Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2023 Mar 23;17(3):e0011168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011168

Chronic Salmonella Typhi carriage at sites other than the gallbladder

Seth A Hoffman 1,2,¤, Michael J Sikorski 1,3,4, Myron M Levine 1,2,4,5,*
Editor: Joseph M Vinetz6
PMCID: PMC10035749  PMID: 36952437

Abstract

Typhoid fever caused by infection with Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serotype Typhi (S. Typhi), an important public health problem in many low- and middle-income countries, is transmitted by ingestion of water or food contaminated by feces or urine from individuals with acute or chronic S. Typhi infection. Most chronic S. Typhi carriers (shedding for ≥12 months) harbor infection in their gallbladder wherein preexisting pathologies, particularly cholelithiasis, provide an environment that fosters persistence. Much less appreciated is the existence of non-gallbladder hepatobiliary chronic S. Typhi carriers and urinary carriers. The former includes parasitic liver flukes as a chronic carriage risk factor. Chronic urinary carriers typically have pathology of their urinary tract, with or without renal or bladder stones. Even as the prevalence of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant S. Typhi strains is rising, global implementation of highly effective typhoid vaccines is increasing. There is also renewed interest in identifying, monitoring, and (where possible) treating chronic carriers who comprise the long-term reservoir of S. Typhi.

Introduction

Typhoid fever, the human host-restricted infection caused by Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serotype Typhi (S. Typhi), remains a cardinal health burden for residents of many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) who lack potable water and improved sanitation. Residents of high-income countries (HICs) mainly acquire typhoid fever by travel to typhoid-endemic LMICs and occasionally by transmission from chronic carriers residing in HICs (including immigrants from typhoid-endemic countries). During acute typhoid infection, S. Typhi that are shed in the feces and urine of the infected individual may lead to transmission to proximal contacts (“short cycle transmission”) via contamination of food during preparation or handling by temporary or chronic carriers with improper hygiene practices [13]; “long cycle transmission” mainly ensues via consumption of water sources contaminated with human feces or by crops irrigated with untreated sewage [4,5].

In the pathogenesis of acute S. Typhi infection, ingested bacilli that survive gastric transit translocate from the lumen of the small intestine (mainly via M cells overlying gut-associated lymphoid tissue) to reach the mucosal lamina propria [6], enter the lymphatic drainage system, and access the blood circulation via the thoracic duct [7,8]. During this primary bacteremia [9], when typhoid bacilli are filtered from the circulation by mononuclear phagocytic cells of the spleen, liver, and bone marrow [7,8], they also reach the gallbladder hematogenously at that point or shortly thereafter by infected hepatic bile entering the gallbladder [7]. After an incubation period of approximately 8 to 14 days, the acute stage of clinical illness commences, characterized by a low-level secondary bacteremia [10,11]. Bile and bile-containing duodenal fluid yield S. Typhi at this stage, with the latter providing a useful clinical specimen for diagnostic purposes [12]. Early investigators reported that clinical specimens besides blood and stool can also serve to isolate S. Typhi from patients with acute typhoid fever including bile, urine, and skin snips of the evanescent rose spots [13]. Decades later, bone marrow, if obtainable, was ultimately confirmed as the gold standard clinical specimen [14].

Soon after the initial report of isolation of typhoid bacilli in the pre-antibiotic era [15], studies revealed that patients with acute typhoid and convalescents excrete the pathogen in their stools, and some contacts of typhoid cases shed the pathogen asymptomatically [16]. To control typhoid in endemic areas of Southwest Germany, Robert Koch established “Bacteriological Stations” to identify the source of infection (typhoid fever cases) and to render them innocuous by disinfecting their excreta [17]. Koch’s teams looked for unhygienic conditions during household visits (e.g., human feces used for fertilizer, unkempt privies) and repeatedly examined stools and urine of convalescents to determine when they ceased shedding typhoid bacilli, to reduce the risk of them transmitting the disease [17]. Less compliant cases were sent to a hospital to isolate them until their stool excretion ceased, while more compliant patients were followed in their domiciles [17]. Investigators in other countries followed Koch’s example and undertook to monitor the duration of S. Typhi excretion in stools by convalescents (reviewed by Ledingham and Arkwright) [18]. They found that a small percentage (2% to 5%) of individuals excrete typhoid bacilli for more than one year and persist in excreting for decades thereafter (Table 1) [1820]. Most chronic stool excretors had gallbladder disease and the female:male ratio was approximately 2:1 to 4:1 (Table 1) [10,18,19]. It became recognized that chronic urinary carriers also exist [18,21], as reported by investigators who performed repetitive cultures of convalescents’ urine over time (Table 1) [13,18,22]. Urinary carriers can also shed S. Typhi for many years or decades (Table 1) [13,18,19,2327].

Table 1. Comparison of reported and unknown features of biliary versus urinary carriers.

Biliary tract carriers Urinary tract carriers
Main anatomic sites of carriage Gallbladder [19] Kidney [19,2327,53]
Peak age Middle-age adults [50,53,64] Potentially second to fourth decades. Paucity of primary data to support an answer, based on pre-antibiotic era data [27]
Female:male ratio Female > male [19,50,53,64] Equal [19]
Clinical specimens tested to detect and monitor carriers Bile and stool cultures [12,13] Urine [13,21,23]
Typhoidal serovars reported S. Typhi > S. Paratyphi A or B [50,64] Paucity of primary data to support an answer
Level of excretion (colony forming units [CFU]/ml or CFU/gm) 106 to 1010 [64,65] Paucity of primary data to support an answer
Approximate % of acute carriers in the pre-antibiotic era who became chronic carriers 2%–5% of adult cases [1820] Paucity of primary data to support an answer
Duration of carriage from pre-antibiotic or early antibiotic eras 2–5 decades [1820] 5–37 years [13,18,19,2327]
Known predispositions Prior gallstones [19] Ureteral abnormalities; renal abscess; chronic cystitis;
kidney stones, bladder stones [13,18,19,2327]
Evidence of biofilm on recovered stones Yes [50,52] Paucity of primary data to support an answer
Associated with very high titers of serum Vi antibody Yes [66,67] Paucity of primary data to support an answer
Eradicable with antibiotics if strain is susceptible Approximately 80% success [36] Paucity of primary data to support an answer
Success of surgical intervention Approximately 70%–80% cure with cholecystectomy alone [58,59,63,6870] If isolated to a single kidney, >95% cure with unilateral nephrectomy [2427,71,72]
Role of point-of-care-ultrasound as an adjunct to screening for chronic carriers May be helpful [73] Paucity of primary data to support an answer

Prior to 1948, there was no specific treatment for typhoid fever and the case fatality rate was 10% to 20% [28,29]. Woodward and colleagues made a historic breakthrough when in 1948 they reported that chloramphenicol could markedly curtail the course of typhoid fever and convert a potentially fatal infection into a relatively short febrile illness [30]; however, 10% to 30% of cases treated with chloramphenicol experienced relapses of milder clinical typhoid that required another course of treatment [31]. From 1950 to 1971, when oral chloramphenicol was used worldwide and S. Typhi were almost universally susceptible, this antibiotic dropped the case fatality rate to approximately 1% and became a therapeutic intervention that controlled typhoid mortality globally. However, despite its efficacy in ameliorating the duration and severity of clinical typhoid, reducing complications, and diminishing case fatality, chloramphenicol did not prevent chronic carriage [29], nor could it terminate the chronic carrier state [31].

Following large epidemics of chloramphenicol-resistant typhoid fever in Latin America and Southeast Asia in the 1970s due to S. Typhi carrying an R factor plasmid encoding resistance genes [32], newer oral antibiotics shown to be efficacious in treating chloramphenicol-resistant infections, including trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and amoxicillin, became the new drugs of choice [3234]. These new effective oral antibiotics did not prevent or reliably treat the carrier state [35]. In small clinical trials conducted in the late 1980s, oral fluoroquinolone antibiotics showed promising efficacy in curing the chronic carrier state [36,37]; one study reported a chronic carrier cure rate of 92% with a 28-day regimen of ciprofloxacin [36]. Since around 1990, S. Typhi circulating in South Asia, where most of the global burden of typhoid fever exists, has become multidrug resistant (MDR), and since 2016 extensively drug-resistant (XDR) S. Typhi strains have emerged and spread; the XDR strains offer few practical options for treatment [38,39].

The diminishing ability to treat typhoid in endemic areas and among travelers has renewed interest in controlling typhoid fever morbidity and mortality burden worldwide by preventing disease with vaccines, including World Health Organization–prequalified Vi conjugate vaccines, as well as water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) improvements. The most widely studied licensed Vi conjugate vaccine consists of S. Typhi Vi polysaccharide linked to tetanus toxoid as the carrier protein (Typbar TCV, Bharat Biotech) [40], which has been evaluated in post-licensure effectiveness trials in Nepal [41], Malawi [42], and Bangladesh [43]. Mass immunizations to assess the impact of administration of a single dose of this vaccine to control endemic and epidemic typhoid have been carried out in Pakistan [44], India [45], Zimbabwe [46], and Samoa [47]. Results from these extensive field assessments support widespread use of Vi conjugate vaccines in typhoid-endemic areas. Should the typhoid disease burden markedly decrease in previously hyperendemic areas following high levels of vaccination coverage (and possible herd effects), one upshot will be an increased interest in identifying and monitoring the chronic carriers within the population who will constitute the long-term reservoir of infection [4851]. Some carriers may be amenable to treatment if their isolates are fluroquinolone-susceptible [36]. Other carriers will die off within the population over several decades, once amplified transmission has been reliably interrupted [48,50,51]. This evolving global epidemiologic situation has reawakened interest in the various types of chronic S. Typhi carriers that constitute the long-term reservoir.

Since the classic physiological niche for chronic S. Typhi infection is the gallbladder, most modern studies have understandably focused on biliary carriers, the role of cholelithiasis, and S. Typhi’s ability to create biofilms on gallstones [50,52]. The prevalence of chronic S. Typhi carriers in endemic populations parallels the prevalence of cholelithiasis and chronic gallbladder disease [50,53]. Thus, chronic carriage is several-fold higher in females than males, and in older adults (>40 years of age) than younger adults and teenagers (Table 1) [50,53].

This review focuses on the less appreciated, less frequent chronic S. Typhi carriers who harbor foci of infection outside the gallbladder, including the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts and the urinary tract. Herein, we review chronic carriage in these other anatomic sites. Although much information presented is also relevant to S. Paratyphi A and B infections, we have limited our scope to S. Typhi as the main new specific intervention becoming available, Vi conjugate vaccines, applies only to prevention and control of typhoid fever.

Methods

In assembling a database of literature to draw upon for this review, the following MeSH search terms were utilized: typhoid, persistent infection, coinfection, trematode infection, clonorchiasis, fascioliasis, opisthorchiasis, schistosomiasis, parasitic diseases, biliary tract disease, cholelithiasis, choledocholithiasis, pyelonephritis, nephrolithiasis, urolithiasis, and/or urinary tract infection. This primary database was cleaned to exclude literature without reference to S. Typhi. This secondary set of articles were then individually evaluated to see if their own references suggested yet uncompiled articles, including articles written in German, French, Spanish, Hindi, Japanese, and Chinese. Additional location of articles was performed via internet search of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health; the Health Sciences and Human Services Library, University of Maryland; Lane Medical Library, Stanford University; Cornell University Library; and HathiTrust Digital Library. Any unevaluated articles were added to the secondary database. All these were subsequently evaluated for their pertinence as primary literature regarding chronic S. Typhi carriage and any association with chronic S. Typhi carriage outside the gallbladder (chronic non-gallbladder hepatobiliary S. Typhi carriers, chronic urinary S. Typhi carriers, and chronic S. Typhi carriage associated with a parasitic coinfection). Articles were excluded if they did not represent primary literature or the information discussed did not provide primary information. However, any articles that referenced data presented whereby the primary article was unable to be produced was included.

Chronic S. Typhi carriage outside the gallbladder

There exist two categories of chronic S. Typhi carriers who are of special interest. These include chronic carriers who continue to shed S. Typhi in stool, despite undergoing cholecystectomy (Fig 1A), and chronic carriers who persistently shed S. Typhi in their urine rather than in their stools (Table 1) [13,18,19,2123,26,31,49,5463]. In both instances, the literature suggests a structural/inflammatory abnormality (e.g., gallstone, Fig 1A; or kidney stone, bladder stone, Fig 1B) versus the presence of a coinfection that provides a nidus for chronic carriage (Fig 1C). These “atypical” chronic carriers of S. Typhi also serve as long-term reservoirs of infection in the population who, when circumstances allow, transmit the infection to susceptible persons (Fig 1). These unusual varieties of chronic carriers must also be taken into account as programs are initiated to control typhoid fever and even to eliminate transmission in circumscribed populations within defined time periods.

Fig 1. Anatomic locations and coinfections associated with chronic Salmonella Typhi carriage.

Fig 1

Image credit: Lohitha Kethu, 2023.

Chronic non-gallbladder hepatobiliary carriers

Given S. Typhi’s association with bile and gallstones, multiple authors have proposed that there may exist sites of chronic S. Typhi infection along the hepatobiliary tract in the absence of gallbladder infection per se. Cholecystectomy has been used to treat chronic typhoid carriers since at least 1907 [68], with a cure rate of approximately 70% to 80% [58,59,63,6870]. In the pre-antibiotic era, when cholecystectomy was the only effective therapeutic option for terminating chronic excretion of S. Typhi by gallbladder carriers [19,22,68,69], various writers described instances in which S. Typhi was persistently cultured from the bile or stool of patients without gallbladders [19,49]. Within the antibiotic era, Woodward and colleagues (1950) described a carrier who underwent cholecystectomy and prolonged chloramphenicol treatment without cure [31], and Tynes and colleagues (1962) reported their failure to eradicate the chronic S. Typhi carrier state using combined cholecystectomy and antimicrobials available at the time [58]. Of note, these attempts were prior to the introduction of more effective antimicrobial regimens to treat chronic carriers (if the strains were susceptible) [33,36]. It was presumed that the nidus of chronic infection in such cases resided in areas of scarring or inflammation along the hepatobiliary tract [58,70].

Concomitant liver fluke infection

Chronic infection with the liver fluke Clonorchis sinensis may predispose to chronic hepatobiliary S. Typhi carriage [61]. Clonorchiasis is associated with cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, and cholangitis [74], all of which may alter the anatomy of the hepatobiliary tract and possibly promote the S. Typhi chronic carrier state. The global prevalence of chronic clonorchiasis, predominantly East Asia and South East Asia, overlies areas of the world heavily affected by typhoid [75,76]. Thus, persons with chronic C. sinensis infection may be at increased risk for becoming a chronic S. Typhi carrier following acute S. Typhi infection. Theoretically, infection with other liver flukes, such as Fasciola spp. or Opisthorchis spp., might also predispose to chronic S. Typhi carriage since, like C. sinensis, they are also associated with chronic hepatobiliary inflammation. However, this has not been conclusively demonstrated [74]. Future work is needed to elucidate these potential coinfection relationships, which may be relevant for control of typhoid fever and elimination campaigns in certain geographic regions where those liver flukes infections are prevalent.

Potential modern approaches for diagnosis and treatment

Modern procedures like magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) may theoretically allow the identification of structural abnormalities that are promoting conditions favorable for establishment of a chronic carrier state and may allow repair of those anatomic predispositions (e.g., hepatolithiasis, choledocholithiasis, sites of obstruction amenable to intervention). To our knowledge, there have been no reports of the use of these new technologies with respect to chronic S. Typhi carriers. More importantly, these procedures are limited by lack of availability in many typhoid-endemic LMIC settings. However, they are available in HICs such as the USA, where approximately 20% of the 300 to 400 annual cases of typhoid fever represent indigenous transmission and >50% of outbreaks are linked to a chronic carrier in the home or one who handled food [77].

Chronic urinary carriers

In the late 19th and early to mid-20th centuries, many reports described patients with chronic urinary excretion of S. Typhi, in some cases with detectable bacteria in their urine for many years [21,23,24,26,27,49,5457,60,72]. Progression to a chronic urinary carrier state is usually associated with a lesion or focus of inflammation in the kidney or urine collecting system (e.g., renal or bladder stone). Supporting this hypothesis, multiple case reports describe or indicate cessation of the carrier state following nephrectomy of a diseased kidney [2427,71,72] or treatment of a diseased bladder with “urinary antiseptics” (i.e., oral urotropin, sometimes combined with other agents, such as boric acid) [55]; in the early 20th century, cystoscopy was already being utilized to diagnose and plan these nephrectomies for cure, and United States Army Soldiers could be court martialed for refusing surgical intervention in the setting of the chronic S. Typhi carrier state [72]. These findings indicate an interesting possibility: Just as S. Typhi is able to develop a chronic carrier state on or within gallstones and other centers of inflammation along the hepatobiliary tract, typhoid bacilli might do the same on or within kidney stones and along the urinary tract. Since certain other bacteria form biofilms on kidney stones, research should pursue whether S. Typhi also can [78]. Of note, early works suggest there is no sex-based difference in cases of chronic urinary carriers [19] (Table 1), as compared to the greater frequency of female versus male chronic gallbladder carriers [19,50,53].

Typhoid–Schistosoma urinary tract coinfection

Hsiao and colleagues (2016) reviewed in detail the literature supporting a putative symbiotic interplay between certain Salmonella enterica serovars (Typhi, Paratyphi A, B and rarely C, and Typhimurium) and human schistosomiasis [79]. Most common was S. Typhi and S. haematobium coinfection [79]. The pathological and immunomodulatory consequences of chronic schistosomiasis favor the progression of S. Typhi infection to the chronic carrier state in a putatively symbiotic association between the two pathogens.

Further investigation into whether Schistosoma species other than S. haematobium may predispose to a chronic S. Typhi carrier state is warranted.

The importance of chronic carriers

In areas of low transmission of S. Typhi, both observational and mathematical modeling data demonstrate the role of asymptomatic chronic carriers in maintaining a reservoir for typhoid endemicity (via short-cycle transmission), until these chronic carriers ultimately die out from the population [50,51]. In planning large-scale interventions for typhoid control, including possible elimination in circumscribed populations [47], chronic carriers must be taken into account. Unfortunately, the diagnostic screening tests utilized, heretofore, to identify possible chronic carriers are suboptimally sensitive and specific, and none are point-of-care [52].

Efforts to control and perhaps even eliminate typhoid must take into account the role of different types of chronic S. Typhi carriers in maintaining typhoid endemicity and difficulties treating carriage due to drug-resistant S. Typhi [38,39]. Particular emphasis has been placed on the paucity of data and clinical understanding of chronic urinary carriers. To this end, historical and contemporary typhoid vaccine challenge models did monitor stool cultures but did not include urine culture in standard practice [80]. This review aims to sensitize clinicians, epidemiologists, modelers, and public health practitioners to the role of chronic S. Typhi carriers in maintaining a long-term reservoir of infection in communities and to the various types of carriers that exist beyond the classic gallbladder carrier.

Key Learning Points

  • Whereas most chronic infection with Salmonella Typhi resides within the gallbladder, other locations of chronic infection also exist including the urinary tract and the biliary tree absent the gallbladder.

  • Contemporary data on chronic typhoid infection outside of the gallbladder are sparse.

  • The long-term importance of chronic typhoid carriers in maintaining typhoid endemicity should not be underestimated.

Top Five Papers

  1. Niepraschk. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Verbreitung des Typhus durch Dauerausscheider. Zeitschrift für Hygiene und Infectionskrankheiten. 1909;64: 454–476.

  2. Browning CH, Coulthard HL, Cruickshank R, Guthrie KJ, Smith RP. Chronic Enteric Carriers and their Treatment. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office; 1933. p. 1–80.

  3. Bondy PK, Barnwell CH. Chronic Typhoid Pyonephrosis: Report of a Case. J Urol. 1947;57(4):642–650. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)69683-6

  4. Tynes BS, Utz JP. Factors influencing the cure of Salmonella carriers. Ann Intern Med. 1962;57:871–882. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-57-6-871

  5. McFadzean AJ, Ong GB. Intrahepatic typhoid carriers. Br Med J. 1966;1(5503):1567–1571. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5503.1567

Funding Statement

This work was supported, in whole or in part, by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1161058 to MML; INV-000049 to MML; INV-029806 to MML), the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK067872 to MJS), and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (F30AI156973 to MJS). MML is supported in part by the Simon and Bessie Grollman Distinguished Professorship at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Under the grant conditions of the Foundation, a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic License has already been assigned to the Author Accepted Manuscript version that might arise from this submission.

References

  • 1.Engleberg NC, Barrett TJ, Fisher H, Porter B, Hurtado E, Hughes JM. Identification of a carrier by using Vi enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay serology in an outbreak of typhoid fever on an Indian reservation. J Clin Microbiol. 1983;18(6):1320–1322. Epub 1983/12/01. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.6.1320-1322.1983 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC272900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lin FY, Becke JM, Groves C, Lim BP, Israel E, Becker EF, et al. Restaurant-associated outbreak of typhoid fever in Maryland: identification of carrier facilitated by measurement of serum Vi antibodies. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26(6):1194–1197. Epub 1988/06/01. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.6.1194-1197.1988 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC266560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wright PW, Wallace RJ Jr., Steingrube VA, Gibson JL, Barth SS. A case of recurrent typhoid fever in the United States: importance of the grandmother connection and the use of large restriction fragment pattern analysis of genomic DNA for strain comparison. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1994;13(12):1103–1106. Epub 1994/12/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sears SD, Ferreccio C, Levine MM, Cordano AM, Monreal J, Black RE, et al. The use of Moore swabs for isolation of Salmonella Typhi from irrigation water in Santiago, Chile. J Infect Dis. 1984;149(4):640–642. Epub 1984/04/01. doi: 10.1093/infdis/149.4.640 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mermin JH, Villar R, Carpenter J, Roberts L, Samaridden A, Gasanova L, et al. A massive epidemic of multidrug-resistant typhoid fever in Tajikistan associated with consumption of municipal water. J Infect Dis. 1999;179(6):1416–1422. Epub 1999/05/06. doi: 10.1086/314766 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sprinz H, Gangarosa EJ, Williams M, Hornick RB, Woodward TE. Histopathology of the upper small intestines in typhoid fever. Biopsy study of experimental disease in man. Am J Dig Dis. 1966;11(8):615–624. Epub 1966/08/01. doi: 10.1007/BF02233509 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gaines S, Sprinz H, Tully JG, Tigertt WD. Studies on Infection and Immunity in Experimental Typhoid Fever: VII. The Distribution of Salmonella Typhi in Chimpanzee Tissue Following Oral Challenge, and the Relationship Between the Numbers of Bacilli and Morphologic Lesions*. J Infect Dis. 1968;118(3):293–306. doi: 10.1093/infdis/118.3.293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Levine MM, Kaper JB, Black RE, Clements ML. New knowledge on pathogenesis of bacterial enteric infections as applied to vaccine development. Microbiol Rev. 1983;47(4):510–550. Epub 1983/12/01. doi: 10.1128/mr.47.4.510-550.1983 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC281589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Darton TC, Zhou L, Blohmke CJ, Jones C, Waddington CS, Baker S, et al. Blood culture-PCR to optimise typhoid fever diagnosis after controlled human infection identifies frequent asymptomatic cases and evidence of primary bacteraemia. J Infect. 2017;74(4):358–366. Epub 2017/01/29. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.01.006 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5345565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hornick RB, Greisman SE, Woodward TE, DuPont HL, Dawkins AT, Snyder MJ. Typhoid fever: pathogenesis and immunologic control. N Engl J Med. 1970;283(13):686–691. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197009242831306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wain J, Diep TS, Ho VA, Walsh AM, Nguyen TT, Parry CM, et al. Quantitation of bacteria in blood of typhoid fever patients and relationship between counts and clinical features, transmissibility, and antibiotic resistance. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36(6):1683–1687. Epub 1998/06/10. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.6.1683-1687.1998 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC104900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Avendano A, Herrera P, Horwitz I, Duarte E, Prenzel I, Lanata C, et al. Duodenal string cultures: practicality and sensitivity for diagnosing enteric fever in children. J Infect Dis. 1986;153(2):359–362. Epub 1986/02/01. doi: 10.1093/infdis/153.2.358 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Horton-Smith P. The Goulstonian Lectures on the Typhoid Bacillus and Typhoid Fever: Delivered before the Royal College of Physicians of London. Br Med J. 1900;1(2049):827–834. Epub 1900/04/07. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.2049.827 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2506206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gilman RH, Terminel M, Levine MM, Hernandez-Mendoza P, Hornick RB. Relative efficacy of blood, urine, rectal swab, bone-marrow, and rose-spot cultures for recovery of Salmonella Typhi in typhoid fever. Lancet. 1975;1(7918):1211–1213. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92194-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Eberth CJ. Die Organismen in den Organen bei Typhus abdominalis. Archiv für pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für klinische Medicin. 1880;81(1):58–74. doi: 10.1007/BF01995472 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Koch R, editor Die Bekämpfung des Typhus. Sitzung des Wissenschaftlichen Senats bei der Kaiser-Wilhelms-Akademie; 1902 11/28/1902: Robert Koch-Institut. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lentz O. The organization and results of the typhoid campaign in South-West Germany. With special reference to typhoid carriers.: Br Med J. 1910. Nov 12;2(2602):1501–1504; 1910. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ledingham JCG, Arkwright JA. The carrier problem in infectious diseases. London: E. Arnold; 1912. vii, 319 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Browning CH, Coulthard HL, Cruickshank R, Guthrie KJ, Smith RP. Chronic Enteric Carriers and their Treatment. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office; 1933. p. 7–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Soper GA. The Curious Career of Typhoid Mary. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1939;15(10):698–712. Epub 1939/10/01. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1911442. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Houston T. On a Case of Cystitis of Three Years’ Duration due to the Typhoid Bacillus. Br Med J. 1899;1(1985):78–79. Epub 1899/01/14. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.1985.78 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2462187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Garbat AL. Typhoid carriers and typhoid immunity. New York: The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research; 1922. 1 p.l., 110 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chronic YH, Cystitis Due To The Typhoid Bacillus. Johns Hopkins Hospital Reports. 1900;8:401–420. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huggins CB, Roome NW. Typhoid Pyonephrosis. Its Urological and Public Health Significance. J Urol. 1934;31(4):587–595. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)72420-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Meyer KA G. Über typhöse Pyonephrose. Mitteilungen aus den Grenzgebieten der Medizin und. Chirurgie. 1909;19:486–495. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Greaves FL. A Case of Pyonephrosis Containing Typhoid Bacilli in Pure Culture. Br Med J. 1907;2(2428):75. Epub 1907/07/13. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.2428.75 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2357885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bondy PK, Barnwell CH. Chronic Typhoid Pyonephrosis: Report of a Case. J Urol. 1947;57(4):642–650. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)69683-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stuart BM, Pullen RL. Typhoid; clinical analysis of 360 cases. Arch Intern Med (Chic). 1946;78(6):629–661. Epub 1946/12/01. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1946.00220060002001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Armijo R, Pizzi A, Lobos H. Prevalence of typhoid carriers after treatment with chloramphenicol. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam. 1967;62(4):295–302. Epub 1967/04/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Woodward TE, Smadel JE, et al. Preliminary report on the beneficial effect of chloromycetin in the treatment of typhoid fever. Ann Intern Med. 1948;29(1):131–134. Epub 1948/07/01. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-29-1-131 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Woodward TE, Smadel JE, Ley HL Jr., Chloramphenicol and other antibiotics in the treatment of typhoid fever and typhoid carriers. J Clin Invest. 1950;29(1):87–99. Epub 1950/01/01. doi: 10.1172/jci102238 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC439729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Butler T, Arnold K, Linh N, Pollack M. Chloramphenicol-Resistant Typhoid Fever in Vietnam Associated with R Factor. Lancet. 1973;302(7836):983–985. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)91086-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Scioli C, Fiorentino F, Sasso G. Treatment of Salmonella Typhi carriers with intravenous ampicillin. J Infect Dis. 1972;125(2):170–173. Epub 1972/02/01. doi: 10.1093/infdis/125.2.170 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gilman RH, Terminel M, Levine MM, Hernandez-Mendosa P, Calderone E, Vasquez V, et al. Comparison of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole and AmoxiciIIin in Therapy of Chloramphenicol-Resistant and ChloramphenicolSensitive Typhoid Fever. J Infect Dis. 1975;132(6):630–636. doi: 10.1093/infdis/132.6.630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Brodie J, Macqueen IA, Livingstone D. Effect of trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole on typhoid and salmonella carriers. Br Med J. 1970;3(5718):318–319. Epub 1970/08/08. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5718.318 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1701497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ferreccio C, Morris JG, Valdivieso C, Prenzel I, Sotomayor V, Drusano GL, et al. Efficacy of ciprofloxacin in the treatment of chronic typhoid carriers. J Infect Dis. 1988;157(6):1235–1239. doi: 10.1093/infdis/157.6.1235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gotuzzo E, Guerra JG, Benavente L, Palomino JC, Carrillo C, Lopera J, et al. Use of Norfloxacin to Treat Chronic Typhoid Carriers. J Infect Dis. 1988;157(6):1221–1225. doi: 10.1093/infdis/157.6.1221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Klemm EJ, Shakoor S, Page AJ, Qamar FN, Judge K, Saeed DK, et al. Emergence of an Extensively Drug-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi Clone Harboring a Promiscuous Plasmid Encoding Resistance to Fluoroquinolones and Third-Generation Cephalosporins. MBio. 2018;9(1). Epub 2018/02/22. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00105-18 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5821095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Levine MM, Simon R. The Gathering Storm: Is Untreatable Typhoid Fever on the Way? MBio. 2018;9(2). Epub 2018/03/22. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00482-18 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5874914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mohan VK, Varanasi V, Singh A, Pasetti MF, Levine MM, Venkatesan R, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a Vi polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (Typbar-TCV) in healthy infants, children, and adults in typhoid endemic areas: a multicenter, 2-cohort, open-label, double-blind, randomized controlled phase 3 study. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(3):393–402. Epub 2015/04/15. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ295 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shakya M, Voysey M, Theiss-Nyland K, Colin-Jones R, Pant D, Adhikari A, et al. Efficacy of typhoid conjugate vaccine in Nepal: final results of a phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(11):e1561–e1568. Epub 2021/10/23. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00346-6 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Patel PD, Patel P, Liang Y, Meiring JE, Misiri T, Mwakiseghile F, et al. Safety and Efficacy of a Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine in Malawian Children. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(12):1104–1115. Epub 2021/09/16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035916 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8202713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Qadri F, Khanam F, Liu X, Theiss-Nyland K, Biswas PK, Bhuiyan AI, et al. Protection by vaccination of children against typhoid fever with a Vi-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine in urban Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2021;398(10301):675–684. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01124-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yousafzai MT, Karim S, Qureshi S, Kazi M, Memon H, Junejo A, et al. Effectiveness of typhoid conjugate vaccine against culture-confirmed Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi in an extensively drug-resistant outbreak setting of Hyderabad, Pakistan: a cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(8):e1154–e1162. Epub 2021/07/24. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00255-2 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8315145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Date K, Shimpi R, Luby S N R, Haldar P, Katkar A, et al. Decision Making and Implementation of the First Public Sector Introduction of Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine—Navi Mumbai, India, 2018. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(Supplement_2):S172-S178. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Olaru ID, Mtapuri-Zinyowera S, Feasey N, Ferrand RA, Kranzer K. Typhoid Vi-conjugate vaccine for outbreak control in Zimbabwe. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(9):930. Epub 2019/09/04. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30425-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sikorski MJ, Desai SN, Tupua S, Thomsen RE, Han J, Rambocus S, et al. Tenacious Endemic Typhoid Fever in Samoa. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(Supplement_2):S120–S126. Epub 2020/07/30. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa314 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7388710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ames WR, Robins M. Age and sex as factors in the development of the typhoid carrier state, and a method for estimating carrier prevalence. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1943;33(3):221–230. Epub 1943/03/01. doi: 10.2105/ajph.33.3.221 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1527221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vogelsang TM, Boe J. Temporary and chronic carriers of Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi B. J Hyg (Lond). 1948;46(3):252–261. Epub 1948/09/01. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400036378 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2235125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Levine MM, Black RE, Lanata C. Precise estimation of the numbers of chronic carriers of Salmonella Typhi in Santiago, Chile, an endemic area. J Infect Dis. 1982;146(6):724–726. doi: 10.1093/infdis/146.6.724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gauld JS, Hu H, Klein DJ, Levine MM. Typhoid fever in Santiago, Chile: Insights from a mathematical model utilizing venerable archived data from a successful disease control program. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(9):e0006759. Epub 2018/09/07. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006759 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6143279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gunn JS, Marshall JM, Baker S, Dongol S, Charles RC, Ryan ET. Salmonella chronic carriage: epidemiology, diagnosis, and gallbladder persistence. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22(11):648–655. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.06.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Littman A, Vaichulis JA, et al. The chronic typhoid carrier; the natural course of the carrier state. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1948;38(12):1675–1679. Epub 1948/12/01. doi: 10.2105/ajph.38.12.1675 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1624756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Irwin ST, Houston T. On a “Typhoid Carrier,” Treated Successfully by the Inoculation of Typhoid Vaccine. Lancet. 1909;173(4457):311–313. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)44750-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Niepraschk. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Verbreitung des Typhus durch Dauerausscheider. Zeitschrift für Hygiene und Infectionskrankheiten. 1909;64:454–476. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Davies DS, Hall IW, Emrys-Roberts E, Fletcher J. Further Observations Upon Typhoid Carriers. Lancet. 1910;176(4540):723–725. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)57964-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dorgan J. Enteric Fever Epidemic, Kilworth, 1909. J R Army Med Corps. 1910;14(4):396–400. doi: 10.1136/jramc-14-04-03 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tynes BS, Utz JP. Factors influencing the cure of Salmonella carriers. Ann Intern Med. 1962;57:871–882. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-57-6-871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Freitag JL. Treatment of Chronic Typhoid Carriers by Cholecystectomy. Public Health Rep. 1964;79:567–570. Epub 1964/07/01. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1915468. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hathout Se-D, Abd el-Ghaffar Y, Awny AY, Hassan K. Relation between urinary schistosomiasis and chronic enteric urinary carrier state among Egyptians. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1966;15(2):156–161. Epub 1966/03/01. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1966.15.156 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.McFadzean AJ, Ong GB. Intrahepatic typhoid carriers. Br Med J. 1966;1(5503):1567–1571. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5503.1567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hathout Se-D, Abd el-Ghaffar Y, Awny AY. Salmonellosis complicating schistosomiasis in Egypt. A new clinical appreciation. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1967;16(4):462–472. Epub 1967/07/01. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1967.16.462 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ristori C, Rodríguez H, Vicent P, Ferreccio C, García J, Lobos H, et al. Persistence of the Salmonella Typhi-Paratyphi carrier state after gallbladder removal. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1982;16(4):361–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Dongol S, Thompson CN, Clare S, Nga TV, Duy PT, Karkey A, et al. The microbiological and clinical characteristics of invasive salmonella in gallbladders from cholecystectomy patients in Kathmandu, Nepal. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(10):e47342. Epub 2012/10/19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047342 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3471863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Merselis JG Jr., Kaye D, Connolly CS, Hook EW. Quantitative bacteriology of the typhoid carrier state. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1964;13:425–429. Epub 1964/05/01. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1964.13.425 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lanata CF, Levine MM, Ristori C, Black RE, Jimenez L, Salcedo M, et al. Vi serology in detection of chronic Salmonella Typhi carriers in an endemic area. Lancet. 1983;2(8347):441–443. Epub 1983/08/20. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)90401-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Losonsky GA, Ferreccio C, Kotloff KL, Kaintuck S, Robbins JB, Levine MM. Development and evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serum Vi antibodies for detection of chronic Salmonella Typhi carriers. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25(12):2266–2269. Epub 1987/12/01. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.12.2266-2269.1987 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC269467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Dehler.. Zur Behandlung der Typhusbazillenträger. Müenchener Medizinische Wochenschrift. 1907;54:779–780. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bigelow GH, Anderson GW. Cure of Typhoid Carriers. J Am Med Assoc. 1933;101(5):348–352. doi: 10.1001/jama.1933.02740300016006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Vogelsang TM. The Campaign Against Typhoid and Paratyphoid B in Western Norway. Results of Cholecystectomy. J Hyg (Lond). 1964;62(4):443–449. Epub 1964/12/01. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400040183 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2134612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Young HLL. Pyonephrosis due to B. typhosus. A report of two cases and three cases found in the literature. Johns Hopkins Hospital Reports. 1906;13:455. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Nichols HJ, Simmons JS, Stimmel CO. The Surgical Treatment of Typhoid Carriers. J Am Med Assoc. 1919;73(9):680–684. doi: 10.1001/jama.1919.02610350028009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hoffman SA, Desai SN, Sikorski MJ, Fatupaito G, Tupua S, Thomsen RE, et al. Point-of-Care Ultrasound by Nonexpert Operators Demonstrates High Sensitivity and Specificity in Detecting Gallstones: Data from the Samoa Typhoid Fever Control Program. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022;106(3):798–804. Epub 2022/01/11. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0973 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8922510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Marcos LA, Terashima A, Gotuzzo E. Update on hepatobiliary flukes: fascioliasis, opisthorchiasis and clonorchiasis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008;21(5):523–530. Epub 2008/08/30. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32830f9818 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Qian MB, Chen YD, Liang S, Yang GJ, Zhou XN. The global epidemiology of clonorchiasis and its relation with cholangiocarcinoma. Infect Dis Poverty. 2012;1(1):4. Epub 2012/01/01. doi: 10.1186/2049-9957-1-4 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3710150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.GBD 2017 Typhoid and Paratyphoid Collaborators. The global burden of typhoid and paratyphoid fevers: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(4):369–381. Epub 2019/02/23. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30685-6 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6437314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Imanishi M, Newton AE, Vieira AR, Gonzalez-Aviles G, Kendall Scott ME, Manikonda K, et al. Typhoid fever acquired in the United States, 1999–2010: epidemiology, microbiology, and use of a space-time scan statistic for outbreak detection. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;143(11):2343–2354. Epub 2014/11/28. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814003021 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5207021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Parsek MR, Singh PK. Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to disease pathogenesis. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2003;57:677–701. Epub 2003/10/07. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090720 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Hsiao A, Toy T, Seo HJ, Marks F. Interaction between Salmonella and Schistosomiasis: A Review. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(12):e1005928. Epub 2016/12/03. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005928 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5131909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Waddington CS, Darton TC, Jones C, Haworth K, Peters A, John T, et al. An outpatient, ambulant-design, controlled human infection model using escalating doses of Salmonella Typhi challenge delivered in sodium bicarbonate solution. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(9):1230–1240. Epub 2014/02/13. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu078 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3982839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES