Harnessing the role of mitogen-activated protein kinases against abiotic stresses in plants

Abstract

Crop plants are vulnerable to various biotic and abiotic stresses, whereas plants tend to retain their physiological mechanisms by evolving cellular regulation. To mitigate the adverse effects of abiotic stresses, many defense mechanisms are induced in plants. One of these mechanisms is the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade, a signaling pathway used in the transduction of extracellular stimuli into intercellular responses. This stress signaling pathway is activated by a series of responses involving MAPKKKs→MAPKKs→MAPKs, consisting of interacting proteins, and their functions depend on the collaboration and activation of one another by phosphorylation. These proteins are key regulators of MAPK in various crop plants under abiotic stress conditions and also related to hormonal responses. It is revealed that in response to stress signaling, MAPKs are characterized as multigenic families and elaborate the specific stimuli transformation as well as the antioxidant regulation system. This pathway is directed by the framework of proteins and stopping domains confer the related associates with unique structure and functions. Early studies of plant MAPKs focused on their functions in model plants. Based on the results of whole-genome sequencing, many MAPKs have been identified in plants, such as Arbodiposis, tomato, potato, alfalfa, poplar, rice, wheat, maize, and apple. In this review, we summarized the recent work on MAPK response to abiotic stress and the classification of MAPK cascade in crop plants. Moreover, we highlighted the modern research methodologies such as transcriptomics, proteomics, CRISPR/Cas technology, and epigenetic studies, which proposed, identified, and characterized the novel genes associated with MAPKs and their role in plants under abiotic stress conditions. In-silico-based identification of novel MAPK genes also facilitates future research on MAPK cascade identification and function in crop plants under various stress conditions.

1. Introduction

One of the sustainable development goals is to end world hunger, and feeding a growing population is a significant worldwide societal concern (Raza et al., 2021; Farooq et al., 2022; Rivero et al., 2022). Despite the world’s population doubling, the long-term drop in global undernourishment has been caused by a substantial rise in food availability since 1960 (Ritchie and Roser, 2020). Nevertheless, there are currently more than 820 million hungry people around the globe (FAO et al., 2019). Only 9% of the world’s agricultural land is suitable for growing crops, while the remaining 91% is subjected to abiotic stress, which frequently occurs in combination. Abiotic stresses cause losses in agricultural productivity of more than 50% (Raza, 2021; Rivero et al., 2022). Still, due to climate change and the overuse of natural resources, their severity and adverse effects are anticipated to increase significantly, which not only reduce crop production but also cause food insecurity in the near future (Minhas et al., 2017; Farooq et al., 2022; Rivero et al., 2022).

Due to industrialization and climate change in recent decades, plants are normally exposed to various abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, extreme temperature ranges, nutrient deficiency, high heavy metal concentrations, and osmosis stress (Haider et al., 2021; Raza et al., 2021; Raza et al., 2022a; Raza et al., 2022b; Raza et al., 2022c; Raza et al., 2022d; Raza et al., 2022e). They cause a lot of damage to plants’ physiology and also reduce growth and development that ultimately minimizes the productivity of crop plants (Anjum et al., 2017). To ensure good crop growth and optimum productivity, stress tolerance mechanisms are imperative to be studied for combating abiotic stresses in crop plants (Baer-Nawrocka and Sadowski, 2019; Raza et al., 2022a; Raza et al., 2022b; Raza et al., 2022c). Understanding these stress tolerance mechanisms will enable the generation of more climate-smart and stress-tolerant lines, which will maintain stability in the growth and productivity of agricultural productivity. For this, it is necessary to understand the genetic basis of a plant’s interaction when encountering ecological stress. Several studies considering transcriptomics, genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and genome editing via CRISPR/Cas technology provide a roadmap toward the acclimatization mechanism in plants and crops (Wang et al., 2019; Raza et al., 2022a; Raza et al., 2022b; Raza et al., 2022c; Raza et al., 2022d; Yaqoob et al., 2023). In-depth molecular studies aid us in developing varieties and cultivars through biotechnology, genetic engineering, and other advanced breeding methods to develop plants that could adapt to different abiotic stresses in a short time (Popescu et al., 2009; Raza et al., 2022a; Raza et al., 2022b; Yaqoob et al., 2023). Post-translational modification and signal transduction are mediated by a process called phosphorylation, which changes the expression of genes through transmission of protein signals. A serine/threonine-protein kinase family called mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) is one of the widely studied gene families and contributes to plant productivity under fluctuating environmental conditions (Hamel et al., 2006).

In this regard, one of the major signal transduction pathways that transduce extracellular stimuli into intracellular responses related to stress is mitogen-activated protein kinase (Mathobo et al., 2017). The first MAPK encoding gene was cloned in the 1990s; to date, many MAPK genes have been identified and isolated from different plants (Zaıdi et al., 2010), which are activated under abiotic stresses like AtMPK4 and AtMPK6 in Arabidopsis and in rice (Oryza sativa) and OsMAPK5 and OsMAPK2 under drought stress (Nadarajah and Sidek, 2010). The abscisic acid (ABA) signaling pathway regulates plant growth and development under abiotic stress conditions, such as drought or high salinity (Cutler et al., 2010). Phosphorylation of two ABA-responsive transcription factors (ABF1 and ABF4) by AtCPK4, 11, and 32 suggested the role of kinases in regulating ABA signaling through these transcription factors under stress conditions (Choi et al., 2005). Using a yeast two-hybrid test, researchers looked at the interactions between 30 members of the MPK family, 9 CPKs, 8 PP2Cs, 5 SnRKs, and 8 PP2Cs in maize’s (Zea mays) MAPK signaling pathways. Moreover, three ZmCPKs connect with three distinct ZmSnRK members, whereas four ZmCPK members positively interact with 13 different ZmMPK members in various combinations. These four ZmCPK proteins originate from three distinct maize groupings. These physical connections between ZmCPKs, ZmSnRKs, and ZmMPKs revealed that these signaling pathways might interact directly with the defense mechanism in maize and have indirect effects. The current work might contribute to a better understanding of plant signal transduction (Khalid et al., 2019). Concerning the downregulation of ZmMPK5, due to ZmCPK11 silencing, the role of ZmCPK11 upstream of ZmMPK5 has been proposed (Ding et al., 2013).

MAPK gene families consist of a vast number of genes that are classified into four different groups: A, B, C, and D. Owing to the evolutionary divergence in different plants, these groups contain a different number of MAPK genes; some of them are listed in Figure 1 and Table 1 . This MAPK signaling cascade works like a chain reaction as mitogen-activated protein kinsase kinase (MAPKK) is activated by the upstream of the mitogen-activated kinase (MAPKKK), which, in turn, activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (Wang et al., 2014; Mitula et al., 2015). This full chain of MAPKs is conserved in plants, which signifies the evolutionary perspective of MAPKs. One of the most important methods that is triggered by posttranslational modification of signal transduction is called phosphorylation (Wang et al., 2019). MAPKKK phosphorylates MAPKK on the conserved serine/threonine motifs (Rodriguez et al., 2010), which finally brings about the phosphorylation of TXY (T is threonine, Y is tyrosine, and X is any amino acid) in MAPKs (Taj et al., 2010).

Figure 1.

(A) Phylogenetic analysis of plant mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and MAPK-likes in 13 plant species following Bayesian inference. Different colors indicate different species. The monocot clade and the PP sequence with the atypical MEY activation loop within the TEY-B clade are marked by asterisks. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of MAPKKKs in grapevine, apple, tomato, and Arabidopsis using the neighbor-joining (NJ) tree using MEGA-X with 1,000 bootstraps. Adapted from He et al. (2020) and Janitza et al. (2012), open-access articles distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).

Table 1.

Identification of groups of MAPK gene families in different plant species.

Plant species	Group A	Group B	Group C	Group D	Total	References
Arabidopsis	3	5	4	8	20	Cçakır and Kılıcçkaya (2015)
Rice	2	1	2	10	15	Reyna and Yang (2006)
Wheat	11	13	22	63	109	Lian et al. (2012)
Maize	7	7	6	19	39	Wang et al. (2010)
Cotton	4	6	5	12	27	Wang et al. (2016)
Poplar	4	4	4	9	21	Zhao et al. (2018)
Tomato	3	4	2	7	16	Kong et al. (2012)
Apple	5	6	5	10	26	Zhang et al. (2013)
Potato	1	4	2	8	15	Zaynab et al. (2021)

Transcription factors and downstream kinases activate the cell after receiving extracellular signals from the activated MAPKs, which describe the variation of the cellular development factors (Zhang et al., 2018). The process of transmission and amplification of signals occurs in stepwise phosphorylation (Hamel et al., 2006). When plants are encountered by any abiotic stress or wounding, MAPK, as well as other hormones like ethylene, jasmonic acid, and salicylic acid, are activated. Studies also suggested that pathogen stimuli also cause the induction of MAPKs in various plants like alfalfa (Medicago sativa), rice (Orzya sativa), maize (Z. mays), and potato (Solanum tuberosum) (Andrasi et al., 2019). Under adverse environmental conditions like high temperature and water scarcity, MAPKs play a key role in signal transduction (Muhammad et al., 2019). Studies also have revealed that MAPK cascade is also activated under salt stress and freezing temperature (Teige et al., 2004). Shreds of evidence provide the signaling activation of MAPKs during early wounding in different plants such as Arbodiposis, apple (Malus hupehensis), poplar (Populous alba), and rice, as reported previously (Takahashi et al., 2011). Recently, many MAPK genes have been identified, which play a role under various stress conditions, but there is little knowledge on the molecular mechanisms of MAPK triggering and signaling ( Figure 1 ) (Mohanta et al., 2015). The available knowledge about the molecular characterization of the MAPK gene family under abiotic stress is summarized owing to need for more information about MAPK signaling and triggering in many crops. In this review, we will focus on the action of transcription factors, transcriptomic studies, and the molecular basis for understanding the biological, biochemical, and physiological processes of different plants under abiotic stresses. Furthermore, we summarized the classification of different MAPK gene families in response to abiotic stress in plants and molecular and cellular signaling pathways in plants for acclimatization under an adverse environment. After all, many phosphorylated MAPKs play a role in signal transmission. In short, incorporating MAPK gene families in plant breeding to produce stress-smart varieties is another aspect of research in MAPKs. This review may help to comprehend the ecological importance of MAPKs in plants to overcome the abiotic stresses for sustainable crop production and also provide new insights for breeders to incorporate MAPK gene families in plant breeding program to produce abiotic stress resistance varieties.

2. Mechanism of MAPKs in crop plants

Plants have acquired different acclimatization strategies under harsh environmental conditions over time via a number of molecular systems that consist of sensing, signaling, and expression under stress conditions by stress-responsive genes (Mahmood et al., 2020). MAPKs are one of the tools that regulate growth and development, cell division, proliferation, apoptosis, hormonal response, and other stress responses by an extremely conserved network. It consists of the three protein kinases MAPK, MAPKK, and MAPKKK. Sequential phosphorylation activates these cascades such as activation of MAPKKK phosphorylates the S/T-X (S/T is a serine/threonine and X is an arbitrary amino acid) conserved motif that is present in the activation loop of MAPKK (Rodriguez et al., 2010); then, the activation of MAPKK phosphorylates the T-X-Y (T is threonine, Y is tyrosine, and X is any amino acid) in the variant motif present in the activation loop of MAPK (Taj et al., 2010). Then, these MAPK cascades send the message in a well-designed manner to the primary genes responsive to tolerance and then to secondary genes, which induce tolerance in crops under stress conditions (Hamel et al., 2006). The MAPK cascades are also phosphorylated by the following activities such as regulation of microtubule proteins, cytoskeletal activities, and other transcription factors that help in numerous responses and phospholipases (Danquah et al., 2014). The transmission of extracellular stimuli into cells and downstream kinases is also activated by MAPK cascades (Xu et al., 2010). The main channel of signal transduction and post-transcriptional modification is carried out by phosphorylation. The process of phosphorylation is a post-translational modification process that alters the expression of downstream genes as well as diffuses and intensifies the external signals (Colcombet and Hirt, 2008).

One of the wide-ranging gene families is the serine/threonine protein kinase family of MAPKs, which are protein kinases and are enzymatic in nature and mediate phosphorylation (Rodriguez et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2010). Conventionally, MAPK cascades transmit signals downstream by the activation of the stimulated receptors of the cell membrane (Wang et al., 2014). By following this mechanism, MAPKs, after activation, control the expression of many genes and proteins by the phosphorylation of transcription factors. This mechanism in plants plays a key role in cell differentiation, cell growth, development, and hormonal movement, and in response to various biotic and abiotic stresses (Komis et al., 2018). In crop species, the MAPK gene families are recognized owing to the many tolerant genes in abiotic stress response, evident from genetic studies of MAPK activity in recent years (SŠamajovaí et al., 2013). The MAPK mechanism is depicted in Figure 2 , where extracellular signals are detected by a plasma membrane and by sensors in cytoplasm, which act like a chain reaction, leading to the activation of MAPKKK and, subsequently, MAPKK and, as a result, phosphorylation of MAPK, which helps in the phosphorylation of proteins, enzymes, and post-transcriptional factors in the nucleus. These factors finally send a message to stress-tolerant responsive genes (Bigeard and Hirt, 2018; Singh et al., 2019). By understanding this novel mechanism, MAPK genes can be identified in different crop plants, which may help in maintaining plant growth under various abiotic stress conditions, but still, there is a limitation due to the activation of other intricate stress responsive mechanisms.

Figure 2.

The receptors after receiving the signals activate the specific mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) proteins that are inactive before. Subsequently, MAP4K activates other MAPKs (including MAP2K and MAP3K) by phosphorylating the ST (S/T is serine/threonine) and TXY (T is threonine, Y is tyrosine, and X is any amino acid) motif in MAPKs (Rodriguez et al., 2010; Taj et al., 2010). As a result, MAPKs activate the transcription factors (TFs), enzymes, and other downstream kinases that transmit extracellular environmental signals to the cells that play a role in growth, development, stress response, and other physiological and biochemical processes (Zhang et al., 2018).

3. MAPK complexity in abiotic stress signaling interaction

Abiotic stresses, such as drought, cold, heat, salinity, and metals, are closely associated with an adverse influence on the physiology of plants (Krasensky and Jonak, 2012; Raza, 2021; Raza et al., 2021; Raza et al., 2022a; Raza et al., 2022b; Raza et al., 2022c; Raza et al., 2022d). For example, when the temperature rises, water deficiency, salinity, and osmotic pressure in the tissues of plants may be encountered (Bita and Gerats, 2013). Likewise, due to salinity and water scarcity, plants suffer from osmotic stress, and signaling molecules are activated in response to stress conditions (Rengasamy, 2006). The mechanism of expression of resistance genes in various plants like maize (Z. mays), rice (O. sativa), potato (S. tuberosum), and Arabidopsis is regulated under various abiotic stress conditions, which are activated by messenger-mediated signal transduction (Zhu, 2016; Zandalinas et al., 2019). The large numbers of stress-responsive genes like MAPK genes or MAPK cascades participate in a variety of abiotic stresses for the protection and survival of plants (Ji et al., 2017; Yanagawa et al., 2017). MAPK gene families have multiple functions in plants, such as growth and development, immune defense system, and response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Certain studies also point toward the role of MAPK cascade in the regulation of cell death and defense responses (Qiu et al., 2008; Zhou et al., 2017).

Recently, it was also reported that MAPK cascade has a dual function in plant immunity: the basal resistance is regulated positively and immunity regulation is facilitated negatively by kinase protein (Zhang et al., 2012). One case reported in Arabidopsis also provides evidence that MAPKs play a vital role in pathogen signaling (Doczi et al., 2007). Furthermore, MAPK cascade mediates Ca²⁺ reactive oxygen species (ROS) by signaling during early wounding (Pitzschke and Hirt, 2009). MAPK pathways regulate the synthesis of ROS, and certain genes of MAPKs are induced by ROS generation (Colcombet and Hirt, 2008). H₂O₂ also plays a key role in activating orthologs of MAPKs in many crops like tobacco (Nicotiana tobacum) and Arabidopsis (Xing et al., 2008). MAPK cascade in Arabidopsis regulates H₂O₂ metabolism (Nakagami et al., 2006), and in tobacco, it is an important component in ROS metabolism (Ning et al., 2010). In maize, H₂O₂ induces transcription and expression of MAPK cascade, whereas in tobacco, it protects against ROS-mediated injury under osmotic stress (Zhang et al., 2010; Kong et al., 2011). This is due to the different expression patterns of MAPK gene families under different stresses in different plant species. In maize, the MAPK network works as an early signaling response by regulating the production of ROS in plants subjected to drought stress (Gao and Xiang, 2008).

In later developmental stages, one MAPKKK gene called MAPKKK20 in Arabidopsis improves salt tolerance (Jammes et al., 2009). Similarly, water loss by transpiration in the Arabidopsis double mutant named MPK9/MPK12 is less as compared to its wild type. Moreover, it was also documented that ABA regulates the physiological response under abiotic stress (Tajdel et al., 2016). In Arabidopsis, one MAPKKK gene named MAPKKK18 shows reduced stomatal opening under normal conditions in mutant plants (Mitula et al., 2015). Furthermore, this mutant also shows ABA-induced stomatal closure, which shows that MAPKKK18 is directly interacting with ABA components, which plays a key role in signal modulation as SnRK2-6 kinase and PP2C phosphatase ABI1 (Zhang et al., 2006). An increment of ABA in plants is an indication of oxidative stress. An abnormal level of ROS causes the oxidation of free radicals such as hydrogen peroxides, which is called oxidative stress and leads to the injury of cells and tissues. The MAPK gene families reinfoirces the ABA-induced antioxidant defense system by decreasing the ROS production in many crops like maize (Shi et al., 2011).

Under physiological and biochemical conditions of abiotic stresses, the intricate role of kinase proteins by signal transduction of MAPKs still has research gaps. It is required to associate the link between MAPKs and their corresponding stress in vivo. In the future, further functional analysis on MAPK members for physiological and biochemical roles in stress management can be helpful in breeding programs for innovation and advancement of agricultural science.

4. Role of MAPKs under abiotic stresses

Plants often experience various abiotic stresses (drought, low and high temperature, salinity, osmotic, etc.), which significantly affect their growth, productivity, and nutritional quality (Yu et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2020; Raza, 2021; Raza et al., 2021; Raza et al., 2022a; Raza et al., 2022b; Raza et al., 2022c; Raza et al., 2022d). The role of MAPKs against various abiotic stresses are briefly discussed in the subsequent sections.

4.1. The role of MAPKs under drought and oxidative stress

Drought stress is a major environmental factor affecting crops’ growth and productivity, leading to significant socioeconomic damage (Sinha et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2018; Raza et al., 2022a). Drought occurs when water uptake within the plant by root is reduced due to low moisture in the soil, afflicting root morphology growth and physiology owing to wilt conditions, and consequently reducing the annual yield in plants (Aditi et al., 2020; Ahmad et al., 2021; Feng et al., 2022; Lu et al., 2022; Raza et al., 2022a). Biochemical and transcriptional studies have elaborated the MAPK response in drought in grassy and woody plants (Huang et al., 2020). Recently, it was studied that the MAPK cascade was induced with Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation in apple (Malus hupehensis) seedling following increased expression level of MAPKs such as MdMAPK16-2, MdMAPK17, and MdMAPK20-1 by 36.93%, 58.14%, and 54.14%, respectively, compared to those that do not have AMF inoculation (Xu and Chua, 2012). By regulating the RNA de-capping process in Arabidopsis, MAK6 improves the tolerance to dehydration (Hua et al., 2006). In Arabidopsis, MAPK gene families are activated. The promoter RD29, which is a dehydration-responsive gene via transient expression assay, suggests that MAPK cascade plays a vital role in drought signaling (Zaheer and Akhtar, 2016). In Arabidopsis, the transcriptional regulation of 44 MAPKs has been identified, out of which some are induced by water stress such as MPK2, MPK4, MPK5, MPK12, and MAPKKK4 (Moustafa et al., 2014).

Potato (S. tuberosum L.) is known as one of the drought-sensitive crops, and serious yield loss has been threatened by drought stress (Handayani et al., 2019; Sattar et al., 2021), as well as lessened the quality of potato crops (Iftikhar et al., 2017). Studies revealed that 108 MAPK protein-coding genes have been found in potatoes (Zhu et al., 2021). More recent studies confirmed that 22 MAPK genes had been reported in the potato genome, such as StMAPK1 to StMAPK22 (Zaynab et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2021), of which, six MAPKs have been related to abiotic stress, as well as six types of plants hormones (Boguszewska-Mankowska et al., 2020). StMAPK11 response is well studied for drought stress in potato, and it shows reasonable drought tolerance in potato when subjected under drought conditions (Zhu et al., 2021). The drought sensitivity of potato is due to the shallow root system that cannot explore the moisture from the deeper soil layers (Kumar et al., 2008). Further studies related to the characterization of MAPKs in drought stress can help improve the gene expression and physiology of potato. Many MAPKs related to drought stress tolerance are also observed in rice such as MAPKKK protein drought-hypersensitive mutant1 (DSM1), which shows reduced ROS generation under water-stressed conditions and increases the survival of plants under drought stress (Gao and Xiang, 2008). Overexpression of OsMAPK5, which is an ortholog of Arabidopsis MAPK3, also acts as a drought-responsive gene. Studies also suggested that the OsMAPK2 responds to drought stress and salt stress signaling within 15 min in rice crops, as shown in Figure 3 (Popescu et al., 2009).

Figure 3.

The schematic diagram of different mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling molecules under different stress conditions in different crops. Solid arrows show verified pathways; dashed arrows indicate assumed pathways; question marks indicate unknown cascade components.

Mostly abiotic stresses such as drought, cold, heat, and osmotic stress interrupt the metabolic equilibrium of the cell, which causes oxidative stress (Gill and Tuteja, 2010; Mittler et al., 2022; Raza et al., 2022b). The abnormal level of ROS such as free radicals and non-radicals leads to damage of specific molecules, which injured the cells or tissues in broad terms. It is called oxidative stress, which is due to the oxidation of molecules (Xing et al., 2007; Mittler et al., 2022). Antioxidants like endogenous or exogenous compounds help in the removal of ROS. Scavenger enzymes in plants like catalase decompose H₂O₂ and overcome oxidative stress. ABA regulates the A. thaliana CAT1, and MAPKK inhibitor PD98059 delayed CAT1 expression, which is mediated by ABA signaling (Ning et al., 2010). Under dehydration stress, the MKK1 and MPK6 mutant in A. thaliana alter their response to ABA. It was proposed from the above findings that MKKI–MPK6 controls the metabolism of H₂O₂ by CAT1 with the absence of ABA-mediated activation of MPK6 and MMKI (Nakagami et al., 2006). Plant defense mechanism and salicylic acid (SA) accumulation are controlled by the CAT2 expression, which is stimulated by MEKK1 and MPK4 (Colcombet and Hirt, 2008). ROS metabolism is regulated by the MEKK1–MPK4 pathways (Ning et al., 2010). Many other MPAKKKs in A. thaliana are activated by H₂O₂, such as ANPI, which causes the downstream activation of MPK3 and MPK6, as shown in Figure 3 (Ding et al., 2009). These findings suggest that MAPKs not only are induced by ROS but also control ROS and arbitrate oxidative stress in crops. Oxidative stress is a communal response under abiotic and biotic stress as ROS is a conjunction point to indicate the stress in plants. Recently, ROS-mediated MAPK signaling in plants has been described. In A. thaliana mutants, MAPK studies reveal the specific protein association related to ROS control (Ning et al., 2010). The significant roles of MAPK genes in different crops like alfalfa (M. sativa), rice (O. sativa), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), maize (Z. mays), apple (Malus hupehensis), potato (S. tuberosum), cucumber (Cucumis sativus), strawberry (Fragaria vesca), mulberry (Moraceaemorus), and cassava (Manihot esculenta) under drought condition are mentioned in Table 2 . From the above discussion, it is concluded that many MAPK gene families in different crops integrate stress-related proteins and regulate stimulus response. It is necessary to identify and isolate more MAPK genes for crop improvement.

Table 2.

MAPK gene signaling responses in different plants under drought stress conditions.

Plant species	MAPK genes	Activation	Plant stage	References
Arabidopsis	AtMPK2, AtMPK3, AtMPK4, AtMPK5, AtMPK12, and AtMKK	Activated at the transcriptional level Activated by promoter RD29 under dehydration	Seedling	Chen et al. (2015)
Alfalfa	MsP44, MsMKK4	Activated at the post-transcriptional level	Seedlings	Chen et al. (2015)
Rice	OsMPK3,4	Activated by the regulation of protein DSM1 (drought-sensitive mutant1)	Seedling	Huang et al. (2020)
	OsMKK6	Transcriptionally regulated by drought	Seedling	Huang et al. (2020)
	OsDSM1			Gao and Xiang (2008)
	OsMSRMK2,5 and OsMAPKK1	Activated under combined drought and osmotic stress	Seedling	Wang et al. (2010); Chen et al. (2015)
Cotton	GhMAPK2, GhMAPK16	Activated under combined drought and osmotic stress	Germination	Wang et al. (2007)
Maize	ZmMPK2	Activated under reducing water and osmotic pressure	Seedling	Zhang et al. (2011)
Apple	MaMPK	Activated at the transcriptional level	Seedling	Sun et al. (2017)
Potato	StMAPK11	Activated by induction of drought and hormone stress	Flowering	Zhu et al. (2021)
Cucumber	CsMAPKs	Activated by the regulation of stress-associated genes and drought stress	Flowering	Wei et al. (2014)
Strawberry	FvMAPK5,8	Activated at the transcriptional level	Reproductive	Zhou et al. (2014)
Mulberry	MnMAPK1, MnMAPK2	Negatively activated by drought stress	Reproductive	Yan et al. (2016)
Cassava	MeMAPK	Activated 20% in leaves and 70% in roots under high drought conditions	Flowering	Chinnusamy et al. (2007)

4.2. The role of MAPKs under cold stress

One of the most critical factors that affect the growth and development of crops is cold stress or chilling temperatures like sudden frost and snow, and freezing temperatures cause serious damage to crop production and quality (Raza et al., 2021; Ma et al., 2022; Raza et al., 2022c). When plants survive under cold or freezing temperatures, it is called cold tolerance or winter hardiness (Peng et al., 2006). The physiological and metabolic status of crops is changed by the altered expression of many genes during cold acclimatization (Agarwal et al., 2010; Medina et al., 2016; Raza et al., 2021; Raza et al., 2022a; Raza et al., 2022c). In Arabidopsis, MAPK genes like MEKK1, MKK2, MPK4, and MPK6 were shown to be activated under cold stress (Teige et al., 2004). The cold-sensitive gene MKK2 does not have any effect on MPK4 or MPK6, which suggests that MKK2 is an upregulator of MPK4 and MPK6 in low temperature. This outcome shows that chilling temperature activates MEKK1, MPK3, MPK4, and MPK6 (Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). Another MAPKK gene named SbMAPKK in halophytes, such as sea bean (Salicornia brachiate), shows upregulation under cold stress (Meng and Zhang, 2013), because cold as well as salt stress induces some kinase molecules that allow plants to survive under adverse environments.

Recently, in tomato, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated SlMAPK3 mutants were used to investigate the relationship between ferulic acid (FA) and SlMAPK3 under chilling temperatures. It was shown that under low temperature, i.e., 4°C, FA content increases, which then increases the FA synthesis-related gene (SlPAL5, SlC3H, and SlCOMT) expression. However, the knockout of SlMAPK3 inhibited the content of FA and the expression of those genes compared with the control, which suggested a close relationship between SlMAPK3 and FA. Plant response to cold stress depends heavily on the CBF/DREB1 (C-repeat binding factor/dehydration resistance element binding protein 1)- and ICE1 (inducer of CBF expression1)-dependent transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. It has been demonstrated that CBFs may bind to cis elements in the COR (COLD RESPONSIVE) gene promoters, sufficiently activating the expression of COR genes and inducing resistance to cold stress. It was revealed that the FA in tomato fruit provides resistance to chilling stress by upregulating the gene expression of the repeat binding transcription factor (CBF), a transcriptional pathway, in a MAPK3-dependent manner (Shu et al., 2022). Under cold stress, MKK4/5-MPK3/6 and MEKK1-MKK1/2-MPK4, the two MAPK gene mutants, show response to external stimuli produced by cold stress (Furuya et al., 2013; Pitzschke et al., 2014). It is also documented that MEKK1-MKK2-MPK4/MPK6 pathways positively regulate the cold response and chilling temperature tolerance in Arabidopsis (Teige et al., 2004). To induce the kinase mechanism, MKK2 activity is phosphorylated by MEKK1 under cold conditions (Raina et al., 2013), which further activates MKK2 that phosphorylates MPK4 and MPK6 (Teige et al., 2004), likely adjusting downstream molecules to regulate the cellular status. These findings showed that the MMK2 pathway regulates the freezing response (Teige et al., 2004). SlMPK3 upregulates the growth of tomato under low temperature (Yu et al., 2015). In potatoes, it is reported that the MAPK3 showed a response under cold stress (Zhang et al., 2017) and chilling temperature stress (Xie et al., 2012). MAPK3 also activates the phosphorylation downstream for ACC synthase and transcriptional factor OsbHLH002/OsICE1 for chilling outbreaks (Xie et al., 2012). Under cold stress, MKK2-MPK4/MPK6 cascades are activated (Teige et al., 2004). In recent years, the MAPK genes in rice OsMKK6-OsMPK3 have been identified, which are activated in cold stress (Fu et al., 2012). cDNA library screening revealed another well-studied MAPKK gene OsMEK1 that showed interaction with OsMAP1, which is important in freezing temperature tolerance (An et al., 2012).

Under cold stress, the MPKK genes ZmMKK4 (Wu et al., 2011) and ZmMPK7, as shown in Figure 3 (Osthoff et al., 2019), showed upregulation in maize. These two genes are found in the nucleus and control the transcription factors at low temperature. Similarly, five more MAPKs have been identified, which responds positively in roots of maize under cold stress (Osthoff et al., 2019). It is described that the seedlings of cotton at low temperature (4°C) showed optimum growth against cold stress, especially in root cells because of the over-expression of the MAPK gene named GhMAPK (Zhang et al., 2011). MAPK genes in different crops like Arabidopsis, alfalfa, blue mustard (Chorispora Bungeana), cotton, maize, rice, and sea bean (Salicornia brachiate) under cold and heat stress conditions are mentioned in Table 3 . Cold stress causes severe damage in many regions of the world. Therefore, research should incorporate MAPK cascades with the help of modern technologies in breeding resistance cultivars of different crops by identifying novel MAPK gene families.

Table 3.

MAPK gene signaling responses in different plants under cold and heat stress conditions.

Plant species	MAPK genes	Activation	References
Cold
Arabidopsis	AtMEKK1,6	Calcium-dependent activation, to regulate vacuolar processing enzyme (VPE)	Zhang et al. (2006)
	AtMPK1,6	MKK2 is the upstream activator of MPK4 and MPK6	Zhang et al. (2018)
	AtMAPKK, AtMKK2
Alfalfa	MsSAMK, MsP44MKK4	Activated by cold shock domain-containing proteins (CSDPs)	Agarwal et al. (2010)
Blue mustard	CbMAPK3	Activated under low temperature	Nakagami et al. (2005)
Cotton	GhMAPK, GhMAPK2, 7	Activated under 4°C	Yang et al. (2019)
Maize	ZmMPK3,5	Activated under high accumulation of proline	Zhang et al. (2011)
	ZmMPK17	Activated under chilling conditions	Kong et al. (2011)
Rice	OsMSRMK2	Activated at 12°C	Meng and Zhang (2013)
	OsMAPKK2, 4,6 and 10	Activated by low temperature stress at the transcriptional level
	OsMKK6, OsMPK3	Activated by cold shock domain-containing proteins (CSDPs)	Xie et al. (2012)
	OsMAPK5	Activation under chilling temperature	Xiong and Yang, 2003
Sea bean	SbMAPKK	Activated by cold shock domain-containing proteins (CSDPs)	Meng and Zhang (2013)
Tomato	SlMPK3	Upregulation under low temperature	Yu et al. (2015)
Heat
Rice	OsMKK4,6	Activated when temperature increased from 37°C	Wen et al. (2002); Kumar et al. (2008)
	OsMSRMK2	Activated at high temperature < 37°C	Agrawal et al. (2002)
Alfalfa	MsHAMK	Activated by the activation of heat shock protein.	Sangwan et al. (2002)
Potato	StMPK1	Activated by high temperature stress at the transcriptional level	Blanco et al. (2006)
Cucumber	CsMKK4	Activated by the upregulation of heat shock transcription factors (HSFs)	Wei et al. (2014)
Strawberry	FvMAPKK3	Activated by the upregulation of HSFs	Lohani et al. (2020)
Mulberry	MnMAPK1,5,6	Activated at 40°C under high temperature	Yan et al. (2016)
Tomato	SlMPK1	Negitively regulated under high temperature	Ding et al., 2018

4.3. The role of MAPKs under heat stress

Temperature is considered the most essential factor to achieve optimum metabolic processes, growth, development, and production of plants (Yin et al., 2014; Haider et al., 2022; Raza et al., 2022c). The amount of water in cells under different temperatures is a fundamental feature for cell survival, which is directly proportional to plant growth and damages the cell structure and organelles and reduces productivity (Jiang et al., 2015; Xing et al., 2015; Raza et al., 2021). High temperature also causes overproduction of ROS due to the high rate of respiration and photosynthesis, which significantly affects the growth and development of plants (Li et al., 2012). MAPKs play an important role under heat stress in plants such as aspen (Brachypodium distachyon); 60% of genes activated under high temperature by MAPKs signal transduction cascade (Suri and Dhindsa, 2008). To date, few studies about heat stress signaling of MAPKs provide evidence that only specific MAPKs are upregulated or activated under high temperature stress (Munns et al., 2020). It has been experimentally proven that MAPK3 is activated under heat stress and ultra-irradiation and helps to mitigate stress by controlling the growth of plants (Tuteja, 2007).

Secondly, the heat shock protein HSP70 plays a vital role in response to heat stress signaling through the HSP gene by the activation of the MAPK named HAMK in tobacco (Wei et al., 2014). In cucumber (C. sativus), an MAPK gene named CsMKK4 is activated after 8 h of heat treatment. Most of the MAPK genes showed activation under heat stress except CsMPK3 and CsMPK7 (Wei et al., 2014). The upregulated transcript level of FvMAPK3, FvMAPKK1, FvMAPKK3, FvMAPKK6, and FvMAPKK7 in strawberry (F. vesca) has been observed under high temperature (Zhou et al., 2014). In the same way, under heat stress, the gene named FvMAPKK3 is activated (Zhou et al., 2014). In mulberry (morus) under heat stress, eight MAPK genes have been identified, which showed upregulation (MnMAPK1, MnMAPK5, MnMAPK6, and MnMAPK9) and downregulation (MnMAPK2, MnMAPK3, MnMAPK8, and MnMAPK10) (Yan et al., 2016). Likewise, under high temperature, the downward growth regulation of the tomato gene named SlMPK1 is shown (Ding et al., 2018). The above studies indicated that under heat stress conditions, MAPK cascade is regulated in plants. MAPK gene families related to heat resistance is negligible; due to climate change, this stress will be a severe threat in coming years. This stress can be overcome by identifying desirable MAPK gene families in commercial crops.

4.4. The role of MAPKs under salinity and osmotic stress

In plants, there are three major salt tolerance mechanisms, namely, osmotic pressure tolerance, ionic balance management, and decreasing the Na⁺ and Cl⁻ cytoplasmic concentrations (Mohamed et al., 2022; Raza et al., 2022d). Salinity stress is a very serious threat in many regions of the world; more than 50% of irrigated soils all over the world face reduction in the productivity of major agricultural crops (Shi et al., 2010). Under salt stress, cell membrane and protein disruption occurs due to the overproduction of ROS in plants, which is one of serious problems for crops grown under salt conditions (Nakagami et al., 2005; Raza et al., 2022d).

It was also reported that MAPK proteins are activated when plants are subjected to salt stress; this leads to speeding up the expression level of V-H⁺-ATPase, which increases the tolerance to salinity stress (Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). In Arabidopsis, a MAPKK gene named MEKK1 mRNA accumulated in response to high salt stress. The protein–protein interaction between MMK2/MEK1 and MPK4 MAPKs, MMK21 and MKK2/MEK1 MAPKKs, and MPK4 and MEKK1 was shown by yeast two-hybrid analysis (Teige et al., 2004). It was also documented that salt stress signal transmission occurred at two MAPK cascades such as MPK4 MAPK cascade with genes named MEKK1-MEK1/MKK2-MPK4 and MPK6 and a second MAPK cascade with a gene named p44MAPK involved in salt tolerance in Arabidopsis, as shown in Table 4 . MEKK1 involve as more upstream of MKK2 and more downstream MAPKs MPK4 and MPK6 under salinity stress (Teige et al., 2004). MAKs such as MPK6, MPK4, and MKP1 play a negative role under salinity stress conditions (Faried et al., 2017). A salt stress-induced MAPK named 46kDa SIMK showed response under salt stress in alfalfa (Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). In vivo as well as in vitro tolerance to salt stress produced by upstream kinase named SIMKK intermingles with SIMK by yeast two-hybrid (Krasensky and Jonak, 2012).

Table 4.

MAPK gene signaling responses in different plants under salinity stress.

Plant species	MAPK genes	Activation	Concentration	References
Arabidopsis	AtMEKK1,2	Activation by accumulation of sodium chloride	High salt accumulation	Teige et al. (2004); Moustafa et al. (2008)
	AtMPK1,3	Activation of RD29A and RD29B gene promoters	Excess of salts	Yu et al. (2010)
	AtMPK4,6	Activated by phosphatidic acid (PA)	Acid accumulation	Moustafa et al. (2008)
Maize	ZmMPK3,5	Activated under very high salt concentration	High amount of salts	Wang et al. (2010)
	ZmSIMK1	Activated by high salinity	Higher salt accumulation	Gu et al. (2010)
	ZmMKK4	Activated by NaCl accumulation	Excess amount of NaCl	Kong et al. (2011)
Rice	OsMSRMK2, MAPKK4, 6	Activated in response to high salt and cytotoxicity.	NaCl accumulation	Agrawal et al. (2002)
	OsMAPK5,	Activated by salt accumulation	Very high concentration	Xiong and Yang (2003)
	OsMPK3, 4, 5	Activated by accumulation of arsenic stress and salts	High arsenic and salt concentration	Rao et al. (2010)
	OsMKK6	Activated in hypersensitivity of other stresses	High salinity
	OsEDR1	Activated by high salt accumulation	Excess salt amount	Kim et al. (2003)
	OsMAPK4	Activated under salt accumulation	NaCl excess amount	Rao et al. (2010)
Cotton	GhMAPK, GhMPK2	Activated by salt stress and osmotic adjustment	High amount of salts	Wang et al. (2007); Zhang et al. (2011)
Blue mustard	CbMAPK3	Activated under salt accumulation	High salt accumulation	Zhang et al. (2006)
Sea bean	SbMAPKK	Activated under salt accumulation	Water reduction and salt accumulation	Agarwal et al. (2010)
Cucumber	CsNMAPK	Activated under salt accumulation	Salt accumulation	Xu et al. (2010)
Tobacco	NtSIPK	Activated by salt stress and osmotic adjustment	NaCl accumulation	Mikolajczyk et al. (2000)
Potato	StMAPK3	Activated by salt stress and osmotic adjustment	PEG, menthol, and NaCl treatment	Zhu et al. (2020)
Osmotic stress
Arabidopsis	AtMPK1, 4, 6, and 20	Activated under high salt accumulation and improved the osmosis	Hyper-osmolarity	Droillard et al. (2004); Moustafa et al. (2008)
	AtMKK7,9	Activated under higher NaCl concentration	Sodium chloride excess	Moustafa et al. (2008)
	AtMPK9, 17,18	Activated under higher salt accumulation	Hyper-osmolarity	Moustafa et al. (2014)
Maize	ZmMPK7	Activated under salt accumulation and molecular imbalance	Hyper-osmolarity	Zong et al. (2009)
Tobacco	NtSIPK	Activated by salicylic acid under high salt concentration	Higher osmotic stress	Mikolajczyk et al. (2000)
Alfalfa	MsSIMK	Upstream activation by SIMKK	Higher osmolarity	Jonak et al. (2004)
Potato	StMAPK3	Activated by NaCl (40 mM and 80 mM)	Salt accumulation	Zhu et al. (2020)

Crops respond to salt stress through different processes like elimination and appropriation of ions (Na⁺ and Cl⁻) into vacuole to lessen cytotoxicity; research has shown that osmotic stress is also regulated by MAPKs (Kim et al., 2003). Protective proteins like late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) and chaperones, a heat shocking protein also speed up to defense the negativity of these toxic ions. MAPKs also respond by conveying signals for osmotic stress to specific effectors and play a key role to survive in the cell under high salt concentration. It is already reported that MAPK cascade is activated under salt and osmotic stress at both transcriptional and protein levels (Iftikhar et al., 2017). In A. thaliana, genes like AtMEKK1, AtMKK2, and AtMPK4, as shown in Figure 3 , have stress tolerance under salinity conditions. MMK gene named as SIMKK an upward regulator of SIMK, a MAPK gene response upregulation in alfalfa under salinity as well as osmotic stress (Xu et al., 2010). In addition, salicylic acid-induced protein kinase (SIPK) regulates osmotic stress in tobacco in a very short time (5 to 10 min) (Ghorbel et al., 2019; Habiba et al., 2021); SIPK is an Arabidopsis MPK6 homolog in tobacco.

In another study, it was also shown that plant growth recovered in the overexpression lines of StMAPK3 in potato, and the lethal effects of osmotic stress and salinity were reduced by the MAPK gene family (Zhu et al., 2020). The increased content of many oxidative markers like NaCl, H₂O_2, polyethylene glycol (PEG), and menthol is weakened by StMAPK3 overexpression in potato (Zhu et al., 2020). Similarly, the opposite effect is shown by catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and proline content by StMAPK3. In Arabidopsis, interchangeable names MPK4 and MPK6 have been identified, whereas salinity signal responding genes like MEKK1 and MKK2 have also been recognized (Teige et al., 2004). Salt tolerance is shown by the stress marker gene MKK2 in transgenic plants. Gene promoters called RD29A and RD29B were activated by the expression of MKK and MPK, respectively (Zaheer and Akhtar, 2016), which shows that the MAPKs regulate upward under salinity and osmotic stress. Many MPKs (MPK9, MPK10, MPK11, MPK17, and MPK18), MKKs (MKK7 and MKK9), and MEKKs (MEKK3, MEKK5, MEKK6, and MEKK7) have been screened for salt and osmotic stress (Moustafa et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2015). In maize, the MAPK named ZmSIMK1 was identified as having high salt tolerance by the overexpression of Arabidopsis transgenic plants. In the same way, in maize, ZmMPK17 also showed high osmotic stress tolerance by the activation of Arabidopsis MPK17 (Yang et al., 2019), which provides an idea that further description and practical study of MPK17 and its ortholog can provide better achievement in abiotic stress tolerance gene identification and screening.

It is also described that, in rice, MAPKs control salinity and osmotic stress; OsMPK4, OsMPK3, OsMSRMK2, OsEDR1, OsEDR1, OsMAPK5, and OsMAPK4 have been classsified as salinity tolerance genes (Xie et al., 2012). Salt tolerance and osmotic pressure are also affected by the activation of OsMPK5 and OsMPK4 in transgenic maize line (Xiong and Yang, 2003). Over-expressing GhMPK2 shows the osmotic stress tolerance in transgenic cotton (G. hirsutum) (Yang et al., 2019). Similarly, cucumber roots and transgenic tobacco seeds showed overexpression of MAPK genes called CsNMAPK and CsNMPAK, which showed a germination rate higher than wild type (Gomi et al., 2005), which proves that CsNMPAK performs better under salt stress condition in the early stages. Salinity is associated with osmotic stress; from the above studies, it is strongly depicted that MAPK genes that are activated under salinity conditions are also upregulated under osmotic stress conditions. The MAPK genes in different crops like Arabidposis, maize, rice, cotton, blue mustard, alfalfa, rice, tobacco, potato, sea bean, cucumber, tobacco, and potato under salinity stress and Arabidposis, maize, tobacco, alfalfa, and potato under osmotic stress are mentioned in Table 4 .

The above discussion revealed that many MAPK genes related to salinity and osmotic stress had been identified, and highly expressed under saline and osmotic stress conditions. By identifying more MAPK genes in crops, crop yield and productivity can be improved, and saline soil can be brought under cultivation.

4.5. The role of MAPKs under heavy metal stress

Heavy metal ions play a vital role in the development and growth as well as in the physiological processes of plants (Lee and Ellis, 2007; Raza et al., 2022e). However, at higher concentrations, they can have lethal effects on plant physiology. With the increase in concentration of heavy metals in the soil, the cellular response of the plants is activated (Raza et al., 2022e). A novel type of MAPK gene called OsMSRMK2 in rice is activated when plants have high levels of cadmium, mercury, and copper ions (Yang et al., 2019). Studies have also confirmed the activation of MAPK genes in rice (O. sativa) with the high level of cadmium ions (Haider et al., 2021).

Many MAPK genes like SIMK, MMK2, MMK3, and SAMK in alfalfa (M. sativa) seedling are activated when they are exposed to copper and cadmium ions stress (Gupta et al., 2009). Studies have also confirmed that the activation of SIMKK is only under copper ion stress but not under cadmium ion stress, as shown in Table 5 . It was documented that this MAPK activity is specific in response as specific treatment indicates the specific signals’ transduction (Yeh et al., 2004). Involvement of MAPK genes called OsMPK3, OsMPK4, and OsMKK4 mediated heavy metal stress tolerance in rice seedlings as shown in Figure 3 (Gupta et al., 2009). In maize (Z. mays), under heavy metal stress, the activation of MAPK genes has also been confirmed (Lumbreras et al., 2010). These findings show the role of MAPKs in signaling activation under various heavy metal stresses.

Table 5.

MAPK gene signaling responses in different plants under heavy metal stress conditions.

Plant species	MAPK genes	Stress causing metals	Methods	Reference
Alfalfa	MsMMK2, MsMMK3, MsSAMK	Cadmium and copper	Complex activation pattern of MAPKs: SIMK, MMK2, MMK3, and SAMK	Jonak et al. (2004)
Rice	OsMSRMK2, OsMPK3,4, and OsMKK4	Mercury, copper, cadmium, and arsenic	Overexpression of functions of an OsMSRMK2 and MBP kinase	Agrawal et al. (2002)
	OsHMA3	Cadmium	Overexpression of a functional allele of OsHMA3	Ueno et al. (2010); Shao et al. (2018)
	OsLCT1	Cadmium	Knockdown of OsLCT1	Ueno et al. (2010)
	OsNRAMP5	Cadmium	CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of OsNRAMP5	Uraguchi et al. (2011)
	OsHMA3	Cadmium	Articulation and tissue restrictions of OsHMA3	Shao et al. (2018)
Maize	ZmMPK3	Cadmium	Signaling activation of ZmMPK3	Wang et al. (2010)

From the above discussion, except rice, maize, and alfalfa, there are no other crops in which MAPK gene families have been identified. In the near future, heavy metal stress will severely threaten crops due to climate change and heavy industrialization. The researcher’s job is to verify the functional roles of MAPK genes and other mechanisms to develop heavy metal resistance cultivars.

5. Conclusion

There is growing evidence that the MAPK cascade is the hub of a sophisticated network structure that transduces signals related to plant stress tolerance. The MAPK cascade gradually amplifies and conveys stress signals to downstream response components through phosphorylation and dephosphorylation, leading to various stress responses. Furthermore, a better understanding of the MAPK cascades’ process should make it easier to create new methods for enhancing plants’ ability to withstand stress. Numerous genetic engineering methods are available to increase abiotic stress tolerance in crops. As key players in signal transduction and regulators of gene transcription, MAPK cascades have already been used to improve abiotic stress tolerance, as discussed in this review. Molecular biology analysis of the MAPK cascade’s components and its function is essential for enhancing crop improvement. Research on the function of MAPK genes or the mechanism by which the MAPK cascade regulates plant stress resistance is still limited, despite many studies in plants that have demonstrated the involvement of MAPK cascades in numerous biological processes in response to abiotic and biotic stresses. In addition, different stress stimuli can activate the same MAPK cascade genes. The above discussion concludes that the MAPK cascades and the molecular mechanisms of plant stress resistance have great significance for elucidating the entire stress tolerance signal transduction pathway in plants.

6. Future perspective

Abiotic stress in crops helps to expand the tolerance of crops under different abiotic stresses by various methods of genetic manipulation. A number of studies recounted that by exploiting MAPK pathways in crops like Arabidopsis and many other crops like potato, maize, rice, and poplar, stress tolerance has improved. In the near future, investigation should include detecting the MAPK substrate, and by using advanced breeding methods and molecular methodologies, the development of new lines would be able to withstand harsh environments to meet the food requirements of the increasing population. Interacting protein is the main factor that needs to identify and quantify for producing multiple environmental stress, also with their mode of action, which is like that (MAPKKK-MAPKK-MAPK) chain and accumulated into one functional ‘MAPK transgenic circuits’ which could be inserted into target sequence or cell through genetic engineering and biotechnology to develop a tolerance species for specific function having specific kinase protein.

It is important to study the function of MAPKs related to abiotic stress in crops, and previous studies have confirmed their role in crops related to abiotic as well as biotic stress. In the future, there is a need to identify more MAPK gene families in crops related to environmental stresses and also identify their functional analysis through advanced methodologies like transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, bioinformatics, CRISPR/Cas technology, and DNA/RNA sequencing to encourage analysis of a regulation network that controls abiotic stress response. In addition, identification and functional analysis of MAPKs can be further processed by mutation, gene silencing, and microRNA techniques to produce MAPK mutants and genetically engineered gene families, which transform into crops for tolerance to biotic stresses.

Author contributions

YM, HS, and XZ conceived the idea. YM, XZ, NZ, Nu-A, AR, and FH contributed to writing and literature search. YM and Nu-A contributed to organizing tables and figures. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding Statement

The research program was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31960444), the Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University (No. GSCS-2019-Z03), and the Gansu Major Science and Technology Project (No. GZGG-2021-6).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.