Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2023 Feb 27;25(9):1431–1435. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c00122

Synthesis of Fluorescent Lanthipeptide Cytolysin S Analogues by Late-Stage Sulfamidate Ring Opening

Nuria Mazo , Imran R Rahman , Claudio D Navo §, Jesús M Peregrina , Jesús H Busto , Wilfred A van der Donk , Gonzalo Jiménez-Osés §,⊥,*
PMCID: PMC10012263  PMID: 36849130

Abstract

graphic file with name ol3c00122_0006.jpg

Nucleophilic ring opening of cyclic sulfamidates derived from amino acids is a common strategy for the synthesis of lanthionine derivatives. In this work, we report the regio-, chemo-, and stereoselective intramolecular S-alkylation of a cysteine residue with N-sulfonyl sulfamidates for the synthesis of cyclic lanthionine-containing peptides. The strategy involves the solid-phase synthesis of sulfamidate-containing peptides followed by late-stage intramolecular cyclization. This protocol allowed for the synthesis of four full-length cytolysin S (CylLS″) analogues, two α-peptides and two hybrid α/β-peptides. Their conformational preferences and biological activities were assessed and compared with those of wild-type CylLS″.


Lanthipeptides are ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs) containing sulfur cross-linked lanthionine (Lan) and/or β-methyllanthionine (MeLan),1,2 formed by a Michael-type addition of a cysteine to a dehydroalanine (Dha) or dehydrobutyrine (Dhb) generated by enzymatic dehydration of Ser or Thr. Many lanthipeptides exhibit antimicrobial properties against Gram-positive3 and Gram-negative4 bacteria, including multidrug resistant strains. These cross-linked macrocycles confer lanthipeptides with exceptional properties such as resistance to chemical and enzymatic degradation5 or conformational rigidity.6 The number of natural lanthipeptides discovered, as well as engineered analogues, steadily increases in the search for therapeutics to overcome antibiotic resistance.2,7 However, large-scale production of lanthipeptides still represents a challenge.8 Solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) is an attractive strategy for the preparation of either natural lanthipeptides or chemically modified variants.7,8 The use of orthogonally protected bis-amino acids allows for the incorporation of Lan/MeLan residues with defined stereochemistry.911 Biomimetic approaches generating Lan/MeLan by intramolecular Michael addition have been reported.12,13

Cyclic sulfamidates have been extensively used for the regio- and stereoselective synthesis of a wide variety of chemicals through regioselective nucleophilic ring-opening reactions.1416 In particular, the intermolecular S-alkylation of five-membered ring sulfamidates has been exploited for the synthesis of orthogonally protected Lan and MeLan analogues.1719 For instance, the thioether ring B of haloduracin β as well as mimetics has been synthesized by intermolecular ring opening of sulfamidates with short cysteine-containing peptides.20,21 However, attempts to achieve the intramolecular ring opening of peptides containing N-carbonyl sulfamidates and cysteine residues produced an unexpected N → S acyl shift.22

Therefore, to avoid this undesired reaction while maintaining the necessary N-activation of the sulfamidate,23 we envisioned using sulfonamide functional groups, which have been extensively used in the ring opening of aziridines24,25 but scarcely with sulfamidates.26 We report the chemo-, regio-, and stereoselective intramolecular ring-opening reactions of peptides incorporating N-sulfonyl sulfamidates derived from (S)- or (R)-α-methylisoserine and (S)- or (R)-α-methylserine (Figure 1A) as the key step in obtaining four different analogues of enterococcal cytolysin S (CylLS″).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Cyclic sulfamidates used in the synthesis of cytolysin S analogues. (B) MW-SPPS of peptide 2 and subsequent intramolecular sulfamidate ring opening. The inset shows the luminescence of peptides 2 and 3 under white light and ultraviolet light in a CD3CN/D2O mixture. (C) Selected regions of the NMR spectra of pure peptide 2 and after reaction for 1 min with triethylamine.

First, we synthesized the linear model peptide that previously led to transacylation (i.e., 1a-Ala-His-Asn-Cys-Gly)22 by microwave (MW)-assisted SPPS,27 and its N-terminus was reacted with dansyl (DNS) chloride (Figure 1B). Upon cleavage and deprotection, peptide 2 was dissolved in a 96:4 mixture of CD3CN and D2O and base-promoted cyclization was monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Figure 1C). After the addition of triethylamine (1.6 equiv), the instantaneous and complete disappearance of the starting material and the formation of cyclic peptide 3 as a single isomer were observed. The identity of this compound was confirmed by NMR, MS, and RP-HPLC analyses (Figures S1 and S2). The intramolecular sulfamidate ring-opening reaction proceeded with excellent chemo-, regio-, and stereoselectivity and high yield (84%) after purification by HPLC. It is noteworthy that a dramatic increase in fluorescence was observed upon cyclization, likely by dequenching of the dansyl group after sulfamidate ring opening (Figure 1B, inset, and Figure S10). This observation offered the opportunity to prepare fluorescent analogues of cytolysin that may be valuable for investigating the cellular localization of cytolysin, which at present is not known.

Once the ability of N-sulfonyl sulfamidates to promote the fast cyclization of small Cys-containing peptides was demonstrated, we focused on the synthesis of an analogue of the A ring of cytolysin S (CylLS″). This lanthipeptide is one of the two components comprising enterococcal cytolysin, which is toxic to Gram-positive bacteria, and is an important virulence factor during infection of eukaryotic cells.28,29 Recently, cytolysin was directly linked to hepatic cell death and the severity of liver disease in human populations.30 The A ring contains a Dhb residue, which cannot be directly coupled to the resin using standard SPPS protocols due to the very low reactivity of the enamine–imine tautomers formed upon Fmoc removal, and their hydrolysis to the corresponding ketone, which precludes further couplings.31 Instead, we used selenocysteine derivative 12 (Fmoc-MeSecPh-OH)12 as a masked version of Dhb (see the Experimental Section in the Supporting Information). This masking also prevents the S-Michael addition to the Dhb residue, which may compete with the desired sulfamidate ring-opening reaction. In this case, the nosyl group was selected as the protecting/activating group of the sulfamidate. This scaffold has been used to promote chemoselective ring opening of aziridines and can be readily removed under mild conditions.32,33 Linear peptide 4 was synthesized and purified by RP-HPLC in a moderate global yield (18%). The cyclization reaction was then carried out using a slight excess (1.6 equiv) of triethylamine. MS and HPLC analyses confirmed that the reaction took place rapidly and quantitatively after the reagents had been mixed (Figure S3). Further treatment with an aqueous HCl solution to remove the sulfamic moiety followed by oxidation with an excess of sodium periodate (8 equiv) to unmask the Dhb residue afforded cyclic peptide 5 in a high yield (79%) after HPLC purification (Scheme 1). It is noteworthy that no oxidation of the thioether group was detected as judged by MS analysis (Figure S3).

Scheme 1. Synthesis of an Analogue of the CylLS″ A Ring (5).

Scheme 1

This CylLS″ ring A analogue (5) features (S)-3-amino-2-methylpropanoic acid, (S)-3-Amp, as the first amino acid in the sequence. (S)-3-Amp is a β-amino acid in which the thioether linkage is attached to the tertiary α-carbon, producing a 15-membered macrocycle, whereas the natural derivative is a 16-membered macrocycle. In addition, the N-terminus is capped with a nosyl group. Attempts to cleave this protecting group were unsuccessful, and intact peptide 4′ was always recovered (Table S1). In view of these results, we decided to proceed with the synthesis of full-length N-dansyl analogues of CylLS″, which would confer fluorescent properties to the final peptides.

To synthesize the full-length CylLS″ analogues, ChemMatrix resin was selected due to its effectiveness for the synthesis of highly hydrophobic peptides. First, the orthogonally protected dl-lanthionine building block 6(34) and the following three natural amino acids (Ala-Lys-Phe) were each manually coupled to the resin. Deprotection and macrolactamization reactions were performed following previously reported conditions34 to form the C-terminal B ring of CylLS″. The rest of the peptide, including the masked Dhb residues (i.e., Fmoc-MeSecPh-OH), sulfamidate 1a, and the dansyl group, was successfully coupled to the resin, yielding peptide 7a upon cleavage. The subsequent late-stage sulfamidate ring-opening cyclization was performed by reacting peptide 7a with triethylamine in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). We used DMSO instead of acetonitrile in this case due to the better solubility of peptide 7a in the former solvent. Complete conversion was observed after 5 min, as judged by HPLC and MS analysis, affording peptide 8a quantitatively. Concentrated aqueous HCl was added to the crude mixture to remove the sulfamic moiety generated upon sulfamidate ring opening. To our delight, concomitant oxidation of the selenides and β-elimination of the resulting selenoxides were observed due to the oxidating properties of DMSO-HCl mixtures. Importantly, the reaction was mild and selective enough to not oxidize the thioether linkages. Consequently, CylLS″ analogue 9a was obtained in a 1% global yield (90% per step on average, considering 45 steps from the first deprotection of the Fmoc from the resin to the final oxidation–elimination reaction). Following the same methodology, CylLS″ analogues 9bd were synthesized in ∼1% global yields using sulfamidates 1bd, where sulfamidate 1b is the enantiomer of sulfamidate 1a leading to (R)-3-amino-2-methylpropanoic acid, (R)-3-Amp, upon cyclization; sulfamidates 1c and 1d were derived from (R)- and (S)-α-methylserine and afford (S)- and (R)-2-amino-2-methylpropanoic acid, (S)- and (R)-2-Amp, upon cyclization, respectively (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2. Synthesis of the Full-Length Analogues of CylLS″ (9ad) and Structure of the Natural CylLS″ (DNS = N-dansyl).

Scheme 2

The conformational preferences and dynamics of natural CylLS″ and analogues 9ad in aqueous solution were analyzed by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations (see the Supporting Information). The three-dimensional structure of CylLS″ in methanol was recently determined by NMR6 and used as a template for the initial geometries of the peptides. Simulations suggested that all peptides are quite flexible and can adopt different conformations (Figure 2 and Figures S11–S15). The native conformation of CylLS″ is frequently observed in all peptides throughout the simulations, particularly at the α-helical C-terminal domain (Val12–Phe20). On the contrary, the middle section (Phe6–Gly11) shows a more random coil/bent conformation, likely due to the abundance of glycine residues.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Conformational preferences of CylLS″ and analogues 9ad. (A) Most abundant secondary structure for each amino acid along MD simulations. (B) Conformational ensembles of ring A of CylLS″ and analogues 9ad. The NMR structure of CylLS″ (Protein Data Bank entry 6VE9) is shown in green as a reference. The C atoms of the first residue and Dhb2 are colored blue and pink, respectively. Only H atoms involved in conserved hydrogen bonds (green dashed lines) are shown. The N-terminal dansyl group and the rest of the peptide (Phe6–Ala21) have been omitted for the sake of clarity.

The more significant conformational differences between natural and modified CylLS″ are observed at the N-terminal A ring, where the unnatural amino acids are located. Most peptides showed a highly conserved hydrogen bond between Cys5 and the Dhb2 backbone, as well as between Ala4 and Abu1, thus preserving the 310-helix-like conformation observed by NMR (Figures S16–S30 and Table S2). The prevalence of the latter hydrogen bond drops significantly in analogues 9b and 9d. An additional hydrogen bond between Cys5 and (S)-3-Amp is highly conserved for analogue 9a, resulting in a more rigid α-helix-like motif. These conformational differences exhibited by analogues 9a and 9b are due to the incorporation of a β-amino acid (3-Amp) at the N-terminus, which also moves the thioether cross-link from the β-carbon to the α-carbon (Scheme 1). Conversely, the conformations adopted by the A ring of analogues 9c and 9d resemble more closely those of natural CylLS″ as only the position of a methyl group is moved from the β-carbon to the α-carbon (Scheme 2).

The antimicrobial activity of the four analogues (9ad) was tested in combination with native cytolysin L (CylLL″) against Lactococcus lactis sp. cremoris. As with natural CylLS″,35 none of the analogues showed antimicrobial activity in the absence of CylLL″, consistent with the current model in which the two peptides act with a 1:1 stoichiometry.34 The four synthetic peptides displayed some degree of synergistic activity with CylLL″ in liquid medium antimicrobial assays, suggesting that they still act on the natural target. However, they are significantly less potent than wild-type CylLS″ with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values in liquid culture around 1000-fold higher in the case of α/β-peptides 9a and 9b and 125- and 250-fold higher for 9c and 9d, respectively (Figure 3 and Figures S8 and S9). Unfortunately, the high MIC values obtained for all analogues prevented the use of subcellular localization data by fluorescence analysis.36 These results are in line with previous observations in other synthetic CylLS″ analogues, in which very slight modifications in ring A completely abolished their antimicrobial activity.34,35,37 Peptides 9ad were also assessed in combination with CylLL″ for hemolytic activity against rabbit red blood cells. All analogues showed a decreased activity with half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) values 6–14-fold higher than that of natural CylLS″. Analogue 9c showed the best antimicrobial and hemolytic activities, possibly due to its ability to better mimic the conformational behavior of natural CylLS″ and/or better complementarity with CylLL″.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Comparison of MIC values between wild-type (avalue extracted from ref (37)) and analogues of CylLS9ad in the presence of equimolar amounts of CylLL″ against L. lactis sp. cremoris. (B) Comparison of the EC50 values of hemolysis of rabbit red blood cells between the wild type and analogues of CylLS9ad in the presence of equimolar amounts of CylLL″.

We have developed a new synthetic methodology for obtaining lanthipeptide analogues with complete control over regio-, chemo-, and stereoselectivity. Our protocol is based on the mild late-stage intramolecular ring opening of N-sulfonyl cyclic sulfamidates incorporated in Cys-containing peptides by SPPS. This strategy was validated by synthesizing four full-length analogues of CylLS″ featuring unnatural α- and β-amino acids. The four synthetic peptides showed a dramatic reduction of antimicrobial activity, as well as a decreased hemolytic activity, reinforcing the unique structural properties of CylLS″.35 Compounds with submicromolar MICs are usually thought to have specific molecular targets,38 which in the case of cytolysin remains to be identified. Although our analogues of CylLS″ proved to be less active than the wild type, the ability to perform stereocontrolled cyclization reactions on unprotected peptides provides a valuable methodology for the synthesis of conformationally constrained cyclic peptide pools that can be selected for binding to desired targets.39,40

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Agencia Estatal Investigacion of Spain (AEI) through Grants PID2021-125946OB-I00, PID2021-127622OB-I00, RTI2018-099592-B-C21, and RTI2018-099592-B-C22 and the Severo Ochoa Excellence Accreditations (CEX2021-001136-S and SEV-2016-0644). I.R.R. thanks NIGMS-NIH for a Chemistry-Biology Interface Training Grant (5T32-GM070421).

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its Supporting Information.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.orglett.3c00122.

  • Experimental procedures, characterization data, and copies of NMR spectra (PDF)

Author Present Address

# N.M.: 3P Biopharmaceuticals, 31110 Noáin, Navarra, Spain

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ol3c00122_si_001.pdf (7.9MB, pdf)

References

  1. Repka L. M.; Chekan J. R.; Nair S. K.; van der Donk W. A. Mechanistic Understanding of Lanthipeptide Biosynthetic Enzymes. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 5457–5520. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Montalbán-López M.; Scott T. A.; Ramesh S.; Rahman I. R.; Van Heel A. J.; Viel J. H.; Bandarian V.; Dittmann E.; Genilloud O.; Goto Y.; Grande Burgos M. J.; Hill C.; Kim S.; Koehnke J.; Latham J. A.; Link A. J.; Martínez B.; Nair S. K.; Nicolet Y.; Rebuffat S.; Sahl H. G.; Sareen D.; Schmidt E. W.; Schmitt L.; Severinov K.; Süssmuth R. D.; Truman A. W.; Wang H.; Weng J. K.; Van Wezel G. P.; Zhang Q.; Zhong J.; Piel J.; Mitchell D. A.; Kuipers O. P.; van der Donk W. A. New Developments in RiPP Discovery, Enzymology and Engineering. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2021, 38, 130–239. 10.1039/D0NP00027B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Willey J. M.; van der Donk W. A. Lantibiotics: Peptides of Diverse Structure and Function. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 61, 477–501. 10.1146/annurev.micro.61.080706.093501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayikpoe R. S.; Shi C.; Battiste A. J.; Eslami S. M.; Ramesh S.; Simon M. A.; Bothwell I. R.; Lee H.; Rice A. J.; Ren H.; Tian Q.; Harris L. A.; Sarksian R.; Zhu L.; Frerk A. M.; Precord T. W.; van der Donk W. A.; Mitchell D. A.; Zhao H. A Scalable Platform to Discover Antimicrobials of Ribosomal Origin. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6135. 10.1038/s41467-022-33890-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rink R.; Arkema-Meter A.; Baudoin I.; Post E.; Kuipers A.; Nelemans S. A.; Akanbi H. J.; Moll G. N. To Protect Peptide Pharmaceuticals against Peptidases. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 2010, 61, 210–218. 10.1016/j.vascn.2010.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bobeica S. C.; Zhu L.; Acedo J. Z.; Tang W.; van der Donk W. A. Structural Determinants of Macrocyclization in Substrate-Controlled Lanthipeptide Biosynthetic Pathways. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 12854–12870. 10.1039/D0SC01651A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ongey E. L.; Neubauer P. Lanthipeptides: Chemical Synthesis versus in Vivo Biosynthesis as Tools for Pharmaceutical Production. Microb. Cell Fact. 2016, 15, 97. 10.1186/s12934-016-0502-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Tabor A. B. The Challenge of the Lantibiotics: Synthetic Approaches to Thioether-Bridged Peptides. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 7606–7628. 10.1039/c1ob05946g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mothia B.; Appleyard A. N.; Wadman S.; Tabor A. B. Synthesis of Peptides Containing Overlapping Lanthionine Bridges on the Solid Phase: An Analogue of Rings d and e of the Lantibiotic Nisin. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4216–4219. 10.1021/ol201548m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Knerr P. J.; van der Donk W. A. Chemical Synthesis of the Lantibiotic Lacticin 481 Reveals the Importance of Lanthionine Stereochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7094–7097. 10.1021/ja4014024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Li Z.; Gentry Z.; Murphy B.; Vannieuwenhze M. S. Scalable Synthesis of Orthogonally Protected β-Methyllanthionines by Indium(III)-Mediated Ring Opening of Aziridines. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 2200–2203. 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b00125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhou H.; van der Donk W. A. Biomimetic Stereoselective Formation of Methyllanthionine. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1335–1338. 10.1021/ol025629g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shen H.; Fallas J. A.; Lynch E.; Sheffler W.; Parry B.; Jannetty N.; Decarreau J.; Wagenbach M.; Vicente J. J.; Chen J.; Wang L.; Dowling Q.; Oberdorfer G.; Stewart L.; Wordeman L.; De Yoreo J.; Jacobs-Wagner C.; Kollman J.; Baker D. De Novo Design of Self-Assembling Helical Protein Filaments. Science 2018, 362, 705. 10.1126/science.aau3775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cohen S. B.; Halcomb R. L. Application of Serine- and Threonine-Derived Cyclic Sulfamidates for the Preparation of S -Linked Glycosyl Amino Acids in Solution- and Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2534–2543. 10.1021/ja011932l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jamieson A. G.; Boutard N.; Beauregard K.; Bodas M. S.; Ong H.; Quiniou C.; Chemtob S.; Lubell W. D. Positional Scanning for Peptide Secondary Structure by Systematic Solid-Phase Synthesis of Amino Lactam Peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7917–7927. 10.1021/ja9010628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Meléndez R. E.; Lubell W. D. Synthesis and Reactivity of Cyclic Sulfamidites and Sulfamidates. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 2581–2616. 10.1016/S0040-4020(03)00284-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Avenoza A.; Busto J. H.; Jiménez-Osés G.; Peregrina J. M. Stereoselective Synthesis of Orthogonally Protected α-Methylnorlanthionine. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2855–2858. 10.1021/ol060993r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cobb S. L.; Vederas J. C. A Concise Stereoselective Synthesis of Orthogonally Protected Lanthionine and β-Methyllanthionine. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 1031–1038. 10.1039/B618178C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Engelhardt D. B.; Donnelly B. L.; Beadle J.; van Belkum M. J.; Vederas J. C. Ring-Opening Reactions for the Solid-Phase Synthesis of Nisin Lipopeptide Analogues. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2022, 20, 8988–8999. 10.1039/D2OB01526A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. De Luca S.; Digilio G.; Verdoliva V.; Saviano M.; Menchise V.; Tovillas P.; Jiménez-Osés G.; Peregrina J. M. A Late-Stage Synthetic Approach to Lanthionine-Containing Peptides via S-Alkylation on Cyclic Sulfamidates Promoted by Molecular Sieves. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 7478–7482. 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b03254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. De Luca S.; Digilio G.; Verdoliva V.; Tovillas P.; Jiménez-Osés G.; Peregrina J. M. Lanthionine Peptides by S-Alkylation with Substituted Cyclic Sulfamidates Promoted by Activated Molecular Sieves: Effects of the Sulfamidate Structure on the Yield. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 14957–14964. 10.1021/acs.joc.9b02306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mazo N.; Navo C. D.; Peregrina J. M.; Busto J. H.; Jiménez-Osés G. Selective Modification of Sulfamidate-Containing Peptides. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020, 18, 6265–6275. 10.1039/D0OB01061H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Navo C. D.; Mazo N.; Avenoza A.; Busto J. H.; Peregrina J. M.; Jiménez-Osés G. Substituent Effects on the Reactivity of Cyclic Tertiary Sulfamidates. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 13250–13255. 10.1021/acs.joc.7b02352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu W.; Chan A. S. H.; Liu H.; Cochrane S. A.; Vederas J. C. Solid Supported Chemical Syntheses of Both Components of the Lantibiotic Lacticin 3147. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14216–14219. 10.1021/ja206017p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dickman R.; Mitchell S. A.; Figueiredo A. M.; Hansen D. F.; Tabor A. B. Molecular Recognition of Lipid II by Lantibiotics: Synthesis and Conformational Studies of Analogues of Nisin and Mutacin Rings A and B. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 11493–11512. 10.1021/acs.joc.9b01253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Moss T. A.; Alonso B.; Fenwick D. R.; Dixon D. J. Catalytic Enantio- and Diastereoselective Alkylations with Cyclic Sulfamidates. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 568–571. 10.1002/anie.200905329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mazo N.; Navo C. D.; Peccati F.; Andreo J.; Airoldi C.; Goldsztejn G.; Çarçabal P.; Usabiaga I.; Sodupe M.; Wuttke S.; Busto J. H.; Peregrina J. M.; Cocinero E. J.; Jiménez-Osés G. Conformationally Restricted β-Sheet Breaker Peptides Incorporating Cyclic α-Methylisoserine Sulfamidates. Chem. - Eur. J. 2022, e202202913. 10.1002/chem.202202913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Coburn P. S.; Gilmore M. S. The Enterococcus Faecalis Cytolysin: A Novel Toxin Active against Eukaryotic and Prokaryotic Cells. Cell. Microbiol. 2003, 5, 661–669. 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.00310.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Cox C. R.; Coburn P. S.; Gilmore M. S. Enterococcal Cytolysin: A Novel Two Component Peptide System That Serves as a Bacterial Defense against Eukaryotic and Prokaryotic Cells. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2005, 6, 77–84. 10.2174/1389203053027557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Duan Y.; Llorente C.; Lang S.; Brandl K.; Chu H.; Jiang L.; White R. C.; Clarke T. H.; Nguyen K.; Torralba M.; Shao Y.; Liu J.; Hernandez-Morales A.; Lessor L.; Rahman I. R.; Miyamoto Y.; Ly M.; Gao B.; Sun W.; Kiesel R.; Hutmacher F.; Lee S.; Ventura-Cots M.; Bosques-Padilla F.; Verna E. C.; Abraldes J. G.; Brown R. S.; Vargas V.; Altamirano J.; Caballería J.; Shawcross D. L.; Ho S. B.; Louvet A.; Lucey M. R.; Mathurin P.; Garcia-Tsao G.; Bataller R.; Tu X. M.; Eckmann L.; van der Donk W. A.; Young R.; Lawley T. D.; Stärkel P.; Pride D.; Fouts D. E.; Schnabl B. Bacteriophage Targeting of Gut Bacterium Attenuates Alcoholic Liver Disease. Nature 2019, 575, 505–511. 10.1038/s41586-019-1742-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schmidt U.; Lieberknecht A.; Wild J. Didehydroamino Acids (DDAA) and Didehydropeptides (DDP). Synthesis 1988, 1988, 159–172. 10.1055/s-1988-27503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Maligres P. E.; See M. M.; Askin D.; Reider P. J. Nosylaziridines: Activated Aziridine Electrophiles. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5253–5256. 10.1016/S0040-4039(97)01157-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wuts P. G. M.; Greene T. W.. Greene’s Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 5th ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mukherjee S.; Huo L.; Thibodeaux G. N.; van der Donk W. A. Synthesis and Bioactivity of Diastereomers of the Virulence Lanthipeptide Cytolysin. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 6188–6191. 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rahman I. R.; Sanchez A.; Tang W.; van der Donk W. A. Structure-Activity Relationships of the Enterococcal Cytolysin. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021, 7, 2445–2454. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Bindman N. A.; van der Donk W. A. A General Method for Fluorescent Labeling of the N-Termini of Lanthipeptides and Its Application to Visualize Their Cellular Localization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10362–10371. 10.1021/ja4010706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tang W.; van der Donk W. A. The Sequence of the Enterococcal Cytolysin Imparts Unusual Lanthionine Stereochemistry. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2013, 9, 157–159. 10.1038/nchembio.1162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Huang H. W. Molecular Mechanism of Antimicrobial Peptides: The Origin of Cooperativity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Biomembr. 2006, 1758, 1292–1302. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Baeriswyl V.; Heinis C. Polycyclic Peptide Therapeutics. ChemMedChem. 2013, 8, 377–384. 10.1002/cmdc.201200513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Bionda N.; Cryan A. L.; Fasan R. Bioinspired Strategy for the Ribosomal Synthesis of Thioether-Bridged Macrocyclic Peptides in Bacteria. ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9, 2008–2013. 10.1021/cb500311k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ol3c00122_si_001.pdf (7.9MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its Supporting Information.


Articles from Organic Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES