Skip to main content
National Science Review logoLink to National Science Review
. 2023 Jan 9;10(4):nwad008. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwad008

Revisiting the mechanisms of mid-Tertiary uplift of the NE Tibetan Plateau

Hong-Hong Wei 1,, Guo-Li Wu 2, Lin Ding 3, Long-Gang Fan 4, Lin Li 5, Qing-Ren Meng 6,7
PMCID: PMC10029854  PMID: 36960219

ABSTRACT

Contrasting views exist on timing and mechanisms of Tertiary crustal uplift in the NE Tibetan Plateau based on different approaches, with many models attributing surface uplift to crustal shortening. We carry out a comprehensive investigation of mid-Tertiary stratigraphy, sedimentology, and volcanism in the West Qinling, Hoh Xil and Qaidam basin, and the results challenge previous views. It was held that the discordance between Oligocene and Miocene strata is an angular unconformity in the West Qinling, but our field observations show that it is actually a disconformity, indicative of vertical crustal uplifting rather than crustal shortening at the Oligocene to Miocene transition. Widespread occurrence of synsedimentary normal faults in mid-Tertiary successions implicates supracrustal stretching. Miocene potassic–ultrapassic and mafic–ultramafic volcanics in the Hoh Xil and West Qinling suggest a crucial role of deep thermomechanical processes in generating crust- and mantle-sourced magmatism. Also noticeable are the continuity of mid-Tertiary successions and absence of volcanics in the Qaidam basin. Based on a holistic assessment of stratigraphic–sedimentary processes, volcanic petrogenesis, and spatial variations of lithospheric thicknesses, we speculate that small-sale mantle convection might have been operating beneath northeast Tibet in the mid-Tertiary. It is assumed that northward asthenospheric flow was impeded by thicker cratonic lithosphere of the Qaidam and Alxa blocks, thereby leading to edge convection. The edge-driven convection could bring about surface uplift, induce supracrustal stretching, and trigger vigorous volcanism in the Hoh Xil and West Qinling in the mid-Tertiary period. This mechanism satisfactorily explains many key geologic phenomena that are hardly reconciled by previous models.

Keywords: NE Tibetan Plateau, mid-Tertiary, unconformity, volcanism, edge convection


Mid-Tertiary uplift of the NE Tibetan plateau is likely driven by edge convection, and this mechanism explains a wide range of prominent phenomena such as regional surface vertical motion, supracrustal extension, generation/distribution of coeval volcanism, and Late Miocene switch of tectonic regimes.

INTRODUCTION

The collision of India with Asia occurred around 55–60 Ma and built the Tibetan Plateau [1–4]. It, however, remains controversial how the plateau expanded laterally and rose in response to the persistent India–Asia convergence [4,5]. Diverse dynamic models have been advanced to reconstruct the spatiotemporal growth of the Tibetan Plateau [6–9]. Some workers suggest that the NE Tibetan Plateau began developing soon after the India–Asia collision [10], but others insist that the Tibetan Plateau expanded outward in steps, with its peripheral margins not having been involved until the Miocene [11]. No agreement has been reached as to how the NE Tibetan Plateau evolved. A great many studies have been carried out to understand different aspects of tectonic history of NE Tibet, such as stratigraphic and sedimentary evolution [12–15], basin tectonics [16–18], exhumation history of structural belts [19–23], petrogenesis of volcanic rocks [24–28], crustal deformation [10,29,30], and crustal and lithospheric structures [31–34].

This work focuses on mid-Tertiary tectonics of the NE Tibetan Plateau based mainly on stratigraphic and sedimentologic observations in the West Qinling, Hoh Xil and Qaidam basin. Our revisit of stratigraphic sequences and sedimentary processes reveals that the West Qinling and Hoh Xil orogens underwent crustal vertical uplifting rather than shortening in the mid-Tertiary, and surface uplift was accompanied by volcanism sourced from both the crust and mantle. The Qaidam basin, by contrast, is free of volcanism and characterized by conformable mid-Tertiary sequences. Based on detailed investigations of stratigraphic and sedimentary successions, together with careful evaluation of petrogenesis of volcanic rocks and spatial variations of the lithospheric thickness, we assume that an edge-driven convection might have been operating beneath the NE Tibetan Plateau in the mid-Tertiary as a consequence of impediment of the thicker lithospheric keels of the Qaidam and North China cratonic blocks to northward asthenospheric flow. The resultant upwelling of the asthenospheric hot materials raised the crustal surface and simultaneously triggered volcanism. This mechanism provides a satisfactory explanation for a number of prominent geologic phenomena such as regional disconformity, supracrustal stretching, and spatial distribution of the crust- and mantle-sourced volcanism.

GEOLOGIC SETTING

The NE Tibetan Plateau is made up of both structural/orogenic belts and cratonic blocks (Fig. 1). The western portion comprises the Qaidam basin and surrounding structural belts such as the Altyn Tagh, Qilian Shan, East Kunlun and Hoh Xil, whereas the eastern portion is a mosaic of intermontane basins and structural belts. The eastern portion is largely occupied by the West Qinling, a wide orogenic domain that experienced multiple terrane accretion, magmatism, and metamorphism in the Paleozoic and early Mesozoic [35–38]. The West Qinling was further modified by the alternating crustal extension and contraction in the late Mesozoic [17].

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(A and B) Geomorphologic map showing distribution of main tectonic elements and Cenozoic intermontane basins in the NE Tibetan Plateau.

Opinions differ considerably on when and how the NE Tibetan Plateau was established (Fig. 2). Surface uplift of NE Tibet is commonly attributed to crustal shortening and thickening due to far-field effect of the India–Asia collision. Crustal contraction is assumed to have been initiated as early as the Early Eocene on account of initiation of reverse faulting [39,40], compressional basins [12,17,41] and conglomeratic sedimentation [10,42,43]. Low-temperature thermochronologic data show that structural belts in NE Tibet underwent cooling/rock exhumation in the interval from ∼30 to 22 Ma, which is often ascribed to crustal shortening [19–22,44,45]. The inference of the ∼30–22 Ma shortening event, however, is not justified because of the lacking of geologic evidence of simultaneous thrust faults and growth strata. By contrast, ∼16–14 Ma crustal shortening and surface uplifting are well confirmed by a variety of geological observations such as growth strata [46], thrust and strike-slip faulting [19,47], marked increase in sedimentation rates [48,49], river system reorganization [50], and rapid exhumation of structural belts and coeval shifting of sediment supply systems of adjacent basins [23,49,51,52]. Rapid contraction-related exhumation of structural belts is demonstrated to occur at ∼10–8 Ma by virtue of growth strata [53,54], cooling ages [55,56] and transpressional deformations [57]. The Pliocene witnesses another period of significant surface uplift that is recorded by rapid fluvial incision, rock denudation and high-rate sedimentation of coarse-grained sediments [23,58–60]. Figure 2 summarizes the key time intervals when the NE Tibetan Plateau is inferred to experience rapid uplift in response to crustal shortening.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A summary of the views on timing of uplift of the NE Tibetan Plateau. Diverse approaches are used to infer the ages of contraction-induced uplift, and tectonic interpretations are based on different rationales of geological phenomena and experimental data.

Vigorous debate exists regarding when crustal shortening initiated in the NE Tibetan Plateau. Paleogene successions of intermontane basins in the West Qinling, such as the Xining, Guide and Linxia basins, are interpreted as infill of flexural or compressional basins [17,41,61]. The Eocene–Oligocene Lulehe conglomerate in the western and middle Qaidam basin is also taken as sedimentary record of thrust-related uplifting of the Qilian Shan in the north [10,42,43]. Dating of some reverse faults hints at Eocene inception of shortening in the West Qinling [39]. All these studies suggest Eocene–Oligocene contractional deformations, implying an immediate response of NE Tibet to the India–Asia collision. Recent structural and stratigraphic investigations, however, show that the eastern NE Tibetan Plateau was in an extensional setting during the Paleogene on account of widespread occurrence of normal faulting that either controls Paleogene sedimentation or occur in Paleogene successions [62]. Early Miocene tectonic setting also remains elusive albeit ∼30–22 Ma exhumation of some structural belts, such as the East Kunlun and Laji Shan, is often interpreted as the result of crustal shortening [20–22,44,45,51,63]. Middle–Late Miocene rock uplift, thrusting and strike-slip faulting have been widely documented throughout the NE Tibetan Plateau [19,49,53,64,65], and it is now accepted that crustal shortening had become predominant since ∼15 Ma [46,48,53].

STRATIGRAPHIC SEQUENCES

Tertiary strata in the NE Tibetan Plateau have been well studied, and the age assignments to lithostratigraphic units rely basically on mammal fossils and magnetostratigraphy [12–15,52,61,66–71]. Tertiary successions are perfectly preserved in many basins, and rest unconformably on Mesozoic and older rocks (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Tertiary stratigraphy of the NE Tibetan Plateau. Chronostratigraphic framework is based on mammal fossils and magnetostratigraphic data. Note the prominent unconformity separating the Miocene from the underlying units. Also noteworthy are Miocene volcanic rocks in the Hoh Xil and West Qinling as well as their absence in the Qaidam basin. The number in parenthesis represents the referenced paper.

The West Qinling

A number of Cenozoic intermontane basins exist in the West Qinling (Figs 1 and 4). A regional unconformity separates Paleogene from Neogene strata (Fig. 3) and can be readily observed in the field (Fig. 5). Tertiary sequence in the Xining basin was previously regarded conformable [66,72], but a careful magnetostratigraphic study identifies a disconformity separating the Xining Group from overlying Miocene Chetougou Formation, which represents a time lapse from 22 to 20 Ma [73]. This disconformity becomes conspicuous in the Laji Shan (Fig. 5A), which bounds the Xining basin on the south and was once a part of the Xining basin in the Paleogene [62]. The unconformity between the Paleogene and Miocene in the Guide basin is often taken as an angular unconformity [41]. However, this low-angle discordance turns out to be a local erosional surface in that Lower Miocene Guidemen Formation remains in general parallel to the underlying Xining Group (Fig. 5B). Field observations further disprove the interpretation of angular unconformity insofar as the ‘angular contact’ changes laterally into a disconformity in a short distance (Fig. 5C). The erosional contact resulted from channeling of rivers that deposited basal conglomerate of the Guidemen Formation. This disconformity is also clearly discerned in the Xunhua and Linxia basins where it manifests itself as a striking erosional surface below the Guidemen and Zhongzhuang formations (Fig. 5D and E), with paleosols being locally present atop the Upper Oligocene Tala Formation [74]. The coeval disconformity in the Tianshui basin is exemplified by a sharp facies change from the Guyuan fluvial conglomerate to Ganquan lacustrine fine-grained clastic rocks (Fig. 5F) [75]. Paleogene strata are missing in the Gonghe basin where Miocene units rest directly on strata of different ages [76].

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Simplified geological map showing distribution of Cenozoic intermontane basins in the West Qinling. Note that original configurations of Paleogene and Early Miocene basins were altered to various degrees by late-stage crustal deformations.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Field photos showing disconformities between Paleogene and Miocene strata in the West Qinling. (A) Disconformable surface between the Guidemen conglomerate and the underlying mudrocks of the Xining Group in the Laji Shan. Width of view ∼200 m. (B) An erosional low-angle unconformity resulting from fluvial channeling into the Xining Group in the Guide basin. Width of view ∼250 m. (C) Typical disconformity separating the Guidemen conglomerate from the underlying Xining Group in the Guide basin. Width of view ∼150 m. (D) Sharp discordance (disconformity) between the Guidemen Formation conglomerate and the Xining Group mudrocks in the Xunhua basin. Width of view ∼300 m. (E) A sharp erosional contact (disconformity) between basal conglomerate of Miocene Zhongzhuang Formation and Oligocene Tala Formation in the Linxia basin. Width of view ∼10 m. (F) Sharp contact (disconformity) between lacustrine mudrocks of the Lower Miocene Ganquan Formation and alluvial conglomerate of the Oligocene Guyuan Group in the Tianshui basin. Width of view ∼150 m. Fm = Formation, Gr = Group, cgl = conglomerate.

The Hoh Xil

Tertiary sequence in the Hoh Xil is composed of three units, the Fenghuoshan Group, Yaxicuo Formation and Wudaoliang Formation in ascending order, and two unconformities separate them from each other (Fig. 3). The Late Eocene–Early Oligocene Yaxicuo Formation is widely distributed (Fig. 6) and dated at 36–30 Ma by magnetostratigraphic studies [77]. This unit is deformed to various degrees and particularly intensely folded near the Tanggula, Fenghuoshan and Hoh Xil thrust belts [29,78,79]. In contrast, the overlying Wudaoliang Formation remains flat-lying throughout the Hoh Xil, indicative of termination of crustal shortening since the Miocene [80]. Thrusting and folding should have come to an end by the Late Oligocene inasmuch as the deformed Yaxicuo Formation is overlain by the undeformed basalt sheets dated at ∼27 Ma [79,81]. The Wudaoliang Formation is assigned to be a Lower–Middle Miocene unit from 23 to 16 Ma on the basis of magnetostratigraphic dating and fossil assemblages [82,83]. The discordance between the Yaxicuo and Wudaoliang formations mostly expresses itself as an angular unconformity [29,78,84] although it is observed as a disconformity in some locales [80].

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Simplified geologic map showing distribution of Tertiary strata and volcanic rocks in the Hoh Xil and northern Qiangtang. Note that Lower Miocene Wudaoliang Formation (Nw) unconformably overlies the pre-Miocene strata. The dates of Miocene volcanic rocks are from Refs [24,26,28].

The Qaidam basin

Cheng et al. [16] provide a helpful review of Cenozoic stratigraphy of the Qaidam basin, and make a discussion about the controversy on age assignments to lithostratigraphic units in the middle of the basin [14,52]. Figure 7A displays a geologic section across the central Qaidam basin, showing the continuity of Cenozoic successions. Given that all the Tertiary successions of the basin were deposited in continental environments, sedimentary facies associations may exhibit marked spatial variations, with some units being diachronous. As a result, simple temporal correlation of lithostratigraphic units can be misleading. For example, the Lulehe Formation is dated or inferred to be an Eocene unit in the westernmost Qaidam basin [10,85,86], but this unit was recently demonstrated to be Early Oligocene (∼31 Ma) in age in its type section [87]. Magnetostratigraphic studies further show that deposition of the Lulehe conglomerate have not started until the Late Oligocene [52] or Early Miocene [70] in the Honggou section in the middle of the Qaidam basin, which is located ca. 120 km east of the type section. This situation clearly indicates that the Lulehe Formation is a diachronous unit, possibly resulting from eastward transgressive deposition. Conglomeratic facies associations of the unit represent alluvial–fluvial sedimentation at the edge of the basin. Expansion of the depositional area of the Qaidam basin is implied by the eastward onlap of Tertiary strata on geologic profiles (Fig. 7B) and isopach maps of different units [16,18]. Middle Tertiary successions are conformable in the western and central Qaidam basin, with the Oligocene Shangganchaigou Formation passing upward conformably into the Lower Miocene Xiayoushashan Formation. The two units are composed dominantly of lacustrine fine-grained siliciclastic and carbonate facies such as thin-bedded mudstone/siltstone and limestone/marls. The Paleogene is absent in the easternmost Qaidam basin or the Wulan basin where Miocene units lie unconformably over the Mesozoic and older rocks [88], similar to Tertiary stratigraphy of the Gonghe basin.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Geological sections of the Qaidam basin based on interpretations of seismic profiles. (A) SW–NE-striking section across the central part of the basin, showing the continuity of Cenozoic successions. Basinward thrusting had not started until the Late Miocene when the Shizigou Formation was deposited as growth strata. (B) The west–east-striking section in the eastern Qaidam basin, showing transgressive overlapping of units toward the east. Refer to Fig. 1 for locations of the two sections.

SEDIMENTARY PROCESSES

The West Qinling

Mid-Tertiary strata are well preserved in intermontane basins of the West Qinling (Figs 3 and 4). Oligocene units are comprised mostly of fine-grained facies associations deposited in lacustrine and meandering fluvial environments. Coarse-grained facies associations exist in some locales and result from fan-deltaic sedimentation due to high-rate extensional subsidence [62]. Paleosols are present at the uppermost parts of some Oligocene units, implicating development of exogenic surfaces at the end of the Paleogene. Lower Miocene successions usually commence with alluvial and braided fluvial debrite and coarse-grained sandstone, and unconformably overlie pre-Miocene rocks (Fig. 5A–D).

Complete Miocene successions perfectly crop out in the Guide basin south of the Laji Shan (Fig. 4). Alluvial and braided-river sedimentation marks the initiation of the Guide basin, as represented by basal debrite of the Guidemen Formation. Debrites are massive or thick-bedded, and consist dominantly of angular clasts of different lithologies such as metavolcanics, schist, quartzite, and argillite. Coarse-grained sandstone with planar and low-angle stratification becomes more abundant in the upper Guidemen Formation. Debrite and sandstone facies associations are interpreted as deposits of debris- and high-concentrated flows. Noteworthy is the rapid change from the Guidemen coarse-grained facies upward into green- and dark-colored fine-grained clastic facies and thin-bedded limestone, which make up the overlying Garang and Ashigong formations.

The Xunhua basin is located to the east of the Guide basin where the Oligocene unit is termed in the literature as either the Tala Formation or Xining Group. This unit consists of alluvial conglomeratic facies in the lower part and fluvial–lacustrine sandstone and mudrock in the middle and upper. In places, paleosol horizons are present in the uppermost part of the Tala Formation, which is then overlain disconformably by massive alluvial debrite and coarse-grained sandstone of the Guide Group. Fine-grained sandstone and mudrock faces become predominant in the middle Guide Group, and are deposited in lacustrine and deltaic environments. Braided river sedimentation took place in the north of the basin, as recorded by cross-bedded and parallel-stratified gravelly sandstone facies associations.

The Linxia and Xunhua basins are separated by the Jishi Shan, the southeastern extension of the Laji Shan (Fig. 4). Compared with its equivalent of the Xunhua basin, the Tala Formation is composed of meandering fluvial and lacustrine sandstones and siltstone, with conglomeratic beds being merely present at the base. The Lower Miocene Zhongzhuang Formation comprises conglomeratic facies in the lower part and fine-grained facies associations in the middle and upper. Our field observations and sedimentary analysis indicate that this unit exhibits a rapid transition from braided-river to meandering-river/lacustrine environments, similar to the Lower Miocene sequences in the Guide basin.

Middle Tertiary stratigraphy and sedimentation in the Tianshui basin northeast of the Linxia basin is also carefully studied [75]. The Oligocene Guyuan Group, less than 500 m thick, is made up primarily of massive conglomerate and coarse-grained sandstone, which are interpreted as debris-flow deposits in alluvial environments. The Miocene Ganquan Formation is comprised mostly of lacustrine siltstone and mudstone (Fig. 3), and rests disconformably on the Guyuan Group, with alluvial–fluvial conglomerate and sandstone being at the base [62].

It is worth noting that extension must have been active during the Early Miocene, as manifested by the presence of various-scale synsedimentary normal faults that either cut the unconformity beneath the Lower Miocene or occur in Lower Miocene successions. Figure 8A displays a normal fault controlling Lower Miocene sedimentation in the Wulan basin. The Wulan basin, located at present in the easternmost area of the Qaidam basin, was once connected with the Gonghe basin in the Early–Middle Miocene [89]. It is noticeable that the Miocene subsidence of the Gonghe basin was governed by normal faulting on its northern and southern borders, as inferred by geologic interpretation of a seismic profile [90]. In addition, normal faulting should have commenced at the beginning of the Early Miocene when the Guidemen and Garang successions were deposited. Normal faults cut the Guidemen conglomeritic sequences and controlled deposition of both the Guidemen alluvial conglomerate and Garang lacustrine fine-grained facies (Fig. 8B). Widespread presence of synsedimentary normal faults of various scales in the Garang succession (Fig. 8C) indicates continuation of normal faulting in the late Early Miocene. Normal faults are also documented in the eastern West Qinling, such the Tianshui basin [91,92]. Guo et al. [93] demonstrate that Miocene sedimentation in the Zhangxian basin should have taken place in an extensional setting based on detailed facies analysis of depositional successions. Miocene bimodal volcanic rocks in the West Qinling are also consistent with an extensional tectonic setting [94]. Extension might have affected the West Qinling until the Pliocene when contractional and transpressional deformation became prevailing [95].

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Field photos showing Early Miocene normal faults in the Wulan and Guide basins in the eastern Qaidam and West Qinling, and lava sheet in the Hoh Xil. (A) A normal fault controlling basal sedimentation of Lower Miocene unit in the Wulan basin, with a small depositional wedge thickening toward the fault. Width of view ∼20 m. (B) A normal fault separates the Guidemen from Garang units in the Guide basin, which is covered with the upper Garang fine-grained layer. Width of view ∼80 m. (C) Various-scale normal faults in the Garang sequence of the Guide basin. People for scale. (D) Early Miocene lava sheet in the distance, which overlies the Yaxicuo Formation and undergoes little deformation. View in the background 500 m wide.

The Hoh Xil

The Late Eocene–Oligocene Yaxicuo Formation is made up primarily of fine-grained siliciclastic rocks, including thin- to medium-bedded sandstone, siltstone, and mudstone. Red-colored mudrock and sandstone typify the middle and upper parts of the formation, and gypsum layers are particularly common in the uppermost. Conglomerate and coarse-grained sandstone facies are present at the base. The fine-grained siliciclastic facies associations are interpreted as the result of coastal to shallow lacustrine sedimentation, whereas the basal conglomeratic facies formed in fluvial and deltaic environments [78,96–98].

The Wudaoliang Formation begins with conglomeratic facies, which pass upward to thin-bedded mudrock, bioclastic limestone, marl, and dolostone. Stromatolites of different morphology are commonplace, and can build up huge reefs or domes up to 80 m thick in some locales [99]. This unit is less than 400 m thick, varying from 100 to 350 m. Abundant ostracode fauna are reported, such as Leucocythere sp. and Microlimnocythere sp., Ilyocypris sp., Eucypris sp., and Candona sp. [82]. The sedimentary facies associations and ostracode fauna indicate that the Wudaoliang succession was deposited in lacustrine environments [82,97]. Broad distribution of fine-grained clastic and carbonate facies and the lack of coarse-grained facies are consistent with the inference of a vast lake in the Hoh Xil during the Early Miocene [82].

Also important is the occurrence of mid-Tertiary normal faults in northern Tibet [100]. Wu et al. [101] made a detailed investigation of the Wenquan basin that is bounded on the west by a normal fault, and demonstrated ∼18 Ma commencement of normal faulting. Blisniuk et al. [102] also documented an ∼13.5 Ma normal fault system that controlled the Shuanghu rift basin just south of the Wenquan basin. Unfortunately, there are no reports of synsedimentary normal faults in Miocene successions in the Hoh Xil in the literature although Pliocene–Quaternary extensional basins widely develop [80].

The Qaidam basin

Mid-Tertiary sedimentary processes of the Qaidam basin have been extensively studied [42,86,103]. The Oligocene–Lower Miocene successions or the Shangganchaigou–Xiayoushashan successions are continuous, contrasting with the mid-Tertiary successions in the West Qinling and Hoh Xil. The successions are dominated by mudstone, siltstone, and carbonate rock, and there also occur stromatolite and algal reefs [104–106]. Fluvial systems mainly develop along the northern margin of the Qaidam basin. Existence of limestone, stromatolite, and algal reefs, in conjunction with the predominance of fine-grained clastic facies associations, hints at expansion of a vast lake during this period. Fluvial and alluvial systems began propagating into the basin from the surrounding structural belts in the Late Miocene, such as the East Kunlun [103], Altyn Tagh [107] and Qilian Shan [42], leading to considerable shrinkage of lake area and disappearance of carbonate deposition.

MIOCENE VOLCANISM

Miocene volcanic rocks are distributed in the Hoh Xil and West Qinling (Fig. 9), and their petrology, geochemistry, and petrogenesis have been well studied [25,26,108–114]. Volcanic eruptions in the Qiangtang took place mainly in the Early–Middle Eocene, and then diminished [24,115–118]. Volcanism migrated northward and became quite active in the Hoh Xil and West Qinling during the Miocene (Fig. 9), as manifested by diverse volcanic lava dated at ∼23–7 Ma [26,28,113].

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Diagram showing distribution of Miocene volcanics in NE Tibet. Note that volcanic rocks are distributed in the Hoh Xil and West Qinling but absent in the Qaidam basin, Qilian Shan and Alxa block. Geochronologic data of volcanics are from Refs [24,26,28,131,132].

Mid-Tertiary volcanoes come in all sizes and shapes in NE Tibet, expressing themselves as positive landforms like lava sheets (Fig. 8D), domes and pyroclastic cones, ranging from 30 to 150 m in thickness [28,119,120]. Some lava sheets cover an area up to 200 km2 [121]. Volcanic rocks overlie sedimentary successions of different ages, with the youngest underlying strata being the Yaxicuo Formation. Volcanics are compositionally variable, including massive trachyte, trachyandesite, rhyolite, volcanic breccia and pyroclastics [28]. Intermediate rocks are basically potassium-rich adakitic volcanics and attributed to lower-crustal melting [26]. Peraluminous rhyolites, dated at 14–9 Ma, are associated with K-rich adakitic rocks, and ascribed to middle crustal melting [122]. It is particularly worth noting the occurrence of 16 Ma olivine leucitites in the Hoh Xil [26,28], which display very low SiO2 and high MgO contents, and are enriched in large ion lithophile elements [123]. These geochemical features indicate that olivine leucitites originate from low-degree partial melting of the lithospheric mantle [123]. Potassic–ultrapotassic volcanics are commonly thought of as the products of partial melting of the enriched lithospheric mantle at high temperatures [109,111]. Coexisting mafic rocks further indicate the contribution of partial melting of the lithospheric mantle to mid-Tertiary volcanism [124].

Miocene lava in the eastern West Qinling is distributed as tens of individual outcrops usually <1 km2 (Fig. 10). Pyroclastic rocks occur as interlayers in volcanic lava successions. Volcanics are predominantly mafic and alkaline, and characterized by very high Na2O/K2O ratios and enrichment of Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic compositions. Timing of volcanic eruptions is constrained by phlogopite 40Ar/39Ar and zircon U-Pb ages from ∼23 to 7 Ma [113,114]. Kamafugite suites are typical of alkaline volcanic rocks in the eastern West Qinling (Fig. 10C), and accompanied by igneous carbonatite [125]. Porphyritic texture characterizes the kamafugites that contain abundant carbonatite inclusions [110,125], xenoliths of pyroxenite, dunite and harzburgite [25], and numerous phenocrysts of olivine, clinopyroxene and nepheline [25,126]. Miocene alkaline mafic and ultramafic volcanics in the middle part of the West Qinling express themselves as alkaline basalt and contain minor olivine crystals and carbonatite inclusions [125]. Basalts in the Duofutun area yield a zircon U-Pb age of ∼14 Ma (Fig. 10D) [114], and their geochemical characteristics implicate their derivation from partial melting of the carbonated mantle lithosphere [125].

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Diagram showing detailed distribution and outcrops of Miocene volcanic rocks in the West Qinling. (A) Volcanic rocks in the eastern West Qinling include kamafugite and minor felsic volcanics. Isotopic ages are from Ref. [113]. (B) Basalts in the middle West Qinling. Isotopic age is from Ref. [114]. (C) Kamafugite in the Lixian area, eastern West Qinling. (D) Basalts in the Tongren area, middle West Qinling. Hammer circled for scale.

No Miocene volcanics occur in the western West Qinling (Fig. 9). It is, however, interesting to note that hot dry rocks are widely reported in the Gonghe basin, and serve as important geothermal resources [127, 128]. Drilling reveals that hot dry rocks possess high temperatures up to 214°C at depths from 3700 to 4610 m, indicating a very high geothermal gradient (up to 14°C/100 m) and high terrestrial heat flows (up to 109.6 mW/m2) in the crust of the Gonghe basin [127,128]. Geophysical explorations attest to the existence of low-velocity zones (LVZs) at depths from 20–40 km, with calculated temperatures ranging from 680–760°C in the lower crust [128]. Plausibly, partial melting might have been happening in the mid-lower crust [129]. All these phenomena are suggestive of a deep-seated heat source beneath the Gonghe basin.

Broad distribution of diverse volcanic rocks and hot dry rocks collectively indicates thermal disturbance in the lithosphere of NE Tibet during the mid-Tertiary, and partial melting occurred in both the crust and lithospheric mantle. Crustal melting is indicated by rhyolite and K-rich adakitic rocks [26,122], whereas mantle sources of volcanics are sustained by the presence of peridotitic xenoliths in kamafugites in the West Qinling [25,27,113] and olivine leucitites and mafic–ultramafic rocks in the Hoh Xil [28,123,130]. It is estimated that potassic volcanics formed at 900–1200°C [26,111,131] and the lithospheric melting must have taken place at high temperatures up to 1400°C [132]. No mid-Tertiary volcanics have been reported in the Qaidam basin and Qilian Shan, in striking contrast to the vigorous volcanism in the adjacent Hoh Xil and West Qinling.

DRIVERS FOR MID-TERTIARY UPLIFT OF NE TIBET

Previous models

Many studies have been focusing on the age of inception of crustal shortening in NE Tibet. It is assumed that the India–Asia collision might have immediately affected the NE Tibetan Plateau, creating compressional basins in the Hoh Xil [29,78,79] and West Qinling [12,17,41]. Eocene–Oligocene conglomeratic sedimentation in the Qaidam basin is also ascribed to a far-field effect of the India–Asia collision [10,43]. Rapid Late Oligocene–Early Miocene exhumation of structural belts in the NE Tibetan Plateau, as recorded by low-temperature thermochronologic data, is considered to be the result of crustal shortening [22,45,51]. However, some tectonic explanations are inconsistent with our geologic observations.

Paleogene successions in the West Qinling were thought of as infill of compressional basins, with basin subsidence resulting from tectonic load applied by surrounding thrust sheets [12,41]. However, widely-observed synsedimentary normal faults of various scales in Paleogene successions hint at crustal stretching rather than shortening [62,133]. In addition, it is often taken for granted that conglomeratic sedimentation is indicative of shortening-related uplift of adjacent structural belts, and accordingly the Eocene–Oligocene Lulehe conglomerate in the Qaidam basin is frequently invoked to argue for activation of thrusting and uplifting of the Qilian Shan on the north. However, broad distribution and textural/petrologic maturation of the Lulehe conglomerate are at odds with the interpretation of rapid proximal subsidence and sedimentation of flexural basins.

There is also meager geological evidence bearing out Early Miocene crustal shortening. The view of Early Miocene crustal contraction in the northern Tibetan Plateau relies mainly upon exhumation history of structural belts, such as the East Kunlun [19,45], Qilian Shan [20] and Laji Shan [21], with cooling ages being utilized to constrain the initiation and chronicle of contraction-related uplifting. Unfortunately, few geologic observations attest to Early Miocene thrust faulting. Growth strata in well-dated Neogene successions show that folding and thrusting commenced ∼15 Ma and have persisted since then, as confirmed by seismic profiles in the Qaidam basin [16,18,46] and field observations in intermontane basins [53,54,134]. A dramatic change in sediment feeding systems, together with synchronous thrusting, also consistently points to ∼15 Ma commencement of rapid uplifting of structural belts in the NE Tibetan Plateau, such as the Qilian Shan [49,65], Jishi Shan [135], and intrabasinal thrust belts like the Luliang Shan in the northern Qaidam basin [64]. Strike-slip faulting along the edges of the NE Tibetan Plateau is also demonstrated to initiate at ∼15 Ma, such as the Altyn Tagh fault [48,136], East Kunlun fault [19,137] and Haiyuan fault [19,47]. Strike-slip faulting within the NE Tibetan Plateau began ∼10 Ma, such as the Elashan and Riyue Shan right-slip faults [57]. Moreover, Early Miocene prevalence of fine-grained clastic and carbonate sedimentation in the Qaidam basin and the West Qinling also negate the assumption of strong crustal contraction during that period of time. Active thrusting and uplifting would produce lots of coarse-grained clastics that rapidly propagate into basins and suppress carbonate sedimentation.

It is important to note another fact that crustal shortening in the northern Qiangtang and Hoh Xil had ceased by ∼27 Ma [79,81], and this view is verified by the observation of flat-lying Lower Miocene Wudaoliang Formation and lava sheets (Fig. 8D). It follows that the focused rock uplift of structural belts in the NE Tibetan Plateau is hardly ascribed to shortening as a result of tectonic push caused by the Asia–India collision. Instead, it is plausible that Late Oligocene–Early Miocene regional surface uplift, including the structural belts, arose from vertical crustal motion. This inference is buttressed by the occurrence of widespread disconformity separating Oligocene from Miocene units in both intermontane basins (Fig. 3) and structural belts such as the Laji Shan in the West Qinling (Fig. 5A). Moreover, the Hoh Xil surface height is estimated to have been ∼1400–2900 m in the Early Miocene in light of leaf fossils (barberry) in the Wudaoliang Formation [138]. Given that shortening had come to an end before ∼27 Ma in the Hoh Xil, exogenic processes and peneplanation was likely attributed to vertical surface uplift driven possibly by deep thermomechanical processes. The Hoh Xil surface elevation is now at ∼5000 m above sea level, and thus it must have experienced high-rate uplift since ∼15 Ma after the termination of Wudaoliang lacustrine deposition.

A number of dynamic models have been advanced to account for the rising of the Tibetan Plateau, such as northward-migrating crustal shortening and thickening [1,11] and convective removal of the mantle lithosphere [139]. These models are favored in that they provide some explanations of spatiotemporal variations of crustal deformation, surface elevation, and volcanism in the Tibetan Plateau as a whole [8,9,29,140], and are thus invoked to reconstruct Tertiary tectonic evolution of the Hoh Xil [78,79]. It is noteworthy that Molnar et al. [139] developed the mantle removal model to account for the rough synchronicity of crustal uplift and volcanism in the Late Miocene. However, Cenozoic volcanism had already begun prior to the Late Miocene, and exhibited striking spatial migration with time [109]. The mantle removal model is thus not fit for the mid-Tertiary tectonic evolution of NE Tibet. Another popular model appeals to southward subduction of the Asian continent to explain tectonic development of the Qaidam basins, surrounding structural belts [11,141], and Miocene volcanism in the Hoh Xil [26,142]. Unfortunately, this model fails to reconcile with some conspicuous features of mid-Tertiary tectonics of NE Tibet, as explicated in this study. First, crustal shortening had terminated by ∼27 Ma in the Hoh Xil, and the West Qinling was basically in an extensional regime in the Early Miocene. These facts are at variance with the postulation that crustal shortening had continued migrating northwards. Second, the convective removal model predicts simultaneous volcanism in a broad area, but Tertiary volcanism displays marked northward shifting, with volcanic eruptions occurring in the Qiangtang during the Eocene and starting in the Hoh Xil and West Qinling during the Miocene. Also noticeable is the absence of Miocene volcanics in the Qaidam and Qilian Shan where volcanism should have taken place if convective removal of lithospheric root happened beneath the NE Tibetan Plateau. Third, observations of flat-lying and gently-dipping Lower Miocene and younger lava sheets in the Hoh Xil are in conflict with tectonic models that assume southward subduction of the Asian continent along the East Kunlun belt and predict strong shortening of the overriding Hoh Xil.

A new mechanism

It remains a key challenge to develop a dynamic model that could exposit mid-Tertiary diverse tectonic processes and their relationships in NE Tibet. A feasible mechanism should at least take into account the new observational data provided in this study, such as widespread disconformity between Oligocene and Miocene strata, Early Miocene normal faulting, and concurrent volcanism. The temperospatial coincidence among vertical surface uplift, supracrustal stretching and volcanism should be no accident. Petrogenesis of volcanic rocks in the Hoh Xil and West Qinling provides essential clues for inferring the driving forces. Potassic–ultrapotassic and mafic–ultramafic volcanic rocks, together with the presence of peridotitic xenoliths and olivine crystals, suggest that thermomechanical processes in the mantle should have played a significant role controlling crustal deformation in NE Tibet [108,109,111,125,143]. The missing Miocene volcanics in the Qaidam basin, Qilian Shan, and Alxa block is also an unavoidable fact (Fig. 9).

The crustal and lithospheric mantle structures of the Hoh Xil and West Qinling prove to be quite different from those of the Qaidam and Alxa blocks. Magnetotelluric data reveal that the Hoh Xil has a conductive or low-resistivity upper mantle, indicative of significant partial melting [144]. This fact is consistent with seismic images that indicate a hot upper mantle beneath the Hoh Xil [145]. Similarly, the West Qinling exhibits weak and diffusive negative velocity gradients in the lithospheric mantle, also implying thermal anomalies or high temperature [32]. By contrast, the Qaidam and Alxa blocks behave as rigid cratonic domains with higher resistivity [144]. Also interesting is the marked change in lithosphere thickness across the boundaries between orogenic and cratonic domains. The Hoh Xil and West Qinling possess relatively thinner lithosphere thickness varying from 125 to135 km [34,146] although their crust is considerably thicker, up to 65 km [147,148]. By comparison, the lithosphere of cratonic blocks is much thicker, varying from 175 to 190 km in the Qaidam basin and up to 200 km in the Alxa block, respectively [34]. Ye et al. [33] provide a deep seismic reflection profile across the boundary between the West Qinling and Alxa block, which illustrates a conspicuous change in lithosphere thickness between the two distinct tectonic domains. Speculations of active southward underthrusting of the Qaidam lithosphere beneath the Hoh Xil and the North China lithosphere beneath the West Qinling depend on interpretations of the seismic images [33,145] or are inferred from geochemistry of Miocene volcanics [26,122,142,149]. The conceptual models, however, are called into question by other geophysical investigations such as differential P- and S-wave travel-time measurement [31] and receiver-function imaging [150]. Moreover, the models are also at odds with geologic observations that Miocene strata basically remain little deformed in both the Hoh Xil and West Qinling.

The Songpan terrane, situated on the south of the West Qinling and merging with the Hoh Xil to the west, is part of the NE Tibetan Plateau (Fig. 1). This terrane consists mostly of strongly deformed Triassic turbiditic successions and is intruded by the scattering granites of Late Triassic–Early Jurassic ages [151,152]. The Songpan shares similar tectonic and magmatic evolution with the Hoh Xil and West Qinling in the early Mesozoic [153], but differs from the two orogens in some aspects. First, Cenozoic volcanics are missing. Second, Cretaceous strata remain essentially undeformed. Third, Cenozoic deposits are basically lacking [154]. These distinct features imply that the Songpan terrane escaped both deep thermomechanical processes and crustal compression in the Cenozoic. It is shown that the Songpan underwent two-phase rapid cooling at ∼120 Ma and ∼80 Ma during the Cretaceous, respectively, which was then followed by extremely slow surface uplift in the Cenozoic [154]. Implicitly, the Songpan might have already attained its present mean elevation of ∼3500 m prior to the Cenozoic. Crustal thickness of this terrane is up to ∼63 km [147], and the thickening might have primarily resulted from early Mesozoic shortening. Also notable is the thinner lithosphere of the Songpan terrane, varying from ∼125–135 km [34].

Cenozoic asthenospheric mantle flow is inferred to have taken place under the Tibetan Plateau in response to the persistent India–Asia convergence [155,156]. The plausibility of northward asthenospheric flow is supported by spatiotemporal variation of Cenozoic volcanism [143], and also extrapolated by seismic heterogeneity and anisotropy in the upper mantle [157] and P-wave velocity perturbations [158]. A thick LVZ is imaged in the upper mantle of the Hoh Xil, reaching down to the top of the mantle transition zone from the Moho [159]. The LVZ exists mainly beneath the Hoh Xil, West Qinling, and Songpan terranes [31,160], but disappears beneath the Qaidam and Alxa blocks [161]. Presumably, the northward asthenospheric mantle flow is driven by continued hinge advance of the subducting Indian lithospheric plate, a kind of tectonic process suggested by Kapp and DeCelles [6].

Based on a holistic treatment of geologic, geochemical and geophysical observations and data, we propose an edge-driven convection model that can satisfactorily account for regional surface uplift of the West Qinling and Hoh Xil as well as generation and spatial distribution of volcanic rocks in NE Tibet during the mid-Tertiary (Fig. 11). As described above, a marked step exists in lithosphere thickness between orogenic and cratonic domains, with the depth offset of the lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary (LAB) up to ∼45 km. Conceivably, the present-day variations in lithospheric thickness does not exactly reflect their original difference, for the lithosphere of the Hoh Xil and West Qinling must have been thinned as a result of thermal erosion or other thermomechanical processes (Fig. 11A and B). Nevertheless, cratonic blocks usually possess a considerably more stable and thicker lithosphere than adjacent orogenic belts [162]. This notion is well illustrated by the striking variation in lithosphere thickness between the Alxa block (>200 km) [163] and the Qilian Shan (∼170 km) [34], both of which have not been altered by Cenozoic deep thermomechanical processes. The discrepancy of LAB depth of the two domains should be even larger in consideration of the increase in crustal thickness of the Qilian Shan due to late Cenozoic shortening. If it is the case, lithospheric keels of the Qaidam and Alxa blocks could have served as barriers to impede the northward mantle flow, thereby inducing small-scale convection cells beneath the West Qinling and Hoh Xil since the Late Oligocene (Fig. 11A). The uprising asthenosphere heated the overlying lithosphere and led to partial melting of both the lithospheric mantle and mid-lower crust (Fig. 11B). Other thermomechanical processes might also be involved in the edge-driven convection, such as delamination and partial removal of the lithospheric mantle (Fig. 11B), especially beneath the Qiangtang–Hoh Xil that had experienced shortening just before the Late Oligocene [79]. K-rich adakitic and peraluminous rhyolitic volcanism resulted from partial melting of the mid-lower crust, whereas partial melting of the lithospheric mantle gave rise to mafic–ultramafic rocks and kamafugite suites. Gradual thermal erosion of the lithosphere by edge convection brought about vertical crustal uplift due to the replacement of metasomatosed mantle lithosphere by less dense asthenosphere (Fig. 11B), possibly in conjunction with magmatic inflation [130]. Upwelling of the asthenospheric hot materials is sustained by petrologic studies that infer very high temperatures from 800 to 1400°C in the crust and lithospheric mantle of the Qiangtang, Hoh Xil and West Qinling [111,131,132].

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

Tectonic model illustrating possible origin of vertical crustal motion and volcanism in the NE Tibetan Plateau in the mid-Tertiary. (A) Asthenospheric mantle flow caused by India-Asia collision was obstructed by the thicker cratonic lithosphere of the Qaidam and Alxa blocks, and the resulting edge-driven convection led to regional surface uplift of the West Qinling and Hoh Xil. (B) The edge convection brought about thinning and/or peeling of lithospheric mantle due to thermal erosion and asthenosphere uprising, and drove surface uplift of the West Qinling and Hoh Xil. Partial melting took place in both the lithospheric mantle and mid-lower crust due to heating of the asthenospheric materials which gave rise to volcanism sourced from the mid-lower crust and lithospheric mantle. Gravitational spreading of the elevated and heated orogenic crust resulted in supracrustal stretching and distributed small extensional basins. (C) Strong crustal shortening began affecting periphery of the NE Tibetan Plateau from the Late Miocene onward and led to thrust-related uplift of structural belts and basin inversion or shrinkage.

The edge convection exerted little effect on the lithosphere of the Qaidam basin, neither heating nor raising it. As a consequence, the Qaidam basin has remained a region of lower elevation (<1500 m) [107,164–166] and free from volcanism in the mid-Tertiary. The Qilian Shan was unaffected either by the edge convection owing to the defense of the Qaidam lithosphere keel on the south, thereby explaining the absence of Miocene volcanics in the Qilian Shan. Rapid uplift and exhumation of the Qilian Shan arose mainly from crustal shortening and thickening from ∼15 Ma [30,167]. The Songpan terrane appears to have also escaped the influence of edge-driven convection as a whole in that no volcanism and striking surface uplift happened there in the mid-Tertiary. The possibility is that the northward mantle flow had not been dammed up until it met the lithospheric keel of the Alxa block. The generated small-scale convection merely affected the West Qinling, and exerted little impact on the Songpan terrane. The focused Early Miocene exhumation of the East Kunlun and Laji Shan, as revealed by low-temperature thermochronologic data, should also be the consequence of convection-driven vertical crustal motion, presumably enhanced by normal faulting on the flanks of structural belts. Another outcome of vertical crustal uplift is supracrustal stretching in the West Qinling and Hoh Xil, possibly due to gravitational collapse (Fig. 11B). Supracrustal stretching created small-scale extensional basins filled with Lower Miocene successions, and was accompanied by volcanic eruptions. The convection-related vertical crustal uplift, therefore, provides a satisfactory explanation for the formation of the regional disconformity beneath Miocene strata and coeval volcanism in NE Tibet.

Crustal shortening has become predominant in the Qaidam basin and surrounding structural belts since Late Miocene time (Fig. 11C). It remains perplexing as to what caused the switch of tectonic regimes around 15 Ma. We conjecture that the change in tectonic settings might have resulted from gravitational collapse and spreading of the rising interior of the Tibetan Plateau. Our rationales are based on the following arguments. First, the Qiangtang and Hoh Xil are estimated to have been at a paleoelevation of <3000 m in the Early Miocene [138] and then reached an altitude of ∼4500 m in a short timespan from the Late Miocene to Pliocene [168], indicating a rapid uplift in the latest Neogene. Second, the Qaidam basin and surrounding structural belts had been regions of lower elevation of <1500 m prior to Late Miocene times, and then rapidly attained a high altitude of ∼3600 m in the Late Miocene [164]. Third, the Qiangtang and Hoh Xil are featured by the overthickened crust [149,169,170] and the presence of LVZs in the mid-lower crust [171]. The overthickened and heated orogens are weak and tend to collapse under internally-generated body force [1]. Finally, crustal stretching in the Qiangtang and Hoh Xil occurred simultaneously with marginal shortening of the East Kunlun and Qaidam basin in the Late Miocene. Taken together, a sharp elevation gradient could readily lead to gravitational collapse and spreading of hotter and thicker orogens toward regions of low elevation. Northward gravitational spreading of the Qiangtang and Hoh Xil is thus likely responsible for compressional force in marginal zones, thereby bringing about folding, thrusting and strike-slip faulting in the Qaidam basin and surrounding structural belts like the East Kunlun, Qilian Shan and Altyn Tagh belts. The West Qinling with ∼60-km-thick crust also underwent rapid elevation in the Late Miocene, as recorded by widespread planation surfaces [172], pollen assemblages [173], incision and reorganization of river systems [50], and supracrustal extension [92,93]. Noticeably, Late Miocene rapid uplifting of the West Qinling was coeval with left-slip faulting of the Haiyuan fault [47] and thrusting of the Longshoushan belt south of the Alxa block at low elevation [174]. The synchronicity of the two distinct tectonic activities implicates their genetic linkage, that is, gravitational spreading of the elevated West Qinling might have played a role in compressional deformations in its northern margin. Much more work is obviously required to unravel the relationships among diverse geologic processes in a holistic framework so as to advance a more feasible mechanism.

CONCLUSIONS

Stratigraphic and sedimentologic investigations of mid-Tertiary successions demonstrate that the contact between Oligocene and Miocene strata is a regional unconformity in the West Qinling and Hoh Xil, but conformable in the Qaidam basin. This discordance manifests itself as a typical disconformity in the West Qinling, but as an angular unconformity in parts of the Hoh Xil, with Lower Miocene strata being nearly horizontal. Late Oligocene termination of shortening in the Hoh Xil and the formation of regional disconformity in the West Qinling indicate that the NE Tibetan Plateau experienced vertical surface uplift rather than crustal shortening in the mid-Tertiary. Widespread occurrences of synsedimentary normal faults in Lower Miocene succession undermines the long-held notion that Early Miocene intermontane basins in the West Qinling were created by crustal shortening. Miocene volcanism, sourced from both the crust and lithospheric mantle in the Hoh Xil and West Qinling, indicate the involvement of deep thermomechanical processes in mid-Tertiary tectonic processes. An edge-driven convection model is proposed that satisfactorily accounts for a number of prominent phenomena such as regional disconformity, synsedimentary normal faults and volcanic eruption in NE Tibet.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The manuscript benefited greatly from constructive and helpful comments and suggestions from four reviewers.

Contributor Information

Hong-Hong Wei, State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources (TPESER), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.

Guo-Li Wu, Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.

Lin Ding, State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources (TPESER), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.

Long-Gang Fan, State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.

Lin Li, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85716, USA.

Qing-Ren Meng, State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

FUNDING

This work was financially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41872239 and 91955311), the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (2019QZKK0708) and the China Geological Survey (DD20221644).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

H.-H.W. and G.-L.W. conceived and designed the project. L.D., F.-L.F., L.L. and Q.-R.M. discussed and co-wrote the manuscript. All authors carried out fieldwork.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Dewey JF, Shackleton RM, Chang Cet al. The tectonic evolution of the Tibetan Plateau. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser Math Phys Sci 1988; 327: 379–413. 10.1098/rsta.1988.0135 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ding L, Kapp P, Cai Fet al. Timing and mechanisms of Tibetan Plateau uplift. Nat Rev Earth Environ 2022; 3: 652–67. 10.1038/s43017-022-00318-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hu X, Garzanti E, Wang Jet al. The timing of India-Asia collision onset—facts, theories, controversies. Earth-Sci Rev 2016; 160: 264–99. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.07.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Molnar P, Stock JM. Slowing of India's convergence with Eurasia since 20 Ma and its implications for Tibetan mantle dynamics. Tectonics 2009; 28: TC3001. 10.1029/2008TC002271 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Harrison TM, Copeland P, Kidd WSFet al. Raising Tibet. Science 1992; 255: 1663–70. 10.1126/science.255.5052.1663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kapp P, DeCelles PG. Mesozoic–Cenozoic geological evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen and working tectonic hypotheses. Am J Sci 2019; 319: 159–254. 10.2475/03.2019.01 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Royden LH, Burchfiel BC, van der Hilst RD. The geological evolution of the Tibetan Plateau. Science 2008; 321: 1054–8. 10.1126/science.1155371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Wang C, Dai J, Zhao Xet al. Outward-growth of the Tibetan Plateau during the Cenozoic: a review. Tectonophysics 2014; 621: 1–43. 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.01.036 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Yin A, Harrison TM. Geologic evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan Orogen. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 2000; 28: 211–80. 10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.211 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Yin A, Dang Y-Q, Zhang Met al. Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Qaidam basin and its surrounding regions (Part 3): structural geology, sedimentation, and regional tectonic reconstruction. Geol Soc Am Bull 2008; 120: 847–76. 10.1130/B26232.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Tapponnier P, Zhiqin X, Roger Fet al. Oblique stepwise rise and growth of the Tibet Plateau. Science 2001; 294: 1671–7. 10.1126/science.105978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Fang X, Yan M, Van der Voo Ret al. Late Cenozoic deformation and uplift of the NE Tibetan Plateau: evidence from high-resolution magnetostratigraphy of the Guide Basin, Qinghai Province, China. Geol Soc Am Bull 2005; 117: 1208–25. 10.1130/B25727.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Fang X, Zhang W, Meng Qet al. High-resolution magnetostratigraphy of the Neogene Huaitoutala section in the eastern Qaidam Basin on the NE Tibetan Plateau, Qinghai Province, China and its implication on tectonic uplift of the NE Tibetan Plateau. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2007; 258: 293–306. 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.03.042 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ji J, Zhang K, Clift PDet al. High-resolution magnetostratigraphic study of the Paleogene-Neogene strata in the Northern Qaidam Basin: implications for the growth of the Northeastern Tibetan Plateau. Gondwana Res 2017; 46: 141–55. 10.1016/j.gr.2017.02.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Li J, Fang X, Song Cet al. Late Miocene–Quaternary rapid stepwise uplift of the NE Tibetan Plateau and its effects on climatic and environmental changes. Quat Res 2014; 81: 400–23. 10.1016/j.yqres.2014.01.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Cheng F, Jolivet M, Guo Zet al. Cenozoic evolution of the Qaidam basin and implications for the growth of the northern Tibetan plateau: a review. Earth-Sci Rev 2021; 220: 103730. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103730 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Horton BK, Dupont-Nivet G, Zhou Jet al. Mesozoic-Cenozoic evolution of the Xining-Minhe and Dangchang basins, northeastern Tibetan Plateau: magnetostratigraphic and biostratigraphic results. J Geophys Res 2004; 109: B04402. 10.1029/2003JB002913 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Meng Q-R, Fang X. Cenozoic tectonic development of the Qaidam Basin in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau. In: Burchfiel BC and Wang E (eds.). Investigations into the Tectonics of the Tibetan Plateau. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America, 2008, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Duvall AR, Clark MK, Kirby Eet al. Low-temperature thermochronometry along the Kunlun and Haiyuan Faults, NE Tibetan Plateau: evidence for kinematic change during late-stage orogenesis. Tectonics 2013; 32: 1190–211. 10.1002/tect.20072 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. George AD, Marshallsea SJ, Wyrwoll K-Het al. Miocene cooling in the northern Qilian Shan, northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau, revealed by apatite fission-track and vitrinite-reflectance analysis. Geology 2001; 29: 939–42. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lease RO, Burbank DW, Clark MKet al. Middle Miocene reorganization of deformation along the northeastern Tibetan Plateau. Geology 2011; 39: 359–62. 10.1130/G31356.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Mock C, Arnaud NO, Cantagrel J-M. An early unroofing in northeastern Tibet? Constraints from 40Ar/39Ar thermochronology on granitoids from the eastern Kunlun range (Qinghai, NW China). Earth Planet Sci Lett 1999; 171: 107–22. 10.1016/S0012-821X(99)00133-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zheng D, Wang W, Wan Jet al. Progressive northward growth of the northern Qilian Shan–Hexi Corridor (northeastern Tibet) during the Cenozoic. Lithosphere 2017; 9: 408–16. 10.1130/L587.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Guo Z, Wilson M, Liu Jet al. Post-collisional, potassic and ultrapotassic magmatism of the Northern Tibetan Plateau: constraints on characteristics of the mantle source, geodynamic setting and uplift mechanisms. J Petrol 2006; 47: 1177–220. 10.1093/petrology/egl007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Su B-X, Zhang H-F, Ying J-Fet al. Nature and processes of the lithospheric mantle beneath the western Qinling: evidence from deformed peridotitic xenoliths in Cenozoic kamafugite from Haoti, Gansu Province, China. J Asian Earth Sci 2009; 34: 258–74. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2008.05.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Wang Q, McDermott F, Xu Jet al. Cenozoic K-rich adakitic volcanic rocks in the Hohxil area, northern Tibet: lower-crustal melting in an intracontinental setting. Geology 2005; 33: 465–8. 10.1130/G21522.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Yu X. Cenozoic potassic alkaline ultrabasic volcanic rocks and its genesis in Lixian–Dangchang area, Gansu Province (in Chinese). Tethyan Geol 1994; 18: 114–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Zheng X, Bian Q, Zheng J. On the Cenozoic volcanic rocks in Hoh Xil district, Qinghai Province (in Chinese). Acta Petrol Sin 1996; 12: 530–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Li Y, Wang C, Zhao Xet al. Cenozoic thrust system, basin evolution, and uplift of the Tanggula Range in the Tuotuohe region, central Tibet. Gondwana Res 2012; 22: 482–92. 10.1016/j.gr.2011.11.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zuza AV, Wu C, Wang Zet al. Underthrusting and duplexing beneath the northern Tibetan Plateau and the evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen. Lithosphere 2019; 11: 209–31. 10.1130/L1042.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Liang X, Sandvol E, Chen YJet al. A complex Tibetan upper mantle: a fragmented Indian slab and no south-verging subduction of Eurasian lithosphere. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2012; 333–334: 101–11. 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.03.036 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Shen X, Liu M, Gao Yet al. Lithospheric structure across the northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau: implications for the plateau's lateral growth. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2017; 459: 80–92. 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.11.027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ye Z, Gao R, Li Qet al. Seismic evidence for the North China plate underthrusting beneath northeastern Tibet and its implications for plateau growth. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2015; 426: 109–17. 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.06.024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Zhang H, Teng J, Tian Xet al. Lithospheric thickness and upper-mantle deformation beneath the NE Tibetan Plateau inferred from S receiver functions and SKS splitting measurements: lithospheric thickness and mantle deformation. Geophys J Int 2012; 191: 1285–94 10.1111/J.1365-246X.2012.05667.X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Feng Y-M, Cao X-D, Zhang E-Pet al. Framework, Orogenic Process and Dynamics of the West Qinling Orogenic Belt (in Chinese). Xi’an: Xi’an Map Press, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Wang X, Wang T, Zhang C. Neoproterozoic, Paleozoic, and Mesozoic granitoid magmatism in the Qinling Orogen, China: constraints on orogenic process. J Asian Earth Sci 2013; 72: 129–51. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.11.037 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Wu G-L, Meng Q-R, Duan Let al. Early Mesozoic structural evolution of the eastern West Qinling, northwest China. Tectonophysics 2014; 630: 9–20. 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.05.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Yan Z, Wang Z, Li Jet al. Tectonic settings and accretionary orogenesis of the West Qinling Terrane, northeastern margin of the Tibet Plateau (in Chinese). Acta Petrol Sin 2012; 28: 1808–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Clark MK, Farley KA, Zheng Det al. Early Cenozoic faulting of the northern Tibetan Plateau margin from apatite (U–Th)/He ages. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2010; 296: 78–88. 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.04.051 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Duvall AR, Clark MK, van der Pluijm BAet al. Direct dating of Eocene reverse faulting in northeastern Tibet using Ar-dating of fault clays and low-temperature thermochronometry. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2011; 304: 520–6. 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.02.028 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Liu S, Zhang G, Pan Fet al. Timing of Xunhua and Guide basin development and growth of the northeastern Tibetan Plateau, China. Basin Res 2013; 25: 74–96. 10.1111/j.1365-2117.2012.00548.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Bush MA, Saylor JE, Horton BKet al. Growth of the Qaidam Basin during Cenozoic exhumation in the northern Tibetan Plateau: inferences from depositional patterns and multiproxy detrital provenance signatures. Lithosphere 2016; 8: 58–82. 10.1130/L449.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Cheng F, Jolivet M, Guo Zet al. Jurassic–Early Cenozoic tectonic inversion in the Qilian Shan and Qaidam Basin, North Tibet: new insight from seismic reflection, isopach mapping, and drill core data. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 2019; 124: 12077–98. 10.1029/2019JB018086 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Li C, Zheng D, Zhou Ret al. Late Oligocene tectonic uplift of the East Kunlun Shan: expansion of the Northeastern Tibetan Plateau. Geophys Res Lett 2021; 48: e2020GL091281. 10.1029/2020GL091281 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Wang F, Feng H, Shi Wet al. Relief history and denudation evolution of the northern Tibet margin: constraints from 40Ar/39Ar and (U–Th)/He dating and implications for far-field effect of rising plateau. Tectonophysics 2016; 675: 196–208. 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.03.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Wu W, Yuan J, Wang Jet al. A Late Neogene framework and transpressional system within the Yingxiongling Range, western Qaidam Basin, Northeast Tibetan Plateau: insights from seismic reflection profiles and active tectonics. J Asian Earth Sci 2020; 198: 104061. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.104061 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Li B, Chen X, Zuza AVet al. Cenozoic cooling history of the North Qilian Shan, northern Tibetan Plateau, and the initiation of the Haiyuan fault: constraints from apatite- and zircon-fission track thermochronology. Tectonophysics 2019; 751: 109–24. 10.1016/j.tecto.2018.12.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Ritts BD, Yue Y, Graham SAet al. From sea level to high elevation in 15 million years: uplift history of the northern Tibetan Plateau margin in the Altun Shan. Am J Sci 2008; 308: 657–78. 10.2475/05.2008.01 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Wang W, Zhang P, Pang Jet al. The Cenozoic growth of the Qilian Shan in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau: a sedimentary archive from the Jiuxi Basin. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 2016; 121: 2235–57. 10.1002/2015JB012689 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Meng K, Wang E, Chu JJet al. Late Cenozoic river system reorganization and its origin within the Qilian Shan, NE Tibet. J Struct Geol 2020; 138: 104128. 10.1016/j.jsg.2020.104128 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Lease RO, Burbank DW, Hough Bet al. Pulsed Miocene range growth in northeastern Tibet: insights from Xunhua Basin magnetostratigraphy and provenance. Geol Soc Am Bull 2012; 124: 657–77. 10.1130/B30524.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Wang W, Zheng W, Zhang Pet al. Expansion of the Tibetan Plateau during the Neogene. Nat Commun 2017; 8: 15887. 10.1038/ncomms15887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Yuan D-Y, Ge W-P, Chen Z-Wet al. The growth of northeastern Tibet and its relevance to large-scale continental geodynamics: a review of recent studies. Tectonics 2013; 32: 1358–70. 10.1002/tect.20081 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Zhang, H, Liu C, Xiong Jet al. Late Cenozoic tectonic deformation and geomorphological evolution in the Gonghe-Chaka Basin on the northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau (in Chinese). Quat Sci 2022; 42: 662–72. 10.11928/j.issn.1001-7410.2022.03.04 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Zheng D, Zhang P-Z, Wan Jet al. Rapid exhumation at ∼8 Ma on the Liupan Shan thrust fault from apatite fission-track thermochronology: implications for growth of the northeastern Tibetan Plateau margin. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2006; 248: 198–208. 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.05.023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Zheng D, Clark MK, Zhang Pet al. Erosion, fault initiation and topographic growth of the North Qilian Shan (northern Tibetan Plateau). Geosphere 2010; 6: 937–41. 10.1130/GES00523.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Yuan D-Y, Champagnac J-D, Ge W-Pet al. Late Quaternary right-lateral slip rates of faults adjacent to the lake Qinghai, northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. Geol Soc Am Bull 2011; 123: 2016–30. 10.1130/B30315.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Craddock WH, Kirby E, Harkins NWet al. Rapid fluvial incision along the Yellow River during headward basin integration. Nature Geosci 2010; 3: 209–13. 10.1038/ngeo777 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Li J, Zhou S, Zhao Zet al. The Qingzang movement: the major uplift of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Sci China Earth Sci 2015; 58: 2113–22. 10.1007/s11430-015-5124-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Palumbo L, Hetzel R, Tao Met al. Topographic and lithologic control on catchment-wide denudation rates derived from cosmogenic 10Be in two mountain ranges at the margin of NE Tibet. Geomorphology 2010; 117: 130–42. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.11.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Fang X, Garzione C, Van der Voo Ret al. Flexural subsidence by 29 Ma on the NE edge of Tibet from the magnetostratigraphy of Linxia Basin, China. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2003; 210: 545–60. 10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00142-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Fan L-G, Meng Q-R, Wu G-Let al. Paleogene crustal extension in the eastern segment of the NE Tibetan plateau. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2019; 514: 62–74. 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.02.036 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Wang F, Shi W, Zhang Wet al. Differential growth of the northern Tibetan margin: evidence for oblique stepwise rise of the Tibetan Plateau. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 41164. 10.1038/srep41164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Zhuang G, Johnstone SA, Hourigan Jet al. Understanding the geologic evolution of northern Tibetan Plateau with multiple thermochronometers. Gondwana Res 2018; 58: 195–210. 10.1016/j.gr.2018.02.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Zhuang G, Zhang YG, Hourigan Jet al. Microbial and geochronologic constraints on the neogene paleotopography of northern Tibetan Plateau. Geophys Res Lett 2019; 46: 1312–9. 10.1029/2018GL081505 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Dai S, Fang X, Dupont-Nivet Get al. Magnetostratigraphy of Cenozoic sediments from the Xining Basin: tectonic implications for the northeastern Tibetan Plateau. J Geophys Res 2006; 111: B11102. 10.1029/2005JB004187 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Deng T, Qiu Z, Wang Bet al. Late Cenozoic biostratigraphy of the Linxia Basin, northwestern China. In: Wang X, Flynn LJ, Fortelius M (eds.). Fossil Mammals of Asia. New York/Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press, 2013, 243–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Fang X, Wang J, Zhang Wet al. Tectonosedimentary evolution model of an intracontinental flexural (foreland) basin for paleoclimatic research. Glob Planet Change 2016; 145: 78–97. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.08.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Lu H, Xiong S. Magnetostratigraphy of the Dahonggou section, northern Qaidam Basin and its bearing on Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Qilian Shan and Altyn Tagh Fault. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2009; 288: 539–50. 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.10.016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Nie J, Ren X, Saylor JEet al. Magnetic polarity stratigraphy, provenance, and paleoclimate analysis of Cenozoic strata in the Qaidam Basin, NE Tibetan Plateau. Geol Soc Am Bull 2020; 132: 310–20. 10.1130/B35175.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Sun Z, Yang Z, Pei Jet al. Magnetostratigraphy of Paleogene sediments from northern Qaidam Basin, China: implications for tectonic uplift and block rotation in northern Tibetan Plateau. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2005; 237: 635–46. 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.07.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Fang X, Fang Y, Zan Jet al. Cenozoic magnetostratigraphy of the Xining Basin, NE Tibetan Plateau, and its constraints on paleontological, sedimentological and tectonomorphological evolution. Earth-Sci Rev 2019; 190: 460–85. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.01.021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Xiao G, Guo Z, Dupont-Nivet Get al. Evidence for northeastern Tibetan Plateau uplift between 25 and 20 Ma in the sedimentary archive of the Xining Basin, northwestern China. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2012; 317–318: 185–95. 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.11.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Wu F, Fang X, Meng Qet al. Magneto- and lithostratigraphic records of the Oligocene-Early Miocene climatic changes from deep drilling in the Linxia Basin, northeast Tibetan Plateau. Glob Planet Change 2017; 158: 36–46. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.09.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Liu S, Li J, Stockli Det al. Late Tertiary reorganizations of deformation in northeastern Tibet constrained by stratigraphy and provenance data from eastern Longzhong Basin. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 2015; 120: 5804–21. 10.1002/2015JB011949 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Craddock W, Kirby E, Zhang H. Late Miocene–Pliocene range growth in the interior of the northeastern Tibetan Plateau. Lithosphere 2011; 3: 420–38. 10.1130/L159.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Liu Z, Zhao X, Wang Cet al. Magnetostratigraphy of Tertiary sediments from the Hoh Xil Basin: implications for the Cenozoic tectonic history of the Tibetan Plateau. Geophys J Int 2003; 154: 233–52. 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01986.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Li L, Garzione CN, Pullen Aet al. Late Cretaceous–Cenozoic basin evolution and topographic growth of the Hoh Xil Basin, central Tibetan Plateau. Geol Soc Am Bull 2018; 130: 499–521. 10.1130/B31769.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Staisch LM, Niemi NA, Clark MKet al. Eocene to late Oligocene history of crustal shortening within the Hoh Xil Basin and implications for the uplift history of the northern Tibetan Plateau. Tectonics 2016; 35: 862–95. 10.1002/2015TC003972 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Zhang Y, Zheng X. Geological Evolution of the Hoh Xil region, Qinghai (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Staisch LM, Niemi NA, Hong Cet al. A Cretaceous-Eocene depositional age for the Fenghuoshan group, Hoh Xil Basin: implications for the tectonic evolution of the northern Tibet Plateau. Tectonics 2014; 33: 281–301. 10.1002/2013TC003367 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Wu Z, Barosh PJ, Wu Zet al. Vast early Miocene lakes of the central Tibetan Plateau. Geol Soc Am Bull 2008; 120: 1326–37. 10.1130/B26043.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Zhang K, Wang G, Ji Jet al. Paleogene-Neogene stratigraphic realm and sedimentary sequence of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and their response to uplift of the plateau. Sci China Earth Sci 2010; 53: 1271–94. 10.1007/s11430-010-4048-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Wang C, Liu Z, Yi Het al. Tertiary crustal shortening and peneplanation in the Hoh Xil region: implications for the tectonic history of the northern Tibetan Plateau. J Asian Earth Sci 2002; 20: 211–23. 10.1016/S1367-9120(01)00051-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Yang F, Ma Z, Xu Tet al. A Tertiary paleomagnetic stratigraphic pro-file in Qaidam Basin (in Chinese). Acta Pet Sin 1992; 13: 97–101. 10.7623/syxb199202016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Zhuang G, Hourigan JK, Ritts BDet al. Cenozoic multiple-phase tectonic evolution of the northern Tibetan Plateau: constraints from sedimentary records from Qaidam basin, Hexi Corridor, and Subei basin, northwest China. Am J Sci 2011; 311: 116–52. 10.2475/02.2011.02 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Duan L, Zhang B, Wang Wet al. Magnetostratigraphy of the Cenozoic Lulehe section in the Qaidam Basin: implications for the tectonic deformation on the northeastern Tibetan Plateau. Chin Sci Bull 2022; 67: 872–87. 10.1360/TB-2021-1352 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Lu H, Wang E, Shi Xet al. Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Elashan range and its surroundings, northern Tibetan Plateau as constrained by paleomagnetism and apatite fission track analyses. Tectonophysics 2012; 580: 150–61. 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.09.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Wang Y, Chen X, Shao Zet al. Miocene Evolution of the Basin-mountain system and paleogeomorphic reconstruction in the easternmost Qaidam Basin (in Chinese). Acta Geosci Sin 2021; 42: 43–54. 10.3975/cagsb.2020.062901 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. He B, Zheng M, Yun Xet al. Structural architecture and energy resource potential of Gonghe Basin, NE Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Earth Sci Front 2023; 30: 81–105. 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.8.35 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Chen P, Shi W, Yang Jet al. Late Cenozoic tectonic evolution of Tianshui Basin: implications for the northeast growth of Tibetan Plateau (in Chinese). Geotecton Metallog 2016; 40: 308–22. 10.16539/j.ddgzyckx.2016.02.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Ma S, Li H, Zhang Yet al. The Neogene extension of the Tianshui basin: evidence from sedimentary and structural records (in Chinese). Geol Bull China 2016; 35: 1314–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Guo J, Han W, Hu Xet al. Cenozoic extensional rift basin in the northern margin of Western Qinling: constraints on the remote tectonic responses to the India-Eurasia collision in the northeastern margin of Tibetan Plateau (in Chinese). Earth Sci Front 2017; 24: 230–44. 10.13745/j.esf.yx.2016-10-10 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Yu X, Mo X, Zhao Zet al. Cenozoic bimodal volcanic rocks of the West Qinling: implication for the genesis and nature of the rifting of north–south tectonic belt (in Chinese). Acta Petrol Sin 2011; 27: 2195–202. [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Guo J, Zhao H, Liu Cet al. When the northeastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau was involved in its present tectonic system: constraints from the Cenozoic sedimentary sequence (in Chinese). Earth Sci Front 2021; 28: 337–61. :10.13745/j.esf.sf.2020.12.13 [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Cai X, Liu D, Wei Qet al. Characteristics of North of Tibetan Plateau uplift at Paleocene-Miocene—the evidence from Ke Kexili Basin (in Chinese). Acta Geol Sin 2008; 82: 194–203. 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2008.02.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Liu Z, Wang CS, Jin Wet al. Oligo-Miocene depositional environment of the Tuotuohe basin, central Tibetan Plateau (in Chinese). Acta Sedimentol Sin 2005; 23: 210–6. 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2005.02.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Liu Z, Wang C. Facies analysis and depositional systems of Cenozoic sediments in the Hoh Xil basin, northern Tibet. Sediment Geol 2001; 140: 251–70. 10.1016/S0037-0738(00)00188-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Yi H, Lin J, Zhou Ket al. The origin of Miocene lacustrine stromatolites in the Hoh Xil area and its paleoclimatic implications (in Chinese). J Miner Petrol 2008; 28: 106–13. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6872.2008.01.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Yin A, Kapp PA, Murphy MAet al. Significant late Neogene east-west extension in northern Tibet. Geology 1999; 27: 787–90. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Wu Z, Ye P, Liu Qet al. Late Cenozoic normal faulting on the western side of Wenquan graben, central Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (in Chinese). Seismol Geol 2004; 26: 658–75. 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2004.04.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Blisniuk PM, Hacker BR, Glodny Jet al. Normal faulting in central Tibet since at least 13.5 Myr ago. Nature 2001; 412: 628–32. 10.1038/35088045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Mao L, Xiao A, Wu Let al. Cenozoic tectonic and sedimentary evolution of southern Qaidam Basin, NE Tibetan Plateau and its implication for the rejuvenation of Eastern Kunlun Mountains. Sci China Earth Sci 2014; 57: 2726–39. 10.1007/s11430-014-4951-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Guo, Z, Zheng D, Liu Wet al. Discovery and significance of the Neogene and Paleogene lacustrine reefs in the western Qaidam basin (in Chinese). J Stratigr 2008; 32: 60–8. 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4959.2008.01.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Wen ZF, Zhong JH, Wang GMet al. Miocene stromatolites associated with lacustrine algal reefs: Qaidam basin, China (in Chinese). Acta Geol Sin 2005; 79: 444–52 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2005.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Zeng L, Yi H, Xia Get al. Sedimentary sequences and implications for paleoenvironment of Cenozoic lacustrine stromatolites, Qaidam Basin (in Chinese). Geoscience 2017; 31: 1251–60. 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2017.06.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Li L, Garzione CN, Pullen Aet al. Early–middle Miocene topographic growth of the northern Tibetan Plateau: stable isotope and sedimentation evidence from the southwestern Qaidam basin. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 2016; 461: 201–13. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.08.025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Arnaud NO, Vidal Ph, Tapponnier Pet al. The high K2O volcanism of northwestern Tibet: geochemistry and tectonic implications. Earth Planet Sci Lett 1992; 111: 351–67. 10.1016/0012-821X(92)90189-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Chung S-L, Chu M-F, Zhang Yet al. Tibetan tectonic evolution inferred from spatial and temporal variations in post-collisional magmatism. Earth-Sci Rev 2005; 68: 173–96. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2004.05.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Guo P, Niu Y, Yu X. A synthesis and new perspective on the petrogenesis of kamafugites from West Qinling, China, in a global context. J Asian Earth Sci 2014; 79: 86–96. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.09.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Turner S, Arnaud N, LIU Jet al. Post-collision, shoshonitic volcanism on the Tibetan Plateau: implications for convective thinning of the lithosphere and the source of Ocean Island basalts. J Petrol 1996; 37: 45–71. 10.1093/petrology/37.1.45 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Yakovlev PV, Saal A, Clark MKet al. The geochemistry of Tibetan lavas: spatial and temporal relationships, tectonic links and geodynamic implications. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2019; 520: 115–26. 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.04.032 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Yu X, Zhao Z, Zhou Set al. 40Ar/39Ar dating for Cenozoic kamafugite from western Qinling in Gansu Province. Chin Sci Bull 2006; 51: 1621–7. 10.1007/s11434-006-2010-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Zheng JP, Griffin WL, Sun Met al. Tectonic affinity of the west Qinling terrane (central China): north China or Yangtze? Tectonics 2010; 29: TC2009. 10.1029/2008TC002428 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Ding L, Kapp P, Zhong Det al. Cenozoic Volcanism in Tibet: evidence for a transition from oceanic to continental subduction. J Petrol 2003; 44: 1833–65. 10.1093/petrology/egg061 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Ou Q, Wang Q, Wyman DAet al. Postcollisional delamination and partial melting of enriched lithospheric mantle: evidence from Oligocene (ca. 30 Ma) potassium-rich lavas in the Gemuchaka area of the central Qiangtang Block, Tibet. Geol Sci Am Bull 2019; 131: 1385–408. 10.1130/B31911.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Wang Q, Wyman DA, Xu Jet al. Eocene melting of subducting continental crust and early uplifting of central Tibet: evidence from central-western Qiangtang high-K calc-alkaline andesites, dacites and rhyolites. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2008; 272: 158–71. 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.04.034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Wang Q, Wyman DA, Li Z-Xet al. Eocene north–south trending dikes in central Tibet: new constraints on the timing of east–west extension with implications for early plateau uplift? Earth Planet Sci Lett 2010; 298: 205–16. 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.07.046 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Sun, Y. Fundamental characteristics of Miocene volcanic active belt in the northern margin of Hoh Xil (in Chinese). Geol Qinghai Prov 1992: 40–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Deng W. Cenozoic Intraplate Volcanic Rocks in the Northern Qinghai-Xizang Plateau (in Chinese). Beijing: Geologic Publishing House, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Li B, Pan B, Gao H. A planation surface and ages of volcanic rocks in eastern Hoh Xil, Qinghai-Tibet plateau (in Chinese). Quat Sci 2002; 22: 397–405. 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7410.2002.05.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Wang Q, Chung S-L, Li X-Het al. Crustal melting and flow beneath northern Tibet: evidence from Mid-Miocene to Quaternary strongly peraluminous rhyolites in the southern Kunlun range. J Petrol 2012; 53: 2523–66. 10.1093/petrology/egs058 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Qi Y, Wang Q, Zhu Y-Tet al. Miocene olivine leucitites in the Hoh Xil Basin, northern Tibet: implications for intracontinental lithosphere melting and surface uplift of the Tibetan Plateau. J Petrol 2020; 61: egaa026. 10.1093/petrology/egaa026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Cooper KM, Reid MR, Dunbar NWet al. Origin of mafic magmas beneath northwestern Tibet: constraints from230Th-238 U disequilibria. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 2002; 3: 1065. 10.1029/2002GC000332 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Lai S, Qin J, Khan J. The carbonated source region of Cenozoic mafic and ultra-mafic lavas from western Qinling: implications for eastern mantle extrusion in the northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. Gondwana Res 2014; 25: 1501–16. 10.1016/j.gr.2013.05.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Su B-X, Zhang H-F, Sakyi PAet al. Compositionally stratified lithosphere and carbonatite metasomatism recorded in mantle xenoliths from the Western Qinling (Central China). Lithos 2010; 116: 111–28. 10.1016/j.lithos.2010.01.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Zhang S, Zhang L, Tian Cet al. Occurrence, geological characteristics and development potential of hot dry rocks in Qinghai Gonghe basin (in Chinese). J Geomech 2019; 25: 501–8. 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2019.25.04.048 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Lin, W, Gan H, Zhao Zet al. Lithospheric thermal-rheological structure and geothermal significance in the Gonghe Basin, Qinghai Province (in Chinese). Acta Geosci Sin 2023; 44: 45–56. 10.3975/cagsb.2022.092001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Gao J, Zhang H, Zhang Set al. Three-dimensional magnetotelluric imaging of the geothermal system beneath the Gonghe Basin, northeast Tibetan Plateau. Geothermics 2018;76:15–25. 10.1016/j.geothermics.2018.06.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Chen J-L, Yin A, Xu J-Fet al. Late Cenozoic magmatic inflation, crustal thickening, and >2 km of surface uplift in central Tibet. Geology 2018; 46: 19–22. 10.1130/G39699.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Wang Q, Hawkesworth CJ, Wyman Det al. Pliocene-Quaternary crustal melting in central and northern Tibet and insights into crustal flow. Nat Commun 2016; 7: 11888. 10.1038/ncomms11888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Wu C, Yang J, Xu Zet al. The mineral chemistry of pyroxenite xenoliths in the volcanic rocks of Hoh Xil and their significance. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci 2001; 44: 128–38. 10.1007/BF02911980 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Zhang J, Wang Y, Zhang Bet al. Tectonics of the Xining Basin in NW China and its implications for the evolution of the NE Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Basin Res 2016; 28: 159–82. 10.1111/bre.12104 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Zhang P, Zheng D, Yin Get al. Discussion on late Cenozoic growth and rise of northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau (in Chinese). Quat Sci 2006; 26: 5–13. 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7410.2006.01.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Saylor JE, Jordan JC, Sundell KEet al. Topographic growth of the Jishi Shan and its impact on basin and hydrology evolution, NE Tibetan Plateau. Basin Res 2018; 30: 544–63. 10.1111/bre.12264 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Wu L, Lin X, Cowgill Eet al. Middle Miocene reorganization of the Altyn Tagh fault system, northern Tibetan Plateau. GSA Bull 2019; 131: 1157–78. 10.1130/B31875.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Fu B, Awata Y. Displacement and timing of left-lateral faulting in the Kunlun Fault Zone, northern Tibet, inferred from geologic and geomorphic features. J Asian Earth Sci 2007; 29: 253–65. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2006.03.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Sun B, Wang Y-F, Li C-Set al. Early Miocene elevation in northern Tibet estimated by palaeobotanical evidence. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 10379. 10.1038/srep10379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Molnar P, England P, Martinod J. Mantle dynamics, uplift of the Tibetan Plateau, and the Indian Monsoon. Rev Geophys 1993; 31: 357–96. 10.1029/93RG02030 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Turner S, Hawkesworth C, Liu Jet al. Timing of Tibetan uplift constrained by analysis of volcanic rocks. Nature 1993; 364: 50–4. 10.1038/364050a0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Meyer B, Tapponnier P, Bourjot Let al. Crustal thickening in Gansu-Qinghai, lithospheric mantle subduction, and oblique, strike-slip controlled growth of the Tibet plateau. Geophys J Int 1998; 135: 1–47. 10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00567.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Guo Z, Wilson M. Late Oligocene–early Miocene transformation of postcollisional magmatism in Tibet. Geology 2019; 47: 776–80. 10.1130/G46147.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Mo X, Zhao Z, Deng Jet al. Petrology and geochemistry of postcollisional volcanic rocks from the Tibetan plateau: implications for lithosphere heterogeneity and collision-induced asthenospheric mantle flow. In: Dilek Y and Pavlides S (eds.). Postcollisional Tectonics and Magmatism in the Mediterranean Region and Asia. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America, 2006, 507–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Unsworth M, Wenbo W, Jones AGet al. Crustal and upper mantle structure of northern Tibet imaged with magnetotelluric data. J Geophys Res 2004; 109: B02403. 10.1029/2002JB002305 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Kind R, Yuan X, Saul Jet al. Seismic images of crust and upper mantle beneath Tibet: evidence for Eurasian Plate subduction. Science 2002; 298: 1219–21. 10.1126/science.1078115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Zhao W, Kumar P, Mechie Jet al. Tibetan plate overriding the Asian plate in central and northern Tibet. Nat Geosci 2011; 4: 870–3. 10.1038/ngeo1309 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Liu M, Mooney WD, Li Set al. Crustal structure of the northeastern margin of the Tibetan plateau from the Songpan-Ganzi terrane to the Ordos basin. Tectonophysics 2006; 420: 253–66. 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.01.025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Tian X, Zhang Z. Bulk crustal properties in NE Tibet and their implications for deformation model. Gondwana Res 2013; 24: 548–59. 10.1016/j.gr.2012.12.024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Zhang X-Z, Wang Q, Wyman Det al. Tibetan Plateau growth linked to crustal thermal transitions since the Miocene. Geology 2022; 50: 610–4. 10.1130/G49534.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Karplus MS, Klemperer SL, Zhao Wet al. Receiver-function imaging of the lithosphere at the Kunlun-Qaidam boundary, Northeast Tibet. Tectonophysics 2019; 759: 30–43. 10.1016/j.tecto.2019.03.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Roger F, Malavieille J, Leloup PhHet al. Timing of granite emplacement and cooling in the Songpan–Garzê Fold Belt (eastern Tibetan Plateau) with tectonic implications. J Asian Earth Sci 2004; 22: 465–81. 10.1016/S1367-9120(03)00089-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Zhang H-F, Parrish R, Zhang Let al. A-type granite and adakitic magmatism association in Songpan–Garze fold belt, eastern Tibetan Plateau: implication for lithospheric delamination. Lithos 2007; 97: 323–35. 10.1016/j.lithos.2007.01.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Zhang L-Y, Ding L, Pullen Aet al. Age and geochemistry of western Hoh-Xil–Songpan-Ganzi granitoids, northern Tibet: implications for the Mesozoic closure of the Paleo-Tethys ocean. Lithos 2014; 190–191: 328–48. 10.1016/j.lithos.2013.12.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Liu S, Li Z, Kamp P JJet al. Discovery of the Mesozoic Zoige paleo-plateau in eastern Tibetan plateau and its geological significance (in Chinese). J Chengdu Univ Sci Technol 2019; 46: 1–28. 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2019.01.01 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Flower M, Tamaki K, Nguyen H. Mantle extrusion: a model for dispersed volcanism and DUPAL-like asthenosphere in East Asian and the Western Pacific. In: Flower MFJ, Chung SL and Luo CH (eds.).Mantle Dynamics and Plate Interactions in East Asia. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, 1998, 67–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Jolivet L, Faccenna C, Becker Tet al. Mantle flow and deforming continents: from India-Asia convergence to Pacific subduction. Tectonics 2018; 37: 2887–914. 10.1029/2018TC005036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Hirn A, Jiang M, Sapin Met al. Seismic anisotropy as an indicator of mantle flow beneath the Himalayas and Tibet. Nature 1995; 375: 571–4. 10.1038/375571a0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Liu M, Cui X, Liu F. Cenozoic rifting and volcanism in eastern China: a mantle dynamic link to the Indo–Asian collision? Tectonophysics 2004; 393: 29–42. 10.1016/j.tecto.2004.07.029 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Chen M, Niu F, Tromp Jet al. Lithospheric foundering and underthrusting imaged beneath Tibet. Nat Commun 2017; 8: 15659. 10.1038/ncomms15659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Liang C, Song X. A low velocity belt beneath northern and eastern Tibetan Plateau from Pn tomography. Geophys Res Lett 2006; 33: L22306. 10.1029/2006GL027926 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Zhou Z, Lei J. Pn anisotropic tomography and mantle dynamics beneath China. Phys Earth Planet Inter 2016; 257: 193–204. 10.1016/j.pepi.2016.06.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Blake R, Liegeois J-P. Cratons, mobile belts, alkaline rocks and continental lithospheric mantle: the Pan-African testimony. J Geol Soc 1993; 150: 89–98. 10.1144/gsjgs.150.1.0088 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Chen L, Cheng C, Wei Z. Seismic evidence for significant lateral variations in lithospheric thickness beneath the central and western North China Craton. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2009; 286: 171–83. 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.06.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Miao Y, Fang X, Sun Jet al. A new biologic paleoaltimetry indicating Late Miocene rapid uplift of northern Tibet Plateau. Science 2022; 378: 1074–9. 10.1126/science.abo2475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Kent-Corson ML, Ritts BD, Zhuang Get al. Stable isotopic constraints on the tectonic, topographic, and climatic evolution of the northern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2009; 282: 158–66. 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.03.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Zhuang G, Brandon MT, Pagani Met al. Leaf wax stable isotopes from northern Tibetan Plateau: implications for uplift and climate since 15 Ma. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2014; 390: 186–98. 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.01.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Wang W, Zheng D, Li Cet al. Cenozoic exhumation of the Qilian Shan in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau: evidence from low-temperature thermochronology. Tectonics 2020; 39: e2019TC005705. 10.1029/2019TC005705 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Deng T, Ding L. Paleoaltimetry reconstructions of the Tibetan Plateau: progress and contradictions. Natl Sci Rev 2015; 2: 417–37. 10.1093/nsr/nwv062 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Gao R, Chen C, Lu Zet al. New constraints on crustal structure and Moho topography in Central Tibet revealed by SinoProbe deep seismic reflection profiling. Tectonophysics 2013; 606: 160–70. 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.08.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Wei Y, He R, Yuan Xet al. Lateral growth mechanism of proto-Tibetan Plateau in the Late Paleogene: implications from detailed crustal structures of the Hoh Xil Basin. Geophys Res Lett 2022; 49: e2022GL097983. 10.1029/2022GL097983 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Owens TJ, Zandt G. Implications of crustal property variations for models of Tibetan plateau evolution. Nature 1997; 387: 37–43. 10.1038/387037a0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Wang X, Zhang Y, Wang Het al. Formation characters and ages of the planation surfaces on West Qinling during Cenozoic era and their significances (in Chinese). J Glaciol Geocryol 2021; 43: 841–52. 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2021.0025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Hui Z, Li X, Ma Zet al. Miocene pollen assemblages from the Zeku Basin, northeastern Tibetan Plateau, and their palaeoecological and palaeoaltimetric implications. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 2018; 511: 419–32. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.09.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Zhang J, Cunningham D, Yun Let al. Kinematic variability of late Cenozoic fault systems and contrasting mountain building processes in the Alxa block, western J Asian Earth Sci 2021; 205: 104597. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2020.104597 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from National Science Review are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES