Abstract
Xyleborini is the largest tribe of Scolytinae accounting for about 1300 species worldwide; all species are primarily xylomycetophagous, developing on symbiotic fungi farmed in plant woody tissues. Xyleborini wood-boring action, associated with the inoculum of symbiotic fungi, can lead, sometimes, to the emergence of host plant dieback, wood damage and death; for this reason, multiple Xyleborini are major pests on both cultivated, forest and ornamental trees. Many Xyleborini are invasive worldwide and great effort is expended to manage their biological invasions or prevent new arrivals. Imports of host plants often have a primary role as a pathway for introduction and are frequently responsible for the establishment of species in non-native environments. In this context, data availability on Xyleborini host plants is a major limiting factor in the development of effective detection and monitoring strategies as well as a fundamental variable to consider in risk assessment of plant pests and invasive species. This contribution provides updated host records and the hosts economic categorization for the 1293 Xyleborini known worldwide to date.
Subject terms: Entomology, Forestry
Background & Summary
The Scolytinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is a highly diverse subfamily of weevil beetles inhabiting all regions of the world, except Antarctica1. Following present interpretations, Scolytinae is a polyphyletic assemblage of weevils united by their adaptation to bore in plant tissues at the adult stage2,3. This group apparently evolved during the mid-Cretaceous in parallel with the synchronous differentiation of Spermatophyta4. Living species are associated with almost all groups of terrestrial herbaceous and arboreous plants and are adapted to feed and develop on almost all plant parts5. These adaptations corresponded with the evolution of multiple morphological, ecological and ethological traits such as the development of compact, cylindrical bodies with a short rostrum that provides powerful mandibles that could easily bore into plant tissues, the capability to feed on plant parts other than xylem, and the evolution of mutualistic relationships with microorganisms6. Due to their evolutionary plasticity and adaptability, Scolytinae are capable of developing on healthy, dead, or dying plants, consequently playing a unique ecological role in forest ecosystems (e.g.7,8).
Xyleborini LeConte, 1876 is the largest tribe in Scolytinae, with almost 1300 described species distributed into 43 genera9–17. The tribe inhabits all major world climatic regions and its highest diversity can be found in tropical and subtropical regions. Xyleborini are generally xylomycetophagous species18, rarely seed feeders19–21, and actively farm symbiotic fungi inside parental galleries22,23. These fungi serve primarily as food for both larvae and adults but also to detoxify plant defense chemicals24. The infection caused by the fungi, in association with the damage caused by the boring activity of the beetles, usually causes the onset of a series defensive responses by the affected plant, such as sap oozing and gumming. In some cases, the infection caused by the fungus can cause the dieback or death of the host plant (e.g.25,26).
Many xyleborine species are significant for agriculture and forestry because they are pests27–31. In addition, Xyleborini include many non-native invasive species introduced worldwide32–38. As is the case for many other alien species, their interactions with both non-native and indigenous plants may cause socio-economic (yield loss, trade restriction, or change in market values) or environmental impacts (disturbance of natural ecosystem processes, influences on populations of native species)39,40.
Consequently, considerable effort has been made worldwide to understand and predict the main pattern of non-native species arrival41–43 and, where possible, to prevent species introduction through the development of effective survey and detection methodologies and tools44–48. In this perspective, information on host plants and host range are two of the key factors explaining species dispersal, introduction pathways, and establishment success41. Furthermore, host preference and host diversity might have a relevant role in Xyleborini management49.
To date, despite a growing interest in host plants for phytosanitary or analytical purposes, much of the data on host associations remains scattered through the extensive literature regarding Scolytinae, with only a few exceptions such as monographs and catalogs, e.g.50. To meet this need we intend to start a series of contributions specifically aimed at summarizing and updating the knowledge about the host species of not only Xyleborini but all Curculionidae Scolytinae known worldwide, providing a new complete and updated resource for future research.
Methods
Host plant definition
In compiling these data, we identified host plant records based on all records of xyleborine species observed boring inside any plant part or tissue. Records derived from trapping or other observations of occurrence in plantations (including in monocultures) were considered unreliable and therefore not included in the dataset.
Data collection
The creation of the host dataset started from drafting of the most updated species list of Xyleborini in the world. This checklist was initially based on the Wood & Bright catalog50 and following supplements50–54, and it was subsequently integrated on the basis of all taxonomic papers on Xyleborini published afterwards. The current version of the database includes all Xyleborini species known and described prior to October 30th 2022.
The research of host plants was conducted through a systematic search, treating individual Xyleborini species one at a time. The search for host plants was performed by searching not only for the beetle’s valid name, but also by using its synonyms. The research was performed in Google Scholar and Google for each species on the list through the use of selected keywords such as the species name of the scolytine (e.g., “Xylosandrus amputatus”) also in combination with other keywords such as “host”, “pest” (integrated by the usage of the Boolean operators “AND”, “OR”, “NOT” and the use of double inverted commas for specific word combinations). Furthermore, data collection was integrated through the extensive revision of reports (annual, research, technical, project, etc.), working papers, government documents, evaluations and a series of websites and online resources55,56, as well as books, catalogs and manuals. The sources consulted were not limited to those in English, but included other languages (e.g. French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish) and idioms (e.g. Chinese, Japanese, Russian) using, where necessary, instant translation sites (DeepL or Google translate). In order to guarantee a search as precise and exhaustive as possible, a reiterated host research was made for each xyleborine species until the results no longer produced new records.
Plant taxonomy adopted in the dataset was based on the information available from the “Plant of The World Online” database (POWO)57, whereas the economic uses of plant species were based on the “U.S. National Plant Germoplasm System” database58. Economic use of plants was organized in three categories: 1) Agricultural (plants used in medicine -also folklore-, human and animal food, agroforestry, materials -beads, gum/resin, essential oils, poison, tannin/dyestuff, etc.); 2) Forest (plants used as wood, fuel, furniture); 3) Ornamental (plants with ornamental, shade and shelter, domestic usage).
The references included in the database were both the most relevant, the most updated and those specifically referring to a determined xyleborine species and its hosts. In case of multiple references referring to the same species or reporting the same information, only one, and generally the first recovered or the most exhaustive, was selected and included in the database. Uncertain or imprecise records, including records using vernacular or local names, that could not be traced back to a reliable host species, were not included in the dataset.
Data Records
The database for the host plants of Scolytinae Xyleborini of the world is available on Zenodo with the original database in XLSX format (i.e. “Complete_dataset_Xyleborini.xlsx”)59; the reference list is included in the same file as a different spreadsheet named “References”. The database is organized in eight columns as follows: “Species”, where the full name of the xyleborine species are provided in association with the describer’s name; “Host Family”; “Host Genus”; “Host Species”; “Reference”, and the three economic categories “Agricultural”, “Forest” and “Ornamental”. In the dataset, xyleborine species are sorted alphabetically, both by genus and by species. Plant family and genus records do not imply that a specific xyleborine species feeds on all the plants belonging to that category, but instead that this data is the most specific/detailed information available in the reviewed literature suggesting that a determined xyleborine species feeds on at least one plant species belonging to that specific family/genus.
The database will be periodically updated with new versions (named Version 1.0 onwards); the latest and most updated database will be the first to access via the DOI provided here, however previous versions of the same file will also remain available in the repository. The first version (1.0) provides information for 1293 species of Xyleborini, of which 535 have no host records available. For the 758 species in which the host is known, 574 species have their host known at species level while for 184 the host is limited to family or genus. The dataset includes records for 2188 plant species, distributed among 178 families and 1027 genera; 723 plants belong at least to one of the three economic categories considered.
Technical Validation
All host records included in the database are based on articles published in scientific journals, books, reports, and databases managed by the major leading experts on scolytine beetles (e.g. Atkinson database: Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of the Americas) and international phytosanitary agencies (e.g. EPPO60, CABI61); therefore, we have confidence in their accuracy, frequently guaranteed by the peer-review process.
As already specified in materials and methods, to standardize and harmonize the information we critically reviewed all the data collected, keeping only those relating to xyleborine species whose relationship with the host plant could be recognized unequivocally; for this reason, we have excluded all possible cases that do not fall within the standards defined in the materials and methods section. Each record in the dataset is associated with the respective bibliographic source, allowing users to both assess the validity of the record and interpret and reuse the data. We listed the references cited in the database, making it possible for users to access the original sources.
Xyleborini taxonomy is standardized following the International Code of Nomenclature Zoology (ICZN)62. The complete list of genera and species belonging to the Xyleborini family was compiled using the Bright, 2021 catalog54, integrated with the latest publications and, finally, cross-validated by Sarah M. Smith and Anthony I. Cognato (Michigan State University), two of the world’s leading experts on Xyleborini. Plant taxonomy follows the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants63, and taxa names and authors, including those of subspecies, varieties and hybrids are consistent with those provided in the internationally recognized Plants of the World Online database and the International Plant Names Index (IPNI)64.
Our aim is to keep updating the xyleborine species list and host plant data in the future. Data will be corrected and updated if any errors or updates are reported to the first or last author (enrico.ruzzier@unipd.it or matteo.marchioro@unipd.it).
Usage Notes
We would appreciate if researchers cite the database stored in Zenodo59 in the specific version used, as well as this publication, when using all or part of the database.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Sarah M. Smith and Anthony I. Cognato (Michigan State University, USA) for having provided important literature used in the realization of this contribution and for the crosscheck of Xyleborini species list and Alison Garside for the language review. Research partially funded by EFSA within the partnership agreement GP/EFSA/ALPHA/2019/01, and by University of Padua (DOR project).
Author contributions
Conceptualization, E.R. and M.M.; methodology, E.R., M.F. and M.M.; data recollection and curation, E.R., G.O., D.V., I.M. and M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, E.R. and M.M.; writing—review and editing, E.R., G.O., D.V., M.F., I.M. and M.M.; funding acquisition, M.F. All authors reviewed and contributed to the final version of the manuscript.
Code availability
No custom code was used to generate or process the data described in the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Raffa, K. F., Gregoire, J. C. & Lindgren, B. S. Natural history and ecology of bark beetles. In: Vega, F. E. & Hofstetter, R. W. (eds.). Bark Beetles - Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species (Academic Press, 2015).
- 2.Pistone D, Gohli J, Jordal BH. Molecular phylogeny of bark and ambrosia beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) based on 18 molecular markers. Syst. Entomol. 2018;43:387–406. doi: 10.1111/syen.12281. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shin S, et al. Phylogenomic data yield new and robust insights into the phylogeny and evolution of weevils. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018;35:823–836. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hulcr, J., Atkinson, T. H., Cognato, A. I., Jordal, B. H. & McKenna, D. D. Morphology, taxonomy, and phylogenetics of bark beetles. In: Vega, F. E. & and Hofstetter, R. W. (eds.). Bark Beetles - Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species (Academic Press, 2015).
- 5.Kirkendall, L. R., Biedermann, P. H. & Jordal, B. H. Evolution and diversity of bark and ambrosia beetles. In: Vega, F. E. & and Hofstetter, R. W. (eds.). Bark Beetles - Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species (Academic Press, 2015).
- 6.Six DL. Ecological and evolutionary determinants of bark beetle—fungus symbioses. Insects. 2012;3:339–366. doi: 10.3390/insects3010339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fettig, C. J. (2016). Native bark beetles and wood borers in Mediterranean forests of California. In: Paine, T. D. & Lieutier, F. (eds.). Insects and Diseases of Mediterranean Forest Systems (Springer, 2016).
- 8.Lieutier, F., Mendel, Z. & Faccoli, M. Bark beetles of Mediterranean conifers. In: Paine, T. D. & Lieutier, F. (eds.). Insects and Diseases of Mediterranean Forest Systems (Springer, 2016).
- 9.Hulcr J, Cognato A. New genera of Palaeotropical Xyleborini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) based on congruence between morphological and molecular characters. Zootaxa. 2010;2717:1–33. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.2717.1.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Smith SM. Dinoxyleborus Smith, a new genus of Neotropical xyleborine ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera, Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Zootaxa. 2017;4303:131–139. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4303.1.8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cognato AI. Callibora Cognato (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Xyleborini), a new genus of xyleborine ambrosia beetle from Ecuador. Coleopt. Bull. 2018;72:801–804. doi: 10.1649/0010-065X-72.4.801. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Beaver RA, Sittichaya W, Liu LY. A review of the genus Immanus Hulcr & Cognato with a key to species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Xyleborini) Zootaxa. 2019;4585:378–386. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4585.2.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sittichaya W, Smith SM. Eggersanthus Sittichaya & Smith gen. nov., a new Oriental ambrosia beetle genus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Xyleborini) Zootaxa. 2020;4779:282–288. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4779.2.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Beaver RA, Petrov AV, Sittichaya W. A new genus of ambrosia beetle from Melanesia (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Xyleborini) Zootaxa. 2021;4949:163–172. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4949.1.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sittichaya W, Smith SM, Beaver RA, Thaochan N. Revision of the xyleborine ambrosia beetle genus Microperus Wood, 1980 (Curculionidae, Scolytinae, Xyleborini) of Thailand with four new species and four newly recorded species. ZooKeys. 2021;1074:191. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1074.76235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Smith SM, Cognato AI. A Revision of the Neotropical genus Coptoborus Hopkins (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae, Xyleborini) ZooKeys. 2021;1044:609. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.144.62246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Osborn RK, Smith SM, Cognato AI. New Xyleborine (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) genus with an Afrotropical-Neotropical distribution. Insect Systematics and Diversity. 2022;6:3. doi: 10.1093/isd/ixac016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dzurenko M, Hulcr J. Ambrosia beetles. Curr. Biol. 2022;32:61–62. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.11.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Browne F. The biology of Malayan Scolytidae and Platypodidae. Malaysian For. 1961;22:1–255. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Thube SH, et al. Xylosandrus crassiusculus (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Its fungal symbiont Ambrosiella roeperi associated with arecanut kernel decay in Karnataka, India. Insects. 2022;13:67. doi: 10.3390/insects13010067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Thube SH, et al. Xylosandrus crassiusculus (Motschulsky) on cocoa pods (Theobroma cacao L.): matter of bugs and fungi. Insects. 2022;13:809. doi: 10.3390/insects13090809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mueller UG, Gerardo NM, Aanen DK, Six DL, Schultz TR. The evolution of agriculture in insects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2005;36:563–595. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152626. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hulcr J, Stelinski LL. The ambrosia symbiosis: from evolutionary ecology to practical management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017;62:285–303. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Biedermann PH, Vega FE. Ecology and evolution of insect-fungus mutualisms. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020;65:431–455. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-024910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.O’Donnell K, et al. Invasive Asian Fusarium–Euwallacea ambrosia beetle mutualists pose a serious threat to forests, urban landscapes and the avocado industry. Phytoparasitica. 2016;44:435–442. doi: 10.1007/s12600-016-0543-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Osborn RK, Ordóñez ME, Cognato AI. Ecuadorian Coptoborus beetles harbor Fusarium and Graphium fungi previously associated with Euwallacea ambrosia beetles. Mycologia. 2022;114:1–14. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2022.2065441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Carrillo D, Duncan RE, Peña JE. Ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) that breed in avocado wood in Florida. Fla. Entomol. 2012;95:573–579. doi: 10.1653/024.095.0306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Greco EB, Wright MG. Ecology, biology, and management of Xylosandrus compactus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) with emphasis on coffee in Hawaii. J. Integr. Pest Manag. 2015;6:7. doi: 10.1093/jipm/pmv007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ranger CM, et al. Biology, ecology, and management of nonnative ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in ornamental plant nurseries. J. Integr. Pest Manag. 2016;7:25–29. doi: 10.1093/jipm/pmw005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Prathapan KD, Hiremath SR. Post-flood outbreak of Xylosandrus crassiusculus and Diuncus corpulentus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Xyleborini) on tree spices in Kerala. J. Spices Aromat. Crops. 2018;27:161–166. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ruzzier E, Prazaru SC, Faccoli M, Duso C. Xylosandrus germanus (Blandford, 1894) on grapevines in Italy with a compilation of world Scolytine weevils developing on Vitaceae. Insects. 2021;12:869. doi: 10.3390/insects12100869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Brockerhoff EG, Knížek M, Bain J. Checklist of indigenous and adventive bark and ambrosia beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae) of New Zealand and interceptions of exotic species (1952–2000) N. Z. Entomol. 2003;26:29–44. doi: 10.1080/00779962.2003.9722106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kirkendall LR, Faccoli M. Bark beetles and pinhole borers (Curculionidae, Scolytinae, Platypodinae) alien to Europe. ZooKeys. 2010;56:227. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.56.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Haack, R. A., & Rabaglia, R. J. Exotic bark and ambrosia beetles in the USA: potential and current invaders. In: Peña, J.E. (ed.) Potential Invasive Pests of Agricultural Crops (CABI, 2013).
- 35.Gomez DF, Rabaglia RJ, Fairbanks KE, Hulcr J. North American Xyleborini north of Mexico: a review and key to genera and species (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae) ZooKeys. 2018;768:19. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.768.24697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dzurenko M, Ranger CM, Hulcr J, Galko J, Kaňuch P. Origin of non-native Xylosandrus germanus, an invasive pest ambrosia beetle in Europe and North America. J. Pest. Sci. 2021;94:553–562. doi: 10.1007/s10340-020-01283-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lin W, et al. New records of two invasive ambrosia beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Xyleborini) to mainland China. Bioinvasions Rec. 2021;10:74–80. doi: 10.3391/bir.2021.10.1.09. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Marchioro M, et al. New species and new records of exotic Scolytinae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) in Europe. Biodivers. Data J. 2022;10:e93995. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.10.e93995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hulcr J, Dunn RR. The sudden emergence of pathogenicity in insect–fungus symbioses threatens native forest ecosystems. Proc. Royal Soc. B. 2011;278:2866–2873. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Coleman TW, et al. Hardwood injury and mortality associated with two shot hole borers, Euwallacea spp., in the invaded region of southern California, USA, and the native region of Southeast Asia. Ann. For. Sci. 2019;76:1–18. doi: 10.1007/s13595-019-0847-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lantschner MV, Corley JC, Liebhold AM. Drivers of global Scolytinae invasion patterns. Ecol. Appl. 2020;30:e02103. doi: 10.1002/eap.2103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Grégoire, J. C. et al. Cosmopolitan Scolytinae: strong common drivers but too many singularities for accurate prediction. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.05.17.492299v1 (2022).
- 43.Vilardo G, Faccoli M, Corley JC, Lantschner M. Factors driving historic intercontinental invasions of European pine bark beetles. Biol. Invasions. 2022;24:1–19. doi: 10.1007/s10530-022-02818-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rassati D, Faccoli M. Petrucco Toffolo, E., Battisti, A. & Marini, L. Improving the early detection of alien wood‐boring beetles in ports and surrounding forests. J Appl. Ecol. 2015;52:50–58. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12347. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Flaherty L, et al. Pheromone-enhanced lure blends and multiple trap heights improve detection of bark and wood-boring beetles potentially moved in solid wood packaging. J. Pest. Sci. 2019;92:309–325. doi: 10.1007/s10340-018-1019-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Poland TM, Rassati D. Improved biosecurity surveillance of non-native forest insects: a review of current methods. J. Pest. Sci. 2019;92:37–49. doi: 10.1007/s10340-018-1004-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Marchioro M, et al. Maximizing bark and ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) catches in trapping surveys for longhorn and jewel beetles. J. Econ. Entomol. 2020;113:2745–2757. doi: 10.1093/jee/toaa181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ruzzier E, Galli A, Bani L. Monitoring exotic beetles with inexpensive attractants: A case study. Insects. 2021;12:462. doi: 10.3390/insects12050462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gugliuzzo A, et al. Recent advances toward the sustainable management of invasive Xylosandrus ambrosia beetles. J. Pest. Sci. 2021;94:615–637. doi: 10.1007/s10340-021-01382-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wood S, Bright D. A catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera), part 2: taxonomic index. Volume A. Gt. Basin Nat. Mem. 1992;13:1–833. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bright, D., Skidmore, R. A Catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera): Supplement 1 (1990–1994) (NRC Research Press, 1997).
- 52.Bright, D., Skidmore, R. A Catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera): Supplement 2 (1995–1999) (NRC Research Press, 2002).
- 53.Bright D. A catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera): supplement 3 (2000–2010), with notes on subfamily and tribal reclassifications. Insecta Mundi. 2014;861:1–336. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bright, D. E. A Catalog of Scolytidae (Coleoptera): Supplement 4 (2011–2019) with an Annotated Checklist of the World Fauna (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytidae) (Contributions of the C. P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, 2021).
- 55.Cognato, A. I. HISL - PEET Xyleborini. http://xyleborini.speciesfile.org/public/site/scolytinae/home (2008).
- 56.Athkinson, T. H. Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of the Americas. http://www.barkbeetles.info (2022).
- 57.Plants of the World Online (POWO). https://powo.science.kew.org/ (2022).
- 58.U.S. National Plant Germoplasm System database. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearcheco (2022).
- 59.Ruzzier E, 2022. Scolytinae Xyleborini host plants dataset. Zenodo. [DOI]
- 60.European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO). https://www.eppo.int (2022).
- 61.CABI Digital Library. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org (2022).
- 62.International Code of Nomenclature Zoology (ICZN). https://www.iczn.org/the-code/the-code-online/ (2022).
- 63.International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants. https://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php (2022).
- 64.International Plant Names Index (IPNI). https://www.ipni.org (2022).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
- Ruzzier E, 2022. Scolytinae Xyleborini host plants dataset. Zenodo. [DOI]
Data Availability Statement
No custom code was used to generate or process the data described in the manuscript.