Social cognition is a multidimensional construct (1, 2) where different cognitive components converge with the aim of efficiently recognizing and interpreting information acquired from the social environment and of producing effective social interactions. Social interactions can be explained through three distinct processes: (1) social perception, the ability to distinguish facial expressions, voice or gesture information (3); (2) social understanding, including empathy and theory of mind (ToM) skills, namely the ability to share (affective empathy) and infer (cognitive empathy) emotions in self and others (4) and the ability to represent mental states and feelings of self and others (1); (3) social decision-making, the ability to adapt social behavior to social context (5). Social cognition is thus a fundamental process for humans in daily life. Accordingly, the DSM-5 (6) included socio-cognitive skills among the 6 main neurocognitive domains of functioning. This complex cognitive domain can be affected in both neurodevelopmental, e.g. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (7), and neurodegenerative disorders, e.g. Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Alzheimer's dementia (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) (8–10). Especially for ADHD patients, social cognition deficit can contribute in daily living impairments, particularly in work, health and academic domains. Patients affected by ADHD are also at high risk of developing personality disorders (11). In light of what was mentioned before, it is necessary an intervention to empower social cognition skills in order to improve the quality of life on individuals with ADHD.
Diagnosis of social cognition deficits in adults affected by ADHD and MCI
A large body of evidence consistently supports an impairment of social cognition not only in children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders [see (12), for a review] but also in adults with ADHD (Morellini et al.). Literature shows however inconclusive and ambiguous results mainly due to methodological inaccuracy and variability, as small sample size, and lack of standardized and harmonized protocols in acquisition and collection of data (Morellini et al.). Findings in MCI and dementia proved a variable degree of impairments in affective and cognitive facets of social cognition domain [see (8, 13)]. MCI performances significantly vary among studies according to inclusion criteria and global cognitive profile (13) proving even opposite socio-cognitive performances [e.g. (14, 15)]. Socio-cognitive disorders have been reported in MCI patients compared with healthy control subjects (10, 16–18), using emotion recognition test [i.e., Ekman 60 faces test (19)], and affective and cognitive ToM tasks [i.e., Reading the Mind in the Eye (20); The Awareness of Social Inference Test (21); the Story-based Empathy Task (2); the Social Cognition and emotional assessment (22)]. Crucially, longitudinal trajectories of changes in social cognition abilities are still largely unknown in MCI patients. The 12-months longitudinal study of Rossetto et al., that is part of this Research Topic, is pioneering in this field. As shown by the authors, affective ToM performances worsen earlier than cognitive ToM ones. As measured by the Reading the Mind in the Eye (20) and the Strange Stories test (23), at 12 months the 46% of MCI was impaired in affective ToM compared to the 28% in cognitive ToM (Rossetto et al.).
In view of what mentioned above, there is a strong need of better experimental studies and better clinical neuropsychological tools for the evaluation of social cognition performances in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative patients. This is a crucial issue in clinics, especially for an accurate early detection of subtle changes in social behavior as those that may occur in MCI or in the prodromal phases of FTD (9, 10). Nonetheless, it has also main implications in research since better experimental tasks may easier capture novel socio-cognitive profiles and longitudinal trajectories of damage. Recently, a European harmonization initiative (24) recommended a Uniform DataSet for the neuropsychological assessment of MCI patients. This includes a social cognition test (i.e., the Story-Based Empathy Task) in order to cover each main cognitive domain in the standard neuropsychological battery, as suggested by DSM-5. Nonetheless, there is a huge debate in the literature on which instrument or combination of tasks may reliably detect socio-cognitive deficits in neurocognitive patients (25, 26). Though the large amount of research evidence collected in the last two decades, only a limited number of neuropsychological instruments (e.g., Ekman 60 faces test, Reading the Mind in the Eye, Social Cognition and Emotional Assessment), in addition to the Story-based Empathy Task have been validated for clinical use. In this Research Topic, a validation of another social cognition instrument (i.e., the 48-Item Yoni short version) has been made in order to investigate ToM in the Italian-speaking population (Isernia et al.).
Treatment of social cognition deficits in adults affected by ADHD and MCI
Socio-emotional impairments may have significant effect on the patient-caregiver dyad (27–29). Better awareness of emotion recognition and processing deficits in neurocognitive patients has been proved to mitigate caregiver burden distress and improve patient homecare setting (30). Although this evidence, treatments specifically targeting socio-emotional alterations in NCDs are crucially lacking and studies are of medium-low quality (31). Oxytocin is the only drug specifically tested with promising results in improving social behaviors and cooperative behavior in frontotemporal dementia (31). Long-term efficacy as well as effects in other neurocognitive disorders have not been fully elucidated. More recent advances in treatment strategies in MCI patients focus on other pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic interventions. Anti-amyloid antibodies as Aducanumab, an amyloid beta-direct monoclonal antibody that has been approved in the US for early stages of AD (32), or Lecanemab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that promotes clearance of protofibrils implicated in AD pathogenesis (33), have focused general attention in the last years. Unfortunately, there is still poor high-quality evidence supporting an effective pharmacological treatment for MCI (34) and additional clinical trials are certainly needed to further investigate the efficacy and safety of these treatments (34). In view of the need of limiting the increasing risk of conversion to dementia (35), combined strategies like physical exercise and cognitive training have also been applied with good efficacy improving executive functions and global functioning in patients with MCI (36). Among the emerging therapeutic strategies for MCI, non-invasive brain stimulation techniques as Trans-cranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and trans-cranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) are gaining increasing interest. TMS would appear to be better tolerated and more effective than tDCS in improving global cognitive functioning in MCI (37). Other non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies have been tested, as acupuncture treatments, well summarized by the meta-analysis drawn up by Zihan et al. and included in this Research Topic (Yin et al.). Regarding ADHD therapy there are meta-analysis, including more than 190 clinical randomized trials, supporting the efficacy of pharmacological and non pharmacological therapy (38) as well as a Cochrane review (39). However, there is a lack of data in adults and the effect of such therapy in the domain of social cognition remains unspecified.
In conclusion, ADHD and MCI are disorders that need better diagnostic tools and new treatment options. There is however a long way to go to identify effective neuropsychological tools in clinics and to test therapeutic targets to treat social cognition changes in such disorders for the ultimate benefit of patients and caregivers.
Author contributions
LS and LM wrote the manuscript. CC revised the manuscript. All authors approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Riccardo Borgonovo for contributing to the revising of the text.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1.Premack D, Woodruff G. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav Brain Sci. (1978) 1:515–26. 10.1017/S0140525X00076512 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dodich A, Cerami C, Canessa N, Crespi C, Iannaccone S, Marcone A, et al. A novel task assessing intention and emotion attribution: Italian standardization and normative data of the Story-based Empathy Task. Neurol Sci. (2015) 36:1907–12. 10.1007/s10072-015-2281-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Malle BF. Social robots and the tree of social cognition. In: Proceedings of the Workshop “Cognition: A bridge between robotics and interaction” at HRI, Vol. 15 (2015). p. 13–14. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Decety J, Jackson PL. The functional architecture of human empathy. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. (2004) 3:71–100. 10.1177/1534582304267187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Malle BF. How the Mind Explains Behavior: Folk Explanation, Meaning and Social Interaction. Cambridge MA: MIT-Press. (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 6.American Psychiatric Association, DSM-5 Task Force. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5TM (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. (2013). 10.1176./appi.books.9780890425596 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kennedy DP, Adolphs R. The social brain in psychiatric and neurological disorders. Trends Cogn Sci. (2012) 16:559–72. 10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Arioli M, Crespi C, Canessa N. Social cognition through the lens of cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Biomed Res Int. (2018) 2018:4283427. 10.1155/2018/4283427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dodich A, Crespi C, Santi GC, Cappa SF, Cerami C. Evaluation of discriminative detection abilities of social cognition measures for the diagnosis of the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia: a systematic review. Neuropsych Rev. (2021) 31:251–66. 10.1007/s11065-020-09457-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dodich A, Crespi C, Santi GC, Marcone A, Iannaccone S, Perani D, et al. Emotion recognition deficits in the differential diagnosis of amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a cognitive marker for the limbic-predominant phenotype. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. (2022) 28:203–9. 10.1017/S1355617721000254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nijmeijer JS, Minderaa RB, Buitelaar JK, Mulligan A, Hartman CA, Hoekstra PJ, et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and social dysfunctioning. Clin Psychol Rev. (2007) 28:692–708. 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bora E, Pantelis C. Meta-analysis of social cognition in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): comparison with healthy controls and autistic spectrum disorder. Psychol Med. (2016) 46:699–716. 10.1017/S0033291715002573 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bora E, Yener GG. Meta-analysis of social cognition in mild cognitive impairment. J Geriatr Psych Neurol. (2017) 30:206–13. 10.1177/0891988717710337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.García-Casal JA, Martínez-Abad F, Cid-Bartolomé T, Smith SJ, Llano-Ordóñez K, Perea-Bartolomé MV, et al. Usability study and pilot validation of a computer-based emotion recognition test for older adults with Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Aging Ment. Health. (2019) 23:365–75. 10.1080/13607863.2017.1423033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hayashi S, Terada S, Takenoshita S, Kawano Y, Yabe M, Imai N, et al. Facial expression recognition in mild cognitive impairment and dementia: Is the preservation of happiness recognition hypothesis true? Psychogeriatrics. (2021) 21:54–61. 10.1111/psyg.12622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kessels R, Waanders-Oude Elferink M, van Tilborg I. Social cognition and social functioning in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's dementia. J Neuropsychol. (2021) 15:186–203. 10.1111/jnp.12223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tsentidou G, Moraitou D, Tsolaki M. Similar theory of mind deficits in community dwelling older adults with vascular risk profile and patients with mild cognitive impairment: the case of paradoxical sarcasm comprehension. Brain Sci. (2021) 11:627. 10.3390/brainsci11050627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Orso B, Lorenzini L, Arnaldi D, Girtler N, Brugnolo A, Doglione E, et al. The role of hub and spoke regions in theory of mind in early Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. Biomedicines. (2022) 10:544. 10.3390/biomedicines10030544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ekman P, Friesen W. Pictures of Facial Affect. Palo Alto CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. (1976). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I. The “reading the mind in theeyes” test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with asperger syndrome orhigh-functioning autism. J Child Psychol Psych. (2001) 42:241–51. 10.1111/1469-7610.00715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McDonald S, Flanagan S, Rollins J, Kinch J. TASIT: a new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. (2003) 18:219–38. 10.1097/00001199-200305000-00001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Funkiewiez A, Bertoux M, de Souza LC, Lévy R, Dubois B. The SEA (Social cognition and Emotional Assessment): a clinical neuropsychological tool for early diagnosis of frontal variant of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neuropsychology. (2012) 26:81–90. 10.1037/a0025318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Devine RT, Hughes C. Measuring theory of mind across middle childhood: reliability and validity of the silent films and strange stories tasks. J Exp Child Psychol. (2016) 149:23–40. 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Boccardi M, Monsch AU, Ferrari C, Altomare D, Berres M, Bos I, et al. Consortium for the harmonization of neuropsychological assessment for neurocognitive disorders. Harmonizing neuropsychological assessment for mild neurocognitive disorders in Europe. Alzheimer's Dement. (2022) 18:29–42. 10.1002/alz.12365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.van den Stock J. Social cognition assessment for mild neurocognitive disorders. Alzheimers Dement. (2022) 18:1439–40. 10.1002/alz.12475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dodich A, Boccardi M, Sacco L, Monsch AU, Démonet JF, Filardi M, et al. Consortium for the harmonization of neuropsychological assessment for neurocognitive disorders. Answer to “Social cognition assessment for mild neurocognitive disorders”. Alzheimers Dement. (2022) 18:1441–2. 10.1002/alz.12664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Riedijk S, Duivenvoorden H, Rosso S, Van Swieten J, Niermeijer M, Tibben A, et al. Frontotemporal dementia: change of familial caregiver burden and partner relation in a Dutch cohort of 63 patients. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. (2008) 26:398–406. 10.1159/000164276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mioshi E, Bristow M, Cook R, Hodges JR. Factors underlying caregiver stress in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. (2009) 27:76–81. 10.1159/000193626 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Riedijk SR, Vugt D, Duivenvoorden ME, Niermeijer HJ, van Swieten MF, Verhey JC, et al. Caregiver burden, health-related quality of life and coping in dementia caregivers: a comparison of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. (2006) 22:405–12. 10.1159/000095750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Spitzer N, Shafir T, Lerman Y, Werner P. The relationship between caregiver burden and emotion recognition deficits in persons with MCI and early AD: the mediating role of caregivers' subjective evaluations. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. (2019) 33:266–71. 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cerami C, Perini G, Panzavolta A, Cotta Ramusino M, Costa A. A call for drug therapies for the treatment of social behavior disorders in dementia: systematic review of evidence and state of the art. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:11550. 10.3390/ijms231911550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Budd Haeberlein S, Aisen PS, Barkhof F, Chalkias S, Chen T, Cohen S, et al. A two randomized phase 3 studies of aducanumab in early Alzheimer's Disease. J Prev. Alzheimers Dis. (2022) 9:197–210. 10.14283/jpad.2022.30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.van Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P, Bateman RJ, Chen C, Gee M, et al. Lecanemab in early Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. (2023) 388:9–21. 10.1056/NEJMoa2212948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Perneczky R, Jessen F, Grimmer T, Levin J, Flöel A, Peters O, et al. Anti-amyloid antibody therapies in Alzheimer's disease. Brain. (2023) awad005. 10.1093./brain/awad005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stokin GB, Krell-Roesch J, Petersen RC, Geda YE. Mild neurocognitive disorder: an old wine in a new bottle. Harvard Rev Psychiat. (2015) 23:368–76. 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chen FT, Etnier JL, Chan KH, Chiu PK, Hung TM, Chang YK, et al. Effects of exercise training interventions on executive function in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med (Auckland, NZ). (2022) 50:1451–67. 10.1007/s40279-020-01292-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chu CS, Li CT, Brunoni AR, Yang FC, Tseng PT, Tu YK, et al. Cognitive effects and acceptability of non-invasive brain stimulation on Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a component network meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2021) 92:195–203. 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Catala-Lopez F, Hutton B, Nunez-Beltran A, Page MJ, Ridao M, Macias Saint-Gerons D, et al. The pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review with network meta-analyses of randomised trials. PLoS ONE. (2017) 12:e018035. 10.1371/journal.pone.0180355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Storebo OJ, Krogh HB, Ramstad E, Moreira-Maia CR, Holmskov M, Skoog M, et al. Methylphenidate for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: cochrane systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomised clinical trials. BMJ. (2015) 351:h5203. 10.1136/bmj.h5203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]