Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0273761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273761

Understanding actions and challenges in protecting older people during covid-19 pandemic in indonesia: A qualitative study with female caregivers

Gregorius Abanit Asa 1,2,*, Nelsensius Klau Fauk 1,3, Melkianus Ratu 4, Elsa Dent 1, Paul Russell Ward 1
Editor: Farooq Ahmed5
PMCID: PMC10032487  PMID: 36947503

Abstract

COVID-19 has rapidly impacted societies on a global scale, with older people among the most affected. To care for older people living in their own homes, female family caregivers play a pivotal role. The current study aimed to explore the actions of female family caregivers and the challenges they faced in taking care of older people living at homes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Belu district, Indonesia. This qualitative study involved twenty female family caregivers, who were recruited using a combination of purposive and snowball sampling techniques. Findings were grouped into two main categories: (i) actions of female family caregivers in taking care of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. These included limiting both visitations of extended family members and older adults’ activities outside homes; explaining the virus to older adults and controlling their access to news, social media and smartphones; providing nutrition, supplement and maintaining daily diets; and (ii) challenges they faced in taking care of older adults included excessive fear of contracting COVID-19 and possibility of transmitting it to older people; feeling stressed; tired and overburdened. The study highlights the significant role family caregivers played to protect older people living at home. The findings can inform government to develop intervention programs that address and support the needs of both family caregivers and older people living at home.

Introduction

COVID-19 has rapidly impacted the health and wellbeing of older people around the world. Older people, particularly those with chronic medical conditions, are reported to have the highest vulnerability to infections and fatalities from COVID-19 disease [13]. Evidence from the US shows that 75% of death cases due to COVID-19 occurred in adults aged over 65 [4], which is in line with evidence from Italy where more than 80% of death-related COVID-19 came from people over 70 years old [5]. Similarly, in those above 60 years old in China, the mortality rate was 80% [6].

To care for older people, especially those living in their own homes during the COVID-19 pandemic, family caregivers have been the frontline workers [7]. They care for and protect older people with vulnerable health conditions such as age-related issues, chronic diseases, disability and mental health problems [8]. They are the invisible workforce of the health system [7]. While providing care for older adults at home, family caregivers concurrently face substantial pressure to also protect themselves from COVID-19 and prevent the transmission to older people they are caring for, which in turn can lead to various mental health issues among them [7, 9]. Previous studies in Spain, Italy and the United Kingdom showed that family caregivers for older adults with chronic illness experienced stress and anxiety during the COVID-10 outbreak [10, 11]. Family caregivers also face increased pressure in terms of personal, health and social care for older adults and other family members leading to negatively influencing their physical and psychological wellbeing [9, 11, 12]. Unlike caregivers in nursing homes, family caregivers work every day without appropriate COVID-related training, job descriptions or personal protective equipment (other than possibly face masks, which may not be appropriate or fitted well), which has been reported to add more burden to their daily responsibilities for other household chores during the COVID-19 pandemic [7]. As a consequence, family caregivers often feel overburdened, with a concern that some older adults living in their homes reported receiving less care and attention compared to those living in nursing homes [13].

Although family caregivers play important roles in care provision for older adults within families, to our knowledge there has been very limited evidence on family caregivers’ actions and challenges they face in caring for older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in resource-limited settings. Previous studies have mainly focused on understanding healthcare providers’ perceptions and experiences of barriers to the provision of care and treatment for older people or older patients in nursing homes or healthcare facilities in developed countries [1417]. This study aims to fill the gap by exploring what female family caregivers did and the challenges they faced in caring for older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in Belu district, Indonesia. In many settings in developing countries, including Belu district, Indonesia, women (mothers, daughters, and daughters-in-law) have the responsibility to care for household chores, parents and other family members (children and husband) [1822]. Understanding the roles of and challenges faced by female family caregivers can be useful in developing targeted interventions to address their needs and support them in the provision of care and protection for older people, especially in the current situation of COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, the role of carers in Belu district is of fundamental importance, given that there are no nursing homes to assist in the care of the older population.

Method

The study used consolidated for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) to guide the report of the methods section of this study [23]. The COREQ checklist contains 32 required items (Fig 1) for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies especially interviews and focus groups.

Fig 1. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ): 32-item checklist.

Fig 1

Study setting

The study was conducted in Belu district, East Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia in February and March 2022. The district has a total population of 204,541 people that are distributed in 12 sub-districts [24]. The district shares the border with East Timor Country and has one public hospital known as MGR Gabriel Manek Hospital where patients with COVID-19 were quarantined, one army hospital, and two private hospitals known as Catholic Marianum hospital and Sitohusada Hospital. All the hospitals in study setting did not have specific services for older people during COVID-19 pandemic. Older people in the study setting are cared for predominantly by female family members, especially their daughters, in their private homes. This role is influenced by cultural values putting expectation for women within the family to look after their parents.

In regards to the COVID-19 pandemic, as of 12th July, 2022 the current data show that there have been 6,112,986 confirmed COVID-19 cases in Indonesia. Of the total number, 5,935,845 people have fully recovered, 156,798 people died and 20,343 people are being treated [25, 26]. In East Nusa Tenggara, where Belu district is located, the current data as of 12th July 2022 report a total of 94,018 confirmed cases, of which 92,431 people have fully recovered, 1,524 people died and 63 people are being treated [25]. Belu is reported as one of the districts in East Nusa Tenggara province with high number of COVID-19 cases, accounting 536 [27] although it is a small district. Belu is selected because of small size, familiarity, and potential of undertaking the current study.

Data collection

Data were collected using in-depth interviews: face-to-face using masks and via telephone and zoom. Participants were recruited using a combination of purposive and snowball sampling techniques. The process started when field researchers Gregorius Abanit Asa, MID and Melkianus Ratu, MHID (a nurse in the study setting) contacted several nurses who worked in a public hospital in the study setting and asked for help to disseminate the study information sheets to potential participants who accessed healthcare services at the hospital for older people they cared for. The nurses distributed the study information by posting it on the information board and WhatsApp groups. Potential participants who contacted the field researchers and confirmed to participate were recruited for an interview, which was conducted at a participant-researcher mutually agreed upon time. The initial participants who had been interviewed were also asked to disseminate the information to their eligible friends or colleagues or families who might be willing to take part in the study. The recruitment of the participants and interviews stopped when the research team felt that the data were rich enough to explain the topic being studied and there was an indication of data saturation as no new issues emerged from interviews with the last few participants [27]. Finally, 20 caregivers were interviewed. The inclusion criteria included (1) female family caregivers caring for an older person during the pandemic and (2) over 18 years old. All older adults they cared for were either their biological mother and/or father. Field notes were also taken during the interviews and integrated into each transcript during the transcription process. Only the researcher and participant were present in the interview room. The interviews were carried out in Indonesian, the primary language of the interviewers and participants. To protect the confidentiality of the participants, anonymity was ensured by using a letter and a number for each participant instead of their personal identifying detail. No participant required to withdraw or dropped out from the interview. The interviews were guided by several predetermined main questions and probing questions were developed during the interview [28]. Some examples of the main questions are “What actions did you take to protect older people or parents during COVID-19 pandemic? What challenges have you experienced when protecting older people during COVID-19 pandemic? What is your experience about older people’s adherence to the actions taken to protect them from COVID-19? (S1 File). The decision about the questions was made through the process of formulation, discussion, and revision. Each participant was offered to correct or comment the transcription of the recording, but none asked to do so.

Data analysis

Data were digitally recorded and transcribed. Content of the interview, emerging themes, coding and analysis were initially discussed by two of the authors (GAA and NKF) and further discussed and refined by the remaining authors (MR, ED and PW). Analysis was conducted in Bahasa Indonesia before the quotes used in this manuscript were translated into English (by GA and NKF) to minimize the risk of losing semantic meaning. The translated quotes were then checked for clarity by other authors (PW and ED). Software package NVivo 12 was utilized for organizing data analysis. Analysis was guided by the five steps of qualitative data analysis introduced in Ritchie and Spencer’s framework approach [29, 30]. The first was familiarization with data involving an iterative process of reading the transcripts, marking ideas and then making comments to search for meanings and patterns of ideas related to actions and challenges experienced by female family caregivers. The second stage was the identification of a thematic framework by writing down key points and concepts to identify themes. The third stage was indexing data by coding each transcript using the framework and analyzing codes to look for similar or redundant codes. Similar codes referring to the same theme were grouped together to reach a few overarching themes and sub-themes. The fourth step was creating a chart for themes and sub-themes by arranging indexed data related to the thematic framework. The fifth step was mapping and interpreting data as a whole.

Ethical consideration

The study obtained the ethics approval from Health Research Ethics Committee, Duta Wacana Christian University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia (No. 1380/C.16/FK/2022). Each participant was informed about the aim of the study and there would be no consequences if they withdraw from the study without giving any reason. All participant signed and returned a written informed consent form via e-mail or WhatsApp a few days before the interviews. Each interview took 30–50 minutes and was recorded with the consent of the participants. Identification letter and number (e.g. R1, R2) was used for confidentiality purposes.

Inclusivity in global research

Additional information regarding the ethical, cultural, and scientific considerations specific to inclusivity in global research can be found in the S2 File.

Results

A total of 20 female family caregivers were included in the study. Of the 20 carers, 11 cared for one parent, and 9 cared for two parents. The mean age of carers and their older parents was 35.8 years and 67.3 years respectively. The details of the sociodemographic of participants and parents they cared for is presented in Table 1.

Table 1. The sociodemographic profile of both female carers and their older parents receiving their care.

Female Caregivers
Respondent No. Age, years Education Occupation Number of older people cared for Age of F (Father) and M (Mother)
R1 34 Senior high school Cleaner 2 F = 65
M = 62
R2 36 Senior high school Unemployment 1 M = 68
R3 33 Junior high school Sales 1 F = 71
R4 39 Diploma Nurse 2 F = 80
M = 76
R5 39 Undergraduate Secretary 1 M = 72
R6 32 Senior high school Entrepreneur (own a stall) 1 M = 75
R7 36 Senior high school Admin 1 M = 65
R8 29 Undergraduate Nurse 2 F = 67
M = 61
R9 35 Diploma Teacher 1 M = 64
R10 31 Senior high school Entrepreneur (own a stall) 1 M = 66
R11 38 Diploma Nurse 1 M = 69
R12 30 Senior high school Admin 1 M = 71
R13 33 Diploma Nurse 2 F = 70
M = 66
R14 36 Undergraduate Nurse 2 F = 68
M = 63
R15 34 Elementary school Unemployment 1 F = 65
R16 41 Junior high school Entrepreneur (own a stall) 1 M = 67
R17 43 Diploma Early childhood teacher 2 F = 69
M = 64
R18 37 Undergraduate Unemployment 2 F = 71
M = 63
R19 42 Diploma Nurse 2 F = 65
M = 64
R20 37 Senior high school Sales 2 F = 64
M = 62

Actions taken by female family caregivers in caring for older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic

Limiting both visitations of extended families and older adults’ activities outside homes

The high level of vulnerability of older adults to COVID-19 transmission and its possible fatal consequences on their health and life required female caregivers to create strict rules to protect them from contracting the infection. One of the strict rules was the visitation limitation of all extended family members to meet older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants described they informed siblings and other family members not to visit their parents (older adults), and suggested them just drop items in front of the family house. These strict rules seemed to stem from their awareness of the possibility of COVID-19 transmission to older adults through extended family members, as reflected in the following narratives:

“We have a big family and we used to gather together in this home before the COVID-19 pandemic. We can spontaneously gather without any plan before. They just came home. You know, when the first COVID-19 case was detected in this district, I messaged my uncles, aunties and grandchildren to not visit our home as our mother was already old and sick. I am aware of the high possibility of COVID transmission to our mother through family members who come to see her” (R10: 31 years old entrepreneur).

“Usually, my sister stopped by our house to drop food or fruits almost every morning to our parents when she was on the way to work. But everything changed since we had COVID-19 cases in the district. I asked her to just drop the food in front of the door and not go into the house to meet our mother or father in their room” (R19: 42 years old nurse).

Another strict action taken by female caregivers to protect older adults from COVID-19 transmission was limiting their activities outside the house. This included limiting their involvement in activities within the community and not allowing them to visit neighbors or go to market for grocery shopping. Participants also reported that they were happy as their parents complied with their suggestions or instructions, however, they were not sure about the feelings or emotional state experienced by older adults during that period or due to restrictions imposed on them. The following narratives illustrated these assertations:

“I was really strict with my mother and band her from going outside the house. I had to do that because my mother was still independent although she was in her 70s. The good news was that she listened to me because I am the one who lives with her and helps her every single day but to be honest, I did not know how she felt. I didn’t ask her and she did not say anything to me either” (R12: 32 years old admin).

“My mother wanted to go to the market during COVID-19. She said she would wear masks and wash her hands. However, I did not want. I told her that my other siblings and I didn’t agree. Practically, I banned her from going outside our house. Probably she did not like it…” (R5: 39 years old secretary).

Explaining about the virus to older adults and controlling news, social media and smartphones

Knowledge about COVID-19 infection and its negative impact such as death was another factor that underpinned action taken by female caregivers to protect their older adults from the infection. Participants reported repeatedly explaining and reminding older adults about adherence to COVID-19 protocols such as washing hands, wearing facemasks, avoiding crowded places and social distancing. These were done with the expectation that such knowledge or information could help older adults comply with or perform preventive behaviors as described in the following quotes:

“I told my mother and father that the virus is very dangerous and could cause death immediately in particular for older people like them. You know, I had to repeat the same sentences every day because they might forget what I said before. I also told and explained almost every day about the importance of washing hands, wearing masks, keeping physical distance and so on to protect them and all of us in the family” (R8: 29 years old nurse).

“I told to my mother that COVID-19 spreads very quickly from one person to another and we don’t know who the carrier of the virus is. The carrier could be my brother, my sister, her grandchildren and could be myself. My mother understood that but I had to say that several times in a day” (R14: 36 years old nurse).

Several participants reported that they controlled the news their parents could watch and read. For example, some did not want their parents to watch too much news about COVID-19 and switched TV channels to dramas. Not allowing older adults to have smart-phones through which they may access COVID-19-related information that could cause fear, stress or anxiety to them was another action undertaken by the caregivers to protect the older adults they cared for:

“I used to control the TV program my parents watched. I did not want them to watch too much news on COVID-19 and the toll death due to the virus. Sometimes they watched the news about COVID-19 but not that often. I always chose the channel that had a lot of drama” (R13: 33 years old nurse).

“My parents had old mobile phones that they could use only for texting and calling. I did not want them to have smart-phones that have WhatsApp application and internet connections. This prevented them from following or updating circulated news through WhatsApp or other applications or accessing information about COVID-19 cases or the number of people who died from COVID-19. If they followed the news from social media, they might be more stressed with negative news such as death toll and the increased number of COVID-19 cases” (R17: 43 years old teacher).

Providing nutrition, supplement and keeping daily diets

Female caregivers were also aware of the importance of a nutritious food supply to support the immune system against infection. Such an awareness was put into practice through the provision of nutritious food for older adults to help them support their body immune and help them stay healthy. The provision of nutritious foods for older adults was considered necessary because older adults spent more time at home and lacked physical activities as illustrated in the quotes below:

“Before COVID-19 exists, I never thought of providing regular supplements or fruits to my mother and father. But now, I thought I needed to provide for them. Maybe not every day, but at least once every three days to support their immune system” (R4: 39 years old nurse).

“Parents did not walk a lot during COVID-19, lack of exercise. They spent all day at home. This caused their immune system to decrease. Therefore, it is important to support them with healthy food, with supplements. I gave them supplements almost every day” (R19: 42 years old nurse).

Although the provision of nutritious food was considered important for older adults, most participants acknowledged that they did not have extra money to buy fruits or supplements every day for their parents (older adults). As a consequence, some participants described that they did not regularly provide nutritious food for parents during the pandemic. Difficult financial condition which seemed to be stemming from unemployment and lack of income was the main reason for the unaffordability of nutritious food for older adults they cared for:

“Sometimes I gave my parents vitamin C which I got from the pharmacy. To be honest, vitamins, fruits, and other supplements were not cheap. I could not give them every day. If they had symptoms then I would provide them” (R20: 37 years old sales).

“I knew it was suggested on TV and news about nutritious foods. However, I only prepared their normal food every day. You know, nutritional food and supplements were not cheap. To be honest, we did not have extra money to buy different food (nutritional food) and supplements. We already struggle with daily needs. I just protected them (parents) to not getting infected with the virus. I am just a housewife and do not have a paid job or income” (R1: 34 years old cleaner).

Challenges faced by female family caregivers in providing care and protection for older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic

Excessive fear of contracting COVID and the possibility of transmitting it to older people

Excessive fear among female caregivers due to the awareness of the high possibility of contracting COVID-19 infection, passing it to older adults and experiencing its negative impact on themselves and the older adults they cared for was a major challenge facing them. The perceived challenging situation that would be faced by older adults if participants had to be in quarantine due to contracting the infection was also another supporting factor for such fear. Similarly, continuous news and information about the length of survival of the coronavirus up to several days on the surface of metal and plastic supported such fear the caregivers felt:

“The biggest challenge for me was if I got infected with the virus and I could pass it to my mother and father who had comorbidities. Or if my parents were lucky (tested negative) and I had to be in quarantine for several days, I did not know who would help them” (R4: 39 years old nurse).

“Every day I was just at my small stall because this is my small business. I felt a bit safe here. However, I might get infected by the virus because according to the news the virus could survive several days on the surface of plastics and metal. You know, most pieces of stuff in my stall were covered by plastics. If I was COVID-19 positive, then the others my home might be positive and this scared me” (R16: 41 years old entrepreneur).

Some participants also reported the same fear of contracting COVID-19 infection due to their big role in their families, including taking care of older adults and other household chores. Thus, a diagnosis of COVID-19 in them was considered to add the burden to themselves and the older adults they cared for:

“My responsibility at home is not only caring for my mother. I had to do other chores such as cooking, cleaning and shopping. Imagine if I got infected. It’s would be harder for my mother and me” (R10: 31 years old entrepreneur).

Feeling stressed

Feeling stressed was another challenge female caregivers faced while being responsible for caring for and protecting their older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was supported by several reasons, including older people’s doubt about the existence and severity of the impact of COVID-19 and the number of COVID-19-related death cases. Similarly, they disbelieved in the deaths of healthy people several days after contracting the virus. Some female caregivers acknowledge that such doubt had an implication on the behaviors of some older adults reflected in their underestimation of health protocols and involvement in communal activities with other people as described in the quotes below:

“I sometimes feel stressed looking after my father during the COVID-19 pandemic as he does not believe that the virus spreads quickly and causes death instantly. He once said it is impossible that those who looked healthy then died several days after contracting the virus. My father believes that this is only media propaganda” (R1: 34 years old nurse).

“I was a bit stressed as he (my father) was brave enough to go out of our house and gather with his friends engaging in cockfighting gambling. This activity was done secretly and a lot of males were there. When I asked him not to do that activity during the pandemic, he replied that all people in the cockfighting arena were healthy and no need to be worried” (R8: 29 years old nurse).

Feeling stressed facing female caregivers was also facilitated by older people’s attitude to only listen to instructions coming from certain children at home. In this study, parents tended to only listen to the oldest son and oldest daughter leading some female family caregivers to a difficult situation to control parents (older adults) when they were not at home. The following statements describe such challenging experiences:

“My mother was a very active woman when she was young. So, it was quite challenging to prevent her from going outside the house. If she noticed no one watched or supervised her at home, she could easily go to the market or visit neighbors. She also sometimes did not listen to my youngest sister. So, to control her activities, I asked my sister to text or call me if my mother sneaked out from home” (R5: 39 years old secretary).

“Sometimes I found it difficult with my mother because she tended to only listen to my oldest brother. So, after I banned her not to go outside the house, I told her that my oldest brother will come if she did not listen to me” (R12: 30 years old admin).

Feeling tired and overburdened

Caring for older adults, during the COVID-19 pandemic, imposed a significant burden on female caregivers. Most participants acknowledged feeling tired and overburdened during the COVID-19 pandemic due to extra tasks and responsibilities. For example, in addition to work, they had to wipe almost all the surfaces of the stuff in their houses and monitored the movement of their parents and controlled people who visited them in the house. Stories of a few participants illustrate such action:

“Prior to this pandemic I just went to work and did not think too much about my parents because they are still active and independent. But now, you know, it’s totally different. I have to make sure the house and surrounding are clean. I wipe all pieces of stuff covered by plastics in my small stall every day and I make sure the house is clean. So, now I have more work. I feel tired but I have to do that” (R19: 42 years old nurse).

“Monitoring parents who remained active and independent is not easy because they do not want to be controlled or monitored. If I do not monitor them, they might go to market or engage with neighbors. In addition to thinking about my work, I also have to control people who visit our home, making sure they wash their hands before they enter the house, wear masks, and keep physical distance from my parents. Of course, I have too much work but I cannot complain because all this for our safety” (R4: 39 years old nurse).

Discussion

In the present study, we explored the actions of female family caregivers and the challenges they faced in taking care of and protecting older people from COVID-19 in Belu district, Indonesia. Our study suggests that female family caregivers were aware of the severe impacts of COVID-19, and knowledgeable about the older population as a vulnerable group affected by the disease with high fatalities. This knowledge was reflected in a range of actions undertaken to limit interactions of older adults with extended family members, neighbors and other community members to prevent their exposure to COVID-19, which are congruent with COVID-19 preventive protocols [31, 32] and previous findings reported elsewhere [33, 34]. The actions of the female caregivers seem to also reflect the social behavior theory suggesting that infection may determine behaviors of individuals or communities and alter or reduce social connectivity to prevent transmission [3537]. Our findings also show the perceived importance of COVID-19-related health and social media literacy for older adults, which led to carer provision of the necessary information about COVID-19 and the control of social media and smart-phones use among older people. A possible explanation for such actions was the perceived lack of critical thinking among older adults to analyze the overload COVID-19-related news or information which could, in turn, result in negative consequences to their emotional states such as anxiety, worry, stress, depression and sadness, as reported in previous studies [3841].

The study also suggests a dilemmatic situation facing the caregivers with regards to the importance of a healthy diet for older adults to boost their body immune system during the COVID-19 pandemic and their difficult financial condition. Their knowledge or understanding of the importance of a healthy diet or good nutritional status for older people is consistent with the reports of previous studies [4244], however, the findings indicate that the caregivers’ economic or financial hardships prevented the translation of the knowledge into practices. The findings supported previous studies which have reported that COVID-19 exacerbates the already existing financial stress, and has led many people including older adults to precarious situations in regard to food security [44] and the inability to afford a healthy diet [45, 46].

In line with previous findings [9, 10, 47, 48], the current findings suggest that female family caregivers experienced challenges in caring for and protecting older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Such challenges were manifested in mental health issues such as over fear, stress, and feeling tired and overburdened. The thoughts about the possibility of being infected, quarantined, and transmitting to older people was reported as the major perceived contributing factors for such fear among the caregivers. Such excessive fear seemed also to be supported by news about characteristics of the virus survival on the surface of certain materials [49]. This characteristic was reported to increase the workload for family caregivers, with the additional chore of needing to frequently clean commonly touched surfaces around the household–a finding consistent with previous studies [50, 51]. Furthermore, the findings showed that the caregivers faced psychological distress due to the older adults’ skepticism of COVID-19 and its severe impact. This skepticism then translated into behavior and practice as evidenced by non-adherence to health protocols, which has also been found in previous research [52].

Similarly, female family caregivers felt tired and overburdened as a result of having extra responsibilities for monitoring older adults’ movements and controlling people who visited their homes. This burden could have likely been exacerbated by the absence of any paid domestic workers during COVID-19 lockdown periods. Furthermore, in many parts of Asia, it is a common expectation by older adults that their children will look after them when they are older–pressure to do so may have contributed to some of the mental health issues felt by the female caregivers in our study. For instance, several recent studies have highlighted the link between caregiver burden and the level of care that children are obliged to provide for their older parents–this is true across all cultures, particularly in Asian countries [5355]. Future research should focus on direct population-wide strategies to reduce the caregiver burden for those looking after their older relatives, including the promotion of less gendered caregiving and the utilization of non-family caregivers, such as paid assistance [55]. An additional strategy to potentially alleviate carer burden is to involve older adults in their own for, including asking what their preferences are. For example, recent research from Australia showed that when an older adult participated in their own healthcare, trust and report with their carer was strengthened [56].

Of important note, the average age of the older adults in our study receiving the care was 67.3 years; the average lifespan in Indonesia is currently 69.4 years for males, and 73.3 years for females [57]. Moreover, life expectancy has experienced unprecedented growth over the last four decades in Indonesia, with life expectancy at 60 years growing from 13.74 years to 18.28 years during this time [58]. As life expectancy continues to rise globally in both high- and low-middle income countries, it will become increasingly important in the future to alleviate the pressure from already overburdened female caregivers, who will need to provide many additional years of care for their older relatives. Thus, it is urgent to devise public health strategies to assist in the dignified care of older adults.

Study limitations and strengths

There are several limitations of the study. First, researchers could not see visual cues or expressions of the participants when conducting the telephone interview. Second, the study only explored the perspectives of female family caregivers and did not explore the view of other family members, who may have provided different stories regarding their actions and challenges facing them in taking care of and protecting older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Third, female caregivers may not have disclosed all information to the male field researchers. Fourth, it is not known how many caregivers in our study usually had additional part-time or full-time paid domestic workers providing care for their older parents before the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, the study was carried out in only one district reflecting the unique conditions of participants in the study setting, and may not be generalizable to other settings. The strength of the study is that it is first investigation of the roles of and challenges faced by female family caregivers of older adults in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, our findings have important implications for the government to allocate resources that can support families with older adults, especially during the challenging situation of COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion

The study presents female family caregivers’ actions and challenges they experienced in taking care of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. The actions were limiting both visitations of extended families and older adults’ activities outside homes; explaining the virus to older adults and controlling news, social media and smartphones; providing nutrition, supplement and maintaining daily diets. Female family caregivers also experienced challenges reflected in over fear of being infected and infecting older adults, feeling stressed, tired and overburdened. The study enhances our understanding of how family caregivers play crucial roles to the best of their ability at the invisible level of the health system to protect older adults at home. The results of the study can contribute to developing intervention programs such as providing food support and nutritional supplements for female family caregivers and older people living at home in poor or limited resource settings. The results of the study can contribute to developing intervention programs that address and support the needs of both female family caregivers and older people living at home in poor or limited resource settings. Large-scale studies to understand the dynamic within families taking of older adults in their private homes in Indonesia are recommended as their findings can better inform policy and practice.

Supporting information

S1 File. Interview guide.

(DOCX)

S2 File. Inclusivity in global research.

(DOCX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Arthur-Holmes F, Agyemang-Duah W. Reaching older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic through social networks and Social Security Schemes in Ghana: Lessons for considerations. Journal of gerontological social work. 2020;63(6–7):699–701. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2020.1764689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shahid Z, Kalayanamitra R, McClafferty B, Kepko D, Ramgobin D, Patel R, et al. COVID‐19 and older adults: what we know. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2020;68(5):926–9. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mueller AL, McNamara MS, Sinclair DA. Why does COVID-19 disproportionately affect older people? Aging (albany NY). 2020;12(10):9959. doi: 10.18632/aging.103344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Elderly people make up 75% of COVID-19 deaths. Many more have died from isolation [Internet]. npr. 2022 [cited 24 April 2022]. Available from: https://www.npr.org/2022/02/19/1081948849/elderly-people-make-up-75-of-covid-19-deaths-partially-due-to-loneliness.
  • 5.De Leo D, Trabucchi M. COVID-19 and the fears of Italian senior citizens. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(10):3572. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103572 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Team E. The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19)—China, 2020. China CDC Weekly. 2020;2(8):113. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Phillips D, Paul G, Fahy M, Dowling-Hetherington L, Kroll T, Moloney B, et al. The invisible workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic: Family carers at the frontline. HRB Open Research. 2020;3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rahimi T, Dastyar N, Rafati F. Experiences of family caregivers of patients with COVID-19. BMC family practice. 2021;22(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chiu MY, Leung CL, Li BK, Yeung D, Lo T. Family caregiving during the COVID-19 pandemic: factors associated with anxiety and depression of carers for community-dwelling older adults in Hong Kong. BMC geriatrics. 2022;22(1):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Makaroun LK, Bachrach RL, Rosland A-M. Elder abuse in the time of COVID-19—Increased risks for older adults and their caregivers. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2020;28(8):876–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.05.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gallagher S, Wetherell MA. Risk of depression in family caregivers: Unintended consequence of COVID-19. BJPsych open. 2020;6(6). doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.99 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lovell B, Wetherell MA. The cost of caregiving: endocrine and immune implications in elderly and non elderly caregivers. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2011;35(6):1342–52. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Most seniors who died of Covid-19 lived outside nursing homes [Internet]. CNN. 2021 [cited 24 April 2022]. Available from: https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/05/health/seniors-covid-19-deaths-partner/index.html.
  • 14.Bianchetti A, Bellelli G, Guerini F, Marengoni A, Padovani A, Rozzini R, et al. Improving the care of older patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020;32(9):1883–8. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01641-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gray-Miceli D, Rogowski J, de Cordova PB, Boltz M. A framework for delivering nursing care to older adults with COVID-19 in nursing homes. Public Health Nursing. 2021;38(4):610–26. doi: 10.1111/phn.12885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Prendki V, Tiseo G, Falcone M. Caring for older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2022;28(6):785–91. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.02.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Montayre J, Wang D. Aged care nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: Protecting older people, Australia. Australia: International Council of Nurses. Available at: https://www.icn.ch/news/aged-care-nurses-during-covid-19-pandemic-protecting-older-people-australia. (Accessed on 14 June 2022); 2021.
  • 18.Bartley SJ, Blanton PW, Gilliard JL. Husbands and wives in dual-earner marriages: Decision-making, gender role attitudes, division of household labor, and equity. Marriage & Family Review. 2005;37(4):69–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Asa GA, Fauk NK, Mwanri L, Ward PR. Understanding Barriers to the Access to Healthcare and Rehabilitation Services: A Qualitative Study with Mothers or Female Caregivers of Children with a Disability in Indonesia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18(21):11546. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Simulja J, Wulandari EH, Wulansari SA. Gender inequality and the division of household labor: A comparative study of middle-class, working married men and women in Japan and Indonesia. Hubs-Asia. 2014;10(1):109–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Claffey ST, Mickelson KD. Division of household labor and distress: The role of perceived fairness for employed mothers. Sex roles. 2009;60(11):819–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sanchez L. Women’s power and the gendered division of domestic labor in the third world. Gender & Society. 1993;7(3):434–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tong A, Sainbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.BPS. Kabupaten Belu dalam angka 2015 [Available from: https://belukab.bps.go.id/].
  • 25.Data Perkembangan Covid-19 di Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia.: antaranews.com; 2022. [Available from: https://www.antaranews.com/covid-19]. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Worldometer. Covid-19 Coronavirus pandemic 2022 [Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/].
  • 27.Dworkin SL. Sample Size Policy for Qualitative Studies Using In-Depth Interviews. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41:1319–20. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dumay J, Sandy QQ. The qualitative research interview QRAM. 2011;8(3):238–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: London: Routledge; 1994. p. 173–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fauk NK, Ward PR, Hawke K, Mwanri L. Cultural and religious determinants of HIV transmission: A qualitative study with people living with HIV in Belu and Yogyakarta, Indonesia. PLoS One. 2021;16(11):e0257906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.World Heath Organization. Older people & COVID-19. 2020. Contract No.: 15 June.
  • 32.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Surveillance of COVID-19 at longterm care facilities in the EU/EEA ECDC; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Coronavirus and COVID-19: Caregiving for the Elderly [Internet]. Johns Hopkins Medicine. 2021. Available from: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/coronavirus-caregiving-for-the-elderly.
  • 34.Jawaid A. Protecting older adults during social distancing. Science. 2020;368(6487):145. doi: 10.1126/science.abb7885 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Oraby T, Vasilyeva O, Krewski D, Lutscher F. Modeling seasonal behavior changes and disease transmission with application to chronic wasting disease. Journal of theoretical biology. 2014;340:50–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lopes PC, Block P, König B. Infection-induced behavioural changes reduce connectivity and the potential for disease spread in wild mice contact networks. Scientific reports. 2016;6(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fauk NK, Seran AL, Raymond C, Merry MS, Tahir R, Asa GA, et al. Why Do We Not Follow Lifesaving Rules? Factors Affecting Nonadherence to COVID-19 Prevention Guidelines in Indonesia: Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(14):8502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Scopelliti M, Pacilli MG, Aquino A. TV news and COVID-19: Media influence on healthy behavior in public spaces. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2021;18(4):1879. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chao M, Xue D, Liu T, Yang H, Hall BJ. Media use and acute psychological outcomes during COVID-19 outbreak in China. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2020;74:102248. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bendau A, Petzold MB, Pyrkosch L, Mascarell Maricic L, Betzler F, Rogoll J, et al. Associations between COVID-19 related media consumption and symptoms of anxiety, depression and COVID-19 related fear in the general population in Germany. European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience. 2021;271(2):283–91. doi: 10.1007/s00406-020-01171-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Liu C, Liu Y. Media exposure and anxiety during COVID-19: The mediation effect of media vicarious traumatization. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020;17(13):4720. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Calder PC, Carr AC, Gombart AF, Eggersdorfer M. Optimal nutritional status for a well-functioning immune system is an important factor to protect against viral infections. Nutrients. 2020;12(4):1181. doi: 10.3390/nu12041181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Calder PC. Nutrition and immunity: lessons for COVID-19. Nutrition & Diabetes. 2021;11(1):1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wolfson JA, Leung CW, Kullgren JT, editors. Food as a critical social determinant of health among older adults during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. JAMA Health Forum; 2020: American Medical Association. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Laborde D, Herforth A, Headey D, de Pee S. COVID-19 pandemic leads to greater depth of unaffordability of healthy and nutrient-adequate diets in low-and middle-income countries. Nature Food. 2021;2(7):473–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Herforth A, Bai Y, Venkat A, Mahrt K, Ebel A, Masters WA. Cost and affordability of healthy diets across and within countries: Background paper for The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020. FAO Agricultural Development Economics Technical Study No. 9: Food & Agriculture Org.; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Irani E, Niyomyart A, Hickman RL Jr. Family caregivers’ experiences and changes in caregiving tasks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical nursing research. 2021;30(7):1088–97. doi: 10.1177/10547738211014211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Park SS. Caregivers’ mental health and somatic symptoms during COVID-19. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. 2021;76(4):e235–e40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Casanova LM, Jeon S, Rutala WA, Weber DJ, Sobsey MD. Effects of air temperature and relative humidity on coronavirus survival on surfaces. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2010;76(9):2712–7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02291-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Morley JE, Vellas B. COVID-19 and older adult. Springer; 2020. p. 364–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Belingheri M, Paladino ME, Riva MA. COVID-19: Health prevention and control in non-healthcare settings. Oxford University Press UK; 2020. p. 82–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Daoust J-F. Elderly people and responses to COVID-19 in 27 Countries. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0235590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pan Y, Chen R, Yang D. The relationship between filial piety and caregiver burden among adult children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Geriatric Nursing. 2022;43:113–23. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.10.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Liu Y, Hughes MC, Roberto KA, Savla J. Physical and mental health of family caregivers of older parents and grandchildren in China. Aging and Health Research. 2022;2(1):100052. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Setiyani R, Windsor C. Filial piety: From the perspective of Indonesian young adults. Nurse Media Journal of Nursing. 2019;9(1):46–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ogrin R, Meyer C, Appannah A, McMillan S, Browning C. The inter-relationship of diversity principles for the enhanced participation of older people in their care: a qualitative study. International journal for equity in health. 2020;19(1):1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-1124-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.World Health Rankings. Indonesia: life expectancy USA2022 [Available from: https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/indonesia-life-expectancy].
  • 58.Indonesia—Life expectancy at age 60 years for both sexes combined [Internet]. Knoema. 2020 [cited 24 July 2022]. Available from: https://knoema.com/atlas/Indonesia/topics/Demographics/Age/Life-expectancy-at-age-60-years.

Decision Letter 0

Farooq Ahmed

30 Jan 2023

PONE-D-22-22781UNDERSTANDING ACTIONS TAKEN BY FEMALE FAMILY CAREGIVERS AND CHALLENGES THEY FACED IN CARING FOR OLDER PEOPLE DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN BELU DISTRICT, INDONESIA: A QUALITATIVE STUDYPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Asa,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 16 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Farooq Ahmed, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf

and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

If you are reporting a retrospective study of medical records or archived samples, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

3. Please include a complete copy of PLOS’ questionnaire on inclusivity in global research in your revised manuscript. Our policy for research in this area aims to improve transparency in the reporting of research performed outside of researchers’ own country or community. The policy applies to researchers who have travelled to a different country to conduct research, research with Indigenous populations or their lands, and research on cultural artefacts. The questionnaire can also be requested at the journal’s discretion for any other submissions, even if these conditions are not met.  Please find more information on the policy and a link to download a blank copy of the questionnaire here: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/best-practices-in-research-reporting. Please upload a completed version of your questionnaire as Supporting Information when you resubmit your manuscript.

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dear authors,

Thanks for the opportunity to review this paper. This paper presents very important findings about older people who are vulnerable to COVID-19 infection and can inform policy and programs to support this population.

Overall, the manuscript is well-written. All parts have been explained very well by the authors. The gap in knowledge is identified, which justifies the study. I have a few suggestions that hopefully help the authors for further improvement of their manuscript.

1. They need to add a brief explanation or justification about why they chose to conduct the study in Belu.

2. Data saturation: there seems to be a repetition of information about data saturation as it is mentioned in two places.

3. Did face-to-face interviews follow COVID-19 prevention protocols? If yes, please make it clear in the methods section.

4. There is a supplementary file of COREQ checklist but you haven’t mentioned it in the text, please report it stating that you follow the guideline and why.

Reviewer #2: The study explores challenges faced by female caregivers in protecting older adult family members during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings are very interesting and relevant and can be considered for publication.

Some comments to be considered by the authors:

I am wondering whether the authors can provide further explanation about why they included only female caregivers. The authors stated, “Older people in the study setting are cared for predominantly by female family members, especially their daughters, in their private homes”. Does it have something to do with culture or religion? Or something else? Also, it would be good to justify the selection of the study setting.

Do the hospitals or healthcare facilities in the study setting have specific services for older people during the COVID-19 pandemic?

It would be helpful for the readers if the authors can provide some examples of the main research questions used to explore the topic.

What are the implications of your findings for the health department or the government in the study setting? The authors mentioned intervention programs to support both female caregivers and older people. Can you propose any appropriate intervention programs that may have been implemented in other settings? Food support, nutritional supplement support, etc….

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0273761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273761.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


6 Feb 2023

Response to Reviewers

Dear Editor,

Thank you very much for considering our manuscript " UNDERSTANDING ACTIONS TAKEN BY FEMALE FAMILY CAREGIVERS AND CHALLENGES THEY FACED IN CARING FOR OLDER PEOPLE DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN BELU DISTRICT, INDONESIA: A QUALITATIVE STUDY" to be published in POLOS ONE Journal. Herewith we submit the revised version of our paper.

On behalf of all authors,

Sincerely,

Gregorius Abanit Asa

RESPONSE TO THE JOURNAL

Comment

Please ensure that you refer to Table 1 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

Response

Table 1 has been referred in the text (in the result section prior to the table)

Comment

Please upload a copy of Figure 1 which you refer to in your text. Or if the figure is no longer to be included as part of the submission please remove all reference to it within the text.

Response

The copy of Figure 1 has been uploaded.

Comment

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Response

The manuscript follows the PLOS ONE’s style requirements.

Comment

Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed).

Response

The study obtained the ethics approval from Health Research Ethics Committee, Duta Wacana Christian University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia (No. 1380/C.16/FK/2022). Each participant was informed about the aim of the study and there would be no consequences if they withdraw from the study without giving any reason. All participant signed and returned a written informed consent form via e-mail or WhatsApp a few days before the interviews. Each interview took 30-50 minutes and was recorded with the consent of the participants. Identification letter and number (e.g. R1, R2) was used for confidentiality purposes.

Comment

Please include a complete copy of PLOS’ questionnaire on inclusivity in global research in your revised manuscript. Our policy for research in this area aims to improve transparency in the reporting of research performed outside of researchers’ own country or community. The policy applies to researchers who have travelled to a different country to conduct research, research with Indigenous populations or their lands, and research on cultural artefacts. The questionnaire can also be requested at the journal’s discretion for any other submissions, even if these conditions are not met. Please find more information on the policy and a link to download a blank copy of the questionnaire here: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/best-practices-in-research-reporting. Please upload a completed version of your questionnaire as Supporting Information when you resubmit your manuscript.

Response

Inclusivity in global research form has been filled (see supporting Information file)

RESPONSE TO REVIEWERS

REVIEWER 1

Comment

They need to add a brief explanation or justification about why they choose to conduct the study in Belu.

Response

Belu is reported as one of the districts in East Nusa Tenggara province with high number of COVID-19 cases, accounting 536 although it is a small district. Belu is selected because of small size, familiarity, and potential of undertaking the current study.

Comment

Data saturation: there seems to be a repetition of information about data saturation as it is mentioned in two places.

Response

This sentence “The recruitment stopped when the authors felt the data saturation had been achieved” is removed because it is a repetition.

Comment

Did face-to-face interviews follow COVID-19 prevention protocols? If yes, please make it clear in the methods section.

Response

Data were collected using in-depth interviews: face-to-face using masks and via telephone and zoom.

Comment

There is a supplementary file of COREQ checklist but you haven’t mentioned it in the text, please report it stating that you follow the guideline and why.

Comment

The study used consolidated for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) to guide the report of the methods section of this study. The COREQ checklist contains 32 required items (Fig.1) for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies especially interviews and focus groups.

REVIEWER 2

Comment

I am wondering whether the authors can provide further explanation about why they included only female caregivers. The authors stated, “Older people in the study setting are cared for predominantly by female family members, especially their daughters, in their private homes”. Does it have something to do with culture or religion? Or something else? Also, it would be good to justify the selection of the study setting.

Response

Older people in the study setting are cared for predominantly by female family members, especially their daughters, in their private homes. This role is influenced by cultural values putting expectation to women within the family to look after their parents.

Comment

Do the hospital or healthcare facilities in the study setting have specific services for older people during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Response

All the hospitals in study setting did not have specific services for older people during COVID-19 pandemic.

Comment

It would be helpful for the readers if the authors can provide some examples of the main research questions used to explore the topic.

Response

The interviews were guided by several predetermined main questions and probing questions were developed during the interview. Some examples of the main questions are “What actions did you take to protect older people or parents during COVID-19 pandemic? What challenges have you experienced when protecting older people during COVID-19 pandemic? What is your experience about older people’s adherence to the actions taken to protect them from COVID-19? The decision about the questions was made through the process of formulation, discussion, and revision.

Comment

What are the implications of your findings for the health department or the government in the study setting? The authors mentioned intervention programs to support both female caregivers and older people. Can you propose any appropriate intervention programs that may have been implemented in other settings? Food support, nutritional supplement support, etc….

Response

The results of the study can contribute to developing intervention programs such as providing food support and nutritional supplements for female family caregivers and older people living at home in poor or limited resource settings.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Farooq Ahmed

6 Mar 2023

UNDERSTANDING ACTIONS TAKEN BY FEMALE FAMILY CAREGIVERS AND CHALLENGES THEY FACED IN CARING FOR OLDER PEOPLE DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN BELU DISTRICT, INDONESIA: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

PONE-D-22-22781R1

Dear Dr. Gregorius Abanit Asa,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Farooq Ahmed, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Acceptance letter

Farooq Ahmed

9 Mar 2023

PONE-D-22-22781R1

UNDERSTANDING ACTIONS AND CHALLENGES IN PROTECTING OLDER PEOPLE DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN INDONESIA: A QUALITATIVE STUDY WITH FEMALE CAREGIVERS

Dear Dr. Asa:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Farooq Ahmed

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Interview guide.

    (DOCX)

    S2 File. Inclusivity in global research.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES