Abstract
Walnut (Juglans) species are used as nut crops worldwide. Eastern black walnut (EBW, Juglans nigra), a diploid, horticultural important woody species is native to much of eastern North America. Although it is highly valued for its wood and nut, there are few resources for understanding EBW genetics. Here, we present a high-quality genome assembly of J. nigra based on Illumina, Pacbio, and Hi-C technologies. The genome size was 540.8 Mb, with a scaffold N50 size of 35.1 Mb, and 99.0% of the assembly was anchored to 16 chromosomes. Using this genome as a reference, the resequencing of 74 accessions revealed the effective population size of J. nigra declined during the glacial maximum. A single whole-genome duplication event was identified in the J. nigra genome. Large syntenic blocks among J. nigra, Juglans regia, and Juglans microcarpa predominated, but inversions of more than 600 kb were identified. By comparing the EBW genome with those of J. regia and J. microcarpa, we detected InDel sizes of 34.9 Mb in J. regia and 18.3 Mb in J. microcarpa, respectively. Transcriptomic analysis of differentially expressed genes identified five presumed NBS-LRR (NUCLEOTIDE BINDING SITE-LEUCINE-RICH REPEAT) genes were upregulated during the development of walnut husks and shells compared to developing embryos. We also identified candidate genes with essential roles in seed oil synthesis, including FAD (FATTY ACID DESATURASE) and OLE (OLEOSIN). Our work advances the understanding of fatty acid bioaccumulation and disease resistance in nut crops, and also provides an essential resource for conducting genomics-enabled breeding in walnut.
Introduction
Eastern black walnut (J. nigra L., 2n = 32) is an ecologically important, wind pollinated, fine hardwood [1, 2], with an extensive geographic range in the central and eastern USA, from New England to Texas [2–4]. It belongs to the section Rhysocaryon, which includes other North American taxa and several Central and South American species [2, 5–7]. Nearly all members of the genus Juglans are valued for their timber; eastern black walnut (EBW) is among the most commercially valuable hardwood timber horticulture species in continental USA [8–10]. Eastern black walnut is also an important industrial crop for its nut shells [11]. There is a market for EBW embryos too, which are like those of Persian walnut (Juglans regia L.), i.e. high in protein, total monounsaturated fatty acids, and oleic acid. Like Persian walnut embryos, EBW embryos are used in as food products, although the flavor of EBW embryos is distinctive [11–13]. EBW embryos contain phenolics, high levelsof phytosterols, unsaturated fatty acids, and tocopherols, compounds with benefits for human health and nutrition [12, 13]. J. nigra is considered a candidate medicinal tree species becauseof its flavonoids [14, 15]. Much of the character of EBW woodand embryos is determined by their high content of phenoliccompounds [10, 12–14]. These contribute to its rich, darkly colored heartwood, highly tannic fruits, and characteristically aromatic vegetation [10, 14].
Eastern black walnut (J. nigra) is considered a tertiary germplasm resource for the improvement of Persian walnut (J. regia), themost commercially important species in this genus [15–18]. J. nigra expresses traits such as high-quality heartwood fortimber, cold-hardiness, vegetative vigor [3, 11, 17], and diseasetolerance/resistance, that are useful for Persian walnut rootstock breeding [15, 19, 20]. Although pests and diseases rarely limit the growth or utilization of EBW, it is locally challenged by biotic stresses from diseases and pests [3, 4, 20], and abiotic stresses such as salinity, drought, and cold [4, 21]. Genes associated with disease and stress responses are important to walnut researchers and breeders [22, 23]; these include NBS-LRR (NUCLEOTIDE BINDING SITE-LEUCINE-RICH REPEAT) genes, which regulate responses to biotic stresses in many plants [24–26]. Specifically, NBS-LRR were associated with the severity of anthracnose in walnut [26, 27].
The biology, morphology, genetics, and breeding of J. nigra have been described [1, 2, 6, 7, 27]. To meet demand for improved EBW varieties, the development of genotypic tools for breeding and the study of evolution, population genetics, and diversity of J. nigra began in the 1980s [11], and expanded considerably over the past decade [14, 27]. These tools include the publication of marker systems such as allozymes and microsatellites [2, 28, 29], population genetic studies [30], preliminary genomes [5, 31], and various specialized transcriptomes [23, 32, 33]. EBW is an ideal candidate for purposeful breeding using marker-assisted selection (MAS), functional genes, and genome data. Present and potential uses for these tools include but are not limited to breeding, seed orchard management, cultivar identification, studies of diversity and adaptation, and chain of custody verification for international timber markets [8, 11]. Although a high-quality chromosome-level genome assembly is an essential genetic resource for improving horticultural traits and breeding in woody crops [34–36], genomic resources for breeding in eastern black walnut remain largely undeveloped. Recently published genetic and genomic data have accelerated Persian walnut (J. regia) improvement [16, 37–39], and comparative genomic studies among walnut (Juglans) species offer the potential to verify genetic factors related to a range of phenotypes and development.
Here, we report a high-quality, chromosome-level de novo genome assembly of J. nigra (genotype NWAFU168). The whole genome of J. nigra was generated using a combination of short reads (Illumina Hiseq) and long read (PacBio) sequencing data, and high-throughput chromatin conformation capture (Hi-C) mapping platforms. We identified EBW-specific expansion of gene families and analysed variation in genome structure and population structure via the genome resequencing of 74 section Rhysocaryon accessions. We described aspects of the evolution, size, and structure of the NBS-LRR gene family in J. nigra. We produced transcriptome expression profiles of flowers and fruits (husks, shells, and embryos) to reveal EBW lipid metabolism. We further identified structural genes associated with fruiting and their potential regulators using time-ordered comparative transcriptome analyses. The genome sequence of EBW reported here is essential for the advanced breeding of J. nigra, for comprehending the response of EBW to biotic and abiotic stresses, and for exploring its potential as a rootstock for J. regia.
Results
De novo assembly high-quality improved genome and gene annotation of J. nigra
To achieve a high-quality J. nigra genome assembly, we combined short reads Illumina Hiseq sequence data, long read PacBio sequencing technology sequence data, and Hi-C mapping sequence data. We sequenced total of ~23.6 Gb Illumina sequencing clean reads, ~55 Gb Hi-C clean reads, and ~ 15.9 Gb PacBio long reads equivalent to ~43.6×, ~100.8×, and ~28.7× genome coverage, respectively (Table S1, see online supplementary material). Using the Hi-C mapping technology, the scaffolds were further anchored onto sixteen chromosomes (for J. nigra as for all Juglans, 2n = 2X = 32) that covered ~98.0% of the assembled sequences (Fig. S1; Tables S2 and S3, see online supplementary material). The final genome assembly was 540.8 Mb with a contig N50 of 21.7 Mb, which is close to the genome size (553.8 Mb) estimated by means of 17-K-mer statistics (Table 1; Figs S1 and S2, Table S1, see online supplementary material). Self-alignment analysis revealed duplicated regions within and between chromosomes (Fig. 1; Fig. S1, see online supplementary material). The lengths of the 16 assembled chromosomes of J. nigra ranged from 22 101 821 bp to 50 134 109 bp, with an average length of 33 963 507 bp (Table S3, see online supplementary material). We compared our J. nigra genome assembly (genotype NWAFU168) with the previously J. nigra assemblies: ‘Sparrow’ [28] and ASM291648 v2 [5] (Table S3 and S4, see online supplementary material). The lengths of the 16 chromosomes of the previous J. nigra ‘Sparrow’ assembly [31] ranged from 17 790 123 bp (chr16) to 43 016 657 bp (chr1), with an average length of 30 054 810 bp. The assembly of ASM291648 v2 [5] ranged from 19 540 967 bp (pseudoChr15) to 52 028 492 bp (pseudoChr7), with an average length of 32 865 598 bp (Table S3, see online supplementary material). Our assembly of J. nigra were highly syntenic with the previous two J. nigra assemblies [5, 31], although the length of each chromosome differed for each of the three J. nigra genome assemblies (Fig. S3, see online supplementary material), and we observed inversions between the J. nigra assembly NWAFU168 and other two assemblies (Fig. S3, see online supplementary material).
Table 1. Statistical summary of the assembly and annotation of eastern black walnut (Juglans nigra) genotype NWAFU168.
| Genomic feature | Value |
|---|---|
| Total genome size (bp) | 540 839 626 |
| N50 contig length (Mb) | 21.7 |
| N50 scaffold length (Mb) | 35.1 |
| GC content (%) | 36.5 |
| Size of retrotransposons (Mb) | 229.1 |
| Size of DNA transposons (Mb) | 17.2 |
| Size of total repeat sequences (Mb) | 272.4 |
| Protein-coding gene number (n) | 29 506 |
| Mean coding sequence length (bp) | 1192 |
| Mean exons per gene (n) | 5.15 |
| Mean exon length (bp) | 23.4 |
| Mean intron length (bp) | 803.4 |
| BUSCO completeness (%) | 99.0 |
Figure 1.
Morphology, genome map, population structure, and demographic history of Juglans nigra. a morphology of J. nigra female flowers (1), male flowers (catkins) (2), leaf (3), mature fruit (4), and nut (5). b Circos map of the J. nigra genome assembly: A, number of chromosomes; B, gene density; C, LTR density; D, Gypsy; E, Copia; F, miRNA; G, rRNA; H, snRNA; I, tRNA; J, syntenic relationships among chromosomes. c Model-based population structure analysis of 74 section Rhysocaryon accessions (K from 2 to 4). d PSMC estimates of the effective population sizes of J. nigra (yellow), Juglans microcarpa (blue), and Juglans hindsii (green); grey shading indicates Riss-Würm interglacial period (13–11 Mya) and the glacial maximum 3–1 Mya.
We used four analytical methods to estimate the completeness of J. nigra genome assembly. First, we verified a total of 1614 BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) groups, 1598 (99.0%) complete BUSCOs, 8 fragmented BUSCOs, 129 duplicated BUSCOs, and 1469 single copy BUSCOs in the NWAFU168 assembly (Table S5, see online supplementary material). Second, based on the CEGMA (Core Eukaryotic Genes Mapping Approach), 243 core eukaryotic genes (98.0%) were verified in NWAFU168 assembly. Third, we aligned the Illumina short read data (23.6 Gb) to our completed genome assembly, and 99.2% of the clean reads were mapped. Finally, we mapped re-sequencing short read data from 54 EBW accessions to the EBW genome NWAFU168 assembly (sample details in Table S6, see online supplementary material), and the mean mapping rate of whole-genome resequencing reads from 54 J. nigra individuals was 97.2% (Table S6, see online supplementary material). These four-assessments validated the quality of the NWAFU168 assembly showed that the EBW genome assembly is of good quality in both genic and intergenic regions.
We annotated a total of 29 506 protein-coding gene models from the J. nigra NWAFU168 genome, with a mean CDS (coding sequence) length of 1193 bp and a mean of five exons per gene (Table 1). Among 29 506 predicted genes, there were 29 151 (96.3%) genes annotated in the Nr (non-redundant) database, 28 644 (94.7%) genes were annotated in InterPro (Protein sequence analysis and classification), 23 106 (76.4%) genes were annotated in KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes), and 23 065 (76.2%) genes were annotated in Pfam (The Pfam protein families database) (Table S7, see online supplementary material). We also annotated a large component of non-coding RNA including rRNA (ribosomal RNA), tRNA (transfer RNA), snRNA (small nuclear RNA), and miRNA (microRNA) (Table S8, see online supplementary material). Total of 5431 rRNA, 1036 tRNA, 855 snRNA, and 372 miRNAs were identified (Table S8, see online supplementary material).
Genomic variation and demographic history of J. nigra.
Our whole-genome resequencing focused on 54 J. nigra and 20 other sect. Rhysocaryon species (so-called ‘black walnuts’). Resequencing resulted in 6.8 Gb Illumina clean reads, with a mean depth of 19.9× and an average coverage of 92.1% of the assembled J. nigra genome (Table S6, see online supplementary material). This dataset allowed us to identify 10 676 835 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 3 523 538 insertions and deletions (InDels) in the germplasm collection (Table S6, see online supplementary material). During mapping, we identified 3 142 846 heterozygous SNPs, showing that the nucleotide completeness rate of the EBW genome assembly was 99.99%. As mentioned above, we found an average mapping rate among the J. nigra samples of 97.2%, whereas for the other sect. Rhysocaryon samples the average mapping rate was 97.7% (Table S6, see online supplementary material). The high mapping rates of other sect. Rhysocaryon species onto the J. nigra reference reflect their shared ancestry and strong genetic affinity. High quality assemblies from one member of sect. Rhysocaryon will likely prove extremely useful for other section members that have not yet been assembled.
Population genetic analysis divided three genetic clusters within Rhysocaryon: J. nigra, Juglans microcarpa, and other black walnut species (Fig. 1c), however, we considered two genetic clusters to be the best representation based on cross-validation (CV) errors (Fig. S4, see online supplementary material). Pairwise genetic distances between re-sequenced samples were envisioned by averages of an NJ (neighbor-joining) phylogenetic tree, which also indicated three distinct clades (Fig. S5a, see online supplementary material). Principal component analysis (PCA) further separated accessions of J. californica, J. jamaicensis, J. major, Juglans hindsii, J. mollis, J. olanchana, Juniperus pyriformis, Juglans neotropica, Jasarum steyermarkii, and J. venezuelensis more clearly than the phylogenetic tree (Fig. S5b, see online supplementary material). We identified signals of gene introgression from the J. microcarpa clade into J. nigra populations (Fig. 1c).
To detect the demographic history of black walnut, we employed the mismatch distribution curve, which showed a single peak Poisson distribution, indicating that EBW populations went through a demographic expansion in the past (Fig. S6, see online supplementary material). Using whole-genome resequencing data, we performed the PSMC method to test the dynamic history effective population size (Ne) of J. nigra populations, J. hindsii, and J. microcarpa during the climatic oscillations (Fig. 1d). We revealed a divergence and decline in Ne for all three black walnut species associated with the well-known Riss-Würm interglacial period (13–11 million years ago, Mya), a decline from which J. hindsii did not recover. The population sizes of all three species appear to have stabilized briefly during the glacial maximum 3–1 Mya in the Northern Hemisphere (Fig. 1d), although they subsequently declined again.
Transposable elements
Analysis of repeat elements showed that LTR-RTs (long terminal repeat retrotransposons), including Copia, Gypsy, and LTR retrotransposon, were the dominant transposable elements (TEs) in the EBW genome. These comprised 87.3% of the annotated TE content, and 44.6% of the assembled J. nigra genome (Fig. 2a). Cross-genome comparisons with J. regia, J. sigillata, J. microcarpa, and Juglans mandshurica showed that the loss or gain of LTR-RTs, especially LTR retrotransposon elements, contributed the most to differences in size between the genome of EBW and its congeners (Fig. 2a). EBW (J. nigra) had ~48.1 Mb more LTR-RTs than J. sigillata, J. regia, and J. mandshurica, but not J. microcarpa. EBW had ~50.4 Mb less of Gypsy elements DNA than did J. regia (55.5 Mb). The J. nigra genome had less LTR retrotransposon element sequence (~18.4 Mb) than did J. sigillata and J. mandshurica, and this difference explained much of the difference in genome size between J. nigra and J. mandshurica (Fig. 2b). By comparing our J. nigra assembly with other walnut genome assemblies (J. regia, J. mandshurica, and J. microcarpa) [40–42] (Fig. 2), we identified a large number of TE super families in EBW (Fig. 2). The role of TE expansion and contraction in the evolution of Juglans needs additional study. TE bursts might be associated with speciation in tertiary relict walnuts, especially in cases where hybridization may have played a role in speciation, such as in the origin of Juglans cinerea.
Figure 2.
Analysis of transposable elements (TEs) in Juglans nigra. a The size and percentage of the entire genome occupied by TEs in J. nigra and in 16 other plant species. b Genomic constituents in J. nigra in comparison with those in Juglans microcarpa, Juglans regia, J. sigillata, and Juglans mandshurica. All five constituents, especially Gypsy, were abundant in walnut genomes. c Insertion breaks of Gypsy and Copia elements in J. nigra. d Temporal patterns and insertion time of LTR-RT in J. nigra as compared to those in J. microcarpa, J. regia, J. sigillata, and J. mandshurica.
A distinctly bimodal distribution was found for the insertion bursts of intact Copia and Gypsy retroelements in black walnut, while a single peak was observed for J. regia, J. microcarpa, J. sigillata, and J. mandshurica (Fig. 2c). EBW and J. microcarpa showed a high percentage of old LTR-RT insertions, with the expansion burst appearing around 1.5 million years ago (Mya). A second peak in J. nigra occurred approximately 0.2 Mya; this peak was also seen in J. regia (Fig. 2c). We found earlier bursts of Copia elements than Gypsy in EBW (Fig. 2c). Apparently, there were large-scale bursts of Copia and Gypsy in J. nigra around 1.5–1.3 Mya. The J. nigra genome shows evidence of two earlier insertion events compared with J. regia, J. microcarpa, J. mandshurica, and J. sigillata (Fig. 2d).
Whole-genome duplication
We investigated the evidence for and consequences of whole-genome duplication events (WGD) in the EBW (J. nigra) genome by comparing three walnut genomes (J. nigra, J. microcarpa, and J. regia) [40, 42], and the genome of grape (Vitis vinifera) (Figs S7–S10, see online supplementary material). Paralogous relationships among the sixteen EBW (J. nigra, NWAFU168) chromosomes (Fig. S7, see online supplementary material), jointly containing 5329 pairs of paralogous genes in all blocks of J. nigra genome (Fig. 1; Fig. S8, see online supplementary material). Both paralogous relationships (Fig. S7, see online supplementary material) and dot-plot alignments (Fig. S8, see online supplementary material) showed eight main duplication sub genomes (chromosome pairs as follows: Chr1 and Chr10, Chr2 and Chr9, Chr3 and Chr4, Chr5 and Chr14, Chr6 and Chr15, Chr7 and Chr12, Chr8 and Chr11, and Chr13 and Chr16) within the assembled eastern black walnut (J. nigra, NWAFU168) chromosomes (Figs S7 and S8, see online supplementary material). We observed similar inversions, collinear genes, and segmental duplications among the Juglans genomes, but there were considerable differences between the J. nigra and V. vinifera chromosomes (Fig. S9, see online supplementary material). The peak of synonymous nucleotide substitution (Ks) was ~0.4 and ~1.3 for orthologous gene pairs within the black walnut assembly, indicating that J. nigra evolved through two polyploidy events (Fig. S10, see online supplementary material). Compared to the V. vinifera genome, all five walnut species had one Ks peak of ~0.9 for orthologous gene pairs, which represented divergence between genes duplicated by the γWGT (whole-genome triplication). Because the peaks of Ks had different values for the orthologous gene pairs between each of the two walnut genomes, the genomes reflect species differentiation (Fig. S10, see online supplementary material).
Comparative genomic analysis and gene family evolution of J. nigra
To understand how the EBW genome evolved, we compared eighteen representative genomes, including several from the walnut family (Juglandaceae) (Fig. 3). The comparison included 18 angiosperm species for which high-quality genomes are available (for details, see Table S9, see online supplementary material). We identified 2160 single-copy genes of black walnut with orthologs in all eighteen angiosperm species (Fig. 3a). Compared with the other plant species, in EBW 1037 gene families were expanded, 705 gene families were contracted, and 91 gene families were rapidly evolving (Fig. 3a; Table S9, see online supplementary material). The rapidly expanding gene families were associated with plant hormone signal transduction, vitamin B6 metabolism, pathogenesis-related protein (PR), pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR), Glutamyl-tRNA amidotransferase, subunit A (GATA), cytochrome P450 (CYP450), and NBS-LRR gene families (Fig. 3e; Table S9, see online supplementary material). We then performed a genome-wide counting of five pathogenesis-related gene families (PR, PPR, GATA, CYP450, and NBS-LRR) among eighteen genomes (Fig. 3c). The NBS-LRR genes, which expanded in J. nigra and J. microcarpa, were contracted in J. regia (Fig. 3c). We found that the five Fagales species, i.e. J. nigra, J. mandshurica, J. regia, Castanea mollissima, and Carya cathayensis, shared 11 759 genes, whereas 159 orthogroups were specific to J. nigra (Fig. 3d). KEGG analysis of these 159 unique genes of J. nigra showed that they regulate phenylpropanoid metabolism, flavonoid biosynthesis, and amino sugar and nucleotide sugar biosynthesis (Fig. 3f).
Figure 3.
Juglans nigra genome evolution. a Expanded, contracted, and rapidly evolving gene families in 18 species; pie charts on each branch of the phylogenetic tree indicate the proportion of genes showing expansion (blue), loss (red), and rapid evolution (orange), the numbers near the nodes shows number of expanded or contracted gene families. The font color indicates the number of genes gained (blue), lost (red), and rapidly evolving (orange). b The proportion of multicopy genes, unique paralogues, single-copy orthologues, other paralogues, and unclustered genes among 18 species; rows correspond to species as listed in panel a. c The number of PR, PPR, GATA, CYP450, and NBS-LRR genes among the species shown in panel a; colors are intended as a visual guide to gene number. d Venn diagram of the gene space of five woody perennial species in Fagales (Jn = J. nigra, Jr = Juglans regia, Jm = Juglans microcarpa, Cmo = Castanea mollissima, and Cca = Carya cathayensis). Regions of overlap indicate shared orthologs. e KEGG analysis of gene families that were expanded, contracted, and rapidly evolving in the J. nigra genome. e KEGG analysis of 159 unique paralogs of J. nigra.
Genome-wide variation within Juglans genomes
To reveal and examine genome-wide variations within walnut (Juglans) genomes we employed chromosome to chromosome comparisons between the J. nigra, Juglans macrocarpa, J. regia and J. mandshurica (Fig. 4a; Figs S11 and S12, see online supplementary material). We identified large syntenic blocks between the J. nigra genome (sect. Rhysocaryon) and its relatives J. regia (sect. Dioscaryon) and J. mandshurica (sect. Cardiocaryon) (Fig. S11, see online supplementary material). Syntenic blocks were also identified between the genomes of J. nigra and Carya illinoinensis, an important nut crop (pecan) and a more distant relative within the Juglandaceae (Fig. S12, see online supplementary material). Synteny between EBW and J. mandshurica chromosomes 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, and 16 was especially strong. Within Juglans, we identified larger syntenic blocks between EBW (J. nigra) and J. regia than between EBW and J. mandshurica (Fig. S12, see online supplementary material). Interestingly, synteny between EBW and C. illinoinensis (chromosomes 1, 7, 8, 13, and 16) was generally focused on different chromosomes than the synteny within congeners (Fig. S12, see online supplementary material). Moreover, we found that synteny between EBW and J. mandshurica chromosomes 1, 7, 8, 9, 13, and 15 had larger inversions within chromosome compared to the synteny between EBW and J. regia (Fig. S12, see online supplementary material). These synteny differences might reflect differences in the evolution of chromosomes among the three walnut species (Fig. 4a and b; Fig. S12, see online supplementary material).
Figure 4.
Comparative analysis of the genomes of Juglans nigra, Juglans regia, and Juglans microcarpa and lipid biosynthesis in J. nigra. a Circos map of InDels and repeats for each J. nigra chromosome versus the J. regia and J. microcarpa assemblies: (1) number of chromosomes; the (2) deletions, (3) insertions, (4) repeat expansion, and (5) repeat contraction detected between J. nigra genome and J. regia genome; the (6) deletions, (7) insertions, (8) repeat expansion, and (9) repeat contraction detected between J. nigra, J. regia, and J. microcarypa. b KEGG analysis of InDels between the first development stage (ET1) and third development stage (ET3) of J. nigra embryo development. c Venn diagram of the DEGs among three development stages of black walnut embryo (80 DAF, 111 DAF, and 140 DAF). d KEGG analysis of DEGs (281 genes) between the first development stage (ET1) and third development stage (ET3) of J. nigra embryo development. e Transcriptional profiles of lipid biosynthetic genes in developing J. nigra embryos. The expression levels of lipid biosynthesis genes in the developing J. nigra embryo based on transcriptome data. The nine colored panes in each horizontal row represent three stages with three biological replications (80 DAF, 111 DAF, and 140 DAF). Blue to red colored squares indicate log10FPKM values.
We described the InDels of the EBW genome by comparison between J. regia and J. microcarpa (Fig. 4a; Fig. S13, see online supplementary material); these totaled 34.9 Mb (6.5%) in J. regia and 18.3 Mb in J. microcarpa (Fig. 4a; Figs S13–S15, see online supplementary material). InDels and repeats in J. regia were obviously greater in number than in J. nigra or its close relative, J. microcarpa (Fig. 4a; Figs S13–S15, see online supplementary material). A comparison of J. nigra and Persian walnut showed large numbers of InDels on the chromosomes 3, 4, 7, 11, and 13; InDels between J. nigra and J. microcarpa were also concentrated on chromosomes 7 and 13 (Fig. S13, see online supplementary material). The mean density of InDels detected between the genomes of EBW and J. regia was 12.5 (InDels bp−1 chromosome−1), whereas the mean density of InDels between the genomes of EBW and J. microcarpa was 3.4. The most common insertions and deletions ranged in size from 50 to 500 bp (Fig. S14, see online supplementary material). InDels >10 kb were uncommon across the J. nigra genome (Fig. S14, see online supplementary material). In total, 2180/136047 InDels were more than 5 kb in J. regia (about 1.6% of all InDels), but only 0.9% of the total in J. microcarpa (312/34457). A total of 2180 genic InDels >5 kb was verified in J. nigra compared to J. regia. Enrichment analysis of genes absent in J. nigra as compared with J. regia showed a significant (− log10 P > 10) depletion of genes related to metabolism of fatty acids and pentose phosphate (Fig. 4b). Annotation of these 2180 genes showed a strong association with RNA transport, pyruvate metabolism, biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acid, and fatty acid metabolism and biosynthesis (Fig. 4b). We also identified 312 genic InDels >5 kb in J. nigra as compared to J. microcarpa (Fig. S15, see online supplementary material). Annotation of these 312 genes showed a strong association with glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, alpha-linolenic acid metabolism, pentose phosphate pathway, and fatty acid degradation. These genetic differences might be expected to contribute to differences in oil content and composition among the three species (Fig. 4a and b; Fig. S15, see online supplementary material).
Transcriptomics profiling of J. nigra embryos in lipid biosynthesis
To detect the profiles of transcriptome associating with the development of EBW fruits, we constructed 33 RNA-seq libraries; 27 were from developing walnut husks, developing shells, and developing embryos, and the remaining were from other six tissues (Table S10, see online supplementary material). We obtained 207.8 Gb clean data, with an average of 6 296 194 063 clean reads of each accession and 97.5% Q20 ratio per sample (Table S10, see online supplementary material). The J. nigra embryo (nut kernel) is rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids. To further detect and profile the transcriptome associated with the development of EBW oils, we constructed nine libraries from developing walnut embryos (Table S10, see online supplementary material). Using a pairwise comparison analysis, we identified a total of 1641 DEGs (differential expressed genes) between samples at three collection times (Fig. 4c). Annotation of these 525 overlapped genes that were expressed in more than one sample (overlap regions of Fig. 4c.) revealed a strong association with plant−pathogen interaction, plant hormone signal transduction, starch and sucrose metabolism, fatty acid degradation, and fructose and mannose metabolism (Fig. 4d). To elucidate the mechanisms of black walnut embryo development, we focused on the trends of DEGs related to lipid biosynthesis (Fig. 4e). We identified 312 unigenes expressed in the embryo samples related to oil (lipid) biosynthesis, including 165 unigenes for fatty acid biosynthesis (in plastids), and 157 for fatty acid biosynthesis in the endoplasmic reticulum (Fig. 4e). Some genes related to fatty acid synthesis were highly abundant at all three development stages of EBW embryo, including PDH [PYRUVATE DEHYDROGENASE, evm.model.Chr7.913, mean FPKM (fragments per kilobase of exon model per million mapped fragments) value = 194.9], HAD (3-HYDROXYACYL-ACP DEHYDRATASE, evm.model.Chr7.3650, mean FPKM value = 68.2), FATB (FATTY ACYL-ACP THIOESTERASES B, evm.model.Chr6.2121, mean FPKM value = 77.8), and SAD (STEAROYL-ACP DESATURASE, evm.model.Chr14.187, mean FPKM value = 28.9) in plastid, and the members of the OLE (OLEOSIN) family (evm.model.Chr7.2305, mean FPKM value = 2654.4), ENR (ENOYL-ACYL CARRIER PROTEIN REDUCTASE, evm.model.Chr11.187, mean FPKM value = 651.5), and FAD (FATTY ACID DESATURASE, evm.model.Chr14.1924, mean FPKM value = 641.2; evm.model.Chr14.754, mean FPKM value = 313.0) in endoplasmic reticulum (Fig. 4e). Two genes were expressed more highly in the first stage ACEE (PYRUVATE DEHYDROGENASE E1 COMPONENT, evm.model.Chr7.913) and KAS I (3-KETOACYL-ACP SYNTHASE I, evm.model.Chr4.1237), while genes that were expressed more highly in the third stages of EBW embryo development included OLE (OLEOSIN, evm.model.Chr13.2126), HAD (3-HYDROXYACYL-ACP DEHYDRATASE, evm.model.Chr7.3650), ENR (ENOYL-ACYL CARRIER PROTEIN REDUCTASE, evm.model.Chr7.3467), and ABCD (ABC TRANSPORTER SUBFAMILY D, evm.model.Chr2.1144 and evm.model.Chr14.1280) (Fig. 4e). We identified 1137 gene models related to lipid synthesis that were differentially expressed based on FPKM values among the three embryo time stages (ET1-ET3) (Fig. 4e). The J. nigra genome assembly contained orthologs to all the essential lipid biosynthesis genes in EBW (Fig. 4e).
NBS-LRR members in J. nigra
In general, the J. nigra, J. regia, and J. microcarpa genomes were highly syntenic along each chromosome (Fig. S16, see online supplementary material), but we observed frequent intrachromosomal rearrangements, especially inversions. For example, the comparison of EBW (J. nigra) with Persian walnut (J. regia) demonstrated eight inversions of more than 600 kb on chromosomes 1, 3, 4, 8, 10, and 16 (Fig. 5a; Fig. S16, see online supplementary material). We characterized the structure variations (SVs) in the assembly of EBW (J. nigra) compared to Persian walnut (Fig. 5a). Twenty-five large SVs (>5 kb) containing translocations and inversions were found between the EBW and Persian walnut genomes, with the lengths ranging from 40 242 bp to 49 410 bp (Fig. 5a; Fig. S15, see online supplementary material). Gene function annotation within the inverted regions indicated that many of those genes were correlated to disease resistance (R genes), including NBS-LRR, myb DNA-binding domain (MYB), and pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) gene families (Fig. 5b).
Figure 5.
Collinearity analysis of resistance-related genes and comparative analysis of the NBS-LRR genes in Juglans nigra and Juglans regia. a Genome collinearity between J. nigra, J. regia, and Juglans microcarpa. Regions of collinearity smaller than 100 kb are filtered out. The green and purple lines indicate syntenic blocks more than 600 kb in length. b The KEGG enrichment analysis of InDels of J. nigra and J. regia. c Gene structure and collinearity of JnNBS-LRR126 and homologous NBS-LRR genes in J. regia, J. microcarpa, Juglans mandshurica, Vitis vinifera, and Arabidopsis thaliana. d The phylogenetic tree and protein sequences of JnNBS-LRR126 and other NBS-LRR genes.
To gain further insight into the important disease resistance gene family NBS-LRR in J. nigra, we compared our newly assembled J. nigra genome to the J. regia genome by performing an evolution and expression profile of NBS-LRR genes. By screening candidate protein domains, we identified 430 genes putatively encoding NBS-LRR proteins in J. nigra and 298 genes in J. regia, a significantly different number (Figs S17 and S18, see online supplementary material). To further explore the disease resistance genes of J. nigra, we used sequence homology to identify candidate genes in J. nigra based on gene function studies in J. regia. JnNBS-LRR126 was located at chromosome 4 in the J. nigra assembly. The chromosomal localizations of NBS-LRR genes on the chromosome 4 in the two walnut genomes showed that JnNBS-LRR126 had high collinearity with JrNBS-LRR88 (Fig. 5c). The gene structure of JnNBS-LRR126 in J. nigra, J. regia, J. microcarpa, J. mandshurica, V. vinifera, and Arabidopsis thaliana assemblies (Fig. 5c) showed that J. nigra, J. mandshurica, and J. microcarpa have two highly conserved homologs of this NBS-LRR gene (JnNBS-LRR125 and JnNBS-LRR126), while J. regia, V. vinifera, and A. thaliana contain one homolog, i.e. JrNBS-LRR88, located within a 1.2 Mb region on chromosome 4 (Fig. 5c). The conserved first CDS sequences of JnNBS-LRR126 and JrNBS-LRR88 had five protein variations (Fig. 5d). A maximum likelihood phylogenetic and protein sequence alignment analysis showed that JnNBS-LRR126 and JrNBS-LRR88 were most closely related to AtLRR-PXC3 (O22938.1 and NP_181713.1) in A. thaliana (Fig. 5d; Table S11, see online supplementary material).
The NBS-LRR genes on chromosomes 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 11 of J. nigra showed a linear similarity with NBS-LRR genes on the same chromosomes in J. regia (Fig. 6a; Fig. S19, see online supplementary material). In general, the NBS-LRR gene members were distributed on both ends of chromosomes 1, 2, 7, 10, and 16 in the J. regia genome, but their distribution was more uniform in J. nigra (Fig. 6a; Figs S17 and S18, see online supplementary material). Chromosomes 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 11 of these two walnut species genomes had the highest collinearity (Fig. 6a; Fig. S19, see online supplementary material). In J. nigra NBS-LRR genes, JnNBS-LRR80 (Chr3), JnNBS-LRR157 (Chr6), JnNBS-LRR221 (Chr7), and JnNBS-LRR303 (Chr11) showed high homology with NBS-LRR gene clusters on the same-numbered chromosomes of J. regia (Fig. 6a and b; Fig. S19, see online supplementary material). For example, the single J. nigra NBS-LRR gene JnNBS-LRR80 on chromosome 3 corresponds to a cluster of 11 homologs in J. regia: JrNBS-LRR39, JrNBS-LRR40, JrNBS-LRR41, JrNBS-LRR42, JrNBS-LRR43, JrNBS-LRR44, JrNBS-LRR45, JrNBS-LRR46, JrNBS-LRR47, JrNBS-LRR48, and JrNBS-LRR49 (Fig. 6a–c). Expansion at this locus in J. regia produced large-scale variation (0.02 Mb) on chromosome 3 (Fig. 6c). The gene structure of JnNBS-LRR80 and eleven JrNBS-LRRs showed that the CDS had collinearity with each other (Fig. 6c). The domains and gene structure of these 12 NBS-LRR genes were conserved, but the gene length was considerably different (Fig. 6c). Although we characterized a total of 430 NBS-LRR genes in J. nigra (Figs S17 and S18, see online supplementary material), all the NBS-LRR genes on chromosome 3 of J. nigra showed a low percentage of similarity with genes on the J. regia chromosome 3 (Fig. 6c; Table S12, see online supplementary material). We determined that the promoter of JnNBS-LRR80 contains two NBS and three MYB elements, while the 11 NBS-LRR genes in the related NBS gene cluster in J. regia contain fewer NBS and MYB elements (Fig. 6c). By examining the promoters of these 12 NBS-LRR genes, we found that the J. nigra versions generally contained more NBS and MYB elements than their homologs in J. regia. This finding highlights the potential role of promoter element content in the regulation of disease resistance in Juglans (Fig. 6c; Fig. S20, see online supplementary material).
Figure 6.
NBS-LRR gene cluster collinearity and expression profiles in Juglans nigra and Juglans regia. a Genome-wide synteny analysis of NBS-LRR genes for J. nigra and J. regia. Orthologous and paralogous NBS-LRR genes were mapped onto the chromosomes and then linked. Red lines and blue lines indicate orthologous and paralogous gene pairs in chromosomes 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 11 in J. nigra and J. regia. Grey lines indicate orthologous and paralogous gene pairs in other remaining chromosomes. bNBS-LRR gene chromosomal distribution and gene collinearity of chromosome 3 in J. nigra and J. regia. The large-scale deletion (0.02 Mb) on chromosome 3 of the J. nigra genome contained one disease resistance gene JnNBS-LRR80 (red), while the J. regia genome contains eleven NBS-LRR genes (blue) in the same region. c Gene structure and synteny analysis of JnNBS-LRR126 and 11 J. regia NBS-LRR genes on chromosome3. Sequence comparison between J. nigra chromosome 3 and J. regia chromosome 3: the upper figure shows, in grey, extensive regions of collinearity >100 kb; the middle figure shows the region from 13 665 230 bp to 136 741 633 bp on the chromosome 3 of J. nigra that includes 11 genes (NBS-LRR) deleted in J. regia; the bottom figure shows NBS-LRR gene collinearity on the chromosome 3 between J. regia (from 13.54 Mb to 13.83 Mb) and J. nigra (from 13.94 Mb to 14.02 Mb). e–f The morphology of five tissue/organs (leaf, female flower, twig, stem, and fruit) and expression heat map of JnNBS-LRR126, JnNBS-LRR80, JnNBS-LRR157, JnNBS-LRR221, and JnNBS-LRR303 in those five tissues. Expression levels of those five NBS-LRR genes during three development stages of J. nigra husks, shell, and embryo. (H = husk; S = shell; E = embryo; for details of samples, see Table S10).
NBS-LRR gene expression in black walnut
We measured the expression profiles of five candidate NBS-LRR genes from J. nigra: JnNBS-LRR126, JnNBS-LRR80, JnNBS-LRR157, JnNBS-LRR221, and JnNBS-LRR303 in developing walnut husk/shells, leaves, twigs, stems, and female flowers of J. nigra (Fig. 6). Among these five tissues, JnNBS-LRR221 was expressed highly in leaves, twigs, stems, and fruit, while JnNBS-LRR157 was expressed highly in female flowers, twigs, and stems (Fig. 6d). JnNBS-LRR126 was expressed higher in leaves than in any other tissue evaluated (Fig. 6d).
To detect and profile the transcriptome associated with JnNBS-LRR126, JnNBS-LRR80, JnNBS-LRR157, JnNBS-LRR221, and JnNBS-LRR303, we constructed 27 libraries from developing walnut husks, developing shells, and developing embryos (Fig. 6e–f; sample details in Table S10, see online supplementary material). We obtained 189.5 Gb clean data, with an average of 7 017 490 111 clean reads of each accession and 97.52% Q20 ratio per sample (Table S10, see online supplementary material). In general, JnNBS-LRR126, JnNBS-LRR80, JnNBS-LRR157, JnNBS-LRR221, and JnNBS-LRR303 expressed significantly more highly levels in developing walnut husks than developing shells and embryos (Fig. S21, see online supplementary material; Fig. 6e–f). Based on the mean FPKM value of transcriptome, the expression of JnNBS-LRR157, JnNBS-LRR221, and JnNBS-LRR303 was greatest at the third collection time point in late September (Fig. 6e–f). JnNBS-LRR221 expression increased during husk development but decreased during shell development (Fig. 6e–f). JnNBS-LRR80 expression generally increased across all developmental time points in all three tissues, except for a slight dip in expression in the endocarp (Fig. 6f).
Discussion
The genus Juglans includes around 23 species that produce large, oily nuts, although there is an international commercial market for the nuts of J. regia only [37–40, 43]. J. nigra (EBW) is best known as a timber species, although humans have also selected nut varieties of EBW for over 100 years [2, 7, 30, 44], and a nut breeding program for EBW is supported by the University of Missouri [7, 30]. J. nigra belongs to the section Rhysocaryon [1], which includes nearly all other New World Juglans, e.g. little walnut (J. microcarpa Berl.), J. hindsii (Jeps.) Rehder, J. californica S. Wats., J. major (Torr. ex Sitsgr.), J. mollis Engelm. ex Hemsl., and J. steyermarkii Mann., etc. [1]. The J. nigra genome we present in this manuscript will be relevant for sect. Rhysocaryon species in particular. J. nigra is especially valued among Juglans for its timber, disease resistance, and cold tolerance [21, 26]. Disease tolerance/resistance within J. nigra and other members of section Rhysocaryon make them attractive as rootstocks for J. regia [24, 27, 44, 45]. The potential role of the NBS-LRR genes in walnut (Juglans) disease resistance has been reported [21, 27, 46, 47].
We constructed a high-quality, chromosome-level genome assembly of J. nigra that contains 29 506 protein-coding genes (Table S6, see online supplementary material). We assembled the J. nigra genome to be 540.8 Mb, similar in size to other Juglans species, such as J. regia (606 Mb) (Chandler 2.0), J. mandshurica (540 Mb) [41], and J. sigillata (548 Mb) [48], but smaller than some other Juglandaceae (Fagales) species, such as Carya cathayensis (750 Mb) [49], C. illinoinensis (‘Oaxaca’, 650 Mb) [34], and C. mollissima (785.5 Mb) [50] in the Fagaceae. For our J. nigra genome assembly, the value of contig N50 was improved 88.6-fold and 9.0-fold compared to the previously available J. nigra genome assemblies (Table S4, see online supplementary material) [5, 31]. The final J. nigra genome size is smaller than the previous genome version (620 Mb, ‘Sparrow’ versus 540 Mb, NWAFU168), while larger than the previous genome version (532 Mb, ASM291648 v2 versus 540 Mb, NWAFU168) (Table S4, see online supplementary material). The results of resequencing 74 section Rhysocaryon accessions indicated that our assembly will be a good reference for the population genetic analysis of EBW and other related species (Fig. 1; Table S6, see online supplementary material).
Based on a comparison with 18 representative species, many of the expanded, contracted, and rapidly evolution gene families in the EBW (J. nigra) genome were associated with plant hormone signal transduction, vitamin B6 metabolism, pathogenesis (e.g. PPR, the pentatricopeptide repeat family), and CYP450 (Fig. 3). A total of 159 unique paralogues were enriched in J. nigra, these were associated with amino sugar metabolism, nucleotide sugar metabolism, flavonoid biosynthesis, and phenylpropanoid metabolism, and their role in the biology of J. nigra remains to be determined (Fig. 3e).
Our genome assembly allowed us to compare the locations of InDels, SNPs, inversions, and structure variations (SVs) among Juglans species (Fig. 4; Fig. S15, see online supplementary material). The prediction of the function of genes containing InDels, inversions, and SVs indicated that some are related to the disease resistance and biosynthesis of fatty acids, including members of NBS-LRR, MYB, glutathione s-transferase (GST), and PPR gene families (Fig. 3). Some disease resistance related genes such as NBS-LRR in J. nigra reflected species-specific variation, probably as a result of selection under speciation and adaption. On chromosome 3 of the J. regia genome we found a 0.02 Mb insertion that includes 11 NBS-LRR disease resistance genes. In the context of walnut evolution, diversification, and domestication, large structural variants could have led to changes in disease tolerance/resistance.
NBS-LRR proteins are among the most important classes of resistance genes (R genes) in plants [51]. Comparison of our J. nigra assembly with the genome of its congener J. regia revealed the extent and location of genome evolution within Juglans. For example, although the two species have a similar number of genes and similar genome sizes [39], we determined that the number of NBS-LRR gene family members in J. nigra was 1.5× greater than the number in J. regia. The distribution of NBS-LRR members in the J. nigra genome was relatively even as compared to J. regia, in which NBS-LRR genes were clustered. In some cases, a single NBS-LRR gene of J. nigra showed high similarity and collinearity with an entire cluster of NBS-LRR genes of J. regia. The expansion and clustering of genes related to resistance has also been observed in the WAK (WALL ASSOCIATED KINASE WAK/WAKL) gene family in Persian walnut and J. mandshurica [52], and it is believed to be related to maintenance of key functions, neo-functionalization, and in some cases, as in the species-specific duplication and clusters of NBS-LRR, evolution in response to selection pressure [52–54].
The identification of NBS-LRR genes identification in eastern black walnut is the first step toward characterizing their role in resistance to biotic stresses. For example, a comprehensive analysis of RNA sequencing data indicated that NBS-LRR genes are activated in plant-microbe interactions in several walnut (J. regia) tissues [22]. J. nigra and J. regia are both susceptible to anthracnose caused by Gnomonia leptostyla [55]. A candidate genetic marker derived from an NBS-LRR gene but of no known function was associated with anthracnose susceptibility in both J. nigra and J. regia genotypes [22]. Recently, it was shown that JrWRKY21 was significantly upregulated upon C. gloeosporioides infection in J. regia [56]. An and Yang (2014) identified a large number of what they called resistance gene analogs that contained domains associated with NBS-LRR genes that were associated with resistance to the pathogen Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in J. regia [57]. In tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), it was reported that long non-coding RNAs (LncRNA) regulate the expression of NBS-LRR genes[58]. In J. regia, there is evidence that LncRNAs are involved in the regulation of resistance to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides based on treatments of AR (anthracnose-resistant) and AS (anthracnose-susceptible) walnut fruits [46, 47]. Comparative genomics analysis will be providing good tools to reveal R genes in walnut species [25, 41]. Of particular importance in EBW are genes activated in response to infection by the fungi Geosmithia morbida, Diaporthe capsica, Fusarium spp., and Nectria galligena, which are associated with a diseases of J. nigra [59–62].
The oil content of most Juglans species is poorly characterized, presenting an opportunity for comparative metabolomics to contribute to our understanding of seed oil production [52, 63]. Seed oil content and composition have not (yet) been important targets for improvement in J. nigra, although they are in other oil seed crops, including J. regia [63]. The SAD, FAD2, and FAD3 were upregulated highly abundantly expressed in the J. regia embryo [63], which indicates that these candidate genes might play an essential role in the polyunsaturated fatty acids biosynthesis in J. regia [64]. Other genes [FUS3 (B3 DOMAIN-CONTAINING TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR), ABI3 (ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 3), LEC2 (LEAFY COTYLEDON 2), and WRI1 (WRINKLED 1) transcription factors] may be involved in the regulation of lipid biosynthesis in J. mandshurica [52]. We found that transcripts for LEA, FAD, OLE, LTP (LIPID TRANSFER PROTEINS), ERD (EMBRYOGENIC CELL PROTEIN), and SSP (SEED STORAGE PROTEIN) were expressed at extremely high levels during three EBW embryo development stages, indicating their possible role in black walnut oil synthesis and/or embryo pattern formation and maturation. The third development stage of shells was associated with oil synthesis and maturity of the walnut fruit. These data lay the genomic foundation for breeders to improve the oil contents and to modify the fatty acid compositions in Juglans.
In summary, we assembled a high-quality genome assembly of J. nigra, a valuable and attractive multi-use species. Our work will not only provide a genome resource for understanding the genomic basis of genomic variations in oil synthesis and disease resistance in J. nigra and other members of the Juglans, it is expected to accelerate genome-enabled breeding of walnut (Juglans) and other Juglandaceae for traits related to nut quality and disease resistance.
Materials and methods
Sample collection, DNA extraction, library construction, and genome sequencing
In 2021 we collected young, heathy leaves from a single individual of J. nigra (genotype NWAFU168), growing in the orchard of Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China (altitude: 500 m, 34°17′N, 108°05′E). Total genomic DNA of NWAFU168 was prepared from the fresh leaf samples using a kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). A DNA library (150 bp) was analysed using short read sequencing with the Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform (San Diego, CA, USA) for short read sequencing. For long read sequencing, genomic DNA was extracted using DNA Template Prep Kit 3.0 (Pacific Biosciences, USA). PacBio SMRTbell long-read (20 kb) libraries were constructed and then sequenced on the PacBio Sequel platform using P6-C4 chemistry (Novogene, Beijing). For the chromosome-level genome Hi-C sequencing, we prepared a Hi-C library that was sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq6000 platform (San Diego, CA, USA). After filtering out the low-quality reads, we obtained ~23.6 Gb (43.6×) of Illumina clean short-reads, 15.9 Gb (28.7×) of long-reads, and ~ 55 Gb (100.8×) of the Hi-C clean reads (Table S1, see online supplementary material).
Genome assembly and assessment
The Illumina raw reads were evaluated with SOAPnuke v1.5.6 to filter adapters or low-quality data [65]. The genome assembly size was estimated by means of 17-K-mer statistics (Fig. S2, see online supplementary material) [66]. De novo assembly of J. nigra was performed with Falcon v1.87 [67]. The sequencing data from PacBio and Hi-C platform were mapped to assembled scaffolds using BWA-aln [68]. Based on Hi-C data, scaffolds were anchored to 16 pseudomolecules using LACHESIS software [69] resulting in an N50 of approximately 27 Mb (Table 1). The interaction heatmap of J. nigra’s 16 chromosomes was produced using HiC-pro software [70].
We evaluated the quality and completeness of the J. nigra genome assembly using the BUSCO v3.0.2 (bench marking universal single-copy orthologs) [71]. Secondly, we also evaluated genome assembly by mapping Illumina DNA short reads using BWA-MEM (Burrows-Wheeler Alignment-Maximal Exact Match) [72]. We further evaluated the genome by mapping transcripts using the software GMAP [73]. Finally, we evaluated genome completeness by mapping Illumina resequencing reads from 74 individuals (Table S8, see online supplementary material) to the J. nigra genome assembly using BWA [72]. J. nigra genome assembly features were visualized using Circos [74].
Annotation of protein-coding genes
Genome annotation and the prediction of protein-coding genes were undertaken using transcriptomic data, homology-based annotation, and de novo prediction methods [41]. RNA sequences from six tissues (dry stigma, mature leaves, bark from stems, immature fruit, new shoots, and stem; Table S10, see online supplementary material) were used to annotate genes using the software AUGUSTUS [75]. For homology-based annotation, gene structure was predicted for protein-coding genes with reference to five species or species hybrids (J. regia, C. illinoinensis, J. regia × J. microcarpa, C. mollissima, and A. thaliana) using Exonerate v2.2.0 [76]. The final annotation of the protein-coding genes was processed using MAKER2 [77] and AUGUSTUS [75] that combined the results from homologous protein-coding gene mapping, transcriptome sequence mapping, PacBio mapping, and whole-genome resequencing mapping [41]. We evaluated the final functional annotation of protein-coding genes based on six databases, including SwissProt (Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics and Protein Information Resource) [78], Nr (non-redundant) [79], KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) [80], InterPro (protein sequence analysis and classification) [81], GO (gene ontology) [82], and Pfam (the Pfam protein families database) [83] databases (details in Table S7, see online supplementary material).
Repeat annotation
To identify transposable elements (TEs), the J. nigra genome sequence was searched and blasted against databases using Repbase v.20.05 [84], RepeatMasker v.4.0.7 [85], Tandem Repeats Finder (TRF) v4.09 [86], PILER [87], and RepeatProteinMask v4.0.7 [85] with default parameters. The LTR-RTs (long terminal repeat retrotransposons) were identified in J. nigra genome and selected genomes using LTRharvest v.1.5.10 [88]. We mapped the translated sequences to the two superfamilies Copia and Gypsy, which were aligning by the software MAFFT with default parameters (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software/).
Genome features analysis
The genome circle plot combined the distribution patterns of various genomic features including the density of gene, LTR, Gypsy, Copia, miRNA, rRNA, snRNA, tRNA, and syntenic relationships among chromosomes. The syntenic relationships within the species J. nigra was obtained using the MCSCANX software [89], in which the Evalue was set to 1E-3 and the number of BlastHits was set to 10 [90]. The pair of two chromosomes containing the greatest collinearity was considered homologous chromosomes. The density of the features was calculated using BEDTOOLS with 1 Mb sliding windows [91]. The genome circle plot was visualized using the ‘advanced ciros’ function in TBtools software [92].
Genomic variation analysis
To investigate the population-level features of the J. nigra genome, we compared whole-genome resequencing data from 74 sect. Rhysocaryon accessions with the J. nigra reference we produced. These 74 genomes included 54 J. nigra and other 20 (sect. Rhysocaryon) species (so-called ‘black walnuts’); 30 of these genomes were published in previous studies (Table S8, see online supplementary material) [44]. All genome re-sequencing reads from the 74 accessions (~20× genomic coverage, for individual information details see Table S8, see online supplementary material) were mapped to the EBW (J. nigra) reference genome assembly NWAFU168 using the BWA [41, 68] with default parameters. We identified SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) and InDels (insertions and deletions) using the program GATK pipeline (Genome Analysis Toolkit) [93]. Firstly, the sequencing data was filtered using the software FASTP with default parameters. After raw data filtering, the clean reads were aligned to the reference genome J. nigra NWAFU168 using the BWA-MEM with the parameters ‘−T 20 −k 30’ [68]. Then, we named the alignments (response to each sample) as SAM files using the software SAMTOOLS [94]. We compared the sequencing depth and coverage using the J. nigra NWAFU168 assembly. We then called the duplication reads, SNPs and InDels using PICARD and GATK with the joint calling strategy [93]. Specifically, we obtained all samples’ genomic variants GVCF files, which are combing with the module ‘CombineGVCFs’. We detected the final genomic variations of SNPs and InDelS via the ‘GenotypeGVCFs’ and ‘HaplotypeCaller’ modules. The filter criterias of SNPs and InDels as follows: (i) we filtered the SNPs near an Indel within the length of 5 bp and adjacent Indels within 10 bp using a perl script vcfutils.pl package in the program BCFTOOLS [94]; (ii) the variations filtered using GATK with the ‘VariantFiltration’ module [93]; and (iii) by removing the variations, we performed subsequent pruning with missing genotype rates >20% or minor allele frequencies (MAF) <0.05 using the software PLINK [95].
Population genomic analysis
All genome re-sequencing reads from J. nigra accessions (~20× genomic coverage) were mapped to the J. nigra NWAFU168 reference genome assembly using BWA [94] with default parameters. We performed a NJ (neighbor-joining) phylogenetic tree of 74 individuals based on a total of 92 560 670 SNPs using software MEGA [96]. We performed genetic cluster analysis using Bayesian clustering software ADMIXTURE v1.30 [97], with the K value from 2 to 15 corresponded to the different numbers of genetic clusters. The K value was estimated using the lowest rate of change in cross-validation error [98]. Principal component analysis (PCA) was evaluated with EIGENSOFT v7.2.1 [99]. Demographic history and Ne (effective population size) were estimated using a PSMC (pairwise sequentially Markovian coalescence) model v0.6.4-r49 [5]. We estimated the changes of the effective population size over time for three black walnut species: J. nigra, J. microcarpa, and J. hindsii. The PSMC (pairwise sequentially Markovian coalescence) model v0.6.4-r49 [5] was used to determine the demographic history and effective population size. First, binary alignment map (.bam) was converted to the Fastq format using the SAMTOOLS and BCFTOOLS to create pseudo diploid heterozygous genomes [94]. Population size history was estimated using the PSMC package with the parameters –p ‘4 + 25 × 2 + 4 + 6’, in which the mutation rate was set to 2.09E-8 per site per year, and the generation time was set to 30 (years) [5].
Comparative genomics
To understand how the EBW genome evolved, we reconstructed the genomes of the walnut family (Juglandaceae) including Carya species [C. illinoinensis (pecan) and C. cathayensis)] [49], Chinese chestnut (C. mollissima) [50], Manchurian walnut (J. mandshurica) [41], Persian walnut [40], little walnut (J. microcarpa) [42], and Iron walnut (J. sigillata) [48]. We selected 17 species (A. thaliana, Carya cathayensis, C. illinoinensis, C. mollissima, J. mandshurica, J. microcarpa, J. regia, Juglans sigillata, Malus domestica, Olea europaea, Oryza sativa, Populus trichocarpa, Pistacia vera, Quercus robur, Sesamum indicum, Theobroma cacao, and V. vinifera) along with J. nigra to perform comparative genome analysis (for details of species information see Table S9, see online supplementary material). Gene families were selected for all-versus-all program BLASTP [90] with an E-value cutoff set to 1e−5. We identified gene families using the software OrthoMCL v.2.0.9 [100]. We then summarized the orthogroup gene families from OrthoMCL output using a custom Python script. We constructed a ML (maximum likelihood) phylogenetic tree using the program RAxML v8.2.12 [101] with a total of 2160 single-copy genes. Based on the gene family statistics, we calculated the expansion, contraction, and rapid evolution of gene family numbers using program CAFE [102]. Species divergence times were estimated using PAML v4.5 software and MCMCtree [103]. We drew Venn diagrams for five plant species (J. nigra, J. regia, J. microcarpa, C. mollissima, and Carya cathayensis) using InteractiVenn (http://www.interactivenn.net/). We performed the synteny analysis of our assembly J. nigra NWAFU168 reference genome and three Juglans species’ genomes (including J. regia [39], J. mandshurica [41], J. microcarya [42]), as well as C. illinoinensis [49], using the software MCScanX [89] and GenomeSyn [104]. We also compared our assembly J. nigra NWAFU168 reference genome and the previous J. nigra assemblies ‘Sparrow’ [31] and ASM291648 v2 [5] (Tables S3 and S4, see online supplementary material).
WGD events and synteny analyses
Both synteny and synonymous substitution rate (Ks) were used to investigate the timing of whole-genome duplication (WGD) events in the J. nigra genome assembly. We calculated the WGD events using software KaKs_Calculator v2.0 [105]. We applied the Ks values using comparisons of EBW (J. nigra), Persian walnut (J. regia), and V. vinifera. The Ks distributions of orthologues among J. nigra, J. regia, and J. mandshurica, and J. microcarpa, and between walnut genomes and V. vinifera and walnut genomes were determined using the ggplot2 package [106]. We identified synteny and collinear blocks of genes using MCScanX [89].
Identification of variation and synteny analysis between J. nigra, J. regia, and J. microcarpa
We identified the InDels (deletion and insertion) and structure variations (SVs) distinguishing J. nigra versus Persian walnut (J. regia), and EBW (J. nigra) versus J. microcarpa genome assemblies using the online Assemblytics analysis pipeline [107]. We aligned the J. nigra assembly as reference genome against the J. regia and J. microcarpa genomes using the software Mummer 4.0.0beta2 [108]. All-vs-all BLASTP [90] was performed between J. nigra versus Persian walnut (J. regia), and J. nigra versus J. microcarpa genome assemblies with an E-value cutoff setting of 1e−5, and synteny blocks containing at least five gene pairs were identified using MCScanX [89] with default parameters. The synteny of chromosome pairs of J. nigra versus J. regia, and J. nigra versus J. microcarpa was processed by MCScan [89].
Transcriptome sequencing and expression analysis.
In this study, we collected six tissues/organs for total RNA extraction and sequencing, i.e. leaves, female flowers, immature fruits, bark, twigs, and stems from a single J. nigra genotype NWAFU168 (Table S10, see online supplementary material). We also collected a total of 27 samples from three organs, including walnut husk, shell (developing endocarp), and embryo at three developmental stages 80 days after flowering (DAF), 111 DAF, and 140 DAF with three biological replications. Each of the replications was separately extracted (Table S10, see online supplementary material). All 33 samples (27 fruits plus six tissues) were processed using RNA Library Prep Kit (Beverly, MA, USA), and (paired-end) sequenced using Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform (Illumina, USA) (transcriptome samples details in Table S10, see online supplementary material). All the clean reads were then mapped to the J. nigra reference genome using Bowtie2 [109] with default parameters. The numbers of FPKM were used to calculate the gene expression levels [110]. We identified DEGs (differential expressed genes) using DESeq2 [111]. Heatmaps were visualized with the TBtools [91].
Genome-wide analysis of gene family
Based on the results from CAFE and the plant species’ resistance traits, we selected five rapidly evolving pathogenesis-related gene families, including pathogenesis-related gene (PR), PPR repeat (PPR), Glutamyl-tRNA amidotransferase, subunit A (GATA), cytochrome P450 (CYP450), and NBS-LRR, and identified their members of gene family in 18 species (A. thaliana, Carya cathayensis, C. illinoinensis, C. mollissima, J. nigra, J. mandshurica, J. microcarpa, J. regia, Juglans sigillata, M. domestica, O. europaea, O. sativa, P. trichocarpa, P. vera, Q. robur, S. indicum, T. cacao, and V. vinifera). The sequences of putative PR, PPR, GATA, CYP450, and NBS-LRR genes were used as queries in a BLASTP search against nine protein databases to identify candidate orthologs with parameters E-value <1e-5, identity≥50% and coverage≥50% [90]. We determined the protein domains in the candidate sequences using database of Pfam [83]. The locations of chromosome of NBS-LRR genes of J. nigra and J. regia were determined using TBtools software [94]. We analysed the NJ tree of the NBS-LRR members in EBW (J. nigra) and Persian walnut (J. regia) using MEGA software [96][96]. To detect the NBS-LRR126 members in J. nigra and J. regia, we downloaded a total of 20 PR126 members from NCBI (for details see Fig. S21, see online supplementary material) to construct a phylogenetic tree with MEGA [96]. We conducted the collinearity analysis of NBS-LRR genes using the software MCScanX [90]. We performed the prediction of cis-acting elements using PlantCARE [112] with the 2000 bp sequences upstream of the NBS-LRR genes.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32070372, 41471038, and 31800372), the Operating Services of Qinling National Forest Ecosystem Research Station financed by Ministry of Science and Technology of China, Natural Science Basis Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (2019JQ-641), Shaanxi Academy of Science Research Funding Project (2019 K-06), and Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Shaanxi Province (2023-JC-JQ-22). This work was also supported in part by the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Mention of a trademark, proprietary product, or vendor does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the US Department of Agriculture and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products or vendors that also may be suitable.
Author contributions
P.Z. and S.Z. conceived and designed the study. F.Y., F.H., and P.Z. collected the samples. F.H., H.Z., and F.Y. took the morphology picture and collected the transcriptome materials of black walnut. H.Z., F.Y., F.H., and P.Z. assembled the genome, and performed gene annotation, gene family, and expression profiles. H.Z., F.Y., M.Y., K.W., H.Y., P.Z., and S.Z. supported the software. F.Y., H.Z., and P.Z. performed the comparative genome analysis. H.Y., H.Z., F.H., and P.Z. performed the population genomic analysis, F.Y. and H.Z. performed the whole-genome duplication and LTRs analysis. H.Z. and P.Z. wrote the draft manuscript and then P.Z., K.W., and S.Z. edited and revised the English writing of this manuscript. All authors contributed to and approved the final manuscript.
Data availability
The whole genome sequence data including Illumina short reads, Nanopore long reads, Hi-C interaction reads, and transcriptome data have been deposited in the NCBI, under accession numbers: PRJNA801766 (SRR17842367 and SRR17841629). The Illumina whole-genome resequencing data of J. nigra in this study have been deposited in China National GeneBank (CNGB) Nucleotide Sequence Archive database under project accession number CNP0001209 (https://db.cngb.org/search/project/CNP0001209/). The transcriptome data of six tissues and organs (leaves, female flowers, immature fruits, mature fruits, bark, and young stem) and husk, shell, and embryo (three developmental stages) have been deposited in the NCBI, under accession numbers: PRJNA799697 (SRR17728328, SRR17728315, SRR17728293, SRR17727056, SRR17715789, SRR17714911, SRR17822893, SRR178417850, RR17817728, SRR17798583, SRR17794307, SRR17777323, SRR17775560, SRR17775247, and SRR17761587).
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Supplementary Data
Supplementary data is available at Horticulture Research online.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Huijuan Zhou, College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China; Key Laboratory of Resource Biology and Biotechnology in Western China, Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710069, China; Xi’an Botanical Garden of Shaanxi Province, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
Feng Yan, Key Laboratory of Resource Biology and Biotechnology in Western China, Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710069, China.
Fan Hao, College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China.
Hang Ye, Key Laboratory of Resource Biology and Biotechnology in Western China, Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710069, China.
Ming Yue, Key Laboratory of Resource Biology and Biotechnology in Western China, Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710069, China; Xi’an Botanical Garden of Shaanxi Province, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
Keith Woeste, USDA Forest Service Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center (HTIRC), Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, 715 West State Street, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47907, USA.
Peng Zhao, Key Laboratory of Resource Biology and Biotechnology in Western China, Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710069, China.
Shuoxin Zhang, College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China.
References
- 1. Aradhya MK, Potter D, Gao Fet al. Molecular phylogeny of Juglans (Juglandaceae): a biogeographic perspective. Tree Genet Genomes. 2007;3:363–78. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Woeste K, Burns R, Rhodes Oet al. Thirty polymorphic nuclear microsatellite loci from black walnut. J Hered. 2002;93:58–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Onofrio L, Hawley G, Leites LP. Ecological genetics of Juglans nigra: differences in early growth patterns of natural populations. Ecol Evol. 2021;11:7399–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Sloan JL, Salifu FK, Jacobs DF. Nitrogen recovery from enhanced efficiency fertilizers and urea in intensively managed black walnut (Juglans nigra) plantations. Forests. 2021;12:352. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bai WN, Yan PC, Zhang BWet al. Demographically idiosyncratic responses to climate change and rapid Pleistocene diversification of the walnut genus Juglans (Juglandaceae) revealed by whole-genome sequences. New Phytol. 2018;217:1726–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Zhao P, Zhang SX, Woeste K. Genotypic data changes family rank for growth and quality traits in a black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) progeny test. New Forest. 2013;44:357–68. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Zhao P, Zhou H, Coggeshall MVet al. Discrimination and assessment of black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) nut cultivars using phenology and microsatellite markers (SSR). Can J Plant Sci. 2018;98:616–27. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Dehon L, Macheix JJ, Durand M. Involvement of peroxidases in the formation of the brown coloration of heartwood in Juglans nigra. J Exp Bot. 2002;53:303–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Huang Z, Zhao P, Medina Jet al. Roles of JnRAP2.6-like from the transition zone of black walnut in hormone signaling. PLoS One. 2013;8:e75857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Celedon JM, Bohlmann J. An extended model of heartwood secondary metabolism informed by functional genomics. Tree Physiol. 2018;38:311–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Coggeshall MV. Black walnut: a nut crop for the midwestern United States. HortScience. 2011;46:340–2. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Câmara CRS, Schlegel V. A review on the potential human health benefits of the black walnut: a comparison with the English walnuts and other tree nuts. Int J Food Prop. 2016;19:2175–89. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Vu DC, Trang HD, Ho TL. An overview of phytochemicals and potential health-promoting properties of black walnut. RSC Adv. 2020;10:33378–88. [Google Scholar]
- 14. McCoy RM, Utturkar SM, Crook JWet al. The origin and biosynthesis of the naphthalenoid moiety of juglone in black walnut. Hortic Res. 2018;5:67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Pollegioni P, Olimpieri I, Woeste KEet al. Barriers to interspecific hybridization between Juglans nigra L. and J. regia L species. Tree Genet Genomes. 2013;9:291–305. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bernard A, Lheureux F, Dirlewanger E. Walnut: past and future of genetic improvement. Tree Genet Genomes. 2018;14:1. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Pollegioni P, Woeste K, Mugnozza GSet al. Retrospective identification of hybridogenic walnut plants by SSR fingerprinting and parentage analysis. Mol Breeding. 2009;24:321–35. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Thomas AL, Brauer DK, Sauer TJet al. Cultivar influences early rootstock and scion survival of grafted black walnut. J Am Pomol Soc. 2008;62:3–12. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Vitale S, Luongo L, Scarpari Met al. Sources of resistance to Phytophthora cinnamomi in Juglans spp. for potential rootstocks. HortScience. 2021;56:667–71. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Moricca S, Bracalini M, Benigno Aet al. Observations on the non-native thousand cankers disease of walnut in Europe's southernmost outbreak. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2020;23:e01159. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Polle A, Chen S. On the salty side of life: molecular, physiological and anatomical adaptation and acclimation of trees to extreme habitats. Plant Cell Environ. 2015;38:1794–816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Pollegioni P, Van der Linden G, Belisario Aet al. Mechanisms governing the responses to anthracnose pathogen in Juglans spp. J Biotechnol. 2012;159:251–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Chakraborty S, Britton M, Wegrzyn Jet al. YeATS-a tool suite for analyzing RNA-seq derived transcriptome identifies a highly transcribed putative extensin in heartwood/sapwood transition zone in black walnut. F1000Res. 2015;4:155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Mondragón-Palomino M, Meyers BC, Michelmore RWet al. Patterns of positive selection in the complete NBS-LRR gene family of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Res. 2002;12:1305–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Trouern-Trend A, Falk T, Zaman Set al. Comparative genomics of six Juglans species reveals disease-associated gene family contractions. Plant J. 2020;102:410–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Chakraborty S, Britton M, Martínez-García PJet al. Deep RNA-Seq profile reveals biodiversity, plant–microbe interactions and a large family of NBS-LRR resistance genes in walnut (Juglans regia) tissues. AMB Express. 2016;6:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Schneider SJ, Hwang AY, Land SDet al. Genetic diversity of ten black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) cultivars and construction of a mapping population. Tree Genet Genomes. 2019;15:1–10.30546292 [Google Scholar]
- 28. Rink G, Carroll ER, Kung FH. Estimation of Juglans nigra L. mating system parameters. For Sci. 1989;35:623–7. [Google Scholar]
- 29. Robichaud RL, Glaubitz JC, Rhodes OEet al. A robust set of black walnut microsatellites for parentage and clonal identification. New Forest. 2006;32:179–96. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Victory ER, Glaubitz JC, Rhodes OEet al. Genetic homogeneity in Juglans nigra (Juglandaceae) at nuclear microsatellites. Am J Bot. 2006;93:118–26. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Stevens KA, Woeste K, Chakraborty Set al. Genomic variation among and within six Juglans species. G3-Genes Genom Genet. 2018;8:2153–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Isacco B, Magel E, Abdel-Latif Aet al. Expression of genes encoding chalcone synthase, flavanone 3-hydroxylase and dihydroflavonol 4-reductase correlates with flavanol accumulation during heartwood formation in Juglans nigra. Tree Physiol. 2002;22:291–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Stevens ME, Woeste KE, Pijut PM. Localized gene expression changes during adventitious root formation in black walnut (Juglans nigra L.). Tree Physiol. 2018;38:877–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Lovell JT, Bentley NB, Bhattarai Get al. Four chromosome scale genomes and a pangenome annotation to accelerate pecan tree breeding. Nat Commun. 2021;12:4125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Wang Y, Xin H, Fan Pet al. The genome of Shanputao (Vitis amurensis) provides a new insight into cold tolerance of grapevine. Plant J. 2021;105:1495–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Rao G, Zhang J, Liu Xet al. De novo assembly of a new Olea europaea genome accession using nanopore sequencing. Hortic Res. 2021;8:64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Ji F, Ma Q, Zhang Wet al. A genome variation map provides insights into the genetics of walnut adaptation and agronomic traits. Genome Biol. 2021;22:300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Martínez-García PJ, Crepeau MW, Puiu Det al. The walnut (Juglans regia) genome sequence reveals diversity in genes coding for the biosynthesis of non-structural polyphenols. Plant J. 2016;87:507–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Marrano A, Britton M, Zaini PAet al. High-quality chromosome-scale assembly of the walnut (Juglans regia L.). Gigascience. 2020;9:giaa050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Zhang J, Zhang W, Ji Fet al. A high-quality walnut genome assembly reveals extensive gene expression divergences after whole-genome duplication. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18:1848–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Yan F, Xi RM, She RXet al. Improved de novo chromosome-level genome assembly of the vulnerable walnut tree Juglans mandshurica reveals gene family evolution and possible genome basis of resistance to lesion nematode. Mol Ecol Resour. 2021;21:2063–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Zhu T, Wang L, You FMet al. Sequencing a Juglans regia × J. microcarpa hybrid yields high-quality genome assemblies of parental species. Hortic Res. 2019;6:55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Zhang BW, Xu LL, Li Net al. Phylogenomics reveals an ancient hybrid origin of the Persian walnut. Mol Biol Evol. 2019;36:2451–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Nicolescu VN, Rédei K, Vor Tet al. A review of black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) ecology and management in Europe. Trees. 2020;34:1087–112. [Google Scholar]
- 45. Sitz RA, Luna EK, Ibarra Caballero Jet al. Eastern black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) originating from native range varies in their response to inoculation with Geosmithia morbida. Front For Glob Chang. 2021;4:627911. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Fang H, Liu X, Dong Yet al. Transcriptome and proteome analysis of walnut (Juglans regia L.) fruit in response to infection by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21:249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Feng S, Fang HC, Liu Xet al. Genome-wide identification and characterization of long non-coding RNAs conferring resistance to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in walnut (Juglans regia). BMC Genomics. 2021;22:15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Ning DL, Wu T, Xiao LJet al. Chromosomal-level assembly of Juglans sigillata genome using Nanopore, BioNano, and hi-C analysis. GigaScience. 2020;9:giaa006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Huang Y, Xiao L, Zhang Zet al. The genomes of pecan and Chinese hickory provide insights into Carya evolution and nut nutrition. GigaScience. 2019;8:giz036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Xing Y, Liu Y, Zhang Qet al. Hybrid de novo genome assembly of Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima). GigaScience. 2019;8:giz112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Urbach JM, Ausubel FM. The NBS-LRR architectures of plant R-proteins and metazoan NLRs evolved in independent events. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:1063–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Li X, Cai K, Zhang Qet al. The Manchurian walnut genome: insights into Juglone and lipid biosynthesis. Gigascience. 2020;11:giac057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Zhong Y, Yin H, Sargent DJet al. Species-specific duplications driving the recent expansion of NBS-LRR genes in five Rosaceae species. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Guo L, Winzer T, Yang Xet al. The opium poppy genome and morphinan production. Science. 2018;362:343–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Belisario A, Scotton M, Santori Aet al. Variability in the Italian population of Gnomonia leptostyla, homothallism and resistance of Juglans species to anthracnose. Forest Pathol. 2008;38:129–45. [Google Scholar]
- 56. Zhou R, Dong Y, Liu Xet al. JrWRKY21 interacts with JrPTI5L to activate the expression of JrPR5L for resistance to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in walnut. Plant J. 2022;111:1152–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. An H, Yang K. Resistance gene analogs inwalnut (Juglans regia) conferring resistance to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Euphytica. 2014;197:175-190. [Google Scholar]
- 58. Jiang N, Cui J, Shi Yet al. Tomato lncRNA23468 functions as a competing endogenous RNA to modulate NBS-LRR genes by decoying miR482b in the tomato-Phytophthora infestans interaction. Hortic Res. 2019;6:28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Montecchio L, Fanchin G, Simonato Met al. First record of thousand cankers disease fungal pathogen Geosmithia morbida and walnut twig beetle Pityophthorus juglandis on Juglans regia in Europe. Plant Dis. 2014;98:1445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Hadziabdic D, Vito LM, Windham MTet al. Genetic differentiation and spatial structure of Geosmithia morbida, the causal agent of thousand cankers disease in black walnut (Juglans nigra). Curr Genet. 2014;60:75–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Gazis R, Poplawski L, Klingeman Wet al. Mycobiota associated with insect galleries in walnut with thousand cankers disease reveals a potential natural enemy against Geosmithia morbida. Fungal Biol. 2018;122:241–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Ramasamy RK, Luo MC, Leslie CAet al. Co-located quantitative trait loci mediate resistance to Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Phytophthora cinnamomi, and P. pini in Juglans microcarpa × J. regia hybrids. Hortic Res. 2021;8:111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Huang R, Zhou Y, Zhang Jet al. Transcriptome analysis of walnut (Juglans regia L.) embryos reveals key developmental stages and genes involved in lipid biosynthesis and polyunsaturated fatty acid metabolism. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69:377–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Liu K, Zhao S, Wang Set al. Identification and analysis of the FAD gene family in walnuts (Juglans regia L.) based on transcriptome data. BMC Genomics. 2020;21:299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Chen Y, Chen Y, Shi Cet al. SOAPnuke: a MapReduce acceleration-supported software for integrated quality control and preprocessing of high-throughput sequencing data. Gigascience. 2018;7:1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin Ket al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017;27:722–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Chin CS, Peluso P, Sedlazeck FJet al. Phased diploid genome assembly with single-molecule real-time sequencing. Nat Methods. 2016;13:1050–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Burton JN, Adey A, Patwardhan RPet al. Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:1119–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Servant N, Varoquaux N, Lajoie BRet al. Hic-pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for hi-C data processing. Genome Biol. 2015;16:259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis Pet al. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. Genomics. 2013;1303:3997. [Google Scholar]
- 73. Wu TD, Watanabe CK. GMAP: a genomic mapping and alignment program for mRNA and EST sequences. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:1859–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol Iet al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19:1639–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Stanke M, Keller O, Gunduz Iet al. AUGUSTUS: Ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:W435–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Slater GSC, Birney E. Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005;6:31–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Holt C, Yandell M. MAKER2: an annotation pipeline and genome-database management tool for second-generation genome projects. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Bairoch A, Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:45–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Maglott DR. NCBI reference sequence (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:D501–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:27–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Zdobnov E, Apweiler R. InterProScan. An integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:847–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JAet al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Finn RD, Tate J, Mistry Jet al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D281–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Bao W, Kojima KK, Kohany O. Repbase update, a database of repetitive elements in eukaryotic genomes. Mob DNA. 2015;6:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Tarailo-Graovac M, Chen N. Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2009;25:10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:573–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Edgar RC, Myers EW. PILER: identification and classification of genomic repeats. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:i152–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Ellinghaus D, Kurtz S, Willhoeft U. LTRharvest, an efficient and flexible software for de novo detection of LTR retrotransposons. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Wang Y, Tang H, DeBarry JDet al. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:e49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan Vet al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Quinlan AR. BEDTools: the Swiss-Army tool for genome feature analysis. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2014;47:1–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Yet al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020;13:1194–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks Eet al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker Aet al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown Ket al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:559–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li Met al. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Alexander DH, Novembre J, Lange K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 2009;19:1655–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Montana G, Clive JH. Statistical software for gene mapping by admixture linkage disequilibrium. Brief Bioinformatics. 2007;8:393–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Patterson N, Price AL, Reich D. Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet. 2006;2:e190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Enright AJ, Van Dongen S, Ouzounis CA. An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:1575–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and postanalysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Bie DT, Cristianini N, Demuth JPet al. CAFE: a computational tool for the study of gene family evolution. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:1269–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Yang ZH. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1586–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Zhou Z-W, Yu Z-G, Huang X-M. GenomeSyn: a bioinformatics tool for visualizing genome synteny and structural variations. J Genet Genomics. 2022;22:00104–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Wang D, Zhang Y, Zhang Zet al. KaKs_Calculator 2.0: a toolkit incorporating gamma-series methods and sliding window strategies. Genom Proteom Bioinf. 2010;8:77–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Kaori I, Murphy D. Application of ggplot2 to Pharmacometric Graphics. CPT: Pharmacomet Syst. 2013;2:e79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Nattestad M, Schatz MC. Assemblytics: a web analytics tool for the detection of variants from an assembly. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:3021–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Marçais G, Delcher AL, Phillippy AMet al. MUMmer4: a fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Compu Biol. 2018;14:e1005944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea Get al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:511–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression of RNA-seq data at the gene level – the DESeq package. Mol Biol. 2012;11:e1005944. [Google Scholar]
- 112. Lescot M, Déhais P, Thijs Get al. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:325–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The whole genome sequence data including Illumina short reads, Nanopore long reads, Hi-C interaction reads, and transcriptome data have been deposited in the NCBI, under accession numbers: PRJNA801766 (SRR17842367 and SRR17841629). The Illumina whole-genome resequencing data of J. nigra in this study have been deposited in China National GeneBank (CNGB) Nucleotide Sequence Archive database under project accession number CNP0001209 (https://db.cngb.org/search/project/CNP0001209/). The transcriptome data of six tissues and organs (leaves, female flowers, immature fruits, mature fruits, bark, and young stem) and husk, shell, and embryo (three developmental stages) have been deposited in the NCBI, under accession numbers: PRJNA799697 (SRR17728328, SRR17728315, SRR17728293, SRR17727056, SRR17715789, SRR17714911, SRR17822893, SRR178417850, RR17817728, SRR17798583, SRR17794307, SRR17777323, SRR17775560, SRR17775247, and SRR17761587).






