Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2022 Jul 13;201(5):2650–2664. doi: 10.1007/s12011-022-03353-w

Application of Bentonite Clay, Date Pit, and Chitosan Nanoparticles as Promising Adsorbents to Sequester Toxic Lead and Cadmium from Milk

Amany Abdelnaby 1,2,, Nabila M Abdelaleem 1, Elham Elshewy 1, Ayman H Mansour 3, Samar S Ibrahim 1
PMCID: PMC10020323  PMID: 35829983

Abstract

Evaluating residual lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) levels in food products, especially milk, is critical for product safety and quality. In this purview, the current study aims to determine Pb and Cd concentrations in milk using atomic absorption spectrophotometry and compare their values with international standards. In addition, it aims to remove these metals from milk samples using low-cost, naturally occurring materials, such as bentonite, date pit, and chitosan nanoparticles. The ability of potential adsorbents was also investigated using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX), and transmission electron microscope (TEM). Moreover, their impact on milk’s nutritional properties was considered. The results revealed that most milk samples contained Pb and Cd, with mean values of 0.237 ± 0.179 and 0.041 ± 0.036 mg/kg, respectively. Furthermore, the three possible adsorbents demonstrated high sequestering ability due to their existing functional groups; the adsorption capacity of bentonite to Pb and Cd was 84 and 88%, date pit was 97 and 93%, and chitosan nanoparticles were 82 and 98%, respectively, with no discernible change in milk nutritional contents. In conclusion, the bentonite, date pit, and chitosan nanoparticles were found to be significantly effective and safe in removing hazardous trace elements (Pb and Cd) from contaminated milk.

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name 12011_2022_3353_Figa_HTML.jpg

Keywords: Heavy metals, Food safety, Adsorption, Bentonite clay, Date pit, Chitosan nanoparticles

Highlights

  1. An atomic absorption spectrophotometer was used to measure residual lead and cadmium levels in milk.

  2. Remediation of metal-contaminated milk using costless and environmentally friendly adsorbents, such as bentonite clay, date pit, and chitosan nanoparticles, was done.

  3. There was a difference in the removal effectiveness of bentonite clay, date pit, and chitosan nanoparticles for their removal effectiveness.

  4. Fat, protein, and lactose of milk insignificantly changed after adsorbent remediation.

Introduction

Heavy metals are defined as any metal component with a relatively high density that causes significant health hazards in the body [1]. Due to food safety concerns and potential health risks, among other heavy elements, lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) in milk have growing interest since they are broadly spread in the environment, and their accumulation in food poses a significant hazard due to their long-term toxicological implications [24].

Pb is responsible for inducing multiple malfunctions and injuries to the central and peripheral nervous system, renal, hematopoietic, and immune systems, as well as memory loss [5, 6]. Children are particularly vulnerable to Pb, as they can absorb a more significant amount than adults, resulting in impaired mental development and behavioral problems. Hyperactivity, lowered immunity, and anemia are also some of the other side effects of Pb [1, 7]. Furthermore, Cd is harmful and non-essential to public health, primarily accumulating in the kidneys and liver. The metal and sewer industries are the most significant sources of Cd exposure [8]. It mainly causes toxicity in the kidneys, liver, brain, lungs, heart, central nervous system, and testicles. In addition, Cd can lead to osteoporosis, anemia, anosmia, non-hypertrophic emphysema, eosinophilia, and persistent rhinitis [5, 7, 9, 10]. Moreover, the International Organization for Cancer Research acknowledges Pb and Cd as human carcinogenes [11, 12].

In order to save human health, it is critical to analyze the residual concentrations of Pb and Cd in milk to monitor these hazardous metals’ levels in products. Various techniques are utilized to extract heavy metal ions from various samples, like chemical precipitation, ion exchange, and reverse osmosis [7, 13]. Adsorption has recently emerged as one of the promising approaches, owing to its simplicity, low cost, and efficiency in heavy metal ions extracted from several kinds of resources [14].

Numerous low-cost adsorbents have already been used among these bentonite clays, corresponding to the smectite clay group [13, 15]. They are also distinguished by their 2:1 structure of two tetrahedral sheets and one octahedral sheet sandwiched in between. It is known to be an effective adsorbent, mainly owing to the net negative charge on the surface generated by isomorphic replacements inside the octahedral sheets, its natural abundance, increased sorption potential, and chemical and mechanical stability [16]. Therefore, Bentonite clay was investigated as an ion exchanger and/or adsorbent due to its structure [13, 17].

Recent research trends attempt to expand the utilization of agricultural waste adsorbents, like date pits, to extract a wide range of environmental contaminants due to their considerable adsorption capability and low cost [18]. Date pit powder is qualified for eliminating trace levels of toxic metal ions with different functional groups, i.e., hydroxyl, phenolic, carboxylic acid, ester, carboxylate, and amino, which can aid as spots for metal ion adsorption [19]. The efficient use of these low-cost sorbents is primarily attributed to functional oxygenated groups found in lignocellulosic substances, including cellulose and lignin units [20].

Chitosan nanoparticles (Cs-NP), colloidal solid particles ranging from 1 to 1000 nm, have piqued the interest of researchers due to their nano size, wide surface area, biodegradability, and remarkable biocompatibility [21]. These characteristics contributed to their high adsorption potential and reactivity, which are both beneficial for extracting heavy metal ions [22]. It is prepared from low-cost, self-degrading, non-toxic, and environmentally friendly biopolymer chitosan. Chitosan (Cs) is a polysaccharide derived from natural chitin present in the exoskeletons of many crustaceans. After cellulose, it is the second most prevalent natural biopolymer [23].

Since milk is a significant contributor to heavy metal contamination, remediation of metal-contaminated milk has received extraordinarily little attention. We used low-cost, naturally derived adsorbents to ensure the product’s safety for human consumption. Noteworthy, bentonite clay, date pit, and Cs-NP have all been employed as effective adsorbents for extracting heavy metal ions from water. However, their potential to adsorb heavy metals in milk-contaminated samples has yet to be evaluated.

Consequently, we aimed to assess Pb and Cd concentrations in milk samples and compare them with the Egyptian and international prescribed limits. The current study was also conducted to investigate the potential metal adsorption capability of bentonite clay, date pit, which was prepared using simple minimal physical pretreatment (heat roasting), and Cs-NP using FTIR, XRD, SEM, EDX, and TEM aside from their effect on fat, protein, and lactose, which are the crucial milk components.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

The substances utilized in this experiment were all analytical reagent grade, nitric acid (65%) and hydrogen peroxide (30%) from Merck, USA. The standards of Pb and Cd were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). For the preparation of working solutions, the standard solutions were diluted with 0.1 M of HNO3. In all dilution procedures, double dH2O was used.

Chelating Adsorbents

Bentonite clay Al2O3.4 (SiO2) H2O was purchased from PIOCHEM, Egypt. Date fruits (Phoenix dactylifera L.) were purchased from local marketplaces, while Cs-NP was obtained from Nano Gate, Egypt. Foremost, date pit powder was prepared based on the method described by Al-Ghouti et al. [24] by performing the following steps; Date fruits were washed, and pits were easily detached manually. Contaminants were removed from date pits by rinsing those multiple times in dH2O. They were dried for 2 h at 65 °C in an oven to remove moisture. Subsequently, dry pits were roasted for 3 h in an oven at 130 °C. The prepared roasted pits were transferred to a coffee machine after being crushed, resulting in coarse to fine particles.

Samples Collection and Preparation

A total of 35 milk samples were randomly obtained from local farms, independent farmers, and dairy shops in Egypt’s El-Qalyubia governorate (15 raw milk and 20 pasteurized cow’s milk). Pre-washed nitric acid polyethylene containers were used to collect samples. The samples were immediately sent to the laboratory in an ice-packed cooler and were kept at − 20 °C until analysis. For confidentiality, the names of the brands and local markets where samples were obtained were not revealed.

Milk samples were prepared by the acid digestion procedure as described by Ahmad et al. [25]. Briefly, all glassware was first cleaned with a 10% solution of HNO3, and after that, it was rewashed with dH2O. On a hot plate, 10 mL milk was digested with a 1:3 mixture of H2O2 and HNO3. The samples were then boiled till their volume was decreased to 2 mL. Brown fumes appeared, signaling the completion of organic matter oxidation. The 2 mL sample solution was diluted with dH2O (20 mL) to get a clear solution. The same procedure was used for the blank digests in which the samples were replaced with double-dH2O. The beaker content was brought with dH2O to the appropriate volume and examined using the graphite furnace AAS.

Assessment of Pb and Cd in Milk Samples

Pb and Cd concentrations in digested samples were determined using the method specified in AOAC [26] by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometer SensAA (SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a hollow cathode lamp at 283.3 and 228.8 nm wavelength, and injection volume of 20 and 10 µL, respectively. Concentrations of Pb and Cd were expressed in mg/kg.

Characterization of Chelating Adsorbents

FTIR Analysis

FTIR spectra of the adsorbents were captured using Nicolet iS50 Thermo Scientific Spectrometer with KBr-pellet in 4000–400 cm−1 range for evaluating the surface functional groups of the adsorbents.

X-ray Diffraction Analysis

XRD (Bruker D8 Advance, Bruker, USA) was utilized to examine adsorbents’ structural and elemental properties to evaluate their mineralogical composition, influencing their physicochemical properties. The X-ray wavelength was set to 1.54060 A°, and the diffraction peaks were scanned between 2θ = 0° and 80°.

SEM Analysis

SEM (JEOL model JSM-6390LA) was applied to identify the pore structures, surface morphologies, topography, shapes, and composition of the substances under analysis. Prior to SEM analysis, samples were coated with gold powder to make them conductive.

Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Analysis

Energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) (Quanttax-EDX, Bruker, Germany) was performed along with SEM to determine the elemental composition of the adsorbents.

TEM Analysis

TEM (JEOL, JEM-2100, Electron Microscope) was used to determine the particle form, size, structure, and morphology. The samples were sonicated ultrasonically after being distributed in dH2O.

Chelating Adsorption of Pb and Cd from Milk Samples

The adsorption procedures were carried out at ambient room temperature (25–27 °C). The adsorption assay was accomplished as follows: dividing the fixed volume of previously tested milk samples (20 samples) contaminated with Pb and Cd ions into triplicates (50 mL) and putting them in polyethylene plastic bottles along with each sorbent dose separately.

Bentonite Clay Adsorption Procedures

A 50 mL of each milk sample was treated with 5 g bentonite clay [15]. The solid–liquid mixture was then violently mixed for 30 min at a speed of 40 cycles per min using the Stuart SSL1 Orbital Shaker. They were then centrifuged for 5 min at 3000 rpm to separate the bentonite clay.

Date Pit Adsorption Procedures

As illustrated by Samra et al. [27], for 60 min, 50 mL of milk samples was combined with 0.3 g of prepared roasted date pit powder and agitated at 250 rpm. The samples were then filtered to remove any remaining date pits.

Cs-NP Adsorption Procedures

Mixing 50 mL milk with 0.25 g Cs-Np [28], which was prepared as reported by Hasanin et al. [29], samples were then shaken for 120 min at 180 rpm before filtration. Following that, the concentration of residual Pb and Cd ions in milk samples treated with bentonite clay, date pit, and Cs-Np was determined using graphite furnace AAS. The formula was used to calculate the sequestering efficiencies of bentonite clay, date pit, and Cs-Np in terms of % removal as follows:

%Removal=Ci-CfCi×100[19] 1

wherever Ci- expresses an initial concentration of heavy metals, and Cf—represents a final concentration of heavy metals.

Chemical Analysis of Milk Composition

Finally, the nutritional milk components, fats, proteins, and lactose, were measured before and after the addition of adsorbents using mid-infrared FTIR (Milkoscan™ FT1) to investigate the effect of bentonite clay, date pit, and Cs-Np on the chemical properties of milk [15].

Statistical Analysis

Mean ± standard deviation (SD), minimum, and maximum levels were expressed as concentrations. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS ver., 22 (Chicago, IL, USA). One-way (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple range analysis were utilized to assess the substantial variations in the measured characteristics. The level of statistical significance was determined at P < 0.05.

Results and Discussion

Assessment of Pb and Cd in Milk Samples

Pb and Cd are non-biodegradable elements that are of great concern due to their adverse effects on human health because they are easily transported through food chains and have no fundamental biological role known to serve [3]. Therefore, internationally, control of these components is a high priority. Milk is contaminated with toxic heavy metals, whether by food and water or the investigated manufacturing and packaging processes [1, 30].

The measured levels of Pb and Cd in collected milk samples are depicted in Table 1. The results revealed that 94.3% of the total milk samples contained Pb with a mean value of 0.237 ± 0.179 mg/kg and a range of 0.008–0.644 mg/kg. According to the findings, in 71.4% of the samples evaluated, the concentration of Cd varied from 0.001 to 0.095 mg/kg, with a mean of 0.041 ± 0.036 mg/kg. Accordingly, the highest occurrence of Pb and Cd was, therefore, higher in pasteurized milk samples than in raw ones.

Table 1.

Concentrations of Pb and Cd (mg/kg) in the examined milk samples

Element Milk sample type No. of samples Positive samples Min Max Mean ± SD
No %
Pb Raw milk 15 14 93.3 0.010 0.557 0.270 ± 0.18
Pasteurized milk 20 19 95 0.008 0.644 0.212 ± 0.18
Total 35 33 94.3 0.008 0.644 0.237 ± 0.179
Cd Raw milk 15 7 47.7 0.001 0.067 0.015 ± 0.02
Pasteurized milk 20 18 90 0.015 0.095 0.06 ± 0.03
Total 35 25 71.4 0.001 0.095 0.041 ± 0.036

Values are expressed as mean ± SD

No. the number of the positive samples and their percentage %, Min. minimum, Max. maximum, SD standard deviation

In general, high concentrations of Pb in milk can be attributed to environmental factors such as the deposition of pollutants in the atmosphere, waste disposal, vehicle exhaust, and urban effluent [4]. In addition, the provenance of Pb in milk is directly linked to the water as well as the soil and fodder contamination with lead, which may be influenced by polluted water [10]. It should be noted that the Pb levels were very high in milk samples, with 29 samples (82.8%) exceeding the acceptable level of 0.02 mg/kg set by Codex Alimentarius Commission [31] and (EOS) Egyptian standards [32], as depicted in Table 2.

Table 2.

Number of positive milk samples exceeding the permissible Egyptian and international limits

Element Egyptian standards1 International standards2
No % No %
Pb 29 82.8% 29 82.8%
Cd 15 42.8% 24 68.5%

1The (EOS) Egyptian standards (2007) permissible limits (0.02 mg/kg for Pb and 0.05 mg/kg for Cd)

2The Codex Alimentarius Commission (2014) allowable values (0.02 mg/kg for Pb and 0.0026 mg/kg for Cd)

Similar to Pb, the existence of Cd in milk can be caused by natural or anthropogenic causes, such as fertilizers and atmospheric accumulation in soils [4]. Likewise, all Cd-polluted samples suggest the presence of potential fertilizer applications, coal production, and fossil fuel burning as sources of pollution [33]. The Cd accumulation in plants, such as animal feed, has grown nearby industrial locations, mining waste storage areas, and places with high traffic volumes, translocating the Cd ion into the tissues of the animals and, therefore, into the milk [8]. Indeed, the pasteurized milk samples demonstrated elevated occurrence levels than the raw milk samples due to milk contact with heavy metal ions in processing, storage, and transport instruments [30]. The determined levels of Cd observed in 24 samples (68.5%) in the current study surpassed the permissible limit (0.0026 mg/kg) set by Codex Alimentarius Commission [34]. In addition, according to (EOS) Egyptian standards [32], 15 samples (42.8%) exceeded the acceptable limits (0.05 mg/kg).

The findings under investigation coincide with several studies conducted in Egypt. The Pb concentrations in the milk samples in different provinces were 0.135 to 0.614 mg/kg, as in the El-Sayed et al. [35], while Cd levels were between 0.004 and 0.018 mg/kg. Moreover, Malhat et al. found that the average Pb concentration ranged from 1.850 to 4.404 μg/g, while the Cd concentration was between 0.200 to 0.288 μg/g in the El-Qalyubyia governorate [5]. On the contrary, Pb and Cd levels in cow’s milk in the Beni-Suef governorate were 0.054–0.408 and 0.008–0.104 ppm, respectively [4]. Likewise, El-Bassiony et al. illustrated that the average levels in milk obtained from The New Valley governorate were 0.215 and 0.05 ppm with respect to Pb and Cd, orderly [10]. Similarly, the Pb mean values of 0.33 ± 0.049 and Cd mean values of 0.039 ± 0.007 ppm were observed in raw milk in Alexandria city, according to Abo El-Makarem et al. [36].

Characterization of Chelating Adsorbents

FTIR Analysis

The FTIR technique was employed to better understand the adsorption mechanism. FTIR is a valuable tool for characterizing the functional groups on the surface of adsorbents. The FTIR examination of bentonite clay revealed an intense band at 1040 cm−1, which is attributed to the silicate (Si–O-Si) structure, as well as additional other bands at 915, 519, and 466 cm−1 may be assigned to octahedral (Al- O- Si), (Al-Al-O), and (Si- O- Si) bending vibrations, respectively (Fig. 1). The presence of iron oxide is demonstrated by the combined band at 466 cm−1 [16]. It was found that bond O–H deformation of the contained water molecules is related to the small band at 1640 cm−1. The band at 3628 cm−1 can also be related to OH-stretching bands [37].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

FTIR spectra of bentonite clay (a), date pit (b), and chitosan nanoparticles (c)

As represented in the date pit FTIR spectrum (Fig. 1), a large band of the O–H stretching vibration emerges at 3381 cm−1, which may be linked to hydroxyl groups both free and bound (e.g., carboxylic acids, phenols, and alcohols) found in cellulose, lignin, and pectin [38]. Two near bands at 2924 and 2854 cm−1 can be related to asymmetric C–H stretching of aldehyde molecules as well as the acetyl and ester groups’ existence in the date pit hemicellulose structure [24]. Carbonyl groups (–COOH and –COOCH3), carboxylic acids, or their esters are assigned to the stretching vibration of C = O found at 1745 cm−1. The syringe ring and C-O stretch may be related to the absorption band at 1242 cm−1 in lignin and xylan. C–O–C vibration and C-O stretch of carboxylic acid, alcoholic, and ester groups of cellulose and hemicellulose may be linked to bands near 1159 and 1065 cm−1, respectively [18, 38]. Consequently, date pit FTIR analysis revealed its hemicellulose structure, which is involved in the Pb and Cd adsorption mechanisms.

The FTIR spectrum of Cs-NP revealed major absorption bands at 3418, 2940, 1645, 1541, 1385, 1026, and 519 cm−1, respectively (Fig. 1). The identified intense broad absorption band at 3462 cm−1 may be due to the stretching vibrations of –NH2 and O–H and attributed to molecules’ extra molecular hydrogen bonds [39]. The amount of water found in the Cs-NP indicated that they were hydrophilic, as evidenced by the presence of the – O– H bonding detected between 3200 and 3550 cm−1 [40]. The asymmetric stretching vibration of methylene (CH2) could explain the absorption band at 2940 cm−1 [23]. The bending vibration of N–H generates an absorption band at 1645 cm−1 due to Cs and TPP interaction. The bands at 1541 and 1385 cm−1 are attributable to an aliphatic nitro compound’s N–O stretching. The primary alcohol C–O stretching vibration had a peak of 1026 cm−1. The absorption band at 519 cm−1 was found to be connected to bromoalkanes [40]. In general, the FTIR spectrums of three used adsorbents demonstrate the complexity of their structure and their ability to behave as prospective adsorbents, as evidenced by the presence of the functional groups on their surfaces.

XRD Analysis

XRD analysis contributes to identifying the sample physicochemical properties through its mineralogical components and determines the compatibility of each component material [16]. The bentonite clay XRD demonstrated the highest intensity of diffraction peaks (100%) at 2θ values of 29.05° and other diffraction peaks at 2θ values of 61.45 and 35.74° with relative intensities of 43.4 and 45%, respectively, which may be attributed to silicon oxide compound (Fig. 2). Other lower intensive diffraction peaks were observed at 2θ values of 42.8°, which may be attributed to aluminum oxide, and 53.9° and 48.3°, which may relate to magnesium oxide (MgO). These findings revealed that bentonite clay was an aluminosilicate mineral [41].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

XRD spectra of bentonite clay (a), date pit (b), and chitosan nanoparticles (c)

As demonstrated in Fig. 2, the XRD of the date pit showed no straight horizontal fundamental line and only a few diffraction peaks. With a relative intensity of 100%, the XRD pattern revealed intense diffraction peaks at 2θ values of 18.6°. This study revealed that date pits are mostly amorphous and contain little crystalline materials [38]. The amorphous form of the date pit allows for simple Pb and Cd ions migration to its surface, resulting in excellent metal ions removal [42].

The XRD study of Cs-NP revealed the presence of clearly identified diffraction peaks (Fig. 2). The XRD pattern revealed intense diffraction peaks at 2θ values of 19.1°, with a relative intensity of 100%. Cs-NPs’ XRD pattern is suggestive of an amorphous polymer, which aligns with the findings of previous studies [28, 39, 43] because the Cs-NP structure is made up of dense counter-ions interpenetrating TPP, whereas polymer chains are cross-linked by TPP counter ions. As a result, the Cs-NP’s crystalline structure was disrupted after TPP cross-linking. The decrease in polymer crystallinity improves metal ion sorption and capacity, as reported by Ali et al. [28]. Considering the XRD diagram, we can contend that bentonite clay, date pit, and Cs-NP could adsorb Pb and Cd on their surfaces.

SEM Analysis

The morphology of the three adsorbents studied in SEM is illustrated in Fig. 3, where the sheet-like structure of bentonite clay is demonstrated in Fig. 3a, and the surface showed a high porosity that increases the contact area and promotes adsorption at active sites of the positively charged ions [13, 16]. It is evident that bentonite clay particles were made up of heterogeneous aggregates of assorted sizes and shapes. These grains form a stack of sheets, indicating clay layers. A little bright crystallite settles on the sample’s surface, which could be made of free silica [37]. In contrast, the SEM micrograph, Fig. 3b, showed a porous surface of the date pit with large pores size and defined structure, thus facilitating the diffusion of particles within the date pit and enhancing the adsorption ability [24]. Generally, most of the constituents have irregular ends with a rough structure, as well as the presence of numerous cavities and holes that allow Pb and Cd ions to be adsorbed. Our findings are consistent with earlier reports [24, 27, 42, 44]. Conversely, the SEM image in Fig. 3c revealed that Cs-NP is intertwined and well dispersed. This form of morphology increases the material’s surface area, making it very convenient for adsorption, by comparing the SEM micrograph descriptions of Cs-NP with previous authors who claimed that Cs-NP seems to have a spherical form [28, 39]. The spherical morphology of Cs-NP was not clearly visible in our SEM image; however, they seemed to have a rod-shaped structure. The current study findings are consistent with Vijayalakshmi et al. [43].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

SEM micrograph descriptions of bentonite clay (a), date pit (b), and chitosan nanoparticles (c) at two magnifications

Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Analysis

The elemental compositions of bentonite clay, date pit, and Cs-NP have been studied by EDX. The elemental composition of bentonite clay is shown in Fig. 4 and Table 3, which reveal that the dominant elements are O, Si, and Al in a percentage of 62.9, 28.05, and 10.22%, respectively, confirming the aluminosilicate structure [13]. Na, Mg, K, Ca, and Fe are other exchangeable cations that exist in lower amounts. By ion exchange, these positively charged ions will enhance the Pb and Cd adsorption on the bentonite surface [16]. The spectrum in Fig. 4 demonstrates that the date pit primarily comprises carbon and oxygen, which account for 56.13 and 40.42%, respectively. In addition to the presence of elements, such as aluminum 2.83%, sulfur, and potassium, also exist but at a percentage < 1%. Our results are similar to that of Al-Saad et al. [45]. Consequently, the surface roughness of the date pit observed in SEM may be due to the existence of its main functional groups of different carbon [42].

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

EDX analysis of bentonite clay (a), date pit (b), and chitosan nanoparticles (c)

Table 3.

EDX elemental analysis of bentonite clay, date pit, and chitosan nanoparticles (Cs-NP)

Adsorbents Element Weight %
Bentonite clay O 62.9
Na 3.85
Mg 2.31
Al 10.22
Si 28.05
K 0.47
Ca 3.20
Fe 3.06
Date pit C 56.13
N 0
O 40.42
Al 2.83
S 0.17
K 0.45
Cs-NP C 31.53
N 8.07
O 53.55
Al 0.74
P 6.11

The elemental compositions of Cs-NP are shown in Fig. 4 and Table 3. The weight percentages of critical elements such as C, O, and N are 31.53, 53.55, and 8.07%, respectively, with the presence of P (6.11%) and Al (< 1%) [23]. These findings demonstrate the presence of amine functional group-containing N and organic matters, like C, in Cs-NP that participate in Pb and Cd adsorption.

TEM Analysis

The TEM analysis was used to determine the size, shape, and morphology of the employed adsorbents. Figure 5 demonstrates the typical TEM images of bentonite, date pit, and Cs-NP, with size histograms beside the corresponding TEM images. The TEM images of the bentonite in Fig. 5a revealed a number of clusters of various sizes and forms. The unique interlaying nature and crystalline substrate can be seen clearly. Surface morphology is analogous to that noticed in SEM photos. According to the TEM image findings, the particle size of bentonite was approximately 47 ± 10.4 nm, which are average montmorillonite dimensions[46]. The TEM micrograph Fig. 5b of the date pit revealed substantial porosity and roughness, which was consistent with the SEM results. Due to the presence of cellulose, the date pit’s morphology revealed irregular clusters with distinct particle size. According to histogram measurements, the predominant particle size of the date pit was around 91.9 ± 17 nm [47]. The nearly irregular spherical shape of the CS-NP is clearly visible in TEM micrograph (Fig. 5c). The typical diameter of CS-NP is estimated to be 19.8 ± 5.64 nm. The results obtained are compatible with prior reports [28, 29, 39]. TEM scans revealed that bentonite, date pit, and CS-NP all had an average size under 100 nm. Based on the previously mentioned results, TEM studies suggest that the number of active sites in bentonite, date pit, and CS-NP improves their adsorption abilities.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

TEM micrograph descriptions of bentonite clay (a), date pit (b), and chitosan nanoparticles (c) with their size histograms

Chelating Adsorption of Pb and Cd from Milk Samples

Due to the widespread recognition of the significant and well-known chemical risks of Pb and Cd in milk, the use of decontamination methods that do not change the nutritional content of milk intended for human consumption is essential, primarily focusing on adsorption practices attributed to their simplicity, affordability, accessibility, and efficiency [16].

Table 4 summarizes milk samples’ adsorbent sequestering efficacy for Pb and Cd. The experimental studies showed that bentonite clay could sequester Pb and Cd (84% and 88%) with mean values of 0.059 ± 0.04 and 0.008 ± 0.007 mg/kg, respectively. Based on the screening results, bentonite clay which is aluminum phyllosilicate primary composed of smectite mineral of montmorillonite [17] has been demonstrated to serve as an effective detoxifying agent of Pb and Cd from contaminated milk at approximately 84 and 88%, respectively. This finding can be attributed to the higher adsorption potential of the negative charged clay for the adsorption of positive ions such as Pb+2 and Cd+2 [13]. The bentonite clay’s aluminosilicate structure, besides its exchangeable cations, has been proven by FTIR, XRD, SEM, EDX, and TEM analysis. It is noteworthy that its removal mechanism could be linked to the chemisorption method, its higher electronegativity, and its composition with a layer of one octahedral sheet and two sheets of silica tetrahedral, which in turn holds a net negative charge as evidence for the broken bonds at the edges of the aluminum–silica units ultimately leading to unsatisfied charges, can be balanced by the exchange of cations [17, 48]. Figure 7 depicts a schematic representation of the proposed adsorption mechanisms between Pb, Cd, and bentonite clay. Our results align with earlier studies in aqueous solution [7, 13, 16], indicating the adsorption ability of bentonite clay to Pb and Cd ions.

Table 4.

The adsorption of Pb and Cd from contaminated milk samples by bentonite clay, date pit, and Chitosan nanoparticles (Cs-NP) (N 20)

Element No adsorbents After adsorbents
Control Bentonite clay Date pit Cs-NP
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Removal % Mean ± SD Removal % Mean ± SD Removal %
Pb (mg/kg) 0.363 ± 0.12 0.059 ± 0.04 84% 0.012 ± 0.01 97% 0.065 ± 0.06 82%
Cd (mg/kg) 0.065 ± 0.03 0.008 ± 0.007 88% 0.005 ± 0.003 93% 0.001 ± 0.001 98%

Data are expressed as (mean ± SD)

The percentage of Pb and Cd removal was determined compared to controls with no adsorbing agent SD standard deviation

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Proposed adsorption mechanisms between (Pb and Cd) and bentonite clay (a), date pit (b), and chitosan nanoparticles (c)

Date pit (Table 4) showed a trend toward removal of Pb and Cd (97 and 93%) with average (0.012 ± 0.1 and 0.005 ± 0.003 mg/kg), respectively. Promisingly, the adsorption studies showed a high potential of date pit for Pb and Cd reduction from milk, where 97 and 93% removal were achieved. The date pits are deemed a waste of zero economic value with possible disposable problems and constitute around 15% of the date fruit weight [24]. It is worth mentioning that the date pit consists primarily of three main components: cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin [49]. The chemical structure of these components is shown in Fig. 6. Many oxygen functional groups found in lignocellulosic content, including cellulose and phenolic compounds, contribute to the high removal efficiency of date pits, as confirmed in FTIR spectrum (Fig. 1) [44]. Two probable mechanisms of date pit adsorption were described by Al-Ghouti et al. [20], where the first was attaching cellulose and hemicellulose units to lignin units using 2 OH-groups in which lignin binds between and inside both cellulose and hemicellulose units serving as a cementing matrix. In addition, it is suggested that the other adsorption mechanisms can be related to the forces of dispersion, complexation, hydrogen bonding, or electrostatic interactions.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

The chemical structure of (a) cellulose, (b) hemicellulose, and (c) lignin (the major components of date pit)

Similarly, Hassan et al. [47] proved that the reactions on the roasted date pit surface correlated with the nuclei of the aromatic rings, which were linked to the roasted date pit’s functional groups, like – OH and – COOH. The proposed mechanism of date pit adsorption is demonstrated in Fig. 7. Notably, there is a paucity of data as well as studies on the utilization of date pits as heavy metal adsorbents from milk. Most research has focused on its potential application as an adsorbent for heavy metals in water. These findings in Table 4 are in harmony with those achieved by Mohamed et al. and Samra et al. [19, 27].

Cs-NP also showed a substantial reduction of Pb and Cd (82 and 98%) with an average of 0.065 ± 0.06 and 0.001 ± 0.001 mg/kg compared to the Pb- and Cd-untreated control samples which have a mean value of 0.363 ± 0.12 and 0.065 ± 0.03 mg/kg, respectively. Furthermore, as depicted in Table 4, Cs-NP, obtained from the amino-functionalized polysaccharide chitosan extracted from the waste shells of crustaceans to improve the surface area for adsorption [50], displayed a remarkable capture of Pb and Cd (82% and 98%). The high adsorption potential of Cs-NP can be elucidated by the sturdy electrostatic binding of its functional groups with metal ions (various carboxylic and hydroxyl), as shown in FTIR (Fig. 1). In addition, this electrostatic interaction between the lone pair of amine functionality (NH2) nitrogen atom electrons of chitosan with bivalent (II) Pb or Cd [23]. Alyasi et al. clarified the several adsorptions’ mechanisms with two key techniques of complexation bonding: a complex with one functional amine group and the second type of complexing with two groups of amines and hydroxyls [50]. In this regard, a representative diagram of the adsorption mechanism is shown in Fig. 7. Our findings are congruent with those previous reports [23, 28], which revealed that Cs-NP is a powerful, safe, and reliable substance used as efficient heavy metals adsorbents from an aqueous solution.

Chemical Analysis of Milk Composition

The significant aspect of this research is that the date pit and Cs-NP showed no affinity for milk fat, protein, or lactose, and the nutritional properties of the milk remained unaffected, as demonstrated in Fig. 8. Nevertheless, adsorption treatment with bentonite clay slightly reduces protein content in milk dispersion from 3.42 to 2.81% on a regular basis while maintaining fat and lactose levels. This decrease might be due to milk protein sequestration by bentonite clay, which is encouraged at low pH, as proteins are easily protonated and adsorbed, or it could be connected to the electronegative structure and the functional groups, as demonstrated by FTIR, XRD, SEM, EDX, and TEM studies. Unlike milk proteins, milk fat adsorption is not of concern. Furthermore, milk’s lactose content did not significantly fluctuate after adding bentonite clay [15].

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Chemical analysis of the milk composition. The data are represented as (mean ± SD). There were no substantial changes in the chemical parameters of milk, including fat, protein, and lactose, after the milk remediation with bentonite clay, date pit, and chitosan nanoparticles (Cs-NP), except for the slight decrease in protein in the case of bentonite clay

The current study’s findings indicate that bentonite clay, date pit, and chitosan nanoparticles are promising adsorbents for heavy metal removal in milk. Their efficacy in removing heavy metals has been established earlier, particularly in water, with little emphasis on milk [7, 16, 23, 24, 45, 50]. The most significant part of our findings is that we are the first to offer new potential in milk purification by utilizing an efficient, simple, and low-cost heavy metal treatment alternative without any chemical alteration to the tested sorbents or modifying the nutritional profile of the product or the availability of its nutritional component. Consequently, the proposed work adds to our understanding of food safety issues by providing a good reference for heavy metal removal from milk products.

Conclusion

This research was initially conducted to analyze Pb and Cd content in raw and pasteurized cow’s milk through flame atomic adsorption analysis. Based on the previous findings, we concluded that the Pb and Cd concentrations in most milk samples collected exceed the allowable limits of EOS and Codex Alimentarius Commission. These values mean that the inhabitants of the province of EL-Qalyubia are vulnerable to a potential health risk associated with milk intake. Furthermore, this research aimed to establish a model for evaluating several adsorbents’ efficacy in removing toxic Pb and Cd from milk. The research suggests new effective adsorbents (bentonite clay, date pit, and chitosan nanoparticles) of Pb and Cd from milk dependent on their structures and functional groups, as demonstrated by FTIR, XRD, SEM, EDX, and TEM analysis, as well as the nutritional composition of milk in terms of fat, protein, and lactose, have been preserved using such adsorbents.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Veterinary Forensic Medicine and Toxicology Department, Benha University, Egypt, for providing the facilities required to perform this study.

Abbreviations

AAS

Atomic absorption spectrophotometer

Cd

Cadmium

Cs-NP

Chitosan nanoparticles

Cs

Chitosan

EDX

Energy-dispersive X-ray

EOS

Egyptian Organization for Standardization and Quality

FTIR

Fourier transform infrared

Pb

Lead

SEM

Scanning electron microscope

TEM

Transmission electron microscope

XRD

X-ray diffraction

Author Contribution

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Amany Abdelnaby, Nabila M. Abdelaleem, Elham Elshewy, Ayman H. Mansour, and Samar S. Ibrahim performed material preparation, data collection, and analysis. Amany Abdelnaby wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Data Availability

The generated and analyzed datasets during the study are available per request from the corresponding author.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Ismail A, Riaz M, Akhtar S, et al. Heavy metals in milk: global prevalence and health risk assessment. Toxin Rev. 2017;38:1–12. doi: 10.1080/15569543.2017.1399276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Najarnezhad V, Jalilzadeh-Amin G, Anassori E, Zeinali V. Lead and cadmium in raw buffalo, cow and ewe milk from west Azerbaijan, Iran. Food Addit Contam Part B Surveill. 2015;8:123–127. doi: 10.1080/19393210.2015.1007396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pilarczyk R, Wójcik J, Czerniak P, et al. Concentrations of toxic heavy metals and trace elements in raw milk of Simmental and Holstein-Friesian cows from organic farm. Environ Monit Assess. 2013;185:8383–8392. doi: 10.1007/s10661-013-3180-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Meshref AMS, Moselhy WA, Hassan NEHY. Heavy metals and trace elements levels in milk and milk products. J Food Meas Charact. 2014;8:381–388. doi: 10.1007/s11694-014-9203-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Malhat F, Hagag M, Saber A, Fayz AE. Contamination of cows milk by heavy metal in Egypt. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012;88:611–613. doi: 10.1007/s00128-012-0550-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Neal AP, Guilarte TR. Mechanisms of lead and manganese neurotoxicity. Toxicol Res. 2013;2:99–114. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang M, Bera G, Mitra K, et al. Tight sorption of arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead by edible activated carbon and acid-processed montmorillonite clay. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28:6758–6770. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10973-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sobhanardakani S. Human health risk assessment of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn through consumption of raw and pasteurized cow’s milk. Iran J Public Health. 2018;47:1172–1180. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rani A, Kumar A, Lal A, Pant M. Cellular mechanisms of cadmium- induced toxicity : a review. Int J Environ Health Res. 2014;24:378–399. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2013.835032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.El-Bassiony TA, Wallaa FA, Ebtsam OA. Impact of heavy metal contamination on milk and underground water of the New Valley. Egypt IOSR J Environ Sci Toxicol Food Technol. 2016;10:23–29. doi: 10.9790/2402-1008012329. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Er C, Senkal BF, Yaman M. Determination of lead in milk and yoghurt samples by solid phase extraction using a novel aminothioazole-polymeric resin. Food Chem. 2013;137:55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Arroyo VS, Flores KM, Ortiz LB, et al. Liver and cadmium toxicity. J Drug Metab Toxicol. 2012;S5001(03):1–7. doi: 10.4172/2157-7609.S5-001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lukman S, Essa MH, Mu’azu ND, et al. Adsorption and desorption of heavy metals onto natural clay material: influence of initial pH. J Environ Sci Technol. 2013;6:1–15. doi: 10.3923/jest.2013.1.15. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Azimi S, Es’haghi Z, A magnetized nanoparticle based solid-phase extraction procedure followed by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry to determine arsenic, lead and cadmium in water, milk, indian rice and red tea. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2017;98:830–836. doi: 10.1007/s00128-017-2068-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Carraro A, De Giacomo A, Giannossi ML, et al. Clay minerals as adsorbents of aflatoxin M1 from contaminated milk and effects on milk quality. Appl Clay Sci. 2014;88–89:92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2013.11.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Burham N, Sayed M. Adsorption behavior of Cd2+ and Zn2+ onto natural Egyptian bentonitic clay. Minerals. 2016;6:1–15. doi: 10.3390/min6040129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Baylan N, Meriçboyu AE. Adsorption of lead and copper on bentonite and grapeseed activated carbon in single- and binary-ion systems. Sep Sci Technol. 2016;51:2360–2368. doi: 10.1080/01496395.2016.1212888. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Aldawsari A, Khan MA, Hameed BH, et al. Mercerized mesoporous date pit activated carbon - a novel adsorbent to sequester potentially toxic divalent heavy metals from water. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:1–17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mohamed AAJ, Vuai LA, Kombo M, Chukwuma OJ. Removal of selected metal ions using powder of seeds of Ajwaa dates from aqueous solution. J Anal Pharm Res. 2019;8:228–232. doi: 10.15406/japlr.2019.08.00343. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Al-Ghouti MA, Li J, Salamh Y, et al. Adsorption mechanisms of removing heavy metals and dyes from aqueous solution using date pits solid adsorbent. J Hazard Mater. 2010;176:510–520. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Syamdidi S, Sidauruk H, Munandar A, Haryati S. The production of nanoparticles chitosan from crustaceans shell using the top-down method. E3S Web Conf. 2020;147:1–7. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202014703025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yang J, Hou B, Wang J, et al. Nanomaterials for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Nanomaterials. 2019;9:1–39. doi: 10.3390/nano9030424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Maity J, Ray SK. Chitosan based nano composite adsorbent—synthesis, characterization and application for adsorption of binary mixtures of Pb(II) and Cd(II) from water. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;182:159–171. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Al-Ghouti MA, Da’ana D, Abu-Dieyeh M, Khraisheh M. Adsorptive removal of mercury from water by adsorbents derived from date pits. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51594-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ahmad I, Zaman A, Samad N, et al. Atomic absorption spectrophotometery detection of heavy metals in milk of camel, cattle, buffalo and goat from various areas of Khyber- Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Pakistan. J Anal Bioanal Tech. 2017;8:1–6. doi: 10.4172/2155-9872.1000367. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.AOAC (2002) AOAC Official Method 999.11 determination of lead, cadmium, copper, iron, and zinc in foods. J AOAC Int
  • 27.Samra SE, Jeragh B, El-nokrashy AM, El-asmy AA. Biosorption of Pb 2 + from natural water using date pits : a green chemistry approach. Mod Chem Appl. 2014;2:1–8. doi: 10.4172/2329-6798.10001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ali MEA, Aboelfadl MMS, Selim AM, et al. Chitosan nanoparticles extracted from shrimp shells, application for removal of Fe(II) and Mn(II) from aqueous phases. Sep Sci Technol. 2018;53:2870–2881. doi: 10.1080/01496395.2018.1489845. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hasanin MT, Elfeky SA, Mohamed MB, Amin RM. Production of well-dispersed aqueous cross-linked chitosan-based nanomaterials as alternative antimicrobial approach. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater. 2018;28:1502–1510. doi: 10.1007/s10904-018-0855-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rezaei M, Akbari Dastjerdi H, Jafari H, et al. Assessment of dairy products consumed on the Arakmarket as determined by heavy metal residues. Health (Irvine Calif) 2014;6:323–327. doi: 10.4236/health.2014.65047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Codex Alimentarius Commission (2011) Joint FAO/WHO food standards programme, Codex Alimentarius commission. Report of the fifth session of the Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods. Hague, Netherlands
  • 32.Egyptian standards (2007) Maximum levels for heavy metals in food. ES:2360–1/2007. Egypt Organ Stand Qual
  • 33.Ismail A, Riaz M, Akhtar S, et al. Estimated daily intake and health risk of heavy metals by consumption of milk. Food Addit Contam Part B Surveill. 2015;8:260–265. doi: 10.1080/19393210.2015.1081989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Codex Alimentarius Commission (2014) Joint FAO/WHO food standards programme, Codex Alimentarius commission. Report of the eighth session of the codex committee on contaminants in foods. Hague, Netherlands
  • 35.El-Sayed EM, Hamed AM, Badran SM, Mostafa AA. A survey of selected essential and heavy metals in milk from different regions of Egypt using ICP-AES. Food Addit Contam Part B Surveill. 2011;4:294–298. doi: 10.1080/19393210.2011.639093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Abo El-Makarem HS, Amer AA, Abdel Naby HA. Prevalence of some dangerous heavy metal residues and aflatoxins in milk and some dairy products. Alexandria J Vet Sci. 2019;62:158–165. doi: 10.5455/ajvs.43520. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Marouf R, Dali N, Boudouara N, et al. Study of adsorption properties of bentonite clay. INTECH. 2021 doi: 10.5772/intechopen.96524. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wakkel M, Khiari B, Zagrouba F. Basic red 2 and methyl violet adsorption by date pits: adsorbent characterization, optimization by RSM and CCD, equilibrium and kinetic studies. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26:18942–18960. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2192-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vaezifar S, Razavi S, Golozar MA, et al. Effects of some parameters on particle size distribution of chitosan nanoparticles prepared by ionic gelation method. J Clust Sci. 2013;24:891–903. doi: 10.1007/s10876-013-0583-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Anand M, Sathyapriya P, Maruthupandy M, Hameedha Beevi A. Synthesis of chitosan nanoparticles by TPP and their potential mosquito larvicidal application. Front Lab Med. 2018;2:72–78. doi: 10.1016/j.flm.2018.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Durowaye SI, Sekunowo OI, Lawal AI, Ojo OE. Development and characterisation of iron millscale particle reinforced ceramic matrix composite. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2017;11:634–644. doi: 10.1016/j.jtusci.2016.08.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Krishnamoorthy R, Govindan B, Banat F, et al. Date pits activated carbon for divalent lead ions removal. J Biosci Bioeng. 2019;128:88–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2018.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vijayalakshmi K, Devi BM, Sudha PN, et al. Synthesis, characterization and applications of nanochitosan/sodium alginate/microcrystalline cellulose film. J Nanomedicine Nanotechnol. 2016;7:419. doi: 10.4172/2157-7439.1000419. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Elkhaleefa A, Ali IH, Brima EI, et al. Efficient removal of Ni(II) from aqueous solution by date seeds powder biosorbent: adsorption kinetics, isotherm and thermodynamics. Processes. 2020;8:1001. doi: 10.3390/pr8081001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Al-Saad K, El-Azazy M, Issa AA, et al. Recycling of date pits into a green adsorbent for removal of heavy metals: a fractional factorial design-based approach. Front Chem. 2019;7:1–16. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vajglová Z, Kumar N, Peurla M, et al. Synthesis and physicochemical characterization of beta zeolite-bentonite composite materials for shaped catalysts. Catal Sci Technol. 2018;8:6150–6162. doi: 10.1039/c8cy01951g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hassan SS, Al-Ghouti MA, Abu-Dieyeh M, McKay G. Novel bioadsorbents based on date pits for organophosphorus pesticide remediation from water. J Environ Chem Eng. 2020;8:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103593. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Deng Y, Velázquez ALB, Billes F, Dixon JB. Bonding mechanisms between aflatoxin B1 and smectite. Appl Clay Sci. 2010;50:92–98. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2010.07.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Reddy KSK, Al Shoaibi A, Srinivasakannan C. Preparation of porous carbon from date palm seeds and process optimization. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2015;12:959–966. doi: 10.1007/s13762-013-0468-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Alyasi H, Mackey HR, McKay G. Removal of cadmium from waters by adsorption using nanochitosan. Energy Environ. 2020;31:517–534. doi: 10.1177/0958305X19876191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The generated and analyzed datasets during the study are available per request from the corresponding author.


Articles from Biological Trace Element Research are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES