Abstract
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common heart disease in cats, characterized by primary left ventricular hypertrophy. Feline HCM closely resembles human HCM and is suggested as translational animal model for the human disease. A genetic cause is established in humans and suspected for cats, but little is known about the gene expression and pathways involved in the pathogenesis of HCM. To investigate the myocardial transcriptome changes in HCM, RNA sequencing was conducted on left ventricle (LV) and left atrium (LA) samples of healthy cats and cats with HCM (each n = 5; 20 samples). Ingenuity Pathway Analysis was used to determine functional pathways, regulators, and networks. Distinct gene expression profiles were identified in the LV and LA of the feline healthy and HCM myocardium. Analysis of differentially expressed mRNAs (>2 fold; FDR < 0.01) found chamber-specific (LV vs. LA) expression in both healthy and HCM groups, with higher transcriptional activity in the LA. Genes that contribute to the distinct structure and function of each chamber in health and HCM were identified in the regional comparison. The gene expression profiles of HCM compared to healthy hearts revealed disease related genes, including THBS4 and KLHL33 (LV), FAM177B and THRSP (LA), the latter 3 have not been reported for the myocardium so far, as the top differently expressed genes in the HCM heart. Differently expressed genes and functional pathways found in the HCM heart are associated with cardiac remodeling and fibrosis, inflammation, microvascular changes, calcium signaling and cardiac metabolism, with some regional differences. RhoGDI-RhoGTPase signaling, integrin and ILK signaling pathways, the LXR/RXR pathway in the LA, and the PPARα/RXRα, HIF1α and CXCR4 pathways in the LV might be of particular importance in the HCM disease process. This study identified region-specific myocardial gene transcription patterns as well as novel genes and pathways associated with HCM.
Introduction
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most prevalent cardiac disease in cats, affecting ~15% of the population [1, 2]. HCM is also common in humans affecting 1 in 500 people [3]. Spontaneous feline HCM closely resembles the human disease regarding phenotype, clinical presentation, and histological changes, and is suggested as translational model for human HCM [4–6]. The disease is characterized by primary left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction [4, 5] and is typically associated with variable clinical presentation and disease progression; many patients remain asymptomatic for years while others develop end-stage cardiomyopathy and severe outcomes such as congestive heart failure and sudden death [7–9]. Histopathological changes include cardiomyocyte degeneration, cardiomyocyte disarray, interstitial fibrosis, accumulation of inflammatory cells, and microvascular changes [5, 9–14]. This overall similarity of feline and human HCM suggests a comparable pathogenesis [4–6, 15]. A genetic cause of HCM is known for humans [16] and suspected for cats based on its prevalence in certain breeds [17–20] and the identification of mutations in sarcomeric genes in cats with HCM, similar to humans [17–19, 21–23]. Genetic variants have been detected in 2 sarcomeric genes using fragment analysis: p.A31P and p.R820W in myosin-binding protein C. These are associated with HCM in Maine Coon and Ragdoll cats, respectively [17, 18, 23]. A p.E1883K variant in the myosin heavy chain 7 gene has been found in a domestic shorthair cat with HCM [19]. These HCM mutations are suspected to affect the function of the sarcomere [24]. Additionally, a non-sarcomeric mutation in the Alstrom syndrome 1 (ALMS1) gene has been identified in Sphynx cats with HCM [20]. However, regulatory factors and signaling pathways involved in the development and progression of HCM are mainly unknown.
Transcriptome profiling is used to determine the abundance of each messenger RNA (mRNA) transcript within a cell or tissue. The mapping of mRNA transcripts provides insight into gene activation and inhibition patterns under physiological conditions and with disease. Recent ‘omics’ research in human cardiomyopathies and particularly in HCM identified between 154 and 4161 differentially expressed genes (DEG) in myocardial samples from humans with HCM, based on the selected database, analysis method and filter criteria [25–31]. These studies revealed disease-specific gene expression in human patients with HCM. To explore the biological functions and pathways of the DEG, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis are commonly used. For human HCM these tools identified pathways involved in protein synthesis, myocyte survival, mitochondrial energetics, fatty acid metabolism, apoptosis, extracellular matrix, sarcomere organization, intracellular calcium handling, autophagy and angiogenesis [25–30]. These studies used either left ventricular samples only or provided no regional information (‘myocardial samples’, ‘myocardial/heart tissue), patient sex was not considered in the analysis [28–31]. While a few studies have investigated gene expression in cats with HCM using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) or microarrays [10, 11, 22, 32–35], high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has so far not been used, hence knowledge on all DEG and pathways involved in feline HCM is still lacking.
Regional differences in gene activation have been identified for the healthy human and feline heart, and for cats with HCM [33–38]. We therefore hypothesized that the myocardial transcriptome differs between cardiac regions (left ventricle; LV and left atrium; LA) in both healthy cats and cats with HCM. We also hypothesized that the HCM gene expression profile differs from that of healthy cats and would uncover genes and pathways activated or inhibited regionally and in HCM. The objective of the present study was to apply next-generation sequencing technology to characterize the healthy and HCM transcriptome profiles and identify regional and disease associated differences in myocardial gene expression.
Material and methods
Myocardial samples
Samples from cats with HCM were available from a previous study [33, 34]. These hearts were obtained from pet cats (between 3 and 15 years of age; Table 1) with an advanced stage of HCM that had been patients of a cardiology referral service. The cats were assessed and HCM was diagnosed by a specialist in veterinary cardiology using echocardiography. A diastolic LV wall thickness > 6 mm in the absence of other diseases that might result in LV wall thickening was considered diagnostic for HCM [4]. Indirect blood pressure measurement and complete blood count and routine biochemistry was carried out to exclude systemic hypertension and systemic diseases as potential cause for LV hypertrophy. Most cats had been long-term patients of the cardiology service and progression of their disease over time was observed. The cats were euthanized for medical reasons, and cat owners provided informed written consent that the hearts could be used for research purposes. The Animal Care Committee of the University scrutinised the consent form and the information given to the owner about the project to ensure that they were fully informed that research would be conducted on tissues obtained post mortem. Heart tissue specimen from male healthy cats (1.5 years of age; Table 1) were donated to the study by a commercial company that carries out animal safety studies for Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency regulatory submissions in support of veterinary drug development and is certified by the Canadian Council on Animal Care (https://kingfisherint.com; https://ccac.ca/en/about-the-ccac/). The samples were collected from a healthy control group of their research cat population; these cats were considered healthy based on physical examination, complete blood count and routine biochemistry carried out by a veterinarian prior to euthanasia and post mortem examination.
Table 1. Cats included in the study and statistics summary of RNA sequencing data.
Sample | Group | Age (years) | Breed | Sex | Read pairs post trimming, n | Ribosomal RNA, % | Mitochondrial RNA, % | Uniquely mapped read pairs, % | Reads mapped to same strand, % | Reads mapped to opposite strand, % | Reads with not determined strand, % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LV1 | Healthy LV | 1.5 | DSH | Male | 47,478,136 | 0.03 | 19.55 | 76.09 | 91.55 | 2.30 | 6.15 |
LV2 | Healthy LV | 1.5 | DSH | Male | 43,888,937 | 0.03 | 21.93 | 71.16 | 92.42 | 2.48 | 5.10 |
LV3 | Healthy LV | 1.5 | DSH | Male | 44,123,313 | 0.03 | 18.25 | 74.39 | 91.12 | 2.50 | 6.39 |
LV4 | Healthy LV | 1.5 | DSH | Male | 42,265,613 | 0.03 | 18.10 | 74.32 | 91.80 | 2.40 | 5.80 |
LV5 | Healthy LV | 1.5 | DSH | Male | 49,505,256 | 0.03 | 18.30 | 73.29 | 90.90 | 2.49 | 6.61 |
LV6 | HCM LV | 9 | DSH | Male | 43,888,937 | 0.03 | 21.93 | 71.16 | 92.42 | 2.48 | 5.10 |
LV7 | HCM LV | 14 | DSH | Male | 44,077,351 | 0.03 | 17.35 | 71.55 | 90.74 | 2.59 | 6.67 |
LV8 | HCM LV | 15 | DLH | Male | 43,482,375 | 0.03 | 25.00 | 72.94 | 91.46 | 2.50 | 6.04 |
LV9 | HCM LV | 13 | DSH | Male | 48,884,797 | 0.03 | 13.67 | 81.88 | 89.75 | 2.56 | 7.69 |
LV10 | HCM LV | 3 | DSH | Male | 42,426,885 | 0.03 | 19.62 | 77.35 | 92.11 | 2.43 | 5.46 |
LA1 | Healthy LA | 1.5 | DSH | Male | 40,543,094 | 0.03 | 20.33 | 71.69 | 92.38 | 2.67 | 4.95 |
LA2 | Healthy LA | 1.5 | DSH | Male | 45,027,733 | 0.03 | 16.67 | 77.39 | 91.72 | 2.54 | 5.74 |
LA3 | Healthy LA | 1.5 | DSH | Male | 46,014,375 | 0.03 | 16.57 | 74.57 | 91.20 | 2.48 | 6.32 |
LA4 | Healthy LA | 1.5 | DSH | Male | 40,878,409 | 0.03 | 18.18 | 77.44 | 92.21 | 2.30 | 5.49 |
LA5 | Healthy LA | 1.5 | DSH | Male | 46,098,081 | 0.03 | 15.64 | 78.41 | 91.10 | 2.61 | 6.29 |
LA6 | HCM LA | 9 | DSH | Male | 51,695,982 | 0.03 | 15.37 | 78.91 | 88.56 | 2.36 | 9.09 |
LA7 | HCM LA | 14 | DSH | Male | 51,877,661 | 0.04 | 13.18 | 63.02 | 90.69 | 2.49 | 6.82 |
LA8 | HCM LA | 15 | DLH | Male | 46,463,111 | 0.04 | 16.17 | 76.02 | 91.75 | 2.37 | 5.89 |
LA9 | HCM LA | 12 | DLH | Male | 41,948,835 | 0.04 | 19.49 | 72.29 | 90.70 | 3.51 | 5.79 |
LA10 | HCM LA | 3 | Ragdoll | Male | 50,189,962 | 0.03 | 12.69 | 80.01 | 90.71 | 2.52 | 6.76 |
Left ventricle (LV) and left atrium (LA) samples from healthy cats and cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Domestic Shorthair (DSH), Domestic Longhair (DLH) and Ragdoll cats were included in the study
The inclusion criteria for the study were the presence of HCM in cats diagnosed with HCM and the absence of cardiac and systemic diseases in the control cats. To ensure that these inclusion criteria were met, gross and histopathology examinations were conducted and supervised by a board-certified specialist in veterinary pathology as the gold standard in all cats to confirm HCM in the cats clinically diagnosed with the disease, the absence of cardiac diseases in the healthy cats and the absence of systemic diseases in all cats. As previously published, HCM criteria comprised of increased left ventricular wall thickness, cardiomyocyte degeneration, cardiomyocyte disarray, interstitial fibrosis, accumulation of inflammatory cells, and microvascular changes [10–14]. Only hearts from male cats were included to limit the potential influence of sex on the results, since sex differences in myocardial gene expression have been reported for non-failing human hearts, healthy cats, and cats with HCM [34, 36, 38]. Furthermore, to ensure appropriate RNA quality, only samples collected within 30 minutes after death were included into this prospective observational post mortem study. Feline heart specimens were examined utilizing RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to detect and quantify all the expressed mRNA transcripts. In total, 20 samples were included: 5 LV and 5 LA samples of male cats with HCM and 5 LV and 5 LA of male healthy cats (Table 1). LV free wall and LA samples were collected immediately after euthanasia and were stored in RNAlater at room temperature for 24 hours, followed by storage at -80 °C until further use.
RNA isolation and quality control
For extraction of total RNA, 700 μL of QIAzol Lysis Reagent (Qiagen, Toronto, ON, Canada) and a 2 mm stainless steel bead were added to myocardial tissue and lysed with using Tissue Lyser II (Qiagen, Toronto, ON, Canada) for 8 minutes at 30/s frequency for high throughput sample disruption and homogenization. The miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Toronto, ON, Canada) was subsequently used to isolate total RNA, according to manufacturer’s protocol from 20 samples: 5 LV and 5 LA samples of healthy cats and 5 LV and 5 LA of cats with HCM. In general, RNA was purified from tissue using spin columns and a series of wash buffers to bind RNA to the silica membrane, which was then eluted in RNase free water. RNA purity was assessed using the Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, DE, USA). RNA integrity was measured using the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). Samples with a 260/280 ratio of >1.9 and RNA integrity number of >5.7 were used for sequencing. Extracted RNA samples were stored at -80 °C until used for sequencing.
Library preparation and sequencing
A stranded, paired-end poly-A mRNA library was prepared for each sample. Sequencing libraries were generated using NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs, USA) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, mRNA was isolated, fragmented and primed from total RNA. Then, the first strand and second strand cDNA synthesis were performed. After, the cDNA fragments were ligated to adapters and underwent PCR amplification according to Illumina instructions. Library quality was assessed using the Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies). The libraries were sequenced on the NovaSeq 6000 system, SP flowcell 2 x 150 bp (Illumina). The Felis_Catus_9.0.96 (Ensembl gene models) with annotations was used as the reference genome. RNA isolation and library preparation for all samples were performed in the same batch.
Read pre-processing, read alignment and transcript assembly
Expression levels were represented by the number of reads of each transcript. After sequencing, the quality of the data was assessed using FastQC v.0.11.5 (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc). The adaptors were trimmed using Trim Galore v.0.4.4. Trimming was stopped if quality of base was greater than 25. The first 6 nucleotides were clipped from the 5’ ends and any read that was shorter than 40 nucleotides was discarded, with only pairs of reads retained. After trimming, the quality of reads was re-assessed with FastQC. Ribosomal RNA and mitochondrial RNA were screened using FastQ-Screen. RSeQC v.3.6.7 was used to assess read distribution, positional read duplication (read_distibution.py) and strandedness of the alignments (infer_experiment.py). 80% of the reads mapped to the exonic sequences. Raw trimmed reads were aligned to reference genome using the STAR aligner, followed by HTSeq-count v.0.6.1p2 to obtain uniquely mapped gene counts.
Data normalization
Raw gene counts were normalized using DESeq v.1.18.0 (R package, Vienna, Austria). The amount of total RNA varied between samples and those with more RNA tended to have higher read counts for genes. For differential gene expression analysis, data were normalized using the trimmed mean of M-values method to avoid obtaining results caused by differences in total RNA between samples rather than the true variance in gene transcription.
Principal component analysis
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering were used to visualize genetic relationships by grouping samples together based on their similarities. PCA is an algorithm that determines the important variables, in the form of principal components (PC1, PC2) from a large set of variables in the data. All filtered transcripts were used to generate the PCA plot.
Differential gene expression analysis
Following quantification, the identification of DEG between HCM and samples from healthy cats as well as between the LV and LA was performed using edgeR R package v.3.22.3 (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/edgeR.html). Statistical significance was determined using a moderated t-test with the P-value corrected using the Benjamini-Hochberg algorithm. Genes were considered differentially expressed if they had log2 fold change ± 1 and a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.01. Moreover, genes that showed less than 3 fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads in both sample groups were excluded, because the error of quantification is high at very low expression levels.
Pathway and network analysis
To determine DEG and discover main functions and pathways, DESeq-identified transcripts were filtered based on statistical significance (log2 fold change ± 1, FDR < 0.01). Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, Qiagen Redwood City, CA [39]) was applied for downstream analysis. Expression core analysis was run to obtain gene orthologues as found in human, mouse and rat databases and to determine orthologous canonical pathways and networks from the data, considering both direct and indirect relationships using the IPA Knowledge Base. Also, sequencing data were mapped as graphical summaries to outline the most significant interactions among pathways, upstream regulators and biological processes as found by the IPA core analysis. As a predicted function, the Z-score (the number of standard deviations the data above or below the mean) indicated the activation (z > 0) or inhibition (z < 0) of genes or pathways. Cut-offs were P-value < 0.01 and log2 fold change ± 1.
Validation by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
To validate the sequencing data, several genes were selected to be verified by RT-qPCR, based on being among the most highly expressed in the HCM heart. 5 LV and 5 LA samples were collected from healthy cats and cats with HCM (n = 20 total). Total RNA was extracted (same protocol as RNA isolation above) and cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription using Invitrogen Superscript III Reverse Transcriptase (ThermoFisher), according to manufacturer’s instructions. RT-qPCR was performed using the LightCycler 480 (Roche Diagnostics). PCR primer sequences (S1 Table) were selected using Primer Express v.3.0.1 for CXCL14, CXCL6, IL18, THBS4, ANKRD2, and ID3. Conditions for RT were as follows: 65°C for 5 mins, 50°C for 60 mins, 70°C for 15 mins and 37°C for 20 mins. The cycling conditions for qPCR were: 95 °C for 7 minutes, 45 cycles of 95 °C for 20 seconds, 60 °C for 20 seconds, 72 °C for 20 seconds, followed by dissociation curve analysis. GAPDH and RSP7 (S1 Table) were used as housekeeping genes [40]. Relative quantification was calculated by the 2-ΔΔCt method [41].
Statistical analysis
The statistical significance of pathway enrichment was analyzed by using the hypergeometric distribution. False discovery rate was used as an adjusted P-value using the Bonferroni correction. All RT-qPCR statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (SPSS, Inc, IBM company, New York). RT-qPCR results were not normally distributed, and Kruskal-Wallis test was applied for comparison of groups: healthy LV vs. HCM LV, and healthy LA vs. HCM LA. P-values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
Results
Characterization of the feline LV and LA transcriptome
To determine the feline myocardial transcriptome profiles of the healthy feline LV and LA and to identify changes associated with HCM as the most prevalent cardiac disease in cats, RNA-seq libraries were constructed from each 5 healthy (5 LV, 5 LA) and HCM (5 LV, 5 LA) myocardial samples. These included paired LV and LA samples from all healthy and 3 HCM cat hearts, and 2 LV and 2 LA from 4 different HCM hearts. The samples were selected based on quality control results (Nanodrop and Bioanalyzer). Demographic information of the cats is provided in Table 1. On average, 46.5 million read pairs were generated from each sample, and 34.6 million reads per sample aligned to the cat (Felis catus) reference genome (Table 1). In total, 82% of total mapped reads were uniquely mapped, of which 91% of reads were mapped to the same (sense) strand of the reference genome. The remaining reads (18%) were from other non-coding RNA, particularly mitochondrial RNAs. Only 11.9% of reads were unaligned to the annotated genome and 6.4% of sequences were reads without a determined strand, indicating potential novel mRNAs (Table 1).
PCA was employed to cluster samples based on similarity of gene expression levels. This revealed low intragroup variability and high intergroup variability indicating that the transcriptomes were similar within each group and distinct between groups (Fig 1). Samples clustered along the first component (PC1) based on heart chamber (LV vs. LA) and along the second component (PC2) based on disease status (healthy vs. HCM). When comparing LV and LA samples of healthy and HCM hearts, the primary sources of variance in the RNA-seq data, as signified by the principal components, were strong regional and disease-associated mRNA expression differences (Fig 1).
Region specific mRNA expression profiles, functional pathways and networks
mRNA expression profiles distinguish the healthy LV and LA, and the HCM LV and LA
To identify regional differences in the transcriptome of the healthy heart, the mRNA profiles of the LV and LA from healthy cats were compared (Fig 2A and 2B). This was followed by a regional comparison, i.e. LV and LA of the feline HCM heart (Fig 2C and 2D). Heat maps were used to illustrate unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the normalized expression of the top 500 DEG across samples (Fig 2A and 2C). Volcano plots served to graphically display the most relevant genes by comparing statistical significance or the P-value against fold change (Fig 2B and 2C).
Healthy LV vs. healthy LA: A heat map of the healthy feline heart showed full separation of gene expression between the LV and the LA among the DEG (Fig 2A). The volcano plot revealed 1423 DEG in the healthy heart, 507 genes were expressed more abundantly and 916 genes less abundantly in the LV compared to the LA (Fig 2B). The top 25 genes with higher expression in the LV vs. LA included those known to be involved in sarcomere function (MYL2, MYL3, MYH7) and transcription factors (Iroquois homeobox [IRX]4, IRX3, IRX2) (S2A Table). The genes with lower expression in LV vs. LA included transcription factors (BARX2, PITX2), sarcomere genes (MYL4, MYL7), cholinergic receptors (CHRNA1, CHRNA6), and natriuretic peptide and its receptor (NPPA, NPR3) (S2B Table).
HCM LV vs. HCM LA: Regional differences were also observed in the myocardium of cats with HCM. A heat map of the HCM heart displayed a transcriptional profile of the LV that is distinct from the LA (Fig 2C). The volcano plot identified 1513 DEG in the HCM heart, 545 genes were expressed more abundantly, and 968 genes were less abundantly in the LV compared to the LA (Fig 2D). Among these were several genes that had also been found to be differently expressed in the healthy heart compartments. The top 25 genes with increased transcription in the LV vs. LA of cats with HCM included genes involved in nicotinamide adenine nucleotide metabolism (ART5, ART1) and transcription factors (IRX4, IRX5, IRX3) (S3A Table). The top 25 genes with reduced transcription in the LV vs. LA included sarcomere genes (MYL7, MYL4), epithelial cell and extracellular matrix genes (COMP, WIF1, KRT7, KRT8, KRT18) and natriuretic peptide (NPPA) (S3B Table).
Pathway signaling and regulators are activated in the LA compared to the LV in both healthy and HCM hearts
Next, we explored the biological functions of the DEG detected in the regional comparison of the healthy and HCM hearts. IPA was used to identify activated or inhibited major pathways, regulators and their interactions (Figs 3 and 4). For both the healthy and HCM hearts, IPA revealed that most pathways were activated in the LA compared to the respective LV (Figs 3A, 3B, 4A and 4B). For both HCM and healthy hearts, activated pathways in the LA included D-myo-inositol-phosphate biosynthesis, cardiac hypertrophy, actin cytoskeleton, ILK and integrin signaling as well as production of nitric oxide (NO) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in macrophages (Fig 3A and 3B). The comparison of LV and LA in healthy and HCM cats found altered regional expression for genes of the dilated cardiomyopathy signaling pathway and the white adipose tissue browning pathway activation. These pathways were activated in the HCM LV and inhibited in the healthy LV when compared to the corresponding LA (Fig 3A and 3B). Top upstream regulators were TGFβ1 and beta-estradiol for both the healthy heart and HCM heart, and TNFα for the HCM heart. The IPA network analysis identified primarily developmental and metabolic pathways in the regional comparison for the healthy heart; fibrosis, structural, inflammatory and angiogenesis pathways were found in the regional comparison for the HCM heart (Fig 4A and 4B).
HCM specific mRNA profiles, functional pathways and networks
mRNA expression profiles distinguish HCM and healthy hearts
To identify alterations in myocardial gene transcription in association with HCM, the LV and LA mRNA profiles of HCM cats were compared with those of their healthy counterparts. Heat maps and the volcano plots were used to visualize the differences (Fig 5A–5D).
HCM LV vs. healthy LV: The DEG showed a transcriptome profile that distinguishes the HCM LV from the healthy LV (Fig 5A and 5B). A total of 412 DEG were identified in the LV of HCM cats compared to the LV of healthy controls, 290 genes were upregulated and 122 downregulated in HCM (Fig 5B). The top 25 upregulated genes in the HCM LV included THBS4 as the top upregulated gene, sarcomere genes (MYL1, MYBPC2) and genes involved in cell-to-cell interactions (IGSF1, JCHAIN), mechano-sensing (SYNPR, ANKRD2), remodeling and fibrosis (GPNMB, LTBP2, UCHL1, FMOD, IGFBP2, OSTN, TNC), and inflammation (CXCL14, CXCL6, CCL19, IL18) (S4A Table). The top 25 downregulated genes in the HCM LV included KLHL33 (top downregulated gene), transcription factors (ATF3, MYB), WNT5A and ART5 (S4B Table).
HCM LA vs. healthy LA: For the HCM LA, 1207 DEG were identified; of these 724 were upregulated and 483 downregulated in the HCM LA compared to the healthy LA (Fig 5C and 5D). Among the top 25 upregulated genes in the HCM LA, FAM177B had the highest enrichment. Sarcomere genes (MYL2, MYL3), extracellular matrix genes (COL23A1, COMP, THBS4), myocyte differentiation (IGFBP2), inflammation (HP, CXCL6, CCL19) and B- (CD79A) and T-cell surface glycoprotein (CD3D, CD3G and CD3E) genes were also higher in the HCM LA than healthy LA (S5A Table). Genes involved with fatty acid synthesis (THRSP [top downregulated gene], DGAT2, FASN, ADIPOQ), cardiac metabolism (PFKFB1, ATF3, TRARG1) and cell death activators (CIDEA, CIDEC) were among the top downregulated genes (S5B Table).
Pathway signaling and regulators are activated in the HCM heart
To explore the biological functions of the DEG observed in the HCM LV and LA, IPA and network analysis were applied and positively or negatively affected pathways and regulators were identified, along with their interactions (Figs 6A, 6B, 7A and 7B). The most activate canonical pathway in the HCM LV was integrin signaling (Fig 6A). Furthermore, signaling pathways associated with adrenomedullin, dilated cardiomyopathy, cardiac hypertrophy, actin nucleation and cytoskeleton, cardiac remodeling and inflammation, and ERK/MAPK were among the top activated pathways (Figs 6A and 7A). PPARα/RXRα activation, RhoGDI signaling, and death pathways were negatively affected in the HCM LV (Figs 6A and 7A). The top upstream regulator was TGFβ1.
Compared to the LV, fewer pathways were enriched in the HCM LA (Fig 6B). These included pathways related to LXR/RXR activation, cardiac hypertrophy signaling, ILK signaling, production of NO and ROS in macrophages, actin cytoskeleton signaling, fibrosis and cell migration pathways, and acute phase response signaling (Figs 6B and 7B). Dilated cardiomyopathy signaling, calcium signaling pathways, RhoGDI, Rho GTPase, PI3K/Akt and protein kinase A (PKA) signaling were negatively affected in the HCM LA (Fig 6B). The top upstream regulator was TNFα. Several pathways that have so far not been reported for the heart included: synaptogenesis (upregulated in the HCM LV and downregulated in the HCM LA), glioma and reelin (upregulated in the HCM LV) and stathmin 1 (upregulated in the HCM LA), as well as endocannabinoid neuronal synapse and opioid signaling (both downregulated in the HCM LA) (Fig 6A and 6B).
RT-qPCR validation of RNA-seq results
To validate and confirm the sequencing results, RT-qPCRs were established for enriched genes of the HCM LV and LA: CXLC14 (logFC HCM LV: 3.87, HCM LA: 2.17), CXCL6 (logFC HCM LV: 3.49, HCM LA: 5.24), THBS4 (log FC HCM LV: 5.67, HCM LA: 5.7), ANKRD2 (logFC HCM LV: 3.34, HCM LA: 6.38), IL18 (logFC HCM LV: 3.38), and ID3 (logFC HCM LA: 1.04). Consistent with the sequencing data, CXCL14, THBS4 and ANKRD2 showed increased expression in the HCM LV and LA, CXCL6 and IL18 were higher in the HCM LV, and ID3 in the HCM LA when compared to their healthy counterpart (Fig 8A and 8B).
Discussion
The present study represents the first transcriptome analysis of the feline heart, identifying not only the constitutive transcriptome profile of the healthy LV and LA, but also its alterations in association with advanced HCM. RNA sequencing identified global changes in cardiac gene expression that distinguished the LV and the LA, as well as the presence of HCM in the feline heart. The biological function and pathways associated with the DEG revealed a unique gene expression pattern in the LV and LA that contribute to the distinct structure and function of each chamber in health and HCM. Regional differences have also been reported for the healthy human heart [36]. A total of 1423 and 1513 DEG were observed for the healthy feline heart and the HCM heart, respectively, comparing the LV and LA for each condition. Associated with HCM were 412 DEG for the LV and 1207 for the LA. The number of LV DEG is similar to that reported for human HCM based on RNA-seq [28, 31]. Several of the top regulated DEG, such as THRBS4, the top enriched HCM LV gene, sarcomere genes (MYH, MYL), mechano-sensing (ANKRD), fibrosis genes (FMOD, COL, LTBP2, TNC, TGFβ), inflammation (CXCL, CCL, IL, TNFα), natriuretic peptides (NPPA, NPR3), transcription factors (IRX, STAT3), and predicted pathways and networks, including myocyte survival, fatty acid oxidation, cytoskeletal, fibrosis, mitochondrial function, calcium signaling, angiogenesis, in the HCM heart, have also been reported for human HCM hearts [27–31]. Interestingly, the top DEG KLHL33 (LV), FAM177B and THRSP (LA) have not been reported in the heart so far and their role in HCM requires further investigation.
Region-specific myocardial transcription pattern indicates morphological and functional chamber characteristics
In both healthy and HCM cats, genes specific for the atrium (MYL4, MYL7 and NPPA) and genes specific for the ventricle (IRX4, IRX3, MYL2 and MYL3) were within the top upregulated genes in the LA and LV samples, respectively. Similarly, higher atrial NPPA and ventricular MYL2 and MYL3 gene expression was observed in healthy humans [36]. IPA analysis of DEG revealed that most pathways were more activated in the LA compared to the LV, as observed with the gene activation pattern. A higher gene activation in the atria compared to ventricles of healthy cats and cats with HCM has been reported for selected cytokines and extracellular matrix enzymes [34, 35, 38]. Regional differences in gene activation with a clear distinction of atrial and ventricular mRNA expression profiles, and a higher number of DEG in the atria than ventricles, were also found for the healthy human heart [36].
The regional differences in functional pathways are consistent with the morphological characteristics of each chamber and with chamber-specific constitutive physiological and pathological remodeling processes [34–36, 38]. The overall increased number of enriched genes and active pathways in the LA compared to the LV suggests a higher reactivity of the thinner walled LA. The activation of the ERK/MAPK signaling pathway in the healthy LA compared to the LV indicates the ability of the LA to adjust cardiac function to hemodynamic changes [42]. ERK/MAPK is a major pathway in cardiac physiology involved in cell growth and differentiation. Within minutes, MAP kinases (MAPKs) temporarily rectify cardiac output by increasing contractility via cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, for example during exercise [42]. The activation of this pathway in the LA of control cats, together with pathways related to dilated cardiomyopathy signaling, which includes genes specific for cardiac structure and function, β-adrenergic signalling, calcium metabolism and myocardial structure suggest their involvement in LA homeostasis. The genes and corresponding pathways in the healthy LV and LA likely represent a constitutive expression pattern that maintains cardiac structure and function and allows adaptation to hemodynamic changes.
HCM results in LV and LA specific mRNA transcription profiles, functional pathways and regulators
Comparison of gene expression in HCM vs. the healthy myocardium found more genes to be up- than downregulated in the disease state. Genes related to the sarcomere, remodeling, fibrosis, and inflammatory mediators were upregulated in the HCM LV and LA, with regional differences for specific genes. For the HCM LA, inflammatory cell marker genes were also found to be activated. The top upregulated gene in the HCM LV was thrombospondin 4 (THBS4). This gene, which is also one of the top upregulated genes in human HCM hearts [28], is involved in cardiac remodeling and inflammation and associated with interstitial fibrosis [43, 44]. The top upregulated gene in the HCM LA was FAM177B, which is a suspected M1 macrophage marker [45] and has been recently identified as a candidate gene for coronary artery disease [46]. Downregulated genes included transcription factors in the HCM LV, and apoptosis and metabolic genes in the LA. KLHL33 was the top downregulated gene in the HCM LV. Kelch-like proteins are implicated in maintenance of structure and function of organs and in the pathogenesis of various human diseases [47]. KLHL31, which is abundant in human and mouse cardiomyocytes, was downregulated in human HCM [28, 47] and KLHL33 has been reported as relevant locus in Takayasu’s arteritis in humans [48]. The top downregulated gene in the HCM LA was THRSP, a gene involved in transcriptional gene regulation and lipogenesis in human liver and adipocytes [49, 50]. The roles of FAM177B, KLHL33 and THRSP in the heart are largely unknown and require further investigations. Pathway analysis found structural, fibrosis and inflammatory pathways activated, with some heterogeneity, in the LV and LA of HCM cats, which is similar to what has been reported for human HCM [27–31]. RhoDGI signaling and PPARα/RXRα activation pathways were reduced in the HCM LV. Pathways related to RhoDGI signaling, calcium signaling, opioid signaling and PKA signaling were inhibited in the HCM LA. Predominant upstream regulators were TGFβ1 for the LV and TNFα for the LA. Increased myocardial transcription of these cytokines had been observed in the feline HCM heart previously [10, 34], and both have also been reported as relevant mediators in the human heart [29, 30, 36].
RhoDGI signaling was inhibited in the HCM LV and LA when compared to the healthy counterparts. RhoGDI maintains a stable cytosolic pool of RhoGTPase [51]. RhoGDI reduction might be the cause of RhoFamily GTPase signaling inhibition in the HCM LA and the observed activation of Rac signaling in the HCM LV [51]. RhoGTPAse stimulates downstream signaling of PI3K/Akt, Rac activates PAK and ERK/MAPK pathways [52]. The PI3K/Akt pathway was found to be inhibited in the HCM LA, and PAK and ERK/MAPK pathways were activated in the HCM LV. The cellular responses that are triggered by this signal transduction pathway include an increase in cardiomyocyte size and protein synthesis, actin polymerization and reactivation of fetal genes and stress markers (such as NPPA, NPPB and MYH7) associated with pathological hypertrophy [27, 52, 53]. Both the HCM LV and LA showed activation of pathways related to actin cytoskeleton signaling and cardiac hypertrophy. In the HCM LV, there was upregulation of the actin nucleation pathway [54], the Rac pathway (involved in actin polymerisation), synaptogenesis signaling (indicating actin stabilization) [55] and the glioma signaling pathway. The latter is a GTPase RhoA and Rac mediated pathway that results in cytoskeleton and extracellular matrix remodeling [56, 57]. Cell growth, extracellular matrix, collagen and actin cytoskeleton pathways are also activated in human HCM hearts [25–31]. For the HCM LA, activation of fibrosis pathways was found. MYH7, listed within the top upregulated genes in the HCM LA, and NPPA in the HCM LV could indicate activation of stress markers and reactivation of fetal genes [25, 27, 52]. RhoGTPase activation is caused by hormones including norepinephrine, endothelin 1, angiotensin II and adrenomedullin, as well as binding to receptors for thrombin, chemokines, cytokines, growth factors and stretch [52, 53, 58]. These hormones and myocardial stretch were likely increased in the HCM study cats, as they were in an advanced stage of disease. Adrenomedullin and thrombin pathways were both activated and the chemokines CXCL14, CXCL6 and CCL19 as well as the cytokine IL18 were within the top upregulated genes in the HCM LV when compared to the healthy LV. Similarly, previous studies reported increased myocardial transcription of cytokines, growth factors and extracellular matrix enzymes in cats with HCM [10, 34, 35].
Additional pathways that are involved in cellular proliferation, cardiac hypertrophy, microtubule and cytoskeletal organization, angiogenesis and endothelial function were found to be activated in the HCM samples; their activation is consistent with the histopathology changes in HCM [5, 9–14]. These included the cell surface receptor integrin and ILK signaling [59, 60], reelin signaling mediated by PI3K/Akt, Rho or STAT3 [61, 62], the stathmin 1 pathway (which results in microtubulus stabilization when phosphorylated by PI3K, PKA or MAPK), and the CREB response (which is mediated by RhoGTPases and MAPK) [60]. ILK connects integrins and other cell surface proteins to the actin cytoskeleton, and initiates phosphorylation of protein kinases which are implicated in cardiac cell growth [59, 60]. Our results identified an activation of the ILK pathway in the HCM LV and LA, the integrin and reelin signaling pathways in the LV, and the stathmin 1 and CREB pathways in the LA of HCM cats. Increased transcription of STAT3 was found in the HCM LV and LA.
RhoGTPase/RhoA-dependent signaling has also been shown to be a key regulator of immune cell differentiation and function. It results in activation of several immune cells including macrophages, dendritic cells, granulocytes, B- and T-cells, and their migration to sites of inflammation [52, 53]. There is also some evidence that RhoA signaling affects macrophage polarization [52, 53]. Classically, M1- and M2-type macrophages are differentiated, with M1-type macrophages being phagocytotic and proinflammatory and releasing reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and cytokines like TNFα, while M2-type macrophages are anti-inflammatory and secrete respective cytokines such as TGFβ and IL10 [53, 63]. Interestingly, the genes for the common macrophage markers GAL3 and CD68 were increased in the LV and LA, and for CD168 also in the LV from HCM cats. In the LA from HCM cats, FAM177B (a M1 macrophage marker gene) [45] was the top upregulated gene and TNFα was an upstream regulator, and there was marked activation of the pathway related to production of NO and ROS in macrophages. Furthermore, PKA-induced phosphorylation of RhoA has been reported to inhibit macrophage migration [53]. The reduced PKA signaling in the HCM LA could indicate active macrophage migration. Activation of FAM177B and the pathway related to increase of NO and ROS in macrophages imply that M1 macrophages play a role in the LA remodeling process. Furthermore, the T-cell (CD3D, CD3G and CD3E) and B-cell (CD79) surface glycoproteins were within the top upregulated genes in the HCM LA, suggesting a potential involvement of T and B lymphocytes. The increase of leukocyte extravasation and acute phase response signaling pathways in the HCM LA indicate an inflammation-favorable environment.
Histopathological and immunohistological investigations reported an increase in interstitial macrophages in the HCM LV [10, 11]. A proliferation of resident macrophages (Iba-1/MHC II positive/calprotectin-negative) was suspected but the type of these macrophages (M1 or M2) was not determined [10, 11]. Only scattered T-cells (CD3-positive) were found. The LA was so far not extensively examined in histological studies. Studies of humans with atrial fibrillation identified an activation of inflammatory factors such as IL6 and TNFα, and an increased number of CD3-positive T cells [64]. Considering that TNFα was identified as an upstream regulator in the HCM LA and IL6 was found to be relevant in HCM (particularly in cats with atrial thrombus) [35], an involvement of T cells in atrial changes in HCM seems likely. For the HCM LV, TGFβ was identified as an upstream regulator and the M2 macrophage gene IL10 was upregulated when compared with the healthy LV. However, no differences were found for the M2 markers EGR2 and MYC, and the transcription of the M1 marker GALS3BP was increased in the HCM LV. This suggests that both types of macrophages (M1 and M2) are present in the HCM LV.
Further involved are the LXR/RXR and PPARα/RXRα pathways. The LXR/RXR pathway was activated in the HCM LA, whilst PPARα/RXRα activation was reduced in the HCM LV when compared with the healthy counterpart. The LXR/RXR pathway attenuates cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, promotes cell survival, modulates myocardial metabolism, has anti-inflammatory effects, promotes angiogenesis, and inhibits fibrosis [65, 66]. A large animal model of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy showed inhibition of the LXR/RXR pathway, activation of the ILK pathway, and increased inflammatory cytokines, apoptosis and fibrosis [67]. LXR/RXR pathway activation in the HCM LA might therefore indicate cardioprotective effects.
PPARα/RXRα regulates energy metabolism. It acts as a fatty acid sensor and promotes fatty acid catabolism, inhibits gluconeogenesis, and reduces ATP synthesis. It has anti-inflammatory effects and suppresses angiogenesis [68–70]. The reduction of this pathway in the LV supports the presence of an inflammatory environment, metabolic changes and new vessel formation [10, 11, 25, 26, 30, 34, 35]. This finding is consistent with the activated HIF1α and CXCR4 pathways in the HCM LV [71, 72].
HIF1α, which is induced in response to hypoxia and inflammatory cytokines, regulates the expression of multiple common genes such as CXCR4, adrenomedullin pathways, and Glut-1 [73], which were all found to be higher in the HCM LV than the healthy LV. These result in angiogenesis, glycolysis, cell proliferation and survival, and promote anerobic metabolism [71, 72, 74]. CXCR4 is a chemokine receptor that is expressed in cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts and endothelial cells, mediates homing of progenitor cells, is involved in cell proliferation, migration and survival; and has been identified as a hub gene in human HCM [26, 71, 72, 75, 76]. In a mouse model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, increased CXCR4-positive macrophages were found in the circulation and the myocardium, which was associated with myofibroblast differentiation, fibrosis and an increased in inflammatory cytokines [77]. The gene expression for the chemokines MIF and CXCL12, which are the main CXCR4 ligands, were reduced in the HCM LV. This might result in fewer inflammatory monocytes being recruited and supports a potential predominance of anti-inflammatory macrophages in the feline HCM LV [71, 72]. The observed gene expression, the reduction of PPARα/RXRα, and the activation of HIF1α, CXCR4 and adrenomedullin pathways in the feline HCM LV could result in angiogenesis and vasodilation improving tissue hypoxia, stem cell mobilization and cell survival, and could be the reason that morbidity and death pathways were reduced in the IPA network analysis. These findings are supported by previous studies that identified attempts of angiogenesis, increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase mRNA and the presence of CD34-positive cells (which indicate a degree of stemness) in the feline HCM LV [10, 11].
The calcium signaling pathway was found to be inhibited in the LA of HCM hearts. This is in accordance with the reduced endocannabinoid neuronal synapse and opioid signaling pathways [78, 79]. Both signaling pathways have several downstream effects including inhibiting calcium influx, PKA and PI3k/Akt pathways and stimulating CREB signaling pathways [78, 79], which were also observed for the HCM LA. The relevance of calcium and these pathways for cardiac structure and function is well known and clustering of gene expression from human patients found calcium signaling and conduction as one module consistent with HCM-related processes [27].
Limitations to this study include the lack of accounting for age-associated cardiac changes in gene expression. For LXL/RXR in humans and mouse models as well as for myocardial cytokine and remodeling marker transcription in healthy cats and cats with HCM, an influence of age was reported [10, 38, 66]. However, the young control cats represent a homogenous control group that allowed the identification of the constitutive gene transcription in the healthy cat heart. We work with pet cats and not with animal models; for ethical reasons, healthy adult cats are not euthanized, so such hearts are rarely available. Euthanasia of adult cats is carried out for medical reasons, and these cats suffer from progressed (systemic) diseases that influence myocardial gene transcription and would preclude the differentiation from gene activation observed with HCM [34]. The cats with HCM had progressed disease, and therefore the gene expression patterns might not reflect those involved in early stages of the disease and might be influenced by heart failure [80]. Echocardiography of cats with HCM was obtained at different time points prior to euthanasia. These data do not reflect the stage of heart disease at the time point of death and were therefore not included into the study. Hearts from the young control cats were donated and echocardiography was not part of their assessment, although no cardiac abnormalities were observed on gross and histopathological examination. The sample size was small, which was mainly caused by the requirement of sampling the hearts within 30 minutes after death to ensure adequate RNA quality. However, the sample size was sufficient for the sequencing analysis and the statistical power was increased by the inclusion of paired (matched) tissue samples from the 5 healthy control cats and 3 individual HCM hearts.
Conclusions
The present study is the first to report global differences in cardiac gene expression that differentiates by region (LV vs. LA) and by health status (HCM vs. healthy) applying RNA-seq. Identification of DEG, their function and associated pathways, regulators and networks revealed unique gene expression patterns in the LV and LA regions of the cat heart that contribute to the distinct structure and function of each chamber in health and HCM. Similarities were observed to the DEG and associated functional pathways reported for human HCM. The top enriched gene in the HCM LV, THBS4, is also top enriched in the human HCM myocardium. Interestingly, the top DEG KLHL33 (LV), FAM177B and THRSP (LA) have not been reported for the heart so far, and their role in the heart and in HCM requires further investigation. These differences in DEG to human HCM are likely caused by different disease stages and heterogeneity across hearts [26, 27, 30, 81] and might be associated with the observed variability in clinical presentation. RhoGDI-RhoGTPase signaling seems to play a central role in the remodeling processes in feline HCM. Genes and pathways associated with structural remodeling and inflammation were activated in the HCM LV and LA, exhibiting some regional differences. Fibrosis and calcium signaling with infiltration of inflammatory cells seem to be of relevance in the HCM LA disease process, while in the LV, an inflammatory environment, microvascular changes, and adaptation to hypoxia seem to predominate. Other findings that might be of particular interest for disease processes occurring in HCM include the role of integrin, ILK signaling, and the LXR/RXR pathway in the LA, and the PPARα/RXRα, HIF1α and CXCR4 pathways in the LV. The present study is of high relevance since knowledge of the pathogenesis of feline and human HCM is still fragmentary, and since mouse models generally fall short for research into HCM [82]. Studying the naturally occurring disease in cats, a species that has been suggested as a model for human HCM [4–6], and not in experimental models is the strength of our research, and DEG and pathways previously not considered in cardiac pathology, particularly in HCM, were identified.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the animal health team at Kingfisher International Inc. for the donation of control cat hearts. They also extend their gratitude to Prof. Brandon Lillie, Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, who supervised the post mortem examinations of the control cats and to the team at the Centre for Applied Genomics at Sick Kids: Sergio Pereira, Karen Ho, Bhooma Thriuvahindrapuram and Roumiana Alexandrova for their expertise and assistance in RNA-sequencing and data analysis. We are grateful to our collaborator Prof. Anja Kipar, Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, for critical review and editing support of the manuscript.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.
Funding Statement
This study has received financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) discovery grant RGPIN-2017-04399 (SF) and the OVC Pet Trust (055189) (SF). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Paige CF, Abbott JA, Elvinger F, Pyle RL. Prevalence of cardiomyopathy in apparently healthy cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009;234; 1398–1403. doi: 10.2460/javma.234.11.1398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Payne JR, Brodbelt DC, Luis Fuentes V. Cardiomyopathy prevalence in 780 apparently healthy cats in rehoming centres (the CatScan study). J Vet Cardiol. 2015;17: S244–S257. doi: 10.1016/j.jvc.2015.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Maron BJ, Gardin JM, Flack JM, Gidding SS, Kurosaki TT, Bild DE. Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a general population of young adults. Echocardiographic analysis of 4111 subjects in the CARDIA Study. Coronary Artery Risk Development in (Young) Adults. Circulation. 1995. Aug 15;92(4):785–9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.4.785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fox PR, Liu SK, Maron BJ. Echocardiographic Assessment of Spontaneously Occurring Feline Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: An Animal Model of Human Disease. Circulation. 1995;92: 2645–2651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Maron BJ, Fox PR. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in man and cats. J Vet Cardiol. 2015;17:S6–S9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvc.2015.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Freeman LM, Rush JE, Stern JA, Huggins GS, Maron MS. Feline Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Spontaneous Large Animal Model of Human HCM. Cardiol Res. 2017;8: 139–142. doi: 10.14740/cr578w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Payne JR, Borgeat K, Brodbelt DC, Connolly DJ, Luis Fuentes V. Risk factors associated with sudden death vs. congestive heart failure or arterial thromboembolism in cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Vet Cardiol. 2015;17: S318–S328. doi: 10.1016/j.jvc.2015.09.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Maron BJ, Maron MS. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 2013. Jan 19;381(9862):242–55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60397-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marian AJ, Braunwald E. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Genetics, Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Circ Res. 2017. Sep 15;121(7):749–770. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kitz S, Fonfara S, Hahn S, Hetzel U, Kipar A. Feline Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: The Consequence of Cardiomyocyte-Initiated and Macrophage-Driven Remodeling Processes? Vet Pathol. 2019;56, 565–575. doi: 10.1177/0300985819837717 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rodríguez JMM, Fonfara S, Hetzel U, Kipar A. Feline hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: reduced microvascular density and involvement of CD34+ interstitial cells. Vet Pathol. 2022. Mar;59(2):269–83. doi: 10.1177/03009858211062631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Khor KH, Campbell FE, Owen H, Shiels IA, Mills PC. Myocardial collagen deposition and inflammatory cell infiltration in cats with pre-clinical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Vet J. 2015. Feb;203(2):161–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.11.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Biasato I, Francescone L, La Rosa G, Tursi M. Anatomopathological staging of feline hypertrophic cardiomyopathy through quantitative evaluation based on morphometric and histopathological data. Res Vet Sci. 2015. Oct;102:136–41. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cesta MF, Baty CJ, Keene BW, Smoak IW, Malarkey DE. Pathology of End-stage Remodeling in a Family of Cats with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Vet Pathol. 2005. Jul;42(4):458–67. doi: 10.1354/vp.42-4-458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kittleson MD, Meurs KM, Harris SP. The Genetic Basis of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Cats and Humans. J Vet Cardiol. 2015;17: S53–S73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvc.2015.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Maron BJ, Maron MS, Semsarian C. Genetics of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. After 20 Years. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60: 705–715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Meurs KM, Sanchez X, David RM, Bowles NE, Towbin JA, Reiser PJ, et al. A cardiac myosin binding protein C mutation in the Maine Coon cat with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14: 3587–3593. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Meurs KM, Norgard MM, Ederer MM, Hendrix KP, Kittleson MD. A substitution mutation in the myosin binding protein C gene in ragdoll hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Genomics. 2007;90: 261–264. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2007.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schipper T, Van Poucke M, Sonck L, Smets P, Ducatelle R, Broeckx BJG, et al. A feline orthologue of the human MYH7 c.5647G>A (p.(Glu1883Lys)) variant causes hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a Domestic Shorthair cat. Eur. J Hum Genet. 2019;27: 1724–1730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Meurs KM, Williams BG, DeProspero D, Friedenberg SG, Malarkey DE, Ezzell JA, et al. A deleterious mutation in the ALMS1 gene in a naturally occurring model of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the Sphynx cat. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16, 108. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-01740-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fries R, Heaney AM, Meurs KM. Prevalence of the Myosin-Binding Protein C Mutation in Maine Coon Cats. J Vet Intern Med. 2008;22: 893–896. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2008.0113.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Meurs KM, Norgard MM, Kuan M, Haggstrom J, Kittleson MD. Analysis of 8 Sarcomeric Candidate Genes for Feline Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Mutations in Cats with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. J Vet Intern Med. 2009;23: 840–843. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0341.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Longeri M, Ferrari P, Knafelz P, Mezzelani A, Marabotti A, Milanesi L, et al. Myosin-Binding Protein C DNA Variants in Domestic Cats (A31P, A74T, R820W) and their Association with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. J Vet Intern Med. 2013;27: 275–285. doi: 10.1111/jvim.12031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.van Dijk SJ, Paalberends ER, Najafi A, Michels M, Sadayappan S, Carrier L, et al. Contractile Dysfunction Irrespective of the Mutant Protein in Human Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy With Normal Systolic Function. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5: 36–46. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.963702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.An Raghow R. ‘Omics’ Perspective on Cardiomyopathies and Heart Failure. Trends Mol Med. 2016;22: 813–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Malgija B, Kumar NS, Piramanayagam S. Collective transcriptomic deregulation of hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy—Importance of fibrotic mechanism in heart failure. Comput Biol Chem. 2018;73: 85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2018.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wehrens M, de Leeuw AE, Wright-Clark M, Eding JEC, Boogerd CJ, Molenaar B, et al. Single-cell transcriptomics provides insights into hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Cell Rep. 2022;39: 110809. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ren CW, Liu JJ, Li JH, Li JW, Dai J, Lai YQ. RNA-seq profiling of mRNA associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Mol Med Rep. 2016. Dec;14(6):5573–5586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gao J, Collyer J, Wang M, Sun F, Xu F. Genetic Dissection of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy with Myocardial RNA-Seq. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. Apr 25;21(9):3040. doi: 10.3390/ijms21093040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li J, Wu Z, Zheng D, Sun Y, Wang S, Yan Y. Bioinformatics analysis of the regulatory lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA network and drug prediction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Mol Med Rep. 2019. Jul;20(1):549–558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Liu X, Ma Y, Yin K, Li W, Chen W, Zhang Y, et al. Long non-coding and coding RNA profiling using strand-specific RNA-seq in human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Sci Data. 2019. Jun 13;6(1):90. doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0094-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Weber K, Rostert N, Bauersachs S, Wess G. Serum microRNA profiles in cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Mol Cell Biochem. 2015;402: 171–180. doi: 10.1007/s11010-014-2324-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fonfara S, Kitz S, Hetzel U, Kipar A. Myocardial leptin transcription in feline hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Res Vet Sci. 2017;112: 105–108. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fonfara S, Kitz S, Monteith G, Hahn S, Kipar A. Myocardial transcription of inflammatory and remodeling markers in cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and systemic diseases associated with an inflammatory phenotype. Res Vet Sci. 2021;136, 484–494. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2021.03.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Colpitts ME, Caswell JL, Monteith G, Joshua J, O’Sullivan ML, Raheb S, et al. Cardiac gene activation varies between young and adult cats and in the presence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Res Vet Sci. 2022;152, 38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2022.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Johnson EK, Matkovich SJ, Nerbonne JM. Regional Differences in mRNA and lncRNA Expression Profiles in Non-Failing Human Atria and Ventricles. Sci Rep. 2018;8: 13919. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32154-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cui Y, Zheng Y, Liu X, Yan L, Fan X, Yong J, et al. Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis Maps the Developmental Track of the Human Heart. Cell Rep. 2019. Feb 12;26(7):1934–1950.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fonfara S, Hetzel U, Hahn S, Kipar A. Age- and gender-dependent myocardial transcription patterns of cytokines and extracellular matrix remodelling enzymes in cats with non-cardiac diseases. Exp Gerontol. 2015;72: 117–123. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2015.09.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Krämer A, Green J, Pollard J, Tugendreich S. Causal analysis approaches in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 523–530. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kessler Y, Helfer-Hungerbuehler AK, Cattori V, Meli ML, Zellweger B, Ossent P, et al. Quantitative TaqMan real-time PCR assays for gene expression normalisation in feline tissues. BMC Mol Biol. 2009;10: 106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-10-106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods. 2001;25: 402–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Javadov S, Jang S, Agostini B. Crosstalk between mitogen-activated protein kinases and mitochondria in cardiac diseases: therapeutic perspectives. Pharmacol Ther. 2014;144: 202–225. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.05.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Palao T, Medzikovic L, Rippe C, Wanga S, Al-Mardini C, van Weert A, et al. Thrombospondin-4 mediates cardiovascular remodelling in angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2018;35: 12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2018.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.McLellan MA, Skelly DA, Dona MSI, Squiers GT, Farrugia GE, Gaynor TL, et al. High-Resolution Transcriptomic Profiling of the Heart During Chronic Stress Reveals Cellular Drivers of Cardiac Fibrosis and Hypertrophy. Circulation. 2020;142: 1448–1463. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.045115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gurvich OL, Puttonen KA, Bailey A, Kailaanmäki A, Skirdenko V, Sivonen M, et al. Transcriptomics uncovers substantial variability associated with alterations in manufacturing processes of macrophage cell therapy products. Sci Rep. 2020;10: 14049. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70967-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Liu H, Sun Y, Zhang X, Li S, Hu D, Xiao L, et al. Integrated Analysis of Summary Statistics to Identify Pleiotropic Genes and Pathways for the Comorbidity of Schizophrenia and Cardiometabolic Disease. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11: 256. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shi X, Xiang S, Cao J, Zhu H, Yang B, He Q, et al. Kelch-like proteins: Physiological functions and relationships with diseases. Pharmacol Res. 2019;148: 104404. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Terao C, Yoshifuji H, Matsumura T, Naruse TK, Ishii T, Nakaoka Y, et al. Genetic determinants and an epistasis of LILRA3 and HLA-B*52 in Takayasu arteritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115: 13045–13050. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1808850115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Singh BK, Sinha RA, Yen PM. Novel Transcriptional Mechanisms for Regulating Metabolism by Thyroid Hormone. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19: 3284. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zeng N, Huang R, Li N, Jiang H, Li R, Wang F, et al. MiR-451a attenuates free fatty acids–mediated hepatocyte steatosis by targeting the thyroid hormone responsive spot 14 gene. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2018;474: 260–271. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2018.03.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Garcia-Mata R, Boulter E, Burridge K. The ‘invisible hand’: regulation of RHO GTPases by RHOGDIs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12: 493–504. doi: 10.1038/nrm3153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kilian LS, Voran J, Frank D, Rangrez AY. RhoA: a dubious molecule in cardiac pathophysiology. J Biomed Sci. 2021;28, 33. doi: 10.1186/s12929-021-00730-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bros M, Haas K, Moll L, Grabbe S. RhoA as a Key Regulator of Innate and Adaptive Immunity. Cells. 2019;8: E733. doi: 10.3390/cells8070733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lane J, Martin T, Weeks HP, Jiang WG. Structure and Role of WASP and WAVE in Rho GTPase Signalling in Cancer. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2014;11: 155–165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nelson TJ, Alkon DL. Molecular regulation of synaptogenesis during associative learning and memory. Brain Res. 2015;1621: 239–251. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.11.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cheng F, Guo D. MET in glioma: signaling pathways and targeted therapies. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38: 270. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1269-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.de Gooijer MC, Guillén Navarro M, Bernards R, Wurdinger T, van Tellingen O. An Experimenter’s Guide to Glioblastoma Invasion Pathways. Trends Mol Med. 2018;24; 763–780. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2018.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Galkov MD, Ivanova AE, Gulyaev MV, Kiseleva EV, Savinkova IG, Gorbachva LR. The Influence of β-Arrestin-2 Gene Knockout in Mice on Survival of Cultured Astrocytes Exposed to Thrombin and on the Cerebral Thrombosis Aftereffects In Vivo. Biochem Mosc Suppl Ser A Membr Cell Biol. 2020;14: 17–23. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hannigan GE, Coles JG, Dedhar S. Integrin-Linked Kinase at the Heart of Cardiac Contractility, Repair, and Disease. Circ Res. 2007;100: 1408–1414. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000265233.40455.62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lal H, Guleria RS, Foster DM, Lu G, Watson LE, Sanghi S, et al. Integrins: Novel Therapeutic Targets for Cardiovascular Diseases. Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem. 2007;5: 109–32. doi: 10.2174/187152507780363223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bock HH, May P. Canonical and Non-canonical Reelin Signaling. Front Cell Neurosci. 2016;10: 166. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Calvier L, Xian X, Lee RG, Sacharidou A, Mineo C, Shaul PW, et al. Reelin Depletion Protects Against Atherosclerosis by Decreasing Vascular Adhesion of Leukocytes. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2021;41: 1309–1318. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.121.316000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sansonetti M, Waleczek FJG, Jung M, Thum T, Perbellini F. Resident cardiac macrophages: crucial modulators of cardiac (patho)physiology. Basic Res Cardiol. 2020;115: 77. doi: 10.1007/s00395-020-00836-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hohmann C, Pfister R, Mollenhauer M, Adler C, Kozlowski J, Wodarz A, et al. Inflammatory cell infiltration in left atrial appendageal tissues of patients with atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm. Sci Rep. 2020;10, 1685. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58797-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Cannon MV, van Gilst WH, de Boer RA. Emerging role of liver X receptors in cardiac pathophysiology and heart failure. Basic Res Cardiol. 2015;111: 3. doi: 10.1007/s00395-015-0520-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.DeLeon-Pennell KY, Mouton AJ, Ero OK, Ma Y, Padmanabhan Iyer R, Flynn ER, et al. LXR/RXR signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling. Basic Res Cardiol. 2018;113, 40. doi: 10.1007/s00395-018-0699-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lin YS, Chang TH, Shi CS, Wang YZ, Ho WC, Huang HD, et al. Liver X Receptor/Retinoid X Receptor Pathway Plays a Regulatory Role in Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8: e009146. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kidani Y, Bensinger SJ. Liver X receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor as integrators of lipid homeostasis and immunity. Immunol Rev. 2012;249, 72–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01153.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Tan Y, Wang M, Yang K, Chi T, Liao Z, Wei P. PPAR-α Modulators as Current and Potential Cancer Treatments. Front Oncol. 2021;11: 599995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Finck BN. The PPAR regulatory system in cardiac physiology and disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;73: 269–277. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.08.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Pawig L, Klasen C, Weber C, Bernhagen J, Noels H. Diversity and Inter-Connections in the CXCR4 Chemokine Receptor/Ligand Family: Molecular Perspectives. Front Immunol. 2015;6: 429. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Döring Y, Pawig L, Weber C, Noels H. The CXCL12/CXCR4 chemokine ligand/receptor axis in cardiovascular disease. Front Physiol. 2014;5: 212. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Imtiyaz HZ, Simon MC. Hypoxia-Inducible Factors as Essential Regulators of Inflammation. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2010;345: 105–120. doi: 10.1007/82_2010_74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Tsuruda T, Kato J, Kuwasako K, Kitamura K. Adrenomedullin: Continuing to explore cardioprotection. Peptides 2019;111: 47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2018.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Cojoc M, Peitzsch C, Trautmann F, Polishchuk L, Telegeev GD, Dubrovska A. Emerging targets in cancer management: role of the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis. OncoTargets Ther. 2013;6: 1347–1361. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S36109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Teicher BA, Fricker SP. CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 Pathway in Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16: 2927–2931. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zhang N, Ma Q, You Y, Xia X, Xie C, Huang Y, et al. CXCR4-dependent macrophage-to-fibroblast signaling contributes to cardiac diastolic dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18: 1271–1287. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.65802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kendall DA, Yudowski GA. Cannabinoid Receptors in the Central Nervous System: Their Signaling and Roles in Disease. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017;10: 294. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Malafoglia V, Ilari S, Vitiello L, Tenti M, Balzani E, Muscoli C, et al. The Interplay between Chronic Pain, Opioids, and the Immune System. Neuroscientist. 2022;28: 613–627. doi: 10.1177/10738584211030493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Tan FL, Moravec CS, Li J, Apperson-Hansen C, McCarthy PM, Young JB, et al. The gene expression fingerprint of human heart failure. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99: 11387–11392. doi: 10.1073/pnas.162370099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Wang L, Lu F, Xu J. Identification of Potential miRNA-mRNA Regulatory Network Contributing to Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM). Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:660372. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.660372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Vakrou S, Liu Y, Zhu L, Greenland GV, Simsek B, Hebl VB, et al. Differences in molecular phenotype in mouse and human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Sci Rep. 2021;11: 13163. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89451-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.