Abstract
Background
Ketogenic diet (KD) refers to any diet in which food composition induces a ketogenic state of human metabolism.
Objective
To assess short- and long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of KD [classic KD and modified Atkins diet (MAD)] in childhood drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and to investigate the effect of KD on electroencephalographic (EEG) features of children with DRE.
Methods
Forty patients diagnosed with DRE according to International League Against Epilepsy were included and randomly assigned into classic KD or MAD groups. KD was initiated after clinical, lipid profile and EEG documentation, and regular follow-up was done for 24 months.
Results
Out of 40 patients with DRE, 30 completed this study. Both classic KD and MAD were effective in seizure control as 60% in classic KD group and 53.33% in MAD group became seizure free, and the remaining showed ≥50% seizure reduction. Lipid profile remained within acceptable levels throughout the study period in both groups. Adverse effects were mild and managed medically with an improvement of growth parameters and EEG during the study period.
Conclusions
KD is an effective and safe non-pharmacologic, non-surgical therapy for the management of DRE with a positive impact on growth and EEG.
Impact
Both common types of KD (classic KD and MAD) are effective for DRE, but unfortunately, nonadherence and dropout rates are frequent.
High serum lipid profile (cardiovascular AE) is often suspected in children following a high-fat diet, but lipid profile remained in the acceptable level up to 24 months. Therefore, KD constitutes a safe treatment.
KD had a positive impact on growth, despite inconsistent results of the KD’s effect on growth.
In addition to showing strong clinical effectiveness, KD also considerably decreased the frequency of interictal epileptiform discharges and enhanced the EEG background rhythm.
Introduction
Up to 65 million people worldwide are affected by epilepsy.1 Approximately one-third of epileptic patients still have difficulty being treated, even though two-thirds of them can control their seizures with current anti-seizure medication (ASM). The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) defines drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) as the failure of adequate trials of two tolerated, properly selected and utilized antiepileptic drug schedules to achieve sustained relief of seizures.2–4
The three main objectives of epilepsy treatment are total seizure control, maintaining quality of life (QoL), and avoiding adverse effects (AEs).2 The retention rates of ASM can be as low as 50% due to their severe AE, such as a considerable deterioration in QoL.5 Therefore, one should initially attempt surgical therapies if a patient is eligible and if surgery is not a possibility for a patient with DRE, vagus nerve stimulation or dietary therapy like the ketogenic diet (KD) are worthwhile alternatives.6–8
KD (a high-fat, adequate-protein, and low-carbohydrate diet) is an effective, non-invasive, and non-pharmacologic treatment for refractory childhood epilepsy used since 1920s with few to no neurotoxic effects when compared to multiple ASM.7,9 Ketosis (which mimics a starving state), decreased glucose, higher fatty acid levels (which improve bioenergetic reserves), anti-epileptogenic properties and neuroprotective properties are only a few of the various, as-yet-unknown processes through which KD operates.10 Also, ketones may confer neurologic protection and ketone bodies could exert anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory, cellular, epigenetic, and gut-microbiome alterations.11–13
Despite the KD’s effectiveness, most patients discontinue the diet because of its unpalatable and restrictive features. So, new variants of KD have emerged, including the modified Atkins diet (MAD) and the low-glycemic-index diet.14–18
MAD provides a more palatable and less restrictive dietary treatment option.14 The most notable aspect of the MAD is that it begins in an outpatient setting without fasting. The effectiveness of MAD in comparison to classic KD is still debatable. Some studies focused on the major AEs of classic KD in refractory epilepsy, while others showed that MAD is equally effective as classic KD.15,19,20
However, since KD is not a physiological diet, it is important to identify and carefully monitor any AEs.21 AEs can happen at the start of the diet as well as months after KD initiation. Dehydration, altered electrolytes, hypoglycemia, tiredness, abdominal pain, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation are short-term AE, while hypoproteinemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalciuria, urolithiasis, alterations in lipid profiles and increase in transaminases or cardiomyopathy are possible long-term AE.22,23 There are few studies available regarding potential long-term negative effects in children using KD for longer than 2 years; the most mentioned symptoms are an increased risk of bone fractures, kidney stones and growth delay.24
Electroencephalographic (EEG) features are improved by KD in addition to significantly reducing clinical seizures in epileptic patients. Despite this, there have not been any reported prospective studies of the predictive power of baseline EEG or early changes in EEG for KD therapy response. In addition, few research have compared the electrophysiologic properties of KD responders and non-responders.25,26
So, this study aimed to assess short- and long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of KD (classic KD and MAD) in childhood DRE and to investigate the effect of KD on EEG features of children with DRE.
Methods
Study design
This prospective randomized study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the KD and its effect on EEG features among children with DRE.
Our primary outcome was to assess the clinical effectiveness of KD (classic KD and MAD) regarding onset of seizure control, seizure frequency and seizure severity, and to assess long-term safety of KD regarding AE and the effect of KD on growth and lipid profile (cardiovascular risk). The secondary outcome was the evaluation of the effect of KD on EEG features prior to and 3 and 6 months after the KD treatment with the possibility of withdrawal of ASM.
Study population
We initially enrolled forty patients with DRE attending Pediatric KD outpatient clinic at Menoufia University Hospital from January 2020 to April 2022, after obtaining the approval of the Institutional Review Boards of the Menoufia Faculty of Medicine (ID number 191019 PEDI 29) and an informed (written) consent was obtained from each parent or caregiver.
Our inclusion criteria were patients who had received two or more types of regular antiepileptic drugs, but frequent seizures continued. Patients with chronic diseases, congenital metabolic disorders, liver diseases, and systemic diseases were excluded from the study.
Patients were randomly assigned to two groups, Group 1 (classic KD group): 20 patients received classic KD in the form of formula (Ketocal milk from Danone, Nutricia) and food with the ratio of 3–4 g of fat for every 1 g of carbohydrate and protein, and Group 2 (MAD group): 20 patients kept on MAD consisting of a nearly balanced diet (60% fat, 30% protein, and 10% carbohydrates by weight) providing 100 kcal/kg/day, without restrictions on calories, fluids, protein or need for an inpatient fast and admission.
Before starting KD, we collected demographic and clinical data of studied patients including age, sex, age of start of seizures, anthropometric measurements (weight, length/height, weight for length/height, and BMI) according to Egyptian Z score growth references for Egyptian children,27,28 etiology, type of seizures, duration of uncontrolled seizures, seizure frequency, and seizure severity [scored according to Chalfont Seizure Severity Scale (CSSS)].29 Number of antiepileptic drugs used, and baseline EEG were also documented.
Method of randomization
The allocation sequence was generated using permuted block randomization technique and the block size was variable.30 Allocation sequence/code was concealed from the person allocating the participants to the intervention arms using sealed opaque envelopes.31 Double-blinded approach was adopted.32 In the present study, consecutive sampling technique was adopted.33
Laboratory procedures
Morning blood samples were taken after 8–12 h fasting. Triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) were measured. Normal values of laboratory data were considered as follows: serum cholesterol (<170 mg/dL is acceptable, 170–199 mg/dL is borderline and >200 mg/dL is high), serum LDL (<110 mg/dL is acceptable, 110–129 mg/dL is borderline and >130 mg/dL is high) and serum HDL (>45 mg/dL is acceptable, 40–45 mg/dL is borderline and <40 mg/dL is low).34
Initiation of KD
For the first month, carbohydrates were restricted to 10 g/day but were permitted to increase by 5 g/day at intervals of at least 1 month if the child was having difficulty with the restriction of carbohydrates to a maximum of 10% carbohydrates per day by weight. A qualified dietician also educated the parents or caregivers about diet preparation at home with close monitoring of blood glucose and urinary ketones. Multivitamins, calcium, and vitamin D were given as supplements and the antiepileptic drugs and doses used were not changed from those administered previously throughout the study period. Patients were requested to attend their regular monthly outpatient visits for 6 months, then every 3 months for 24 months and the form and frequency of seizures and adverse reactions were observed and recorded.
KD tolerability
After 1 month of KD initiation, two patients of classic KD group and one patient of MAD group were excluded from the study due to noncompliance of their caregivers. At 3-month follow-up visit, six patients were excluded from the study as they did not tolerate the MAD and the ketogenic liquid formula. Also, one patient of MAD group died secondary to infection in COVID-19 epidemic, so only 30 patients completed the study for 2 years, 15 in each group.
Short-term outcome
The clinical efficacy of KD was evaluated regarding the onset of improvement of seizures and seizures frequency and severity (according to CSSS) prior to and 3 and 6 months after the KD treatment were analyzed. Effectiveness was evaluated as complete seizure free or seizure reduction percentage change. Percentage change was calculated as follows:
KD and EEG
The NIHON KOHDEN EEG-1200K was used to record the EEG in a quiet environment. The 21-channel-EEGs were recorded under typical circumstances (rest, hyperventilation, and photostimulation). Throughout the recording period, children were being studied while resting off with their eyes closed. The International 10–20 system was used to record EEG data from 19 scalp electrodes for 20 min using an average reference (MIZAR-sirius 33 Channels, EBNeuro).35
At FP1, F3, C3, P3, O1, F7, T3, T5, FP2, F4, C4, P4, O2, F8, T4, T6, Fz, Cz, and Pz, electrodes were placed. The EEG was digitized at 256 Hz with a time constant of 0.1 sec, a high-frequency filter of 70 Hz and a notch filter in each channel. Based on visual assessment, consecutive, 2-s-long epochs free of artifacts were chosen offline. The provided EEG software was used to perform a rapid Fourier transform on these 20 epochs. Mean-power spectra were gathered for every channel and frequency range in each subject. Six bands were utilized to divide the frequency ranges: Delta (0–4 Hz), Theta (4–8 Hz), Alpha (8–12 Hz), Beta-1 (12–18 Hz), Beta-2 (18–24 Hz), and Gamma (24–64) were the six bands used to separate the frequency ranges.35
By comparing EEG before and 1, 3 and 6 months after the KD therapy regarding the background rhythm in the occipital region under the awake and silent states and variations of interictal spike-wave index (SI), the effect of KD on EEG features was assessed. SI represented the mean of the spike discharge times during a second. In the calculation procedure, 100 s of the awake and quiet EEG findings (free of artifact fragments) were chosen, and SI = n/100 was used to compute the number of spikes (n) present in the recording.
Long-term outcome
Anthropometric measurements, lipid profile, and the development of AE were monitored at 3-month intervals up to 24 months. In addition, we assessed the possibility of antiepileptic drug withdrawal in seizure free patients after the first 6 months.
Statistical methodology
Data were collected and entered into the computer using Statistical Package for Social Science program for statistical analysis (ver 25). Data were described using median and interquartile range. Comparisons were carried out between two studied independent not-normally distributed subgroups using the Mann–Whitney U test. Comparisons were carried out among related samples by Friedman’s test. Odds ratio (OR) was used to quantify the strength of the association between two events. McNemar’s test was used on paired nominal data with matched pairs of subjects to determine whether the row and column marginal frequencies were equal. Statistical significance was tested at P value < 0.05.
Based on El-Rashidy et al.’s18 results, adopting a power of 80% to detect a non-inferiority margin (d) of 15% in success rate [complete disappearance of seizures (primary outcome)] and level of significance 5% (α = 0.05), the minimum required sample size was found to be 15 patients per group (number of groups = 2) and the total sample size = 30 patients.36,37
Results
Out of 40 patients enrolled initially in our study, 30 patients (13 males and 17 females) with median age 3 years (36 months) in classic KD group versus 6 years (72 months) in MAD group tolerated this study for 24 months, 11 patients (36.67%) were underweight, 3 patients (10%) were overweight, and 7 patients (23.33%) were wasted with non-significant difference between the two groups. Patient characteristics are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
All patients (n = 30) | Groups | Test of significance (P value) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Classic KD (n = 15) | MAD (n = 15) | |||
Age (months) | ||||
Min–Max | 4.00–144.00 | 4.00–96.00 | 6.00–144.00 | P = 0.161 NS |
Median [IQR] | 48.00 [72.00] | 36.00 [48.00] | 72.00 [85.00] | |
Sex | ||||
Male | 13 (43.33%) | 6 (40.00%) | 7 (46.67%) | P = 0.713 NS |
Female | 17 (56.67%) | 9 (60.00%) | 8 (53.33%) | |
Age of start of seizures (months) | ||||
Min–Max | 0.00–96.00 | 0.00–96.00 | 2.00–96.00 | P = 0.036* |
Median [IQR] | 12.00 [44] | 5.00 [21.5] | 48.00 [55] | |
Weight for age | ||||
Underweight | 11 (36.67%) | 6 (40.00%) | 5 (33.33%) | P = 0.70394 NS |
Normal | 16 (53.33%) | 7 (46.67%) | 9 (60.00%) | P = 0.46540 NS |
Overweight | 3 (10.00%) | 2 (13.33%) | 1 (06.67%) | P = 0.54186 NS |
Length/height for age | ||||
Normal | 30 (100.00%) | 30 (100.00%) | 30 (100.00%) | NA |
Weight for length or BMI | ||||
Wasted | 7 (23.33%) | 4 (26.67%) | 3 (20.00%) | P = 0.66720 NS |
Normal | 20 (66.67%) | 9 (60.00%) | 11 (73.33%) | P = 0.44130 NS |
Overweight | 3 (10.00%) | 2 (13.33%) | 1 (06.67%) | P = 0.54186 NS |
n number of patients, Min–Max Minimum–Maximum, IQR interquartile range, NA non-applicable statistics.
*Statistically significant (P < 0.05); NS: not statistically significant (P ≥ 0.05).
Clinical presentation
According to ILAE (2017),38,39 epilepsy of unknown etiology was the commonest etiology among the participants [12 patients (40%)] and Myoclonic seizure was the most prevalent type [10 cases (33.33%)] followed by infantile spasm [6 cases (20%)]. The median duration of uncontrolled seizures before KD was 7 months in classic KD group versus 8 months in MAD group with a median seizure severity scale (according to CSSS) and seizure frequency per day of 165 and 10, respectively. Sixteen patients (53.33%) were on three AEDs, ten (33.33%) patients were on four AEDs and four patients (13.33%) were on two AEDs. The clinical characteristics of the cases before KD are illustrated in Table 2.
Table 2.
All patients (n = 30) | Groups | Test of significance (P value) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Classic KD (n = 15) | MAD (n = 15) | |||
Type of seizures | ||||
Generalized tonic clonic | 5 (16.67%) | 2 (13.33%) | 3 (20.00%) | P = 0.62414 NS |
Myoclonic | 10 (33.33%) | 5 (33.33%) | 5 (33.33%) | P = 1.000 NS |
Infantile spasm | 6 (20.00%) | 3 (20.00%) | 3 (20.00%) | NA |
Focal | 3 (10.00%) | 2 (13.33%) | 1 (06.67%) | P = 0.54186 NS |
Unclassified seizures | 6 (20.00%) | 3 (20.00%) | 3 (20.00%) | NA |
Duration of uncontrolled seizures (months) | ||||
Min–Max | 2.00–48.00 | 2.00–48.00 | 2.00–36.00 | P = 0.983 NS |
Median [IQR] | 7.50 [15.00] | 7.00 [11.00] | 8.00 [21.00] | |
Etiology of epilepsy | ||||
Unknown etiology | 12 (40.00%) | 8 (53.33%) | 4 (33.33%) | P = 0.136 NS |
Genetic | 7 (23.33%) | 3 (20.00%) | 4 (33.33%) | P = 0.667 NS |
Structural | ||||
Post-anoxic | 4 (13.33%) | 2 (13.33%) | 2 (13.33%) | NA |
Sturge–Weber syndrome | 1 (03.33%) | 1 (06.67%) | 0 (00.00%) | P = 0.3077 NS |
Tuberous sclerosis | 1 (03.33%) | 0 (00.00%) | 1 (06.67%) | P = 0.3077 NS |
Miller–Dieker syndrome | 1 (03.33%) | 0 (00.00%) | 1 (06.67%) | P = 0.3077 NS |
Post-traumatic | 3 (10.00%) | 0 (00.00%) | 3 (20.00%) | P = 0.06724 NS |
White matter disease causing leukodystrophy | 1 (03.33%) | 0 (00.00%) | 1 (06.67%) | P = 0.3077 NS |
Seizures frequency (baseline) (days) | ||||
Min–Max | 00.28–30.00 | 04.00–30.00 | 00.28–30.00 | P = 0.611 NS |
Median [IQR] | 10.00 [9.00] | 10.00 [9.00] | 10.00 [11.00] | |
Seizures severity scale (baseline) | ||||
Min–Max | 111.00–177.00 | 127.00–177.00 | 111.00–177.00 | P = 0.144 NS |
Median [IQR] | 165.00 [46.00] | 169.00 [16.00] | 157.00 [54.00] | |
Number of antiepileptic drugs | ||||
Two | 4 (13.33%) | 2 (13.33%) | 2 (13.33%) | NA |
Three | 16 (53.33%) | 8 (53.33%) | 8 (53.33%) | NA |
Four | 10 (33.33%) | 5 (33.33%) | 5 (33.33%) | NA |
NS non significant, NA non-applicable.
Efficacy of KD
The onset of seizure improvement was 14 days in classic KD group versus 10 days in MAD group with a non-significant difference between the two groups. Regarding the CSSS, there was a statistically significant decrease in seizure severity by −100% percent change after 3 and 6 months of KD compared to baseline (P < 0.0001) without a significant difference between the two groups (Table 3). Analysis of CSSS after 6 months of KD initiation demonstrates improvement of duration of seizures in all patients and improvement in time to return to normal from the onset in 96.67% of patients. Figure 1 illustrates the improvement in CSSS after 3 and 6 months of KD treatment.
Table 3.
Groups | Test of significance (P value) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Classic KD (n = 15) | MAD (n = 15) | ||
Onset of seizures improvement (days) | |||
Min–Max | 07.00–21.00 | 07.00–21.00 | P = 0.624 NS |
Median | 14.00 | 10.00 | |
IQR | 10.00–14.00 | 10.00–14.00 | |
Seizures Severity Scale baseline (at 0 months) | |||
Min–Max | 127.00–177.00 | 111.00–177.00 | P = 0.144 NS |
Median | 169.00 | 157.00 | |
IQR | 16 | 54 | |
Seizures Severity Scale (after 3 months) | |||
Min–Max | 0.00–127.00 | 0.00–129 | P = 0.646 NS |
Median | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
IQR | 98 | 111 | |
Seizures Severity Scale (after 6 months) | |||
Min–Max | 0.00–111.00 | 0.00–79.00 | P = 0.963 NS |
Median | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
IQR | 70 | 52 | |
Friedman test |
χ2 (Fr) (df = 2) = 27.882 P < 0.0001* |
χ2 (Fr) (df = 2) = 27.846 P < 0.0001* |
|
Seizure Severity Scale percentage change (3 M vs baseline) | |||
n | 15 | 15 | P = 0.680 NS |
Min–Max | −100.00 to −24.20 | −100.00 to −27.12 | |
Median | −100.00 | −100.00 | |
IQR | 55.37 | 67.86 | |
Seizure Severity Scale percentage change (6 M vs baseline) | |||
n | 15 | 15 | P = 0.909 NS |
Min–Max | −100.00 to −34.32 | −100.00 to −53.25 | |
Median | −100.00 | −100.00 | |
IQR | 39.55 | 31.64 | |
Seizure Severity Scale percentage change (6 vs 3 M) | |||
n | 6 | 7 | P = 0.086 NS |
Min–Max | −74.79 to −3.80 | −59.69 to −31.58 | |
Median | −20.58 | −44.88 | |
IQR | 28.90 | 19.54 |
χ2 (Fr) Friedman Chi-Square, df degree of freedom.
Intragroup: statistically significant when compared with baseline values (using Dunn–Sidak method).
*Statistically significant; NS: non significant.
Seizure frequency after 3 and 6 months of KD showed a statistically significant decrease in comparison with baseline (P < 0.0001) with a non-significant difference between both groups. Six months after initiation of KD, 60% of patients in classic KD group and 46.67% of patients in MAD group became seizure free and the other 40% and 53.33% had ≥50% seizure reduction with a median percent decrease of −83.33% and −75% after 3 months in classic KD and MAD, respectively, and −100% after 6 months in both groups (Table 4).
Table 4.
Seizures frequency | Classic KD (n = 15) | MAD (n = 15) | Test of significance (P value) | Total (n = 30) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (days) | ||||
Median [IQR] | 10.00 [9.00] | 10.00 [11.00] | P = 0.611 ΝS | 10.00 [9.00] |
After 3 months (days) | ||||
Median [IQR] | 0.00♯ [ΝΑ] | 1.00♯ [4.86] | P = 0.367 ΝS | 1.00 [3.00] |
After 6 months (days) | ||||
Median [IQR] | 0.00♯ [ΝΑ] | 0.00♯ [ΝΑ] | P = 0.890 ΝS | 0.00♯ [ΝΑ] |
Friedman test |
χ2 (Fr) (df = 2) = 28.000 P < 0.0001* |
χ2 (Fr) (df = 2) = 25.000 P < 0.0001* |
||
Percentage change (%) (after 3 months) | ||||
Median [IQR] | −83.33 [−50.00] | −75.00 [−43.33] | P = 0.831 ΝS | −77.50 [−50.00] |
Percentage change (%) (after 6 months) | ||||
Median [IQR] | −100.0 [ΝΑ] | −100.0 [ΝΑ] | P = 0.783 ΝS | −100.00 [−33.30] |
Seizure frequency reduction after 3 months | ||||
Seizure free (100% reduction) | 8 (53.33%) | 4 (26.67%) | P = 0.1362 ΝS | 12 (40.00%) |
SFR (if still convulsions) | 7 (46.67%) | 11 (73.33%) | 18 (60.00%) | |
50 | 1 (6.67%) | 2 (13.33%) | P = 0.54186 ΝS | 3 (10.00%) |
50–<60 | 4 (26.67%) | 2 (13.33%) | P = 0.3628 ΝS | 6 (20.00%) |
60–<70 | 1 (6.67%) | 3 (20.00%) | P = 0.2843 ΝS | 4 (13.33%) |
70–<80 | 0 (0.00%) | 1 (6.67%) | P = 0.3077 ΝS | 1 (3.33%) |
80–<90 | 1 (6.67%) | 2 (13.33%) | P = 0.54186 ΝS | 3 (10.00%) |
90–<100 | 0 (0.00%) | 1 (6.67%) | P = 0.3077 ΝS | 1 (3.33%) |
Seizure frequency reduction after 6 months | ||||
Seizure free (100% reduction) | 9 (60.00%) | 7 (46.67%) | P = 0.46540 NS | 16 (53.33%) |
SFR (if still convulsions) | 6 (40.00%) | 8 (53.33%) | 14 (46.67%) | |
50 | 1 (6.67%) | 1 (6.67%) | NA | 2 (6.67%) |
50–<60 | 2 (13.33%) | 2 (13.33%) | NA | 4 (13.33%) |
60–<70 | 1 (6.67%) | 2 (13.33%) | P = 0.54186 NS | 3 (10.00%) |
70–<80 | 1 (6.67%) | 2 (13.33%) | P = 0.54186 NS | 3 (10.00%) |
80–<90 | 1 (6.67%) | 1 (6.67%) | NA | 2 (6.67%) |
90–<100 | 0 (0.00%) | 0 (0.00%) | NA | 0 (0.00%) |
SFR seizure frequency reduction, NS non significant, χ2 (Fr) Friedman Chi-Square, df degree of freedom.
*Statistically significant.
#NA = non applicable.
Bold values refer to the total number of cases who became seizure-free or showed seizure frequency reduction 3 months after KD and followed by details of seizure frequency reduction.
The best seizures control was observed in genetic epilepsy, Sturge–Weber syndrome, tuberous sclerosis, Miller–Dieker syndrome and white matter disease causing leukodystrophy, each of them (11 cases) became seizure free 6 months after KD, followed by cases of post-traumatic epilepsy and post-anoxic epilepsy who responded well to the KD treatment with 2 out of 3 and 3 out of 4, respectively, were seizure free and seizures in the remaining 1/3 and 1/4 of them were reduced by >80–90%. On the other hand, the efficacy of KD for epilepsy of unknown etiology (12 cases) was poor as no patients became seizure free and seizure reduction ranged from >50 to <80%.
In addition to seizure control, we observed that 46.67% of patients in classic KD group and 66.67% of patients in MAD group showed attention improvement 6 months after initiation of KD.
KD and EEG
KD had an impact on the EEG after the first month, and after 3 months, improvements in the background rhythm slowing were observed by plus ≥2 Hz in 8 cases and by plus 1–2 Hz in 15 cases, while after 6 months was observed by plus ≥2 Hz in 9 cases and by plus 1–2 Hz in 15 cases compared to baseline with significant correlation with seizure control after 6 months (P value = 0.031 and 0.021), respectively (Table 5). In addition, no change in background rhythm (<1 Hz) which was found in 20 out of 30 cases after 1 month, considerably improved to continue in just 7 cases after 3 months, and in only 6 cases after 6 months, with a significant correlation with seizure control (P value < 0.001). Figure 2 illustrates changes in background rhythm slowing after 1, 3 and 6 months of KD.
Table 5.
Background rhythm (n = 30) | After 1 month | After 3 months | After 6 months | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No seizures (n = 5) | Still seizuring (n = 25) | No seizures (n = 12) | Still seizuring (n = 18) | Test of significance | No seizures (n = 16) | Still seizuring (n = 14) | Test of significance | |
Plus ≥2 Hz | 1 (33.36%) | 2 (66.67%) | 2 (25.00%) | 6 (75.00%) | P = 0.063 NS | 3 (33.33%) | 6 (66.67%) | P = 0.031* |
Plus 1–2 Hz | 2 (28.57%) | 5 (71.43%) | 7 (46.67%) | 8 (53.33%) | P = 0.021* | 8 (53.33%) | 7 (46.67%) | P = 0.021* |
No change (<1 Hz) | 2 (10.00%) | 18 (90.00%) | 3 (42.86%) | 4 (57.14%) | P < 0.001* | 5 (83.33%) | 1 (16.67%) | P < 0.001* |
Baseline EEG (n = 30) | After 1 month | After 3 months | After 6 months | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No seizures (n = 5) | Still seizuring (n = 25) | Test of significance OR 95% CI P value |
No seizures (n = 12) | Still seizuring (n = 18) | Test of significance OR 95% CI P value |
No seizures (n = 16) | Still seizuring (n = 14) | Test of significance | |
No Epileptiform discharge(R) | 3 (37.50%) | 5 (62.50%) |
6.00 0.780–46,145 P = 0.085 NS |
8 (100.00%) | 0 (0.00%) |
69.88 3.368–1450.232 P = 0.006* |
8 (100.00%) | 0 (0.00%) |
29.00 1.480–568.234 P = 0.026* |
Epileptiform discharge | 2 (9.09%) | 20 (90.91%) | 4 (18.18%) | 18 (81.82%) | 8 (36.36%) | 14 (63.64%) |
Spike Index reduction (n = 22) | After 1 month | After 3 months | After 6 months | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No seizures (n = 5) | Still seizuring (n = 17) | No seizures (n = 12) | Still seizuring (n = 10) | Test of significance | No seizures (n = 16) | Still seizuring (n = 6) | Test of significance | |
>75% | 1 (33.33%) | 2 (66.67%) | 4 (50.00%) | 4 (50.00%) | P = 0.063 NS | 7 (77.78%) | 2 (22.22%) | P = 0.031* |
>50–75% | 1 (20.00%) | 4 (80.00%) | 4 (66.67%) | 2 (33.33%) | P = 1.000 NS | 5 (71.43%) | 2 (28.57%) | P = 0.754 NS |
30–50% | 1 (16.67%) | 5 (83.33%) | 2 (40.00%) | 3 (60.00%) | P = 0.687 NS | 3 (75.00%) | 1 (25.00%) | P = 0.687 NS |
<30% | 2 (25.00%) | 6 (75.00%) | 2 (66.67%) | 1 (33.33%) | P = 0.250 NS | 1 (50.00%) | 1 (50.00%) | P = 0.031* |
(R) reference category, CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio, P P value of McNemar test (compared with 1-month findings), n number, NS non significant, Hz Hertz.
*Statistically significant.
There was a statistically significant difference regarding seizures control between cases with baseline EEG with no epileptiform discharge and cases with baseline EEG with epileptiform discharge after 3 and 6 months of KD as all 8 cases with baseline EEG with no epileptiform discharge became seizures free 3 months after KD compared to cases with baseline EEG with epileptiform discharge only 4/22 and 8/22 became seizures free at 3 and 6 months (P value = 0.006 and 0.026) respectively. Moreover, the interictal SI among cases with baseline EEG with epileptiform discharge (22 cases, 11 in each group) showed a significant reduction of >50% after 1 month in 8/22 then this increased to 14 cases after 3 months and 16 cases after 6 months. Also, SI reduction <30% significantly reduced from 8 cases after 1 month to only 2 cases after 6 months with a significant correlation with seizure control (P = 0.031). The details of EEG changes in response to KD and its correlation with seizure control are illustrated in Table 5.
KD and ketosis
Our results did not find any correlation between the level of urinary ketones and seizure control 3 and 6 months after KD with a P value of 0.197 and OR 0.300.
Adverse effects
Our results revealed that gastrointestinal (GI) complications were frequent in our studied cases and constipation was the most common with the same occurrence in the two groups (33.33%), followed by diarrhea with a lower occurrence in classic KD group (13.33%) than MAD group (20%) then vomiting (20%) in classic KD group and (6.67%) in MAD group. We did not document renal/genitourinary complications in our study.
Long-term outcome
KD and cardiovascular risk
In our study, median level of HDL decrease did not reach a low level till the end of the study for 24 months. Also, median level of LDL, total cholesterol, and TG increase did not reach a high level (remained in the acceptable level) throughout the study period, without a significant difference between classic KD group and MAD group. Figure 3 demonstrates serial measurements of lipid profile from baseline up to 24 months.
KD and antiepileptic drugs
Upon regular follow-up visits every 3 months after the first 6 months, it was possible to withdraw one AEDs in three patients (20%) of classic KD group and five patients (33.33%) of MAD groups, in addition to withdrawal of two AEDs in three patients (20%) in classic KD group and two patients (13.33%) in MAD group leading to less AEDs side effects and better QoL while on adequate seizure control by KD.
KD and growth
The current study found a positive impact of KD on growth of studied cases (weight loss and BMI reduction were minimal) except in patients who were significantly overweight at diet initiation. Median weight and BMI of cases up to 24 months are illustrated in Fig. 4.
Discussion
Forty patients with DRE were initially enrolled in this prospective study, but only 30 patients successfully completed it. Six patients (15%) were unable to tolerate KD and were removed from the study (85% tolerability), three additional patients were excluded due to parental noncompliance and one case died during the study period. Overall reasons for dropout were mostly intolerance of the diet, AEs (mostly GI tract related), weight loss, parental unhappiness and change of mind.40
Meta-analysis studies have confirmed the efficacy of the KD and showed a seizure frequency reduction (SFR) of ≥50% for both the classic KD and MAD.41 Our findings revealed that 60% of patients in classic KD group and 46.67% of patients in MAD group became seizure free and the other 40% and 53.33%, respectively, had ≥50% SFR. Also, the effectiveness of the KD treatment showed an increased tendency over time, with a median decrease in seizure frequency of −83.33% and −100% versus −75% and −100% after 3 and 6 months in the classic KD group and MAD group respectively compared to patients’ baseline.
With a median percent change of −100%, we also documented a statistically significant reduction in seizure severity based on the CSSS 3 and 6 months after the KD compared to baseline in both groups. Two RCTs reported a statistically significant decrease in seizure severity, El-Rashidy et al.18 with a mean reduction in seizure severity of 37.63% (MAD) and 35.89% (KD) after 6 months, and Lambrechts et al.42 with a mean reduction of 65.2%.
The KD enhanced patients’ cognitive and functional status while also reducing seizure severity and frequency. Six months following KD, we noticed improvements in functional status and cognition, with 66.67% of patients in the MAD group and 46.67% of patients in the classic KD group displaying better attention. This is essential for DRE patients since uncontrolled seizures and the use of numerous anticonvulsants may negatively impact cognition, behavior, drowsiness, memory, and attention issues.43,44 These cognitive enhancements might be attributable to the KD given as the mean number of AEDs did not change until 6 months after the diet therapy.
Several studies revealed the effectiveness of KD for epileptic syndromes such as myoclonic-astatic epilepsy, Rett syndrome, West syndrome (particularly combined with tuberous sclerosis), and Dravet and Doose syndromes.21,45–48 In our study, all 3 patients with focal seizures, 4/5 of patients with generalized tonic-clonic seizures, 3/6 with infantile spasms, 5/10 with myoclonic seizures and 1/6 with unclassified seizures became seizure free after 6 months after KD initiation with no significant difference between the two groups. However, because of the small sample size, we were unable to draw any conclusions about which type of seizure was linked to better seizure control.
Although the KD has been proven to be a successful treatment for reducing seizures in DRE patients, its wider effects on cerebral neurophysiology are less clear.49 KD not only demonstrated good clinical efficacy in this study, but it also significantly reduced the frequency of interictal epileptic discharges and improved the EEG background rhythm. This was evident in 22 patients (73.33%) who had baseline EEG with epileptiform abnormalities (11 in each group) with a reduction in the SI >50% in 8 patients after 1 month, which increased to 14 patients after 3 months and 16 after 6 months. Zhu et al.50 reported ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency and reduction of epileptiform discharges in the awake state in 69.0% of patients after 3 months of KD treatment.
KD side effects are frequently blamed for trial dropouts since they are observed in a high percentage of young patients.7 More than forty different types of AEs were found with cardiovascular, renal/genitourinary, skeletal systems, and GI (mainly constipation) being the most prevalent.22,51 In our study, the most common AEs were GI related, with constipation reported in 33.33% of patients in each group and we did not report any renal/genitourinary AEs in our study. In general, AEs were transient, well controlled by conservative management and did not necessitate for diet discontinuation.
Lipid profile underwent frequent changes throughout the study period. However, HDL median levels did not reach the low level and the median of LDL, total cholesterol and TG measurements remained within the acceptable range till the end of the study for 24 months with a non-significant difference between classic KD and MAD. Kossoff et al., in 2006, 2007, and 2008 over the course of these investigations, observed that there was a comparable increase in total cholesterol and LDL levels, which was within the accepted value.14,52,53 Contrarily, Coppola et al.54 observed hyperlipidemia as a side effect in their group of patients receiving liquid ketogenic formula for refractory epileptic encephalopathies. Variations of the lipid profile especially during the first 12 months of the diet have been described in up to 60% of children22 and may happen during the first month but tend to normalize within the first few months following the diet’s introduction.24,55–57 Acceptable change of lipid profile with a long-term duration of KD (24 months) can be a good indicator for the safety of high-fat diet on cardiovascular system in children with DRE.
Systematic reviews have discovered conflicting results about the KD’s effects on growth, with some indicating a favorable benefit and others indicating a negative impact.55 Poor caloric and protein intake, acidosis or ketosis, the effects of underlying illnesses and therapies, ambulatory status, and related endocrine changes are some of the etiologies of poor growth in children on KDTs.58,59 The current study found that children who were underweight at diet onset [11 (36.67%) underweight and 7 (23.33%) wasted] showed an increase in Z scores of child weight over time. However, those who were overweight at diet onset and remained on the diet showed a decrease in the Z score over the longer term. This positive impact on growth highlights that fears from KD regarding weight loss were not evident.
Due to their excellent response to the diet, it was possible to withdraw AEDs in 13 patients (43.33%) after the first 6 months: one AEDs in 8 patients (3 in classic KD group vs. 5 in the MAD group) and two AEDs in 5 patients (3 in classic KD group vs. 2 in the MAD group). This can be attributed to the patients’ functional status and QoL.
The study’s points of strength include its prospective nature, which increased the accuracy of our data. We studied two types of KD (classic KD and MAD) commonly used for DRE to allow more options and less diet restrictions. In addition, the effectiveness of the KD regarding seizure control was not measured based solely on caregiver reports but included the EEG changes so allowing more objective evaluation and avoiding subjective errors. Along with growth tracking and documenting of the KD’s effects on growth, we also evaluated the KD’s safety for up to 24 months in terms of side effects and cardiovascular risk.
Limitation of the study
The main limitations of our study were the small sample size and the heterogeneity of the enrolled patients, which influenced the lack of statistical significance. Another point of limitation was the dropped-out cases due to noncompliance as we started the study with 40 patients and only 30 patients completed the study; the most common reasons for discontinuing the diet were intolerability and poor parental compliance when maintaining the diet.
Conclusion
With no major side effects reported and a positive influence on EEG and growth, KD (classic KD and MAD) appears to be an effective and generally well-tolerated therapy in the treatment of children with DRE. The role of KD as a single line of therapy, whether from the beginning or after withdrawal of all other medications once full control is established, is also recommended to be clarified by more research.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the parents of the children for their active participation in our study.
Author contributions
A.M.E.-S., S.A.A.E.N., W.A.B., Z.A.O., E.M.B., A.A.A.H. and H.M.S.E.Z. idea and design and data interpretation. A.M.E.-S., W.A.B. and Z.A.O. participant enrolment and data collection. A.A.A.H. and H.M.S.E.Z. manuscript writing. A.A.A.H., H.M.S.E.Z. and W.A.B. statistical analysis. A.M.E.-S., E.M.B., A.A.A.H., H.M.S.E.Z. and W.A.B. manuscript revision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Data availability
All datasets presented in this study are included in the article.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Menoufia Faculty of Medicine approved the study (ID number: 191019 PEDI 29). Research work was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all the legally authorized representatives of participants included in the study.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Singh A, Trevick S. The epidemiology of global epilepsy. Neurol. Clin. 2016;34:837–847. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2016.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Löscher W, Klitgaard H, Twyman RE, Schmidt D. New avenues for anti-epileptic drug discovery and development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2013;12:757–776. doi: 10.1038/nrd4126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Picot MC, Baldy‐Moulinier M, Daurès JP, Dujols P, Crespel A. The prevalence of epilepsy and pharmacoresistant epilepsy in adults: a population‐based study in a western European country. Epilepsia. 2008;49:1230–1238. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01579.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kwan P, et al. Definition of drug resistant epilepsy: consensus proposal by the ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies. Epilepsia. 2010;51:1069–1077. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02397.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schmidt D. Drug treatment of epilepsy: options and limitations. Epilepsy Behav. 2009;15:56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sourbron J, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation in children: a focus on intellectual disability. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 2017;21:427–440. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2017.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Martin K, Jackson CF, Levy RG, Cooper PN. Ketogenic diet and other dietary treatments for epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016;2:CD001903. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001903.pub3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Armeno M, Caraballo R. The evolving indications of KD therapy. Epilepsy Res. 2020;163:106340. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lambrechts DA, et al. Ketogenic diet effects on cognition, mood, and psychosocial adjustment in children. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2013;127:103–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2012.01686.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Youm YH, et al. The ketone metabolite β-hydroxybutyrate blocks NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated inflammatory disease. Nat. Med. 2015;21:263–269. doi: 10.1038/nm.3804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Simeone TA, Simeone KA, Stafstrom CE, Rho JM. Do ketone bodies mediate the anti-seizure effects of the ketogenic diet? Neuropharmacology. 2018;133:233–241. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang Y, et al. Altered gut microbiome composition in children with refractory epilepsy after ketogenic diet. Epilepsy Res. 2018;145:163–168. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2018.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Boison D. New insights into the mechanisms of the ketogenic diet. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2017;30:187–192. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kossoff, et al. A modified Atkins diet is effective for the treatment of intractable pediatric epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2006;47:421–424. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00438.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tonekaboni SH, et al. Efficacy of the Atkins diet as therapy for intractable epilepsy in children. Arch. Iran. Med. 2010;13:492–497. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Coppola G, et al. Low glycemic index diet in children and young adults with refractory epilepsy: first Italian experience. Seizure. 2011;20:526–528. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2011.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Miranda MJ, Turner Z, Magrath G. Alternative diets to the classical ketogenic diet-can we be more liberal? Epilepsy Res. 2012;100:278–285. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2012.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.El-Rashidy OF, et al. Modified Atkins diet vs classic ketogenic formula in intractable epilepsy. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2013;128:402–408. doi: 10.1111/ane.12137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Miranda MJ, Mortensen M, Povlsen JH, Nielsen H, Beniczky S. Danish study of a modified Atkins diet for medically intractable epilepsy in children: can we achieve the same results as with the classical ketogenic diet? Seizure. 2011;20:151–155. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2010.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Porta N, et al. Comparison of seizure reduction and serum fatty acid levels after receiving the ketogenic and modified Atkins diet. Seizure. 2009;18:359–364. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2009.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kossoff EH, et al. Optimal clinical management of children receiving the ketogenic diet: recommendations of the International Ketogenic Diet Study Group. Epilepsia. 2009;50:304–317. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01765.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kang HC, Chung DE, Kim DW, Kim HD. Early- and late-onset complications of the ketogenic diet for intractable epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2004;45:1116–1123. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.10004.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Muscogiuri G, et al. The management of very low-calorie ketogenic diet in obesity outpatient clinic: a practical guide. J. Transl. Med. 2019;17:356. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-2104-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Groesbeck DK, Bluml RM, Kossoff EH. Long-term use of the ketogenic diet in the treatment of epilepsy. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2006;48:978–981. doi: 10.1017/S0012162206002143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hallböök T, Köhler S, Rosén I, Lundgren J. Effects of ketogenic diet on epileptiform activity in children with therapy resistant epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2007;77:134–140. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2007.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Remahl S, Dahlin MG, Amark PE. Influence of the ketogenic diet on 24-hour electroencephalogram in children with epilepsy. Pediatr. Neurol. 2008;38:38–43. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2007.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.El Shafie AM, et al. Development of LMS and Z score growth references for Egyptian children from birth up to 5 years. Front. Pediatr. 2021;18:598499. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.598499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.El Shafie AM, et al. Establishment of Z score reference of growth parameters for Egyptian school children and adolescents aged from 5 to 19 years: a cross sectional study. Front. Pediatr. 2020;21:368. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Duncan JS, Sander JW. The Chalfont Seizure Severity Scale. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1991;54:873–876. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.54.10.873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice. Lancet. 2002;359:515–519. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07683-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering. Lancet. 2002;359:614–618. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07750-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Karanicolas PJ, Farrokhyar F, Bhandari M. Practical tips for surgical research: blinding: who, what, when, why, how? Can. J. Surg. 2010;53:345–348. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Thewes B, et al. One way or another: the opportunities and pitfalls of self-referral and consecutive sampling as recruitment strategies for psycho-oncology intervention trials. Psychooncology. 2018;27:2056–2059. doi: 10.1002/pon.4780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.de Ferranti SD, et al. Cardiovascular risk reduction in high-risk pediatric patients: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139:e603–e634. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schrader LM, Stern JM, Koski L, Nuwer MR, Engel J., Jr Seizure incidence during single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in individuals with epilepsy. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004;115:2728–2737. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chow, S.-C., Shao, J. & Wang, H. Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research. 2nd edn, 90 (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2008).
- 37.Sealed Envelope Ltd. Power calculator for binary outcome non-inferiority trial (accessed 5 August 2021); https://www.sealedenvelope.com/power/binary-noninferior/ (2012).
- 38.Fisher RS, et al. Operational classification of seizure types by the International League Against Epilepsy: Position Paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia. 2017;58:522–530. doi: 10.1111/epi.13670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Scheffer IE, et al. ILAE classification of the epilepsies: Position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia. 2017;58:512–521. doi: 10.1111/epi.13709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sourbron J, et al. Ketogenic diet for the treatment of pediatric epilepsy: review and meta-analysis. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2020;36:1099–1109. doi: 10.1007/s00381-020-04578-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ruiz Herrero J, et al. Safety and effectiveness of the prolonged treatment of children with a ketogenic diet. Nutrients. 2020;12:306. doi: 10.3390/nu12020306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lambrechts DA, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the ketogenic diet in refractory childhood epilepsy. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2017;135:231–239. doi: 10.1111/ane.12592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Neuropsychological effects of epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs. Lancet. 2001;357:216–222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03600-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Aldenkamp AP. Effect of seizures and epileptiform discharges on cognitive function. Epilepsia. 1997;38:S52–S55. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1997.tb04520.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kang HC, Kim YJ, Kim DW, Kim HD. Efficacy and safety of the ketogenic diet for intractable childhood epilepsy: Korean multicentric experience. Epilepsia. 2005;46:272–279. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2005.48504.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Caraballo RH, et al. Ketogenic diet in patients with myoclonic-astatic epilepsy. Epileptic Disord. 2006;8:151–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kilaru S, Bergqvist AGC. Current treatment of myoclonic astatic epilepsy: clinical experience at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Epilepsia. 2007;48:1703–1707. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01186.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Korff C, et al. Dravet syndrome (severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy): a retrospective study of 16 patients. J. Child Neurol. 2007;22:185–194. doi: 10.1177/0883073807300294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kessler SK, Gallagher PR, Shellhaas RA, Clancy RR, Bergqvist AG. Early EEG improvement after ketogenic diet initiation. Epilepsy Res. 2011;94:94–101. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2011.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhu D, et al. Ketogenic diet effects on neurobehavioral development of children with intractable epilepsy: a prospective study. Epilepsy Behav. 2016;55:87–91. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Pietrzak D, Kasperek K, Rękawek P, Piątkowska-Chmiel I. The therapeutic role of ketogenic diet in neurological disorders. Nutrients. 2022;14:1952. doi: 10.3390/nu14091952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kossoff EH, Turner Z, Bluml RM, Pyzik PL, Vining EP. A randomized, crossover comparison of daily carbohydrate limits using the modified Atkins diet. Epilepsy Behav. 2007;10:432–436. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kossoff EH, Rowley H, Sinha, S R, Vining EP. A prospective study of the modified Atkins diet for intractable epilepsy in adults. Epilepsia. 2008;49:316–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01256.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Coppola G, et al. Ketogenic diet for the treatment of catastrophic epileptic encephalopathies in childhood. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 2010;14:229–234. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2009.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Güzel O, Yılmaz U, Uysal U, Arslan N. The effect of olive oil-based ketogenic diet on serum lipid levels in epileptic children. Neurol. Sci. 2016;37:465–470. doi: 10.1007/s10072-015-2436-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kwiterovich PO, Jr, Vining EP, Pyzik P, Skolasky R, Jr, Freeman JM. Effect of a high-fat ketogenic diet on plasma levels of lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins in children. JAMA. 2003;290:912–920. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.7.912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Cai QY, et al. Safety and tolerability of the ketogenic diet used for the treatment of refractory childhood epilepsy: a systematic review of published prospective studies. World J. Pediatr. 2017;13:528–536. doi: 10.1007/s12519-017-0053-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ferraris C, et al. Impact of the ketogenic diet on linear growth in children: a single-center retrospective analysis of 34 cases. Nutrients. 2019;11:1442. doi: 10.3390/nu11071442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Svedlund A, Hallböök T, Magnusson P, Dahlgren J, Swolin-Eide D. Prospective study of growth and bone mass in Swedish children treated with the modified Atkins diet. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 2019;23:629–638. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2019.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All datasets presented in this study are included in the article.