Methotrexate (MTX) is a folate antagonist with known teratogenicity including abortifacient effects that interfere with DNA synthesis. We want to discuss on which findings teratogenicity is based and which open questions still exist. In this context, we introduce a recent Italian study by Zanetti et al1 on pregnancy outcomes after therapeutic use of MTX in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
MTX is on the WHO list of essential medicines. In addition to the approved indications for the drug treatment of malignancies and inflammatory disorders, it is used for the non-surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy and elective termination of pregnancy (TOP). The dose differs according to indication and also plays a role in teratology. Paracelsius already pointed to the fact that the ‘dose makes the poison’.
Findings teratogenicity of MTX is based on
As often, teratogenicity in humans was discovered by case reports describing a similar phenotype of malformations (MTX embryopathy), at first after failed TOP. Already in the 50th, the teratogenic effects of aminopterin,2 a structurally similar but more potent folate antagonist was described. In 1968, the first case of an infant with MTX-induced congenital malformations after failed attempted TOP was published.3 Since then, multiple similar case reports have been reported,4 also after misdiagnosed ectopic pregnancies.5 The guideline dosage for the indication of ectopic pregnancy is a single intramuscular administration of 50 mg/m².
Unanswered questions
Even though the teratogenicity of MTX is indisputable, not every malformation in an infant after intrauterine exposure is attributable to the drug. The following considerations should be taken into account:
Background risk: One should consider the 3%–5% major malformation baseline risk. Birth defects may represent the baseline risk rather than result from MTX, especially true for relatively common malformations such as septal defects.6
Genetic aetiology: If an infant has combinations of malformations similar to those of MTX embryopathy, it is important to consider genetic causes. This was not possible in the past. Martin et al,7 for example, thought their small study was unique as it described ‘for the first time a prospectively ascertained case of MTX embryopathy in a woman exposed to a typical low dose of 7.5 mg/week for rheumatoid arthritis’. However, no genetic test for mutations causing FGFR (fibroblast growth factor receptor) craniosynostosis syndromes was carried out; they may resemble MTX embryopathy.
Exposure time: The information that an exposure occurred during the first trimester, the time of organogenesis, is insufficient to assume causality as the development of the different organs follows a determined schedule. Neural tube defects (NTDs), for example, appear early in embryogenesis. Hyoun et al8 discuss a report on failed TOP with aminopterin. The fetus had an NTD with meningomyelocele.9 However, exposure took place 3 weeks after neural tube closure had been completed. Causality thus seems unlikely in this case.
Concomitant drugs: In order to terminate a pregnancy, MTX is often combined with the teratogen misoprostol.10–15 If pregnancy continues and results in a malformed infant, the malformation may be caused by MTX, misoprostol or both.
In summary, MTX is not the cause for all malformations in offspring with intrauterine MTX exposure. Thus, not every malformation associated with intrauterine MTX exposure expands the phenotype of the MTX embryopathy, which, unfortunately, is neither well understood nor adequately described. However, at least craniosynostosis, limb deficiencies and cardiovascular defects seem to be part of the embryopathy.4 8 16
Low-dose MTX
It is of special clinical interest to know if a typical rheumatic weekly low-dose of MTX leads to an MTX embryopathy. No characteristic MTX embryopathy was observed in the case series,17 18 in a prospective study from France with 2819 and in a multicentre prospective cohort study with 324 treated patients.20 In this study, 188 pregnancies were MTX-exposed post conception and 136 preconception. In the preconception cohort, the risk of neither major malformations nor spontaneous abortions was increased. However, in the postconception cohort, the rate of overall major malformations was 6.6%. This was significantly higher compared with the non-autoimmune disease cohort but not with the disease-matched comparison group. The risk of spontaneous abortion was also significantly increased in the postconception group (42.5%), suggesting that low-dose MTX may also be an abortifacient.
The overall rather low malformation risk is good news for women who unintentionally conceive during low-dose MTX treatment. However, there are some main shortcomings: The high proportion of TOPs might have falsely mitigated the magnitude of teratogenic effects. In addition, the median duration of MTX administration was 4.3 weeks after the last menstrual period (LMP) (IQR 3–6). This does not cover the entire first trimester. However, 27 of 188 were still taking their medication between weeks 8 and 10 (after LMP). This number is not high enough to rule out an MTX embryopathy after low dose. The median weekly dose was 10 mg (IQR 8.8–15.0). Would the results be different with a higher median dosage and longer exposure duration?
Italian study on low-dose MTX and pregnancy
In view of these questions and uncertainties, it is to be welcomed that the Italian Society of Rheumatology published a retrospective cohort study evaluating the impact of low-dose MTX in patients with RA on pregnancy outcomes, namely, the risks of spontaneous abortion and elective TOP, the rate of congenital anomalies and the probability of becoming pregnant.1 The study was performed using administrative healthcare data of the Record Linkage of Rheumatic Disease. Antirheumatic comedication was included, and the study provides a lot of thorough statistical testing and sensitivity analyses. Of note, there was no pregnancy with MTX exposure during pregnancy. In the vast majority, MTX was discontinued even earlier than 3 months before conception. This may indicate that education about the potential risks of MTX therapy is very effective in Lombardy, Italy.
Of 3564 women with RA in the MTX cohort, 223 conceived. This is a significantly lower percentage (6.3%) compared with the RA-without-MTX cohort (9.1%) and with the no-RA cohort (11.9%). However, as it is unknown how many women tried to conceive, this finding is difficult to interpret.
The recommendation is to withdraw MTX treatment 1–3 months before conception.21 22 At least in the past, women often chose TOP when low-dose MTX was discontinued within this preconception time window. The study could confirm a significant positive relationship between the exposure to MTX in the 3 months’ window before conception and an increased risk of TOP (OR 4.77, 95% CI 1.08 to 19.40).
There were few infants with congenital abnormalities. The rate was under 1% in all three groups, a rate which is below the background risk, suggesting underascertainment.
The risk of spontaneous abortion was not increased when MTX was discontinued in the preconception period of 3 months. However, there was a statistically significantly increased risk when MTX treatment was halted at any time before conception and there was some dose relationship. This means that, in the majority of cases, MTX treatment was stopped long prior to pregnancy. There is no biologically plausible explanation yet on how MTX could cause this. The authors rightly discuss this result as probably not related to the past drug exposure but to a supposedly higher disease activity and other unmeasured factors. More research is necessary to prove or refute the higher risk of miscarriage after an MTX therapy discontinued long before pregnancy and to include further variables such as disease activity.
Prospects
It will be difficult to close the information gaps in the future because, fortunately, not many women unintentionally conceive while taking MTX. Before prescribing low-dose MTX to women with RA in their reproductive age, the physician should address the issue of pregnancy and contraception. In this context, it is important to know that about 40% of pregnancies are unintended worldwide.23 If MTX was discontinued within the 3 months preconception, the risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes do not seem to be increased.24 Therefore, preconception counselling should not advise or encourage TOP due to prepregnancy MTX.
Acknowledgments
We thank PD Dr Herbert Juch, from the Institute of Human Genetics at the Medical University of Graz, Austria, for his valuable advice and genetic expertise in assessing the case report by Martin et al.
Footnotes
Contributors: CW-S and OD-C contributed to the conception and design of the work. CW-S wrote the draft and OD-C critically revised it. Both authors approved the final version.
Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests: OD-C is the president of the European Network of Teratology Information Services.
Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
References
- 1.Zanetti A, Zambon A, Scirè CA, et al. Impact of rheumatoid arthritis and methotrexate on pregnancy outcomes: retrospective cohort study of the Italian Society for rheumatology. RMD Open 2022;8:e002412. 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Warkany J, Beaudry PH, Hornstein S. Attempted abortion with aminopterin (4-amino-pteroylglutamic acid); malformations of the child. AMA J Dis Child 1959;97:274–81. 10.1001/archpedi.1959.02070010276003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Milunsky A, Graef JW, Gaynor MF. Methotrexate-induced congenital malformations. J Pediatr 1968;72:790–5. 10.1016/s0022-3476(68)80430-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Verberne EA, de Haan E, van Tintelen JP, et al. Fetal methotrexate syndrome: a systematic review of case reports. Reprod Toxicol 2019;87:125–39. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.05.066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nurmohamed L, Moretti ME, Schechter T, et al. Outcome following high-dose methotrexate in pregnancies misdiagnosed as ectopic. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:533. 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lorenz LB, Knudtson EJ. Anomalies in a fetus exposed to methotrexate in the first trimester. Am J Pharmacol Toxicol 2007;2:146–7. 10.3844/ajptsp.2007.146.147 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Martín MC, Barbero P, Groisman B, et al. Methotrexate embryopathy after exposure to low Weekly doses in early pregnancy. Reprod Toxicol 2014;43:26–9. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hyoun SC, Običan SG, Scialli AR. Teratogen update: methotrexate. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2012;94:187–207. 10.1002/bdra.23003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Thiersch JB. Therapeutic abortions with a folic acid antagonist, 4-aminopteroylglutamic acid (4-amino P.G.A) administered by the oral route. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1952;63:1298–304. 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)38924-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chapa JB, Hibbard JU, Weber EM, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of methotrexate embryopathy. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:1104–7. 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00120-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Goffman D, Cole DS, Bobby P, et al. Failed methotrexate termination of pregnancy: a case report. J Perinatol 2006;26:645–7. 10.1038/sj.jp.7211563 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kozma C, Ramasethu J. Methotrexate and misoprostol teratogenicity: further expansion of the clinical manifestations. Am J Med Genet A 2011;155A:1723–8. 10.1002/ajmg.a.34037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.MacDonald K, Norman WV, Popescu O. New anomalies due to methotrexate and misoprostol exposure in early pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013;122:267–8. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.03.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mantilla-Rivas E, Brennan A, Goldrich A, et al. Extremity findings of methotrexate embryopathy. Hand (N Y) 2020;15:14–21. 10.1177/1558944719837657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wheeler M, O’Meara P, Stanford M. Fetal methotrexate and misoprostol exposure: the past revisited. Teratology 2002;66:73–6. 10.1002/tera.10052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Feldkamp M, Carey JC. Clinical teratology counseling and consultation case report: low dose methotrexate exposure in the early weeks of pregnancy. Teratology 1993;47:533–9. 10.1002/tera.1420470605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kozlowski RD, Steinbrunner JV, MacKenzie AH, et al. Outcome of first-trimester exposure to low-dose methotrexate in eight patients with rheumatic disease. Am J Med 1990;88:589–92. 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90522-f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ostensen M, Hartmann H, Salvesen K. Low dose Weekly methotrexate in early pregnancy. A case series and review of the literature. J Rheumatol 2000;27:1872–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lewden B, Vial T, Elefant E, et al. Low dose methotrexate in the first trimester of pregnancy: results of a French collaborative study. J Rheumatol 2004;31:2360–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Weber-Schoendorfer C, Chambers C, Wacker E, et al. Pregnancy outcome after methotrexate treatment for rheumatic disease prior to or during early pregnancy: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014;66:1101–10. 10.1002/art.38368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sammaritano LR, Bermas BL, Chakravarty EE, et al. 2020 American college of rheumatology guideline for the management of reproductive health in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72:529–56. 10.1002/art.41191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Götestam Skorpen C, Hoeltzenbein M, Tincani A, et al. The EULAR points to consider for use of antirheumatic drugs before pregnancy, and during pregnancy and lactation. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:795–810. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Singh S, Sedgh G, Hussain R. Unintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes. Stud Fam Plann 2010;41:241–50. 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2010.00250.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Svirsky R, Rozovski U, Vaknin Z, et al. The safety of conception occurring shortly after methotrexate treatment of an ectopic pregnancy. Reprod Toxicol 2009;27:85–7. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2008.11.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]