Abstract
Introduction: A major cause of death globally is cardiovascular disease (CVD). Chest pain, nausea, vomiting, and heartburn are common symptoms of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Chest pain is also the main symptom of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Therefore, the differential diagnosis of chest pain can become more challenging when GERD and AMI coincide. This study evaluated and compared the knowledge of the signs, symptoms, and immediate action that must be taken regarding AMI among GERD and non-GERD patients.
Methodology: An observational cross-sectional study using an online questionnaire was created and published between October and November 2022 to collect data from Saudi males and females 18 or older willing to participate in the study. Participants who were not Saudi had declined to complete the survey or had not fully completed it was excluded. The questionnaire contained three sections; after collecting informed consent, it made inquiries regarding respondents’ GERD status, demographic information, and knowledge and attitudes regarding GERD.
Results: This study included 691 responses from 300 non-GERD participants and 391 GERD participants. The study showed a high level of awareness (75.5%) of GERD, with significant differences in the level of awareness according to marital status, education levels, and occupation status. There was no significant difference in the level of awareness according to gender and GERD diagnosis, where the p-value > 0.05. The most common source of information about AMI was the Internet, followed by health care professionals. The most commonly known symptoms of AMI were sudden pain or discomfort in the chest, followed by a sudden shortness of breath.
Additionally, there was no significant association between the diagnosis of GERD and known risk factors. The association between GERD and other diseases (chi-square = 46.94, p-value 0.01). Obesity and smoking were the two main risk factors for heart attacks.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that there was no significant difference between GERD and non-GERD participants regarding the knowledge and awareness level of AMI. Moreover, it showed that there was a lack of general knowledge and awareness of AMI in Saudi Arabia. The authors recommend initiating more awareness programs in Saudi Arabia to inform people about AMI and cardiovascular disease. More research is required to determine whether other patients are aware of AMI.
Keywords: first-aid, chest pain, non-cardiac chest pain, chest discomfort, gerd, mi, ami, st elevation myocardial ischemia, myocardial ischemia and infarction, gastroesophageal reflux disorder (gerd)
Introduction
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, with approximately 17.9 million deaths reported annually [1]. Saudi Arabia reported a rise in CVD rates in recent years, with an overall prevalence of 5.5% [2]. Additionally, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) death rates in Saudi Arabia were 4%, 5.8%, and 8.1% in-hospital, at one month, and at one year, respectively [3]. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) results from the regurgitation of gastric contents into the esophagus [4]. More than 40% of adults in the United States suffer from GERD each month [5]. In Saudi Arabia, the estimated range of GERD prevalence is between 23.47% and 45.4% [6]. The classic symptoms of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) include chest pain, nausea, vomiting, and heartburn. These symptoms are also associated with GERD [7]. Moreover, the coexistence of GERD and AMI at the same time can make the differential diagnosis of chest pain more complicated [8]. GERD shares similar risk factors with AMI that include obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, along with behavioral risk factors, including smoking and alcohol use [9-12]. Recent studies in Saudi Arabia showed a suboptimal awareness level of coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors [13,14]. Since GERD is the most common cause of non-cardiac chest pain, it is crucial to assess public knowledge about the differences between heart attack and heartburn. No such work appears to have been published regarding such awareness among GERD patients. This study assesses and compares the understanding of early signs, symptoms, and appropriate responses in cases of AMI among GERD and non-GERD patients in Saudi Arabia.
Materials and methods
Study design and selection criteria
An observational cross-sectional study was carried out using an online questionnaire to obtain responses from male and female citizens of Saudi Arabia who are older than 18 years of age and willing to participate in the study. Non-Saudi citizen participants, people who declined participation, and people who did not complete the entire questionnaire were excluded.
Questionnaire design
The questionnaire was designed in Arabic, as it is the native language of Saudi Arabia, and distributed randomly via Google Forms using social media platforms such as WhatsApp, Twitter, and Telegram. The questionnaire consisted of three sections and was presumed to take approximately three minutes to be completed. The questionnaire was developed and published between October and November 2022 and generated 691 responses, with 391 suffering from GERD who were self-diagnosed based on their symptoms and 300 who have never experienced such symptoms. The first section began with gathering informed consent from participants, followed by a query regarding the respondent’s status with regard to GERD. The second section addressed demographic data, including age, gender, marital status, educational level, and occupational status of respondents. Finally, the third section contained questions regarding the knowledge and attitude of GERD respondents' knowledge of and attitude toward AMI among GERD and non-GERD patients in Saudi Arabia.
Ethical consideration and statistical analysis
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of King Faisal University with an ethical approval code KFU-REC-2022-SEP-ETHICS172. Participants were given a statement guaranteeing that their confidential information and privacy would be protected before proceeding to the questionnaire. Completion and submission of the questionnaire were considered as consent for inclusion in the study. Data were extracted, reviewed, coded, and entered into IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 22 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).
Results
The results showed a significant difference in awareness level according to marital status; the highest awareness level was among single people and the lowest awareness was among widowed people (F= 3.602, p-value = 0.013). By educational level, the highest level of awareness was among bachelors and the lowest awareness level was among people with diplomas (F= 8.328, p-value < 0.01). By occupational status, the highest awareness level was among students and the lowest was among housewives (F= 8.328, p-value < 0.01). There were no significant differences in awareness according to gender or GERD diagnosis (p-value > 0.05) (Table 1). There were 691 participants between the ages of 15 and 86 (mean = 31.7, standard deviation = 13.66). The majority (56.4%) were female, and 43.3% were male. Regarding marital status: the majority (55.9%) were single, 42.5% were married, 1% were divorced, and 0.6% were widowed. On an educational level, the majority (58.8%) had a bachelor’s degree, 21% had secondary education, 8.4% had a diploma, 5.2% had postgraduate education, 4.8% had primary education, and 1.9% had intermediate education. The majority (41.8%) of respondents were students, 29.2% were employees, 11.3% were retired, 9.7% were housewives, and 8% were looking for a job. The majority (53.5%) earned monthly incomes of less than 3,000 SR, 23.4% had incomes from 3,000 SR to 10,000 SR, 15.5% had incomes from 10,000 SR to 20,000 SR, and 7.5% had incomes of more than 20,000 SR (Table 2). Results show that 56.6% have GERD diagnoses and 43.4% do not. Among people with GERD diagnoses, 37.6% had no other diseases, 5.2% had diabetes, 4.1% had dyslipidemia, 3.9% had hypertension, 1.4% had heart diseases, 0.45 had suffered a stroke, and 3.9% had other diseases. 51.4% of this cohort were aware of heart attacks and 5.2% had not. 38.9% of the people knew someone who had experienced a heart attack before and 17.7% did not. 39.8% had received information related to heart attacks and 16.8% had not. 52% knew that sudden heart attack requires prompt treatment and 4.6% did not. 28.4% would call an ambulance if they witnessed heart attack signs/symptoms, 24.6% would take the patient to the hospital, 2.9% will call a doctor and 0.7% would contact the patient’s family. 47.95% knew the phone number to contact an ambulance and 8.7% did not. 44.4% had heard about the risk factors of heart attack and 2.2% had not. Among people without GERD/heartburn diagnoses, 37.9% did not suffer from any diseases, 1.4% had diabetes, 0.4% had dyslipidemia, 0.7% had hypertension, 0.9% had heart disease, none had suffered a stroke, and 14% had other diseases. 40.1% knew about heart attacks and 3.3 % did not. 25.3% knew someone who had experienced a heart attack and 18.1% did not. 29.1% had received information related to heart attacks and 14.3% had not. 39.8% knew sudden heart attacks require prompt treatment and 3.6% did not. 21.1% would call an ambulance if they witnessed heart attack signs/symptoms, 20.7% would the patient to the hospital, 9% would call a doctor, and 0.3% would contact the patient’s family. 34.7 knew the phone number to contact an ambulance and 8.7% did not. 32.4% had heard about the risk factors of heart attack and 11% had not (Table 3). Levels of awareness among respondents regarding heart attack information were high (mean: 75.5%). The most identified item was that sudden heart attacks require prompt treatment (91.8%), then hearing about heart attacks (91.5%), and the least-known item was what to do first when witnessing signs/symptoms of heart attack (49.5%) (Table 4). There was a significant association between GERD diagnoses and other diseases (chi-square = 46.94, p-value < 0.01). There were also significant associations between this diagnosis and knowing someone who had experienced a heart attack before (chi-square = 8.094, p-value = 0.004). However, there were no significant associations between this diagnosis and other factors (hearing about heart attacks, receiving information related to heart attacks, knowing the need for prompt treatment for sudden heart attacks, knowing the proper actions to take when witnessing signs/symptoms of heart attack, knowing the ambulance phone number). The p-value for these factors was > 0.05 (Table 5). The most popular source of information about heart attack was the Internet (28.1%), followed by health care professionals (21%), books (15.8%), TV (13.9%), media (13.6%), seminars (4.8%), and promotional leaflets (2.8%) (Table 6). The most identified risk factor for heart attack among respondents was obesity (14.5%), followed by smoking (13.9%), heart diseases (11.6%), high cholesterol (9.8%), stress (9.1%), diabetes (8.4%), unhealthy diet (8%), lack of exercise (7.2%), alcohol (6.1%), genetics (5.5%), atrial fibrillation (4.6%), and exercise (0.9%). 0.5% were not aware of any risk factors (Table 7). The most frequently identified symptoms of heart attack were sudden pain or discomfort in the chest (26.2%), sudden shortness of breath (21.2%), sudden pain or discomfort in the arms or shoulders (16.9%), sudden pain or discomfort in jaw, neck, or back (15.2%), weakness or dizziness (11.2%) and sudden disturbance of the vision in one or both eyes (9.2%) (Table 8).
Table 1. Difference in awareness level.
Variable | Test | Categories | Mean | Statistics | P-value |
Gender | Independent Samples Test | Male | 1.598 | -1.018 | 0.309 |
Female | 1.615 | ||||
Marital Status | ANOVA | Single | 1.6299 | 3.602 | 0.013 |
Married | 1.5821 | ||||
Divorced | 1.5306 | ||||
Widowed | 1.4643 | ||||
Educational Level | ANOVA | Primary | 1.6364 | 4.216 | 0.001 |
Intermediate education | 1.4176 | ||||
Diploma | 1.532 | ||||
Secondary | 1.597 | ||||
Bachelor | 1.6256 | ||||
Postgraduate | 1.6111 | ||||
Occupational Status | ANOVA | Employee | 1.5898 | 8.328 | 0.000 |
Student | 1.6466 | ||||
Looking for job | 1.5714 | ||||
Retired | 1.6337 | ||||
Housewife | 1.4925 | ||||
Monthly Income | ANOVA | Less than 3000 SR | 1.6116 | 0.865 0.459 | |
From 3000 SR – 10000 SR | 1.5847 | ||||
From 10000 SR – 20000 SR | 1.6222 | ||||
More than 20000 SR | 1.6209 | ||||
Diagnosis with GERD | Independent Samples Test | Yes | 1.6215 | -1.916 | 0.56 |
No | 1.5895 |
Table 2. Demographic data.
Variable | Category | Frequency | Percent |
Gender | Male | 301 | 43.6 |
Female | 390 | 56.4 | |
Marital Status | Single | 386 | 55.9 |
Married | 294 | 42.5 | |
Divorced | 7 | 1.0 | |
Widowed | 4 | 0.6 | |
Education Level | Primary | 33 | 4.8 |
Intermediate Education | 13 | 1.9 | |
Diploma | 58 | 8.4 | |
Secondary | 145 | 21.0 | |
Bachelor | 406 | 58.8 | |
Postgraduate | 36 | 5.2 | |
Occupational Status | Employee | 202 | 29.2 |
Student | 289 | 41.8 | |
Looking for job | 55 | 8.0 | |
Retired | 78 | 11.3 | |
Housewife | 67 | 9.7 | |
Monthly Income | Less than 3,000 SR | 370 | 53.5 |
From 3,000 SR – 10,000 SR | 162 | 23.4 | |
From 10,000 SR – 20,000 SR | 107 | 15.5 | |
More than 20,000 SR | 52 | 7.5 |
Age | Min | Max | Mean | Standard Deviation |
15 | 89 | 31.7 | 13.66 |
Table 3. Comparison among people who have/have not been diagnosed with GERD.
Variables | Have you ever been diagnosed with GERD or heartburn? | ||||
No | Yes | ||||
300 | 43.4% | 391 | 56.6% | ||
Frequency | % | Frequency | % | ||
Do you suffer from any diseases? | No | 262 | 37.9% | 260 | 37.6% |
Hypertension | 5 | 0.7% | 27 | 3.9% | |
Diabetes | 10 | 1.4% | 36 | 5.2% | |
Heart diseases | 6 | 0.9% | 10 | 1.4% | |
Dyslipidemia | 3 | 0.4% | 28 | 4.1% | |
Stroke | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 0.4% | |
Other diseases | 14 | 2.0% | 27 | 3.9% | |
Have you ever heard about heart attacks? | No | 23 | 3.3% | 36 | 5.2% |
Yes | 277 | 40.1% | 355 | 51.4% | |
Do you know anyone who has had a heart attack before? | No | 125 | 18.1% | 122 | 17.7% |
Yes | 175 | 25.3% | 269 | 38.9% | |
Have you ever received any information related to heart attacks? | No | 99 | 14.3% | 115 | 16.8% |
Yes | 39.8% | ||||
Does sudden heart attack require prompt treatment? | No | 25 | 3.6% | 32 | 4.6% |
Yes | 285 | 39.8% | 359 | 52.0% | |
Take them to hospital. | 143 | 20.7% | 170 | 24.6% | |
If someone shows signs and symptoms of a heart attack, what do you think should do first? | Call his/her doctors | 9 | 1.3% | 20 | 2.9% |
Call an ambulance | 146 | 21.1% | 196 | 28.4% | |
Contact their family | 2 | 0.3% | 5 | 0.7% | |
Other actions | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
If you want to call an ambulance, do you know the phone number? | No | 60 | 8.7% | 60 | 8.7% |
Yes | 240 | 34.7 | 331 | 47.9% | |
Have you heard about the risk factors of heart attacks? | No | 76 | 11.0% | 84 | 12.2% |
Yes | 224 | 32.4% | 307 | 44.4% |
Table 4. Level of awareness.
Questions | Correct Answer | Percentage of Respondents with the Correct Answer | |
1 | Have you ever heard about heart attacks? | Yes | 91.5% |
2 | Do you know anyone who has had a heart attack before? | Yes | 64.3% |
3 | Have you ever received any information related to heart attacks? | Yes | 68.9% |
4 | Does sudden heart attack require prompt treatment? | Yes | 91.8% |
5 | If someone shows signs and symptoms of a heart attack, what do you think you should do first? | Call an ambulance | 49.5% |
6 | If you want to call an ambulance, do you know the phone number? | Yes | 82.6% |
7 | Have you heard about the risk factors of heart attacks? | Yes | 79.8% |
Mean | 75.5% |
Table 5. Association between diagnosis with GERD or heartburn and other factor.
Pearson Chi-Square Tests | ||
Variables | Have you ever been diagnosed with GERD or heartburn? | |
Do you suffer from any diseases? | Chi-square | 46.942 |
Df | 6 | |
Sig. | .000* | |
Have you ever heard about heart attacks? | Chi-square | 0.516 |
Df | 1 | |
Sig. | .004* | |
Have you ever received any information related to heart attacks? | Chi-square | 0.88 |
Df | 1 | |
Sig. | 0.348 | |
Does sudden heart attack require prompt treatment? | Chi-square | 0.005 |
Df | 1 | |
Sig. | 0.944 | |
If someone shows signs and symptoms of a heart attack, what do you think should do first? | Chi-square | 3.168 |
Df | 3 | |
Sig. | .366 | |
If you want to call an ambulance, do you know the phone number? | Chi-square | 2.563 |
Df | 1 | |
Sig. | 0.234 |
Table 6. Sources of information.
Source | N | Percent |
TV | 153 | 13.90 |
Internet | 308 | 28.10 |
Books | 173 | 15.80 |
Media | 149 | 13.60 |
Promotional leaflets | 31 | 2.80 |
Health care professionals | 230 | 21.00 |
Seminars | 53 | 4.80 |
Table 7. Risk factors for a heart attack.
Risk | N | Percent |
Smoking | 549 | 13.90 |
Obesity | 571 | 14.50 |
Diabetes | 331 | 8.40 |
Exercise | 34 | 0.90 |
Unhealthy diet | 314 | 8.00 |
Stress | 358 | 9.10 |
Alcohol | 240 | 6.10 |
Genetic | 219 | 5.50 |
Atrial Fibrilation | 183 | 4.60 |
High Cholesterol | 386 | 9.80 |
Lack of Exercise | 286 | 7.20 |
Heart Diseases | 457 | 11.60 |
I Don’t Know | 20 | 0.50 |
Table 8. Symptoms of a heart attack.
Symptoms | N | Percent |
Sudden pain or discomfort in jaw, neck, or back | 280 | 15.20 |
Weakness or dizziness | 207 | 11.20 |
Sudden pain or discomfort in the chest | 482 | 26.20 |
Sudden disturbance of vision in one or both eyes | 170 | 9.20 |
Sudden pain or discomfort in the arms or shoulders | 311 | 16.90 |
Sudden shortness of breath | 391 | 21.20 |
Discussion
The current study assessed the awareness of early signs and symptoms of AMI among GERD and non-GERD patients in Saudi Arabia and their knowledge of the best course of action to be taken from the onset of symptoms. The result showed that 43.6% of participants were male and 56.4% were female. Out of the respondents, 56.6% had received a diagnosis of GERD, and 43.3% had not received such a diagnosis. The result demonstrated a high level of awareness toward AMI in both groups of respondents (GERD and non-GERD), which was higher than expected. Moreover, there was a significant difference in the level of awareness according to an educational level only. Conversely, there were no significant differences between males and females and between GERD/non-GERD diagnoses. The knowledge of proper action in response to AMI was low. The result showed a high level of knowledge of AMI in GERD patients. This might be due to the disease itself; it could encourage patients to be more aware of complications and other diseases that share similar risk factors. The present findings seem to be consistent with other research, which found high levels of knowledge of AMI (60.4%) among hypertensive patients [15]. Similarly, a study conducted in Nepal illustrated that more than half of the participants knew that AMI could be a complication of diabetes mellitus [16]. Additionally, there were no significant differences between participants who had GERD and those who did not have GERD regarding knowledge of AMI. This might be explained by the fact that most participants had a high level of education. The most common symptoms identified by the participants were sudden pain in the chest, followed by a sudden shortness of breath and sudden pain in the arm or shoulder. However, a study in the United States reported that the most common symptoms of AMI are chest pain and jaw, neck, or back pain. Furthermore, the knowledge of the most common symptoms of AMI was higher in that study compared to this one [17]. The most prevalent risk factors recognized among respondents were smoking (13.90%) and obesity (14.50%). This aligns with a study that was conducted in the western region of Saudi Arabia, where 66.7% of respondents identified smoking as a risk factor [18]. Moreover, two other studies in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait reported very high awareness levels of smoking as a risk factor, reaching over 95% of respondents [19,20]. The results showed that the level of knowledge regarding the appropriate action to be taken in the presence of AMI symptoms (49.5%) was low compared with Korea (67.0%) [21], Poland (87.4%) [22], and the United States (86.8%) [17].
Limitations
This study’s strength was its high enrollment of participants who had been diagnosed with GERD or heartburn; this strengthened the result. However, there were some limitations in the study. First, the database did not contain data on the source of participants’ GERD diagnoses and whether they had been made by a doctor or by the participants themselves. Second, Saudi residents in Saudi Arabia were included in the study, but residents of other nationalities and Saudis residing abroad were not included. Third, the majority of the participants were of young age; the mean age was 31.6, with a standard deviation of 13.66. If there was a greater diversity in respondent age, the study might have shown additional information. Future studies should take these limitations into consideration.
Recommendation
Based on the findings of this study, annual awareness and education campaigns would be appropriate, with a focus on GERD patients and high-risk people, in order to raise knowledge of AMI symptoms and the appropriate course of action that should be taken if symptoms develop.
Conclusions
The study showed that the overall knowledge and awareness of AMI were suboptimal. The majority of participants had previously heard about AMI, but they were unsure regarding the proper first step to be taken when witnessing signs or symptoms. There was no significant difference in awareness levels among people who reported GERD diagnoses and those who did not. The authors suggest launching additional awareness campaigns about AMI and what to do next and educating people about cardiovascular disease in Saudi Arabia, especially among members of high-risk groups. More studies are needed to identify awareness of GERD complications and also to detect awareness regarding AMI among other patients.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Research Ethics Committee at King Faisal University issued approval KFU-REC-2022-SEP–ETHICS172
Animal Ethics
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
References
- 1.Non-communicable diseases. [ Jun; 2022 ]. 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases
- 2.Coronary artery disease in. Al-Nozha MM, Arafah MR, Al-Mazrou YY, et al. https://smj.org.sa/content/25/9/1165. Saudi Med J. 2004;25:1165–1171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.The first survey of the Saudi Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Program: main results and long-term outcomes (STARS-1 Program) Alhabib KF, Kinsara AJ, Alghamdi S, et al. PLoS One. 2019;14:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) Clarrett DM, Hachem C. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Gastroesophageal-Reflux-Disease-(GERD).-Clarrett-Hachem/770fbe7df209cb78dd28cb36d44537e2a748b9db. Mo Med. 2018;115:214–218. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:308–328. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease in Saudi Arabia. Alkhathami AM, Alzahrani AA, Alzhrani MA, Alsuwat OB, Mahfouz ME. Gastroenterology Res. 2017;10:294–300. doi: 10.14740/gr906w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Misconception of heart attack pain with heart burn - how common is it? Khan S, Memon RA, Khan MF, Dar MI. Pak Heart J. 2017;50:89–93. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Risk of acute myocardial infarction in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a nationwide population-based study. Lei WY, Wang JH, Wen SH, et al. PLoS One. 2017;12:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meta-analysis: obesity and the risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications. Hampel H, Abraham NS, El-Serag HB. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:199–211. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-3-200508020-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Obesity is associated with increased transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Wu JC, Mui LM, Cheung CM, Chan Y, Sung JJ. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:883–889. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.12.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Association between reflux oesophagitis and features of the metabolic syndrome in Japan. Moki F, Kusano M, Mizuide M, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:1069–1075. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03454.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.13-year long-term associations between changes in traditional cardiovascular risk factors and changes in fibrinogen levels: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. Okwuosa TM, Klein O, Chan C, Jenny NS, Schreiner P, Green D, Liu K. Atherosclerosis. 2013;226:214–219. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.10.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Population awareness of coronary artery disease risk factors in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Almalki MA, AlJishi MN, Khayat MA, Bokhari HF, Subki AH, Alzahrani AM, Alhejily WA. Int J Gen Med. 2019;12:63–70. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S184732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Public awareness of early symptoms of acute myocardial infarction among Saudi population. Basham K, Aldubaikhi A, Sulaiman I, et al. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10:3785–3790. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_449_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Awareness and practice of prevention of myocardial infarction among hypertensive patients: cross-sectional study in a tertiary cardiac centre of Nepal. Adhikari A, Bhandari B. Nepalese Heart J. 2017;14:29–30. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Awareness regarding myocardial infarction among diabetic patients attending in a tertiary level hospital. Karki RKC, Pandey A. Acta Sci Med Sci. 2019;3:131–136. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Awareness of heart attack symptoms among US adults in 2007, and changes in awareness from 2001 to 2007. Fang J, Gillespie C, Keenan NL, Greenlund KJ. Future Cardiol. 2011;7:311–320. doi: 10.2217/fca.10.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.The perception of coronary artery disease and cardiac catheterization in Saudi Arabia: “What the public know”. Albugami S, Al-Husayni F, Bakhsh L, et al. Cureus. 2020;12:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Patients' knowledge of risk and protective factors for cardiovascular disease. Wartak SA, Friderici J, Lotfi A, Verma A, Kleppel R, Naglieri-Prescod D, Rothberg MB. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:1480–1488. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Public knowledge of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors in Kuwait: a cross-sectional survey. Awad A, Al-Nafisi H. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1131. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.The general public’s awareness of early symptoms of and emergency responses to acute myocardial infarction and related factors in South Korea: a national public telephone survey. Kim HS, Lee H, Kim K, et al. J Epidemiol. 2016;26:233–241. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20150074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Knowledge of a patient-dependant phase of acute myocardial infarction in Polish adults: the role of physician's advice. Kopec G, Sobien B, Podolec M, et al. Eur J Public Health. 2011;21:603–608. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]