Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To gain insight into the overlap between additional information supplied by recently developed health status instruments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and traditional clinical and laboratory tests. METHODS--A cross sectional study of 282 outpatients with RA was made. From each patient, variables of clinical and laboratory measurements were obtained and the modified health assessment questionnaire (MHAQ) and a Dutch quality of life questionnaire, the IRGL, were completed. These variables were analysed for their interrelationship. RESULTS--Clinical and laboratory variables correlated significantly with the scales of the physical dimension and the disease impact scale of the IRGL. Their significant correlations with the IRGL psychological scales were weak. There were no significant correlations between any of the traditional variables and the IRGL social scales. Factor analysis yielded five factors: functionality, pain, depressive mood, social support, and laboratory. The laboratory factor is a measure of the disease process. The other four factors provide a health model. CONCLUSION--The results suggest that the IRGL questionnaire that was studied covers a complete health model that incorporates aspects of health that are not measured by clinical and laboratory tests. A simple questionnaire for the psychological and social dimension of health status, however, would probably be more cost effective and easier to use in clinical practice.
Full text
PDFSelected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Anderson J. J., Firschein H. E., Meenan R. F. Sensitivity of a health status measure to short-term clinical changes in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1989 Jul;32(7):844–850. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bergner M., Bobbitt R. A., Carter W. B., Gilson B. S. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981 Aug;19(8):787–805. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198108000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bijlsma J. W., Huiskes C. J., Kraaimaat F. W., Vanderveen M. J., Huber-Bruning O. Relation between patients' own health assessment and clinical and laboratory findings in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1991 May;18(5):650–653. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bombardier C., Ware J., Russell I. J., Larson M., Chalmers A., Read J. L. Auranofin therapy and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Results of a multicenter trial. Am J Med. 1986 Oct;81(4):565–578. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90539-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deyo R. A., Inui T. S., Leininger J. D., Overman S. S. Measuring functional outcomes in chronic disease: a comparison of traditional scales and a self-administered health status questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Med Care. 1983 Feb;21(2):180–192. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198302000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fries J. F., Spitz P., Kraines R. G., Holman H. R. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1980 Feb;23(2):137–145. doi: 10.1002/art.1780230202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kazis L. E., Callahan L. F., Meenan R. F., Pincus T. Health status reports in the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(11):1243–1253. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90025-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meenan R. F., Gertman P. M., Mason J. H. Measuring health status in arthritis. The arthritis impact measurement scales. Arthritis Rheum. 1980 Feb;23(2):146–152. doi: 10.1002/art.1780230203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pincus T., Callahan L. F., Brooks R. H., Fuchs H. A., Olsen N. J., Kaye J. J. Self-report questionnaire scores in rheumatoid arthritis compared with traditional physical, radiographic, and laboratory measures. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Feb 15;110(4):259–266. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-110-4-259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pincus T., Summey J. A., Soraci S. A., Jr, Wallston K. A., Hummon N. P. Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum. 1983 Nov;26(11):1346–1353. doi: 10.1002/art.1780261107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ritchie D. M., Boyle J. A., McInnes J. M., Jasani M. K., Dalakos T. G., Grieveson P., Buchanan W. W. Clinical studies with an articular index for the assessment of joint tenderness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Q J Med. 1968 Jul;37(147):393–406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson P. W., Silman A. J., Kirwan J. R., Currey H. L. Articular indices of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Correlation with the acute-phase response. Arthritis Rheum. 1987 Jun;30(6):618–623. doi: 10.1002/art.1780300603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tugwell P., Bombardier C., Buchanan W. W., Goldsmith C., Grace E., Bennett K. J., Williams H. J., Egger M., Alarcon G. S., Guttadauria M. Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Impact on quality of life assessed by traditional standard-item and individualized patient preference health status questionnaires. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Jan;150(1):59–62. doi: 10.1001/archinte.150.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Heijde D. M., van Riel P. L., van de Putte L. B. Sensitivity of a Dutch Health Assessment Questionnaire in a trial comparing hydroxychloroquine vs. sulphasalazine. Scand J Rheumatol. 1990;19(6):407–412. doi: 10.3109/03009749009097629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]