Skip to main content
PLOS Global Public Health logoLink to PLOS Global Public Health
. 2022 Nov 29;2(11):e0001145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001145

Conflict, healthcare and professional perseverance: A qualitative study in a remote hospital in an Anglophone Region of Cameroon

Juste Ongeh Niba 1,2,*,#, Stewart Ndutard Ngasa 2,3,#, Neh Chang 2,4,, Eric Sanji 2,, Anne-Marie Awa 5, Therence Nwana Dingana 2, Carlson Babila Sama 2, Leticia Tchouda 2, Mekolle Enongene Julius 6
Editor: Shailendra Prasad7
PMCID: PMC10021219  PMID: 36962876

Abstract

Armed conflicts are a major contributor to global disease burden owing to their deleterious effects on health and healthcare delivery. The Anglophone crisis in Cameroon is one of the ongoing conflicts in Sub-Saharan Africa and has led to massive displacement of healthcare workers (HCWs). However, some HCWs have stayed back and continued working. An understanding of their experiences, perspectives and professional perseverance is lacking. We designed a phenomenological study using Focused Group Discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews to: understand the experiences of 12 HCWs in a remote hospital in the North West region of Cameroon with armed groups; evaluate how it affects healthcare delivery from HCWs perspective and examine HCWs coping mechanisms during the conflict with a view of informing HCW protection policies in conflict zones. Results revealed that HCWs go through all forms of violence including threats, assaults and murders. Overall insecurity and shortage of health personnel were major barriers to healthcare delivery which contributed to underutilization of healthcare services. Participants observed an increase in complications due to malaria, malnutrition and a rise in maternal and infant mortality. The hospital management and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) played an essential role in HCWs adaptation to the crisis. Nevertheless they unanimously advocated for a cease fire to end the conflict. In the meantime, passion for their job was the main motivating factor to stay at work.

Introduction

Since the end of the Second World War, there have been a declining number of wars around the world. However, armed conflicts and violence are currently on the rise, with many conflicts today waged between non-state actors such as political militias, criminal and international terrorist groups [1]. In every continent, unresolved regional tensions, a breakdown in the rule of law, illicit economic gain and the scarcity of resources exacerbated by climate change, have become major drivers of civil wars and international conflict [1]. In 2016, the United Nations reported that more countries experienced violent conflict than at any point in the last three decades. At the same time, conflicts are becoming more fragmented [1].

The Anglophone crisis in Cameroon is one of such fragmented conflicts. The conflict is marked by territorial contestation between separatists and the government of the Republic of Cameroon over the North West (NW) and South West (SW) regions. The origin of the crisis dates back to 1961 where both English (Southern) and French speaking parts of Cameroon agreed on a federated state with equal partnership and preservation of their respective sociocultural heritages [2]. In late 2016, a peaceful protest by English speaking teachers and lawyers for the preservation of the English education curriculum and law courts led to hostile retaliation from the armed forces and later escalated into a full blown war between secessionists and the government [2].

Reports suggest that the armed conflict has led to the displacement of over 1.3 million people of whom about 70,000 are refugees in neighbouring Nigeria, with over 3000 fatalities [3]. The United Nations estimated over 2.2 million people living in these regions need humanitarian aid and over 600,000 children are deprived of effective schooling [4]. Massive displacement of persons might have major effects on all sectors including education, economy, and healthcare. The impact on the health sector has been further exacerbated by attacks on healthcare professionals and patients together with destruction of health facilities [5]. Instances of people being shot in healthcare facilities have also been reported. Such occurrences may lead to a breakdown of healthcare systems in these regions especially in remote areas. Access to healthcare in many remote villages and some urban towns is limited. Hence the available facilities are put under additional strain due to high demand and limited resources [5].

Despite all the challenges on ground, many healthcare facilities have remained functional and healthcare professionals have stayed back providing services to the non-displaced population. An understanding of the experiences, perspectives and professional perseverance of HCWs in an ongoing complex conflict like that of the Anglophone crisis in Cameroon is lacking.

We thus sought to understand HCWs’ perseverance amid crisis through three questions:

  1. What are the experiences of HCWs working in conflict zones with brutality?

  2. What are the consequences of this on healthcare delivery?

  3. How do HCWs respond to these challenges while preserving professionalism at work?

The ultimate goal is to provide local authorities and stake holders with comprehensive evidence that will allow them make informed decisions concerning the welfare of HCWs in conflict settings.

Methods

To answer our research questions, we conducted a qualitative study in a hospital setting using the phenomenological approach. Data were obtained from participants using a semi-structured interview guide.

Setting

Data were collected from January to Mach 2022 from health personnel working at the Saint Joseph Catholic Health Center (SJCHC) under the Batibo administrative Health District in the North West region of Cameroon. This was the only functional hospital in the town which was now almost fully under the control of the separatists. The hospital has a workforce of 32 HCWs with 20 nurses (62.5%), 6 midwives (18.75%), 4 laboratory technicians (12.5%) and 2 medical doctors (6.25%).

Widikum is a border town between the NW and SW Regions. This makes it a confluence for socio-economic activities between the regions and thus an area of interest for both the separatists and the government of Cameroon. It has been severely affected by the crisis, recording some of the worst health outcomes in the entire region [6].

Participants

Health care workers in the aforementioned health facility were recruited to participate in the study. To be eligible for the study, participants had to be: 1) a HCW with ≥ 2 years of working permanently at the study site; 2) able to voluntarily consent to the study. Using the purposive and snowball sampling methods [7], we recruited a total of 12 participants (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of participants.

Demographics N = 12
Age, years (Mean±SD) 33.7±6.7
Gender (female, %) 50
Marital status (married, %) 50
Profession (%)
    • Nurse 66.7
    • Doctor 25
    • Laboratory technician 8.3

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Bamenda Regional Hospital in the North West Region of Cameroon. Participants provided informed consent prior to commencement of interviews.

Data collection

We collectively designed a semi-structured interview guide which we used to conduct FGDs and individual interviews (Table 2). The guide was developed by members of the research team (Research and Med Career) and it covered the following topics: experiences of HCW with armed groups; brutality and barriers to healthcare delivery; and professional perseverance of HCWs during conflict.

Table 2. Semi-structured interview guide for participants.

    A. Experiences with brutality from any armed groups
    1. Have you had a confrontation or encounter with any of the armed forces?
        If yes, can you tell me more about the incident?
Probe 1: What in your opinion provoked the incident?
Probe 2: Did you sustain any physical injuries?
    2. Did you make any official report to your superior on the incident? If no why not? If yes what was the outcome of the report?
    3. Any specific incidents or stories of brutality experienced by other health workers that you would like to share with us anonymously?
    4. Do you think health workers are specifically targeted? If yes in your opinion are they such an important target to all armed groups?
    B. Brutality and barriers to health care delivery
    1. Do you think the incident has affected the way you work?
Probe 1: How often do you come to the hospital?
Probe 2: Do you usually get distracted by thoughts of the event?
    2. In your opinion, what do you think can be done to improve on security and healthcare access?
    C. Professional Perseverance of health workers during conflict
    1. Have you thought of abandoning your post of duty?
Probe 1: What will make you stay back if you are planning to leave?
    2. With all that you have told me today, what are your motivations to keep carrying on daily in your profession?
Probe 1: Are there any added incentives at work?
Probe 2: How do you manage your work and family (If family)?
    D. Final thoughts
We have come to the end of the interview, thank you for your participation. Is there anything else you would like us to know?

Focused group discussions

A total of two FGDs were conducted by the principal investigator (first author) who had a previous experience in qualitative research methods. Each FGD comprised of 5 participants and lasted 45 minutes.

Individual interviews

Two face to face interviews were administered by the principal investigator and each session lasted 20 minutes.

All interviews were conducted in English language and this was done only after written consent was obtained. Before each interview commenced, participants filled out a socio-demographic questionnaire which included age, sex, marital status and profession (Appendix 1). We stopped interviewing participants when no new themes emerged [8].

A smart phone (Motorola g(8) plus 4104) was used to record interviews. After each session, the recording was saved and transferred to a personal computer (PC) where transcription and translation of texts were done remotely. Data anonymity was respected all through the data collection process.

Data analyses

Interviews were transcribed using an inductive, iterative process involving: 1) familiarization with participants, questionnaire, and study area; 2) coding data by abstracting texts; 3) identifying concepts and themes based on research objectives 4) identifying recurring themes 5) refining and 6) report writing.

Transcription and translation of data were done manually using Microsoft word and reviewed by other members of the research team to avoid misinterpretation of texts. The transcribed data were then entered into Atlas.ti 9 software for coding texts segments. Codes were later used as themes and a total of 86 themes emerged which were later grouped according to pre-determined concepts (Table 3). Recurring themes were highlighted and used in the final analysis. Discrepancies in coding were examined by a fieldwork assistant and further reviewed by the fieldwork mentor where needed.

Table 3. Code–participant frequency.

Concepts/Topic Respondent 1
QC = 33
Respondent 2
QC = 41
FG discussions
QC = 56
Total
Barriers to healthcare
*QC = 59; **CC = 35
18 19 22 59
Consequences of limited healthcare
QC = 14; CC = 11
2 11 1 14
Experience with brutality
QC = 28; CC = 15
8 8 12 28
Motivation to work
QC = 13; CC = 10
6 3 4 13
Response to crisis
QC = 12; CC = 9
5 5 2 12
Totals 39 46 41 126

*QC: Quotation Count

**CC: Code (theme) Count.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of participants

Participants’ ages ranged from 27–40 with a mean of 34 years. Male and female genders were equally represented. Majority of respondents were nurses (Table 1).

The table below shows what participants said (codes/themes) about a particular concept (topic) and the number of times participants spoke about each theme (quotations). Half of what participants said pertained to barriers to healthcare utilization (47%) (Table 3).

Experiences of health workers with brutality

When asked about ‘experiences with brutality’ from any of the armed groups, majority of participants reported that their lives had been threatened in one way or another; either at home, on their way to work, at their work places or during outreach activities (Table 4). Some participants said they had been assaulted in the process and one participant described an event involving the murder of two HCWs at home (Table 4). Two participants admitted being abducted and released only after a ransom payment. The threats, intimidations, assaults, and murders resulted in an overall insecurity in and around the hospital premises. This caused panic, leading to unplanned internal displacement of HCWs and their families to other regions for better opportunities.

Table 4. Responses and quotes to the question “have you had any physical encounter with an armed group?”.

Document Relevant quote Codes
Respondent 2  ‘Another instance I was called that one staff was missing, she had to run away because she was receiving threats. Personnel threatened

Respondent 1
‘Yes, yes. Unfortunately one of our doctors was attacked although not in the health facility. He travelled to Bamenda to run an errand for the health facility where he was attacked and the fingers cut off………’ Physical assault of health workers
FGD 1 ‘Yes, actually there is an incident we heard of in Mbengwi involving two nurses, a man and his wife shot by the armed forces’ Health workers murdered

Barriers to healthcare delivery

When asked about the barriers to healthcare delivery, themes related to workers’ experiences with brutality were repeatedly raised by participants, as it contributed to the global unrest in the community and at their work places (Fig 1). As a result of the insecurity, panic and uncertainty, health care workers frequently came late to work or did not come at all, most often for several days (Table 5). Others were overburdened with multiple shifts to cover for the absences which led to physical and mental fatigue. The already existing problem of personnel shortage made the situation worse. In extreme cases, three participants expressed their resolve to leave and some fled eventually (Table 5). Recruiting competent health personnel became challenging and this contributed to the hiring of unqualified staff (Table 5).

Fig 1. Network of barriers to healthcare delivery.

Fig 1

Table 5. Responses and sample quotes to the question “how has this incident(s) affected the way you work?”.

Document Relevant Quote Codes
Respondent 1 ‘Firstly is the insecurity. Most patients will not come to the hospital at a time when the atmosphere is tense and others will not like to visit this health centers especially with people (armed forces) patrolling the streets’ Overall insecurity
FGD 2 ‘There are also some patients who leave from far distances to reach the hospital and because of the insecurity; it is difficult for them to move’ Overall insecurity
Respondent 2 ‘Sometimes when the insecurity becomes so high, workers drop out and you are stuck with no one to work with. It becomes very difficult to recruit….. Forced to quit job/
Lack of personnel

Common problems like lack of communication network, internet services, incessant power cuts and perpetual lockdowns disrupted economic and hospital activities. Some participants sadly explained that the lockdowns led to inflation of prices and as such worsened the rate of hunger and lack of concentration amongst them during working hours (Fig 1).

Two participants painfully described how they had lost siblings amid the crisis, thus concentrating at work often became difficult. In the same light, focus at work was further impaired by gunned men within the hospital premises, even at bedside during administration of care to patients. Sometimes HCWs were unable to treat all patients equally because they were worried they will be met with resistance or even threats from another armed group for treating an enemy (Fig 1).

Consequences of limited healthcare access

Participants shared the following thoughts that resulted from limited healthcare access during the ongoing conflict. They were quite disgruntled when talking about this subject.

Firstly, most participants thought that because of diminished healthcare utilization, there was an increase in the prevalence of chronic diseases such as hypertension, poorly controlled diabetes and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Table 6). One participant said the cases of malnutrition in children under five and infectious diseases like malaria especially for those exposed to mosquito bites in the bushes rose significantly (Table 6).

Table 6. Probing into the question “do you think the incident has affected the way you work?”.

Document Relevant Quote Codes
Respondent 2 ‘…they escape into the bushes with the mosquitoes there. So they are exposed to bites, poor feeding like just cocoyam and palm oil, children become malnourished, they contract malaria and after the lockdown, the cases start coming in multitudes’. Disease complications
Increase disease prevalence
FGD 1 ‘…most people are not able to reach the hospital, most women deliver at home. It is after weeks or a month of lockdown when the roads are accessible we start seeing critical cases…. Delivery at home/disease complications

Participants also discussed delayed diagnosis as one of the factors associated with limited healthcare access. As a result, patients are forced to take herbal remedies at home anticipating the day roads to the hospital facility will be accessible. They also pointed out that pregnant women at term had home births without proper postnatal care (Table 6). All these, they articulated, gave rise to complications that significantly increased maternal and infant mortality.

At the administrative level, a participant voiced the implications of a low patient attendance on hospital revenue and consequently medication availability. The issue of unplanned spending in order to cover for the weeks of lockdown was also raised.

Health worker response to crisis

When asked about HCW response to the crisis, participants were all in favor of the crisis coming to an end so that life could return to normal. They felt a cease fire was the best way to end the conflict with the government being the main protagonist in ensuring this (Table 7). They also mentioned that the hospital had been a safe haven for health workers and the community at large, providing shelter and food with the help of some NGO’s (Table 7).

Table 7. Responses and sample quotes to the question “what do you think can be done to improve on security and healthcare access?”.

Document Relevant Quote Codes
Respondent 1 ‘There should be a cease fire between both parties then we are going to have peace. If that is done there will be peace and…’ Ceasefire
Respondent 2 ‘This is a place of refuge for many so during that time the health center is crowded with people and all the staff stays here until the period is over. So these are some of the ways they support and encourage us and it is good.’ 
 Safe haven
Respondent 2 ‘There were so many children in the compound and thanks to some organizations who helped to buy food for the children’ Free aid
FGD 1 ‘So maybe if community health workers are placed at the disposal of every community they will be able to reach them and administer baseline medications on time’ CHW

One participant emphasized the importance of free aid provided by NGO’s such as ‘Doctors Without Borders’ in the response, that they provide free food and clothing for the internally displaced and this makes rationing for all possible (Table 7). Some participants strongly perceived ‘waiting patiently’ was the best option since the anticipated intervention of the government had tarried.

Another participant explained that community health workers (CHW) be trained and sent to remote villages where they can quickly identify those critically ill and administer first aid or if possible transport the patient to the hospital) (Table 7). In her opinion that was the best way to curb disease complications and mortality (home deaths and infant mortality.

Motivation to work

Participants gave different responses when asked about the factors that motivate health personnel to work. Most of the participants expressed their love and passion for the profession as a drive that makes them empathetic towards patients and derive satisfaction in their wellness (Table 8). One participant was determined to stay at all costs because she believed it was divinely ordained. Some however, insisted that their basic needs had to be met for them to keep working and according to a few the hospital administration played a major role in prolonging their stay (Table 8).

Table 8. Responses and sample quotes to the question “have you thought of abandoning your post of duty?”.

Document Relevant quote Codes
FGD 1 What is still keeping me here is my love for the job. I love my job; I love to care for the patients…… Love and passion
Respondent 1 Firstly if things normalize, if there is a cease fire, I will not leave and more so I would have gone if not for the encouragement given to us by the administrator. Motivation to work

Four participants felt that being a health worker had a protective effect against brutality. Nevertheless, this contradicted some of the experiences shared concerning assaults on HCWs.

Discussion

Armed conflicts are a major contributor to global disease burden (GDB) due to their direct effects via deaths and injury and their indirect effects on the educational and healthcare systems [9]. The objective of this study was to understand the experiences of HCWs with armed groups, the limitations to healthcare delivery during an armed conflict from HCW perspective and their response to these challenges. We provide an in-depth discussion of the thoughts and experiences of twelve HCWs from the North West region of Cameroon categorized into five major concepts; experiences with brutality, barriers to healthcare delivery, consequences of limited healthcare access, response to the crisis and motivation to work.

Violence in all its forms was the main theme that emerged from the experiences of HCWs with armed groups. Although our study did not suggest HCWs being specifically targeted by armed groups, almost all participants had one or more brutal experiences that suggested otherwise. A study on the effects of armed conflicts on population health also supported the fact that HCWs were specifically targeted by armed groups [10]. According to a systematic review of articles concerning HCWs in conflict settings, violence against HCWs was the most tackled theme [11]. An observational study in Cameroon estimated a total of 11 HCWs killed since the onset of the conflict [12]. The International Humanitarian Law (IHL) clearly states the conduct of parties to armed conflict which involves not targeting those providing medical or humanitarian assistance [13]. Our findings were in complete violation of the IHL rules.

Armed conflict diminishes healthcare utilization significantly evidenced by observational studies in Cameroon on vaccination coverage and ANC attendance which dropped considerably from 2017 to 2018 [12,14]. In our study, the topic ‘barriers to healthcare delivery’ had the most emerging themes and participants mentioned the overall insecurity in the region as a major hindrance to healthcare delivery. In Afghanistan, almost 3/4th of patients had a limiting factor to healthcare, of which the main barriers cited were insecurity (60%), long distance and lack of transport [15]. Other themes mentioned by participants included shortage of personnel, HCWs overburdened with work, HCW fleeing to other regions and intimidation at work by armed groups. Similar challenges were documented in neighbouring Northeastern Nigeria by the International Peace Institute [5,16]. Further studies in ten underdeveloped conflict settings revealed that shortage in health workforce, health service delivery and insecurity are major barriers to implementing sexual, reproductive, child and adolescent interventions [17].

Limited healthcare access can have dire consequences especially on maternal and child health [18]. In our study, participants highlighted the implications of the former on women and children, most especially the acute complications such as malaria and malnutrition which are a common cause of death among children in conflict settings [18]. Between 1995 and 2015 it was estimated that more that 10 million children died due to the direct or indirect effects of conflict, with malnutrition and infections being among the most common causes [18,19]. Vaccination coverage and ANC attendance dropped by 35% (DPT3) and 18% respectively in the South West region of Cameroon within one year [12,14]. Although participants in our study and related studies emphasized on maternal and child health, it was also noticed that the health of adults deteriorated. Managing chronic diseases like diabetes and hypertension became challenging and there was an apparent surge in new cases as articulated by participants. Congruently, 15 patients with diabetes and hypertension in conflict Iraq reported consistent impedance to NCD care including shortages of medications and insecurity [20].

Armed conflict does not promote good health thus its cessation is unarguably the ultimate step in restoring the healthcare system to normal. States, governments, peace institutes, human rights and NGO’s all play a part in curbing the damages and losses caused by armed conflicts [13]. They help alleviate suffering, save lives and provide humanitarian aid. As expected, participants consensually opted for a ceasefire as a means to end the conflict. The effects of armed conflict on health outcomes are better evaluated after the conflict has ended. Post-conflict Nepal made progress in 16 out of 19 Millennium Development Goals (MDG) health indicators [21]. This supports the ceasefire concept as possibly the best solution. The impact of NGOs was greatly felt according to participants’ testimonies. Core humanitarian principles governing HCWs include neutrality, impartiality [13] and the obligation to ensure all the sick and wounded receive medical care. Nevertheless, HCWs in our study were intimidated into discriminative care and some were coerced to take sides with either of the armed groups. This reflects the real challenges HCWs face in implementing these principles on the field, which may explain why they have to either flee or succumb to threats from armed groups.

Behavioral studies have identified factors that promote job satisfaction such as conducive work environment, career progression or promotion, remuneration, adequate working conditions and recognition [22,23]. In conflict setting however, motivations may change such as is the case in our study, where participants’ main motivation was their moral obligation to improve lives and reduce suffering and their ability to lead a relatively comfortable life. One participant emphatically expressed her religious inclinations towards patients and the community. Similar coping strategies were identified amongst HCWs in Yemen including fatalism [24] and in Syria participants had both intrinsic (humanitarian) and ideological (religious) reasons for staying at work [23]. Hospital administration has a vital role in ensuring job satisfaction amongst workers and according to our study the hospital administration did not fail in this aspect.

Conclusion

Health care workers face significant personal and professional challenges in conflict settings as evidenced in our study, despite existing regulations governing conduct during conflicts and wars. This affects their performance and consequently healthcare delivery; as such they desperately find opportunities to flee the hostile environment which is usually elusive. They are therefore forced to exercise perseverance to survive, even to their own detriment. There is need for an independent body to enforce International Health regulations and attend to the physical and psychological needs of HCWs in conflict zones.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Socio-demographic characteristics of participants (SPSS version 20).

(DOC)

S2 Table. Quotation report–assault of HCWs.

(PDF)

S3 Table. Quotation report–HCWs murdered.

(PDF)

S4 Table. Quotation report–overall insecurity.

(PDF)

S5 Table. Quotation report–disease complications.

(PDF)

S6 Table. Quotation report–delivery at home/malnutrition.

(PDF)

S7 Table. Quotation report–safe haven.

(PDF)

S8 Table. Quotation report–free humanitarian aid.

(PDF)

S9 Table. Quotation report–cease fire.

(PDF)

S10 Table. Quotation report–Community Health Workers (CHW).

(PDF)

S11 Table. Quotation report–motivation to work.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We would like to appreciate the entire staff of the Saint Joseph Catholic Hospital Widikum as well as the District Hospital Batibo for their collaboration to make this study a reality. We would also like to thank the “Medical Research and Career” research team who contributed to make this work a success.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.A new era of conflict and violence | United Nations [Internet]. [cited 2022 Oct 27]. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/un75/new-era-conflict-and-violence.
  • 2.Ekah RE. The Anglophone crisis in Cameroon: A geopolitical analysis [Internet]. Rochester, NY; 2020 [cited 2022 Oct 27]. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3529815.
  • 3.Cameroon economy hard hit by Anglophone unrest, jihadist attacks—France 24 [Internet]. [cited 2022 Oct 27]. Available from: https://www.france24.com/en/20181005-cameroon-economy-hard-hit-anglophone-unrest-jihadist-attacks.
  • 4.Cameroon | Crisis Group [Internet]. [cited 2022 Oct 27]. Available from: https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/central-africa/cameroon.
  • 5.Hard to reach: providing healthcare in armed conflict—World | ReliefWeb [Internet]. [cited 2022 Oct 27]. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/hard-reach-providing-healthcare-armed-conflict.
  • 6.Bang HN, Balgah RA. The ramification of Cameroon’s Anglophone crisis: conceptual analysis of a looming “complex disaster emergency.” Int J Humanitarian Action. 2022. Jan 24;7(1):6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015. Sep;42(5):533–44. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893–907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Murray CJL, King G, Lopez AD, Tomijima N, Krug EG. Armed conflict as a public health problem. BMJ. 2002. Feb 9;324(7333):346–9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7333.346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Levy BS, Sidel VW. Documenting the effects of armed conflict on population health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:205–18. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bou-Karroum L, El-Harakeh A, Kassamany I, Ismail H, Arnaout NE, Charide R, et al. Health care workers in conflict and post-conflict settings: systematic mapping of the evidence. PLoS ONE. 2020. May 29;15(5):e0233757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Saidu Y, Vouking M, Njoh AA, Bachire HB, Tonga C, Mofor R, et al. The effect of the ongoing civil strife on key immunisation outcomes in the North West and South West regions of Cameroon. Confl Health. 2021. Feb 10;15(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13031-021-00341-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.A guidance document for medical teams responding to health emergencies in armed conflicts and other insecure environments [Internet]. [cited 2022 Oct 27]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/341858.
  • 14.Haddison EC, Julius CE, Kagina BM. Health services utilisation before and during an armed conflict; experiences from the Southwest Region of Cameroon. The Open Public Health J [Internet]. 2020. Oct 26 [cited 2022 Oct 27];13(1). Available from: https://www.openpublichealthjournal.com. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nic Carthaigh N, De Gryse B, Esmati AS, Nizar B, Van Overloop C, Fricke R, et al. Patients struggle to access effective health care due to ongoing violence, distance, costs and health service performance in Afghanistan. Int Health. 2015. May;7(3):169–75. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihu086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.International Peace Institute. Providing healthcare in armed conflict:: The case of Nigeria. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Women’s and children’s health in conflict settings: Barriers and facilitators to delivering effective services. [cited 2022 Oct 27]. Available from: https://www.google.com/.
  • 18.Bendavid E, Boerma T, Akseer N, Langer A, Malembaka EB, Okiro EA, et al. The effects of armed conflict on the health of women and children. The Lancet. 2021. Feb 6;397(10273):522–32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00131-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rieder M, Choonara I. Armed conflict and child health. Arch Dis Child. 2012. Jan 1;97(1):59–62. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.178186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Baxter LM, Eldin MS, Al Mohammed A, Saim M, Checchi F. Access to care for non-communicable diseases in Mosul, Iraq between 2014 and 2017: a rapid qualitative study. Confl Health. 2018. Dec 29;12(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13031-018-0183-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Devkota B, van Teijlingen ER. Understanding effects of armed conflict on health outcomes: the case of Nepal. Confl Health. 2010. Dec 1;4(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1752-1505-4-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fernandes A, Santinha G, Forte T. Public service motivation and determining factors to attract and retain health professionals in the public sector: A systematic review. Behav Sci (Basel). 2022. Mar 29;12(4):95. doi: 10.3390/bs12040095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kallström A, Al-Abdulla O, Parkki J, Häkkinen M, Juusola H, Kauhanen J. I don’t leave my people; They need me: Qualitative research of local health care professionals’ working motivations in Syria. Confl Health. 2022. Jan 3;16(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13031-021-00432-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Elnakib S, Elaraby S, Othman F, BaSaleem H, Abdulghani AlShawafi NA, Saleh Al-Gawfi IA, et al. Providing care under extreme adversity: The impact of the Yemen conflict on the personal and professional lives of health workers. Soc Sci Med. 2021. Mar 1;272:113751. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001145.r001

Decision Letter 0

Shailendra Prasad

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

30 Jul 2022

PGPH-D-22-01049

Conflict, Healthcare and Professional Perseverance: A Qualitative Study in an Anglophone Region in Cameroon

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Niba,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 13 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Shailendra Prasad, MD, MPH

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

1. Please ensure that you refer to the main tables in your text as, if accepted, production will need these reference to link the reader to the tables.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Dear Authors,

I would encourage you to revise and resubmit. Please address the concerns that the reviewers have on your paper. Looking forward to reading the resubmission.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Great Job to the team for the progress made so far!

Just a few comments, observations and suggestions for your consideration.

1, It would have been good to tie this study to its relevance in the public health spaces in terms of real life existing problems it seeks to solve or gaps to be addressed. e.g " to understand the experiences of 12 HCWs in the North West region of Cameroon with armed groups; evaluate how it affects healthcare delivery from HCWs perspective and examine HCWs coping mechanisms during the conflict with a view to informing health worker protection policies in conflict zones". You alluded to the need to better enforce the IHR implementation in your conclusion, which is good. I think this also needs to be reflected in the abstract and Introduction sections

2,The Sample size could have been better more. 12 HCW in one district and mostly from one facility seems to me not very representative for the conclusions drawn.

3, The survey tool could have been richer if there was a segment to sought to understand specific changes or actions respondents would have desired. This is not a major limitation however.

Reviewer #2: The research is technically weak, lacks detail in several areas, and the rigor required for qualitative research.

Introduction – the authors must provide a bit more detail of what the Anglophone crisis in Cameroon is. Readers must get all the details about the crisis from this article without resorting to an internet search to find out what this crisis is about.

Setting – It is not clear whether “Batibo Health District” is a health facility (hospital), or an administrative district with multiple health facilities. While this becomes somewhat clear that the health district may mean a district hospital, this must be clarified since “Health District” can have many meanings depending on country.

Participants – The study details how participants were recruited from the “district” based on a criterion yet in the results, it becomes somewhat apparent that these healthcare workers all worked at one rural hospital. The authors should provide a breakdown (percentages) of the various categories of healthcare workers at the hospital (nurses, doctors, lab scientists) as these were the only ones recruited for the study, to justify the claim that indeed care was taken to have each group fairly represented.

Data collection – this section is lacking in detail. It is not clear how many sessions were conducted for the FDGs. The authors attempt to explain data collection for both FDGs and interviews in the same sentences, leaving the reader unclear whether the entire data collection for the study was done in just over an hour.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr Nonso Ephraim Ejiofor. DDS, MBA.

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001145.r003

Decision Letter 1

Shailendra Prasad

17 Oct 2022

PGPH-D-22-01049R1

Conflict, Healthcare and Professional Perseverance: A Qualitative Study in a Remote Hospital in an Anglophone Region of Cameroon

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Niba,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. 

Please pardon my "minor revision" recommendation. You have addressed the concerns that the reviewers had. In some instances these have been addressed a little too well!

My recommendation would be to cut some of the changes that you have made and still address the reviewers comments -

1) The second paragraph of the Introduction: I recommend you delete "Over the years, it appeared that the autonomy and identity of the Southern Cameroonians (today’s NW and SW regions) was gradually being suppressed in an attempt by their French counterparts to have absolute control. Awareness of this stirred grievances and complaints which were apparently not well handled by the current regime." and "eventually a problem which seemed so small "

2) The fourth paragraph of the introduction: I recommend you move the sentence "The ultimate goal is to provide local authorities and stake holders with comprehensive evidence that will allow them make informed decisions concerning the welfare of HCWs in conflict settings." to after the three questions. I think the sentence is important; it reads better after the three questions.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 16 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Shailendra Prasad, MD, MPH

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001145.r005

Decision Letter 2

Shailendra Prasad

21 Oct 2022

Conflict, Healthcare and Professional Perseverance: A Qualitative Study in a Remote Hospital in an Anglophone Region of Cameroon

PGPH-D-22-01049R2

Dear Dr Niba,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Conflict, Healthcare and Professional Perseverance: A Qualitative Study in a Remote Hospital in an Anglophone Region of Cameroon' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Global Public Health. Thank you for addressing the suggestions and comments promptly. 

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact globalpubhealth@plos.org.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Global Public Health.

Best regards,

Shailendra Prasad, MD, MPH

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Socio-demographic characteristics of participants (SPSS version 20).

    (DOC)

    S2 Table. Quotation report–assault of HCWs.

    (PDF)

    S3 Table. Quotation report–HCWs murdered.

    (PDF)

    S4 Table. Quotation report–overall insecurity.

    (PDF)

    S5 Table. Quotation report–disease complications.

    (PDF)

    S6 Table. Quotation report–delivery at home/malnutrition.

    (PDF)

    S7 Table. Quotation report–safe haven.

    (PDF)

    S8 Table. Quotation report–free humanitarian aid.

    (PDF)

    S9 Table. Quotation report–cease fire.

    (PDF)

    S10 Table. Quotation report–Community Health Workers (CHW).

    (PDF)

    S11 Table. Quotation report–motivation to work.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS Global Public Health are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES