Skip to main content
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
. 2023 Mar 6;17:1105247. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1105247

The neuroprotective effects of targeting key factors of neuronal cell death in neurodegenerative diseases: The role of ER stress, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation

Mohammad Sobhan Karvandi 1, Farzam Sheikhzadeh Hesari 2, Amir Reza Aref 3, Majid Mahdavi 2,4,*
PMCID: PMC10025411  PMID: 36950516

Abstract

Neuronal loss is one of the striking causes of various central nervous system (CNS) disorders, including major neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Huntington’s disease (HD), and Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Although these diseases have different features and clinical manifestations, they share some common mechanisms of disease pathology. Progressive regional loss of neurons in patients is responsible for motor, memory, and cognitive dysfunctions, leading to disabilities and death. Neuronal cell death in neurodegenerative diseases is linked to various pathways and conditions. Protein misfolding and aggregation, mitochondrial dysfunction, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and activation of the innate immune response are the most critical hallmarks of most common neurodegenerative diseases. Thus, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation are the major pathological factors of neuronal cell death. Even though the exact mechanisms are not fully discovered, the notable role of mentioned factors in neuronal loss is well known. On this basis, researchers have been prompted to investigate the neuroprotective effects of targeting underlying pathways to determine a promising therapeutic approach to disease treatment. This review provides an overview of the role of ER stress, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation in neuronal cell death, mainly discussing the neuroprotective effects of targeting pathways or molecules involved in these pathological factors.

Keywords: neurodegenerative diseases, cell death, ER stress, UPR – unfolded protein response, oxidative stress, ROS, neuroinflammation

Introduction

Neurodegenerative diseases are nervous system disorders in which millions of people, especially the elderly, are being affected worldwide. The rising prevalence of these diseases has put the world with a serious challenge (Bloem et al., 2021; Milošević et al., 2021). Despite the developments in this field of study and advancements in pharmacological aspects, there is not a promising drug to consummately cure neurodegenerative diseases yet (Pohl and Kong Thoo Lin, 2018). However, there are still so many studies to alleviate disease symptoms and extend life span (Breijyeh and Karaman, 2020). Neurodegenerative diseases are mostly characterized by toxic protein aggregates with abnormal conformation within neurons or neuroglia, leading to memory, cognitive, and/or movement disorders (Dugger and Dickson, 2017). These diseases include a wide range of neurological disorders, but the major types are Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Huntington’s disease (HD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS; Lezi and Swerdlow, 2012). Protein misfolding and accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) and phosphorylated Tau is the major pathological feature in AD, as well as α-synuclein in PD, and mutant superoxide dismutase 1 (mSOD1) in ALS (Ghemrawi and Khair, 2020). Clinical manifestations in these kinds of diseases mainly occur as a consequence of neuron dysfunction or neuronal cell death (Andreone et al., 2020). Besides apoptosis, depending on the conditions, other different types of cell deaths, such as ferroptosis, necroptosis, and parthanatos are also possible to affect cell fidelity (Wang et al., 2018; Ferrada et al., 2020; Reichert et al., 2020; David et al., 2022; Mangalmurti and Lukens, 2022). The mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) play crucial role in the occurrence of neuronal cell death among many other organelles (Gorman et al., 2012; Johnson et al., 2021; Markovinovic et al., 2022). Mitochondria are dynamic organelles that participate in producing energy and maintaining cellular redox balance, among many other functions (Johri and Beal, 2012). Therefore, mitochondrial dysfunction, including excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, mitochondrial calcium overload, loss of the mitochondrial membrane potential leading to release of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF), and other pro-apoptotic factors could lead to caspase activation and cell death (Culmsee and Plesnila, 2006; Kaminskyy and Zhivotovsky, 2014; Hoffmann et al., 2021). Evidence also reveals that mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations are present in patients with neurodegeneration (Johri and Beal, 2012). Also, aberrant ROS production and imbalance in antioxidant activity could influence mitochondria and impair mitochondria’s function, leading cells to death (Angelova and Abramov, 2018; Doroudian et al., 2021), which is explained in the following sections. Of note, ROS can also contribute to the production of protein aggregates and exacerbate disease pathology (Van Dam and Dansen, 2020).

On the other hand, the ER is a large and dynamic organelle responsible for protein folding and maturation. Once a protein folds with an abnormal conformation, the misfolded protein enters the ER-associated degradation (ERAD) pathway to prevent the following plausible detrimental effects of the protein (Schwarz and Blower, 2016). Aberrant misfolded proteins or aggregates can potentially trigger the process “Unfolded Protein Response” (UPR) to attenuate ER stress or initiate apoptosis pathways (Schwarz and Blower, 2016). UPR has three signaling arms, including IRE1-α, PERK, and ATF6, which are highly conserved pathways (Shi et al., 2022). However, toxic protein aggregates may also undergo degradation by lysosomes (i.e., autophagy), to ameliorate disease progression (Djajadikerta et al., 2020). Autophagy is able to activate or inhibit the apoptosis signaling to maintain intracellular balance or induce neuronal cell death (Gupta R. et al., 2021). All three UPR arms, Ca2+ release, and oxidative stress can directly or indirectly activate autophagy induction (Andhavarapu et al., 2019; Ramirez-Moreno et al., 2019; Ren et al., 2021). Although protein aggregates are the key reasons for the pathology of neurodegenerative diseases, other factors, including activation of glutamate ionotropic receptors, excitotoxicity from dysregulation of neuronal calcium homeostasis, dysfunction of lysosomes, aberrant cell-cycle re-entry, and impairments in axonal transport and synaptic function can also contribute to neuronal injury or death in various neurodegenerative diseases such as AD and PD (Emerit et al., 2004; Fricker et al., 2018; Sushma and Mondal, 2019; Behl et al., 2021; Hoffmann et al., 2021). In addition, increased levels of inflammatory factors in the serum and brain tissue, known as neuroinflammation, participates in the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases (Calsolaro and Edison, 2016). Emerging evidence indicates that neuroinflammation can be the cause and consequence of both ER stress and oxidative stress (Salminen et al., 2009; Sochocka et al., 2013; Pintado et al., 2017). A neurotoxic microenvironment caused by the activation of microglial cells and release of cytotoxic inflammatory factors in the CNS can affect cell fidelity and induce neuronal cell death (Behl et al., 2021; Wu and Zou, 2022). This can be carried out by triggering pyroptosis, an inflammasome-mediated type of cell death (Kovacs and Miao, 2017). However, the undeniable contribution of age, genetics, and environmental factors in the disruption of neuronal homeostasis and subsequently neuronal cell death cannot be discounted (Bejanin et al., 2017).

There have been clinical trials targeting neuropathological hallmarks of neurodegenerative diseases, investigating glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists, monoclonal antibodies against toxic protein aggregates, antioxidant agents, beta-secretase (BACE1) inhibitors and other receptor inhibitors such as 5HT-6 serotonin receptor inhibitor (Table 1, Hung and Fu, 2017). The results were controversial, as there was no evidence of beneficial effect on patients’ cognitive and functional status in most trials; while in some cases the condition of patients who received drugs worsened, compared with those who received placebo (Table 1, Egan et al., 2019). These results indicate that novel agents with different features must be studied and trialled. Given the complex interplay of ER stress, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation in the pathology of most neurodegenerative diseases, developments in the knowledge of underlying mechanisms may be crucial for researchers to propose a promising therapeutic strategy to achieve a more efficient treatment for neurodegenerative diseases.

Table 1.

Clinical trials associated with neurodegenerative diseases.

Trial Identification Drug used Drug description Delivery route Disease Phase Status Results
NCT03659682 Semaglutide GLP-1R agonistprevents neurons from apoptosis, alleviates oxidative stress and neuroinflammation (Chen et al., 2023) Subcutaneous PD II Not yet recruiting NA
NCT03439943 Lixisenatide GLP-1R agonist prevents neurons from apoptosis, alleviates oxidative stress and neuroinflammation (Chen et al., 2023) Subcutaneous PD II Unknown NA
NCT04305002 Exenatide GLP-1R agonist prevents neurons from apoptosis, alleviates oxidative stress and neuroinflammation (Chen et al., 2023) Subcutaneous PD II Active, not recruiting NA
NCT04232969 Bydureon (Exenatide) GLP-1R agonist prevents neurons from apoptosis, alleviates oxidative stress and neuroinflammation (Chen et al., 2023) Subcutaneous PD III Active, not recruiting NA
NCT04154072 NLY01 a pegylated form of exenatide (Lv et al., 2021) Subcutaneous PD II Active, not recruiting NA
NCT04269642 PT320 sustained-release Exenatide (Li et al., 2019) Subcutaneous PD II Active, not recruiting NA
NCT04777409 Semaglutide GLP-1R agonist prevents neurons from apoptosis, alleviates oxidative stress and neuroinflammation (Chen et al., 2023) Oral AD III Recruiting NA
NCT02953665 Liraglutide GLP-1R agonist prevents neurons from apoptosis, alleviates oxidative stress and neuroinflammation (Chen et al., 2023) Subcutaneous PD II Completed NA
NCT00004731 Coenzyme Q10 An antioxidant involved in electron transport chain (Gherardi et al., 2022) NA PD II Completed NA
NCT00608881 Coenzyme Q10 An antioxidant involved in electron transport chain (Gherardi et al., 2022) Oral HD III Terminated CoQ had no effect on avoiding functional decline in HD patients (Mcgarry et al., 2017)
NCT01892176 Coenzyme Q10 An antioxidant involved in electron transport chain (Gherardi et al., 2022) Oral PD II and III Completed NA
NCT00243932 Coenzyme Q10 An antioxidant involved in electron transport chain (Gherardi et al., 2022) Oral ALS II Completed Showed insufficient promise to warrant phase III testing (Kaufmann et al., 2009)
NCT00740714 Coenzyme Q10 with VitE VitE: a fat-soluble antioxidant (Blaner et al., 2021) Oral PD III Terminated No evidence of benefit
NCT00076492 CoQ10 and GPI 1485 GPI 1485: a neuroimmunophilin ligand (Poulter et al., 2004) NA PD II Completed NA
NCT03514875 MitoQ A mitochondrial reactive oxygen species scavenger (Piscianz et al., 2021) Oral AD NA Withdrawn NA
NCT00329056 MitoQ A mitochondrial reactive oxygen species scavenger (Piscianz et al., 2021) Oral PD II Completed NA
NCT04777331 Prasinezumab Humanized monoclonal antibody against aggregated α-synuclein (Pagano et al., 2022) Intravenous (IV) infusion PD II Recruiting NA
NCT03114657 Crenezumab Monoclonal antibody against Aβ (Avgerinos et al., 2021) Intravenous (IV) infusion AD III Terminated Could not reduce clinical decline in participants with early AD (Ostrowitzki et al., 2022)
NCT03491150 Crenezumab Monoclonal antibody against Aβ (Avgerinos et al., 2021) Intravenous (IV) infusion AD III Terminated Crenezumab was unlikely to meet its primary endpoint
NCT00676143 Bapineuzumab Monoclonal antibody against Aβ (Avgerinos et al., 2021) Intravenous (IV) infusion AD III Terminated Phase 3 studies showed no clinical benefit
NCT00606476 Bapineuzumab Monoclonal antibody against Aβ (Avgerinos et al., 2021) Intravenous (IV) infusion AD II Terminated NA
NCT01656525 Gantenerumab Monoclonal antibody against Aβ (Avgerinos et al., 2021) Subcutaneous AD I Completed NA
NCT02051608 Gantenerumab Monoclonal antibody against Aβ (Avgerinos et al., 2021) Subcutaneous AD III Completed Gantenerumab doses up to 1200 mg resulted in robust amyloid-β plaque removal at 2 years (Klein et al., 2019)
NCT04374253 Gantenerumab Monoclonal antibody against Aβ (Avgerinos et al., 2021) Subcutaneous AD III Active, not recruiting NA
NCT03444870 Gantenerumab Monoclonal antibody against Aβ (Avgerinos et al., 2021) Subcutaneous AD III Active, not recruiting NA
NCT03443973 Gantenerumab Monoclonal antibody against Aβ (Avgerinos et al., 2021) Subcutaneous AD III Active, not recruiting NA
NCT05310071 Aducanumab Monoclonal antibody against Aβ (Dhillon, 2021) Intravenous (IV) infusion AD III Recruiting NA
NCT03639987 Aducanumab Monoclonal antibody against Aβ (Dhillon, 2021) Intravenous (IV) infusion AD II Terminated Study was discontinued based on futility analysis conducted on Phase III trials
NCT05108922 Aducanumab, Donanemab Monoclonal antibody against Aβ (Decourt et al., 2021) Intravenous (IV) infusion AD III Active, not recruiting NA
NCT03582137 Cannabidiol A major constituent of Cannabis sativa L. (Karimi-Haghighi et al., 2022) Oral PD II Completed NA
NCT01502046 Sativex Contains Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol in a 1:1 molecular ratio (Cristino et al., 2020) Oromucosal Spray HD II Completed No significant molecular effects were detected on the biomarker analysis No significant symptomatic effects were detected at the prescribed dosage and for a 12-week period (López-Sendón Moreno et al., 2016)
NCT04075435 High CBD/low THC sublingual solution CBD: Cannabidiol THC: Tetrahydrocannabinol Sublingual AD Early phase I Recruiting NA
NCT02783573 Lanabecestat (AZD3293) BACE1 inhibitor (Patel et al., 2022) Oral AD III Terminated Did not slow cognitive or functional decline (Wessels et al., 2020)
NCT02245737 Lanabecestat (AZD3293) BACE1 inhibitor (Patel et al., 2022) Oral AD II and III Terminated Did not slow cognitive or functional decline (Wessels et al., 2020)
NCT02956486 Elenbecestat (E2609) BACE1 inhibitor (Patel et al., 2022) Oral AD III Terminated No evidence of potential efficacy, and the adverse event profile of E2609 being worse than placebo
NCT01600859 Elenbecestat (E2609) BACE1 inhibitor (Patel et al., 2022) Oral AD I Completed NA
NCT01496170 Verubecestat (MK-8931) BACE1 inhibitor (Patel et al., 2022) Oral AD I Completed NA
NCT01739348 Verubecestat (MK-8931) BACE1 inhibitor (Patel et al., 2022) Oral AD II and III Terminated Did not reduce cognitive or functional decline in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease (Egan et al., 2018)
NCT01953601 Verubecestat (MK-8931) BACE1 inhibitor (Patel et al., 2022) Oral AD III Terminated Cognition and daily function were worse among patients who received verubecestat than among those who received placebo Did not improve clinical ratings of dementia among patients with prodromal Alzheimer’s disease (Egan et al., 2019)
NCT01689246 TRx0237 Tau aggregation inhibitor (Hung and Fu, 2017) Oral AD III Completed No evidence of benefits for patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease (Gauthier et al., 2016)
NCT03539380 TRx0237 Tau aggregation inhibitor (Hung and Fu, 2017) NA AD NA Available NA
NCT02585934 Intepirdine (RVT-101) and donepezil Intepirdine: 5HT-6 serotonin receptor inhibitor (Hung and Fu, 2017) Donepezil: acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (Marucci et al., 2021) Oral AD III Completed Did not produce statistical improvement over placebo on cognition or activities of daily living in mild-to-moderate AD dementia patients (Lang et al., 2021)

ER stress-induced cell death in neurodegenerative diseases

Mechanism of ER stress-induced apoptotic cell death

The ER is known as an organelle involved in protein maturation and folding (Read and Schröder, 2021). Toxic protein aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases, pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), ROS, and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), can disrupt protein folding processes in the ER lumen, leading to ER stress (Zhang and Kaufman, 2008). In the condition of ER stress, the aggregation of unfolded or misfolded proteins within the ER lumen of neurons and neuroglia leads to failure of ER in maintaining protein homeostasis through UPR and ERAD. For instance, accumulation of tau protein in AD can affect essential components of ERAD and block this pathway, leading to the accumulation of more misfolded proteins in the ER lumen (Hetz and Saxena, 2017; Ghemrawi and Khair, 2020). Subsequently, UPR-dependent inflammation and apoptotic pathways are induced, resulting in neuronal cell death (Sprenkle et al., 2017; Ghemrawi and Khair, 2020). The ER stress can also be induced by ER Ca2+ dysregulation, impairments in vesicular trafficking, or any defects in UPR components (Cooper et al., 2006; Sprenkle et al., 2017). PKR-like ER kinase (PERK), inositol-requiring transmembrane kinase/endoribonuclease 1 α (IRE1α), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) are three vital sensor proteins that are involved in UPR regulation (Ghemrawi and Khair, 2020). Under normal conditions, these proteins are inactive due to association with ER chaperone proteins such as Immunoglobulin binding protein (BiP) or 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78), which are members of heat shock protein families (Halperin et al., 2014).

Under ER stress conditions, the misfolded proteins interact with the substrate binding domain of BiP. Consequently, BiP is released and leads to dimerization and auto-phosphorylation of PERK, as well as intramembrane proteolysis of ATF6 and phosphorylation of IRE1α. Subsequently, the UPR cascade activates to maintain protein homeostasis (Ghemrawi and Khair, 2020). To elaborate, the phosphorylation of the alpha subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF2α) followed by activation of PERK occurs through BiP dissociation. This process inhibits protein synthesis to prevent overload of proteins in the ER lumen (Hetz and Saxena, 2017; Almeida et al., 2022), therefore attempting to restore protein homeostasis (Da Silva et al., 2020). Besides, under prolonged ER stress conditions and failure in the UPR mechanism, p-eIF2α promotes activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) translation, which enhances up-regulation of pro-apoptotic factors, including CHOP (also known as GADD153; Ghemrawi and Khair, 2020). Eventually, down-regulation of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family makes neurons more susceptible to death (Doyle et al., 2011; Hetz and Saxena, 2017; Da Silva et al., 2020; Figure 1A). Moreover, it has been claimed that TRB3 genes, GADD34, death receptor 5 (DR5), ER oxidase 1 (ERO1), and other apoptotic molecules can potentially receive apoptosis signals from CHOP and induce cell death (Taalab et al., 2018; Da Silva et al., 2020). ATF4 also induces transcription of the p53-upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA), which results in ER-stress-induced neuronal apoptosis (Galehdar et al., 2010). Interestingly, experiments have indicated that CHOP could not induce apoptosis in PUMA-deficient neurons, demonstrating the key role of PUMA in CHOP-induced neuronal apoptosis (Galehdar et al., 2010). Moreover, in IRE1-α signaling pathway, the second arm of UPR, after the release of BiP by aggregated proteins, IRE1-α undergoes oligomerization and auto-phosphorylation. p-IRE1α facilitates neuronal death by activation of the apoptotic-signaling kinase-1 (ASK1) and other apoptotic factors as a result of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) pathways activation (Ghemrawi and Khair, 2020). This pathway may induce p53 activation and lead to the upregulation of Bcl-2 associated X (BAX) protein, which triggers the release of cytochrome C (Cyt C) from the mitochondria to the cytosol and cause apoptotic neuronal cell death (Stefani et al., 2012). Furthermore, the RNase activity of IRE1α plays a critical role in splicing the mRNA coding for X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1) and increases the expression of genes involved in ER machinery, such as BiP (Lee et al., 2003; Hirota et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2022). Besides outlined functions, IRE1α participates in the degradation of some mRNAs and microRNAs, known as “regulated IRE1α-dependent decay” (RIDD; Hetz and Saxena, 2017; Figure 1B). Mutations in Presenilin 1 and 2 (PS1 and PS2), which are frequently involved in AD, can inhibit IRE1 and impair UPR, leading to AD pathology and neuronal cell death (Doyle et al., 2011). ATF6 is the third sensor protein of UPR cascades which is embedded in the ER membrane. By interaction of aggregated proteins with ATF6 in the ER lumen and release of BiP, ATF6 translocates to the Golgi apparatus and undergoes proteolysis. Subsequently, cleaved ATF6 induces transcription of ER chaperones and XBP1 in the nucleus and participates in protein homeostasis (Da Silva et al., 2020; Figure 1C).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The role of three arms of UPR in inducing apoptosis and the neuroprotective effects of particular inhibitors (shown in yellow box). (A) The PERK pathway: interaction of substrate binding domain of BiP with misfolded or aggregated proteins leads to BiP dissociation, dimerization, and autophosphorylation of PERK, which further causes eIF2α phosphorylation. Phosphorylated eIF2α induces cell death by transcription of apoptotic factors by means of ATF4 transcription factor as well as inhibition of protein synthesis. (B) The IRE1 pathway: after dissociation of BiP from IRE1 receptor by misfolded or aggregated proteins in the ER lumen, IRE1 undergoes oligomerization and autophosphorylation. This results in mRNA degradation termed “regulated IRE1alpha-dependent decay” (RIDD) and inducing apoptotic factors by initiating JNK/MAPK cascade. To mitigate ER stress, the IRE1 pathway also leads to XBP1 mRNA splicing to transcript ER chaperones to improve ER machinery. (C) The ATF6 pathway: translocation of ATF6 to the Golgi apparatus as a result of BiP dissociation, and the proteolysis of ATF6 in Golgi brings out an activated ATF6 transcription factor to transcript ER chaperones and XBP1 for ER machinery.

ER stress-associated alterations of apoptotic factors

In AD, Aβ can trigger ER stress, mitochondrial fragmentation, and neuronal death through ER Ca2+ release by ryanodine receptors (RyRs) and inositol triphosphate receptors (IP3R; Chami and Checler, 2020). Based on studies, overexpression of RyRs contributed to Ca2+ dysregulation in AD mouse models and cell lines. In addition, increase in IP3 receptor-mediated Ca2+ signaling was indicated in AD patients’ fibroblast cells (Callens et al., 2021). Aβ oligomer-dependent ER stress responses can subsequently activate different kinases which phosphorylate specific epitopes on tau leading to the development of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) and propagating AD pathology (Sprenkle et al., 2017). Aβ peptides can activate ASK1 and JNK pathways, which can subsequently mediate ER stress-induced apoptosis (Ghemrawi and Khair, 2020). Both ASK1 and JNK were reported to be upregulated in transgenic mouse brains and post-mortem AD samples, respectively (Galvan et al., 2007; Sbodio et al., 2019). It has been revealed that CHOP activation plays a crucial role in the triggering and progression of pathological hallmarks of AD. In agreement, CHOP and its downstream effectors, including caspase-12 and GADD34, are markedly upregulated in the brains of AD patients (Ghemrawi and Khair, 2020). In addition, phosphorylated forms of PERK and eIF2α were significantly increased in the hippocampal pyramidal cells and frontal cortex of AD patients (Stutzbach et al., 2013). The evidence also shows that ER chaperones, including BiP, are also upregulated in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and AD brains (Ghemrawi and Khair, 2020).

Mutations in PARK7, a gene involved in familial PD, might activate ASK1-induced neuronal death in PD. This can be due to the dysfunction in protecting against the Daxx-ASK1 cell death axis, which plays a key role in the completion of signaling pathways from cell surface death receptors (Chang et al., 1998; Homma et al., 2009). In addition, upregulation of ER stress markers, such as GRP78, p-PERK, and p-eIF2α in dopaminergic (DA) neurons of post-mortem PD samples (Shi et al., 2022), demonstrate their function in initiating apoptosis pathways, which could cause serious clinical implications. According to evidence, upregulation in ER stress markers, including BiP and CHOP in post-mortem HD brains, may be associated with neuronal death in HD (Shi et al., 2022). Mutation in genes such as SOD1, a gene encoding Superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), can also induce ER stress in neurons in ALS and cause neuronal damages (Sprenkle et al., 2017). ALS-associated mutations in vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein B (VAPB) can physically interact with ATF6 and disturb its natural function (Hetz and Saxena, 2017). Patients with ALS-associated VAPB mutations indicated malfunctions in Ca2+ signaling and storage, excessive ER stress, and neuronal death as a result of inhibition of ATF6 (Ghemrawi and Khair, 2020). Furthermore, upregulation of PERK, IRE1α, and ATF6 was found in the ALS mouse models (Ghemrawi and Khair, 2020; Zhao et al., 2022).

Targeting ER stress-induced apoptotic cell death

According to the critical role of ER stress in the occurrence of neuronal cell death in neurodegenerative diseases, targeting associated pathways seem to have hopeful effects on protecting neurons from death (Figure 1). Among three arms of UPR in ER stress conditions, the PERK pathway is the most well-studied in the neuroprotective effects of inhibition of ER stress. In parallel with this, Salubrinal, an anti-ER stress compound, has been well investigated in neurodegenerative disease pathology and treatment (Gupta S. et al., 2021; Ajoolabady et al., 2022). Salubrinal is an activator of UPR, which raises ER chaperone levels, including BiP. It inhibits eIF2α dephosphorylation which can attenuate neuronal death by interfering with death-related signaling pathways, including ATF4 or ASK1 (Figure 1, Table 2; Niso-Santano et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2014; Sprenkle et al., 2017). Accumulating evidence indicates that Salubrinal reduced ER accumulation of α-synuclein and significantly protected against α-synuclein-mediated dopaminergic (DA) neuronal death in transgenic mouse models (Colla et al., 2012). Also, Salubrinal reduced the accumulation of mutant huntingtin (mHTT) by upregulation of BiP and p-eIF2α, and prevent neuronal cell death (Maity et al., 2022). In addition, the drug Adaptaquin blocks Tribbles pseudokinase 3 (Trib3) induction by inhibiting ATF4 and CHOP activity probably through an eIF2α-independent mechanism, leading to neuronal protection in mouse models of PD (Figure 1, Table 2). More investigation is required for the neuroprotective effects of Adaptaquin in ER stress-induced neuronal cell death (Karuppagounder et al., 2016; Aime et al., 2020). Moreover, the PKR inhibitor “C16” can reduce transcriptional induction of pro-apoptotic target genes of ATF4, such as CHOP, Trib3, and PUMA (Figure 1, Table 2). This could significantly reduce MPP+ and 6-OHDA neurotoxin-induced neuronal cell death in PD models (Demmings et al., 2021). According to the experimental study, PUMA expression can be downregulated by directly targeting CHOP to decrease ER stress-induced neuronal apoptosis (Galehdar et al., 2010). Notably, pharmacological inhibition of ATF4, using imidazole-oxindole PKR inhibitor, indicated neuroprotection against neurotoxin-induced cell death in PD models (Demmings et al., 2021). Comparing motor neuron death in ATF4-ablated transgenic ALS mouse models with those expressing normal levels of ATF4 demonstrated the possible role of ATF4 ablation in neuroprotection against ALS by reducing apoptosis components, including CHOP (Matus et al., 2013). Likewise, another study revealed an increase in neuronal death in PD rat models by overexpression of ATF4 using recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus (rAAV; Gully et al., 2016). Halliday et al. (2017) revealed the inhibition of UPR-induced p-eIF2α signaling and neuronal survival by two chemical compounds termed “Trazodone” and “dibenzoylmethane” (DBM) in prion-infected mice (Figure 1, Table 2), presumably by reversing translational attenuation and lowering levels of ATF4 and CHOP which needs to be more inquired in other neurodegenerative diseases including AD and PD. Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that PERK inhibitor GSK2606414 (Figure 1, Table 2), despite its pancreatic toxicity (Halliday et al., 2015), inhibits and reduces PERK expression, which has a neuroprotective effect on DA neurons in Substantia Nigra pars compacta (SNpc) of PD mouse models, and improves the motor performance and neuronal excitability of PD mice (Mercado et al., 2018). In addition, inhibition of PERK signaling with IRSIB has been investigated in ALS rodent models, and a reduction in ATF4 and CHOP levels has been indicated (Figure 1, Table 2), which results in significant neuronal survival. In the same study, a reduction in IRE1-dependent signaling has also been indicated (Halliday et al., 2015, 2017).

Table 2.

The function and target molecules of drugs tested in neurodegenerative disease models in different cellular stress conditions.

Condition Drug name Target Molecule(s) Function Reference
ER stress Salubrinal ATF4 Inhibit transcription of apoptotic factors Kim et al. (2014) and Ghemrawi and Khair (2020)
Salubrinal ASK1 Prevent apoptosis by affecting downstream molecules of JNK/MAPK pathway Ghemrawi and Khair (2020)
Adaptaquin ATF4 Inhibit transcription of apoptotic factors Aime et al. (2020)
C16 ATF4 Inhibit transcription of apoptotic factorsreduce neuronal death caused by neurotoxins Demmings et al. (2021)
Trazodone p-eIF2α Decrease ATF4 levels Halliday et al. (2017)
Dibenzoylmethane p-eIF2α Decrease ATF4 levels Halliday et al. (2017)
GSK2606414 PERK Inhibit PERK pathway by preventing the phosphorylation of eIF2α Mercado et al. (2018)
IRSIB PERK Reduce ATF4 and CHOP levels Halliday et al. (2015) and Halliday et al. (2017)
KIRA6 IRE1 Break IRE1 oligomersinhibit RNase activity of IRE1 Ghosh et al. (2014)
Kaempferol ATF6, IRE1, PERK, CHOP Reduce the expression of mentioned factors Abdullah and Ravanan (2018)
DHCR24 BiP, CHOP Reduce the expression of mentioned factorsattenuate apoptotic signaling pathways Lu X. et al. (2014)
xestospongin C IP3R Regulate Ca2+ homeostasis Wang et al. (2019)
Ryanodine RyR Regulate Ca2+ homeostasis Adasme et al. (2015)
4-Phenyl Butyric acid Unfolded protein Interaction between hydrophobic regions of the chaperone and hydrophobic regions of the unfolded protein Pao et al. (2021)
Oxidative stress Humanin Pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family Inhibit CytC and AIF release Ma and Liu (2018) and Hazafa et al. (2021)
L-NAT Caspase Inhibit CytC and AIF releaseinhibit caspase activity Li et al. (2015) and Sirianni et al. (2015)
NAS NA Increase antioxidant levels Yoo et al. (2017)
CoQ10 Mitochondrial permeability transition pore Inhibit CytC and AIF release Young et al. (2007) and Akanji et al. (2021)
Diphenyleneiodonium NADPH oxidase Inhibit ROS production by NOX activity Chocry and Leloup (2020)
Apocynin NADPH oxidase Inhibit ROS production by NOX activity Chocry and Leloup (2020)
VAS2870 NADPH oxidase Inhibit ROS production by NOX activity Chocry and Leloup (2020)
Aucubin Nrf2 Regulating mitochondrial membrane potential and decreasing ROS generation Wang et al. (2020) and Li Y. C. et al. (2021)
Salidroside Pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family caspase Inhibit CytC and AIF release inhibit caspase activation Wang et al. (2015)
Borneol pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family Inhibit Cyt C and AIF release Hur et al. (2013)
[6]-Gingerol Free radicals Scavenge free radicals and decrease phospholipid peroxidation Lee et al. (2011)
Isoorientin GSK-3β Blocks GSK-3β via an ATP noncompetitive inhibition to attenuate tau hyperphosphorylation Liang et al. (2016)
Neuroinflammation Rosmarinic acid miR-155-5p Attenuate inflammation by miR-155–5p regulation Lv et al. (2020)
Alpha1-antitrypsin Calpain Inhibit calpain activity Feng et al. (2020)
Alpha1-antitrypsin NA Attenuate microglial inflammation Feng et al. (2020)
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate NA Attenuate neuroinflammation Cheng C.-Y. et al. (2021)
Aucubin NF-κB, JNK, p38, and ERK Reduce phosphorylation levels of mentioned factors to decrease inflammatory factor overexpression Li Y. C. et al. (2021)
Hesperetin TLR4, NF-κB ERK, p38 MAPK Modulate TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway downregulate the phosphorylation of ERK and p38 MAPK Jo et al. (2019) and Muhammad et al. (2019)
15d-PGJ2 PPAR-γ Inhibit production of interleukins Xu et al. (2008)
Anakinra IL-1 Inhibit pyroptosis mediated by IL-1β Wang et al. (2019)
GW501516 PPAR-β/δ Attenuate NLRP3-mediated neuroinflammation Chen et al. (2019) and Altinoz et al. (2021)
MCC950 NLRP3 inflammasome Inhibit inflammasome activation Gordon et al. (2018) and Deora et al. (2020)
Dihydromyricetin (DHM) NLRP3 inflammasome Inhibit inflammasome activation Feng et al. (2018)
Benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) IL-1β, NLRP3 inflammasome Inhibition of IL-1β release and NLRP3 inflammasome Lee et al. (2016)
Dopamine Dopamine D1 receptor The binding of cAMP with NLRP3 and NLRP3 degradation Yan et al. (2015)
Baicalein NLRP3 inflammasome, Caspase Decreasing pro-inflammatory cytokines production Rui et al. (2020)
Resveratrol NF-κB Decrease phosphorylation of NF-κB Inhibit microglial activation (Zhong et al. (2012), Zhang et al. (2017), and Huang et al. (2021)

Inhibition of the IRE1 pathway is also a possible way to attenuate neuronal cell death. For instance, Kinase-Inhibiting RNase Attenuator 6 (KIRA6) inhibits apoptosis by breaking IRE1 oligomers and inhibiting RNase activity of IRE1α (Figure 1, Table 2; Ghosh et al., 2014). Given the vital role of ASK1 in IRE1-mediated UPR and inducing apoptosis, targeting and deletion of ASK1 in mutant SOD1-transgenic mice have been indicated to mitigate motor neuronal death (Homma et al., 2009). Additionally, evidence shows that overexpression of XBP1 protects DA neurons against neurotoxin-induced ER Stress-associated cell death (Valdes et al., 2014; Shi et al., 2022). Furthermore, upregulation of autophagy by targeting XBP1 in ALS and HD models is known to be another way of protection from neuronal cell death (Remondelli and Renna, 2017). The experiments have been demonstrated that ablation of ATF6 facilitates DA neuronal death caused by neurotoxins, including 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) and 1-methyl-4-phenyl-pyridinium (MPP+; Shi et al., 2022). This indicates the plausible role of the third arm of UPR pathways in inducing neuronal death. Kaempferol (Table 2), a plant-derived ER stress-induced cell death inhibitor, has also reduced the expression of ATF6, PERK, IRE1α, as well as CHOP in Brefeldin A (BFA)-induced ER stress in IMR32 cell lines. More investigations is needed to determine whether it is effective in animal and human neurodegenerative models (Abdullah and Ravanan, 2018). It is also claimed that 3β-Hydroxysteroid-Δ24 reductase (DHCR24) can protect neuronal cells by reducing BiP and CHOP levels and attenuating ER stress-specific apoptotic signaling pathways (Table 2; Lu X. et al., 2014). Targeting other indirect factors involved in ER stress, such as IP3 receptors and Ryanodine receptors, has also been examined. Remarkably, the first research confirming blocking Inositole triphosphate receptors (IP3Rs) and ryanodine receptors (RyRs) to decrease ER stress-induced Ca2+ dyshomeostasis in DA neurons revealed that a RyRs blocker (RY) markedly reduced 6-OHDA-induced cytosolic Ca2+ increases. In contrast, an IP3Rs blocker (Xes) had no considerable effect on cytosolic Ca2+ levels and neuronal cell death (Table 2). Moreover, pre-treatment with an ER stress inhibitor 4-phenyl butyric acid (4-PBA) had a neuroprotective effect on DA neurons from 6-OHDA-induced apoptosis (Table 2; Huang et al., 2017).

Oxidative stress-induced apoptotic cell death in neurodegenerative diseases

Mechanism of oxidative stress-induced apoptotic cell death

Healthy mitochondria produce ROS as a byproduct of oxidative phosphorylation mainly as signaling messengers (Hajam et al., 2022; Trushina et al., 2022), while defective mitochondria generate aberrant amounts of ROS and cause oxidative stress and suspend cellular homeostasis due to the disruption of the balance between ROS generation and antioxidant function (Figure 2; Höhn et al., 2020; Holubiec et al., 2022). Neurons are susceptible to produce free radicals due to being metabolically very active. Evidently, any pathological situation or dysfunction in neurons can generate excess ROS leading to oxidative stress (Bhat et al., 2015). Given that the metabolism rate of neurons is very high, the brain has a high oxygen consumption rate (20%–25% of the total body oxygen consumption). Furthermore, the high content of easily peroxidizable unsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and the relative paucity of antioxidant enzymes compared with other organs makes the brain vulnerable to free radical damage (Nunomura et al., 2007; Rocha et al., 2018). Therefore, the excessive production of ROS and RNS resulting from various factors, including calcium influx and mitochondrial dysfunction, can compromise cell fidelity and exacerbate disease progression. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide anion (O2), and highly reactive hydroxyl radical (HO) are the ROS involved in neurodegeneration. The RNS, such as nitric oxide (NO), are also found to have a deleterious effect on neurons (Singh et al., 2019; Korovesis et al., 2023).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cause and consequences of ROS production in the CNS and the neuroprotective effects of inhibitory factors (shown in yellow box).

ROS adversely affects the oxidation or peroxidation of specific macromolecules such as lipid peroxidation to malondialdehyde (MDA), protein carbonylation, and oxidation of specific nucleic acids (Singh et al., 2019). It has been claimed that ROS allows Cyt C and AIF to be released from the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) and initiate an apoptotic cascade (Figure 2; Bhat et al., 2015). The neural brain cells are enriched in PUFA, such as docosahexaenoic acid, arachidonic acid, and cardiolipin, which makes cells susceptible to lipid peroxidation and subsequent outcomes (Höhn et al., 2020; Falabella et al., 2021). For example, Cardiolipin (CL), a specific phospholipid of IMM, located in the sites of ROS production in the mitochondrial electron transport chain, can potentially be a target for ROS due to its high composition of unsaturated acyl chains. After peroxidation by ROS, CL is supposed to be involved in the conformational changes in IMM and the release of pro-apoptotic proteins, including Cyt C (Bhat et al., 2015; Falabella et al., 2021). However, a serine protease called HTRA2 takes part in the inhibition of pro-apoptotic protein release from mitochondria, but its function may not be sufficient, or it may be disturbed (Bhat et al., 2015). Moreover, the brain is also enriched in redox-active metals (copper and iron) that involve in generating free radicals and peroxidation of lipids (Sbodio et al., 2019; Falabella et al., 2021). These metals could be reduced by proteins such as Aβ, which leads to the formation of H2O2 and pro-apoptotic lipid peroxidation (LPO) products, such as 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE; Opazo et al., 2002; Jiang et al., 2009). In addition to the role of HNE in decreasing antioxidant levels by reacting with sulfhydryl groups (Taso et al., 2019), HNE forms stable adducts with amine or thiol groups in proteins and may eventually anomalously activate caspases and triggers neuronal cell death (Figure 2; Gaschler and Stockwell, 2017; Barrera et al., 2018). It has been demonstrated that Cadmium (Cd) could easily penetrate the blood-brain barrier and contribute to neurotoxicity. Cd can induce mitochondrial ROS production in neurons as well as downregulation of x-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP), leading to an increase in mouse double minute 2 (MDM2). Consequently, decrease in p53 facilitates neuronal apoptosis cell death (Figure 2; Zhao et al., 2020).

ROS can influence protein oxidation and contribute to the formation of insoluble protein aggregates (Figure 2), including Aβ peptides and NFTs, α-synuclein, and mSOD1. Oxidative stress can enhance expression of gamma-secretase and beta-secretase (BACE1) through activation of MAPK pathway and involves in Aβ production in neurons and amyloidogenic processing of amyloid precursor protein (APP; Tamagno et al., 2005; Lin and Beal, 2006; Höhn et al., 2020). Oxidative stress also increases tau phosphorylation by activation of glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3; Lin and Beal, 2006). ROS also mediate JNK/stress-activated protein kinase pathways, which subsequently contributes to hyper-phosphorylation of tau proteins, formation of intracellular NFTs, and Aβ-induced neuronal death (Liu et al., 2017). Indeed, hydrogen peroxide and deficiency of mitochondrial antioxidant enzymes has been tested in animal models, which led to increase in Aβ levels (Gerakis and Hetz, 2019) and neuronal cell death (Lin and Beal, 2006). Interestingly, it has been revealed that neurons close to Aβ-plaques seem to be more at risk of cell death due to more severe toxicity of the microenvironment caused by oxidative stress in AD (Xie et al., 2013). Aβ-mediated oxidative stress can enhance the activity of a serine/threonine phosphatase, known as calcineurin, and promotes neuronal death by associating with caspases and/or triggering pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins (Figure 2; Awasthi et al., 2005; Akanji et al., 2021). Moreover, ROS can have noxious effects by affecting Ca2+ cation channels on the ER and plasma membrane. Impaired Ca2+ channels can, in turn, lead to Ca2+ influx to the cytosol, as well as impairment in pumping intracellular Ca2+ out of the cell to maintain homeostasis (Brini et al., 2014). Toxic levels of calcium can trigger cell death through activation of apoptotic factors, including calcium-dependent proteases calpain and caspases (Figure 2; Fairless et al., 2014). Importantly, ROS has also a deleterious effect on nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) regulation. Nrf2 is a transcription factor that has an essential role in regulating cellular redox homeostasis (Kovac et al., 2015). Reduced levels of Nrf2 can subsequently result in mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis. Therefore, upregulation of Nrf2 reduces oxidative stress by promoting the expression of antioxidant enzymes (Figure 2; Li Y. C. et al., 2021). Besides, the Repressor element 1-silencing transcription factor (REST) regulates cell death-associated genes, including BAX, BH3 interacting domain death agonist (BID), and also PUMA, and maintains resistance to stress conditions. REST-depleted neurons are more susceptible to oxidative stress and anomalously express apoptosis-inducing genes which facilitates neuronal death in AD (Lu T. et al., 2014). Remarkably, upregulation of the transient receptor potential melastatin-2 (TRPM2) in the SNpc of human PD brains agrees with the role of TRPM2 in ROS-induced cell death in PD pathogenesis (Malko et al., 2021). The function of Parkin can be affected by mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress. This will promote Cyt C release and caspase-9 activation, which leads to neuronal cell death and facilitating PD pathogenesis (Figure 2; Lin and Beal, 2006). Defect in Complex I of the mitochondrial electron transport chain by aggregation of α-synuclein and PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1) mutations can be also involved in PD pathogenesis by inducing neuronal apoptosis and failure in maintaining mitochondrial membrane potential, respectively (Liu et al., 2017; Morales-Martínez et al., 2022).

Oxidative stress-associated alterations of apoptotic factors

Besides the oxidation of macromolecules is elevated in the brain of patients, decreased levels of antioxidants, including uric acid, vitamin C and E, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, and especially the antioxidant glutathione (GSH), lead to decreased detoxification of ROS in the brain cells which has been discovered in various AD, PD, and other neurodegenerative disease patients (Singh et al., 2019). Oxidative damage occurs before the onset of significant plaque pathology in the AD by triggering glycogen synthase kinase 3 (Lin and Beal, 2006; Wu et al., 2019). Overproduction of ROS and RNS in AD patients has been detected. Additionally, 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), a biomarker of oxidative damage, was elevated in AD ventricular CSF (Niedzielska et al., 2016). However, alterations in plasma levels of antioxidants in AD patients are paradoxical in experimental reports (Niedzielska et al., 2016). Aβ plaques can cause Ca2+ dyshomeostasis in ER leading to Ca2+ influx in the cytosol. Consequently, endogenous GSH levels are reduced, and ROS can cause neurotoxic effects (Liu et al., 2017). The alterations of transition metals, including Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe3+, have been assessed in AD samples. The results indicated that transition metals seem to be imbalanced in AD brains which contributed to oxidative damage and subsequent neuronal death (Bhat et al., 2015). Evidence also shows reduction in nuclear REST levels in neurons of degenerated regions in AD brains, such as prefrontal cortical and hippocampal neurons, which transcriptional dysregulation in apoptotic genes and vulnerability to oxidative stress has made them susceptible to apoptosis cell death (Lu T. et al., 2014). Elevated levels of activated JNK have been reported in post-mortem AD samples, which is probably associated with Aβ formation. JNK implicates in the upregulation of BACE1 and promotes the formation of Aβ, leading to oxidative stress and neuronal apoptosis cell death (Yao et al., 2005; Guglielmotto et al., 2011; Sbodio et al., 2019).

HNE levels were significantly high in the CSF of AD and PD patients, which can be considered as an important reason for neuronal demise and behavioral symptoms in neurodegenerative diseases (Taso et al., 2019). Decreased level of GSH in the Substantia Nigra (SN) of PD patients is one of the earliest biochemical alterations that facilitate the neurotoxic effects of ROS (Niedzielska et al., 2016). Moreover, overexpression of α-synuclein in transgenic mice results in mitochondrial dysfunction and increased oxidative stress (Song et al., 2004). It has been observed that aberrant activity of mutant human SOD1 in ALS patients leads to increase in the level of free radicals in CSF, serum, and urine samples of ALS patients, which exacerbates neuronal damage (Liu and Wang, 2017). Indeed, mSOD1 accumulation in outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) can result in mitochondrial dysfunction and promotes aberrant ROS production. In an experimental study, mice expressing mSOD1 showed more oxidative damage to mitochondrial lipids and molecules (Mattiazzi et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2004). P53 can regulate genes involved in oxidative stress and mitochondrial function. Environmental toxicants such as bisphenol A (BPA) play a role in inducing neurotoxicity by significantly increased oxidative stress. BPA subsequently leads to upregulation in apoptotic inducing factors, including p53, PUMA, and Drp-1 (Ishtiaq et al., 2021). Additionally, in Huntington’s disease pathology, mHTT can interact with p53 and increase p53 levels, and eventually upregulates apoptotic factors BAX and PUMA, which leads to apoptosis (Bae et al., 2005; Lin and Beal, 2006). mHTT also interacts with mitochondrial membranes, causing mitochondrial abnormalities and an increase in ROS generation, which potentially leads to neuronal degeneration and cell death (Ross and Tabrizi, 2011; Liu et al., 2017). Elevated levels of lipid peroxidation and decreased levels of GSH content have been indicated in the plasma of HD patients (Klepac et al., 2007). In addition, increased levels of 8-OHdG have been observed in the serum of HD patients and post-mortem HD samples (Sbodio et al., 2019).

Targeting oxidative stress-induced apoptosis cell death

Undoubtedly, oxidative stress has neurotoxic effects in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases. However, the exact molecular pathways remain unclear and need to be more inquired about finding a promising therapeutic strategy to decrease neuronal death in neurodegenerative diseases and extend the lifespan of patients. In this regard, the antioxidant properties of many candidate compounds have been reported. In addition, many other molecules that mediate oxidative stress-induced apoptosis have been targeted to prevent neuronal cell death and disease progression (Figure 2). A cytoprotective polypeptide called Humanin (HN), which is encoded by mtDNA, has neuroprotective activity against cellular stress conditions, such as oxidative stress. HN regulates mitochondrial function by targeting apoptotic factors and inhibits apoptosis by upregulation of Bcl-2 and downregulation of Bid and Bax (Figure 1, Table 2; Hazafa et al., 2021). Also, some amino acid derivatives have shown anti-apoptotic effects in ALS models in vitro (Sirianni et al., 2015). N-acetyl-L-tryptophan (L-NAT) and N-acetyl-DL-tryptophan (DL-NAT) have inhibited neuronal cell death in H2O2-induced NSC-34 motor neurons (Figure 1, Table 2). L-NAT inhibits the release of Cyt C/Smac/AIF from mitochondria, as well as inhibition of caspase activity, thereby preventing neuronal apoptosis cell death (Sirianni et al., 2015). Another study by Yoo et al. (2017) showed that N-acetyl serotonin (NAS) has anti-apoptotic properties by activating neurotrophic signaling TrkB/CREB/BDNF pathways. NAS induces and activates the expression of antioxidant enzymes to reduce the level of ROS (Figure 1, Table 2). It also regulates anti- and pro-apoptotic factors and restores mitochondrial membrane potential to prevent neuronal cell death in neurodegenerative disease models (Yoo et al., 2017). According to evidence, mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) can increase mitochondrial calcium retention and cause cell death. CoQ10 is considered as an inhibitor of mitochondrial permeability transition pore and protects neurons from oxidative stress and apoptosis. The exact protective mechanism of CoQ10 is still indistinct and needs more experiments. CoQ10 may decrease apoptosis by maintaining the integrity of the mitochondrial membrane and inhibiting Cyt C release. CoQ10 may also decrease the Bcl-2 protein level and prevent caspase activation (Figure 1, Table 2; Akanji et al., 2021). As previously mentioned, protein aggregates can potentially induce oxidative stress in neuronal cells. For instance, Aβ can interact and bind to Aβ-binding alcohol dehydrogenase (ABAD), a mitochondrial-matrix protein, and induce apoptosis and free-radical generation. Blocking the interaction of Aβ and ABAD with a “decoy peptide” suppress oxidative stress and neuronal death. In contrast overexpression of ABAD in mouse models contribute to exaggerating cellular stress and further complications (Lustbader et al., 2004). Moreover, NADPH oxidase (NOX) catalyzes the formation of O2 and participates in elevating neurotoxicity and increasing cell death in HD. Treatment of HD models with NOX inhibitors, including diphenyleneiodonium, apocynin, and VAS2870, prevented neurons from cell death (Figure 1, Table 2; Sbodio et al., 2019).

In several studies, it has been reported that plant iridoids have therapeutic applications in several neurodegenerative diseases by regulating apoptotic factors and neuroprotective proteins (Dinda et al., 2019). Aucubin (AU) is an iridoid glycoside with neuroprotective properties, which significantly increases cell viability in neurons via oxidative stress reduction. AU enhances the antioxidant capacity of cells through the Nrf2 signaling pathway and decreases ROS-induced neuronal apoptosis by regulating mitochondrial membrane potential and reducing ROS generation (Figure 1, Table 2; Li Y. C. et al., 2021). The pharmacological effects of other herbal compounds have also been investigated. Salidroside (Sald), is a Chinese plant-derivative compound that could detoxify neurons by suppressing the elevation of the intracellular ROS level and induction of antioxidant enzymes. Sald also participates in the downregulation of pro-apoptotic protein Bax and upregulation of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-xl, and prevents neuronal cell death (Figure 1, Table 2; Zhang et al., 2010). Some plant-derived organic oils, including a bicyclic monoterpene termed “Borneol”, indicated neuroprotective effects against H2O2-induced apoptosis in vitro. Borneol alleviates neuronal apoptosis by inhibiting Cyt C and AIF release through increase in the expression of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 and decrease in expression of pro-apoptotic protein Bax (Figure 1, Table 2; Hur et al., 2013). -gingerol also attenuates Aβ-induced oxidative stress. Studies revealed that -gingerol scavenges free radicals and decreases phospholipid peroxidation, as well as improves cellular redox balance (Figure 1, Table 2; Lee et al., 2011). Increase in the activity of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) under oxidative stress condition leads to Nrf2 dysregulation (Kumar et al., 2012). Thus, GSK-3β inhibitors, including an anti-oxidative phytochemical known as Isoorientin, can have neuroprotection against oxidative damage by regulating Nrf2 antioxidant activity (Figure 1, Table 2; Lim et al., 2007; Gianferrara et al., 2022).

Neuroinflammation-induced cell death in neurodegenerative diseases

Mechanism of neuroinflammation-induced cell death

Research findings have indicated that several neurodegenerative diseases are associated with inflammation (Kwon and Koh, 2020). Activated microglia and T lymphocytes have been detected in the SN of PD patients (Dias et al., 2013). In parallel with this, high expression levels of chemokines, interleukins, interferons, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) have been discovered in the striatum and substantia nigra of PD post-mortem brain samples and CSF of AD patients (Hirsch and Hunot, 2009; Llano et al., 2012; Gelders et al., 2018). A neurotoxic microenvironment can be promoted by the continuous secretion of inflammatory mediators from microglia and astrocytes, thus facilitating neural degeneration, and glial cell death (Pardillo-Díaz et al., 2022; Song et al., 2022). In addition to apoptosis cell death, pyroptosis, a non-apoptotic programed cell death, can also occur in the CNS, which is mainly mediated by inflammatory processes. Pyroptosis is characterized by cell swelling, formation of pores in the plasma membrane carried out by cleaved Gasdermin D, and the release of pro-inflammatory cytosolic contents into the extracellular space (Figure 3; Walle and Lamkanfi, 2016; Man et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019). Besides, some specific caspases, including caspase-1, 4, 5, 11, are called “inflammatory caspases”, can mediate pyroptosis (Taylor et al., 2008; Gaidt and Hornung, 2016). Some factors are associated with initiation of inflammatory cascades and promotion of disease pathology. For instance, ER stress can cause inflammation in neurodegenerative diseases. In other words, inducing ER stress in neurons mostly initiates apoptosis, whereas intense ER stress in glial cells can potentially trigger inflammation in neurodegenerative diseases (Sprenkle et al., 2017). The UPR can increase the production and the release of inflammatory factors, such as transcription factor “nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells” (NF-κB), interleukin 1 (IL-1), IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α (Feng et al., 2017). Furthermore, in ER stress condition, p-IRE1 can bind to the TRAF-2 protein and forms the TRAF2-IRE1 complex. The complex may bind to ASK-1 and activate the JNK signaling pathway that enhances inflammation (Vukic et al., 2009; Mohammed-Ali et al., 2015). In addition, p-PERK also facilitates neuroinflammation by inducing the JAK1/STAT3 signaling pathway in glial cells (Meares et al., 2014). Moreover, neuroinflammation is a cause and a consequence of chronic oxidative stress. Studies indicate that the production of free radicals (such as ROS) are elevated in neurodegenerative diseases, which can be due to neuroinflammation (Dias et al., 2013; González-reyes et al., 2017). On the other hand, increased levels of ROS can contribute to pro-inflammatory gene transcription and release of cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α (Sochocka et al., 2013; Teleanu et al., 2022). Debris of dead neurons may trigger glia-mediated neuroinflammation and initiate a pro-inflammatory cascade that can exacerbate disease progression (Wang et al., 2015; Joshi et al., 2019). Recently, it was revealed that microglial pro-inflammatory cytokines are associated with increased α-synuclein aggregation (Guo et al., 2020). Thereby, protein aggregates can be involved in inducing neuroinflammation in the CNS parenchyma.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The possible role of inhibiting inflammatory factors to attenuate neuroinflammation-induced neuronal cell death.

It has been investigated that the failure to clear apoptotic cells and activation of glial cells by DAMPs and PAMPs can enhance inflammation response and subsequent neuronal damage and loss (Imbeault et al., 2014; Salter and Stevens, 2017; Voet et al., 2019; Cheng Y. et al., 2021). Activation of complex signaling cascades such as the NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome can be triggered by a wide range of factors including cellular stress, infection (Bader and Winklhofer, 2020; Mahboubi Mehrabani et al., 2022), protein aggregates, and activated microglia (Nichols et al., 2019; Bader and Winklhofer, 2020; Tansey et al., 2022). This phenomenon contributes to producing more neurotoxic cytokines and chemokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and CCL2 (also known as monocyte chemo-attractant protein-1 or MCP-1), that cause enhancement in neurotoxicity and cell death (Sprenkle et al., 2017; Rocha et al., 2018; Joshi et al., 2019; Nichols et al., 2019). The exact mechanism of neuronal death through activation of NLRP3 inflammasome in microglia has not been perfectly discovered yet (Lee et al., 2019). In fact, NLRP3 inflammasome induces heteromer formation or aggregation of apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain (ASC), which subsequently activates caspase-1. It results in the maturation of IL-1β and induction of pyroptosis using cleaved Gasdermin D and membrane pores (Figure 3; Stancu et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019; Bader and Winklhofer, 2020; Feng et al., 2020; Onyango et al., 2021).

Specific receptors, including TLRs and NLRs expressing on neurons or neuroglia, can recognize extracellular neurotoxic protein aggregates (Nichols et al., 2019; Leng and Edison, 2021; Heidari et al., 2022). This may facilitate neuronal cell death (Li Y. et al., 2021) by involvement in caspase activation and secretion of pro-inflammatory factors through NF-κB activation (Figure 3; Rocha et al., 2018; Leng and Edison, 2021). The expression of the receptors for cytokines was indicated in DA neurons, making neurons more susceptible to damage and death (Hirsch and Hunot, 2009). Complement receptors and Fc receptors on microglia can also mediate pro-inflammatory responses independent from extracellular protein aggregates (Leng and Edison, 2021). Activation of microglia can potentially contribute to activating astrocytes, which rapidly upregulates inflammatory signaling molecules (Sims et al., 2022), and can potentially initiate or enhance nitrosative stress due to producing NO (Rocha et al., 2018). In support of this claim, the presence of activated astrocytes is confirmed in post-mortem brain samples of various neurodegenerative disease patients (Hashioka et al., 2021). DAMPs released by dying neurons may also activate microglia through the ionotropic P2X and metabotropic P2Y purinergic receptors and initiate an inflammatory response. For example, under pathological conditions, P2X7 receptors can be overexpressed in the CNS. ATP acts as a DAMP and activates P2X7 receptors, and promotes chronic inflammatory neurological disorders (Thawkar and Kaur, 2019). Post-mortem brain samples of AD patients showed overexpression of P2X7 receptors, which can be associated with disease pathology and progression. It is also suggested that P2X4 receptor overstimulation may result in neuronal cell death (Thawkar and Kaur, 2019). Interestingly, upregulation of P2X and P2Y receptors in ALS patients can subsequently lead to overproduction of TNF-α and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2), which facilitates neurotoxicity (Liu and Wang, 2017).

Targeting neuroinflammation-induced cell death

Even though the neuroinflammatory cascades exacerbate neurodegenerative disease progression and participate in neuronal death, the exact mechanism of this involvement and therapeutic strategies regarding targeting neuroinflammation is not well studied. According to some investigations, targeting neuroinflammation can be a promising therapeutic approach to decrease inflammation and its further complications in neurodegenerative diseases (Figure 3). Therefore, it can improve patients’ neuronal function in mental and physical activities. Incipiently, some specific microRNAs, such as miR-155-5p, can be key regulators of inflammatory cascades in neurodegenerative diseases. Overexpression of miR-155-5p has been reported in the CSF of AD and MS patients (Lv et al., 2020). It has been recently found that Rosmarinic acid (RA) can inhibit neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative disease samples by regulating miR-155-5p, leading to attenuation in inflammation-associated neuronal damage and loss (Figure 3, Table 2; Lv et al., 2020). Calpains as non-caspase proteases participate in the execution of neuronal cell death and cooperate with key factors of neuronal cell death. Thus, targeting these proteases may result in neuroprotection. Studies have demonstrated that Alpha1-antitrypsin (A1AT) can attenuate microglial neuroinflammation as well as inhibition of calpain activity (Figure 3, Table 2; Feng et al., 2020). Other novel strategies have also been recruited with a focus on neuroinflammation. A recent study by Cheng C.-Y. et al. (2021) targeted inflammation in the substantia nigra of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated rats by liposomes carrying Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), a natural antioxidant in green tea. It demonstrated neuroprotection by inhibiting neuroinflammation (Figure 3, Table 2; Cheng C.-Y. et al., 2021). Aucubin, which showed neuroprotective effects in oxidative stress-induced neurotoxicity, can also reduce phosphorylation levels of NF-κB, JNK, p38, and ERK, leading to a decrease in the level of inflammatory factors (Figure 3, Table 2; Li Y. C. et al., 2021). Additionally, a polyphenol named Resveratrol indicated a similar effect by down-regulation of the transcription factor NF-κB in vitro (Figure 3, Table 2; Zhong et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2017). Targeting TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway by Hesperetin, a Citrus flavonoid, protected neurons from neuroinflammation and apoptosis (Table 2; Muhammad et al., 2019). Many other similar signaling pathways can be inhibited, aiming to alleviate neuroinflammation in the CNS (Hou et al., 2021). Furthermore, targeting inflammation-associated receptors expressed on neurons can also be an approach. For example, 15d-PGJ2 is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-γ) agonist that inhibits the production of some interleukins and suppresses inflammation in microglial cells in vitro (Figure 3, Table 2; Xu et al., 2008). Suppressing neuroinflammation by targeting P2X7R has been studied, but blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability limits candidate drugs, so more studies are needed in this case (Thawkar and Kaur, 2019). Intriguingly, Anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist (Mahboubi Mehrabani et al., 2022), reaches CNS easily and inhibits the activity of IL-1β by binding to its receptor and mitigate pyroptosis in neurons (Figure 3, Table 2; Wang et al., 2019).

As mentioned in the former section, since the NLRP3 inflammasome plays a significant role in the enhancement of neurotoxicity, inhibition of NLRP3 and its subsequent pathways might be an effective method to decrease neuroinflammation-induced cell death. MCC950 is a small-molecule NLRP3 inhibitor that has inhibited inflammasome activation in rodent PD models leading to substantial neuroprotection, mitigation in motor deficits, and accumulation of α-synuclein aggregates (Figure 3, Table 2; Gordon et al., 2018). Noteworthy, the neurotransmitter dopamine can bind to the dopamine D1 receptor, which results in ubiquitination and degradation of NLRP3 via the binding of cAMP with NLRP3, leading to the restriction of NLRP3 activation (Figure 3, Table 2; Yan et al., 2015). Some experiments revealed attenuation of NLRP3-mediated neuroinflammation in PD mouse models using peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta (PPAR-β/δ) agonist GW501516 (Figure 3, Table 2). There were some limitations with this drug, such as the resistance of the BBB to pass the drug to reach the brain parenchyma. Hence, this compound cannot be considered a candidate for PD treatment until the problem is not solved (Chen et al., 2019). A flavonoid derived from the roots of Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi, termed “Baicalein”, indicated anti-inflammatory and anti-pyroptosis properties in animal models of PD. Experiments suggest that Baicalein may play a role in preventing the loss of DA neurons by reducing the production of various pro-inflammatory cytokines. It can also inhibit NLRP3 and caspase-1 activation, and simultaneously suppress pyroptosis by targeting Gasdermin D in 1-methyl-4phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) Induced Mice Model of PD (Figure 3, Table 2; Rui et al., 2020). Benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) and dihydromyricetin (DHM) are other plant-derived compounds with anti-inflammation properties (Lee et al., 2016; Feng et al., 2018). BITC seems to have the neuroprotective effects by inhibition of IL-1β release and NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition in the BV2 microglial cells (Lee et al., 2016). Treatment of APP/PS1 transgenic mice with DHM improved neuroinflammation and memory function, as a result of decreased NLRP3 inflammasome activation (Figure 3, Table 2; Feng et al., 2018). Taken together, the detrimental effects of neuroinflammation in induced neuronal cell death must not be underestimated, and more research is required to provide a better understanding of mechanisms and underlying therapeutic strategies.

Conclusion

As described elaborately, neuronal cell death plays a key role in demonstrating neurodegenerative disease manifestations. Understanding the exact mechanisms and pathways leading to cell death would provide the opportunity for researchers to recommend high-efficiency neuroprotective agents. Until now, many pre-clinical studies have been done in an attempt to cure neurodegenerative diseases, targeting crucial agents involved in well-known pathways leading to neuronal cell death. The field of targeting ER stress and UPR as a therapeutic approach to treat neurodegeneration is growing and has revealed considerable results. On the other hand, ROS damage to mitochondria and homeostasis of the neuron is prominent in neurodegenerative diseases. Hence, this has led to therapeutic approaches using agents with antioxidant properties or inducing the antioxidant activity of the neuron, resulting in inhibition of ROS-mediated neuronal injury. Activation of neuroglia and initiation of neuroinflammation could also lead to a neurotoxic microenvironment for neurons. Unfortunately, the exact mechanism of neuroinflammation-induced cell death is still under debate. Thus, there are not sufficient experimental results of targeting key components of neuroinflammation to decrease neuronal loss in neurodegenerative diseases directly. However, there is strong evidence implicating the role of inhibiting neuroinflammation in attenuating ROS- and ER stress-induced neuronal cell death. Nowadays, the focus on the neuroprotective effects of phytochemicals has significantly increased; nevertheless, there is still much to research and discover to approve phytochemicals as a promising therapeutic agent. Taken together, despite advances in the field of targeting cell death to treat neurodegenerative diseases, there is not an approved compound to directly inhibit cell death yet, so it needs intensive research to find a novel therapeutic strategy for treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

Author contributions

MK, FSH, and MM provided the idea and mainly wrote the manuscript. MK and AA contributed to the search and assessment of the available literature. MK designed and illustrated the figures. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Glossary

4-PBA 4-phenyl butyric acid
6-OHDA 6-hydroxydopamine
8-OHdG 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine
A1AT alpha1-antitrypsin
ABAD amyloid beta-binding alcohol dehydrogenase
AD Alzheimer’s disease
AIF apoptosis-inducing factor
ALS amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
APP amyloid precursor protein
ASC apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase activation and recruitment domain
ASK1 apoptotic signaling kinase 1
ATF4 activating transcription factor 4
ATF6 activating transcription factor 6
AU aucubin
amyloid-beta
BACE1 beta secretase 1
BAX bcl2-associated X protein
BBB blood-brain barrier
BFA brefeldin A
BID BH3 interacting domain death agonist
BiP immunoglobulin binding protein
BITC benzyl isothiocyanate
BPA bisphenol A
CCL2 monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
Cd cadmium
CHOP C/EBP homologous protein
CL cardiolipin
CNS central nervous system
COX cyclooxygenase
CSF cerebrospinal fluid
Cyt C cytochrome c
DA dopaminergic
DAMP damage-associated molecular pattern
DBM dibenzoylmethane
DHCR24 3-beta-hydroxysteroid delta-24-reductase
DHM dihydromyricetin
DL-NAT N-acetyl-DL-tryptophan
DR5 Death Receptor 5
EGCG Epigallocatechin-3-gallate
eIF2α eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 α
ER endoplasmic reticulum
ERAD ER-associated degradation
ERO1 ER Oxidase 1
GLP-1R glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor
GRP78 78kDa glucose-regulated protein
GSH glutathione
GSK-3β glycogen synthase kinase-3beta
GSK3 glycogen synthase kinase 3
H2O2 hydrogen peroxide
HD Huntington’s disease
HN humanin
HNE 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal
HO• hydroxyl radical
IL interleukin
IMM inner mitochondrial membrane
IP3R inositol triphosphate receptor
IRE1α inositol-requiring transmembrane kinase/endoribonuclease 1 α
JAK-STAT janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription
JNK c-Jun N-terminal kinase
KIRA6 kinase-inhibiting RNase attenuator 6
L-NAT N-acetyl-L-tryptophan
LPO lipid peroxidation
LPS lipopolysaccharide
MDA malondialdehyde
MDM2 mouse double minute 2
mHTT mutant huntingtin protein
MPP+ 1-methyl-4-phenyl-pyridinium
MPTP 1-methyl-4phenyl1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine
mPTP mitochondrial permeability transition pore
mSOD1 mutant superoxide dismutase 1
mtDNA mitochondrial DNA
NAS N-acetyl serotonin
NF-κB nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells
NFT neurofibrillary tangle
NLRP3 NLR family pyrin domain containing 3
NO nitric oxide
NOX NADPH oxidase
Nrf2 nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2
O2- superoxide anion
OMM outer mitochondrial membrane
p38 MAPK p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase
PAMP pathogen-associated molecular pattern
PARK7 parkinsonism associated deglycase
PD Parkinson’s disease
PERK PKR-like ER kinase
PINK1 PTEN-induced putative kinase 1
PPAR peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
PUFA polyunsaturated fatty acid
PUMA p53-upregulated modulator of apoptosis
RA rosmarinic acid
rAAV recombinant adeno-associated virus
REST repressor element 1-silencing transcription factor
RIDD regulated IRE1α-dependent decay
RNS reactive nitrogen species
ROS reactive oxygen species
RY ryanodine
RYR ryanodine receptor
Sald salidroside
SN substantia nigra
SNpc substantia nigra pars compacta
SOD1 superoxide dismutase
TNF tumor necrosis factor
TRAF2 TNF receptor-associated factor 2
Trib3 tribbles pseudokinase 3
TRPM2 transient receptor potential melastatin-2
UPR unfolded protein response
VAPB vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein B
XBP1 X-box binding protein 1
XIAP x-linked inhibitor of apoptosis

References

  1. Abdullah A., Ravanan P. (2018). Kaempferol mitigates Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Induced Cell Death by targeting caspase 3/7. Sci. Rep. 8:2189. 10.1038/s41598-018-20499-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adasme T., Paula-Lima A., Hidalgo C. (2015). Inhibitory ryanodine prevents ryanodine receptor-mediated Ca2+ release without affecting endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ content in primary hippocampal neurons. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 458, 57–62. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.01.065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aime P., Karuppagounder S. S., Rao A., Chen Y., Burke R. E., Ratan R. R., et al. (2020). The drug adaptaquin blocks ATF4/CHOP-dependent pro-death Trib3 induction and protects in cellular and mouse models of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 136:104725. 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ajoolabady A., Lindholm D., Ren J., Pratico D. (2022). ER stress and UPR in Alzheimer’s disease: mechanisms, pathogenesis, treatments. Cell Death Dis. 13:706. 10.1038/s41419-022-05153-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Akanji M. A., Rotimi D. E., Elebiyo T. C., Awakan O. J., Adeyemi O. S. (2021). Redox homeostasis and prospects for therapeutic targeting in neurodegenerative disorders. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2021:9971885. 10.1155/2021/9971885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Almeida L. M., Pinho B. R., Duchen M. R., Oliveira J. M. A. (2022). The PERKs of mitochondria protection during stress: insights for PERK modulation in neurodegenerative and metabolic diseases. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 97, 1737–1748. 10.1111/brv.12860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Altinoz M. A., Elmaci İ., Hacimuftuoglu A., Ozpinar A., Hacker E., Ozpinar A. (2021). PPARδ and its ligand erucic acid may act anti-tumoral, neuroprotective, and myelin protective in neuroblastoma, glioblastoma, and Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Aspects Med. 78:100871. 10.1016/j.mam.2020.100871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Andhavarapu S., Mubariz F., Arvas M., Bever C., Jr., Makar T. K. (2019). Interplay between ER stress and autophagy: a possible mechanism in multiple sclerosis pathology. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 108, 183–190. 10.1016/j.yexmp.2019.04.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Andreone B. J., Larhammar M., Lewcock J. W. (2020). Cell Death and neurodegeneration. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 12:a036434. 10.1101/cshperspect.a036434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Angelova P. R., Abramov A. Y. (2018). Role of mitochondrial ROS in the brain: from physiology to neurodegeneration. FEBS Lett. 592, 692–702. 10.1002/1873-3468.12964 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Avgerinos K. I., Ferrucci L., Kapogiannis D. (2021). Effects of monoclonal antibodies against amyloid-β on clinical and biomarker outcomes and adverse event risks: a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase III RCTs in Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing Res. Rev. 68:101339. 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Awasthi A., Matsunaga Y., Yamada T. (2005). Amyloid-beta causes apoptosis of neuronal cells via caspase cascade, which can be prevented by amyloid-beta-derived short peptides. Exp. Neurol. 196, 282–289. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bader V., Winklhofer K. F. (2020). Mitochondria at the interface between neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 99, 163–171. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.05.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bae B. I., Xu H., Igarashi S., Fujimuro M., Agrawal N., Taya Y., et al. (2005). p53 mediates cellular dysfunction and behavioral abnormalities in Huntington’s disease. Neuron 47, 29–41. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Barrera G., Pizzimenti S., Daga M., Dianzani C., Arcaro A., Cetrangolo G. P., et al. (2018). Lipid peroxidation-derived aldehydes, 4-hydroxynonenal and malondialdehyde in aging-related disorders. Antioxidants (Basel) 7:102. 10.3390/antiox7080102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Behl T., Makkar R., Sehgal A., Singh S., Sharma N., Zengin G., et al. (2021). Current trends in neurodegeneration: cross talks between oxidative stress, cell death and inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22:7432. 10.3390/ijms22147432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bejanin A., Schonhaut D. R., La Joie R., Kramer J. H., Baker S. L., Sosa N., et al. (2017). Tau pathology and neurodegeneration contribute to cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 140, 3286–3300. 10.1093/brain/awx243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bhat A. H., Dar K. B., Anees S., Zargar M. A., Masood A., Sofi M. A., et al. (2015). Oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegenerative diseases; a mechanistic insight. Biomed. Pharmacother. 74, 101–110. 10.1016/j.biopha.2015.07.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Blaner W. S., Shmarakov I. O., Traber M. G. (2021). Vitamin A and vitamin E: will the real antioxidant please stand up? Annu. Rev. Nutr. 41, 105–131. 10.1146/annurev-nutr-082018-124228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bloem B. R., Okun M. S., Klein C. (2021). Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 397, 2284–2303. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00218-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Breijyeh Z., Karaman R. (2020). Comprehensive review on Alzheimer’s disease: causes and treatment. Molecules 25:5789. 10.3390/molecules25245789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Brini M., Calì T., Ottolini D., Carafoli E. (2014). Neuronal calcium signaling: function and dysfunction. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 2787–2814. 10.1007/s00018-013-1550-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Callens M., Kraskovskaya N., Derevtsova K., Annaert W., Bultynck G., Bezprozvanny I., et al. (2021). The role of Bcl-2 proteins in modulating neuronal Ca2+ signaling in health and in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 1868:118997. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2021.118997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Calsolaro V., Edison P. (2016). Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: current evidence and future directions. Alzheimers Dement. 12, 719–732. 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chami M., Checler F. (2020). Alterations of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) calcium signaling molecular components in Alzheimer’s disease. Cells 9:2577. 10.3390/cells9122577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chang H. Y., Nishitoh H., Yang X., Ichijo H., Baltimore D. (1998). Activation of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) by the adapter protein Daxx. Science 281, 1860–1863. 10.1126/science.281.5384.1860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen L., Bi M., Zhang Z., Du X., Chen X., Jiao Q., et al. (2022). The functions of IRE1α in neurodegenerative diseases: beyond ER stress. Ageing Res. Rev. 82:101774. 10.1016/j.arr.2022.10177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen S. D., Chuang Y. C., Lin T. K., Yang J. L. (2023). Alternative role of glucagon-like Peptide-1 receptor agonists in neurodegenerative diseases. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 938:175439. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.175439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chen L., Xue L., Zheng J., Tian X., Zhang Y., Tong Q. (2019). PPARß/δ agonist alleviates NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated neuroinflammation in the MPTP mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Behav. Brain Res. 356, 483–489. 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cheng C.-Y., Barro L., Tsai S. T., Feng T. W., Wu X. Y., Chao C. W., et al. (2021). Epigallocatechin-3-gallate-loaded liposomes favor anti-inflammation of microglia cells and promote neuroprotection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22:3037. 10.3390/ijms22063037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Cheng Y., Song Y., Chen H., Li Q., Gao Y., Lu G., et al. (2021). Ferroptosis mediated by lipid reactive oxygen species: a possible causal link of neuroinflammation to neurological disorders. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2021:5005136. 10.1155/2021/5005136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Chocry M., Leloup L. (2020). The NADPH oxidase family and its inhibitors. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 33, 332–353. 10.1089/ars.2019.7915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Colla E., Coune P., Liu Y., Pletnikova O., Troncoso J. C., Iwatsubo T., et al. (2012). Endoplasmic reticulum stress is important for the manifestations of α-synucleinopathy in vivo. J. Neurosci. 32, 3306–3320. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5367-11.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Cooper A. A., Gitler A. D., Cashikar A., Haynes C. M., Hill K. J., Bhullar B., et al. (2006). α-synuclein blocks ER-Golgi traffic and Rab1 rescues neuron loss in Parkinson’s models. Science 313, 324–328. 10.1126/science.1129462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Cristino L., Bisogno T., Di Marzo V. (2020). Cannabinoids and the expanded endocannabinoid system in neurological disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 16, 9–29. 10.1038/s41582-019-0284-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Culmsee C., Plesnila N. (2006). Targeting Bid to prevent programmed cell death in neurons. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 34, 1334–1340. 10.1042/BST0341334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Da Silva D. C., ValentãO P., Andrade P. B., Pereira D. M. (2020). Endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling in cancer and neurodegenerative disorders: tools and strategies to understand its complexity. Pharmacol. Res. 155:104702. 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. David S., Jhelum P., Ryan F., Jeong S. Y., Kroner A. (2022). Dysregulation of iron homeostasis in the central nervous system and the role of ferroptosis in neurodegenerative disorders. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 37, 150–170. 10.1089/ars.2021.0218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Decourt B., Boumelhem F., Pope E. D., 3rd, Shi J., Mari Z., Sabbagh M. N. (2021). Critical appraisal of amyloid lowering agents in AD. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 21:39. 10.1007/s11910-021-01125-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Demmings M. D., Tennyson E. C., Petroff G. N., Tarnowski-Garner H. E., Cregan S. P. (2021). Activating transcription factor-4 promotes neuronal death induced by Parkinson’s disease neurotoxins and α-synuclein aggregates. Cell Death Differ. 28, 1627–1643. 10.1038/s41418-020-00688-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Deora V., Lee J. D., Albornoz E. A., McAlary L., Jagaraj C. J., Robertson A. A. B., et al. (2020). The microglial NLRP3 inflammasome is activated by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis proteins. Glia 68, 407–421. 10.1002/glia.23728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Dhillon S. (2021). Aducanumab: first approval. Drugs 81, 1437–1443. 10.1007/s40265-021-01569-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Dias V., Junn E., Mouradian M. M. (2013). The role of oxidative stress in Parkinson’s disease. J. Parkinsons Dis. 3, 461–491. 10.3233/JPD-130230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Dinda B., Dinda M., Kulsi G., Chakraborty A., Dinda S. (2019). Therapeutic potentials of plant iridoids in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases: a review. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 169, 185–199. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Djajadikerta A., Keshri S., Pavel M., Prestil R., Ryan L., Rubinsztein D. C. (2020). Autophagy induction as a therapeutic strategy for neurodegenerative diseases. J. Mol. Biol. 432, 2799–2821. 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.12.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Doroudian M., Azhdari M. H., Goodarzi N., O’Sullivan D., Donnelly S. C. (2021). Smart nanotherapeutics and lung cancer. Pharmaceutics 13:1972. 10.3390/pharmaceutics13111972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Doyle K. M., Kennedy D., Gorman A. M., Gupta S., Healy S. J., Samali A. (2011). Unfolded proteins and endoplasmic reticulum stress in neurodegenerative disorders. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 15, 2025–2039. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01374.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Dugger B. N., Dickson D. W. (2017). Pathology of neurodegenerative diseases. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 9:a028035. 10.1101/cshperspect.a028035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Egan M. F., Kost J., Tariot P. N., Aisen P. S., Cummings J. L., Vellas B., et al. (2018). Randomized trial of verubecestat for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 1691–1703. 10.1056/NEJMoa1706441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Egan M. F., Kost J., Voss T., Mukai Y., Aisen P. S., Cummings J. L., et al. (2019). Randomized trial of verubecestat for prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 1408–1420. 10.1056/NEJMoa1812840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Emerit J., Edeas M., Bricaire F. (2004). Neurodegenerative diseases and oxidative stress. Biomed. Pharmacother. 58, 39–46. 10.1016/j.biopha.2003.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Fairless R., Williams S. K., Diem R. (2014). Dysfunction of neuronal calcium signalling in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. Cell Tissue Res. 357, 455–462. 10.1007/s00441-013-1758-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Falabella M., Vernon H. J., Hanna M. G., Claypool S. M., Pitceathly R. D. S. (2021). Cardiolipin, mitochondria and neurological disease. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 32, 224–237. 10.1016/j.tem.2021.01.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Feng Y., Li X., Zhou W., Lou D., Huang D., Li Y., et al. (2017). Regulation of SET gene expression by NFkB. Mol. Neurobiol. 54, 4477–4485. 10.1007/s12035-016-9967-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Feng Y. S., Tan Z. X., Wu L. Y., Dong F., Zhang F. (2020). The involvement of NLRP3 inflammasome in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing Res. Rev. 64:101192. 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Feng J., Wang J. X., Du Y. H., Liu Y., Zhang W., Chen J. F., et al. (2018). Dihydromyricetin inhibits microglial activation and neuroinflammation by suppressing NLRP3 inflammasome activation in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 24, 1207–1218. 10.1111/cns.12983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ferrada L., Barahona M. J., Salazar K., Vandenabeele P., Nualart F. (2020). Vitamin C controls neuronal necroptosis under oxidative stress. Redox Biol. 29:101408. 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Fricker M., Tolkovsky A. M., Borutaite V., Coleman M., Brown G. C. (2018). Neuronal cell death. Physiol. Rev. 98, 813–880. 10.1152/physrev.00011.2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Gaidt M. M., Hornung V. (2016). Pore formation by GSDMD is the effector mechanism of pyroptosis. EMBO J. 35, 2167–2169. 10.15252/embj.201695415 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Galehdar Z., Swan P., Fuerth B., Callaghan S. M., Park D. S., Cregan S. P. (2010). Neuronal apoptosis induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress is regulated by ATF4-CHOP-mediated induction of the Bcl-2 homology 3-only member PUMA. J. Neurosci. 30, 16938–16948. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1598-10.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Galvan V., Banwait S., Spilman P., Gorostiza O. F., Peel A., Ataie M., et al. (2007). Interaction of ASK1 and the β-amyloid precursor protein in a stress-signaling complex. Neurobiol. Dis. 28, 65–75. 10.1016/j.nbd.2007.06.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Gaschler M. M., Stockwell B. R. (2017). Lipid peroxidation in cell death. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 482, 419–425. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.10.086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Gauthier S., Feldman H. H., Schneider L. S., Wilcock G. K., Frisoni G. B., Hardlund J. H., et al. (2016). Efficacy and safety of tau-aggregation inhibitor therapy in patients with mild or moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a randomised, controlled, double-blind, parallel-arm, phase 3 trial. Lancet 388, 2873–2884. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31275-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Gelders G., Baekelandt V., Van der Perren A. (2018). Linking neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease. J. Immunol. Res. 2018:4784268. 10.1155/2018/4784268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Gerakis Y., Hetz C. (2019). Brain organoids: a next step for humanized Alzheimer’s disease models? Mol. Psychiatry 24, 474–478. 10.1038/s41380-018-0343-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Ghemrawi R., Khair M. (2020). Endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response in neurodegenerative diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21:6127. 10.3390/ijms21176127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Gherardi G., Corbioli G., Ruzza F., Rizzuto R. (2022). CoQ10 and resveratrol effects to ameliorate aged-related mitochondrial dysfunctions. Nutrients 14:4326. 10.3390/nu14204326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ghosh R., Wang L., Wang E. S., Perera B. G., Igbaria A., Morita S., et al. (2014). Allosteric inhibition of the IRE1α RNase preserves cell viability and function during endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell 158, 534–548. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Gianferrara T., Cescon E., Grieco I., Spalluto G., Federico S. (2022). Glycogen synthase kinase 3β involvement in neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases. Curr. Med. Chem. 29, 4631–4697. 10.2174/0929867329666220216113517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. González-reyes R. E., Nava-Mesa M. O., Vargas-Sánchez K., Ariza-Salamanca D., Mora-Muñoz L. (2017). Involvement of astrocytes in Alzheimer’s disease from a neuroinflammatory and oxidative stress perspective. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 10:427. 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Gordon R., Albornoz E. A., Christie D. C., Langley M. R., Kumar V., Mantovani S., et al. (2018). Inflammasome inhibition prevents α-synuclein pathology and dopaminergic neurodegeneration in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 10:eaah4066. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aah4066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Gorman A. M., Healy S. J., Jäger R., Samali A. (2012). Stress management at the ER: regulators of ER stress-induced apoptosis. Pharmacol. Ther. 134, 306–316. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Guglielmotto M., Monteleone D., Giliberto L., Fornaro M., Borghi R., Tamagno E., et al. (2011). Amyloid-β42 activates the expression of BACE1 through the JNK pathway. J. Alzheimers Dis. 27, 871–883. 10.3233/JAD-2011-110884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Gully J. C., Sergeyev V. G., Bhootada Y., Mendez-Gomez H., Meyers C. A., Zolotukhin S., et al. (2016). Up-regulation of activating transcription factor 4 induces severe loss of dopamine nigral neurons in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 627, 36–41. 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.05.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Guo M., Wang J., Zhao Y., Feng Y., Han S., Dong Q., et al. (2020). Microglial exosomes facilitate α-synuclein transmission in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 143, 1476–1497. 10.1093/brain/awaa090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Gupta R., Ambasta R. K., Pravir K. (2021). Autophagy and apoptosis cascade: which is more prominent in neuronal death? Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 78, 8001–8047. 10.1007/s00018-021-04004-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Gupta S., Mishra A., Singh S. (2021). Cardinal role of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2α) in progressive dopaminergic neuronal death, DNA fragmentation: implication of PERK:IRE1α:ATF6 axis in Parkinson’s pathology. Cell Signal. 81:109922. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2021.109922 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Hajam Y. A., Rani R., Ganie S. Y., Sheikh T. A., Javaid D., Qadri S. S., et al. (2022). Oxidative stress in human pathology and aging: molecular mechanisms and perspectives. Cells 11:552. 10.3390/cells11030552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Halliday M., Radford H., Sekine Y., Moreno J., Verity N., Le Quesne J., et al. (2015). Partial restoration of protein synthesis rates by the small molecule ISRIB prevents neurodegeneration without pancreatic toxicity. Cell Death Dis. 6:e1672. 10.1038/cddis.2015.49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Halliday M., Radford H., Zents K. A. M., Molloy C., Moreno J. A., Verity N. C., et al. (2017). Repurposed drugs targeting eIF2α-P-mediated translational repression prevent neurodegeneration in mice. Brain 140, 1768–1783. 10.1093/brain/awx074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Halperin L., Jung J., Michalak M. (2014). The many functions of the endoplasmic reticulum chaperones and folding enzymes. IUBMB Life 66, 318–326. 10.1002/iub.1272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Hashioka S., Wu Z., Klegeris A. (2021). Glia-driven neuroinflammation and systemic inflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 19, 908–924. 10.2174/1570159X18666201111104509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Hazafa A., Batool A., Ahmad S., Amjad M., Chaudhry S. N., Asad J., et al. (2021). Humanin: a mitochondrial-derived peptide in the treatment of apoptosis-related diseases. Life Sci. 264:118679. 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Heidari A., Yazdanpanah N., Rezaei N. (2022). The role of toll-like receptors and neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neuroinflammation 19:135. 10.1186/s12974-022-02496-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Hetz C., Saxena S. (2017). ER stress and the unfolded protein response in neurodegeneration. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 13, 477–491. 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Hirota M., Kitagaki M., Itagaki H., Aiba S. (2006). Quantitative measurement of spliced XBP1 mRNA as an indicator of endoplasmic reticulum stress. J. Toxicol. Sci. 31, 149–156. 10.2131/jts.31.149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Hirsch E. C., Hunot S. (2009). Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease: a target for neuroprotection? Lancet Neurol. 8, 382–397. 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70062-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Hoffmann L., Waclawczyk M. S., Tang S., Hanschmann E. M., Gellert M., Rust M. B., et al. (2021). Cofilin1 oxidation links oxidative distress to mitochondrial demise and neuronal cell death. Cell Death Dis. 12:953. 10.1038/s41419-021-04242-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Höhn A., Tramutola A., Cascella R. (2020). Proteostasis failure in neurodegenerative diseases: focus on oxidative stress. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020:5497046. 10.1155/2020/5497046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Holubiec M. I., Gellert M., Hanschmann E. M. (2022). Redox signaling and metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 14:1003721. 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1003721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Homma K., Katagiri K., Nishitoh H., Ichijo H. (2009). Targeting ASK1 in ER stress-related neurodegenerative diseases. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 13, 653–664. 10.1517/14728220902980249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Hou Y., Wei Y., Lautrup S., Yang B., Wang Y., Cordonnier S., et al. (2021). NAD+ supplementation reduces neuroinflammation and cell senescence in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease via cGAS-STING. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 118:e2011226118. 10.1073/pnas.2011226118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Huang J., Huang N., Xu S., Luo Y., Li Y., Jin H., et al. (2021). Signaling mechanisms underlying inhibition of neuroinflammation by resveratrol in neurodegenerative diseases. J. Nutr. Biochem. 88:108552. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2020.108552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Huang L., Xue Y., Feng D., Yang R., Nie T., Zhu G., et al. (2017). Blockade of RyRs in the ER attenuates 6-OHDA-induced calcium overload, cellular hypo-excitability and apoptosis in dopaminergic neurons. Front. Cell Neurosci. 11:52. 10.3389/fncel.2017.00052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Hung S. Y., Fu W. M. (2017). Drug candidates in clinical trials for Alzheimer’s disease. J. Biomed. Sci. 24:47. 10.1186/s12929-017-0355-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Hur J., Pak S. C., Koo B. S., Jeon S. (2013). Borneol alleviates oxidative stress via upregulation of Nrf2 and Bcl-2 in SH-SY5Y cells. Pharm. Biol. 51, 30–35. 10.3109/13880209.2012.700718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Imbeault E., Mahvelati T. M., Braun R., Gris P., Gris D. (2014). Nlrx1 regulates neuronal cell death. Mol. Brain 7:90. 10.1186/s13041-014-0090-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Ishtiaq A., Ali T., Bakhtiar A., Bibi R., Bibi K., Mushtaq I., et al. (2021). Melatonin abated bisphenol A-induced neurotoxicity via p53/PUMA/Drp-1 signaling. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 28, 17789–17801. 10.1007/s11356-020-12129-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Jiang D., Li X., Williams R., Patel S., Men L., Wang Y., et al. (2009). Ternary complexes of iron, amyloid-β, and nitrilotriacetic acid: binding affinities, redox properties and relevance to iron-induced oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochemistry 48, 7939–7947. 10.1021/bi900907a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Jo S. H., Kim M. E., Cho J. H., Lee Y., Lee J., Park Y. D., et al. (2019). Hesperetin inhibits neuroinflammation on microglia by suppressing inflammatory cytokines and MAPK pathways. Arch. Pharm. Res. 42, 695–703. 10.1007/s12272-019-01174-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Johnson J., Mercado-Ayon E., Mercado-Ayon Y., Dong Y. N., Halawani S., Ngaba L., et al. (2021). Mitochondrial dysfunction in the development and progression of neurodegenerative diseases. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 702:108698. 10.1016/j.abb.2020.108698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Johri A., Beal M. F. (2012). Mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 342, 619–630. 10.1124/jpet.112.192138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Joshi A. U., Minhas P. S., Liddelow S. A., Haileselassie B., Andreasson K. I., Dorn G. W., 2nd, et al. (2019). Fragmented mitochondria released from microglia trigger A1 astrocytic response and propagate inflammatory neurodegeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 1635–1648. 10.1038/s41593-019-0486-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Kaminskyy V. O., Zhivotovsky B. (2014). Free radicals in cross talk between autophagy and apoptosis. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 21, 86–102. 10.1089/ars.2013.5746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Karimi-Haghighi S., Razavi Y., Iezzi D., Scheyer A. F., Manzoni O., Haghparast A. (2022). Cannabidiol and substance use disorder: dream or reality. Neuropharmacology 207:108948. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2022.108948 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Karuppagounder S. S., Alim I., Khim S. J., Bourassa M. W., Sleiman S. F., John R., et al. (2016). Therapeutic targeting of oxygen-sensing prolyl hydroxylases abrogates ATF4-dependent neuronal death and improves outcomes after brain hemorrhage in several rodent models. Sci. Transl. Med. 8:328ra29. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac6008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Kaufmann P., Thompson J. L., Levy G., Buchsbaum R., Shefner J., Krivickas L. S., et al. (2009). Phase II trial of CoQ10 for ALS finds insufficient evidence to justify phase III. Ann. Neurol. 66, 235–244. 10.1002/ana.21743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Kim J. S., Heo R. W., Kim H., Yi C. O., Shin H. J., Han J. W., et al. (2014). Salubrinal, ER stress inhibitor, attenuates kainic acid-induced hippocampal cell death. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna) 121, 1233–1243. 10.1007/s00702-014-1208-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Klein G., Delmar P., Voyle N., Rehal S., Hofmann C., Abi-Saab D., et al. (2019). Gantenerumab reduces amyloid-β plaques in patients with prodromal to moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a PET substudy interim analysis. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 11:101. 10.1186/s13195-019-0559-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Klepac N., Relja M., Klepac R., Hećimović S., Babić T., Trkulja V. (2007). Oxidative stress parameters in plasma of Huntington’s disease patients, asymptomatic Huntington’s disease gene carriers and healthy subjects: a cross-sectional study. J. Neurol. 254, 1676–1683. 10.1007/s00415-007-0611-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Korovesis D., Rubio-Tomás T., Tavernarakis N. (2023). Oxidative stress in age-related neurodegenerative diseases: an overview of recent tools and findings. Antioxidants (Basel) 12:131. 10.3390/antiox12010131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Kovac S., Angelova P. R., Holmström K. M., Zhang Y., Dinkova-Kostova A. T., Abramov A. Y. (2015). Nrf2 regulates ROS production by mitochondria and NADPH oxidase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1850, 794–801. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.11.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Kovacs S. B., Miao E. A. (2017). Gasdermins: effectors of pyroptosis. Trends Cell. Biol. 27, 673–684. 10.1016/j.tcb.2017.05.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Kumar H., Lim H. W., More S. V., Kim B. W., Koppula S., Kim I. S., et al. (2012). The role of free radicals in the aging brain and Parkinson’s disease: convergence and parallelism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13, 10478–10504. 10.3390/ijms130810478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Kwon H. S., Koh S. H. (2020). Neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative disorders: the roles of microglia and astrocytes. Transl. Neurodegener. 9:42. 10.1186/s40035-020-00221-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Lang F. M., Mo Y., Sabbagh M., Solomon P., Boada M., Jones R. W., et al. (2021). Intepirdine as adjunctive therapy to donepezil for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial (MINDSET). Alzheimers Dement. (N Y) 7:e12136. 10.1002/trc2.12136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Lee A.-H., Iwakoshi N. N., Glimcher L. H. (2003). XBP-1 regulates a subset of endoplasmic reticulum resident chaperone genes in the unfolded protein response. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 7448–7459. 10.1128/MCB.23.21.7448-7459.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Lee C.-M., Lee D.-S., Jung W.-K., Yoo J. S., Yim M.-J., Choi Y. H., et al. (2016). Benzyl isothiocyanate inhibits inflammasome activation in E. coli LPS-stimulated BV2 cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 38, 912–918. 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Lee C., Park G. H., Kim C.-Y., Jang J.-H. (2011). -Gingerol attenuates β-amyloid-induced oxidative cell death via fortifying cellular antioxidant defense system. Food Chem. Toxicol. 49, 1261–1269. 10.1016/j.fct.2011.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Lee E., Hwang I., Park S., Hong S., Hwang B., Cho Y., et al. (2019). MPTP-driven NLRP3 inflammasome activation in microglia plays a central role in dopaminergic neurodegeneration. Cell Death Differ. 26, 213–228. 10.1038/s41418-018-0124-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Leng F., Edison P. (2021). Neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Alzheimer disease: where do we go from here? Nat. Rev. Neurol. 17, 157–172. 10.1038/s41582-020-00435-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Lezi E., Swerdlow R. H. (2012). Mitochondria in neurodegeneration. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 942, 269–286. 10.1007/978-94-007-2869-1_12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Li W., Fotinos A., Wu Q., Chen Y., Zhu Y., Baranov S., et al. (2015). N-acetyl-L-tryptophan delays disease onset and extends survival in an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis transgenic mouse model. Neurobiol. Dis. 80, 93–103. 10.1016/j.nbd.2015.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Li Y. C., Hao J. C., Shang B., Zhao C., Wang L. J., Yang K. L., et al. (2021). Neuroprotective effects of aucubin on hydrogen peroxide-induced toxicity in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells via the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway. Phytomedicine 87:153577. 10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Li Y., Vaughan K. L., Tweedie D., Jung J., Kim H. K., Choi H. I., et al. (2019). Pharmacokinetics of Exenatide in nonhuman primates following its administration in the form of sustained-release PT320 and Bydureon. Sci. Rep. 9:17208. 10.1038/s41598-019-53356-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Li Y., Xia Y., Yin S., Wan F., Hu J., Kou L., et al. (2021). Targeting microglial α-synuclein/TLRs/NF-kappaB/NLRP3 inflammasome axis in Parkinson’s disease. Front Immunol. 12:719807. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.719807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Liang Z., Zhang B., Su W. W., Williams P. G., Li Q. X. (2016). C-Glycosylflavones alleviate tau phosphorylation and amyloid neurotoxicity through GSK3β inhibition. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 7, 912–923. 10.1021/acschemneuro.6b00059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Lim J. H., Park H. S., Choi J. K., Lee I. S., Choi H. J. (2007). Isoorientin induces Nrf2 pathway-driven antioxidant response through phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling. Arch. Pharm. Res. 30, 1590–1598. 10.1007/BF02977329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Lin M. T., Beal M. F. (2006). Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature 443, 787–795. 10.1038/nature05292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Liu J., Lillo C., Jonsson P. A., Vande Velde C., Ward C. M., Miller T. M., et al. (2004). Toxicity of familial ALS-linked SOD1 mutants from selective recruitment to spinal mitochondria. Neuron 43, 5–17. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.06.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Liu J., Wang F. (2017). Role of neuroinflammation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: cellular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Front. Immunol. 8:1005. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Liu Z., Zhou T., Ziegler A. C., Dimitrion P., Zuo L. (2017). Oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases: from molecular mechanisms to clinical applications. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017:2525967. 10.1155/2017/2525967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Llano D. A., Li J., Waring J. F., Ellis T., Devanarayan V., Witte D. G., et al. (2012). Cerebrospinal fluid cytokine dynamics differ between Alzheimer disease patients and elderly controls. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 26, 322–328. 10.1097/WAD.0b013e31823b2728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. López-Sendón Moreno J. L., García Caldentey J., Trigo Cubillo P., Ruiz Romero C., García Ribas G., Alonso Arias M. A., et al. (2016). A double-blind, randomized, cross-over, placebo-controlled, pilot trial with Sativex in Huntington’s disease. J. Neurol. 263, 1390–1400. 10.1007/s00415-016-8145-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Lu T., Aron L., Zullo J., Pan Y., Kim H., Chen Y., et al. (2014). REST and stress resistance in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 507, 448–454. 10.1038/nature13163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Lu X., Li Y., Wang W., Chen S., Liu T., Jia D., et al. (2014). 3 β-hydroxysteroid-Δ 24 reductase (DHCR24) protects neuronal cells from apoptotic cell death induced by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. PLoS One 9:e86753. 10.1371/journal.pone.0086753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Lustbader J. W., Cirilli M., Lin C., Xu H. W., Takuma K., Wang N., et al. (2004). ABAD directly links Aβ to mitochondrial toxicity in Alzheimer’s disease. Science 304, 448–452. 10.1126/science.1091230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Lv R., Du L., Zhou F., Yuan X., Liu X., Zhang L. (2020). Rosmarinic acid alleviates inflammation, apoptosis and oxidative stress through regulating miR-155-5p in a Mice Model of Parkinson’s disease. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 11, 3259–3266. 10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Lv M., Xue G., Cheng H., Meng P., Lian X., HöLscher C., et al. (2021). The GLP-1/GIP dual-receptor agonist DA5-CH inhibits the NF-κB inflammatory pathway in the MPTP mouse model of Parkinson’s disease more effectively than the GLP-1 single-receptor agonist NLY01. Brain Behav. 11:e2231. 10.1002/brb3.2231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Ma Z. W., Liu D. X. (2018). Humanin decreases mitochondrial membrane permeability by inhibiting the membrane association and oligomerization of Bax and Bid proteins. Acta. Pharmacol. Sin. 39, 1012–1021. 10.1038/aps.2017.169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Mahboubi Mehrabani M., Karvandi M. S., Maafi P., Doroudian M. (2022). Neurological complications associated with Covid-19; molecular mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. Rev. Med. Virol. 32:e2334. 10.1002/rmv.2334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Maity S., Komal P., Kumar V., Saxena A., Tungekar A., Chandrasekar V. (2022). Impact of ER stress and ER-mitochondrial crosstalk in Huntington’s disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23:780. 10.3390/ijms23020780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Malko P., Ding R., Jiang L.-H. (2021). TRPM2 channel in oxidative stress-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptotic cell death. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 125, 51–72. 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2020.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Man S. M., Karki R., Kanneganti T. D. (2017). Molecular mechanisms and functions of pyroptosis, inflammatory caspases and inflammasomes in infectious diseases. Immunol. Rev. 277, 61–75. 10.1111/imr.12534 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Mangalmurti A., Lukens J. R. (2022). How neurons die in Alzheimer’s disease: implications for neuroinflammation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 75:102575. 10.1016/j.conb.2022.102575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Markovinovic A., Greig J., Martín-Guerrero S. M., Salam S., Paillusson S. (2022). Endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria signaling in neurons and neurodegenerative diseases. J. Cell Sci. 135:jcs248534. 10.1242/jcs.248534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Marucci G., Buccioni M., Ben D. D., Lambertucci C., Volpini R., Amenta F. (2021). Efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropharmacology 190:108352. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Mattiazzi M., D’aurelio M., Gajewski C. D., Martushova K., Kiaei M., Beal M. F., et al. (2002). Mutated human SOD1 causes dysfunction of oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria of transgenic mice. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 29626–29633. 10.1074/jbc.M203065200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Matus S., Lopez E., Valenzuela V., Nassif M., Hetz C. (2013). Functional contribution of the transcription factor ATF4 to the pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS One 8:e66672. 10.1371/journal.pone.0066672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Mcgarry A., Mcdermott M., Kieburtz K., De Blieck E. A., Beal F., Marder K., et al. (2017). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of coenzyme Q10 in Huntington disease. Neurology 88, 152–159. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Meares G. P., Liu Y., Rajbhandari R., Qin H., Nozell S. E., Mobley J. A., et al. (2014). PERK-dependent activation of JAK1 and STAT3 contributes to endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced inflammation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 34, 3911–3925. 10.1128/MCB.00980-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Mercado G., Castillo V., Soto P., López N., Axten J. M., Sardi S. P., et al. (2018). Targeting PERK signaling with the small molecule GSK2606414 prevents neurodegeneration in a model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 112, 136–148. 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Milošević M., Arsić A., Cvetković Z., Vučić V. (2021). Memorable food: fighting age-related neurodegeneration by precision nutrition. Front. Nutr. 8:688086. 10.3389/fnut.2021.688086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Mohammed-Ali Z., Cruz G. L., Dickhout J. G. (2015). Crosstalk between the unfolded protein response and NF-κB-mediated inflammation in the progression of chronic kidney disease. J. Immunol. Res. 2015:428508. 10.1155/2015/428508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Morales-Martínez A., Martínez-Gómez P. A., Martinez-Fong D., Villegas-Rojas M. M., Perez-Severiano F., Del Toro-Colín M. A., et al. (2022). Oxidative stress and mitochondrial complex I dysfunction correlate with neurodegeneration in an α-synucleinopathy animal model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23:11394. 10.3390/ijms231911394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Muhammad T., Ikram M., Ullah R., Rehman S. U., Kim M. O. (2019). Hesperetin, a citrus flavonoid, attenuates LPS-induced neuroinflammation, apoptosis and memory impairments by modulating TLR4/NF-κB signaling. Nutrients 11:648. 10.3390/nu11030648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Nichols M. R., St-Pierre M.-K., Wendeln A.-C., Makoni N. J., Gouwens L. K., Garrad E. C., et al. (2019). Inflammatory mechanisms in neurodegeneration. J. Neurochem. 149, 562–581. 10.1111/jnc.14674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Niedzielska E., Smaga I., Gawlik M., Moniczewski A., Stankowicz P., Pera J., et al. (2016). Oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 53, 4094–4125. 10.1007/s12035-015-9337-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Niso-Santano M., Bravo-San Pedro J. M., Gómez-Sánchez R., Climent V., Soler G., Fuentes J. M., et al. (2011). ASK1 overexpression accelerates paraquat-induced autophagy via endoplasmic reticulum stress. Toxicol Sci. 119, 156–168. 10.1093/toxsci/kfq313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Nunomura A., Moreira P. I., Lee H. G., Zhu X., Castellani R. J., Smith M. A., et al. (2007). Neuronal death and survival under oxidative stress in Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 6, 411–423. 10.2174/187152707783399201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Onyango I. G., Jauregui G. V., Čarná M., Bennett J. P., Jr., Stokin G. B. (2021). Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Biomedicines 9:524. 10.3390/biomedicines9050524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Opazo C., Huang X., Cherny R. A., Moir R. D., Roher A. E., White A. R., et al. (2002). Metalloenzyme-like Activity of Alzheimer’s disease β-amyloid: CU-Dependent catalytic conversion of dopamine, cholesterol, and biological reducing agents to neurotoxic H2O2*. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 40302–40308. 10.1074/jbc.M206428200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Ostrowitzki S., Bittner T., Sink K. M., Mackey H., Rabe C., Honig L. S., et al. (2022). Evaluating the safety and efficacy of crenezumab vs. placebo in adults with early Alzheimer disease: two phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trials. JAMA Neurol. 79, 1113–1121. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Pagano G., Taylor K. I., Anzures-Cabrera J., Marchesi M., Simuni T., Marek K., et al. (2022). Trial of prasinezumab in early-stage Parkinson’s disease. N Engl. J. Med. 387, 421–432. 10.1056/NEJMoa2202867 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Pao H. P., Liao W. I., Tang S. E., Wu S. Y., Huang K. L., Chu S. J. (2021). Suppression of endoplasmic reticulum stress by 4-PBA protects against hyperoxia-induced acute lung injury via up-regulating claudin-4 expression. Front. Immunol. 12:674316. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.674316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Pardillo-Díaz R., Perez-GarcíA P., Castro C., Nunez-Abades P., Carrascal L. (2022). Oxidative stress as a potential mechanism underlying membrane hyperexcitability in neurodegenerative diseases. Antioxidants (Basel) 11:1511. 10.3390/antiox11081511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Patel S., Bansoad A. V., Singh R., Khatik G. L. (2022). BACE1: a key regulator in Alzheimer’s disease progression and current development of its inhibitors. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 20, 1174–1193. 10.2174/1570159X19666211201094031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Pintado C., Macías S., Domínguez-Martín H., Castaño A., Ruano D. (2017). Neuroinflammation alters cellular proteostasis by producing endoplasmic reticulum stress, autophagy activation and disrupting ERAD activation. Sci. Rep. 7:8100. 10.1038/s41598-017-08722-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Piscianz E., Tesser A., Rimondi E., Melloni E., Celeghini C., Marcuzzi A. (2021). MitoQ is able to modulate apoptosis and inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22:4753. 10.3390/ijms22094753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Pohl F., Kong Thoo Lin P. (2018). The potential use of plant natural products and plant extracts with antioxidant properties for the prevention/treatment of neurodegenerative diseases: in vitro, in vivo and clinical trials. Molecules 23:3283. 10.3390/molecules23123283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Poulter M. O., Payne K. B., Steiner J. P. (2004). Neuroimmunophilins: a novel drug therapy for the reversal of neurodegenerative disease? Neuroscience 128, 1–6. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.06.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Ramirez-Moreno M. J., Duarte-Jurado A. P., Gopar-Cuevas Y., Gonzalez-Alcocer A., Loera-Arias M. J., Saucedo-Cardenas O., et al. (2019). Autophagy stimulation decreases dopaminergic neuronal death mediated by oxidative stress. Mol. Neurobiol. 56, 8136–8156. 10.1007/s12035-019-01654-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Read A., Schröder M. (2021). The unfolded protein response: an overview. Biology (Basel) 10:384. 10.3390/biology10050384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Reichert C. O., De Freitas F. A., Sampaio-Silva J., Rokita-Rosa L., Barros P. L., Levy D. L., et al. (2020). Ferroptosis mechanisms involved in neurodegenerative diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21:8765. 10.3390/ijms21228765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Remondelli P., Renna M. (2017). The endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response in neurodegenerative disorders and its potential therapeutic significance. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 10:187. 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Ren H., Zhai W., Lu X., Wang G. (2021). The cross-links of endoplasmic reticulum stress, autophagy and neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 13:691881. 10.3389/fnagi.2021.691881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Rocha E. M., De Miranda B., Sanders L. H. (2018). Alpha-synuclein: pathology, mitochondrial dysfunction and neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 109, 249–257. 10.1016/j.nbd.2017.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Ross C. A., Tabrizi S. J. (2011). Huntington’s disease: from molecular pathogenesis to clinical treatment. Lancet Neurol. 10, 83–98. 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70245-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Rui W., Li S., Xiao H., Xiao M., Shi J. (2020). Baicalein attenuates neuroinflammation by inhibiting NLRP3/caspase-1/GSDMD pathway in MPTP induced mice model of Parkinson’s disease. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 23, 762–773. 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Salminen A., Kauppinen A., Suuronen T., Kaarniranta K., Ojala J. (2009). ER stress in Alzheimer’s disease: a novel neuronal trigger for inflammation and Alzheimer’s pathology. J. Neuroinflammation 6:41. 10.1186/1742-2094-6-41 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Salter M. W., Stevens B. (2017). Microglia emerge as central players in brain disease. Nat. Med. 23, 1018–1027. 10.1038/nm.4397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Sbodio J. I., Snyder S. H., Paul B. D. (2019). Redox mechanisms in neurodegeneration: from disease outcomes to therapeutic opportunities. Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 30, 1450–1499. 10.1089/ars.2017.7321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Schwarz D. S., Blower M. D. (2016). The endoplasmic reticulum: structure, function and response to cellular signaling. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 73, 79–94. 10.1007/s00018-015-2052-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Shi M., Chai Y., Zhang J., Chen X. (2022). Endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated neuronal death and innate immune response in neurological diseases. Front. Immunol. 12:794580. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.794580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Sims S. G., Cisney R. N., Lipscomb M. M., Meares G. P. (2022). The role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in astrocytes. Glia 70, 5–19. 10.1002/glia.24082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Singh A., Kukreti R., Saso L., Kukreti S. (2019). Oxidative stress: a key modulator in neurodegenerative diseases. Molecules 24:1583. 10.3390/molecules24081583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Sirianni A. C., Jiang J., Zeng J., Mao L. L., Zhou S., Sugarbaker P., et al. (2015). N-acetyl-l-tryptophan, but not N-acetyl-d-tryptophan, rescues neuronal cell death in models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurochem. 134, 956–968. 10.1111/jnc.13190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Sochocka M., Koutsouraki E. S., Gasiorowski K., Leszek J. (2013). Vascular oxidative stress and mitochondrial failure in the pathobiology of Alzheimer’s disease: a new approach to therapy. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 12, 870–881. 10.2174/18715273113129990072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Song J., Han K., Wang Y., Qu R., Liu Y., Wang S., et al. (2022). Microglial activation and oxidative stress in PM2.5-induced neurodegenerative disorders. Antioxidants (Basel) 11:1482. 10.3390/antiox11081482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Song D. D., Shults C. W., Sisk A., Rockenstein E., Masliah E. (2004). Enhanced substantia nigra mitochondrial pathology in human α-synuclein transgenic mice after treatment with MPTP. Exp. Neurol. 186, 158–172. 10.1016/S0014-4886(03)00342-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Sprenkle N. T., Sims S. G., Sánchez C. L., Meares G. P. (2017). Endoplasmic reticulum stress and inflammation in the central nervous system. Mol. Neurodegener. 12:42. 10.1186/s13024-017-0183-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Stancu I. C., Cremers N., Vanrusselt H., Couturier J., Vanoosthuyse A., Kessels S., et al. (2019). Aggregated Tau activates NLRP3-ASC inflammasome exacerbating exogenously seeded and non-exogenously seeded Tau pathology in vivo. Acta Neuropathol. 137, 599–617. 10.1007/s00401-018-01957-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Stefani I. C., Wright D., Polizzi K. M., Kontoravdi C. (2012). The role of ER stress-induced apoptosis in neurodegeneration. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 9, 373–387. 10.2174/156720512800107618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Stutzbach L. D., Xie S. X., Naj A. C., Albin R., Gilman S., Lee V. M., et al. (2013). The unfolded protein response is activated in disease-affected brain regions in progressive supranuclear palsy and Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 1:31. 10.1186/2051-5960-1-31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Sushma, Mondal A. C. (2019). Role of GPCR signaling and calcium dysregulation in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 101:103414. 10.1016/j.mcn.2019.103414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Taalab Y. M., Ibrahim N., Maher A., Hassan M., Mohamed W., Moustafa A. A., et al. (2018). Mechanisms of disordered neurodegenerative function: concepts and facts about the different roles of the protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK). Rev. Neurosci. 29, 387–415. 10.1515/revneuro-2017-0071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Tamagno E., Parola M., Bardini P., Piccini A., Borghi R., Guglielmotto M., et al. (2005). β-site APP cleaving enzyme up-regulation induced by 4-hydroxynonenal is mediated by stress-activated protein kinases pathways. J. Neurochem. 92, 628–636. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02895.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Tansey M. G., Wallings R. L., Houser M. C., Herrick M. K., Keating C. E., Joers V. (2022). Inflammation and immune dysfunction in Parkinson disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 657–673. 10.1038/s41577-022-00684-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Taso O. V., Philippou A., Moustogiannis A., Zevolis E., Koutsilieris M. (2019). Lipid peroxidation products and their role in neurodegenerative diseases. Ann. Res. Hosp. 3:2. 10.21037/arh.2018.12.02 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  200. Taylor R. C., Cullen S. P., Martin S. J. (2008). Apoptosis: controlled demolition at the cellular level. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 231–241. 10.1038/nrm2312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Teleanu D. M., Niculescu A.-G., Lungu I. I., Radu C. I., Vladacenco O., Roza E., et al. (2022). An overview of oxidative stress, neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23:5938. 10.3390/ijms23115938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Thawkar B. S., Kaur G. (2019). Inhibitors of NF-κB and P2X7/NLRP3/caspase 1 pathway in microglia: novel therapeutic opportunities in neuroinflammation induced early-stage Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neuroimmunol. 326, 62–74. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2018.11.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Trushina E., Trushin S., Hasan M. F. (2022). Mitochondrial complex I as a therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 12, 483–495. 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.11.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Valdes P., Mercado G., Vidal R. L., Molina C., Parsons G., Court F. A., et al. (2014). Control of dopaminergic neuron survival by the unfolded protein response transcription factor XBP1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 111, 6804–6809. 10.1073/pnas.1321845111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Van Dam L., Dansen T. B. (2020). Cross-talk between redox signalling and protein aggregation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 48, 379–397. 10.1042/BST20190054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Voet S., Srinivasan S., Lamkanfi M., Van Loo G. (2019). Inflammasomes in neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases. EMBO Mol. Med. 11:e10248. 10.15252/emmm.201810248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  207. Vukic V., Callaghan D., Walker D., Lue L. F., Liu Q. Y., Couraud P. O., et al. (2009). Expression of inflammatory genes induced by beta-amyloid peptides in human brain endothelial cells and in Alzheimer’s brain is mediated by the JNK-AP1 signaling pathway. Neurobiol. Dis. 34, 95–106. 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.12.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Walle L. V., Lamkanfi M. (2016). Pyroptosis. Curr. Biol. 26, R568–R572. 10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Wang W.-Y., Tan M.-S., Yu J. T., Tan L. (2015). Role of pro-inflammatory cytokines released from microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann. Transl. Med. 3:136. 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.03.49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Wang H. F., Wang Z. Q., Ding Y., Piao M. H., Feng C. S., Chi G. F., et al. (2018). Endoplasmic reticulum stress regulates oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced parthanatos in human SH-SY5Y cells via improvement of intracellular ROS. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 24, 29–38. 10.1111/cns.12771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Wang S., Yuan Y. H., Chen N. H., Wang H. B. (2019). The mechanisms of NLRP3 inflammasome/pyroptosis activation and their role in Parkinson’s disease. Int. Immunopharmacol. 67, 458–464. 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.12.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Wang H., Zhou X. M., Wu L. Y., Liu G. J., Xu W. D., Zhang X. S., et al. (2020). Aucubin alleviates oxidative stress and inflammation via Nrf2-mediated signaling activity in experimental traumatic brain injury. J. Neuroinflammation 17:188. 10.1186/s12974-020-01863-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Wessels A. M., Tariot P. N., Zimmer J. A., Selzler K. J., Bragg S. M., Andersen S. W., et al. (2020). Efficacy and safety of lanabecestat for treatment of early and mild Alzheimer disease: the AMARANTH and DAYBREAK-ALZ randomized clinical trials. JAMA Neurol. 77, 199–209. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Wu L., Luo N., Zhao H. R., Gao Q., Lu J., Pan Y., et al. (2014). Salubrinal protects against rotenone-induced SH-SY5Y cell death via ATF4-parkin pathway. Brain Res. 1549, 52–62. 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Wu Q., Zou C. (2022). Microglial dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases via RIPK1 and ROS. Antioxidants (Basel) 11:2201. 10.3390/antiox11112201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  216. Wu Y., Chen M., Jiang J. (2019). Mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases and drug targets via apoptotic signaling. Mitochondrion 49, 35–45. 10.1016/j.mito.2019.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Xie H., Hou S., Jiang J., Sekutowicz M., Kelly J., Bacskai B. J. (2013). Rapid cell death is preceded by amyloid plaque-mediated oxidative stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 110, 7904–7909. 10.1073/pnas.1217938110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Xu J., Barger S. W., Drew P. D. (2008). The PPAR-γ agonist 15-deoxy-Δ-prostaglandin J2 attenuates microglial production of IL-12 family cytokines: potential relevance to Alzheimer’s disease. PPAR Res. 2008:349185. 10.1155/2008/349185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Yan Y., Jiang W., Liu L., Wang X., Ding C., Tian Z., et al. (2015). Dopamine controls systemic inflammation through inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome. Cell 160, 62–73. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. Yao M., Nguyen T. V., Pike C. J. (2005). β-amyloid-induced neuronal apoptosis involves c-Jun N-terminal kinase-dependent downregulation of Bcl-w. J. Neurosci. 25, 1149–1158. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4736-04.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Yoo J. M., Lee B. D., Sok D. E., Ma J. Y., Kim M. R. (2017). Neuroprotective action of N-acetyl serotonin in oxidative stress-induced apoptosis through the activation of both TrkB/CREB/BDNF pathway and Akt/Nrf2/Antioxidant enzyme in neuronal cells. Redox Biol. 11, 592–599. 10.1016/j.redox.2016.12.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Young A. J., Johnson S., Steffens D. C., Doraiswamy P. M. (2007). Coenzyme Q10: a review of its promise as a neuroprotectant. CNS Spectr. 12, 62–68. 10.1017/s1092852900020538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Zhang K., Kaufman R. J. (2008). From endoplasmic-reticulum stress to the inflammatory response. Nature 454, 455–462. 10.1038/nature07203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  224. Zhang L., Yu H., Zhao X., Lin X., Tan C., Cao G., et al. (2010). Neuroprotective effects of salidroside against beta-amyloid-induced oxidative stress in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells. Neurochem. Int. 57, 547–555. 10.1016/j.neuint.2010.06.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  225. Zhang S., Gao L., Liu X., Lu T., Xie C., Jia J. (2017). Resveratrol attenuates microglial activation via SIRT1-SOCS1 pathway. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2017:8791832. 10.1155/2017/8791832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  226. Zhao C., Liao Y., Rahaman A., Kumar V. (2022). Towards understanding the relationship between ER stress and unfolded protein response in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front. Aging Neurosci. 14:892518. 10.3389/fnagi.2022.892518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  227. Zhao R., Yu Q., Hou L., Dong X., Zhang H., Chen X., et al. (2020). Cadmium induces mitochondrial ROS inactivation of XIAP pathway leading to apoptosis in neuronal cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 121:105715. 10.1016/j.biocel.2020.105715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  228. Zhong L. M., Zong Y., Sun L., Guo J. Z., Zhang W., He Y., et al. (2012). Resveratrol inhibits inflammatory responses via the mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway in cultured LPS-stimulated microglial cells. PLoS One 7:e32195. 10.1371/journal.pone.0032195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES