Significance
Ribosome quality control (RQC) is a co-translational surveillance mechanism for degradation of nascent polypeptides in aberrantly stalled ribosomes during translation. Although dysfunction of RQC is suggested to elicit neurological disorders, molecular mechanisms therein have remained poorly understood. Here, we revealed that the loss of LTN1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase in the RQC pathway, significantly increases TTC3 and UFMylation signaling proteins in neurons. The abnormally accumulated TTC3 was stabilized by UFMylation signaling and prevented further accumulation of translationally arrested products by inhibiting translation initiation of selective genes. Instead, the aberrantly increased TTC3 protein caused dendritic and synaptic abnormalities associated with cognitive disorders. Thus, our data provide novel evidence of a possible molecular link between neuronal RQC dysfunction and cognitive disorders.
Keywords: ribosome-associated quality control, TTC3, UFMylation, ribosome stalling, cognitive disorders
Abstract
Ribosome-associated quality control (RQC) pathway is responsible for degradation of nascent polypeptides in aberrantly stalled ribosomes, and its defects may lead to neurological diseases. However, the underlying molecular mechanism of how RQC dysfunction elicits neurological disorders remains poorly understood. Here we revealed that neurons with knockout (KO) of ubiquitin ligase LTN1, a key gene in the RQC pathway, show developmental defects in neurons via upregulation of TTC3 and UFMylation signaling proteins. The abnormally enhanced TTC3 protein in Ltn1 KO neurons reduced further accumulation of translationally arrested products by preventing translation initiation of selective genes. However, the overaccumulated TTC3 protein in turn caused dendritic abnormalities and reduced surface-localized GABAA receptors during neuronal development. Ltn1 KO mice showed behavioral deficits associated with cognitive disorders, a subset of which were restored by TTC3 knockdown in medial prefrontal cortex. Together, the overactivated cellular compensatory mechanism against defective RQC through TTC3 overaccumulation induced synaptic and cognitive deficits. More broadly, these findings represent a novel cellular mechanism underlying neuronal dysfunctions triggered by exaggerated cellular stress response to accumulated abnormal translation products in neurons.
All organisms have evolved mechanisms to selectively survey and eliminate misfolded or misprocessed proteins by degradation (1–3). The ribosome-associated quality control (RQC) pathway is a co-translational quality control system that recognizes aberrantly stalled ribosomes and degrades nascent polypeptides remaining on 60S subunits (4–6). In the RQC pathway, stalled ribosomes on aberrant mRNAs are first sensed by ubiquitin ligase ZNF598, which binds to 40S ribosome subunit and ubiquitinates ribosomal proteins Rps10 and Rps20, leading to splitting of stalled 80S ribosome into 40S and 60S subunits (7, 8). Then, nuclear export mediator factor (NEMF) binds to the 60S subunit and adds C-terminal alanine and threonine residues (CAT-tails) to nascent polypeptides (9, 10). NEMF also recruits ubiquitin ligase LTN1, which polyubiquitinates the nascent polypeptides with CAT-tails for subsequent proteasomal degradation (11–13). A failure of RQC machinery due to genetic removal of a RQC factor such as LTN1 or NEMF is known to cause proteotoxic stress in cells (14, 15). Furthermore, recent studies show that NEMF variants are associated with neurological disorders including intellectual disability (16, 17), suggesting a link between dysfunction of neuronal RQC and human neurological diseases. However, our understanding of how impaired RQC function elicits neurological disorders and causative molecular mechanisms therein is highly limited. In addition to the RQC, a cellular pathway involving UFM1, which is a ubiquitin-like posttranslational modification and covalently attached to a lysine residue of substrates, also regulates co-translational quality control of nascent polypeptides in aberrantly stalled ribosomes (18, 19). As known for ubiquitination pathway, UFMylation involves E1-like UBA5, E2-like UFC1, and E3-like UFL1 (20, 21). UFL1 forms a complex with DDRGK and CDK5RAP3, both of which are the key components that mediate UFMylation of substrate proteins in the ER (20, 21). Importantly, missense mutations in UFMylation-related genes have been linked to human neuropathologies including defective brain development (22, 23). However, pathological roles of UFMylation in neurons remain poorly understood.
In this study, we established LTN1-deficient mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A) and performed multi-dimensional analyses at the molecular, cellular, and behavioral levels to uncover physiological consequences of neuronal RQC dysfunction. We report here that TTC3 and UFMylation signaling proteins are substantially accumulated in Ltn1 KO neurons, which reduces further overload of translationally arrested products by inhibiting translation initiation. Instead, however, we found that the aberrantly accumulated TTC3 protein elicits defects of neurite outgrowth and underlie cognitive disorders in Ltn1 KO mice.
Results
Increased TTC3 and UFMylation Signaling Proteins in Ltn1 KO Neurons.
To reveal molecular alterations in Ltn1 knockout (KO) neurons, we first performed an unbiased quantitative proteomic screen by combining sucrose density gradient centrifugation and stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC). Fractions of 60S ribosomal subunits were isolated from SILAC-labeled Ltn1 wild-type (WT) and KO neurons and analyzed by LC-MS/MS (Fig. 1A). We specifically searched for proteins whose abundance was increased by the loss of LTN1 and identified several proteins that fit our criteria (SILAC ratio > 1.5) (Fig. 1A). Among these proteins, we were interested in tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3 (TTC3), ubiquitin-fold modifier 1 (UFM1), CDK5 regulatory subunit-associated protein 3 (CDK5RAP3), and E3 UFM1-protein ligase 1 (UFL1), because these proteins reproducibly showed large SILAC ratios and have not yet been investigated in the RQC pathway (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, UFM1, UFL1, and CDK5RAP3 are all key components of the UFMylation pathway which is an ubiquitin-like posttranslational protein modification (20, 21), while TTC3 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase highly expressed in the CNS and is closely involved in Down syndrome (24, 25). To corroborate these results, we investigated the levels of TTC3 and UFMylated proteins in both total and 60S fractions of WT and Ltn1 KO cultured neurons and brains. TTC3 and UFMylated protein levels were significantly increased in both LTN1-deficient cultured neurons and mouse brain in various regions (Fig. 1 B–E and SI Appendix, Fig. S1B). Next we purified each 40S and 60S subunit by thoroughly eliminating ribosome-free proteins with ultracentrifugation. The protein levels of UFL1, CDK5RAP3, and DDRGK1 were substantially increased in isolated 60S fractions of Ltn1 KO neurons (SI Appendix, Fig. S1C), while TTC3 was mainly detected in the 40S subunit (SI Appendix, Fig. S1D). Next, we performed quantitative PCR analysis to examine whether mRNA level of TTC3 is also abnormally increased in Ltn1 KO neurons and found that mRNA level was not altered by LTN1 deletion (SI Appendix, Fig. S1E). Finally, we performed immunohistological analysis with frozen mouse brain sections and found that both UFM1 and TTC3 protein levels were substantially increased in cerebral cortices of Ltn1 KO mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S1 F and G). These results were consistent with our quantitative MS analysis using cultured neurons.
UFMylated RPL26 is increased in 60S Subunit of Ltn1 KO Neurons.
We found by sucrose density gradient analysis that UFMylated proteins were mainly detected in 60S and, to a lesser degree, 80S and polyribosome fractions (SI Appendix, Fig. S2A). The ribosomal protein RPL26 was previously reported to be as a major substrate for UFMylation in non-neuronal cells (26). In Ltn1 KO neurons, an anti-RPL26 antibody detected three clear bands at ~30, ~40, and ~50 kDa corresponding to non-UFMylated, 1× and 2× UFM1-conjugated RPL26, respectively (SI Appendix, Fig. S2B). Furthermore, immunoprecipitation of RPL26 from neuronal cell lysates, followed by immunoblotting with an anti-UFM1 antibody, demonstrated that RPL26 is UFMylated and its level was significantly increased in Ltn1 KO neurons (SI Appendix, Fig. S2C).
Next, we examined how LTN1 deficiency contributed to the observed increase of UFMylated RPL26. When we expressed functional, WT LTN1 in Ltn1 KO neurons, the level of UFMylated RPL26 was significantly decreased, demonstrating that the increase in UFMylated RPL26 is indeed LTN1-dependent (SI Appendix, Fig. S3). Unexpectedly, however, the expression of LTN1 ΔRing, which lacks a catalytic ring finger domain, also reduced the level of UFMylated RPL26 in Ltn1 KO neurons. Next, to examine the effects of LTN1’s localization on 60S subunit, we employed the ΔN-DD LTN1 mutant which cannot bind to 60S subunit (8). The expression of ΔN-DD LTN1 failed to reduce UFMylated RPL26 in Ltn1 KO neurons (SI Appendix, Fig. S3). These results indicate that the abnormally increased UFMylation of RPL26 in Ltn1 KO neurons was not caused by the lack of E3 ligase activity of LTN1, but by its absence on the 60S subunit.
TTC3 Protein is accumulated in 40S Subunit of Ltn1 KO Neurons.
We investigated the mechanism that increases the protein level of TTC3 in Ltn1 KO neurons. First, we found that an N-terminally truncated isoform designated as “TTC3 M402” with an initiation codon of Met 402, but not the full length (1979 amino acids) of TTC3, is predominantly expressed in neurons, and its abundance was substantially increased by LTN1 deletion (SI Appendix, Fig. S4A). Importantly, as we observed for UFMylated RPL26, the abnormal increase in TTC3 level in Ltn1 KO neurons was also caused by the loss of LTN1’s localization on 60S subunit, but not by the lack of its E3 ligase activity (SI Appendix, Fig. S3).
Next, when we assessed the precise localization of TTC3 among 40S, 60S, monosomes, and polysomes in cultured neurons, TTC3 was predominantly detected in 40S subunit (Fig. 2A and SI Appendix, Fig. S1D). Since cells contain cytosolic and ER-associated ribosomes, we investigated whether TTC3 preferentially binds to either or both of the ribosomes in neurons. Previous studies with mammalian dividing cells showed that TTC3 is detected mainly in the nucleus (27, 28). In neurons, however, we found that TTC3 is localized to the cytoplasm, including neurites (Fig. 2B and SI Appendix, Fig. S1B), and our double-immunostaining analysis showed that TTC3 showed a mesh-like distribution and frequently co-localized with an ER marker, calnexin (Fig. 2B). This finding was in agreement with the perinuclear localization of TTC3 by the immunohistological analysis of cerebral cortex from Ltn1 KO mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S1G). These immunostaining data were confirmed by subcellular fractionation of neuronal lysates for separation between cytosolic and ER-bound ribosome-enriched membrane (ER-Ribo) fractions (29) (Fig. 2C). Furthermore, our treatment of the isolated membrane fraction with proteinase K degraded TTC3, but not an ER luminal protein, protein disulfide isomerase, demonstrating that TTC3 is not an ER luminal protein but is associated with the cytosolic face of ER membrane (SI Appendix, Fig. S4B). Together, these results suggest that TTC3 plays a role in translation regulation in the 40S subunit of ER-associated ribosomes.
Given such a significant increase in both UFMylated RPL26 and TTC3 levels in Ltn1 KO neurons, we next investigated the hierarchical relationships between UFMylation signaling and TTC3 in neurons. When we immunoprecipitated UFMylated proteins from cytoplasmic and ER-Ribo fractions of neuronal lysates (SI Appendix, Fig. S4C), TTC3 was detected in ER-Ribo fractions of Ltn1 KO neurons. This result indicates that TTC3 itself is UFMylated or interacts with other UFMylated, ER-Ribo associated proteins (SI Appendix, Fig. S4C), although future studies are required to examine it. Importantly, the knockdown (KD) of UFM1 significantly decreased the protein level of TTC3 (Fig. 2D), whereas the KD of TTC3 showed no impact on the UFMylated RPL26 level (Fig. 2E). Therefore, the UFMylation signaling is located upstream of TTC3 and regulates the abundance of TTC3 protein. In UFM1 KD neurons, while the proteasome inhibitor MG132 had no effect on TTC3 levels (Fig. 2F), the lysosomal inhibitor bafilomycin A partially restored TTC3 protein levels (Fig. 2G). Together, these results show that UFMylation signaling at least partly stabilizes TTC3 protein and increases its abundance by protecting TTC3 from lysosomal degradation.
TTC3 Protein Level Is Increased when Translationally Arrested K24 Products were Overloaded.
Since TTC3 abundance is significantly increased by disrupted RQC and TTC3 is localized in Cyto-Ribo and ER-Ribo, we next investigated whether TTC3 is involved in the RQC pathway by using the reporter constructs that induce translational stalling at either cytosolic (EGFP-K24) ribosomes or ER-associated (SSER-CHO-EGFP-K24) ribosomes that harbors an ER targeting signal sequence (SSER) and an N-glycosylation site (CHO) to monitor ER-inserted translationally arrested products (18) (SI Appendix, Fig. S5A). When either reporter construct was expressed, translationally arrested products were substantially accumulated in Ltn1 KO neurons compared to WT neurons (SI Appendix, Figs. S3A and S5B), demonstrating that RQC function is disrupted by the loss of LTN1, as expected. Importantly, the KD of TTC3 further enhanced the accumulation of arrested products in Ltn1 KO neurons, but not in WT neurons (Fig. 3A and SI Appendix, Fig. S5B). Therefore, when additional RQC functions are required due to the overload of arrested products in LTN1-deficient neurons, TTC3 may participate in RQC pathway to reduce the amount of arrested products.
Next, we explored whether the enhanced UFMylated RPL26 in stalled ribosomes is responsible for the abnormal increase in TTC3 levels in Ltn1 KO neurons. To address it, we treated neurons with anisomycin, which stalls ribosomes and enhances UFMylation of RPL26 (20). We found that the UFMylated RPL26 level was significantly increased (Fig. 3B) in WT neurons, as reported in non-neuronal cells (18), but TTC3 protein level was unchanged (Fig. 3B). Similar results were obtained in Ltn1 KO neurons (Fig. 3B). Therefore, it is not simply the UFMylated RPL26-associated ribosomal stalling that enhanced the TTC3 protein level.
We then examined whether RQC-associated ribosomal stalling increases TTC3 protein levels by expressing an excess of EGFP-K24 or SSER-CHO-EGFP-K24. Remarkably, compared to the non-stalling K12 control (SI Appendix, Fig. S5A), the expression of EGFP-K24 or SSER-CHO-EGFP-K24 induced significant accumulation of TTC3 not only in Ltn1 KO neurons, but also in WT neurons (Fig. 3C and SI Appendix, Fig. S5C), demonstrating that TTC3 protein level is increased selectively in response to the overload of arrested products that need to be eliminated by RQC. These results suggest that TTC3 protein level is increased when the amount of arrested products exceeds the capacity of neurons to degrade by canonical RQC function.
TTC3 inhibits further Accumulation of Arrested Products by preventing Translation Initiation.
We examined the mechanism by which TTC3 mediates the reduction of arrested products in Ltn1 KO neurons. By using the K24 reporter construct, we found by immunoprecipitation experiments that TTC3 does not interact with nascent polypeptides of the K24 arrested products in stalled ribosomes (SI Appendix, Fig. S5D). This result indicates that TTC3 does not ubiquitinate nascent polypeptides in 60S subunit as an E3 ligase like LTN1 and is consistent with the observation that TTC3 is mainly localized to 40S (Fig. 2A and SI Appendix, Fig. S1D).
Next, we examined the possibility that TTC3 indirectly degrades arrested products in stalled ribosomes. Our proteomic analysis indicated that the NEMF protein level was enhanced in Ltn1 KO neurons (Fig. 1A), suggesting an increase in NEMF-mediated CATylation of nascent polypeptides. This situation may promote LTN1-independent ubiquitination of nascent polypeptides for proteasomal degradation, as reported previously (30). To examine this possibility, we first investigated whether the binding of TTC3 to 40S subunits might enhance NEMF’s binding to 60S subunit and thereby facilitate NEMF-mediated, LTN1-independent degradation of arrested products (30). As was shown by our initial proteomic analysis, the abundance of NEMF in 60S subunit was increased in Ltn1 KO neurons, although the total expression level of NEMF did not change by LTN1 deletion (Fig. 3D). Interestingly, TTC3 KD significantly reduced the binding of NEMF to 60S subunit in Ltn1 KO neurons (Fig. 3D). These results suggest that in Ltn1 KO neurons the accumulated TTC3 caused the increased binding of NEMF to 60S subunit, implying that TTC3 indirectly enhances NEMF-mediated ubiquitination of translationally arrested products for proteasomal degradation in a LTN1-independent manner (30).
To test this hypothesis, we examined how the proteasome inhibitor, MG132, stabilizes K24 arrested products in WT or Ltn1 KO neurons with or without TTC3 KD. First, as expected from the notion that K24 arrested products in Ltn1 KO neurons have already been stabilized by the lack of LTN1’s E3 ligase activity, the MG132 treatment in Ltn1 KO neurons exhibited smaller stabilization effects on the arrested products than that in WT neurons. However, MG132 treatment partially stabilized arrested products in Ltn1 KO neurons (SI Appendix, Fig. S5E), suggesting that arrested products are degraded to some extent even in the absence of LTN1 as indicated previously (30). Importantly, we found that the MG132 treatment in Ltn1 KO neurons with TTC3 KD did not alter the stabilization effects on K24 arrested products, as compared with that in Ltn1 KO neurons with scramble RNAi, indicating that although TTC3 promotes the binding of NEMF to 60S subunit, it does not enhance NEMF-mediated, LTN1-independent proteasomal degradation of K24 arrested products (SI Appendix, Fig. S5E). Together, it is unlikely that the increase in TTC3 abundance in Ltn1 KO neurons plays a role in boosting cellular RQC function by directly or indirectly enhancing proteasomal degradation of nascent polypeptides in aberrantly stalled ribosomes.
Since TTC3 mainly localizes in the 40S subunit, we then hypothesized that the overaccumulated TTC3 might reduce the amount of arrested products by acting on small ribosomal subunits and inhibiting translation initiation. First, we examined phosphorylation of eIF2α in Ltn1 KO neurons, as it is widely known to inhibit translation initiation (31). We found that phosphorylation of eIF2α was not altered in Ltn1 KO neurons (SI Appendix, Fig. S6A), suggesting that TTC3 does not inhibit translation initiation simply by enhancing phosphorylation of eIF2α in the eIF2 ternary complex. Next, we performed co-immunoprecipitation experiments with isolated 40S fractions to examine whether TTC3 interacts with translation initiation factors on small ribosomal subunits. Interestingly, we found that TTC3 interacts with several translation initiation factors such as eIF4E, eIF4G, PABP, and RACK1 (Fig. 4A). Moreover, we found that ubiquitination of RPS2, which is triggered by inhibition of translation initiation (32, 33), was increased in 40S subunits of Ltn1 KO neurons (Fig. 4B). Importantly, TTC3 KD significantly reduced ubiquitination of RPS2 in 40S subunit (Fig. 4B), suggesting that translation initiation in Ltn1 KO neurons is impaired at least in part due to the increased TTC3 abundance. However, when we performed the experiments of BioOrthogonal Non-Canonical Amino acid Tagging (BONCAT) to examine whether total translation levels are altered in Ltn1 KO neurons, they were not largely different between WT and Ltn1 KO neurons (SI Appendix, Fig. S6B). Therefore, the defects of translation initiation by the loss of LTN1 may be selective for specific genes.
To further test our hypothesis that overaccumulated TTC3 inhibits translation initiation in Ltn1 KO neurons, we employed a ribosome profiling (Ribo-seq) technique, which is based on deep sequencing of ribosome-protected mRNA fragments and allows us to investigate translation at single nucleotide resolution, for the neurons treated with harringtonine, an inhibitor of translation initiation (34). Since harringtonine induces accumulation of ribosomes at translation initiation sites (34), Ribo-seq with harringtonine is likely to provide detailed information on translation initiation in Ltn1 KO neurons. Ribo-seq data revealed that Ltn1 KO neurons showed a decrease in ribosome-protected mRNAs (footprints) at translation initiation sites suggesting that translation initiation is compromised by the loss of LTN1. When we sorted the genes by the difference in footprint number at translation initiation site between WT and Ltn1 KO neurons, we found that a subset (46.3%), but not all, of genes showed reduced translation initiation in Ltn1 KO neurons (SI Appendix, Fig. S6C and Table S1), indicating that translation initiation of selective mRNAs was affected by the deletion of LTN1. Furthermore, the Gene Ontology (GO) term analysis using the top 5% differential genes revealed that the reduction of translation initiation in Ltn1 KO neurons was enriched for the genes associated with various metabolic processes required for maintenance of cellular homeostasis (SI Appendix, Fig. S6D). Strikingly, TTC3 KD in Ltn1 KO neurons restored the ribosome footprint number at translation initiation site, indicating that the increased protein level of TTC3 is responsible for inhibition of translation initiation in Ltn1 KO neurons (Fig. 4 C and D). Together, these results support the notion that the enhanced TTC3 protein in Ltn1 KO neurons reduces further accumulation of arrested products by acting on 40S ribosomal subunits and preventing the process of translation initiation for selective genes.
Overaccumulated TTC3 Protein induces Dendritic and Synaptic Defects in Ltn1 KO Neurons.
A previous study suggested that LTN1 KD in neurons reduce neuritic outgrowth, albeit through unknown mechanisms (35). To gain insights into the effects of impaired RQC in neuronal morphology, we first investigated whether LTN1 deletion in neurons affects dendritic outgrowth. On both 4 and 7 days in vitro (DIV), total dendritic length in Ltn1 KO was significantly shorter that in WT neurons (Fig. 5A and SI Appendix, Fig. S7A). Furthermore, the number of dendrites was increased in Ltn1 KO neurons on 7 DIV (Fig. 5B and SI Appendix, Fig. S7B). In contrast, such alterations in Ltn1 KO were not observed in mature DIV12 neurons (Fig. 5C and SI Appendix, Fig. S7C). These results suggest that RQC dysfunction by LTN1 deletion caused developmental abnormalities in neurons. Since previous studies implicated TTC3 in neurite extension (28, 36), we next examined the involvement of overaccumulated TTC3 protein in the reduced dendritic outgrowth observed in Ltn1 KO neurons. Strikingly, the KD of TTC3 normalized both the dendritic outgrowth and the number of dendrites in Ltn1 KO neurons (Fig. 5 D and E). Therefore, the increased TTC3 protein is responsible for neuronal developmental defects caused by the RQC deficiency.
Since the dendritic arbor is responsible for receiving and consolidating neuronal inputs, we next examined the impact of RQC deficiency on synaptic homeostasis. We investigated whether surface expression levels of neurotransmitter receptors, which are critical for synaptic functions, are affected in Ltn1 KO neurons. On DIV 5 and 7, while no significant differences were observed for surface expression levels of AMPA and NMDA receptors, surface GABAAβ3 receptor levels were selectively decreased in Ltn1 KO neurons without affecting total protein expression levels (Fig. 5 F and G). Importantly, the KD of TTC3 normalized the reduction of surface-localized GABAAβ3 receptor levels in Ltn1 KO neurons (Fig. 5 F and G). These results show that TTC3 is crucial for maintaining the surface expression of GABAAβ3 receptors, suggesting that the excess protein level of TTC3 due to the LTN1 deficiency may disrupt synaptic functions in neurons.
Ltn1 KO Mice exhibit Cognitive Disorders via TTC3 Overaccumulation.
Ltn1 KO neurons showed impairments of neuronal development and synaptic homeostasis. Therefore, we performed a series of behavioral tests for 3-mo-old Ltn1 KO mice to examine how such neuronal defects may impact behaviors. In the prepulse inhibition (PPI) test, Ltn1 KO mice showed significantly reduced PPI (Fig. 6A), which is a typical phenotype observed in both autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia. In the fear conditioning test, contextual fear memory was significantly affected in LTN1-deficient mice. Ltn1 KO mice showed decreased levels of freezing (Fig. 6B), indicating that they exhibit cognitive dysfunction. In the rotarod test, Ltn1 KO mice showed a reduction of motor performance (Fig. 6C). However, spontaneous locomotor activity in the open field was not affected (Fig. 6D), and the wire hang test showed that neuromuscular function was not altered in Ltn1 KO mice (Fig. 6E). These results suggest that the reduced rotarod performance was not caused by impaired motor function itself, but possibly due to a learning impairment in motor coordination. Consistently, our immunohistological analysis did not reveal any obvious neuronal loss in the cerebral cortices of 3-mo-old Ltn1 KO mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S8A). We next tested Ltn1 KO mice for anxiety-like behaviors, first with the elevated plus maze (EPM) test. Ltn1 KO mice spent more time on the open arms (Fig. 6F), suggesting reduced anxiety. With the marble-burying test, Ltn1 KO mice buried fewer marbles compared to WT mice (Fig. 6G), showing a blunted response to the aversive situation. In the nest building test, Ltn1 KO mice showed impaired nesting behaviors compared to WT mice (Fig. 6H), implying a decline in cognition and depressive-like behaviors.
In order to examine causal relationships between accumulated TTC3 protein and behavioral deficits of Ltn1 KO mice, we performed stereotaxic injections of adeno-associated virus (AAV) encoding TTC3 or scramble shRNA into the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), where neural circuits of various higher brain functions are involved. Importantly, the decreased anxiety phenotype manifested by the marble-burying test and the defects in nest building capability in Ltn1 KO mice were fully restored by the KD of TTC3 (Fig. 6 G and H). Furthermore, the TTC3 KD appeared to counteract the reduced PPI observed in Ltn1 KO mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S8B). Together, these results indicate that Ltn1 KO mice showed behavioral abnormalities associated with cognitive disorders and a cohort of the behavioral deficits is caused by the aberrantly increased TTC3 protein due to the loss of LTN1.
Discussion
We revealed that TTC3 and UFMylation signaling proteins are abnormally increased in Ltn1 KO neurons. The up-regulated TTC3 protein was suggested to prevent further accumulation of translationally arrested products in stalled ribosomes by inhibiting translation initiation, when neurons face an overload of the arrested products that need to be eliminated by RQC. Therefore, our findings indicate that TTC3 serves as a compensatory feedback loop to reduce further accumulation of arrested products, when neuronal RQC function cannot sufficiently cope with the overload of arrested products (SI Appendix, Fig. S9). In other words, our data suggest a novel cellular feedback mechanism by which neurons inhibit translation initiation by increasing the abundance of TTC3 protein on 40S subunit. Remarkably, however, we found that abnormally increased TTC3 protein induced various deleterious effects on neuronal functions; the overaccumulated TTC3 protein in Ltn1 KO neurons and mice results in dendritic and synaptic abnormalities and behavioral deficits associated with cognitive disorders.
Our results provide insights into how RQC dysfunction elicits disorders in the central nervous system. Notably, our findings were unexpected as Ltn1 KO mice were phenotypically distinct from the previously reported lister mice, which were found through a genome-wide ENU mutagenesis screen and exhibited severe signs of neurodegeneration within 3 wk of age (37). Instead, Ltn1 KO mice showed phenotypes associated with cognitive disorders without showing obvious deficits in locomotor activity, neuromuscular function, and neuronal loss at 4 to 5 mo of age. Although lister mice express the mutant LTN1 with a deletion of 14 amino acid residues, it remains unclear what functions of LTN1 are altered by this deletion. Moreover, since ENU can randomly introduce mutations throughout the genome, one cannot rule out the possibility that mutations in the genes other than LTN1 are also responsible for the severe neurodegeneration in lister mice. Nonetheless, the phenotypic differences might be caused by the downstream molecular pathways, such as those involving TTC3 and UFMylation signaling found in this study, which are potentially distinct between Ltn1 KO mice and lister mice. Interestingly, TTC3 is one of the key genes in Down syndrome critical region on 21q22.2, as multiple Down syndrome model mice with TTC3 triplication have been shown to commonly exhibit developmental and cognitive dysfunctions (38, 39). Intriguingly, a variant of the deUFMylation enzyme Ufsp2 that enhances UFMylated protein levels was recently identified as a factor contributing to neurodevelopmental disorders in humans (23). In addition, NEMF variants, which were hypothesized to reduce RQC functions, are associated with intellectual disability (16). Together, these results support our observation that Ltn1 KO mice show behavioral deficits associated with cognitive disorders rather than severe neurodegenerative disorders.
Our results resolved the previous puzzling observations that Ltn1 KO leads to neurite outgrowth defects and behavioral deficits (35, 37). First, although the previous study indicates that neurite outgrowth defects in LTN1 KD neurons were rescued by additional KD of NEMF (35), the underlying mechanism had remained unclear. Here, we revealed that TTC3 KD in Ltn1 KO neurons normalized the enhanced binding of NEMF to 60S subunit and restored the dendritic abnormalities. Therefore, our findings suggest that the overaccumulated TTC3-mediated increase in NEMF abundance in 60S subunit is at least partly involved in the neurite outgrowth defects observed in Ltn1 KO neurons. Next, our data provide possible molecular explanations for the cognitive deficits of Ltn1 KO mice. The enhanced protein level of TTC3 reduced not only dendritic outgrowth but also surface-localized GABAAβ3 receptor levels (Fig. 5 F and G), which would at least partly account for the abnormal behaviors associated with cognitive disorders in Ltn1 KO mice, as suggested previously (40). Notably, since increased TTC3 protein levels induce fragmentation of the Golgi apparatus (28, 36), the overaccumulated TTC3 by LTN1 deletion might impair Golgi-mediated transport of GABAAβ3 receptors to the plasma membrane, resulting in reduced surface-localized GABAAβ3 receptors. Furthermore, the increased UFMylation signaling proteins in Ltn1 KO may offer mechanistic insights into the selectivity of GABAA receptor. An E1-like enzyme UBA5 in UFMylation pathway interacts with GABA receptor-associated proteins (GABARAPs) (41, 42), which regulate trafficking of GABAA receptors (43). Therefore, dysfunction of GABARAPs leads to reduced expression of surface GABAAβ3 (44). Likewise, aberrantly enhanced levels of UFMylation factors in Ltn1 KO neurons might disturb the trafficking function of GABARAPs, resulting in reduction of surface GABAAβ3 receptor levels (Fig. 5 F and G). Although further mechanistic studies are required, the present findings suggest a possible molecular link between RQC dysfunction, dendritic and synaptic defects, and behavioral deficits in Ltn1 KO mice.
Recent studies indicate that dysregulation of various processes in translation, including initiation, elongation, and termination, is associated with a wide range of neurological diseases (45–47). Importantly, our study provides another layer of evidence that not only dysregulation of each translation process itself, but also impaired quality control of nascent polypeptides during translation, could lead to cognitive disorders. Notably, since TTC3 is highly expressed in the central nervous system, it is tempting to speculate that neurons have evolved to maintain highly regulated, balanced mechanisms, such as the TTC3-mediated feedback loop, in order to ensure translation by preventing an overload of translationally arrested products. By contrast, our findings provide a novel concept that overactivation of such a proteostasis maintenance mechanism that responds to ribosome stalling may elicit cognitive disorders. Beyond these mechanistic insights, our study suggests that TTC3 and UFMylation signaling factors may represent novel therapeutic targets for neurological diseases in which arrested translation is involved. More broadly, our findings that developmental defects in neurons are triggered by overaccumulated TTC3 protein provide therapeutic implications for cognitive, neurodevelopmental disorders including Down syndrome.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank N. Takahashi and M. Yamaguchi for help with reagent preparation and generation of KO mice, respectively, and the members of Tanaka laboratory for discussion. We also thank T. Takumi and R. Ando for advice on generation of KO mice and injection of AAV in mice, respectively. DNA-sequencing and mass spectral analyses were performed by the Support Unit for Bio-Material Analysis, RIKEN CBS Research Resources Division. This work was supported in part by the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research for Innovative Areas (Dynamic regulation of brain function by Scrap & Build system) (19H04763; to M.T.), AdAMS (JP 16H06276; to M.T.) and Transformative Research Area (A) (21H05257 to M.T.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan, the RIKEN Pioneering Project (Biology of Intracellular Environments) and AMED Brain/MINDS Project (JP21dm0207001 to M.T.), AMED-CREST (JP21gm1410009 to M.T.), and AMED Pioneering Brain Research Project (JP21wm0525014 to M.T.) and Takeda Science Foundation (Visionary Reasearch) (to M.T.).
Author contributions
R.E. and M.T. designed research; R.E., Y.-K.C., J.B., N.T., N.S., K.K.H., and T.M. performed research; R.E., Y.-K.C., J.B., N.T., N.S., K.K.H., and T.M. analyzed data; T.M. performed immunohistological experiments; and R.E. and M.T. wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Footnotes
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
All study data are included in the article and/or supporting information.
Supporting Information
References
- 1.Hartl F. U., Protein misfolding diseases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 86, 21–26 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hipp M. S., Kasturi R., Hartl F. U., The proteostasis network and its decline in ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 421–435 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Balchin D., Hayer-Hartl M., Hartl F. U., In vivo aspects of protein folding and quality control. Science 353, aac4354 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brandman O., et al. , A Ribosome-bound quality control complex triggers degradation of nascent peptides and signals translation stress. Cell 151, 1042–1054 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Joazeiro C. A. P., Mechanisms and functions of ribosome-associated protein quality control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 368–383 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Inada T., Quality controls induced by aberrant translation. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 1084–1096 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sandaramoorthy E., et al. , ZNF598 and RACK1 regulate mammalian ribosome-associated quality control function by mediating regulatory 40S ribosomal ubiquitylation. Mol. Cell 4, 751–764 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Garzia A., et al. , The ubiquitin ligase and RNA-binding protein ZNF598 orchestrates ribosome quality control of premature polyadenylated mRNAs. Nat. Commun. 8, 16056 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kostova K. K., et al. , CAT-tailing as a fail-safe mechanism for efficient degradation of stalled nascent polypeptides. Science 357, 414–417 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Osuna B. A., Howard C. J., Kc S., Frost A., Weinberg D. E., In vitro analysis of RQC activities provides insights into the mechanism and function of CAT tailing. Elife 6, e27949 (2017), 10.7554/eLife.27949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bengston M. H., Joazeiro C. A. P., Role of a ribosome-associated E3 ubiquitin ligase in protein quality control. Nature 467, 470–473 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shao S., Brown A., Santhanam B., Hegde R. S., Structure and assembly pathway of the ribosome quality control complex. Mol. Cell 57, 433–444 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shen P. S., et al. , Rqc2p and 60S ribosomal subunits mediate mRNA-independent elongation of nascent chains. Science 347, 75–78 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yonashiro R., et al. , The Rqc2/Tae2 subunit of the ribosome-associated quality control (RQC) complex marks ribosome-stalled nascent polypeptide chains for aggregation. Elife 5, e11794 (2016), 10.7554/eLife.11794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Choe Y. J., et al. , Failure of RQC machinery causes protein aggregation and proteotoxic stress. Nature 531, 191–195 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Anazi S., et al. , Clinical genomics expands the morbid genome of intellectual disability and offers a high diagnostic yield. Mol. Psychiatry 22, 615–624 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Martin P. B., et al. , NEMF mutations that impair ribosome-associated quality control are associated with neuromuscular disease. Nat. Commun. 11, 4625 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang L., et al. , UFMylation of RPL26 links translation-associated quality control to endoplasmic reticulum protein homeostasis. Cell Res. 30, 5–20 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang L., Ye Y., Clearing traffic jam during protein translocation across membrane. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 610689 (2021), 10.3389/fcell.2020.610689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gerakis Y., Quinter M., Li H., Hetz C., The UFMylation system in proteostasis and beyond. Trends Cell Biol. 29, 974–986 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Banerjee S., Kumar M., Wiener R., Decrypting UFMylation: How proteins are modified with UFM1. Biomolecules 10, 1442 (2020), 10.3390/biom10101442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nahorski M. S., et al. , Biallelic UFM1 and UFC1 mutations expand the essential role of ufmylation in brain development. Brain 7, 1934–1945 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ni M., et al. , A pathogenic UFSP2 variant in an autosomal recessive form of pediatric neurodevelopmental anomalies and epilepsy. Genet. Med. 23, 900–908 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ohira M., et al. , Gene identification in 1.6-Mb region of the Down Syndrome region on chromosome 21. Genome Res. 7, 47–58 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Reeves R. H., Baxter L. L., Richtsmeier T., Too much of a good thing: Mechanisms of gene action in Down syndrome. Trends Genet. 17, 83–88 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Walczak C. P., et al. , Ribosomal protein RPL26 is the principal target of UFMylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 1299–1308 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Suizu F., et al. , The E3 ligase TTC3 facilitates ubiquitination and degradation of phosphorylated Akt. Dev. Cell 17, 800–810 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Berto G., et al. , The Down syndrome critical region protein TTC3 inhibits neuronal differentiation via RhoA and Citron kinase. J. Cell Sci. 120, 1859–1867 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jagannathan S., Nwosu C., Nicchitta C. P., Analyzing subcellular mRNA localization via cell fractionation. Methods Mol. Bio. 714, 301–321 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Thrun A., et al. , Convergence of mammalian RQC and C-end rule proteolytic pathways via alanine tailing. Mol. Cell 81, 2112–2122 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Costa-Mattioli M., Walter P., The integrated stress response: From mechanism to disease. Science 368, aat5314 (2020), 10.1126/science.aat5314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Higgins R., et al. , The unfolded protein response triggers site-specific regulatory ubiquitylation of 40S ribosomal proteins. Mol. Cell 59, 35–49 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Garshott D. M., et al. , iRQC, a surveillance pathway for 40S ribosomal quality control during mRNA translation initiation. Cell Rep. 36, 109642 (2021), 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ingolia N. T., Lareau L. F., Weissman J. S., Ribosome profiling of mouse embryonic stem cells reveals the complexity and dynamics of mammalian proteomes. Cell 147, 789–802 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Udagawa T., et al. , Failure to degrade CAT-tailed proteins disrupts neuronal morphogenesis and cell survival. Cell Rep. 34, 108599 (2021), 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Berto G. E., et al. , The DCR protein TTC3 affects differentiation and Golgi compactness in neurons through specific actin-regulating pathways. PLos One 9, e93721 (2014), 10.1371/journal.pone.0093721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chu J., et al. , A mouse forward genetics screen identifies LISTERIN as an E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in neurodegeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 2097–2103 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Guedj F., et al. , An integrated human/murine transcriptome and pathway approach to identify prenatal treatments for Down syndrome. Scientific Rep. (2016), 10.1038/srep32353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 39.Antonarakis S. E., Down syndrome and the complexity of genome dosage imbalance. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 147–163 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Braat S., Kooy R. F., The GABAA receptor as a therapeutic target for neurodevelopmental disorders. Neuron 86, 1119–1130 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Habisov S., et al. , Structural and functional analysis of a novel interaction motif within UFM1-activating enzyme 5 (UBA5) required for binding to ubiquitin-like proteins and ufmylation. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 9025–9041 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Huber J., et al. , An atypical LIR motif within UBA5 (ubiquitin like modifier activating enzyme 5) interacts with GABARAP proteins and mediates membrane localization of UBA5. Autophagy 16, 256–270 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Leil T. A., Chen Z. W., Chang C. S. S., Olsen R. W., GABAA receptor-associated protein traffics GABAA receptors to the plasma membranes in neurons. J. Neurosci. 24, 11429–11438 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hui K. K., et al. , GABARAPs dysfunction by autophagy deficiency in adolescent brain impairs GABAA receptor trafficking and social behavior. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau8237 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Richter J. D., Coller J., Pausing on polyribosomes: Make way for elongation in translational control. Cell 163, 292–300 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gao F. B., Richter J. D., Cleveland D. W., Rethinking unconventional translation in neurodegeneration. Cell 171, 994–1000 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Longo F., Klann E., Reciprocal control of translation and transcription in autism spectrum disorder. EMBO Rep. 22, e52110 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All study data are included in the article and/or supporting information.