Kidney Development.” Developmental Cell 18 (5): 698–712. 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cruz Nelly M., Song Xuewen, Czerniecki Stefan M., Gulieva Ramila E., Churchill Angela J., Kim Yong Kyun, Winston Kosuke, et al. 2017. “Organoid Cystogenesis Reveals a Critical Role of Microenvironment in Human Polycystic Kidney Disease.” Nature Materials 16 (11): 1112–19. 10.1038/NMAT4994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Daly Andrew C., Davidson Matthew D., and Burdick Jason A.. 2021. “3D Bioprinting of High Cell-Density Heterogeneous Tissue Models through Spheroid Fusion within Self-Healing Hydrogels.” Nature Communications 12 (1): 1–13. 10.1038/s41467-021-21029-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Deschamps Jacqueline, and van Nes Johan. 2005. “Developmental Regulation of the Hox Genes during Axial Morphogenesis in the Mouse.” Development 132 (13): 2931–42. 10.1242/dev.01897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dong Lihua, Pietsch Stefan, and Englert Christoph. 2015. “Towards an Understanding of Kidney Diseases Associated with WT1 Mutations.” Kidney International 88 (4): 684–90. 10.1038/ki.2015.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Dressler Gregory R. 2009. “Advances in Early Kidney Specification, Development and Patterning.” Development 136 (23): 3863–74. 10.1242/dev.034876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Duval Kayla, Grover Hannah, Han Li Hsin, Mou Yongchao, Pegoraro Adrian F., Fredberg Jeffery, and Chen Zi. 2017. “Modeling Physiological Events in 2D vs. 3D Cell Culture.” Physiology 32 (4): 266–77. 10.1152/physiol.00036.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Research Misconduct Found]
  31. Ettou Sandrine, Jung Youngsook L., Miyoshi Tomoya, Jain Dhawal, Hiratsuka Ken, Schumacher Valerie, Taglienti Mary E., Morizane Ryuji, Park Peter J., and Kreidberg Jordan A.. 2020. “Epigenetic Transcriptional Reprogramming by WT1 Mediates a Repair Response during Podocyte Injury.” Science Advances 6 (30): 1–14. 10.1126/sciadv.abb5460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Forbes Thomas A., Howden Sara E., Lawlor Kynan, Phipson Belinda, Maksimovic Jovana, Hale Lorna, Wilson Sean, et al. 2018. “Patient-IPSC-Derived Kidney Organoids Show Functional Validation of a Ciliopathic Renal Phenotype and Reveal Underlying Pathogenetic Mechanisms.” American Journal of Human Genetics 102 (5): 816–31. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.03.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Freedman Benjamin S, Brooks Craig R, Lam Albert Q, Fu Hongxia, Morizane Ryuji, Agrawal Vishesh, Saad Abdelaziz F, et al. 2015. “Modelling Kidney Disease with CRISPR-Mutant Kidney Organoids Derived from Human Pluripotent Epiblast Spheroids.” Nature Communications 6. 10.1038/ncomms9715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Freire Analía V., Ropelato María Gabriela, and Rey Rodolfo A.. 2019. “Development and Function of the Ovaries and Testes in the Fetus and Neonate.” Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Endocrinology: Physiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Management, 625–41. 10.1016/B978-0-12-814823-5.00037-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ganchiku Yoshikazu, and Riella Leonardo V.. 2022. “Pig‐to‐human Kidney Transplantation Using Brain‐dead Donors as Recipients: One Giant Leap, or Only One Small Step for Transplantkind?” Xenotransplantation, no. April (May): 1–6. 10.1111/xen.12748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ganeva Veronika, Unbekandt Mathieu, and Davies Jamie A.. 2011. “An Improved Kidney Dissociation and Re-Aggregation Culture System Results in Nephrons Arranged Organotypically around a Single Collecting Duct System.” Organogenesis 7 (2): 83–87. 10.4161/org.7.2.14881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Garreta Elena, Prado Patricia, Tarantino Carolina, Oria Roger, Fanlo Lucia, Martí Elisa, Zalvidea Dobryna, et al. 2019. “Fine Tuning the Extracellular Environment Accelerates the Derivation of Kidney Organoids from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.” Nature Materials 18 (4): 397–405. 10.1038/s41563-019-0287-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gaunt Stephen J., George Martin, and Paul Yu Lee. 2013. “Direct Activation of a Mouse Hoxd11 Axial Expression Enhancer by Gdf11/Smad Signalling.” Developmental Biology 383 (1): 52–60. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Genovese Giulio, Friedman David J., Ross Michael D., Lecordier Laurence, Uzureau Pierrick, Freedman Barry I., Bowden Donald W., et al. 2010. “Association of Trypanolytic ApoL1 Variants with Kidney Disease in African Americans.” Science 329 (5993): 841–45. 10.1126/science.1193032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Goldwich Andreas, Burkard Miriam, Ölke Martha, Daniel Christoph, Amann Kerstin, Hugo Christian, Kurts Christian, Steinkasserer Alexander, and Gessner André. 2013. “Podocytes Are Nonhematopoietic Professional Antigen-Presenting Cells.” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 24 (6): 906–16. 10.1681/ASN.2012020133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Goulart Ernesto, Luiz Carlos de Caires-Junoir, Telles-Silva Kayque Alves, Silva Araujo Bruno Henrique, Rocco Silvana Aparecida, Sforca Mauricio, de Sousa Irene Layane, et al. 2020. “3D Bioprinting of Liver Spheroids Derived from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Sustain Liver Function and Viability in Vitro.” Biofabrication 12: 015010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Grahammer Florian, Schell Christoph, and Huber Tobias B. 2013. “The Podocyte Slit Diaphragm—from a Thin Grey Line to a Complex Signalling Hub.” Nature Reviews Nephrology 9 (10): 587–98. 10.1038/nrneph.2013.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gupta Navin, Dilmen Emre, and Morizane Ryuji. 2021. “3D Kidney Organoids for Bench-to-Bedside Translation.” Journal of Molecular Medicine 99 (4): 477–87. 10.1007/s00109-020-01983-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gupta Navin, Matsumoto Takuya, Hiratsuka Ken, Edgar Garcia Saiz Pierre Galichon, Miyoshi Tomoya, Susa Koichiro, Tatsumoto Narihito, Yamashita Michifumi, and Morizane Ryuji. 2022. “Modeling Injury and Repair in Kidney Organoids Reveals That Homologous Recombination Governs Tubular Intrinsic Repair.” Science Translational Medicine 14 (634): 1–16. 10.1126/scitranslmed.abj4772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Gupta Navin, and Morizane Ryuji. 2021. “Kidney Development to Kidney Organoids and Back Again.” Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, no. September. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Gupta Navin, Susa Koichiro, and Morizane Ryuji. 2017. “Regenerative Medicine, Disease Modeling, and Drug Discovery in Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Kidney Tissue.” European Medical Journal. Reproductive Health 3 (1): 57–67. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31157117%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC6544146. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Hakroush Samy, Kopp Sarah Birgit, Tampe Désirée, Gersmann Ann Kathrin, Korsten Peter, Zeisberg Michael, and Tampe Björn. 2021. “Variable Expression of Programmed Cell Death Protein 1-Ligand 1 in Kidneys Independent of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition.” Frontiers in Immunology 11 (January): 1–7. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.624547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hale Lorna J., Howden Sara E., Phipson Belinda, Lonsdale Andrew, Er Pei X., Ghobrial Irene, Hosawi Salman, et al. 2018. “3D Organoid-Derived Human Glomeruli for Personalised Podocyte Disease Modelling and Drug Screening.” Nature Communications 9 (1). 10.1038/s41467-018-07594-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hamilton Sara E., Badovinac Vladimir P., Beura Lalit K., Pierson Mark, Jameson Stephen C., Masopust David, and Griffith Thomas S.. 2020. “New Insights into the Immune System Using Dirty Mice.” The Journal of Immunology 205 (1): 3–11. 10.4049/jimmunol.2000171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Han Xiao, Wang Mengning, Duan Songwei, Franco Paul J., Kenty Jennifer Hyoje Ryu, Hedrick Preston, Xia Yulei, et al. 2019. “Generation of Hypoimmunogenic Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116 (21): 10441–46. 10.1073/pnas.1902566116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. He Jiabei, Hu Ying, Hu Mingming, and Li Baolan. 2015. “Development of PD-1/PD-L1 Pathway in Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Treatment for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.” Scientific Reports 5: 1–9. 10.1038/srep13110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Heemann Uwe, and Lutz Jens. 2013. “Pathophysiology and Treatment Options of Chronic Renal Allograft Damage.” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 28 (10): 2438–46. 10.1093/ndt/gft087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hill Nathan R., Fatoba Samuel T., Oke Jason L., Hirst Jennifer A., O’Callaghan Christopher A., Lasserson Daniel S., and Hobbs F. D. Richard. 2016. “Global Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Edited by Remuzzi Giuseppe. PLOS ONE 11 (7): 1–18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0158765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hoefele Julia, Mayer Karin, Scholz Manuela, and Klein Hanns Georg. 2011. “Novel PKD1 and PKD2 Mutations in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD).” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 26 (7): 2181–88. 10.1093/ndt/gfq720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Homan Kimberly A., Gupta Navin, Kroll Katharina T., Kolesky David B., Skylar-Scott Mark, Miyoshi Tomoya, Mau Donald, et al. 2019. “Flow-Enhanced Vascularization and Maturation of Kidney Organoids in Vitro.” Nature Methods 16 (3): 255–62. 10.1038/s41592-019-0325-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Huber Tobias B, and Benzing Thomas. 2005. “The Slit Diaphragm: A Signaling Platform to Regulate Podocyte Function.” Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension 14 (3): 211–16. 10.1097/01.mnh.0000165885.85803.a8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Humphreys Benjamin D., Valerius M. Todd, Kobayashi Akio, Mugford Joshua W., Soeung Savuth, Duffield Jeremy S., McMahon Andrew P., and Bonventre Joseph V.. 2008. “Intrinsic Epithelial Cells Repair the Kidney after Injury.” Cell Stem Cell 2 (3): 284–91. 10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Iimura Tadahiro, and Pourquié Olivier. 2006. “Collinear Activation of Hoxb Genes during Gastrulation Is Linked to Mesoderm Cell Ingression.” Nature 442 (7102): 568–71. 10.1038/nature04838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Jansen J,M Fedecostante M Wilmer J, Peters JG, Kreuser UM, van den Broek PH, Mensink RA, et al. 2016. “Bioengineered Kidney Tubules Efficiently Excrete Uremic Toxins.” Scientific Reports 6 (1): 26715. 10.1038/srep26715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Jourde-Chiche Noemie, Fakhouri Fadi, Dou Laetitia, Bellien Jeremy, Burtey Stéphane, Frimat Marie, Jarrot Pierre André, et al. 2019. “Endothelium Structure and Function in Kidney Health and Disease.” Nature Reviews Nephrology 15 (2): 87–108. 10.1038/s41581-018-0098-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Junhee Seok H Warren Shaw, Alex G. Cuenca, Michael N. Mindrinos, Henry V. Baker, Xu Weihong, Richards Daniel R., et al. 2013. “Genomic Responses in Mouse Models Poorly Mimic Human Inflammatory Diseases.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (9): 3507–12. 10.1073/pnas.1222878110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Kaku Yusuke, Taguchi Atsuhiro, Tanigawa Shunsuke, Haque Fahim, Sakuma Tetsushi, Yamamoto Takashi, and Nishinakamura Ryuichi. 2017. “PAX2 Is Dispensable for in Vitro Nephron Formation from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.” Scientific Reports 7 (1): 1–12. 10.1038/s41598-017-04813-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Karner Courtney M., Das Amrita, Ma Zhendong, Self Michelle, Chen Chuo, Lum Lawrence, Oliver Guillermo, and Carroll Thomas J.. 2011. “Canonical Wnt9b Signaling Balances Progenitor Cell Expansion and Differentiation during Kidney Development.” Development 138 (7): 1247–57. 10.1242/dev.057646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Kuppe Christoph, Ibrahim Mahmoud M., Kranz Jennifer, Zhang Xiaoting, Ziegler Susanne, Perales-Patón Javier, Jansen Jitske, et al. 2021. “Decoding Myofibroblast Origins in Human Kidney Fibrosis.” Nature 589 (7841): 281–86. 10.1038/s41586-020-2941-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Lawlor Kynan T., Vanslambrouck Jessica M., Higgins J. William, Chambon Alison, Bishard Kristina, Arndt Derek, Er Pei Xuan, et al. 2021. “Cellular Extrusion Bioprinting Improves Kidney Organoid Reproducibility and Conformation.” Nature Materials 20 (2): 260–71. 10.1038/s41563-020-00853-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Lee Han Na, Yoon Young Choi Jin Won Kim, Young Seo Lee Ji Wook Choi, Kang Taewook, Kim Yong Kyun, and Chung Bong Guen. 2021. “Effect of Biochemical and Biomechanical Factors on Vascularization of Kidney Organoid-on-a-Chip.” Nano Convergence 8 (1). 10.1186/s40580-021-00285-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Lemos Dario R., McMurdo Michael, Karaca Gamze, Wilflingseder Julia, Leaf Irina A., Gupta Navin, Miyoshi Tomoya, et al. 2018. “Interleukin-1b Activates a MYC-Dependent Metabolic Switch in Kidney Stromal Cells Necessary for Progressive Tubulointerstitial Fibrosis.” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 29 (6): 1690–1705. 10.1681/ASN.2017121283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Little Melissa H., and Combes Alexander N.. 2019. “Kidney Organoids: Accurate Models or Fortunate Accidents.” Genes and Development 33 (19–20): 1319–45. 10.1101/gad.329573.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Low Jian Hui, Li Pin, Chew Elaine Guo Yan, Zhou Bingrui, Suzuki Keiichiro, Zhang Tian, Lian Michelle Mulan, et al. 2019. “Generation of Human PSC-Derived Kidney Organoids with Patterned Nephron Segments and a De Novo Vascular Network.” Cell Stem Cell 25 (3): 373–87. 10.1016/j.stem.2019.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Lu Tianyu, Yang Bochao, Wang Ruolin, and Qin Chuan. 2020. “Xenotransplantation: Current Status in Preclinical Research.” Frontiers in Immunology 10 (January). 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Maeshima Akito, Yamashita Shin, Maeshima Kyoko, Kojima Itaru, and Nojima Yoshihisa. 2003. “Activin A Produced by Ureteric Bud Is a Differentiation Factor for Metanephric Mesenchyme.” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 14 (6): 1523–34. 10.1097/01.ASN.0000067419.86611.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Montgomery Robert A., Stern Jeffrey M., Lonze Bonnie E., Tatapudi Vasishta S., Mangiola Massimo, Wu Ming, Weldon Elaina, et al. 2022. “Results of Two Cases of Pig-to-Human Kidney Xenotransplantation.” New England Journal of Medicine 386 (20): 1889–98. 10.1056/nejmoa2120238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Montgomery Robert A., Tatapudi Vasishta S., Leffell Mary S., and Zachary Andrea A.. 2018. “HLA in Transplantation.” Nature Reviews Nephrology 14 (9): 558–70. 10.1038/s41581-018-0039-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Morizane Ryuji, and Bonventre Joseph V. 2017. “Generation of Nephron Progenitor Cells and Kidney Organoids from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.” Nature Protocols 12 (1): 195–207. 10.1038/nprot.2016.170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Morizane Ryuji, Lam Albert Q., Freedman Benjamin S., Kishi Seiji, Valerius M. Todd, and Bonventre Joseph V.. 2015. “Nephron Organoids Derived from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells Model Kidney Development and Injury.” Nature Biotechnology 33 (11): 1193–1200. 10.1038/nbt.3392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Mugford Joshua W., Sipilä Petra, McMahon Jill A., and McMahon Andrew P.. 2008. “Osr1 Expression Demarcates a Multi-Potent Population of Intermediate Mesoderm That Undergoes Progressive Restriction to an Osr1-Dependent Nephron Progenitor Compartment within the Mammalian Kidney.” Developmental Biology 324 (1): 88–98. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Nashimoto Yuji, Okada Ryu, Hanada Sanshiro, Arima Yuichiro, Nishiyama Koichi, Miura Takashi, and Yokokawa Ryuji. 2020. “Vascularized Cancer on a Chip: The Effect of Perfusion on Growth and Drug Delivery of Tumor Spheroid.” Biomaterials 229 (October 2019): 119547. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Nishinakamura Ryuichi. 2019. “Human Kidney Organoids: Progress and Remaining Challenges.” Nature Reviews Nephrology 15 (10): 613–24. 10.1038/s41581-019-0176-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Pascual Julio, Berger Stefan P., Witzke Oliver, Tedesco Helio, Mulgaonkar Shamkant, Qazi Yasir, Chadban Steven, et al. 2018. “Everolimus with Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor Exposure in Renal Transplantation.” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 29 (7): 1979–91. 10.1681/asn.2018010009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Porrett Paige M., Orandi Babak J., Kumar Vineeta, Houp Julie, Anderson Douglas, Killian A. Cozette, Hauptfeld-Dolejsek Vera, et al. 2022. “First Clinical-Grade Porcine Kidney Xenotransplant Using a Human Decedent Model.” American Journal of Transplantation 22 (4): 1037–53. 10.1111/ajt.16930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Potter S. Steven, Hartman Heather A., Kwan Kin M., Behringer Richard R., and Patterson Larry T.. 2007. “Laser Capture-Microarray Analysis of Lim1 Mutant Kidney Development.” Genesis 45 (7): 432–39. 10.1002/dvg.20309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Riella LV, Paterson AM, Sharpe AH, and Chandraker A. 2012. “Role of the PD-1 Pathway in the Immune Response.” American Journal of Transplantation 12 (10): 2575–87. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04224.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Riella Leonardo V., Djamali Arjang, and Pascual Julio. 2017. “Chronic Allograft Injury: Mechanisms and Potential Treatment Targets.” Transplantation Reviews 31 (1): 1–9. 10.1016/j.trre.2016.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Rizki-Safitri Astia, Traitteur Tamara, and Morizane Ryuji. 2021. “Bioengineered Kidney Models: Methods and Functional Assessments.” Function 2 (4): 1–17. 10.1093/function/zqab026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Ryan Anne R., England Alicia R., Chaney Christopher P., Cowdin Mitzy A., Hiltabidle Max, Daniel Edward, Gupta Ashwani Kumar, Oxburgh Leif, Carroll Thomas J., and Cleaver Ondine. 2021. “Vascular Deficiencies in Renal Organoids and Ex Vivo Kidney Organogenesis.” Developmental Biology 477 (April): 98–116. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2021.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Saxen Lauri. 1987. Organogenesis of the Kidney. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511565083. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Schell C, Wanner N, and Huber TB. 2014. “Glomerular Development - Shaping the Multi-Cellular Filtration Unit.” Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 36: 39–49. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Sharp Cierra N., Doll Mark A., Megyesi Judit, Oropilla Gabrielle B., Beverly Levi J., and Siskind Leah J.. 2018. “Subclinical Kidney Injury Induced by Repeated Cisplatin Administration Results in Progressive Chronic Kidney Disease.” American Journal of Physiology - Renal Physiology 315 (1): F161–72. 10.1152/ajprenal.00636.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Skylar-Scott Mark A., Uzel Sebastien G.M., Nam Lucy L., Ahrens John H., Truby Ryan L., Damaraju Sarita, and Lewis Jennifer A.. 2019. “Biomanufacturing of Organ-Specific Tissues with High Cellular Density and Embedded Vascular Channels.” Science Advances 5 (9): 1–13. 10.1126/sciadv.aaw2459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Solanki Ashish K., Arif Ehtesham, Srivastava Pankaj, Furcht Christopher M., Rahman Bushra, Wen Pei, Singh Avinash, et al. 2021. “Phosphorylation of Slit Diaphragm Proteins NEPHRIN and NEPH1 upon Binding of HGF Promotes Podocyte Repair.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 297 (3): 101079. 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Starke Astrid, Lindenmeyer Maja T., Segerer Stephan, Neusser Matthias A., Barbara Rüsi Daniel M. Schmid, Cohen Clemens D., Wüthrich Rudolf P., Fehr Thomas, and Waeckerle-Men Ying. 2010. “Renal Tubular PD-L1 (CD274) Suppresses Alloreactive Human T-Cell Responses.” Kidney International 78 (1): 38–47. 10.1038/ki.2010.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Taguchi Atsuhiro, Kaku Yusuke, Ohmori Tomoko, Sharmin Sazia, Ogawa Minetaro, Sasaki Hiroshi, and Nishinakamura Ryuichi. 2014. “Redefining the in Vivo Origin of Metanephric Nephron Progenitors Enables Generation of Complex Kidney Structures from Pluripotent Stem Cells.” Cell Stem Cell 14 (1): 53–67. 10.1016/j.stem.2013.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Takasato M, Er PX, Becroft M, Vanslambrouck JM, Stanley EG, Elefanty AG, and Little MH. 2014. “Directing Human Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation towards a Renal Lineage Generates a Self-Organizing Kidney.” Nature Cell Biology 16 (1): 118–26. 10.1038/ncb2894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Takasato Minoru, Er Pei X., Chiu Han S., Maier Barbara, Baillie Gregory J., Ferguson Charles, Parton Robert G., et al. 2015. “Kidney Organoids from Human IPS Cells Contain Multiple Lineages and Model Human Nephrogenesis.” Nature 526 (7574): 564–68. 10.1038/nature15695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Tanigawa Shunsuke, Islam Mazharul, Sharmin Sazia, Naganuma Hidekazu, Yoshimura Yasuhiro, Haque Fahim, Era Takumi, et al. 2018. “Organoids from Nephrotic Disease-Derived IPSCs Identify Impaired NEPHRIN Localization and Slit Diaphragm Formation in Kidney Podocytes.” Stem Cell Reports 11 (3): 727–40. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Tanigawa Shunsuke, Tanaka Etsuko, Miike Koichiro, Ohmori Tomoko, Inoue Daisuke, Chen Leng Cai Atsuhiro Taguchi, Kobayashi Akio, and Nishinakamura Ryuichi. 2022. “Generation of the Organotypic Kidney Structure by Integrating Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Renal Stroma.” Nature Communications 13 (1): 1–15. 10.1038/s41467-022-28226-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Tekguc Murat, James Badger Wing Motonao Osaki, Long Jia, and Sakaguchi Shimon. 2021. “Treg-Expressed CTLA-4 Depletes CD80/CD86 by Trogocytosis, Releasing Free PD-L1 on Antigen-Presenting Cells.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118 (30): 1–12. 10.1073/pnas.2023739118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Tran Tracy, Lindström Nils O., Ransick Andrew, De Sena Brandine Guilherme, Guo Qiuyu, Kim Albert D., Der Balint, et al. 2019. “In Vivo Developmental Trajectories of Human Podocyte Inform In Vitro Differentiation of Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Podocytes.” Developmental Cell 50 (1): 102–16. 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Trautmann Agnes, Bodria Monica, Ozaltin Fatih, Gheisari Alaleh, Melk Anette, Azocar Marta, Anarat Ali, et al. 2015. “Spectrum of Steroid-Resistant and Congenital Nephrotic Syndrome in Children: The PodoNet Registry Cohort.” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 10 (4): 592–600. 10.2215/CJN.06260614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Uchino Shigehiko, John A Kellum Rinaldo Bellomo, Gordon S Doig Hiroshi Morimatsu, Morgera Stanislao, Schetz Miet, et al. 2005. “Acute Renal Failure in Critically Ill Patients: A Multinational, Multicenter Study.” JAMA 294 (7): 813–18. 10.1001/jama.294.7.813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Unbekandt Mathieu, and Davies Jamie A.. 2010. “Dissociation of Embryonic Kidneys Followed by Reaggregation Allows the Formation of Renal Tissues.” Kidney International 77 (5): 407–16. 10.1038/ki.2009.482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Vaidya Vishal S., Ozer Josef S., Dieterle Frank, Collings Fitz B., Ramirez Victoria, Troth Sean, Muniappa Nagaraja, et al. 2010. “Kidney Injury Molecule-1 Outperforms Traditional Biomarkers of Kidney Injury in Preclinical Biomarker Qualification Studies.” Nature Biotechnology 28 (5): 478–85. 10.1038/nbt.1623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Wearn JT, and Richards AN. 1924. “OBSERVATIONS ON THE COMPOSITION OF GLOMERULAR URINE, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE PROBLEM OF REABSORPTION IN THE RENAL TUBULES.” American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content 71 (1): 209–27. 10.1152/ajplegacy.1924.71.1.209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  104. Wehmeier C, Hönger G, Cun H, Amico P, Hirt-Minkowski P, Georgalis A, Hopfer H, Dickenmann M, Steiger J, and Schaub S. 2017. “Donor Specificity but Not Broadness of Sensitization Is Associated With Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Graft Loss in Renal Allograft Recipients.” American Journal of Transplantation 17 (8): 2092–2102. 10.1111/ajt.14247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Whiting PH, and Brown PAJ. 1996. “The Relationship between Enzymuria and Kidney Enzyme Activities in Experimental Gentamicin Nephrotoxicity.” Renal Failure 18 (6): 899–909. 10.3109/08860229609047716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Wiggins RC 2007. “The Spectrum of Podocytopathies: A Unifying View of Glomerular Diseases.” Kidney International 71 (12): 1205–14. 10.1038/sj.ki.5002222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Williams Robert C., Opelz Gerhard, McGarvey Chelsea J., Weil E. Jennifer, and Chakkera Harini A.. 2016. “The Risk of Transplant Failure With HLA Mismatch in First Adult Kidney Allografts From Deceased Donors.” Transplantation 100 (5): 1094–1102. 10.1097/TP.0000000000001115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Wilson Sean B., Howden Sara E., Vanslambrouck Jessica M., Dorison Aude, Alquicira-Hernandez Jose Powell Joseph E., and Little Melissa H.. 2022. “DevKidCC Allows for Robust Classification and Direct Comparisons of Kidney Organoid Datasets.” Genome Medicine 14 (1): 1–25. 10.1186/s13073-022-01023-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Wing James B, Tekgüç Murat, and Sakaguchi Shimon. 2018. “Control of Germinal Center Responses by T-Follicular Regulatory Cells.” Frontiers in Immunology 9 (1910): 1–12. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Wu Haojia, Uchimura Kohei, Donnelly Erinn L., Kirita Yuhei, Morris Samantha A., and Humphreys Benjamin D.. 2018. “Comparative Analysis and Refinement of Human PSC-Derived Kidney Organoid Differentiation with Single-Cell Transcriptomics.” Cell Stem Cell 23 (6): 869–881.e8. 10.1016/j.stem.2018.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Xia Yun, Nivet Emmanuel, Ignacio Sancho-Martinez Thomas Gallegos, Suzuki Keiichiro, Okamura Daiji, Wu Min Zu, et al. 2013. “Directed Differentiation of Human Pluripotent Cells to Ureteric Bud Kidney Progenitor-Like Cells.” Nature Cell Biology 15 (12): 1507–15. 10.1038/ncb2872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Xinaris Christodoulos, Benedetti Valentina, Rizzo Paola, Abbate Mauro, Corna Daniela, Azzollini Nadia, Conti Sara, et al. 2012. “In Vivo Maturation of Functional Renal Organoids Formed from Embryonic Cell Suspensions.” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 23 (11): 1857–68. 10.1681/ASN.2012050505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Xu Huaigeng, Wang Bo, Ono Miyuki, Kagita Akihiro, Fujii Kaho, Sasakawa Noriko, Ueda Tatsuki, et al. 2019. “Targeted Disruption of HLA Genes via CRISPR-Cas9 Generates IPSCs with Enhanced Immune Compatibility.” Cell Stem Cell 24 (4): 566–578.e7. 10.1016/j.stem.2019.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Yang Yong Guang, and Sykes Megan. 2007. “Xenotransplantation: Current Status and a Perspective on the Future.” Nature Reviews Immunology 7 (7): 519–31. 10.1038/nri2099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Yokote Shinya, Matsunari Hitomi, Iwai Satomi, Yamanaka Shuichiro, Uchikura Ayuko, Fujimoto Eisuke, Matsumoto Kei, Nagashima Hiroshi, Kobayashi Eiji, and Yokoo Takashi. 2015. “Urine Excretion Strategy for Stem Cell-Generated Embryonic Kidneys.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 (42): 201507803. 10.1073/pnas.1507803112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Zhang Shun, Wan Zhengpeng, and Kamm Roger D.. 2021. “Vascularized Organoids on a Chip: Strategies for Engineering Organoids with Functional Vasculature.” Lab on a Chip 21 (3): 473–88. 10.1039/d0lc01186j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Zhang Yu Shrike, Arneri Andrea, Bersini Simone, Shin Su-Ryon, Zhu Kai, Zahra Goli-Malekabadi Julio Aleman, et al. 2016. “Bioprinting 3D Microfibrous Scaffolds for Engineering Endothelialized Myocardium and Heart-on-a-Chip.” Biomaterials 110 (December): 45–59. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES