Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Internet Research logoLink to Journal of Medical Internet Research
. 2023 Mar 2;25:e44741. doi: 10.2196/44741

Chronic Diseases and Sociodemographic Characteristics Associated With Online Health Information Seeking and Using Social Networking Sites: Nationally Representative Cross-sectional Survey in Japan

Seigo Mitsutake 1,✉,#, Yoshimitsu Takahashi 2, Aki Otsuki 3,4, Jun Umezawa 5, Akiko Yaguchi-Saito 3,6, Junko Saito 3, Maiko Fujimori 3,7, Taichi Shimazu 3,#; INFORM Study Group8
Editor: Gunther Eysenbach
Reviewed by: Yen-Yuan Chen, Iskra Mircheva
PMCID: PMC10020913  PMID: 36862482

Abstract

Background

In an aging society, worsening chronic diseases increase the burden on patients and the health care system. Using online health information including health information via social networking sites (SNSs), such as Facebook and YouTube, may play an important role in the self-management of chronic diseases and health promotion for internet users.

Objective

This study aims to improve strategies for promoting access to reliable information for the self-management of chronic diseases via the internet, and to identify populations facing barriers to using the internet for health, we examined chronic diseases and characteristics associated with online health information seeking and the use of SNSs.

Methods

This study used data from the INFORM Study 2020, which was a nationally representative cross-sectional postal mail survey conducted using a self-administered questionnaire in 2020. The dependent variables were online health information seeking and SNS use. Online health information seeking was assessed using 1 question about whether respondents used the internet to find health or medical information. SNS use was assessed by inquiring about the following 4 aspects: visiting SNSs, sharing health information on SNSs, writing in an online diary or blog, and watching a health-related video on YouTube. The independent variables were 8 chronic diseases. Other independent variables were sex, age, education status, work, marital status, household income, health literacy, and self-reported health status. We conducted a multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for all independent variables to examine the associations of chronic diseases and other variables with online health information seeking and SNS use.

Results

The final sample for analysis comprised 2481 internet users. Hypertension or high blood pressure, chronic lung diseases, depression or anxiety disorder, and cancer were reported by 24.5%, 10.1%, 7.7%, and 7.2% of respondents, respectively. The odds ratio of online health information seeking among respondents with cancer was 2.19 (95% CI 1.47-3.27) compared with that among those without cancer, and the odds ratio among those with depression or anxiety disorder was 2.27 (95% CI 1.46-3.53) compared with that among those without. Further, the odds ratio for watching a health-related YouTube video among those with chronic lung diseases was 1.42 (95% CI 1.05-1.93) compared with that among those without these diseases. Women, younger age, higher level of education, and high health literacy were positively associated with online health information seeking and SNS use.

Conclusions

For patients with cancer, strategies for promoting access to websites with reliable cancer-related information as well as access among patients with chronic lung diseases to YouTube videos providing reliable information may be beneficial for the management of these diseases. Moreover, it is important to improve the online environment to encourage men, older adults, internet users with lower education levels, and those with low health literacy to access online health information.

Keywords: chronic diseases; cross-sectional study; eHealth literacy, health communication; internet, social networking

Introduction

As the global population ages, the development of strategies for improving health is becoming increasingly critical. Chronic diseases become more prevalent with aging, causing an increasing burden on patients and the health care system [1,2]. In Japan, a previous study reported that over 90% of adults aged 75 or older have 1 chronic disease, and, of those, approximately 80% have multiple chronic diseases [1]. It is thus important to optimize health care strategies to support people with chronic diseases.

The internet has become widely used as a tool for improving individuals’ health-related knowledge and behavior. National surveys in the United States and Japan reported that over 80% of the general population had used the internet [3,4]. Recently, internet use has increased among older adults in developed countries [4,5]. In a previous study, approximately 80% of patients with chronic diseases reported having searched for health information using the internet [6]. Recent reviews reported that health information seeking on the internet can improve physician-patient relationships [7,8]. The internet has therefore become an important information tool for health promotion, and is widely used in health care settings. More recent development of internet-based applications has provided methods for interactive health-related communication using social networking sites (SNSs) such as Facebook and Twitter. SNSs are widely used and varied, and provide opportunities for health-related communication to support individuals with chronic diseases [4,9,10]. Identifying chronic diseases associated with health information seeking and the use of SNSs may help to improve the strategies used to promote access to reliable information for self-management of chronic diseases via the internet. However, only few studies have examined the associations between different chronic diseases and online health information seeking and SNS use.

Several prior studies have examined the characteristics associated with online health information seeking and SNS use [10-14]. Two studies reported that individuals who seek health information on the internet were more likely to be younger, women, non-Hispanic white, and to have higher socioeconomic status [11,12]. Furthermore, younger adults were reported to be more likely to use SNSs for health communication [10], while younger adults and those with higher levels of education were found to be more likely to watch health-related videos on YouTube [13]. Although these prior studies were conducted in the United States, few studies have also examined the associations of sociodemographic factors with online health information seeking and SNS use in Asian populations. It is thus important to identify the characteristics associated with online health information seeking and various aspects of SNS use to identify target populations that need assistance in seeking health information via the internet and SNSs.

In this study, we identified chronic diseases associated with online health information seeking and the use of SNSs to improve strategies for promoting access to reliable information for the self-management of chronic diseases via the internet. In addition, to identify populations facing barriers to using the internet for health purposes, we examined characteristics associated with online health information seeking and the use of SNSs.

Methods

Study Design and Participants

We conducted a nationally representative cross-sectional postal mail survey using a self-administered questionnaire (INFORM Study 2020). Questionnaire items were initially selected from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) [15]. The INFORM Study 2020 was designed to monitor information relevant to cancer (eg, cancer awareness, knowledge, attitudes) nationally, and to identify the populations most in need of cancer-related information. The sampling method of the INFORM Study 2020 was based on the census conducted by the Japanese government. A total of 10,000 Japanese individuals were sampled using a 2-stage stratified random sampling method, with census area as the primary sampling unit and individuals aged 20 years or older as the secondary sampling unit. From 35 strata crossing 9 regions and 4 municipality groups by population size, we randomly selected 500 census areas with a probability that was proportional to the size of the stratum. We set the total sample size at 10,000 to retain the margin of error of the recommended value (0.05) from the World Health Organization (WHO) sample size calculator using a 35% response rate to the questionnaire, on the basis of the HINTS [16,17]. A more detailed description of this sampling method was reported in a prior study [18].

We mailed the invitation letter and the questionnaire to 10,000 individuals. Of these, 281 were undelivered. Data collection for the INFORM Study 2020 began on August 1, 2020, and concluded on September 30, 2020. We excluded participants that did not use the internet, as assessed by question “Do you ever go online to access the internet or World Wide Web, or to send and receive email?” in the INFORM Study 2020 questionnaire, because our analysis focused only on participants who had used the internet [18]. Participants who had even 1 missing data point, or provided no answers in relation to the dependent variables or independent variables without the income variable, were also excluded.

Ethics Approval

The INFORM Study 2020 protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the National Cancer Center (research project number 2019-290) and the Ethics Committee of the Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology (research project number: 2020-32). We considered the participants who selected the item “Agree to participate” in the introductory statement of the questionnaire as consenting to participate in the study.

Measures

Online Health Information Seeking and SNS Use

The dependent variables were online health information seeking and SNS use. Online health information seeking was assessed by the following question in the INFORM questionnaire: “In the past 12 months, have you used the internet to look for health or medical information for yourself?” Participants answered either “yes” or “no.”

SNS use was assessed using 4 subquestions after the following context was provided: “Sometimes people use the internet to connect with other people online through social networks like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LINE. This is often called social media.” The 4 subquestions were as follows: “In the last 12 months, have you used the internet for any of the following reasons?: (1) to visit an SNS, such as Facebook; (2) to share health information on SNS, such as Facebook or Twitter; (3) to write in an online diary or blog (ie, web log); and (4) to watch a health-related video on YouTube. The participants answered either “yes” or “no,” and participants who answered “yes” were categorized as using SNSs in each of the 4 questions. We did not use the data for 1 subquestion of “to participate in an online forum or support group for people with a similar health or medical issue” because very few participants answered “yes” to conduct multivariable analyses (n=33).

Chronic Diseases

The independent variables of 8 chronic diseases were assessed using the question of “Have you ever been diagnosed as having cancer?” and 7 subquestions of “Has a doctor ever told you had any of the following medical conditions?” The 7 subquestions asked about the following conditions: (1) diabetes or high blood sugar; (2) hypertension or high blood pressure; (3) heart diseases such as heart attack, angina, or congestive heart failure; (4) cerebrovascular diseases including stroke; (5) chronic lung diseases such as asthma, emphysema, or chronic bronchitis; (6) arthritis or rheumatism; (7) depression or anxiety disorder. The participants answered either “yes” or “no.”

Sociodemographic Variables and Other Variables

We included sex, age, education status, work, marital status, household income, health literacy, and self-reported health status as the sociodemographic variables and other variables in our analyses. Education status was divided into 3 categories (≤high school graduate, career college and junior college, and ≥college graduate). Regarding work status, participants who answered that they had a job were categorized as “yes,” and participants who answered “none” or “students” were categorized as “no.” Regarding marital status, participants who answered “married” were categorized as “married,” and participants who answered “never married,” “widowed,” or “divorced” were categorized as “not married.” Furthermore, participants were sorted into 6 categories according to annual household income (“<2 million yen,” “2 to <4 million yen,” “4 to <6 million yen,” “6 to <8 million yen,” “8 to <10 million yen,” and “≥10 million yen”; US $1=JPY 105.9) [19]. We measured health literacy using a tool that included 5 questions to assess communicative and critical health literacy [20]. Participants answered using a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) for whether they could do the following: (1) obtain health-related information from various sources; (2) extract the required information; (3) understand and communicate the information obtained; (4) assess the reliability of the information; and (5) make decisions based on the information, specifically in the context of health-related issues. The scores for the 5 questions were summed and divided into 4 categories using quartile of the scores (5-15, 16-18, 19-20, and ≥21). Furthermore, participants reported their subjective health status as “excellent,” ”very good,” “good,” ”fair,” or “poor”: they were then classified as either “excellent-good” or “fair-poor.”

Statistical Analysis

First, the chi-square test was used to compare the proportion of online health information seeking and SNS use among patients with various characteristics. We then examined the associations of chronic diseases and other variables with online health information seeking and SNS use using a multivariable logistic regression model that was adjusted for all variables (sex, age, education status, work, marital status, household income, health literacy, self-reported health status, and 8 chronic diseases). Given the results of the national survey, we weighted data by multiplying the reciprocal of the probability of selecting the participants for the survey by the reciprocal of the probability of nonresponse with reference to the HINTS methodology [21]. The probability of nonresponse was estimated based on strata, sex, and age information according to our survey sampling method, which differs from the HINTS. We conducted a weighted analysis to account for the complex sampling design and missing responses to calculate accurate population parameter estimates and 95% CIs for the Japanese general population using the Taylor series linearization method [22]. All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 28.0 (IBM Corp).

Results

Study Participant Selection

Figure 1 shows the participant selection process. A total of 3605/9719 responses were obtained (response rate=37.1%). We excluded 803 respondents who had never used the internet, and included 2802 respondents who had used the internet (77.72%). In addition, we excluded 321 respondents with missing data. The final sample for analysis comprised 2481 participants.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow chart of patient selection in the INFORM Study 2020.

Characteristics of Study Participants

Table 1 summarizes the weighted sample characteristics of internet users. Approximately 51.6% of internet users were men, and 24.1% were 40-49 years old. Approximately 24.5% of internet users had high blood pressure or hypertension, 10.1% had chronic lung diseases, 7.7% had depression or anxiety disorder, and 7.2% had cancer. In addition, approximately 72.9% of internet users had sought health information and 64.1% of internet users had used SNSs. Regarding SNS use, 55.3% of internet users had visited an SNS, 12.9% had shared health information on an SNS, 26.6% had watched a health-related video on YouTube, and 6.6% had written in an online diary or blog.

Table 1.

Weighted sample of internet users (n=2481).

Characteristics Weighted percentagea
Sex

Men 51.6
Women 48.4
Age groups (years)

20-29 14.3
30-39 17.3
40-49 24.1
50-59 19.4
60-69 14.4
≥70 10.5
Education status

≤High school graduate 37.5
Career college/junior college 24.3
≥College graduate 38.2
Work

No 25.8
Yes 74.2
Marital status

Not married 32.3

Married 67.7
Household income (million yenb)

<2 5.6

2 to <4 21.6

4 to <6 23.8

6 to <8 19.5

8 to <10 12.4

≥10 14.9

No answer 2.1
Health literacy

5-15 19.6

16-18 30.7

19-20 34.6

≥21 15.1
Self-reported health status

Excellent, very-good, good 79.9
Fair-poor 20.1
Chronic diseasesc

Cancer 7.2

Diabetes or high blood sugar 6.9

Hypertension or high blood pressure 24.5

Heart diseases 3.9

Cerebrovascular diseases including stroke 1.0

Chronic lung diseases 10.1

Arthritis or rheumatism 3.8

Depression or anxiety disorder 7.7
Dependent variablesc

Online health information seeking 72.9
SNSsd usec

Visiting SNSs 55.3

Sharing health information on SNSs 12.9

Watching a health-related video on YouTube 26.6

Writing in an online diary or blog 6.6

aResults were weighted to be representative of the population of internet users in Japan.

bUS $1=JPY 105.9.

cIncludes only those who answered “yes.”

dSNS: social networking site.

Comparisons of Chronic Diseases and Other Variables and Online Health Information Seeking and SNS Use

Table 2 presents the comparisons of characteristics of online health information seeking among internet users. A higher proportion of internet users with depression or anxiety disorder sought health information on the internet compared with those without these diseases. Higher proportions of women than men, those who were employed compared with those who were unemployed, and those who experienced worse health status were more likely to seek health information on the internet. In addition, internet users who were 30-39 years old, those with the highest level of education, those with the highest household income, and those with the highest health literacy level exhibited the highest proportions of online health information seeking.

Table 2.

Comparisons of characteristics of online health information seeking.

Characteristics Weighted percentagea P valueb
Chronic conditions

Cancer


No 72.4 .05


Yes 79.1


Diabetes or high blood sugar


No 73.1 .43


Yes 70.4


Hypertension or high blood pressure


No 73.6 .15


Yes 70.6


Heart diseases


No 72.8 .70


Yes 74.5


Cerebrovascular diseases including stroke


No 59.3 .18


Yes 72.9


Chronic lung diseases


No 72.4 .13


Yes 77.0


Arthritis or rheumatism


No 72.7 .37


Yes 77.0


Depression or anxiety disorder


No 71.8 <.001


Yes 86.5

Sociodemographic variables and other variables

Sex


Men 69.9 .001


Women 76.2


Age groups (years)


20-29 75.9 <.001
30-39 77.9

40-49 75.3

50-59 72.9

60-69 70.6

≥70 58.2


Education status


≤High school graduate 66.7 <.001
Career college/junior college 75.6

≥College graduate 77.3


Work


No 68.1 .003
Yes 74.6


Marital status


Not married 71.8 .45


Married 73.4


Household income (million yenc)


<2 69.3 <.001


2 to <4 66.6



4 to <6 74.6



6 to <8 76.3



8 to <10 73.9



≥10 77.9



No answer 56.3


Health literacy


5-15 61.5 <.001


16-18 73.3



19-20 74.7



≥21 82.8


Self-reported health status


Excellent, very-good, good 71.7 .008
Fair-poor 77.7

aResults were weighted to be representative of the population of internet users in Japan.

bChi-square test.

cUS $1=JPY 105.9.

Table 3 shows the comparisons of the characteristics of SNS users. A higher proportion of internet users without cancer reported visiting an SNS compared with those with cancer. A higher proportion of internet users with chronic lung diseases reported watching a health-related video on YouTube compared with those without chronic lung diseases. A higher proportion of internet users with depression or anxiety disorder reported using all domains of SNS compared with those without these diseases. Moreover, women, younger adults, and those with the highest level of education exhibited the highest proportions of visiting an SNS and writing in an online diary or blog. Internet users that were employed were more likely to visit an SNS and share health information on an SNS. Higher proportions of those who were married compared with those who were not married, and those who had the highest level of health literacy compared with those with the lowest level of health literacy used all domains of SNS. In addition, higher proportions of those with the highest household income and those who experienced worse health status visited an SNS.

Table 3.

Comparisons of characteristics of SNSa use.

Characteristics Visiting an SNS Sharing health information on SNSs Watching a health-related video on YouTube Writing in an online diary or blog
%b P valuec %b P valuec %b P valuec %b P valuec
Chronic conditions

Cancer


No 56.9 <.001 13.2 .12 27.0 .16 6.8 .08


Yes 35.1
9.0
22.2
3.5

Diabetes or high blood sugar


No 56.7 <.001 13.1 .24 27.2 .03 6.7 .51

Yes 35.8
9.7
19.3
5.3

Hypertension or high blood pressure


No 60.8 <.001 14.3 <.001 27.7 .03 7.4 .005

Yes 38.2
8.5
23.2
4.0

Heart diseases


No 56.1 <.001 13.1 .07 26.9 .15 6.6 .55

Yes 34.9
6.8
20.4
5.1

Cerebrovascular diseases including stroke


No 46.9 .42 11.3 .81 23.2 .69 3.2 .44


Yes 55.3
12.9
26.6
6.6

Chronic lung diseases


No 55.5 .57 12.6 .23 25.9 .02 6.4 .38

Yes 53.5
15.4
32.9
7.9

Arthritis or rheumatism


No 55.9 .001 12.9 .88 26.6 .77 6.4 .03

Yes 38.2
12.3
27.9
11.9

Depression or anxiety disorder


No 54.3 .002 12.2 .001 26.1 .03 6.2 .01

Yes 67.0
20.8
33.3
11.3
Sociodemographic and other variables

Sex


Men 52.8 .01 12.7 .79 25.1 .10 5.5 .03

Women 57.9
13.1
28.2
7.7

Age groups (years)


20-29 85.1 <.001 24.5 <.001 38.4 <.001 10.2 <.001

30-39 75.6
19.1
34.1
9.6

40-49 61.6
13.9
23.4
7.9

50-59 45.4
8.2
22.4
4.0

60-69 30.9
5.0
23.7
4.1

≥70 18.4
3.7
17.7
1.8

Education status


≤High school graduate 46.4 <.001 12.0 .48 25.7 .74 5.8 .04

Career college/junior college 57.3
12.6
27.5
5.3

≥College graduate 62.8
13.9
27.0
8.2

Work


No 45.5 <.001 10.1 .02 26.6 .99 6.3 .73

Yes 58.7
13.8
26.6
6.7

Marital status


Not married 62.2 <.001 16.8 <.001 30.1 .01 8.3 .02

Married 51.9
11.0
25.0
5.7

Household income (million yend)


<2 43.9 <.001 11.6 .27 27.0 .26 10.1 .31

2 to <4 44.2
9.9
24.9
5.6

4 to <6 55.2
13.7
29.2
6.6

6 to <8 59.7
13.7
27.4
7.8

8 to <10 60.2
12.7
29.4
5.9

≥10 64.6
14.6
22.2
5.1

No answer 64.8
19.7
22.2
9.7

Health literacy


5-15 48.5 <.001 10.9 <.001 24.2 .19 5.0 <.001

16-18 55.9
10.7
25.2
6.9

19-20 54.8
12.5
28.0
5.1

≥21 64.0
20.6
29.6
11.3

Self-reported health status


Excellent, very-good, good 57.6 <.001 13.3 .24 26.5 .76 6.9 .17

Fair-poor 46.0
11.3
27.2
5.1

aSNS: social networking site.

bResults were weighted to be representative of the adult population of internet users in Japan.

cChi-square test.

dUS $1=JPY 105.9.

Associations of Chronic Diseases and Characteristics With Online Health Information Seeking and SNS Use

Table 4 shows the associations of chronic diseases and characteristics with online health information seeking adjusted for all variables. The odds ratio of online health information seeking among those with cancer was 2.19 (95% CI 1.47-3.27) compared with that among those without cancer, and the odds ratio among those with depression or anxiety disorder was 2.27 (95% CI 1.46-3.53) compared with that among those without depression or anxiety disorder. In addition, compared with men, women were more likely to seek health information on the internet, as were adults aged 20-29 years compared with adults aged 40 years or older, college graduates compared with high school graduates or lower, those who were married compared with those who were not married, those with health literacy scores of 16 or higher compared with those with health literacy scores of 5-15, and those who experienced worse health status compared with those who experienced good health status.

Table 4.

Association of characteristics with online health information seeking.

Characteristics Online health information seeking, adjusted odds ratio (95% CIa)
Chronic conditions

Cancer


No Reference


Yes 2.19 (1.47-3.27)

Diabetes or high blood sugar


No Reference


Yes 1.07 (0.73-1.56)

Hypertension or high blood pressure


No Reference


Yes 1.10 (0.87-1.38)

Heart condition


No Reference


Yes 1.47 (0.92-2.35)

Cerebrovascular diseases including stroke


No Reference


Yes 0.53 (0.19-1.51)

Chronic lung disease


No Reference


Yes 1.20 (0.88-1.65)

Arthritis or rheumatism


No Reference


Yes 1.30 (0.78-2.17)

Depression or anxiety disorder


No Reference


Yes 2.27 (1.46-3.53)
Sociodemographic variables and other variables

Sex


Men Reference
Women 1.56 (1.25-1.94)

Age groups (years)


20-29 Reference
30-39 0.90 (0.59-1.37)
40-49 0.67 (0.46-0.98)
50-59 0.57 (0.38-0.85)
60-69 0.52 (0.35-0.78)
≥70 0.32 (0.20-0.50)

Education status


≤High school graduate Reference
Career college/junior college 1.24 (0.96-1.60)
≥College graduate 1.55 (1.23-1.95)

Work


No Reference
Yes 1.18 (0.91-1.53)

Marital status


Not married Reference


Married 1.27 (1.00-1.61)

Household income (million yenb)


<2 Reference


2 to <4 0.77 (0.47-1.25)


4 to <6 1.02 (0.62-1.67)


6 to <8 1.01 (0.60-1.70)


8 to <10 0.86 (0.50-1.48)


≥10 1.01 (0.59-1.74)


No answer 0.40 (0.19-0.86)

Health literacy


5-15 Reference


16-18 1.82 (1.38-2.41)


19-20 1.97 (1.52-2.57)


≥21 3.12 (2.17-4.50)

Self-reported health status


Excellent, very-good, good Reference
Fair-poor 1.63 (1.26-2.12)

aMultivariable logistic regression model adjusted for all variables.

bUS $1=JPY 105.9.

Table 5 shows the associations of chronic diseases and characteristics with SNS use adjusted for all variables. The odds ratio for watching a health-related video on YouTube among those with chronic lung diseases was 1.42 (95% CI 1.05-1.93) compared with that among those without chronic lung diseases. In addition, the odds ratios for visiting an SNS and sharing health information on an SNS among participants with depression or anxiety disorder were 1.49 (95% CI 1.04-2.15) and 1.67 (95% CI 1.13-2.46) compared with those among participants without depression or anxiety, respectively. Moreover, women and internet users with higher levels of education were more likely to visit an SNS and write in an online diary or blog. Younger adults and those with higher health literacy were more likely to use all domains of SNS. Participants whose annual income was over 10 million yen were more likely to visit an SNS than those whose annual income was lower than 2 million yen, and less likely to write in an online diary or blog.

Table 5.

Associations of characteristics and chronic diseases with SNSa use.

Characteristics Visiting an SNS, AORb (95% CI)c Sharing health information on SNSs, AOR (95% CI)c Watching a health-related video on YouTube, AOR (95% CI)c Writing in an online diary or blog, AOR (95% CI)c
Chronic conditions

Cancer


No Reference Reference Reference Reference

Yes 0.93 (0.64-1.34) 1.35 (0.76-2.42) 0.99 (0.67-1.46) 0.84 (0.35-2.02)

Diabetes or high blood sugar


No Reference Reference Reference Reference

Yes 1.02 (0.70-1.48) 1.31 (0.71-2.42) 0.78 (0.51-1.19) 1.32 (0.61-2.83)

High blood pressure or hypertension


No Reference Reference Reference Reference

Yes 0.83 (0.67-1.02) 1.01 (0.70-1.45) 1.06 (0.83-1.35) 0.89 (0.54-1.49)

Heart condition


No Reference Reference Reference Reference

Yes 0.98 (0.64-1.48) 0.66 (0.29-1.50) 0.80 (0.47-1.38) 0.99 (0.34-2.92)

Cerebrovascular diseases including stroke


No Reference Reference Reference Reference

Yes 1.81 (0.79-4.18) 1.36 (0.31-5.96) 0.97 (0.38-2.47) 0.53 (0.03-9.85)

Chronic lung disease


No Reference Reference Reference Reference

Yes 1.00 (0.72-1.38) 1.21 (0.80-1.82) 1.42 (1.05-1.93) 1.20 (0.69-2.07)

Arthritis or rheumatism


No Reference Reference Reference Reference

Yes 0.90 (0.55-1.46) 1.50 (0.72-3.13) 1.16 (0.72-1.85) 3.19 (1.53-6.64)

Depression or anxiety disorder


No Reference Reference Reference Reference

Yes 1.49 (1.04-2.15) 1.67 (1.13-2.46) 1.27 (0.90-1.78) 1.62 (0.98-2.68)
Sociodemographic variables and other variables

Sex


Men Reference Reference Reference Reference

Women 1.32 (1.07-1.63) 0.99 (0.75-1.32) 1.14 (0.92-1.41) 1.52 (1.07-2.17)

Age groups (years)


20-29 Reference Reference Reference Reference

30-39 0.51 (0.32–0.83) 0.81 (0.52–1.25) 0.83 (0.58–1.21) 1.09 (0.61–1.94)

40-49 0.25 (0.16-0.39) 0.52 (0.35-0.79) 0.48 (0.33-0.71) 0.92 (0.52-1.65)

50-59 0.13 (0.08-0.21) 0.27 (0.17-0.44) 0.46 (0.31-0.67) 0.45 (0.23-0.89)

60-69 0.08 (0.05-0.12) 0.17 (0.09-0.31) 0.48 (0.31-0.72) 0.42 (0.21-0.87)

≥70 0.05 (0.03-0.08) 0.13 (0.06-0.27) 0.32 (0.20-0.52) 0.17 (0.06-0.50)

Education status


≤High school graduate Reference Reference Reference Reference

Career college/junior college 1.15 (0.90-1.47) 0.92 (0.64-1.33) 1.02 (0.79-1.32) 0.77 (0.48-1.21)

≥College graduate 1.59 (1.24-2.02) 0.96 (0.69-1.33) 1.03 (0.80-1.33) 1.51 (1.00-2.29)

Work


No Reference Reference Reference Reference

Yes 0.98 (0.78-1.23) 1.13 (0.79-1.61) 0.91 (0.71-1.15) 0.92 (0.58-1.47)

Marital status


Not married Reference Reference Reference Reference

Married 1.10 (0.87-1.40) 0.89 (0.65-1.21) 1.00 (0.78-1.28) 0.89 (0.60-1.33)

Household income (million yend)


<2 Reference Reference Reference Reference

2 to <4 1.17 (0.78-1.77) 0.96 (0.50-1.83) 0.98 (0.61-1.55) 0.53 (0.24-1.18)

4 to <6 1.48 (0.97-2.26) 1.23 (0.63-2.41) 1.15 (0.73-1.83) 0.54 (0.24-1.19)

6 to <8 1.49 (0.97-2.27) 1.14 (0.58-2.26) 1.02 (0.63-1.66) 0.60 (0.26-1.35)

8 to <10 1.52 (0.95-2.43) 1.06 (0.53-2.13) 1.16 (0.68-1.98) 0.44 (0.18-1.08)

≥10 1.79 (1.12-2.86) 1.22 (0.60-2.48) 0.77 (0.46-1.31) 0.35 (0.15-0.83)

No answer 1.72 (0.81-3.63) 1.59 (0.58-4.41) 0.67 (0.31-1.48) 0.67 (0.21-2.14)

Health literacy


5-15 Reference Reference Reference Reference

16-18 1.50 (1.14-1.98) 1.05 (0.71-1.54) 1.14 (0.86-1.49) 1.52 (0.93-2.49)

19-20 1.64 (1.25-2.17) 1.41 (0.97-2.05) 1.38 (1.04-1.81) 1.17 (0.69-1.98)

≥21 1.99 (1.43-2.77) 2.31 (1.52-3.50) 1.41 (1.03-1.94) 2.52 (1.47-4.30)

Self-reported health status


Excellent, very-good, good Reference Reference Reference Reference

Fair-poor 0.88 (0.69-1.11) 0.97 (0.70-1.34) 1.17 (0.90-1.52) 0.70 (0.44-1.10)

aSNS: social networking site.

bAOR: adjusted odds ratio.

cMultivariable logistic regression model adjusted for all variables.

dUS $1=JPY 105.9.

Discussion

Principal Findings

This national representative cross-sectional survey identified chronic diseases and characteristics associated with online health information seeking and SNS use among Japanese internet users. Internet users with cancer and those with depression/anxiety disorder were more likely to seek health information on the internet than those without these diseases. Those with chronic lung diseases were more likely to watch a health-related video on YouTube than those without chronic lung diseases, and those with depression or anxiety disorder were more likely to visit an SNS and share health information on SNS than those without depression or anxiety disorder. In addition, women, younger age, higher education status, being married, having higher health literacy, and experiencing worse health status were predictive variables associated with online health information seeking. Moreover, women and higher education status were predictive of visiting an SNS and writing in an online diary or blog. Younger adults and those with higher health literacy were also more likely to use all domains of SNS.

Internet users with cancer were more likely to seek health information on the internet than those without cancer. This result is in accordance with the findings of a previous national cohort study in the United States [23]. Approximately 80% of internet users with cancer sought health information on the internet in this study, which was consistent with data from the HINTS [3]. Several studies reported that online health information seeking among patients with cancer has increased in recent years [24,25]. Access to appropriate information regarding cancer can contribute to improving anxiety and the quality of life (QOL) among patients with cancer [26,27]. Therefore, online health information seeking plays an increasingly important role in clinical settings, and in the behavior and QOL of patients with cancer. However, many websites contain unreliable and difficult to understand cancer information [28-31]. Misinformation can negatively affect health behavior and patient-physician relationships [7,32]. Therefore, an effective strategy may be for medical staff in hospitals to specify websites containing reliable cancer-related information to patients with cancer. Moreover, eHealth literacy, defined as the ability to seek, find, understand, and appraise health information on the internet to address or resolve a health problem, may be important for using health information on the internet effectively [33-35]. Therefore, it is important to improve the strategy for increasing eHealth literacy among internet users with cancer. Although a recent prior study reported effective eHealth literacy interventions for older adults using both text and pictures, such as illustrations and animation [36], only few studies have examined the effect of eHealth literacy interventions while adjusting for confounders such as education level. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the effect of eHealth literacy interventions while considering the influence of confounders.

In this study, compared with internet users without chronic lung diseases, the odds of watching a health-related video on YouTube among those with chronic lung diseases were 1.4 times higher. This study is the first to show that internet users with chronic lung diseases are more likely to watch a health-related video on YouTube. Education is important for people with chronic lung diseases because self-management skills such as problem solving, decision making, or resource utilization for patients with chronic lung diseases are associated with their QOL [37,38]. Several previous studies indicated that YouTube videos can be useful educational tools for asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [39,40]. The results of our study indicated that publishing the video content of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on YouTube may provide an effective education strategy for patients with chronic lung diseases. For example, the Japan Asthma Society has published several videos about how to use inhaled drug treatment on YouTube [41]. However, several prior studies indicated that YouTube contains a substantial amount of low-quality information about chronic lung disease [39,40]. Therefore, strategies to help patients with chronic lung diseases and low levels of eHealth literacy to access high-quality videos via YouTube, and to improve patients’ eHealth literacy, are important.

The results of this study indicated that internet users with depression or anxiety disorder were more likely to seek health information on the internet, and to visit and share health information on SNS compared with those without these diseases. These results are consistent with those of several studies showing a positive association between the prevalence of mental conditions and online health information seeking [42,43]. These associations may be affected by cyberchondria, which is defined as increased anxiety caused by excessive online health information seeking and has recently become a common problem [43]. However, a prior study showed a negative association between depression and online health information seeking among older women [25]. In particular, patients with severe depression are less likely to seek health information on the internet owing to a loss of interest [44]. Thus, only few individuals with severe depression would have participated in this study because many individuals with severe depression did not respond to our survey. Although we were unable to examine the association of the severity of depression or the prevalence of anxiety only with online health information seeking in this study, these results indicate that internet users with mild depression or anxiety were likely to seek online health information and use SNSs. Examination of the association between depression severity and online health information seeking or SNS use is required in future studies. Besides, strategies using the internet appear to be effective, and reports of the use of information technologies in mental health care have increased in recent years [45]. However, several prior studies indicated a bidirectional relationship between social media use and depression or anxiety, and the risk of a downward depressive spiral effect related to SNSs [46,47]; whether this effect was beneficial or detrimental depends at least partly on the quality of social factors in the SNS environment [48]. Thus, future studies will be needed to identify the characteristics of individuals with depression or anxiety who can benefit from the intervention using the internet.

This study revealed that several sociodemographic factors and health literacy were associated with online health information seeking and SNS use. Men, older age, lower education status, and being unmarried were associated with less online health information seeking, which is consistent with previous findings [11,12,16,49,50]. Men, older age, and lower education status were also associated with a lower likelihood of SNS use, which is also in accord with the findings of previous studies [10,13,49,51,52]. Websites and SNSs may be effective tools for health communication among internet users. It may be beneficial to encourage men, older adults, internet users with low education levels, and those with low health literacy to develop the ability to seek health information and to use SNSs. Furthermore, internet users who experienced worse health status were found to be more likely to use health information on the internet, consistent with previous studies [16,50]. This result may indicate that people are more likely to require health information when their health status is worse. Therefore, improving the online environment to enable easy access to websites providing reliable health information and improving the health literacy of individuals are important.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, the response rate was low. Among the study respondents, the crude percentage of women and adults aged 50-69 years was higher than that among nonrespondents in terms of sex and age (Multimedia Appendix 1). This point should be considered when interpreting the results, even though we used a weighted analysis for the general population in Japan based on data from a national survey. In addition, we excluded respondents with missing data. In an additional analysis of our data including respondents with missing data, the proportion of older adults aged 70 or older and the proportion of individuals with chronic diseases were higher, and the proportion of the participants seeking health information on the internet and SNS was lower in respondents with missing data compared with those in the final sample for the analyses (Multimedia Appendix 2). If this is the case among nonrespondents, the prevalence of chronic diseases may have been underestimated, and the proportion of online health information seeking and SNS use may be overestimated in this study compared with the general Japanese population, even though we adjusted for nonrespondents. Moreover, our findings may not be directly generalizable to other countries because this study was conducted only in Japan. Second, this study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although no studies have identified an effect of COVID-19 on online health information seeking, online health information seeking may have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic because approximately 90% of internet users accessed information about COVID-19 from the official government website [53]. Thus, the proportion of those seeking health information on the internet may have been overestimated in this study compared with data before or after the COVID-19 pandemic. Although a previous study showed a heavy reliance on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic [54], another study indicated limited use of SNS during the COVID-19 pandemic [55]. Future studies will be needed to examine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on SNS use in Japan. Despite these limitations, our findings have important implications for the management of chronic diseases and health promotion using the internet.

Conclusions

For patients with cancer, strategies for promoting access to websites with reliable cancer-related information and access among patients with chronic lung diseases to YouTube videos providing reliable information may be beneficial for the management of these diseases. Moreover, it is important to improve the online environment to encourage men, older adults, internet users with low education levels, and those with low health literacy to access online health information.

Acknowledgments

SM and TS equally contributed to the manuscript as the corresponding author. This project was supported by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (30-A-18; 2021-A-19). The items of the questionnaire in this survey were selected and developed by the INFORM study group: Maiko Fujimori, Masayo Hayakawa, Satoyo Hosono, Manami Inoue, Yuki Kaji, Kota Katanoda, Aya Kuchiba, Tomohiro Matsuda, Yutaka J. Matsuoka, Miyuki Odawara, Aki Otsuki, Junko Saito, Hirokazu Takahashi, Miyako Takahashi, Yosuke Uchitomi, Jun Umezawa, Otome Watanabe, Akiko Yaguchi-Saito, Itsuro Yoshimi and Taichi Shimazu (National Cancer Center); Gary L. Kreps (George Mason University); Naomi Sakurai (Cancer Solutions Co., Ltd.); Takumi Momosaka (Hitotsubashi University); Miki Akiyama (Keio University); Rina Miyawaki (Meiji University); Ryo Okubo (National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry); Rie Akamatsu, Yui Kawasaki (Ochanomizu University); Kahori Fujisaki (Sagami Women’s University); Hirono Ishikawa, Runa Ogawa and Yoshiharu Fukuda (Teikyo University); Haruhiko Imamura (Toho University); Kumi Nakaya and Naoki Nakaya (Tohoku University); and Seigo Mitsutake and Hiroyuki Sasai (Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology).

Abbreviations

AOR

adjusted odds ratio

CVA

cerebrovascular diseases including stroke

HINTS

Health Information National Trends Survey

QOL

quality of life

SNS

social networking site

WHO

World Health Organization

Multimedia Appendix 1

Crude percentages of respondents and nonrespondents in this study.

Multimedia Appendix 2

Weighted percentages of final sample for analyses and respondents with missing data.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia Appendix 1

Crude percentages of respondents and nonrespondents in this study.

Multimedia Appendix 2

Weighted percentages of final sample for analyses and respondents with missing data.


Articles from Journal of Medical Internet Research are provided here courtesy of JMIR Publications Inc.

RESOURCES