In the published article, there were errors in Figures 1, 3 as published. In Figure 1C, the southernmost area should be Longyan. It was mistakenly marked as Nanping. In Figure 3F, the column diagram of T16 for root under +Mg treatment should be filled with blue color. It was mistakenly filled with gray. The corrected Figures 1, 3 and their captions appear below.
Figure 1.
Map representing the geographic distribution of tobacco. (A) major flue-cured tobacco producing areas; (B, C) average temperature during the months of January and February.
Figure 3.
Effect of Mg application on concentration of minerals nutrients under different temperature in tobacco plant. (A) shoot-C content and root-C content; (B) shoot-N content and root-N content; (C) shoot-K content and root-K content; (D) shoot-P content and root-P content; (E) shoot-Mg concentration and root-Mg concentration; (F) shoot-Mg content and root-Mg content. The different letters above the bars are indicating significant difference (Duncan P < 0.05).
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.