Skip to main content
PLOS Global Public Health logoLink to PLOS Global Public Health
. 2023 Jan 24;3(1):e0000477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000477

Pediatric diarrhea patients living in urban areas have a higher incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection

Ayodele T Adesoji 1, Osaro Mgbere 2,3, Charles Darkoh 4,5,*
Editor: Sindhu Kulandaipalayam Natarajan6
PMCID: PMC10022077  PMID: 36962940

Abstract

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and an unappreciated contributor to child mortality in low- and middle-income countries where the diagnosis may be difficult. There is little information about the prevalence of CDI among infants, children, and adolescents in Africa. Using a cross-sectional design, seventy-six samples were collected from pediatric patients presenting with diarrhea, including infants (≤ 2 years old), children (2–12 years), and adolescents (13 ≤17 years) from three hospitals between January and December 2019. Demographic data, medical history, and prior antibiotic use were recorded. Toxigenic culture and PCR were used to detect and validate the presence of C. difficile in the samples. Data obtained were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. A total of 29 (38.7%), 39 (52.0%) and 7 (9.3%) samples were from infants, children, and adolescents, respectively. The average age of the patients was 4.4 years. Of these samples, 31 (41%) were positive for C. difficile by culture and were verified by PCR amplification of C. difficile-specific genes (tcdA and tcdB). The most positive cases were children (53.3%) and infants (40.0%) with the majority of them residing in urban areas. Forty-nine (66.2%) of the patients had no known antibiotics exposure, whereas 29.0% and 29.7% reported the use of over-the-counter antibiotics at 14 and 90 days, prior to the hospital visit, respectively. CDI is relatively common among children with diarrhea in Northern Nigeria. Therefore, for effective management and treatment, more attention should be given to testing for C. difficile as one of the causative agents of diarrhea.

Introduction

Clostridioides difficile is a strict anaerobic Gram-positive bacterium that colonizes up to 15% of healthy people [1]. It is a major cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea worldwide, whereby antibiotic treatment reduces the abundance of competing gut microbiota, allowing C. difficile to proliferate and cause mild to severe diarrhea [24].

The toxins (enterotoxin A and cytotoxin B) released during C. difficile infection (CDI) cause tissue damage [5]. These two toxins, encoded by the tcdA and tcdB, are located within a 19.6 kbp pathogenicity locus. Older age, antibiotic usage, gastric acid-suppressing drugs, inflammatory bowel disease, gastrointestinal surgery, use of naso, gastric tubes, neoplastic disease, immunodeficiency, and comorbidities are risk factors for CDI [6].

The United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) declared C. difficile as one of the five ‘urgent health threats in 2019, because of the significant risk associated with antibiotic use [7]. Despite this urgency, the prevalence of CDI in low and middle-income countries is underestimated. In developing nations where self-medication occurs frequently, a higher incidence of CDI may be expected. Outbreaks of CDI in developed countries have increased vigilance in these countries but little is known about CDI in Nigeria [8]. Adegboyega [9] and Doughari, Kachalla and Jaafaru, [10] found C. difficile spores and the bacterium, respectively, from samples obtained from hospital environments. Oguike and Emeruwa [11] isolated C. difficile from 156 (48.8%) out of 320 stool samples collected from infants under the age of 5 years and confirmed the occurrence of cytotoxin production from 25 (14.8%) of the isolates. Onwueme et al., [12] reported that among 71 HIV outpatients at one hospital, 10 (14.1%) and 61 (85.9%) of C. difficile isolates were toxin-positive and toxin-negative, respectively.

Normally, CDI testing in developing countries is not routine owing to the lack of resources for diagnosis and culture facilities for obligate anaerobes [13]. This is unfortunate because the majority of global mortality among children in the first 5 years of their life is due to diarrhea, of which a potentially large proportion could involve CDI [14, 15]. Limited testing also translates into a low index of clinical suspicion that exacerbates the lack of effort toward diagnostic screening [12, 16] resulting in misdiagnosis and incorrect treatment [17]. The lack of information about CDI is also problematic because most African countries are popular tourist destinations and may serve as incubators of CDI [18].

In most African countries, antimicrobials are easily accessed over-the-counter (OTC) [17, 19, 20]. There is also a high incidence of community- and nosocomial-associated diarrhea among children [20, 21], but few data are available on the incidence of CDI. Consequently, we initiated a survey to estimate the occurrence of CDI among pediatric diarrheic outpatients (0–17 years) in Katsina State, Nigeria.

Materials and methods

Study population and sample collection

Using a cross-sectional design, a total of 76 participants from three hospitals in Katsina State including (Malam Mande General Hospital in Dutsin-Ma) and Turai Yaradua Maternity and Children hospital and Government House Clinic in Katsina metropolis) were sampled for this study. The Katsina metropolis was designated as an urban area, while Dutsin-Ma was designated as a rural area. All the hospitals are under the management of the Katsina State Hospital Management Board.

Only diarrhea-presenting out-patients who were reporting to these hospitals between January and December 2019, and between the age of 0 and 17 years old (infant <2 years, children 2–12 years, adolescent 13–17 years) were eligible for inclusion in the study. The case definition was based on evaluation by attending physicians, where the severity of illness was indicated by whether a child was admitted to the hospital (inpatient) or treated as an outpatient.

As a result of the non-availability of information on diarrhea frequency or gravity of the symptoms available, disease severity was determined by the treatment setting of the patients [22]. Accordingly, diarrhea that required hospitalization was classified as severe, those that resolved within a few hours were considered mild, while the ones that resolved within a day were classified as moderate.

Recruitment of the patients was integrated with the services of the clinic and hospital ward under the supervision of the attending physicians who referred diarrhea patients to the microbiology laboratory. Following consent, questionnaires were administered to the patients that captured demographic data, previous antibiotics use, and medical history including hospitalization, and then stool samples were collected and stored at -20°C. The samples were subsequently shipped on ice to the University of Texas Health Science Center, School of Public Health Center for Infectious Diseases, Houston, Texas, USA for analysis.

Detection of C. difficile in stool samples by culture

To detect C. difficile, the stools were tested by toxigenic culture [23], followed by PCR of the isolates, as described previously [18]. Anaerobic condition was maintained in a Bactron 600 anaerobic chamber (Sheldon Manufacturing, Cornelius, OR, USA) using 5% CO2, 10% H2, and 85% N2.

PCR analysis of bacterial pellets

DNA from the isolates was extracted using the GenElute Bacterial Genomic DNA Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of the extracted DNA was estimated using a NanoDrop (ThermoScientific Wilmington, DE, USA). Primers specific for toxins A and B were used to assess the presence of these genes while a 16S ribosomal marker (16S rRNA) served as a positive control for the PCR reaction [15, 2429]. The primer sequences used were as follows: TcdA2 (F-5’AGATTCCTATATTTACATGACAATAT3’, R-5’GTATCAGGCATAAAGTAATATACTTT3’); TNC (F-5’GAGCACAAAGGGTATTGCTCTACTGGC3’, R-5’CCAGACACAGCTAATCTTATTTGCACCT3’); 16S rRNA (F-ACACGGTCCAAACTCCTACG, R-5’AGGCGAGTTTCAGCCTACAA3’). OneTaq Quick-Load 2X Master Mix (New England Biolabs, IPSwich, MA, USA) was used for the PCR amplification with an initial denaturation temperature of 94°C for 30 s, followed by 36 cycles of 94°C for 30s; 55°C for 30s; 68°C for 30s; and a final extension of 68°C for 5 min. Gel electrophoresis (1.0%) followed by staining with ethidium bromide and UV exposure was used to assess the results.

Toxin detection

Cdifftox activity assay was used to detect toxin activity using 48 h culture supernatant from the isolates [30] while C. difficile TOX A/B II ELISA test (TechLab, Blacksburg, VA, USA) was used to detect toxin production.

For the ELISA test, 200 μl of the culture supernatant was treated according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

Data obtained from the survey were subjected to descriptive statistics using frequency runs to describe the proportional distribution of the study sample by sex, age educational status, and area of residence. To determine the associations between the history of antibiotic use, the severity of diarrhea, and the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in the stool samples of the patients, we applied a chi-square inferential test of independence. Furthermore, to examine the relationships between the length of diarrhea and hospitalization and the age of children with CDI, we carried out bivariate curve fitting models and density contour mappings to determine the potential patterns (clusters) within these measures. Density ellipse probability was applied to evaluate the mass of points of the measures at p = 0.25 and p = 0.50. Additionally, we used Pearson’s correlation coefficient to determine the linear correlation between each of the measures and the age of diarrheal patients. Based on the sample data, we build a partition-based model using the participants’ area of residence, age category, and sex to determine the probability of obtaining a positive CDI test result. All statistical tests conducted were 2-tailed, and a probability of ≤0.05 was used as the threshold for declaring statistical significance. Data management and statistical analyses were conducted using SAS JMP Statistical Discovery Software version 14.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).

Ethics statement

Approval to conduct this study was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee of the Ministry of Health in Katsina State, Nigeria (MOH/ADM/SUB/1152/258) after reviewing the study protocol that included the consent procedures. Written consent from responsible guardians and ‘assent’ for those >7 years old was obtained before sample collection. Guardians of participants were informed of the purpose of the study and the fact that participation in the survey was anonymous, consensual, and voluntary.

Results

Seventy-six stool samples were collected from patients presenting with diarrhea: 29 (38.7%), 39 (52.0%), and 7 (9.3%) infants, children, and adolescents, respectively (Table 1). There were more male (63.2%) than female (36.8%) patients.

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the pediatric patients with diarrhea.

Characteristic N %
Sex
Female 28 36.8
Male 48 63.2
Age Category (years)
Infant (< 2) 29 38.7
Children (2–12) 39 52.0
Adolescent (13–17) 7 9.3
Mean ± SEM (4.4 ± 0.51)
Educational Status
No Schooling 7 9.2
Primary School 9 11.8
Secondary School 8 10.5
Unknown 52 68.4
Area of Residence
Urban 44 57.9
Rural 32 42.1

Note: Within characteristic, n may not add up to the total number of records due to missing response; Percentages may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

For all samples, 31 (41%) grew C. difficile colonies while 45 (59%) were negative. All putative C. difficile colonies were PCR-positive for tcdA and tcdB genes, and toxin positive by ELISA. None of the isolates that tested negative by PCR were positive for toxin production. Among the confirmed C. difficile patients, 11 (35%) and 20 (65%) were female and male, respectively (Fig 1A). The distributions across infants, children, and adolescents were 40%, 53%, and 7%, respectively (Fig 1B).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Distribution of the presence of C. difficile in the stools of pediatric patients with diarrhea by sex (A) and age (B).

The majority of the parents of the patients (66.2%) did not have any knowledge about antibiotics, whereas 29.0% and 29.7% reported OTC antibiotic use at 14 and 90 days respectively. About 13.2% and 9.2%, respectively, reported using metronidazole, and other types of antibiotics (tetracycline, ampicillin, ampiclox, cloxacillin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, septrin, cefuroxime, erythromycin, doxycycline, penicillin, etc.). There was a significant association between knowledge of antibiotics (X2 = 3.74, p = 0.05) and use of antibiotics in the last 14 days (X2 = 4.56, p = 0.05), and the occurrence of CDI (Table 2). Of those who have knowledge of antibiotics (n = 25, 33.8%), 18.9% of them tested positive for CDI, while 17.7% (n = 11) of the patients with positive CDI indicated having taken antibiotics in the last 14 days (p = 0.05) prior to sample collection.

Table 2. History of antibiotics used by the patients, presence of toxigenic C. difficile, and disease severity among pediatric patients with diarrhea.

Measure N (%) CDI
Positive Negative
n (%) n (%)
Parent’s Knowledge of Antibiotics
No 49 (66.2) 16 (21.6) 33 (44.6)
Yes 25 (33.8) 14 (18.9) 11 (14.9)
Test Statistics: χ2 value, P-value 3.743, 0.0530*
Use Antibiotics in the last 14 days
No 44 (71.0) 14 (22.6) 30 (48.4)
Yes 18 (29.0) 11 (17.7) 7 (11.3)
Test Statistics: χ2 value, P-value 4.555, 0.0328*
Type of Antibiotic Used in the last 14 days
Metronidazole/Flaggy 10 (13.2) 7 (9.2) 3 (4.0)
Other types of Antibiotics 7 (9.2) 4 (5.3) 3 (4.0)
Unknown 59 (77.6) 20 (26.3) 39 (51.3)
Test Statistics: χ2 value, P-value 5.468, 0.0650
Used Antibiotics in the Last 90 days (3 Months)
No 52 (70.3) 20 (27.0) 32 (43.2)
Yes 22 (29.7) 11 (14.9) 11 (14.9)
Test Statistics: χ2 value, P-value 0.846, 0.3578
Last occurrence of diarrhea prior to clinic visit
Less than 14 days 24 (55.8) 15 (34.9) 9 (20.9)
Last 1 or more months 19 (44.2) 7 (16.3) 12 (27.9)
Test Statistics: χ2 value, P-value 2.794; 0.0946
Ailment Experienced prior to Clinic visit
Vomiting 25 (32.9) 11 (14.5) 14 (18.4)
Non-vomiting 30 (39.5) 10 (13.2) 20 (26.3)
Unknown 21 (27.6) 10 (13.2) 11 (14.5)
Test Statistics: χ2 value, P-value 1.203; 0.5480
Severity of Diarrhea
Mild 14 (19.7) 7 (9.9) 7 (9.9)
Moderate 47 (66.2) 18 (25.4) 29 (40.9)
Severe 10 (14.1) 3 (4.2) 7 (9.9)
Test Statistics: χ2 value, P-value 1.052; 0.5908
Hospitalization due to Diarrhea
No 49 (68.1) 20 (27.8) 29 (40.3)
Yes 23 (31.9) 9 (12.5) 14 (19.4)
Test Statistics: χ2 value, P-value 0.018; 0.8918

Note: Within measure percentages may not add up to 100 exactly due to rounding; within characteristic, “n” may not add up to the total number of records due to missing response.

Significance Level

* = p<0.05; ns = not significant (p>0.05).

Among the patients, 19.7%, 66.2%, and 14.1% reported mild, moderate, and severe diarrhea cases, respectively. Also, 55.8% (n = 24) and 44.2% (n = 19) reported suffering from diarrhea in the past 14 and 30 or more days prior to their hospital visit, respectively (Table 2). Some patients (32.9%) exhibited symptoms of vomiting prior to their visit to the clinic. The majority of the patients (68.1%) reported no prior hospitalization due to diarrhea.

Fig 2A and 2B demonstrate the relationships between length of diarrhea, hospitalization, and age of the pediatric patients with the contours displaying the regions with various densities. The contours with red color and gradients denote regions of high density and fade to regions with medium densities colored light green, and subsequently, to regions of low densities colored purple with gradients. The inner and outer density ellipses represent regions where 25% and 50% of the cases, respectively occurred in relation to the measures. The average length of diarrhea among the patients was 5.75±1.25 days at an average age of 4.36±0.52 years, while the average length of hospitalization due to diarrhea was 7.06±3.57 days (1 week) at an average age of 3.36±0.91 years. Although the length of diarrhea and hospital stay were positively and significantly correlated (r = 0.6870, p<0.01), they were both negatively correlated with the patients’ age (r = -0.1946 vs. -0.1336) (Results not presented). Consequently, younger children were more likely to have longer diarrheal periods and hospitalization than older ones.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Relationship between the length of diarrhea and hospitalization (A) and age of pediatric patients (B).

Fig 3 shows the probability of obtaining a positive CDI test by selected demographic characteristics. The majority of the children residing in the urban areas had more positive CDI compared to those living in the rural areas. For instance, the probability of obtaining a positive CDI among female and male children, of age 2–12 years in urban areas were 0.543 and 0.629 compared to 0.173 and 0.216 for those in the rural areas, respectively.

Fig 3. Response probability of toxigenic CDI among pediatric patients with diarrhea.

Fig 3

Discussion

CDI has been underestimated by clinicians and public health workers in Africa despite a well-documented risk of diarrhea and self-medication with antibiotics [31]. Due to a lack of culture facilities for obligate anaerobes and resources for diagnostic testing, routine tests for CDI are rarely carried out in developing countries, and diarrhea is often treated symptomatically, resulting in mistreatment, misdiagnosis, and likely underrating C. difficile contribution to diarrhea [13]. Among the 76 pediatric stool samples tested in this study, 31 (41%) were positive for C. difficile. This is within the prevalence rate reported by Emeruwa and Oguike [32], but slightly higher than what Plant-Paris et al., [31] reported among children less than 5 years in Kenya. Our data also showed a higher (53.33%) CDI proportion in children between 2–12 years old compared to 3–15 years old patients (30%) reported by Mutai et al., [13]. Whereas higher observation of CDI among pediatric diarrhea patients living in the urban area compared to rural dwellers in our study is contrary to what Oguike and Emeruwa [11] reported in their study. The authors reported higher (48.3–52.5%) CDI among infants living in rural areas than their urban counterparts (42–47.8%). However, in a study conducted recently in rural Ontario, Canada by Babey et al., [33], the authors noticed similarities between CDI incidence in their study compared to urban-based estimates.

We confirmed toxins A and B production in the isolates, suggesting that infants and children can be reservoirs of clinically relevant strains of C. difficile. The study also showed that younger children can have longer diarrheal periods and hospitalization than older children. This may be related to the immune system since infants and children still have compromised immune systems compared to adolescents [34]. As a result, diarrhea could be more quickly resolved in adolescents than in infants and children. Also, it has been reported that the prevalence of C. difficile colonization in neonates ranges from 2% to 50% with colonization often occurring within the first week of life [35]. In contrast to adults where the rate of colonization in community and hospital settings is 3% and 20%, respectively.

Our study has some limitations that warrant cautious interpretation of the findings. First, the small sample size of participants stemmed from the fact that only diarrheal patients who reported to the hospitals were screened by the attending physicians. Consequently, although the sample size met the statistical threshold and provided adequate statistical power, the non-random sampling technique applied placed some constraints on the generalizability of our findings. This is because some patients who had diarrhea may not have reported to the hospitals. Second, the study population was from one major race/ethnicity in northern Nigeria, making it impossible to determine racial/ethnic disparities in the occurrence and severity of CDI. Third, the presence of other diarrhea-causing pathogens was not tested in this study and will be the subject of our ongoing research in this population. Finally, the survey was self-reported, and thus, some participants may have exhibited social desirability and recall biases in their responses. Despite, these, we believe that social desirability was not, however, associated with the objective measures in our study.

In conclusion, attention should be given to testing for C. difficile as one of the causes of diarrhea during diagnosis rather than simply administrating antibiotics empirically. Testing can also promote the development and implementation of strategies that regulate antimicrobials known to induce community and hospital-acquired CDI. As this is the first report of CDI in the northern part of Nigeria, future work will include examining the diversity of strains as well as other phenotypic and virulence-associated characteristics.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Malam Mande General Hospital, Turai Yaradua Maternity and Children Hospital, and Government House Clinic managements for facilitating the recruitment of patients for this study.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but may be made available upon request from the corresponding author or from the UTHealth Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at cphs@uth.tmc.edu.

Funding Statement

This study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIH/NIAID) grants R01AI116914 [CD] and R01AI150685 [CD]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Furuya-Kanamori L, Marquess J, Yakob L, Riley TV, Paterson DL, Foster NF, et al. Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile colonization: epidemiology and clinical implications. BMC Infect Dis. 2015. Nov 14;15:516. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1258-4 ; PMCID: PMC4647607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang S, Palazuelos-Munoz S, Balsells EM, Nair H, Chit A, Kyaw MH. Cost of hospital management of Clostridium difficile infection in United States-a meta-analysis and modelling study. BMC Infect Dis. 2016. Aug 25;16(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1786-6 ; PMCID: PMC5000548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ferreyra JA, Wu KJ, Hryckowian AJ, Bouley DM, Weimer BC, Sonnenburg JL. Gut microbiota-produced succinate promotes C. difficile infection after antibiotic treatment or motility disturbance. Cell Host Microbe. 2014. Dec 10;16(6):770–7. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.11.003 ; PMCID: PMC4859344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pérez-Cobas AE, Artacho A, Ott SJ, Moya A, Gosalbes MJ, Latorre A. Structural and functional changes in the gut microbiota associated to Clostridium difficile infection. Front Microbiol. 2014. Jul 4;5:335. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00335 ; PMCID: PMC4163665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Voth DE, Ballard JD. Clostridium difficile toxins: mechanism of action and role in disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005. Apr;18(2):247–63. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.2.247-263.2005 ; PMCID: PMC1082799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yoo J, Lightner AL. Clostridium difficile Infections: What Every Clinician Should Know. Perm J. 2010. Summer;14(2):35–40. doi: 10.7812/tpp/10-001 ; PMCID: PMC2912081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Warny M, Pepin J, Fang A, Killgore G, Thompson A, Brazier J, et al. Toxin production by an emerging strain of Clostridium difficile associated with outbreaks of severe disease in North America and Europe. Lancet. 2005. Sep 24–30;366(9491):1079–84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67420-X . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Adegboyega T. "Environmental sources Clostridium difficile in Lagos state, Nigeria." Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing 3 (2014): 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Doughari J., Kachalla N., and Jaafaru M. "Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in Hospital Environment within Yola Adamawa State Nigeria." Microbiol Infect Dis 5.2 (2021): 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Oguike JU, Emeruwa AC. Incidence of Clostridium difficile in infants in rural and urban areas of Nigeria. Microbiologica. 1990. Jul;13(3):267–71. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Onwueme K, Fadairo Y, Idoko L, Onuh J, Alao O, Agaba P, et al. High prevalence of toxinogenic Clostridium difficile in Nigerian adult HIV patients. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2011. Nov;105(11):667–9. Epub 2011 Aug 19. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.07.014 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mutai WC, Mureithi MW, Anzala O, Revathi G, Kullin B, Burugu M, et al. High Prevalence of Multidrug-Resistant Clostridioides difficile Following Extensive Use of Antimicrobials in Hospitalized Patients in Kenya. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021. Feb 8;10:604986. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.604986 ; PMCID: PMC7897694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.GBD Diarrhoeal Diseases Collaborators. Estimates of global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoeal diseases: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017. Sep;17(9):909–948. Epub 2017 Jun 1. Erratum in: Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;17(9):897. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30276-1 ; PMCID: PMC5589208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S, Perin J, Scott S, Lawn JE, et al. Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group of WHO and UNICEF. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet. 2012. Jun 9;379(9832):2151–61. Epub 2012 May 11. Erratum in: Lancet. 2012 Oct 13;380(9850):1308. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60560-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Galaydick J, Xu Y, Sun L, Landon E, Weber SG, Sun D, et al. Seek and you shall find: prevalence of Clostridium difficile in Wuhan, China. Am J Infect Control. 2015. Mar 1;43(3):301–2. Epub 2015 Jan 1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.11.008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Roldan GA, Cui AX, Pollock NR. Assessing the Burden of Clostridium difficile Infection in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. J Clin Microbiol. 2018. Feb 22;56(3):e01747–17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01747-17 ; PMCID: PMC5824057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Oyaro MO, Plants-Paris K, Bishoff D, Malonza P, Gontier CS, DuPont HL, et al. High rate of Clostridium difficile among young adults presenting with diarrhea at two hospitals in Kenya. Int J Infect Dis. 2018. Sep;74:24–28. Epub 2018 Jun 28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.06.014 ; PMCID: PMC6152928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bebell LM, Muiru AN. Antibiotic use and emerging resistance: how can resource-limited countries turn the tide? Glob Heart. 2014. Sep;9(3):347–58. Epub 2014 Oct 31. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2014.08.009 ; PMCID: PMC4369554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nwokediuko S, Bojuwoye B, Ozumba UC, Ozoh G. Peculiarities of chronic diarrhea in Enugu, Southeastern Nigeria. Journal of health science. 2002;48(5):435–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Adesoji AT, Liadi AM. Antibiogram studies of Escherichia coli and Salmonella species isolated from diarrheal patients attending Malam Mande General Hospital Dutsin-Ma, Katsina State, Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. 2020. Oct 1;37:110. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.110.24851 ; PMCID: PMC7757212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kotloff KL, Nataro JP, Blackwelder WC, Nasrin D, Farag TH, Panchalingam S, et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet. 2013. Jul 20;382(9888):209–22. Epub 2013 May 14. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60844-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Darkoh C, Kaplan HB, Dupont HL. Harnessing the glucosyltransferase activities of Clostridium difficile for functional studies of toxins A and B. J Clin Microbiol. 2011. Aug;49(8):2933–41. Epub 2011 Jun 8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00037-11 ; PMCID: PMC3147749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lemee L, Dhalluin A, Testelin S, Mattrat MA, Maillard K, Lemeland JF, et al Multiplex PCR targeting tpi (triose phosphate isomerase), tcdA (Toxin A), and tcdB (Toxin B) genes for toxigenic culture of Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 2004. Dec;42(12):5710–4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5710-5714.2004 ; PMCID: PMC535266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Murray R, Boyd D, Levett PN, Mulvey MR, Alfa MJ. "Truncation in the tcdC region of the Clostridium difficilePathLoc of clinical isolates does not predict increased biological activity of Toxin B or Toxin A." BMC infectious diseases 9.1 (2009): 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Griffiths D, Fawley W, Kachrimanidou M, Bowden R, Crook DW, et al. Multilocus sequence typing of Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 2010. Mar;48(3):770–8. Epub 2009 Dec 30. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01796-09 ; PMCID: PMC2832416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fry PR, Thakur S, Abley M, Gebreyes WA. Antimicrobial resistance, toxinotype, and genotypic profiling of Clostridium difficile isolates of swine origin. J Clin Microbiol. 2012. Jul;50(7):2366–72. Epub 2012 Apr 18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06581-11 ; PMCID: PMC3405606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fiedoruk K, Daniluk T, Rozkiewicz D, Zaremba ML, Oldak E, Sciepuk M, et al. Conventional and molecular methods in the diagnosis of community-acquired diarrhoea in children under 5 years of age from the north-eastern region of Poland. Int J Infect Dis. 2015. Aug;37:145–51. Epub 2015 Jul 6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2015.06.028 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Li N, Jia H, Yang H, Ji B, Liu Y, Peng X, et al. Preliminary screening of type IV secretion system in divergent geographic sources of Clostridium difficile. Exp Ther Med. 2017. Nov;14(5):4405–4410. Epub 2017 Aug 29. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.5065 ; PMCID: PMC5658759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Darkoh C, Dupont HL, Kaplan HB. Novel one-step method for detection and isolation of active-toxin-producing Clostridium difficile strains directly from stool samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2011. Dec;49(12):4219–24. Epub 2011 Oct 5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01033-11 ; PMCID: PMC3232957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Plants-Paris K, Bishoff D, Oyaro MO, Mwinyi B, Chappell C, Kituyi A, et al. Prevalence of Clostridium difficile infections among Kenyan children with diarrhea. Int J Infect Dis. 2019. Apr;81:66–72. Epub 2019 Jan 17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.01.024 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Emeruwa AC, Oguike JU. Incidence of cytotoxin producing isolates of Clostridium difficile in faeces of neonates and children in Nigeria. Microbiologica. 1990. Oct;13(4):323–8. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Babey K, Kelton S, Milne WK, Muileboom J, Voth B, Kelly L, et al. Clostridium difficile infection in rural Ontario: a retrospective multisite population-based study. Can J Rural Med. 2015. Fall;20(4):117–20. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Raqib R, Mia SM, Qadri F, Alam TI, Alam NH, Chowdhury AK, et al. Innate immune responses in children and adults with Shigellosis. Infect Immun. 2000. Jun;68(6):3620–9. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.6.3620-3629.2000 ; PMCID: PMC97651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tamma PD, Sandora TJ. Clostridium difficile Infection in Children: Current State and Unanswered Questions. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2012. Sep;1(3):230–43. Epub 2012 Jul 25. doi: 10.1093/jpids/pis071 ; PMCID: PMC3656539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000477.r001

Decision Letter 0

Sindhu Kulandaipalayam Natarajan

24 Aug 2022

PGPH-D-22-00619

Pediatric Diarrhea Patients Living in Urban Areas Have Higher Incidence of Clostridioides difficile Infection

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Darkoh,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please find my detailed comments (as an attachment) added along with the reviewers' comments. Overall, this is a very valuable and important study from Nigeria. You will need to address the comments from the two reviewers as well as those from the academic editor.However, a significant modification of the manuscript is needed to make this eligible for publication. 

Please submit your revised manuscript by 10-10-2022. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Sindhu Kulandaipalayam Natarajan, MD, DTM&H

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

1. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified whether consent was written or verbal/oral. If consent was verbal/oral, please specify: 1) whether the ethics committee approved the verbal/oral consent procedure, 2) why written consent could not be obtained, and 3) how verbal/oral consent was recorded. If your study included minors, please state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians in these cases. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

2. Please send a completed 'Competing Interests' statement, including any COIs declared by your co-authors. If you have no competing interests to declare, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist". Otherwise please declare all competing interests beginning with the statement "I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests:"

3. Please amend your detailed Financial Disclosure statement. This is published with the article. It must therefore be completed in full sentences and contain the exact wording you wish to be published.

a. State the initials, alongside each funding source, of each author to receive each grant.

b. State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

4. Please provide separate figure files in .tif or .eps format only and remove any figures embedded in your manuscript file. Please also ensure that all files are under our size limit of 10MB.

For more information about how to convert your figure files please see our guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/s/figures

5. Please provide a complete Data Availability Statement in the submission form, ensuring you include all necessary access information or a reason for why you are unable to make your data freely accessible. If your research concerns only data provided within your submission, please write "All data are in the manuscript and/or supporting information files" as your Data Availability Statement.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: I don't know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1. In the abstract please mention your study design, and a sentence about the statistical methods you used.

2. Study Population: Please include your study design.

3. How did you determine this sample size? Please describe your sampling procedure. And justify whether 76 sample size provide the adequate level of power for this study.

4. Since you have considered three different pediatric groups as your study participant, so how did you adjust for their individual affects on CDI?

5. It is important to know that whether your sample size is adequate enough for performing the statistical test and showing sufficient statistical power to answer your research objectives.

6. In line 151, you have mentioned that frequency distribution of study sample are shown by race/ ethnicity which didn't display in the results section.

7. The level of statistical significance was considered as <=0.05 in this study. According to this cut off-point, the association between knowledge of antibiotics and CDI occurrence are not statistically significant at 5% level of significance.

8. In line 197-200, please describe a little more about the patterns exhibits in the figure 2a, 2b.

9. In figure2, please specify the color legends.

10. Please work on the grammar and sentence structure of the manuscript.

Reviewer #2: It is a well-written research paper which highlights an important issue of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) among children in low and middle-income countries. The authors should highlight the reasons for the non-diagnosis of CDI in Nigeria from the health system perspective also. Is it a shortage of trained staff or sophisticated equipment which are expensive or so on? This should be included in the discussion section. Secondly, as multiple diagnostic tests are mentioned in the paper, are there any standard treatment guidelines (STGs) for the diagnosis of CDI in Nigeria or other LMICs? if yes, details of diagnostics required for the diagnosis of CDI in a real-world scenario should be added in the introduction of the article. Thirdly, as mentioned in the limitations why the presence of other diarrhoea-causing pathogens was not tested in this study? Does it mean that it can be a non-CDI infection but due to lack of testing classified as a CDI? Can be a multiple pathogen infection? If yes, how authors decided that it's a CDI and no other pathogen is predominant? Lastly, the limitations section is written very briefly, more details can be added to it.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Sudipta Das Gupta

Reviewer #2: Yes: Maninder Pal Singh

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000477.r003

Decision Letter 1

Sindhu Kulandaipalayam Natarajan

21 Dec 2022

Pediatric Diarrhea Patients Living in Urban Areas Have Higher Incidence of Clostridioides difficile Infection

PGPH-D-22-00619R1

Dear Dr Darkoh,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Pediatric Diarrhea Patients Living in Urban Areas Have Higher Incidence of Clostridioides difficile Infection' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Global Public Health.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact globalpubhealth@plos.org.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Global Public Health.

Best regards,

Sindhu Kulandaipalayam Natarajan, MD, DTM&H

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers comments _09.23.22.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but may be made available upon request from the corresponding author or from the UTHealth Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at cphs@uth.tmc.edu.


    Articles from PLOS Global Public Health are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES