Abstract
Purpose
Roux en Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) is an effective therapy for patients with severe obesity. It induces both significant weight loss and rapid improvements of metabolic complications. This study was undertaken to better define the direct role of weight loss in the metabolic improvements.
Methods
A retrospective, case-control study of a cohort of 649 patients with obesity who underwent RYGB, comparing higher and lower responders at 2 years after surgery (n = 100 pairs). Pairs of patients were matched for age, gender, and initial BMI. The rates of remission of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and hyperuricemia were compared using a mixed effects logistic regression analysis. Results Diabetes before surgery was present in 12/100 lower responders and 17/100 higher responders. Remission at 2 years was observed in 4/12 (33%) of lower responders, compared to 15/17 (88%) of higher responders. Thus, the odds of diabetes remission was significantly smaller in lower responders (OR = 0.067, 95% CI 0.01–0.447). A mixed model regression analysis of all the parameters for each patient showed that the odds of achieving remission of any comorbidity was significantly lower in lower responders (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.39–0.97).
Conclusion
We could demonstrate that weight loss is a significant determinant of the remission of diabetes 2 years after RYGB. These data underline the importance of weight loss in the benefits of this procedure.
Keywords: Obesity, Roux-en-y gastric bypass surgery, Metabolic comorbidities, Weight loss, Remission of diabetes mellitus
Introduction
Obesity is defined by WHO as an abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that presents a risk to health [1], mostly because comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension (HTN), or dyslipidemia [2]. Weight loss achieved with conservative multidisciplinary therapy, averaging 5–10% at most, usually allows to achieve improvement of most comorbidities but is rarely sustained over time [3].
Bariatric surgery, including Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), has been an accepted therapy in patients with severe obesity since 1991 [4]. It is an effective procedure that induces a rapid and important decrease in body weight that can amount to a loss of up to 70% of the excess weight (or ~ 30% of the pre-surgery weight) in the long-term. The nadir of the weight curve often occurs between 18 and 24 months [5].. It also allows for an improvement, and at times even resolution, of comorbidities [5–9]. Indeed, remission rates of approximately 70%, 60%, and 40% have been reported between 3 and 7 years after RYGB for T2DM, dyslipidemia, and HTN, respectively [3, 6, 10].
However, little is known of the relationship between body weight trajectories over the initial 2 years following surgery and the remission of somatic comorbidities. Therefore, the present study was specifically designed to assess the role, if any, played by the amount of weight loss achieved during these initial 2 years after surgery on the evolution of comorbidities of obesity. We hypothesized that regardless of the type of comorbidity, their resolution would be greater in the patients losing the most weight.
Materials and Methods
Study Population
Data from this study were derived from the COOL cohort (for Cohort Obesity Lausanne), an ongoing observational bariatric study approved by the Ethics Committee for Clinical Research of the Canton de Vaud (authorization CER-VD #304/15). Patients from this cohort underwent RYGB by a single surgical team at the Lausanne University Hospital between 1999 and 2012 (N = 649).
All patients were evaluated and prepared before surgery by a multidisciplinary team including an endocrinologist, dietitians, psychologists, a psychiatrist, and a bariatric surgeon. All patients were submitted to preoperative teaching focusing on the principles and risks of bariatric surgery, dietary, and behavioral aspects. All patients were submitted to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and abdominal echography before surgery, and were evaluated using nocturnal oximetry for sleep apnea. Other investigations (i.e., cardiological evaluation) were performed only if deemed necessary. After surgery, patients were seen after 1 month, then every 3 months during the first year, biannually during the second year, then annually. Each visit included a clinical evaluation and laboratory tests to evaluate comorbidities and micronutritional deficiencies. The latter were supplemented as required. Patients were also seen by the dietician and, if deemed necessary, by the psychologist. The comprehensive work-up and follow-up protocol did not change over time.
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was performed by laparoscopy using 6 ports. Briefly, the procedure involved formation of a small 10–20 ml gastric pouch using linear staplers, a 30–50 cm biliopancreatic limb, and a 100 cm Roux limb. The latter was brought up in a retrocolic and retrogastric fashion. The gastrojejunostomy was performed using a 21 mm circular stapler, and the jejunojejunoistomy with a 45 mm linear stapler. All mesenteric defects were closed. The technique remained the same over time, but for small purely technical details (stapler brand, choice of suturing material).
Study Design
This study was designed as a retrospective, case-control study of the COOL patients comparing higher responders and lower responders at 2 years after surgery. To this end, all the patients of the cohort were first stratified according to the loss of weight achieved at 2 years, expressed in percent of excess weight loss (%EWL = [(initial weight) − (postoperative weight)]/[(initial weight) − (ideal weight)]), with ideal weight considered as the weight corresponding to a BMI = 25 kg/m2 [11].
Then, one hundred patients with the highest %EWL (higher responders) were matched for pre-intervention BMI, age, and gender to one hundred patients with the lowest %EWL (lower responders), allowing to build 100 case-controls pairs (Fig. 1). For the matching, a mean difference of 2.4 (± 1.8) BMI points and 8.9 (± 7) years of age was accepted between two members of a pair.
Fig. 1.

Each bar represents the percent of excess weight loss (%EWL) at 2 years of all patients from the COOL cohort. Higher responders of the present study in red, lower responders in blue (N = 649)
Study End Points
Comorbidities assessed before and 2 years after surgery were prediabetes and T2DM, dyslipidemia, HTN, and hyperuricemia. The clinical criteria used to define a pathologic condition, or the cutoff laboratory values applied to the biological data, are listed in Table 1. All data were retrieved from electronic medical records, and then de-identified for analyses.
Table 1.
Clinical or laboratory criteria used to define comorbidities
| Condition | Definition |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Hyperuricemia1 | > 339 (mmol/l) or use of medication |
| Hypertension | > 140/902 or use of medication |
| Prediabetes3 | Fasting glucose : > 5.6 < 7 mmol/l, or HbA1c : 5.7–6.4 %, or OGTT4 120’ : 7.9–11.0 mmol/l |
| Diabetes2 | Fasting glucose : ≥ 7 mmol/l, or HbA1c : ≥ 6.5%, or OGTT 120’ > = 11.1 mmol/l, or use of any glucose lowering drug |
| Dyslipidemia | According to ATPIII5 : |
| Hypercholesterolemia : LDL-cholesterol ≥ 2.6 mmol/l | |
| Isolated hypertriglyceridemia : TG ≥ 1.7 mmol/L | |
| Mixed dyslipidemia: LDL ≥ 2.6 mmol/L and TG ≥1.7 mmol/L or use of any lipid lowering drug | |
Normal reference range used in hospital laboratory
Data’s collection was done before the new AHA’s 2017 Hypertension Clinical Guidelines
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2018 [28]
OGTT oral glucose tolerance test
Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults–2001 [29]
For patients diagnosed with any of these comorbidities preoperatively, the definition of remission was as follows: achievement of normal biological values (according to cut off values of Table 1), in absence of any medical therapy, at the time of evaluation. According to this definition, remission criteria were identical for prediabetes and diabetes, and required normalization of the biological work-up (fasting glucose ≤5.6 mmol/l and/or HbA1c <5.7%, and/or OGTT 120’ < 7.9 mmol/l, depending on the available values).
Statistical Analysis
Numerical variables are presented as means ± SD, and categorical variables as numbers (%). First, the rate of remission of each comorbidity was calculated separately for higher and lower responders. It was calculated as the number of patients experiencing a remission at 2 years divided by the number of patients presenting the comorbidity preoperatively, expressed in percent values. These remission rates were compared between the 2 groups, separately for each comorbidity, using logistic regression analysis to assess the likelihood of remission of lower responders relatively to higher responders. To do this, individual remissions were considered as a binary (presence or absence of remission) outcome variable.
Then, all comorbidity remissions were analysed together, using a mixed effects logistic regression analysis with random intercept to take into account the likely lack of independence between comorbidities within patients.
Due to inherent imperfections in the matching design, each analysis was finally adjusted for the following potential confounding factors; age (years), sex, and initial BMI.
Results
Pre-surgery
The clinical characteristics of patients before surgery are described in Table 2. Patients were predominantly women (90%), with a mean age of 36.1 ± 9.2 years (range 19–54) for lower responders and 37.7 ± 9.7 years (range 20–65) for higher responders (p = 0.2). By study design, the mean preoperative BMI was identical between the two patients groups: 42.5 ± 3.8 kg/m2 (range 34.0–56.8) for higher responders and 43.1 ± 4.2 kg/m2 (range 36.3–59.2) for lower responders. Despite the matching by BMI, prevalence of both HTN (53% and 38% for lower and higher responders, respectively; p = 0.05) and hypertriglyceridemia alone (16% and 5%, respectively; p = 0.03) were significantly higher in lower responders compared to higher responders at baseline. All other biochemical characteristics were identical.
Table 2.
Pre-surgery clinical characteristics of the 200 patients
| Lower responders (n = 100) | Higher responders (n = 100) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Baseline BMI (kg/m2) | 43.1 ± 4.2 | 42.5 ± 3.8 | 0.3a |
| Male/female (%) | 10/90 | 10/90 | |
| Age (years) | 36.1 ± 9.2 | 37.8 ± 9.6 | 0.2a |
| Comorbidities (%) | |||
| Ethnicityc | |||
| Caucasian | 87 | 92 | 0.36b |
| Hispanic | 8 | 7 | 1b |
| African | 3 | 0 | 0.45b |
| Dyslipidemia | 90 | 81 | 0.11b |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 40 | 37 | 0.88b |
| Hypertriglyceridemia | 16 | 5 | 0.03b |
| Mixed dyslipidemia | 34 | 39 | 0.22b |
| Taking medicationd | 8 | 11 | 0.34b |
| Prediabetes | 37 | 25 | 0.09b |
| Diabetes | 12 | 17 | 0.42b |
| On oral medication | 5 | 12 | 0.14b |
| On insulin | 5 | 3 | 0.24b |
| Hypertension | 53 | 38 | 0.05b |
| Taking medicatione | 22 | 25 | 0.4b |
| Hyperuricemia | 43 | 39 | 0.67b |
Unpaired bilateral student’s t test
Fisher’s exact test
Unknown data for ethnicity was, respectively, of 2% and 1%
Unknow data 3%
Unknow data 1.5%
As a result of this pairing, the mean %EWL at 2 years was lower in the lower responders (79.4 ± 14.1%; range 35.0–99.5) than in the higher responders (109.5 ± 8.4%; range 100–141.7; p < 0.001). Similarly, the mean BMI at 2 years was higher in the lower responders (29 ± 3.3 kg/m2; range 25.1–40.5) than in the higher responders (23.4 ± 1.2 kg/m2; range 18.7–25.0, p < 0.001). The percent of total body weight loss (%TWL) was also significantly different between both groups, with a mean %TWL of 32.8% ± 6.1 (range 15.6–46.8) for lower responders, and 44.5% ± 5 (range 37.4–56.9) for higher responders (p < 0.001, Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.

BMI, percent of extra weight loss (%EWL) and percent of total weight loss (%TWL) at 2 years after surgery. All parameters significantly different between higher and lower responders by unpaired Student’s T test (p < 0.001)
Remission Rate of Metabolic Comorbidities After RYGB
Remission rates for all comorbidities in higher and lower responders are displayed in Table 3. The remission rate of T2DM was significantly lower in lower responders (OR = 0.067, 95% CI 0.01–0.447). 17 patients among the higher responders and 12 among the lower responders (on a total of 200 patients) had diabetes before surgery. After 2 years, diabetes was in remission in 88% of them in the higher responders group and 33% in the lower responder one (OR = 0.067, 95% CI 0.01–0.447). In contrast, no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups was noted for the rate of resolution of prediabetes, dyslipidemia, HTN, and hyperuricermia, even after adjusting for age, gender and initial BMI. (Table 3).
Table 3.
Results of logistic regression analysis to assess the risk of metabolic comorbidities’ remission after 2 years of RY GB between higher and lower responders (N = 200; corresponding to 100 higher responders and 100 lower responders)
| Patients affected % (N) | Patients not affected % (N) | Missing 2-year data N (lower/higher) | Total patients in remission after 2 years % | Lower responders in remission % | Higher responders in remission % | Odds ratio | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Diabetes | 14.5 (29) | 85.5 (171) | 0 | 66 | 33 | 88 | 0.067 | 0.01–0.447 |
| Prediabetes | 31 (62) | 69 (138) | 0 | 87 | 87 | 88 | 0.873 | 0.189–4.034 |
| Dyslipidemia | 85.5(171) | 14.5 (29) | 4 (1/3) | 62 | 58 | 65 | 0.744 | 0.397–1.395 |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 38.5 (77) | 14.5 (29) | 4(1/3) | 65 | 63 | 67 | 0.834 | 0.324–2.141 |
| Isolated hypertriglyceridemia | 10.5 (21) | 14.5 (29) | 4(1/3) | 61 | 75 | 60 | 0.450b | |
| Mixed dyslipidemia | 36.5 (73) | 14.5 (29) | 4(1/3) | 56 | 46 | 65 | 0.451 | 0.173–1–181 |
| Hypertension | 45.5 (91) | 54 (108) | 18(8/10) | 77 | 72 | 86 | 0.423 | 0.123–1.459 |
| Hyperuricemia | 41(82) | 59 (118) | 12(4/8) | 80 | 80 | 81 | 0.93 | 0.285–3–034 |
OR for estimate risk of remission for lower responders relatively to higher responders
Fisher’s exact test because of small number of subjects with preoperative hypertriglyceridemia that could not be used to estimate an OR with acceptable accuracy
A total of 402 pre-surgery comorbidities were recorded among 182 patients, an average of 2.2 comorbidities per patient. In a mixed model regression analysis on data adjusted for age, gender, and initial BMI, the odds of achieving remission of any comorbidity was significantly lower in lower responders than in higher responders (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.39–0.97).
Discussion
RGYB induces significant weight loss and major metabolic improvements linked to modifications in gastrointestinal tract hormones [12–14]. In this case-control study, we tested the hypothesis that the amount of weight loss achieved after surgery can influence the rate of remission of the metabolic comorbidities of obesity. We could thus demonstrate that the rate of remission of T2DM 2 years after RYGB was significantly higher in patients who lost most weight. This finding is consistent with our initial hypothesis, demonstrating the role of weight loss in the resolution of T2DM after RYGB.
Initial observations had suggested the role of factors other than weight loss in the evolution of T2DM after RYGB [15–18]. These studies allowed to identify the crucial role played by rapid changes in GI tract hormones. However, the well-recognized direct relationship between overweight/obesity and insulin resistance may also play a role in the long-term effects. Campos et al. [19] compared non-diabetic obese patients after RYGB to obese controls submitted to calorie restriction and losing the same amount of weight. Peripheral insulin sensitivity evolved in an identical way in the two groups, in a manner that was only dependent upon long-term weight loss. These data and others [20] demonstrate the very important role of weight loss in long-term diabetes remission. Long-term 10 year data from the SOS study [21] which include patients after lap banding, vertical band gastrectomy, or RYGB show that the amount of weight lost was significantly correlated with the reduction in fasting glycemia, and to insulin secretion and sensitivity. The impact of changes in upper gastrointestinal track on diabetes resolution [15] is also challenged by the similar rates of weight loss and diabetes remission observed after RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy [22].
Although collected solely after RYGB, the present data are entirely consistent with these past observations, demonstrating the importance of the amount of weight loss for intermediate-term diabetes remission, regardless of the surgical procedure [22]. One of the mechanisms implicated in diabetes remission could be the loss of visceral adipose tissue (VAT). Indeed our group recently showed in patients from the same cohort that the reduction of visceral adipose tissue correlates directly with the amelioration of glucose metabolism [23]. In addition, weight loss has also a direct impact upon the amount of liver and pancreatic fat accumulation, and decreases in these fat depots have been associated with improvements in insulin sensitivity and fasting plasma glucose levels [24, 25].
Here, we show no effect of the amount of weight loss on the remission rate of dyslipidemia. In rodents, RYGB is associated with a significant decrease in cholesterol absorption paralleled with an increase in its stool excretion [26]. As a result, circulating cholesterol levels decrease after RYGB, but not sleeve gastrectomy [10]. In the human as well, RYGB decreases cholesterol absorption and improves hypercholesterolemia independently from weight changes [27]. Therefore, the present data may reflect the preponderance of this specific mechanism of RYGB on the metabolism of biliary salts, independent of the total weight loss amount.
This study has several potential limitations. Matching the two groups for their pre-surgery BMI resulted in a relatively large range of weight loss within each group. Thus, and although the two groups remained significantly different by all parameters evaluated, some of the patients in the lower response group had an absolute weight loss close to some in the higher response group. Another potential limitation lies in the relatively small number of patient pairs included, although the study design can at least partially compensate for that. Also, a relatively low number of patients were diagnosed with diabetes before surgery, again potentially resulting in a loss of statistical power. Furthermore, we have no information upon diabetes duration prior to surgery, which may also constitute a determinant of remission [18].
Despite these potential limitations, we could demonstrate here that there is an overall significantly greater amelioration of all the parameters measured in patients with the greatest initial weight loss, using a mixed model regression analysis. This latter observation constitutes a strong argument in favor of long-term multidisciplinary follow-up of patients after bariatric surgery, with the aim to improve weight maintenance.
In conclusion, our data showed that in patients with obesity who have undergone RYGB, the rate of remission of diabetes mellitus 2 years after surgery is significantly correlated with the amount of excess weight lost at 2 years.
Acknowledgments
R.L. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Ethical Approval All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with ethical standard of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the local institutional review board.
References
- 1.WHO | Obesity and overweight [Internet]. WHO. [cité 5 oct 2016]. Disponible sur: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/ [Google Scholar]
- 2.Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, et al. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA. 282(16):1523–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Adams TD, Davidson LE, Litwin SE, et al. Weight and metabolic outcomes 12 years after gastric bypass. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1143–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.NIH conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(12):956–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Duvoisin C, Favre L, Allemann P, et al. Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass: Ten-year results in a cohort of 658 patients. Ann Surg. 2018;268(6):1019–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, Frampton GK. Surgery for weight loss in adults. In: The Cochrane Collaboration, éditeur. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2014. [cité 13 avr 2016]. Disponible sur: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sugerman HJ, Wolfe LG, Sica DA, et al. Diabetes and hypertension in severe obesity and effects of gastric bypass-induced weight loss. Ann Surg. 2003;237(6):751–6. discussion 757–758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Courcoulas AP, Yanovski SZ, Bonds D, et al. Long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery: a National Institutes of Health symposium. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(12):1323–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mehaffey JH, LaPar DJ, Clement KC, et al. 10-Year outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2016;264(1):121–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ahmed B, King WC, Gourash W, et al. Long-term weight change and health outcomes for sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and matched Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) participants in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery (LABS) study. Surgery. 2018;164(4):774–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brethauer SA, Kim J, el Chaar M, et al. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2015;11(3):489–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Patti M-E, Houten SM, Bianco AC, et al. Serum bile acids are higher in humans with prior gastric bypass: potential contribution to improved glucose and lipid metabolism. Obes Silver Spring Md. 2009;17(9):1671–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Thaler JP, Cummings DE. Minireview: Hormonal and metabolic mechanisms of diabetes remission after gastrointestinal surgery. Endocrinology. 2009;150(6):2518–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Laferrère B, Heshka S, Wang K, et al. Incretin levels and effect are markedly enhanced 1 month after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery in obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(7):1709–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rubino F, Forgione A, Cummings DE, et al. The mechanism of diabetes control after gastrointestinal bypass surgery reveals a role of the proximal small intestine in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):741–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Moo T-A, Rubino F. Gastrointestinal surgery as treatment for type 2 diabetes. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2008;15(2):153–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, et al. Bariatric-metabolic surgery versus conventional medical treatment in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: 5 year follow-up of an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2015;386(9997):964–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes – 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 376(7):641–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Campos GM, Rabl C, Peeva S, et al. Improvement in peripheral glucose uptake after gastric bypass surgery is observed only after substantial weight loss has occurred and correlates with the magnitude of weight lost. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(1):15–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bradley D, Conte C, Mittendorfer B, et al. Gastric bypass and banding equally improve insulin sensitivity and β cell function. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(12):4667–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sjöholm K, Sjöström E, Carlsson LMS, et al. Weight change–adjusted effects of gastric bypass surgery on glucose metabolism: 2- and 10-year results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(4):625–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pucci A, Tymoszuk U, Cheung WH, et al. Type 2 diabetes remission 2 years post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: the role of the weight loss and comparison of DiaRem and DiaBetter scores. Diabet Med J Br Diabet Assoc. 2018;35(3):360–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Favre L, Marino L, Roth A, et al. The reduction of visceral adipose tissue after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is more pronounced in patients with impaired glucose metabolism. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):4006–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Taylor R, Al-Mrabeh A, Zhyzhneuskaya S, et al. Remission of human type 2 diabetes requires decrease in liver and pancreas fat content but is dependent upon capacity for β cell recovery. Cell Metab. 2018;28(4):547–556.e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Steven S, Carey PE, Small PK, et al. Reversal of Type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery is determined by the degree of achieved weight loss in both short- and long-duration diabetes. Diabet Med J Br Diabet Assoc. 2015;32(1):47–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Blanchard C, Moreau F, Ayer A, Toque L, Garçon D, Arnaud L, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass reduces plasma cholesterol in diet-induced obese mice by affecting trans-intestinal cholesterol excretion and intestinal cholesterol absorption. Int J Obes 2005. 2018;42(3):552–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Suter M, Donadini A, Romy S, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: significant long-term weight loss, improvement of obesity-related comorbidities and quality of life. Ann Surg. 2011;254(2):267–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Association AD. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes—2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(Supplement 1):S13–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285(19):2486–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
