Abstract
The definition and classification of early clinically apparent osteoarthritis both in clinical situations and in epidemiological surveys remains a problem. Few data exist on the between-observer reproducibility of simple clinical methods of detecting hand and knee osteoarthritis in the population and their sensitivity and specificity as compared with radiography. Two observers first studied the reproducibility of a number of clinical signs in 41 middle aged women. Good rates of agreement were found for most of the clinical signs tested (kappa = 0.54-1.0). The more reproducible signs were then tested on a population of 541 women, aged 45-65, drawn from general practice, screening centres, and patients previously attending hospital for non-rheumatic problems. The major clinical signs used had a high specificity (87-99%) and lower sensitivity (20-49%) when compared with radiographs graded on the Kellgren and Lawrence scale (2+ = positive). When analysis was restricted to symptomatic radiographic osteoarthritis, levels of sensitivity were increased and specificity was lowered. These data show that certain physical signs of osteoarthritis are reproducible and may be used to identify clinical disease. They are not a substitute for radiographs, however, if radiographic change is regarded as the 'gold standard' of diagnosis. As the clinical signs tested seemed specific for osteoarthritis they may be of value in screening populations for clinical disease.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Altman R., Asch E., Bloch D., Bole G., Borenstein D., Brandt K., Christy W., Cooke T. D., Greenwald R., Hochberg M. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Aug;29(8):1039–1049. doi: 10.1002/art.1780290816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Claessens A. A., Schouten J. S., van den Ouweland F. A., Valkenburg H. A. Do clinical findings associate with radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee? Ann Rheum Dis. 1990 Oct;49(10):771–774. doi: 10.1136/ard.49.10.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cushnaghan J., Cooper C., Dieppe P., Kirwan J., McAlindon T., McCrae F. Clinical assessment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Rheum Dis. 1990 Oct;49(10):768–770. doi: 10.1136/ard.49.10.768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Danielsson L., Hernborg J. Clinical and roentgenologic study of knee joints with osteophytes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1970 Mar-Apr;69:302–312. doi: 10.1097/00003086-197003000-00035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KELLGREN J. H., LAWRENCE J. S. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957 Dec;16(4):494–502. doi: 10.1136/ard.16.4.494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kallman D. A., Wigley F. M., Scott W. W., Jr, Hochberg M. C., Tobin J. D. New radiographic grading scales for osteoarthritis of the hand. Reliability for determining prevalence and progression. Arthritis Rheum. 1989 Dec;32(12):1584–1591. doi: 10.1002/anr.1780321213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawrence J. S., Bremner J. M., Bier F. Osteo-arthrosis. Prevalence in the population and relationship between symptoms and x-ray changes. Ann Rheum Dis. 1966 Jan;25(1):1–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McAlindon T., Dieppe P. Osteoarthritis: definitions and criteria. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989 Jul;48(7):531–532. doi: 10.1136/ard.48.7.531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rogers J., Watt I., Dieppe P. Comparison of visual and radiographic detection of bony changes at the knee joint. BMJ. 1990 Feb 10;300(6721):367–368. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6721.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Saase J. L., van Romunde L. K., Cats A., Vandenbroucke J. P., Valkenburg H. A. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Zoetermeer survey. Comparison of radiological osteoarthritis in a Dutch population with that in 10 other populations. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989 Apr;48(4):271–280. doi: 10.1136/ard.48.4.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]