Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Asthma. 2022 Sep 14;60(5):1000–1008. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2119865

Pediatric and Adult Asthma Clinical Phenotypes: A Real World, Big Data Study Based on Acute Exacerbations

Jie Xu 1, Jiang Bian 1, Jennifer N Fishe 2,3
PMCID: PMC10011007  NIHMSID: NIHMS1848294  PMID: 36039465

Abstract

Introduction:

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease with a range of observable phenotypes. To date, the characterization of asthma phenotypes is mostly limited to allergic versus non-allergic disease. Therefore, the aim of this big data study was to computationally derive asthma subtypes from the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium

Methods:

We obtained data from 2012-2020 from the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium. Longitudinal data for patients greater than two years of age who met inclusion criteria for an asthma exacerbation based on International Classification of Diseases codes. We used matrix factorization to extract information and K-means clustering to derive subtypes. The distributions of demographics, comorbidities, and medications were compared using Chi-square statistics.

Results:

A total of 39,807 pediatric patients and 23,883 adult patients met inclusion criteria. We identified five distinct pediatric subtypes and four distinct adult subtypes. Pediatric subtype P1 had the highest proportion of black patients, but the lowest use of inhaled corticosteroids and allergy medications. Subtype P2 had a predominance of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, whereas P3 had a predominance of patients with allergic disorders. Adult subtype A2 was the most severe and all patients were on biologic agents. Most of subtype A3 patients were not taking controller medications, whereas most patients (>90%) in subtypes A2 and A4 were taking corticosteroids and allergy medications.

Conclusion:

We found five distinct pediatric asthma subtypes and four distinct adult asthma subtypes. Future work should externally validate these subtypes and characterize response to treatment by subtype to better guide clinical treatment of asthma.

Keywords: allergy, asthma, computational phenotypes, K-means clustering, subtypes

Introduction

Asthma is one of the most prevalent diseases, affecting 339 million people worldwide and over 25 million people in the United States.1,2 The diagnosis of asthma is made clinically by observing a constellation of symptoms such as wheezing, shortness of breath, chest tightness, and cough, in combination with expiratory airflow limitation.3 However, rather than being a uniform condition, asthma is a term that describes a variety of observable phenotypes that result in chronic airway inflammation.4,5 Therefore, patients with asthma have different etiologies of their respiratory disease, triggers, clinical presentation, and response to treatment.

Since asthma is a heterogeneous disease, it follows that characterizing asthma phenotypes would aid in improved primary preventative care and treatment of asthma exacerbations. However, to date, the characterization of asthma phenotypes is largely confined to allergic versus non-allergic asthma,6,7 which ignores overlapping phenotypes, and does not account for how asthma varies between pediatric and adult patients.4,8 Patients with allergic asthma are candidates for targeted biologic therapies which have helped decrease the number and severity of exacerbations.6,7 Accordingly, further characterization of other asthma phenotypes could also lead to targeted individualized therapy that decreases morbidity. In particular, patients with severe asthma whose exacerbations are resistant or poorly responsive to corticosteroids are ideal candidates for personalized management based on better characterization of their asthma phenotype.5,9

Prior studies on asthma phenotypes have either contained small sample sizes, and/or were confined to outpatient data.5,8,10 Yet accounting for a patient’s presentation during an asthma exacerbation (i.e., severity and response to treatment) is arguably one of the most clinically relevant ways to define asthma phenotypes.11 Management of asthma exacerbations currently follows a “one size fits all” approach, which although evidence-based and tailored for severity and pediatric versus adult patients, does not account for different asthma phenotypes.12,13 Therefore, as a first step towards better characterization of both adult and pediatric asthma phenotypes in order to improve management of exacerbations and chronic symptoms, the aim of this big data study was to computationally derive asthma subtypes from the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium.

Methods

Data Sources and Population

We obtained individual-level patient data from 2012-2020 from the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium,14 which contains robust longitudinal and linked patient-level real world data of ~15 million (>60%) Floridians, including data from Medicaid claims, cancer registries, vital statistics, and electronic health records (EHRs) from its clinical partners. As one of the Clinical Data Research Networks contributing to the national Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet), OneFlorida includes 12 healthcare organizations that provide care through 4,100 physicians, 914 clinical practices, and 22 hospitals, covering all 67 Florida counties. OneFlorida follows the PCORnet Common Data Model including patient demographics, enrollment status, vital signs, conditions, encounters, diagnoses, procedures, prescribing (i.e., provider orders for medications), dispensing (i.e., outpatient pharmacy dispensing), and laboratory testing results.15 This study was approved by the study institution’s Institutional Review Board.

Longitudinal EHR data of patients who met inclusion criteria for an asthma exacerbation based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes from the OneFlorida network between 2012 and 2020 were analyzed. We identified the asthma patients in our data based on diagnostic codes (ICD codes 9th and 10th revision) and required at least one asthma event. Selected codes include (ICD-9: 493.01, 493.02, 493.11, 493.12, 493.21, 493.22, 493.91, 493.92; ICD-10: J45.901, J45.902, J45.21, J45.31, J45.41, J45.51, J45.22, J45.32, J45.42, J45.52). Patients younger than two years of age were excluded from our study to avoid confounding with bronchiolitis.

Feature Representation

We set the index date to the first ever encounter in which an asthma exacerbation event was assigned (index date). We refer to the observed time as two years before and two years after the index date as the baseline period and use the information collected during that time period to derive subtypes. We extracted features from both adult and pediatric cohorts including demographics (e.g., age, sex, race / ethnicity), diagnoses (i.e., ICD 9 / 10 – see Supplementary Table 1), and drug prescriptions (i.e., National Drug Codes / RXNorm). We calculated age based on the date of birth and date of the index asthma exacerbation. We grouped the selected drugs to drug classes (see Supplementary Table 2). By determining whether a patient had received a diagnosis or a drug in those categories or not, we assigned a one or zero to each feature (i.e., one-hot encoding). We concatenated all features to represent each patient as a binary matrix X = [x1, …, xn] ∈ {0,1}p×n. xi,j = 1 denotes the i-th patient has p-th feature (i.e., diagnosis or drug classes).

Clustering With Nonnegative Matrix Factorization

Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) is a machine learning technique that has been demonstrated to extract meaningful information from high-dimensional data such as gene expression microarrays.16,17 More specifically, NMF uses unsupervised learning, which is the analysis of unlabeled datasets using machine learning algorithms to discover patterns and groupings that otherwise may be hidden. After representing the patient data as a data matrix X ∈ {0,1}p×n, NMF is applied to decompose the data matrix X into the product of two matrices W and H,

XWH,

where XRp×n, WRp×r is a binary matrix and HRr×n is a non-negative matrix. In our study, rank r is determined by taking consideration of both the final objective values and learning efficiency. Matrices W and H preserve the most important properties of the input matrix X. Matrix H was, then, used as our new feature representation. The K-means clustering algorithm was applied on H to derive subtypes, and the number of clusters was determined by Elbow Method, Davies-Bouldin Index and Gap Statistic.18 After deriving subtypes, we calculated the frequency of each variable in each subtype. The distributions of demographics, comorbidities, and medications were compared using Chi-square statistics.

Results

A total of 63,690 patients met study inclusion criteria (Figure 1). There were 39,807 pediatric patients ages 2 to18 years and 23,883 adult patients. Salient characteristics of both adult and pediatric patients overall are displayed in Figure 2.

Figure 1: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Applied to Study Population.

Figure 1:

*Index date: first asthma diagnosis date

Figure 2: Relevant Comorbidities of Adult and Pediatric Study Patients.

Figure 2:

GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease; LABA = long-acting beta agonist; SABA = short-acting beta agonist

Pediatric Patient Subtypes

Overall, the mean age of pediatric patients (N=39,807) was 7.1 years, 41.2% of were female, 28.2% were White and 40.5% were Black. The most common comorbidities were allergic rhinitis (45.1%), sinusitis (27.6%), and eczema (24.6%). The most common drug classes were systemic corticosteroids (90.4%), inhaled corticosteroids (73.4%), and allergy medications (67.8%).

There were five subtypes identified in pediatric patients (P1-P5). Characteristics of pediatric patients and their five subtype groups (P1-P5) are displayed in Table 1 and Figure 3. Patients in subtype P4 were relatively younger (mean age is 6.3) than other four subtypes (mean age greater than 7 years). Subtype P1 had a higher proportion of Black patients (N=5913, 46.9%) and less White patients (N=3092, 24.5%), whereas Subtype P2 was the opposite, with 28.3% Black and 35.9% White patients.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the 5 Pediatric Subtypes

Characteristic Total Subtypes χ2
p-value
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5
No. of patients (%) 39807 (100) 12621 (31.7) 3139 (7.9) 7299 (18.3) 5269 (13.2) 11479 (28.8)
Age, Mean (SD), yr 7.1 (4.1) 7.1 (4.3) 7.3 (4.4) 7.3 (4.2) 6.3 (3.8) 7.3 (3.9)
Sex, No. (%)
 Female 16381 (41.2) 5239 (41.5) 1328 (42.3) 3041 (41.7) 2160 (41) 4613 (40.2) ***
Race,# No. (%)
 Asian 239 (0.6) 65 (0.5) 20 (0.6) 49 (0.7) 29 (0.6) 76 (0.7) ***
 Black 16127 (40.5) 5913 (46.9) 889 (28.3) 2495 (34.2) 2264 (43) 4566 (39.8) ***
 White 11223 (28.2) 3092 (24.5) 1126 (35.9) 2140 (29.3) 1882 (35.7) 2983 (26) ***
American Indian or Alaska Native 71 (0.2) 21 (0.2) 7 (0.2) 13 (0.2) 7 (0.1) 23 (0.2) ns
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 3 (< 0.1) 1 (<0.1) 0 (0) 2 (<0.1) 2 (<0.1) 2 (<0.1) ns
Multiple races 113 (2.8) 24 (0.2) 19 (0.6) 14 (0.2) 29 (0.6) 27 (0.2) *
 Other^ 9517 (23.9) 2781 (22) 707 (22.5) 2044 (28) 859 (16.3) 3126 (27.2) ***
Comorbidities, No. (%)
 Obesity 6117 (15.4) 1533 (12.1) 967 (30.8) 1270 (17.4) 500 (9.5) 1847 (16.1) ns
 Allergic rhinitis 17972 (45.1) 2486 (19.7) 2427 (77.3) 4513 (61.8) 1881 (35.7) 6665 (58.1) ***
 Sinusitis 10983 (27.6) 2138 (16.9) 1330 (42.4) 6201 (85) 1182 (22.4) 132 (1.1) ***
 Hypertension 853 (2.1) 208 (1.6) 267 (8.5) 166 (2.3) 71 (1.3) 141 (1.2) ***
Second hand smoke exposure 1665 (4.2) 412 (3.3) 206 (6.6) 259 (3.5) 312 (5.9) 476 (4.1) ***
 Depression 1260 (3.2) 300 (2.4) 244 (7.8) 278 (3.8) 126 (2.4) 312 (2.7) ***
 GERD 3781 (9.5) 690 (5.5) 2342 (74.6) 389 (5.3) 360 (6.8) 0 (0) ***
 Obstructive sleep apnea 2453 (6.2) 341 (2.7) 1191 (37.9) 424 (5.8) 182 (3.5) 315 (2.7) ***
 Eczema 9783 (24.6) 1981 (15.7) 1071 (34.1) 2173 (29.8) 1330 (25.2) 3228 (28.1) ***
 Pulmonary hypertension 178 (0.4) 45 (0.4) 99 (3.2) 14 (0.2) 9 (0.2) 11 (0.1) ***
 Disorders relating to short gestation and low birthweight 668 (1.7) 152 (1.2) 257 (8.2) 77 (1.1) 87 (1.7) 95 (0.8) ***
 Environmental allergies 5130 (12.9) 689 (5.5) 656 (20.9) 1188 (16.3) 890 (16.9) 1707 (14.9) ***
Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis 17 (0) 3 (0) 6 (0.2) 4 (0.1) 1 (0) 3 (0) *
Drug Class, No. (%)
 Systemic corticosteroid 35967 (90.4) 10382 (82.3) 3126 (99.6) 5875 (80.5) 5105 (96.9) 11479 (100) ***
 Inhaled corticosteroid 29203 (73.4) 6188 (49) 3127 (99.6) 6848 (93.8) 1561 (29.6) 11479 (100) ***
 Long-acting beta agonist 4023 (10.1) 355 (2.8) 1005 (32) 872 (11.9) 126 (2.4) 1665 (14.5) ***
 Allergy 27004 (67.8) 67 (0.5) 3087 (98.3) 7266 (99.5) 5105 (96.9) 11479 (100) **
 Allergy & Asthma shortacting beta agonist 4063 (10.2) 776 (6.1) 830 (26.4) 489 (6.7) 630 (12) 1338 (11.7) ***
 Biologic agent 116 (0.3) 67 (0.5) 49 (1.6) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) ns
 Other controller 315 (0.8) 18 (0.1) 266 (8.5) 8 (0.1) 23 (0.4) 0 (0) ns
 Other short-acting beta agonist 4 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0) 2 (0) ns
*

p<0.05

**

p<0.01

***

p<0.001

#

ns=not significant, GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease, Race - missing data not shown

^

Other = Other as defined by PCORnet common data model v6.0.

Figure 3: Graphical Depiction of Pediatric Subtypes.

Figure 3:

From top left to right bottom: All subtypes, P1, P2, P3, P4, P5.

For each individual figure, the color shading is anchored to the subtype represented. The projections of that color go to the characteristics found in the subtype, and the width of those projections represents the relative proportion of patients in that subtype who have that characteristic.

Compared with the other four subtypes, obesity, allergic rhinitis, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were more common in subtype P2. Figure 3 represents the connections between five subtypes (represented by different color) and several most common comorbidities or medications. Each comorbidity or medication is represented by a fragment on the outer part of the circular layout. The size of the different colors of the arc is proportional to the number of patients in each subtype. In particular, GERD was found in 74.6% (N=2342) of patients with subtype P2, and less than 10% of patients with other subtypes. Subtype P3 had a higher proportion of patients with sinusitis (N=6201, 85%) and allergic rhinitis (N=4513, 61.8%).

Almost all patients in subtypes P2, P3 and P5 were taking inhaled corticosteroids, but only 49% (N=6,188) patients in subtype P1 and 29.6% patients (N=1,561) in subtype P4 were taking inhaled corticosteroids. Most patient in subtypes P2-P5 took allergy medications, while only 0.5% (N=67) patients took allergy medications in Subtype P1.

Adult Patient Subtypes

Overall, the mean age of adult patients (N=23,883) was 44.4 years. The adult study population had a female predominance (80.8%). In contrast with pediatric patients, there were more adult White patients (40.9%) than Black patients (33.7%). The most common comorbidities were hypertension (59.1%), obesity (47.0%), GERD (39.7%), depression (32.2%), and tobacco use disorder (30.5%). The most common drug classes were systemic corticosteroids (66.8%), allergy medications (47.6%), and inhaled corticosteroids (45.9%)

There were four subtypes identified in adult patients (A1-A4). Characteristics of adult patients and their four subtypes groups are displayed in Table 2 and Figure 4. Patients with subtype A1 were younger (mean age 36.3 years) and had less comorbidities than the other three subtypes. Patients with subtype A3 were the oldest (mean age 55.1 years), and most patients had hypertension (N=6543, 97.6%). Subtype A2 appeared to be the most severe, as patients had more comorbidities than other subtypes. Additionally, all patients with subtype A2 were taking biologic drugs (i.e., Omalizumab, Mepolizumab, Benralizumab, Reslizumab). Subtype A4 had the most patients with tobacco use order (38.3%). Most patients in subtype A2 (> 95%) and A4 (> 90%) were taking systemic corticosteroids, inhaled corticosteroids, and allergy medications, while most patients in subtype A3 were not taking those medications. Additionally, less than 30% of patients in subtype A1 and A3 were taking allergy drugs.

Table 2.

Characteristics of the 4 Adult Subtypes

Characteristic Total Subtypes χ2
p-value
A1 A2 A3 A4
No. of patients (%) 23883 (100) 9261 (38.8) 129 (0.5) 6705 (28.1) 7788 (32.6)
Age, Mean (SD), yr 44.4 (18.2) 36.3 (16.4) 44.8 (15.5) 55.1 (17.7) 44.7 (15.7)
Sex, No. (%)
 Female 19305 (80.8) 7302 (78.8) 106 (82.2) 5387 (80.3) 6510 (83.6)
Race,# No. (%)
 Asian 173 (0.7) 71 (0.8) 1 (0.8) 53 (0.8) 48 (0.6) ns
 Black 8037 (33.7) 3199 (34.5) 37 (28.7) 2077 (31) 2724 (35) ***
 White 9770 (40.9) 3925 (42.4) 46 (35.7) 2841 (42.4) 2958 (38) ***
American Indian or Alaska Native 54 (0.2) 23 (0.2) 1 (0.8) 11 (0.2) 19 (0.2) *
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 7 (0.1) 7 (0.1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) ns
Multiple races 135 (5.7) 52 (0.6) 1 (0.8) 53 (0.8) 29 (0.4) ns
 Other^ 4208 (17.6) 1662 (17.9) 29 (22.5) 1191 (17.8) 1326 (17) ***
Comorbidities, No. (%)
 Obesity 11236 (47.0) 1520 (16.4) 82 (63.6) 4612 (68.8) 5022 (64.5) ***
 Allergic rhinitis 4310 (18.0) 670 (7.2) 84 (65.1) 729 (10.9) 2827 (36.3) ***
 Sinusitis 5136 (21.5) 1284 (13.9) 66 (51.2) 1022 (15.2) 2764 (35.5) ***
 Hypertension 14118 (59.1) 1916 (20.7) 89 (69) 6543 (97.6) 5570 (71.5) ***
Second hand smoke exposure 284 (1.2) 56 (0.6) 4 (3.1) 67 (1) 157 (2) ns
 Depression 7683 (32.2) 1212 (13.1) 54 (41.9) 2821 (42.1) 3596 (46.2) ***
 GERD 9485 (39.7) 997 (10.8) 80 (62) 4065 (60.6) 4343 (55.8) ***
 Obstructive sleep apnea 4476 (18.7) 134 (1.4) 60 (46.5) 2034 (30.3) 2248 (28.9) ***
 Eczema 1468 (6.1) 306 (3.3) 20 (15.5) 328 (4.9) 814 (10.5) ***
 Pulmonary hypertension 1825 (7.6) 59 (0.6) 13 (10.1) 955 (14.2) 798 (10.2) ***
 Environmental allergies 1768 (7.4) 424 (4.6) 31 (24) 324 (4.8) 989 (12.7) ***
 Tobacco use disorder 7284 (30.5) 2515 (27.2) 20 (15.5) 1769 (26.4) 2980 (38.3) ***
Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis 26 (0.1) 4 (0) 2 (1.6) 5 (0.1) 15 (0.2) ns
Drug Class, No. (%)
 Systemic corticosteroid 15947 (66.8) 5668 (61.2) 125 (96.9) 3033 (45.2) 7121 (91.4) ***
 Inhaled corticosteroid 10955 (45.9) 2020 (21.8) 125 (96.9) 1212 (18.1) 7598 (97.6) ***
 Long-acting beta agonist 7130 (29.9) 711 (7.7) 122 (94.6) 581 (8.7) 5716 (73.4) ***
 Allergy 11372 (47.6) 2390 (25.8) 128 (99.2) 1413 (21.1) 7441 (95.5) ***
 Allergy & Asthma short-acting beta agonist 5570 (23.3) 926 (10) 79 (61.2) 692 (10.3) 3873 (49.7) ***
 Biologic agent 129 (0.5) 0 (0) 129 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) ***
 Other controller 1949 (8.2) 81 (0.9) 65 (50.4) 138 (2.1) 1665 (21.4) ***
 Other short-acting beta agonist 20 (0.1) 0 (0) 1 (0.8) 0 (0) 19 (0.2) ns
*

p<0.05

**

p<0.01

***

p<0.001

#

ns=not significant, GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease, Race - missing data not shown

^

Other = Other as defined by PCORnet common data model v6.0.

Figure 4: Graphical Depiction of Adult Subtypes.

Figure 4:

Left center: All subtypes; then from top left to bottom right: A1, A2, A3, A4.

For each individual figure, the color shading is anchored to the subtype represented. The projections of that color go to the characteristics found in the subtype, and the width of those projections represents the relative proportion of patients in that subtype who have that characteristic.

Discussion

In this big data study of the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium, we found five distinct pediatric asthma subtypes and four distinct adult asthma subtypes. To our knowledge, to date this is the largest sample size for a computationally derived asthma phenotyping study. Our results reinforce the traditional allergic versus non-allergic asthma subtype distinction,6,7 but also further divide both allergic and non-allergic asthma into more distinct subtypes that account for severity of disease and response to treatment, as well as potentially asthma determinants such as race, ethnicity, and environmental triggers.

In the 39,807 included pediatric patients, we found five distinct subtypes (P1-P5). Although the overall pediatric cohort was 40.5% Black patients, Subtype P1 had the highest proportion of Black patients (46.9%) and lowest proportion of White patients (24.5%), while Subtype P2 had the lowest proportion of Black patients (28.3%) and the highest proportion of White patients (35.9%). Corresponding to that, subtype P2 had a significantly higher incidence of GERD, obesity, and obstructive sleep apnea comorbidities compared to P1 and the other subtypes with a larger proportion of Black patients. However, despite P1 having the highest proportion of Black patients, and the known higher morbidity and mortality suffered by Black children due to asthma,19 patients in P1 had significantly lower rates of all asthma and allergy medication administrations and prescriptions, including inhaled corticosteroids (82.3% in P1 versus 99.6% in P2) and short-acting beta agonists (6.1% in P1 versus 26.4% in P2). That finding may represent a lack of access to care or other social determinants of health for the more racially diverse P1 patients. It could also represent the known differences in pharmacogenomic response to asthma medications, particularly bronchodilators, among Black pediatric patients,20, 21 which may lead to clinicians not prescribing those medications due to a perceived lack of effectiveness.

Based off the comorbidities of allergic rhinitis and eczema, subtypes P2, P3, and P5 appear to constitute what has been traditionally grouped as the allergic or atopic subtype of asthma. However, subtype P4, while not having higher rates of allergic rhinitis compared to other subtypes, did have a higher rate of patients with eczema and environmental allergies. Regardless, P2 is distinguished from the other subtypes with allergic characteristics by a statistically significant higher percentage of patients with a history of prematurity and low birth weight (8% in P2 versus around 1% in all other subtypes), higher rates of pulmonary hypertension that likely correspond to a history of prematurity (3% in P2 for near 0% for all other subtypes), and nearly one-third of P2 patients with a diagnosis of obesity. Corresponding to that, P2 had the most patients prescribed a biologic agent. However, P2 and subtype P5 both had nearly equivalent high rates of systemic and inhaled corticosteroid prescriptions (99.6% for both in P2 and 100% for both in P5). Thus, it appears subtypes P2 and P5 appear to be the most severe pediatric phenotypes. Further study, particularly of P2 and P5, but also of all the pediatric subtypes, is warranted to characterize in more detail patients’ response to treatments (particularly inhaled and systemic corticosteroids, cornerstones of asthma controller and exacerbation therapy) and the burden of emergency department visits and intensive care admissions.

We found four distinct adult asthma phenotypes, with subtype A1 being the youngest (mean age 36.3 years), most male predominant (78.8% female), and least obese (16.4% obese versus > 60% obese in all other subtypes). Subtype A3 was the oldest and had significantly higher rates of both systemic hypertension (97.6% of A3 patients) and pulmonary hypertension (14.2% of A3 patients). Pulmonary hypertension could be related to obstructive sleep apnea, which is known to worsen chronic lung diseases such as asthma.22 Further, poor control of systemic hypertension could also have a deleterious effect on asthma outcomes.23

However, despite those characteristics of subtype A3, it appears subtype A2 is the most severe phenotype, as 100% of A2 patients were on biologic agents. Subtype A2 also had the highest rates of obstructive sleep apnea (46.5%), allergic rhinitis (65.1%), and eczema (15.5%). Thus, it appears that subtype A2 falls into the classic allergic phenotype. However, it also appears that subtype A4 has allergic characteristics as well (36.3% of patients with allergic rhinitis and 10.5% of patients with eczema), thus perhaps A4 is also allergic but of a less severe phenotype. Further to this, A4 had the highest rates of tobacco use disorder, therefore perhaps the allergic characteristics of A4 of environmentally-induced and modifiable, in contrast to perhaps more a genetically driven allergic phenotype of A2.7 As with the pediatric subtypes, further characterization of outcomes in terms of emergency department visits, intensive care admissions, response to treatment, and even pharmacogenetic data would help guide definitive preventative and emergency management of these distinct subtypes of patients.

Limitations

This study has limitations that merit consideration. First, although the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium is a large repository of real-world clinical data, it contains encounters from a distinct region of the United States, and thus the patient data may not be generalizable to the rest of the United States or more globally. Second, due to the unsupervised nature of the clustering methods we used, we ultimately decided the number of subtypes. Thus, there is some potential human error inherent in that approach, even though we used a variety of statistical methods to minimize this potential (i.e., the “Elbow” method and the Gap Statistic). Third, we performed our subtype characterization using a total of four years of clinical data per patient: two years before and two years after an index encounter. For older pediatric patients and for adult patients with mild asthma and / or infrequent encounters with the healthcare system, this may miss some patients or mischaracterize other patients. We also did not include more qualitative assessments of patients’ asthma, such as quality of life or other validated asthma severity scores, which are difficult to obtain from the EHR (or not contained in the EHR). However, further study using natural language processing of free text note could help fill that knowledge gap. Further to this, we did not have access to granular treatment response data or genomic data which could add more breadth and explanation to the subtype characteristics.

Conclusion

We found five distinct pediatric asthma subtypes and four distinct adult asthma subtypes. These subtypes reinforce the traditional allergic versus non-allergic asthma distinction, but also add further characterization, and vary by race and comorbidities. Further work should be done to externally validate these subtypes and more definitively characterize their response to current therapies to better guide clinical treatment of asthma.

Supplementary Material

Supp 1

Funding:

Dr. Fishe’s work is funded in part by a grant from the NHLBI (K23HL149991).

Abbreviations:

EHR

electronic health record

GERD

gastroesophageal reflux disease

ICD

international classification of diseases

LABA

long-acting beta agonist

RWD

real world data

SABA

short-acting beta agonist

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: No authors have conflicts of interest or financial disclosures.

Presentations: Portions of this manuscript were presented at the University of Florida College of Medicine Research Day in May 2022.

All authors are responsible for the reported research and have read and approve the manuscript as submitted. All authors listed have collectively written 100% of the manuscript. Jennifer N. Fishe, MD contributed to the study conceptualization and design, interpretation of the results, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision/editing. Jiang Bian, PhD contributed to the conceptualization, data acquisition, interpretation of the results, and critical revision/editing of the manuscript. Jie Xu, PhD contributed to the study conceptualization and design, data analysis, interpretation of the results, and critical revision/editing of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.The Global Asthma Report. 2018. Auckland, New Zealand: Global Asthma Network, 2018. Available at: http://globalasthmareport.org/resources/Global_Asthma_Report_2018.pdf Accessed April 7, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.National Health Interview Survey, National Center for Health Statistics, CDC Compiled 12/July/2020, available at: https://www.cdc.gov/asthma/most_recent_national_asthma_data.htm. Accessed April 7, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pocket Guide for Asthma Management and Prevention: Adults and Children Older than 5 Years. Global Initiative for Asthma. Updated 2021. Available at: https://ginasthma.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/GINA-Pocket-Guide-2021-V2-WMS.pdf Accessed April 7, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wenzel SE. Asthma: defining of the persistent adult phenotypes. Lancet. 2006;368:804–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wardlaw AJ, Silverman M, Siva R, Pavord ID, Green R. Multi-dimensional phenotyping: towards a new taxonomy for airway disease. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005;35:1254–1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kuruvilla ME, Lee FE, Lee GB. Understanding asthma phenotypes, endotypes, and mechanisms of disease. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019;56(2):219–233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Akar-Ghibril N, Casale T, Custovic A, Phipatanakul W. Allergic Endotypes and Phenotypes of Asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8(2):429–440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Conrad LA, Cabana MD, Rastogi D. Defining pediatric asthma: Phenotypes to Endotypes and Beyond. Pediatr Res. 2021;90(1):45–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heaney L, Robinson DS. Severe asthma treatment: need for characterizing patients. The Lancet. 2005;365(9463):974–976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Haldar P, Pavord ID, Shaw DE, Berry MA, Thomas M, Brightling CE, Wardlaw AJ, Green RH. Cluster analysis and clinical asthma phenotypes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(3):218–224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fishe JN, Labilloy G, Higley R, Casey D, Ginn A, Baskovich B, Blake KV. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in PRKG1 & SPATA13-AS1 are associated with bronchodilator response: a pilot study during acute asthma exacerbations in African American children. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2021;31(7):146–154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Expert Panel Working Group of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) administered and coordinated National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Coordinating Committee (NAEPPCC), Cloutier MM, Baptist AP, Blake KV, Brooks EG, Bryant-Stephens T, DiMango E, Dixon AE, Elward KS, Hartert T, Krishnan JA, Lemanske RF Jr, Ouellette DR, Pace WD, Schatz M, Skolnik NS, Stout JW, Teach SJ, Umscheid CA, Walsh CG. 2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Focused Updates to the Asthma Management Guidelines: A Report from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Coordinating Committee Expert Panel Working Group. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;146(6):1217–1270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Erratum in: J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021. Apr;147(4):1528–1530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shenkman E, Hurt M, Hogan W, Carrasquillo O, Smith S, Brickman A, et al. OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium: linking a clinical and translational science institute with a community based distributive medical education model. Academic Medicine. 2018;93(3):451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li Q, He Z, Guo Y, Zhang H, George TJ, Hogan W, et al. Assessing the Validity of an a priori Patient-Trial Generalizability Score using Real-world Data from a Large Clinical Data Research Network: A Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trial Case Study. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2019;2019:1101–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhang Zhongyuan, et al. "Binary matrix factorization with applications." Seventh IEEE international conference on data mining (ICDM 2007). IEEE, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pehkonen P, Wong G, Törönen P. Theme discovery from gene lists for identification and viewing of multiple functional groups. BMC bioinformatics. 2005. Dec;6(1):1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kodinariya Trupti M., and Makwana Prashant R.. "Review on determining number of Cluster in K-Means Clustering." International Journal 1.6 (2013): 90–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Asthma prevalence, health care use and mortality: United States, 2003-05.” 2015. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/asthma03-05/asthma03-05.htm. Accessed May 24, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Naqvi M, Thyne S, Choudhry S, Tsai HJ, Navarro D, Castro RA, Nazario S, Rodriguez-Santana JR, Casal J, Torres A, et al. Ethnic-specific differences in bronchodilator responsiveness among African Americans, Puerto Ricans, and Mexicans with asthma. J Asthma. 2007;44(8):639–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fishe JN, Labilloy G, Higley R, Casey D, Ginn A, Baskovich B, Blake KV. “Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in PRKG1 and SPATA13-AS1 are associated with bronchodilator response: a pilot study during acute asthma exacerbations in African American children.” Pharmacogenomics and Genetics. 2021;31:146–154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Locke BW, Lee JJ, Sundar KM. OSA and Chronic Respiratory Disease: Mechanisms and Epidemiology. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. Apr 30;19(9):5473. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cardet JC, Bulkhi AA, Lockey RF. Non-respiratory Comorbidities in Asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021. Nov;9(11):3887–3897. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.08.027. Epub 2021 Sep 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp 1

RESOURCES