Abstract
Natural products discovered from bacteria provide critically needed therapeutic leads for drug discovery, and myxobacteria are an established source for metabolites with unique chemical scaffolds and biological activities. Myxobacterial genomes accommodate an exceptional number and variety of biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) which encode for features involved in specialized metabolism. Continued discovery and sequencing of novel myxobacteria from the environment provides BGCs for the genome mining pipeline. Herein, we describe the collection, sequencing, and genome mining of 20 myxobacteria isolated from rhizospheric soil samples collected in North America. Nine isolates where determined to be novel species of myxobacteria including representatives from the genera Archangium, Myxococcus, Nannocystis, Polyangium, Pyxidicoccus, Sorangium, and Stigmatella. Growth profiles, biochemical assays, and descriptions are provided for all proposed novel species. We assess the BGC content of all isolates and observe differences between Myxococcia and Polyangiia clusters. Utilizing complete or near complete genome sequences we compare the chromosomal organization of BGCs of related myxobacteria from various genera and suggest spatial proximity of hybrid, modular clusters contributes to the metabolic adaptability of myxobacteria.
Keywords: myxobacteria, specialized metabolism, genome mining, biosynthetic gene clusters, Nannocystis
INTRODUCTION
Myxobacteria are metabolically “gifted” bacteria with large genomes accommodating an exceptional number of biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) and the potential to produce highly diverse specialized metabolites (1–4). Excellent reservoirs of candidate therapeutics, over 100 unique metabolite scaffolds have been discovered from myxobacteria (2). Extensive metabolomic analysis of ~2,300 myxobacterial extracts revealed a correlation between detected metabolites and taxonomic distance with genus-level hierarchical clustering of metabolite profiles (5). Although limited to metabolic profiles of axenically grown myxobacteria, this observation suggests investigation of lesser-studied genera within the phylum Myxococcota might increase the likelihood of metabolite discovery. Ongoing natural product discoveries from novel species of myxobacteria reinforce the need for continued isolation and characterization of environmental myxobacteria (6–9). Most recently described Myxococcota belong to the genera Corallococcus, Myxococcus, and Pyxidicoccus (10–14), and comparatively fewer members of lesser-studied myxobacterial taxa have been reported over the last decade (15–17). For example, no new type strain Stigmatella has been reported since 2007. Herein we report isolation and genome sequencing of 20 environmental myxobacteria including representatives from the less-well-studied Archangium, Nannocystis, and Polyangium. Complete and near-complete genome data enabled a thorough assessment of BGC content which revealed 1) significant differences in cluster sizes of Myxococcia and Polyangiia, 2) unique biosynthetic capacity of Nannocystis, and 3) chromosomal organization of myxobacterial BGCs.
RESULTS
Isolation and genomic comparison of 20 isolated myxobacteria.
Rhizospheric soil samples collected from shrubs and trees were screened for bacterial swarms using standard prey-baiting and filter paper degradation methods (18–20) to isolate environmental myxobacteria (Supplemental Figure 1)(21). Morphology screening of visible swarms facilitated isolation of myxobacteria from multiple genera with a specific focus on lesser-studied myxobacteria. A total of 20 environmental isolates of putative myxobacteria including eight agarolytic isolates were obtained as monocultures (Figure 1). Lesser-studied myxobacteria include genera with agarolytic phenotypes such as Nannocystis, Polyangium, and Sorangium thus numerous agarolytic isolates with similar morphologies were advanced for genome sequencing (18). We have previously discussed four of the 20 environmental isolates (SCHIC03, SCPEA02, NCCRE02, NCSPR01) (22). Genome sequencing of all isolates provided five complete genomes, seven draft genomes with ≤3 contigs, three draft genomes with 5–8 contigs, and five lower quality genome assemblies with ≤44 contigs (Table 1). Genome sizes ranged from 9,459,689–13,831,693 Mb and GC content varied from 68.1–71.5%. High quality assemblies enabled subsequent whole genome comparison approaches for phylogenetic analysis and assessment of biosynthetic gene cluster content and organization.
Table 1:
Isolate | Size (bp) | CDS | GC% | N50 | L50 | Contigs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIWBW | 13,831,693 | 11,592 | 68.1 | 13,758,192 | 1 | 2 |
SCHIC03* | 10,367,529 | 8,339 | 68.6 | - | 1 | 1 |
BB15–2 | 11,048,555 | 9,803 | 71.5 | 3,033,751 | 2 | 5 |
FL3 | 13,228,663 | 12,183 | 71.5 | - | 1 | 1 |
NCELM | 12,940,226 | 11,412 | 71.2 | 791,632 | 7 | 29 |
RBIL | 12,529,437 | 11,262 | 71.4 | 6,343,246 | 1 | 3 |
RJM3 | 13,254,631 | 11,155 | 68.6 | 13,235,919 | 1 | 2 |
SCPEA02* | 13,211,253 | 10,588 | 69.6 | - | 1 | 1 |
WIWO2 | 13,472,481 | 11,616 | 71.1 | 2,525,385 | 2 | 7 |
NCWAL01 | 10,951,030 | 8,884 | 66.9 | 941,459 | 1 | 2 |
NCSPR01* | 9,785,177 | 8,033 | 70.1 | 9,343,940 | 1 | 3 |
NCCRE02* | 10,538,407 | 8,589 | 69.7 | 3,024,381 | 2 | 8 |
MSG2 | 13,340,839 | 10,353 | 70.3 | 13,193,640 | 1 | 2 |
NCRR | 9,787,125 | 8,044 | 70.2 | - | 1 | 1 |
MISCRS | 10,873,373 | 8,896 | 70.2 | 10,790,239 | 1 | 2 |
SCPEA4 | 12,461,442 | 11,002 | 71.3 | 1,797,159 | 3 | 22 |
BB11–1 | 9,459,689 | 7,665 | 70.6 | 427,033 | 7 | 44 |
BB12–1 | 10,337,840 | 8,427 | 69.6 | 593,731 | 6 | 38 |
ILAH1 | 12,844,680 | 11,575 | 71.2 | 573,330 | 8 | 41 |
NMCA1 | 9,502,182 | 8,152 | 69 | - | 1 | 1 |
Phylogenetic relationships of isolated myxobacteria.
Initial phylogenetic analysis using 16S rRNA sequences of type strain myxobacteria (obtained from the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN)) suggested the environmental isolates included 1 Archangium, 5 Corallococcus, 3 Myxococcus, 6 Nannocystis, 1 Polyangium, 2 Pyxidicoccus, 1 Sorangium, and 1 Stigmatella (Supplemental Figure 2). Utilizing genome data from each isolate, conserved gene sequence similarities between isolates and type strain myxobacteria were determined using average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization values (dDDH) according to established methods for taxonomic assignment of myxobacteria (10, 11). Resulting ANI and dDDH values indicated ten of the 20 environmental isolates to be novel species with values below the respective cutoffs of 95% and 70% when compared to most similar type strains (Figure 2 and Supplemental Table 1). Isolate MIWBW is most phylogenetically similar to Archangium gephyra DSM2261T and A. gephyra Cbvi76 (previously referred to as Cystobacter violaceus Cbvi76 (23)) (Figure 2A). Of the four published type strain Archangium, A. gephyra DSM2261T is currently the only representative sufficiently sequenced for comparative genomic analysis. More rigorous analysis comparing sequenced representatives of closely related Cystobacter and Melittangium reinforced MIWBW as a novel species. This analysis also revealed Cystobacter gracilis DSM 14753T to be an outlier within the three genera with ANI values below 77.5 for all included representatives. Isolate SCHIC03 is most phylogenetically similar to Myxococcus stipitatus DSM 14675T when compared to eight Myxococcus type strains (Figure 2B). Also observed by Chambers et al., the ANI value between established type strain species Myxococcus xanthus DSM 16526T and Myxococcus virescens DSM 2260T is above the threshold for novel species (11). Initial 16S rRNA analysis suggested environmental isolates RBIL2, FL3, BB15–2, and NCELM to all be novel Nannocystis species. However, of the three type strain Nannocystis, there was no genome data for Nannocystis pusilla DSM 14622T (also referred to as N. pusilla Na p29T). Subsequent sequencing of N. pusilla DSM 14622T and comparison including our genome data for N. pusilla DSM 14622T revealed RBIL2 to be a subspecies of N. pusilla that is slightly above the novel species threshold (Figure 2E). Isolates BB15–2, FL3, and NCELM are most phylogenetically similar to Nannocystis exedans DSM 71T and are significantly distinct from each other. Our proposed addition of three Nannocystis doubles the current member total. Isolate RJM3 is most phylogenetically similar to Polyangium fumosum DSM 14688T (Figure 2C). However, only three of ten Polyangium type strains have sufficient 16S rRNA and genome sequence data suitable for thorough analysis (15, 24). Isolate SCPEA02 is most phylogenetically similar to Pyxidicoccus caerfyrddinensis CA032AT (Figure 2G) (11). The proposed addition to the Pyxidicoccus will make SCPEA02 just the fourth type strain Pyxidicoccus. Isolate WIWO2 is most phylogenetically similar to Sorangium cellulosum Soce56, but no type strain of Sorangium have been sufficiently sequenced for comparative genomics (Figure 2D). Alternatively, 16S RNA analysis suggests WIWO2 is most phylogenetically similar to Sorangium kenyense Soce 375T (Supplemental Figure 2). Isolate NCWAL01 is most phylogenetically similar to Stigmatella aurantiaca DSM17044T and St. aurantiaca DW4_3–1. Interestingly, our analysis indicates ANI values above the threshold for novel species for all three type strains of Stigmatella (Figure 2F).
Environmental isolates NCSPR01 and NCRR are both highly similar subspecies of Corallococcus coralloides DSM 2259T (Supplemental Table 1 and Supplemental Figure 3A). As previously suggested by Ahearne et al., isolate NCCRE02 is a subspecies of Corallococcus exiguus DSM 14696T (Supplemental Table 1 and Supplemental Figure 3A) (22). Isolate BB12–1 is likely a subspecies of Corallococcus terminator CA054AT, and isolate BB11–1 is potentially a novel species of Corallococcus (Supplemental Table 1 and Supplemental Figure 3B). However, fragmented genome assemblies for BB11–1 and BB12–1 limited our confidence in precise taxonomic placement. Isolate MISCRS is a subspecies of Myxococcus fulvus DSM 16525T, and isolate NMCA is a subspecies of M. xanthus DSM 16526T (Supplemental Table 1 and Supplemental Figure 3C). Isolate MSG2 is a subspecies of Py. caerfyrddinensis CA032AT (Supplemental Table 1 and Supplemental Figure 3D). Isolate SCPEA04 is a Nannocystis highly similar to NCELM, and isolates RBIL2 and ILAH1 are both subspecies of N. pusilla DSM 14622T (Supplemental Table 1 and Supplemental Figure 3E).
Physiological and biochemical analysis of nine novel genomospecies.
All isolated strains swarmed on VY/2 media, and growth characteristics at various pH values and temperatures were analyzed for all nine novel species (Table 2). All nine strains grew at 25–30°C, and SCPEA02 grew at temperatures up to 40°C. Growth at pH 7 was observed from all strains, and SCHIC03, NCELM, and SCPEA02 all grew at pH 6–9. Agarolytic strains include BB15–2, WIWO2, FL3, NCELM, and RJM3. Metabolic activity was assessed for all strains (Table 3), and none were able to reduce nitrate or metabolize arginine, glucose, or urea. All strains were able to hydrolyze esculin, and all except FL3 and WIWO2 hydrolyzed gelatin. SCPEA02 and SCHIC03 were the only strains that did not exhibit alkaline phosphatase activity. MIWBW was the only strain to demonstrate both trypsin and ɑ-chymotrypsin activity and possessed overlapping characteristics with A. gephyra (25). Growth and activity of SCHIC03 was most similar to M. stipitatus and M. fulvus (11). Growth profiles and biochemical activities of BB15–2, FL3, and NCELM are similar to other Nannocystis; however, all three demonstrated comparatively limited pH-dependent growth (17). Unlike Nannocystis konarekensis, N. exedans, and N. pusilla, none of the Nannocystis strains grew at pH 10. Temperature and pH-dependent growth ranges for RJM3 are notably different from other Polyangium, which all grow at temperatures above 30°C and pH ranges of 6–8.5 (15). The growth profile and biochemical activity of SCPEA02 were closely aligned with the reported activities of Py. caerfyrddinensis (11). Growth profile and biochemical activity of WIWO2 overlapped somewhat with the recently described Sorangium species (16). Characterization and description of all type strain Stigmatella pre-date modern description methodology, however St. aurantiaca and NCELM have similar growth and biochemical profiles (26, 27).
Table 2:
temperature (°C) | WIWO2 | BB15–2 | FL3 | RJM3 | NCWAL01 | SCHIC03 | NCELM | SCPEA02 | MIWBW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20 | − | ++ | + | + | +++ | ++ | − | + | ++ |
25 | + | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | +++ |
30 | +++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
35 | + | − | +++ | − | + | +++ | − | +++ | +++ |
40 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | +++ | − |
pH | |||||||||
5 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
6 | + | − | + | − | ++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | + |
7 | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
8 | − | +++ | +++ | − | +++ | ++ | +++ | + | +++ |
9 | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | − |
10 | − | − | − | − | − | ++ | − | − | − |
Table 3:
Assay | MIWBW | FL3 | BB15–2 | NCELM | NCWAL01 | RJM3 | SCPEA02 | WIWO2 | SCHIC03 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alkaline phosphatase | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | − |
Esterase (C4) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Esterase Lipase (C8) | + | + | + | + | + | +/− | + | + | + |
Lipase (C14) | + | +/− | − | − | + | − | − | − | +/− |
Leucine arylamidase | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Valine arylamidase | + | + | − | + | + | +/− | +/− | + | +/− |
Cysteine arylamidase | +/− | + | − | +/− | − | − | +/− | − | − |
Trypsin | +/− | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
α-chymotrypsin | +/− | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | − |
Acid phosphatase | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | +/− | + |
Naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase | + | + | + | + | + | +/− | + | + | +/− |
α-galactosidase | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
β-galactosidase | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
β-glucuronidase | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
α-glucosidase | − | − | − | − | +/− | − | − | − | − |
β-glucosidase | − | +/− | − | + | + | − | − | + | − |
N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase | +/− | − | − | − | +/− | − | − | − | − |
α-mannosidase | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
α-fucosidase | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
Nitrate reduction | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− |
Indole production | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
Glucose acidification | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
Arginine dihydrolase | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
Urease | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
Esculin hydrolysis | + | + | + | +/− | + | + | + | + | + |
Gelatin hydrolysis | + | − | +/− | + | + | + | + | − | + |
p-Nitrophenyl-beta-D-galactopyranosidase | − | − | − | − | − | − | +/− | + | − |
Biosynthetic potential of myxobacterial isolates.
AntiSMASH analysis of BGCs from all sequenced isolates provided notable differences in BGC contents, sizes, and similarities with previously characterized clusters (28, 29). A total of 735 BGCs were predicted from 20 genome assemblies and only 36 were identified by antiSMASH to be fragmented clusters (~5%) with the vast majority of fragmented BGCs included in sequenced Corallococcus strains (20 fragmented BGCs). Genome data from sequenced Archangium, Myxococcus, Polyangium, Pyxidicoccus, Sorangium, and Stigmatella provided three or fewer fragmented BGCs total from each genus. Of our isolated strains MIWBW had the most predicted BGCs with 52 total (zero fragmented), and NMCA1 had the least with 23 total (zero fragmented). The average length of BGCs from all 20 sequenced isolates was ~56 kb. Clusters from Nannocystis strains were significantly shorter (average size ~30 kb) than Corallococcus, Myxococcus, and Pyxidicoccus clusters (Figure 3A). Clusters from Pyxidicoccus strains were significantly longer than Archangium, Nannocystis, Polyangium, and Sorangium clusters. Interestingly, Myxococcia clusters were significantly longer than Polyangiia BGCs (Figure 3B).
All identified BGCs were compared with the 1,225,071 BGCs and 29,955 gene cluster families (GCFs) included in the BiGFAM database (30, 31). Utilizing a previously established clustering threshold (T=900) to determine distance from database GCFs, we evaluated our 764 BGCs for similarity with BiGFAM BGCs. Clusters below the arbitrary threshold have similarities with BiGFAM GCFs and are likely less novel than clusters above the threshold (31, 32). Clusters from Pyxidicoccus strains (SCPEA02 and MSG2) had the highest average distance (1165) and somewhat predictably Myxococcus strains had the lowest (824) with an average distance below the threshold (Figure 3C). Average distance of Pyxidicoccus BGCs was significantly higher than the average distances of Corallococcus, Myxococcus, and Nannocystis clusters. Although Nannocystis and Polyangium are lesser-studied myxobacteria, average distances of clusters from members of each genus were just above the threshold for novelty (923 and 924 respectively). No significant difference was observed between the average distances of Myxococcia and Polyangiia clusters (Figure 3D).
Of the 764 predicted BGCs, 384 clusters (~50%) had distances above the threshold. Removal of clusters below the threshold revealed differences in remaining cluster types across genera (Figure 4). Subsequent comparison of these 384 BGCs with cluster similarities identified during antiSMASH analysis revealed 52 clusters were either highly homologous to characterized clusters deposited in the MiBIG database (33) or included embedded clusters with high similarity to known clusters. For example, the myxochelin BGC was found to be embedded in 10 clusters that scored above the BiGFAM threshold (34, 35). Although co-clustering likely impedes analysis of novelty and similarity to BiGFAM GCFs, we suggest such co-clustering does not necessarily preclude uniqueness of proximal clusters. This analysis also identified clusters that likely produce known metabolites including: 2-methylisoborneol (FL3), alkylpyrone 407/393 (BB11–1, BB12–1), aurafuron A (NCWAL01), carotenoid (RJM3), chloromyxamide (MSG2), dawenol (BB12–1, SCHIC03), dkxanthene (MISCRS, NMCA1, SCHIC03), geosmin (BB12–1, NCRR, NCSPR01), myxoprincomide (MSG2), nannocystin A (FL3), phenalamide A2 (SCHIC03), pyrronazol B (RBIL2), rhizopodin (NCWAL01, SCHIC03), ripostatin A/B/C (WIWO2), and VEPE/AEPE/TG-1 (BB11–1, BB12–1, CRE02, MIWBW, MSG2, NCRR) clusters (36–51). Modular clusters with high homology but differing organization that likely produce analogs of known metabolites were also identified including the 2-methylisoborneol (NCELM), fulvuthiacene A/B (MISCRS), lyngbyatoxin A (NCELM, SCPEA04), myxoprincomide (MISCRS, SCPEA02, SCHIC03, MIWBW), pyrronazol B (BB15–2, ILAH1) and violacein (SCHIC03) clusters (38, 46, 49, 52–55). Additional cluster similarity was identified across the eight sequenced Nannocystis strains. For example, strain SCPEA04 contained no unique clusters that were not also present in the other seven Nannocystis genomes, and no strain had more than five unique clusters. Five intriguing novel phosphonate clusters from four Nannocystis strains (BB15–2, NCELM, SCPEA04, RBIL2) and WIWO2 highlight the potential for novel metabolite discovery from the lesser-studied myxobacteria. Typically discovered from Streptomyces and Pseudomonas spp. (56, 57), no phosphonate metabolites have previously been discovered from a myxobacterium. Further differences between Myxococcia and Polyangiia cluster content was revealed with subsequent analysis of BGC relatedness between isolates and sequenced myxobacteria deposited in the antiSMASH database using BiG-SCAPE (Supplemental Figures 4 and 5). Resulting gene cluster families included connectivities between clusters of various Myxococcia suggesting an inherited overlap in specialized metabolism. However all Nannocystis and Sorangium gene cluster families with 2 or more clusters were exclusively genus-specific, and all BGCs from Polyangium sp. strain RJM3 were present in singleton gene cluster families.
Additional analysis of myxobacterial BGCs that encode metabolites with reported ecological utility unveiled notable differences and similarities amongst genera. The myxochelin cluster is present in all sequenced strains excluding WIWO2 and Nannocystis strains (Figure 5). Myxochelin has been discovered from numerous myxobacteria and functions as a siderophore during iron starvation conditions (58). One or more alternative siderophore clusters are present in all Nannocystis strains. Carotenoid and VEPE/AEPE/TG-1 clusters were present in all analyzed Myxococcia and notably absent in all Polyangiia. Geosmin serves as a small molecule deterrent or “warning signal” to dissuade predatory nematodes, and the geosmin cluster is present in all strains (59). Myxovirescin (60, 61) and myxoprincomide (62) benefit M. xanthus predation of Gram negative and Gram positive prey respectively (63). Myxovirescin has been found to significantly benefit M. xanthus predation of E. coli (61, 64). However, none of the investigated strains including the M. xanthus strain NMCA1 possessed a cluster with similarity to the myxovirescin BGC. Aside from the absence of a myxovirescin cluster, NMCA1 and M. xanthus DK1622 share incredible similarity in BGC content including high similarity surrounding the myxovirescin BGC in M. xanthus DK1622 (Supplemental Figure 6). The myxoprincomide cluster or a cluster with high similarity to it is present in all strains excluding members of the class Polyangiia and NCWAL01.
Genomic organization of BGCs.
AntiSMASH analysis of complete or near-complete genome data from FL3, MIWBW, MSG2, NCRR, NCSPR03, NMCA1, SCHIC03, and SCPEA02 provided contiguous sequence data sufficient to observe genome organization of BGCs. Cluster data from related myxobacteria with complete genome data from the antiSMASH database was used to compare BGC organization between related strains (Figures 6 and 7). Similarities between BGC content and genome organization were observed between subspecies (Figure 6A and 6B) and related strains within the same genus (Figures 6C and Figure 7). Biosynthetic gene clusters were dispersed throughout all genomes with segments of clusters appearing more dense with hybrid type clusters such as PKS-NRPS clusters or clusters including more than one cluster type. The myxochelin and myxoprincomide BGCs are located within a cluster-dense region in all sequenced environmental Myxococcia (Supplemental Figure 7). Clusters highly similar to carotenoid, geosmin, and VEPE/AEPE/TG-1 BGCs are often located in less-dense segments of analyzed chromosomes. Chromosomal segments with increased adjacency of hybrid and modular clusters were observed for all analyzed myxobacteria albeit less apparent in FL3 and N. exedans DSM 71T (Figure 7C). Other than small differences in cluster content between analyzed subspecies, such as the absence of the myxovirescin BGC from NMCA1 (Figure 6A), numerous inversions of clusters resulting in changes to cluster organization were observed. Apparent BGC inversions were predominantly located within or near cluster-dense regions, and inversions were often relegated to core biosynthetic genes of single clusters with proximal genes unchanged between strains. Additional synteny analysis of strains with observed BGC inversions using a set of 10 homologous housekeeping genes revealed highly similar genome organization with no observed inversions (Supplemental Figures 8 and 9) (65).
Proposal of nine novel species from seven genera of Myxococcota.
We propose nine candidate strains to represent novel species with the genera Archangium, Myxococcus, Nannocystis, Polyangium, Pyxidicoccus, Sorangium, and Stigmatella. Comparative genomics including differences in genome content, phylogeny, and biosynthetic capacities as well as physiological and biochemical analyses support the following distinctions: Archangium lansinium sp. nov. (MIWBWT), Myxococcus landrumus sp. nov. (SCHIC03T), Nannocystis bainbridgea sp. nov. (BB15–2T), Nannocystis poenicansa sp. nov. (FL3T), Nannocystis radixulma sp. nov. (NCELMT), Polyangium mundeleinium sp. nov. (RJM3T), Pyxidicoccus parkwaysis sp. nov. (SCPEA02T), Sorangium aterium sp. nov. (WIWO2T), and Stigmatella ashevillena sp. nov. (NCWAL01T). Corresponding species descriptions for each candidate strain are provided below.
DISCUSSION
Myxococcota taxonomy.
Myxobacteria are excellent resources for discovery of therapeutics and are suggested to be keystone taxa influencing polymicrobial community structure in soil (1, 2, 66–68). Recent discoveries of novel Corallococcus, Myxococcus, and Pyxidicoccus species as well as species from lesser-studied genera indicate an abundance of uncharacterized myxobacteria (10–12, 14–17, 69–79). Our investigation of rhizospheric soil samples provided 20 environmental myxobacteria including 9 proposed novel species. As an initial attempt to isolate myxobacteria from soil, we were surprised by the effectiveness of morphology screening to enable discovery of myxobacteria from a variety of genera. We suspect that improved genome data will clarify the observed discrepancies in type strain differentiation and recommend high quality genome data be provided for all newly described type strain myxobacteria. We demonstrate that established comparative genome analysis thresholds for designation of novel species indicate M. xanthus DSM 16526T and M. virescens DSM 2260T to not be separate species as well as St. aurantiaca DSM 17044T, Stigmatella erecta DSM 16858T, and Stigmatella hybrida DSM 14722T. Data from sequenced Myxococcus and Pyxidicoccus strains aligns with previously recommended consideration of Myxococcus/Pyxidicoccus as a single genus (11, 12). However, we note the significant differences in BGC content between Myxococcus and Pyxidicoccus strains included in this analysis. Overall, our phylogenetic analysis provides further support for comparative genomics approaches to identify and classify myxobacteria. The primary limitation being the absence of quality genome data for established type strains within genera such as Archangium, Polyangium, and Sorangium.
Expansion of the genus Nannocystis.
Current type strain Nannocystis include N. exedans DSM 71T, N. konarekensis DSM 104509T, and N. pusilla DSM 14622T. Our investigation resulted in discovery of an additional three proposed type strains doubling the current total of Nannocystis (17). We also report genome data for all three proposed type strain species as well as three Nannocystis subspecies and N. pusilla DSM 14622T. Cumulative analysis of all sequenced Nannocystis and our isolates provided notable differences in BGC content when compared to other myxobacteria such as absence of a cluster with similarity to the myxochelin BGC, presence of multiple siderophore and phosphonate cluster types, and smaller cluster sizes. Resulting genome data for an additional eight Nannocystis will improve future efforts to characterize and describe members of this underexplored genus of myxobacteria.
Genomic organization of BGCs and adaptability of specialized metabolism.
Afforded complete or near-complete genome sequence data, we report the first comparative analysis of spatial organization of myxobacterial BGCs. Dissimilar from Streptomyces localization of BGCs in the extremities of linear genomes (80, 81), clusters are distributed throughout the circular genomes of myxobacteria. Observed cluster-rich regions replete with modular BGCs and noted inversions of biosynthetic genes could however contribute to metabolic differentiation similar to how terminal compartments of Streptomyces chromosomes enable spatial reorganization and conditional expression of BGCs during metabolic development and sporulation (80). We suggest BGC enriched regions may benefit BGC evolution and contribute to metabolic adaptability of myxobacteria. Compartmentalization of modular-type clusters with highly homologous domains may benefit module duplication and deletion events associated with evolution of BGCs (82–84). Vertical inheritance of the myxochelin cluster is apparent from all sequenced Myxococcia. Our data also reveals vertical transfer and likely concerted evolution of myxoprincomide-type clusters across sequenced Myxococcia (84). Alternatively, presence of the myxovirescin trans-AT PKS cluster within a cluster-rich region of the M. xanthus DK1622 genome and absence of a homologous cluster in NMCA1 indicates horizontal acquisition. Although loss of the myxovirescin cluster from NMCA1 provides an alternative explanation, absence of the myxovirescin cluster from all other sequenced members of the Myxococcus and Myxococcota currently deposited in the antiSMASH database instead supports horizontal acquisition by DK1622. Regardless, either explanation for cluster presence in DK1622 and absence in other myxobacteria demonstrates metabolic adaptability within the BGC enriched segments of myxobacterial genomes. Further investigation of chromosomal organization of BGCs in myxobacteria is required to determine functional impacts on metabolic adaptability and cluster evolution.
Species Descriptions.
(i). Archangium lansinium sp. nov.
Archangium lansinium (lan.sin’i.um. N.L. neut. ajd. lansinium from Lansing, Michigan, United States of America, referencing the area of isolation).
Vegetative cells glide on solid media. Cells grow as translucent swarms during the early growth phase on VY/4 agar and form non-uniform, clumping fruiting bodies that range from yellow to pale orange over time. Aerobic growth was observed at 20 to 35°C but not at 40°C at a pH range of 6.0 to 8.0. Hydrolyzes gelatin and esculin. Shows an API ZYM positive reaction to alkaline phosphatase, C4 esterase, C8 lipase, C14 lipase, leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, cysteine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, acid phosphatase, napthol-AS-BI-aphosphohydrolase, and N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase and a negative reaction to α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, α-mannosidase, and α-fucosidase. DNA GC content is 68.1%. The genome assembly of the organism is available at NCBI Assembly (ASM2662663v1). The 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence is available at Genbank (OP852336.1). Phylogenetically most similar to A. gephyra DSM 2261T.
The type strain (MIWBWT = NCCB 100916T) was isolated from soil collected in the Summer of 2021 from the roots of a white basswood tree near the city of Lansing, Michigan, United States of America (42.73°N, 84.48°W).
(ii). Myxococcus landrumus sp. nov.
Myxococcus landrumus (lan.drum’us. N.L. masc. ajd. landrumus from Landrum, South Carolina, United States of America, referencing the area of isolation).
Vegetative cells glide on solid media. Cells grow as slightly orange swarms and develop rounded, stalking fruiting bodies that range from white to purple on VY/4 media. Aerobic growth was observed at 20 to 35°C but not at 40°C at a pH range of 6.0 to 10.0. Hydrolyzes gelatin and esculin. Shows an API ZYM positive reaction to C4 esterase, C8 lipase, C14 lipase, leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, acid phosphatase, and napthol-AS-BI-aphosphohydrolase and a negative reaction to alkaline phosphatase, cysteine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, α-mannosidase, and α-fucosidase. DNA GC content is 68.6%. The genome assembly of the organism is available at NCBI Assembly (ASM1730163v1). The 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence is available at Genbank (OP852328v1). Phylogenetically most similar to M. stipitatus DSM 14675T.
The type strain (SCHIC03T = NCCB 100915T) was isolated from soil collected in Spring 2020 from the roots of a hickory tree near the city of Landrum, South Carolina, United States of America (35.14°N, −82.16°W).
(iii). Nannocystis bainbridgea sp. nov.
Nannocystis bainbridgea (bain’bridg.ea. N.L. fem. ajd. bainbridgea from Bainbridge Island, Washington, United States of America, referencing the area of isolation).
Vegetative cells glide on solid media. Cells are agarolytic and form deep etches in VY/4 agar. Grows as translucent red swarms and forms rounded fruiting bodies. Aerobic growth was observed at 20 to 30°C but not at 35 to 40°C at a pH range of 7.0 to 8.0. Hydrolyzes gelatin and esculin. Shows an API ZYM positive reaction to alkaline phosphatase, C4 esterase, C8 lipase, leucine arylamidase, α-chymotrypsin, acid phosphatase, and napthol-AS-BI-aphosphohydrolase and a negative reaction to C14 lipase, valine arylamidase, cysteine arylamidase, trypsin, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, α-mannosidase, and α-fucosidase. DNA GC content is 71.5%. The genome assembly of the organism is available at NCBI Assembly (ASM2696555v1). The 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence is available at Genbank (OP852329.1). Phylogenetically most similar to N. exedens DSM 71T.
The type strain (BB15–2T) was isolated from soil collected summer of 2020 from the roots of a blueberry bush near the city of Bainbridge Island, Washington, United States of America (47.65°N, −122.55°W).
(iv). Nannocystis poenicansa sp. nov.
Nannocystis poenicansa (poe.ni.can’sa. N.L. fem. adj. poenicansa the bright red, referencing bright red pigment production).
Vegetative cells glide on solid media. Cells are agarolytic and form deep etches in VY/4 agar. Aerobic growth was observed at 20 to 35°C but not at 40°C at a pH range of 6.0 to 8.0. Hydrolyzes esculin. Shows an API ZYM positive reaction to alkaline phosphatase, C4 esterase, C8 lipase, C14 lipase, leucine arylamidase, cysteine arylamidase, acid phosphatase, napthol-AS-BI-aphosphohydrolase, and β-glucosidase and a negative reaction to valine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, α-mannosidase, and α-fucosidase. DNA GC content is 71.5%. The complete genome sequence of the organism is available at GenBank (CP114040.1). The 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence is available at Genbank (OP852330.1). Phylogenetically most similar to N. exedens DSM 71T.
The type strain (FL3T = NCCB 100918T) was isolated from soil collected Fall of 2020 from the roots of a southern live oak near the city of Palm Coast, Florida, United States of America (29.59°N, −81.21°W).
(v). Nannocystis radixulma sp. nov.
Nannocystis radixulma (ra’dix.ul.ma. L. fem. n. poenicansa the root of elm, referencing the isolation from an elm tree rhizosphere).
Vegetative cells glide on solid media. Cells are agarolytic and form deep etches in VY/4 agar. Early growth ranges from translucent swarm perimeters to yellow pigmented swarm centers, and form textured, clumping fruiting bodies that range from yellow to orange on VY/4 agar. Aerobic growth was observed at 25 to 30°C but not at 20°C or 35 to 40°C at a pH range of 6.0 to 9.0. Hydrolyzes gelatin and esculin. Shows an API ZYM positive reaction to alkaline phosphatase, C4 esterase, C8 lipase, leucine arylamidase, cysteine arylamidase, acid phosphatase, napthol-AS-BI-aphosphohydrolase, and β-glucosidase and a negative reaction to C14 lipase, valine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, α-mannosidase, and α-fucosidase. DNA GC content is 71.2%. The genome assembly of the organism is available at NCBI Assembly (ASM2836909v1). The 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence is available at Genbank (OP852331.1). Phylogenetically most similar to N. exedens DSM 71T.
The type strain (NCELMT = NCCB 100919T) was isolated from soil collected in Spring 2020 from the roots of an elm tree near the city of Asheville, North Carolina, United States of America (35.63°N, −82.55°W).
(vi). Polyangium mundeleinium sp. nov.
Polyangium mundelenium (mun.del.en’ni.um. N.L. neut. adj. mundelenium from Mundelein, Illinois, United States of America, referencing the area of isolation).
Vegetative cells glide on solid media. Cells grow as translucent swarms and develop dispersed rounded, yellow fruiting bodies on VY/4 media. Aerobic growth was observed at 20 to 30°C but not at 20°C or 35 to 40°C at a pH of 7.0. Hydrolyzes gelatin and esculin. Shows an API ZYM positive reaction to alkaline phosphatase, C4 esterase, C8 lipase, leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, α-chymotrypsin, acid phosphatase, and napthol-AS-BI-aphosphohydrolase and a negative reaction to C14 lipase, cysteine arylamidase, trypsin, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, α-mannosidase, and α-fucosidase. DNA GC content is 68.6%. The genome assembly of the organism is available at NCBI Assembly (ASM2836910v1). The 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence is available at Genbank (OP852332.1). Phylogenetically most similar to P. fumosum DSM 14688T.
The type strain (RJM3T = NCCB 100920T) was isolated from soil collected Fall of 2020 from the roots of a red Japanese maple near the village of Mundelein, Illinois, United States of America (42.26°N, −88.0°W).
(vii). Pyxidicoccus parkwaysis sp. nov.
Pyxidicoccus parkwaysis (park.way.sis. N.L. masc. adj. parkwaysis from Parkway Farm in Landrum, South Carolina, United States of America, referencing the area of isolation).
Vegetative cells glide on solid media. Cells grow as mucoid swarms with a slight pink pigmentation and develop, mounded fruiting bodies after 3 weeks of growth on VY/4 media. Aerobic growth was observed at 20 to 40°C at a pH range of 6.0 to 9.0. Hydrolyzes gelatin and esculin. Shows an API ZYM positive reaction to C4 esterase, C8 lipase, leucine arylamidase, acid phosphatase, and napthol-AS-BI-aphosphohydrolase and a negative reaction to alkaline phosphatase, C14 lipase, valine arylamidase, cysteine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, α-mannosidase, and α-fucosidase. DNA GC content is 69.6%. The genome assembly of the organism is available at NCBI Assembly (ASM1730173v1). The 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence is available at Genbank (OP852333). Phylogenetically most similar to P. caerfyrddinensis CA032AT.
The type strain (SCPEA02T = NCCB 100921T) was isolated from soil collected in Spring 2020 from the roots of a peach tree near Parkway Farm in Landrum, South Carolina, United States of America (35.14°N, −82.12°W).
(viii). Sorangium aterium sp. nov.
Sorangium aterium (at’er.i.um. N.L. neut. adj. aterium the flat black, referencing black pigment production).
Vegetative cells are Gram negative and glide on solid media. Degrades and decomposes cellulose filter paper. Cells are pigmented dark brown to black when grown on VY/4 agar. Dark brown to black fruiting bodies form on ST21 media, and similarly pigmented sporangioles from on VY/4 agar. Aerobic growth was observed at 25 to 30°C but not at 20°C or 35 to 40°C at a pH range of 6.0 to 7.0. Hydrolyzes esculin. Shows an API ZYM positive reaction to alkaline phosphatase, C4 esterase, C8 lipase, leucine arylamidase, acid phosphatase, napthol-AS-BI-aphosphohydrolase, and β-glucosidase and a negative reaction to C14 lipase, valine arylamidase, cysteine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, α-mannosidase, and α-fucosidase. DNA GC content is 71.1%. The genome assembly of the organism is available at NCBI Assembly (ASM2836893v1). The 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence is available at Genbank (OP852334.1). Phylogenetically most similar to S. cellulosum Soce56.
The type strain (WIWO2T = NCCB 100922T) was isolated from soil collected in Fall 2021 from the roots of a white oak near the village of Pleasant Prairie, Wisconsin, United States of America (42.56°N, −87.94°W).
(ix). Stigmatella ashevillena sp. nov.
Stigmatella ashvillena (ash’vill.en.a. N.L. fem. adj. from Asheville, North Carolina, United States of America, referencing the area of isolation).
Vegetative cells are Gram negative and glide on solid media. Cells are yellow during early growth on VY/4 media and form stalked, orange fruiting bodies over time. Aerobic growth was observed at 25 to 30 °C but not at 20°C or 35 to 40°C at a pH range of 6.0 to 9.0. Hydrolyzes gelatin and esculin. Shows an API ZYM positive reaction to alkaline phosphatase, C4 esterase, C8 lipase, C14 lipase, leucine arylamidase, cysteine arylamidase, acid phosphatase, napthol-AS-BI-aphosphohydrolase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, and N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase and a negative reaction to valine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-mannosidase, and α-fucosidase. DNA GC content is 66.9%. The genome assembly of the organism is available at NCBI Assembly (ASM2836897v1). The 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence is available at Genbank (OP852335.1). Phylogenetically most similar to S. aurantiaca DSM17044T.
The type strain (NCWAL01T = NCCB 100923T) was isolated from soil collected in Spring 2020 from the roots of a walnut tree near the city of Asheville, North Carolina, United States of America (35.63°N, −82.55°W).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Isolation of myxobacteria.
Bacteriolytic myxobacteria were isolated by the Escherichia coli baiting method (18). Briefly, an E. coli lawn was grown overnight at 37°C and resuspended in 1 mL of an antifungal solution (250 μg/mL cycloheximide and nystatin). A 300 μl solution was spread across a WAT agar (1.5% agar, 0.1% CaCl2) plate and air dried. Previously air dried soil was wet with the antifungal solution to a mud like consistency, and a pea sized amount was placed on the dried E. coli WAT plate. The plate was incubated at 25°C for up to 4 weeks. After 3 days of incubation, the plates were checked daily for the appearance of lytic zones or fruiting bodies in the E. coli lawn. Using a syringe needle, the lytic zones were moved to a plate of VY/4 (Baker’s yeast 2.5 g/L, CaCl2 × 2H2O 1.36 g/L, vitamin B12 0.5 mg/L, agar 15 g/L). The swarm edge was repeatedly used to inoculate a fresh VY/4 plate until pure cultures were obtained. Isolates were cultivated continuously at 25–30°C on VY/4. Isolation of cellulolytic myxobacteria was accomplished using the filter paper method (18). A small square of autoclaved filter paper was placed in the center of a ST21 agar plate (K2HPO4 1 g/L, yeast extract 20 mg/L, agar 14 g/L, KNO3 1 g/L, MgSO4 × 7H2O 1 g/L, CaCl2 × 2H2O 1 g/L, MnSO4 × 7H2O 0.1 g/L, FeCl3 0.2 g/L). A pea sized amount of soil, wet with the antifungal solution, was placed at the edge of the filter paper. Plates were incubated at 25°C for up to 2 months. After 2 weeks, the plates were checked every two days for cellulose degradation and fruiting body formation. Fruiting bodies were moved to a fresh ST21 plate with filter paper repeatedly until pure monocultures were observed. Isolates were cultivated continuously at 25–30°C on VY/4.
Cultivation of isolates.
All isolates were maintained on VY/4 media. Growth in liquid cultures was achieved using CYH/2 media (casitone 0.75 g/L, yeast extract 0.75 g/L, starch 2g/L, soy flour 0.5 g/L, glucose 0.5 g/L, MgSO4 × 7H2O 0.5 g/L, CaCl2 × 2H2O 1 g/L, HEPES 6 g/L, EDTA-Fe 8 mg/L, vitamin B12 0.5 mg/L)
Sequencing methods.
Once pure cultures were obtained, DNA isolation was performed using either the Monarch HMW DNA extraction kit for tissue or the Macherey Nagel nucleobond HMW DNA extraction kit, following the manufacturer’s instructions for Gram-negative bacteria. All novel strains were sequenced using Pacbio Sequel or Sequel II with a 10 hour movie. De Novo Assembly of the genome was accomplished using the SMRT Analysis Hierarchical Genome Assembly Process (HGAP; SMRT Link 9.0.0 or SMRT Link 10.1.0 ). Nannocystis pusilla Na p29T was sequenced using an Oxford Nanopore Minion Flongle R9.4.1. Raw data was processed using Guppy (v6.0.1) (85). Reads were trimmed using porechop (v0.2.4) (86). The worst 10% of reads were filtered out using filtong (v0.2.1). Flye assembler (v2.9) was used for de novo assembly using the trimmed and filtered reads (87). Correction of the final assembly was achieved by long read correction using two iterations of Racon (v1.5) (88), followed by two iterations of Medaka (v1.7.2) (89). Genome assemblies and complete genomes data was deposited at NCBI for the following isolates: Corallococcus exiguus strain NCCRE02 (ASM1730297v1), Corallococcus sp. strain NCSPR01 (ASM1730913v1), Corallococcus sp. strain BB11–1 (ASM2662662v1), Corallococcus sp. strain BB12–1 (ASM2662676v1), Corallococcus sp. strain NCRR (ASM2696553v1), Myxococcus sp. strain MISCRS (ASM2662660v1), Myxococcus sp. strain NMCA1 (ASM2681020v1), Nannocystis sp. strain SCPEA4 (ASM2662668v1), Nannocystis sp. strain ILAH1 (ASM2662658v1), Nannocystis sp. strain RBIL2 (ASM2662674v1) and Pyxidicoccus sp. strain MSG2 (ASM2662670v1). Genome assembly for Nannocystis pusilla Na p29T was also deposited at NCBI (ASM2662666v1).
Microscopy.
A Zeiss stereo discovery.V12 microscope using Axio cam 105 and a Plano Apo S 1.0X objective were used to observe fruiting bodies and swarming patterns.
Comparative genomics.
OrthoAni calculations and tree generation were achieved using OAT (orthoANI tool v0.93.1) (90). dDDH calculations were performed on the type strain genome server (TYGS) website (91). Synteny analysis was done using SimpleSynteny (v1.6) (65).
Enzymatic Assays.
Enzymatic activity was assessed for myxobacteria utilizing commercial API ZYM (bioMérieux, France) and API NE (bioMérieux, France) kits. Each isolate strain was suspended in NaCl 0.85% to an OD600 of 0.7 and 0.1 for API NE. API ZYM strips were incubated for 4.5 hours at 37°C, and API NE strips were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. After incubation, specific reagents were added to the cupule and evaluated according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Growth Conditions.
For most of the myxobacteria tested, strains were grown on VY/4 (pH 7.2) for 5 to 7 days and resuspended in deionized water to an OD600 of 0.5. For the genera Nannocystis and Polyangium, strains were grown for 5 to 7 days in CYH/2 media, centrifuged, washed, and resuspended in sterile distilled water. The optimal growth temperature was tested by inoculating VY/4 plates with 25 μl of the 0.5 OD600 suspension for given myxobacteria. Plates were incubated at 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40°C for up to 14 days. Optimal pH was assessed by plating the 0.5 OD600 solution on VY/4 plates buffered to pH 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10. The pH conditions were buffered at a pH of 5 to 6 with 25 mM MES buffer, 7 to 8 with 25 mM HEPES buffer, and 9 to 10 with 25 mM TRIS buffer in VY/4 plates and incubated at 25°C for two weeks. Comparisons of swarm diameters were used to determine optimal growth conditions.
BGC analysis.
FASTA files for all sequenced isolates were uploaded for analysis using antiSMASH (version 6.1.1) using relaxed detection strictness with all extra features toggled on (28). Resulting antiSMASH job IDs from analyzed isolates were submitted as queries using the BIGFAM database v1.0.0 (1,225,071 BGCs and 29,955 GCFs) to assess BGC similarity to database clusters (31). All BGCs with >900 distance from model GCFs were subsequently dereplicated manually to remove characterized BGCs not clustered with GCGs within the BIGFAM database. The antiSMASH database v3.0 (147,571 BGCs) was used to analyze BGCs from included myxobacteria (92). BiG-SCAPE v1.1.0 was used to analyze all BGCs .gbk files from sequenced isolates as well as all .gbk files from myxobacteria with sequenced genomes deposited in the antiSMASH database with the using the “hybrids-off” and “MiBIG” parameters (33, 93).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements.
The authors would like to thank Mary Williams and Ashlen Ahearne for coordinating the collection and delivery of soil samples analyzed in this project. The authors also appreciate the Glycoscience Center of Research Excellence Imaging Research Core and Computational Chemistry and Bioinformatics Research Core for assistance imaging isolates and assembly of the N. pusilla Na p29T draft genome with specific gratitude for the Imaging Research Core manager, Dr. Ruofan Cao.
Funding.
This research was supported by funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (1 R15 AI137996) and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1 P20 GM130460).
Footnotes
Supplementary Materials. Supplementary materials include: dDDH values for all isolates (Supplementary Table 1), a map of collection sites for all isolates (Supplementary Figure 1), a phylogenetic tree for isolates and type strain myxobacteria from 16S RNA sequences (Supplementary Figure 2), orthoANI values for all isolates not included in Figure 2 (Supplementary Figure 3), BGC similarity networks generated with BiG-SCAPE (Supplementary Figures 4 and 5), chromosomal context for the myxovirescin BGC in M. xanthus DK1622 and NMCA1 (Supplementary Figure 6), evolutionary relationship the myxochelin BGC (Supplementary Figure 7), and shared synteny of myxobacteria included in Figures 6 and 7 (Supplementary Figures 8 and 9).
Conflicts of Interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Bader CD, Panter F, Muller R. 2020. In depth natural product discovery - Myxobacterial strains that provided multiple secondary metabolites. Biotechnol Adv 39:107480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Herrmann J, Fayad AA, Muller R. 2017. Natural products from myxobacteria: novel metabolites and bioactivities. Nat Prod Rep 34:135–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Baltz RH. 2021. Genome mining for drug discovery: progress at the front end. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol doi: 10.1093/jimb/kuab044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baltz RH. 2017. Gifted microbes for genome mining and natural product discovery. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 44:573–588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hoffmann T, Krug D, Bozkurt N, Duddela S, Jansen R, Garcia R, Gerth K, Steinmetz H, Muller R. 2018. Correlating chemical diversity with taxonomic distance for discovery of natural products in myxobacteria. Nat Commun 9:803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zeng H, Birkelbach J, Hoffmann J, Popoff A, Volz C, Muller R. 2022. Expanding the Ajudazol Cytotoxin Scaffold: Insights from Genome Mining, Biosynthetic Investigations, and Novel Derivatives. J Nat Prod 85:2610–2619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Okoth DA, Hug JJ, Garcia R, Muller R. 2022. Discovery, Biosynthesis and Biological Activity of a Succinylated Myxochelin from the Myxobacterial Strain MSr12020. Microorganisms 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Haack PA, Harmrolfs K, Bader CD, Garcia R, Gunesch AP, Haid S, Popoff A, Voltz A, Kim H, Bartenschlager R, Pietschmann T, Muller R. 2022. Thiamyxins: Structure and Biosynthesis of Myxobacterial RNA-Virus Inhibitors. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 61:e202212946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bader CD, Panter F, Garcia R, Tchesnokov EP, Haid S, Walt C, Sproer C, Kiefer AF, Gotte M, Overmann J, Pietschmann T, Muller R. 2022. Sandacrabins - Structurally Unique Antiviral RNA Polymerase Inhibitors from a Rare Myxobacterium. Chemistry 28:e202104484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Livingstone PG, Ingleby O, Girdwood S, Cookson AR, Morphew RM, Whitworth DE. 2020. Predatory Organisms with Untapped Biosynthetic Potential: Descriptions of Novel Corallococcus Species C. aberystwythensis sp. nov., C. carmarthensis sp. nov., C. exercitus sp. nov., C. interemptor sp. nov., C. llansteffanensis sp. nov., C. praedator sp. nov., C. sicarius sp. nov., and C. terminator sp. nov. Appl Environ Microbiol 86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chambers J, Sparks N, Sydney N, Livingstone PG, Cookson AR, Whitworth DE. 2020. Comparative Genomics and Pan-Genomics of the Myxococcaceae, including a Description of Five Novel Species: Myxococcus eversor sp. nov., Myxococcus llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogochensis sp. nov., Myxococcus vastator sp. nov., Pyxidicoccus caerfyrddinensis sp. nov., and Pyxidicoccus trucidator sp. nov. Genome Biol Evol 12:2289–2302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang C, Lv Y, Zhou L, Zhang Y, Yao Q, Zhu H. 2022. Comparative genomics of Myxococcus and Pyxidicoccus, including the description of four novel species: Myxococcus guangdongensis sp. nov., Myxococcus qinghaiensis sp. nov., Myxococcus dinghuensis sp. nov., and Pyxidicoccus xibeiensis sp. nov. Front Microbiol 13:995049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Inoue D, Hiroshima N, Nakamura S, Ishizawa H, Ike M. 2022. Characterization of Two Novel Predatory Bacteria, Bacteriovorax stolpii HI3 and Myxococcus sp. MH1, Isolated from a Freshwater Pond: Prey Range, and Predatory Dynamics and Efficiency. Microorganisms 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Babadi ZK, Garcia R, Ebrahimipour GH, Risdian C, Kampfer P, Jarek M, Muller R, Wink J. 2022. Corallococcus soli sp. Nov., a Soil Myxobacterium Isolated from Subtropical Climate, Chalus County, Iran, and Its Potential to Produce Secondary Metabolites. Microorganisms 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang J, Ran Q, Du X, Wu S, Wang J, Sheng D, Chen Q, Du Z, Li YZ. 2021. Two new Polyangium species, P. aurulentum sp. nov. and P. jinanense sp. nov., isolated from a soil sample. Syst Appl Microbiol 44:126274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mohr KI, Wolf C, Nubel U, Szafranska AK, Steglich M, Hennessen F, Gemperlein K, Kampfer P, Martin K, Muller R, Wink J. 2018. A polyphasic approach leads to seven new species of the cellulose-decomposing genus Sorangium, Sorangium ambruticinum sp. nov., Sorangium arenae sp. nov., Sorangium bulgaricum sp. nov., Sorangium dawidii sp. nov., Sorangium kenyense sp. nov., Sorangium orientale sp. nov. and Sorangium reichenbachii sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:3576–3586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mohr KI, Moradi A, Glaeser SP, Kampfer P, Gemperlein K, Nubel U, Schumann P, Muller R, Wink J. 2018. Nannocystis konarekensis sp. nov., a novel myxobacterium from an Iranian desert. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:721–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mohr KI. 2018. Diversity of Myxobacteria-We Only See the Tip of the Iceberg. Microorganisms 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mohr KI, Zindler T, Wink J, Wilharm E, Stadler M. 2017. Myxobacteria in high moor and fen: An astonishing diversity in a neglected extreme habitat. Microbiologyopen 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mohr KI, Stechling M, Wink J, Wilharm E, Stadler M. 2016. Comparison of myxobacterial diversity and evaluation of isolation success in two niches: Kiritimati Island and German compost. Microbiologyopen 5:268–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Adaikpoh BI, Akbar S, Albataineh H, Misra SK, Sharp JS, Stevens DC. 2020. Myxobacterial Response to Methyljasmonate Exposure Indicates Contribution to Plant Recruitment of Micropredators. Front Microbiol 11:34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ahearne A, Albataineh H, Dowd SE, Stevens DC. 2021. Assessment of Evolutionary Relationships for Prioritization of Myxobacteria for Natural Product Discovery. Microorganisms 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stevens DC, Young J, Carmichael R, Tan J, Taylor RE. 2014. Draft Genome Sequence of Gephyronic Acid Producer Cystobacter violaceus Strain Cb vi76. Genome Announc 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lang E, Reichenbach H. 2013. Designation of type strains for seven species of the order Myxococcales and proposal for neotype strains of Cystobacter ferrugineus, Cystobacter minus and Polyangium fumosum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:4354–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lang E, Schumann P, Tindall BJ, Mohr KI, Sproer C. 2015. Reclassification of Angiococcus disciformis, Cystobacter minus and Cystobacter violaceus as Archangium disciforme comb. nov., Archangium minus comb. nov. and Archangium violaceum comb. nov., unification of the families Archangiaceae and Cystobacteraceae, and emended descriptions of the families Myxococcaceae and Archangiaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:4032–4042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Reichenbach H, Voelz H, Dworkin M. 1969. Structural changes in Stigmatella aurantiaca during myxospore induction. J Bacteriol 97:905–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kleinig H, Reichenbach H. 1969. Carotenoid pigments of Stigmatella aurantiaca (Myxobacterales).I. The minor carotenoids. Arch Mikrobiol 68:210–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel GP, Medema MH, Weber T. 2021. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W29–W35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Medema MH, Blin K, Cimermancic P, de Jager V, Zakrzewski P, Fischbach MA, Weber T, Takano E, Breitling R. 2011. antiSMASH: rapid identification, annotation and analysis of secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters in bacterial and fungal genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W339–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kautsar SA, van der Hooft JJJ, de Ridder D, Medema MH. 2021. BiG-SLiCE: A highly scalable tool maps the diversity of 1.2 million biosynthetic gene clusters. Gigascience 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kautsar SA, Blin K, Shaw S, Weber T, Medema MH. 2021. BiG-FAM: the biosynthetic gene cluster families database. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D490–D497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Waschulin V, Borsetto C, James R, Newsham KK, Donadio S, Corre C, Wellington E. 2022. Biosynthetic potential of uncultured Antarctic soil bacteria revealed through long-read metagenomic sequencing. ISME J 16:101–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kautsar SA, Blin K, Shaw S, Navarro-Munoz JC, Terlouw BR, van der Hooft JJJ, van Santen JA, Tracanna V, Suarez Duran HG, Pascal Andreu V, Selem-Mojica N, Alanjary M, Robinson SL, Lund G, Epstein SC, Sisto AC, Charkoudian LK, Collemare J, Linington RG, Weber T, Medema MH. 2020. MIBiG 2.0: a repository for biosynthetic gene clusters of known function. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D454–D458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li Y, Weissman KJ, Muller R. 2008. Myxochelin biosynthesis: direct evidence for two- and four-electron reduction of a carrier protein-bound thioester. J Am Chem Soc 130:7554–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gaitatzis N, Kunze B, Muller R. 2001. In vitro reconstitution of the myxochelin biosynthetic machinery of Stigmatella aurantiaca Sg a15: Biochemical characterization of a reductive release mechanism from nonribosomal peptide synthetases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:11136–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hug JJ, Panter F, Krug D, Muller R. 2019. Genome mining reveals uncommon alkylpyrones as type III PKS products from myxobacteria. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 46:319–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gorges J, Panter F, Kjaerulff L, Hoffmann T, Kazmaier U, Muller R. 2018. Structure, Total Synthesis, and Biosynthesis of Chloromyxamides: Myxobacterial Tetrapeptides Featuring an Uncommon 6-Chloromethyl-5-methoxypipecolic Acid Building Block. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 57:14270–14275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Witte SNR, Hug JJ, Geraldy MNE, Muller R, Kalesse M. 2017. Biosynthesis and Total Synthesis of Pyrronazol B: a Secondary Metabolite from Nannocystis pusilla. Chemistry 23:15917–15921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fu C, Auerbach D, Li Y, Scheid U, Luxenburger E, Garcia R, Irschik H, Muller R. 2017. Solving the Puzzle of One-Carbon Loss in Ripostatin Biosynthesis. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 56:2192–2197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Park S, Hyun H, Lee JS, Cho K. 2016. Identification of the Phenalamide Biosynthetic Gene Cluster in Myxococcus stipitatus DSM 14675. J Microbiol Biotechnol 26:1636–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Krastel P, Roggo S, Schirle M, Ross NT, Perruccio F, Aspesi P Jr., Aust T, Buntin K, Estoppey D, Liechty B, Mapa F, Memmert K, Miller H, Pan X, Riedl R, Thibaut C, Thomas J, Wagner T, Weber E, Xie X, Schmitt EK, Hoepfner D. 2015. Nannocystin A: an Elongation Factor 1 Inhibitor from Myxobacteria with Differential Anti-Cancer Properties. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 54:10149–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Osswald C, Zaburannyi N, Burgard C, Hoffmann T, Wenzel SC, Muller R. 2014. A highly unusual polyketide synthase directs dawenol polyene biosynthesis in Stigmatella aurantiaca. J Biotechnol 191:54–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lorenzen W, Ahrendt T, Bozhuyuk KA, Bode HB. 2014. A multifunctional enzyme is involved in bacterial ether lipid biosynthesis. Nat Chem Biol 10:425–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bhat S, Ahrendt T, Dauth C, Bode HB, Shimkets LJ. 2014. Two lipid signals guide fruiting body development of Myxococcus xanthus. mBio 5:e00939–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pistorius D, Muller R. 2012. Discovery of the rhizopodin biosynthetic gene cluster in Stigmatella aurantiaca Sg a15 by genome mining. Chembiochem 13:416–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cortina NS, Krug D, Plaza A, Revermann O, Muller R. 2012. Myxoprincomide: a natural product from Myxococcus xanthus discovered by comprehensive analysis of the secondary metabolome. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 51:811–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Meiser P, Weissman KJ, Bode HB, Krug D, Dickschat JS, Sandmann A, Muller R. 2008. DKxanthene biosynthesis--understanding the basis for diversity-oriented synthesis in myxobacterial secondary metabolism. Chem Biol 15:771–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Oliynyk M, Samborskyy M, Lester JB, Mironenko T, Scott N, Dickens S, Haydock SF, Leadlay PF. 2007. Complete genome sequence of the erythromycin-producing bacterium Saccharopolyspora erythraea NRRL23338. Nat Biotechnol 25:447–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jiang J, He X, Cane DE. 2007. Biosynthesis of the earthy odorant geosmin by a bifunctional Streptomyces coelicolor enzyme. Nat Chem Biol 3:711–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Frank B, Wenzel SC, Bode HB, Scharfe M, Blocker H, Muller R. 2007. From genetic diversity to metabolic unity: studies on the biosynthesis of aurafurones and aurafuron-like structures in myxobacteria and streptomycetes. J Mol Biol 374:24–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Botella JA, Murillo FJ, Ruiz-Vazquez R. 1995. A cluster of structural and regulatory genes for light-induced carotenogenesis in Myxococcus xanthus. Eur J Biochem 233:238–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Panter F, Krug D, Muller R. 2019. Novel Methoxymethacrylate Natural Products Uncovered by Statistics-Based Mining of the Myxococcus fulvus Secondary Metabolome. ACS Chem Biol 14:88–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hoshino T. 2011. Violacein and related tryptophan metabolites produced by Chromobacterium violaceum: biosynthetic mechanism and pathway for construction of violacein core. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:1463–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Edwards DJ, Gerwick WH. 2004. Lyngbyatoxin biosynthesis: sequence of biosynthetic gene cluster and identification of a novel aromatic prenyltransferase. J Am Chem Soc 126:11432–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Cardellina JH 2nd, Marner FJ, Moore RE. 1979. Seaweed dermatitis: structure of lyngbyatoxin A. Science 204:193–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Olivares P, Ulrich EC, Chekan JR, van der Donk WA, Nair SK. 2017. Characterization of Two Late-Stage Enzymes Involved in Fosfomycin Biosynthesis in Pseudomonads. ACS Chem Biol 12:456–463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Rogers TO, Birnbaum J. 1974. Biosynthesis of fosfomycin by Streptomyces fradiae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 5:121–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Silakowski B, Kunze B, Nordsiek G, Blocker H, Hofle G, Muller R. 2000. The myxochelin iron transport regulon of the myxobacterium Stigmatella aurantiaca Sg a15. Eur J Biochem 267:6476–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zaroubi L, Ozugergin I, Mastronardi K, Imfeld A, Law C, Gelinas Y, Piekny A, Findlay BL. 2022. The Ubiquitous Soil Terpene Geosmin Acts as a Warning Chemical. Appl Environ Microbiol 88:e0009322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Xiao Y, Gerth K, Muller R, Wall D. 2012. Myxobacterium-produced antibiotic TA (myxovirescin) inhibits type II signal peptidase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:2014–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Xiao Y, Wei X, Ebright R, Wall D. 2011. Antibiotic production by myxobacteria plays a role in predation. J Bacteriol 193:4626–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Muller S, Strack SN, Ryan SE, Shawgo M, Walling A, Harris S, Chambers C, Boddicker J, Kirby JR. 2016. Identification of Functions Affecting Predator-Prey Interactions between Myxococcus xanthus and Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 198:3335–3344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Phillips KE, Akbar S, Stevens DC. 2022. Concepts and conjectures concerning predatory performance of myxobacteria. Front Microbiol 13:1031346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ellis BM, Fischer CN, Martin LB, Bachmann BO, McLean JA. 2019. Spatiochemically Profiling Microbial Interactions with Membrane Scaffolded Desorption Electrospray Ionization-Ion Mobility-Imaging Mass Spectrometry and Unsupervised Segmentation. Anal Chem 91:13703–13711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Veltri D, Wight MM, Crouch JA. 2016. SimpleSynteny: a web-based tool for visualization of microsynteny across multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W41–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Petters S, Gross V, Sollinger A, Pichler M, Reinhard A, Bengtsson MM, Urich T. 2021. The soil microbial food web revisited: Predatory myxobacteria as keystone taxa? ISME J doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00958-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Baltz RH. 2019. Natural product drug discovery in the genomic era: realities, conjectures, misconceptions, and opportunities. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 46:281–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Perez J, Contreras-Moreno FJ, Marcos-Torres FJ, Moraleda-Munoz A, Munoz-Dorado J. 2020. The antibiotic crisis: How bacterial predators can help. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 18:2547–2555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Zhou Y, Yi S, Zang Y, Yao Q, Zhu H. 2021. The Predatory Myxobacterium Citreicoccus inhibens gen. nov. sp. nov. Showed Antifungal Activity and Bacteriolytic Property against Phytopathogens. Microorganisms 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Garcia R, Muller R. 2018. Simulacricoccus ruber gen. nov., sp. nov., a microaerotolerant, non-fruiting, myxospore-forming soil myxobacterium and emended description of the family Myxococcaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:3101–3110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Moradi A, Ebrahimipour GH, Mohr KI, Kampfer P, Glaeser SP, Hennessen F, Gemperlein K, Awal RP, Wolf C, Muller R, Wink J. 2017. Racemicystis persica sp. nov., a myxobacterium from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:472–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Awal RP, Garcia R, Gemperlein K, Wink J, Kunwar B, Parajuli N, Muller R. 2017. Vitiosangium cumulatum gen. nov., sp. nov. and Vitiosangium subalbum sp. nov., soil myxobacteria, and emended descriptions of the genera Archangium and Angiococcus, and of the family Cystobacteraceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:1422–1430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Garcia R, Stadler M, Gemperlein K, Muller R. 2016. Aetherobacter fasciculatus gen. nov., sp. nov. and Aetherobacter rufus sp. nov., novel myxobacteria with promising biotechnological applications. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:928–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Awal RP, Garcia R, Muller R. 2016. Racemicystis crocea gen. nov., sp. nov., a soil myxobacterium in the family Polyangiaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:2389–2395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sood S, Awal RP, Wink J, Mohr KI, Rohde M, Stadler M, Kampfer P, Glaeser SP, Schumann P, Garcia R, Muller R. 2015. Aggregicoccus edonensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an unusually aggregating myxobacterium isolated from a soil sample. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:745–753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Yamamoto E, Muramatsu H, Nagai K. 2014. Vulgatibacter incomptus gen. nov., sp. nov. and Labilithrix luteola gen. nov., sp. nov., two myxobacteria isolated from soil in Yakushima Island, and the description of Vulgatibacteraceae fam. nov., Labilitrichaceae fam. nov. and Anaeromyxobacteraceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:3360–3368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Garcia R, Gemperlein K, Muller R. 2014. Minicystis rosea gen. nov., sp. nov., a polyunsaturated fatty acid-rich and steroid-producing soil myxobacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:3733–3742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Iizuka T, Jojima Y, Hayakawa A, Fujii T, Yamanaka S, Fudou R. 2013. Pseudenhygromyxa salsuginis gen. nov., sp. nov., a myxobacterium isolated from an estuarine marsh. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:1360–1369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Mohr KI, Garcia RO, Gerth K, Irschik H, Muller R. 2012. Sandaracinus amylolyticus gen. nov., sp. nov., a starch-degrading soil myxobacterium, and description of Sandaracinaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:1191–1198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Lioy VS, Lorenzi JN, Najah S, Poinsignon T, Leh H, Saulnier C, Aigle B, Lautru S, Thibessard A, Lespinet O, Leblond P, Jaszczyszyn Y, Gorrichon K, Varoquaux N, Junier I, Boccard F, Pernodet JL, Bury-Mone S. 2021. Dynamics of the compartmentalized Streptomyces chromosome during metabolic differentiation. Nat Commun 12:5221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Karoonuthaisiri N, Weaver D, Huang J, Cohen SN, Kao CM. 2005. Regional organization of gene expression in Streptomyces coelicolor. Gene 353:53–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Chevrette MG, Gutierrez-Garcia K, Selem-Mojica N, Aguilar-Martinez C, Yanez-Olvera A, Ramos-Aboites HE, Hoskisson PA, Barona-Gomez F. 2020. Evolutionary dynamics of natural product biosynthesis in bacteria. Nat Prod Rep 37:566–599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Fischbach MA, Walsh CT, Clardy J. 2008. The evolution of gene collectives: How natural selection drives chemical innovation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:4601–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Medema MH, Cimermancic P, Sali A, Takano E, Fischbach MA. 2014. A systematic computational analysis of biosynthetic gene cluster evolution: lessons for engineering biosynthesis. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1004016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Wick RR, Judd LM, Holt KE. 2019. Performance of neural network basecalling tools for Oxford Nanopore sequencing. Genome Biol 20:129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Completing bacterial genome assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing. Microb Genom 3:e000132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Vaser R, Sovic I, Nagarajan N, Sikic M. 2017. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res 27:737–746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Nicholls SM, Quick JC, Tang S, Loman NJ. 2019. Ultra-deep, long-read nanopore sequencing of mock microbial community standards. Gigascience 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. 2016. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:1100–1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Goker M. 2019. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 10:2182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Blin K, Shaw S, Kautsar SA, Medema MH, Weber T. 2021. The antiSMASH database version 3: increased taxonomic coverage and new query features for modular enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D639–D643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Navarro-Munoz JC, Selem-Mojica N, Mullowney MW, Kautsar SA, Tryon JH, Parkinson EI, De Los Santos ELC, Yeong M, Cruz-Morales P, Abubucker S, Roeters A, Lokhorst W, Fernandez-Guerra A, Cappelini LTD, Goering AW, Thomson RJ, Metcalf WW, Kelleher NL, Barona-Gomez F, Medema MH. 2020. A computational framework to explore large-scale biosynthetic diversity. Nat Chem Biol 16:60–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.van den Belt MG C.; Booth T. J.; Chooi Y.; Medema M. H.; Alanjary M. 2023. CAGECAT: The CompArative GEne Cluster Analysis Toolbox for rapid search and visualisation of homologous gene clusters. bioRxiv doi: 10.1101/2023.02.08.527634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.