Skip to main content
AsiaIntervention logoLink to AsiaIntervention
. 2023 Mar 15;9(1):39–48. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-22-00033

Reduced-dose prasugrel monotherapy without aspirin after PCI with the SYNERGY stent in East Asian patients presenting with chronic coronary syndromes or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: rationale and design of the ASET Japan pilot study

Shinichiro Masuda 1, Takashi Muramatsu 2, Yuki Ishibashi 3, Ken Kozuma 4, Kengo Tanabe 5, Shimpei Nakatani 6, Norihiro Kogame 7, Masato Nakamura 8, Taku Asano 9, Takayuki Okamura 10, Yosuke Miyazaki 11, Hiroki Tateishi 12,13, Yukio Ozaki 14, Gaku Nakazawa 15, Yoshihiro Morino 16, Yuki Katagiri 17, Scot Garg 18, Hironori Hara 19, Masafumi Ono 20, Hideyuki Kawashima 21,22, Pedro A Lemos 23,24, Patrick W Serruys 25, Yoshinobu Onuma 26,*
PMCID: PMC10018289  PMID: 36936091

Abstract

The Acetyl Salicylic Elimination Trial (ASET) Japan pilot study is a multicentre, single-arm, open-label, proof-of-concept study with a stopping rule based on the occurrence of definite stent thrombosis. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of low-dose prasugrel monotherapy following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Japanese patients presenting with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Four hundred patients with a SYNTAX score <23 requiring PCI due to CCS or NSTE-ACS will be screened and considered eligible for the study. The enrolment is planned in two phases: 1) 200 patients presenting with CCS, followed by 2) 200 patients presenting with NSTE-ACS. After optimal PCI with implantation of a SYNERGY (Boston Scientific) stent, patients will be enrolled and loaded with prasugrel 20 mg, followed by a maintenance dose of prasugrel 3.75 mg once daily without aspirin continued for 3 months in Phase 1 (CCS patients), and for 12 months in Phase 2 (NSTE-ACS patients). After these follow-up periods, prasugrel will be replaced by standard antiplatelet therapy according to local practice. The primary endpoint is a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or definite stent thrombosis after the index procedure. The primary bleeding endpoint is any Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding occurring within 3 months of the index PCI for CCS patients, or 12 months for NSTE-ACS patients. The ASET Japan study is designed to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of reduced-dose prasugrel monotherapy after PCI in East Asian patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes.

Introduction

Following coronary stent implantation, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is prescribed to prevent acute and late stent thrombosis and to minimise repeat ischaemic events due to progressive atherosclerosis; however, its use increases the risk of bleeding complications1,2. In patients not at high bleeding risk, the current European and US guidelines recommend DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) for at least 6 months in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) and at least 12 months in acute coronary syndromes (ACS)3,4, whereas in patients at high bleeding risk, an abbreviated regimen of 1-3 months is suggested5. However, there are currently no recommendations regarding aspirin-free strategies. The history and recent trials of antiplatelet therapy are summarised in Supplementary Appendix 1,Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 1-Supplementary Figure 3.

The East Asian paradox and optimal dose of antiplatelet therapy

East Asian patients have a higher prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity compared with Caucasian patients, whilst their thrombotic event rate after PCI is similar, or even lower6. Conversely, the risk of bleeding events in East Asian patients appears to be greater than in Western patients7. This phenomenon, referred to as the “East Asian paradox”, suggests that the optimal therapeutic dose of antiplatelets may be different between East Asian and Western patients (Figure 1).

Figure 1. The East Asian paradox.

Figure 1

Postulated differences in the optimal “therapeutic window” of platelet reactivity between Western (blue square) and East Asian populations (blue dotted square). Compared to Western individuals, East Asian individuals have lower ischaemic risk at a same level of platelet reactivity (blue arrow); however, bleeding risk in East Asian individuals is higher than Western individuals (red arrow). The optimal “therapeutic window” of platelet reactivity might differ between Western and East Asian patients (yellow arrow).

Based on this hypothesis, a recent clinical trial has shown the efficacy of adjusted-dose prasugrel in Japanese patients8. The multicentre PRASFIT-ACS study in ACS patients showed no significant difference in ischaemic and bleeding events between patients randomised to DAPT followed by low-dose prasugrel (3.75 mg daily) and aspirin (81-330 mg daily) compared to DAPT followed by standard-dose clopidogrel (75 mg daily) and aspirin (81-330 mg daily)8.

Consequently, current guidelines in Japan and Taiwan recommend a reduction in the maintenance dose of prasugrel to 3.75 mg daily after coronary stent deployment9,10. The current recommended doses of oral antiplatelet therapy after PCI with stent implantation in patients with CCS and non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) are summarised in Table 1. The PENDULUM mono study was a multicentre, non-interventional, prospective registry that assessed the frequency of bleeding complications and cardiovascular events associated with adjusted-dose prasugrel monotherapy (3.75 mg daily) after PCI in high bleeding risk Japanese patients11. In this trial, 65.7% of patients switched to low-dose prasugrel monotherapy at 3 months and up to 83.5% switched at 12 months following their PCI. At 12 months, the cumulative incidence of bleeding complications, defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3 or 5 after the periprocedural period (from 1 to 12 months after PCI), was 3.2%, and the rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cerebral infarction, and stent thrombosis, was 3.8%. Furthermore, a prespecified analysis in the PENDULUM mono and the PENDULUM registry comparing single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with prasugrel versus DAPT showed that SAPT significantly reduced BARC 2, 3, and 5 bleeding between 0 and 12 months after the index PCI without increasing ischaemic events11,12. These observational studies suggest that adjusted-dose prasugrel monotherapy may be safely used in Japanese patients, but this needs to be further demonstrated in prospective studies. In addition, if low-dose prasugrel monotherapy is appropriate for CCS patients, further prospective studies will be needed to explore its feasibility and safety in high-risk patients.

Table 1. Current guidelines for the dosing of oral antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation due to chronic coronary syndrome and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Loading dose Maintenance dose
JCS ESC ACC/AHA JCS ESC ACC/AHA
Aspirin 162-324 mg 150–300 mg 162–325 mg 81–162 mg, once daily 75–100 mg, once daily 81 mg, once daily
Clopidogrel 300 mg 600 mg 600 mg 75 mg, once daily 75 mg, once daily 75 mg, once daily
Prasugrel 20 mg **60 mg 60 mg 3.75 mg, once daily 10 mg, once daily 10 mg, once daily
Ticagrelor *180 mg **180 mg 180 mg ††90 mg, twice daily §90 (60) mg, twice daily ||90 mg, twice daily
Reduced doses of P2Y12 inhibitor are highlighted in bold. *Ticagrelor is not available for CCS patients. In patients with NSTE-ACS, a ticagrelor 180 mg loading dose may be considered in P2Y12 receptor inhibitor-naive patients before PCI, when prasugrel or clopidogrel are not available or are contraindicated. **Prasugrel or ticagrelor on top of aspirin may be considered instead of clopidogrel for CCS patients undergoing PCI, considering the ischaemic (e.g., high SYNTAX score, prior stent thrombosis, location and number of implanted stents) and bleeding risks. †Prasugrel and ticagrelor are not available for CCS patients. ††Ticagrelor is considered when prasugrel is not available or contraindicated. 5 mg/day for patients aged ≥75 years or with a body weight <60 kg. §Ticagrelor 60 mg is the treatment option for DAPT in combination with aspirin 75–100 mg daily in post-myocardial infarction patients who have tolerated DAPT for 1 year with a high or moderate risk of an ischaemic event, and without a high bleeding risk. In patients with ACS (NSTE-ACS or STEMI) treated with DAPT after coronary stent implantation who are not at high risk for bleeding complications and who do not have a history of stroke or TIA, it is reasonable to choose prasugrel over clopidogrel for maintenance P2Y12 inhibitor therapy. ||In patients with ACS (NSTE-ACS or STEMI) treated with DAPT after coronary stent implantation, it is reasonable to use ticagrelor in preference to clopidogrel for maintenance P2Y12 inhibitor therapy. ACC/AHA: American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; CCS: chronic coronary syndrome; DAPT: dual antiplatelet therapy; ESC: European Society of Cardiology; JCS: Japanese Circulation Society; NSTE-ACS: non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI: ST-elevation myocardial infarction; TIA: transient ischaemic attack

The objective of the present trial is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of low-dose (3.75 mg daily) prasugrel monotherapy following PCI in Japanese patients presenting with CCS or NSTE-ACS.

Methods

Study design

The Acetyl Salicylic Elimination Trial (ASET) Japan Pilot Study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05117866) is designed as a multicentre, single-arm, open-label, proof-of-concept trial with a stopping rule based on the occurrence of definite stent thrombosis13. The study flowchart is shown in Figure 2. The enrolment of patients across 12 sites in Japan is planned in two phases: 1) 200 patients presenting with CCS, followed by 2) 200 patients presenting with NSTE-ACS. The recruitment will start with patients presenting with CCS, and the Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) will closely monitor safety events and will meet when recruitment in the CCS cohort reaches 100. The DSMB will then advise the steering committee whether enrolment of the NSTE-ACS population should be started based on clinical events reported at that time. During Phase 1, patient recruitment will be stopped if three or more cases of definite stent thrombosis occur within three months of the index PCI. In Phase 2, enrolment will be stopped if three or more patients experience definite stent thrombosis within 12 months of the index PCI, or if there are two or more sudden deaths in the first 30 days. The cut-off rate for definite stent thrombosis was determined based on the previously reported incidence of stent thrombosis14. In the EVOLVE II Trial, the incidence of stent thrombosis was 0.4% at 30 days and 0.4% at 1 year15, whilst it was 1.2% at 30 days and 1.5% at 1 year in the CARDIOBASE Bern PCI Registry16.

Figure 2. Flowchart of the ASET Japan trial.

Figure 2

ASA: acetylsalicylic acid; CCS: chronic coronary syndromes; DAPT: dual antiplatelet therapy; NSTE-ACS: non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention

Sample size considerations

Due to the exploratory nature of this study, no formal sample size calculations were performed. Based on a previous pilot study17, we decided to enrol 200 consecutive patients in each phase (for a of total 400 patients). The Benestent-II Pilot Study, which attempted to eliminate the convention of anti-vitamin K anticoagulation post-stenting that was in use at the time, was the first-in-human study to apply a stopping rule involving a fixed rate of stent thrombosis beyond which the study would have to be terminated. This first-in-human study was successfully completed without any stent thrombosis in 200 patients and was followed by the large randomised Benestent-II Pilot Study, with 827 patients treated without anticoagulation18.

Informed consent

All potential patients provided written informed consent prior to undergoing any study-specific procedures, including screening and diagnostic angiography potentially leading to “ad hoc” PCI. The certified review board (CRB), central ethics committee and local ethics committee at each participating centre approved the study protocol (CR20-023 and CR21-017 at the Fujita Health University). The study protocol has been registered at the Japanese Registry of Clinical Trials (identifier: jRCTs042200053).

Patient screening

Patients requiring PCI for CCS or NSTE-ACS with an anatomical SYNTAX score <23 prior to revascularisation will be screened for enrolment in this trial. The anatomical SYNTAX score will be assessed onsite by trained investigators, and the results will be confirmed by an independent core lab. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed in Table 2. Cardiac enzymes and biomarkers must be sampled to detect acute MI prior to the index PCI. The criteria for cardiac enzymes and biomarkers are shown in Supplementary Appendix 2.

Table 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria of the ASET Japan trial.

For CCS patients (Phase 1)
1. Inclusion criteria for CCS patients
All candidates must meet the following inclusion criteria:
1. Successful PCI with optimal acute stent implantation of one or more SYNERGY stent(s).
2. SYNERGY stent implantation was performed to treat:
a) at least one de novo lesion with ≥50% diameter stenosis determined by visual assessment in at least one native coronary artery with a vessel size between 2.25 mm and 5.0 mm in diameter.
b) non-acute coronary disease, with normal cardiac biomarker values prior to the PCI procedure, and evidence of myocardial ischaemia by symptoms or non-invasive/invasive testing.
c) patients with anatomical SYNTAX score <23 prior to PCI
3. Patient has provided written informed consent as approved by the ethics committee of the respective clinical site.
2. Exclusion criteria for CCS patients
Candidates will be ineligible for enrolment if any of the following conditions apply:
1. ≤20 years of age.
2. Unable to give informed consent.
3. Females of child-bearing potential unless negative pregnancy test at screening and willing to use effective contraception for the duration of treatment with study medication.
4. Females who are breastfeeding at time of enrolment.
5. Patients concomitantly receiving any other non-study stent for the same procedure.
6. Patients with planned PCI or surgical intervention to treat any cardiac or non-cardiac condition.
7. Previous PCI with any non-SYNERGY stents in the last 6 months.
8. Current (same hospitalisation) or previous (within 12 months) acute coronary syndrome.
9. Patients with the following lesion characteristics prior to PCI: saphenous or arterial graft, in-stent (re)stenosis.
10. History of definite stent thrombosis.
11. Concomitant cardiac valve disease requiring invasive therapy.
12. Atrial fibrillation or other indication for oral anticoagulant therapy.
13. Known allergy to aspirin or prasugrel or diagnosed lactose intolerance.
14. Acute heart failure.
15. Active myocarditis.
16. Cardiomyopathy.
17. Patient in haemodialysis.
18. Treatment in the last 10 days or requirement for ongoing treatment with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor or inducer.
19. History of stroke or transient ischaemic cerebrovascular accident.
20. History of intracranial haemorrhage or other intracranial pathology associated with increased bleeding risk.
21. Haemoglobin <10 g/dL or other evidence of active bleeding.
22. Peptic ulceration documented by endoscopy within the last 3 months unless healing proven by repeat endoscopy.
23. Any other condition deemed by the investigator to place the patient at excessive risk of bleeding with prasugrel.
24. Participation in another trial with an investigational drug or device.
25. Comorbidity associated with life expectancy <1 year.
26. Assessment that the subject is not likely to comply with the study procedures or have complete follow-up.
27. Known drug or alcohol dependence within the past 12 months as judged by the investigator.
CCS: chronic coronary syndrome; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention
For NSTE-ACS patients (Phase 2)
1. Inclusion criteria
For NSTE-ACS patients
1. Patients with diagnosed non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.
2. Patients with anatomical SYNTAX score <23 prior to PCI.
3. Patient provided written informed consent as approved by the ethics committee of the respective clinical site.
Post-PCI for NSTE-ACS patients
1. Patient is free of angina symptoms at the end of PCI procedure.
2. Successful PCI with optimal acute stent implantation of one or more SYNERGY stent(s).
3. SYNERGY stent implantation was performed to treat at least one de novo lesion with ≥50% diameter stenosis determined by visual assessment in at least one native coronary artery with a vessel size between 2.25 mm and 5.0 mm in diameter.
2. Exclusion criteria
Candidates will be ineligible for enrolment if any of the following conditions apply:
1. ≤20 years of age.
2. Unable to give informed consent.
3. Females of child-bearing potential unless negative pregnancy test at screening and willing to use effective contraception for the duration of treatment with study medication.
4. Females who are breastfeeding at time of enrolment.
5. Patients concomitantly received any other non-study stent at the same procedure.
6. Patients with planned PCI or surgical intervention to treat any cardiac or non-cardiac condition.
7. Previous PCI with any non-SYNERGY stents in the last 6 months.
8. Patient with following lesion characteristics prior to PCI.
9. History of definite stent thrombosis.
10. Concomitant cardiac valve disease requiring invasive therapy.
11. Known allergy to aspirin, prasugrel or diagnosed lactose intolerance.
12. Atrial fibrillation or other indication for oral anticoagulant therapy.
13. History of stroke or transient ischaemic cerebrovascular accident.
14. History of intracranial haemorrhage or other intracranial pathology associated with increased bleeding risk.
15. Acute heart failure.
16. Active myocarditis.
17. Cardiomyopathy.
18. Patient in haemodialysis.
19. Haemoglobin <10 g/dL or other evidence of active bleeding.
20. Haemodynamic instability or cardiogenic shock.
21. Recurrent or ongoing chest pain refractory to medical treatment.
22. Life-threatening arrhythmias or cardiac arrest.
23. Mechanical complications of myocardial infarction.
24. Recurrent dynamic ST-T wave changes, particularly with intermittent ST-elevation.
25. Peptic ulceration documented by endoscopy within the last 3 months unless healing proven by repeat endoscopy.
26. Any other condition deemed by the investigator to place the patient at excessive risk of bleeding with prasugrel.
27. Participation in another trial with an investigational drug or device.
28. Comorbidity associated with life expectancy <1 year.
29. Assessment that the subject is not likely to comply with the study procedures or have complete follow-up.
30. Known drug or alcohol dependence within the past 12 months as judged by the investigator.
ACS: acute coronary syndrome; NSTE-ACS: non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention

PCI procedure

All patients will be loaded with standard DAPT (aspirin 81 to 330 mg and clopidogrel 300 mg, prasugrel 20 mg, or ticagrelor 180 mg, unless patients are on long-term [≥5 days prior to the index PCI] therapy with prasugrel 3.75 mg as a Japanese standard maintenance dose), which according to local practice is at least two hours prior to their index PCI for CCS patients (Phase 1), and prior to their PCI procedure for NSTE-ACS patients (Phase 2). The use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors is regulated in Japan by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), and previous trials have demonstrated that abciximab does not reduce major coronary events, whilst significantly increasing bleeding and thrombocytopaenia19.

The index PCI will be performed using a radial, brachial or femoral approach with the intention to achieve complete revascularisation in at least one stenosis with an angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50%, as identified by the local interventional cardiologist. Although not mandated, the radial approach will be strongly recommended. Periprocedural anticoagulation will be used at the operator’s discretion according to local or international guidelines20. All target lesions must be exclusively treated with the SYNERGY stent (Boston Scientific), which elutes everolimus within three months from a 4 μm biodegradable poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) coating that is located only on the abluminal side of 74 μm/79 μm/81 μm platinum-chromium struts (for the stent sizes ≤2.5 mm/3.0-3.5 mm/4.0 mm, respectively) and is resorbed within four months. These features have been introduced to improve early endothelialisation of stent struts, accelerate vessel healing, and reduce thrombotic events. The SYNERGY stent has been shown to have clinical safety and efficacy in a previous randomised trial15. The feasibility and safety of the SYNERGY stent with prasugrel monotherapy without aspirin were shown in the ASET study17. The potential advantage of uniform use of the SYNERGY stent is to facilitate the pooling of data with that of the ASET study in which the SYNERGY stent was also uniformly used. However, the potential disadvantage of this is that evidence stemming from this study will not be generalisable to other technologies.

The investigator should perform the procedure to achieve optimal stent implantation according to local standards of care by angiography including quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and/or findings from intracoronary imaging (intravascular ultrasound [IVUS], optical coherence tomography [OCT], or optical frequency domain imaging [OFDI]). An optimal immediate coronary stent result is a combination of successful stent implantation with no significant residual diameter stenosis (<20%), no major edge dissection, no angiographic finding suggestive of thrombus, no major side branch occlusion, no post-procedure delay in contrast filling, and no major stent incomplete apposition21. Use of intracoronary imaging pre- and/or post-stent implantation for optimisation is left to the operator’s discretion. After the index PCI, only if the angiographic and/or intravascular results are considered satisfactory in the operator’s clinical judgement will the patient be enrolled in the study.

In cases of screening failure, the reasons why optimal stent implantation was not achieved need to be recorded.

Enrolment and follow-up

After achievement of optimal SYNERGY stent implantation, patients will be enrolled in the study and loaded with prasugrel 20 mg immediately in the cath lab to avoid further delays in loading and maintained on prasugrel 3.75 mg monotherapy once daily for 3 months in Phase 1, and for 12 months in Phase 2. This strategy of switching P2Y12 inhibitors is in line with the international consensus on switching therapies and is supported by pharmacodynamic studies22,23. Patients who were loaded with prasugrel preprocedure or have been on long-term prasugrel do not need additional loading. Aspirin will be discontinued the day after the index PCI.

In Phase 1, clinical follow-up with outpatient visits will be performed at 3 months and with telephone contacts at 1 and 4 months. In Phase 2, clinical follow-up will be performed with outpatient visits at 1 and 12 months and telephone contact at 3, 6, and 13 months. The 4- and 13-month telephone follow-ups are not related to the scientific purpose of this pilot study; this period is rather for observational assessment after switching the standard of care (aspirin alone, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, or DAPT). An assessment of angina status, cardiovascular drug use, and any serious adverse events will be recorded during clinical follow-up visits.

Optimal medical therapy with strict control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is strongly recommended along with optimisation of all medication therapy according to current guidelines20. The use of other medications (e.g., beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers) will also be recommended.

Study endpoints

The study endpoints are described in Table 3. The primary endpoint is a composite of cardiac death, target vessel MI (>48 hours post-PCI), defined as an MI case with evidence of myocardial necrosis in the vascular territory of a previously treated target vessel, or definite stent thrombosis occurring within 3 months of the index PCI in CCS patients or 12 months for NSTE-ACS patients. Inclusion in this trial occurs after the index procedure; hence, only MI occurring >48 hours after the index PCI will be taken into consideration as a primary endpoint. The primary bleeding endpoint is any BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding occurring within 3 months of the index PCI in CCS patients or 12 months for NSTE-ACS patients.

Table 3. Endpoints of the ASET Japan trial.

Study endpoints.
Primary ischaemic endpoints
A composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (>48 hours post-PCI), and definite stent thrombosis up to 3 months for CCS patients (Phase 1) and up to 12 months for NSTE-ACS patients (Phase 2) after the index procedure.
Primary bleeding endpoints
The primary bleeding endpoint is any BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding up to 3 months for CCS patients, and 12 months for NSTE-ACS patients after the index PCI.
Secondary endpoints
1. All-cause death.
2. Stroke Ischaemic
Haemorrhagic
Unknown
3. All myocardial infarctions.
4. Repeat revascularisation.
5. Definite/probable/possible stent thrombosis.
6. BARC type 1–5 bleedings and each individual component of the primary endpoint.
7. Patient-oriented composite endpoints (PoCE).
8. Device-oriented composite endpoints (DoCE).
9. Net adverse clinical event (NACE).
ACS: acute coronary syndrome; BARC: Bleeding Academic Research Consortium; CCS: chronic coronary syndrome; DoCE: device-oriented composite endpoint; NACE: net adverse clinical event; NSTE ACS: non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; PoCE: patient-oriented composite events

Secondary endpoints will include all-cause death, stroke (subclassified as ischaemic, haemorrhagic, or unknown), all MI, repeat revascularisation, definite/probable/possible stent thrombosis, BARC type 1-5 bleeding, and each individual component of the primary endpoint. The patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) is defined as a composite of all-cause death, any stroke, any MI, or revascularisation. The device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE) is defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, target vessel MI, or clinically driven target lesion revascularisation. Net clinical adverse events are defined as a composite of PoCE and BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding.

All deaths will be considered cardiac unless an undisputed non-cardiac cause can be established. Spontaneous MI will be defined according to the Fourth Universal definitions24. Periprocedural MI (<48 hours post-PCI) will be defined according to the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) 2013 definition25. Stent thrombosis will be defined according to the Academic Research Consortium (ARC)-2 definition13. BARC bleeding will be defined as previously reported26. Safety measures will assess any drug discontinuation rate and date.

Clinical events adjudication and data safety monitoring

All events will be adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee. An independent DSMB will monitor the safety and efficacy of all the patients during enrolment and 3-month follow-up in CCS patients, and during enrolment and 12-month follow-up in NSTE-ACS patients, including the stopping rule based on the occurrence of definite stent thrombosis.

Discussion

Several randomised controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitor monotherapy following 1- or 3-month DAPT in CCS and ACS patients treated by PCI27,28,29,30. The characteristics of contemporary clinical trials of ticagrelor or clopidogrel monotherapy after PCI are summarised in Supplementary Table 1. The first-in-human ASET study was conducted in Brazil as a multicentre, single-arm, open-label trial and demonstrated the feasibility and safety of aspirin-free prasugrel monotherapy following PCI using the SYNERGY stent in low-risk patients with CCS or stabilised ACS17. Among the 201 enrolled patients, no stent thrombosis occurred with a high adherence to prasugrel (98.3%) during the 4-month follow-up period. The primary bleeding endpoint, defined as BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding, occurred in one patient (0.5%). Currently at least 3 clinical trials, STOPDAPT-3, NEOMINDSET, and OPTICA, are exploring novel strategies of monotherapy using P2Y12 receptor inhibitors (Supplementary Table 2).

Limitations

With regard to limitations of the present study, firstly, the findings need to be considered as hypothesis-generating due to the single-arm design with a small sample size without formal sample size calculation. Secondly, only patients with optimal angiographic and/or intravascular results will be enrolled in the study. This is a potential issue in terms of generalising the ASET Japan results into practice. Finally, due to the protocol of the trial, some of the participants will be required to have a loading dose of P2Y12 inhibitor twice. Although this strategy has been accepted in line with expert consensus, it potentially could affect the results.

Conclusions

With this “no DAPT” study, the investigators expect to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of prasugrel monotherapy just after stent deployment in selected Japanese patients with CCS and NSTE-ACS. Further randomised controlled trials are needed to evaluate the aspirin-free strategy compared with traditional DAPT following PCI.

Supplementary data

Supplementary Appendix 1

The history and recent trials of antiplatelet therapy.

Supplementary Appendix 2

Cardiac enzyme and biomarkers before the index PCI.

Supplementary Table 1

Characteristics of contemporary clinical trials of ticagrelor and clopidogrel monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Supplementary Table 2

Characteristics of current clinical trials for prasugrel monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Supplementary Figure 1

History of antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Supplementary Figure 2

Gastrointestinal endoscopy showing gastric ulcer and the rate of gastrointestinal damage of aspirin and PL 2200 in a previous randomised trial.

Supplementary Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier curves of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding up to 30 days, from 31 days to 1 year, and from 1 year to end of follow-up by clinical presentation in the GLOBAL LEADERS trial.

Acknowledgments

Funding

The ASET Japan is an investigator initiated study, and Meditrix Corporation is the sponsor. This trial is supported by grants from Boston Scientific Japan. The authors declare this funding source had no role in the design of this study and will not have any role during its execution, analyses, interpretation of the data, or decision to submit results.

Conflict of interest statement

S. Masuda reports a grant from Terumo outside the submitted work. T. Muramatsu has received honoraria/speaker fees from Boston Scientific Japan and Daiichi Sankyo. K. Kozuma received honoraria for lectures and is a member of the advisory boards of Daiichi Sankyo and Boston Scientific. K. Tanabe received honoraria from Boston Scientific and Daiichi Sankyo. M. Nakamura reports grants from Daiichi Sankyo during the conduct of the study; and honoraria from Bayer KK, Daiichi Sankyo KK, and Japan Lifeline. Y. Morino received a scientific grant and lecture fee from Boston Scientific. P.W. Serruys reports institutional grants from Sino Medical Sciences Technology, SMT, Philips Volcano, Xeltis, and HeartFlow, outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Abbreviations

ACS

acute coronary syndrome

AHA

American Heart Association

ARC

Academic Research Consortium

BARC

Bleeding Academic Research Consortium

CCS

chronic coronary syndrome

CEC

clinical event committee

DAPT

dual antiplatelet therapy

DES

drug-eluting stent

DSMB

Data Safety and Monitoring Board

ESC

European Society of Cardiology

MI

myocardial infarction

NSTE-ACS

non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome

Contributor Information

Shinichiro Masuda, Department of Cardiology, National University of Ireland Galway (NUIG), Galway, Ireland.

Takashi Muramatsu, Department of Cardiology, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Japan.

Yuki Ishibashi, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.

Ken Kozuma, Department of Cardiology, Teikyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Kengo Tanabe, Division of Cardiology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Shimpei Nakatani, Department of Cardiology, JCHO Hoshigaoka Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.

Norihiro Kogame, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.

Masato Nakamura, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.

Taku Asano, Department of Cardiology, St. Luke’s International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Takayuki Okamura, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical Science and Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Yosuke Miyazaki, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical Science and Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Hiroki Tateishi, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical Science and Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan; Department of Cardiology, Shibata Hospital, Aichi, Japan.

Yukio Ozaki, Department of Cardiology, Fujita Health University Okazaki Medical Center, Aichi, Japan.

Gaku Nakazawa, Department of Cardiology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Yoshihiro Morino, Department of Cardiology, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Iwate, Japan.

Yuki Katagiri, Department of Cardiology, Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.

Scot Garg, Department of Cardiology, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, UK.

Hironori Hara, Department of Cardiology, National University of Ireland Galway (NUIG), Galway, Ireland.

Masafumi Ono, Department of Cardiology, National University of Ireland Galway (NUIG), Galway, Ireland.

Hideyuki Kawashima, Department of Cardiology, National University of Ireland Galway (NUIG), Galway, Ireland; Department of Cardiology, Teikyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Pedro A. Lemos, Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.

Patrick W. Serruys, Department of Cardiology, National University of Ireland Galway (NUIG), Galway, Ireland.

Yoshinobu Onuma, Department of Cardiology, National University of Ireland Galway (NUIG), Galway, Ireland.

References

  1. Giustino G, Baber U, Sartori S, Mehran R, Mastoris I, Kini AS, Sharma SK, Pocock SJ, Dangas GD. Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:1298–310. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Palmerini T, Benedetto U, Bacchi-Reggiani L, Della RivaD, Biondi-Zoccai G, Feres F, Abizaid A, Hong MK, Kim BK, Jang Y, Kim HS, Park KW, Genereux P, Bhatt DL, Orlandi C, De Servi, Petrou M, Rapezzi C, Stone GW. Mortality in patients treated with extended duration dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: a pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;385:2371–82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60263-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Costa F, Jeppsson A, Jüni P, Kastrati A, Kolh P, Mauri L, Montalescot G, Neumann FJ, Petricevic M, Roffi M, Steg PG, Windecker S, Zamorano JL, Levine GN ESC Scientific Document Group; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG); ESC National Cardiac Societies. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2018;39:213–60. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, Brindis RG, Fihn SD, Fleisher LA, Granger CB, Lange RA, Mack MJ, Mauri L, Mehran R, Mukherjee D, Newby LK, O'Gara PT, Sabatine MS, Smith PK, Smith SC, Halperin JL, Levine GN, Al-Khatib SM, Birtcher KK, Bozkurt B, Brindis RG, Cigarroa JE, Curtis LH, Fleisher LA, Gentile F, Gidding S, Hlatky MA, Ikonomidis JS, Joglar JA, Pressler SJ, Wijeysundera DN. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:1243–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.07.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, Barthélémy O, Bauersachs J, Bhatt DL, Dendale P, Dorobantu M, Edvardsen T, Folliguet T, Gale CP, Gilard M, Jobs A, Jüni P, Lambrinou E, Lewis BS, Mehilli J, Meliga E, Merkely B, Mueller C, Roffi M, Rutten FH, Sibbing D, Siontis GCM ESC Scientific Document Group. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:1289–367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kimura T, Morimoto T, Nakagawa Y, Tamura T, Kadota K, Yasumoto H, Nishikawa H, Hiasa Y, Muramatsu T, Meguro T, Inoue N, Honda H, Hayashi Y, Miyazaki S, Oshima S, Honda T, Shiode N, Namura M, Sone T, Nobuyoshi M, Kita T, Mitsudo K j-Cypher Registry Investigators. Antiplatelet therapy and stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Circulation. 2009;119:987–95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.808311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Levine GN, Jeong YH, Goto S, Anderson JL, Huo Y, Mega JL, Taubert K, Smith SC. Expert consensus document: World Heart Federation expert consensus statement on antiplatelet therapy in East Asian patients with ACS or undergoing PCI. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11:597–606. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Saito S, Isshiki T, Kimura T, Ogawa H, Yokoi H, Nanto S, Takayama M, Kitagawa K, Nishikawa M, Miyazaki S, Nakamura M. Efficacy and safety of adjusted-dose prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome: the PRASFIT-ACS study. Circ J. 2014;78:1684–92. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-1482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nakamura M, Kimura K, Kimura T, Ishihara M, Otsuka F, Kozuma K, Kosuge M, Shinke T, Nakagawa Y, Natsuaki M, Yasuda S, Akasaka T, Kohsaka S, Haze K, Hirayama A. JCS 2020 Guideline Focused Update on Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Circ J. 2020;84:831–65. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Li YH, Lee CH, Huang WC, Wang YC, Su CH, Sung PH, Chien SC, Hwang JJ. 2020 Focused Update of the 2012 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology for the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2020;36:285–307. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202007_36(4).20200619A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nakamura M, Morino Y, Kakuta T, Hata Y, Takamisawa I, Tanabe K, Anzai H, Takahashi A, Kadota K, Suzuki H, Wakatsuki T, Okayama H, Yamashita J, Akasaka T, Yokoi H, Nakagami T, Higuchi Y, Yamaguchi J, Kimura T, Harada A, Kuroda T, Takita A, Iijima R, Murakami Y, Saito S. Monotherapy With Prasugrel After Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy for Japanese Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients With High Bleeding Risk- A Prospective Cohort Study (PENDULUM mono Study). Circ J. 2020;85:27–36. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nakamura M, Kadota K, Takahashi A, Kanda J, Anzai H, Ishii Y, Shibata Y, Yasaka Y, Takamisawa I, Yamaguchi J, Takeda Y, Harada A, Motohashi T, Iijima R, Uemura S, Murakami Y PENDULUM RegistryInvestigators*. Relationship Between Platelet Reactivity and Ischemic and Bleeding Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in East Asian Patients: 1-Year Results of the PENDULUM Registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e015439. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es, Steg PG, Morel MA, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007;115:2344–51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Palmerini T, Benedetto U, Biondi-Zoccai G, Della Riva, Bacchi-Reggiani L, Smits PC, Vlachojannis GJ, Jensen LO, Christiansen EH, Berencsi K, Valgimigli M, Orlandi C, Petrou M, Rapezzi C, Stone GW. Long-Term Safety of Drug-Eluting and Bare-Metal Stents: Evidence From a Comprehensive Network Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:2496–507. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kereiakes DJ, Meredith IT, Windecker S, Lee Jobe R, Mehta SR, Sarembock IJ, Feldman RL, Stein B, Dubois C, Grady T, Saito S, Kimura T, Christen T, Allocco DJ, Dawkins KD. Efficacy and safety of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting coronary stent: the EVOLVE II Randomized Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015:8e002372. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zanchin C, Ueki Y, Zanchin T, Haner J, Otsuka T, Stortecky S, Koskinas KC, Siontis GCM, Praz F, Moschovitis A, Hunziker L, Valgimigli M, Pilgrim T, Heg D, Windecker S, Räber L. Everolimus-Eluting Biodegradable Polymer Versus Everolimus-Eluting Durable Polymer Stent for Coronary Revascularization in Routine Clinical Practice. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:1665–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kogame N, Guimarães PO, Modolo R, De Martino, Tinoco J, Ribeiro EE, Kawashima H, Ono M, Hara H, Wang R, Cavalcante R, Moulin B, Falcão BAA, Leite RS, de Almeida, Morais GR, Meireles GC, Campos CM, Onuma Y, Serruys PW, Lemos PA. Aspirin-Free Prasugrel Monotherapy Following Coronary Artery Stenting in Patients With Stable CAD: The ASET Pilot Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:2251–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Serruys PW, van Hout, Bonnier H, Legrand V, Garcia E, Macaya C, Sousa E, van der, Colombo A, Seabra-Gomes R, Kiemeneij F, Ruygrok P, Ormiston J, Emanuelsson H, Fajadet J, Haude M, Klugmann S, Morel MA. Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II). Lancet. 1998;352:673–81. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11128-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nakagawa Y, Nobuyoshi M, Yamaguchi T, Meguro T, Yokoi H, Kimura T, Hosoda S, Kanmatsuse K, Matsumori A, Sasayama S. Efficacy of abciximab for patients undergoing balloon angioplasty: data from Japanese evaluation of c7E3 Fab for elective and primary PCI organization in randomized trial (JEPPORT). Circ J. 2009;73:145–51. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-08-0560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Jüni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferović PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. EuroIntervention. 2019;14:1435–534. doi: 10.4244/EIJY19M01_01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Watanabe H, Morimoto T, Shiomi H, Natsuaki M, Kawai K, Kozuma K, Igarashi K, Kadota K, Tanabe K, Morino Y, Hibi K, Akasaka T, Abe M, Suwa S, Muramatsu T, Kobayashi M, Dai K, Nakao K, Tarutani Y, Fujii K, Kimura T RESET and NEXT Investigators. Impact of Angiographic Residual Stenosis on Clinical Outcomes After New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation: Insights From a Pooled Analysis of the RESET and NEXT Trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;30;7:e008718. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Diodati JG, Saucedo JF, French JK, Fung AY, Cardillo TE, Henneges C, Effron MB, Fisher HN, Angiolillo DJ. Effect on platelet reactivity from a prasugrel loading dose after a clopidogrel loading dose compared with a prasugrel loading dose alone: Transferring From Clopidogrel Loading Dose to Prasugrel Loading Dose in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients (TRIPLET): a randomized controlled trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:567–74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.000063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Angiolillo DJ, Rollini F, Storey RF, Bhatt DL, James S, Schneider DJ, Sibbing D, So DYF, Trenk D, Alexopoulos D, Gurbel PA, Hochholzer W, De Luca, Bonello L, Aradi D, Cuisset T, Tantry US, Wang TY, Valgimigli M, Waksman R, Mehran R, Montalescot G, Franchi F, Price MJ. International Expert Consensus on Switching Platelet P2Y12 Receptor-Inhibiting Therapies. Circulation. 2017;136:1955–75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, White HD ESC Scientific Document Group. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J. 2019;40:237–69. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Moussa ID, Klein LW, Shah B, Mehran R, Mack MJ, Brilakis ES, Reilly JP, Zoghbi G, Holper E, Stone GW. Consideration of a new definition of clinically relevant myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1563–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, Kaul S, Wiviott SD, Menon V, Nikolsky E, Serebruany V, Valgimigli M, Vranckx P, Taggart D, Sabik JF, Cutlip DE, Krucoff MW, Ohman EM, Steg PG, White H. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011;123:2736–47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vranckx P, Valgimigli M, Jüni P, Hamm C, Steg PG, Heg D, van Es, McFadden EP, Onuma Y, van Meijeren, Chichareon P, Benit E, Möllmann H, Janssens L, Ferrario M, Moschovitis A, Zurakowski A, Dominici M, Van Geuns, Huber K, Slagboom T, Serruys PW, Windecker S GLOBAL LEADERS Investigators. Ticagrelor plus aspirin for 1 month, followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for 23 months vs aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial. Lancet. 2018;392:940–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31858-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mehran R, Baber U, Sharma SK, Cohen DJ, Angiolillo DJ, Briguori C, Cha JY, Collier T, Dangas G, Dudek D, Džavík V, Escaned J, Gil R, Gurbel P, Hamm CW, Henry T, Huber K, Kastrati A, Kaul U, Kornowski R, Krucoff M, Kunadian V, Marx SO, Mehta SR, Moliterno D, Ohman EM, Oldroyd K, Sardella G, Sartori S, Shlofmitz R, Steg PG, Weisz G, Witzenbichler B, Han YL, Pocock S, Gibson CM. Ticagrelor with or without Aspirin in High-Risk Patients after PCI. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2032–42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim BK, Hong SJ, Cho YH, Yun KH, Kim YH, Suh Y, Cho JY, Her AY, Cho S, Jeon DW, Yoo SY, Cho DK, Hong BK, Kwon H, Ahn CM, Shin DH, Nam CM, Kim JS, Ko YG, Choi D, Hong MK, Jang Y TICO Investigators. Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy vs Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TICO Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020;323:2407–16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Watanabe H, Domei T, Morimoto T, Natsuaki M, Shiomi H, Toyota T, Ohya M, Suwa S, Takagi K, Nanasato M, Hata Y, Yagi M, Suematsu N, Yokomatsu T, Takamisawa I, Doi M, Noda T, Okayama H, Seino Y, Tada T, Sakamoto H, Hibi K, Abe M, Kawai K, Nakao K, Ando K, Tanabe K, Ikari Y, Hanaoka KI, Morino Y, Kozuma K, Kadota K, Furukawa Y, Nakagawa Y, Kimura T STOPDAPT-2 Investigators. Effect of 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Clopidogrel vs 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events in Patients Receiving PCI: The STOPDAPT-2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;321:2414–27. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Leon MB, Baim DS, Popma JJ, Gordon PC, Cutlip DE, Ho KK, Giambartolomei A, Diver DJ, Lasorda DM, Williams DO, Pocock SJ, Kuntz RE. A clinical trial comparing three antithrombotic-drug regimens after coronary-artery stenting. Stent Anticoagulation Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1665–71. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812033392303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Miyazaki Y, Suwannasom P, Sotomi Y, Abdelghani M, Tummala K, Katagiri Y, Asano T, Tenekecioglu E, Zeng Y, Cavalcante R, Collet C, Onuma Y, Serruys PW. Single or dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017;14:294–303. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Colombo A, Hall P, Nakamura S, Almagor Y, Maiello L, Martini G, Gaglione A, Goldberg SL, Tobis JM. Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation. 1995;91:1676–88. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.6.1676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, Cannon CP, Emanuelsson H, Held C, Horrow J, Husted S, James S, Katus H, Mahaffey KW, Scirica BM, Skene A, Steg PG, Storey RF, Harrington RA PLATO Investigators, Freij A, Thorsén M. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1045–57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0904327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S, Neumann FJ, Ardissino D, De Servi, Murphy SA, Riesmeyer J, Weerakkody G, Gibson CM, Antman EM TRITON-TIMI 38 Investigators. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2001–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Armstrong PC, Dhanji AR, Tucker AT, Mitchell JA, Warner TD. Reduction of platelet thromboxane A2 production ex vivo and in vivo by clopidogrel therapy. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:613–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03714.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Armstrong PC, Leadbeater PD, Chan MV, Kirkby NS, Jakubowski JA, Mitchell JA, Warner TD. In the presence of strong P2Y12 receptor blockade, aspirin provides little additional inhibition of platelet aggregation. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9:552–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04160.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Alli O, Smith C, Hoffman M, Amanullah S, Katz P, Amanullah AM. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:410–4. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181faec3c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yeomans ND, Lanas AI, Talley NJ, Thomson AB, Daneshjoo R, Eriksson B, Appelman-Eszczuk S, Langström G, Naesdal J, Serrano P, Singh M, Skelly MM, Hawkey CJ. Prevalence and incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers during treatment with vascular protective doses of aspirin. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22:795–801. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02649.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Cryer B, Bhatt DL, Lanza FL, Dong JF, Lichtenberger LM, Marathi UK. Low-dose aspirin-induced ulceration is attenuated by aspirin-phosphatidylcholine: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:272–7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Chen WC, Lin KH, Huang YT, Tsai TJ, Sun WC, Chuah SK, Wu DC, Hsu PI. The risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding in low-dose aspirin users. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45:1542–50. doi: 10.1111/apt.14079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Levy DJ. Images in clinical medicine. An aspirin tablet and a gastric ulcer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:863. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200009213431206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Huang WY, Saver JL, Wu YL, Lin CJ, Lee M, Ovbiagele B. Frequency of Intracranial Hemorrhage With Low-Dose Aspirin in Individuals Without Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76:906–14. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Vranckx P, Valgimigli M, Odutayo A, Serruys PW, Hamm C, Steg PG, Heg D, Mc Fadden, Onuma Y, Benit E, Janssens L, Diletti R, Ferrario M, Huber K, Räber L, Windecker S, Jüni P GLOBAL LEADERS Investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor Monotherapy by Clinical Presentation: Pre-Specified Analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e015560. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Natsuaki M, Morimoto T, Shiomi H, Kadota K, Tada T, Takeji Y, Matsumura-Nakano Y, Yoshikawa Y, Watanabe H, Yamamoto K, Imada K, Domei T, Yamaji K, Kaneda K, Taniguchi R, Ehara N, Nawada R, Toyofuku M, Shinoda E, Suwa S, Tamura T, Inada T, Matsuda M, Aoyama T, Sato Y, Furukawa Y, Ando K, Nakagawa Y, Kimura T CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-3 Investigators. Effects of Acute Coronary Syndrome and Stable Coronary Artery Disease on Bleeding and Ischemic Risk After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circ J. 2021;85:1928–41. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Franzone A, McFadden E, Leonardi S, Piccolo R, Vranckx P, Serruys PW, Benit E, Liebetrau C, Janssens L, Ferrario M, Zurakowski A, Diletti R, Dominici M, Huber K, Slagboom T, Buszman P, Bolognese L, Tumscitz C, Bryniarski K, Aminian A, Vrolix M, Petrov I, Garg S, Naber C, Prokopczuk J, Hamm C, Steg PG, Heg D, Jüni P, Windecker S, Valgimigli M GLASSY Investigators. Ticagrelor Alone Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy From 1 Month After Drug-Eluting Coronary Stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:2223–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Valgimigli M, Frigoli E, Heg D, Tijssen J, Jüni P, Vranckx P, Ozaki Y, Moric MC, Chevalier B, Onuma Y, Windecker S, Tonino PAL, Roffi M, Lesiak M, Mahfoud F, Bartunek J, Hildick-Smith D, Colombo A, Stanković G, Iñiguez A, Schultz C, Kornowski R, Ong PJL, Alasnag M, Rodriguez AE, Moschovitis A, Laanmets P, Donahue M, Leonardi S, Smits PC MASTER DAPT Investigators. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after PCI in Patients at High Bleeding Risk. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1643–55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Valgimigli M, Gragnano F, Branca M, Franzone A, Baber U, Jang Y, Kimura T, Hahn JY, Zhao Q, Windecker S, Gibson CM, Kim BK, Watanabe H, Song YB, Zhu Y, Vranckx P, Mehta S, Hong SJ, Ando K, Gwon HC, Serruys PW, Dangas GD, McFadden EP, Angiolillo DJ, Heg D, Jüni P, Mehran R. P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy or dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary revascularisation: individual patient level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2021;373:n1332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wiviott SD, Trenk D, Frelinger AL, O'Donoghue M, Neumann FJ, Michelson AD, Angiolillo DJ, Hod H, Montalescot G, Miller DL, Jakubowski JA, Cairns R, Murphy SA, McCabe CH, Antman EM, Braunwald E PRINCIPLE-TIMI 44 Investigators. Prasugrel compared with high loading- and maintenance-dose clopidogrel in patients with planned percutaneous coronary intervention: the Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 trial. Circulation. 2007;116:2923–32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.740324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Aytekin A, Ndrepepa G, Neumann FJ, Menichelli M, Mayer K, Wöhrle J, Bernlochner I, Lahu S, Richardt G, Witzenbichler B, Sibbing D, Cassese S, Angiolillo DJ, Valina C, Kufner S, Liebetrau C, Hamm CW, Xhepa E, Hapfelmeier A, Sager HB, Wustrow I, Joner M, Trenk D, Fusaro M, Laugwitz KL, Schunkert H, Schüpke S, Kastrati A. Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circulation. 2020;142:2329–37. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Appendix 1

The history and recent trials of antiplatelet therapy.

Supplementary Appendix 2

Cardiac enzyme and biomarkers before the index PCI.

Supplementary Table 1

Characteristics of contemporary clinical trials of ticagrelor and clopidogrel monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Supplementary Table 2

Characteristics of current clinical trials for prasugrel monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Supplementary Figure 1

History of antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Supplementary Figure 2

Gastrointestinal endoscopy showing gastric ulcer and the rate of gastrointestinal damage of aspirin and PL 2200 in a previous randomised trial.

Supplementary Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier curves of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding up to 30 days, from 31 days to 1 year, and from 1 year to end of follow-up by clinical presentation in the GLOBAL LEADERS trial.


Articles from AsiaIntervention are provided here courtesy of Europa Group

RESOURCES