Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2023 Mar 17;12:e80768. doi: 10.7554/eLife.80768

Involvement of ILC1-like innate lymphocytes in human autoimmunity, lessons from alopecia areata

Rimma Laufer Britva 1,2,, Aviad Keren 1,, Marta Bertolini 3, Yehuda Ullmann 4, Ralf Paus 3,5,6,‡,, Amos Gilhar 1,‡,
Editors: Valerie Horsley7, Betty Diamond8
PMCID: PMC10023162  PMID: 36930216

Abstract

Here, we have explored the involvement of innate lymphoid cells-type 1 (ILC1) in the pathogenesis of alopecia areata (AA), because we found them to be significantly increased around lesional and non-lesional HFs of AA patients. To further explore these unexpected findings, we first co-cultured autologous circulating ILC1-like cells (ILC1lc) with healthy, but stressed, organ-cultured human scalp hair follicles (HFs). ILClc induced all hallmarks of AA ex vivo: they significantly promoted premature, apoptosis-driven HF regression (catagen), HF cytotoxicity/dystrophy, and most important for AA pathogenesis, the collapse of the HFs physiological immune privilege. NKG2D-blocking or IFNγ-neutralizing antibodies antagonized this. In vivo, intradermal injection of autologous activated, NKG2D+/IFNγ-secreting ILC1lc into healthy human scalp skin xenotransplanted onto SCID/beige mice sufficed to rapidly induce characteristic AA lesions. This provides the first evidence that ILC1lc, which are positive for the ILC1 phenotype and negative for the classical NK markers, suffice to induce AA in previously healthy human HFs ex vivo and in vivo, and further questions the conventional wisdom that AA is always an autoantigen-dependent, CD8 +T cell-driven autoimmune disease.

Research organism: Mouse

Introduction

Alopecia areata (AA) is both the most common inflammatory hair loss disorder and one of the most common human autoimmune diseases and exerts a major negative impact on quality of life (Gilhar et al., 2012; Gilhar et al., 2019a; Korta et al., 2018; Pratt et al., 2017). Despite major recent advances in AA therapy, a causal therapy does not yet exist, and disease relapse after therapy discontinuation is the rule, not the exception in long-standing AA (Meah et al., 2020; Gilhar et al., 2019a). Thus, the currently available, purely symptomatic AA therapy, including JAK inhibitors (Gilhar et al., 2019b), remains unsatisfactory. Since the exact pathobiology of AA and its clinical variants remains to be fully characterized, the – likely diverse – disease-initiating factors that ultimately result in the characteristic AA hair loss pattern shared by all AA variants, require more comprehensive dissection for optimal, personalized therapeutic targeting (Bertolini et al., 2020; Paus et al., 2018).

Specifically, there is increasing awareness that a classical, autoantigen- and CD8 +T cell-dependent autoimmune variant of AA (AAA) and a possibly autoantigen-independent non-autoimmune variant (NAIAA) may have to be distinguished from each other (Gilhar et al., 2019a; Bertolini et al., 2020; Paus et al., 2018; Paus, 2020). This is in line with the long-standing, but often under-appreciated clinical recognition that AA shows a wide spectrum of phenotypes and sub-forms (Gilhar et al., 2012; Ikeda, 1965; Meah et al., 2021; King et al., 2022).

One reason why the currently available AA therapy is not entirely satisfactory may be related to as yet insufficient therapeutic targeting of innate immunocytes in the immunopathogenesis of human AA, namely in NAIAA, even though these are now recognized as major players in AA pathobiology (Ghraieb et al., 2018; Ito et al., 2008; Li et al., 2016; Uchida et al., 2020; Uchida et al., 2021).

Previously, we had demonstrated that AA lesions are associated with a massive increase in the number of perifollicular NKG2D+NK cells (Gilhar et al., 2013a), which recognize the activating NKG2D ligand MICA, a ‘danger’ signal that is greatly overexpressed by the epithelium of lesional AA HFs (Ito et al., 2008; Li et al., 2016; Connell and Jabbari, 2022). Subsequent work has confirmed the key role of NKG2D and its activating ligands in human and murine AA (Xing et al., 2014; Petukhova et al., 2010). In fact, AA lesions can be induced experimentally in healthy human scalp skin in vivo by the transfer of interleukin 2 (IL-2)-activated NKG2D+ cells (Gilhar et al., 2013a), most of which had NK cell characteristics, with only a small minority of CD8 +T cells being present, that is the best-recognized pathogenic lymphocyte population in AA (Gilhar et al., 2012; Gilhar et al., 2013a; Pratt et al., 2017; Bertolini et al., 2020; de Jong et al., 2018). Moreover, pro-inflammatory mast cells (Bertolini et al., 2014) and (likely autoantigen-non-specific) γδ T-cells are also increased around/in lesional human AA HFs (Uchida et al., 2020). Finally, these ‘intermediate immunity’ protagonists suffice to induce the hallmarks of AA ex vivo (Uchida et al., 2021).

Taken together, this questions whether pathogenic, autoreactive CD8 +T cells are the only drivers of disease, and that all cases of AA, represent a genuine, autoantigen-dependent autoimmune disease (Bertolini et al., 2020; Paus et al., 2018) in the strictly defined sense of this term (Rose and Bona, 1993).

In our ongoing exploration of the role of innate/transitional immunity in the pathobiology of AA (Paus, 2020; Uchida et al., 2020; Uchida et al., 2021; Gilhar et al., 2019a; Bertolini et al., 2014), we, therefore, have asked in the current study whether innate lymphoid cells type 1 (ILC1 cells) (Zhou et al., 2020; Nabekura and Shibuya, 2021a; Colonna, 2018) can initiate human AA lesions.

We were interested in these immunocytes since human ILC1 cells secrete large amounts of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) (Ebbo et al., 2017), the crucial AA pathogenesis-promoting cytokine (Gilhar et al., 2012; Gilhar et al., 2019a; Paus et al., 2018), and this notably independent of classical autoantigen-specific CD8 +T cell activities. These ‘unconventional’ T-cells are placed in strategic tissue locations (Collins et al., 2017; Jiao et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2021) and represent an important link between innate and adaptive immunity (Vivier et al., 2018). While ILC1s play an essential role in human inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (Ebbo et al., 2017; Luo et al., 2022; Clottu et al., 2021), their role in the pathophysiology of autoimmune hepatitis and rheumatoid arthritis requires further investigation (Ebbo et al., 2017; Fang et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2015), and their role in human autoimmune diseases overall remains insufficiently understood. We hypothesized that AA might offer a good model disease for interrogating this role.

ILC1 cells are classified as a component of type 1 immunity (Shannon et al., 2021), express NKG2D, recognize conserved phosphoantigens (Nabekura and Shibuya, 2021a), and contribute to immunity against tumor cells, for example through NKG2D activation (Dadi et al., 2016). The activating receptor NKG2D and its ligands (MICA, ULBP3) play an important role in innate (NK, ILC1), ‘translational’ (γδ T-cells) and CD8 T-cell-mediated immune responses to tumors and in several autoimmune diseases (Frazao et al., 2019; Babic and Romagnani, 2018).

Given that ILC1 cells produce TH1-type cytokines (such as IFN-γ) and share several phenotypic markers with NK cells, namely NKG2D (Spits et al., 2016), it is challenging to distinguish NKs and ILC1 cells (Tulic et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2018; Seillet et al., 2021; Conlon et al., 2021). In fact, how to reliably discriminate between NK cells and ILC1s and unraveling the shared and distinct functions of these cell populations remains an important open quest (Seillet et al., 2021; Lopes et al., 2023; Cheng et al., 2023; Taggenbrock and van Gisbergen, 2023). For example, Eomeshi T-betlo liver-resident NK cells have been described in humans and mice (Park et al., 2019; Harmon et al., 2016), while ILC1s from human tonsil and blood was also found to be Eomes+ (Cella et al., 2019). Therefore, the distinction between NK cells and ILC1s remains provisional – which is exactly why we have cautiously labeled the latter as ‘ILC1lc.’. The transcriptional and functional identity of ILC1 cells in humans is still a matter of debate, given that in contrast to other ILC subsets ILC1 cells seem to lack robust markers that enable their unequivocal identification and isolation (Bennstein et al., 2020).

However, although integrin α1 (CD49a) is upregulated on activated NK cells (Albini et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2016), CD49a and integrin α2 (CD49b) are used as two mutually exclusive markers for distinguishing between NK and ILC1 cells, with NK cells being defined as CD49b+CD49a- and ILC1 as CD49b-CD49a+ (Gao et al., 2017; Vienne et al., 2021; Flommersfeld et al., 2021; Krzywinska et al., 2022) In the current study, we have accepted and employed this consensus. Also, in contrast to ILC1 and ILC1lc, classical NK cells demonstrate high T-bet and Eomes expression (T-bethi /Eomeshi) (Verma et al., 2020). Therefore, for the purpose of this study, we define ILC1lc as CD49a+CD49b- (Verma et al., 2020) and as lin-/CD127+/CD117-/CRTH2-phenotype, which are typical to classical ILC1 cells (Bennstein et al., 2020; Krabbendam et al., 2021), and also as T-betlo/ Eomeshi (Bennstein et al., 2020) (in contrast to classical T-bethi /Eomeslo ILC1 cells Verma et al., 2020).

Specifically, we have asked whether (a) their number is increased in lesional AA skin, (b) they can damage human HFs ex vivo in a manner that mimics the AA phenotype, and finally (c) whether ILC1lc alone suffice to induce AA in previously healthy human scalp skin in vivo. To address these questions, we first analyzed the abundance, distribution, and phenotype of ILC1lc in human AA skin lesions compared to healthy human control skin. We then co-cultured autologous ILC1lc with freshly organ-cultured scalp HFs from the same patient, that is under conditions where the epithelium of these HFs transiently undergo an acute stress response and overexpresses MICA (Uchida et al., 2021), to check whether these innate lymphocytes exert any HFs cytotoxicity and/or impact on the physiological immune privilege (IP) of HFs (Bertolini et al., 2020; Paus et al., 2005; Ito et al., 2004; Peters et al., 2007; Bertolini et al., 2016). Finally, we injected autologous ILC1lc intradermally into healthy human scalp skin xenotransplants from the same human volunteers on SCID/beige mice to probe whether this suffices to induce classical AA hair loss lesions in vivo.

Taken together, our data show that ILC1lc is increased in AA lesions and suffice to induce an AA phenotype in healthy human HFs ex vivo and in vivo. This provides the first functional evidence of a key role of ILC1lc innate lymphocytes in a model human autoimmune disease (Colonna, 2018; Seillet et al., 2021; Conlon et al., 2021; Flommersfeld et al., 2021; Daussy et al., 2014; Park et al., 2019) - but also questions whether AA always a classical autoimmune disease is and underscore the role of innate immune cells in AA pathobiology.

Results

Peri- and intrafollicular infiltrates of ILC1lc are seen in both lesional and non-lesional AA skin

First, we investigated whether healthy and AA-affected human skin differs in their content and/or distribution of ILC1lc, using a comprehensive set of triple-immunofluorescence (IF) staining best suited to identify these immunocytes (Seillet et al., 2021; Bennstein et al., 2020; Gao et al., 2017). This revealed the presence of only extremely few ILC1lc in healthy control skin with all three staining settings employed (Eomes+, CD49a+, NKG2D+ [Figure 1A and Figure 1—figure supplement 1A], Eomes+, c-KIT-, CD49a+ [Figure 1B and Figure 1—figure supplement 1A], or NKp44+, CD103+, T-bet- cells [Figure 1C and D and Figure 1—figure supplement 1A; Kim, 2015; Fuchs et al., 2013; Salimi and Ogg, 2014]). These cells appeared to be preferentially scattered along the papillary dermis of healthy scalp skin biopsies and around the HFs (Figure 1C). This is reminiscent of the few Vδ1+T cells detectable in healthy human skin that also have a preferential perifollicular location and may ‘police’ the skin for molecular indications of tissue stress, namely of HFs (Uchida et al., 2020; Uchida et al., 2021).

Figure 1. Immunofluorescence microscopy analyses of ILC1lc and CD8+/NKG2D+ cells in alopecia areata (AA) scalp skin.

(A) ILC1lc (EOMES+, CD49a+, and NKG2D+) around HF in normal scalp skin, intrafollicular and perifollicular ILC1lc infiltrates in lesional and in non-lesional AA scalp patient. (B) EOMES+, c-KIT-,CD49a+, and (C) NKp44+, CD103+, T-bet- ILC1lc. For each panel, yellow staining indicates double staining A-EOMES+, NKG2D+; B- EOMES+, CD49a+; C- NKp44+,CD103+ (D) Quantitative immunohistomorphometry (qIHM) shows an increased number of ILC1lc in AA patients as compared to normal volunteers and increased number of the cells in lesional versus non-lesional areas of the patients. There is a significant increased perifollicular than intrafollicular ILC1lc in the lesional and non lesional areas. (E) CD8+/NKG2D+ cells around HF in AA scalp patient and absence of these cells in normal scalp skin of normal scalp skin. (F) There is an increased number of CD8+/NKG2D+ cells in HFs of AA patients compared to normal scalp skin and a significant lower number of ILC1lc versus CD8+/NKG2D+ cells in AA scalp skin. N=6 biopsies /AA patients and six biopsies /healthy donors from six independent donors, three areas were evaluated per section, and three sections per biopsy. Following Shapiro-Wilk test, Student’s t-test: *p<0.05, **p<0.01 or Mann Whitney U test: #p<0.05. Scale bars, 50 µm. CTS- connective tissue sheath, DP - dermal papilla, HM - hair matrix, White arrow- c-KIT stained melanocyte.

Figure 1—source data 1. Quantitative data for immunofluorescence microscopy analyses of ILC1lc and CD8+/NKG2D+ cells in AA scalp skin.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Single channels immunofluorescence microscopy analyses of various markers in AA scalp skin and in AA-induced xenotransplants.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) Single channels of EOMES, T-bet, CD49a+, NKG2D+, c-kit, CD103, and NKp44 expressing cells in alopecia areata (AA) scalp patient and (B) in the humanized AA model. N=4 biopsies from AA patients and five biopsies from the humanized AA mouse model. Scale bars, 50 µm.

Instead, intra and peri-follicular infiltrates of ILC1lc were frequently present in lesional AA HFs (Figure 1A, B, C and D and Figure 1—figure supplement 1A), typically in conjunction with a dominant infiltrate of CD8+/NKG2D+ cells around the hair bulb (p<0.05) (Figure 1E and F). Importantly, the number of ILC1lc was already significantly increased in/around non-lesional AA HFs compared to healthy scalp skin (p<0.01) (Figure 1A, B, C and D and Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). This may indicate that ILC1lc may actually have arrived around the HFs before the CD8 cells and may have contributed to attracting the CD8 cells into the perifollicular space.

This strongly suggested that ILC1lc are not mere bystanders attracted only secondarily to the HFs by CD8 T-cells, similar to, but more pronounced than we have recently observed regarding perifollicular Vδ1+T cells in non-lesional AA skin (Uchida et al., 2020). This invited the hypothesis that ILC1lc is actively involved in transforming healthy human scalp HFs into lesional AA HFs.

T-betlo/Eomeshi ILC1lc can be expanded from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in vitro

To functionally probe this hypothesis, we isolated, purified, and characterized human peripheral blood-derived ILC1lc as the most suitable cell source for the planned HF-immunocyte co-culture studies. The scarcity of ILC1lc in healthy human skin, compared to their relative abundance in peripheral blood (Colonna, 2018; Artis and Spits, 2015) necessitated to isolate autologous ILC1lc from the latter source rather than from skin (Teunissen et al., 2014). To facilitate ILC1lc isolation, PBMCs of healthy volunteers were first cultured with high-dose IL-2 (100 U/mL) in the presence of IL-18 (1 µg/1 ml), IL-33 (1.5 µg/5 ml), and IL-12 (1.5 µg/5 ml), since these cytokines induce ILC1lc expansion (Salimi and Ogg, 2014; Silver et al., 2016; Orimo et al., 2020; Ohne et al., 2016). When ILC1lc were sorted by FACS Aria and characterized by FACS analysis on day seven of culture, low T-bet, and high Eomes expression were observed (Figure 2A), in contrast to classical T-bethi and Eomeslo ILC1 cells (Jiao et al., 2016; Vivier et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018). In addition, the ILC1lc expressed and shared the following markers with classical ILC1 cells: LIN- CD3/CD1a/D14/CD19/CD34/CD123/CD11c /BDCH2/FcεR1α/TCRαβ/TCRγδ/CD56, CD127+, CD161+, c-KIT-, and CRTH2- (Zook and Kee, 2016; Bernink et al., 2017; Simoni and Newell, 2017; Figure 2A).

Figure 2. Circulating ILC1lc expanded and characterized by FACS analysis.

(A) PBMCs activated by IL-18, IL-33 and IL-12 were sorted by FACS Aria and characterized by FACS analysis. ILC1lc markers were identified by the expression of CD127+, CD161+, c-KIT-, and CRTH2-, high levels of integrin α1 (CD49a) expression, combined with the absence of integrin α2 (CD49b) and transcription factors Eomeshi and T-betlo (B) unstimulated PBMCs (C) isotype controls. N=10 blood donors, 1.5 × 106 cells/blood donor, analysis was performed in triplicates from each of the blood donors. Following Shapiro-Wilk test, Student’s t-test, p<0.05.

Figure 2—source data 1. Quantitative data for circulating ILC1lc expanded and characterized by FACS analysis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Circulating ILC1lc expanded and characterized by FACS analysis.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A) PBMCs activated by IL-18, IL-33, and IL-12 were sorted by FACS Aria and characterized by FACS analysis. ILC1-like cell markers were identified by the expression of Eomes+, CXCR6+, CD200R+, IRF8-, Perforin-, CD16-, and NKP80 (B) IL-2 induced PBMCs (C) isotype controls. (D) expression of CD127+, CD161 +, and RORγt-. N=4 blood donors, 1.5 × 106 cells/blood donor, analysis was performed in triplicates from each of the blood donors. Following Shapiro-Wilk test, Student’s t-test, p<0.05.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Scheme demonstrating the isolation of ILC1lc, ILC2s, and ILC3s cells from PBMCs of healthy human volunteers.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

This immune phenotype suggests that the immune cells used in our study are best classified as ILC1lc (Nabekura and Shibuya, 2021a), and documents that all experiments reported below were indeed performed with autologous ILC1lc rather than with NK cell subpopulations. Indeed, the FACS analysis (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A,B and C) revealed that ILC1lc demonstrates the ILC1 phenotype (CD200R, CD127, CXCR6) (Lopes et al., 2023; Curio and Belz, 2022) but not of the classical NK cell lineage (IRF8, Perforin, NKp80, CD16) (Sagebiel et al., 2019; Brownlie et al., 2021; Krämer et al., 2023), thus further serving as an evidence that EOMES +ILCs represent distinct ILC1 lineage-defining markers. In contrast to NK cells, ILC1lc also expressed the expected high levels of integrin α1 (CD49a), combined with the absence of integrin α2 (CD49b) (Jiao et al., 2016; Figure 2A). All these characteristic markers of ILClc were absent in the control unstimulated PBMCs (Figure 2B and C).

This immune phenotype suggests that the immune cells used in our study are best classified as ILC1lc (Nabekura and Shibuya, 2021a), and documents that all experiments reported below were indeed performed with autologous ILC1lc rather than with NK cell subpopulations. Note that we had previously shown that NKG2D+/CD56 +NK cells suffice to induce AA lesions in human skin in vivo (Gilhar et al., 2013a; Laufer Britva et al., 2020) while iNKT cells are AA-protective in the humanized AA mouse model (Ghraieb et al., 2018). Subsequently, these ILC1lc were either used for HF co-culture assays or injected into healthy human scalp skin xenotransplants on SCID/beige mice (Gilhar et al., 2013a; Ito et al., 2005b). As controls, we also isolated ILC2 and ILC3 cells, which failed to induce AA phenotype in a sharp contrast to the ILC1lc (see Materials and methods).

In order to exclude the possibility that contamination from ILC3s during sorting the ILC1lc and thus contributing to the observed results, we generated a new set of FACS data on sorted ILC1lc. Given that ILC1 cells are RORγt negative while ILC3 cells are RORγt positive (Peng et al., 2022; Fiancette et al., 2021), the data clearly demonstrate that the contamination hypothesis is highly unlikely (Figure 2—figure supplement 1D).

ILC1lc induces HF cytotoxicity ex vivo

Next, we functionally probed the interaction of ILC1lc with HFs that were investigated here as a model human (mini-) organ in which the interactions of a healthy human tissue system with defined, autologous immunocyte populations can be interrogated ex vivo in the absence of any confounding systemic immune or neural inputs (Uchida et al., 2021). For this, microdissected, organ-cultured human scalp HFs (Langan et al., 2015) were co-cultured for six days with autologous, peripheral blood-derived, purified, IL-12/IL-18/IL-33-prestimulated ILC1lc, or with autologous human CD8 +NKG2D+ cells (=positive control), ILC2, ILC3 cells, or PBMCs non-specifically activated with PHA (PBMCs/PHA) (=negative controls).

Importantly, only scalp HFs in the anagen VI stage of the hair cycle were used (identified as described) (Kloepper et al., 2010) that had been freshly placed into HF organ culture for 24 hr, since these HFs are maximally ‘stressed,’ in contrast to non-cultured HFs, that is immediately after isolation, or that had already undergone several days of adjusting to the harsh conditions of serum-free organ culture (Uchida et al., 2021; Langan et al., 2015). These ‘stressed’ day 1 HFs temporarily up-regulate MHC class Ia and ß2-microglobulin while the expression of IP guardians, that is αMSH and TGFβ2 remain unchanged (Uchida et al., 2021), indicating a transiently weakened, but partially maintained HF immune privilege (Bertolini et al., 2020; Ito et al., 2004). The expression of molecules associated with tissue stress, that is the intrafollicular produced neurohormone, CRH (Ito et al., 2005a), and the NKG2D ligand MICA/B is also higher in day 1 organ-cultured HFs compared to freshly microdissected HFs or after day 3 of organ culture. Day 1 HFs also show signs of mild HF dystrophy (as evidenced by increased lactate dehydrogenase [LDH] release into the medium), and express chemokines recognized for their relevance in AA pathobiology, that is CXCL10 and CXCL12 (Uchida et al., 2021; Ito et al., 2020). Thus, day 1 HFs are ideally suited for interrogating human immunocyte interactions with a transiently ‘stressed,’ but otherwise healthy human (mini-) organ that overexpresses the NKG2D-activating ‘danger’ signal, MICA/B, under physiologically relevant ex vivo conditions (Uchida et al., 2021; Langan et al., 2015).

First, we studied the cytotoxic effects of ILC1lc on healthy human scalp HF ex vivo by measuring the HF release of LDH into the culture medium. This not only showed significantly higher LDH release induced by ILC1lc than by co-culture with all three negative control cell populations (ILC2s, ILC3s, or PBMCs/PHA) but also even higher HF cytotoxicity levels than those induced by CD8+/NKG2D+ cells (p<0.01), namely after three days of co-culture (Figure 3). These HF cytotoxicity results were fully corroborated by characteristic morphological signs of HF dystrophy following co-culture with ILC1lc; while CD8+/NKG2D+ cells induced similar dystrophy phenomena, these were not seen after co-culture with PBMC/PHA (Figure 4A, B and C). The induction of significant HF dystrophy by ILC1lc ex vivo was further documented by the presence of pathological melanin clumping and ectopically located intrafollicular melanin granules (Bodó et al., 2007; Hendrix et al., 2005; Figure 4D, E, F and G) and by decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis of hair matrix keratinocytes (Figure 4H, I, J and K). Both were also seen in the CD8+/NKG2D+group (positive control), but not in HFs co-cultured with PBMCs/PHA (negative control) (p<0.001, p<0.01, respectively). Thus, autologous ILC1lc alone suffice to induce substantial HF cytotoxicity ex vivo if co-cultured with transiently ‘stressed,’ but otherwise healthy human scalp HFs.

Figure 3. Cytotoxic effects of CD8+/NKG2D+and ILC1lc on normal human scalp HF ex vivo.

Figure 3.

These cell populations were placed separately into wells with (+Hair) dissected HFs and without (-Hair). Cytotoxic effects of these cell populations on normal human scalp HF ex vivo were studied by measuring the spontaneous release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) from the microdissected HFs. Increased cytotoxicity of ILC1lc co-cultured with HFs compared to CD8+/NKG2D+, as well as to ILC2s and ILC3s, and PBMCs/PHA cells. N=20–24 HFs/group derived from three independent donors analyzed in three independent HF organ culture experiments. Following Shapiro-Wilk test and Dunn’s test §p<0.05, §§p<0.01, §§§p<0.001.

Figure 3—source data 1. Quantitative data for cytotoxic effects of CD8+/NKG2D+ and ILC1lc on normal human scalp HF ex vivo.

Figure 4. Hair follicles (HFs) dystrophy, melanin clumping, and apoptosis in normal human scalp HF ex vivo co-cultured with ILC1lc and CD8+/NKG2D+ cells.

Figure 4.

(A–C) H&E staining revealed undifferentiated and prominent matrix cells, condensed dermal papilla, and the appearance of apoptotic cells, N=15–19 HFs/group from three independent donors. (D–G) Masson-Fontana histochemistry revealed melanin clumping and ectopic location of melanin granules only in HFs co-cultured with CD8+/NKG2D+and ILC1lc, but not in HFs cultured with PBMCs/PHA. N=7–11, HFs/group from three independent donors. Following Shapiro-Wilk test,Student’s t-test: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. (H–K) HFs co-cultured with ILC1lc or CD8+/NKG2D+ cells showed a significantly decreased proliferation (pink, arrowhead) and increased apoptosis (green, wide arrows). N=6 HFs/group from two independent donors, three areas were evaluated per section. Following Shapiro-Wilk test, Student’s t-test: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 in the anagen hair bulb compared to HFs cultured with PBMCs/PHA. Scale bars, 50 µm. DP - dermal papilla, HM - hair matrix.

Figure 4—source data 1. Quantitative data for HFs dystrophy, melanin clumping and apoptosis in normal human scalp HF ex vivo co-cultured with ILC1lc and CD8+/NKG2D+ cells.

ILC1lc induces HF immune privilege collapse ex vivo via NKG2D stimulation

Given that AA cannot occur without the prior collapse of HF immune privilege [HF-IP] (Gilhar et al., 2012; Bertolini et al., 2020), we also investigated the impact of ILC1lc on key HF-IP markers. Indeed, the co-culture of HFs with ILC1lc triggered IP collapse, as evidenced by ectopic and overexpressed HLA-A,B,C, ß2-microglobulin (ß2 MG), and HLA-DR, along with overexpression of the ‘danger’/tissue distress signals, MICA and CD1d, which interact with and stimulate NKG2D (Uchida et al., 2021; Fan et al., 2022) as compared to HFs interacting with PBMC/PHA or with ILC3 cells (Figure 5A, B, C, D, E and F).

Figure 5. Characteristic immunopathology features of alopecia areata (AA) hair follicles (HFs).

Figure 5.

(A) MICA, (B) HLA-A,B,C, (C) β2 MG, (D) HLA-DR, and (E) CD1d, expression by HFs epithelium, which had been co-cultured with either ILC1lc or CD8+/NKG2D+ cells but not in the control HFs, which had been co-cultured with either ILC3s, PBMCs/PHA, ILC1lc /NKG2D neutralization or in the untreated HFs. (F) quantitation. (G) The immune inhibitory HF immune privilege guardians, α-MSH and (H) TGF-β1 almost disappeared in HFs/ ILC1lc and HFs/NKG2D but were prominently present in ILC1lc /NKG2D neutralization and control HFs, N=9–12 HFs/group from three independent donors, three areas were evaluated per section. Following Shapiro-Wilk test,Student’s t-test, *p<0.05. Scale bar, 100 µm. ORS - outer root sheet.

Figure 5—source data 1. Quantitative data for characteristic immunopathology features of AA HFs.

Notably, quantitative immunohistomorphoemtry (qIHM) also showed that protein expression of the immunoinhibitory HF-IP guardians, TGF-β1 and α-MSH (Gilhar et al., 2012; Bertolini et al., 2020; Paus et al., 2018; Ito et al., 2004), almost disappeared in the epithelium of HFs co-cultured with autologous ILC1lc or CD8+/NKG2D+ cells (=positive control) (Figure 5G, H and I), while these critical HF-IP guardians were still prominently expressed in negative control HFs (Figure 5G, H and I). Importantly, adding anti-NKG2D blocking antibodies prevented HFs IP collapse and preserved the IP in the ILC1lc /NKG2D treated group (Figure 5G, H and I).

This demonstrates that autologous ILC1lc induces human HF-IP collapse ex vivo – incidentally, the first time that the induction of IP collapse by ILC1lc has been documented in an intact human tissue/organ.

ILC1lc are activated by ‘stressed’ HFs and induce premature catagen development via IFN-γ secretion

Next, we examined how autologous ILC1lc impacted on human HF cycling, given that premature induction of apoptosis-driven HF regression (catagen) is one of the hallmarks of AA (Gilhar et al., 2012; Bertolini et al., 2020; Messenger et al., 1986). This showed that ILC1lc significantly accelerated the transformation of anagen into catagen HFs ex vivo (Paus et al., 2005) compared to all three negative controls (ILC2, ILC3, or PBMCs/PHA) – thus eliciting the third hallmark of the AA phenotype besides HF-IP collapse and dystrophy ex vivo (Gilhar et al., 2012; Bertolini et al., 2020; Messenger et al., 1986; Figure 6A), just as we had previously shown for Vδ1+ γδT cells (Uchida et al., 2021). As expected (Gilhar et al., 2012; Pratt et al., 2017; Bertolini et al., 2020; de Jong et al., 2018; Xing et al., 2014), premature catagen induction was also seen with CD8+/NKG2D+ cells (=positive control), but not with any of the negative control cell populations (Figure 6A).

Figure 6. Transition of anagen to catagen hair follicles (HFs) following culture with ILC1lc or CD8+/NKG2D+ cells in human scalp HF ex vivo.

Figure 6.

(A) These immune cells significantly accelerated the transformation of anagen HFs into catagen HFs ex vivo compared to ILC2, ILC3, PBMCs/PHA, and neutralizing anti- IFN-γ, anti-NKG2D antibodies. N=28–34 HFs/group taken from six independent donors, Student’s t-test: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. (B) ELISA analysis revealed increased IFN-γproduction by ILC1lc /HFs compared to production by CD8+/NKG2D+ cells, ILC2s, ILC3s, and PBMCs/PHA. N=6 healthy donors, 6 × 106 cells from each donor. Following Shapiro-Wilk test, Student’s t-test: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. (C) FACS analysis revealed a significant increased intracellular IFN-γexpression in ILC1lc co-cultured with HFs compared to the effector CD8+/NKG2D+and to ILC2s and ILC3s, N=6 blood donors, 1.5 × 106 cells/blood donor. Student’s t-test, p<0.05.

Figure 6—source data 1. Quantitative data for transition of anagen to catagen HFs following culture with ILC1lc or CD8+/NKG2D+ cells in human scalp HF ex vivo.

ILC1lc prominently secrete IFN-γ (Seillet et al., 2021), that is the cytokine that we had shown to induce HF damage (dystrophy), premature catagen, and HF-IP collapse most potently (Ito et al., 2004; Ito et al., 2005a). Therefore, we next investigated IFN-γrelease in these co-culture experiments. ELISA analysis revealed that ILC1lc produced and secreted higher amounts of IFN-γ into the medium than all other cells co-cultured with ‘stressed’ HFs, including CD8+/NKG2D+ cells (p<0.05) (Figure 6B). This suggests that ILC1lc possesses even stronger HF cytotoxicity-, IP collapse- and dystrophy-inducing properties than CD8 +T cells, the classical effector cells of AAA (Gilhar et al., 2012; Pratt et al., 2017; Bertolini et al., 2020).

FACS analysis showed ILC1lc activation when these were co-cultured with ‘stressed,’ autologous HFs (600 cells/HF), as evidenced by significantly increased intracellular IFN-γ expression by ILC1lc (Bernink et al., 2017) (93 ± 11%) compared to the positive control (CD8+/NKG2D+, 75 ± 9%, p<0.05) (Figure 6C) and the negative controls ILC2s, 11 ± 1%, p<0.05; ILC3s, 28 ± 5%, p<0.05; PBMCs/PHA, 2 ± 1.3%, p<0.001 (Figure 6C).

When neutralizing anti- IFN-γ antibodies were administered into the medium of the organ culture, premature catagen development of HFs co-cultured with ILC1lc was significantly reduced (Figure 6A), strongly suggesting that premature catagen induction by ILC1lc depends on their IFN-γsecretion (Seillet et al., 2021). Importantly, reduced catagen induction was also seen after adding NKG2D-blocking antibodies to the medium (Figure 6A). This suggests that ILC1lc activation and IFN-γsecretion are induced by NKG2D-stimulating danger signals overexpressed by stressed HF epithelium, such as MICA. These findings further support the recognized central role of both IFN-γand NKG2D in the initial stages of AA pathobiology (Gilhar et al., 2012; Paus et al., 2018; Ito et al., 2008; de Jong et al., 2018).

ILC1lc suffice to induce AA lesions in healthy human scalp skin in vivo

Taken together, these clinically relevant ex vivo experiments documented that ILC1lc can indeed induce the hallmarks of AA in healthy human scalp HFs ex vivo: HF-IP collapse, HF dystrophy, and premature catagen development (Gilhar et al., 2012; Paus et al., 2018). Therefore, we finally probed the hypothesis that ILC1lc may also suffice to induce human AA-like hair loss lesions in vivo using our established humanized AA mouse model (Gilhar et al., 2013a; Ghraieb et al., 2018; Gilhar et al., 2016). We had previously demonstrated that a macroscopic and histological phenocopy of human AA lesions can be rapidly induced experimentally in healthy human scalp skin xenotransplants on SCID/beige mice in vivo by the intradermal injection of enriched CD8/NKG2D are defined as PBMCs that have been cultured for 14 days in high-dose IL-2 (100 U/ml) according to our previously published characterization (Ghraieb et al., 2018; Gilhar et al., 2013a; Gilhar et al., 2013b; Gilhar et al., 2016; Bertolini et al., 2014). These cells are derived from healthy donors, that is in the absence of a specific genetic or autoimmune constellation.

For this, 10 SCID/beige mice were each xenotransplanted with three full-thickness human scalp skin grafts (3 mm) obtained from parietal skin regions of four healthy donors without a prior history of AA (males aged 37±6). Eighty-nine days after transplantation, that is when hair regrowth had occurred in all xenotransplants, the mice were randomly divided into three groups, and each mouse from each group received one intradermal injection of either autologous IL-12/IL-18/IL-33-preactivated ILC1lc (test), PBMCs co-cultured with a nonspecific mitogen (PHA; negative control), or enriched CD8/NKG2D cells (positive control). When measured 45 days later, significant AA-like hair loss was observed macroscopically in the xenotransplants injected with ILC1lc compared to the negative control, at about the same level as positive control xenotransplants (Figure 7A).

Figure 7. Development of alopecia areata (AA) in the humanized mouse model treated with ILC1lc.

(A) Significant hair loss is observed following the injection of ILC1lc and enriched CD8/NKG2D cells, while in the PBMCs/PHA treated group, hair number remains almost constant. N=7–9 xenotransplants/group from three independent donors, Following Shapiro-Wilk test, Mann-Whitney U test: #p<0.05, ##p<0.01. (B) HF dystrophy and perifollicular lymphocytic infiltrates around anagen hair follicles (HFs) (H&E staining) combined with strong expression of (C) HLA-A,B,C, β2 MG, HLA-DR, and downregulation of α-MSH and TGF-β1 in the ILC1lc and in (D) enriched CD8/NKG2D cells versus xenotransplants treated with (E) PBMCs/PHA (IHC staining) (F) quantitative data. N=5–9 xenotransplats/group from three independent donors. 4–5 defined reference areas were evaluated per section, and three sections per xenotransplants. Following Shapiro-Wilk test, Student’s t-test: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. Scale bar, 50 µm. DP - dermal papilla, HM - hair matrix.

Figure 7—source data 1. Quantitative data for development of AA in the humanized mouse model treated with ILC1lc.

Figure 7.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1. Anti-CD3 antibodies prevent the development of alopecia areata (AA) in scalp skin xenotransplants treated with enriched CD8/NKG2D but not with ILC1lc.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1.

(A) Significant hair loss was observed following the injection of ILC1lc, ILC1lc /OKT3, or enriched CD8/NKG2D cells into normal scalp skin on SCID/beige mice, but not in those treated with enriched CD8+/NKG2D+/anti-CD3 (OKT3), N=5 xenotransplants/group from two independent donors. Following Shapiro-Wilk test, Mann-Whitney U test: #p<0.05, ##p<0.01. Hair follicle (HF) dystrophy combined with perifollicular lymphocytic infiltrate around anagen HFs (H&E staining) in xenotransplants treated with (B) ILC1lc, ILC1lc /OKT3, or enriched CD8/NKG2D. Normal HF in anagen in xenotransplant treated with enriched CD8/NKG2D/OKT3. Induction of HLA-A,B,C and of HLA-DR, downregulation of α-MSH and TGF-β1 by the follicular epithelium and increased dermal IFN-γ cells (IHC staining) in xenotransplants treated with (C) ILC1lc and similarly in (D) ILC1lc /OKT3 and (E) enriched CD8/NKG2D treated groups. Reduced expression of HLA-A,B,C, HLA-DR, and upregulation of α-MSH and TGF-β1 combined with decreased number of dermal IFN-γ cells were observed in xenotransplants treated with (F) enriched CD8/NKG2D/OKT3 cells. (G) Quantitative data, N=5–6 xenotransplants/group from two independent donors. 3–4 areas were evaluated per section, and three sections per xenotransplant. Following Shapiro-Wilk test, Student’s t-test: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. Scale bar, 50 µm. HM - hair matrix.
Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Quantitative data for anti-CD3 antibodies prevent the development of AA in scalp skin xenotransplants treated with enriched CD8/NKG2D but not with ILC1lc.
Figure 7—figure supplement 2. Dermal infiltrates of the various treated xenotransplants.

Figure 7—figure supplement 2.

Several CD8 and CD4 in xenotransplants treated with (A) ILC1lc and similarly in xenotransplants treated with (B) ILC1lc /OKT3, and (C) enriched CD8/NKG2D/OKT3 cells versus increased CD8 and CD4 in xenotransplants treated with (D) enriched CD8/NKG2D cells. (E) Quantitative data,N=5–6 xenotransplants/group from two independent donors, 3–four areas were evaluated per section, and three sections per xenotransplant. Following Shapiro-Wilk test, Student’s t-test: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. Scale bar, 50 µm. DP - dermal papilla,HM - hair matrix.
Figure 7—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Quantitative data for dermal infiltrates of the various treated xenotransplants.
Figure 7—figure supplement 3. Development of alopecia areata (AA) in normal human scalp skin xenotransplants treated with (A) ILC1lc.

Figure 7—figure supplement 3.

Infiltrates of IFN-γ +, CD8, and CD4 cells in group treated with (B) enriched CD8/NKG2D cells. Decreased number of IFN-γ +, CD8, and CD4 cells in the (C) PBMCs/PHA treated one. (D) Quantitative data (E) presence of ILC1lc in transplants injected with ILC1lc compared to the virtual absence of these cells in enriched CD8/NKG2D and PBMCs/PHA treated mice.(F) Quantitative data N=5–9 xenotransplats/group from three donors. 4–5 areas were evaluated per section, and three sections per xenotransplant. Following Shapiro-Wilk test, Student’s t-test: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. Scale bar, 50 µm. DP - dermal papilla,HM - hair matrix.
Figure 7—figure supplement 3—source data 1. Quantitative data for development of AA in normal human scalp skin xenotransplants treated with ILC1lc, enriched CD8/NKG2D and PBMCs/PHA.

To exclude that the above phenomena were not caused by residual human T-cells present in the transplants, an additional eight xenotransplanted mice were also injected intradermally once daily for 45 days with anti-CD3 antibodies (OKT3), in addition to injecting either ILC1lc or enriched CD8/NKG2D cells as described above (four mice each). This showed that anti-CD3 failed to abrogate hair loss induction in the mice treated with ILC1lc alone, but suppressed hair loss in the group treated with enriched CD8/NKG2D cells, as expected (Figure 7—figure supplement 1A). These findings invalidate the residual T-cell hypothesis.

ILC1lc induce the characteristic immunopathology of human AA lesions in vivo

Immunohistology revealed that ILC1lc, just like autologous enriched CD8/NKG2D cells, induced a phenocopy of AA immunopathology in previously healthy human scalp skin in vivo, in sharp contrast to the negative control PBMCs/PHA group: HFs dystrophy, miniaturization and perifollicular lymphocytic infiltrate around anagen HFs (Figure 7B) as well as induction of HF-IP collapse (significantly increased expression of HLA-A,B,C, β2 MG, and HLA-DR of the HF epithelium, along with downregulation of the immune privilege guardians, α-MSH and TGF-β1) (Figure 7C and D). In contrast, negative control xenotransplants injected with PBMCs/PHA showed normal anagen HFs and a significantly lower expression of HLA-A,B,C, β2 MG, and HLA-DR, paired with the expected normal expression levels α-MSH and TGF-β1 protein (Figure 7E) as assessed by qIHM (Figure 7F).

In addition, histology and quantitative immunohistomorphometry confirmed the preventive effect of anti-CD3 antibodies in inducing an AA-like phenotype in xenotransplants treated with enriched CD8/NKG2D cells, but not in those treated with ILC1lc (Figure 7—figure supplement 1B,C,D,E,F and G and Figure 7—figure supplement 2).

In line with the key role of IFN-γ in the development of AA (Gilhar et al., 2012; Gilhar et al., 2019a), IFN-γ+ cells were found to be increased around the bulb of xenotransplants injected with ILC1lc, even in the presence of the anti-CD3 antibody (OKT3), or with enriched CD8/NKG2D cells, but not with PHA-treated PBMCs or enriched CD8/NKG2D cells in the presence of OKT3 (Figure 7—figure supplement 1A,B,C,D,E,F and G and Figure 7—figure supplement 2A,B,C and D).

ILC1lc in the experimentally induced AA lesions

Given that both, enriched CD8/NKG2D cells, and ILC1lc produce high amounts of IFN-γ, we then investigated the subtype of these cells around the bulb of control and treated xenotransplants, along with the frequencies of CD4 +T cells. In enriched CD8/NKG2D cells injected xenotransplants, the number of CD8 + cells and CD4 +T cells was significantly increased as compared to ILC1lc (p<0.001, p<0.001) (Figure 7—figure supplement 3A,B,C and D) while dense infiltration of ILC1lc was found only in xenotransplants treated with the purified ILC1lc (Figure 7—figure supplement 3E and F).

Interestingly, qIHM also showed that the peri- and intrafollicular distribution and mean number of ILC1lc in human skin xenotransplants injected with enriched CD8/NKG2D cells imitated that of ILC1lc seen in spontaneously developed hair loss lesions of AA patients, further supporting the role of ILC1lc in human AA (Figure 1A, B, C and D, Figure 8A, B, C and D and Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). Yet, CD8+/NKG2D+lymphocytes significantly outnumbered ILC1lc in the experimentally induced AA lesions (p<0.01) (Figure 8E and F), just as they do in human AA patients (Figure 1E and F).

Figure 8. Immunofluorescence microscopy analysis of ILC1lc and enriched CD8/NKG2D cells in AA-induced xenotransplant.

Figure 8.

(A) EOMES+, CD49a+, and NKG2D+ around hair follicle (HF) in normal scalp skin, intrafollicular and perifollicular ILC1lc infiltrates in AA-induced xenotransplants (B) EOMES+,c-KIT-,CD49a+, and (C) NKp44+, CD103+, T-bet- ILC1lc. Absence of these cells in normal scalp xenotransplant. For each panel, yellow staining indicates double staining A-EOMES+, NKG2D+; B- EOMES+,CD49a+; C- NKp44+, CD103+. (D) Quantitation. (E) CD8+/NKG2D+ cells around HF in AA-induced xenotransplant versus absence of the cells in normal xenotransplant. (F) The quantitative data demonstrate the significant increased CD8+/NKG2D+ cells in HFs of alopecia areata (AA) humanized mice compared to normal scalp xenotransplants. N=6 xenotransplants/ group from three independent donors, three areas were evaluated per section. Following Shapiro-Wilk test, Student’s t-test: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. Mann Whitney U test: #p<0.05, ##p<0.01.Scale bar, 50 µm. DP - dermal papilla, HM - hair matrix, White arrow- c-KIT stained melanocyte.

Figure 8—source data 1. Quantitative data for immunofluorescence microscopy analysis of ILC1lc and enriched CD8/NKG2D cells in AA-induced xenotransplant.

Discussion

The current study is the first to phenotypically and functionally explore the role of Eomes +ILC1 lc in human AA in vivo and ex vivo. Eomes +ILCs may represent the NK cell lineage and therefore the ILC1 phenotype in our study, more closely resembles a tissue-resident or activated NK cell rather than an ILC1, based on recent single-cell RNAseq studies in mice and human tissues (Lopes et al., 2023). However, Eomes expression by ILCs was observed differently depending on the tissue localization (McFarland et al., 2021). For example, a recent single-cell RNA-sequencing study reveals that ILC1lc both in blood and tonsil are Eomes positive (Mazzurana et al., 2021). Other study demonstrated that intraepithelial ILC1s from human tonsils were found to be heterogeneous, encompassing Eomes− and Eomes +subsets (Cella et al., 2019). It is indeed very important to obtain greater clarity on how ILC1lc and NKs differ from each other, namely in the context of human AA. Our new data demonstrate that ILC1lc are positive for CD49a, CD200R, CD127, CXCR6 (Lopes et al., 2023) but negative for IRF8, Perforin, NKp80, CD16 (Sagebiel et al., 2019; Figure 2—figure supplement 1A,B and C), strongly support that ILC1lc and NK cells have distinct lineages. This claim remains limited by the set of biomarkers that is currently available (and can reasonably be expected to be applied) to ‘definitively’ distinguish between ILC1 and NK lineages, namely in human skin, and that our data may eventually have to be re-evaluated in the context of research progress in this fast-moving field. It would be desirable to further complement these results in future studies with unbiased scRNAseq data, which can then be compared with published human ILC1 and NK cell gene signatures so as to gain deeper insights into the – still controversial and unclear - transcriptional similarities and differences between ILC1lc and NK cells and their lineage relationship to each other.

Here, we show that ILC1lc are increased in AA lesions provide the first functional evidence that expanded circulating autologous human ILC1lc suffice to induce all hallmarks of the AA hair loss phenotype (premature catagen, HF dystrophy, and HF-IP collapse) in previously healthy, organ-cultured human scalp HFs ex vivo and in human scalp skin xenotransplants in vivo, where they also cause the characteristic clinical hair loss phenomenon. This also provides the first unequivocal functional evidence of a key role of ILC1lc innate lymphocytes in a model human autoimmune disease, and thus identifies these lymphocytes as important novel targets in future AA therapy.

Mechanistically, we demonstrate that IFN-γsecretion and NKG2D signaling are both required for this AA-pattern HF damage to occur (Figure 9). That ILC1lc alone can induce all hallmarks of AA in a healthy human (mini-) organ ex vivo and in vivo, presumably in an autoantigen-independent manner, also demonstrates that these innate/transitional lymphocytes interact directly with human HFs, rather than affecting them only indirectly. We also show that resident T-cells in human scalp skin transplants are not responsible for the AA-inducing effects of ILC1lc in vivo (Figure 7—figure supplement 1 and Figure 7—figure supplement 2).

Figure 9. Pathobiology scenario: How ILC1lc can induce alopecia areata (AA).

Figure 9.

(A) ILC1lc are rarely detected around the bulb of healthy human scalp hair follicles (HFs), which exhibit relative immune privilege and low or absent expression of MICA and MHC class I, and CD1d. (B) Various tissue stressors (in the current study: hair follicle microdissection and organ culture), can transiently weaken the hair follicle’s physiological immune privilege by upregulating the expression of MHC class I, MICA (a key activating NKG2D ligand), and of CD1d, along with the secretion of chemoattractants such as CXCL12. (C) This recruits and activates ILC1lc, which migrates towards the ‘stressed’ hair follicle and secretes IFN-γ, thus ultimately inducing HF-IP collapse. (D) Either alone or in conjunction with other recognized AA-inducing immune cells (i.e. CD8 +T cells which recognize hair follicle autoantigens now exposed by ectopically expressed MHC class I; NK cells, and γδTCs), ILC1lc can then induce the full AA phenotype, characterized by HF-IP collapse, premature hair follicle regression (catagen), and hair follicle dystrophy.

Our study demonstrates that CD8+ T cells, which have long been thought to represent the central players in AA pathobiology (Pratt et al., 2017; Xing et al., 2014; de Jong et al., 2018; Gilhar et al., 1998; Wang et al., 2016; Paus et al., 1993), are not the only drivers of disease (Gilhar et al., 2019a; Pratt et al., 2017; de Jong et al., 2018; Paus et al., 1993), and are no joined not only by NK cells (Ito et al., 2008; Gilhar et al., 2013a) and γδT cells (Uchida et al., 2020; Uchida et al., 2021), but also by ILC1lc lymphocytes. The study further supports the concept that the characteristic hair loss pattern we diagnose as AA phenotype, does not always represent a classical, autoantigen- and autoreactive CD8+/NKGD2 +T-cell-dependent autoimmune disease (‘autoimmune AA’ [AAA]), but can also reflect non-autoimmune pathomechanisms that may perhaps best be defined as non-autoimmune AA subtype (NAIAA) (Bertolini et al., 2020; Paus et al., 2018; Figure 9). In a state of prolonged HF-IP collapse and thus chronic exposure of HF-associated autoantigens to (pre-existent?) autoreactive CD8 +T cells, it is well conceivable that an AA-subtype that began as NAIAA can over time transform into the AAA-variant, thus explaining the chronic-intermittent course that is seen in so many autoimmune diseases.

The novel concept of ILC1-induced NAIAA mandates a differential, personalized management approach to future AA therapy, which tailors treatment to the specific pathobiology at hand in any given AA patient. This must now include the targeting of pathogenic, potently IFN-γ -secreting ILC1lc, at least when these are seen to be increased in lesional AA biopsies.

Although the number of ILC1lc in lesional AA skin was significantly lower than that of CD8 + cells (Figure 1) this does not rule out a crucial role of the cells in spontaneous AA development in patients. In fact, we demonstrate here that ILC1lc are even more potent IFN-γproducers than CD8 +T cells. Also, despite the relatively low numbers of ILC1lc, their selective tissue distribution makes them ideally localized to provide an early source of cytokines to initiate/trigger pro-inflammatory immune responses directed against distressed tissues (Vivier, 2021), as documented here in our co-culture assay with ‘stressed’ human scalp HFs ex vivo.

That IL-12 and IL-18 were among the cytokines used here to facilitate ILC1lc isolation from human PBMCs is also interesting in the context of our most recent observation that local IL-12 signaling, supported by IL-18, may be involved in the early stages of AA development by stimulating IFN-γ production from resident IL-12Rß2+immune cells, eventually leading to HF-IP collapse (Edelkamp, 2021). In fact, treatment with IL-12 +IL-18 of healthy HFs selectively enriches IFN-γ -inducible genes and promotes the release of IFN-γ into the medium and thus HF-IP collapse. These responses were abrogated by the co-administration of a selective TYK2 inhibitor (Edelkamp, 2021), which confirms a key role of IL-12, whose receptor utilizes a TYK2 and Janus kinase 2 pair for downstream signal transduction (Ullrich et al., 2020; Krueger et al., 2022), These preliminary findings suggest that IL-12 is a key effector cytokine in promoting pathogenic IFN-γ secretion and HF-IP collapse. Given that ILC1 are IFN-γ producing cells (Nabekura and Shibuya, 2021b; Resende et al., 2017; Quintino-de-Carvalho et al., 2022), our data, therefore, encourage one to dissect, next, the exact role of IL-12/IL-12R-mediated signaling in activating, attracting and/or expanding ILC1lc and in stimulating their IFN-γ secretion in the early stages of human AA pathogenesis.

An immunopathology-initiating role of ILC1lc is not unique to AA and has also been proposed in other inflammatory conditions (Kim et al., 2021), including vitiligo (Tulic et al., 2019), which shares some pathogenesis features with AA (Harris, 2013; Tomaszewska et al., 2020), inflammatory bowel disease (McDonald et al., 2018; Bernink et al., 2013; Tang et al., 2019), lupus erythematosus (Guo et al., 2019), and the aggravation of atherosclerosis (Wu et al., 2018). Yet, to the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to demonstrate that these innate immunocytes can indeed induce the full disease-mimicking immunopathology phenotype in a previously healthy human (mini-) organ. Also, abnormalities in the crosstalk between ILC1lc and gut microbiota have been observed in various diseases (Jiao et al., 2020). Therefore, it is interesting to ask whether the microbial dysbiosis that has been reported in the scalp skin of AA patients (Pinto et al., 2020) may activate the very few, strategically positioned perifollicular ILC1lc present in healthy human scalp skin through abnormal crosstalk with HF microbiota (Lousada et al., 2021). This hypothesis can now be explored using our ex vivo and humanized AA mouse model.

Collectively, our study introduces IFN-γ -secreting ILC1lc lymphocytes as important novel players in human AA pathobiology and identifies them as new therapeutic intervention targets. Their strategic location, their capability to recognize and respond to HF distress signals such as MICA and selected chemokines, the excessive production of IFN-γ by ILC1lc, and their direct, pathogenic effects on human HFs ex vivo documented here, all support that these cells play a hitherto unappreciated role in early AA pathogenesis. Moreover, our study demonstrates that autoreactive CD8 +T cells are not indispensable for AA induction and further supports that non-autoimmune AA variants (NAIAA) (Bertolini et al., 2020) exist and that innate/transitional immune cells play an important role in AA pathobiology.

Materials and methods

Patients, tissue, and blood samples

For the in situ analyses we used archival paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens of human AA scalp skin lesions from the Department of Pathology, Rambam Medical Center ( fourfemales, 12–35 years, mean age 20.5±9.5; sixmales, 6–38 years, mean age 18±12). Three of these AA patients showed active hair loss of the AA universalis phenotype while the other patients showed stable hair loss patches of the multifocal AA phenotype (Gilhar et al., 2012). One ten-year-old male patient had a positive family history of allergic rhinitis. AA was diagnosed both clinically and by histopathology, and none of the enrolled patients showed clinical evidence or had a personal history of other AA-associated autoimmune diseases (Gilhar et al., 2012; Meah et al., 2021).

Clinically healthy human skin scalp specimens were obtained from healthy volunteers undergoing cosmetic facelift surgery ( three females, 43–72 years, mean age 58±15; 5 males, 31–44 years, mean age 36±8).

The ex vivo experiments utilized scalp HFs from 20 healthy donors (13 males and seven females) without a history of AA (31–63 years, mean age 49±12).

The in vivo experiments in the humanized AA mouse model Ghraieb et al., 2018 used scalp skin pieces obtained from five healthy donors ( four males and one female, 34–45 years, mean age 38±5). For the ex vivo and in vivo experiments, frontotemporal human scalp skin specimens were obtained during elective cosmetic facelift procedures performed under general anesthesia, and 20 ml of autologous venous blood was drawn, both with informed written patient consent.

The study for both ex vivo and in vivo experiments was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (RMB-0182–14).

For the ex vivo experiments, frozen HFs sections were dehydrated for 40 min and incubated with acetone for 10 min at –20 °C for fixation. Slides were dehydrated for 20 min and transferred to double-distilled water following three times wash with 1xphosphate buffered saline (PBS) (pH = 7.4). Sections were blocked with suitable serum (horse/goat) for 30 min to prevent nonspecific binding and incubated at 4 °C with primary Ab overnight. Slides were incubated with an appropriate biotinylated secondary Ab (FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ab, Rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG Ab or Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG Ab) for 30 min, following three times wash with PBS.

For the in vivo experiment, five-micrometer paraffin sections were used. Antigen retrieval was for 20  min at 90 °C in a microwave. Specimens were blocked for 30  min to prevent nonspecific binding and incubated with the first antibody (Ab) overnight, followed by a wash and incubation with biotinylated 2nd Ab (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA), and subsequent binding with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin. Markers were revealed with AEC (red) (Aminoethyl Carbazole Substrate kit). Sections were then mounted and analyzed under a light microscope.

Histochemistry, immunohistology, and quantitative immunohistomorphometry (qIHM)

Five-micrometer paraffin sections of lesional AA biopsies and human scalp skin xenotransplants were processed for histochemistry or immunohistology. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-CD8 (Cell Marque-108M-95), anti-CD4 (DAKO-M7310), anti-HLA-A,B,C (Abcam-70328), anti-HLA-DR (Abcam-20281), anti- IFN-γ (Abcam-25101), anti- α-MSH (LSBio-C25584), anti-beta2 microglobulin (Abcam-218230), and anti-TGF-β1 (Santa Cruz-52893) (Ghraieb et al., 2018; Laufer Britva et al., 2020; Keren et al., 2018).

Since there is no single, highly specific surface marker for ILC1 cells, triple immunostaining was performed with three sets of antibodies that are routinely used for the identification of human ILC1lc (Talayero et al., 2016; Hawke et al., 2020a; Hawke et al., 2020b; Cruz-Zárate et al., 2018): (a) NKp44+ (Bioss-YEYS3W) (Talayero et al., 2016), CD103+ (eBioscience 1401038–82) (Hawke et al., 2020b) and T-bet- (Santa Cruz-H3112) Cruz-Zárate et al., 2018; (b) c-KIT- (DAKO-MA512944) (Nagasawa et al., 2019), CD49a+ (R&D systems-AF5676) (Colonna, 2018) and EOMES+ (ThermoFisher-14-4877-82); and (c) CD49a+ (R&D systems), EOMES+ (ThermoFisher-14-4877-82) and NKG2D+ (Novus-5c6) (de Jong et al., 2018). Skin-infiltrating CD8 +NKG2D+T cells were double-immunostained by NKG2D (Novus-5c6)/CD8 (Cell Marque-108M-95) (de Jong et al., 2018). For negative control, the primary antibody was replaced with non-specific IgG1 and IgG2 isotype control.

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed on cryo- or paraffin sections as previously described (Keren et al., 2018). For the ex vivo experiments, HFs cryosections were dehydrated for 40 min and fixed with acetone for 10 min at –20 °C (Ghraieb et al., 2018; Laufer Britva et al., 2020; Keren et al., 2015).

The following primary antibodies were used for immunohistochemistry (IHC) or immunofluorescence microscopy (IF) of key HF immune privilege markers (Bertolini et al., 2020; Paus et al., 2005) anti-HLA-A,B,C (Abcam-70328)/ anti-HLA-DR (Abcam-20281)/anti-MICA(Santa Cruz- 20931)/anti-CD1d (Abcam-11076)/anti- α-MSH (LSBio-C25584)/anti-beta2 microglobulin (Abcam-218230) and anti-TGF-β1(Santa Cruz-52893).

The immunoreactivity patterns were assessed in standardized, well-defined reference areas by quantitative immunohistomorphoemtry (qIHM) by experienced, blinded observers, following our standard protocols for evaluating human HF immunology read-outs (Bertolini et al., 2014; Bertolini et al., 2016; Christoph et al., 2000; Harries et al., 2013; Hardman-Smart et al., 2020), counting at least three reference areas each on three non-consecutive sections, presented randomly to the blinded observer(s). Specifically, immunoreactive cells around and within the HFs were counted in an area of 0.66  mm2.

For HLA-A,B,C, HLA-DR, MICA, CD1d, α-MSH, beta2 microglobulin, and TGF-β1 image analysis was performed using Image J software. Protein expression was measured by calculating the percentage of staining coverage within the analyzed area.

Masson-Fontana staining (Abcam) was performed as described by us (Laufer Britva et al., 2020; Purba et al., 2016). Briefly, five-micrometer paraffin sections were deparaffinized and hydrated in distilled water. Slides were placed in mixed ammoniacal silver solution in a 58–60°C water bath and allowed adequate time for the temperature to equilibrate. Slides were then placed in the warmed ammoniacal silver solution for 30–60 min or until the tissue section became yellowish/brown in color. Counterstaining was performed with Nuclear Fast Red Solution for 5 min.

TUNEL analysis

Apoptotic cells were evaluated using a commercial TUNEL kit (Roche) with anti-digoxigenin fluorescein labeling and according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Ki-67 (Invitrogen) was visualized using Alexa Flour 594-conjugated goat anti-mouse (Jackson, 115-585-062). Sections were counterstained by DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Staining was visualized using a confocal Microscope - Zeiss LSM 700. Quantification was performed as previously described (Peters et al., 2006).

Immunohistology

Slides were photographed using immunofluorescence confocal microscopy and compared systematically by qIHM in standardized, defined tissue compartments. Mouse skin served as a negative control. Three non-consecutive sections were analyzed per patient.

Isolation, characterization, and culture of circulating ILC1lc, ILC2, ILC3, and CD8+/NKG2D+ cells

ILC2 and ILC3 cells were used as negative controls, while CD8+/NKG2D+ cells were used as a positive control to evaluate the ILC1lc cytotoxic effects on HFs.

The cells were cultured and induced to expand, as we have previously described (Keren et al., 2018). The isolation and characterization of ILC1lc, ILC2, and ILC3 cells by FACS cell sorting or MACS were performed as we previously described (Keren et al., 2018; Mjösberg et al., 2011; Mora-Velandia et al., 2017; Creyns et al., 2020).

Autologous human PBMCs were isolated from heparinized whole blood from healthy donors by Lymphoprep density gradient centrifugation (Alere Technologies, Norway). Cells were frozen for further assays (70% FBS, 20% RPMI1640, and 10% DMSO) or cultured at a seeding density of 3 × 106 cells/ml in 24 wells plate with medium (RPMI 1640, 10% human AB serum, 1% penicillin-streptomycin antibiotics, 2 mML glutamine) in the presence of different cytokines for cells expansion.

The following components are required for the expansion of various immune cell populations:

On days three and five, half of the medium was either frozen for further analysis or discarded and replaced with fresh medium containing cytokines. After seven days, cells were sorted by FACS Aria (FACSAria III Cell Sorter, BD Biosciences, USA) and in the case of ILC3 further enriched by MACS for negative selection of CD3 + cells (see Figure 2—figure supplement 2).

Flow cytometry sorting for ILC1lc, ILC2, and CD8+/NKG2D+ cells

Cells were cultured for one week, collected, and washed with PBS containing 1% BSA and 2% PSN. Surface cells were stained with antibodies to the PE-conjugated lineage cocktail that includes antibodies against CD1a (BLG-300105), CD3 (BLG-300–307), CD14 (BLG-367103), CD19 (BLG-302207), CD34 (BLG-343605), CD123 (BLG-306005), CD11c (BLG-301605), BDCA2 (BLG-354203), FcεR1α (BLG-334609), TCRαβ (BLG-306707), TCRγδ (BLG-331209), CD56 (BLG- 362565) (Hawke et al., 2020b).

Following gating on lineage, cell population cells were sorted as follows:

ILC1lc – APC-conjugated-CD127+ (BLG-351315), PE/CY7-conjugated-CD161+ (BLG-339917), and FITC-conjugated-NKp44 + (SC-53597), Brilliant Violet 421TM anti-human CD117- (c-KIT) (BLG-313215) and APC/CY7-conjugated-CRTH2- (BLG-350113). (Santa Cruz H3112) (Talayero et al., 2016; Hawke et al., 2020a).

ILC2 cells – APC-conjugated-CD127+ (BLG-351315), PE/CY7-conjugated-CD161+ (BLG-339917), Brilliant Violet 421TM anti-human CD117+ (c-KIT) (BLG-313215) and APC/CY7-conjugated-CRTH2+ (BLG-350113) (Cruz-Zárate et al., 2018; Nagasawa et al., 2019).

CD8+/NKG2D+ cells – CD8 (Cell Marque-108M-95)/NKG2D(Novus-5c6) (Ito et al., 2008). The cells were sorted using a FACS Aria instrument with software (BD Biosciences). The sorted cells were collected in a tube with a medium enriched with 20% human serum. Afterward, the cells were centrifuged, suspended, counted, and co-cultured with HFs or used for ELISA assay.

Compensation was done using Comp-Beads (BDTM Biosciences) and data were analyzed using FlowJo software.

Magnetic isolation of ILC3 subsets

Separation was performed using anti-CD3 antibodies conjugated to ferromagnetic microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and directed through a cell separation column containing a magnetic field (Miltenyi Biotec). For the purification of ILC3s, CD3−sorted cells were collected and stained with anti-NKp44-PE conjugated to ferromagnetic microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) and directed through a cell separation column containing a magnetic field (Keren et al., 2018).

Finally, cells were co-cultured with autologous HFs ex vivo (see below) or used for different assays (Keren et al., 2018).

Co-culture of autologous ILC1lc with ‘stressed’ human scalp hair follicles ex vivo

Experimental induction of HF-IP collapse by IFN-γ is the standard ex vivo-assay system for interrogating key elements of AA-related human HF immunopathology (Ito et al., 2004; Bertolini et al., 2016; Kinori et al., 2012). We have recently complemented this assay by co-culturing key immunocytes in AA pathogenesis (CD8 +T cells, γδTCs) directly with organ-cultured human scalp HFs ex vivo (Uchida et al., 2021).

For this, healthy human anagen scalp HFs were collected and microdissected as described (Ito et al., 2004), and HFs were placed individually into a 96-well plate slot with 100 µl supplemented medium (William’s E plus 1% penicillin-streptomycin antibiotics, 1% L-glutamine (Invitrogen-Gibco)), 0.01% hydrocortisone (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.01% insulin (Sigma-Aldrich) (Langan et al., 2015).

As we have documented in detail elsewhere (Uchida et al., 2021), on day 1 after initiation of organ culture, the HFs are markedly, but transiently stressed by the trauma of microdissection and the transfer to a harsh, hyperoxygenated ex vivo culture environment. This results in significantly increased LDH activity release and up-regulation of CXCL12 and CXCL10 expression as well as in a transient, partial weakening of the HFs physiological immune privilege. The latter was evidenced by increased protein expression of MHC class Ia, β2-microglobulin, and MICA/B but no change in the expression of IP guardians such as αMSH and TGFβ2. As reported before, all these ‘HF stress’ indicators normalize on day 3 of organ culture (Supplementary file 1) (Taken from: Uchida et al., 2021). Thus, due to their expression of NKG2D ligands (MICA/B) CXCL12 and CXCL10 secretion, and transiently weakened HF immune privilege, the stressed (day 1) HFs can attract and interact with immune cells expressing NKG2D receptors and are primed to elicit anti-HF immune responses ex vivo (Uchida et al., 2021).

Therefore, organ culture-stressed day 1 HFs (1HF/well) were co-cultured in supplemented William’s E medium from day 1 until day 6 with one of five different immune cell populations: (1) ILC1lc (100 µl/600 cells per well), either alone or in combination with anti- IFN-γ antibody (10 µg/ml, R&D Systems, MAB285) or NKG2D neutralizing antibody (5 µg/ml, R&D Systems, MAB139-100); ILC1lc demonstrated cytotoxic effect on HFs with 600 cells per well, while (2) CD8/NKG2D cells demonstrated similar effect only with 100 µl/3500 cells per well. Therefore, 100 µl/3500 per well was used for the following control groups: (3) ILC2s cells; (4) ILC3s, or (5) PHA cultured PBMCs.

The medium was not replaced in order to avoid losing any immunocytes. Basic HF biology read-out parameters were assessed by evaluating the Ki-67/TUNEL ratio, values of LDH release, HF pigmentation, and hair shaft production in situ, all of which indicated that the HFs did not suffer major damage after 6 days of organ culture. At the end of the experimentation, the HFs were photo-documented and cryopreserved in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) blocks. Cytokine release into the culture medium by ELISA was analyzed as previously described (Zook and Kee, 2016).

Flow cytometry analysis for characterization of ILC1lc

PBMCs were isolated from healthy blood via centrifugation on ficol/Hypaque and cultured for seven days in a medium composed of RPMI 1640, 10% human AB serum, 1% L-glutamine, and 1% PSN. The medium was changed as needed.

Seven days later, 6 hr prior to FACS staining, cells were then collected (1–1.5 × 106 cells/tube), centrifuged at 1200 RPM for 5 min, and washed twice in staining buffer (1 ml of 1% Bovine Serum Albumin [BSA] in 1 x sterile PBS). First antibodies (as described above, flow cytometry sorting) were used at a concentration of 2.5 μl per 1 × 106 cells.

Cells were incubated for 25 min at room temperature in the dark. All tubes were washed once with 1 ml staining buffer, then Fixation/Permeabilization solution (250 μl) was added and cells were incubated for 20 min at 4 °C. Cell permeability was performed using 1 × BD Perm/Wash buffer, intra-cellular antibody mixtures (50 μl/Brilliant Violet 605TM anti-T-bet BLG 644817), Eomes-conjugated-PerCP-eFluor 710 (Dan11mag), IRF8 (sc-365042), Perforin (BLG-308119), and INF-γ-conjugated- PE/VIO-770 (Miltenyi Biotec 130-109-313), CD49a-APC-Vio770 (Miltenyi Biotec 130-101-324),FITC anti-human CD49b (BLG 359305), APC anti-human NKp80 (BLG 346707), BV421 anti-human CXCR6 (BLG 356013) and APC/Fire 810 anti-human CD16 (BLG 302073) and BV421 anti-human RORγt were added and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark, cells were then washed twice with 1xBD Perm/Wash buffer (BD Cytofix/CytopermTM Fixation/Permeabilization Kit).

All cell samples were detected by FACS Calibur Flow Cytometer (Benton Dickinson) using Cell Quest software, and the acquired data were further analyzed using FlowJo 5.7.2 (Tree Star).

Cytokine analyses in culture medium by ELISA

Production of IFN-γ by ILC1lc from healthy volunteers was analyzed using ELISA. ILC2, ILC3, and PBMCs/PHA were analyzed as negative controls. CD8+/NKG2D+ cells were analyzed as a positive control.

The concentration of IFN-γ was determined in the supernatant of 6 × 106 cells from each donor (six healthy donors) using the Human IFN-γ ELISA deluxe set (BioLegend) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Analysis of HF cytotoxicity, catagen induction, and immune privilege collapse

As an indication of HF cytotoxicity, LDH release into the supernatants was quantified by colorimetric assay using the Cytotoxicity Detection kit Plus (Roche), which measures the conversion of tetrazolium salt in formazan, a water-soluble dye with a broad absorption maximum at approximately 500 nm (Uchida et al., 2021; Lu et al., 2007; Poeggeler et al., 2010). Medium with/without HFs was cultured with PBMCs/PHA, CD8+/NKG2D+, ILC1lc, ILC2, or ILC3 cells for three days. Formazan absorbance was measured for each condition that correlates with cell cytotoxicity. Anagen and catagen HFs were visualized and differentiated under Nikon Diaphot inverted binocular and thereafter qualitative morphological and quantitative morphometric assessments were analyzed as previously described (Kloepper et al., 2010). IHC staining was performed to test all hallmarks of AA in order to probe whether co-culture with ILC1lc induced abnormal HLA-DR, HLA-ABC, CD1d, ß2-microglobulin, and MICA protein expression in the proximal HF epithelium and/or downregulated the key guardians of HF immune privilege, TGF-β1, and α-MSH (Bertolini et al., 2020; Ito et al., 2004), using the qIHM method described above.

In order to check whether ILC1lc affects HFs via IFN-γoverproduction or via activation of the NKG2D-NKG2DL axis following excessive MICA expression by stressed HFs, neutralizing anti- IFN-γ (10 µg/ml, R&D Systems, MAB285) or function-blocking NKG2D (5 µg/ml, R&D Systems, MAB139-100) antibodies, were added to the HFs co-cultured with ILC1lc (defined as CD49a+CD49b- Verma et al., 2020), lin-/CD127+/CD117-/CRTH2-, and T-betlo/ Eomeshi (Bennstein et al., 2020; Krabbendam et al., 2021).

Humanized AA mouse model

For the humanized AA mouse model (Gilhar et al., 2013a; Ghraieb et al., 2018; Gilhar et al., 2016), full-thickness biopsies were taken from healthy donors undergoing plastic surgery on the scalp. Biopsies from each donor were dissected horizontally to generate pieces with a diameter of 3  mm. Three 3  mm pieces were grafted orthotopically into the subcutaneous layer of each SCID/beige mice as previously described (Gilhar et al., 2013a; Ghraieb et al., 2018; Gilhar et al., 2013b). Seven days after surgery, mice were treated with Minoxi-5 (hair regrowth treatment for men containing 5% Minoxidil active ingredient) by spreading it on the grafts twice a day until we received optimal expedited hair growth (period of two months). The topical minoxidil application is not required for hair regrowth induction after the initial post-transplantion hair shaft shedding, but only accelerates it. This application is discontinued before the ILC1lc injection (Gilhar et al., 2013a). Since the immune cell infiltrate in AA attacks only hair follicles in anagen (Gilhar et al., 2012), it is critical that the majority of xenotransplant HFs are in anagen at the time the immune cells are injected. Topical minoxidil pretreatment increases the likelihood that this is the case (Price et al., 1999; Suchonwanit et al., 2019). Moreover, we have recently demonstrated that 5% minoxidil does indeed significantly stimulate hair regrowth in human androgenetic alopecia scalp skin transplanted onto SCID/beige mice (Gilhar et al., 2022). It also deserves mentioning that topical minoxidil reduces the degranulation of – hair growth-modulatory! (Paus et al., 1994) - perifollicular mast cells in the skin of mice, namely under conditions of perceived stress (Arck et al., 2003), while excessive degranulation of perifollicular mast cells is an important feature of lesional human AA skin (Bertolini et al., 2014). Therefore, this pretreatment likely also helps to reestablish perifollicular mast cell homeostasis after the stress of xenotransplantation. In the current study, 18 female SCID/beige mice (C.B-17/IcrHsd-scid-bg) (Harlan Laboratories Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel) were used at 2–3 months of age and were housed in the pathogen-free animal facility of the Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology. Animal care and research protocols were in accordance with institutional guidelines and were approved by the Institutional Committee on Animal Use (17-08-115-IL).

Culture of Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

PBMCs were isolated from healthy donors without any history of AA or other autoimmune diseases by centrifugation on Ficoll/Hypaque (Pharmacia, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) (Ghraieb et al., 2018). The PBMCs were then cultured for 14 days with 100 U IL-2 per ml (Pepro Tech Inc, Rocky Hill, NJ) in a medium composed of RPMI 1640, 10% human AB serum (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 1% glutamine, 1% antibiotics (media components; Biological Industries, Kibbutz Beit Haemeck, Israel). Medium was changed as needed. The cultured cells defined as enriched CD8/NKG2D according to our previous publication (Ghraieb et al., 2018), were injected intradermally into human explants on beige-SCID mice.

Study design

Two sets of experiments were performed: In the first set, the mice were divided randomly into three groups on day 89 after scalp skin transplantation and treated as described in Supplementary file 2.

The second set of experiments was performed to eliminate the confounding influence of resident human T-cells present in the human scalp skin xenotransplants. To this end, anti-CD3/OKT3 antibodies (Supplementary file 2) were injected into xenotransplants treated with either autologous ILC1lc or autologous enriched CD8+/NKG2D+ cells. For both sets of experiments, the mice were sacrificed and skin biopsies were taken for analysis on day 45 after immunocyte injection.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) or fold change of mean ± SEM; p values of <0.05 were regarded as significant.

Gaussian distribution of the data was analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk test. Significant differences were analyzed using either unpaired Student′s t-test (comparison between one set of data), or One Way ANOVA (comparison between multiple sets of data) for parametric data, or Mann–Whitney test (comparison between one set of data and sham or vehicle) for nonparametric data or Kruskal–Wallis test, and Dunn’s test (comparison between multiple sets of data). The n (e.g. number of donors, tissue sections, or microscopic fields) used for each individual data reported here is listed in corresponding figure legend.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported in part by the Technion Research & Development Foundation (to AG), a Frost Endowed Scholarship from the University of Miami Dermatology Department (to RP), and a basic research grant from Monasterium Laboratory GmbH, Münster (to AG & CR).

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Ralf Paus, Email: rxp803@med.miami.edu.

Amos Gilhar, Email: doritg2000@gmail.com.

Valerie Horsley, Yale University, United States.

Betty Diamond, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, United States.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • Technion research and development foundation to Amos Gilhar.

  • Frost Endowed Scholarship from the university of Miami to Ralf Paus.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

No competing interests declared.

is affiliated with CUTANEON. The author has no financial interests regarding the research presented here to declare.

Author contributions

Data curation, Investigation.

Data curation, Investigation.

Data curation, Investigation.

Methodology.

Conceptualization, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Ethics

The informed consent was obtained. The study for both ex vivo and in vivo experiments was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (RMB-0182-14).

This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#17-08-115-IL) of the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology (Permit Number: 17-08-115-IL). All surgery was performed under isoflurane anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Additional files

Supplementary file 1. Microdissected, organ-cultured HFs are ‘stressed’ on day 1, but become equilibrated on day 3, as assessed by the listed objective read-out parameters that indicate a temporarily weakened HF immune privilege and HF damage as well as MICA overexpression on day 1.

Instead, the expression of HF immune privilege guardians (αMSH, TGFß2) (Bertolini et al., 2020) is preserved. This makes freshly microdissected healthy human scalp HFs one day after initiation of HF organ culture optimally suited as ‘stressed’ human (mini-) organs that strongly express the NKG2D-activating ‘danger’ ‘signal,’ MICA, which also is overexpressed by human AA HFs (Li et al., 2016) (these data are repeated from Uchida et al., 2021 to illustrate the HF distress/partial IP collapse of microdissected human scalp HFs one day 1 after initiation of organ culture).

elife-80768-supp1.docx (13.4KB, docx)
Supplementary file 2. Route of injections, volume, and the number of immune cells injected into the normal healthy human xenotransplants.
elife-80768-supp2.docx (13.4KB, docx)
MDAR checklist

Data availability

Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1-8 and figures supplement 2,3,4.

References

  1. Albini A, Gallazzi M, Palano MT, Carlini V, Ricotta R, Bruno A, Stetler-Stevenson WG, Noonan DM. TIMP1 and TIMP2 downregulate TGFβ induced decidual-like phenotype in natural killer cells. Cancers. 2021;13:4955. doi: 10.3390/cancers13194955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arck PC, Handjiski B, Peters EMJ, Hagen E, Klapp BF, Paus R. Topical minoxidil counteracts stress-induced hair growth inhibition in mice. Experimental Dermatology. 2003;12:580–590. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0625.2003.00028.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Artis D, Spits H. The biology of innate lymphoid cells. Nature. 2015;517:293–301. doi: 10.1038/nature14189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Babic M, Romagnani C. The role of natural killer group 2, member D in chronic inflammation and autoimmunity. Frontiers in Immunology. 2018;9:1219. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennstein SB, Weinhold S, Manser AR, Scherenschlich N, Noll A, Raba K, Kögler G, Walter L, Uhrberg M. Umbilical cord blood-derived ILC1-like cells constitute a novel precursor for mature KIR+NKG2A- NK cells. eLife. 2020;9:e55232. doi: 10.7554/eLife.55232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernink JH, Peters CP, Munneke M, te Velde AA, Meijer SL, Weijer K, Hreggvidsdottir HS, Heinsbroek SE, Legrand N, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA, Mjösberg JM, Spits H. Human type 1 innate lymphoid cells accumulate in inflamed mucosal tissues. Nature Immunology. 2013;14:221–229. doi: 10.1038/ni.2534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bernink JH, Mjösberg J, Spits H. Human ILC1: to be or not to be. Immunity. 2017;46:756–757. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bertolini M, Zilio F, Rossi A, Kleditzsch P, Emelianov VE, Gilhar A, Keren A, Meyer KC, Wang E, Funk W, McElwee K, Paus R. Abnormal interactions between perifollicular mast cells and CD8+ T-cells may contribute to the pathogenesis of alopecia areata. PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e94260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bertolini M, Pretzlaff M, Sulk M, Bähr M, Gherardini J, Uchida Y, Reibelt M, Kinori M, Rossi A, Bíró T, Paus R. Vasoactive intestinal peptide, whose receptor-mediated signalling may be defective in alopecia areata, provides protection from hair follicle immune privilege collapse. The British Journal of Dermatology. 2016;175:531–541. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bertolini M, McElwee K, Gilhar A, Bulfone-Paus S, Paus R. Hair follicle immune privilege and its collapse in alopecia areata. Experimental Dermatology. 2020;29:703–725. doi: 10.1111/exd.14155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bodó E, Tobin DJ, Kamenisch Y, Bíró T, Berneburg M, Funk W, Paus R. Dissecting the impact of chemotherapy on the human hair follicle: a pragmatic in vitro assay for studying the pathogenesis and potential management of hair follicle dystrophy. Am J Pathol. 2007;171:1153–1167. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.061164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Brownlie D, Scharenberg M, Mold JE, Hård J, Kekäläinen E, Buggert M, Nguyen S, Wilson JN, Al-Ameri M, Ljunggren HG, Marquardt N, Michaëlsson J. Expansions of adaptive-like NK cells with a tissue-resident phenotype in human lung and blood. PNAS. 2021;118:e2016580118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2016580118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cella M, Gamini R, Sécca C, Collins PL, Zhao S, Peng V, Robinette ML, Schettini J, Zaitsev K, Gordon W, Bando JK, Yomogida K, Cortez V, Fronick C, Fulton R, Lin LL, Gilfillan S, Flavell RA, Shan L, Artyomov MN, Bowman M, Oltz EM, Jelinsky SA, Colonna M. Subsets of ILC3-ILC1-like cells generate a diversity spectrum of innate lymphoid cells in human mucosal tissues. Nature Immunology. 2019;20:980–991. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0425-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cheng C, Zhang Q, Li Y, Jiang J, Xie L, Shen H, Wu D, Zhang H, Zhang H, Wang X, Wu H, Xu J, Gui L, Li B, Ju C, Peng H, Yin S, Xu L. Interplay between liver type 1 innate lymphoid cells and NK cells drives the development of alcoholic steatohepatitis. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;15:261–274. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2022.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Christoph T, Müller-Röver S, Audring H, Tobin DJ, Hermes B, Cotsarelis G, Rückert R, Paus R. The human hair follicle immune system: cellular composition and immune privilege. The British Journal of Dermatology. 2000;142:862–873. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03464.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Clottu AS, Humbel M, Fluder N, Karampetsou MP, Comte D. Innate lymphoid cells in autoimmune diseases. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021;12:789788. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.789788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Collins A, Rothman N, Liu K, Reiner SL. Eomesodermin and T-bet mark developmentally distinct human natural killer cells. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e90063. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.90063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Colonna M. Innate lymphoid cells: diversity, plasticity, and unique functions in immunity. Immunity. 2018;48:1104–1117. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Conlon TM, Knolle PA, Yildirim AÖ. Local tissue development of type 1 innate lymphoid cells: guided by interferon-gamma. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2021;6:287. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00705-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Connell SJ, Jabbari A. The current state of knowledge of the immune ecosystem in alopecia areata. Autoimmunity Reviews. 2022;21:103061. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Creyns B, Jacobs I, Verstockt B, Cremer J, Ballet V, Vandecasteele R, Vanuytsel T, Ferrante M, Vermeire S, Van Assche G, Ceuppens JL, Breynaert C. Biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients partly restores intestinal innate lymphoid cell subtype equilibrium. Frontiers in Immunology. 2020;11:1847. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cruz-Zárate D, Cabrera-Rivera GL, Ruiz-Sánchez BP, Serafín-López J, Chacón-Salinas R, López-Macías C, Isibasi A, Gallegos-Pérez H, León-Gutiérrez MA, Ferat-Osorio E, Arriaga-Pizano L, Estrada-García I, Wong-Baeza I. Innate lymphoid cells have decreased HLA-DR expression but retain their responsiveness to TLR ligands during sepsis. Journal of Immunology. 2018;201:3401–3410. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1800735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Curio S, Belz GT. The unique role of innate lymphoid cells in cancer and the hepatic microenvironment. Cellular & Molecular Immunology. 2022;19:1012–1029. doi: 10.1038/s41423-022-00901-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dadi S, Chhangawala S, Whitlock BM, Franklin RA, Luo CT, Oh SA, Toure A, Pritykin Y, Huse M, Leslie CS, Li MO. Cancer immunosurveillance by tissue-resident innate lymphoid cells and innate-like T cells. Cell. 2016;164:365–377. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Daussy C, Faure F, Mayol K, Viel S, Gasteiger G, Charrier E, Bienvenu J, Henry T, Debien E, Hasan UA, Marvel J, Yoh K, Takahashi S, Prinz I, de Bernard S, Buffat L, Walzer T. T-Bet and eomes instruct the development of two distinct natural killer cell lineages in the liver and in the bone marrow. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2014;211:563–577. doi: 10.1084/jem.20131560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. de Jong A, Jabbari A, Dai Z, Xing L, Lee D, Li MM, Duvic M, Hordinsky M, Norris DA, Price V, Mackay-Wiggan J, Clynes R, Christiano AM. High-Throughput T cell receptor sequencing identifies clonally expanded CD8+ T cell populations in alopecia areata. JCI Insight. 2018;3:e121949. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.121949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ebbo M, Crinier A, Vély F, Vivier E. Innate lymphoid cells: major players in inflammatory diseases. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2017;17:665–678. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Edelkamp J. Selective Inhibition of Tyrosine Kinase 2 (TYK2) Protects Hair Follicles from Immune Privilege Collapse Induced by Interleukin (IL)-12 Stimulation. EADV’s 30th Anniversary Congress; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fan J, Shi J, Zhang Y, Liu J, An C, Zhu H, Wu P, Hu W, Qin R, Yao D, Shou X, Xu Y, Tong Z, Wen X, Xu J, Zhang J, Fang W, Lou J, Yin W, Chen W. Nkg2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano-regulated ligand conformational changes. The EMBO Journal. 2022;41:e107739. doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Fang W, Zhang Y, Chen Z. Innate lymphoid cells in inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2020;22:25. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-2115-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fiancette R, Finlay CM, Willis C, Bevington SL, Soley J, Ng STH, Baker SM, Andrews S, Hepworth MR, Withers DR. Reciprocal transcription factor networks govern tissue-resident ILC3 subset function and identity. Nature Immunology. 2021;22:1245–1255. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-01024-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Flommersfeld S, Böttcher JP, Ersching J, Flossdorf M, Meiser P, Pachmayr LO, Leube J, Hensel I, Jarosch S, Zhang Q, Chaudhry MZ, Andrae I, Schiemann M, Busch DH, Cicin-Sain L, Sun JC, Gasteiger G, Victora GD, Höfer T, Buchholz VR, Grassmann S. Fate mapping of single NK cells identifies a type 1 innate lymphoid-like lineage that bridges innate and adaptive recognition of viral infection. Immunity. 2021;54:2288–2304. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Frazao A, Rethacker L, Messaoudene M, Avril MF, Toubert A, Dulphy N, Caignard A. NKG2D/NKG2-ligand pathway offers new opportunities in cancer treatment. Frontiers in Immunology. 2019;10:661. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Fuchs A, Vermi W, Lee JS, Lonardi S, Gilfillan S, Newberry RD, Cella M, Colonna M. Intraepithelial type 1 innate lymphoid cells are a unique subset of IL-12- and IL-15-responsive IFN-γ-producing cells. Immunity. 2013;38:769–781. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gao Y, Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes F, Bald T, Ng SS, Young A, Ngiow SF, Rautela J, Straube J, Waddell N, Blake SJ, Yan J, Bartholin L, Lee JS, Vivier E, Takeda K, Messaoudene M, Zitvogel L, Teng MWL, Belz GT, Engwerda CR, Huntington ND, Nakamura K, Hölzel M, Smyth MJ. Tumor immunoevasion by the conversion of effector NK cells into type 1 innate lymphoid cells. Nature Immunology. 2017;18:1004–1015. doi: 10.1038/ni.3800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ghraieb A, Keren A, Ginzburg A, Ullmann Y, Schrum AG, Paus R, Gilhar A. INKT cells ameliorate human autoimmunity: lessons from alopecia areata. Journal of Autoimmunity. 2018;91:61–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gilhar A, Ullmann Y, Berkutzki T, Assy B, Kalish RS. Autoimmune hair loss (alopecia areata) transferred by T lymphocytes to human scalp explants on SCID mice. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:62–67. doi: 10.1172/JCI551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gilhar A, Etzioni A, Paus R. Alopecia areata. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;366:1515–1525. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1103442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Gilhar A, Keren A, Shemer A, d’Ovidio R, Ullmann Y, Paus R. Autoimmune disease induction in a healthy human organ: a humanized mouse model of alopecia areata. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2013a;133:844–847. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Gilhar A, Keren A, Shemer A, Ullmann Y, Paus R. Blocking potassium channels (kv1.3): a new treatment option for alopecia areata? The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2013b;133:2088–2091. doi: 10.1038/jid.2013.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Gilhar A, Schrum AG, Etzioni A, Waldmann H, Paus R. Alopecia areata: animal models illuminate autoimmune pathogenesis and novel immunotherapeutic strategies. Autoimmunity Reviews. 2016;15:726–735. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2016.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gilhar A, Keren A, Paus R. Jak inhibitors and alopecia areata. Lancet. 2019a;393:318–319. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32987-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gilhar A, Laufer-Britva R, Keren A, Paus R. Frontiers in alopecia areata pathobiology research. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2019b;144:1478–1489. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.08.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gilhar A, Keren A, Ullmann Y, Wu J, Paus R. Effect of minoxidil formulations on human scalp skin xenotransplants on SCID mice: A novel pre-clinical in vivo assay for androgenetic alopecia research. Experimental Dermatology. 2022;31:980–982. doi: 10.1111/exd.14523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Guo C, Zhou M, Zhao S, Huang Y, Wang S, Fu R, Li M, Zhang T, Gaskin F, Yang N, Fu SM. Innate lymphoid cell disturbance with increase in ILC1 in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clinical Immunology. 2019;202:49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2019.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hardman-Smart JA, Purba TS, Panicker S, Farjo B, Farjo N, Harries MJ, Paus R. Does mitochondrial dysfunction of hair follicle epithelial stem cells play a role in the pathobiology of lichen planopilaris? The British Journal of Dermatology. 2020;183:964–966. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Harmon C, Robinson MW, Fahey R, Whelan S, Houlihan DD, Geoghegan J, O’Farrelly C. Tissue-resident eomes(hi) T-bet(lo) CD56(bright) NK cells with reduced proinflammatory potential are enriched in the adult human liver. European Journal of Immunology. 2016;46:2111–2120. doi: 10.1002/eji.201646559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Harries MJ, Meyer K, Chaudhry I, E Kloepper J, Poblet E, Griffiths CE, Paus R. Lichen planopilaris is characterized by immune privilege collapse of the hair follicle’s epithelial stem cell niche. The Journal of Pathology. 2013;231:236–247. doi: 10.1002/path.4233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Harris JE. Vitiligo and alopecia areata: apples and oranges? Experimental Dermatology. 2013;22:785–789. doi: 10.1111/exd.12264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Hawke LG, Mitchell BZ, Ormiston ML. TGF-β and IL-15 synergize through MAPK pathways to drive the conversion of human NK cells to an innate lymphoid cell 1-like phenotype. Journal of Immunology. 2020a;204:3171–3181. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1900866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hawke LG, Whitford MKM, Ormiston ML. The production of pro-angiogenic VEGF-A isoforms by hypoxic human NK cells is independent of their TGF-β-mediated conversion to an ILC1-like phenotype. Frontiers in Immunology. 2020b;11:1903. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hendrix S, Handjiski B, Peters EMJ, Paus R. A guide to assessing damage response pathways of the hair follicle: lessons from cyclophosphamide-induced alopecia in mice. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2005;125:42–51. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23787.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ikeda T. A new classification of alopecia areata. Dermatologica. 1965;131:421–445. doi: 10.1159/000254503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ito T, Ito N, Bettermann A, Tokura Y, Takigawa M, Paus R. Collapse and restoration of MHC class-I-dependent immune privilege: exploiting the human hair follicle as a model. The American Journal of Pathology. 2004;164:623–634. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63151-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ito N, Ito T, Kromminga A, Bettermann A, Takigawa M, Kees F, Straub RH, Paus R. Human hair follicles display a functional equivalent of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and synthesize cortisol. FASEB Journal. 2005a;19:1332–1334. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-1968fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ito T, Ito N, Saathoff M, Bettermann A, Takigawa M, Paus R. Interferon-gamma is a potent inducer of catagen-like changes in cultured human anagen hair follicles. The British Journal of Dermatology. 2005b;152:623–631. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06453.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ito T, Ito N, Saatoff M, Hashizume H, Fukamizu H, Nickoloff BJ, Takigawa M, Paus R. Maintenance of hair follicle immune privilege is linked to prevention of NK cell attack. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2008;128:1196–1206. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5701183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Ito T, Kageyama R, Nakazawa S, Honda T. Understanding the significance of cytokines and chemokines in the pathogenesis of alopecia areata. Experimental Dermatology. 2020;29:726–732. doi: 10.1111/exd.14129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Jiao Y, Huntington ND, Belz GT, Seillet C. Type 1 innate lymphoid cell biology: lessons learnt from natural killer cells. Frontiers in Immunology. 2016;7:426. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Jiao Y, Wu L, Huntington ND, Zhang X. Crosstalk between gut microbiota and innate immunity and its implication in autoimmune diseases. Frontiers in Immunology. 2020;11:282. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Keren A, Shemer A, Ullmann Y, Paus R, Gilhar A. The PDE4 inhibitor, apremilast, suppresses experimentally induced alopecia areata in human skin in vivo. Journal of Dermatological Science. 2015;77:74–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2014.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Keren A, Shemer A, Ginzburg A, Ullmann Y, Schrum AG, Paus R, Gilhar A. Innate lymphoid cells 3 induce psoriasis in xenotransplanted healthy human skin. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2018;142:305–308. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Kim BS. Innate lymphoid cells in the skin. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2015;135:673–678. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Kim J, Ryu S, Kim HY. Innate lymphoid cells in tissue homeostasis and disease pathogenesis. Molecules and Cells. 2021;44:301–309. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2021.0053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. King BA, Mesinkovska NA, Craiglow B, Kindred C, Ko J, McMichael A, Shapiro J, Goh C, Mirmirani P, Tosti A, Hordinsky M, Huang KP, Castelo-Soccio L, Bergfeld W, Paller AS, Mackay-Wiggan J, Glashofer M, Aguh C, Piliang M, Yazdan P, Lo Sicco K, Cassella JV, Koenigsberg J, Ahluwalia G, Ghorayeb E, Fakharzadeh S, Napatalung L, Gandhi K, DeLozier AM, Nunes FP, Senna MM. Development of the alopecia areata scale for clinical use: results of an academic-industry collaborative effort. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2022;86:359–364. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.08.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kinori M, Bertolini M, Funk W, Samuelov L, Meyer KC, Emelianov VU, Hasse S, Paus R. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) may award relative protection from interferon-γ-induced collapse of human hair follicle immune privilege. Experimental Dermatology. 2012;21:223–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01432.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kloepper JE, Sugawara K, Al-Nuaimi Y, Gáspár E, van Beek N, Paus R. Methods in hair research: how to objectively distinguish between anagen and catagen in human hair follicle organ culture. Experimental Dermatology. 2010;19:305–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.00939.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Korta DZ, Christiano AM, Bergfeld W, Duvic M, Ellison A, Fu J, Harris JE, Hordinsky MK, King B, Kranz D, Mackay-Wiggan J, McMichael A, Norris DA, Price V, Shapiro J, Atanaskova Mesinkovska N. Alopecia areata is a medical disease. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2018;78:832–834. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Krabbendam L, Bernink JH, Spits H. Innate lymphoid cells: from helper to killer. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2021;68:28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2020.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Krämer B, Nalin AP, Ma F, Eickhoff S, Lutz P, Leonardelli S, Goeser F, Finnemann C, Hack G, Raabe J, ToVinh M, Ahmad S, Hoffmeister C, Kaiser KM, Manekeller S, Branchi V, Bald T, Hölzel M, Hüneburg R, Nischalke HD, Semaan A, Langhans B, Kaczmarek DJ, Benner B, Lordo MR, Kowalski J, Gerhardt A, Timm J, Toma M, Mohr R, Türler A, Charpentier A, van Bremen T, Feldmann G, Sattler A, Kotsch K, Abdallah AT, Strassburg CP, Spengler U, Carson WE, Mundy-Bosse BL, Pellegrini M, O’Sullivan TE, Freud AG, Nattermann J. Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies a population of human liver-type ilc1s. Cell Reports. 2023;42:111937. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Krueger JG, McInnes IB, Blauvelt A. Tyrosine kinase 2 and Janus kinase‒signal transducer and activator of transcription signaling and inhibition in plaque psoriasis. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2022;86:148–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Krzywinska E, Sobecki M, Nagarajan S, Zacharjasz J, Tambuwala MM, Pelletier A, Cummins E, Gotthardt D, Fandrey J, Kerdiles YM, Peyssonnaux C, Taylor CT, Sexl V, Stockmann C. The transcription factor HIF-1α mediates plasticity of nkp46+ innate lymphoid cells in the gut. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2022;219:e20210909. doi: 10.1084/jem.20210909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Langan EA, Philpott MP, Kloepper JE, Paus R. Human hair follicle organ culture: theory, application and perspectives. Experimental Dermatology. 2015;24:903–911. doi: 10.1111/exd.12836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Laufer Britva R, Keren A, Paus R, Gilhar A. Apremilast and tofacitinib exert differential effects in the humanized mouse model of alopecia areata. The British Journal of Dermatology. 2020;182:227–229. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Li J, van Vliet C, Rufaut NW, Jones LN, Sinclair RD, Carbone FR. Laser capture microdissection reveals transcriptional abnormalities in alopecia areata before, during, and after active hair loss. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2016;136:715–718. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2015.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Lopes N, Vivier E, Narni-Mancinelli E. Natural killer cells and type 1 innate lymphoid cells in cancer. Seminars in Immunology. 2023;66:101709. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2022.101709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Lousada MB, Lachnit T, Edelkamp J, Rouillé T, Ajdic D, Uchida Y, Di Nardo A, Bosch TCG, Paus R. Exploring the human hair follicle microbiome. The British Journal of Dermatology. 2021;184:802–815. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Lu Z, Hasse S, Bodo E, Rose C, Funk W, Paus R. Towards the development of a simplified long-term organ culture method for human scalp skin and its appendages under serum-free conditions. Experimental Dermatology. 2007;16:37–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2006.00510.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Luo W, Tian L, Tan B, Shen Z, Xiao M, Wu S, Meng X, Wu X, Wang X. Update: innate lymphoid cells in inflammatory bowel disease. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2022;67:56–66. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-06831-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Mazzurana L, Czarnewski P, Jonsson V, Wigge L, Ringnér M, Williams TC, Ravindran A, Björklund ÅK, Säfholm J, Nilsson G, Dahlén SE, Orre AC, Al-Ameri M, Höög C, Hedin C, Szczegielniak S, Almer S, Mjösberg J. Tissue-specific transcriptional imprinting and heterogeneity in human innate lymphoid cells revealed by full-length single-cell RNA-sequencing. Cell Research. 2021;31:554–568. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-00445-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. McDonald BD, Jabri B, Bendelac A. Diverse developmental pathways of intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2018;18:514–525. doi: 10.1038/s41577-018-0013-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. McFarland AP, Yalin A, Wang SY, Cortez VS, Landsberger T, Sudan R, Peng V, Miller HL, Ricci B, David E, Faccio R, Amit I, Colonna M. Multi-Tissue single-cell analysis deconstructs the complex programs of mouse natural killer and type 1 innate lymphoid cells in tissues and circulation. Immunity. 2021;54:1320–1337. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.03.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Meah N, Wall D, York K, Bhoyrul B, Bokhari L, Sigall DA, Bergfeld WF, Betz RC, Blume-Peytavi U, Callender V, Chitreddy V, Combalia A, Cotsarelis G, Craiglow B, Donovan J, Eisman S, Farrant P, Green J, Grimalt R, Harries M, Hordinsky M, Irvine AD, Itami S, Jolliffe V, King B, Lee W-S, McMichael A, Messenger A, Mirmirani P, Olsen E, Orlow SJ, Piraccini BM, Rakowska A, Reygagne P, Roberts JL, Rudnicka L, Shapiro J, Sharma P, Tosti A, Vogt A, Wade M, Yip L, Zlotogorski A, Sinclair R. The alopecia areata consensus of experts (ACE) study: results of an international expert opinion on treatments for alopecia areata. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2020;83:123–130. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Meah N, Wall D, York K, Bhoyrul B, Bokhari L, Asz-Sigall D, Bergfeld WF, Betz RC, Blume-Peytavi U, Callender V, Chitreddy V, Combalia A, Cotsarelis G, Craiglow B, Donovan J, Eisman S, Farrant P, Green J, Grimalt R, Harries M, Hordinsky M, Irvine AD, Itami S, Jolliffe V, King B, Lee W-S, McMichael A, Messenger A, Mirmirani P, Olsen E, Orlow SJ, Piraccini BM, Rakowska A, Reygagne P, Roberts JL, Rudnicka L, Shapiro J, Sharma P, Tosti A, Vogt A, Wade M, Yip L, Zlotogorski A, Sinclair RD. The alopecia areata consensus of experts (ACE) study part II: results of an international expert opinion on diagnosis and laboratory evaluation for alopecia areata. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2021;84:1594–1601. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Messenger AG, Slater DN, Bleehen SS. Alopecia areata: alterations in the hair growth cycle and correlation with the follicular pathology. The British Journal of Dermatology. 1986;114:337–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1986.tb02825.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Mjösberg JM, Trifari S, Crellin NK, Peters CP, Drunen CM, Piet B, Fokkens WJ, Cupedo T, Spits H. Human IL-25- and IL-33-responsive type 2 innate lymphoid cells are defined by expression of CRTH2 and CD161. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:1055–1062. doi: 10.1038/ni.2104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Mora-Velandia LM, Castro-Escamilla O, Méndez AG, Aguilar-Flores C, Velázquez-Avila M, Tussié-Luna MI, Téllez-Sosa J, Maldonado-García C, Jurado-Santacruz F, Ferat-Osorio E, Martínez-Barnetche J, Pelayo R, Bonifaz LC. A human lin- CD123+ cd127low population endowed with ILC features and migratory capabilities contributes to immunopathological hallmarks of psoriasis. Front Immunol. 2017;8:176. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Nabekura T, Shibuya A. Type 1 innate lymphoid cells: soldiers at the front line of immunity. Biomedical Journal. 2021a;44:115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2020.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Nabekura T, Shibuya A. ILC1: guardians of the oral mucosa against enemy viruses. Immunity. 2021b;54:196–198. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Nagasawa M, Heesters BA, Kradolfer CMA, Krabbendam L, Martinez-Gonzalez I, de Bruijn MJW, Golebski K, Hendriks RW, Stadhouders R, Spits H, Bal SM. KLRG1 and nkp46 discriminate subpopulations of human CD117+CRTH2− ilcs biased toward ILC2 or ILC3. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2019;216:1762–1776. doi: 10.1084/jem.20190490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Ohne Y, Silver JS, Thompson-Snipes L, Collet MA, Blanck JP, Cantarel BL, Copenhaver AM, Humbles AA, Liu YJ. IL-1 is a critical regulator of group 2 innate lymphoid cell function and plasticity. Nature Immunology. 2016;17:646–655. doi: 10.1038/ni.3447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Orimo K, Saito H, Matsumoto K, Morita H. Innate lymphoid cells in the airways: their functions and regulators. Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research. 2020;12:381–398. doi: 10.4168/aair.2020.12.3.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Park E, Patel S, Wang Q, Andhey P, Zaitsev K, Porter S, Hershey M, Bern M, Plougastel-Douglas B, Collins P, Colonna M, Murphy KM, Oltz E, Artyomov M, Sibley LD, Yokoyama WM. Toxoplasma gondii infection drives conversion of NK cells into ILC1-like cells. eLife. 2019;8:e47605. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Paus R, Slominski A, Czarnetzki BM. Is alopecia areata an autoimmune-response against melanogenesis-related proteins, exposed by abnormal MHC class I expression in the anagen hair bulb? The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 1993;66:541–554. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Paus R, Maurer M, Slominski A, Czarnetzki BM. Mast cell involvement in murine hair growth. Developmental Biology. 1994;163:230–240. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Paus R, Nickoloff BJ, Ito T. A “ hairy ” privilege. Trends in Immunology. 2005;26:32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2004.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Paus R, Bulfone-Paus S, Bertolini M. Hair follicle immune privilege revisited: the key to alopecia areata management. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. Symposium Proceedings. 2018;19:S12–S17. doi: 10.1016/j.jisp.2017.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Paus R. The evolving pathogenesis of alopecia areata: major open questions. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. Symposium Proceedings. 2020;20:S6–S10. doi: 10.1016/j.jisp.2020.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Peng V, Cao S, Trsan T, Bando JK, Avila-Pacheco J, Cleveland JL, Clish C, Xavier RJ, Colonna M. Ornithine decarboxylase supports ILC3 responses in infectious and autoimmune colitis through positive regulation of IL-22 transcription. PNAS. 2022;119:e2214900119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2214900119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Peters EMJ, Stieglitz MG, Liezman C, Overall RW, Nakamura M, Hagen E, Klapp BF, Arck P, Paus R. P75 neurotrophin receptor-mediated signaling promotes human hair follicle regression (catagen) The American Journal of Pathology. 2006;168:221–234. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.050163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Peters EMJ, Liotiri S, Bodó E, Hagen E, Bíró T, Arck PC, Paus R. Probing the effects of stress mediators on the human hair follicle: substance P holds central position. The American Journal of Pathology. 2007;171:1872–1886. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.061206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Petukhova L, Duvic M, Hordinsky M, Norris D, Price V, Shimomura Y, Kim H, Singh P, Lee A, Chen WV, Meyer KC, Paus R, Jahoda CAB, Amos CI, Gregersen PK, Christiano AM. Genome-wide association study in alopecia areata implicates both innate and adaptive immunity. Nature. 2010;466:113–117. doi: 10.1038/nature09114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Pinto D, Calabrese FM, De Angelis M, Celano G, Giuliani G, Gobbetti M, Rinaldi F. Predictive metagenomic profiling, urine metabolomics, and human marker gene expression as an integrated approach to study alopecia areata. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:146. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Poeggeler B, Bodó E, Nadrowitz R, Dunst J, Paus R. A simple assay for the study of human hair follicle damage induced by ionizing irradiation. Experimental Dermatology. 2010;19:e306-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.01009.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Pratt CH, King LE, Messenger AG, Christiano AM, Sundberg JP. Alopecia areata. Nature Reviews. Disease Primers. 2017;3:17011. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Price VH, Menefee E, Strauss PC. Changes in hair weight and hair count in men with androgenetic alopecia, after application of 5% and 2% topical minoxidil, placebo, or no treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 1999;41:717–721. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(99)70006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Purba TS, Brunken L, Hawkshaw NJ, Peake M, Hardman J, Paus R. A primer for studying cell cycle dynamics of the human hair follicle. Experimental Dermatology. 2016;25:663–668. doi: 10.1111/exd.13046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Quintino-de-Carvalho IL, Gonçalves-Pereira MH, Faria Ramos M, de Aguiar Milhim BHG, Da Costa ÚL, Santos ÉG, Nogueira ML, Da Costa Santiago H. Type 1 innate lymphoid cell and natural killer cells are sources of interferon-γ and other inflammatory cytokines associated with distinct clinical presentation in early dengue infection. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2022;225:84–93. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Resende M, Cardoso MS, Ribeiro AR, Flórido M, Borges M, Castro AG, Alves NL, Cooper AM, Appelberg R. Innate IFN-γ-producing cells developing in the absence of IL-2 receptor common γ-chain. Journal of Immunology. 2017;199:1429–1439. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Rose NR, Bona C. Defining criteria for autoimmune diseases (witebsky’s postulates revisited) Immunology Today. 1993;14:426–430. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(93)90244-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Sagebiel AF, Steinert F, Lunemann S, Körner C, Schreurs R, Altfeld M, Perez D, Reinshagen K, Bunders MJ. Tissue-resident eomes+ NK cells are the major innate lymphoid cell population in human infant intestine. Nat Commun. 2019;10:975. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08267-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Salimi M, Ogg G. Innate lymphoid cells and the skin. BMC Dermatology. 2014;14:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-5945-14-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Seillet C, Brossay L, Vivier E. Natural killers or ilc1s? that is the question. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2021;68:48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2020.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Shannon JP, Vrba SM, Reynoso GV, Wynne-Jones E, Kamenyeva O, Malo CS, Cherry CR, McManus DT, Hickman HD. Group 1 innate lymphoid-cell-derived interferon-γ maintains anti-viral vigilance in the mucosal epithelium. Immunity. 2021;54:276–290. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Silver JS, Kearley J, Copenhaver AM, Sanden C, Mori M, Yu L, Pritchard GH, Berlin AA, Hunter CA, Bowler R, Erjefalt JS, Kolbeck R, Humbles AA. Inflammatory triggers associated with exacerbations of COPD orchestrate plasticity of group 2 innate lymphoid cells in the lungs. Nature Immunology. 2016;17:626–635. doi: 10.1038/ni.3443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Simoni Y, Newell EW. Toward meaningful definitions of innate-lymphoid-cell subsets. Immunity. 2017;46:760–761. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Spits H, Bernink JH, Lanier L. NK cells and type 1 innate lymphoid cells: partners in host defense. Nature Immunology. 2016;17:758–764. doi: 10.1038/ni.3482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Suchonwanit P, Iamsumang W, Rojhirunsakool S. Efficacy of topical combination of 0.25% finasteride and 3% minoxidil versus 3% minoxidil solution in female pattern hair loss: A randomized, double-blind, controlled study. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology. 2019;20:147–153. doi: 10.1007/s40257-018-0387-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Taggenbrock R, van Gisbergen KPJM. ILC1: development, maturation, and transcriptional regulation. European Journal of Immunology. 2023;53:e2149435. doi: 10.1002/eji.202149435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Talayero P, Mancebo E, Calvo-Pulido J, Rodríguez-Muñoz S, Bernardo I, Laguna-Goya R, Cano-Romero FL, García-Sesma A, Loinaz C, Jiménez C, Justo I, Paz-Artal E. Innate lymphoid cells groups 1 and 3 in the epithelial compartment of functional human intestinal allografts. American Journal of Transplantation. 2016;16:72–82. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Tang Y, Tan SA, Iqbal A, Li J, Glover SC. STAT3 genotypic variant rs744166 and increased tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3 in IL-23 responsive innate lymphoid cells during pathogenesis of crohn’s disease. Journal of Immunology Research. 2019;2019:9406146. doi: 10.1155/2019/9406146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Teunissen MBM, Munneke JM, Bernink JH, Spuls PI, Res PCM, Te Velde A, Cheuk S, Brouwer MWD, Menting SP, Eidsmo L, Spits H, Hazenberg MD, Mjösberg J. Composition of innate lymphoid cell subsets in the human skin: enrichment of NCR(+) ILC3 in lesional skin and blood of psoriasis patients. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2014;134:2351–2360. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Tomaszewska K, Kozłowska M, Kaszuba A, Lesiak A, Narbutt J, Zalewska-Janowska A. Increased serum levels of IFN-γ, IL-1β, and IL-6 in patients with alopecia areata and nonsegmental vitiligo. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:5693572. doi: 10.1155/2020/5693572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Tulic MK, Cavazza E, Cheli Y, Jacquel A, Luci C, Cardot-Leccia N, Hadhiri-Bzioueche H, Abbe P, Gesson M, Sormani L, Regazzetti C, Beranger GE, Lereverend C, Pons C, Khemis A, Ballotti R, Bertolotto C, Rocchi S, Passeron T. Innate lymphocyte-induced CXCR3B-mediated melanocyte apoptosis is a potential initiator of T-cell autoreactivity in vitiligo. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2178. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09963-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Uchida Y, Gherardini J, Schulte-Mecklenbeck A, Alam M, Chéret J, Rossi A, Kanekura T, Gross CC, Arakawa A, Gilhar A, Bertolini M, Paus R. Pro-inflammatory Vδ1+t-cells infiltrates are present in and around the hair bulbs of non-lesional and lesional alopecia areata hair follicles. Journal of Dermatological Science. 2020;100:129–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2020.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Uchida Y, Gherardini J, Pappelbaum K, Chéret J, Schulte-Mecklenbeck A, Gross CC, Strbo N, Gilhar A, Rossi A, Funk W, Kanekura T, Almeida L, Bertolini M, Paus R. Resident human dermal γδT-cells operate as stress-sentinels: lessons from the hair follicle. Journal of Autoimmunity. 2021;124:102711. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2021.102711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Ullrich KAM, Schulze LL, Paap EM, Müller TM, Neurath MF, Zundler S. Immunology of IL-12: an update on functional activities and implications for disease. EXCLI Journal. 2020;19:1563–1589. doi: 10.17179/excli2020-3104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Verma R, Er JZ, Pu RW, Sheik Mohamed J, Soo RA, Muthiah HM, Tam JKC, Ding JL. Eomes expression defines group 1 innate lymphoid cells during metastasis in human and mouse. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1190. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Vienne M, Etiennot M, Escalière B, Galluso J, Spinelli L, Guia S, Fenis A, Vivier E, Kerdiles YM. Type 1 innate lymphoid cells limit the antitumoral immune response. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021;12:768989. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.768989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Vivier E, Artis D, Colonna M, Diefenbach A, Di Santo JP, Eberl G, Koyasu S, Locksley RM, McKenzie ANJ, Mebius RE, Powrie F, Spits H. Innate lymphoid cells: 10 years on. Cell. 2018;174:1054–1066. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Vivier E. The discovery of innate lymphoid cells. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2021;21:616. doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00595-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Wang EHC, Yu M, Breitkopf T, Akhoundsadegh N, Wang X, Shi FT, Leung G, Dutz JP, Shapiro J, McElwee KJ. Identification of autoantigen epitopes in alopecia areata. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2016;136:1617–1626. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Wu C, He S, Liu J, Wang B, Lin J, Duan Y, Gao X, Li D. Type 1 innate lymphoid cell aggravation of atherosclerosis is mediated through TLR4. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology. 2018;87:e12661. doi: 10.1111/sji.12661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Xing L, Dai Z, Jabbari A, Cerise JE, Higgins CA, Gong W, de Jong A, Harel S, DeStefano GM, Rothman L, Singh P, Petukhova L, Mackay-Wiggan J, Christiano AM, Clynes R. Alopecia areata is driven by cytotoxic T lymphocytes and is reversed by JAK inhibition. Nature Medicine. 2014;20:1043–1049. doi: 10.1038/nm.3645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Yang Z, Tang T, Wei X, Yang S, Tian Z. Type 1 innate lymphoid cells contribute to the pathogenesis of chronic hepatitis B. Innate Immunity. 2015;21:665–673. doi: 10.1177/1753425915586074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Zhang J, Marotel M, Fauteux-Daniel S, Mathieu AL, Viel S, Marçais A, Walzer T. T-bet and eomes govern differentiation and function of mouse and human NK cells and ILC1. European Journal of Immunology. 2018;48:738–750. doi: 10.1002/eji.201747299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Zheng M, Sun R, Wei H, Tian Z. Nk cells help induce anti-hepatitis B virus CD8+ T cell immunity in mice. Journal of Immunology. 2016;196:4122–4131. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Zhou S, Li Q, Wu H, Lu Q. The pathogenic role of innate lymphoid cells in autoimmune-related and inflammatory skin diseases. Cellular & Molecular Immunology. 2020;17:335–346. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0399-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Zook EC, Kee BL. Development of innate lymphoid cells. Nature Immunology. 2016;17:775–782. doi: 10.1038/ni.3481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Editor's evaluation

Valerie Horsley 1

This manuscript provides fundamental data that implicate ILC1-like cells in alopeia areata. The data are solid in the use of cultured human hair follicles co-cultured with ILC-1-like cells and demonstration that alopecia phenotypes emerge. The authors also provide compelling evidence that injection of ILC1-like cells induces alopecia in a mouse model grafted with human hair follicle-containing skin. This work will be of interest to immunologists, skin biologists, and scientists interested in autoimmune disorders.

Decision letter

Editor: Valerie Horsley1
Reviewed by: Rodney Sinclair2

In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Involvement of ILC1-like innate lymphocytes in human autoimmunity, lessons from alopecia areata" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Betty Diamond as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in the review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Rodney Sinclair (Reviewer #2).

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

1. Clarify the color differences between white and yellow in their triple staining of immunofluorescent photo data in Figure 1A-C, either in the figure legend or the Materials and methods section.

2. Please provide the data for the effect of non-autologous ILC1lc on AA patients ex vivo with co-culture or in vivo with injection are available as references.

3) The reviewers should discuss whether 5% Minoxidil is required for hair regrowth in this system given that the efficacy of Minoxidil has not been convincing to all subjects even for the human species in the previous clinical studies.

4. The authors should update their phenotyping data and subsequent sorting strategy to provide more definitive evidence for the involvement in an ILC1 or tissue-resident NK cell population in AA.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

The authors provide useful data implicating a subset of type 1 innate lymphocytes in the pathogenesis of human AA. Strengths include mini organ models and humanized mouse models, and weaknesses involve inadequate characterization of ILC1-like populations to confidently conclude that the observed cell type is not of the NK cell lineage. This weakness restricts the impact of the manuscript given the author's previous findings on NK cells and AA pathogenesis. The authors need to provide definitive evidence that the reported "ILC1-like" cells are not an activation state of NK cells to support the conclusions and novelty claims written in the manuscript.

– Although previous literature has associated CD49a expression with the ILC1 lineage in mice and humans, CD49a is upregulated on activated NK cells (EOMES+), and EOMEShi TBETlo liver-resident NK cells have been described in humans. Recent single-cell RNAseq studies in mice and human tissues support the conclusion that EOMES+ ILCs represent the NK cell lineage. These findings are directly at odds with the author's main conclusions and are not discussed in the manuscript. The author's phenotype more closely resembles a tissue-resident or activated NK cell rather than an ILC1. Without further evidence of ILC1 lineage-defining markers (CD200R, granzyme C, etc.) or single cell RNAseq validation, the presented phenotyping data is inadequate to support the authors' claims. If evidence is presented to suggest that "ILC1-like cells" closely resemble a tissue-resident NK cell, then there would be no loss of impact on the manuscript.

– It is not clear from Figure S5 whether the authors can conclude that only ILC1-like cells were sorted into this fraction Lin-CD127+NKp44+ cells could still contain ILC3s capable of producing IFNγ. The authors need to formally exclude the possibility that contamination from ILC3s during sorting can contribute to their observed results. This is a caveat of previous studies that the author cites as well.

– ILC1 phenotyping in humans is controversial, however, the addition of more surface markers and single-cell RNAseq data will significantly improve the interpretation of the study. CXCR6, CD200R (ILC1) and Perforin, NKp80, CD16 (NK cells) staining can all be used to further support the author's conclusions. Lack of IRF8 and Eomes expression would signify strong evidence that ILC-like cells are not of the NK cell lineage. ILC1 gene signatures can be sourced from previously published studies in mice and humans to help with unbiased analysis of cell lineages.

– It is suggested that the authors update their phenotyping data and subsequent sorting strategy to provide more definitive evidence for the involvement in an ILC1 or tissue-resident NK cell population in AA.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

Recent major breakthroughs in our understanding of the pathogenesis of AA have led to highly effective FDA-approved treatments for this potentially disfiguring disease. As these treatments require maintenance dosing to prevent relapse, further studies are required to identify the initiating events for hair follicle auto-immunity leading to AA. Natural killer cells expressing cell surface NKG2D transmembrane proteins are already implicated in the pathogenesis of AA. The authors identified and isolated a novel population of NKG2D+ cells – the ILC1-like lymphocytes – that are strategically localized around hair bulbs, that respond to hair follicle distress signals, that play a very early role in the pathogenesis of AA through robust secretion of IFN-γ, leading to loss of hair follicle immune privilege and also a later ole in AA pathogenesis through induction of hair fibre dystrophy and induction of catagen. in vivo studies using mouse xenograft models confirmed that ILCS-a-like cells can induce the AA hair loss phenotype.

This manuscript makes a very important contribution to our understanding of the molecular biology of AA and suggests novel therapeutic targets for future investigation.

A great body of work summarized in a single paper.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

This manuscript intensively studied the direct involvement of ILC1 cells on the onset of AA., cells which seem to be very difficult, characterized by no existence of a single clear marker, and its relatively few populations in the HF even in the lesion of AA patients. To overcome this situation, the authors nicely used a combination of multiple reliable markers such as Enomes, NKG2D, CD49a, and confirmed its location and existence very convincingly.

Authors also carefully define the ILC1 cells as "ILC1-like cells (ILC1-lc), which is also a sincere attitude by the authors on scientific accuracy.

This is excellent work and a comprehensive set of various experiments to confirm the involvement of ILC1-lc on the onset of AA.

Although ex vivo and in vivo models in this manuscript each still have their limitations, such as no systemic system involved or host species difference, nevertheless, they seem to be highly valued as studies using the best model systems currently conceived for AA disease.

In the future, it is expected that clinical data indicating the direct involvement of ILC-1 in AA obtained from the results of this study will be accumulated, and the treatment of current AA patients will be further improved by this finding.

This manuscript is very comprehensive, and all necessary experiments to prove the involvement of ILC1lc for AA disease seem to be performed including both positive and negative controls. It is a very impressive and intensive study for me.

eLife. 2023 Mar 17;12:e80768. doi: 10.7554/eLife.80768.sa2

Author response


Essential revisions:

1. Clarify the color differences between white and yellow in their triple staining of immunofluorescent photo data in Figure 1A-C, either in the figure legend or the Materials and methods section.

Thanks. We have now clarified the color differences between white and yellow in our triple staining of immunofluorescent photo data in Figure 1A-C and Figure 8A-C, as follows:

“For each panel yellow staining indicates double staining (A-EOMES+, NKG2D+; B- EOMES+,CD49a+ ; C- NKp44+,CD103+).”

2. Please provide the data for the effect of non-autologous ILC1lc on AA patients ex vivo with co-culture or in vivo with injection are available as references.

We respectfully propose that this is a questionable and dispensable request. In this study, only the effect of autologous ILC1lc on healthy scalp skin xenotransplants is clinically relevant in the context of alopecia areata (AA), since heterologous ILC1lc cells might induce an (entirely irrelevant and likely misleading) graft-versus-host scenario. This would cause a pathobiologically completely different, scarring type of folliculitis – which is exactly what one must avoid in AA in vivo models (for detailed discussion: see Gilhar et al. Autoimmun Rev 2016).

Using allogeneic ILC1lc would also be physiologically and clinically irrelevant, as this constellation almost never occurs in AA (except in the vanishly rare number of cases of AA after an allogeneic bone marrow transplantation). Moreover, the suggested control experiment could also be criticized for being wasteful, as it violates the widely accepted animal experimentation principle to only use the number of animals that is indispensable for answering the relevant research question(s) at hand.

While we agree that studying this would, nevertheless, be academically interesting, this clearly lies outside of our study scope and would cause major unjustifiable additional costs and loss of time.

3) The reviewers should discuss whether 5% Minoxidil is required for hair regrowth in this system given that the efficacy of Minoxidil has not been convincing to all subjects even for the human species in the previous clinical studies.

Thanks for raising this excellent point. We now explain in the revised Materials and methods section that topical minoxidil application is not required for hair regrowth induction after the initial post-transplantation hair shaft shedding, but only accelerates it, and that this application is discontinued before the ILC1lc injection (Gilhar et al. JID 2013). Since the immune cell infiltrate in AA attacks only hair follicles in anagen (Gilhar et al. NEJM 2012), it is critical that the majority of xenotransplanted HFs are in anagen at the time the immune cells are injected. Topical minoxidil pretreatment increases the likelihood that this is the case (Price, NEJM 1999; Suchonwanit et al. Drug Des Devel Ther 2019).

Moreover, we have recently demonstrated that 5% minoxidil does indeed significantly stimulate hair regrowth in human androgenetic alopecia scalp skin transplanted onto SCID/beige mice (Gilhar et al. Exp Dermatol 2022). It also deserves mentioning that topical minoxdil reduces the degranulation of – hair growth-modulatory! (Paus et al. Dev Biol 1994) – perifollicular mast cells in the skin of mice, namely under conditions of perceived stress (Arck et al. Exp Dermatol 2003), while excessive degranulation of perifollicular mast cells is an important feature of lesional human AA skin (Bertolini et al. PLoS One 2014). Therefore, this pretreatment likely also helps to reestablish perifollicular mast cell homeostasis after the stress of xenotransplantation.

These explanations are now given on pages 34 and 35:

“The topical minoxidil application is not required for hair regrowth induction after the initial post-transplantation hair shaft shedding, but only accelerates it. This application is discontinued before the ILC1lc injection (Gilhar et al., 2013).Since the immune cell infiltrate in AA attacks only hair follicles in anagen (Gilhar et al., 2012), it is critical that the majority of xenotransplant HFs are in anagen at the time the immune cells are injected. Topical minoxidil pretreatment increases the likelihood that this is the case (Price, 1999; Suchonwanit et al., 2019). Moreover, we have recently demonstrated that 5% minoxidil does indeed significantly stimulate hair regrowth in human androgenetic alopecia scalp skin transplanted onto SCID/beige mice (Gilhar et al., 2022). It also deserves mentioning that topical minoxdil reduces the degranulation of – hair growth-modulatory! (Paus et al., 1994) – perifollicular mast cells in the skin of mice, namely under conditions of perceived stress (Arck et al., 2003), while excessive degranulation of perifollicular mast cells is an important feature of lesional human AA skin (Bertolini et al., 2014). Therefore, this pretreatment likely also helps to reestablish perifollicular mast cell homeostasis after the stress of xenotransplantation.”

4. The authors should update their phenotyping data and subsequent sorting strategy to provide more definitive evidence for the involvement in an ILC1 or tissue-resident NK cell population in AA.

Thank you for this important suggestion. In order to provide more definitive evidence for the involvement in an ILC1 or tissue-resident NK cell population in AA, we now have re-analyzed the sorted ILC1lc by FACS analysis, using the additional ILC1lc markers CXCR6, CD200R (Curio et al. Cell Mol Immunol 2022) and the classical NK markers IRF8, perforin, NKp80, and CD16 (Brownlie et al. PNAS 2021; Krämer et al. Cell Rep 2023; Gilhar et al. JID 2013). Granzyme C is expressed by murine and not human NK cells and therefore has not been used in the current study (Susanto et al. Tissue Antigens 2012; Cai et al. J Immunol 2009). This shows more definitive evidence for the involvement of ILC1 cell population in AA. These novel data are now reported in the results (page 10) and in a new Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

The authors provide useful data implicating a subset of type 1 innate lymphocytes in the pathogenesis of human AA. Strengths include mini organ models and humanized mouse models, and weaknesses involve inadequate characterization of ILC1-like populations to confidently conclude that the observed cell type is not of the NK cell lineage. This weakness restricts the impact of the manuscript given the author's previous findings on NK cells and AA pathogenesis. The authors need to provide definitive evidence that the reported "ILC1-like" cells are not an activation state of NK cells to support the conclusions and novelty claims written in the manuscript.

We fully agree with this expert reviewer in principle, but must reemphasize how challenging it is to “definitively” distinguish between ILC1 and NK cells (even all experts on this do not seem to be able to fully agree on how to best do so…).

In fact, how to reliably discriminate between NK cells and ILC1s and unravelling the shared and distinct functions of these cell populations remains an important open quest (Seillet et al. Curr Opin Immunol 2021; Lopes et al. Semin Immunol 2023; Cheng et al. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; Taggenbrock et al. Eur J Immunol 2022). Therefore, distinction between NK cells and ILC1s remains provisional – which is exactly why we have cautiously labeled the latter as “ILC1lc”.

We have now further underscored this in the revised Introduction, pages 5 and 6.

"In fact, how to reliably discriminate between NK cells and ILC1s and unravelling the shared and distinct functions of these cell populations remains an important open quest (Seillet et al., 2021; Lopes et al., 2023; Cheng et al., 2023; Taggenbrock and van Gisbergen, 2022). For example, Eomeshi T-betlo liver-resident NK cells have been described in humans and mice (Park et al., 2019; Harmon et al., 2016), while ILC1s from human tonsil and blood were also found to be Eomes+ (Cella et al., 2019). Therefore, distinction between NK cells and ILC1s remains provisional – which is exactly why we have cautiously labeled the latter as “ILC1lc."

In order to provide even more persuasive evidence than before that the reported "ILC1-like" cells (ILC1lc) are not just activated NK cells, and to support the conclusions and novelty claims contained in our study, we have performed additional FACS analyses with multiple established key markers of NK versus ILC1lc (details: see above). These new data clearly support our claims (new Figure 2—figure supplement 1 A-C).

– Although previous literature has associated CD49a expression with the ILC1 lineage in mice and humans, CD49a is upregulated on activated NK cells

Thank you for pointing this out. An upregulation of CD49a on activated human and murine NK cells has indeed been reported (Albini et al. Cancers (Basel) 2021; Zheng et al. J Immunol 2016). To correctly reflect this, we have reworded the corresponding text in the revised Introduction (page 6):

“However, although integrin α1 (CD49a) is upregulated on activated NK cells (Albini et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2016), CD49a and integrin α2 (CD49b) are used as two mutually exclusive markers for distinguishing between NK and ILC1 cells, with NK cells being defined as CD49b+CD49a- and ILC1 as CD49b-CD49a+ (Gao et al., 2017; Vienne et al., 2021; Flommersfeld et al., 2021; Krzywinska et al., 2022) In the current study, we have accepted and employed this consensus."

(EOMES+), and EOMEShi TBETlo liver-resident NK cells have been described in humans.

Thanks again for raising this important point. Indeed, Eomeshi T-betlo liver-resident NK cells have been described in humans and mice (Park et al. eLife 2019; Harmon et al. Eur J Immunol 2016). However ILC1s from human tonsil and blood were also found to be Eomes+ (Cella et al. Nat Immunol 2019; Mazzurana et al. Cell Res 2021), further indicating the importance to compare the expression levels of additional key NK and ILC1 cell markers on both cell populations (see introduction, pages 5 and 6 and above). This has now been done by the new FACS analysis we have integrated into the R.1 manuscript (new Figure 2—figure supplement 1 A-C and Results section, page 10):

"This immune phenotype suggests that the immune cells used in our study are best classified as ILC1lc (Nabekura et al., 2021a), and documents that all experiments reported below were indeed performed with autologous ILC1lc rather than with NK cell subpopulations. Indeed, the FACS analysis (Figure 2 – figure supplement 1A,B and C) revealed that ILC1lc demonstrate the ILC1 phenotype (CD200R, CD127, CXCR6) (Lopes et al., 2023; Curio and Belz, 2022) but not of the classical NK cell lineage (IRF8, Perforin, NKp80, CD16) (Brownlie et al., 2021; Krämer et al., 2023; Sagebiel et al., 2019), thus further serving as an evidence that EOMES+ ILCs represent distinct ILC1 lineage-defining markers"

Recent single-cell RNAseq studies in mice and human tissues support the conclusion that EOMES+ ILCs represent the NK cell lineage. These findings are directly at odds with the author's main conclusions and are not discussed in the manuscript.

Once again, the reviewer raises an excellent point. However, the ILC1lc analyzed in our study are highly unlikely to represent the NK cell lineage because our new data demonstrate that ILC1lc are positive for, CD200R, CD127, CXCR6 but negative for IRF8, Perforin, NKp80, CD16 (new Figure 2—figure supplement 1 A-C). We could not use granzyme C as NK marker, since it is expressed only in mice and not in human (Susanto et al. Tissue Antigens 2012; Cai et al. J Immunol 2009).

The author's phenotype more closely resembles a tissue-resident or activated NK cell rather than an ILC1. Without further evidence of ILC1 lineage-defining markers (CD200R, granzyme C, etc.) or single cell RNAseq validation, the presented phenotyping data is inadequate to support the authors' claims. If evidence is presented to suggest that "ILC1-like cells" closely resemble a tissue-resident NK cell, then there would be no loss of impact on the manuscript.

For the reasons delineated above, we respectfully disagree with this expert referee’s verdict. The following additional data and arguments further support our claim that the ILC1lc analyzed here indeed have much more in common ILC1 than NK characteristics:

1. EOMES expression by ILCs was observed differently dependent on tissue localization (McFarland et al. Immunity 2021).

2. Recent single-cell RNA-sequencing study reveals that ILC1lc both in blood and tonsil are Eomes positive (Mazzurana et al. Cell Res 2021).

3. Other study demonstrated that intraepithelial ILC1s from human tonsil were found to be heterogeneous, encompassing Eomes− and Eomes+ subsets (Cella, et al. Nat Immunol 2019).

Therefore, it is our carefully considered opinion that it would be unreasonable to demand additional data in support of the ILC1-like nature of “our” cells. However, in the revised Discussion, we have now openly acknowledged and cautiously highlighted that “…This claim remains limited by the set of biomarkers that is currently available (and can reasonably be expected to be applied) to “definitively” distinguish between ILC1 and NK lineages, namely in human skin, and that our data may eventually have to be re-evaluated in the context of research progress in this fast-moving field.” (page 19).

This is now stated clearly in the revised manuscript as follows in the M and M (page 32):

“Cells were incubated for 25 minutes at room temperature in the dark. All tubes were washed once with 1 ml staining buffer, then Fixation/Permeabilization solution (250 μl) was added and cells were incubated for 20 minutes at 4oC. Cell permeability was performed using 1xBD Perm/Wash buffer, intra-cellular antibody mixtures 50 μl/Brilliant Violet 605TM anti-T-bet (BLG 644817), Eomes-conjugated-PerCP-eFluor 710 (Dan11mag), IRF8 (sc-365042), Perforin (BLG-308119) and INF-γ-conjugated- PE/VIO-770 (Miltenyi Biotec 130-109-313), CD49a-APC-Vio770 (Miltenyi Biotec 130-101-324) ,FITC anti-human CD49b (BLG 359305), APC anti-human NKp80 (BLG 346707), BV421 anti-human CXCR6 (BLG 356013) and APC/Fire 810 anti-human CD16 (BLG 302073) and BV421 anti-human RORγt were added and incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature in the dark, cells were then washed twice with 1xBD Perm/Wash buffer (BD Cytofix/CytopermTM Fixation/Permeabilization Kit).

All cell samples were detected by FACS Calibur Flow Cytometer (Benton Dickinson) using Cell Quest software, and the acquired data were further analyzed using FlowJo 5.7.2 (Tree Star).”

In the abstract

“This provides the first evidence that ILC1lc, which are positive for the ILC1 phenotype and negative for the classical NK markers, suffice to induce AA in previously healthy human HFs ex vivo and in vivo, and further questions the conventional wisdom that AA is always an autoantigen-dependent, CD8+ T cell-driven autoimmune disease."

Results (see above and page 10).

Discussion (pages 18 and 19):

"The current study is the first to phenotypically and functionally explore the role of Eomes+ ILC1lc in human AA in vivo and ex vivo. Eomes+ ILCs may represent the NK cell lineage and therefore the ILC1 phenotype in our study, more closely resembles a tissue-resident or activated NK cell rather than an ILC1, based on recent single-cell RNAseq studies in mice and human tissues (Lopes et al., 2023). However, Eomes expression by ILCs was observed differently depending on the tissue localization (McFarland et al., 2021). For example, recent single-cell RNA-sequencing study reveals that ILC1lc both in blood and tonsil are Eomes positive (Mazzurana et al., 2021). Other study demonstrated that intraepithelial ILC1s from human tonsil were found to be heterogeneous, encompassing Eomes− and Eomes+ subsets (Cella et al., 2019). It is indeed very important to obtain greater clarity on how ILC1lc and NKs differ from each other, namely in the context of human AA. Our new data, which demonstrate that ILC1lc are positive for CD49a, CD200R, CD127, CXCR6 (Lopes et al., 2023) but negative for IRF8, Perforin, NKp80, CD16 (Sagebiel et al., 2019) (Figure 2 – figure supplement 1A,B and C), strongly support that ILC1lc and NK cells have distinct lineages. This claim remains limited by the set of biomarkers that is currently available (and can reasonably be expected to be applied) to “definitively” distinguish between ILC1 and NK lineages, namely in human skin, and that our data may eventually have to be re-evaluated in the context of research progress in this fast-moving field. It would be desirable to further complement these results in future studies with unbiased scRNAseq data, which can then be compared with published human ILC1 and NK cell gene signatures so as to gain deeper insights into the – still controversial and unclear – transcriptional similarities and differences between ILC1lc and NK cells and their lineage relationship to each other."

– It is not clear from Figure S5 whether the authors can conclude that only ILC1-like cells were sorted into this fraction Lin-CD127+NKp44+ cells could still contain ILC3s capable of producing IFNγ. The authors need to formally exclude the possibility that contamination from ILC3s during sorting can contribute to their observed results. This is a caveat of previous studies that the author cites as well.

We fully agree with the reviewer's comment and therefore have now formally excluded the possibility that contamination from ILC3s during sorting may have contributed to our results by generating a new set of FACS data on sorted ILC1lc. Given that ILC1 cells are RORγt negative while ILC3 cells are RORγt positive (Peng et al. PNAS 2022; Fiancette et al. Nat Immunol 2021), these novel data render the contamination hypothesis highly unlikely (see Figure 2—figure supplement 1 D). This is now stated clearly in the revised Materials and methods and Results sections.

Materials and methods (page 32)

“Cells were incubated for 25 minutes at room temperature in the dark. All tubes were washed once with 1 ml staining buffer, then Fixation/Permeabilization solution (250 μl) was added and cells were incubated for 20 minutes at 4oC. Cell permeability was performed using 1xBD Perm/Wash buffer, intra-cellular antibody mixtures (50 μl/Brilliant Violet 605TM anti-T-bet (BLG 644817)), Eomes-conjugated-PerCP-eFluor 710 (Dan11mag), IRF8 (sc-365042), Perforin (BLG-308119) and INF-γ-conjugated- PE/VIO-770 (Miltenyi Biotec 130-109-313), CD49a-APC-Vio770 (Miltenyi Biotec 130-101-324) ,FITC anti-human CD49b (BLG 359305), APC anti-human NKp80 (BLG 346707), BV421 anti-human CXCR6 (BLG 356013) and APC/Fire 810 anti-human CD16 (BLG 302073) and BV421 anti-human RORγt were added and incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature in the dark, cells were then washed twice with 1xBD Perm/Wash buffer (BD Cytofix/CytopermTM Fixation/Permeabilization Kit)..

All cell samples were detected by FACS Calibur Flow Cytometer (Benton Dickinson) using Cell Quest software, and the acquired data were further analyzed using FlowJo 5.7.2 (Tree Star).”

Result section (page 11):

“In order to exclude the possibility that contamination from ILC3s during sorting the ILC1lc and thus contributing to the observed results, we generated a new set of FACS data on sorted ILC1lc. Given that ILC1 cells are RORγt negative while ILC3 cells are RORγt positive (Peng et al., 2022; Fiancette et al., 2021), the data clearly demonstrate that the contamination hypothesis is highly unlikely (Figure 2 – figure supplement 1D).”

– ILC1 phenotyping in humans is controversial, however, the addition of more surface markers and single-cell RNAseq data will significantly improve the interpretation of the study. CXCR6, CD200R (ILC1) and Perforin, NKp80, CD16 (NK cells) staining can all be used to further support the author's conclusions. Lack of IRF8 and Eomes expression would signify strong evidence that ILC-like cells are not of the NK cell lineage. ILC1 gene signatures can be sourced from previously published studies in mice and humans to help with unbiased analysis of cell lineages.

Again, we fully agree with the reviewer's comment and have therefore engaged in more rigorous ILC1 phenotyping, including by investigating whether “our” ILC1lc lack IRF8 and Eomes surface marker expression. Our new data show that this is indeed the case (see new Figure 2—figure supplement 1 A-C), thus further supporting our previous claim that ILC-like cells are not of the NK cell lineage. This is now stated clearly in the revised Abstract and Results (page 10) and is explained in the revised Discussion (pages 18 and 19).

We also accept that single-cell RNAseq analysis and comparison with published data may help with unbiased analysis of cell lineages. However, this time-consuming and costly analysis far exceeds our available budget for this study and, in view of new, more relevant data (new Figure 2—figure supplement 1 A-C), also appears dispensable to support our claims. Moreover the costs for the ILC1 antibodies are extremely high and we simply do not have the funds for this, and that we therefore had to go for the FACS approach.

Yet, we now explicitly acknowledge in the revised Discussion (Page 19) that:

“It would be desirable to further complement these results in future studies with unbiased scRNAseq data, which can then be compared with published human ILC1 and NK cell gene signatures so as to gain deeper insights into the – still controversial and unclear – transcriptional similarities and differences between ILC1lc and NK cells and their lineage relationship to each other.”

– It is suggested that the authors update their phenotyping data and subsequent sorting strategy to provide more definitive evidence for the involvement in an ILC1 or tissue-resident NK cell population in AA.

Thanks again so much for these very helpful, important, and constructive suggestions!

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

Recent major breakthroughs in our understanding of the pathogenesis of AA have led to highly effective FDA-approved treatments for this potentially disfiguring disease. As these treatments require maintenance dosing to prevent relapse, further studies are required to identify the initiating events for hair follicle auto-immunity leading to AA. Natural killer cells expressing cell surface NKG2D transmembrane proteins are already implicated in the pathogenesis of AA. The authors identified and isolated a novel population of NKG2D+ cells – the ILC1-like lymphocytes – that are strategically localized around hair bulbs, that respond to hair follicle distress signals, that play a very early role in the pathogenesis of AA through robust secretion of IFN-γ, leading to loss of hair follicle immune privilege and also a later ole in AA pathogenesis through induction of hair fibre dystrophy and induction of catagen. in vivo studies using mouse xenograft models confirmed that ILCS-a-like cells can induce the AA hair loss phenotype.

This manuscript makes a very important contribution to our understanding of the molecular biology of AA and suggests novel therapeutic targets for future investigation.

A great body of work summarized in a single paper.

Thank you kindly for this most encouraging verdict.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

This manuscript intensively studied the direct involvement of ILC1 cells on the onset of AA., cells which seem to be very difficult, characterized by no existence of a single clear marker, and its relatively few populations in the HF even in the lesion of AA patients. To overcome this situation, the authors nicely used a combination of multiple reliable markers such as Enomes, NKG2D, CD49a, and confirmed its location and existence very convincingly.

Authors also carefully define the ILC1 cells as "ILC1-like cells (ILC1-lc), which is also a sincere attitude by the authors on scientific accuracy.

This is excellent work and a comprehensive set of various experiments to confirm the involvement of ILC1-lc on the onset of AA.

We are most grateful for this assessment.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. Quantitative data for immunofluorescence microscopy analyses of ILC1lc and CD8+/NKG2D+ cells in AA scalp skin.
    Figure 2—source data 1. Quantitative data for circulating ILC1lc expanded and characterized by FACS analysis.
    Figure 3—source data 1. Quantitative data for cytotoxic effects of CD8+/NKG2D+ and ILC1lc on normal human scalp HF ex vivo.
    Figure 4—source data 1. Quantitative data for HFs dystrophy, melanin clumping and apoptosis in normal human scalp HF ex vivo co-cultured with ILC1lc and CD8+/NKG2D+ cells.
    Figure 5—source data 1. Quantitative data for characteristic immunopathology features of AA HFs.
    Figure 6—source data 1. Quantitative data for transition of anagen to catagen HFs following culture with ILC1lc or CD8+/NKG2D+ cells in human scalp HF ex vivo.
    Figure 7—source data 1. Quantitative data for development of AA in the humanized mouse model treated with ILC1lc.
    Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Quantitative data for anti-CD3 antibodies prevent the development of AA in scalp skin xenotransplants treated with enriched CD8/NKG2D but not with ILC1lc.
    Figure 7—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Quantitative data for dermal infiltrates of the various treated xenotransplants.
    Figure 7—figure supplement 3—source data 1. Quantitative data for development of AA in normal human scalp skin xenotransplants treated with ILC1lc, enriched CD8/NKG2D and PBMCs/PHA.
    Figure 8—source data 1. Quantitative data for immunofluorescence microscopy analysis of ILC1lc and enriched CD8/NKG2D cells in AA-induced xenotransplant.
    Supplementary file 1. Microdissected, organ-cultured HFs are ‘stressed’ on day 1, but become equilibrated on day 3, as assessed by the listed objective read-out parameters that indicate a temporarily weakened HF immune privilege and HF damage as well as MICA overexpression on day 1.

    Instead, the expression of HF immune privilege guardians (αMSH, TGFß2) (Bertolini et al., 2020) is preserved. This makes freshly microdissected healthy human scalp HFs one day after initiation of HF organ culture optimally suited as ‘stressed’ human (mini-) organs that strongly express the NKG2D-activating ‘danger’ ‘signal,’ MICA, which also is overexpressed by human AA HFs (Li et al., 2016) (these data are repeated from Uchida et al., 2021 to illustrate the HF distress/partial IP collapse of microdissected human scalp HFs one day 1 after initiation of organ culture).

    elife-80768-supp1.docx (13.4KB, docx)
    Supplementary file 2. Route of injections, volume, and the number of immune cells injected into the normal healthy human xenotransplants.
    elife-80768-supp2.docx (13.4KB, docx)
    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1-8 and figures supplement 2,3,4.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES