Abstract
A realistic analysis of the criteria used by rheumatologists in evaluating the progress of patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis must be based on actual clinical judgments rather than on expressed opinions. A randomly selected 15% sample of British rheumatologists (48) recorded judgements on the progress of 50 'paper' patients, based on data taken from actual patients participating in clinical trials. The rheumatologists differed markedly in their assessments of the progress of disease, with serious disagreements even when only 'clinically important' changes were considered. Some clinicians showed little consistency in their judgments of duplicate cases. Multiple regression analysis of the patient data in relation to the disease assessments provided a model of each clinician's judgment policy. These judgment policy models showed that the differences in clinical assessment were greater than could be explained by the inconsistent application of similar assessment policies, and were a consequence also of differences in the underlying judgment policies themselves. Judgments related more closely to changes in ESR and other process measures than to changes in functional ability.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dixon J. S., Pickup M. E., Lowe J. R., Hallett C., Lee M. R., Wright V. Discriminatory indices of response of patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with D-penicillamine. Ann Rheum Dis. 1980 Aug;39(4):301–311. doi: 10.1136/ard.39.4.301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joyce C. R., Hammond K. R. Improving clinical judgement. Br J Rheumatol. 1983 Aug;22(3 Suppl):14–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirwan J. R., Bellamy N., Condon H., Buchanan W. W., Barnes C. G. Judging "current disease activity" in rheumatoid arthritis--an international comparison. J Rheumatol. 1983 Dec;10(6):901–905. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirwan J. R., Chaput De Saintonge D. M., Joyce C. R., Currey H. L. Clinical judgement analysis--practical application in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1983 Aug;22(3 Suppl):18–23. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/xxii.suppl_1.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirwan J. R., Chaput de Saintonge D. M., Joyce C. R., Currey H. L. Clinical judgment in rheumatoid arthritis. I. Rheumatologists' opinions and the development of 'paper patients'. Ann Rheum Dis. 1983 Dec;42(6):644–647. doi: 10.1136/ard.42.6.644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirwan J. R., Chaput de Saintonge D. M., Joyce C. R., Currey H. L. Clinical judgment in rheumatoid arthritis. II. Judging 'current disease activity' in clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis. 1983 Dec;42(6):648–651. doi: 10.1136/ard.42.6.648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirwan J. R., Currey H. L. Rheumatoid arthritis: disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Clin Rheum Dis. 1983 Dec;9(3):581–599. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MILLER G. A. The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):81–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McConkey B., Davies P., Crockson R. A., Crockson A. P., Butler M., Constable T. J., Amos R. S. Effects of gold, dapsone, and prednisone on serum C-reactive protein and haptoglobin and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1979 Apr;38(2):141–144. doi: 10.1136/ard.38.2.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright V., Amos R. Do drugs change the course of rheumatoid arthritis? Br Med J. 1980 Apr 5;280(6219):964–966. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6219.964-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]