Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0283375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283375

Effects of acupuncture on age-related macular degeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Wu Sun 1,2,#, Yuwei Zhao 1,#, Liang Liao 3, Xueyao Wang 4, Qiping Wei 3, Guojun Chao 4,*, Jian Zhou 3,*
Editor: Shiying Li5
PMCID: PMC10035922  PMID: 36952520

Abstract

Background

In recent years, an increasing number of patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) have received acupuncture treatment, but there has been no systematic review to evaluate the effect of acupuncture on patients with AMD.

Purpose

This meta-analysis aims to review the clinical efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of AMD.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials up to September 4, 2022 were searched in the following databases: PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, The Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, VIP, Wanfang, and SINOMED. Two reviewers independently performed literature screening and data extraction. RevMan 5.4 was used for the meta-analysis.

Results

Nine of the 226 articles were finally included. A total of 508 AMD patients (631 eyes) were enrolled, including 360 dry eyes and 271 wet eyes. The results showed that acupuncture alone or as an adjunct therapy improved both the clinical efficacy and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of AMD patients and reduced their central macular thickness. The certainty of the evidence ranged from "low" to "very low".

Conclusion

There is no high-quality evidence that acupuncture is effective in treating patients with AMD; patients with dry AMD may benefit from acupuncture treatment. Considering the potential of acupuncture treatment for AMD, it is necessary to conduct a rigorously designed randomized controlled trials to verify its efficacy.

1. Introduction

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a disease that affects the macular area of the retina and causes progressive damage to central vision [1]. The early stage manifests as drusen and retinal pigment epithelium abnormalities, and the later stage manifests as dry AMD characterized by non-vascular proliferation or wet AMD characterized by choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Later, AMD can cause loss of central visual acuity of the patient, accompanied by severe visual impairment and even blindness [2]. Currently, AMD is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in developed countries [3, 4]. A meta-analysis involving a total of 129,664 participants worldwide showed that the overall global prevalence of early- and late-stage AMD in the adult population was 8.01% and 0.37%, respectively, with a total prevalence of 8.69% [5]. Considering that aging is the greatest risk factor for AMD, the number of people suffering from AMD will continue to increase [6]. By 2040, the number of AMD patients is expected to increase to 288 million [5].

The current treatment measures for AMD include anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection therapy, antioxidant vitamins and minerals, photodynamic therapy, thermal laser photocoagulation surgery, etc [7, 8]. To date, there is no effective treatment for dry AMD patients other than appropriate antioxidant supplementation. Anti-VEGF therapy, the current first-line treatment, may reduce the odds of legal blindness caused by neovascular AMD [9]. However, a long-term follow-up study of patients initially receiving regular anti-VEGF agents showed that among patients who were followed up for more than 7 years, two-thirds lost most of their gains in visual acuity (VA) [10]. Currently, an increasing number of other treatment measures are causing concern. Relevant studies have shown that acupuncture may become an effective method for the treatment of AMD, which can improve the eye symptoms and visual acuity of patients [11, 12]. There are the following hypotheses about the mechanism of acupuncture treatment for AMD. Previous research revealed that acupuncture has obvious specificity for the macular area [13]. Acupuncture could improve microcirculation in the macular area by expanding the surrounding blood vessels after acting on the peripheral area of the eyes [1416]. Clinical studies have further confirmed that acupuncture can reduce central macular thickness (CMT) and promote the absorption of fundus exudate [1618]. In addition, relevant study have also shown that acupuncture may reduce serum VEGF levels in patients with wet AMD [19, 20]. Although many studies have revealed an intervention effect of acupuncture on AMD, there has been no review to scientifically evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture therapy. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of AMD.

2. Methods

2.1. Study registration

This meta-analysis was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration number: CRD42020168611) and strictly adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) [21].

2.2. Inclusion criteria

2.2.1. Types of studies

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

2.2.2. Types of participants

Patients diagnosed with AMD by the investigators of the original study. Dioagnostic criteria inlucding at least one of the following:

1) Presence of at least intermediate-size drusen (≥63 μm in diameter); 2) Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) abnormalities; 3) Presence of any of the following features: geographic atrophy of the RPE, CNV (wet), polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, reticular pseudodrusen, or retinal angiomatous proliferation [8].

2.2.3. Types of interventions

All types of acupuncture were included, including electroacupuncture, warm acupuncture, and scalp acupuncture. Interventions in the control group included sham acupuncture, no treatment, placebo, antioxidants or other treatments. To evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture as an adjunctive therapy, studies that compared acupuncture combined with other therapies with the other therapies were also included.

2.2.4. Outcome measures

The primary outcomes were clinical efficacy rates and BCVA. The clinical efficacy rates were defined as the number of patients who showed improvement in VA and the absorption of fundus bleeding and exudate, and the improvements were assessed by clinicians based on the “Criteria of Diagnosis and Therapeutic Effect of Internal Diseases and Syndromes in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM)” [22] (S1 File in S1 Appendix). The secondary outcomes included changes in the CMT of the patients and adverse events.

2.3. Exclusion criteria

Studies involving any of the following were not included: 1) research that involved a comparison of different acupuncture techniques or a comparison of different acupuncture points; 2) treatments involving laser needle or hydro-acupuncture therapy; 3) duplicate published studies or case reports.

2.4. Search strategy

Relevant literature was searched in the following databases: PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, The Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, VIP, Wanfang, and SINOMED. The search time was from inception to September 4, 2022. In addition, relevant web pages were also manually searched (www.clinicaltrials.gov; www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu; trialsearch.who.int) for ongoing trials or unpublished clinical trial reports. The specific search strategy can be found in S1 Table in S1 Appendix.

2.5. Data extraction

Two reviewers conducted a literature search independently. After screening out the duplicate documents in EndNote software, a preliminary review was carried out by reading the titles and abstracts of the retrieved documents. The literature that satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria was read in full to determine its eligibility for further inclusion. Any differences between the two reviewers were resolved through communication and negotiation with an arbiter.

2.6. Quality assessment

The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) as follows [23]: randomization process, deviations from the intended interventions, missing outcome data, measurement of the outcome and selection of the reported result. Each item was classified as “low risk of bias”, “some problems”, and “high risk of bias”.

2.7. Data analysis

RevMan 5.4 was used for the meta-analysis. Continuous outcome variables were calculated by mean differences (MDs) or standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and dichotomous outcome variables were calculated by risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs. When the heterogeneity of outcome variables was low (P > 0.10, I2 < 50%), the fixed-effect model was used; otherwise, the random-effect model was used. Publication bias assessment based on funnel plots was performed when the number of included studies was greater than 10. Subgroup analysis was performed by intervention type (with or without TCM), AMD type (dry or wet), or intervention course. Sensitivity analyses were performed to observe changes in synthetic results according to the following operations: 1) excluding low-quality studies; 2) excluding studies with small sample size; 3) excluding studies with the largest sample size; 4) excluding studies containing Chinese herbal medicine; 5) or switching between fixed and random effects models.

2.8. Quality of evidence

The quality of the pooled evidence for all the outcomes was judged by two independent reviewers according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system [24]. The strength of evidence was graded as “high”, “moderate”, “low” or “very low” based on five assessment items: risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and other considerations.

3. Results

3.1. Literature search

A total of 226 articles were included, of which 102 studies were removed due to duplication. After reading the titles and abstracts, 15 articles remained (110 articles were removed, including 68 irrelevant articles, 26 reviews, 15 case reports and case series, and 1 mechanistic study). Of these, 4 included inappropriate comparisons, 1 was a comparison of different acupuncture manipulation techniques, and 1 was a comparison of different acupoints. Finally, nine studies were included [1518, 2529] (Fig 1). Excluded studies were listed in S1 Table in S1 Appendix.

Fig 1. Study flow diagram.

Fig 1

3.2. Characteristics of the studies

All 9 RCTs were conducted in China. A total of 508 AMD patients (631 eyes) were enrolled, including 360 eyes with dry AMD and 271 eyes with wet AMD. The study period was from 2011 to 2020, and the patients were over 50 years old. Of the 9 studies, 3 studies consisted of patients with wet AMD [15, 16, 18], 4 studies consisted of patients with dry AMD [2528], and the remaining 2 studies included patients with dry and wet AMD [17, 29]. Three studies compared acupuncture with antioxidants (vitamin E/C) [18, 25, 29]. Five studies compared acupuncture combined with medication therapy with the same medication therapy, in which all the medications were Chinese herbs [1517, 26, 27]. One study compared an acupuncture group with a control group, and the control group was only observed regularly without any treatment [28]. All the studies involved true acupuncture with filiform needles. The course of treatment ranged from 20 days to 3 months. In terms of outcome indicators, 7 studies reported clinical effectiveness [1518, 26, 27, 29], 5 studies reported BCVA [1618, 25, 27], and 3 studies mentioned CMT [1618]. Side effects were reported in only 2 studies [17, 28]. While the BCVA included in all studies were tested using international standard visual acuity charts, the recording method used was the five-point recording method or decimal recording method. Tables 1 & 2 list the specific information from the studies included.

Table 1. Summary of included studies.

Study ID Sample size (eyes) Age (years) (M/F) AMD type Intervention Outcomes
E C E C E C
Yao 2015 [15] 23 cases (36 eyes) 22 cases (34 eyes) 69.2±9.8 (27/18) Wet AMD A+TCM TCM
Yang 2019 [16] 34 cases (47 eyes) 31 cases (40 eyes) 63.62±8.56 (16/18) 63.46±8. 65 (15/16) Wet AMD A+TCM TCM ①~③
Wang 2019 [17] 37 cases (37 eyes) 37 cases (37 eyes) 57.52±4.16 (24/13) 57.55±4.11 (25/12) Dry + wet AMD A+TCM TCM ①~④
liu 2016 [18] 20 cases (20 eyes) 19 cases (20 eyes) 66.72±8.71 (10/10) 65.24± 9.01 (11/8) Wet AMD A Vitamin C/E ①~③
Xia 2014 [25] 22 cases (44 eyes) 15 cases (30 eyes) 60±4 (12/10) 61±3 (8/7) Dry AMD A Vitamin C/E
Wang 2017 [26] 36 cases (36 eyes) 36 cases (36 eyes) 58.7±3.4 (30/42) Dry AMD A+TCM TCM
Qin 2020 [27] 30 cases (30 eyes) 30 cases (30 eyes) > 50 (NR) Dry AMD A+TCM TCM ①②
Xia 2013 [28] 22 cases (44 eyes) 10 cases (20 eyes) 60.45±3.85(12/10) 60.56±3.23(4/6) Dry AMD A No treatment
Jiao 2011 [29] 56 cases (60 eyes) 28 cases (30 eyes) 50–80 (NR) Dry + wet AMD A Vitamin C/E

A, acupuncture; C, control group; E, experimental group; NR, not reported; TCM, traditional chinese medicine; ① clinical efficacy rates; ② best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA); ③ central macular thickness (CMT); ④ adverse events.

Table 2. Descriptions of acupuncture interventions.

Study ID Acupuncture stimulation method Needle type Acupuncture point Retention time Treatment regimen Practitioner background
Yao 2015 [15] MA NR BL1,EX-HN7,GB1, LR3,ST1,shangming, jianming NR 1 session every 2 days for 21 days NR
Yang 2019 [16] MA NR BL2,BL23,EX-HN5,EX-HN7,L14,L20,SP6, ST36 30min 1 session every day for 3 months NR
Wang 2019 [17] MA NR BL1,EX-HN5,GB1, GB37, K16, L14, LI11,ST36,ST40 30min 2 sessions a week for 2 months NR
liu 2016 [18] MA 0.25×25 mm BL1,BL2, EX-HN1, GB1 30min 1 session every day for 30 days NR
Xia 2014 [25] MA 0.25×(40–50) mm BL1,BL2, EX-HN5, EX-HN14,GB20,ST1 / 2 session a week for 2 months NR
Wang 2017 [26] MA 0.25×25 mm BL1,BL2,BL24,BL26,CV9,DU20,EX-HN4,EX-HN5,EX-HN7,GB14,GB37,K13, LR3, SP6, SP10, ST1,ST36,ST40, shangming 30min 1 session every day for 30 days NR
Qin 2020 [27] MA NR BL10,EX-HN5,GB20,SJ23,ST1,xinming 20min 1 session every day for 20 days NR
Xia 2013 [28] MA 0.25×(40/50) mm BL1,EX-HN7, GB1, LR3, ST1 30min 2 sessions a week for 2 months NR
Jiao 2011 [29] MA 0.25×(25–50) mm BL1,BL2,BL18,BL20,BL23,EX-HN5,GB1,GB14,GB20,GB37, ST2, ST40 30min 1 session every day for 50 days NR

MA, manual acupuncture; NR, not reported.

3.3. Risk of bias assessment

All studies mentioned randomization, of which 4 studies used a random number table [15, 25, 28, 29] and 5 did not mention random methods. None of the studies mentioned allocation concealment. Considering that without sham acupuncture, the patients could not be blinded to the treatment, we think that blinded the acupuncture practitioner is equivalent to blinding. Three studies had a high risk of selective reporting [17, 26, 29]. All studies reported complete results with no significant missing data. Five studies were supported by government funding [15, 16, 18, 25, 28], and the remaining studies did not mention funding information. See Fig 2 for details.

Fig 2. Risk of bias assessment of included studies.

Fig 2

A, literature quality evaluation; B, summary of the quality evaluation of the literature.

3.4. Outcome measurements

3.4.1. Clinical efficacy rates

The clinical efficacy rates were evaluated in 7 studies [1518, 26, 27, 29], and there was no heterogeneity in the outcome (I2 = 0%). The fixed-effect model showed that compared with the control, acupuncture significantly improved the clinical efficacy rates of the AMD patients (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.17,1.42) (Fig 3A).

Fig 3. Forest plot of meta-analysis results.

Fig 3

(A) Clinical response rates; (B) BCVA; (C) CMT.

3.4.2. BCVA

BCVA was mentioned in 5 studies [1618, 25, 27], with very high heterogeneity in the results (I2 = 89%). The random-effect model indicated that there was a significant difference between the acupuncture group and the control group in terms of BCVA (SMD = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.26,1.64) (Fig 3B).

3.4.3 CMT

CMT was mentioned in three studies [1618], with high heterogeneity in the results (I2 = 67%). The random-effect model suggested that the acupuncture group had reduced CMT compared with that in the control group (MD = - 32.74, 95% CI: - 60.96,-4.55). (Fig 3C).

3.4.4 Adverse events

Adverse events were reported in only 2 studies [17, 28]. In one study, 10 of 22 patients in the acupuncture group had bleeding [28], while no side effects occurred in the control group. In another study, 3 patients in the control group and the acupuncture group each had nausea, vomiting, and flushing [17].

3.4.5 Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis

Sensitivity analysis showed the stability of both Clinical efficacy rates and BCVA outcomes. When one study was removed [16], the difference in CMT between the two groups was no longer statistically significant.

Subgroup analysis showed that heterogeneity in BCVA and CMT outcomes disappeared when limiting the type of AMD to wet AMD, suggesting that heterogeneity was mainly related to the type of AMD. In addition, heterogeneity decreased to varying degrees when restricting the duration of the intervention (duration = 20–50 days) and the type of intervention (intervention includes TCM).

In the subgroup analysis of wet AMD or short intervention course (duration = 20–50 days), we noted changes in BCVA outcomes, with no statistically significant difference between the acupuncture group and the control group. See Tables 3 & 4 for details.

Table 3. Subgroup analysis.
Subgroup analysis No. of trials (reference nos.) No. of patients I2 RR [95% CI] P value
Clinical efficacy rates Overall 7 (15–18,24,25,27) 492 0 1.29 [1.17, 1.42] <0.0001
Type of intervention
Including TCM 5 (15–17,24,25) 362 0 1.22 [1.11, 1.35] <0.0001
Without TCM 2 (18,27) 130 0 1.56 [1.17, 2.07] 0.002
Intervention course
20–50 days 5 (15,18,24,25,27) 331 0 1.33 [1.17, 1.52] <0.0001
51–90 days 2 (16,17) 161 21 1.21 [1.06, 1.39] 0.006
AMD type
Dry AMD 2 (24,25) 132 0 1.22 [1.05, 1.42] 0.01
Wet AMD 3 (15,16,18) 196 18 1.26 [1.06, 1.50] 0.01
Dry and wet AMD 2(17,27) 164 0 1.39 [1.16, 1.65] 0.0002
Subgroup analysis No. of trials (reference nos.) No. of patients I 2 SMD [95% CI] P value
BCVA Overall 5 (16–18,23,25) 335 89% 0.95 [0.26,1.64] 0.007
Type of intervention
Including TCM 3 (16,17,25) 221 56% 0.76 [0.34, 1.18] 0.0004
Without TCM 2 (18,23) 114 96% 1.23 [-1.00, 3.46] 0.28
Intervention course
20–50 days 2 (18,25) 100 65% 0.47 [-0.22, 1.16] 0.18
50–90 days 3 (16,17,23) 235 93% 1.28 [0.21, 2.34] 0.02
AMD type
Dry AMD 2 (23,25) 134 93 1.58 [0.04, 3.11] 0.04
Wet AMD 2 (16,18) 127 0 0.31 [-0.04, 0.66] 0.09
Dry and wet AMD 1 (17) 74 NA 1.11 [0.62, 1.60] <0.0001
Subgroup analysis No. of trials (reference nos.) No. of patients I 2 MD [95% CI] P value
CMT Overall 3(16–18) 201 67% -32.74 [-60.94, -4.55] 0.02
Type of intervention
Including TCM 2 (16,17) 161 83% -31.69 [-71.37, 7.99] 0.12
Without TCM 1 (18) 40 NA -32.60 [-77.59, 12.39] 0.16
Intervention course
20–50 days 1 (18) 40 NA -32.60 [-77.59, 12.39] 0.16
51–90 days 2 (16,17) 161 83% -31.69 [-71.37, 7.99] 0.12
AMD type
Wet AMD 2 (16,18) 127 0 -16.21 [-40.80, 8.39] 0.2
Dry and wet AMD 1 (17) 74 NA -49.93 [-64.13, -35.73] <0.0001

NA, not applicable.

Table 4. Sensitivity analyses.
Sensitivity analyses No. of included trials (reference nos.) RR [95% CI] P
Clinical efficacy rates Overall analysis 7 (15–18,24,25,27) 1.29 [1.17, 1.42] <0.0001
Excluding studies with low quality 6 (15,17,18,25,27) 1.33 [1.19, 1.49] <0.0001
Excluding small trial (participants < 50) 6 (15–17,24,25,27) 1.26 [1.15, 1.39] <0.0001
Excluding the lagest trial 6 (15,17,18,25,27) 1.33 [1.19, 1.49] <0.0001
Excluding studies containing TCM 2 (18,27) 1.56 [1.17, 2.07] 0.002
Using random-effects model 7 (15–18,24,25,27) 1.25 [1.14, 1.37] <0.0001
Sensitivity analyses No. of included trials (reference nos.) SMD [95% CI] P
BCVA Overall analysis 5 (16–18,23,25) 0.95 [0.26,1.64] 0.007
Excluding studies with low quality 4 (16–18,23) 0.99 [0.09, 1.89] 0.03
Excluding small trial (participants < 50) 4 (16,17,23,25) 1.15 [0.38, 1.92] 0.003
Excluding the lagest trial 3 (17,18,23,25) 1.09 [0.24, 1.95] 0.01
Excluding studies containing TCM 3 (16,17,25) 0.76 [0.34, 1.18] 0.0004
Using fixed-effects model 5 (16–18,23,25) 0.88 [0.65, 1.12] <0.0001
Sensitivity analyses No. of included trials (reference nos.) MD [95% CI] P
CMT Overall analysis 3(16–18) -32.74 [-60.94, -4.55] 0.02
Excluding studies with low quality 2 (17,18) -31.69 [-71.37, 7.99] 0.12
Excluding small trial (participants < 50) 2 (17,18) -31.69 [-71.37, 7.99] 0.12
Excluding the lagest trial 2 (16,17) -48.36 [-61.90, -34.81] <0.0001
Excluding studies containing TCM 1 (18) -32.60 [-77.59, 12.39] 0.16
Using fixed-effects model 3(16–18) -41.49 [-53.79, -29.19] <0.0001

4. Discussion

4.1. Summary of evidence

The meta-analysis showed that compared with conventional treatment, acupuncture treatment increased the clinical efficacy and visual acuity of patients with AMD. In addition, acupuncture may have had a positive effect on the CMT of AMD patients. However, the certainty of the evidence was low due to concerns about the quality of the included studies.

According to TCM theory, inner eye tissue is closely related to meridians, which are the distribution network of essential substances of qi, blood, and body fluids throughout the body. The macula is yellowish on the unshaded fundus or eyeball, so it is considered to belong to the foot Taiyin Spleen Channel [30]. The spleen has the function of controlling the normal operation of blood in the meridians. Once the spleen-qi movement is not comfortable, it will impair the spleen’s ability to control the blood flow, which will cause the macular blood to flow out of the blood vessels. Of the twelve channels, only the liver channel is directly connected to the eyes. Therefore, the liver channel plays an important role in connecting the eyes with the liver, which can communicate the flow of qi and blood between the two organs. In the TCM system, the liver is the main reservoir of blood and the eyes need to be nourished by blood. In addition, liver qi is also closely related to eye function. Only when the liver-qi is comfortable can the eyes perform optimally [30]. Therefore, Qi and blood are very important for the eyes, and regulating qi and blood has become an important principle in the treatment of AMD in TCM theory.

In TCM theory, acupoints are specific parts of the body surface that reflect the state of human organs and regulate their physiological functions. Through acupuncture to stimulate the acupoint of the meridians, the human qi machinery is regulated, so as to ease the movement of qi and blood of the meridians, so that the eyes can get the nourishment of qi and blood, and finally treat the discomfort of the eyes. In addition, acting on acupoints around the eye is also believed to stimulate the movement of qi and blood in the eye and treat eye diseases. For example, the acupoint around the eyes, Jingming Point (BL1). As the first point of the bladder meridian, BL1 receives the ascending qi and blood from the bladder meridian and supplies it to the eyes. The eye receives the supply of qi and blood and therefore can see clearly. At present, acupuncture treatment of AMD mostly uses a combination of periocular and systemic acupuncture points [31].

Relevant histological studies have found that local acupoints may include high-density nerve endings, nerve and vascular components, and mast cells with sensory stimulation functions [32]. Acupuncture treatment of AMD mostly uses a combination of periocular and systemic acupuncture points. When the points are stimulated by acupuncture, in addition to the local release of biological factors to regulate local effects, acupuncture also transmits somatosensory information to the central nervous system by stimulating the nerves connected to the skin and muscles, thereby regulating the function of the autonomic nervous system [32, 33].

Oxidative stress is known to be one of the important pathogenesis of AMD [34]. The photoreceptor cells and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells in the retina need to be metabolized in a high oxygen environment to fully exert their physiological functions, but at the same time, this will lead to a large accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). In addition, due to the presence of a large number of unsaturated fatty acids and photoreceptor cytochromes, the macular region exhibits characteristics including high oxygen consumption and sensitivity to light radiation, which will further generate ROS [34, 35]. The increased level of ROS not only directly damages the components of RPE cells and photoreceptor cells such as proteins and lipids, thereby impairing their physiological functions, but also stimulates RPE cells to produce VEGF and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 to stimulate CNV generation [34, 36].

Several studies have found that acupuncture has the effect of maintaining redox homeostasis, which is achieved by modulating the imbalance between pro-oxidants and antioxidants [37]. Acupuncture can reduce oxidative stress and injury by inhibiting the production of ROS, reducing the ratio of the redox state of plasma glutathione/oxidized glutathione, and increasing the expression of redox effector [32, 33, 38, 39]. In addition, the regulatory effects of acupuncture on autophagy [40], inflammatory factors [41], and complement levels [42] may also play a role in delaying the progression of AMD.

Some studies have reported positive effects of acupuncture in AMD patients. Krenn et al. found in an observational study that acupuncture may have a positive effect on the vision of AMD patients [11]. Li et al. found that acupuncture improved the visual acuity of patients and reduced the levels of the macular nerve fiber layer, retinal neuroepithelium layer, pigment epithelium, and choroid capillary composite layer. Further, a 3-month follow-up showed that the improvement effect on visual acuity and macular retinal structure was still be maintained [12]. Other studies have also reported positive effects of acupuncture in patients with dry or wet AMD, including improving visual prognosis [4345], alleviating ocular symptoms (e.g., visual distortion, blurred vision, visual fatigue, shadow occlusion) [43, 44], and enhancing the quality of life of the patients [45]. Similarly, our meta-analysis showed that acupuncture improved clinical efficacy rates and BCVA in AMD patients, and sensitivity analysis showed stability for both outcomes. However, when limiting the duration of intervention to 20–50 days, we did not observe significant improvements in BCVA and CMT in the acupuncture group compared to the control group, suggesting that prolonged intervention may be necessary for the efficacy of acupuncture. In addition, a subgroup analysis of wet AMD patients showed no improvement in BCVA and CMT with acupuncture, despite its ability to improve clinical efficiency in patients with wet AMD. It should be noted that the limitation of the number of studies in the subgroup analysis reduces the certainty of this conclusion. None of the studies mentioned the follow-up of patients’ visual acuity; therefore, we cannot provide evidence to support the effects of acupuncture on the long-term vision prognosis of patients.

Results from a meta-analysis of 3 studies showed that compared with the control, acupuncture reduced the CMT more in the AMD patients. However, the lack of included literature and the high heterogeneity of outcomes greatly limit the certainty of this evidence. CMT is an important indicator of OCT for observing the morphological structure and pathological changes of the macular area. An increase in CMT is related to the deterioration of retinal function and can damage visual acuity in AMD patients [4649]. Acupuncture can reduce CMT, which may be related to the expansion of the surrounding blood vessels, thereby improving the microcirculation in the macular region [1618]. This microcirculation can not only improve the nutrient supply to the working cells in the fundus [50] but also promote the absorption of hemorrhage and edema caused by CNV to restore the normal shape and function of the macular area. Only two studies reported side effects [17, 28]. The failure to mention the qualifications of the acupuncturists and the small number of research samples make their finding extremely uncertain. We noted that one of the studies reported 10 cases of bleeding at the site of acupuncture [28]. After further communication with the author, the bleeding occurred when the needle was withdrawn and could be stopped after a cotton swab was pressed against the bleeding site for around 10 seconds. It is necessary to standardize the extraction process of acupuncture needles. In reports of acupuncture treatment of other eye diseases, acupuncture was a relatively safe treatment method [5153], and its safety in application to AMD treatment still needs further research.

All the included studies were conducted in China, so the global inference is limited. The population involved in this study was over 50 years old; considering that cases of AMD between the ages of 40 and 50 are not uncommon [54], we cannot assume that our results apply to all age groups. In addition, we reviewed the related technologies for acupuncture treatment in AMD. None of the studies provided detailed information on the acupuncture practitioners. Our senior acupuncture review authors (WQP and ZJ) found that most of the studies (88.9%) selected appropriate acupoints because these acupoints were used by professionally trained and experienced clinicians for a long time. Seven studies used a sufficient frequency and treatment time. Nine studies mentioned specific acupuncture techniques, which can ensure the reproducibility of the acupuncture implementation. None of the included studies guaranteed that participants or acupuncturists had been blinded successfully. The quality of evidence was limited by the high risk of co-intervention bias (performance bias), failure to use intentional analysis (attrition bias), and the inconsistency (high heterogeneity; I2 = 89%, for BCVA; I2 = 67%, for CMT) and imprecision (335 samples for BCVA, 201 samples for CMT) of studies involving BCVA and CMT. Therefore, no evidence was highly certain. The quality of our evidence ranged from “low” to “very low” according to the GRADE evaluation system (S2 Table in S1 Appendix).

4.2 Limitations

First, the quality of included studies is of concern, with many studies failing to mention allocation concealment, or blinding of participants or personnel, limiting our understanding of the evidence. Second, although we implemented an adequate and detailed search strategy, the possibility of publication bias cannot be ruled out, which means that some result values may be amplified, especially in the presence of selective reporting bias in some included studies. Also, most studies used clinical efficacy rates as an outcome measure rather than BCVA or other international standard vision outcomes, failing to thoroughly assess the efficacy of acupuncture.

5. Conclusion

Limited evidence suggests that patients with AMD may benefit from acupuncture, especially those with dry AMD. Considering the potential of acupuncture treatment, it is necessary to carry out a rigorously designed RCT to verify its efficacy.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. PRISMA 2009 checklist.

(DOC)

S1 Appendix

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

All authors of this manuscript would like to express our sincere gratitude to the ophthalmologist of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Oriental Hospital for reviewing acupuncture techniques.

Data Availability

All data can be found in the article.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), No.81874491. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

Decision Letter 0

Ditta Zobor

30 Aug 2022

PONE-D-22-08228Effects of acupuncture on age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Zhou,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 14 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ditta Zobor, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf".

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“This study was supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), No.81874491.”

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: ""The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

“This study was supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), No.81874491.”

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

“This study was supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), No.81874491.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Thank you for stating the following in your Competing Interests section: 

“None”

Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state ""The authors have declared that no competing interests exist."", as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now

This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. Please amend your authorship list in your manuscript file to include author names.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This meta-analysis aims to review the clinical efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). In fact,there is no high-quality evidence that acupuncture is effective in treating patients with AMD. Analysis showed patients with dry AMD may benefit from acupuncture. Overall, this study has clinical significance. It can provide some evidence for clinical practice and further clinical trial.

Figures should be more clear.

Reviewer #2: Overall, the methodology is acceptable overall. However, there are some limitations as follows.

1. In methods, the criteria for considering studies for the review should move in front of the search strategy. And in 2.3.1, just RCTs is enough, the second half of the sentences could be omit.

2. In 2.3.2, at least one diagnostic criteria should be the references.

3. 2.4, I believe the exclusion criteria is not enough.

4. In the search strategy, supplement 1.1, the search strategies are not rigorous, Published, highly sensitive, validated search filters to identify randomized trials should be considered, not just RCT(publication Type).

5. in 2.5, the duplicate documents should be filtered by software, not human.

6. Some of the methodologies are outdated: risk of bias tools 2.0 should be used; Revman Web should be used, or at least Revman 5.4.

7. In 3.3, as there is no sham acupuncture, how to blind the practioners?

8. In table 3, is the P value for the heterogeneity, or for the effect size RR.

9. In 3.4.4, one study reported 10 of 22 patients in the acupuncture group had bleeding. I assume there are more discussion about the safety of acupunture of AMD, the acupoints, the manipulation, etc..

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Chen, Chao

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0283375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283375.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


6 Sep 2022

Jian Zhou

Dear Editors and Reviewers:

Thank you for your letter and the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript

entitled “Effects of acupuncture on age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials” (Manuscript ID: PONE-D-22-08228). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our research. We have studied the comments carefully and have made corrections which we hope meet with approval. Revised portions are marked in red on the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responses to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:

Responds to the reviewer’s comments:

Journal requirements:

1. Response to comment: adjust for manuscript style.

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. We changed the style based on the style templates.

2. Response to comment: stating the financial disclosure.

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. We added the financial disclosure in the cover letter.

3. Response to comment: remove any funding-related text from the manuscript:

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. We removed the funding-related text from the manuscript and add it in the cover letter.

4. Response to comment: stating Competing Interests section.

Response: We added the Competing Interests section in the cover letter, thank you.

5. Response to comment: amend authorship list.

Response: We did a relevant adjustment to the authorship list. Thank you for your suggestion.

Special thanks to you for your good comments!

Reviewer #1:

1. Response to comment: Figures should be more clear.

Response: Thank you very much for your recognition of this paper. We re-adjusted the graphics quality, which is shown in Figure 2.

Special thanks to you for your good comments!

Reviewer #2:

1. Response to comment: In methods, the criteria for considering studies for the review should move in front of the search strategy. And in 2.3.1, just RCTs is enough, the second half of the sentences could be omitted.

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. We moved the criteria in front of the search strategy and made adjustments to the study type in the inclusion criteria.

2. Response to comment: add diagnostic criteria.

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. We supplemented the diagnostic criteria for AMD and please refer to them in 2.2.2. Thank you.

3. Response to comment: amend exclusion criteria.

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. We amended the exclusion criteria and please refer to them in 2.3. Thanks for your opinion.

4. Response to comment: modify the search strategies.

Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. We added "random" or "randomized trials" to the search strategy and did the search again. The number of studies we searched changed, but no new studies were found that met the inclusion criteria. Please refer to the supplementary material and Figure 1. Thanks for your opinion.

5. Response to comment: the duplicate documents should be filtered by software, not humans.

Response: Thank you for your comments. We apologize for not being clear on this part. We used Endnote software for the preliminary deletion of duplicate articles. We have updated this section in 2.5. Thank you.

6. Response to comment: Some of the methodologies are outdated.

Response: Thank you for kindly remind. We used ROBIS 2 to re-evaluate the quality of the literature, please refer to Figure 2. In addition, we used Revman 5.4 and the results did not change in any way. We have updated the content in the corresponding part. Thank you.

7. Response to comment: In 3.3, as there is no sham acupuncture, how to blind the practitioners?

Response: What we mean by blinding here is that the intervening acupuncturist was unaware that the patient was the researcher. We realized that the description here was inappropriate and removed this content. Thank you for remind.

8. Response to comment: In table 3, is the P value for the heterogeneity, or for the effect size RR.

Response: The P value is for effect size including RR MD or SMD.

9. Response to comment: add more discussion about the safety of acupuncture.

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. We noted that one of the studies reported 10 cases of bleeding at the site of acupuncture. After further communication with the authors, the bleeding occurred when the needle was withdrawn and could be stopped after a cotton swab was pressed against the bleeding site for 10 seconds. We believe that this is mainly caused by the improper operation of acupuncture extraction. In our study, there was insufficient evidence to investigate the safety of acupuncture for AMD due to few studies reporting side effects. Combined with the available evidence, we found no significant side effects of acupuncture. In other meta-analyses of acupuncture in the treatment of ophthalmic diseases [1-3], acupuncture has shown a good safety profile. We have added relevant descriptions to the safety issues of acupuncture, thank you.

Special thanks to you for your good comments!

Other changes:

Since we have re-performed the research process, we have updated the content of supplementary material 1.1.

We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript.

These changes will not influence the framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked them in red in the revised paper.

We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly and hope that the correction will meet with approval.

Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

Decision Letter 1

Shiying Li

8 Mar 2023

Effects of acupuncture on age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PONE-D-22-08228R1

Dear Dr. Zhou,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Shiying Li, MBBS

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

All comments are responsed, I suggested to accept it.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #3: Partly

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #3: 1. Line 18~19, please describe the ‘relationship’ more exactly, it would be better to describe what relationship is.

2. Line 36, please add the full name of the ‘RCT’ because this is the first time to be here.

3. Table 1, there are some overlapped number markers (‘Outcomes’), it would be better to make them more clear by adjusting them, for example use 1~4 to replace ‘1234’

4. Line 250~259, when you discussed the ‘TCM theory’, it would be better to add more references to address this question, especially more discussion about why the acupuncture is not effective in treating the patients with AMD.

5. In Discussion, it would be better to discuss the effects of the ‘acupuncture points’, for example BL1.

Reviewer #4: 1.The literature collection process is detailed and clear, but most of the content of the discussion is mainly summary, the review content can be further enriched.

2.Possible bias could be more specific

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Shiying Li

14 Mar 2023

PONE-D-22-08228R1

Effects of acupuncture on age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Dear Dr. Zhou:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Shiying Li

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Checklist. PRISMA 2009 checklist.

    (DOC)

    S1 Appendix

    (PDF)

    Data Availability Statement

    All data can be found in the article.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES