Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2023 Feb 6;24(3):1065–1077. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c01385

Opportunities and Challenges for Lignin Valorization in Food Packaging, Antimicrobial, and Agricultural Applications

Alice Boarino , Harm-Anton Klok †,*
PMCID: PMC10015462  PMID: 36745923

Abstract

graphic file with name bm2c01385_0007.jpg

The exploration of renewable resources is essential to help transition toward a more sustainable materials economy. The valorization of lignin can be a key component of this transition. Lignin is an aromatic polymer that constitutes approximately one-third of the total lignocellulosic biomass and is isolated in huge quantities as a waste material of biofuel and paper production. About 98% of the 100 million tons of lignin produced each year is simply burned as low-value fuel, so this renewable polymer is widely available at very low cost. Lignin has valuable properties that make it a promising material for numerous applications, but it is far from being fully exploited. The aim of this Perspective is to highlight opportunities and challenges for the use of lignin-based materials in food packaging, antimicrobial, and agricultural applications. In the first part, the ongoing research and the possible future developments for the use of lignin as an additive to improve mechanical, gas and UV barrier, and antioxidant properties of food packaging items will be treated. Second, the application of lignin as an antimicrobial agent will be discussed to elaborate on the activity of lignin against bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Finally, the use of lignin in agriculture will be presented by focusing on the application of lignin as fertilizer.

1. Introduction

The world dependence on and excessive use of fossil fuels have led to climate change, which has forced researchers and industries to focus their attention on the exploration of renewable and green alternatives to oil, natural gas, and coal. First-generation biorefineries address this issue through the fermentation of corn, sugar cane, and wheat to obtain bioethanol1 and the transesterification of rapeseed and soybean oil to produce biodiesel.2 Although these are well-established processes to generate green energy, their sustainability is still under debate because they utilize edible crops and, thus, compete with food production. To avoid, for example, deforestation to free the extensive land that these crops need and a potential increase of food price, a new generation of biorefineries is being developed that aim to utilize nonedible lignocellulosic biomass.3,4 In particular, the valorization of lignin, one of the main biomass components, holds great promise for contributing to the successful development of future biorefineries.5,6 Lignin is a cross-linked aromatic heteropolymer, which, together with cellulose and hemicellulose, is found in the plant cell wall (Figure 1) where it provides mechanical support and protection against pathogens.7 Lignin makes up 15–35% of lignocellulosic biomass, and ∼100 million tons of this biopolymer are yearly isolated as waste material from the paper and bioethanol industry.8 Less than 2% of this enormous quantity is currently commercialized as low-value products, such as surfactants and adhesives, while the rest is mainly burned.5,8 The application of this underutilized biopolymer is, hence, attractive from both a sustainability and economic point of view.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Representation of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and lignin structural units.

Lignin biosynthesis takes place via oxidative radical polymerization of coniferyl, sinapyl, and p-coumaryl alcohol9,10 that is triggered by a series of enzymes, which includes laccases and peroxidases as key players.11 Once incorporated in the lignin polymer, these structural units are referred to as guaiacyl, syringyl, and p-hydroxyphenyl units, respectively.10,1214 The structure of lignin and these different building blocks is shown in Figure 1. Since lignin is generated via coupling reactions between phenolic radicals, the molecular weight distribution and composition of this biopolymer is very heterogeneous and can widely vary depending on the plant species.14,15

Lignin can be industrially isolated from various natural sources, such as woody biomass, agricultural residues, and energy crops.5 There are four main biorefinery processes used for lignin extraction: sulfite, soda, kraft, and organosolv. As summarized in Table 1, they present different features and afford technical lignins with different properties. Generally speaking, they apply high temperature and/or highly acid or basic conditions that cleave the lignin ether bonds to result in the formation of oligomers containing stable C–C bonds, which cannot be further modified and, thus, hinder lignin depolymerization into individual monomers. A number of research groups have developed methods to avoid the formation of C–C bonds during lignin extraction. This allows the depolymerization of lignin to produce a wide number of aromatic monomers.9,16,17 As a consequence, the valorization of lignin can both involve the use and application of the whole polymer, as well as the exploration of opportunities for the low-molecular-weight oligomers that are obtained via lignin depolymerization.5

Table 1. Overview of Technical Lignin Extraction Processes, And Solubility, Weight-Average Molecular Weight (Mw), Dispersity (Đ), and Impurities in the Different Types of Lignins.

lignin type extraction process18,19 solubility20,21 Mw (kDa)20,21 Đ21,22 impurities20
kraft lignin 170 °C, NaOH, Na2S aqueous media pH > 10 0.1–3 2.5–3.5 sulfur
lignosulfonates 140 °C, SO2, Na+/Ca+/Mg+/NH4+ water 20–50 6.0–8.0 sulfur
organosolv lignin 150–200 °C, acetic acid/formic acid/organic solvents organic solvents 0.5–4 1.3–4.0 carbohydrates and ash
soda lignin 150–170 °C, NaOH aqueous media pH > 10 0.8–3 2.5–3.5 carbohydrates and ash

Besides being both economically and environmentally friendly, lignin also presents intrinsic properties that make it an attractive material to be used in a wide range of applications, as reported in a number of review articles.12,13,23,24 The aim of this Perspective is to highlight opportunities and challenges for the use of lignin-based materials in three, which we believe are, important and promising areas of application, namely food packaging, antimicrobial applications, and agriculture. Herein, we not only give an overview of the role of lignin in these three application fields, but we also highlight the challenges and problems that still need to be addressed and we provide a forward-looking perspective on the possible future developments on this topic.

2. Lignin in Food Packaging

Every year, 140 million tons of plastic are produced and utilized as packaging materials.25,26 Around 40% of this is for food packaging, where it is mostly designed to be single-use and not recycled. Food and food packaging currently are also responsible for almost half of the total municipal solid waste.27 Most of the polymers used for food packaging are nondegradable oil-derived materials, such as poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and polystyrene (PS).28,29 A number of strategies are possible to reduce the use of petroleum-based resources and prevent the accumulation of discarded materials in the environment. One possibility is the implementation of food storage systems to prolong the food shelf life. Another approach is to substitute conventionally used polymers with biodegradable alternatives.30 Biodegradable polymers, which can be decomposed into CH4, CO2, and H2O by microorganisms, can be classified according to their sources into natural, microbial, and synthetic polymers (Figure 2A). It is important to highlight that the end-of-life management of these materials, such as industrial composting or home composting for some of them, remains as important as in the case of the oil-derived ones.3133

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) Biodegradable polymers utilized in food packaging. (B) Properties that lignin incorporation can affect, when incorporated in a biodegradable polymer film.

Although the polymers that are highlighted in Figure 2A can be used to substitute non-biodegradable plastics and reduce the environmental impact, they generally have only moderate mechanical and barrier properties, and often are more expensive than the commonly utilized materials.28 For these reasons, they constitute only 1% of the plastics utilized for food packaging.30 To improve the market expansion of the materials shown in Figure 2A, the performance of these bioplastics needs to be improved. The introduction of lignin as a filler for biodegradable plastics is one way to achieve this goal. Lignin incorporation can modify the mechanical and gas barrier properties of food packaging films, and also provide the packaging material with properties such as antioxidant and UV-barrier activity (Figure 2B). Lignin can be incorporated either by blending free lignin with the polymer of interest or, alternatively, by using lignin nanoparticles. Table 2 lists examples of studies that have used lignin as a filler in biodegradable polymer films.

Table 2. Examples of Studies Where Lignin Was Incorporated into Biodegradable Polymers and the Effect of Lignin Incorporation on Tensile Strength, Elongation at Break, Gas Barrier Properties, and Antioxidant and UV-Barrier Activity of the Resulting Composite Films3441.

2.

a

PLA = poly(lactic acid).

b

PVA = poly(vinyl alcohol).

c

PHB/PHA = poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/polyhydroxyalkanoates.

In addition to blending free lignin, this biopolymer can also be incorporated in food packaging films in the form of nanoparticles. Lignin nanoparticles can be synthesized by different methods, such as precipitation via solvent or pH exchange, self-assembly, microwave assistance, ultrasonication, and aerosol processing.42,43 These particles can be incorporated in a matrix to prepare nanocomposites.43,44 The main advantage of using nanoparticles is that they present a high surface-area-to-volume ratio. There are some examples, in which lignin nanoparticles have been incorporated in a biodegradable polymer matrix to form nanocomposites that could potentially be used for food packaging (Table 3). As Table 3 indicates, typically only a small amount of lignin nanoparticles is incorporated in the polymer matrix (max 3%). This is because, at higher nanoparticle contents, the nanoparticles aggregate to form larger clusters. This is caused by the poor compatibility between the aromatic cross-linked lignin and the polymer matrix. This obstacle can be overcome by surface modification of the lignin nanoparticles in order to increase their compatibility with the surrounding matrix. In one example, this was accomplished by etherification of the surface of lignin nanoparticles with citric acid. In this way, 10 wt % of lignin nanoparticles could be incorporated inside a PVA film.45 Another approach involves grafting polymer chains from the particle surface. Ring-opening polymerization of lactide, for example, has been used to generate PLA-modified lignin nanoparticles that could be incorporated in a well-dispersed fashion to generate PLA films that contained up to 10 wt % lignin nanoparticles.46

Table 3. Examples of Studies Where Lignin Nanoparticles Were Incorporated into Biodegradable Polymers and the Effect of Lignin Incorporation on the Tensile Strength, Elongation at Break, Gas Barrier Properties, and Antioxidant and UV-Barrier Activity of the Resulting Films4752.

2.

As mentioned above, the addition of lignin is attractive because it provides a way to improve mechanical and gas barrier properties, as well as the antioxidant activity and UV-barrier properties of food packaging materials. When lignin is incorporated in a polymer film, the mechanical properties can change in different ways. As Tables 2 and 3 highlight, the tensile strength and elongation at break can increase, decrease, or remain unchanged, depending on the polymer matrix and the type of lignin. The effect of lignin incorporation is, thus, film specific, but the take home message from the literature is that, overall, the compatibility between the lignin filler and the polymer matrix defines the mechanical properties of the film.13 Generally, a more efficient lignin dispersion and compatibilization lead to better mechanical properties. Possible ways to improve the compatibility between lignin and the polymer matrix and to avoid phase separation are lignin esterification,5358 the use of cross-linkers,5961 and polymer surface modification.45,46,62,63

Lignin incorporation can reduce the oxygen and water vapor transmission, particularly when films are made from hydrophilic materials, such as alginate37 and starch.38 This is not only because of the overall hydrophobic nature of lignin but also because of the interaction of lignin and film matrix. Once incorporated in the film, lignin interacts with the hydrophilic groups of the biopolymer, thereby reducing their affinity to water and oxygen molecules.13

Oxidation of lipids and proteins inside food is one of the main reasons for food deterioration, and it affects food appearance, taste, and smell and can lead to the generation of toxic aldehydes.64 Antioxidant compounds, which act as radical scavengers and delay radical oxidative processes, can be incorporated in packaging materials to prevent food oxidation. Typical examples of antioxidants are butylated hydroxyanisole and butylated hydroxytoluene.65 Although they are very efficient in hindering food oxidation, these compounds can generate benzoic acid, nitrates, and sulphites, which can cause allergies and may have other side effects on human health.66,67 Recently, the interest in greener and safer natural antioxidants has, therefore, increased. Lignin is an efficient antioxidant and a promising alternative for the mentioned synthetic compounds.35,68,69 The antioxidant activity of lignin is due to the presence of phenols in its structure, which can act as radical scavengers. A number of studies have verified that a higher phenol content, lower molecular weight, and narrower dispersities correlate with a higher antioxidant activity of lignin.7073

The presence of chromophores, such as carbonyl and conjugated phenol groups, inside the lignin structure enables this polymer to absorb light in the UV range (200–400 nm).24,74 This is a further advantage of using lignin fillers in food packaging because they help to protect food from UV irradiation. It is important to consider that the UV protection provided by lignin comes with a loss of visible transparency of the polymer film because of the brown color of lignin. Visible transparency is an important factor for food packaging because customers generally desire to see the product inside the packaging. It is, hence, always important to optimize the lignin content and distribution inside the polymer film in order to find a material composition where the film is protecting the food from UV irradiation but also allowing the product to be visually seen.

Challenges and Future Perspectives for the Use of Lignin in Food Packaging Applications

Lignin can be incorporated into biodegradable polymer films to improve their performance in food packaging. The addition of lignin can enhance mechanical and gas barrier properties, two of the main weaknesses of biodegradable polymers, and provide them with antioxidant and UV barrier properties, which are of major importance for food preservation. Among the challenges for the preparation of such blend materials is the compatibility between the polymer matrix, often made of linear aliphatic polymer chains, and the aromatic cross-linked structure of lignin. This leads to phase separation and heterogeneity inside the film, which limits the performance of the final product. The same applies for the preparation of nanocomposites where lignin nanoparticles are incorporated in the polymer film. Only very small amounts of nanoparticles have been introduced into such films, while a higher particle content could not be achieved without aggregation and phase separation. The functionalization of lignin and of lignin nanoparticles to improve their affinity with the polymer matrix is, thus, key to achieve an efficient dispersion of lignin in the final film. Another important issue that still needs to be addressed regarding the use of lignin in food packaging is safety. Studies about the interaction of lignin with the packaged food, as well as in vivo digestion, are to date very preliminary and will require additional investigation.

The design of sustainable food packaging items must take into consideration the end-of-life management of the final product. Most of the food packaging items are disposed of by landfilling, and are not recycled because of the presence of additives, as well as food contamination that can be challenging to separate. Landfilling results in the occupation of large amounts of space and the production of greenhouse gases, whereas composting is a valid alternative end-of-life treatment.75 The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) defines a plastic as compostable when it “undergoes degradation by biological processes during composting to yield carbon dioxide, water, inorganic compounds, and biomass at a rate consistent with other known compostable materials and that leaves no visible, distinguishable, or toxic residue.”76 This is a subgroup of biodegradable plastics, which are instead defined as “plastic in which the degradation results from the action of naturally-occurring micro-organisms such as bacteria, fungi, and algae.”76 Therefore, not all biodegradable plastics are compostable. Lignin is efficiently biodegraded by white-rot fungi and various types of bacteria,77,78 but the degradation of lignin under composting conditions commonly used to dispose of food packaging items is incomplete and inefficient.79 Moreover, the properties introduced by the addition of lignin in a polymer matrix, such as improved gas barrier, decreased water permeability, and increased hydrophobicity, can reduce the material degradability in the composting conditions. Additional attention should be placed on studying how the introduction of lignin influences the compostability of the final product because this parameter is often not considered in the published studies.

3. Lignin as Antimicrobial Agent

Some bioactive compounds extracted from plants can be used as antimicrobial agents to inhibit the harmful activity of bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Common examples are polyphenols, amino acids, terpenoids, flavonoids, and tannins, which not only are very interesting for their biological activity but also for their biocompatibility, renewability, and biodegradability.12,80 Most of these compounds, however, are found in very small quantities in plants and typically require complex extraction processes to be isolated. Lignin has recently attracted much attention since it is cheap and accessible and also shows interesting biological activities. The antimicrobial activity of lignin derives from its natural ability to protect a plant from pathogens.7 Inside the plant, lignin can preserve carbohydrates from degradation by suppressing the attack of bacteria and fungi.12 Technical lignins isolated from lignocellulosic biomass have been involved in biological and medical studies as an antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral agent (Figure 3). Table 4 presents several selected examples of studies that have investigated the antimicrobial activity of various lignins in solution.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Antimicrobial activity of lignin.

Table 4. Examples of Studies That Have Investigated the Antimicrobial Properties of Lignin in Solution.

lignin type solvent conc (mg/mL) inactivated pathogen reference
      bacteria  
kraft lignin DMSO 15 Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enteritidis, Bacillus cereus (81)
pyrolytic lignin DMSO 5 Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli (82)
kraft lignin Bacto Tryptic Soy Broth 100 Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus (83)
      fungi  
organosolv/kraft lignin DMSO 1–20 Aspergillus niger (84)
organosolv lignin DMSO 0.48–0.025 Candida parapsilosis, Candida krusei, Candida guilliermondii, Candida albicans, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus furmigatus (85)
organosolv lignin DMSO 0.5, 5, 10 Aspergillus niger, Saccharomyces cerevisiae (86)
      viruses  
lignin–carbohydrate complex 1% H2SO4 + organic solvents 0.05 encephalomyocarditis virus (EMV) (87)
DMEM 0.5 herpes simplex virus (HSV) (88)
H2O 0.1, 2 EMV, HSV (89)
lignosulfonate PBS 10 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), HSV (90)
cell culture medium 70 nM–236.6 μMa HIV (91)
cell culture medium 0–0.2 HIV (92)
cell culture medium 0–0.5 HIV, HSV (93)
a

In the article referenced, lignosulfonate concentration was expressed as the molar concentration of polymer.

The antibacterial activity of lignin is generally attributed to the phenolic hydroxyl groups, which are able to damage the bacterial cell membrane and lead to the bacteria lysis.94,95 The antibacterial activity of phenols and polyphenols is generally known, but the precise mechanism of action is still unclear. The antibacterial performance varies with and depends on the type of lignin and the bacterial strain. For instance, Dong et al. investigated and described a kraft lignin isolated from corn, which was able to efficiently inactivate Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus, two Gram-positive bacteria, but not Gram-negative bacteria or bacteriophages.83 In another study, Lourençon et al. reported that a kraft lignin extracted from eucalyptus can successfully inactivate both Gram-positive bacteria, such as Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as well as Gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella enteritidis.(81) In addition to being used as a pure antibacterial agent, lignin can also be blended with or incorporated into more complex systems. A very interesting example was provided by Ritcher et al., who placed lignin around a silver nanoparticle core to achieve excellent antibacterial performance against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli without production of environmentally adverse silver ions.96 Some studies have also examined the antibacterial activity of polymer films where lignin was used as a filler, prepared analogously to the polymer blends described in the previous paragraph, which showed successful inactivation of various bacteria.9799

Lignin can also inhibit specific species of fungi. The mechanism of fungal inhibition is currently unknown, but is dependent both on the lignin source and extraction process. Gordobil et al. compared the antifungal activity of lignin extracted from both eucalyptus and spruce via organosolv and kraft processes against Aspergillus niger and verified that the kraft lignin from eucalyptus exhibited the best antifungal performance.84 Another example that is worth mentioning was provided by de Melo et al., who tested a lignin isolated from Caesalpinia pulcherrima leaves against a wide number of fungi. The outcome of this study was that a very different amount of the same lignin type can be necessary to inhibit different fungi species.85

The antiviral activity of lignin–carbohydrate complex and lignosulfonate, both of which are water-soluble, has been studied in cell culture medium and aqueous solution against a number of viruses. Even though some research groups have tried to establish a relationship between the lignin structure and the antiviral effect, the well-defined antiviral mechanism has not been clarified yet.

Inside the plant wall, lignin is covalently bound to carbohydrates and forms a lignin–carbohydrate complex, which can be extracted from biomass via different methods, such as acidolysis, fractionation, and enzymatic hydrolysis.100,101 Lignin–carbohydrate complexes have shown efficient inactivation of encephalomyocarditis virus (EMV) and herpes simplex virus (HSV).8789 Their antiviral activity in aqueous solution was attributed to the inhibition of viral binding and penetration into the host cells. The specific role of lignin in the antiviral activity of the lignin–carbohydrate complex remains unclear.

Lignosulfonate, the only water-soluble technical lignin type, has shown antiviral activity against HSV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The antiviral activity of lignosulfonates was attributed to the structural similarity with heparan sulfate, a proteoglycan found in the proximity of the cell wall where viruses can typically interact with cells. The antiviral mechanism was not completely clarified but was proved to be influenced by sulfur content, molecular weight, and counterion (Na+, Ca2+, NH4+).9093

Challenges and Future Perspectives for the Application of Lignin as Antimicrobial Agent

Lignin has been proven to be an efficient agent for the inhibition of bacteria, fungi, and viruses. The main challenge for the application of lignin as an antimicrobial compound is its heterogeneity in terms of structure, reactive group content, and impurities. Since lignin can be obtained from different natural sources by using various methods, its properties and activity against pathogens can drastically vary. A fundamental mechanistic understanding of the deactivation of bacteria, fungi, and viruses by lignin is, hence, required in order to define a structure–activity dependency profile. Although lignin can be degraded in the environment by specific fungi, bacteria, and enzymes, the fate of this polymer inside the human body is still under debate. Moreover, despite a large number of studies on the biocompatibility of lignin, the consequences of lignin use for biomedical purposes on cells and genes are still mainly unknown and will require a detailed investigation. Regarding the studies about viral inactivation, besides the use of lignin as a macromolecule, it is noteworthy to mention that a number of phenol monomers have been identified and extracted from lignin that displayed efficient antiviral activity against encephalomyocarditis virus,102104 which suggests the involvement of phenolic groups in the antiviral activity of lignin. For this application, only water-soluble lignosulfonates and lignin–carbohydrate complexes in solution have been tested. In a recent study, antiviral lignin surface coatings made of water insoluble lignins were prepared, which showed very efficient inactivation of HSV-2 (>99% after 30 min). Particular attention has been focused on the mechanism behind the antiviral activity of these coatings, which turned out to be strongly related to the lignin phenol content.105 The COVID-19 outbreak has highlighted the importance of antiviral surfaces. Lignin is a promising material to develop affordable and sustainable antiviral coatings on a large scale, which deserves additional investigation. New methods to prepare resistant coatings on any type of surface, such as spray and brush coatings, should be tested. The adhesive properties of the coating on different types of substrates, such as glass, wood, or plastic, should also be examined in the future.

4. Lignin for Agricultural Applications

Lignin has been applied in several fields of agriculture, such as fertilizer, pesticide, and plant growth regulator.23 Since lignin directly derives from plants and can be extracted from agricultural residues, such as straw and husk, its use for agricultural applications is very attractive from the sustainability and circular economy points of view. This Perspective specifically focuses on lignin-based fertilizers, a field of primary importance, where this biopolymer has made a significant contribution and has the potential to make further impact

The use of fertilizers is essential to fulfill the continuously growing demand for food, which accompanies the increase of global population. At the moment, 187 million metric tons of fertilizer are applied every year to allow the production of more than three billion metric tons of crops.106 In 2015, the United Nations established 17 sustainable development goals to be accomplished by 2030, including eradicating hunger107 and making agriculture sustainable.108 With 800 million people suffering from hunger nowadays and a growing global population, it is imperative to further increase the efficiency of crop production.109 To match this growing demand, technological innovations will be essential to increase the efficiency of fertilization and other agricultural practices, which are at the moment intrinsically inefficient. A significant portion of the applied fertilizers do not reach the targeted plant and are lost because of evaporation and wash off in the groundwater.109111 Not only is this a waste of nutrients and energy, but it also is a huge environmental problem, which can lead to water eutrophication and dramatic changes in the ecosystems. The challenge of increasing crop production without compromising the environment can be addressed by better controlling nutrient release into the soil using slow- or controlled-release fertilizers.112114 Among the starting materials used for the development of such fertilizers, lignin is very attractive because of its biocompatibility and wide availability at low cost.115 Moreover, lignin has many reactive groups that allow the chemical binding of a wide number of nutrient containing groups,21,116 which can then be gradually released into the soil upon the biodegradation of lignin.115 Several reviews have been published on this topic, which highlight the opportunities for lignin to contribute toward more sustainable agricultural practices (Table 5). Overall, these review articles point out the high potential of lignin to produce agrochemicals with improved efficiency in nutrient release. However, the structural complexity and heterogeneity of lignin always require an elaborated characterization of both reagents and products. These reviews also highlight the lack of a uniform and standardized evaluation of the produced fertilizers.

Table 5. Overview of Selected Review Papers on Lignin-Based Fertilizers.

review title publication year reference
Application of lignin in preparation of slow-release fertilizer: Current status and future perspectives 2022 (117)
Lignin-based controlled release fertilizers: A review 2022 (118)
Novel fertilizing products from lignin and its derivatives to enhance plant development and increase the sustainability of crop production 2022 (119)
Can lignin be transformed into agrochemicals? Recent advances in the agricultural applications of lignin 2021 (23)
Research Progress in Lignin-Based Slow/Controlled Release Fertilizer 2020 (120)
Lignin in Crop Cultivations and Bioremediation 2005 (121)
Nitrogenous Fertilizers From Lignins - a Review 2002 (122)

Lignin-based slow/controlled release fertilizers can be prepared via a number of approaches, where lignin can be (i) modified by chemical reaction and directly constitute the nutrient, (ii) used as coating for the active ingredient, and (iii) applied as a chelating agent for trace element release. These three strategies are illustrated in Figure 4 and summarized in Table 6.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Methods to prepare lignin-based slow-release fertilizers: (A) chemical modification, (B) coating, and (C) chelation.

Table 6. Preparation of Lignin-Based Slow-Release Fertilizers.

preparation method lignin type procedure active ingredient reference
ammoxidation kraft lignin O2, 150 °C, 50 min 12 N % content (123)
kraft lignin O2, 150 °C, 90 min 13–14 N % content (124)
straw pulping solid residue H2O2, 90 °C, 90 min 4.9 N % content (125)
Mannich reaction soda lignin formaldehyde, NaOH, 60–80 °C, 3–5 h 5.4–10.2 N % content (126)
soda lignin formaldehyde, ultrasound, 60–90 °C, 3 h 6.9–8.2 N % content (127)
soda lignin formaldehyde, acetic acid, 60 °C, 4 h 3.4–4.2 N % content (128)
soda lignin formaldehyde, NaOH, 60 °C, 3 h 12 N % content (129)
coating kraft lignin drum coating urea (130)
kraft lignin drum coating urea (131)
acetylated lignosulfonates fluidized bed urea (132)
soda lignin turning pan coater urea (133)
chelation kraft lignin precipitation Ca2+ (134)
aminated lignin mixing Fe3+ (135)
lignosulfonates mixing Fe3+ (136)
lignosulfonates mixing Fe3+ (137)

Most of the lignin-based slow-release fertilizers are prepared by chemically binding nutrients to the reactive groups of lignin. In particular, nitrogen-containing groups are mainly attached to lignin via ammoxidation and Mannich reactions, as shown in Figure 4A.

Ammoxidation involves the oxidation of an organic compound using an oxidant (e.g., O2, H2O2, or H2SO4) in the presence of ammonia.122 The amount of nitrogen that can be incorporated into lignin depends on the reaction conditions, which include temperature, pressure, time, and the type of oxidant.120 A nitrogen content of 13–14% was achieved using optimal conditions.124 Although this is a well-established method for the preparation of nitrogen-bearing lignin, some drawbacks still need to be addressed, such as frequent damage of the equipment under the required harsh conditions and the easy leakage of ammonia.117

The Mannich reaction allows the attachment of amine-group-bearing molecules to lignin in the presence of formaldehyde and can be performed in basic, neutral, or acidic conditions. This reaction modifies the aromatic rings of lignin, in particular the ortho and para position of the phenols,126 and displays higher yields on lower-molecular-weight lignins. To increase the efficiency of the reaction, lignin can be pretreated via phenolation or mild depolymerization.138 Although this reaction is very efficient and straightforward, the use of formaldehyde is a serious drawback from a sustainability point of view. A more environmentally friendly alternative should be considered in the future.

Thanks to its aromatic structure and hydrophobic nature, the incorporation of a fertilizer inside a lignin coating can reduce leaching in the environment and groundwater (see Figure 4B). A number of papers have been published on urea incorporation inside lignin coatings prepared by mixing urea and lignin with a sealing agent, such as paraffin. For this process, lignin can be used as is or as previously modified. The nutrient inside the lignin coating can then be released by a rupture mechanism, which means that water vapor enters the coating and dissolves the fertilizers, thereby increasing the osmotic pressure and breaking the coating. If the coating can resist the osmotic pressure increase, the nutrient is instead released via diffusion, which relies on the different concentration of the nutrient inside and outside the coating.139141

The elements necessary for the plant growth are in total 14, divided into major elements (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, and S) and trace elements (Cl, B, Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, Ni, and Mo).142,143 Thanks to the numerous hydroxyl and carbonyl groups in the lignin structure, this polymer can be used to chelate a number of ions for the preparation of trace element fertilizers (see Figure 4C). The ability to create chelating bonds with metal ions depends both on the lignin type and on the metal.144

Challenges and Future Perspectives for the Application of Lignin as Fertilizer

Lignin is a very attractive material for the preparation of slow-release fertilizers because of its biodegradability, low cost, and biocompatibility; hence, a large number of articles have been published on this topic. However, several drawbacks currently limit the application of lignin as fertilizer. For the chemically modified lignin-based fertilizers, the ammoxidation process should be optimized in terms of temperature, pressure and choice of oxidant in order to increase the N % content in the final product. The recycling of ammonia should also be considered. Regarding the Mannich reaction and chelation reaction, additional research work should be invested to use sustainable reagents and avoid the generation of toxic byproducts. Considering the lignin-based slow-release fertilizers prepared via the coating method, the main limitation is that the coating can often be uneven and present cracks, thereby making the nutrient release less controllable than the products prepared via chemical modification. Improvements are, thus, needed to optimize the coating process and quality in order to achieve a more stable slow-release effect. Another implementation could be made in regard to the delivered nutrient type. Overall, most of the developed lignin-based fertilizers bear nitrogen, while the literature regarding fertilizers containing phosphorus, the second most limiting nutrient in soil, is very limited.145147 To achieve this, lignin could be simply phosphorylated,148 or phosphorus cross-linkers and phosphorus-containing compounds could be easily incorporated into a lignin carrier.149 Another interesting perspective is the development of nanosized lignin-based fertilizers. Nanofertilizers are known to present many advantages over conventional fertilizers,109,150152 and lignin nanoparticles can be prepared with a wide number of methods.153156 Finally, the slow- and controlled-release fertilizers developed so far simply slow down the nutrient distribution in the soil, independent of proximity to the target plant. A more efficient approach to diminish the waste of nutrients in the environment would be to develop plant growth synchronized-release fertilizers that are able to deliver the active principle only in the presence of the plant roots.

5. Conclusions and Perspectives

This Perspective has discussed the state-of-the-art methods and opportunities for the valorization of lignin for food packaging, antimicrobial, and agricultural applications. Lignin has the potential to be used in a range of applications, but the use of this biopolymer can be challenging because of a number of problems. Overall, the main complication is the structural and compositional heterogeneity of lignin, which depends on the plant source and extraction process and requires an elaborate characterization of both the starting reagents and products. A consequence of the wide diversity in lignin types is that a well-defined structure–activity dependency should be established for most of the applications where this biopolymer is employed.

For food packaging applications, lignin can be used as a green additive not only to improve the mechanical and gas barrier properties of polymer films but also to provide antioxidant and anti-UV activity. The main challenge for the incorporation of lignin into a polymer film is its compatibility with the surrounding matrix. To avoid heterogeneity and phase separation, particular attention must be placed on the functionalization of the lignin or the lignin nanoparticles in order to improve their compatibility with and dispersion inside the polymer film. A deeper understanding of the interactions between lignin and the packaged products, as well as the digestibility of the film, is also required. Since lignin is hardly degradable in composting conditions, additional attention should also be focused on evaluating the effect of the lignin incorporation on the compostability and degradability of the final product.

Regarding the use of lignin as an antimicrobial agent, the precise mechanism of the interaction between lignin and bacteria, fungi, and viruses is currently still unclear and under debate. The heterogeneity of lignin in terms of molecular weight, impurities, and reactive group content opens the door to many applications in medicine and biology but also complicates the assessment of its activity and safety for the human body. Despite a number of studies that have investigated and demonstrated the antimicrobial activity of lignin in solution, only very limited efforts have been made to use lignin as a coating material to develop antimicrobial surfaces. Since viruses and bacteria can transmit via contact with contaminated surfaces, and the systematic disinfection of surfaces is labor- and time-consuming, the development of coatings that are able to directly inactivate microbes is very useful. Lignin coatings can be easily prepared and tested against bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Additional research work should be focused both on the preparation of such coatings and on their performance against a large spectrum of pathogens.

The last part of this Perspective has discussed the use of lignin for agricultural applications and, in particular, as a fertilizer. The current use of fertilizers is very inefficient. Lignin is a promising starting material for the preparation of controlled-release fertilizers, but some drawbacks need to be overcome to allow their large-scale use. On the one hand, the methods to prepare lignin-based fertilizers require improvement. Ammoxidation and Mannich reactions are both efficient to enrich lignin with nitrogen, but their sustainability should be optimized in terms of reagents, side products, and working conditions. The same also applies to the use of lignin as a coating material to develop controlled-release fertilizers or as depots for the release of essential elements. On the other hand, lignin could be used to design new types of fertilizers. An interesting option to be examined is the use of lignin nanoparticles, and of lignin modified with types of nutrients other than nitrogen, for instance, by modification with or through the incorporation of phosphorus. The development of lignin-based nanofertilizers is another opportunity to implement the yield of crop production. In particular, a promising perspective is to develop systems that would allow the release of nutrients specifically in the proximity of the plant, thus avoiding a waste of nutrients and helping to prevent or reduce environmental pollution.

Overall, the aim of this Perspective was to highlight the potential of lignin, an underutilized natural source that holds a lot of promise not only for food packaging, antimicrobial, and agricultural applications, but also for a range of other technological challenges that call for sustainable materials solutions.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) Grant CRSII5_180258.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Mesa L.; Martínez Y.; Celia de Armas A.; González E. Ethanol Production from Sugarcane Straw Using Different Configurations of Fermentation and Techno-Economical Evaluation of the Best Schemes. Renewable Energy 2020, 156, 377–388. 10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mandari V.; Devarai S. K. Biodiesel Production Using Homogeneous, Heterogeneous, and Enzyme Catalysts via Transesterification and Esterification Reactions: A Critical Review. BioEnergy Res. 2022, 15 (2), 935–961. 10.1007/s12155-021-10333-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Robak K.; Balcerek M. Review of Second-Generation Bioethanol Production from Residual Biomass. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2018, 56 (2), 174. 10.17113/ftb.56.02.18.5428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hassan S. S.; Williams G. A.; Jaiswal A. K. Moving towards the Second Generation of Lignocellulosic Biorefineries in the EU: Drivers, Challenges, and Opportunities. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2019, 101, 590–599. 10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Yu O.; Kim K. H. Lignin to Materials: A Focused Review on Recent Novel Lignin Applications. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10 (13), 4626. 10.3390/app10134626. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bertella S.; Luterbacher J. S. Lignin Functionalization for the Production of Novel Materials. Trends Chem. 2020, 2 (5), 440–453. 10.1016/j.trechm.2020.03.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Neutelings G. Lignin Variability in Plant Cell Walls: Contribution of New Models. Plant Sci. 2011, 181 (4), 379–386. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bajwa D. S.; Pourhashem G.; Ullah A. H.; Bajwa S. G. A Concise Review of Current Lignin Production, Applications, Products and Their Environmental Impact. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 139, 111526. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111526. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Li Y.; Shuai L.; Kim H.; Motagamwala A. H.; Mobley J. K.; Yue F.; Tobimatsu Y.; Havkin-Frenkel D.; Chen F.; Dixon R. A.; Luterbacher J. S.; Dumesic J. A.; Ralph J. An “Ideal Lignin” Facilitates Full Biomass Utilization. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4 (9), eaau2968. 10.1126/sciadv.aau2968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Vanholme R.; Demedts B.; Morreel K.; Ralph J.; Boerjan W. Lignin Biosynthesis and Structure. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153 (3), 895–905. 10.1104/pp.110.155119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boerjan W.; Ralph J.; Baucher M. Lignin Biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2003, 54 (1), 519–546. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shu F.; Jiang B.; Yuan Y.; Li M.; Wu W.; Jin Y.; Xiao H. Biological Activities and Emerging Roles of Lignin and Lignin-Based Products—A Review. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22 (12), 4905–4918. 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tao J.; Li S.; Ye F.; Zhou Y.; Lei L.; Zhao G. Lignin – An Underutilized, Renewable and Valuable Material for Food Industry. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60 (12), 2011–2033. 10.1080/10408398.2019.1625025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Calvo-Flores F. G.; Dobado J. A. Lignin as Renewable Raw Material. ChemSusChem 2010, 3 (11), 1227–1235. 10.1002/cssc.201000157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Biopolymers; Abe A., Dusek K., Kobayashi S., Eds.; Advances in Polymer Science, Vol. 232; Springer Berlin, Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shuai L.; Amiri M. T.; Questell-Santiago Y. M.; Héroguel F.; Li Y.; Kim H.; Meilan R.; Chapple C.; Ralph J.; Luterbacher J. S. Formaldehyde Stabilization Facilitates Lignin Monomer Production during Biomass Depolymerization. Science 2016, 354 (6310), 329–333. 10.1126/science.aaf7810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen F.; Tobimatsu Y.; Havkin-Frenkel D.; Dixon R. A.; Ralph J. A Polymer of Caffeyl Alcohol in Plant Seeds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109 (5), 1772–1777. 10.1073/pnas.1120992109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Upton B. M.; Kasko A. M. Strategies for the Conversion of Lignin to High-Value Polymeric Materials: Review and Perspective. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116 (4), 2275–2306. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mandlekar N.; Cayla A.; Giraud S.; Salaün F.; Malucelli G.; Guan J.-P.. An Overview on the Use of Lignin and Its Derivatives in Fire Retardant Polymer Systems. In Lignin; Poletto M., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  20. Vishtal A.; Kraslawski A. Challenges in Industrial Applications of Technical Lignins. BioResources 2011, 6 (3), 3547–3568. 10.15376/biores.6.3.3547-3568. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Laurichesse S.; Avérous L. Chemical Modification of Lignins: Towards Biobased Polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39 (7), 1266–1290. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.11.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fredheim G. E.; Braaten S. M.; Christensen B. E. Molecular Weight Determination of Lignosulfonates by Size-Exclusion Chromatography and Multi-Angle Laser Light Scattering. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 942 (1–2), 191–199. 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)01377-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ahmad U. M.; Ji N.; Li H.; Wu Q.; Song C.; Liu Q.; Ma D.; Lu X. Can Lignin Be Transformed into Agrochemicals? Recent Advances in the Agricultural Applications of Lignin. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 170, 113646. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113646. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang Y.; Naebe M. Lignin: A Review on Structure, Properties, and Applications as a Light-Colored UV Absorber. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2021, 9 (4), 1427–1442. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06998. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Geyer R.; Jambeck J. R.; Law K. L. Production, Use, and Fate of All Plastics Ever Made. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3 (7), e1700782. 10.1126/sciadv.1700782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ritchie H.; Roser M.. Plastic Pollution. www.ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution (accessed 03-09-2022).
  27. United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/ (accessed 16-10-2022).
  28. Sangroniz A.; Zhu J.-B.; Tang X.; Etxeberria A.; Chen E. Y.-X.; Sardon H. Packaging Materials with Desired Mechanical and Barrier Properties and Full Chemical Recyclability. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10 (1), 3559. 10.1038/s41467-019-11525-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Asgher M.; Qamar S. A.; Bilal M.; Iqbal H. M. N. Bio-Based Active Food Packaging Materials: Sustainable Alternative to Conventional Petrochemical-Based Packaging Materials. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109625. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. European Bioplastics. Bioplastics Market Development Update 2020. In 15th European Bioplastics (EUBP) Conference, November 30–December 3, 2020, Berlin, Germany; European Bioplastics: Berlin, 2020. www.european-bioplastics.org (accessed 31-09-2022).
  31. Rosenboom J.-G.; Langer R.; Traverso G. Bioplastics for a Circular Economy. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2022, 7 (2), 117–137. 10.1038/s41578-021-00407-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Law K. L.; Narayan R. Reducing Environmental Plastic Pollution by Designing Polymer Materials for Managed End-of-Life. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2022, 7 (2), 104–116. 10.1038/s41578-021-00382-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Albertsson A.-C.; Hakkarainen M. Designed to Degrade. Science 2017, 358 (6365), 872–873. 10.1126/science.aap8115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ji M.; Li J.; Li F.; Wang X.; Man J.; Li J.; Zhang C.; Peng S. A Biodegradable Chitosan-Based Composite Film Reinforced by Ramie Fibre and Lignin for Food Packaging. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 281, 119078. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.119078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Domenek S.; Louaifi A.; Guinault A.; Baumberger S. Potential of Lignins as Antioxidant Additive in Active Biodegradable Packaging Materials. J. Polym. Environ. 2013, 21 (3), 692–701. 10.1007/s10924-013-0570-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shankar S.; Reddy J. P.; Rhim J.-W. Effect of Lignin on Water Vapor Barrier, Mechanical, and Structural Properties of Agar/Lignin Composite Films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 81, 267–273. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Aadil K. R.; Prajapati D.; Jha H. Improvement of Physcio-Chemical and Functional Properties of Alginate Film by Acacia Lignin. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2016, 10, 25–33. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2016.09.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Bhat R.; Abdullah N.; Din R. H.; Tay G.-S. Producing Novel Sago Starch Based Food Packaging Films by Incorporating Lignin Isolated from Oil Palm Black Liquor Waste. J. Food Eng. 2013, 119 (4), 707–713. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.06.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Guo Y.; Tian D.; Shen F.; Yang G.; Long L.; He J.; Song C.; Zhang J.; Zhu Y.; Huang C.; Deng S. Transparent Cellulose/Technical Lignin Composite Films for Advanced Packaging. Polymers 2019, 11 (9), 1455. 10.3390/polym11091455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hu X.-Q.; Ye D.-Z.; Tang J.-B.; Zhang L.-J.; Zhang X. From Waste to Functional Additives: Thermal Stabilization and Toughening of PVA with Lignin. RSC Adv. 2016, 6 (17), 13797–13802. 10.1039/C5RA26385A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Vostrejs P.; Adamcová D.; Vaverková M. D.; Enev V.; Kalina M.; Machovsky M.; Šourková M.; Marova I.; Kovalcik A. Active Biodegradable Packaging Films Modified with Grape Seeds Lignin. RSC Adv. 2020, 10 (49), 29202–29213. 10.1039/D0RA04074F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Duarah P.; Haldar D.; Purkait M. K. Technological Advancement in the Synthesis and Applications of Lignin-Based Nanoparticles Derived from Agro-Industrial Waste Residues: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 163, 1828–1843. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang Z.; Terrasson V.; Guénin E. Lignin Nanoparticles and Their Nanocomposites. Nanomaterials 2021, 11 (5), 1336. 10.3390/nano11051336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lizundia E.; Sipponen M. H.; Greca L. G.; Balakshin M.; Tardy B. L.; Rojas O. J.; Puglia D. Multifunctional Lignin-Based Nanocomposites and Nanohybrids. Green Chem. 2021, 23 (18), 6698–6760. 10.1039/D1GC01684A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. He X.; Luzi F.; Hao X.; Yang W.; Torre L.; Xiao Z.; Xie Y.; Puglia D. Thermal, Antioxidant and Swelling Behaviour of Transparent Polyvinyl (Alcohol) Films in Presence of Hydrophobic Citric Acid-Modified Lignin Nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 127 (15), 665–676. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Boarino A.; Schreier A.; Leterrier Y.; Klok H.-A. Uniformly Dispersed Poly(Lactic Acid)-Grafted Lignin Nanoparticles Enhance Antioxidant Activity and UV-Barrier Properties of Poly(Lactic Acid) Packaging Films. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2022, 4 (7), 4808–4817. 10.1021/acsapm.2c00420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yang W.; Qi G.; Kenny J. M.; Puglia D.; Ma P. Effect of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Lignin Nanoparticles on Mechanical, Antioxidant and Water Vapour Barrier Properties of Glutaraldehyde Crosslinked PVA Films. Polymers 2020, 12 (6), 1364. 10.3390/polym12061364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Yang W.; Fortunati E.; Dominici F.; Giovanale G.; Mazzaglia A.; Balestra G. M.; Kenny J. M.; Puglia D. Synergic Effect of Cellulose and Lignin Nanostructures in PLA Based Systems for Food Antibacterial Packaging. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 79, 1–12. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Yang W.; Owczarek J. S.; Fortunati E.; Kozanecki M.; Mazzaglia A.; Balestra G. M.; Kenny J. M.; Torre L.; Puglia D. Antioxidant and Antibacterial Lignin Nanoparticles in Polyvinyl Alcohol/Chitosan Films for Active Packaging. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 94, 800–811. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yang W.; Dominici F.; Fortunati E.; Kenny J. M.; Puglia D. Effect of Lignin Nanoparticles and Masterbatch Procedures on the Final Properties of Glycidyl Methacrylate-g-Poly (Lactic Acid) Films before and after Accelerated UV Weathering. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 77, 833–844. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.09.057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yang W.; Fortunati E.; Dominici F.; Kenny J. M.; Puglia D. Effect of Processing Conditions and Lignin Content on Thermal, Mechanical and Degradative Behavior of Lignin Nanoparticles/Polylactic (Acid) Bionanocomposites Prepared by Melt Extrusion and Solvent Casting. Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 71, 126–139. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.07.051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Cavallo E.; He X.; Luzi F.; Dominici F.; Cerrutti P.; Bernal C.; Foresti M. L.; Torre L.; Puglia D. UV Protective, Antioxidant, Antibacterial and Compostable Polylactic Acid Composites Containing Pristine and Chemically Modified Lignin Nanoparticles. Molecules 2021, 26 (1), 126. 10.3390/molecules26010126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Guo J.; Chen X.; Wang J.; He Y.; Xie H.; Zheng Q. The Influence of Compatibility on the Structure and Properties of PLA/Lignin Biocomposites by Chemical Modification. Polymers 2020, 12 (1), 56. 10.3390/polym12010056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Gordobil O.; Egüés I.; Llano-Ponte R.; Labidi J. Physicochemical Properties of PLA Lignin Blends. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2014, 108, 330–338. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.01.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Gordobil O.; Delucis R.; Egüés I.; Labidi J. Kraft Lignin as Filler in PLA to Improve Ductility and Thermal Properties. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 72, 46–53. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.01.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Vila C.; Santos V.; Saake B.; Parajó J. C. Manufacture, Characterization, and Properties of Poly-(Lactic Acid) and Its Blends with Esterified Pine Lignin. BioResources 2016, 11 (2), 5322–5332. 10.15376/biores.11.2.5322-5332. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Gao Y.; Qu W.; Liu Y.; Hu H.; Cochran E.; Bai X. Agricultural Residue-derived Lignin as the Filler of Polylactic Acid Composites and the Effect of Lignin Purity on the Composite Performance. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136 (35), 47915. 10.1002/app.47915. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Anugwom I.; Lahtela V.; Kallioinen M.; Kärki T. Lignin as a Functional Additive in a Biocomposite: Influence on Mechanical Properties of Polylactic Acid Composites. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 140, 111704. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111704. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Kumar A.; Tumu V. R.; Ray Chowdhury S.; S.V.S R. R. A Green Physical Approach to Compatibilize a Bio-Based Poly (Lactic Acid)/Lignin Blend for Better Mechanical, Thermal and Degradation Properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 121, 588–600. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ge X.; Chang M.; Jiang W.; Zhang B.; Xing R.; Bulin C. Investigation on Two Modification Strategies for the Reinforcement of Biodegradable Lignin/Poly(Lactic Acid) Blends. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137 (44), 49354. 10.1002/app.49354. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang N.; Zhang C.; Weng Y. Enhancing Gas Barrier Performance of Polylactic Acid/Lignin Composite Films through Cooperative Effect of Compatibilization and Nucleation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 138 (15), 50199. 10.1002/app.50199. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Chung Y.-L.; Olsson J. V.; Li R. J.; Frank C. W.; Waymouth R. M.; Billington S. L.; Sattely E. S. A Renewable Lignin–Lactide Copolymer and Application in Biobased Composites. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2013, 1 (10), 1231–1238. 10.1021/sc4000835. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Sun Y.; Ma Z.; Xu X.; Liu X.; Liu L.; Huang G.; Liu L.; Wang H.; Song P. Grafting Lignin with Bioderived Polyacrylates for Low-Cost, Ductile, and Fully Biobased Poly(Lactic Acid) Composites. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2020, 8 (5), 2267–2276. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06593. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lai W.-F. Design of Polymeric Films for Antioxidant Active Food Packaging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23 (1), 12. 10.3390/ijms23010012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Dassarma B.; Nandi D. K.; Gangopadhyay S.; Samanta S. Hepatoprotective Effect of Food Preservatives (Butylated Hydroxyanisole, Butylated Hydroxytoluene) on Carbon Tetrachloride-Induced Hepatotoxicity in Rat. Toxicology Reports 2018, 5, 31–37. 10.1016/j.toxrep.2017.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Vally H.; Misso N. L. Adverse Reactions to the Sulphite Additives. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 2012, 5 (1), 16–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Cantwell M.; Elliott C. Nitrates, Nitrites and Nitrosamines from Processed Meat Intake and ColorectalCancer Risk. Journal of Clinical Nutrition & Dietetics 2017, 03 (04), 27. 10.4172/2472-1921.100062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Lu F.; Chu L.; Gau R. Free Radical-scavenging Properties of Lignin. Nutrition and Cancer 1998, 30 (1), 31–38. 10.1080/01635589809514637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Dizhbite T. Characterization of the Radical Scavenging Activity of Lignins-Natural Antioxidants. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 95 (3), 309–317. 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Pan X.; Kadla J. F.; Ehara K.; Gilkes N.; Saddler J. N. Organosolv Ethanol Lignin from Hybrid Poplar as a Radical Scavenger: Relationship between Lignin Structure, Extraction Conditions, and Antioxidant Activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54 (16), 5806–5813. 10.1021/jf0605392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Hage R. E.; Perrin D.; Brosse N. Effect of the Pre-Treatment Severity on the Antioxidant Properties of Ethanol Organosolv Miscanthus x Giganteus Lignin. Nat. Resour. 2012, 3 (2), 29–34. 10.4236/nr.2012.32005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Ugartondo V.; Mitjans M.; Vinardell M. Comparative Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Effects of Lignins from Different Sources. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99 (14), 6683–6687. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Ma P.; Gao Y.; Zhai H. Fractionated Wheat Straw Lignin and Its Application as Antioxidant. BioResources 2013, 8 (4), 5581–5595. 10.15376/biores.8.4.5581-5595. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Tran M. H.; Phan D.-P.; Lee E. Y. Review on Lignin Modifications toward Natural UV Protection Ingredient for Lignin-Based Sunscreens. Green Chem. 2021, 23 (13), 4633–4646. 10.1039/D1GC01139A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Kale G.; Kijchavengkul T.; Auras R.; Rubino M.; Selke S. E.; Singh S. P. Compostability of Bioplastic Packaging Materials: An Overview. Macromol. Biosci. 2007, 7 (3), 255–277. 10.1002/mabi.200600168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. ASTM . Standard Terminology Relating to Plastics. In Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 08.03; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 1946. [Google Scholar]
  77. Janusz G.; Pawlik A.; Sulej J.; Świderska-Burek U.; Jarosz-Wilkołazka A.; Paszczyński A. Lignin Degradation: Microorganisms, Enzymes Involved, Genomes Analysis and Evolution. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41 (6), 941–962. 10.1093/femsre/fux049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Cui L.; Wang Z.; Zeng Y.; Yang N.; Liu M.; Zhao Y.; Zheng Y. Lignin Biodegradation and Its Valorization. Fermentation 2022, 8 (8), 366. 10.3390/fermentation8080366. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Tuomela M.; Vikman M.; Hatakka A.; Itävaara M. Biodegradation of Lignin in a Compost Environment: A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 72 (2), 169–183. 10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00104-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  80. Jha A. K.; Sit N. Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Plant Materials Using Combination of Various Novel Methods: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 119, 579–591. 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.11.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Lourençon T. V.; de Lima G. G.; Ribeiro C. S. P.; Hansel F. A.; Maciel G. M.; da Silva K.; Winnischofer S. M. B.; de Muniz G. I. B.; Magalhães W. L. E. Antioxidant, Antibacterial and Antitumoural Activities of Kraft Lignin from Hardwood Fractionated by Acid Precipitation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 166, 1535–1542. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Matos M.; Claro F. C.; Lima T. A. M.; Avelino F.; Hansel F. A.; Maciel G. M.; Lomonaco D.; Magalhães W. L. E. Acetone:Water Fractionation of Pyrolytic Lignin Improves Its Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activity. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 2021, 156, 105175. 10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105175. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Dong X.; Dong M.; Lu Y.; Turley A.; Jin T.; Wu C. Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Lignin from Residue of Corn Stover to Ethanol Production. Ind. Crops Prod. 2011, 34 (3), 1629–1634. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.06.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Gordobil O.; Herrera R.; Yahyaoui M.; İlk S.; Kaya M.; Labidi J. Potential Use of Kraft and Organosolv Lignins as a Natural Additive for Healthcare Products. RSC Adv. 2018, 8 (43), 24525–24533. 10.1039/C8RA02255K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. de Melo C. M. L.; da Cruz Filho I. J.; de Sousa G. F.; de Souza Silva G. A.; do Nascimento Santos D. K. D.; da Silva R. S.; de Sousa B. R.; de Lima Neto R. G.; do Carmo Alves de Lima M.; de Moraes Rocha G. J. Lignin Isolated from Caesalpinia Pulcherrima Leaves Has Antioxidant, Antifungal and Immunostimulatory Activities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 1725–1733. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. García A.; Spigno G.; Labidi J. Antioxidant and Biocide Behaviour of Lignin Fractions from Apple Tree Pruning Residues. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 104, 242–252. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.04.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Li R.; Ouda R.; Kimura C.; Narita R.; Nishimura H.; Fujita T.; Watanabe T. Conversion of Beech Wood into Antiviral Lignin–Carbohydrate Complexes by Microwave Acidolysis. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2021, 9 (28), 9248–9256. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01450. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Zhang Y.; But P. P.-H.; Ooi V. E.-C.; Xu H.-X.; Delaney G. D.; Lee S. H. S.; Lee S. F. Chemical Properties, Mode of Action, and in Vivo Anti-Herpes Activities of a Lignin–Carbohydrate Complex from Prunella Vulgaris. Antiviral Res. 2007, 75 (3), 242–249. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2007.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Lee J.-B.; Yamagishi C.; Hayashi K.; Hayashi T. Antiviral and Immunostimulating Effects of Lignin-Carbohydrate-Protein Complexes from Pimpinella Anisum. Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem. 2011, 75 (3), 459–465. 10.1271/bbb.100645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Fukuchi K.; Koshikawa T.; Asai D.; Inomata M.; Sakagami H.; Takemura H.; Kanamoto T.; Aimi H.; Kikkawa Y. Lignosulfonate Rapidly Inactivates Human Immunodeficiency and Herpes Simplex Viruses. Medicines 2021, 8 (10), 56. 10.3390/medicines8100056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Oeyen M.; Noppen S.; Vanhulle E.; Claes S.; Myrvold B. O.; Vermeire K.; Schols D. A Unique Class of Lignin Derivatives Displays Broad Anti-HIV Activity by Interacting with the Viral Envelope. Virus Res. 2019, 274, 197760. 10.1016/j.virusres.2019.197760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Qiu M.; Wang Q.; Chu Y.; Yuan Z.; Song H.; Chen Z.; Wu Z. Lignosulfonic Acid Exhibits Broadly Anti-HIV-1 Activity – Potential as a Microbicide Candidate for the Prevention of HIV-1 Sexual Transmission. PLoS One 2012, 7 (4), e35906. 10.1371/journal.pone.0035906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Gordts S. C.; Férir G.; D’huys T.; Petrova M. I.; Lebeer S.; Snoeck R.; Andrei G.; Schols D. The Low-Cost Compound Lignosulfonic Acid (LA) Exhibits Broad-Spectrum Anti-HIV and Anti-HSV Activity and Has Potential for Microbicidal Applications. PLoS One 2015, 10 (7), e0131219. 10.1371/journal.pone.0131219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Bouarab-Chibane L.; Forquet V.; Lantéri P.; Clément Y.; Léonard-Akkari L.; Oulahal N.; Degraeve P.; Bordes C. Antibacterial Properties of Polyphenols: Characterization and QSAR (Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship) Models. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 829. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Miklasińska-Majdanik M.; Kępa M.; Wojtyczka R.; Idzik D.; Wąsik T. Phenolic Compounds Diminish Antibiotic Resistance of Staphylococcus Aureus Clinical Strains. IJERPH 2018, 15 (10), 2321. 10.3390/ijerph15102321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Richter A. P.; Brown J. S.; Bharti B.; Wang A.; Gangwal S.; Houck K.; Cohen Hubal E. A.; Paunov V. N.; Stoyanov S. D.; Velev O. D. An Environmentally Benign Antimicrobial Nanoparticle Based on a Silver-Infused Lignin Core. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10 (9), 817–823. 10.1038/nnano.2015.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. El-Nemr K. F.; Mohamed H. R.; Ali M. A.; Fathy R. M.; Dhmees A. S. Polyvinyl Alcohol/Gelatin Irradiated Blends Filled by Lignin as Green Filler for Antimicrobial Packaging Materials. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2020, 100 (14), 1578–1602. 10.1080/03067319.2019.1657108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  98. Alzagameem A.; Klein S. E.; Bergs M.; Do X. T.; Korte I.; Dohlen S.; Hüwe C.; Kreyenschmidt J.; Kamm B.; Larkins M.; Schulze M. Antimicrobial Activity of Lignin and Lignin-Derived Cellulose and Chitosan Composites Against Selected Pathogenic and Spoilage Microorganisms. Polymers 2019, 11 (4), 670. 10.3390/polym11040670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Lee E.; Song Y.; Lee S. Crosslinking of Lignin/Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Nanocomposite Fiber Webs and Their Antimicrobial and Ultraviolet-Protective Properties. Text. Res. J. 2019, 89 (1), 3–12. 10.1177/0040517517736468. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  100. Zhao Y.; Shakeel U.; Saif Ur Rehman M.; Li H.; Xu X.; Xu J. Lignin-Carbohydrate Complexes (LCCs) and Its Role in Biorefinery. J. Cleaner Prod. 2020, 253, 120076. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  101. Tarasov D.; Leitch M.; Fatehi P. Lignin–Carbohydrate Complexes: Properties, Applications, Analyses, and Methods of Extraction: A Review. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11 (1), 269. 10.1186/s13068-018-1262-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Li R.; Narita R.; Nishimura H.; Marumoto S.; Yamamoto S. P.; Ouda R.; Yatagai M.; Fujita T.; Watanabe T. Antiviral Activity of Phenolic Derivatives in Pyroligneous Acid from Hardwood, Softwood, and Bamboo. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2018, 6 (1), 119–126. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01265. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  103. Kimura C.; Li R.; Ouda R.; Nishimura H.; Fujita T.; Watanabe T. Production of Antiviral Substance from Sugarcane Bagasse by Chemical Alteration of Its Native Lignin Structure through Microwave Solvolysis. ChemSusChem 2020, 13 (17), 4519–4527. 10.1002/cssc.202000490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Li R.; Narita R.; Ouda R.; Kimura C.; Nishimura H.; Yatagai M.; Fujita T.; Watanabe T. Structure-Dependent Antiviral Activity of Catechol Derivatives in Pyroligneous Acid against the Encephalomycarditis Virus. RSC Adv. 2018, 8 (63), 35888–35896. 10.1039/C8RA07096B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Boarino A.; Wang H.; Olgiati F.; Artusio F.; Özkan M.; Bertella S.; Razza N.; Cagno V.; Luterbacher J. S.; Klok H.-A.; Stellacci F. Lignin: A Sustainable Antiviral Coating Material. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2022, 10 (42), 14001–14010. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c04284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Lowry G. V.; Avellan A.; Gilbertson L. M. Opportunities and Challenges for Nanotechnology in the Agri-Tech Revolution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2019, 14 (6), 517–522. 10.1038/s41565-019-0461-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs . Goal 2: End Hunger, Achieve Food Security and Improved Nutrition and Promote Sustainable Agriculture; United Nations, 2022. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal2 (accessed 04-11-2022).
  108. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs . Goal 12: Ensure Sustainable Consumption and Production Patterns; United Nations, 2022. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal12 (accessed 04-11-2022).
  109. Kah M.; Tufenkji N.; White J. C. Nano-Enabled Strategies to Enhance Crop Nutrition and Protection. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2019, 14 (6), 532–540. 10.1038/s41565-019-0439-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Smith A. M.; Gilbertson L. M. Rational Ligand Design To Improve Agrochemical Delivery Efficiency and Advance Agriculture Sustainability. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2018, 6 (11), 13599–13610. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03457. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  111. Gilbertson L. M.; Pourzahedi L.; Laughton S.; Gao X.; Zimmerman J. B.; Theis T. L.; Westerhoff P.; Lowry G. V. Guiding the Design Space for Nanotechnology to Advance Sustainable Crop Production. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020, 15 (9), 801–810. 10.1038/s41565-020-0706-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Beig B.; Niazi M. B. K.; Jahan Z.; Hussain A.; Zia M. H.; Mehran M. T. Coating Materials for Slow Release of Nitrogen from Urea Fertilizer: A Review. J. Plant Nutr. 2020, 43 (10), 1510–1533. 10.1080/01904167.2020.1744647. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  113. Fu J.; Wang C.; Chen X.; Huang Z.; Chen D. Classification Research and Types of Slow Controlled Release Fertilizers (SRFs) Used - a Review. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2018, 49 (17), 2219–2230. 10.1080/00103624.2018.1499757. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  114. Lawrencia D.; Wong S. K.; Low D. Y.; Goh B. H.; Goh J. K.; Ruktanonchai U. R.; Soottitantawat A.; Lee L. H.; Tang S. Y. Controlled Release Fertilizers: A Review on Coating Materials and Mechanism of Release. Plants 2021, 10 (2), 238. 10.3390/plants10020238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Datta R.; Kelkar A.; Baraniya D.; Molaei A.; Moulick A.; Meena R. S.; Formanek P. Enzymatic Degradation of Lignin in Soil: A Review. Sustainability 2017, 9 (7), 1163. 10.3390/su9071163. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  116. Eraghi Kazzaz A.; Hosseinpour Feizi Z.; Fatehi P. Grafting Strategies for Hydroxy Groups of Lignin for Producing Materials. Green Chem. 2019, 21 (21), 5714–5752. 10.1039/C9GC02598G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  117. Lu J.; Cheng M.; Zhao C.; Li B.; Peng H.; Zhang Y.; Shao Q.; Hassan M. Application of Lignin in Preparation of Slow-Release Fertilizer: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 176, 114267. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114267. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  118. Abbas A.; Wang Z.; Zhang Y.; Peng P.; She D. Lignin-Based Controlled Release Fertilizers: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 222, 1801–1817. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.09.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Savy D.; Cozzolino V. Novel Fertilising Products from Lignin and Its Derivatives to Enhance Plant Development and Increase the Sustainability of Crop Production. J. Cleaner Prod. 2022, 366, 132832. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132832. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  120. Chen J.; Fan X.; Zhang L.; Chen X.; Sun S.; Sun R. Research Progress in Lignin-Based Slow/Controlled Release Fertilizer. ChemSusChem 2020, 13 (17), 4356–4366. 10.1002/cssc.202000455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Abaecherli A.; Popa V. I. Lignin in Crop Cultivations and Bioremediation. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2005, 4 (3), 273–292. 10.30638/eemj.2005.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  122. Fischer K.; Schiene R.. Nitrogenous Fertilizers from Lignins — A Review. In Chemical Modification, Properties, and Usage of Lignin; Hu T. Q., Ed.; Springer US: Boston, MA, 2002; pp 167–198. [Google Scholar]
  123. Lapierre C.; Monties B.; Meier D.; Faix O. Structural Investigation of Kraft Lignins Transformed via Oxo-Ammoniation to Potential Nitrogenous Fertilizers. Holzforschung 1994, 48 (s1), 63–68. 10.1515/hfsg.1994.48.s1.63. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  124. Meier D.; Zúñiga-Partida V.; Ramírez-Cano F.; Hahn N.-C.; Faix O. Conversion of Technical Lignins into Slow-Release Nitrogenous Fertilizers by Ammoxidation in Liquid Phase. Bioresour. Technol. 1994, 49 (2), 121–128. 10.1016/0960-8524(94)90075-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  125. Huang C.; Ragauskas A. J.; Wu X.; Huang Y.; Zhou X.; He J.; Huang C.; Lai C.; Li X.; Yong Q. Co-Production of Bio-Ethanol, Xylonic Acid and Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizer from Low-Cost Straw Pulping Solid Residue. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 250, 365–373. 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Jiao G.-J.; Peng P.; Sun S.-L.; Geng Z.-C.; She D. Amination of Biorefinery Technical Lignin by Mannich Reaction for Preparing Highly Efficient Nitrogen Fertilizer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 127, 544–554. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Wang X.; Lü S.; Gao C.; Xu X.; Zhang X.; Bai X.; Liu M.; Wu L. Highly Efficient Adsorption of Ammonium onto Palygorskite Nanocomposite and Evaluation of Its Recovery as a Multifunctional Slow-Release Fertilizer. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 252, 404–414. 10.1016/j.cej.2014.04.097. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  128. Wang B.; Chen T.-Y.; Wang H.-M.; Li H.-Y.; Liu C.-F.; Wen J.-L. Amination of Biorefinery Technical Lignins Using Mannich Reaction Synergy with Subcritical Ethanol Depolymerization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 426–435. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Wang M.; Sjöholm E.; Li J. Fast and Reliable Quantification of Lignin Reactivity via Reaction with Dimethylamine and Formaldehyde (Mannich Reaction). Holzforschung 2017, 71 (1), 27–34. 10.1515/hf-2016-0054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  130. García C.; Vallejo A.; Diéz J. A.; García L.; Cartagena M. C. Nitrogen Use Efficiency with the Application of Controlled Release Fertilizers Coated with Kraft Pine Lignin. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1997, 43 (2), 443–449. 10.1080/00380768.1997.10414768. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  131. Ariyanti S.; Man Z.; Bustam M. A. Improvement of Hydrophobicity of Urea Modified Tapioca Starch Film with Lignin for Slow Release Fertilizer. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 626, 350–354. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.626.350. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  132. Sadeghi N.; Shayesteh K.; Lotfiman S. Effect of Modified Lignin Sulfonate on Controlled-Release Urea in Soil. J. Polym. Environ. 2017, 25 (3), 792–799. 10.1007/s10924-016-0848-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  133. Mulder W. J.; Gosselink R. J. A.; Vingerhoeds M. H.; Harmsen P. F. H.; Eastham D. Lignin Based Controlled Release Coatings. Ind. Crops Prod. 2011, 34 (1), 915–920. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.02.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  134. Sipponen M. H.; Rojas O. J.; Pihlajaniemi V.; Lintinen K.; Österberg M. Calcium Chelation of Lignin from Pulping Spent Liquor for Water-Resistant Slow-Release Urea Fertilizer Systems. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2017, 5 (1), 1054–1061. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02348. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  135. Li T.; Lü S.; Ji Y.; Qi T.; Liu M. A Biodegradable Fe-Fertilizer with High Mechanical Property and Sustainable Release for Potential Agriculture and Horticulture Applications. New J. Chem. 2018, 42 (23), 19129–19136. 10.1039/C8NJ04381G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  136. Rodríguez-Lucena P.; Benedicto A.; Lucena J. J.; Rodríguez-Castrillón J. A.; Moldovan M.; García Alonso J. I.; Hernández-Apaolaza L. Use of the Stable Isotope 57Fe to Track the Efficacy of the Foliar Application of Lignosulfonate/Fe3+ Complexes to Correct Fe Deficiencies in Cucumber Plants. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91 (3), 395–404. 10.1002/jsfa.4197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Rodríguez-Lucena P.; Tomasi N.; Pinton R.; Hernández-Apaolaza L.; Lucena J. J.; Cesco S. Evaluation of 59Fe-Lignosulfonates Complexes as Fe-Sources for Plants. Plant and Soil 2009, 325 (1), 53. 10.1007/s11104-009-0091-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  138. Du X.; Li J.; Lindström M. E. Modification of Industrial Softwood Kraft Lignin Using Mannich Reaction with and without Phenolation Pretreatment. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 52, 729–735. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.11.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  139. Azeem B.; KuShaari K.; Man Z. B.; Basit A.; Thanh T. H. Review on Materials & Methods to Produce Controlled Release Coated Urea Fertilizer. J. Controlled Release 2014, 181, 11–21. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Naz M. Y.; Sulaiman S. A. Slow Release Coating Remedy for Nitrogen Loss from Conventional Urea: A Review. J. Controlled Release 2016, 225, 109–120. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.01.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Kochba M.; Gambash S.; Avnimelech Y. Studies On Slow Release Fertilizers: 1. Effects Of Temperature, Soil Moisture, And Water Vapor Pressure. Soil Sci. 1990, 149 (6), 339–343. 10.1097/00010694-199006000-00004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  142. White P. J.; Broadley M. R. Biofortification of Crops with Seven Mineral Elements Often Lacking in Human Diets – Iron, Zinc, Copper, Calcium, Magnesium, Selenium and Iodine. New Phytol. 2009, 182 (1), 49–84. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02738.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. White P. J.; Brown P. H. Plant Nutrition for Sustainable Development and Global Health. Annals of Botany 2010, 105 (7), 1073–1080. 10.1093/aob/mcq085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Guo X.; Zhang S.; Shan X. Adsorption of Metal Ions on Lignin. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151 (1), 134–142. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.05.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Li T.; Lü S.; Wang Z.; Huang M.; Yan J.; Liu M. Lignin-Based Nanoparticles for Recovery and Separation of Phosphate and Reused as Renewable Magnetic Fertilizers. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 765, 142745. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Rotondo F.; Coniglio R.; Cantera L.; Di Pascua I.; Clavijo L.; Dieste A. Lignin-Based Coatings for Controlled P-Release Fertilizer Consisting of Granulated Simple Superphosphate. Holzforschung 2018, 72 (8), 637–643. 10.1515/hf-2017-0176. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  147. Fertahi S.; Bertrand I.; Amjoud M.; Oukarroum A.; Arji M.; Barakat A. Properties of Coated Slow-Release Triple Superphosphate (TSP) Fertilizers Based on Lignin and Carrageenan Formulations. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019, 7 (12), 10371–10382. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00433. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  148. Prieur B.; Meub M.; Wittemann M.; Klein R.; Bellayer S.; Fontaine G.; Bourbigot S. Phosphorylation of Lignin: Characterization and Investigation of the Thermal Decomposition. RSC Adv. 2017, 7 (27), 16866–16877. 10.1039/C7RA00295E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  149. Sipponen M. H.; Lange H.; Crestini C.; Henn A.; Österberg M. Lignin for Nano- and Microscaled Carrier Systems: Applications, Trends, and Challenges. ChemSusChem 2019, 12 (10), 2039–2054. 10.1002/cssc.201900480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Jakhar A. M.; Aziz I.; Kaleri A. R.; Hasnain M.; Haider G.; Ma J.; Abideen Z. Nano-Fertilizers: A Sustainable Technology for Improving Crop Nutrition and Food Security. NanoImpact 2022, 27, 100411. 10.1016/j.impact.2022.100411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Verma K. K.; Song X.-P.; Joshi A.; Tian D.-D.; Rajput V. D.; Singh M.; Arora J.; Minkina T.; Li Y.-R. Recent Trends in Nano-Fertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture under Climate Change for Global Food Security. Nanomaterials 2022, 12 (1), 173. 10.3390/nano12010173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Mejias J. H.; Salazar F.; Pérez Amaro L.; Hube S.; Rodriguez M.; Alfaro M. Nanofertilizers: A Cutting-Edge Approach to Increase Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Grasslands. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2021, 9, 635114. 10.3389/fenvs.2021.635114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  153. Beisl S.; Miltner A.; Friedl A. Lignin from Micro- to Nanosize: Production Methods. IJMS 2017, 18 (6), 1244. 10.3390/ijms18061244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Yadav V. K.; Gupta N.; Kumar P.; Dashti M. G.; Tirth V.; Khan S. H.; Yadav K. K.; Islam S.; Choudhary N.; Algahtani A.; Bera S. P.; Kim D.-H.; Jeon B.-H. Recent Advances in Synthesis and Degradation of Lignin and Lignin Nanoparticles and Their Emerging Applications in Nanotechnology. Materials 2022, 15 (3), 953. 10.3390/ma15030953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Schneider W. D. H.; Dillon A. J. P.; Camassola M. Lignin Nanoparticles Enter the Scene: A Promising Versatile Green Tool for Multiple Applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2021, 47, 107685. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Iravani S.; Varma R. S. Greener Synthesis of Lignin Nanoparticles and Their Applications. Green Chem. 2020, 22 (3), 612–636. 10.1039/C9GC02835H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biomacromolecules are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES