Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2023 Mar 13;9(3):e14541. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14541

Potentiality of homestead agroforestry for achieving sustainable development goals: Bangladesh perspectives

Umama Begum Ruba a, Mohammad Samiul Ahsan Talucder a,b,
PMCID: PMC10036652  PMID: 36967908

Abstract

Homestead agroforestry is one of the recognized agroforestry practices in Bangladesh. While the monoculture cropping system is enormously intensified, homestead agroforestry has added dimension to rapid economic growth. But despite having significance, homestead agroforestry is not gaining concern in further development. The study was done to bring this topic into focus by compiling the prospects of homestead agroforestry in Bangladesh by highlighting the significance and necessity. A secondary analysis was done by reviewing the findings to do this research. To collect paper keywords, “Bangladesh homestead agroforestry”, “Homestead agroforestry practices”, “Homestead agroforestry status”, “Homestead biodiversity’', “Homestead and SDGs,” “Dominant species,” and “Home garden agroforestry system” were entered. Following the PRISMA framework, 337 papers were collected, among which 113 met the inclusion or eligibility criteria. The interrelated publications of homestead agroforestry with SDGs were assessed from the 113 shortlisted articles. The interrelated publications assessment on homestead agroforestry in the context of Sustainable Development Goals figured out that major research output was oriented towards no poverty (44%), decent work and economic growth (27%), zero hunger (20%), indicating its link to achieve SDGs from Bangladesh perspectives. The shortlisted articles were reviewed in the context of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), food security, livelihood improvement, environmental resources conservation, and dominant species coverage. Consequently, the dominant species were tabulated along with their respective coverages according to their uses. The study identified that in all localities of Bangladesh, Mango, Areca, Coconut, and Mahogany are the highly preferred dominant species, while Jackfruit, Acacia, and Banana also prevailed. Hence, the study concluded that homestead agroforestry has significant prospects in food security, livelihood improvement, and environmental resources conservation, and its contribution to achieving Sustainable Development Goals cannot be ignored. But homestead agroforestry system is exposed to vulnerability due to constraints. The systematic elimination of prevailing constraints can help in successfully executing sustainable development goals, and fruitful consequences can be derived by imposing potential concerns on this sector.

Keywords: Bangladesh, Dominant species, Environmental resources, Food security, Homestead agroforestry, Prospects, SDGs

1. Introduction

Bangladesh has become self-sufficient in food production. The geographical position, climatic conditions, and arable land have made Bangladesh a vibrant economy. The geographical location of Bangladesh is between 20.34′ & 26.38′ north latitudes and 88.01′ & 92.41′ east latitudes of South Asia. The average temperature ranges between 11° and 20° during winter whereas 21°–38° during summer. The subtropical monsoon is the climatic characteristic where rainfall ranges between 1100 mm and 3400 mm from June to August. According to World Bank data, 38% of total employment is from the agriculture sector [1]. Agriculture is the primary employment sector for a maximum number of people, where maximum land is utilized for agricultural production. In the era of the 21st century, addressing Sustainable Development Goals is mandatory through which the progress of a country can be measured. The agriculture sector triggered the accomplishment of such goals. According to the report of the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics 2020, 13.02% of the GDP of the country is contributed by the agriculture sector, and it is recognized as a productive sector in the economy as 87% of rural people directly or indirectly rely upon agriculture (BBS report, 2020). The rural economy is dependent upon this sector for food security. People are intimately connected with crop production as well as forestry practices. The forest and its natural resources provide food, timber, fuels, and fodder. Meanwhile, ecological functions of carbon storage, wildlife habitat maintenance, and environmental resource protection are also carried out by forests. But the agriculture sector is vulnerable due to population problems, deforestation, and natural hazards. Every year certain localities of Bangladesh undergo natural disasters such as floods, hailstorms, soil erosion, landslide, heavy rain, drought, etc. People are exposed to diseases and malnutrition, still living below the poverty line, and are hungry. In response to this vulnerable situation, agroforestry is a potential sector that can effectively respond. While monoculture is commonly preferred by farmers who deal only with a mono-cropping pattern, agroforestry joins two dominant aspects of tree and crop cultivation on the same land with or without animals. Agroforestry has the potential to improve living standards through poverty elimination [2]. The appropriate management practices of agroforestry can respond to climate change and acts as a mitigation option for climate change [3]. The opportunity for greater output becomes broadened by adopting homestead agroforestry. While home gardens occupy 0.88 million hectares of land, rural areas' home gardens occupy 0.81 million hectares, with 11% occupied for the plantation of vegetables [4]. Consequently, such areas and practices enlarge the beneficiary output by providing fuel, wood or timber, fruit-bearing plants, medicinal plants, non-timber products, and forages with significant economic value. As a result, homestead agroforestry fulfills the objectives of food security and cash return, nutritional security, environmental sustainability, and positive climatic action. In developing countries like Bangladesh, homestead agroforestry has added new dimensions to food and nutrition security and poverty alleviation by creating the opportunity for income generation, inequalities reduction, and execution of women empowerment. At the same time, the natural agroforestry offered by homesteads has the potential to protect natural habitats or lives on land, such as plant biodiversity, and store carbon, thereby protecting the environment from greenhouse gas emissions and saving the climate. As a result, people can lead a healthy life, and developing countries like Bangladesh can move towards achieving Sustainable Development Goals. Despite the economic significance, homestead agroforestry is an underrated topic beyond the focus and concerns. Most empirical studies identified the existing species without explaining the potential prospects for Sustainable Goals Development Achievement. Again, most of the studies identified farmers' barriers in homestead production practice and recommended possible strategies to upgrade this sector. Hence, the study’s objective was to address homestead agroforestry prospects in the context of Bangladesh. The prospects were figured out in a significant dimension by reviewing published information regarding homestead agroforestry. Through secondary qualitative research, the study aimed to address the significant aspects in the context of Bangladesh to achieve Sustainable Development Goals effectively. We overviewed the scope of homestead agroforestry towards sustainable development targets. This study’s primary objective was to identify homestead agroforestry’s potential in achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Bangladesh. Besides, the paper aimed to figure out the link of homestead agroforestry to food security, livelihood improvement, and environmental resources conservation from Bangladesh’s perspective. Dominant species and coverage of various species prioritized by farmers for production on homesteads assessment was another focus to determine the preference for major species among farmers in multiple localities. Consequently, the study aimed to determine constraints that hinder the efficient adoption of homestead agroforestry practice and identify recommended strategies to improve the homestead agroforestry system. This study comprises contribution to policy implications as it can help in figuring out all favorable prospects of homestead agroforestry that can add value to the implementation of Sustainable Development Goals by acting as a policy option. The implications of policies in terms of minimizing existing constraints and executing recommended strategies can bring out the welfare of rural farmers. The study highlighted synergies between Sustainable Development Goals and the food system, livelihood improvement, and protection of natural resources.

2. Methodology

2.1. Article search and inclusion

Sources of information were collected from online electronic journal databases of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science to proceed with the review. The content search was carried out by searching key phrases of the review topic. Key terms “Bangladesh homestead agroforestry,” “Homestead agroforestry practices,” “Homestead agroforestry status,” “Homestead biodiversity”, “Homestead and SDGs,” “Dominant species,” and “Home garden agroforestry system” were entered. Initially, all articles collected from respective online databases were listed in an excel file with their title. The total number of identified articles was 337. In the next step, duplicate articles were removed and marked excluded, were 100 in number, and a list of recorded 237 papers was screened. A systematic approach undertook the proceeding of reviewing 237 articles. A set of eligibility criteria (Table 1) was determined, and articles were excluded based on eligibility criteria.

Table 1.

Eligibility criteria for articles inclusion.

Criterion Inclusion Eligibility Exclusion criteria
Literature type Research article Book, review, conference/seminar/workshop paper
Text availability Full text Text unavailability
Language English Not in English
Paper quality Non-predatory, original article Predatory
Study region relevancy Bangladesh Not relevant to Bangladesh
Relevant article to the research topic Comprehensive Non-comprehensive

The articles, mainly book chapters, review papers, conference or workshop or seminar papers, full text unavailable, not in English, published in a predatory journal, not relevant to the study region, and irrelevant to the research topic, were excluded. The total number of excluded articles was 124 based on eligibility criteria. Such criteria were used in article selection in previous studies [5,6]. A total number of 113 articles were selected and forwarded for further qualitative analysis. The detailed methodology of the PRISMA framework of article selection is depicted in figure.

2.2. Article analysis

From the shortlisted 113 articles, the interrelated publications in the context of SDGs were assessed (Table 2) based on sustainable development goals. Later, a comprehensive review regarding the potentiality of homestead agroforestry was conducted from shortlisted articles in the context of the implementation of SDGs, food security, livelihood improvement, and environmental resources conservation was made from shortlisted articles. The dominant species and coverage according to various usage were also tabulated from the literature (Table 4). The frequency of species was categorized into three levels: low (frequency below 5), moderate (frequency ranging between 5 and 10), and high (frequency greater than 10) to analyze dominancy levels in terms of their frequency determined in different localities (Table 5). Again, the division-wise frequency of the dominant species was also determined (Table 6). Finally, the constraints and recommended strategies from the literature were reviewed structurally. All the analyses were done using SPSS software and MS excel. Data were systematically reviewed considering historical and updated referenced papers to determine the potential contribution to achieving Sustainable Development Goals and targets. Data were presented in tables and relevant figures.

Table 2.

The assessed interrelated publications of homestead agroforestry in the context of sustainable development goals.

SDGs Publications number (%)
No Poverty 50 (44)
Zero Hunger 23 (20)
Good Health and Well being 14 (12)
Quality Education 0 (0)
Gender Equality 6 (5)
Clean Water and Sanitation 1 (1)
Affordable and Clean Energy 20 (18)
Decent Work and Economic Growth 31 (27)
Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure 0 (0)
Reduced Inequalities 9 (8)
Sustainable Cities and Communities 4 (4)
Reasonable Consumption and Production 13 (12)
Climate Action 19 (17)
Life Below water 1 (1)
Life on Land 15 (13)
Peace, Justice, and Strong Institution 2 (2)
Partnership for Goals 0 (0)

Table 4.

Dominant coverage of plant species in homesteads of various localities.

Dominant Species Located Region Division Species Coverage or function (%) References
Coconut, Betel nut, Guava, Banana, Papaya, Date palm, Mango, Mahogany, Raintree, Sada koroi, Teak Sandwip Chattogram Fruit-23
Vegetables-22
Timber-17
Fuelwood-15
Medicinal-11
Ornamental-8
Spice-4
[7]
Acacia, Jackfruit, Coconut, Mango, Teak Bandarban Chattogram MPTS-37
Fruits 13 timber-13
Fruits and medicinal-20
[8]
Areca, Coconut, Mango, Bamboo sp., Alocasia indica, Jackfruit, Date palm, Citrus, Sofeda, Papaya, Drumstick, Turmeric, Plum Kalaroa, Satkhira Khulna Woody and non-woody- 15.55
Multipurpose-13.33
Self-consumption- 64
Commercial-9
Self-consumption & commercial-27
[9]
Betel nut, Jackfruit, Mango Rajshahi Rajshahi Fruit-33
Timber-24
Firewood-16
Vegetables-9
Spices-4
Medicinal-6
Ornamental-8
[10]
Betelnut, bamboo, Mango, Banana, Coconut, Fig, Acacia, Eucalyptus, Teknaf Peninsula, Cox’s Bazar Chattogram Not mentioned [11]
Alocasia indica, Xanthosoma nigrum, Colocasia nymphaepholia, Turmeric, Citrus limon, Mango, Jackfruit, Date palm, Musa sp., Areca, Coconut, Hog Plum, Black plum, Mahogany, Raintree, Giant bamboo Bagerhat, Satkhira,
Khulna, Faridpur,
Chuadanga, Jessore
Khulna Food-36
Medicinal-27
Fuelwood-22
Ornamental-19
Timber-11
Fodder-8
Fiber-1.5
Ceremonial-1
[12]
Raintree, Mango, Banana species, Coconut, Betel nut Khulna, Jessore
Bagerhat, Satkhira,
Chuadanga, Faridpur
Khulna Not mentioned [13]
Coconut, Areca, Simul, Mandar Sudharam, Noakhali Chattogram Not mentioned [14]
Betelnut, Mahogany, Akashmoni, Raintree, Turmeric, Spinach, Papaya, Chili, Aroid Nakla,
Sherpuur
Mymensingh Timber −28.85
Fruit −36.54
Medicinal- 11.53
Fodder −11.53
Ornamental- 7.69
Others −3.85
[15]
Jackfruit, Mango, mahogany, Coconut, Teak, Guava, Litchi Gazipur district Dhaka Horticultural-65.12
Timber & fuelwood −34.88
[16]
Betel nut, Velvety apple, Mango, Coconut, Jackfruit, Guava, Mahogany, Raintree,
Raj koroi, Katbadam
Bhola, Borguna, Patuakhali Barisal Timber-53.62
Fruit-46.38
[17]
Acacia, Eucalyptus, Jackfruit, Neem, Datura, Basok, Betelnut,
Coconut, Mango, Bokain, Greengram, Gamar, chili, Jute,
Bitter gourd, Bottle gourd
Gobadia, Mymensingh Mymensingh Fruit-21.74
Vegetable-28.26
Crop-17.39
Timber-13.04
Medicinal-13.04
Fuel-6.52
[18]
Bamboo, Mango, Betel nut, Date palm, Jackfruit, Neem, Coconut Naogaon Rajshahi Timber-51.79
Fruit-35.71
Fuelwood-19.64
[19]
Acacia, Betel nut, Musa sp. Lakshmipur and Narsingdi Dhaka Timber-44.26
Fruits-55.74
[20]
Banana, Betel nut, Jackfruit, Mango, Mahogany, Teak,
Acacia, Bamboo species
Mymensingh (Bhaluka, Mymensing sadar, Fulbaria, Muktagacha) Mymensingh Woody perennial-53.09
Vegetable −46.91
[21]
Mango, Jackfruit, Papaya, Coconut, Acacia hybrid, Mahogany, Coriander, Areca, Tulsi, Neem, Bamboo, Pudina,
Bohera
Kamalganj, Moulvibazar Sylhet Timber-25.55
Fruit-26.28
Vegetable-32.85
Medicinal and other-15.33
[22]
Akashmoni, Jackfruit, Coconut, Mango, Neem, Eucalyptus, Bokain, Betelnut, Jujube Madhupur, Tangail Dhaka Not mentioned [23]
Jackfruit, Acacia, Mango, Mahogany, Eucalyptus, Papaya, Plum, wood apple Gopalpur, Tangail Dhaka Timber-51.13
Fruit-21.05
Medicinal-26.32
[24]
Betel leaf, Betel nut, Pineapple, Ginger, Turmeric Jaintiapur, Sylhet Sylhet Timber −22.05
Horticultural-32.35
Annual crop-19.12
Spice-10.29
Medicinal- 8.82
Bamboo- 7.35
[25]
Mango, kochu, Mahogany, Sajna, Areca, Turmeric, Ginger Domar, Nilphamari Rangpur Fruits-37
Timber-23
Medicinal-17
Vegetable and spice-15
Ornamental-8
[26]
Jackfruit, Guava, Jujube, Litchi, Bamboo, Mango, Coconut, Areca, Mahogany, Teak, Silk tree, Acacia, Kadam Gazipur sadar, Gazipur Dhaka Fruit-45.3
Bamboo- 29.5
Timber-25.2
[27]
Guava, Coconut, Mango, Raintree, Mahogany, Banana,
Sajna, Neem
Keshabpur and chaugachha, Jessore Khulna Food-71
Fuelwood-18
Timber-17
Ornamental-5
Fodder-3
[28]
Coconut, Giant Bamboo, Betel nut, Mahogany, Bengal bamboo Bagerhat sadar, Bagerhat Khulna Fruit-47.6
Timber-29.6
Bamboo-22.7
[29]
Betel nut, Jackfruit, Lemon, Coconut, Mango, silk koroi, Kala koroi, Rain tree Sandwip, Chattogram Chattogram Fruit-57.58
Timber-42.42
[30]
Akashmoni, Neem, Mahogany, Mango, Eucalyptus, Jackfruit,
Wood Apple, Bamboo, Ipil Ipil, Mandar, Sissoo
Gopalpur, Tangail Dhaka Timber-29.34
Fruit-32
Medicinal-17.34
Fodder-10.66
[31]
Betel nut, Hog Plum, Coconut, Pomegranate, Acacia, Mahogany, Raintree Chhagalnaiya, Feni Chattogram Fruit-58.97
Timber-41.03
[32]
Mango, Mahogany, Earleaf acacia, Papaya, Litchi, Wood apple, Banana, Drumstick, Hori Toki Bandarban and Rangamati Chattogram Not mentioned [33]
Citrus Barlekha, Moulvibazar Sylhet Timber-34.09
Fruit-31.09
Agar-18.14
Citrus-12.63
Medicinal-3
Aesthetic-1.05
[34]
Mango, Mahogany, Coconut, Jackfruit, Date palm, Banana, Papaya, Sweet gourd Rajshahi Rajshahi Not mentioned [35]
Mango, Jackfruit, Neem, Musa spp., Mahogany Takhurgao sadar, Baliadangi, Thakurgaon Rangpur Not mentioned [36]
Jackfruit, Eucalyptus, Ipil ipil, Neem, Mango, Mahogany Natore Rajshahi Not mentioned [37]
Betel nut, Coconut, Mango, Banana, Giant taro, Jackfruit, citrus, Turmeric, Drumstick, Date palm, Papaya, Jam, Sofeda Kalaroa, Satkhira Khulna (Woody & non-woody) Climbers 15
Tree - 40
Herb −25
Shrub-20
Self-consumption-15
Self-consumption & commercial −27
[38]
Acacia, Teak, Gamar, Mahogany, Mango, Jam, Chili,
Jackfruit, Guava, Betel nut, Durba grass, Neem, Thankuni, Tulsi, Pineapple, Banana, Citrus, Papaya, Ginger, Turmeric, Onion, Brinjal, Red amaranth
Durgapur, Netrokona Mymensingh Food-12.86
Fruits-21.43
Energy producing-17.14
Timber-15.71
Medicinal- 32.86
[39]
Coconut, Mahogany, Brinjal, Bottle gourd Ajmirigonj, Habigonj Sylhet Fruits-33.33
Timber-28.57
Summer vegetable-22.62
Winter vegetables-15.48
[40]
Jackfruit, Mango, Mahogany, Betel nut, Bead tree, Eucalyptus Rangpur Rangpur Not mentioned [41]
Coconut, Mango, Betelnut, Banana, Jujube, Mahogany,
Neem, Sweet gourd, Country bean, Chili
Noakhali Chattogram Fruits-30.9
Timber-29.09
Vegetables-34.54
Spices-5.45
[42]
Coconut, Mango, Jujube, Banana, Betel nut, Papaya, Guava Ajmiriganj, Habiganj Sylhet Not mentioned [43]
Coconut, betel nut, Tamarind, Mango, Raintree, Lemon, Pummelo, night queen, Ginger, Turmeric Kishoreganj Dhaka Fruit & food −45
Medicinal - 38.71
Firewood - 32.26
Timber - 29
[44]
Betel nut, Mango, Jackfruit, Coconut Teknaf, Cox’s bazar Chattogram Not mentioned [45]

Table 5.

Most prevalent dominant species in the studied areas.

Dominant Species Frequency Percent Dominance Level
Low = <5, Moderate = 5 to 9, High= >9
Acacia 14 4.3 High
Amra 2 .6 Low
Areca 28 8.7 High
Aroid 1 .3 Low
Bamboo 10 3.1 Moderate
Banana 14 4.3 High
Basok 1 .3 Low
Bead tree 3 .9 Low
Betel leaf 1 .3 Low
Bitter gourd 1 .3 Low
Bohera 1 .3 Low
Bottle gourd 2 .6 Low
Brinjal 2 .6 Low
Chilli 4 1.2 Low
Citrus 7 2.2 Moderate
Coconut 25 7.7 High
Coriander 1 .3 Low
Country bean 1 .3 Low
Date palm 6 1.9 Moderate
Dhatura 1 .3 Low
Durba grass 1 .3 Low
Eucalyptus 7 2.2 Moderate
Fig 1 .3 Low
Gamar 2 .6 Low
Ginger 4 1.2 Low
Green gram 1 .3 Low
Guava 7 2.2 Moderate
Horitoki 1 .3 Low
Ipil ipil 2 .6 Low
Jackfruit 22 6.8 High
Jam 3 .9 Low
Jujube 4 1.2 Low
Jute 1 .3 Low
Kadam 1 .3 Low
Kala koroi 1 .3 Low
Katbadam 1 .3 Low
Kochu 4 1.2 Low
Litchi 3 .9 Low
Mahogony 22 6.8 High
Mandar 2 .6 Low
Mango 31 9.6 High
Neem 10 3.1 Moderate
Night queen 1 .3 Low
Onion 1 .3 Low
Papaya 10 3.1 Moderate
Pineapple 2 .6 Low
Plum 2 .6 Low
Pomegranate 1 .3 Low
Pomelo 1 .3 Low
Pudina 1 .3 Low
Raintree 9 2.8 Moderate
Raj koroi 1 .3 Low
Red amaranth 1 .3 Low
Sada koroi 1 .3 Low
Sajna 5 1.5 Moderate
Silk koroi 1 .3 Low
Silk tree 1 .3 Low
Simul 1 .3 Low
Sissoo 1 .3 Low
Sofeda 2 .6 Low
Spinach 1 .3 Low
Sweet gourd 2 .6 Low
Tamarind 1 .3 Low
Teak 6 1.9 Moderate
Thankuni 1 .3 Low
Tulsi 2 .6 Low
Turmeric 8 2.5 Moderate
Velvety apple 1 .3 Low
Wood apple 3 .9 Low

Table 6.

Division-wise prevalence of high and moderate dominant species.

Dominant Species Dhaka Chattogram Khulna Rajshahi Barisal Sylhet Mymensingh Rangpur
Mango 6 7 5 4 0 5 3 3
Areca 4 7 5 2 1 3 4 2
Coconut 4 8 6 2 1 3 1 0
Mahogany 4 4 3 2 1 2 3 3
Jackfruit 5 3 3 4 1 1 3 2
Acacia 5 4 0 0 0 1 4 0
Banana 1 4 4 1 0 1 2 1
Bamboo 2 1 4 1 0 1 1 0
Neem 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 1
Papaya 1 2 2 1 0 2 2 0
Raintree 1 3 3 0 1 0 1 0
Turmeric 1 0 3 0 0 1 2 1
Citrus 1 1 3 0 0 1 1 0
Eucalyptus 3 1 0 1 0 0 1 1
Guava 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
Date palm 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0
Teak 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 0
Drumstick 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1

Most literature had addressed homestead agroforestry’s efficiency in food security, employment opportunity, and economic growth that were efficient enough to accomplish Sustainable Development Goals of “No Poverty,” “Decent work,” and economic growth.” Again, the significant number of literature highlighted the significance of homestead agroforestry in fulfilling the goals of “Zero Hunger” followed by “Affordable and Clean Energy,” “Climate Action,” “Life on Land,” “Good Health and Well-being,” “Reasonable Consumption and Production,” “Reduced inequalities” and “Gender Equality” respectively. Most of the publications were directed toward the goals mentioned above.

3. Homestead agroforestry in the context of sustainable development goals

In tropical and subtropical regions, homestead agroforestry can be extended due to favorable climatic appearance. This ultimately helps implement the attributes of sustainable development goals, including sustainable production, food security, and nutritional security. It has been clarified that homestead agroforestry has the potential to contribute to achieving sustainable development goals. In developing countries like Bangladesh, most rural people depend on homestead products to get their required fruits, fodder, medicinal plants, and fuelwood species from homestead areas. After fulfilling the self-consumption, the rest of the products are marketed. That eventually helps in the reduction of their poverty level and also encourages economic growth through employment opportunities. Besides, an enormous contribution lies in environmental resource conservation, such as greenhouse gas emission mitigation, carbon stocking, and exotic species preservation. Hence, homestead agroforestry is greatly directed toward achieving sustainable goals as it greatly connects to fulfilling sustainable development targets (Table 3).

Table 3.

The relevancy of homestead agroforestry in achieving SDG in Bangladesh.

SDGs Homestead Agroforestry Relevance Reference
No Poverty In household income, homestead apportioned 20.65% of total annual income with profitable production of fruit and timber species such as Mango, Jackfruit, and Mahogany [46]
Zero Hunger On the off-shore island, 42.72% of vegetation was occupied by homestead products, and farmers preferred fruits (76%) and timber (62%) production that acted as a reservoir of food and income. [7]
The vegetable production by small, marginal, and landless farmers was 511 kg/year, 499 kg/year, and 422 kg/year, respectively. [47]
Good Health and Well-being Homestead agroforestry was found as a prime source of medicinal plants, and they were recorded at 32.6% in Feni. [48]
Involvement in homestead vegetable production increased the yielding of plant protein (by 171%), vitamin A (189%), vitamin C (290%), and iron (284%). [49]
Quality Education Homestead agroforestry in Bangladesh was found not directed towards this ground. Not available
Gender Equality 53% of women were connected in input organizing, selecting, and planting tree species and post plantation management comprising preservation of seeds and selling in Natore district. [50]
Clean Water and Sanitation The involvement in homestead agroforestry-related projects or agricultural diversification projects caused 100% of farmers to obtain good sanitation and safe drinking water [51]
Affordable and Clean Energy The homestead fuelwood utilization helped reduce 0.22 mg CO2 eH/Ha and contributed as an alternative to fossil fuel use in Bandarban. [8]
Fuelwood produce helped in earning US$71.9 annually. [52]
Decent Work and Economic Growth Tangible net benefits of US$674.9 (without labour cost from family) and US$535.2 (with family labour cost) derived from home garden products. [52]
As a measure of plant repositioning, homesteads contributed 18% of overall annual income in a household after fulfilling self-consumption. [9]
Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure 40% of raw materials of bamboo, such as Melocanna baccifera and Bambusa polymorpha supplied from homestead sources for the cottage industry (bamboo-based) [53]
Reduced Inequalities The homesteads of different religious subcultures significantly conserved the local ecosystem by adopting species richness in the Narsingdi district [54]
Sustainable Cities and Communities In Sylhet Metropolitan city, betel nut, Coconut, Borassus flabellifer, and date palm were common palm trees that contributed to biomass accumulation and organic carbon storage of 20.28 MT/ha [55]
Reasonable Consumption and Production In Ganges valley, homestead agroforestry supplied 30% of fruits and 80% of crops for self-consumption, where 70% of fruits were sold to local markets that indicated its beneficiary output in terms of dietary and economic [10]
Climate Action A Homestead area of 70% was found allocated for forestry in the Teknaf peninsula due to which above ground. Biomass and carbon stock recorded 235.45 Mg/ha and 117.73 Mg C/ha, respectively [11]
Life Below Water The traditional use of forestry, such as fruits of D. indica immersion, protects aquatic fish by discouraging otters [56]
Life on Land meanwhile, IUCN red list species bet, Kalo Megh, kosum were detected in the southern region [12]
Peace, Justice, and Strong Institution The contribution of neighbors in supplying sources of planting materials such as seeds, seedlings, and vegetative propagules was 3%, whereas the forest department contributed 17% [13]
Partnership for Goals The relevancy of homestead agroforestry with this goal was not detected Not available

Homestead farming led maximum farmers to prefer a high vegetable intake of 51–100 g per person per day, which was responsible for improving the farm economy and livelihood in Narsingdi and Gazipur [51]. The great extent of the production of vegetables and fruits not only satisfied self-consumption or food and nutrition security but also generated a profound net return [57]. In the case of landless, marginal, and small farmers, net benefits were derived from selling products such as homestead woodlots [58]. In Sandwip Upazila of Chattogram, fruit, timber, and fuelwood plantations were preferred by 75%,63.3%, and 45% of farmers, respectively, and succeeded in obtaining 13.5% of total annual income by securing nutritional and wood fuel requirements and climate resilience [59]. Farmers found interest in homestead agroforestry for fruit, timber, and fuelwood, and common species were recorded Jackfruit, Citrus, Litchi, Pineapple, Banana, Guava, Mango, Beechwood, Teak, Albizia spp., Mahogany, Acacia in Chattogram hill tract [60]. The presence of species fulfils the need for affordable energy utilizing fuelwood. In the south-central Noakhali district, the study revealed that 58% of respondents depended on home gardens for biomass fuel, while 87% used homestead products (wood, dry leaves, crop residues, etc.) as a source of fuelwood [14]. Homestead forests were responsible for increasing ecosystem services for which the average biomass density and carbon density were recorded at 9.33 ton/ha and 4.57 ton/ha, respectively, with the economic value of USD 80.96 ± 25.52 in Fatikchari, Chattagram [61]. While land fragmentation is a threat to sustainable cities and climatic change, homestead agroforestry eliminates the threats by increasing carbon stock and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Subsequently, life on land is protected by the maintenance of biodiversity. The presence of species richness revealed that Bangladesh could protect life on land [62]. In South Surma of Sylhet, most women showed positive opinions toward traditional homestead vegetable production practices [63]. The high Survival rate of tree species is assured by women’s involvement in site selection and maintenance within their domain, which indicates Bangladesh has the scope to intensify homestead agroforestry [64]. Women and minorities get the opportunity to access homestead production. For instance, the Manipuri community applied their indigenous management practices in the home garden in Sylhet, which expressed the probability of inequality reduction by ensuring their accessibility [65] (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Article inclusion procedure based on eligibility criteria.

Meanwhile, among religious communities, the highest source of tree species was derived from home gardens in Narsingdi Sadar, Raipur, and Palash sub-districts of Narsingdi district [66]. Hence, homestead agroforestry paves the way for livelihood improvement. Women’s engagement in homestead agricultural activities, consumption, marketing, and decision-making hinted at the opportunity for optimum production through further training facilities, technical support, and encouragement [67]. Fig. 2 depicts the potentiality of homestead agroforestry for Sustainable Development Goals in Bangladesh by combining all targets.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Potentiality of homestead agroforestry towards attaining SDGs.

3.1. Prospects of homestead agroforestry in food security

Homestead facilitates self-consumption, thus securing food requirements in Bangladesh. Farmers of different regions depend on homesteads for household food security and have opted to plant diverse plants in their homestead areas. A study in 2015 revealed that the homestead area increased by 55–57%, spreading from a low elevation to a high elevation over eight years [68]. A study in Northern Bangladesh expressed that 9% of land found utilized as homestead agroforestry with conspicuous characteristics of the upper layer, intermediate layer, the herbaceous layer of the fully grown tree, fruit, medicinal, emergent, vegetable species for home consumption, and market supply [69]. In the Meherpur district, 21% of the land was utilized for agroforestry, where the majority of, 92% of farmers preferred practicing agroforestry in homesteads [70]. The prospects of homestead agroforestry are praiseworthy as farmers had their homesteads for planting trees [71]. Farmers prefer diverse species that can fulfill their dietary needs and act as an influencer of food security. The record on diversity and species richness in the Gazipur district revealed that farmers were willing to adopt homestead agroforestry for basic needs such as fruit, fodder, vegetables, fuel, cash, timber, etc. [16]. The common deltaic, plain, hilly, and dryland species identified Mango, Pineapples, Papaya, Jackfruit, Banana, Guava, Betel nut, and general uses of the products marked as food, fruit, timber, fodder, medicine, fuelwood, etc. [72]. In the Bhola, Patuakhali, and Barguna regions of southern districts, over 80% of households were associated with producing fruit tree species, whereas over 65% of households preferred timber species [17]. In Keshabpur of Jessore district, many farmers preferred homestead agroforestry and possessed a positive attitude toward its contribution to offering tangible and intangible benefits of diverse products, selling them, and providing environmental service [2]. Fruit species were dominantly present in 75% of respondents' homesteads, whereas 80% of respondents preferred timber species of Mahogany, Eucalyptus, and Acacia in Gopalpur, Tangail district [18]. In Sandwip, 75% of the homestead was occupied by dominant species of Coconut, Betel nut, Guava, Musa sp., Papaya, Date palm, and Mango for subsistence and cash need; 62.2% of farmers preferred Mahogany, Acacia, Teak, Eucalyptus for timber while preference for horticultural species helped in generating monetary benefit and nutrition demand [73]. Sixty-eight percent of farmers were found practicing homestead agroforestry with woody perennials (Mango, Litchi, Citrus, Jackfruit, Guava, Acacia, Jujube, Beechwood, Neem, Teak, Sal, Khaya sp., Bamboo) and crop (Papaya, Banana, Taro or Colocasia alba, Yard long bean, Sponge gourd, Malabar Spinach)species in Tangail and Mymensingh district [74]. Dominant practices found Mahogany-Turmeric, Mahogany-Acacia-Turmeric, and Litchi-Banana-Turmeric in the Nakla sub-district, and it was interpreted that not only food security but also annual income positively related to tree species diversity [15]. Farmers of Kaliganj sub-district, Satkhira district, produced Betel nut, Coconut, Mahogany, Spinach, Plum, Date palm, Tal, Neem, Jackfruit, and Kaora with vegetables, crops, and 98% of farmers were positive regarding homestead agroforestry [75]. In the Naogaon district, common species, timber, gum, medicinal, and exotic species (Sissoo, Eucalyptus, Mahogany) were planted by farmers, and dominance indices followed an upward trend with increased landholdings [19]. The IVI (Importance Value Index) value was found 42.34% and 54.74%, respectively, for Acacia in Lakshmipur and Narsingdi villages respectively [20]. The nutrition supply, economic return, employment opportunities, and poverty reduction were consequences of adopting homestead production practices. The formation of smallholder farmers' subsistence and income was shaped by the homestead garden and its various cropping schedule, which acted as production units of food, cash, firewood, and year-round production facilities in Kishoreganj, Nawabganj, Satkhira, and Dhaka districts [76]. While smaller farm holders depended on their home gardens for income, the large farm holder depended on self-consumption in the Thakurgaon district [77]. Edible species contained the greatest proportion of overall uses that meet daily subsistence and dietary requirements and the rich traditional heritage hints at the necessity of species conservation in respective regions. The home yard, front yard, approach road, and boundary microsites should be aligned with appropriate design and management [78].

3.2. Prospects of homestead agroforestry in livelihood improvement

Adopting different agroforestry practices in homestead areas widens the opportunity for livelihood improvement. The SDGs of poverty alleviation, well-being, decent work by employment opportunity, and economic growth is boosted by homestead agroforestry. In support of livelihood, commercial benefits, household expenses, and annual income, the contribution of intense food-producing and fruit-producing species was undeniable in deltaic, hilly, dryland, and hilly areas [79]. Income from the homestead, credit and homestead area had a significant positive relationship with Gazipur Sadar’s biodiversity [80]. In Bhaluka, Fulbaria, Mymensingh Sadar, and Muktagacha of the Mymensingh district, farmers constructed a great deal of traditional and indigenous knowledge for homestead agroforestry that essentially delivers economic and environmental benefits [21]. The empirical study of those sub-districts figured out that a correlation existed between income and homestead practices, and such forestry practices could be enriched by synthesizing existing indigenous knowledge [81]. In the Kalroa and Tala sub-districts of the Satkhira district, tree diversity was significantly related to annual income [82]. As a means of livelihood improvement, nutritional security, and food security, plant diversity is regarded as a commendable scope, and it maintained a positive correlation with annual income in Kamalganj Upazila of Moulvibazar district [22]. Net benefit increased with increased landholdings of homesteads in the Ganges valley and a multilayered cropping system [10]. Meanwhile, tree species diversification was significantly correlated with annual income in Madhupur, Tangail district [23]. Income correlated with tree species diversity, and homestead was responsible for diversity maintenance and increased productivity [24]. Forty-nine percent of the contribution to the annual income of hillsides in the peninsula, Cox’s Bazar, was kept by homestead forests [11]. Meanwhile, another study in Teknaf Peninsula revealed that 25% of total annual income was derived from homestead produce as 85% of homesteads contained diverse species, and farm sizes of 1.1–2 ha contained greater species richness [83]. The agro-silviculture (62%) was found to be the most prevalent practice in homesteads of Kamalganj Upazila in the Moulvibazar district, and fruitful outputs from homestead agroforestry by farmers were noted in the shade, the daily need, additional income, soil erosion management, N-fixation [84]. In mid-hill, timber and bamboo facilitated high revenue generation that contributed to the household economy [8]. The economic prosperity of the Khasia community occurred due to the practice of betel leaf-based agroforestry in a home garden,s which contributed 79.73% of total agroforestry income [25]. Homestead forest served wood fuel by keeping a contribution of 78.75% where most identified species were Bot, Koroi, Mango, Tentul, Bamboo, Akashmoni, etc. [85]. In damar Upazila of Nilphamari district, Betel nut, Jackfruit, and Mango occupied homestead areas of 19.17%,10.34%, and 7.96%, respectively, and contributed 6.63% of household income [26]. In southwestern Bangladesh, 40% of species were used for multipurpose was 31% contributed to cash generation, which indicated livelihood subsistence significantly supported by homesteads in those localities [12]. Homesteads offered 11.8% of total household income and provided potential subsistence as 39.1% of homestead forests were utilized for household consumption, and 60.9% were utilized for marketing [27]. More than one-third of farmers were associated with planting Eucalyptus for multiple purposes, including pole and post, fuelwood, shade, soil rehabilitation, windbreak, and protection, while the mean annual increment stood at 10.68m3/ha/year in Mir Sarai Chattogram [86]. In the Jessore district, 13% contributed to subsistence, followed by cash generation, where monthly contribution stood at 9% of average household income [28]. 72.97% of total species were recognized as economically useful, among which medicinal, timber, fruit, ornamental, vegetables, fuelwood, oil, spice, and fiber were detected 55.42%,10.24%,11.45%,10.84%,9.03%, 7.83%,4.22%,1.5%,2.41% respectively in respective districts of Tangail, Dhaka, Manikganj, and Gazipur [87]. Contributions in average annual income in Teknaf Peninsula were 49,36 and 6% in the hillside, beachside, and Shahpariar dwip, respectively [11]. The percent of usage of total homestead products was 33.2 contributed to self-consumption, whereas 66.8% of products were utilized for selling and 15.9% contribution generated by average household income [29]. The Homestead area occupied 61% of Tal trees, and it substantially helped in improving the rural economy through income and employment opportunities in the Jhalakathi district [88]. An analysis of investment return in Sandwip Upazila of Chattogram disclosed that homestead agroforestry was responsible for yielding a high benefit-cost ratio, high return, and net value by the production of Jackfruit, Coconut, Teak, Mahogany, etc. [30]. In char Gobadia, Mymensingh district, livelihood improvement relied upon the agroforestry system by increasing income related to plant richness [18]. Homestead agroforestry fulfilled the objectives of maximum production and increased income of large farmers who adopted multipurpose tree species greater than five Tangail district Gopalpur Upazila [31]. In terms of generating profitability, the identified species were Black plum, Hog plum, and Betel nut among fruit species, and Mahogany, Teak among timber species in Chhagalnaiya subdistrict, Feni district [32]. In the Moulvibazar district, the cash return annual income of Khasia tribes was increased by adopting betel leaf-based homestead agroforestry practices alongside the production of Jarul, Chapalish, Rata, Toon, Jackfruit, Simul, Kadam, Mango, Betelnut and others [89]. The agroforestry system of bean-betelnut was found most prevalent in the char land of Mymensingh, Sherpur, and Jamalpur, whereas Turmeric-ginger-mango was top-ranked in the hill ecosystem of Rangamati and Bandarban [33]. In the Panchagarh district, home gardens were partially allocated for planting betel leaves and nuts for sustainable profitability [90]. Farmers realized the economic importance of citrus production to satisfy their needs as annual income perceived a significant relation with the increasing number of citrus species in Barlekha, Moulvibazar [34]. Mahogany, Jackfruit, Mango, Date palm, etc., were profoundly planted by farmers to secure food requirements and alleviate poverty through their contribution to household income [2]. In northeastern Bangladesh, people planted a wide range of drought-tolerant plants such as Khair, Babla, Bel, Kadam, Betelnut, Jackfruit, etc., as a supplement to resin, timber, medicine, gum, nutrition, etc. [91]. A study of the northwestern agroecological zone found that Bamboo, Jackfruit, Mango, Betelnut, and Jujube were common trees in homesteads where women played a role in species selection, such as indigenous trees and exotic species [92]. Sweet gourds, Mahogany, and Mango, were planted as profitable species along with other perennial species of Coconut, Jackfruit, Date palm, Blackberry, Guava, Sissoo, Betel-nut, and Bamboo in the Rajshahi district [35]. The identified species for cash growth were Jackfruit and Mango in the Thakurgaon district [36]. In the ship-breaking area in Sitakund of Chattogram documented dominant species were Coconut, Eucalyptus, and Mango, where the dominant purpose of the plantation was deposit [93]. In the Natore district, the homesteads contained an average of 21.25 tree species, 10 agroforestry systems, and timber plants that had great economic value [37]. Farmers encountered planting trees on homestead primarily for economic purposes, which indicated that in poverty alleviation and household income ascendance, agroforestry practices on the homestead are capable enough [94]. Meanwhile, in Kapasia, Gazipur’s annual production was contributed mostly by home yards of homesteads [78]. Such practices in a piece of homestead render income opportunities and improve the livelihood. For instance, homestead gardening develops employment opportunity for women, ameliorate the environment through environmental resource conservation and sustainable management, and significantly impacts economic condition and home garden investment [38]. Meanwhile, for livelihood improvement and sustainable land use in Chattogram, homestead agroforestry practices were found efficient for nursery establishment, women’s employment opportunities, and increased productivity [95]. Training, varietal development, and seedling raising were found to be positive influencers, and farmers' preferences for these were responsible for improving the farm economy and livelihood. In terms of decision-making on homestead agroforestry, savings and expenditure decisions were predominantly taken by females in Kamalganj, Moulvibazar district [96]. The Agrosilvopastoral system was found to be followed by the Garo tribe, where homestead forest management was rendered by women [39]. In terms of affordable energy, both household categories of rich and medium farm size obtained biomass fuel of 44% and 49%, respectively, from homesteads, where 63% of females contributed to the collection of biomass fuel in the Chattogram region [97]. The evidences indicated that homestead agroforestry is capable enough in improving the livelihood status of rural people which can consequently result in rural empowerment.

3.3. Prospects of homestead agroforestry in environmental resources conservation

Bangladesh is exposed to increased environmental pollution, where greenhouse gas emission is a major threat. In this aspect, homestead agroforestry could effectively measure sustainable resilience to climate change and biodiversity maintenance. The provisioning services of fruit consumption, fuelwood collection, bamboo extraction, and regulating services of climate regulation, biodiversity conservation, cooling effects, and environmental resource protection are supported by homestead agroforestry that increases ecological benefits such as carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation. To satisfy self-consumption and expenditure, homestead areas could be a sustainable option through which disaster risk also could be reduced [98]. Farmers believed home gardens were an influential attribute of livelihood improvement by providing subsistence, family income, and efficient responsiveness towards climatic change [99]. Homestead gardening is an efficient platform for ecological balance maintenance and environmental stabilization [15]. It was explained as one of the contributory factors developed in response to food and cash demand, deterioration of water, and soil quality [100]. The unavailability of forests led farmers to depend on the homestead that fulfilled their requirement of wood fuel, nutrition, income, and protection from cyclones by homestead agroforestry products in Sandwip, off-shore Island [59]. The study in the Satkhira district revealed that almost all farmers adopted homestead agroforestry [101]. In Ullarpara of Sirajganj district, the average farmland size of a home garden was 0.07 ha which was the second major contributor to species diversification, and from there, 80% of farmers derived their fodder [102]. In biodiversity maintenance, the potential contributor identified Betel nut, Snake gourd, Red amaranth, and Mahogany in Ajmiriganj of Habiganj district [40]. To avoid shade problems for shade-intolerant species, farmers preferred Mahogany, Eucalyptus, Date palm, Indian ash tree, etc., in Ullarpara of Sirajganj [102]. Besides contribution to increasing income, sales, revenue, and land utilization, the total energy supply, biomass fuel harvest, multiple provisioning services, and substantial reduction in CO2 gas emissions were also accompanied by home gardens in Moheshkhali island, Cox’s Bazar district [103]. The high tree coverage, basal area, and height helped in carbon sequestration by storing substantial amounts of carbon and biomass carbon in Dighalia Upazila, Khulna district [104]. In the Rangpur district, the study revealed that total biomass and carbon stock were found above 53.53 mg/ha, whereas small home gardens contained 69.15 mg/ha of carbon stock [41]. In Peninsula, Cox’s Bazar biomass of 235.45 mg/ha and carbon of 117.73 mg/ha were recorded above ground coverage [11]. Such records of carbon sequestration pose a positive impact on the environment. Homestead forests can assure emission reduction and carbon sequestration. The homestead of high and medium altitudes detected containing efficient biomass carbon stock where one unit increased in species diversity elevated biomass stock by 23 mg C/ha and carbon sequestration detected by 89 mg C/ha [105]. In Northern Bangladesh, the analysis from a soil depth of 0–10 cm shrub homestead (soil organic carbon: phosphorus = 0.011, Soil nitrogen: phosphorus = 0.023),0–10 cm tree shrub homestead (soil nitrogen: phosphorus = 0.03), and 10–20 cm depth of soil (Carbon: nitrogen = p < 0.05) revealed that mixed plantation, diversifications or species richness were more effective for resources Conservation [106]. In Moheshkhali island of Cox’s Bazar, the determined carbon stocks due to one unit increase in diversity and species richness were 30 Mg C/ha and 22 Mg C/ha, respectively, where carbon stock was found greatest in the inland forest (51 Mg C/ha) and soil surface of hillside forests [107].

3.4. Dominant species coverage

The farmers of Bangladesh are associated with planting diverse species of fruits, fodder, timber, medicinal, etc., among which most acted as Muti Purpose Tree Species (MPTS). As a result, the economy benefited from the significant coverage of tree species. Table 4 represents the dominant species and their respective coverage in different localities of Bangladesh.

3.5. Frequent dominant species in different localities

Among all dominant species, Mango (N = 31), Areca (N = 28), Coconut (N = 25), Mahogany (N = 22), Jackfruit (N = 22), Acacia (N = 14), Banana (N = 14) were highly dominant in terms of prevalence whereas Bamboo (N = 10), Neem (N = 10), Papaya (n = 10), Raintree (N = 9), Turmeric (N = 8), Citrus (N = 7), Eucalyptus (N = 7), Guava (N = 7), Date palm (N = 6), Teak (N = 6), Sajna or Drumstick (N = 5) prevailed moderately. The rest of the detected dominant species were found at a lower frequency (Table 5).

Fig. 3 depicts the intensity or prevalence of the dominant species. The division-wise distribution of dominant species revealed that Areca, Mahogany, and Jackfruit were common among all those found in all divisions as dominant species (Table 6). Mango and Coconut were also significant dominant species preferred by farmers in all divisions except Barisal and Rangpur.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Intensity of various dominant species.

In Dhaka, the dominant species, Mango, followed by Jackfruit and Acacia, covered most of the cultivated homestead. Meanwhile, Coconut, followed by Mango and Areca, was most abundant in the Chattogram region. A similar scenario was quite evident for Khulna and Sylhet divisions. But the difference was that in Sylhet, Mango was the most frequent. Rajshahi and Barisal divisions had minimized coverage of dominant species where Mango and Jackfruit were quite popular. In contrast, Acacia and Areca were the most abundant dominant species in Mymensingh, followed by Mango, Coconut, and Jackfruit. Finally, in Rangpur, Mango, Mahogany followed by Areca and Jackfruit, were the most prevalent dominant species. In all respective divisions, Mango, Areca, Coconut, and Mahogany are the most significant dominant species farmers of Bangladesh prefer for their homestead area.

3.6. Homestead agroforestry scope towards sustainable development targets in Bangladesh

From the above literature, it is quite evident that being an integrated part of life science, homestead agroforestry has already been accepted by all groups, including marginalized farmers. In this case, homestead agroforestry has developed the criteria for fulfilling SDGs directly, and in some cases, it acts as a pathway for fulfilling some vital targets indirectly (Table 7).

Table 7.

Homestead agroforestry scope towards sustainable development targets.

Sustainable Development Targets Scope
  • 1.1

    Elimination of excess poverty of all people, including the current estimation of less than $1.25 per day

  • Direct

  • 1.2

    Reduction of poverty by a minimum half proportion of all ages, including children, women, and men, in respect of all dimensions and according to national definitions

  • Direct

  • 1.3

    System of social protection, measures for all comprising floors implementation which is nationally appropriate and substantial coverage attainment of vulnerable and poor

  • Indirect

  • 1.4

    ensuring equal rights and access to economic resources and essential services, including land ownership, land control, inheritance, various property forms, natural resources, financial assistance, microfinance, and technology to all vulnerable and poor

  • Direct

  • 1.5

    Reducing vulnerable situations of exposure as well as climate vulnerability, including hazardous climatic events, social and economic shocks, and environmental disasters

  • Direct

  • 1.a

    Resource mobilization ensuring from various sources and development cooperation enhancement to assure predictable and adequate means, policies, and programs implementation to eradicate poverty of all dimensions

  • Indirect

  • 1.b

    Healthy policy framework creation based on development strategy such as gender-sensitive and pro-poor at all levels, including regional, national, and international levels, to enhance investment in actions of poverty eradication

  • Direct

  • 2.1

    Hunger mitigation of all people exposed to vulnerability and poverty and ensuring access to food that is nutritious, safe, and prevails year-round

  • Direct

  • 2.2

    Malnutrition elimination of every form comprising wasting and stunting (children below five) by the year 2025 and identifying nutrition requirements of teenage girls, older individuals, nursing and pregnant women

  • Direct

  • 2.3

    Agricultural productivity as well as small-scale producers' income doubling, including family farmers, indigenous, pastoralists, women, and fishers and assuring equal and secured access to land, input, knowledge, productive assets, financial assets, off-farm employment, and value addition opportunities

  • Direct

  • 2.4

    ensuring sustainable and resilient food production and agricultural practices that elevate production and productivity, conserve the ecosystem, build climatic resilience and improve soil and land quality

  • Direct

  • 2.5

    Genetic diversity (seed, domesticated and farmed animals, cultivated plants, wild species) maintenance by 2020 through plants and seed banks at all levels and ensuring equal benefit-sharing from genetic resource utilization as well as associated conventional knowledge with international level agreements

  • Direct

  • 2.a

    Increasing investment in rural infrastructure, technological advancement, agricultural research, gene banks (livestock and plants), and extension service, particularly in nations of least developed with international collaboration

  • Direct

  • 2.b

    Trade barriers and distortions correction, including export subsidies and equivalent export measures in global agricultural markets, conforming with the direction of the Doha Development Round.

  • Indirect

  • 2.c

    Limiting price volatility of food by assuring the appropriate operation of derivatives and markets of food commodities and allowing access to market information on food reserves

  • Direct

  • 3.1

    Ratio of global maternal mortality reduction less than 70 (per live birth of 100,000)

  • Indirect

  • 3.2

    Neonatal mortality reduction to a minimum of 25 per live birth of 1000, which causes the death of children under five and newborns

  • None

  • 3.3

    Mitigation of all sorts of tropical illnesses, AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, water borne disease, hepatitis, and other communicable diseases

  • Indirect

  • 3.4

    Reduction of premature mortality by 1/3 from non-communicable disease by treatment and prevention, thereby increasing wellbeing and good mental health

  • Indirect

  • 3.5

    Substance abuse treatment and strengthening the prevention comprising alcohol and narcotics.

  • None

  • 3.6

    Reducing global road accidents and deaths by half by the year 2020

  • None

  • 3.7

    Ensuring universal access to health care facilities of reproductive and sexual comprising education, information, family planning, and reproductive health integration into national programs and plans.

  • None

  • 3.8

    Global health coverage achievement, including protection from financial risks, accessibility to health care facilities of affordable medicines, vaccines that are effective, safe, and qualitative

  • Indirect

  • 3.9

    Substantial reduction of deaths and diseases caused by water, soil, air pollution, and harmful chemicals

  • Direct

  • 3.a

    WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control’s implementation in all countries when appropriate

  • None

  • 3.b

    Medicines and vaccines research and development supporting all kinds of diseases and ensuring access in the context of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, which affirms developing countries' right to fully utilize TRIPS Agreement provisions and trade-related aspects of rights (Intellectual Property) regarding flexibility.

  • None

  • 3.c

    Health financing and health workforce recruitment, training, development, and retention in all developing nations, significantly least developed nations, developing states such as small island

  • None

  • 3.d

    Capacity strengthening of all developing nations, particularly least developing nations, in terms of early warning, minimizing risks, managing health issues

  • Indirect

  • 4.1

    ensuring access of boys and girls to full free, quality, and equitable primary and secondary education, which leads to learning outcomes that are effective and relevant

  • None

  • 4.2

    ensuring access of all boys and girls to care, early childhood improvement, and pre-primary education to make them prepared for primary education

  • None

  • 4.3

    Ensuring equitable access of females and males to quality and affordable vocational, technical, and higher education, including university

  • None

  • 4.4

    Increasing frequency of young adults who consist relevant skills, such as vocational and technical for decent jobs, employment, and entrepreneurship

  • None

  • 4.5

    Eliminating gender gaps in education and ensuring access of vulnerable individuals, including children, indigenous and the disabled, to all education levels and vocational training.

  • None

  • 4.6

    Ensuring numeracy and literacy of all youth and a significant proportion of grown-ups, including males and females

  • None

  • 4.7

    ensuring that all learners have skills and knowledge to enhance sustainable development and lifestyles, gender equality, human rights, zero violence, cultural peace, cultural diversity acceptance, global citizenship, etc., through education

  • None

  • 4.a

    Education facilities building and upgrading for the child, gender-sensitive, and disabled and providing learning environments of inclusive, non-violent, and safe.

  • None

  • 4.b

    Expanding available global scholarships in developing nations, specifically least developed regions (small islands) and African countries, and facilitating enrolment in information technology, communication technology, vocational training, scientific and engineering programs

  • None

  • 4.c

    Increasing the proportion of qualified teachers through international cooperation in the least developed nations, developing countries, and developing states of small islands

  • None

  • 5.1

    All types of discrimination are eliminated everywhere against females and girls.

  • Indirect

  • 5.2

    All kinds of violence elimination against girls and women in private and public, including sexual exploitation, trafficking, and others

  • None

  • 5.3

    Detrimental practices of early child and forced marriage and women’s genital mutilation stopping

  • Indirect

  • 5.4

    Domestic works and unpaid works appreciation and recognition using public service provisioning, infrastructure, policies on social protection, shared responsibility promotion within the family, household

  • Direct

  • 5.5

    ensuring females' effective and complete involvement and equal access to leadership and decision-making at all levels of public, economic, and political life

  • Direct

  • 5.6

    Ensuring global access to reproductive and sexual health rights in terms of the International Conference (on programs of Population and Development’s Action) and the Beijing Platform of Action, the definitive texts of the reviewed conferences.

  • None

  • 5.a

    Ensuring women’s equal access to economic resources of land control and ownership, inheritance, financial service, and natural resources in conformity with national laws.

  • Direct

  • 5.b

    Uplifting enabled technology, including communication and information, to assure women’s empowerment.

  • Direct

  • 5.c

    Solid policies adoption and strengthening and enforcing legislation for gender equality proportion and empowering females.

  • Indirect

  • 6.1

    Ensuring safe and equal global access to affordable drinking water

  • None

  • 6.2

    Ensuring access to sufficient and equitable hygiene and sanitation for all and mitigating open defection, and providing particular concerns to females' needs in vulnerable conditions

  • Indirect

  • 6.3

    Developing water quality by pollution reduction, dumping elimination, hazardous substance and materials release minimization, and increasing safe reuse and recycling

  • Indirect

  • 6.4

    Improving water use efficiency in all sectors and sustainable withdrawals ensuring freshwater supply to highlight water scarcity and reducing the proportion of people suffering due to water scarcity

  • None

  • 6.5

    Integration of management regarding water resources and implementation through appropriate transboundary cooperation

  • None

  • 6.6

    Protection and restoration of ecosystems related to water by 2020 comprising lakes, aquifers, wetlands, forests, rivers, and mountains

  • None

  • 6.a

    International cooperation expansion and supporting capacity building to developing nations in programs and activities related to sanitation and water comprising desalination, water harvesting, wastewater treatment, water efficiency, reuse and recycle technologies

  • None

  • 6.b

    Supporting and strengthening the local community’s participation in water improvement and sanitation management

  • Indirect

  • 7.1

    Ensuring global access to energy services of trustworthy, affordable, and modern

  • Direct

  • 7.2

    Substantially increasing the renewable energy share in the world energy mix

  • Direct

  • 7.3

    Improving global energy efficiency rate by twice

  • Indirect

  • 7.a

    Enhancing International cooperation to ensure clean energy technology and research access comprising renewable energy, advanced, cleaner, and efficient fossil fuel energy and promoting investment in clean infrastructure and technology

  • Indirect

  • 7.b

    Infrastructure expansion and technology upgrading for sustainable and modern energy service supply in all developing nations, particularly the least developed nations and small islands, concerning respective supportive programs

  • Indirect

  • 8.1

    Sustaining per capital economic growth concerning the national situation with minimum 7% GDP growth (per annum) in the least developed nations

  • Indirect

  • 8.2

    Higher economic productivity attainment through diversification, innovation, and upgraded technology comprising sectors of labour-intensive and value addition

  • Indirect

  • 8.3

    Oriented policies development promotion which supports the creation of decent jobs, productive activities, innovation, creativity, entrepreneurship, formalization encouragement, small, medium, and micro enterprises growth enhancement, and financial service accessibility

  • Direct

  • 8.4

    Progressive improvement of efficiency in global resources production and consumption and decoupling of economic growth from potential environmental degradation in the context of the sustainable output and Consumption Programs and frameworks with the lead of developed nations

  • Indirect

  • 8.5

    Achieving complete and productive decent employment for all males and females, including disabled and young individuals, and ensuring equal pay for works with equal value

  • Indirect

  • 8.6

    Reduction of youth proportion who are not engaged in education, employment, and training

  • Direct

  • 8.7

    Implementing effective and immediate measures to deduct forced labor, mitigate slavery, trafficking and eliminate child labor, including using child recruitment and use, and by 2025, eliminating all forms of child labor

  • None

  • 8.8

    Labor rights protection and secured work environment promotion for all kinds of workers, including migrants, women migrants, and workers in precarious employment

  • None

  • 8.9

    Policies devising and implementing sustainable tourism promotion, which facilitates jobs and develops products and local culture

  • None

  • 8.10

    Strengthening the domestic financial capacity and expanding access to financial services, including insurance and baking, for all

  • Indirect

  • 8.a

    Trade support aid increasing for developing nations, particularly least developing nations, through the framework of enhanced integrated for technical assistance of trade-related to least developed nations

  • Indirect

  • 8.b

    Operationalizing and developing global strategy of youth employment and jobs pact implementation of international labor organization

  • None

  • 9.1

    Developing reliable, qualitative, resilient, and sustainable infrastructure of transborder and regional to encourage wellbeing and economic growth, focusing on equitable and affordable access

  • Indirect

  • 9.2

    Sustainable and inclusive industrialization promotion to increase industry’s employment share and GDP aligned with national circumstances and doubling the share in the least developed nations

  • Indirect

  • 9.3

    Small scales industries and enterprises access development in terms of financial services, affordable credits, and their integration into markets and value chains in developing nations

  • Indirect

  • 9.4

    Retrofit industries and infrastructure upgrading for sustainability along with improving resource utilization efficiency and environmentally clean industrial process and sound technology adoption with respective capabilities of all nations

  • Indirect

  • 9.5

    Scientific research enhancement and technological capabilities upgrading, encouraging innovativeness, elevating the number of development and research workers (per one million people) and spending on private and public research

  • Direct

  • 9.a

    Facilitating resilient and sustainable infrastructure development in developing nations by enhanced support in terms of finance, technology, and techniques to African nations, least developed nations, landlocked developing nations, developing states of small island

  • Indirect

  • 9.b

    In developing nations, supporting innovation, research, and technology development by a beneficial policy environment ensuring for industrial diversification, among other things, and value addition to products

  • Indirect

  • 9.c

    Improving access to communication and information technology in the least developed nations and providing affordable global access to the internet by 2020

  • Indirect

  • 10.1

    Progressive achievement of sustainable income growth (40% population of bottom) at a high rate than the national average

  • Direct

  • 10.2

    Promoting and empowering inclusion of political, social, and economic irrespective of sex, age, race, disability, religion, origin, financial status, ethnicity, and others

  • Indirect

  • 10.3

    Ensuring equivalent opportunity and minimizing inequalities in the outcome by mitigating biased laws, practices, and policies and implementing accurate legislation, action, and procedures.

  • None

  • 10.4

    Adopting policies in terms of fiscal, social protection, wages, and achieving progressive equality

  • Indirect

  • 10.5

    Strengthening the regulations and universal financial markets and organizations, monitoring and implementing strengthened regulations

  • None

  • 10.6

    For developing nations, voice and enhanced representation implementation in financial institutions of international economic and economical to deliver legitimate, credible, effective, and accountable institutions

  • Indirect

  • 10.7

    Facilitating regular, safe, responsible, and orderly mobility and migration of people by well-managed and planned migration policies.

  • None

  • 10.a

    In conformity with agreement of the World Trade Organization, principles of differential and special treatment implementation in developing nations, specifically least developed nations

  • Indirect

  • 10.b

    Financial flows and official progression assistance encouraging comprising direct foreign investment to locations where the necessity is optimum, particularly in the least developed nations, African nations, developing states of small islands, and landlocked developing nations aligned to national programs and plans

  • Indirect

  • 10.c

    Minimizing transaction costs of migrant remittances to less than three per cent and reducing remittance corridors greater than five per cent costs

  • None

  • 11.1

    Ensuring access to affordable, safe, sufficient essential services and housing and also upgrading slums

  • Indirect

  • 11.2

    Providing access to transport systems that are accessible, safe, sustainable, and affordable, ensuring road safety public transport expansions by providing concerns to all in vulnerable circumstances, including children, women and disabled, and older

  • None

  • 11.3

    Sustainable and inclusive urbanization and capacity enhancement utilizing sustainable and integrated settlement management and planning in all nations

  • Direct

  • 11.4

    Strengthening efforts and safeguarding the Global natural and cultural heritage

  • None

  • 11.5

    Ensuring protection of poor people in vulnerable situations by reducing death numbers, affected people, and economic loss reduction concerning GDP occurred by disasters such as water-related disasters

  • Direct

  • 11.6

    Reduction of adverse environmental impacts of urban (per capita) and paying concern to the management of municipal, air, and wastes

  • Direct

  • 11.7

    Ensuring global penetration to accessible, inclusive, and safe public and green spaces, especially for children, women, and disabled individuals

  • Direct

  • 11.a

    Strengthening regional and national development training and supporting social, environmental, and economic links among rural, pre-urban and urban localities

  • Direct

  • 11.b

    Number of cities increasing, adopting human settlements, implementations of integrated planned policies for inclusion, improving resource efficiency, adaptation and mitigation to climatic change, facilitating disaster resilience and risk management at every level by 2015–2030 aligned to Sendai Framework of Disaster Risk Mitigation

  • Direct

  • 11.c

    Supporting the least developed nations through technical and financial assistance, resilient and sustainable building by utilizing local resource

  • Direct

  • 12.1

    Sustainable production and consumption programs implemented by ten years of framework where all nations taking action where leading ensured by developed countries by considering developing nations' capabilities

  • Direct

  • 12.2

    Achieving sustainable management and encouraging proper utilization of natural resources

  • Direct

  • 12.3

    Reducing food wastes globally by half (per capita) at consumer and retail levels and food loss reduction in production, post-harvest, and supply chain

  • Direct

  • 12.4

    Achieving environmentally safe management of wastes and chemicals in their life cycle with international frameworks and significant reduction of their exposure to air, and soil and minimizing the harmful impact on environment and health by 2020

  • Indirect

  • 12.5

    Substantial reduction of generation of waste by reusing, reducing, recycling and prevention

  • None

  • 12.6

    Encouraging companies that are transnational and large to adopt sustainable practices and integrate the sustainability information into sustainability information

  • Indirect

  • 12.7

    Practices of sustainable public procurement promotion according to national priorities and policies

  • Indirect

  • 12.8

    Ensuring that every individual has awareness and relevant information for sustainable lifestyles and development with natural harmony

  • Direct

  • 12.a

    Supporting developing nations by strengthening the capacity of scientific technology and moving toward patterns of sustainable production and consumption

  • Direct

  • 12.b

    Developing tools for sustainable improvement monitoring tools for sustainable tourism to job creation and local products and culture promotion

  • None

  • 12.c

    Rationalizing the inefficient subsidies of fossil fuels by eliminating market distortions, restructuring taxations and hazardous offerings, reflecting the environmental influence, and considering specific conditions and needs of developing nations to protect affected communities and the poor.

  • Indirect

  • 13.1

    Strengthening adaptive capacity and resilience to natural disasters and climatic hazards in all nations

  • Direct

  • 13.2

    Climatic change dimensions integration into planning, strategies, and policies

  • Direct

  • 13.3

    Awareness-raising, improving education and institutional and human capacity development on climate change adaptation, early warning, mitigation, and impact reduction

  • Indirect

  • 13.a

    Implementing the undertaken commitment by developed nation groups to the framework of the United Nations Conference on Climate Change with the target of joint mobilization (annually $100 billion) from all origins to develop nations' needs addressed in the context of implementation transparency and appropriate mitigation actions, operationalizing the fund of Green Climate through capitalization by 2020

  • Indirect

  • 13.b

    Capacity promotion for related climate change management and planning in the least developed nations concerning marginalized and local communities, youths, and women

  • Direct

  • 14.1

    Prevention and significant reduction of all forms of marine pollution by 2025, mainly from activities of land-based, nutrient pollution, and marine debris

  • Indirect

  • 14.2

    Sustainable protection and management of coastal and marine ecosystems by avoiding adverse impacts and resilience strengthening, taking actions for restoration to ensure productive and sound oceans by 2025

  • None

  • 14.3

    Addressing and minimizing ocean acidification through practical scientific cooperation

  • None

  • 14.4

    Regulating harvesting and prohibiting unreported, illegal, unregulated, and destructive fishing, overfishing, and restoring fish stocks in the least period by implementing scientific management plans by 2020 for maximizing sustainable yield aligned to biological features

  • None

  • 14.5

    Conserving a minimum of ten percent of marine and coastal areas by 2020, which is compatible with international and national legislation based on available information

  • None

  • 14.6

    Restricting particular sorts of fisheries subsidies of overfishing and extreme capacity and eradicating unregulated, unreported, illegal fishing and staying away from new subsidies introduction; integrating developing and least developed nations on behalf of World Trade Organization negotiation (fisheries subsidy) by recognizing differential and special appropriate and effective treatment

  • Indirect

  • 14.7

    Increasing the economic benefits from sustainable utilization of marine resources by sustainable management of tourism, fisheries, and aquaculture of states of small island and least developed nation

  • None

  • 14.a

    Increasing scientific knowledge, developing research capacity, and transferring marine technology aligned with considering guidelines and criteria of the Inter-governmental Oceanographic regarding marine technology transfer for the betterment of ocean health and uplifting marine diversity contribution to the development of countries which are developed, least developed and small island (developing States)

  • None

  • 14.b

    Ensuring access of small-scale fishers (artisanal) to marine markets and resources

  • None

  • 14.c

    Enhancing sustainable utilization of oceans and conservation and international laws implementation following the United Nations Convention on the law (of the sea) that provides the framework for legal utilization and conservation of oceans and related resources (paragraph 158 of “The future we want”)

  • None

  • 15.1

    Ensuring restoration, conservation, and sustainable utilization of ecosystems of inland freshwater and terrestrial, specifically drylands, wetlands, forests, and mountains, aligned with international agreements and obligations by 2020

  • Direct

  • 15.2

    Sustainable management implementation of forests, reducing deforestation, restoring destroyed forests, increasing reforestation and afforestation by 2020

  • Direct

  • 15.3

    Reducing desertification and restoring soil and lands that are degraded, affected due to desertification, flood, and drought and attain a neutral environment devoid of degradation by 2020

  • Direct

  • 15.4

    Ecosystem of biodiversity and mountain conservation to capacity enhancement for providing sustainable development benefits.

  • Direct

  • 15.5

    Taking immediate actions to reduce natural degradation, decrease biodiversity loss by 2020 and protect and prevent red-list species' extinction

  • Direct

  • 15.6

    Promoting equitable and fair share of genetic resource benefits and ensuring access to these resources in terms of international agreements

  • Direct

  • 15.7

    Taking immediate action to mitigate trafficking and poaching of preserved fauna and flora species and addressing the supply and demand of invalidated wildlife assets

  • Indirect

  • 15.8

    Introduction of steps for preventing effects of invasive exotic species impact on the ecosystem of water and land by 2020

  • Indirect

  • 15.9

    Integrating values of biodiversity and ecosystems into regional and national planning, improvement process, penurity reduction accounts, and strategies by 2020

  • Direct

  • 15.a

    Increasing and mobilizing financial assets of all origins to enhance sustainable utilization and conservation of ecosystem and biodiversity

  • Direct

  • 15.b

    Resource mobilization from all origins and enhancing finance and sustainable management of forests, providing sufficient remuneration to developing nations to increase surveillance of reforestation and conservation

  • Direct

  • 15.c

    Enhancing worldwide support to eliminate trafficking and poaching of preserved species comprising capacity improvement of regional communities to obtain opportunities for a sustainable livelihood

  • Indirect

  • 16.1

    All kinds of violence reduction along with the significant decrease in birth rates

  • None

  • 16.2

    Eliminating all kinds of exploitation, including violence, trafficking, and child abuse

  • None

  • 16.3

    Law promotions at regional and international levels and ensuring equal justice

  • None

  • 16.4

    Significant reduction of arms and financial flows that are illicit and improving return and recovery of assets that are stolen and reducing all kinds of crimes

  • None

  • 16.5

    Reduction of all forms of bribery and corruption

  • None

  • 16.6

    Developing institutions that are accountable, effective, and transparent

  • Indirect

  • 16.7

    Ensuring decision-making that is inclusive, representative, participatory and responsive at every level

  • Indirect

  • 16.8

    Strengthening and widening the developing nations' participation in worldwide institutions of governance

  • Indirect

  • 16.9

    Providing legitimate identity for everyone comprising registration of birth

  • None

  • 16.10

    Ensuring people’s accessibility to information and protecting fundamental freedom aligned with domestic legislation and foreign agreements

  • None

  • 16.a

    Strengthening domestic institutions employing international assistance for capacity building at every level in developing nations to eliminate violence and reduce crime and terrorism

  • None

  • 16.b

    Promoting and enforcing non-biased policies and legislation for sustainable improvement

  • None

  • 17.1

    Strengthening mobilization of the national resources by ensuring international assistance to developing nations to develop tax capacity and collection of revenue

  • None

  • 17.2

    Implementing commitments of official development support comprising the obligation by developed nations to obtain 0.7% targets of ODA/GNI to developing nations, as well ODA/GNI of 0.15–0.20% to least developed nations; providers (ODA) are induced to set targets of minimum 0.20% (ODA/GNI) to least developed nations.

  • None

  • 17.3

    Ensuring more mobilization of financial resources from various sources for developing nations

  • Indirect

  • 17.4

    Assisting developing nations in sustainability from prolonged debt through policies that are coordinated and focused on debt restricting, relieving, and finance fostering following appropriateness and external debt addressing of vulnerable nations

  • None

  • 17.5

    For developed nations, adopting and implementing the promotion of investment regimes

  • None

  • 17.6

    Enhancing international collaboration of triangular, south-south, north-south and assuring access to innovation, technology, and science by enhanced knowledge sharing by the agreement at levels of United nations and mechanisms of world technology facilitation

  • None

  • 17.7

    Promoting the technologies development, dissemination, transfer, and diffusion that are environmentally acceptable to developing nations in terms of mutual agreement, preferential and concessional agreement

  • Indirect

  • 17.8

    Complete operationalizing the technological innovation, science, knowledge, and bank, building capacity mechanism for nations that are least developed by 2017, enhancing utilization of available technology, specifically communication and information

  • Indirect

  • 17.9

    Enhancing universal support (South-south, north-south, triangular collaboration) in developing nations for implementation of targeted and effective capacity building to assist nationwide plans and sustainable development goals implementation

  • Indirect

  • 17.10

    Promoting a global, non-biased, equitable, and independent trading system that is multilateral under the World Trade Organization and by negotiations conclusion under the agenda of Doha Development

  • Indirect

  • 17.11

    Increasing developing nations' exportation to double worldwide exportation by 2020

  • None

  • 17.12

    Realizing the timely execution of market access that is free of quota and duty for least developed nations on a lasting basis, aligned with the decision of the World Trade Organization, and ensuring that applied import rules are simple, transparent, and neutralizing market access

  • None

  • 17.13

    Enhancing the stability of worldwide macroeconomy through coordinated policy coherence and coordination

  • Indirect

  • 17.14

    Enhancing coherence of policy for ensuring sustainable development

  • Indirect

  • 17.15

    Respecting individuals' leadership and space of policy and policies implementation for poverty mitigation and sustained development

  • None

  • 17.16

    For sustainable development, enhancing worldwide partnership which is accompanied by multi-stakeholders that share and mobilize knowledge, financial assets, technology, and expertise to support sustainable development goals and achievements in all nations, explicitly developing nations

  • Indirect

  • 17.17

    Promoting and encouraging effective partnerships of public-private, public and civil society on resources and experience of partnership strategies

  • None

  • 17.18

    Enhancing support of capacity building in developing nations, least developing nations, and developing states of small islands by 2020, elevating availability of reliable, high-quality, and timely data separated by gender, income, age, ethnicity, race, geographic location, disability, migratory status and other characteristics which are matches national contexts

  • None

  • 17.19

    Existing initiatives building by progress measurements on sustainable development that support GDP and statistical capability building in developing nations

  • Indirect

4. Constraints identified regarding homestead agroforestry expansion

The major constraints of homestead agroforestry expansion are farmers' preference for conventional planting systems, monoculture cropping, manufacturing activities, natural disruptions, financial crisis, technological unavailability, etc. (Fig. 4). Traditional uses and a wide range of homestead plants indicate that Bangladesh needs to initiate the conservation of plant biodiversity [56]. Monoculture cropping, anthropogenic activities, natural causes, and pest intensifications disrupt biodiversity and species compositions [19]. Interspecific biodiversity of moderate to high exists in Bangladesh, where environmental and social factors of salinity and family need, respectively, the direct distribution pattern of species [42]. The backdated management system and inadequate scientific information are constraints, and it requires facilities of training, NGO (Non-Government Organization) support, and a management plan [44]. As a home garden is an effective ecological tool, the management plan requires carbon sequestration and tree diversity conservation [41]. The fruit and crop diversification system requires special attention for sustainability and biodiversity maintenance [43]. Farmers are exposed to impediments regarding quality planting materials supply, land scarcities, and financial instability, which urgently require emphasis on Nursery development and capacity building. Inadequate modern technological facilities, arable land, and inputs impede food security, and priority should be given to the efficient utilization of homesteads by intensifying the diversity or composition of tree species [82]. The limiting factors in expanding plant diversity were identified as insufficient quality planting stock [108]. The unavailability of planting materials and reliable sources are limiting constraints of betel leaf-based practices, which require technological support, infrastructure development support, GOs and NGOs support, and training for greater conservation and income generation [25]. Urbanization, sanitation, and homestead fragmentation were marked as factors responsible for decreasing plant biodiversity [80]. Along with urbanization, decreased farm size is described as a factor in restricting plant biodiversity in homesteads [109]. The reasons for fuelwood scarcity were high price, unsustainability, and fragmentation of homestead land in the Narsingdi district, and these necessitate sustainable management of forests, technical information, and support of the institution, extension workers, and forestry professionals [110]. Participatory action research programs unveiled the fact that farmers prioritize homestead tree plantation, but it is exposed to technical barriers, financial problems, and energy shortages [111]. Lack of interest, dissatisfactory market price, and environmental problems were responsible for declining citrus production [34]. Despite the existence of common species of Mango, Banana, Jackfruit, Neem, and Betelnut, the mismanaged cultural practices, lack of space and extension support, and unavailability of organic fertilizers and technologies, the homestead agroforestry were hindered [77]. The empirical study in the Mymensingh district concluded that even in small areas, homesteads were enriched with the sporadic distribution of plant species that urged an emphasis on providing training to homestead dwellers for technical and managerial flexibility [21]. In the Chattogram hill tract, shifting cultivation is exposed to vulnerability as unsuitability has been increasing due to population pressure, and in this situation, agroforestry is the alternative solution [112].

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Constraints of efficiency of homestead agroforestry.

5. Recommended strategies in response to identified constraints

To minimize the potential hindrances, structural emphasis should be given to aspects of socio-economic characteristics, conservation practices by genetic diversity maintenance and technological advancement, strong institutional support from government and non-government authorities, utilization of available land and resources, and further research and adoption of participatory approaches.

Improving socio-economic characteristics is a way, as socio-economic characteristics of annual income, farm size, and knowledge positively affect plant species diversification [96]. The socio-economic status and livelihood can be advanced by appropriate agroforestry practices implementation [113]. In homestead afforestation, maximum women interplayed medium roles where their performance was positively influenced by training exposure, annual income, education qualifications, and Knowledge in the Mymensingh district [114]. As the education of forest owners was a determining factor in increased productivity in Bagerhat Sadar, education needed to be increased among farmers along with implementing forest policy [29]. Livelihood could be improved by increasing education levels and diversification [46]. In Teknaf Upazila of Cox’s Bazar, the income of large farm holders was comparatively higher, and all farm holders' income could be improved by designing a homestead system with compatible species [45]. In response to decreasing production of cereal, agronomic and horticultural crops, the homestead can be utilized for greater economic stability. The involvement of women can broaden income opportunities and species diversification [83].

In the aspect of conservation practices, the creation of genetic diversity and cash generation can be done by homestead agroforestry as it is the best alternative to monoculture cropping [16]. For species richness, propagation, provision, protection, and popularity, building for rare species need implementation for livelihood betterment, environmental resilience, and biodiversity conservation [9]. The disaster risks of cyclones and storm surges can be escaped by planting timber and fruit trees in homestead areas [98]. Technological advancement could be induced through conventional planting system improvement, lac culture, and sericulture can enlarge economic opportunities [79]. Scientific knowledge and techniques need improvement [91]. In homestead afforestation, women are exposed to underperformance due to a lack of quality planting materials, infestations by biotic agents, lack of knowledge, etc., which need solutions by supplying quality seeds, training facilities, encouraging social system and extension services, etc. [114].

Increasing tree coverage needs to be encouraged with institutional support from respective authorities, including govt and non-govt support [10]. Initiatives by authorities for positive attitude generation are commendable approach [75]. NGOs can play an active role in the utilization of land [95]. Govt should integrate high-value crops and betel leaf-based forests [89]. The Forest Department, local government, and council can ensure Sustainability and Conservation by providing technical advice and incentives on material support [103]. Insufficiency of technical knowledge and land area, finance, and awareness ranked as major constraints that could be improved by external support, financial support, technological advancement, and management plans [99]. Management practices, extension services, and research are important in improving species richness [36].

Home gardens should be enriched to reduce pressure on forests by utilizing marginal households, public roads, river banks, and railways [14]. The agroforestry system of jackfruit pineapple [115] could be an effective contributor to satisfying nutritional demand. Further studies for broadening the scope of increasing local biodiversity are recommended [20]. The efficiency of this sector can contribute to household need satisfaction and sustainable wood fuel distribution [85]. To expand livelihood capital, degradation reduction and the conduction of upland settlement projects are effective approaches to greater exploration [116]. Participatory forestry can be an effective strategy for livelihood improvement by employing farmers in tree plantations that contribute to income generation and encourage plantation [117]. Hence, the strategic and structural approaches need execution for broadening the scope of homestead agroforestry expansion in the context of Sustainable Development Goals.

6. Conclusion

Homestead agroforestry is a thriving forestry practice that is enormously adopted in every rural household. Regarding food security, nutritional security, and welfare, homestead agroforestry is recognized in Bangladesh. The preference for this practice is also commendable. Again, it is widely adopted among various groups regardless of the farm category, social status, community, etc. As a result, different groups of people get the opportunity to improve their livelihood by introducing a wide range of plant species that satisfy self-consumption and generate income opportunities. The participation of a different group of people, including men, women, and ethnic community, in homestead agroforestry help in broadening their employment opportunity. As a result, these positively impact the environment in terms of greenhouse gas emission reduction and carbon stock. Hence, climatic resilience is obtained. The abundant species coverage fulfils the objectives of self-consumption and subsistence that ultimately bring out well-being. The propensity of beneficial outputs has great remarks on achieving sustainable development goals. Hence, the literature review on food security, livelihood improvement, and environmental resources conservation expressed that homestead agroforestry possessed a great connection with sustainable development goals. Homesteads of Bangladesh possess a satisfactory plant species diversity and coverage that facilitate species conservation and provides food, fuel, or timber, besides contributing to livelihood improvement and resource conservation. As a result, the contribution is praiseworthy in achieving SDGs and fulfilling the relevant targets. Therefore, Bangladesh has enormous scope to utilize its potential success. Although this sector is exposed to limitations such as the rapid practice of conventional planting systems and monoculture cropping patterns, anthropogenic and environmental influence, lack of technology and institutional support, backdated knowledge, scarcity of land, and lack of enthusiasm towards the practices. The elimination of such constraints through a structurally recommended strategic approach in terms of socio-economic development, conservation practices, technological advancement, institutional support improvement, sustainable land utilization, intensive research, and homestead agroforestry program implementation can help in the successful execution of sustainable development goals. Fruitful consequences can be derived by imposing potential concerns on this sector.

Funding statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not for profit sectors.

Declaration of competing interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Appendix. List of Species Mentioned with their Scientific Name

English Name Local Name Scientific Name
Acacia
Almond
Aroid
Bamboo
Banana
Bead tree
Beechwood
Beleric
Bengal Bamboo
Betel nut
Bitter Gourd
Black berry
Bottle gourd
Brinjal
Bur flower tree
Caesalpinia
Cassia Tree
Chapalish
Chili
Citrus
Coconut
Coral tree
Coriander
Country bean
Crab Grass
Date palm
Drumstick
Earleaf Acacia
Elephant ear
Eucalyptus
Giant Bamboo
Giant Taro
Ginger
Green Chiretta
Greengram
Guava
Gum Arabic tree
Hog plum
Holy basil
Indian pennywort
Ipil Ipil
Indian ash tree
Jackfruit
Akashmoni
Kathbadam
Aroid
Bash
Kola
Ghora neem/Bokain
Gamar
Bohera
Bangla bash
Supari
Korola
Jam
Lau
Begun
Kadam
Krishnachura
Minjiri ful
Chapalish
Morich
Citrus
Narkel
Mandar
Dhone gach
Shim
Dhurba grass
Khejur
Sajina
Sonajhuri
Kochu/taro
Eucalyptus
Bansh
Man kochu
Ada
Kalomegh
Mungbean
Peyara
Babla
Amra
Tulsi
Thankuni
Ipil ipil
Jhika
Kathal
Acacia auriculiformis
Terminalia catappa
Araceae spp.
Bambusa spp
Musa spp.
Melia azedarach
Gamelina arborea
Terminalia bellirica
Bambusa tulda
Areca catechu
Momordica charantia
Syzygium cumini
Lagenaria siceraria
Solanum melongena L.
Anthocephallus chinensis
Delonix regia
Cassia siamea
Artocarpus lacucha
Capsicum spp.
Citrus spp.
Cocos nucifera
Erythrina orientalis
Coriandrum sativum
Lablab purpureus
Cynodon dactylon
Phoenix sylvestris
Moringa oliferia
Acacia auriculiformis
Xanthosoma nigrum
Eucalyptus camaldulensis
Bambua balocooa
Alocasia indica
Zingiber officinale
Andrographis paniculata
Vigna radiata
Psidium guava L.
Acacia nilotica
Spondias pinnata
Ocimuum tenuiflorum
Centella asiatica
Leucaena leucocephala
Lannea coromandelica
Artocarpus heterophyllus
Jute
Khair
Lac tree
Lemon
Litchi
Mahogany
Malabar Nut Tree
Mango
Malabar spinach
Mint
Neem
Night Queen
Northern rata
Onion
Palmyra palm
Papaya
Pineapple
Plum/Ber/jujube
Pomegranate
Pomelo
Queen flower
Raintree
Rata tree
Red Amaranth
Red silk cotton
Sal
Sapodilla
Screw pine
Shirish
Siris tree
Silk tree
Sissoo
Spinach
Sponge gourd
Stramonium
Tamarind
Taro
Teak
Toona
Turmeric
Velvety apple
Wood Apple
Yard long bean/Snake bean
Pat shak
Khoyer
Kusum tree
Lebu
Litchu
Mahogany
Basok
Aam
Pui shak
Pudina
Neem
Jasmine
Rata
Piyaj
Tal
Pepe
Anarosh
Boroi/kul
Dalim
Jambura
Jarul
Raintree
Rata
Lal note shak
Shimul
Shal
Sofeda
Kaora/Kewra
Sada koroi
Raj koroi
Sirish gach
Sissoo
Palong shak
Dhundul
Datura
Tentul
Taro
Shegun
Toona
Holud
Gab
Bel
Borboti
Corchorus spp.
Senegalia catechu
Ceylon oak
Citrus limon
Litchi synensis
Swietenia macrophylla
Justicia adhatoda
Mangifera indica
Basella alba
Mentha spicata
Azadirachta indica
Cestrum nocturnum
Metrosideros robusta
Allium cepa
Borassus flabellifer
Carica papaya
Ananas comosum
Ziziphus jujube
Punica granatum
Citrus maxima
Lagerstroemia speciosa
Albizia saman
Metrosideros robusta
Amaranthus cruentus
Bombax ceiba
Shorea robusta
Manikara zapota
Sonneratia alba
Albizia lebbeck
Albizia richardiana
Albizia julibrissin
Dalbargia sissoo
Spinacia oleracea
Luffa spp.
Datura metel
Tamarindus indica
Colocasia nymphaepholia
Colocasia alba
Tectona grandis
Toona sinensis
Curcuma longa
Piospyros discolor
Aegle marmelos
Vigna sesquipedalis

References

  • 1.The World Bank The World Bank. 2021. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.AGR.EMPL.ZS?locations=BD (accessed May 23, 2022)
  • 2.Islam M.W., Islam M.M., Sadath M.N. Contributions of agroforestry practice towards reducing poverty at Keshabpur upazila of Jessore district – a case study. J. Environ. Sci. Nat. Resour. 2012;5:267–274. doi: 10.3329/jesnr.v5i2.14829. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jahan H., Rahman Md.W., Islam Md.S., Rezwan-Al-Ramim A., Tuhin Md.M.-U.-J., Hossain Md.E. Adoption of agroforestry practices in Bangladesh as a climate change mitigation option: investment, drivers, and SWOT analysis perspectives. Environ. Chall. 2022;7 doi: 10.1016/j.envc.2022.100509. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.BBS Statistical Yearbook Bangladesh 2020. 2020. http://bbs.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/bbs.portal.gov.bd/page/b2db8758_8497_412c_a9ec_6bb299f8b3ab/2021-08-11-04-54-154c14988ce53f65700592b03e05a0f8.pdf (accessed February 8, 2023)
  • 5.Shaffril H.A.M., Krauss S.E., Samsuddin S.F. A systematic review on Asian’s farmers' adaptation practices towards climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;644:683–695. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nasir Ahmad N.S.B., Mustafa F.B., Muhammad Yusoff S.@Y., Didams G. A systematic review of soil erosion control practices on the agricultural land in Asia. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 2020;8:103–115. doi: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2020.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Alam M., Masum K. Status of homestead biodiversity in the offshore island of Bangladesh. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2005;1:246–253. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Baul T.K., Peuly T.A., Nandi R., Kar S., Mohiuddin M. Composition of homestead forests and their contribution to local livelihoods and environment: a study focused on Bandarban hill district, Bangladesh. Trees, For. People. 2021;5 doi: 10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kabir M.E., Rahman M.M., Ando K. Home gardening for biodiversity conservation in Kalaroa Upazila of Satkhira district, Bangladesh. Trop. Agric. Dev. 2016;60:205–215. doi: 10.11248/jsta.60.205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rahman S.A., Baldauf C., Mollee E.M., Abdullah-Al-Pavel M., Abdullah-Al-Mamun Md., Toy M.M., Sunderland T. Cultivated plants in the diversified homegardens of local communities in Ganges Valley, Bangladesh, Sjarm. 2013. 2013. [DOI]
  • 11.Nath T.K., Aziz N., Inoue M. Contribution of homestead forests to rural economy and climate change mitigation: a study from the ecologically critical area of cox’s Bazar—Teknaf Peninsula, Bangladesh. Small-Scale For. 2015;14:1–18. doi: 10.1007/s11842-014-9270-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kabir Md.E., Webb E.L. Floristics and structure of southwestern Bangladesh homegardens. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Manag. 2008;4:54–64. doi: 10.1080/17451590809618183. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kabir Md.E., Webb E.L., Dhar T.K. Are home-gardens managed properly in rural Bangladesh? Asia Pac. J. Rural Dev. 2010;20:47–68. doi: 10.1177/1018529120100204. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mukul S.A., Tito Mashiur Rahman, Munim Shifath Ahmed. Can homegardens help save forests in Bangladesh? Domestic biomass fuel consumption patterns and implications for forest conservation in south-central Bangladesh. 2014. [DOI]
  • 15.Rejuan M., Mondol M.M., Wadud M. Studies on tree diversity of homestead Agroforestry systems in three union of Nakla upazila of Sherpur district. J. Agrofor. Environ. 2011;5:49–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ahmed M.F.U., Rahman S.M.L. Profile and use of multi-species tree crops in the homesteads of Gazipur District, Central Bangladesh. J. Sustain. Agric. 2004;24:81–93. doi: 10.1300/J064v24n01_07. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Islam S.A., Miah M.A.Q., Habib M.A. Diversity of fruit and timber tree species in the coastal homesteads of Southern Bangladesh. J. Asiatic Soc. Bangladesh, Sci. 2013;39:83–94. doi: 10.3329/jasbs.v39i1.16037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zico A., Mondol M.A., Wadud M.A., Alam Z., Rahman G.M.M. 2011. Study on Agroforestry and Plant Diversity in the Char Gobadia of Mymensingh District; p. 4. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Alam M., Sarker S.K. Homestead agroforestry in Bangladesh: dynamics of stand structure and biodiversity. J. Sustain. For. 2011;30:584–599. doi: 10.1080/10549811.2011.571606. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Akhter J., Alam H.M.S., Rahman M.N. A quantitative analysis of the homestead timber and fruit species diversity in two different agro ecological zones of Bangladesh. J. Biodiv. Ecol. Sci. 2014;4:7. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Muhammed N., Masum Md.F.H., Hossain Md.M., Chakma S., Oesten G., von Detten R. Floral composition and biodiversity conservation in homestead forests in Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Int. J. Biodiv. Sci., Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2011;7:247–257. doi: 10.1080/21513732.2011.629211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Uddin M.S., Singha S., Kashem M.A. Diversity of plant species in homestead area of Moulvibazar District in Bangladesh. SAARC J. Agric. 2021;19:285–299. doi: 10.3329/sja.v19i2.57688. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yasmin R., Wadud M.A., Mondol M.A., Sharif M.O. Tree diversity in the homestead and cropland areas of Madhupur upazila under Tangail district. J. Agrofor. Environ. 2010;4:89–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Begum M., Haque M.A., Karim M.R., Akter M., Wadud M.A. 2008. Study on Homestead Agroforestry and Plant Diversity in Gopalpur Upazila of Tangail District; p. 4. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rahman M., Rahman M.M., Islam M. Financial viability and conservation role of betel leaf based agroforestry: an indigenous hill farming system of Khasia community in Bangladesh. J. For. Res. 2009;20:131–136. doi: 10.1007/s11676-009-0023-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kibria M.G., Anik S.I. Homestead plant species diversity and its contribution to the household economy: a case study from northern part of Bangladesh. J. For. Sci. 2010;26:9–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rahman Md.M., Furukawa Y., Kawata I., Rahman M.M., Alam M. Homestead forest resources and their role in household economy: a case study in the villages of Gazipur Sadar Upazila of central Bangladesh. Small-Scale For. 2005;4:359–376. doi: 10.1007/s11842-005-0022-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rahaman M.M., Haider M.Z., Chakraborty M. Contribution of home garden to household economy in rural areas of Bangladesh. Asia Pac. J. Rural Dev. 2015;25:49–60. doi: 10.1177/1018529120150105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Motiur R.M., Furukawa Y., Kawata I., Rahman M.M., Alam M. Role of homestead forests in household economy and factors affecting forest production: a case study in southwest Bangladesh. J. Res. 2006;11:89–97. doi: 10.1007/s10310-005-0191-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Momen R.U., Huda S.M.S., Hossain M.K., Khan B.M. Economics of the plant species used in homestead agroforestry on an off-shore Sandwip Island of Chattogram District, Bangladesh. J. For. Res. 2006;17:285–288. doi: 10.1007/s11676-006-0065-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Haque M.A., Naher N., Sultana T. Homestead tree species diversity and its impact on the livelihood of the farmers in Bangladesh. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Food Sci. 2018;2:148–154. doi: 10.31015/jaefs.18025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rana M.P., Akhter S., Sohel M.S.I. Economics of the plant species used in homestead agroforestry of Southern Bangladesh. J. For. Environ. Sci. 2009;25:35–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jewel K.N.A., Ahmed F., Saifullah M., Wadud M.A., Shahjahan M., Rahman G.M.M. Existing agroforestry practices and tree species abandons in some selective char and hill ecological zones of Bangladesh. J. Agrofor. Environ. 2019;13:67–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Roy R., Sarker T. 2019. “Farmers” Opinion towards Conservation and Causes of Depletion of Citrus at Barlekha Upazila of Moulvibazar District in Bangladesh. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Islam W. vol. 7. Khulna University Studies; 2006. p. 8. (Annual and Perennial Species Preference in Different Cropping Systems in Rajshahi District of Bangladesh). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zaman S., Siddiquee S.U., Katoh M. Structure and diversity of homegarden agroforestry in Thakurgaon District, Bangladesh. Open For. Sci. J. 2010;3:38–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shabuj M.B.H., Wadud M.A., Sharif M.O., Khan T.A., Mondol M.A. Homestead agroforestry systems practiced by the farmers of Natore district. J. Agrofor. Environ. 2010;4:133–136. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kabir Md.E., Rahman Md.M., Rahman Md.A.U., Ando K. Effects of household characteristics on homegarden characteristics in Kalaroa Upazila, Satkhira District, Bangladesh. Small-Scale For. 2016;15:443–461. doi: 10.1007/s11842-016-9332-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rahman M.H., Fardusi M.J. Indigenous plant utilization and farming system of Garo tribe in North-East Bangladesh: a means of sustainable biodiversity conservation. Journal of Forest and Environmental Science. 2012;28:84–96. doi: 10.7747/JFS.2012.28.2.084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Haque Md.M., Mannan Md.A., Islam M. Plant biodiversity in the hoar homesteads of Bangladesh. Int. Res. J. Appl. Life Sci. 2014;2:10–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jaman Md.S., Hossain M., Shariful Islam M., Helal M., Jamil M., Rahman M. Quantification of carbon stock and tree diversity of homegardens in Rangpur District, Bangladesh. Int. J. Agric. For. 2016;6:169–180. doi: 10.5923/j.ijaf.20160605.01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Uddin S., Rahman M., Mannan M.A., Begum S.A., Rahman A.F.M.F., Uddin M.R. Plant biodiversity in the homesteads of saline area of Southeastern Bangladesh. Pakistan J. Biol. Sci. 2002;5 doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2002.710.714. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Islam M.S., Haque M.M., Mannan M.A. Homestead fruit species diversity in the haor area of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Plant Breed Genet. 2011;24:15–22. doi: 10.3329/bjpbg.v24i1.16309. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Roy B., Rahman Md.H., Fardusi Most.J. Status, diversity, and traditional uses of homestead gardens in northern Bangladesh: a means of sustainable biodiversity conservation. ISRN Biodiv. 2013;2013:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2013/124103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rahman Md.A. In: Deforestation in the Teknaf Peninsula of Bangladesh: A Study of Political Ecology. Tani M., Rahman M.A., editors. Springer; Singapore: 2018. The Homestead as a Production System; pp. 155–168. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hoque M., Rahman Md.M., Haque M., Afrad M.S.I., Rahman Md.M. Comparative contribution of crops and homestead forest enterprises to rural household economy: a case study of Keshorita village in Bangladesh. Asian J. Adv. Agric. Res. 2018;7:1–16. doi: 10.9734/AJAAR/2018/41652. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ferdous Z., Datta A., Anal A.K., Anwar M., Khan A.S.M.M.R. Development of home garden model for year round production and consumption for improving resource-poor household food security in Bangladesh. NJAS - Wageningen J. Life Sci. 2016;78:103–110. doi: 10.1016/j.njas.2016.05.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chowdhury M.S.H., Koike M., Muhammed N., Halim Md.A., Saha N., Kobayashi H. Use of plants in healthcare: a traditional ethno-medicinal practice in rural areas of southeastern Bangladesh. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Manag. 2009;5:41–51. doi: 10.1080/17451590902771342. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Schreinemachers P., Patalagsa M.A., Islam Md.R., Uddin Md.N., Ahmad S., Biswas S.C., Ahmed Md.T., Yang R.-Y., Hanson P., Begum S., Takagi C. The effect of women’s home gardens on vegetable production and consumption in Bangladesh. Food Secur. 2015;7:97–107. doi: 10.1007/s12571-014-0408-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Islam M. Women in the homestead agroforestry-contribution to sustainable development. J. Nat. Sci. Res. 2015;5 [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jabber’ M.A., Miah M.G., Mortuza M.G.G., Hossain M.F., Ahmed M. Impact of homestead farming on the livelihood and farm economy in some selected areas of Narsindi and Gazipur districts. J. Sher-E-Bangla Agric. Univ. 2010;4:106–113. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Alam M. Valuation of tangible benefits of a homestead agoforestry system: a case study from Bangladesh. Hum. Ecol. 2012;40:639–645. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Saha N., Rana M.S., Rahman M., Islam M. Potential rural employment in bamboo based industry in the northeast region of Bangladesh. Int. J. For. Usufructs Manag. 2010;11:47–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Miah Md.D., Rahman M.M. The effect of religious sub-culture on the stock and diversity of the village forests in the floodplain area of Bangladesh. For. Trees Livelihoods. 2006;16:139–150. doi: 10.1080/14728028.2006.9752552. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dey A., Islam M., Masum K.M. Above ground carbon stock through palm tree in the homegarden of Sylhet city in Bangladesh. J. For. Environ. Sci. 2014;30:293–300. doi: 10.7747/JFS.2014.30.3.293. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Millat-E-Mustafa M., Teklehaimanot Z., Haruni A.K.O. Traditional uses of perennial homestead garden plants in Bangladesh. For. Trees Livelihoods. 2002;12:235–256. doi: 10.1080/14728028.2002.9752430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Awal M.A., Islam M.R., Choudhury E.R. Homestead fruits and vegetables production and utilization systems in a selected area of Jamalpur District., Bangladesh. J. Train. Dev. 2000;13:167–174. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Millat-E-Mustafa M., Bhuiyan M.K., Hossain M., Ali M. Species composition and management techniques in homestead woodlots - a case study in Comilla district., Chattogram University Studies. Science. 1994;18:97–102. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Masum K.M., Alam M.S., Abdullah-Al-Mamun M.M. Ecological and economical significance of homestead forest to the household of the offshore island in Bangladesh. J. For. Res. 2008;19:307–310. doi: 10.1007/s11676-008-0055-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nath T.K., Inoue M., Myant H. Small-scale agroforestry for upland community development: a case study from Chattogram Hill Tracts, Bangladesh. J. For. Res. 2005;10:443–452. doi: 10.1007/s10310-005-0171-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yeasmin S., Islam K.S., Jashimuddin M., Islam K.N. Ecosystem services valuation of homestead forests: a case study from Fatikchari, Bangladesh. Environ. Chall. 2021;5 doi: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100300. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sarker C.R., Robbani M., Rahim M.A., Iqbal T.M.T. Fruit diversity in the coastal homesteads of Bangladesh. J. Crop Weed. 2015;11:95–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Akter A., Ahmad N., Bagum T., Islam M.M., Rahma M.M., Hossain M.I. The impact of traditional homestead vegetable cultivation on the improvement of livelihood of rural women in Bangladesh. Asian J. Agric. Rural Dev. 2019;9:242–254. doi: 10.18488/journal.1005/2019.9.2/1005.2.242.254. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hocking D., Hocking A., Ray I., Roy I. Trees in Bangladesh paddy fields and homesteads: the future of forestry in crowded countries. Commonw. For. Rev. 1997;76:255–260. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Rahman M., Islam J., Islam M., Alam M., Rana P. Species composition and indigenous management of homegarden of Manipuri community in Sylhet, Bangladesh. Int. J. For. Usufructs Manag. 2010;11:37–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Miah M.D., Rahman M.M. Tree and shrub species preferences and planting materials used by sub-religious communities in the village groves of floodplain area of Bangladesh. J. For. Res. 2004;15:55–60. doi: 10.1007/BF02858011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hannan F.H. 1990. Women in Homestead Agriculture; pp. 52–72. (Environmental Aspects of Agricultural Development in Bangladesh). [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Shapla T., Park J., Hongo C., Kuze H. Agricultural land cover change in Gazipur, Bangladesh, in relation to local economy studied using landsat images. Adv. Rem. Sens. 2015;4:214. doi: 10.4236/ars.2015.43017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rahman S.A., Imam M.H., Wachira S.W., Farhana K.M., Torres B., Kabir D.M.H. Land use patterns and the scale of adoption of agroforestry in the rural landscapes of Padma floodplain in Bangladesh. For. Trees Livelihoods. 2008;18:193–207. doi: 10.1080/14728028.2008.9752629. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hossain M.S., ISlam M.W., editors. Prospects and Reprospects of Land Use System through Agroforestry Practices in Meherpur District, Bangladesh. 2017. (International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology (IJARIT)). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Leuschner W.A., Khaleque K. Homestead agroforestry in Bangladesh. Agrofor. Syst. 1987;5:139–151. doi: 10.1007/BF00047518. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Millat-E-Mustafa Md., Haruni A.K.O. Vegetation characteristics of Bangladesh homegardens. Schweizerische Zeitschrift Fur Forstwesen. 2002;153:454–461. doi: 10.3188/szf.2002.0454. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Masum K.M., Mamun A.A., Mamun-Or-Rashid M., Abdullah-Al-Mamun M.M., Islam M.N. Preference and consumption pattern of horticultural species in the offshore homestead forest of Bangladesh. J. For. Environ. Sci. 2012;28:75–83. doi: 10.7747/JFS.2012.28.2.075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Akter R., Hasan M.K., Kabir K.H., Darr D., Roshni N.A. Social Science Research Network; Rochester, NY: 2022. Composition of Agroforestry Systems and Their Impact on Livelihood Improvement of Tribal Farmers in a Tropical Moist Deciduous Forest in Bangladesh. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Nurunnahar M.N., Pitol S., Sharmin A. Status and prospects of agroforestry at Kaligonj Upazila in Satkhira District. Eur. J. Agric. Food Sci. 2020;2 doi: 10.24018/ejfood.2020.2.6.186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ali A.M.S. Homegardens in smallholder farming systems: examples from Bangladesh. Hum. Ecol. 2005;33:245–270. doi: 10.1007/s10745-005-2434-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zaman S., Katoh M. Homegarden agroforestry in Bangladesh : assessment of its role for farmers' income source in Thakurgaon District. J. For. Plann. 2009;15:37–43. doi: 10.20659/jfp.15.1_37. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Rahman M., Rahman M. 2018. Species Diversity and Productivity at Different Microsites of Homestead in the Terrace Ecosystem of Bangladesh. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Millat-E-Mustafa Md., Fazlul Hoque A.K., Azad Md.A.K., Ahmed F.U. Plant resources of the traditional homegardens in Bangladesh. J. Sustain. For. 1997;5:153–168. doi: 10.1300/J091v05n03_09. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Islam M.R., Baten M.A., Hossain S.M.A., Afroz S.M., Naher K. Factors affecting plant biodiversity in the homesteads of rural areas under process of modernization in Bangladesh. Int. J. Agric. Res. Innovat. Technol. 2018;8:44–54. doi: 10.3329/ijarit.v8i1.38228. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Muhammed N., Masum Md.F.H., Hossain Md.M., Chakma S., Oesten G. Economic dependence of rural people on homestead forestry in Mymensingh, Bangladesh. J. For. Res. 2013;24:591–597. doi: 10.1007/s11676-013-0339-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mahamud M.A., Islam M.T., Mondol M.A., Rahman G.M.M. Species composition and its diversity in the homesteads of Kalaroa and Tala upazila of Satkhira district of Bangladesh. J. Agrofor. Environ. 2010;4:205–208. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Rahman Md.A., Tani M., Asahiro K., Asik Ullah S.M. Species composition, diversity and productivity of homesteads in Southeastern Bangladesh. Small-Scale For. 2017;16:295–309. doi: 10.1007/s11842-016-9356-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chandra Banik S. Homestead agroforestry systems practiced at Kamalganj upazila of Moulvibazar District in Bangladesh. Asian J. Res. Agric. For. 2018;2 doi: 10.9734/AJRAF/2018/44384. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Jashimuddin M., Masum K.M., Salam M.A. Preference and consumption pattern of biomass fuel in some disregarded villages of Bangladesh. Biomass Bioenergy. 2006;30:446–451. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.11.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Mamun A., Muhammad S., Hossain M., Hossain M., Kabir M. Eucalyptus agroforestry system in Chattogram: socio-economic potentiality amid controversies. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Res. (IJAAR) 2014;4:32–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Roy G.K., Khan S.A. Preliminary taxonomic study on homestead flora of four districts of Bangladesh: Magnoliopsida. Bangladesh J. Plant Taxon. 2020;27:37–65. doi: 10.3329/bjpt.v27i1.47567. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Nath T.K., Karmakar N.C., Molla M.A.H., Kabir M.A. Tal (borassus Flabellifer Linn.: Arecaceae): a valuable economic palm of rural Bangladesh. For. Trees Livelihoods. 2002;12:283–295. doi: 10.1080/14728028.2002.9752432. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Saha N., Azam M.A. Be℡ leaf based forest farming by Khasia: tribes: A sustainable system of forest management in Moulvibazar District, Bangladesh. For. Trees Livelihoods. 2005;15:275–290. doi: 10.1080/14728028.2005.9752528. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Nath T.K., Inoue M., Pradhan F.E., Kabir M.A. Indigenous practices and socio-economics of Areca Catechu L. And Piper Be℡ L. Based innovative agroforestry in northern rural Bangladesh. For. Trees Livelihoods. 2011;20:175–190. doi: 10.1080/14728028.2011.9756705. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Alam M., Furukawa Y. Ethnobotany and traditional management of drought tolerant tree species in homestead forests of Bangladesh. Ethnobotanical Leaflets. 2008;2008 https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/ebl/vol2008/iss1/154 [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Hocking D., Hocking A., Islam K. Trees on farms in Bangladesh. Agrofor. Syst. 1996;33:231–247. doi: 10.1007/BF00055425. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Nandi R., Murad M., Dey T. Homestead plant diversity at the ship breaking areas of Bangladesh. Asian J. Biol. 2017;4:1–12. doi: 10.9734/AJOB/2017/36115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Salam M.A., Noguchi T., Koike M. Understanding why farmers plant trees in the homestead agroforestry in Bangladesh. Agrofor. Syst. 2000;50:77–93. doi: 10.1023/A:1006403101782. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Safa M.S. The role of NGOs in improving social forestry practice: do they promote livelihood, sustainability and optimal land use in Bangladesh? Small-Scale For. 2006;5:207–229. doi: 10.1007/s11842-006-0011-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Singha S., Sharaf Uddin M., Chandra Banik S., Goswami B., Kashem M. Impact of homestead agroforestry on socio-economic condition of the respondents at Kamalganj upazila of moulvibazar district in Bangladesh. Asian J. Res. Agric. For. 2019:1–9. doi: 10.9734/ajraf/2019/v3i130030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Miah D., Ahmed R., Belal Uddin M. Biomass fuel use by the rural households in Chattogram region, Bangladesh. Biomass Bioenergy. 2003;24:277–283. doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00173-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Amena’ N., Shapla T., Haque A. Determination of the feasible interventions to evaluate the development and strategy for reducing disaster risk in the coastal area of Bangladesh. J. Sher-E-Bangla Agric. Univ. 2018;9:15–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Alam M., Furukawa Y., Mika M. Perceptions, preferences, and attitude of Bangladesh farmers towards homegarden farming systems. Small-Scale For. 2010;9:213–226. doi: 10.1007/s11842-010-9111-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Misbahuzzaman K. Traditional farming in the mountainous region of Bangladesh and its modifications. J. Mt. Sci. 2016;13:1489–1502. doi: 10.1007/s11629-015-3541-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Islam M.A., Aktar L.A., Jubair S.M.R., Dey T., Biswas R. Addressing farmer’s perceptions-attitudes and constraints to adopt agroforestry adjacent to the coastal Belt of Sundarbans, Bangladesh. Eur. J. Agric. Food Sci. 2021;3:78–88. doi: 10.24018/ejfood.2021.3.4.304. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Baul T.K., Rahman M.M., Moniruzzaman Md., Nandi R. Status, utilization, and conservation of agrobiodiversity in farms: a case study in the northwestern region of Bangladesh. Int. J. Biodiv. Sci., Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2015;11:318–329. doi: 10.1080/21513732.2015.1050456. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Baul T.K., Chakraborty A., Nandi R., Nath T.K., Mohiuddin M. Phytosociological attributes and ecosystem services of homegardens of Maheshkhali island of Bangladesh. Trees, For. People. 2021;5 doi: 10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100092. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Rahman M.M., Kundu G.K., Kabir M.E., Ahmed H., Xu M. Assessing tree coverage and the direct and mediation effect of tree diversity on carbon storage through stand structure in homegardens of southwestern Bangladesh. Forests. 2021;12:1661. doi: 10.3390/f12121661. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Baul T.K., Peuly T.A., Nandi R., Schmidt L.H., Karmakar S. Carbon stocks of homestead forests have a mitigation potential to climate change in Bangladesh. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:9254. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88775-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Jaman Md.S., Muraina T.O., Dam Q., Zhang X., Jamil M., Bhattarai S., Islam F. Effects of single and mixed plant types on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics in homestead agroforestry systems in Northern Bangladesh. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2021;315 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107434. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Baul T.K., Chakraborty A., Nandi R., Mohiuddin M., Kilpeläinen A., Sultana T. Effects of tree species diversity and stand structure on carbon stocks of homestead forests in Maheshkhali Island, Southern Bangladesh. Carbon Bal. Manag. 2021;16:11. doi: 10.1186/s13021-021-00175-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Hocking D., Hocking A., Islam K. Trees as crops in Bangladesh paddy fields and homesteads. Int. Tree Crops J. 1998;9:283–302. doi: 10.1080/01435698.1998.9752985. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Islam M.R., Baten M.A., Hossain S.M.A., Afroz S.M., Naher K., editors. Changes in Homestead Biodiversity with Modernization in the Rural Areas of Bangladesh. 2017. (International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology (IJARIT)). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Akther S., Miah D., Koike M. Household adaptations to fuelwood shortage in the old Brahmaputra downstream zone in Bangladesh and implications for homestead forest management. Int. J. Biodiv. Sci., Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2010;6:139–145. doi: 10.1080/21513732.2010.538720. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Hocking D., Islam K. Trees in Bangladesh paddy fields and homesteads: participatory action research towards a model design. Agrofor. Syst. 1994;25:193–216. doi: 10.1007/BF00707460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Nath T.K., Jashimuddin M., Kamrul Hasan Md., Shahjahan Md., Pretty J. The sustainable intensification of agroforestry in shifting cultivation areas of Bangladesh. Agrofor. Syst. 2016;90:405–416. doi: 10.1007/s10457-015-9863-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Ibrahim K., Wadud M.A., Mondol M.A., Alam Z., Rahman G.M.M. 2011. Impact of Agroforestry Practices on Livelihood Improvement of the Farmers of Char Kalibari Area of Mymensingh; p. 4. [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Mamun M., Wadud M., Hasan M., Miah M.M. vol. 4. 2010. pp. 113–116. (Role of Women in the Homestead Aforestation Activities of Mymensingh District). [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Hasan M.K., Ahmed M.M., Miah M.G. Agro-economic performance of jackfruit-pineapple agroforestry system in Madhupur tract. J. Agric. Rural Dev. 2008;6:147–156. doi: 10.3329/jard.v6i1.1672. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Nath T.K., Inoue M. The upland settlement project of Bangladesh as a means of reducing land degradation and improving rural livelihoods. Small-Scale For. 2008;7:163–182. doi: 10.1007/s11842-008-9048-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Sajjadur Rasheed K.B. Participatory forestry as a strategy for reforestation in Bangladesh. Geojournal. 1995;37:39–44. doi: 10.1007/BF00814883. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES