Skip to main content
PLOS Global Public Health logoLink to PLOS Global Public Health
. 2022 Jun 17;2(6):e0000475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000475

Contribution of genetic factors to high rates of neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia on the Thailand-Myanmar border

Germana Bancone 1,2,*, Gornpan Gornsawun 1, Pimnara Peerawaranun 3, Penporn Penpitchaporn 1, Moo Kho Paw 1, Day Day Poe 1, December Win 1, Naw Cicelia 1, Mavuto Mukaka 2,3, Laypaw Archasuksan 1, Laurence Thielemans 4, Francois Nosten 1,2, Nicholas J White 2,3, Rose McGready 1,2, Verena I Carrara 1,2,5
Editor: Collins Otieno Asweto6
PMCID: PMC10021142  PMID: 36962413

Abstract

Very high unconjugated bilirubin plasma concentrations in neonates (neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia; NH) may cause neurologic damage (kernicterus). Both increased red blood cell turn-over and immaturity of hepatic glucuronidation contribute to neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia. The incidence of NH requiring phototherapy during the first week of life on the Thailand-Myanmar border is high (approximately 25%). On the Thailand-Myanmar border we investigated the contribution of genetic risk factors to high bilirubin levels in the first month of life in 1596 neonates enrolled in a prospective observational birth cohort study. Lower gestational age (<38 weeks), mutations in the genes encoding glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) and uridine 5′-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 were identified as the main independent risk factors for NH in the first week, and for prolonged jaundice in the first month of life. Population attributable risks (PAR%) were 61.7% for lower gestational age, 22.9% for hemi or homozygous and 9.9% for heterozygous G6PD deficiency respectively, and 6.3% for UGT1A1*6 homozygosity. In neonates with an estimated gestational age ≥ 38 weeks, G6PD mutations contributed PARs of 38.1% and 23.6% for “early” (≤ 48 hours) and “late” (49–168 hours) NH respectively. For late NH, the PAR for UGT1A1*6 homozygosity was 7.7%. Maternal excess weight was also a significant risk factor for “early” NH while maternal mutations on the beta-globin gene, prolonged rupture of membranes, large haematomas and neonatal sepsis were risk factors for “late” NH. For prolonged jaundice during the first month of life, G6PD mutations and UGT1A1*6 mutation, together with lower gestational age at birth and presence of haematoma were significant risk factors. In this population, genetic factors contribute considerably to the high risk of NH. Diagnostic tools to identify G6PD deficiency at birth would facilitate early recognition of high risk cases.

Introduction

Neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia (NH) is common. Although it is usually benign and resolves in the first week of life without treatment, sustained very high plasma concentrations of unconjugated bilirubin are neurotoxic and cause kernicterus [1]. Morbidity and mortality from severe NH occurs predominantly in resource-limited settings as a result of delays in diagnosis and treatment [2]. Permanent sequelae to the nervous system of surviving neonates cause substantial morbidity to the affected individual and difficulties for their family. Most low-income countries have little or no infrastructure for social and medical support of affected children [3]. Identifying newborns at risk of severe NH is important therefore to permit preventive steps.

Genetic factors predisposing to haemolysis or reduced bilirubin conjugation predispose to NH [4]. X-linked glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is the most common human enzymopathy, with an allelic frequencies averaging 8–10% in tropical areas, but in some populations reaching over 30% [5]. G6PD deficiency is expressed completely in the red cells of hemizygote males and homozygote females but, because of Lyonisation, heterozygotes have a range of phenotypic expression between deficient and normal. The increased risk of NH in G6PD deficient neonates probably results from the shortened erythrocyte lifespan, sometimes exacerbated by exposure to oxidising agents. Over 200 mutations causing reduced enzymatic activity have been described [6], affecting over 400 million people worldwide. Mahidol (487G>A), Viangchan (871G>A), Union (1360C>T), Canton (1376G>T) and Kaiping (1388G>A) are the most common variants found in the Greater Mekong Subregion [7]. These variants are historically classified as moderate to severe and can be associated with severe acute haemolysis upon exposure to oxidants.

The uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes are a superfamily of conjugating enzymes. UGT1A1 is the sole enzyme responsible for the metabolism of bilirubin. Reduced activity is associated with neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia, Gilbert’s syndrome, and both type I and type II Crigler-Najjar syndromes. Several mutations cause reduced activity in the UGT1A1 protein. In the promoter region, the UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*37 alleles have 7 and 8 repetitions of the (TA) box respectively which impair efficient transcription, resulting in >70% reduction in gene transcription [810]. In the coding region, the UGT1A1*6 allele (Arg71Gly; 211G>A; rs4148323) results in a critical reduction in enzymatic activity in both homozygotes (32% of normal) and heterozygotes (60% of normal [11]). The prevalence of UGT1A1*28 is around 30% in Caucasians, between 40% and 56% in African Americans, and less than 15% in Asian populations [12]. UGT1A1*6 has been found mostly in Asian population where its allele frequency ranges from 13% to 23% [13].

Haemoglobinopathies are also potential risk factors for NH, notably in neonates born from mothers carrying sickle cell [14], or thalassaemia genetic polymorphisms.

On the Thailand-Myanmar border NH requiring phototherapy is common. G6PD deficiency was identified as a major contributory factor a decade ago [15]. A further prospective birth cohort from the same site (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02361788) described the epidemiology of NH and confirmed increased the risk in G6PD deficient neonates [16]. The current analysis of the same cohort assessed the relative contributions of genetic traits including G6PD and UGT1A1 mutations and maternal abnormal haemoglobins to NH.

Materials and methods

Study

This prospective observational birth cohort study was conducted on the Thailand-Myanmar border in three SMRU clinics between January 2015 and May 2016 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02361788). SMRU clinics serve a refugee and migrant population mainly comprising subjects of Sgaw Karen, Burman and Poe Karen ethnicities. Antenatal care (ANC) is provided free of charge. Estimation of gestation by ultrasound is routine, as are laboratory analyses including regular assessments of haematocrit concentration and malaria smear. In addition, a maternal complete blood count at the first ANC visit was performed together with a G6PD qualitative test and haemoglobin typing [17] during the study period. All live born neonates with estimated gestational age (EGA) ≥ 28 weeks were included if they were seen within 48 hours of life, or if they presented with jaundice within their first week of life. Clinical examination and laboratory tests were scheduled at defined time-points (see later) during the first week of life and weekly until one month of age [18]. Mothers were encouraged to bring their jaundiced or unwell neonates to the clinics any time in-between appointments for examination and treatment.

Total serum bilirubin (TSB) levels were used to define NH using EGA and neonatal age-adjusted treatment thresholds for phototherapy which followed NICE guidelines [19], e.g. newborns with EGA ≥38 weeks and a TSB of 260umol/L at 48 hours of life, would be diagnosed with NH and treated with phototherapy. Two types of bulbs for phototherapy were available: Phillips TL20/52 blue light bulbs of 400 to 500 nm wavelength and LED bulbs (peak wavelength 455 nm). The blue-light bulbs were either inserted into a wooden or a metallic framed cot; LED bulbs units were mobile and set directly above the baby cot. Phototherapy units delivered recommended minimal irradiance levels of 8–10 μW/cm2/nm; the distance between the light and the cot was adjustable in order to obtain, if necessary, intensive phototherapy (≥30 μW/cm2/nm, [20]). The first phototherapy units were set up in the clinics in 2009 [15] and by the time of this study they were well accepted by the mothers who could sleep near the cot, breastfeed, and care for their newborn.

For the analysis in neonates with EGA≥38 weeks, NH diagnosed within the first 48 hours of life was categorised as ‘early NH’, while NH occurring between 48-168h of life was defined as ‘late NH’. The 48h cut-off was based on the median duration stay in the postnatal ward following an uncomplicated delivery in this setting. NH was defined as severe if at least one TSB was on or above the NICE-defined exchange transfusion threshold. Care for each newborn with severe NH was based on clinical assessment and TSB trajectories after diagnosis; it also included discussion with the local Thai hospital (located approximately 1-hour drive from SMRU clinics) where exchange transfusion was available. By protocol, follow up measurements included TSB, haematocrit, and daily weight for 3 days and at day 7 on all newborns. Follow-up was deemed ‘complete’ if a minimum of three TSB measurements were available: I) one before or at 30h hours of life, II) a second ≤36h after the first, and III) a third between 5 and 7 days of life.

Neonates were then assessed weekly until one month of age. Each visit included a clinical examination, weighing and visual assessment of jaundice. Clinically apparent jaundice assessed at any follow-up visit in neonates older than 14 days was defined as prolonged jaundice. Onsite TSB levels were checked at each visit while direct and indirect bilirubin concentrations were measured at weeks 3 or 4.

Laboratory evaluations

G6PD status was assessed initially on cord blood by the qualitative fluorescent spot test (FST, R&D Diagnostic, Greece). ABO and Rhesus blood grouping was performed using the agglutination method with anti-A, anti-B and anti-D sera (Plasmatec, UK). TSB and haematocrit measurements were performed in centrifuged capillary heel prick samples (3 min centrifugation at 10,000 rotations per minute). Haematocrit was estimated using a Hawksley micro-haematocrit reader. The sample were then used to assess total serum bilirubin photometrically using the Bilimeter2 or Bilimeter3 micro-bilirubinometers (Pfaff Medical GmbH, Germany). During the follow-up visits after three weeks of life, when clinically indicated, serum direct and indirect bilirubin measurements were assessed biochemically at an external accredited laboratory.

At the central haematology laboratory, newborns’ DNA was extracted using column kits (Favorgen Biotech Corp., Taiwan) from 200 μL of cord blood. G6PD genotyping for Mahidol (487G>A), the most common local variant, was performed on all samples; genotyping for the other 4 local G6PD variants, Union (1360C>T), Canton (1376G>T), Kaiping (1388G>A) and Chinese-4 (392G>T) was performed only on FST-deficient samples; established protocols were used [21, 22]. Since over 90% of G6PD mutations in this population are Mahidol variant, for the statistical analyses all detected mutations were pooled; for the analyses of risk, hemizygote and homozygote genotypes were pooled. Genotyping for UGT1A1*6 (211G>A) and for TA repeats in the UGT1A1 gene promoter (UGT1A1*28, UGT1A1*26, UGT1A1*37) was adapted from published protocols and summarized in S1 Table. For the statistical analyses of risk, heterozygote and homozygote UGT1A1*28 genotypes were pooled together.

Haemoglobin typing of the mother was carried out by Capillary Electrophoresis using a Capillarys II (Sebia, France) on blood collected at the first ANC visit. Capillary Electrophoresis allows for diagnosis of Hb structural variants such as HbE, HbC, HbS (by appearance of retention peaks at specific elution times), presumed beta-thalassaemia carriage (by increased percentage of HbA2), and presumptive diagnosis of alpha-thalassaemia trait (by decreased percentage of HbA2). For the statistical analysis, women were classified based on the likely expected haematologic picture associated with the globin variant; normal women were grouped with carriers of presumptive alpha-thalassemia trait or HbE trait in the “Non-clinically significant haemoglobinopathies” group. Homozygous HbEE and women with beta-thalassaemia trait, and HbE/beta-thalassaemia were pooled in the “Haemoglobinopathies” group.

Statistical analysis

The prospective observational cohort study that was used for analyses included 1,710 neonates. In order to evaluate the contributions of G6PD and UGT1A1 genotypes, and maternal abnormal haemoglobin types to the risk of NH in the first week and in prolonged jaundice, the analysis included variables related to the mother, the obstetric history, the neonate and the perinatal period previously identified in the same cohort [16]. These were maternal age, literacy, smoking, gravida, overweight (body mass index ≥27.5 mg/kg2 within 2 weeks of delivery [23]), pre-eclampsia or eclampsia for the mother; prolonged rupture of membranes, oxytocin infusion, delayed cord clamping for the obstetric history, gestational age, resuscitation, presence of haematoma, ethnicity, sex, size for gestational age, siblings with history of jaundice, use of naphthalene for storing clothes, G6PD deficiency by FST, potential ABO incompatibility (i.e. mother with blood group O and neonate with either A, B or AB), positive Coombs test for the neonate; and severe infection, weight loss >7%, haematocrit level and polycythaemia for the clinical events within the first 24 hours of life.

For the neonates’ genotypes, allelic frequencies (p) were calculated as the total number of mutated alleles observed as a proportion of the total analysed; for G6PD mutations, males provide 1 allele per person and females provide 2. 95% CI were calculated as 1.96 multiplied by the square root of [p (1-p)]/N where N was the total number of alleles analysed, where 1.96 is the standard normal z-value corresponding to the 95% CI. Allelic frequencies were compared between ethnic groups using the Chi squared test. Neonates’ ethnicity (Sgaw Karen, Poe Karen, Burman, “Burmese Muslim” and others) was based on self-reported ethnicity of both parents and grandparents. People of Islamic faith self-identified as “Burmese Muslim” [17]. Ethnicity was reported as “mixed” when parents’ ethnicity differed.

A mixed effects Cox proportional hazard model that accounted for clustering by site was used to analyse risk factors for NH in the first week of life. Accounting for clustering was important because members of the same cluster (site) tend to have more correlated outcomes compared to members of a different cluster (site). Failure to account for these correlations tends to bias p-values downwards thereby increasing type I error. The hazard ratios (HRs) and the corresponding 95% CIs from this model have been presented. Harrell’s C statistic was used for Cox regression model discrimination. Because neonates born earlier have an increased risk of NH and NICE guidelines for starting treatment propose lower thresholds with each gestational week below 38 weeks, analysis of “early” and “late” NH was carried out only on newborns with EGA≥38 weeks who would normally be discharged from clinics around two days of life. In order to assess the impact of the risk factors on neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia the Population Attributable risk (PAR) percentages have been used. The PAR percentages were calculated for all significant risk factors of the multivariable analysis as: PAR% = [prevalence of exposed x (AHR-1)] / (1 + [prevalence of exposed x (AHR-1)]) x 100. The 95%CIs of PAR% were calculated using the same formula whereby AHR is replaced by the lower and upper 95% CI limits of AHR.

A mixed effects logistic model that accounted for clustering by site was used to analyse the risk of prolonged jaundice. The odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% CIs from this model are presented. The PARs for the odds ratios were also calculated using the same formula as that for AHR using AOR instead of AHR.

A mixed effects negative binomial model that took into account clustering by site was used to analyse the duration of prolonged jaundice. The incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and the corresponding 95% CIs from this model are reported. A mixed effects linear regression clustering by site was used to analyse interactions between G6PD and UGT1A1 genotypes on TSB levels. The slope and the corresponding 95% CIs from this model are reported. Comparison of total and indirect levels of bilirubin at week 3 among different genotypes was analysed by ANOVA. All tests of significance were performed at 5% level. Data were analysed using SPSS version 27 and Stata MP version 16.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee, UK (OxTREC 41–144), the Mahidol University Faculty of Tropical Medicine Ethical Committee, Thailand (TMEC 14–012) and the Tak Province Border Community Ethics Advisory Board (TCAB-08-13). Written informed consent was obtained from literate parents or guardians of the neonates; a thumbprint was obtained in the presence of a literate witness for illiterate parents.

Results

The full cohort included 1,710 neonates (890 males and 820 females); a small percentage (1.2%, N = 20) were twins and were excluded from the genetic analysis because related. Twins were also excluded from the risk analysis because they are often born smaller and earlier independently from their genetic background or other clinical factors. Of the remaining 1,690 neonates, there were 120 that could not be genotyped so a total of 1,570 neonates were analysed for distribution of genetic variants among ethnic groups. The study flow is represented in Fig 1. Among the 1,690, 420 with incomplete TSB follow-up were excluded from the risk factors analysis of NH. The remaining 1,270 neonates were assessed for NH, 96.5% (1,225/1,270) of whom had an available genotype for G6PD and/or UGT1A1. Sub-analysis of early NH (within 48h of birth) and late NH (after 48h) in the first week of life was performed in a total of 1,124 neonates born with EGA≥ 38 weeks (1,087 with a genotype; 562 males and 525 females). Prolonged jaundiced was analysed in 1,596 newborns with at least one follow-up visit of the full cohort. Analysis of the duration of prolonged jaundice was performed on 1222 neonates with full follow-up until 35 days of life.

Fig 1. Study flow.

Fig 1

In total 24.3% (309/1,270) neonates developed NH in the first week of life. Among the neonates with EGA≥38 weeks, 5.4% (61/1,124) developed NH early (within 48 hours) and 11.4% (128/1,124) developed NH late (49–168 hours). Among neonates with at least one follow-up until 35 days of life, 38.5% (615/1,596) had prolonged jaundice.

G6PD and UGT1A1 genotypes

Among the 802 males genotyped for G6PD mutations, 97 (12.1%) were hemizygotes (91 Mahidol, 4 Canton and 2 Union mutations) and 7 other males were deficient by G6PD testing but none of the tested mutations were found. Among the 767 females genotyped, 10 (1.3%) were homozygotes and 156 (20.3%) were heterozygotes for the Mahidol mutation, and 1 had a deficient phenotype but no mutation was identified. The overall allelic frequency of all characterised G6PD deficient mutations was 11.6%.

Among the 1,570 neonates genotyped for the UGT1A1*6 allele, 47 were homozygotes and 440 were heterozygotes. The overall allelic frequency was 17.0%. Among the neonates genotyped for the UGT1A1 promoter (1,246), the allelic frequency of the TA7 repeat (UGT1A1*28) was 12.3%; there were 251 heterozygotes and 28 homozygotes. No TA8 repeat (UGT1A1*37) was observed in the population.

Results of genotyping by ethnic group are shown in Table 1 and Fig 2. There was a distinct association of genotypes with ethnic groups. G6PD deficient mutations were more common among newborns of Karen ethnicity (13.5%) as compared to Burman (9.2%, P = 0.011). The allelic frequency of the UGT1A1*6 mutation was significantly higher in Sgaw Karen (21.0%) as compared to Burmans (12.4%, P<0.001) and was twice as high as in “Burmese Muslims” (8.4%, P<0.001). Poe Karen (16.2%) also had a significantly higher allelic frequency of the of the UGT1A1*6 mutation compared to “Burmese Muslims” (P<0.020). Allelic frequency of UGT1A1*28 had the opposite distribution, with a significantly higher frequency in “Burmese Muslims” (28.1%) and Burmans (16.2%) as compared to Sgaw Karen (8.8%, P<0.001) and Poe Karen (9.2%, P<0.001 for “Burmese Muslims” and P = 0.025 for Burmans).

Table 1. Estimated allelic frequencies [95% confidence intervals] of genetic traits analysed in the cohort of newborns.

Newborn G6PD all p-value UGT1A1*6 p-value UGT1A1*28 p-value
ethnicity mutations
MAF%[95%CI] MAF%[95%CI] MAF%[95%CI]
(N) (N) (N)
Sgaw Karen 13.5[11.3–15.8] Reference 21.0[18.7–23.3] Reference 8.8[7.0–10.5] (508) <0.001
(594) (595)
Burman 9.2[6.6–11.9] 0.011 12.4[9.8–15.0] <0.001 16.2[12.7–19.7] 0.0016
(302) (303) (216) Pvs SK<0.001
Pvs PK = 0.025
Poe Karen 10.0[5.5–14.5] 0.207 16.2[11.4–21.0] 0.100 9.2[4.9–13.5] <0.001
(114) (114) (87)
“Burmese Muslim” 9.7[4.5–14.9] 0.231 8.4[4.2–12.7] <0.001 28.1[20.8–35.4] Reference
(83) (83) (73)
Others 8.7[0.0–20.2] NA 17.9[3.7–32.0] (14) NA 10.0[0.0–23.1] (10) NA
(14)
Mix 11.5[9.0–14.0] NA 16.9[14.3–19.4] NA 12.6[10.0–15.2] NA
(413) (412) (314)
Total& 11.6[10.3–12.9] 17.0[15.7–18.3] 12.3[11.0–13.6]
(N = 1569) (N = 1570) (N = 1246)

MAF: minor allele frequency; NA: non analysed.

Allelic frequencies of neonates of other ethnic groups (pooled in “Others”) and neonates of mixed ethnic origin were not compared to the others.

&Includes also neonates of unknown ethnicity (N = 49).

Fig 2. Allelic frequencies of analysed genetic traits by ethnicity.

Fig 2

Bars indicate 95%CI.

Analysis of risk factors for NH in the first week of life

Independent of maternal, obstetric and neonatal risk factors, G6PD deficiency hemizygotes or homozygotes had an adjusted Hazard Ratio (AHR) of 4.78 (95%CI:3.35–6.84; P<0.001) for developing NH in the first week of life compared to G6PD wild type genotypes (Table 2, and S2 Table). This confirmed the results obtained previously with the G6PD FST phenotypic screening test in the same cohort [16]. In addition, females heterozygous for G6PD deficient alleles had an AHR of 2.09 (95%CI: 1.41–3.12; P<0.001) for developing NH in the first week of life. Nearly all G6PD heterozygous neonates (121/123) had a “normal” phenotype assessed by the FST, and would therefore not be considered at risk of NH if a qualitative screening test only had been used. The overall PARs for G6PD hemi/homozygotes and heterozygotes compared to G6PD wild type genotype were 22.9% and 9.9% respectively.

Table 2. Neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia (NH) in the first week of life: Uni- and multivariable analyses of genetic factors and other significant risk factors for developing NH using a mixed effects Cox proportional hazard model clustering by site.

Characteristics Univariable analysis Multivariable analysisa PAR
HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value % (95% CI)
Newborn genotyping
G6PD (any mutation)
 WT Reference Reference
 Heterozygote 1.76 (1.25, 2.47) 0.001 2.09 (1.41, 3.12) <0.001 9.9 (4.0–17.6)b
 Hemi + Homozygote 3.58 (2.63, 4.86) <0.001 4.78 (3.35, 6.84) <0.001 22.9 (15.6–31.4)b
UGT1A1*6
 WT Reference Reference
 Heterozygote 1.18 (0.91, 1.51) 0.206 1.24 (0.92, 1.66) 0.151
 Homozygote 2.50 (1.55, 4.01) <0.001 3.22 (1.94, 5.37) <0.001 6.3 (2.8–11.7)
UGT1A1*28
 WT (TA6/6) Reference Reference
 Hetero and homozygote (TA6/7+ TA7/7) 0.67 (0.48, 0.95) 0.022 0.77 (0.53, 1.11) 0.160
Maternal Characteristics
Primigravida (Primipara) 1.81 (1.45, 2.27) <0.001 1.71 (1.30, 2.25) <0.001 19.6 (9.3–30.0)
Obstetric characteristics
Rupture of membranes ≥ 18h 1.76 (1.21, 2.57) 0.003 2.30 (1.50, 3.53) <0.001 7.9 (3.2–14.3)
Neonatal Characteristics
Gestational age (<38 weeks) 12.6 (10.0, 15.8) <0.001 15.0 (11.3, 20.0) <0.001 61.7 (54.2–68.6)
Presence of haematoma 2.24 (1.45, 3.46) <0.001 1.98 (1.18, 3.32) 0.010 3.8 (0.7–8.5)
Sgaw Karen ethnicity 1.36 (1.04, 1.77) 0.025 1.29 (0.95, 1.74) 0.104
Potential ABO incompatibility 1.32 (0.98, 1.76) 0.068 1.30 (0.93, 1.82) 0.131

WT: wild type; EGA: Estimated Gestational Age; PAR: population attributable Risk (sum of PAR can be >100% [24]); HR: Hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval.

aAdjusted for Primigravida, Pre-ecl ampsia or eclampsia, Rupture of membranes ≥ 18h, Delayed cord clamping, Gestational age <38 weeks, Presence of haematoma, Sgaw Karen ethnicity, Potential ABO incompatibility, Severe infection 0-24h, and genotyping of G6PD, UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1 promoter with p<0.15 from univariate model. Young maternal age, Oxytocin infusion, sex and G6PD deficiency were all significant in univariable model but were not included in the multivariable model because they were highly correlated with Primigravida, Rupture of membranes ≥ 18h, and G6PD genotyping, respectively. There was no interaction effect between G6PD status (Hemi-Homo/Heterozygote vs WT) and UGT1A1*6 status (homozygote vs non- homozygote), p = 0.171.

b Combined PAR% (95%CI) for G6PD non-WT vs WT is 27.2 (19.0–36.0)

Harrell’s C statistic for model discrimination = 0.818.

UGT1A1*6 homozygotes had an AHR of 3.22 (95%CI:1.94–5.37; P<0.001) contributing a PAR of 6.3% for NH, but for heterozygotes the risk was not significantly increased; AHR 1.24 (95%CI:0.92–1.66; P = 0.151). Those with the UGT1A1*28 allele had a non-significant reduced AHR of 0.77 (95%CI:0.53–1.11;) when pooling heterozygous and homozygous genotypes compared to wild type genotype. Harrell’s C statistic for model discrimination indicated that 81.8% of NH in the first week of life was explained by the analysed factors in the multivariable analysis.

Severe NH

A total of 20 severe cases of neonatal jaundice in this cohort of 1,710 neonates have been described previously [16]. The current analysis of genotypes showed that a boy born at home who was seen at day 2, had fever, clinical signs of sepsis and died shortly afterwards, was hemizygous for Canton mutation (he tested G6PD deficient by FST). In two neonates who received exchange transfusion, one was a UGT1A1*6 heterozygous and G6PD*Mahidol hemizygous boy and the other was a UGT1A1*6 heterozygous and G6PD*Mahidol heterozygous girl.

Among the 1,270 neonates with full follow-up in the first week of life analysed here, 15 reached TSB levels above the exchange transfusion threshold; 5 in the group with EGA<38 weeks and 10 in the group with EGA≥38 weeks. Among the neonates with EGA≥38 weeks reaching the severe threshold, 3 out 5 males were G6PD*Mahidol hemizygotes (and tested deficient by FST at birth) and 3 out 5 females were G6PD*Mahidol heterozygote (and tested normal by FST); 6 neonates were heterozygote for the UGT1A1*6 allele. Overall, 9/10 neonates with EGA≥38 weeks in the group of severe NH had at least one mutation in either the G6PD or UGT1A1 genes, but only 3 had been diagnosed earlier as having a risk factor. One female term neonate who was heterozygous for G6PD*Mahidol allele had clinical signs of sepsis and severe NH at the day 7 visit (TSB = 1,072 μmol/L) and was referred for exchange transfusion at the local Mae Sot Hospital. Despite receiving 3 exchange transfusions, she died the same day. She was diagnosed with possible ABO incompatibility.

Analysis of risk factors of “early” and “late” NH in neonates with EGA≥38 weeks

A risk analysis for early and late NH was performed only on 1,124 neonates born with EGA≥38 weeks. Of those, 5.4% (61/1,124) developed NH early (≤48 hours), and 11.4% developed NH (128/1,124) late (49–168 hours), the remaining 83.2% (935/1,124) did not develop NH. Their characteristics by group are presented in S3 Table.

Risk factors for early NH

Primigravida and the mother being overweight were independently associated with a 2-fold increased risk of early NH while delayed cord clamping had a protective effect (Table 3 and S4 Table). All mutated G6PD genotypes were associated significantly with an increased risk of developing NH in the first 48 hours of life; G6PD heterozygotes had more than twice the risk of developing early NH as compared to wild type (AHR = 2.61, 95%CI: 1.18–5.77; P = 0.018), while G6PD hemi and homozygous neonates had >9-fold risk as compared to wild type (AHR = 9.18, 95%CI: 4.79–17.59; P<0.001). Combined PAR (95%CI) for mutated G6PD genotypes against wild type genotype was 38.1 (22.1–54.4) %. Mutations in the UGT1A1 gene had no impact on the development of early NH.

Table 3. Early Neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia (NH) in neonates with EGA≥38 weeks: Uni- and multivariable analysis of genetic factors and other significant risk factors using a mixed effects Cox proportional hazard model clustering by site among neonates who developed NH early (within 48 hours) and neonates who did not develop NH in the first week of life.

Characteristics Univariable analysis Multivariable analysisa PAR
HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value % (95% CI)
Newborn genotyping
G6PD (any mutation)
 WT Reference Reference
 Heterozygote 2.27 (1.05, 4.91) 0.038 2.61 (1.18, 5.77) 0.018 13.1 (1.7–30.8)b
 Hemi + Homozygote 8.75 (4.93, 15.54) <0.001 9.18 (4.79, 17.59) <0.001 34.8 (19.8–52.0)b
UGT1A1*6
 WT Reference Reference
 Heterozygote 0.92 (0.51, 1.66) 0.781 1.17 (0.64, 2.17) 0.608
 Homozygote 2.49 (0.77, 8.03) 0.127 1.47 (0.43, 5.10) 0.540
UGT1A1*28
 WT (TA6/6) Reference
 Hetero and homozygote (TA6/7+ TA7/7) 1.17 (0.63, 2.16) 0.620
Maternal Characteristics
Primigravida (Primipara) 1.74 (1.05, 2.88) 0.032 2.06 (1.10, 3.88) 0.024 26.4 (3.3–49.3)
Overweight 2.35 (1.41, 3.95) 0.001 2.15 (1.20, 3.88) 0.011 21.6 (4.6–40.9)
Obstetric characteristics
Delayed cord clamping 0.36 (0.20, 0.64) <0.001 0.38 (0.17, 0.84) 0.018

WT: wild type; HR: Hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; PAR: population attributable Risk (sum of PAR can be >100% [24])

aAdjusted for Primigravida, Overweight, Pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, Oxytocin infusion, Delayed cord clamping, Resuscitation, Presence of haematoma, Sibling with history of jaundice, Potential ABO incompatibility, Positive Coombs test and genotyping of G6PD and UGT1A1*6 with p<0.15 from univariate model. Sex and G6PD deficiency by FST were significant in the univariable model but not included in the multivariable model because they were highly correlated with G6PD genotyping. There was no interaction effect between G6PD status (Hemi-Homo/Heterozygote vs WT) and UGT1A1*6 status (homozygote vs non- homozygote), p = 0.658.

b Combined PAR% (95%CI) for G6PD non-WT vs WT is 38.1 (22.1–54.4)

Harrell’s C statistic for model discrimination = 0.824.

Risk factors for late NH

Maternal haemoglobinopathies, prolonged rupture of membranes, the presence of haematoma at birth, and neonatal sepsis in the first 24 hour of life were all independently associated with an increased risk of late NH (Table 4 and S5 Table). Mutations in the G6PD gene were associated with significant risk of late NH (AHR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.23–3.78; P = 0.007 for heterozygotes and AHR = 4.40, 95% CI: 2.54–7.71; P<0.001, for hemi and homozygotes) with combined PAR% (95%CI) of 23.6 (12.6–36.1). Homozygotes for UGT1A1*6 had an almost 4-fold increase in risk of late NH (AHR = 3.77, 95%CI: 2.01–7.08; P<0.01- PAR = 7.7%) while UGT1A1*28 in the promoter had a protective effect compared to G6PD wild type genotype (AHR = 0.40, 95%CI: 0.20–0.81; P = 0.011). When risk factors were compared in neonates developing NH between 72 hours and one week of life and those who did not develop NH in the first week of life (S6 Table), the UGT1A1*6 homozygotes had an even higher AHR of 7.78 (95%CI: 3.68–16.47; P<0.001).

Table 4. Late Neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia (NH) in neonates with EGA≥38 weeks: Uni- and multivariable analysis of genetic factors and other significant risk factors using a mixed effects Cox proportional hazard model clustering by site among neonates who developed NH late (49–168 hours) and neonates who did not develop NH in the first week of life.

Characteristics Univariable analysis Multivariable analysisa: Model A PAR
HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value % (95% CI)
Newborn genotyping
G6PD (any mutation)
 WT Reference Reference
 Heterozygote 2.07 (1.26, 3.41) 0.004 2.16 (1.23, 3.78) 0.007 10.2 (2.2–21.5)b
 Hemi + Homozygote 3.59 (2.20, 5.85) <0.001 4.40 (2.51, 7.71) <0.001 17.7 (8.7–29.8)b
UGT1A1*6
 WT Reference Reference
 Heterozygote 1.51 (1.03, 2.23) 0.036 1.34 (0.87, 2.06) 0.179
 Homozygote 4.46 (2.45, 8.11) <0.001 3.77 (2.01, 7.08) <0.001 7.7 (3.0–15.5)b
UGT1A1*28
 WT (TA6/6) Reference Reference
 Hetero and homozygote (TA6/7+ TA7/7) 0.34 (0.18, 0.65) 0.001 0.40 (0.20, 0.81) 0.011
Maternal Characteristics
Haemoglobinopathies 1.81 (1.10, 2.99) 0.020 1.88 (1.09, 3.26) 0.024 6.6 (0.7–15.3)
Obstetric characteristics
Rupture of membranes ≥ 18h 1.63 (0.90, 2.97) 0.107 2.02 (1.07, 3.82) 0.030 5.9 (0.4–14.7)
Neonatal Characteristics
Presence of haematoma 2.81 (1.52, 5.22) 0.001 2.04 (1.01, 4.11) 0.047 3.8 (0.0–10.5)
Clinical events
Severe infection 0-24h 2.05 (1.08, 3.92) 0.029 2.29 (1.12, 4.67) 0.023 5.4 (0.5–14.0)

WT: wild type; HR: Hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; PAR: population attributable Risk (sum of PAR can be >100% [24])

aAdjusted for Literacy, Primigravida, Rupture of membranes ≥ 18h, Presence of hematoma, Sgaw Karen ethnicity, Severe infection 0-24h and genotyping of G6PD, UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1 promoter and mother’s haemoglobinopathies with p<0.15 from univariate model. Sex and G6PD deficiency by FST were significant in univariable model but not be included in the multivariable model because they were highly correlated with G6PD genotyping. There was no interaction effect between G6PD status (Hemi-Homo/Heterozygote vs WT) and UGT1A1*6 status (homozygote vs non- homozygote), p = 0.995 and between the G6PD status and UGT1A1*28 status, p = 0.718.

b Combined PAR% (95%CI) for G6PD non-WT vs WT is 23.6 (12.6–36.1); Combined PAR% (95%CI) for G6PD non-WT (vs WT) or UGT1A1*6 homozygote (vs heterozygote +WT) or mother with haaemoglobinopathies is 34.9 (21.9–47.8)

Harrell’s C statistic for model discrimination = 0.753.

Analysis of TSB levels

A comparison of TSB levels at 24h (±4h), 48h(±4h), 72h(±4h) and 168h(±4h) follow-up in neonates with EGA≥38 weeks who did not need phototherapy, or before they had received it, is shown in Fig 3 and S7 Table. While the physiologic increase in TSB levels between 24h and 48h was slightly more pronounced in neonates with G6PD mutations, TSB levels after 48 hours increased substantially in G6PD wild type neonates with homozygote UGT1A1*allele. Neonates with EGA≥38 weeks who are G6PD normal are usually considered low risk and tend to be discharged early from the clinic. There was no interaction between G6PD mutated and UGT1A1*6 homozygous genotypes on TSB levels over time (slope of regression (95%CI): -8.8 (-38.7, 21.0); P = 0.56) although the number of neonates with both conditions was very small (4, 3, 2 and 1 G6PD mutated and UGT1A1*6 homozygotes per time point, S7 Table).

Fig 3. Total serum bilirubin concentrations in neonates with EGA≥38 weeks: UGT1A1*6 genotype (homozygote vs non-homozygote) in G6PD hemi-homo/heterozygote group and wild type group.

Fig 3

TSB = Total Serum Bilirubin; Boxes represent inter quartile ranges; middle horizontal lines are medians Red areas represent TSB values at which phototherapy (light red) and exchange transfusion (darker red) should be provided based on neonates’ age (NICE guideline). One data point (TSB = 1072μmol/L) at 168h in the right panel among UGT1A1*6 WT-heterozygote is not shown.

Analysis of risks factors for prolonged jaundice in the first month of life

A total of 1,596 neonates (185 with EGA<38 weeks and 1,411 with EGA≥38 weeks) with at least one follow-up visit after the first week of life were included in the analyses.

Overall, over a third (615/1,596, 38.5%) of the neonates followed up between 14 days and one month of life had visible jaundice at one follow-up visit; neonates with lower EGA (<38 weeks) were more likely to develop prolonged jaundice compared to neonates with EGA≥38 weeks (107/185 vs 507/1,411, p<0.001).

A large proportion of neonates with prolonged jaundice (64.7%, 397/614) did not have NH in the first week of life. Of the neonates who had NH in the first week of life, 60.6% (217/358) had also prolonged jaundice.

Most neonates were exclusively breastfed, both among those who had prolonged jaundice (94/107, 87.9% in EGA<38 weeks and 497/507, 98.0% in EGA≥38 weeks) and those who did not have it (73/78, 93.6% in EGA<38 weeks and 890/904, 98.5% in EGA≥38 weeks).

Among jaundiced neonates, further clinical and laboratory investigations were done for 80 (74.8%) neonates with EGA <38 weeks and 359 (70.8%) neonates with EGA≥38 weeks. None of the neonates with prolonged jaundice were diagnosed with intra or extrahepatic disease.

EGA <38 weeks and presence of haematoma at birth were the only clinical factors which were significantly associated with an increased risk of developing prolonged jaundice (Table 5). Neonates with G6PD hemi and homozygous genotypes had more than 2-fold increased risk (95%CI:1.3–3.2, p = 0.002) of having prolonged jaundice in their first month of life and those carriers of UGT1A1*6 both in heterozygosity and homozygosity had a risk of about 1.6 (95%CI:1.2–2.0, p = 0.001) and 3.6 (95%CI:1.8–6.9, p<0.001) respectively. The proportion of newborns with prolonged jaundice at each follow-up visit according to G6PD and UGT1A1 genotypes is shown in S9 Table.

Table 5. Prolonged jaundice (between day 14–35 days): Uni- and multivariable analysis of potential risk factors and genotyping using mixed effects logistic model clustering by site.

Characteristics Neonates with prolonged Jaundice, n (%) (N = 615) Neonates without prolonged Jaundice, n (%) (N = 981) Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis a PAR
OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value % (95% CI)
Newborn genotyping
G6PD (any mutation) b (N = 573) (N = 914)
 WT 465 (81) 772 (84) Reference Reference
 Heterozygote 56 (10) 92 (10) 1.00 (0.69, 1.44) 0.998 1.00 (0.69, 1.46) 0.982
 Hemi + Homozygote 52 (9) 50 (6) 1.93 (1.27, 2.95) 0.002 2.06 (1.31, 3.24) 0.002 6.8 (2.1–13.4)
UGT1A1*6 b (N = 555) (N = 914)
 WT 356 (62) 665 (73) Reference Reference
 Heterozygote 187 (33) 233 (25) 1.61 (1.26, 2.05) <0.001 1.57 (1.22, 2.02) 0.001 14.0 (5.9–22.6)
 Homozygote 29 (5) 16 (2) 3.50 (1.84, 6.67) <0.001 3.57 (1.84, 6.91) <0.001 7.4 (2.5–15.5)
UGT1A1*28 (N = 489) (N = 713)
 WT (TA6/6) 366 (75) 567 (80) Reference
 Hetero and homozygote (TA6/7+ TA7/7) 123 (25) 146 (20) 1.23 (0.92, 1.63) 0.156
Maternal Characteristics
Young maternal age (≤20 y) 191 (31) 245 (25) 1.30 (1.03, 1.63) 0.028 1.24 (0.96, 1.59) 0.097
Illiterate (cannot read) 200 (33) 363 (37) 0.87 (0.70, 1.08) 0.214
Smoking 53 (9) 90 (9) 0.93 (0.65, 1.35) 0.718
Primigravida (Primipara) 233 (38) 321 (33) 1.23 (0.99, 1.53) 0.059
Overweight 146/596 (25) 237/967 (25) 1.09 (0.85, 1.39) 0.505
Pre-eclampsia or eclampsia 15 (2) 24 (2) 1.08 (0.55, 2.11) 0.833
Haemoglobinopathies 42 (7) 80 (8) 0.88 (0.59, 1.31) 0.535
Obstetric characteristics
Rupture of membranes ≥ 18h 45/564 (8) 61/900 (7) 1.08 (0.72, 1.64) 0.698
Oxytocin infusion 70/606 (12) 108/958 (11) 1.07 (0.77, 1.49) 0.679
Delayed cord clamping 494 (80) 775 (79) 1.03 (0.79, 1.33) 0.836
Neonatal Characteristics
 Gestational age <38 weeks 108 (18) 77 (8) 2.77 (2.00, 3.84) <0.001 2.79 (1.95, 3.98) <0.001 17.2 (9.9–25.7)
 ≥38 weeks 507 (82) 904 (92) Reference Reference
Resuscitation 17/598 (3) 30/942 (3) 0.87 (0.47, 1.61) 0.649
Presence of haematoma 31/607 (5) 28/ 968 (3) 1.85 (1.08, 3.19) 0.026 1.95 (1.10, 3.44) 0.022 3.4 (0.4–8.3)
Sgaw Karen ethnicity 249/599 (42) 363/955 (38) 1.33 (1.04, 1.70) 0.021 1.20 (0.92, 1.56) 0.187
Male sex 354 (58) 467 (48) 1.50 (1.21, 1.85) <0.001 *
Small for gestational age 119/610 (20) 190/975 (20) 0.96 (0.74, 1.25) 0.754
Sibling with history of jaundice 68 (11) 107 (11) 1.01 (0.73, 1.41) 0.939
Use of naphthalene for storing the clothes 33 (5) 51 (5) 0.88 (0.55, 1.40) 0.590
G6PD deficiency (by FST) 538 (9) 57 (6) 1.98 (1.33, 2.95) 0.001 *
Potential ABO incompatibility 94 (15) 146 (15) 1.03 (0.77, 1.38) 0.843
Positive Coombs test 14/543 (3) 32/869 (4) 0.62 (0.32, 1.20) 0.156
Clinical events
Severe infection 0-24h 30 (5) 38 (4) 1.34 (0.81, 2.23) 0.258
Weight loss ≥7% at 24h [12-30h] of life 13/610 (2) 20/974 (2) 0.87 (0.42, 1.80) 0.714
HCT at 24h [12-30h] of life mean (SD)
58.1 (6.8)
mean (SD)
57.8 (7.2)
1.69 (0.31, 9.12)
(Per 10-unit increment)
0.540
Polycythaemia (HCT > = 70%) at 24 [12-30h] of life 45 (7) 73 (7) 1.17 (0.78, 1.76) 0.443

WT: wild type; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval; PAR: population attributable Risk (sum of PAR can be >100% [24])

a Adjusted for Young maternal age, Gestational age group, Presence of hematoma, Sgaw Karen ethnicity, genotyping of G6PD and UGT1A1 with p<0.15 from univariate model.

b There was no significant interaction effects between G6PD status (Hemi-Homo/Heterozygote vs WT) and UGT1A1 status (homozygote vs non- homozygote) on prolonged jaundice in the first month of life (p = 0.468)

* Gender and G6PD deficiency result from FST were not included in the model because they were highly correlated with G6PD genotyping.

Of the 1,596 neonates, the majority (76.6%, 1,222) had a full follow-up with three completed visits at week 2, week 3 and one month of age. Among those with a full follow-up, 761 (62.3%) never had visible yellow skin. The majority of neonates with prolonged jaundice were visibly jaundiced during the first 3 weeks (231/462) and one month (166/462) of life; only a small minority were jaundiced only at week 2 (65/462). Analysis of risk factors for duration of prolonged jaundice (Table 6) identified gestational age and positive Coomb’s test as significant factors in addition to the heterozygous and homozygous UGT1A1*6 genotypes (Incidence rate ratio[95%CI] of 1.4 [1.1–1.7], p = 0.001 and 2.4[1.5–3.9], p<0.001 respectively) and G6PD deficiency (hemi and homozygous genotypes, IRR[95%CI] = 1.6[1.2–2.3], p = 0.003).

Table 6. Uni- and multivariable analysis of genetic factors and other significant risk factors for duration of prolonged jaundice using mixed effects negative binomial model clustering by site.

Characteristics Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis a
IRR (95% CI) p-value IRR (95% CI) p-value
Newborn genotyping
G6PD (any mutation) b
 WT Reference Reference
 Heterozygote 0.99 (0.73, 1.33) 0.929 0.95 (0.70, 1.30) 0.766
 Hemi + Homozygote 1.49 (1.09, 2.04) 0.012 1.63 (1.18, 2.26) 0.003
UGT1A1*6 b
 WT Reference Reference
 Heterozygote 1.39 (1.15, 1.69) 0.001 1.40 (1.14, 1.71) 0.001
 Homozygote 2.22 (1.42, 3.47) <0.001 2.42 (1.51, 3.86) <0.001
UGT1A1*28
 WT (TA6/6) Reference
 Hetero and homozygote (TA6/7+ TA7/7) 1.13 (0.90, 1.42) 0.295
Neonatal Characteristics
Gestational age
 <38 weeks 1.86 (1.47, 2.35) <0.001 1.96 (1.52, 2.54) <0.001
 ≥38 weeks Reference Reference
Sgaw Karen ethnicity 1.32 (1.09, 1.61) 0.005 1.22 (0.99, 1.51) 0.065
Positive Coombs test 0.63 (0.37, 1.06) 0.083 0.58 (0.34, 0.99) 0.044

WT: wild type; IRR: Incidence rate ratio; CI: Confidence interval

a Adjusted for Gestational age group, Sgaw Karen ethnicity, Positive Coombs test, genotyping of G6PD and UGT1A1 with p<0.15 from univariate model. Gender and G6PD deficiency result from FST were not included in the model because they were highly correlated with G6PD genotyping.

b There was no significant interaction between G6PD status (Hemi-Homo/Heterozygote vs WT) and UGT1A1 status (homozygote vs non- homozygote) on duration of prolonged jaundice in the first month of life (p = 0.735)

Total and indirect bilirubin levels were analysed in neonates who had visible yellow skin discoloration at the 3-weeks follow-up visit. Bilirubin analysis results and genotype were available in 87.5% (386/441) of jaundiced neonates at that visit. Mean [SD] total and indirect bilirubin levels were 156.2[58.2] μmol/L and 138.8 [56.1] μmol/L in neonates with EGA <38 weeks with similar values in neonates with EGA>38 weeks; 144.6 [61.3] μmol/L and 128.4 [60.0] μmol/L respectively. Indirect bilirubin levels (i.e. unconjugated bilirubin) were similar among neonates with different G6PD genotypes but were significantly higher in 132 neonates with UGT1A1*6 heterozygous genotype (143.6 [60.9] μmol/L) and 23 neonates with homozygous genotype (182.5 [62.4] μmol/L) as compared with the 230 neonates with UGT1A1 wild type genotype (117.3 [53.8] μmol/L; P<0.001). No differences were observed among neonates with different genotypes in the UGT1A1 promoter.

Discussion

In this population living along the Thailand-Myanmar border low EGA was the main risk factor for NH in the first week of life (PAR[95%CI] = 61.7 [54.2–68.6]%); Among neonates with EGA≥38 weeks, the analysed genetic risk factors had a combined PAR (95%CI) of 38.1 (22.1–54.4) % for early NH and 34.9 (21.9–47.8) % for late NH. Currently available tests in most low-resource settings do not identify all neonates at risk, especially term neonates who are often discharged around two days of life. Identification of risk factors at birth for a “late” increase in bilirubinaemia levels is particularly important because these neonates may not be able to access required medical care or may access it too late.

G6PD deficiency was strongly associated with both early and late NH. Hemizygotes and homozygotes had adjusted risks (AHR) of more than 9 for early and more than 4 for late NH. G6PD heterozygotes also had an increased risk of more than twice that in the remaining population [2527]. G6PD Mahidol is the main genotype accounting for nearly 90% of G6PD deficiency. The allele frequency varies among the different ethnic groups but averages approximately 10%. Currently available qualitative point-of-care tests have moderate sensitivity for identifying deficient newborns (8.7% of deficient newborns missed) and cannot identify females with intermediate phenotypes [28]. In this series, 98% (121/123) of G6PD heterozygous neonates were classified as phenotypically normal using the rapid FST screening test and could not be diagnosed as being at increased risk during post-natal care.

In this population, mutations in the bilirubin conjugating enzyme UGT1A1 were described for the first time. UGT1A1*6 allele was common (prevalence ranging from 12% to 21% in the major ethnic groups) and was associated specifically with late NH, which developed more commonly than early NH in term neonates. UGT1A1*6 homozygotes had a 3-fold increased risk of NH in the first week of life, in particular after 2–3 days of life. Increased risk of NH in UGT1A1*6 was first reported in Japan over 20 years ago [29] and has been observed elsewhere in East Asian countries (Taiwan [30]; Malaysia [31]; Thailand [32]), although in certain contexts the increased risk in neonates with the mutation was only observed in association with large neonatal body weight loss [33]. NH which develops after discharge from birth centres in newborns with higher EGA and no obvious risk factors represents a clinical challenge in low resource settings and, in particular, in migrant populations where access and medical follow-up cannot be provided easily [34]. Levels of TSB observed in neonates homozygous for UGT1A1*6 at 48h (i.e. roughly around the time of discharge) were only slightly elevated as compared to UGT1A1 wild type and would not have justified extended observation. Since reduced activity of UGT1A1 cannot be identified by a simple laboratory test, a genotyping test for the UGT1A1*6 mutation in either the expectant mother or the neonates at birth, may be warranted especially in the ethnic groups with the high allele frequencies. Parental education about signs of NH after discharge from hospital remains of paramount importance and is feasible in low-resource settings; while neonates with undiagnosed UGT1A1*6 mutations might be numerically few, their individual risk is high.

Increased number of TA repeats in the promoter (UGT1A1*28; a common cause of Gilbert’s syndrome) was found in 12% of the newborns and was associated with lower risk of NH. Two meta-analyses conducted in 2015 and 2020 [35, 36] showed a large variability in risk of NH for each variant across the 34 included studies. Overall, the UGT1A1*6 allele was associated with a larger risk as compared to allele *28 (the latter found mostly in African populations). Studies in East Asia where both alleles were analysed in the same newborn population ((Malaysia [31]; Vietnam [37]; Taiwan [30] and China [38]) provided very similar results to those observed here. In these studies, UGT1A1*6 allele had a higher population frequency as compared to allele UGT1A1*28 and was associated with increased risk of NH as opposed to allele UGT1A1*28. This suggests different contributions to increased risk by different mutations on the UGT1A1 gene according to their prevalence.

A novel result was the impact of beta-thalassemia trait and HbE of the mother on the increased risk (AHR = 1.88, 95%CI 1.09–3.26) of developing late NH (after 48 hours of life). Hypothesising increased neonatal anaemia in these cases, we analysed haematocrits at 24 hours of life (S9 Table) but no differences in infants’ haematocrit values were observed.

Prolonged jaundice was common and mostly uncomplicated in this population of mainly breastfed neonates, an association described extensively in the literature since the 1960s [39]. There are different recommendations regarding the required investigations in case of prolonged neonatal jaundice [40, 41] in order to exclude potential treatable causes (including sepsis, urine tract infection, hypothyroidism, metabolic and liver disease- mainly congenital biliary atresia). In this study, in addition to lower EGA, mutations in the G6PD and UGT1A1 genes were the major risk factors for prolonged jaundice; total and especially indirect bilirubin levels were significantly elevated in neonates with the UGT1A1*6 allele. Commonly seen “breast milk jaundice” might indeed have a genetic component due to this trait [42].

The current analysis has some limitations. Other genetic traits not analysed here presumably contributed to increased risk. Other UGT1A1 variants associated to increased risk in Asian population [43] have not been investigated here. Variation in expression of the HMOX gene which encodes for heme oxygenase, the enzyme responsible for transformation of heme into biliverdin, has been shown to be associated with increased risk of NH [38]. Analysis of the gene promoter in the local adult Karen and Burman population, showed a high degree of polymorphism [44]. Mutations on the alpha-globin genes were not analysed in this cohort but are common in the population (around 25% carrier; [17]) and might play a role on the onset of NH [45, 46].

Future perspectives

In conclusion, the high risk of NH in the first week of life in this cohort of Karen and Burman neonates was mainly a result of lower EGA. This has many aetiologies but, in low resource settings, infections are an important and preventable cause [47]. For neonates with EGA≥38 weeks, some actionable risk factors were identified such as excess maternal weight gain [48], prolonged rupture of membranes, trauma at birth and neonatal sepsis. The analysis showed that delayed cord clamping, which is an inexpensive practice associated with multiple benefits for the newborn, also reduces risk of NH in this population with multiple risk factors [49]. Genetic risk factors, common in this population, play a large role in neonatal jaundice, including the severe forms, as seen in other low-resource settings [50]. Improved diagnostics are urgently needed and different screening strategies should be considered in populations with a high prevalence of these traits. Genotyping of expectant mothers might prove cost-effective in settings where high-throughput techniques are widely available. For example, this would be useful for ruling-out heterozygosity for UGT1A1*6 allele in the mother (necessary for homozygosity in newborn) or planning for extended monitoring of bilirubin levels after birth. In rural and low-resources settings, in lack of simple and cheap genetic tests for UGT1A1 (such as a LAMP-based PCR test), continued neonatal bilirubin monitoring (where possible) and education on signs of NH remain the only feasible approaches. For G6PD deficiency, easy to use quantitative point-of-care tests (in place of qualitative tests) able to identify both deficient and intermediate phenotypes would represent a cost-effective tool to provide appropriate care in male and female neonates at risk. One such test has been recently evaluated with good results in this setting among newborns (Bancone, in preparation) and few more are in the late stage of development.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Primers, PCR conditions, restriction enzyme and band interpretation for genotyping of allele *6 and promoter of the human UGT1A1 gene.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Uni- and multivariable analysis of potential risk factors and genotyping for developing NH in the first week of life using mixed effect Cox proportional hazard model clustering by site.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Characteristics of neonates with EGA ≥ 38 weeks who developed NH within 48 hours, between 49 and 168 hours and not develop NH in the first week of life.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Early NH: Uni- and multivariable analysis of potential risk factors using a mixed effects Cox proportional hazard model clustering by site among neonates ≥ 38 weeks who developed NH early (within 48 hours) and neonates who did not develop NH in the first week of life.

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Late NH: Uni- and multivariable analysis of potential risk using mixed effects Cox proportional hazard model clustering by site among neonates ≥ 38 weeks who developed NH late (49–168 hours) and neonates who did not develop NH in the first week of life.

(DOCX)

S6 Table. Uni- and multivariable analysis of potential risk factors and genotyping for developing NH in the first week of life using mixed effects Cox proportional hazard model clustering by site among neonates who develop NH after 72 hours of life and neonates who did not develop NH in the first week of life.

(DOCX)

S7 Table. Median total serum bilirubin concentrations over time by genotype.

(DOCX)

S8 Table. Proportion (%) of newborns with prolonged jaundice at each follow-up week according to genotype.

(DOCX)

S9 Table. Haematocrits tested at 24 hours in neonates born from mothers with different haemoglobin types.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all the mothers (and neonates) for the collaboration and patience. They also want to thank the clinical and laboratory SMRU staff involved in the study for their hard work and dedication. Thanks also to the paediatric staff at Mae Sot General Hospital for their care of neonates requiring exchange transfusion.

Data Availability

There are ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly and we do not have consent from participants for their data to be shared openly without any restrictions, and both Mahidol and Oxford Ethics Committees have agreed upon those terms. The population we work with has been displaced by conflict or work in Thailand without any legal status; their situation has become worse since the recent coup and any data pertaining to people on the border who have no legal status is therefore extremely sensitive. The data is available on request from scientists with a genuine interest in neonatal jaundice, which can be easily verified by the Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Data Access Committee established in 2016, for data sharing purposes. Data are available from MORU Tropical Health Network upon request from this link: https://www.tropmedres.ac/units/moru-bangkok/bioethics-engagement/data-sharing.

Funding Statement

This research was funded in part by the Wellcome Trust [grant 106698]. LT was supported by a PhD grant from “The Belgian Kids Fund for Pediatric Research”. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Riordan SM, Shapiro SM. Review of bilirubin neurotoxicity I: molecular biology and neuropathology of disease. Pediatric research. 2020;87(2):327–31. doi: 10.1038/s41390-019-0608-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Olusanya BO, Kaplan M, Hansen TWR. Neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia: a global perspective. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018;2(8):610–20. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30139-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Slusher TM, Zamora TG, Appiah D, Stanke JU, Strand MA, Lee BW, et al. Burden of severe neonatal jaundice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2017;1(1):e000105. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lauer BJ, Spector ND. Hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn. Pediatr Rev. 2011;32(8):341–9. doi: 10.1542/pir.32-8-341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cappellini MD, Fiorelli G. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Lancet. 2008;371(9606):64–74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60073-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gomez-Manzo S, Marcial-Quino J, Vanoye-Carlo A, Serrano-Posada H, Ortega-Cuellar D, Gonzalez-Valdez A, et al. Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase: Update and Analysis of New Mutations around the World. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(12). doi: 10.3390/ijms17122069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bancone G, Menard D, Khim N, Kim S, Canier L, Nguong C, et al. Molecular characterization and mapping of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) mutations in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Malaria journal. 2019;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2652-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bosma PJ, Chowdhury JR, Bakker C, Gantla S, de Boer A, Oostra BA, et al. The genetic basis of the reduced expression of bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1 in Gilbert’s syndrome. The New England journal of medicine. 1995;333(18):1171–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199511023331802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tukey RH, Strassburg CP. Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: metabolism, expression, and disease. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2000;40:581–616. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.40.1.581 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Iolascon A, Faienza MF, Moretti A, Perrotta S, Miraglia del Giudice E. UGT1 promoter polymorphism accounts for increased neonatal appearance of hereditary spherocytosis. Blood. 1998;91(3):1093. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yamamoto K, Soeda Y, Kamisako T, Hosaka H, Fukano M, Sato H, et al. Analysis of bilirubin uridine 5’-diphosphate (UDP)-glucuronosyltransferase gene mutations in seven patients with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type II. Journal of human genetics. 1998;43(2):111–4. doi: 10.1007/s100380050050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Beutler E, Gelbart T, Demina A. Racial variability in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1 (UGT1A1) promoter: a balanced polymorphism for regulation of bilirubin metabolism? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998;95(14):8170–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.14.8170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Akaba K, Kimura T, Sasaki A, Tanabe S, Wakabayashi T, Hiroi M, et al. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and a common mutation of the bilirubin uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase gene in Japanese. Journal of human genetics. 1999;44(1):22–5. doi: 10.1007/s100380050100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brown AK, Sleeper LA, Pegelow CH, Miller ST, Gill FM, Waclawiw MA. The influence of infant and maternal sickle cell disease on birth outcome and neonatal course. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994;148(11):1156–62. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1994.02170110042007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Turner C, Carrara V, Aye Mya Thein N, Chit Mo Mo Win N, Turner P, Bancone G, et al. Neonatal intensive care in a Karen refugee camp: a 4 year descriptive study. PloS one. 2013;8(8):e72721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Thielemans L, Peerawaranun P, Mukaka M, Paw MK, Wiladphaingern J, Landier J, et al. High levels of pathological jaundice in the first 24 hours and neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia in an epidemiological cohort study on the Thailand-Myanmar border. PloS one. 2021;16(10):e0258127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bancone G, Gilder ME, Chowwiwat N, Gornsawun G, Win E, Cho WW, et al. Prevalences of inherited red blood cell disorders in pregnant women of different ethnicities living along the Thailand-Myanmar border. Wellcome open research. 2017;2:72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Thielemans L, Trip-Hoving M, Bancone G, Turner C, Simpson JA, Hanboonkunupakarn B, et al. Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia in a Marginalized Population on the Thai-Myanmar Border: a study protocol. BMC pediatrics. 2017;17(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0798-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gynaecologists RCoOa. Neonatal jaundice: clinical guideline. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. 2010.
  • 20.Hyperbilirubinemia So. Management of Hyperbilirubinemia in the Newborn Infant 35 or More Weeks of Gestation. Pediatrics. 2004;114(1):297–316. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.1.297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bancone G, Chu CS, Somsakchaicharoen R, Chowwiwat N, Parker DM, Charunwatthana P, et al. Characterization of G6PD Genotypes and Phenotypes on the Northwestern Thailand-Myanmar Border. PloS one. 2014;9(12):e116063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bancone G, Gornsawun G, Chu CS, Porn P, Pal S, Bansil P, et al. Validation of the quantitative point-of-care CareStart biosensor for assessment of G6PD activity in venous blood. PloS one. 2018;13(5):e0196716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Consultation WHOE. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363(9403):157–63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rowe AK, Powell KE, Flanders WD. Why population attributable fractions can sum to more than one. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26(3):243–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kaplan M, Hammerman C, Vreman HJ, Stevenson DK, Beutler E. Acute hemolysis and severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient heterozygotes. The Journal of pediatrics. 2001;139(1):137–40. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.115312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Meloni T, Forteleoni G, Dore A, Cutillo S. Neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia in heterozygous glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficient females. British journal of haematology. 1983;53(2):241–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1983.tb02017.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Molou E, Schulpis KH, Thodi G, Georgiou V, Dotsikas Y, Papadopoulos K, et al. Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency in Greek newborns: the Mediterranean C563T mutation screening. Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. 2014;74(3):259–63. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2013.879733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thielemans L, Gornsawun G, Hanboonkunupakarn B, Paw MK, Porn P, Moo PK, et al. Diagnostic performances of the fluorescent spot test for G6PD deficiency in newborns along the Thailand-Myanmar border: A cohort study. Wellcome open research. 2018;3:1. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13373.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Maruo Y, Nishizawa K, Sato H, Doida Y, Shimada M. Association of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia with bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase polymorphism. Pediatrics. 1999;103(6 Pt 1):1224–7. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.6.1224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huang CS, Chang PF, Huang MJ, Chen ES, Hung KL, Tsou KI. Relationship between bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 gene and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatric research. 2002;52(4):601–5. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200210000-00022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Huang MJ, Kua KE, Teng HC, Tang KS, Weng HW, Huang CS. Risk factors for severe hyperbilirubinemia in neonates. Pediatric research. 2004;56(5):682–9. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000141846.37253.AF [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Prachukthum S, Nunnarumit P, Pienvichit P, Chuansumrit A, Songdej D, Kajanachumpol S, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in Thai neonates with hyperbilirubinemia. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(7):1106–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01275.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sato H, Uchida T, Toyota K, Kanno M, Hashimoto T, Watanabe M, et al. Association of breast-fed neonatal hyperbilirubinemia with UGT1A1 polymorphisms: 211G>A (G71R) mutation becomes a risk factor under inadequate feeding. Journal of human genetics. 2013;58(1):7–10. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2012.116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Steinbrook E, Min MC, Kajeechiwa L, Wiladphaingern J, Paw MK, Pimanpanarak MPJ, et al. Distance matters: barriers to antenatal care and safe childbirth in a migrant population on the Thailand-Myanmar border from 2007 to 2015, a pregnancy cohort study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2021;21(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04276-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yu Z, Zhu K, Wang L, Liu Y, Sun J. Association of Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia with UGT1A1 Gene Polymorphisms: A Meta-Analysis. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:3104–14. doi: 10.12659/msm.894043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang J, Yin J, Xue M, Lyu J, Wan Y. Roles of UGT1A1 Gly71Arg and TATA promoter polymorphisms in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: A meta-analysis. Gene. 2020;736:144409. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nguyen TT, Zhao W, Yang X, Zhong DN. The relationship between hyperbilirubinemia and the promoter region and first exon of UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms in Vietnamese newborns. Pediatric research. 2020;88(6):940–4. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-0825-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhou J, Yang C, Zhu W, Chen S, Zeng Y, Wang J, et al. Identification of Genetic Risk Factors for Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia in Fujian Province, Southeastern China: A Case-Control Study. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:7803175. doi: 10.1155/2018/7803175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gartner LM, Arias IM. Studies of prolonged neonatal jaundice in the breast-fed infant. The Journal of pediatrics. 1966;68(1):54–66. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(66)80422-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rodie ME, Barclay A, Harry C, Simpson J. NICE recommendations for the formal assessment of babies with prolonged jaundice: too much for well infants? Archives of disease in childhood. 2011;96(1):112–3. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.199984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Steadman S, Ahmed I, McGarry K, Rasiah SV. Is screening for urine infection in well infants with prolonged jaundice required? Local review and meta-analysis of existing data. Archives of disease in childhood. 2016;101(7):614–9. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Maruo Y, Morioka Y, Fujito H, Nakahara S, Yanagi T, Matsui K, et al. Bilirubin uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase variation is a genetic basis of breast milk jaundice. The Journal of pediatrics. 2014;165(1):36–41 e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.01.060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Li Z, Song L, Hao L. The role of UGT1A1 (c.-3279 T > G) gene polymorphisms in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia susceptibility. BMC Med Genet. 2020;21(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12881-020-01155-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kuesap J, Na-Bangchang K. The Effect of ABO Blood Groups, Hemoglobinopathy, and Heme Oxygenase-1 Polymorphisms on Malaria Susceptibility and Severity. The Korean journal of parasitology. 2018;56(2):167–73. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2018.56.2.167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Meloni T, Corti R, Costa S, Mele G, Franca V. alpha-Thalassaemia and hyperbilirubinaemia in G-6-PD-deficient newborns. Archives of disease in childhood. 1980;55(6):482–4. doi: 10.1136/adc.55.6.482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shwe S, Boo NY, Ong HK, Chee SC, Maslina M, Ling MMM, et al. Haemoglobin Constant Spring (HbA2: c.427T>C) and Haemoglobin Adana (HbA2: c.179G>A) in jaundiced Malaysian term neonates with clinically significant hyperbilirubinemia. Malays J Pathol. 2020;42(2):253–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Min AM, Saito M, Simpson JA, Kennedy SH, Nosten FH, McGready R. Placental histopathology in preterm birth with confirmed maternal infection: A systematic literature review. PloS one. 2021;16(8):e0255902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rougee LR, Miyagi SJ, Collier AC. Obstetric Obesity is Associated with Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia with High Prevalence in Native Hawaiians and Pacific Island Women. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2016;75(12):373–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Carvalho OMC, Augusto MCC, Medeiros MQ, Lima HMP, Viana AB Junior, Araujo E Junior, et al. Late umbilical cord clamping does not increase rates of jaundice and the need for phototherapy in pregnancies at normal risk. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(22):3824–9. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1473367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Olusanya BO, Osibanjo FB, Slusher TM. Risk factors for severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one. 2015;10(2):e0117229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000475.r001

Decision Letter 0

Collins Otieno Asweto

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

6 Apr 2022

PGPH-D-22-00231

Contribution of genetic factors to high rates of neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia on the Thailand-Myanmar border

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Germana Bancone,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by 20th April, 2022. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Collins Otieno Asweto, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

1. Your co-authors, Gornpan Gornsawun (gornpan@shoklo-unit.com), Penporn Penpitchaporn (penporn@shoklo-unit.com), Moo Kho Paw (mookhopaw@shoklo-unit.com), Day Day Poe (daydaypoe@shoklo-unit.com), December Win (december@shoklo-unit.com), Naw Cicelia (nawcicelia@shoklo-unit.com), Mavuto Mukaka (mavuto@tropmedres.ac), Laypaw Archasuksan (laypaw@shoklo-unit.com), Laurence Thielemans (thielemans.laurence@gmail.com), Francois Nosten (francois@tropmedres.ac), and Rose Mc Gready (rose@shoklo-unit.com), have not confirmed authorship of the manuscript. We have resent them the authorship confirmation email; however please check that the above email address for them is correct and follow up personally to ensure they confirm. Please note that we cannot pass your manuscript to Production until we have received confirmations from all co-authors. 

2. In the online submission form, you indicated that “Data are available from MORU Tropical Health Network upon request from this link: https://www.tropmedres.ac/units/moru-bangkok/bioethics-engagement/data-sharing”. All PLOS journals now require all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript to be freely available to other researchers, either 1. In a public repository, 2. Within the manuscript itself, or 3. Uploaded as supplementary information.

This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If your data cannot be made publicly available for ethical or legal reasons (e.g., public availability would compromise patient privacy), please explain your reasons by return email and your exemption request will be escalated to the editor for approval. Your exemption request will be handled independently and will not hold up the peer review process, but will need to be resolved should your manuscript be accepted for publication. One of the Editorial team will then be in touch if there are any issues.

3. We ask that a manuscript source file is provided at Revision. Please upload your manuscript file as a .doc, .docx, .rtf or .tex. If you are providing a .tex file, please upload it under the item type ‘LaTeX Source File’ and leave your .pdf version as the item type ‘Manuscript’.

4. Please provide separate figure files in .tif or .eps format only and ensure that all files are under our size limit of 20MB.

For more information about how to convert your figure files please see our guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/s/figures

5. We have noticed that you have uploaded supporting information but you have not included a list of legends.  Please add a full list of legends for all supporting information files (including figures, table and data files) after the references list.

6. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Reviewer comment

Line 34-35: Increased red blood cell turn-over and immaturity of hepatic glucuronidation both contribute. Revise this statement in terms of language structure

Line 36: define ca

Line 46: state specific haemoglobinopathies

Line 49: define EGA

Lines 38, 43: state specific mutations identified to be associated with NH

Line 70: for reader comprehension, define Viangchan (871G>). This is because the resulting amino acid was not indicated

Lines 54-94: most references are outdated. Provide current references and current information

Line 135, there was an open bracket but not a close bracket. Insert it appropriately

Line 224-225: it is not clear why authors excluded twins from the study. explanation to this decision is expected

Line 285: Tables 2-6, define WT

Reviewer #2: Thank you for the opportunity to review this paper. Congratulations to the team and also apology for delay in reviewing.

Several comments/suggestion:

- Though the title is self explanatory, in the abstract it would be beneficial to add one line stating the aim of the study, and also in method to mention the study design

- In method: please specify the phototherapy used - because in many Asian communities, the tradition to sunbath newborn is quite common. How does the cultural factors are taken into account into the study procedures?

- Please, specify why clustering was important to be taken into account in each model

- Results: very thorough and detailed, use of table is good to visualize what otherwise lost in the dense narrative. The use of PAR as well is very appropriate to express the relative contribution of the studies variables. What were the main assumptions used and why the mixed effect binomial model was used for the prolonged icterus.

- Discussion; The limitations mentioned only other genetic factors that were not investigated in this study, is it because the study was conducted back in 2016-17?

- What are the recommendations that applies to this setting? Would it be feasible and desirable to As said in line 539 on availability of sequencing, do the authors refer to high income countries?

- The conclusion also mentions diagnosis of G6PD, but availability of the desired product (quantitative) seems to be sub optimal, is there any development in the pipeline worth mentioning?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr Enoch Aninagyei

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000475.r003

Decision Letter 1

Collins Otieno Asweto

5 May 2022

Contribution of genetic factors to high rates of neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia on the Thailand-Myanmar border

PGPH-D-22-00231R1

Dear Dr. Bancone,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Contribution of genetic factors to high rates of neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia on the Thailand-Myanmar border' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Global Public Health.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact globalpubhealth@plos.org.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Global Public Health.

Best regards,

Collins Otieno Asweto, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Primers, PCR conditions, restriction enzyme and band interpretation for genotyping of allele *6 and promoter of the human UGT1A1 gene.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Uni- and multivariable analysis of potential risk factors and genotyping for developing NH in the first week of life using mixed effect Cox proportional hazard model clustering by site.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. Characteristics of neonates with EGA ≥ 38 weeks who developed NH within 48 hours, between 49 and 168 hours and not develop NH in the first week of life.

    (DOCX)

    S4 Table. Early NH: Uni- and multivariable analysis of potential risk factors using a mixed effects Cox proportional hazard model clustering by site among neonates ≥ 38 weeks who developed NH early (within 48 hours) and neonates who did not develop NH in the first week of life.

    (DOCX)

    S5 Table. Late NH: Uni- and multivariable analysis of potential risk using mixed effects Cox proportional hazard model clustering by site among neonates ≥ 38 weeks who developed NH late (49–168 hours) and neonates who did not develop NH in the first week of life.

    (DOCX)

    S6 Table. Uni- and multivariable analysis of potential risk factors and genotyping for developing NH in the first week of life using mixed effects Cox proportional hazard model clustering by site among neonates who develop NH after 72 hours of life and neonates who did not develop NH in the first week of life.

    (DOCX)

    S7 Table. Median total serum bilirubin concentrations over time by genotype.

    (DOCX)

    S8 Table. Proportion (%) of newborns with prolonged jaundice at each follow-up week according to genotype.

    (DOCX)

    S9 Table. Haematocrits tested at 24 hours in neonates born from mothers with different haemoglobin types.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: NH_PGPH_rev_responses_all.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    There are ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly and we do not have consent from participants for their data to be shared openly without any restrictions, and both Mahidol and Oxford Ethics Committees have agreed upon those terms. The population we work with has been displaced by conflict or work in Thailand without any legal status; their situation has become worse since the recent coup and any data pertaining to people on the border who have no legal status is therefore extremely sensitive. The data is available on request from scientists with a genuine interest in neonatal jaundice, which can be easily verified by the Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Data Access Committee established in 2016, for data sharing purposes. Data are available from MORU Tropical Health Network upon request from this link: https://www.tropmedres.ac/units/moru-bangkok/bioethics-engagement/data-sharing.


    Articles from PLOS Global Public Health are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES