Skip to main content
PLOS Global Public Health logoLink to PLOS Global Public Health
. 2022 Nov 2;2(11):e0001079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001079

Depressive symptoms and violence exposure in a population-based sample of adult women in South Africa

Abigail M Hatcher 1,2,*, Sthembiso Pollen Mkhize 3, Alexandra Parker 3, Julia de Kadt 3
Editor: Ahmed Waqas4
PMCID: PMC10021317  PMID: 36962572

Abstract

Depressive symptoms are a major burden of disease globally and is associated with violence and poverty. However, much of the research linking these conditions is from resource-rich settings and among smaller, clinical samples. Secondary data from a household survey in Gauteng Province of South Africa examines the cross-sectional association between adult women’s elevated depressive symptoms and markers of violence. Using tablet computers, participants self-completed interview modules to screen for depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire 2-item screener), childhood exposure to physical and sexual abuse (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire 4-item index), as well as past-year exposure to sexual or intimate partner violence (SIPV; WHO Multicountry Study instrument 4-item index). Socio-economic status, food security, education, and income were self-reported. Representative data at the ward level allows for modeling of results using survey commands and mixed-level modeling. Of the 7,276 adult women participating in the household survey, 42.1% reported elevated depressive symptoms. A total of 63.9% reported childhood violence exposure and 5.3% had past-year SIPV. Multi-level modeling suggests that violence is a strong predictor of depressive symptoms. Childhood abuse alone increases the odds of high depressive symptomology, after controlling for individual-level markers of poverty and neighborhood of residence (aOR 1.31, 95%, CI 1.17–1.37). Combined exposure to childhood abuse and past-year SIPV increased odds of reporting elevated depressive symptoms (aOR 2.05, 95%, CI 1.54–2.71). Ward characteristics account for 6% of the variance in depressive symptoms, over and above the contributions of household food security and socio-economic status. Exposure to violence in childhood and past-year SIPV were associated with depressive symptoms among women. These associations persist after controlling for socio-economic markers and latent neighborhood characteristics, which also had significant association with elevated depressive symptoms. These data suggest that efforts to reduce the burden of depressive symptoms may benefit from approaches that prevent violence against women and children.

Introduction

Depressive symptoms represent a major mental health challenge for populations across the globe [1]. The Global Burden of Disease Study found that depressive disorders are among the most important causes of years lost to disability, especially among women [2], and this trend has only heightened since the start of the SARS-Cov2 pandemic [3]. In South Africa, national surveys suggest probable depression occurs among up to 28% of women [4], with considerable variation across the country [5].

Depressive symptoms among women in South Africa may be associated with their recent or childhood exposure to violence. Intimate partner violence (physical and/or sexual abuse by a current or ex-boyfriend [6]) is high in South Africa, with one population-based survey noting past-year exposure rates to sexual (8%) or physical (13%) violence [7]. Similarly sexual violence in the form of rape by a partner or non-partner is higher in South Africa than most settings globally, with 25–28% reporting ever experiencing rape [7, 8]. Childhood violence is similarly high in South Africa, with exposure to physical or sexual violence reported by 15% of girls in South Africa national population-based study [9].

Across cohort studies globally, there is robust evidence that violence exposure underpins mental health. A meta-analysis of cohorts found IPV exposure is associated with later elevated depressive symptoms [10]. Longitudinal South Africa studies drawn from clinical samples confirm this relationship between violence and later depression [11]. Childhood adversity can also have profound effects on mental health, with longitudinal research linking exposure to childhood abuse with anxiety and depression later in life [12, 13].

Poverty also frames the mental health of individuals in multiple ways. In South Africa, poverty is associated with worsened depressive symptoms [14, 15]. Poverty and depressive symptoms seem to be bi-directional, with new experimental evidence suggesting each condition worsens the other [16]. Poor mental health can also be a result of neighborhood conditions, since inadequate housing, physical degradation, or a lack of opportunity in the workforce are deeply intertwined with how people function psychologically [1719]. An increasing number of studies from sub-Saharan Africa suggest that urban populations more frequently present with common mental disorders than their rural counterparts [20, 21]. This could be a result of the psychological toll of living in peri-urban settlements [22], neighborhood-level exposures to violence [23], or deprivation in terms of the living environment or employment prospects [24].

Overall, little population-based research from South Africa has measured the association of mental health and key structural determinants such as violence or socio-economic context. Filling this gap using stratified samples representative of wider populations can help programming and policy to target mental health and violence prevention policies in coming years.

Methods

Study setting

The Quality of Life survey has been conducted in Gauteng Province of South Africa every two years since 2009. In addition to being home to the major urban centers of Johannesburg and Pretoria, it comprises multiple burgeoning informal and peri-urban settlements. The province has a high degree of income inequality, and variable living conditions. In disadvantaged areas, quality of basic services (such as paved roads, sewerage, or electricity) is often poor. Public health, education and policing services are highly variable, and wealthier residents typically make use of private services [25].

Study population and sampling

Quality of Life survey 6 interviewed 13 616 male and female adults across Gauteng, South Africa between the time of Sept 2019 –August 2020. The multistage stratified cluster sample design covered urban, peri-urban, and rural areas within the province and has been described fully elsewhere [26]. South African local government assigns neighborhoods as administrative wards. Within each (total of n = 529 wards), 5 to 6 enumeration areas were sampled on a probability proportional to size (PPS) basis. PPS uses population data to assign a sampling probability variable so that between 4 to 6 dwelling units were randomly selected within each enumeration areas, using a randomly generated interval. A fixed sample size was set for each ward in the province (dependent on municipal location). Within the ward, each numeration area was assigned a sampling weight according to the number of dwelling unit, meaning the probability of selecting an enumeration area was proportional to its relative size in terms of number of dwelling units within the ward. A floor of 20 interviews was conducted in each ward. Data was weighted by population size, race and gender to ensure representative estimates.

Procedures

On arrival at each dwelling unit, a trained enumerator spoke with residents to list all adults living in the dwelling. In-field random sampling selected one resident adult from a household roster for interview. This was achieved in practice by manually listing all resident adults and programming the data collection system (on tablet computers) to randomly select one adult to be interviewed. Participants were eligible if they were 18 years or older, willing to take part, and cognitively able to complete the interview.

Interviews were conducted in-person by trained enumerators following verbal informed consent. Participants were given a printed information sheet to keep, if they chose. All study materials were translated in nine local languages, and interviews were conducted in the language of choice.

An additional voluntary module was comprised of self-completed questions about experiences of violence. Self-completion can help protect participant confidentiality, ensures that answers can be completed without added distress of disclosure to another person, and can protect fieldworkers from vicarious trauma of listening to difficult stories. All participants were asked verbally if they chose to self-complete questions using a tablet programmed with questions in the language of their choice. Participants were given the option to skip this section, and the tablet locked before being returned to the fieldworker, so that no data around violence exposure was made known to any member of the study team.

Measures

Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 2-item shortened version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2), which has been validated in South Africa [27]. This brief screening tool asks about frequency of two symptoms over the past two weeks (feeling down, depressed, and hopeless or losing pleasure or interest in doing things) with responses ranging on a Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (every day). PHQ-2 has been shown to have good sensitivity and adequate specificity across settings with a cut-point of 2+ suggesting probable depression [28]. While results of PHQ-2 are not clinically meaningful, they can provide a screening estimate of population-based prevalence of depressive symptoms.

Childhood violence exposure was asked using 4 items from the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire [29], a tool that has been validated in its entirety in South Africa [30]. For physical abuse, respondents were asked about whether they had been beaten with a belt, stick, or other hard object, at home or at school, before the age of 18. To assess exposure to childhood sexual abuse, they were asked whether they had been molested (forced touching of genitals) or raped (forced sex or sex under threat), before the age of 18.

Sexual or Intimate Partner Violence (SIPV) was assessed using items from the WHO Multi-Country Study Instrument [31]. These items were selected from 10 possible items due to optimal discriminate value based on Item Response Theory in previous South African samples. SIPV includes past-year reports of any of the following by a current or former partner: hitting, kicking, threats or use of a weapon and/or forced sex. It also includes forced sex or sex under conditions of threat by a non-partner. The rationale for including this broader definition of SIPV is that rape in South Africa (by a partner or non-partner) is considered a pressing health and policy issue. Therefore, the survey wanted to establish baseline levels of exposure to both partner perpetration and non-partner perpetration.

Socio-economic status is a weighted measure of coverage by medical insurance, highest level of education completed, working internet access in the home, employment status, and household income, that ranges from 1–10 on a continuous scale. Food insecurity was measured using a non-validated measure of 5 items. The index comprised inadequate monthly expenditure on food relative to household size, an adult having skipped meals due to lack of money to buy food, and no place to purchase food within walking distance.

Education was assessed using the total number of years of schooling attained. This was dichotomized for descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis as achieving high school education or not. Monthly income was captured as categorical in the self-complete module. Participants were asked to include all money available to their household, including from work or social grants. These data were imputed using the R program MissForest [32] as missing values occurred in 1 963 instances (27% of sample). Employment was measured through a single item asking whether the participant worked (y/n) in the past 7 days. Ward is a latent construct based on groupings 20–32 participants living within a defined sub-region in the province.

Quality control

As described fully elsewhere [33], data was quality was checked by quality assurance managers at the field level on a daily basis. Built-in checks were implemented through queries built into real-time data entry and in a back-end audit trail. Call backs were implemented to 26.6% of the full sample to check basic socio-demographics against the dataset. Any records that did not pass each of these three quality checks were omitted from the final dataset.

Analysis

Descriptive statistics were assessed using STATA 16, using survey commands to adjust for clustering by ward and sampling strategies. To compare the sample characteristics of those participants who opted into the self-completed violence, section used chi-square statistics. Mixed-level regression used melogit commands, modeling neighborhood as a random effect. This technique allows neighborhood to serve as a latent confounding variable [34].

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was secured from the University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee (H19/11/09).

Dedicated training of field workers included activities on how to conduct the self-complete section, sensitivities around collecting information around violence, and how they could offer support if a participant wanted to speak to them about mental health or violence. A distress protocol helped to ensure that a basic level of calming containment was provided by field workers, with the option to phone their field work team leader if additional support was required.

All participants, regardless of taking part in this portion of the interview or not, were given the option of taking a printed list of referrals for each provincial sub-region. The team phoned all listed referrals in advance to establish whether they were actively working and accepting new clients. All field team members were provided with three group debriefing sessions led by an experienced social worker. Field workers who struggled with vicarious trauma were additionally invited to take part in debriefing facilitated by a social worker who specialized in lay health worker training around violence and trauma.

Results

Descriptive statistics

A total of 7 276 adult females were included in the sample for this analysis. Women taking part ranged from age 18 to 86, with 13% being in the youngest age group (18–24 years). Weighted population-representative estimates suggest monthly household income was less than R 1600 monthly (about US$ 110) for one-third of women. Approximately half had high school education and more than two-thirds were currently unemployed. Over half of women were currently food insecure (Table 1).

Table 1. Descriptive statistics of women in the survey (n = 7276).

1 2 3 4
Proportion in overall sample* (n = 7276) Missing module (n = 993, 13.6%) Completing module (n = 6283, 86.4%) test for difference
Age <34 years 13.0% 16.8% 38.3% < .001
Monthly income <R1600 30.3% 31.5% 23.1% < .001
High school education 55.0% 45.1% 56.7% < .001
Unemployed 68.4% 70.0% 68.1% 0.259
Food insecure 56.6% 43.7% 58.8% < .001
Elevated depressive symptoms 42.1% 38.5% 42.7% 0.013
Exposed to childhood violence - - 63.9% -
Past-year SIPV exposure - - 5.3% -

aOR: adjusted odds ratio; SIPV: sexual or intimate partner violence

*Proprotions account for clustering by ward

The self-completed violence module was taken by 86% of women. Those women opting to take this module skewed younger, were more educated, and had higher income. They were more likely to report food insecurity (Table 1).

Depressive symptoms and violence exposure

Of the entire sample of women participating in the survey, 42.1% reported elevated symptoms of depression as assessed by the PHQ-2 (Table 1).

The group taking part in the self-complete violence section had 42.7% reporting elevated depressive symptoms (p = 0.013). Sexual abuse during childhood was reported by 12.9% of female participants (including 10.1% who reported molestation and 7.5% who reported rape). Physical abuse was reported by 63.1% of participants (including 47.1% who reported being beaten at home and 50.2% who were beaten at school).

Overall, 5.3% of female respondents reported past-year exposure to SIPV. This number includes women exposed to non-partner rape (n = 150, 1.7%) as well as those exposed to physical or sexual partner violence (n = 271, 4.4%). The two groups are not mutually exclusive as 35 participants experienced both non-partner rape and intimate partner violence.

Bivariate associations

In unadjusted logistic regression, accounting for clustering by ward, multiple socio-economic markers were significantly associated with elevated depressive symptoms (Table 2). Lower income, no high school education, being unemployed in the past week, and food insecurity significantly increased odds of a woman reporting elevated depressive symptoms. Younger age was protective for depressive symptoms.

Table 2. Associations of key covariates and elevated depressive symptoms.

OR 95% CI p value
Age <34 years 0.79 (0.70–0.90) <0.001
Monthly income <R1600 1.46 (1.28–1.66) <0.001
Lacks high school education 1.52 (1.35–1.72) <0.001
Unemployed 1.41 (1.24–1.62) <0.001
Food insecure 1.72 (1.51–1.95) <0.001
No violence ever Ref -- -
 Exposed to childhood abuse 1.37 (1.19–1.57) <0.001
 Past-year SIPV exposure 1.51 (0.74–3.08) 0.26
 Both childhood abuse & past year violence 1.92 (1.36–2.72) <0.001

OR: odds ratio; SIPV: sexual or intimate partner violence

Model accounts for clustering by ward

The reference group for examining odds of elevated depressive symptoms was women who reported no violence at any timepoint. Compared to these violence-free women, those reporting exposure to childhood violence alone had 37% greater odds of elevated depressive symptoms (p = <0.001). Past-year SIPV exposure was associated with 51% higher odds, but not at a significant level (p = 0.26). Women reporting both childhood abuse and past-year SIPV had nearly doubled odds of elevated depressive symptoms (p = <0.001).

Mixed effects model

Mixed effects modeling showed strong associations between current elevated depressive symptoms, violence exposure, and poverty (Table 3). Compared to women reporting no violence, those with childhood violence had 31% higher odds of adult depressive symptoms (aOR 1.31, 95%, CI 1.17–1.37). The small number of women reporting past-year SIPV but never reporting childhood abuse also had higher odds of depressive symptoms, but this was not statistically significant (aOR 1.31, 95%, CI 0.72–2.39). Those reporting both childhood abuse and past-year SIPV had more than doubled odds of high depressive symptoms (aOR 2.05, 95%, CI 1.54–2.71).

Table 3. Mixed effects model of elevated depressive symptoms in a stratified cluster sample of women (n = 6093).

aOR 95% CI p value
No violence ever Ref
 Childhood abuse 1.31 (1.17–1.47) <0.001
 Past-year SIPV exposure 1.31 (0.72–2.39) 0.375
 Both childhood & SIPV 2.05 (1.54–2.71) <0.001
Age 1.06 (1.04–1.08) <0.001
Food secure
 Moderate food insecurity 1.28 (1.13–1.45) <0.001
 Severe food insecurity 1.83 (1.49–2.24) <0.001
Social class 0.91 (0.89–0.93) <0.001
ICC variance by Ward 0.06 (0.04–0.08) <0.001

aOR: adjusted odds ratio; SIPV: sexual or intimate partner violence; ICC: intra-class correlation

Model accounts for clustering by ward

In the final model, food insecurity heightened reports of depressive symptoms, whether this was moderate (28% increased odds) or severe (83% increased odds). Social class as a weighted index was predictive of depressive symptoms, with each 1-point increase in the scale associated with 9% lower odds of reporting depressive symptoms. Intra-class correlation suggests that 6% of the variance in depressive symptoms can be attributed to the ward of residence.

Results are qualitatively similar in a sensitivity analysis using 3 as the cut-point for the PHQ-2 (Table A in S1 Appendix). A sensitivity analysis explored assumptions about the 13.6% who chose not to self-complete the violence module. If these participants are assumed to be violence-free or if they are assumed to be exposed to one or more forms of violence, the key associations between violence exposure and elevated depressive symptoms hold (Tables B and C in S1 Appendix).

Discussion

High rates of elevated symptoms of depression were found in a population-based sample of women in urban and peri-urban South Africa. After controlling for latent neighborhood characteristics, age, food security, and social class, exposure to violence was independently associated with poor mental health. Combined exposure to childhood abuse and SIPV more than doubled the odds of women reporting high depressive symptoms. Childhood abuse on its own was independently associated with adult depressive symptoms.

Population-based estimates of violence exposure add to a limited body of research in South Africa. The estimate of 12.9% reporting childhood sexual violence are similar to a national population-based study finding that 14.6% of girls in South Africa report childhood sexual abuse [9]. The 4.4% estimate of past-year IPV is lower than 13.2% found in a similar study by Machisa et al., who conducted a household study in Gauteng Province [7].

On the other hand, our estimate of past-year rape is more than 20-fold higher than the most recent police statistics, which suggest that in 2021, 0.069% of the Gauteng population reported past-year rape to the police [35]. This paper is among the first population-based estimates of rape incidence in a high-risk region of South Africa.

Latent characteristics of one’s ward of residence seem to explain considerable variation in depressive symptoms, over and above individual social class and food security. There seem to be multiple plausible reasons for neighborhood residence and depressive symptoms. The physical infrastructure of a community can be linked to depressive symptoms by causing increased daily stressors and strain [22, 36]. Crime and witnessing violence can directly impact on mental health [23, 37]. It is also possible that those who live in poor socio-economic areas have fewer social or institutional resources to cope with strains or threats to safety when exposed [19, 24].

The distinction between the study sample completing the self-report violence section and those declining warrants attention. A relatively younger sample may have reported more depressive symptoms, since violence and depression are found at higher rates in younger women compared to older peers [3840]. Those taking part were more food insecure than those declining, which may have altered the models given strong links from hunger to depression [4143].

These sample considerations should be viewed in light of other study limitations. Cross-sectional data can only suggest associations, rather than causality. The brief PHQ-2 screener cannot be used to diagnose clinical depression. The non-validated measure of food insecurity and the continuous additive scale for social class has limitations compared to existing measures or principal component analysis, but these poverty markers needed to align with past survey rounds in order to track trends over time. A brief violence measure was used within a broader survey, which limits sensitivity to detecting cases of violence exposure–a more robust set of items would have likely identified higher incidence of SIPV. The measure of childhood exposure to violence does not provide detail on duration or source of abuse, but as shown by other studies, some reported childhood violence may have been enacted by a partner [44, 45].

Scholars have noted that studies dedicated to violence–and for whom staff training and support centers around skills of safely asking and hearing about disclosures of violence–have more accurate findings than general surveys where a violence module is added [46]. This leads to consideration of these SIPV estimates, in particular, as a minimum level of population-based exposure. It is unclear whether higher estimates of SIPV exposure would alter the relationship between exposure and high depressive symptoms.

Conclusion

Exposure to violence was independently associated with high depressive symptoms among a relatively large, population-based sample of women in South Africa. These data may contribute to national efforts to reduce violence against women and girls. Global efforts to improve mental health could gain traction by supporting individuals who are exposed to high rates of violence and increasing resources to communities where poverty and safety intersect. Preventing violence within communities represents a crucial step for ensuring health and well-being for women and children globally.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix

Table A: Mixed effects model of elevated depressive symptoms at cutpoint of PHQ >3 in a stratified cluster sample of women (n = 6093). Table B: Mixed effects model of elevated depressive symptoms assuming non-completers are violence-free (n = 6093). Table C: Mixed effects model of elevated depressive symptoms assuming non-completers are violence-exposed (n = 6093).

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge GeoSpace and the team of trained enumerators, our colleagues at GCRO and local government, and the many participants who took part in this survey.

Data Availability

Public access data for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License available at https://www.datafirst.uct.ac.za/dataportal/index.php/collections/GCRO or by requesting access to support@data1st.org.

Funding Statement

The Quality of Life Survey 6 (2020/21) was funded by the Gauteng City-Region Observatory’s core grant from the Gauteng Provincial Government, with additional financial contributions from the three metropolitan municipalities in Gauteng, South Africa. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. SPM, AP and JDK received salaries from the Gauteng City-Region Observatory’s core grant during the preparation of the article. AMH received payment as a consultant from the Gauteng City-Region Observatory’s core grant for work on the preparation of this study.

References

  • 1.Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Santelli JS, Ross DA, Afifi R, Allen NB, et al. Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. Lancet. 2016;387(10036):2423–78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00579-1 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mokdad AH, Forouzanfar MH, Daoud F, Mokdad AA, El Bcheraoui C, Moradi-Lakeh M, et al. Global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors for young people’s health during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2016;387(10036):2383–401. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00648-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Santomauro DF, Herrera AMM, Shadid J, Zheng P, Ashbaugh C, Pigott DM, et al. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet. 2021;398(10312):1700–12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mutyambizi C, Booysen F, Stornes P, Eikemo TA. Subjective social status and inequalities in depressive symptoms: a gender-specific decomposition analysis for South Africa. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18(1):87. Epub 2019/06/15. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0996-0 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cuadros DF, Tomita A, Vandormael A, Slotow R, Burns JK, Tanser F. Spatial structure of depression in South Africa: A longitudinal panel survey of a nationally representative sample of households. Scientific reports. 2019;9(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Breiding M, Basile K, Smith S, Black M, Mahendra R. Intimate Partner Violence Surveillance: Uniform Definitions and Recommended Data Elements, Version 2.0. Atlanta (GA): National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2015.
  • 7.Machisa M, Jewkes R, Lowe-Morna C, Rama K. The war at home. Johannesburg: GenderLinks. 2011:1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jewkes R, Sikweyiya Y, Morrell R, Dunkle K. The relationship between intimate partner violence, rape and HIV amongst South African men: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24256. Epub 2011/09/22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024256 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ward CL, Artz L, Leoschut L, Kassanjee R, Burton P. Sexual violence against children in South Africa: a nationally representative cross-sectional study of prevalence and correlates. The Lancet Global Health. 2018;6(4):e460–e8. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30060-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bacchus LJ, Ranganathan M, Watts C, Devries K. Recent intimate partner violence against women and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e019995. Epub 2018/07/30. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019995 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tsai AC, Tomlinson M, Comulada WS, Rotheram-Borus MJ. Intimate Partner Violence and Depression Symptom Severity among South African Women during Pregnancy and Postpartum: Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study. PLoS Med. 2016;13(1):e1001943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001943 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lindert J, von Ehrenstein OS, Grashow R, Gal G, Braehler E, Weisskopf MG. Sexual and physical abuse in childhood is associated with depression and anxiety over the life course: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Public Health. 2014;59(2):359–72. doi: 10.1007/s00038-013-0519-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li M, D’arcy C, Meng X. Maltreatment in childhood substantially increases the risk of adult depression and anxiety in prospective cohort studies: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proportional attributable fractions. Psychological medicine. 2016;46(4):717–30. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Naidoo I, Charlton KE, Esterhuizen TM, Cassim B. High risk of malnutrition associated with depressive symptoms in older South Africans living in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a cross-sectional survey. J Health Popul Nutr. 2015;33:19. doi: 10.1186/s41043-015-0030-0 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hatcher AM, Gibbs A, Jewkes R, McBride RS, Peacock D, Christofides N. Effect of Childhood Poverty and Trauma on Adult Depressive Symptoms Among Young Men in Peri-Urban South African Settlements. J Adolesc Health. 2019;64(1):79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.07.026 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ridley M, Rao G, Schilbach F, Patel V. Poverty, depression, and anxiety: Causal evidence and mechanisms. Science. 2020;370(6522). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Curtis S, Pain R, Fuller S, Khatib Y, Rothon C, Stansfeld SA, et al. Neighbourhood risk factors for Common Mental Disorders among young people aged 10–20 years: a structured review of quantitative research. Health Place. 2013;20:81–90. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.10.010 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Evans GW, Wells NM, Moch A. Housing and mental health: A review of the evidence and a methodological and conceptual critique. J Soc Issues. 2003;59(3):475–500. doi: 10.1111/1540-4560.00074 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Richardson R, Westley T, Gariépy G, Austin N, Nandi A. Neighborhood socioeconomic conditions and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology. 2015;50(11):1641–56. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1092-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jebena MG, Lindstrom D, Belachew T, Hadley C, Lachat C, Verstraeten R, et al. Food Insecurity and Common Mental Disorders among Ethiopian Youth: Structural Equation Modeling. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0165931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165931 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Carta MG, Carpiniello B, Dazzan P, Reda MA. Depressive symptoms and occupational role among female groups: a research in a south-east African village. Psychopathology. 2000;33(5):240–5. doi: 10.1159/000029152 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Patel V, Saxena S, Lund C, Thornicroft G, Baingana F, Bolton P, et al. The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development. The Lancet. 2018;392(10157):1553–98. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31612-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Meffert SM, McCulloch CE, Neylan TC, Gandhi M, Lund C. Increase of perceived frequency of neighborhood domestic violence is associated with increase of women’s depression symptoms in a nationally representative longitudinal study in South Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2015;131:89–97. Epub 2015/03/15. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.008 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dowdall N, Ward CL, Lund C. The association between neighbourhood-level deprivation and depression: evidence from the south african national income dynamics study. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):395. Epub 2017/12/13. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1561-2 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.de Kadt J, Hamman C, Mkhize SP, Parker A. QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY 6 (2020/21): OVERVIEW REPORT. Johannesburg, South Africa: Gauteng City Regional Observatory, 2021.
  • 26.Hamman C, de Kadt J. Sampling Design. University of Cape Town, 2021.
  • 27.Bhana A, Rathod SD, Selohilwe O, Kathree T, Petersen I. The validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire for screening depression in chronic care patients in primary health care in South Africa. BMC psychiatry. 2015;15(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0503-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Levis B, Sun Y, He C, Wu Y, Krishnan A, Bhandari PM, et al. Accuracy of the PHQ-2 alone and in combination with the PHQ-9 for screening to detect major depression: systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama. 2020;323(22):2290–300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bernstein DP, Ahluvalia T, Pogge D, Handelsman L. Validity of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire in an adolescent psychiatric population. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 1997;36(3):340–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Spies G, Kidd M, Seedat S. A factor analytic study of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form in an all-female South African sample with and without HIV infection. Child abuse & neglect. 2019;92:157–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.García-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts C. WHO Multi-country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence against Women: Initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. Geneva: WHO, 2005.
  • 32.Stekhoven DJ, Bühlmann P. MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(1):112–8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.International G. Fieldwork Report. University of Cape Town, 2021.
  • 34.Dahlqwist E. Method developments for the attributable fraction in causal inference. 2019.
  • 35.South African Police Service (2020) aJ. SAPS Crime Statistics 2019/2020. 2020.
  • 36.Galea S, Ahern J, Rudenstine S, Wallace Z, Vlahov D. Urban built environment and depression: a multilevel analysis. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2005;59(10):822–7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.033084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Baranyi G, Di Marco MH, Russ TC, Dibben C, Pearce J. The impact of neighbourhood crime on mental health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine. 2021:114106. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Groves AK, Gebrekristos LT, Reyes LM, Moodley D, Maman S. Describing Relationship Characteristics and Postpartum HIV Risk Among Adolescent, Young Adult, and Adult Women in South Africa. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.12.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wong M, Myer L, Zerbe A, Phillips T, Petro G, Mellins CA, et al. Depression, alcohol use, and stigma in younger versus older HIV-infected pregnant women initiating antiretroviral therapy in Cape Town, South Africa. Archives of women’s mental health. 2017;20(1):149–59. doi: 10.1007/s00737-016-0688-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Thomas JL, Lewis JB, Martinez I, Cunningham SD, Siddique M, Tobin JN, et al. Associations between intimate partner violence profiles and mental health among low-income, urban pregnant adolescents. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2019;19(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2256-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hadley C, Tegegn A, Tessema F, Cowan JA, Asefa M, Galea S. Food insecurity, stressful life events and symptoms of anxiety and depression in east Africa: evidence from the Gilgel Gibe growth and development study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62(11):980–6. Epub 2008/10/16. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.068460 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Huddleston-Casas C, Charnigo R, Simmons LA. Food insecurity and maternal depression in rural, low-income families: a longitudinal investigation. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12(8):1133–40. Epub 2008/09/16. doi: 10.1017/S1368980008003650 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Maharaj V, Tomita A, Thela L, Mhlongo M, Burns JK. Food Insecurity and Risk of Depression Among Refugees and Immigrants in South Africa. J Immigr Minor Health. 2017;19(3):631–7. Epub 2016/03/18. doi: 10.1007/s10903-016-0370-x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shamu S, Gevers A, Mahlangu BP, Jama Shai PN, Chirwa ED, Jewkes RK. Prevalence and risk factors for intimate partner violence among Grade 8 learners in urban South Africa: baseline analysis from the Skhokho Supporting Success cluster randomised controlled trial. International health. 2016;8(1):18–26. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihv068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Meinck F, Cluver LD, Boyes ME, Loening-Voysey H. Physical, emotional and sexual adolescent abuse victimisation in South Africa: prevalence, incidence, perpetrators and locations. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70(9):910–6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-205860 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ellsberg M, Heise L, Pena R, Agurto S, Winkvist A. Researching domestic violence against women: methodological and ethical considerations. Stud Fam Plann. 2001;32(1):1–16. Epub 2001/05/01. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2001.00001.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001079.r001

Decision Letter 0

Ahmed Waqas

22 Apr 2022

PGPH-D-22-00209

Depressive symptoms and violence exposure in a population-based sample of adult women in South Africa

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Hatcher,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by . If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ahmed Waqas

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

1. Please send a completed 'Competing Interests' statement, including any COIs declared by your co-authors. If you have no competing interests to declare, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist".

2. Please amend your detailed Financial Disclosure statement. This is published with the article. It must therefore be completed in full sentences and contain the exact wording you wish to be published.

a. State the initials, alongside each funding source, of each author to receive each grant.

b. State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

c. If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

3. We notice that your supplementary tables are included in the manuscript file. Please remove them and upload them with the file type 'Supporting Information'. Please ensure that each Supporting Information file has a legend listed in the manuscript after the references list.

4. Please note that your Data Availability Statement is currently missing a direct link to access each database. If your manuscript is accepted for publication, you will be asked to provide these details on a very short timeline. We therefore suggest that you provide this information now, though we will not hold up the peer review process if you are unable.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Dear Dr. Hatcher,

Thank you for considering PloS Global Public Health for submission of your manuscript. The manuscript is well-written and explores an important public health topic. I have received a favorable response from both the reviewers. Could you please revise your manuscript in line with their comments? I look forward to reading the revised manuscript.

Best wishes,

Dr. Ahmed Waqas

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I want to appreciate the authors for their time and effort in doing this very important public health issue. The following comment needs to be addressed for the additional value of the paper. The paper needs to be revised the grammar, editing (you used present illness), list acronyms/ abbreviations (when you used in the first line for example line 110, PHQ), and avoid using words such as our, us, and we throughout the paper.

The Abstract section is good but the conclusion is too general, in this you also said that "Individual markers of poverty" and "Reduction of poverty" what do you mean. Your conclusion is general it should be specific and based on your finding. In the Introduction section, Paragraph two (line 62) the way of citation need to be corrected and what does elsewhere mean? In general, the introduction is good, but you failed to address, depression and violence from global to local and what efforts was done in South Africa, consequence, magnitude, and severity of violence and depression are not clearly addressed in this section.

In the method section, it is good but there is no clear information about the study area, study time, study design, population (source and study population/inclusion and exclusion criteria), sample size determination, sampling technique, and data quality control separately (subtitle) in this paper. The measurement (operational definitions) is good but the way that you measured some variables is somehow confused. Line 119 you said that "These 4 items have not been validated", in this, the definition of an intimate partner is defined as also for non-partner (why?), how did you measure this? Also, intimate partner violence is broad and includes physical, sexual, and psychological violence but you only used some of them? The socioeconomic status and food insecurity measurement are also not clear (why you did not use Principal component analysis for the economic status?) In the ethical considerations, you included the funding issue, it is better to list in the funding report.

In the Result section, avoid words that are not scientific such as Just (line 161). Avoid (columns 2-4) in line 167 when you referred to table 1. It would be better for readers if you show the results of depressed symptoms and violence in a separate paragraph (make in one paragraph from lines 170-179) b/ce it is about violence. Line 183, change the word "lacking high school education"

Discussion: In this, some parts of the justification are cited, it be better to justify the possible reasons for both the magnitudes and for factors (for example lines 227-236). Line 242 what does theoretically mean? The conclusion did not show the finding and not concluded based on your pertinent findings in addition to that you cited the reference (42) while it is unnecessary. Conclude your finding based on your objective. There are no abbreviation, author contribution, funding information, ethical issue, data availability, Acknowledgement, consent and conflict of interest statement in this paper. Follow the guideline of the journal for tables and edit some of the references and avoid reference number 42 from the citation (conclusion) and reference list.

Reviewer #2: Overall, this is a well-written manuscript. The authors have systematically examined the topic of investigation.

There are a few specific comments as mentioned below.

1. Line 34-38: Abstract: - Mention Odds Ratio and 95% confidence interval for significant associations.

2. Line 82-86: Elaborate on sampling method used. How many total wards and Enumeration Areas are there in the province? Do they cover rural, urban or both areas? What proportion was chosen for PPS sampling? Which type of random sampling was used to select dwelling units? were chosen out of how many total wards available? If more than one adult women were there in a dwelling, how were they selected?

3. Line 106-107, 114-115, 120-121: Were the data collection tools translated to local language? Mention it clearly.

4. Line 138-139: Description of a ward should be part of methods section where the study area is mentioned. Move it there.

5. Line 188-192: Provide Odds Ratio and 95% confidence interval in bracket for significant associations.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: DEEPANJALI BEHERA

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001079.r003

Decision Letter 1

Ahmed Waqas

22 Jul 2022

PGPH-D-22-00209R1

Depressive symptoms and violence exposure in a population-based sample of adult women in South Africa

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Hatcher,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 21 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ahmed Waqas

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

1. In the Funding Information you indicated that no funding was received. Please revise the Funding Information field to reflect funding received.

Please ensure that the funders and grant numbers match between the Financial Disclosure field and the Funding Information tab in your submission form. Note that the funders must be provided in the same order in both places as well.

2. We have noticed that you have uploaded Supporting Information files, but you have not included a list of legends. Please add a full list of legends for your Supporting Information files after the references list.

3. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Majority of the comments are addressed. But there are some editorial errors that still need to be addressed throughout the paper. Subjective words such as our, us are also still common in the paper that needs to be corrected. The conclusion part is still not corrected. No need of citation in the conclusion part and you should conclude based on your pertinent finding and avoid citation.

Reviewer #2: There is a good improvement in the revised version.

1. There is still a need to make the sampling description more clear and specific. What proportion was chosen for PPS sampling? Which type of random sampling was used to select dwelling units? How was the total sample size reached at by combining respondents selected at all levels? If more than one adult respondents were available in a dwelling, how were they selected?

2. In Line 113, it is mentioned that 13616 interviews were carried out. But, the same number is regarded as the overall study population in Line 219. It also states that 7276 women were included as the sample. Were there a total of 7276 women in the database of 13616 respondents which was used as part of this study? If they were more, how were these 7276 women chosen? There is a need to present these details with more clarity.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Deepanjali Behera

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001079.r005

Decision Letter 2

Ahmed Waqas

20 Sep 2022

Depressive symptoms and violence exposure in a population-based sample of adult women in South Africa

PGPH-D-22-00209R2

Dear Dr Hatcher,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Depressive symptoms and violence exposure in a population-based sample of adult women in South Africa' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Global Public Health.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of request. Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact globalpubhealth@plos.org.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Global Public Health.

Best regards,

Ahmed Waqas

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Appendix

    Table A: Mixed effects model of elevated depressive symptoms at cutpoint of PHQ >3 in a stratified cluster sample of women (n = 6093). Table B: Mixed effects model of elevated depressive symptoms assuming non-completers are violence-free (n = 6093). Table C: Mixed effects model of elevated depressive symptoms assuming non-completers are violence-exposed (n = 6093).

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Hatcher Rebuttal 14Jun22.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Rebuttal.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Public access data for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License available at https://www.datafirst.uct.ac.za/dataportal/index.php/collections/GCRO or by requesting access to support@data1st.org.


    Articles from PLOS Global Public Health are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES