Abstract
Infarcts and ischemia of abdominal organs may present with acute abdominal pain, and early diagnosis is crucial to prevent morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, some of these patients present in poor clinical conditions to the emergency department, and imaging specialists are crucial for optimal outcomes. Although the radiological diagnosis of abdominal infarcts is often straightforward, it is vital to use the appropriate imaging modalities and correct imaging techniques for their detection. Additionally, some non-infarct-related abdominal pathologies may mimic infarcts, cause diagnostic confusion, and result in delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis. In this article, we aimed to outline the general imaging approach, present cross-sectional imaging findings of infarcts and ischemia in several abdominal organs, including but not limited to, liver, spleen, kidneys, adrenals, omentum, and intestinal segments with relevant vascular anatomy, discuss possible differential diagnoses and emphasize important clinical/radiological clues that may assist radiologists in the diagnostic process.
Graphical abstract
Keywords: Infarction, Abdomen, CT, MR, Cross-sectional imaging
Introduction
Infarcts in the abdominal organs could be common and may cause clinical diagnostic confusion. The symptoms are mostly nonspecific, and acute onset abdominal pain, sometimes localized, is the most common presenting symptom. Abdominal organ infarcts may be self-limiting with supportive treatment or can be catastrophic in some clinical situations. Therefore early diagnosis is critical for optimal clinical management, and imaging plays an essential role in properly triaging patients.
In this article, we aimed to outline the general imaging approach, present cross-sectional imaging findings of abdominal ischemia and infarcts with an organ-based approach, discuss possible differential diagnoses, and emphasize important clinical/radiological clues that may assist radiologists in the diagnostic process. An organ-based comprehensive summary of infarcts and ischemia in the abdomen can be found in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1.
Disease | Imaging findings | Auxiliary clinical information |
---|---|---|
Hepatic infarct | Peripherally located wedge-shaped hypoenhancing area. Hypointense on T1W and hyperintense on T2W images. Extensive infarction may present with hypoenhancing areas with geographic distribution | History of possible iatrogenic reasons, including surgery, ablation, endovascular procedures, and transplantation may be suggestive. Should also be considered in the presence of other underlying causes such as trauma, vasculitis, HELLP syndrome, and severe shock |
Biliary necrosis | Strictures and dilatations in the intrahepatic bile ducts, multiple bilomas, peribiliary necrotic tissues, and intraductal filling defects representing debris or sludge may be seen. Hepatic artery thrombosis is generally the underlying condition | History of vasculitis, systemic infections, cardioembolic episodes, trauma, liver transplantation, or transcatheter chemoembolization may be helpful. Progressively increasing bilirubin levels despite all necessary biliary interventions may be suggestive |
Arterial occlusive mesenteric ischemia | Endoarterial thrombus/filling defect. Paper-thin bowel wall. Air densities within the bowel wall, mesenteric fat planes and/or mesenteric venous branches. Air–fluid levels within dilated bowel loops may also be seen | Advanced age. Severe atherosclerotic disease or cardioembolic conditions. Severe abdominal pain disproportionate to physical examination findings may be suggestive |
Veno-occlusive mesenteric ischemia | Endovenous thrombus/filling defect. Mesenteric congestion and fat stranding, intraabdominal free fluid, abnormal thickening of segmental bowel loops with target appearance. In advanced stages, bowel perforation may be seen | May present with acute-onset progressive diffuse colicky pain, abdominal distension, and blood in the stool. Presence of possible underlying causes, including hypercoagulable state, recent surgery, and systemic infections may be helpful |
Renal infarct | Pyramidal or wedge-shaped hypoenhancing areas mostly without any significant mass effect. «Cortical rim sign» may be observed in cases of global renal infarction. «Reverse rim sign» is typical of renal cortical necrosis | Patients may present with flank pain, nausea, vomiting, and fever. Presence of possible underlying causes, including infective endocarditis, atrial fibrillation, advanced atherosclerosis, surgical or endovascular interventions, rheumatological and hematological diseases may be helpful |
Splenic infarct | Pyramidal or wedge-shaped hypoenhancing area. In the subacute and chronic phases, involution of the infarcted parenchyma with cystic transformation may be seen. In case of global infarction, splenic capsular enhancement may be observed. Splenic infarcts generally appear hypointense compared to the normal spleen parenchyma on both T1W and T2W images | Variable symptomatology ranging from asymptomatic presentation to severe left upper quadrant pain. Presence of possible underlying causes, including hemoglobinopathies, cardioembolism, lymphoproliferative diseases, certain infections (infectious mononucleosis, malaria), rheumatological conditions, pancreatitis, and splenic torsion may be helpful |
Table 2.
Disease | Imaging findings | Auxiliary clinical information |
---|---|---|
Non-hemorrhagic adrenal infarct | Non-enhancing, slightly thickened adrenal glands. Enhancing thin rim surrounding the infarcted parenchyma may be seen. Diffuse parenchymal hyperintensity on T2W images and parenchymal restricted diffusion on DWI may be other suggestive findings | Rare. Generally secondary to pregnancy, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, hereditary thrombophilias, or conditions that may cause extensive microarteriolar thrombi such as DIC. Patients may present with abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and even acute adrenal crisis |
Hemorrhagic adrenal infarct | Glandular enlargement secondary to diffuse macroscopic adrenal hemorrhage, which appears as hyperdense on non-enhanced CT and hyperintense on T1W pre-contrast MR images | Same as non-hemorrhagic adrenal infarcts |
Intraperitoneal focal fat infarction |
Omental necrosis triangular-shaped large heterogeneous fatty mass in the omentum Epiploic appendagitis oval-shaped fat-containing lesion (< 5 cm) surrounded by inflammatory fat stranding located at the antimesenteric border of the colon. «Central dot sign» may be seen Perigastric appendagitis oval-shaped, heterogeneous lesion located in the falciform, gastrohepatic, or gastrosplenic ligaments and accompanied by peripheral fat stranding |
Self-limiting conditions with non-specific clinical presentation, which may mimic other more serious causes of acute abdominal pain. Patients generally present with well-localized, non-migrating, relatively constant abdominal pain. Nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and fever may also accompany the pain. Heavy food intake, local trauma, rapid body movement, and coughing may trigger IFFI |
Ovarian torsion | Enlarged and displaced ovary, heterogeneous ovarian stroma due to edema and hemorrhage, peripherally displaced follicles, pelvic free fluid, and «twisted pedicle sign». Other suggestive findings include the absence of parenchymal enhancement on MRI and lack of internal vascularity on Doppler US. T2 hypointense ovarian rim may also be seen | Should be considered in female patients with acute pelvic pain. Early diagnosis and intervention are crucial to prevent irreversible tissue loss. Previous history of ovarian torsion/detorsion episodes may be a clue |
Testicular torsion | Testicular enlargement, change in the echotexture, and twisting of the spermatic cord on gray scale US. Decreased, absent, or abnormally high-resistance flow in the symptomatic testis on Doppler US | One of the most common reasons of acute scrotum. Early diagnosis and intervention are crucial to prevent irreversible tissue loss |
Segmental testicular infarct |
Wedge-shaped heterogeneous lesion with the apex pointing to the testicular mediastinum on scrotal US. Absent flow within the lesion on Doppler US Non-enhancing, relatively well-defined heterogeneous parenchymal area peripherally outlined by capsular rim enhancement on post-contrast MR images |
Rare. Acute scrotal pain. Presence of possible underlying causes including vasculitis, trauma, hematological diseases, and epididymo-orchitis |
General imaging approach
US findings are generally nonspecific, and US has limited diagnostic utility except for a few organs such as the testis and ovary. Doppler US, on the other hand, is an operator-dependent examination but might be useful as it allows non-invasive evaluation of the relevant vascular anatomy and parenchymal resistive index in real-time and portable conditions. It can be used as an important gatekeeper in identifying critically ill patients and directing them to contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging, if necessary.
CT (and more rarely MRI) with intravenous contrast is the primary diagnostic tool for diagnosing and managing infarcts. CT appears to be the workhorse modality with its high speed and wide availability in emergency departments. However, MRI can be a good alternative on a case-by-case basis due to its superior soft tissue resolution and the absence of ionizing radiation.
Infarcts and ischemia in solid abdominal organs and hollow viscera may present with different imaging findings, and should be handled differently in terms of cross-sectional imaging.
In solid abdominal organs such as the liver, spleen, and kidney, infarcts are generally observed as triangular or wedge-shaped peripheral lesions or hypoenhancing geographical areas. Standard postcontrast portal venous phase images are very useful in showing the affected area. Again in this phase, it is possible to evaluate the presence of complications such as superposed infection, to follow infarct progression, and to evaluate the patency of major visceral veins. Additional arterial phase images are essential for detecting major arterial occlusion, especially in the patient group thought to benefit from endovascular treatment or revascularization surgery. However, it is not always possible to distinguish abdominal infarcts from non-infarct-related pathologies. In these equivocal cases, dynamic contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging combined with the subtraction technique can be a problem-solver. After subtraction, at least some enhancement is observed in masses, which is not expected in infarcts.
On the other hand, acute bowel ischemia is an entity that can progress rapidly to infarction, has a mortal course, and sometimes presents with very subtle findings. In the presence of clinical suspicion, it is critical to demonstrate vascular patency in the arterial and venous phases after intravenous contrast administration. Additionally, when bowel ischemia is suspected, the use of neutral oral contrast, such as water, is recommended instead of positive oral contrast. Because positive oral contrast may hinder the evaluation of vascular anatomy by distorting maximum-intensity projection images, and may make the detection of early stage enhancement changes in the bowel wall challenging [1]. Last but not least, current literature indicates that dual-energy CT applications can facilitate the detection of small bowel ischemia. Thanks to the increased conspicuity via iodine mapping, enhancement changes in the bowel wall can be detected at an earlier stage, visualization of the entire mesenteric vasculature can be improved despite single-phase imaging, the presence of intramural hematoma can be demonstrated with virtual non-contrast images, and all these advantages can be achieved using a much lower dose of intravenous contrast agent [2, 3].
Liver infarction
Hepatic infarction (HI) is rare due to the dual blood supply of the liver from the hepatic artery (HA) and the portal vein (PV). The presence of extensive collaterals is another contributing factor to the rarity of HI. Despite being the main feeding vessel of the liver, PV occlusion rarely causes HI, per se [4]. HI occurs commonly in patients with HA occlusion or PV thrombosis with concomitant HA occlusion [4].
In modern medical practice, HI related to iatrogenic reasons are also common. Surgery [5], percutaneous ablation [6], endovascular tumor treatments [7], transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure [8], and liver transplantation [9] may be counted among the iatrogenic causes. Systemic vasculitis, trauma, infection, severe shock, preeclampsia or HELLP (hemolytic anemia, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) syndrome, and hypercoagulability are the other rarer reasons for HI [10, 11].
On imaging, HI typically is seen on CT as a wedge-shaped hypoenhancing area with its base abutting on the liver capsule and its apex pointing towards the liver hilum. The infarcted areas appear as hypointense areas on T1-weighted (T1W) images and hyperintense on T2-weighted (T2W) images (Fig. 1). Geographic distribution may also be observed in patients with larger infarcts (Fig. 2).
Abscess formation may be seen in the infarcted areas due to the secondary infection. During follow-up imaging, intralesional gas formation, rounding of the lesion contours, and development of an enhancing wall are considered as red flags suggesting superinfected infarction [12]. However, the differential diagnosis between the sterile infarcts and abscesses using imaging findings solely is not always possible, and in case of suspicion, percutaneous sampling is needed (Fig. 3).
Despite the fact that diagnosing hepatic parenchymal infarcts is generally straightforward, caution should be exercised to differentiate parenchymal infarcts from focal fatty infiltration, abscess, or neoplastic processes (Fig. 4) [13, 14]. In-phase/opposed-phase imaging can be used to assess the presence of fat infiltration in areas that appear hypodense on contrast-enhanced CT. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging can show contrast-enhancing areas of neoplastic lesions and enhancing walls of abscesses. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can provide additional information by revealing restricted diffusion caused by the purulent content within the abscess cavity or hypercellular regions of neoplastic lesions.
Apart from those above-mentioned well-known entities, hepatic perfusion disorders and pseudoinfarcts (Zahn's infarcts, infarct-like cyanotic atrophy) should be considered in the differential diagnosis of true HI. Although pseudoinfarcts can only be confirmed in the histopathological examination, they should be considered, especially in cases of hepatic and portal venous occlusion [10, 15]. PV occlusion or PV branch stenosis generally presents with early arterial enhancement in the affected parenchyma due to arterial buffer response or arterioportal shunting, and parenchymal homogenization is expected in the portal venous phase [16]. On the other hand, impaired hepatic venous outflow initially causes centrilobular congestion, and subsequent parenchymal atrophy develops due to the chronically elevated intrasinusoidal pressure [17, 18]. Unlike true HI, congestion and atrophy predominance with no apparent coagulation necrosis is expected histologically in pseudoinfarcts [15]. In the acute phase of Budd–Chiari syndrome (BCS), pseudoinfarcts may be observed as peripheral hypoattenuating parenchymal areas on CT. This finding may be related to parenchymal congestion, edema, and steatosis (Fig. 5) [17, 19]. In addition, the so-called “straight border sign” may be seen in these cases and refers to the linear demarcation border between the normal and hypoperfused portions of the liver parenchyma (Fig. 6) [20]. Radiologists should be aware that in contrast to true HI, peripheral perfusion defects, congestion, and progressive fibrosis observed in BCS may be potentially reversible with prompt endovascular treatment approaches such as direct or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedures (Fig. 7) [19].
Biliary ischemia and necrosis
Biliary necrosis (BN), also known as ischemic cholangiopathy, is an entity characterized by focal or extensive damage to the intrahepatic bile duct epithelium secondary to the impaired blood supply to these structures. The bile ducts are predominantly supplied by the peribiliary plexus originating from the HA, unlike the dual supply of hepatocytes, and any interruption of flow from these small arterioles may cause necrosis of the biliary epithelium [21].
Several diseases may cause HA thrombosis and BN. Vasculitic (such as polyarteritis nodosa), infectious (AIDS), cardioembolic, traumatic, or iatrogenic (liver transplantation or transarterial chemoembolization) processes may all result in BN [21]. Additionally, Osler–Weber–Rendu disease may lead to chronic biliary ischemia due to the stealing of blood from the biliary tree secondary to extensive hepatic arteriovenous shunting and may present with irregular biliary dilatation in the liver [22]. As the imaging findings may all look similar in all these different entities, clinical history is critical in these patients.
CT and MRCP are both frequently used non-invasive imaging modalities in these patients. Beading appearance secondary to the alternating strictures and dilatations in the intrahepatic bile ducts, multiple bilomas, and peribiliary necrotic tissues may be counted among the typical imaging findings [23]. Air bubbles and air–fluid levels may be observed within bilomas/necrotic collections, and this finding does not always indicate the presence of a concomitant infection (Fig. 8). Because pneumobilia is a normal finding in patients who have had a biliary intervention and biliary air may communicate with the collection. Therefore, air–fluid levels can be observed within sterile bilomas [23]. Color Doppler US is a practical imaging test for evaluating the patency of the HA in patients with liver transplants. Also, spectral Doppler US can be used to diagnose HA stenosis, which may cause post-transplant biliary complications. Tardus-parvus wave-form, decreased hepatic resistive index (< 0.5), and prolonged systolic acceleration time are diagnostic for HA stenosis [23].
Interventional radiology plays a critical role in diagnosing and managing complications related to HA occlusion in patients with liver transplants, including BN. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) may particularly reveal dilation of bile ducts and leakage of contrast medium into the periportal space [23]. In the presence of chronic ischemic changes, intraductal filling defects may represent endoluminal debris or sludge (Fig. 9). In rare cases, the gallbladder may also be affected due to the BN, and linear endoluminal filling defects secondary to the sloughed gallbladder epithelium may be observed [23].
Caroli's disease, periportal edema, peribiliary cysts, and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) may all be considered in the differential diagnosis [23]. In Caroli's disease, saccular dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts may mimic bilomas. However, the «central dot sign», which represents malformed biliary cysts encircling the portal radicle, is very helpful in differential diagnosis on CT. Periportal edema is expected to occur on both sides of the portal triads, whereas intrahepatic bile duct dilatation is usually unilateral. Peribiliary cysts are generally observed in the setting of chronic liver disease or autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Although they rarely cause diagnostic confusion due to intrahepatic bile duct dilatation via mass effect, peribiliary cysts generally do not pose any diagnostic difficulties. On the other hand, PSC may pose a particular diagnostic challenge on cholangiographic examinations. However, intrahepatic peribiliary collections or bilomas are not among the frequent imaging findings of PSC [23].
Bowel ischemia and infarction
Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) may progress to bowel infarction (BI) in a significant percentage of patients. Despite the improvements in diagnosis and treatment, the mortality rate is still high, around 50–60% [24]. Early diagnosis and treatment may significantly improve clinical outcomes, so prompt diagnosis is crucial. In patients with delayed treatment, more than 24 h, the mortality rate approaches 100% [25]. Most patients present at advanced ages, and the mortality rate increases significantly with advancing age [26, 27]. BI may be related to mesenteric arterial and venous causes. Embolic and thrombotic diseases of the mesenteric arteries are common reasons for BI, but mesenteric venous thrombosis should also be considered in the differential diagnosis.
Arterial embolism to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is the most common cause of AMI, representing 40–50% of the cases [28]. The heart is the most common embolic source in these patients. Therefore, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, and ventricular aneurysm should be sought after in these patients. Its acute take-off from the abdominal aorta makes this vessel especially vulnerable to emboli which typically lodge 6–8 cm beyond the SMA origin. Arterial thrombosis is another important cause of AMI, representing 25% of the cases, and atherosclerosis is the most common predisposing factor in these patients. Patients with SMA thrombosis secondary to atherosclerosis are generally expected to have pre-existing symptoms of chronic mesenteric ischemia, such as weight loss, “food fear”, or postprandial pain. Also, unlike embolism, occlusion usually develops at the SMA origin in cases with SMA thrombosis. Less common non-atherosclerotic causes of SMA thrombosis include SMA dissection, vasculitis involvement, or mycotic aneurysms [29].
Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia is a poorly understood entity. Severe vasospasm is thought to be the underlying etiology. This entity is associated with systemic diseases, such as shock, severe sepsis, myocardial infarction, and renal and hepatic diseases [30].
Irreversible ischemia and subsequent transmural BI typically occur within 6 h in subjects with complete luminal occlusion [31]. Initially, patients may present with severe abdominal pain disproportionate to physical examination findings. The infarction of the muscular layer and the neural elements, adynamic ileus, and luminal distension occur with progression to transmural infarction. At this stage, bowel perforation and peritonitis occur with subsequent death.
As stated above, imaging plays a fundamental role in the diagnosis as the clinical findings may be nonspecific. Abdominal CT, coupled with CT angiography (CTA), is typically the imaging modality of choice due to its high temporal and spatial resolution, as well as wide availability. CT is beneficial in this clinical situation as it can pinpoint the culprit abnormalities in the mesenteric vessels. It may also help diagnose (or rule out) the other acute intraabdominal conditions that may clinically mimic AMI and BI. Triphasic CT with non-contrast images followed by arterial and venous phase images allows evaluation of vascular atherosclerosis as well as arterial and venous luminal patency with high sensitivity. Arterial and venous phases also allow evaluation of the end organ findings and the bowel walls.
The embolus in the SMA is seen as a filling defect in the arterial phase. The exact location of the emboli and the extent of the endoluminal thrombus are identified in this phase. Reformatted images in different planes may help orient the clinicians (Fig. 10). A paper-thin bowel wall may indicate the loss of intestinal muscle tone and transmural infarction. The detection of air within the bowel wall and within the lumens of the mesenteric venous branches and the PV are other important indicators of transmural BI (Fig. 11).
Veno-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (VMI) is a less common cause of AMI and generally develops secondary to superior mesenteric vein thrombosis. It may present with acute-onset, progressively worsening diffuse colicky abdominal pain. Abdominal distension and the presence of blood in the stool may also be seen. In the later stages, VMI may lead to mortality by causing the development of bowel necrosis, perforation, and sepsis. The underlying causes of VMI include a hypercoagulable state, portal hypertension, recent intraabdominal surgery, and intraabdominal infections. On CT, a filling defect in a mesenteric vein, mesenteric fat stranding, intraabdominal free fluid, and abnormal thickening of the bowel loops with target appearance can be seen in patients with VMI (Fig. 12). The extent of bowel involvement mainly depends on the location of thrombi as occlusion of small-sized segmentary venous branches presents with much more localized bowel edema (Fig. 13).
Other clinical entities presenting with segmental and symmetrical bowel wall thickening, such as inflammatory bowel disease, infections, radiation enteritis, spontaneous intramural bowel hematoma, portal enteropathy, and angioedema should all be considered in the differential diagnosis of VMI [32]. A detailed evaluation of the clinical history is usually helpful in differentiating these various diseases (Fig. 14). After excluding the endovenous thrombus with CT angiography, differential diagnosis can be narrowed in accordance with other accompanying imaging findings and patient history.
Surgery and endovascular interventions are the two fundamental therapeutic approaches for bowel ischemia. Surgical resection of the ischemic/infarcted bowel segments and surgical thromboembolectomy are two basic approaches in surgery. In addition, a second-look laparotomy within 48 h after the first surgery to assess the viability of the bowel wall may be necessary for certain patients [24].
Endovascular techniques are increasingly used in the treatment of AMI. This approach is typically used in the early stages of the disease before the peritoneal findings and imaging findings of transmural BI appear. Endovascular approaches seem to be extremely promising when patients are appropriately selected [33].
Renal infarction
Renal infarction (RI) is an uncommon clinical condition, and therefore, the index of suspicion is low. It is one of the rare causes of acute abdominal pain, and its clinical diagnosis is difficult [34]. Flank and/or abdominal pain are the common presenting symptoms. Nausea, vomiting, and fever are not common at the time of initial diagnosis [35]. RI should be especially considered in patients with known atrial fibrillation or bacterial endocarditis who present with flank pain. Advanced atherosclerosis, medical renal diseases, dehydration, fibromuscular dysplasia, sickle cell disease, rheumatologic diseases, and iatrogenic conditions (related to endoarterial catheter interventions) are other predisposing factors [34]. Arterial causes are the most common reason for RI, whereas, albeit rare, venous causes may also cause parenchymal infarcts in the kidney. Traumatic complete or partial devascularization of the kidney should also be considered in trauma cases having flank pain (Fig. 15). In these trauma patients, it is thought that the intimal injury within the wall of the renal artery induces luminal thrombosis, which causes subsequent RI [36].
Abdominal CT, with associated CTA, studies are the most commonly used cross-sectional imaging modalities for evaluating RI. Wedge-shaped parenchymal hypoenhancing areas without significant mass effect are the typical imaging findings of a focal parenchymal infarct. However, the mass effect may be observed in infarcted areas in certain patients, and these areas may be confused with a space-occupying neoplasm. MRI, with subtraction images, may be helpful in these patients to rule out an underlying neoplastic process by proving the absence of contrast enhancement, which suggests parenchymal infarction (Fig. 16).
RI may give rise to the “cortical rim sign”, which refers to devascularization of the affected renal parenchyma with only thin cortical enhancement. This sign, seen in approximately 50% of renal infarcts, is secondary to preserved collateral capsular perfusion. In case of branch occlusion of the renal artery, the renal capsular artery, an early branch of the renal artery, may not be affected. Thanks to the perforating branches of the renal capsular artery, rim-shaped enhancement can be seen in the renal capsule and subcapsular area [37].
Apart from hypoenhancing infiltrative neoplasms, pyelonephritis, and renal contusion are the other main differential diagnoses of RI. Although not entirely distinctive, pyelonephritis should always be considered in patients with clinical signs of infection, elevated serum inflammatory markers, and other ancillary imaging findings that may suggest inflammation. Unlike RI, the “cortical rim sign” is not typically observed in patients with pyelonephritis [38]. Focal parenchymal renal contusion should also be considered in patients with trauma. Contusions are generally observed as ill-defined, round, or ovoid-shaped hypoattenuating areas, in contrast to sharply demarcated and wedge-shaped infarcts [39].
Renal allograft infarction is a rare but serious complication of renal transplant surgery [40]. Parenchymal infarcts in these patients may appear in global or segmental fashions. Accompanying cortical rim sign may also be seen and could be helpful as a diagnostic clue (Fig. 17). Allograft infarcts mainly develop in the early postoperative period and occur secondary to the main branch or segmental renal artery thromboses. The most common causes of this clinical phenomenon include hyperacute rejection, renal artery kinking, and anastomotic occlusion [40]. Color and spectral Doppler US are both beneficial for early diagnosis. Segmental allograft infarcts can be observed as an avascular hypoechoic ill-defined mass on color Doppler US and may closely mimic focal pyelonephritis [40]. Correlation with the clinical and laboratory findings may be helpful for correct diagnosis in patients with equivocal imaging findings. Cross-sectional or invasive angiography should be liberally used in these patients to diagnose renal artery occlusion at an early stage.
Renal cortical necrosis (RCN) should also be considered in the presence of hypoenhancing kidneys. The pathological hallmark of RCN is the detection of fibrin thrombi in the renal capillaries. The pathogenesis of RCN is not well described and appears to be multifactorial. Reduced arterial blood flow due to vasospasm, sepsis, postpartum hemorrhage, and shock seems to be the primary abnormality leading to RCN [41]. The disease is more common in neonates and early postpartum females [42]. Contrast-enhanced CT is the most commonly used imaging modality for diagnosis. Nonenhancing and hypoattenuating cortical rim with simultaneous enhancement of the renal medulla is the typical imaging finding, also called the “reverse rim sign” (Fig. 18). The constellation of imaging findings correlates with the histopathologic features of the disease [43–45].
Splenic infarction
Spleen is a highly vascular solid organ, and the distal branches of the splenic artery are noncommunicating end arteries. This anatomic structure leads to parenchymal infarcts in the spleen when these distal branches occlude. Splenic infarction (SI) can be due to iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic reasons.
Non-iatrogenic splenic infarcts
Among the causes of non-iatrogenic SI are: infections such as infectious mononucleosis and malaria, hemoglobinopathies (sickle cell anemia being a common reason), cardiac emboli, lymphoproliferative disorders, collagen vascular diseases, pancreatitis, portal hypertension, and splenic torsion (Fig. 19) [46, 47].
Clinical symptomatology is highly variable in these patients. Splenic infarcts can be clinically silent or severely symptomatic with acute left upper quadrant pain. The size and distribution of the infarct areas are variable, from focal small-area infarcts to complete SI. Parenchymal abscesses, pseudocyst formations, splenic rupture, and hemorrhage are among the potential complications of SIs [48, 49].
On US, the SIs present as ill-defined, wedge-shaped, or nodular hypoechoic areas, but US has limited sensitivity and was found to be diagnostic in only 18% of the patients [50].
CT is the workhorse imaging modality for diagnosing SI due to its high sensitivity. On contrast-enhanced CT, SIs appear as wedge-shaped, hypoattenuating areas demonstrating poor enhancement in the acute period after infarction occurs. As the process advances to the subacute phase, the infarcted area may appear cystic with the involution of the dead parenchyma in the chronic phase (Fig. 20). The demarcation line between the infarcted and non-infarcted areas may be more prominent in the subacute phase [46]. The liquefaction and expansion of the infarcted area on follow-up imaging are alarming findings for superimposed infection, and these imaging findings appear more commonly in SIs caused by thromboembolism. Image-guided aspiration and sampling may be considered for managing these patients [46]. Global SI may occur when the splenic artery becomes completely thrombosed due to thrombus formation or tumor invasion. In these patients, the only enhancing area of the spleen may be the splenic capsule demonstrating rim enhancement (Fig. 21) [51].
MRI is rarely used for the initial diagnosis of SI. The decreased parenchymal signal on both T1W and T2W images is thought to be secondary to fibrosis, calcification, and hemosiderin deposition [52]. The demarcation line of preserved and infarcted parenchyma may be better outlined on MRI with dynamic post-contrast T1W imaging.
As a differential of non-iatrogenic SI, acute splenic sequestration crisis should be considered in patients with sickle cell anemia if the massive enlargement of the spleen is seen with capsular rim sign and global absence of parenchymal enhancement. Although it is quite rare in the adult population, recognition of this condition, which causes hypersplenism secondary to blood pooling in the spleen due to entrapment of sickled erythrocytes in the microvascular bed, could be critical for patient management. Because splenic sequestration increases the risk of splenic rupture, and splenectomy may be required. In these cases, the splenic artery and vein are expected to be patent in the contrast-enhanced examination as opposed to the typical SI. However, it has been reported that the contrast filling in the splenic vein is counterintuitively retrograde from the PV. Lack of flow void and luminal hyperintensity due to the slow flow in the splenic vessels on T2W imaging might be helpful in making the diagnosis (Fig. 22) [47].
Iatrogenic splenic infarcts
Iatrogenic SIs can occur as complications of various surgical procedures such as hemicolectomy, nephrectomy, and a variety of endovascular interventions for embolization or bleeding control, or they can be induced intentionally and therapeutically in patients with hypersplenism [53–55]. As expected, the management of iatrogenic SIs secondary to the procedural adverse events differs from those induced therapeutically since the latter does not present any initial diagnostic challenge and may require follow-up imaging for the treatment response.
Emerging as a viable alternative to surgery in patients with hypersplenism, minimally invasive endovascular splenic embolization was initially performed to embolize the whole splenic parenchyma. However, this approach has largely been abandoned in modern practice due to several severe complications associated with the procedure, such as abscess formation, splenic rupture, and life-threatening sepsis. To mitigate the complications of this procedure, partial splenic embolization, paired with antibiotic and vaccine prophylaxis, gained popularity due to its better outcomes and favorable complication rates. Abdominal CT and US may be performed pre-procedurally to establish the splenic volume and the patency of the splenoportomesenteric venous axis [56].
Follow-up CT is typically performed 1 week after the procedure to assess the percentage of infarcted tissue. Immediate post-procedure CT is not typically performed, but the threshold for ordering a CT should be low in patients with immediate hypotension and fever to rule out splenic rupture or abscess (Fig. 23). CT is beneficial to evaluate the success of the procedure. On CT, a sharp demarcation line between the infarcted and viable splenic parenchyma is easily visible on post-contrast images. In the months following the procedure, the spleen size gradually decreases, as expected (Fig. 24). Follow-up imaging may not be necessary at this phase, and most patients are monitored clinically [56].
Adrenal infarction
Adrenal infarction (AI) is a rare but serious condition that usually presents with nonspecific symptoms such as abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. It is well-known that pregnancy, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, and hereditary thrombophilias may be associated with this clinical condition [57–59]. Adrenal infarcts related to systemic diseases are mostly bilateral, but unilateral infarcts may also be observed in a subset of patients [58]. The presence of a concomitant hemorrhage is important as non-hemorrhagic infarcts may be treated with anticoagulation, whereas a conservative approach is preferred in patients with hemorrhagic infarcts [59].
Early diagnosis is crucial for patients with bilateral AI as the clinical condition may suddenly deteriorate in certain patients due to hemodynamic collapse related to severe adrenal insufficiency. Furthermore, patients with unilateral involvement may suffer from sequential AI developing in the contralateral gland in a short interval, leading to an adrenal crisis [57].
As adrenal glands have a rich collateral arterial supply, they are relatively resistant to arterial ischemia. Therefore, AIs are mainly secondary to acute venous thrombosis and related parenchymal severe congestion/ischemia [57]. Arterial infarcts, however, may be seen due to extensive microarteriolar thrombi in certain patients, such as in cases with disseminated intravascular coagulation, DIC [57].
Despite the fact that the cause-effect relationship between hemorrhage and infarction is still controversial, it has been suggested that reperfusion injury secondary to the infarction may promote hemorrhage in certain cases [57].
CT and MRI are the most commonly utilized modalities for diagnosis. However, as gadolinium use may be limited in pregnant cases, CT may be preferred over MRI when there is a diagnostic need for an IV contrast study [58].
Non-enhancing and slightly thickened glands are the typical imaging findings in these patients. The so-called “capsular sign”, which refers to the enhancing thin rim surrounding the nonenhancing adrenal parenchyma, may also be observed (Fig. 25) [59]. The hyperintense-looking adrenal gland on T2W images and accompanying diffusion restriction on DWI are typical findings on MRI in subjects with non-hemorrhagic infarcts [59]. However, it should be kept in mind that diffusion restriction is not specific to AI, and normal adrenal glands may also exhibit physiological diffusion restriction. On the other hand, the presence of asymmetric diffusion restriction compared to the contralateral adrenal gland may suggest infarction [60].
In the precontrast images, macroscopic hemorrhage in adrenal glands is typically observed as hyperdense on CT and hyperintense on T1W MR images, respectively (Fig. 26) [57]. In the subacute and chronic phases of hemorrhagic infarcts, MR signal characteristics tend to vary depending on the age of the blood products. It has been reported that adrenal pseudocysts, glandular atrophy, and calcifications may be seen in chronic phases of adrenal hemorrhages [61].
Adequate and detailed clinical history is crucial for correct diagnosis in these patients since rare cases of infectious (such as Waterhouse–Friderichsen syndrome), or drug-related adrenalitis may also mimic AIs on imaging (Fig. 27).
Intraperitoneal focal fat infarction
This entity refers to a self-limiting abdominal disease group characterized by focal acute inflammation and necrosis of intraabdominal adipose tissues, including acute omental infarcts (AOI), acute epiploic appendagitis (AEA), and acute perigastric appendagitis (APA).
Acute omental infarcts
AOIs are not among the common causes of acute abdominal pain. Pain in the right lower quadrant is a common clinical complaint with nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and fever [62]. The clinical and laboratory findings are nonspecific, and imaging plays a fundamental role in diagnosing and triaging patients. Acute cholecystitis and acute appendicitis are commonly confused clinical entities with AOI [63, 64]. Most cases are idiopathic with no detectable underlying cause, but several predisposing conditions such as accessory omentum, irregular omental fat accumulation, bifid omentum, and narrowed omental pedicle have been proposed. Heavy food intake, local trauma, rapid body movement, and coughing are other reported predisposing conditions [65].
CT is the most commonly used imaging modality for diagnosing AOI. The typical finding is a triangular-shaped, fat-containing heterogeneous mass between the abdominal wall and the transverse or ascending colon segments (Fig. 28) [66]. In the presence of a whirled pattern of linear strands, omental torsion may be considered as the cause of AOI [62]. Due to the close relationship between the colon and the increased adipose tissue density secondary to AOI, colonic diverticulitis may be confused with AOI. However, the absence of colonic diverticulosis, colonic wall thickening, and collection may favor AOI over colonic diverticulitis [67]. AEA is another important clinical entity that may mimic AOI. The size smaller than 5 cm, the presence of a surrounding hyperdense rim, and colonic wall abutment are other imaging features suggesting AEA over AOI [62, 68].
Furthermore, focal inflammatory changes in the omentum secondary to various underlying conditions such as trauma, surgery, pancreatitis, and foreign body reaction may present with fat-containing pseudo mass appearance and mimic AOI (Fig. 29) [69].
Correct diagnosis is critical to prevent unnecessary surgical interventions because the treatment is primarily conservative. However, resection of the infarcted tissue may be needed when peritonitis signs worsen, or there is clinical suspicion of a complication [70, 71].
Acute epiploic appendagitis
AEA is a relatively rare cause of acute abdomen. Clinical diagnosis is mostly not possible, and imaging is, therefore, essential for diagnosis. Clinically, it is a benign, self-limiting disease, but the pain may be quite intense in the acute stage.
Anatomically, epiploic appendages (also called epiploicae appendices) are fatty outpouchings located on the colonic wall, and there are around 50–100 epiploic appendages in an adult colon [72, 73]. Epiploic appendages may be found near the appendix vermiformis and are absent in the rectum [74]. They are typically 2–5 cm in length with a thickness of 1–2 cm and tend to be larger in obese and in those who have recently lost weight [75, 76]. The vascular supply of the epiploic appendages is limited, and their increased mobility renders them susceptible to torsion and infarcts [74]. In primary AEA, the underlying pathophysiology is related to a torsed pedicle causing ischemic or hemorrhagic infarction with a thrombosed central vein. Among the secondary causes of AEA, inflammatory processes such as diverticulitis, pancreatitis, cholecystitis, or appendicitis may be counted [74]. In both conditions, the typical clinical symptomatology is characterized by focal, non-migrating abdominal pain in the left or right lower quadrants with no change in patient position. The treatment is mainly conservative, and surgery is almost never indicated. However, some authors have suggested that surgical removal represents the only way to avoid adhesion formation, recurrence, and intussusception induced by focal inflammation [77]. Areas adjacent to the sigmoid colon, the descending colon, and the right hemicolon, in decreasing order, are the most common sites of the disease [73]. As the clinical signs and symptoms are nonspecific, imaging, especially CT, plays a fundamental role in correct diagnosis.
The typical CT finding in patients with AEA is an oval fat-containing lesion with a diameter of less than 5 cm, surrounded by inflammation (Fig. 30) [78]. Intestinal obstruction and abscess formation are not expected. The local inflammation may also cause thickening of the adjacent parietal peritoneum and colonic wall (Fig. 31). The so-called "central dot sign”, which refers to a thrombosed vein, is highly characteristic for diagnosis. However, its absence should not rule out the diagnosis [73]. Acute diverticulitis may simulate AEA on CT studies. However, a size smaller than 5 cm, the absence of extraluminal air and fluid, and abscess formation are helpful for differential diagnosis.
Acute perigastric appendagitis
APA is a rare entity characterized by ischemia and inflammation of the perigastric ligaments (falciform, gastrohepatic, gastrocolic, and gastrosplenic ligaments).
Falciform ligament connects the liver to the anterior abdominal wall and contains the involuted umbilical vein remnant. It also has a connection with the lesser omentum [79]. Gastrohepatic ligament, a part of the lesser omentum, is also anatomically close to falciform ligament, and this anatomic structure connects the stomach to the liver. The remaining two perigastric ligaments are the gastrocolic and gastrosplenic ligaments, which are located between the transverse colon and the greater curvature of the stomach, and the spleen and the greater curve of the stomach, respectively.
All these perigastric ligaments have epiploic appendages, which may undergo torsion and subsequent infarct. Infarcts of these perigastric appendages appear to be extremely rare compared to colonic AEA, and there is not much information in the literature regarding their clinical and imaging aspects [79]. Accurate diagnosis is critical for ruling out more severe clinical mimickers and guiding treatment. For example, falciform ligament torsion may present with severe right hypochondrium pain or epigastric pain accompanied by elevated inflammatory markers. If it is not diagnosed radiologically, it may cause unnecessary interventions such as upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, laparoscopy, or laparotomy [80, 81]. As the clinical course of APA appears to be self-limiting and responsive to supportive non-invasive treatment, correct diagnosis with imaging gains even more importance.
CT is the workhorse in diagnosing acute abdominal pain. Therefore, most of the information on APA is based on this modality. The CT imaging characteristics of APA are not different from those of colonic AEA. Oval-shaped, heterogeneously appearing focus with associated surrounding stranding in the fat planes, consistent with edema, is the most typical imaging finding. The twisted infarcted fatty appendage can also be seen in falciform ligament torsion (Fig. 32) [80]. The rim around the torsed appendage is another relatively common finding (Fig. 33). The size of the abnormal area is also variable, with an average diameter of 4 cm. Mild adjacent gastric antral thickening has been reported in patients with gastrohepatic ligament appendagitis [79].
Ovarian torsion
Ovarian torsion (OT) is an uncommon cause of acute abdominal and pelvic pain. The cascade of events starts with the twisting of the ovarian pedicle and/or fallopian tubes. Concomitant torsion of the ovary and the tubes has been reported in 67% of cases of adnexal torsion [82, 83]. Unless surgical correction is performed timely, the subsequent vascular compromise leads to hemorrhagic infarction of the affected ovary [84]. Early diagnosis and treatment are mandatory since the delay of surgical intervention eventually leads to irreversible tissue loss. As the clinical findings are highly nonspecific, imaging plays a crucial role in the positive outcome of these patients.
US is almost always the first imaging modality used in female patients with acute pelvic pain as it is non-invasive, easily accessible, and cost-effective. An enlarged ovary is one of the most common imaging findings of OT on grayscale US [82]. This enlargement may be detected even in the early phase of the disease before the development of infarction. On average, the organ volume may be up to 28 times the normal size in torsed ovaries [85]. Heterogeneity of the ovarian stroma due to hemorrhage and edema is another important sonographic feature (Fig. 34). The presence of cysts within the ovarian stroma is a predisposing factor for OT, with benign mature cystic teratomas being the most common [86]. Peripherally displaced follicles, likely due to stromal edema and venous congestion, is another important diagnostic clue. Peripherally located cysts may also be seen in normal ovaries, but detecting these cysts in a unilaterally enlarged ovary is suggestive of OT [85].
Color Doppler imaging may also be beneficial as vascular compromise is the basis of ovarian ischemia/infarction in these patients. The absence of arterial flow on color Doppler imaging is a highly specific finding for OT; however, vice versa is not valid. Relying solely on the presence of parenchymal arterial flow can be quite deceiving to rule out OT, because the arterial flow signal is absent on imaging in only 73% of OT cases [82]. The diminished arterial flow is typically associated with venous flow abnormality [82].
Although not very common, CT is also used for diagnosing OT in certain patients. Although CT findings are not very specific, it is beneficial to rule out other clinical mimickers. The enlarged ovary displaced into the midline or the contralateral side, ascites, and peripherally displaced follicles may also be detected with CT. Other imaging findings include the absence of parenchymal enhancement, gas formation within the torsed mass, and obliteration of fat planes [87–89].
MRI offers unique benefits for evaluating the female pelvis due to its high soft-tissue resolution and lack of ionizing radiation. Its high resolution may obviate the need for IV contrast injection, which may benefit patients with limited renal reserve. Isolated ovarian and combined ovarian and adnexal torsion may be effectively evaluated with MRI. Ovarian edema and hemorrhage may be detected efficiently with MRI [90]. Peripherally displaced follicles, enlarged ovary, and heterogeneous stroma are all indicative for diagnosing OT. Alternative diagnoses may also be efficiently evaluated with MRI. The detection of T2 hypointense ovarian rim has also been suggested as an imaging indicator of OT (Fig. 35) [90].
In addition to those parenchymal changes, a twisted pedicle, a pathognomonic finding, can also be observed, especially on MRI and US [91].
The absence of parenchymal enhancement in postcontrast images may indicate a transition from ischemia to infarction [91]. However, the absence of abnormal ovarian enhancement on MRI does not entirely rule out the possibility of OT, like in Doppler US [91].
Clinical presentation and radiological findings may be confusing in partial or intermittent OT due to recurrent torsion/detorsion episodes [92]. Therefore, it is vital to consider the possibility of torsion in female patients presenting with acute pelvic pain, as early diagnosis and early intervention increase the likelihood of organ salvage.
Testicular ischemia and infarction
The testicular arteries originate from the abdominal aorta and pass through the inguinal canal to supply the testicular parenchyma. Testicular ischemia and infarcts usually present with acute scrotal pain and may require medical management or emergency surgical intervention depending on the cause. Although the most common causes of acute scrotal pain are epididymoorchitis, torsion of the appendix testis, and testicular torsion, it is important to keep in mind other rarer causes. US and Doppler US are indispensable tools for the differential diagnosis and management of these conditions presenting with similar symptoms.
In testicular torsion, decreased, absent, or abnormally high-resistance flow is expected in the symptomatic testis on Doppler US. While compromised venous drainage secondary to the torsion causes a high resistive index (> 0.75) in the early period, arterial occlusion in the advanced stage results in absent flow [93]. In addition, testicular enlargement, echotexture change, and spermatic cord twisting are other valuable radiological findings on gray scale US (Fig. 36). Early diagnosis (especially in the first 6 h) is critical for tissue viability. On the other hand, partial torsion can be confusing both clinically and radiologically due to spontaneous detorsions. After spontaneous detorsion, increased parenchymal vascularity mimicking orchitis can be observed on Doppler US [93].
Segmental testicular infarction (STI) is a rare and mostly idiopathic condition seen in patients aged 20–40. However, it is well-known that it may be seen secondary to vasculitis, trauma, hematological diseases, and infections [94, 95]. On scrotal US, STI is characterized by a wedge-shaped heterogeneous lesion with the apex pointing to the testicular mediastinum. Although the absence of flow on Doppler US helps distinguish STI from the mass, follow-up imaging may be required to exclude malignancy. MRI can be beneficial in cases where the differential diagnosis cannot be made with US. Non-enhancing, relatively well-defined heterogeneous parenchymal area peripherally outlined by capsular rim enhancement on postcontrast MR images suggests STI (Fig. 37). Additionally, hemorrhagic changes characterized by hyperintensities on T1 precontrast images can be seen within the infarct [94, 95].
Finally, it should be kept in mind that sequelae of testicular trauma, torsion or epididymoorchitis, extrinsic factors such as fluid collection, mass, inguinal hernia or hematoma compressing testicular parenchyma, and iatrogenic testicular artery injury (e.g., inguinal hernia repair) may cause testicular ischemia and may present with decreased/absent flow on Doppler US [93, 96].
Simultaneous multiple intraabdominal infarcts
In patients with multiple foci of parenchymal infarcts in different intraabdominal organs, various pro-thrombotic conditions should be considered as the underlying etiology [97]. Among the most common causes of multiple intraabdominal infarcts, hereditary thrombophilias, antiphospholipid antibody disease, Behcet's disease, and cardioembolic conditions (such as atrial fibrillation and infective endocarditis) may be considered initially (Fig. 38). Additionally, certain hematological diseases that may increase the tendency towards thrombus formation, such as DIC and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, malignancy-associated coagulopathy (Trousseau syndrome), connective tissue diseases, vasculitides, and shock state should also be borne in mind (Fig. 39). Among the other rare causes, amniotic fluid embolism, fat/cholesterol crystal embolism, medication-induced thrombosis, and nephrotic syndrome may be counted.
More recently, with the onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic, multiple intraabdominal infarcts related to this infection have been observed and reported increasingly [98, 99]. It is now well-known that this infection may induce thromboembolic complications due to severe systemic inflammatory response, endothelial injury, and hypoxia (Fig. 40) [100].
In case of any extensive thromboembolism, infarction of several intraabdominal organs with extensive vascular supply and rich collateral circulation, such as the stomach, pancreas, and urinary bladder may be observed [101–105]. Despite mentioned infarct resistance of those organs, anecdotal case reports of infarcts have been reported in certain clinical conditions such as DIC and cholesterol crystal embolism [101, 103]. As expected, it has been proposed that infarcts of these organs may develop as a result of massive microemboli to the distal vascular bed rather than a major arterial occlusion.
Conclusion
The early detection of ischemia and infarcts in the abdomen is crucial for preventing potentially devastating complications related to these diseases. Prompt medical or surgical intervention is of fundamental importance to ensure a good outcome. Imaging specialists can play a crucial role in patient management by guiding clinicians in choosing the correct imaging modalities, optimizing imaging protocols, making a timely and accurate diagnosis, and highlighting possible differential diagnoses when appropriate.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. M. Ruhi Onur for providing the cases of splenic torsion and acute splenic sequestration crisis.
Abbreviations
- HI
Hepatic infarction
- HA
Hepatic artery
- PV
Portal vein
- T1W
T1-weighted
- T2W
T2-weighted
- BCS
Budd–Chiari syndrome
- BN
Biliary necrosis
- AIDS
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
- MRCP
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
- PTC
Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography
- PSC
Primary sclerosing cholangitis
- AMI
Acute mesenteric ischemia
- BI
Bowel infarction
- SMA
Superior mesenteric artery
- CTA
CT angiography
- VMI
Veno-occlusive mesenteric ischemia
- RI
Renal infarction
- RCN
Renal cortical necrosis
- SI
Splenic infarction
- AI
Adrenal infarction
- IV
Intravenous
- DIC
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
- DWI
Diffusion-weighted imaging
- AOI
Acute omental infarcts
- AEA
Acute epiploic appendagitis
- APA
Acute perigastric appendagitis
- OT
Ovarian torsion
- STI
Segmental testicular infarction
Author contributions
ADK, OO, and VK wrote the manuscript and collected data. MCK and VK designed illustrations. MK, DA, MNO, MCK, and PFH provided cases and edited the text. All of the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Not applicable.
Data availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Dhatt HS, Behr SC, Miracle A, Wang ZJ, Yeh BM. Radiological evaluation of bowel ischemia. Radiologic Clinics. 2015;53(6):1241–1254. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2015.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lourenco PD, Rawski R, Mohammed MF, Khosa F, Nicolaou S, McLaughlin P. Dual-energy CT iodine mapping and 40-keV monoenergetic applications in the diagnosis of acute bowel ischemia. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2018;211(3):564–570. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Obmann MM, Punjabi G, Obmann VC, Boll DT, Heye T, Benz MR, et al. Dual-energy CT of acute bowel ischemia. Abdominal Radiology. 2022;47(5):1660–1683. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03188-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Virmani V, Ramanathan S, Virmani VS, Kielar A, Sheikh A, Ryan J. Non-neoplastic hepatic vascular diseases: spectrum of CT and MRI appearances. Clin Radiol. 2014;69(5):538–548. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen V, Hamilton J, Qizilbash A. Hepatic infarction. A clinicopathologic study of seven cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1976;100(1):32–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chuang CH, Chen CY, Tsai HM. Hepatic infarction and hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm with peritoneal bleeding after radiofrequency ablation for hepatoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3(11):A23. doi: 10.1016/S1542-3565(05)00159-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cohen SE, Safadi R, Verstandig A, Eid A, Sasson T, Symmer L, et al. Liver-spleen infarcts following transcatheter chemoembolization: a case report and review of the literature on adverse effects. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42(5):938–943. doi: 10.1023/A:1018816531421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lopera JE, Katabathina V, Bosworth B, Garg D, Kroma G, Garza-Berlanga A, et al. Segmental liver ischemia/infarction after elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: clinical outcomes in 10 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26(6):835–841. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.11.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tzakis AG, Gordon RD, Shaw BW, Jr, Iwatsuki S, Starzl TE. Clinical presentation of hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation in the cyclosporine era. Transplantation. 1985;40(6):667–671. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198512000-00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bandyopadhyay S, Bandyopadhyay D. Acute Budd-Chiari syndrome as an initial presentation of acute promyelocytic leukemia. J Cancer Res Ther. 2010;6(4):567–569. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.77077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Boll DT, Merkle EM. Diffuse liver disease: strategies for hepatic CT and MR imaging. Radiographics. 2009;29(6):1591–1614. doi: 10.1148/rg.296095513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stewart BG, Gervais DA, O'Neill MJ, Boland GW, Hahn PF, Mueller PR. Imaging and percutaneous treatment of secondarily infected hepatic infarctions. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2008;190(3):601–607. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Giovine S, Pinto A, Crispano S, Lassandro F, Romano L. Retrospective study of 23 cases of hepatic infarction: CT findings and pathological correlations. Radiol Med. 2006;111(1):11–21. doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0002-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Smith GS, Birnbaum BA, Jacobs JE. Hepatic infarction secondary to arterial insufficiency in native livers: CT findings in 10 patients. Radiology. 1998;208(1):223–229. doi: 10.1148/radiology.208.1.9646817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zimmermann A. Tumor-like necroses of the liver: liver infarct and hepatic pseudo-infarct (Zahn’s infarct). Tumors and tumor-like lesions of the hepatobiliary tract Springer International Publishing Switzerland. 2017:2445–53.
- 16.Yim NY, Jeong YY, Shin SS, Song SG, Lim HS, Heo SH, et al. Hepatic perfusion disorders: a pictorial review of CT and MR imaging. Journal of the Korean Radiological Society. 2005;53(3):199–213. doi: 10.3348/jkrs.2005.53.3.199. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Torabi M, Hosseinzadeh K, Federle MP. CT of nonneoplastic hepatic vascular and perfusion disorders. Radiographics. 2008;28(7):1967–1982. doi: 10.1148/rg.287085067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brancatelli G, Vilgrain V, Federle MP, Hakime A, Lagalla R, Iannaccone R, et al. Budd-Chiari syndrome: spectrum of imaging findings. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2007;188(2):W168–W176. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cura M, Haskal Z, Lopera J. Diagnostic and interventional radiology for Budd-Chiari syndrome. Radiographics. 2009;29(3):669–681. doi: 10.1148/rg.293085056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Itai Y, Murata S, Kurosaki Y. Straight border sign of the liver: spectrum of CT appearances and causes. Radiographics. 1995;15(5):1089–1102. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.15.5.7501852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Deltenre P, Valla D-C. Ischemic cholangiopathy. Journal of Hepatology. 2006;44(4):806–817. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kharmach O, Borahma M, Lagdali N, Benelbarhdadi I, Ajana F-Z. Ischemic cholangitis during Osler–Weber–Rendu disease: a case report. Egyptian Liver Journal. 2022;12(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s43066-021-00163-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Alabdulghani F, Healy G, Cantwell C. Radiological findings in ischaemic cholangiopathy. Clinical Radiology. 2020;75(3):161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hawthorn BR, Ratnam LA. Acute mesenteric ischaemia: imaging and intervention. Clin Radiol. 2020;75(5):398.e19–e28. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 25.Klar E, Rahmanian PB, Bucker A, Hauenstein K, Jauch KW, Luther B. Acute mesenteric ischemia: a vascular emergency. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109(14):249–256. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Haga Y, Odo M, Homma M, Komiya K, Takeda K, Koike S, et al. New prediction rule for mortality in acute mesenteric ischemia. Digestion. 2009;80(2):104–111. doi: 10.1159/000219367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wadman M, Syk I, Elmstahl S. Survival after operations for ischaemic bowel disease. Eur J Surg. 2000;166(11):872–877. doi: 10.1080/110241500447263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Oldenburg WA, Lau LL, Rodenberg TJ, Edmonds HJ, Burger CD. Acute mesenteric ischemia: a clinical review. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(10):1054–1062. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.10.1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bala M, Kashuk J, Moore EE, Kluger Y, Biffl W, Gomes CA, et al. Acute mesenteric ischemia: guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2017;12(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0150-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Trompeter M, Brazda T, Remy CT, Vestring T, Reimer P. Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia: etiology, diagnosis, and interventional therapy. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(5):1179–1187. doi: 10.1007/s00330-001-1220-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chiu CJ, McArdle AH, Brown R, Scott HJ, Gurd FN. Intestinal mucosal lesion in low-flow states. I. A morphological, hemodynamic, and metabolic reappraisal. Arch Surg. 1970;101(4):478–483. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1970.01340280030009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fernandes T, Oliveira MI, Castro R, Araújo B, Viamonte B, Cunha R. Bowel wall thickening at CT: simplifying the diagnosis. Insights into imaging. 2014;5(2):195–208. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0308-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Arthurs ZM, Titus J, Bannazadeh M, Eagleton MJ, Srivastava S, Sarac TP, et al. A comparison of endovascular revascularization with traditional therapy for the treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(3):698–704; discussion -5. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 34.Suzer O, Shirkhoda A, Jafri SZ, Madrazo BL, Bis KG, Mastromatteo JF. CT features of renal infarction. Eur J Radiol. 2002;44(1):59–64. doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(01)00476-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Antopolsky M, Simanovsky N, Stalnikowicz R, Salameh S, Hiller N. Renal infarction in the ED: 10-year experience and review of the literature. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(7):1055–1060. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.06.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Harris AC, Zwirewich CV, Lyburn ID, Torreggiani WC, Marchinkow LO. Ct findings in blunt renal trauma. Radiographics. 2001;21 Spec No: S201-14. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 37.Ambesh P, Lal H. Renal cortical rim sign. Abdominal imaging. 2015;40:2914–2915. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0483-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Piccoli GB, Priola AM, Vigotti FN, Guzzo G, Veltri A. Renal infarction versus pyelonephritis in a woman presenting with fever and flank pain. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2014;64(2):311–314. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Corl FM, West OC, Tamm EP, Fishman EK, et al. Imaging of renal trauma: a comprehensive review. Radiographics. 2001;21(3):557–574. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.21.3.g01ma11557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sugi MD, Joshi G, Maddu KK, Dahiya N, Menias CO. Imaging of renal transplant complications throughout the life of the allograft: comprehensive multimodality review. Radiographics. 2019;39(5):1327–1355. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019190096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Spiesecke P, Munch F, Fischer T, Hamm B, Lerchbaumer MH. Multiparametric ultrasound findings in acute kidney failure due to rare renal cortical necrosis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81690-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Prakash J, Vohra R, Wani IA, Murthy AS, Srivastva PK, Tripathi K, et al. Decreasing incidence of renal cortical necrosis in patients with acute renal failure in developing countries: a single-centre experience of 22 years from Eastern India. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22(4):1213–1217. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chen F, Alexander L, Caserta M. Reverse rim sign on CEUS. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020;45(1):255–256. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02273-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dyer RB, Chen MY, Zagoria RJ. Classic signs in uroradiology. Radiographics. 2004;24(Suppl 1):S247–S280. doi: 10.1148/rg.24si045509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Regine G, Stasolla A, Miele V. Multidetector computed tomography of the renal arteries in vascular emergencies. Eur J Radiol. 2007;64(1):83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Alabousi A, Patlas MN, Scaglione M, Romano L, Soto JA. Cross-sectional imaging of nontraumatic emergencies of the spleen. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2014;43(5):254–267. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2014.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Unal E, Onur MR, Akpinar E, Ahmadov J, Karcaaltincaba M, Ozmen MN, et al. Imaging findings of splenic emergencies: a pictorial review. Insights into imaging. 2016;7(2):215–222. doi: 10.1007/s13244-016-0467-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Emery KH. Splenic emergencies. Radiol Clin North Am. 1997;35(4):831–843. doi: 10.1016/S0033-8389(22)00436-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Foss JN, O'Hara SM, Bisset GS., III A pattern-oriented approach to splenic imaging in infants and children. Radiographics. 1999;19(6):1465–1485. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.19.6.g99no231465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Antopolsky M, Hiller N, Salameh S, Goldshtein B, Stalnikowicz R. Splenic infarction: 10 years of experience. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27(3):262–265. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Taylor AJ, Dodds WJ, Erickson SJ, Stewart ET. CT of acquired abnormalities of the spleen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157(6):1213–1219. doi: 10.2214/ajr.157.6.1950868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Levin TL, Berdon WE, Haller JO, Ruzal-Shapiro C, Hurlet-Jenson A. Intrasplenic masses of “preserved” functioning splenic tissue in sickle cell disease: correlation of imaging findings (CT, ultrasound, MRI, and nuclear scintigraphy) Pediatr Radiol. 1996;26(9):646–649. doi: 10.1007/BF01356826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Feola A, Niola M, Conti A, Delbon P, Graziano V, Paternoster M, et al. Iatrogenic splenic injury: review of the literature and medico-legal issues. Open Medicine. 2016;11(1):307–315. doi: 10.1515/med-2016-0059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kartha A, Sulaiman TO. Iatrogenic splenic infarction after embolization of an anomalous artery supplying a pulmonary sequestration: A report of a rare case. Yemen Journal of Medicine. 2022:97–9.
- 55.Ekeh AP, McCarthy MC, Woods RJ, Haley E. Complications arising from splenic embolization after blunt splenic trauma. The American Journal of Surgery. 2005;189(3):335–339. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hadduck TA, McWilliams JP. Partial splenic artery embolization in cirrhotic patients. World J Radiol. 2014;6(5):160–168. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Riddell A, Khalili K. Sequential adrenal infarction without MRI-detectable hemorrhage in primary antiphospholipid–antibody syndrome. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2004;183(1):220–222. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.1.1830220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Green P-AD, Ngai IM, Lee TT, Garry DJ. Unilateral adrenal infarction in pregnancy. Case Reports. 2013;2013:bcr2013009997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 59.Glomski SA, Guenette JP, Landman W, Tatli S. Acute nonhemorrhagic adrenal infarction in pregnancy: 10-year MRI incidence and patient outcomes at a single institution. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2018;210(4):785–791. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Padilla RM, Way AR, Soule E, Gopireddy D, Lall C. Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Unilateral Adrenal Infarction: A Case of Colicky Right Upper Quadrant Pain in a Pregnant Female. Cureus. 2021;13(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 61.Jordan E, Poder L, Courtier J, Sai V, Jung A, Coakley FV. Imaging of nontraumatic adrenal hemorrhage. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2012;199(1):W91–W98. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Singh AK, Gervais DA, Lee P, Westra S, Hahn PF, Novelline RA, et al. Omental infarct: CT imaging features. Abdom Imaging. 2006;31(5):549–554. doi: 10.1007/s00261-005-0251-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Miguel Perello J, Aguayo Albasini JL, Soria Aledo V, Aguilar Jimenez J, Flores Pastor B, Candel Arenas MF, et al. Omental torsion: imaging techniques can prevent unnecessary surgical interventions. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;25(8):493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Puylaert JB. Right-sided segmental infarction of the omentum: clinical, US, and CT findings. Radiology. 1992;185(1):169–172. doi: 10.1148/radiology.185.1.1523302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Occhionorelli S, Zese M, Cappellari L, Stano R, Vasquez G. Acute Abdomen due to Primary Omental Torsion and Infarction. Case Rep Surg. 2014;2014:208382. doi: 10.1155/2014/208382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hollerweger A, Rettenbacher T, Macheiner P, Gritzmann N. Spontaneous fatty tissue necrosis of the omentum majus and epiploic appendices: clinical, ultrasonic and CT findings. Rofo. 1996;165(6):529–534. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Garant M, Taourel P, Fried GM, Bret PM. Thickening of the transverse colon associated with torsion of the greater omentum. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165(5):1309. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.5.7572536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Singh AK, Alhilali LM, Gervais DA, Mueller PR. Omental infarct: an unusual CT appearance after superior mesenteric artery occlusion. Emerg Radiol. 2004;10(5):276–278. doi: 10.1007/s10140-004-0339-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Nee C-H, Huang C-W, Chou S-C. Omental inflammatory mass secondary to a migrating fish bone: A case report. 中華民國急救加護醫學會雜誌. 2011;22(1):40–8.
- 70.Helmrath MA, Dorfman SR, Minifee PK, Bloss RS, Brandt ML, DeBakey ME. Right lower quadrant pain in children caused by omental infarction. Am J Surg. 2001;182(6):729–732. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00825-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kimber CP, Westmore P, Hutson JM, Kelly JH. Primary omental torsion in children. J Paediatr Child Health. 1996;32(1):22–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1996.tb01535.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Almeida AT, Melao L, Viamonte B, Cunha R, Pereira JM. Epiploic appendagitis: an entity frequently unknown to clinicians—diagnostic imaging, pitfalls, and look-alikes. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(5):1243–1251. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Singh AK, Gervais DA, Hahn PF, Sagar P, Mueller PR, Novelline RA. Acute epiploic appendagitis and its mimics. Radiographics. 2005;25(6):1521–1534. doi: 10.1148/rg.256055030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Giambelluca D, Cannella R, Caruana G, Salvaggio L, Grassedonio E, Galia M, et al. CT imaging findings of epiploic appendagitis: an unusual cause of abdominal pain. Insights Imaging. 2019;10(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0715-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ghahremani GG, White EM, Hoff FL, Gore RM, Miller JW, Christ ML. Appendices epiploicae of the colon: radiologic and pathologic features. Radiographics. 1992;12(1):59–77. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.12.1.1734482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Pereira JM, Sirlin CB, Pinto PS, Jeffrey RB, Stella DL, Casola G. Disproportionate fat stranding: a helpful CT sign in patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiographics. 2004;24(3):703–715. doi: 10.1148/rg.243035084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Saad J, Mustafa HA, Elsani AM, Alharbi F, Alghamdi S. Primary epiploic appendagitis: reconciling CT and clinical challenges. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2014;33(5):420–426. doi: 10.1007/s12664-014-0466-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Singh AK, Gervais DA, Hahn PF, Rhea J, Mueller PR. CT appearance of acute appendagitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(5):1303–1307. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.5.1831303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Justaniah AI, Scholz FJ, Katz DS, Scheirey CD. Perigastric appendagitis: CT and clinical features in eight patients. Clin Radiol. 2014;69(12):e531–e537. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Maccallum C, Eaton S, Chubb D, Franzi S. Torsion of fatty appendage of falciform ligament: acute abdomen in a child. Case Reports in Radiology. 2015;2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 81.Oconnor A, Sabri S, Solkar M, Ramzan A, Solkar M. Falciform ligament torsion as a rare aetiology of the acute abdomen. Journal of Surgical Case Reports. 2022;2022(1):rjab150. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjab150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Albayram F, Hamper UM. Ovarian and adnexal torsion: spectrum of sonographic findings with pathologic correlation. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20(10):1083–1089. doi: 10.7863/jum.2001.20.10.1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Breech LL, Hillard PJ. Adnexal torsion in pediatric and adolescent girls. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17(5):483–489. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000179666.39548.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Duigenan S, Oliva E, Lee SI. Ovarian torsion: diagnostic features on CT and MRI with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(2):W122–W131. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.7293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Graif M, Shalev J, Strauss S, Engelberg S, Mashiach S, Itzchak Y. Torsion of the ovary: sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984;143(6):1331–1334. doi: 10.2214/ajr.143.6.1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Stark JE, Siegel MJ. Ovarian torsion in prepubertal and pubertal girls: sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163(6):1479–1482. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.6.7992751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Bennett GL, Slywotzky CM, Giovanniello G. Gynecologic causes of acute pelvic pain: spectrum of CT findings. Radiographics. 2002;22(4):785–801. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.22.4.g02jl18785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Kawahara Y, Fukuda T, Futagawa S, Sakamoto I, Takao M, Kinoshita Y, et al. Intravascular gas within an ovarian tumor: a CT sign of ovarian torsion. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20(1):154–156. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199601000-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, Jung JI, Choi BG, Kim BS, et al. CT and MR imaging features of adnexal torsion. Radiographics. 2002;22(2):283–294. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.22.2.g02mr02283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Petkovska I, Duke E, Martin DR, Irani Z, Geffre CP, Cragun JM, et al. MRI of ovarian torsion: Correlation of imaging features with the presence of perifollicular hemorrhage and ovarian viability. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(11):2064–2071. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Duigenan S, Oliva E, Lee SI. Ovarian torsion: diagnostic features on CT and MRI with pathologic correlation. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2012;198(2):W122–W131. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.7293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Chang HC, Bhatt S, Dogra VS. Pearls and pitfalls in diagnosis of ovarian torsion. Radiographics. 2008;28(5):1355–1368. doi: 10.1148/rg.285075130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Alexander LF, Caserta MP, Baden K, Livingston D, Cernigliaro JG, Bhatt S. Absent, abnormal, or reduced flow in the testis: thinking beyond torsion. RadioGraphics. 2020;40(2):529–530. doi: 10.1148/rg.2020190111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Cassidy FH, Ishioka KM, McMahon CJ, Chu P, Sakamoto K, Lee KS, et al. MR imaging of scrotal tumors and pseudotumors. Radiographics. 2010;30(3):665–683. doi: 10.1148/rg.303095049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Fernández-Pérez GC, Tardáguila FM, Velasco M, Rivas C, Dos Santos J, Cambronero J, et al. Radiologic findings of segmental testicular infarction. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2005;184(5):1587–1593. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.5.01841587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Dellabianca C, Bonardi M, Alessi S. Testicular ischemia after inguinal hernia repair. Journal of Ultrasound. 2011;14(4):205–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jus.2011.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Olson MC, Lubner MG, Menias CO, Mellnick VM, Mankowski Gettle L, Kim DH, et al. Venous thrombosis and hypercoagulability in the abdomen and pelvis: causes and imaging findings. RadioGraphics. 2020:190097. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 98.Bhayana R, Som A, Li MD, Carey DE, Anderson MA, Blake MA, et al. Abdominal imaging findings in COVID-19: preliminary observations. Radiology. 2020;297(1):E207–E215. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Besutti G, Bonacini R, Iotti V, Marini G, Riva N, Dolci G, et al. Abdominal visceral infarction in 3 patients with COVID-19. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2020;26(8):1926. doi: 10.3201/eid2608.201161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Mondal S, Quintili AL, Karamchandani K, Bose S. Thromboembolic disease in COVID-19 patients: a brief narrative review. Journal of Intensive Care. 2020;8(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s40560-020-00483-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Harvey RL, Doberneck RC, Black WC., III Infarction of the stomach following atheromatous embolization: report of a case and literature review. Gastroenterology. 1972;62(3):469–472. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(72)80155-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Cohen EB. Infarction of the stomach: report of three cases of total gastric infarction and one case of partial infarction. The American Journal of Medicine. 1951;11(5):645–652. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(51)90096-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Park DH, Kwon T-H, Cho HD, Park JH, Lee S-H, Park S-H, et al. Pancreatic infarction resulting from cholesterol crystal embolism mimicking a solid pancreatic tumor. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2008;67(1):176–178. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Matsukuma S, Suda K. Pancreatic Ischemic Lesions. Pancreas-Pathological Practice and Research: Karger Publishers; 2007. p. 36–44.
- 105.Nino-Murcia M, Friedland GW. Bladder infarct. Urologic Radiology. 1988;9(1):234–236. doi: 10.1007/BF02932674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.