Abstract
Inosine 5’ monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) is a critical regulatory enzyme in purine nucleotide biosynthesis that is inhibited by the downstream product GTP. Multiple point mutations in the human isoform IMPDH2 have recently been associated with dystonia and other neurodevelopmental disorders, but the effect of the mutations on enzyme function has not been described. Here, we report identification of two additional affected individuals with missense variants in IMPDH2 and show that all of the disease-associated mutations disrupt GTP regulation. Cryo-EM structures of one IMPDH2 mutant suggest this regulatory defect arises from a shift in the conformational equilibrium toward a more active state. This structural and functional analysis provides insight into IMPDH2-associated disease mechanisms that point to potential therapeutic approaches and raises new questions about fundamental aspects of IMPDH regulation.
Keywords: IMP dehydrogenase, enzyme filaments, allostery, neurodevelopment, dystonia, cryo-EM, nucleotide biosynthesis
Introduction
Dystonia is a neurological movement disorder associated with many different genetic variants. Recent studies have identified mutations in IMPDH2, a key regulatory enzyme in purine nucleotide biosynthesis, associated with dystonia and other neurodevelopmental disorders. Purine nucleotides are essential components of cells where they serve as signaling molecules, energy sources, and precursors of RNA and DNA. Purine salvage pathways function alongside de novo synthesis pathways to maintain purine pools during steady state, but de novo biosynthesis is upregulated during proliferation to meet increased purine demand (1, 2). IMPDH catalyzes the rate-limiting step of de novo guanine nucleotide biosynthesis - the conversion of inosine 5’-monophosphate (IMP) to xanthosine 5’-monophosphate (XMP) (3, 4). Because IMP is also a precursor in the de novo synthesis of adenine nucleotides, IMPDH sits at a key metabolic branchpoint that controls flux between adenine and guanine nucleotide production (5–7).
To control this branch point, IMPDH is tightly regulated at multiple levels including through allosteric regulation by purine nucleotide binding and reversible assembly into filaments (8–14) (Fig. 1). The IMPDH protomer consists of a catalytic domain and a regulatory Bateman domain, connected by a flexible hinge. IMPDH constitutively assembles tetramers through catalytic domain interactions, and tetramers reversibly dimerize into octamers through interactions of the Bateman domains in response to binding of ATP or GTP in three allosteric sites. Binding of ATP in sites 1 and 2 promotes Bateman domain interactions in an extended, active conformation. Binding of GTP in site 2 and site 3, which is only formed in the compressed conformation, stabilizes a compressed, inactive conformation. Thus, GTP acts as an allosteric inhibitor by controlling the transition from extended to compressed conformations (9).
IMPDH2 is further regulated by assembly into filaments of stacked octamers, which reduces affinity for GTP by disfavoring the compressed conformation (12, 13). Filament formation is induced in cells under conditions with increased demand for guanine nucleotides, such as in response to IMPDH inhibition and starvation (15–22). In the presence of ATP, IMPDH filaments are conformationally heterogeneous, sampling a range of states between symmetrically extended and asymmetrically compressed. In the presence of GTP, the filaments more uniformly adopt a compressed conformation.
In humans, there are two IMPDH isozymes with 84% sequence identity (23). IMPDH1 is constitutively expressed in most cells as a housekeeping gene, while expression levels of IMPDH2 are higher in developing tissues (24, 25). IMPDH2 expression is also selectively enhanced in cancerous cells such as human brain tumors, sarcoma cells, and leukemic cells (24, 26–28). Both isoforms assemble filaments, but for IMPDH2 only, incorporation into filaments reduces sensitivity of the enzyme to GTP inhibition by preventing complete compression of the octamer (13, 14). Assembly of enzymes into filaments is a commonly observed mechanism that cells leverage to regulate metabolic processes (29–31).
Five mutations in IMPDH2 were recently identified in patients with early-onset neurodevelopmental diseases, including dystonia (32). All of the mutations are located in the regulatory domain or near the hinge that connects the regulatory and catalytic domains (Fig. 1). A series of similar mutations in IMPDH1 have been associated with retinal degeneration (33–37), and a subset of these were recently shown to disrupt GTP feedback inhibition (14, 38). The role of IMPDH2 is believed to be essential for cell proliferation and growth, as knockout of IMPDH2 in mice is embryonic lethal (39). Mice deficient in IMPDH1 and heterozygous for IMPDH2 had reduced IMPDH activity, but no developmental defects, supporting the hypothesis that IMPDH dysregulation, rather than a net decrease in its activity, is causative of disease (39, 40). However, more recently, a heterozygous early termination in exon 1 of IMPDH2 was identified in a patient with dystonia (41), suggesting a decrease in IMPDH2 activity could also be causative of disease.
Here, we report two additional variants, L245P and K238R, of human IMPDH2 associated with neurodevelopmental disease and show that neurodevelopmental disease-associated point mutations disrupt GTP feedback inhibition. Cryo-EM structures of the L245P mutant show that it can access both extended active and compressed inhibited conformations, but with the equilibrium between these conformational states disrupted relative to wildtype (WT). We propose a mechanism of dysregulation of the L245P variant in which the transition to the inhibited compressed state is disfavored. Other mutations result in a variety of structural phenotypes that suggest different mutations may have different molecular mechanisms of dysregulation.
Results
Identification of the L245P variant.
The proband (Fig. 2), a 3-year-old female, presented with global developmental delay, congenital anomalies (pulmonic stenosis, hip dysplasia), hypotonia, and dysmorphic features. The torticollis and abnormal posturing may be a form of dystonia in this patient. The full clinical description of the patient is reported in Supplemental Notes.
Genetic evaluation in the proband included a chromosomal microarray (CMA) which did not identify any pathogenic or likely pathogenic genomic deletions or duplications, followed by trio exome sequencing. A de novo heterozygous variant was identified in IMPDH2: chr3:49064205[hg19]; NM_000884.3; c.734T>C; p.(Leu245Pro). This was confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Fig. 2). The variant is rare (not found in gnomAD or in the local database of ~15,000 exomes), alters a conserved amino acid (GERP 5.97), has a high CADD score of 29.7, and is predicted to be damaging by multiple bioinformatic algorithms (MutationTaster, SIFT, Revel, and others). In addition, a de novo heterozygous variant was identified in LRP1: chr12:57589465[hg19]; c.8463dup; p.(Glu2822Ter). Pathogenic variants in LRP1 have recently been associated with developmental dysplasia of the hip (42) and this variant therefore may have contributed to this phenotype in the proband.
Identification of the K238R variant.
The proband is a now 3-year-old male who presented to genetics evaluation at 9 months of age due to hypotonia and global developmental delays, including gross motor and speech delay. The full clinical description of the patient is reported in the Supplemental Notes. Photos of the proband at different ages are shown in Supplemental Fig. 1.
Chromosomal SNP microarray, Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome methylation analysis, and metabolic screening labs were all performed and non-diagnostic. Exome sequencing was then recommended at 16 months of age and identified a de novo, likely pathogenic variant in IMPDH2 (c.713A>G, p.Lys238Arg).
IMPDH2 variants are defective in GTP regulation.
To determine whether disease associated IMPDH2 mutations have a direct effect on enzyme activity or regulation, we assayed purified recombinant enzymes in vitro. We observed modest variation in the apparent Vmax of the enzymes and K0.5 values for IMP and NAD+ among the IMPDH2 variants relative to WT enzyme, suggesting that basal activity is not severely affected by the mutations (Table 1). We next tested whether the disease mutations affect GTP inhibition (Fig. 3). WT IMPDH2 filaments are inhibited by GTP with an IC50 of 577 μM under our assay conditions (Fig. 3); as previously reported, we find that IMPDH2 retains a basal level of activity even in the presence of saturating GTP (12, 13). Each mutant we tested retains significant activity up to 5 mM GTP (Fig. 3). While L245P, one of the mutations reported here, could be inhibited at much higher GTP concentrations, with an estimated IC50 of 7 mM, this value is far above the usual physiological concentration range of GTP (Supplemental Fig. 2). Thus, each neurodevelopmental mutant dramatically compromises feedback inhibition by GTP, suggesting that disease phenotypes may be related to hyperactivity of IMPDH2 under conditions in which the WT enzyme would be inhibited.
Table 1:
Variant | IMP | NAD+ | Vmax app (μM NADH min−1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
K0.5 (μM) | Hill | K0.5 (μM) | Hill | ||
WT | 45.6 | 7.4 | 44.9 | 5.3 | 2.2 ± 0.1 |
G113E | 17.6 | 2.3 | 44.9 | 2.8 | 2.4 ± 0.8 |
G113R | 20.1 | 2.8 | 31.5 | 3.3 | 2.0 ± 0.5 |
G207R | 35.5 | 2.8 | 37.1 | 5.8 | 2.1 ± 0.1 |
S160del | 15.1 | 2.8 | 25.8 | 5.7 | 1.7 ± 0.2 |
Q243H | 52.1 | 4.9 | 60.2 | 3.0 | 3.6 ± 0.5 |
L245P | 16.9 | 1.7 | 24.6 | 3.5 | 2.8 ± 0.4 |
K238R | 17.2 | 2.5 | 33.4 | 9.0 | 1.4 ± 0.1 |
Structural phenotypes of IMPDH2 mutants.
The IMPDH2 neurodevelopmental mutations are in or near the regulatory domain, which controls the extended-compressed structural transition (Fig. 1). This led us to hypothesize that the loss of GTP regulation we observe arises from an inability to transition into the compressed inhibited conformation. To assess changes to the structure and conformation in IMPDH2 mutants, we used negative stain electron microscopy. Under activating and inhibiting conditions for the WT enzyme, it is relatively straightforward to assess whether the enzyme is extended or compressed by directly observing the helical rise of filaments (12–14). Because the mutants have normal basal activity but are not inhibited by GTP, we anticipated that in the absence of GTP, the mutants should resemble the WT in the extended, active conformation. In the presence of GTP, which causes compression of WT filaments, we predicted we would not observe compression. However, negative stain analysis of IMPDH2 revealed surprising large-scale structural differences among the mutants (Fig. 4, Table 2).
Table 2:
Variant | ATP | GTP |
---|---|---|
WT | Extended filaments | Compressed filaments |
G113E | Compressed filaments | Compressed filaments |
G113R | Compressed filaments | Compressed filaments |
G207R | Extended filaments | Compressed filaments |
S160del | No filaments | Octamers |
Q243H | Extended filaments | Compressed filaments |
L245P | Extended filaments | Compressed filaments |
K238R | Extended filaments | Compressed filaments |
First, we examined IMPDH2 mutant structures in the absence of GTP, where all mutants retain WT activity (Fig. 4A). Under this condition, G207R, Q243H, L245P, and K238R closely resemble WT in the canonical extended and active conformations. However, S160del did not assemble filaments at all, instead forming mostly tetramers in the presence of ATP. Surprisingly, both G113E and G113R are uniformly compressed, which has not previously been observed for IMPDH2 in the absence of GTP (9–13). More surprising still, in the presence of GTP, all of the disease mutants are able to assemble filaments in the compressed conformation, with the exception of S160del which forms only octamers, although it was not possible to directly measure whether GTP octamer are in the extended or compressed conformation (Fig. 4B). In all prior studies, a compressed conformation of IMPDH is associated with inhibition (9, 11–13), but the variants described here retain catalytic activity in the presence of GTP, suggesting that additional factors beyond compression must be required for IMPDH2 inhibition (Table 2).
Filament assembly reduces sensitivity of variants to GTP.
We next investigated the effect of filament assembly on the variants’ sensitivity to GTP. The engineered mutation Y12A at the filament assembly interface of IMPDH2 disrupts polymerization, and increases sensitivity of IMPDH2 to GTP inhibition compared to the WT (12, 13). We introduced the Y12A mutation into each of the IMPDH2 mutants and confirmed with negative stain that the double mutants do not form filaments (Supplemental Fig. 3). Next, we performed GTP inhibition assays on the double mutants. Because the S160del mutant does not form filaments at all, we anticipated that the Y12A mutation would not affect enzyme activity (Fig. 4). The S160del+Y12A mutant displayed no significant decrease in activity in the presence of GTP, as expected (Fig. 5). The other six double mutants display some inhibition at high GTP concentrations, with L245P+Y12A being the most sensitive (IC50 = 1.3 mM), followed by K238R+Y12A (IC50 = 1.9 mM). None of the double mutants were as sensitive to GTP inhibition as the non-assembly mutant alone (IC50 = 200 μM). This suggests that the mutations affect the octameric form of the enzyme as well, and assembly of the variants into filaments would further exacerbate downstream regulatory defects in the cell.
L245P filament structures reveal differences in flexibility.
To investigate the structural basis for IMPDH2 dysregulation by neurodevelopmental mutations, we determined structures of L245P in the presence of ATP and GTP. We chose L245P as representative of the most common structural phenotype we observed, with enzymes that undergo the extended to compressed transition in the presence of GTP despite retaining full activity (G207R, Q243H, L245P, and K238R).
First, we determined the structure of L245P in the catalytically active extended conformation, in the absence of GTP. Flexibility in WT IMPDH2 filaments under these conditions arises from heterogeneity in the extended and compressed conformations of protomers within each octamer, which can limit the resolution of cryo-EM structures. We previously developed an image processing strategy for the very flexible WT IMPDH2 filaments, which allows us to computationally separate uniformly extended from partially compressed (bent) filament segments (13). The approach also allows us to generate focused reconstructions of the repeating octameric subunit and the filament assembly interface. Following symmetry expansion and focused classification, we found that the majority of L245P segments were sorted into fully extended classes (73%), compared to only 17% fully extended WT IMPDH2 segments under these conditions (Supplemental Fig. 4) (13). Thus, it appears that L245P reduces octamer flexibility in the active state, leading to a more uniformly extended structure than the very heterogeneous WT filaments.
The extended L245P structures refined to global resolutions that were significantly higher than our earlier WT structures: 2.0 Å for the filament assembly interface and the catalytic core, and 2.6 Å resolution for the octamer-centered reconstruction (Fig. 6C, 6B). The mutation of L245 to proline is clear in the cryo-EM map and does not appear to perturb the conformation of the backbone around the mutation site relative to WT (Fig. 6E). IMP and NAD+ are clearly resolved in the active site, and ATP is well resolved in sites 1 and 2 in the regulatory domain (Supplemental Fig. 5). Overall, the structures are nearly identical to the WT structure under this condition at the level of individual protomers, octamers, and the filament assembly interface (Fig. 6D). Some minor differences in loops of the regulatory domain likely reflect improved accuracy in model building at the improved resolution of the current reconstructions.
Next, we determined the structure of L245P in the presence of 20 mM GTP. At this high GTP concentration, we had previously observed that the WT IMPDH2 forms uniformly compressed filaments, with no significant population of extended or bent octamers (13). However, from initial two-dimensional classification of L245P helical segments, it was clear that the mutant filaments were very heterogeneous (Fig. 7A). The data processing approach described above allowed us to separate out asymmetric bent segments, which closely resemble bent segments of WT IMPDH2 observed only in the absence of GTP (13). The remaining symmetrically compressed filament segments comprise only about 13% of the data set (Supplemental Fig. 6). Compared to the uniformly compressed WT, then, one consequence of the L245P mutation is to increase the heterogeneity of IMPDH2 filaments in the presence of GTP.
We used the symmetrically compressed filament segments to determine structures with global resolutions of 2.1 Å for the filament assembly interface and 3.0 Å for the octamer-centered reconstruction (Supplemental Fig. 6). We also determined a structure of the asymmetric, bent filament segment at a global resolution of 2.7 Å (Supplemental Fig. 6). Again, all ligands including GTP were well resolved (Supplemental Fig. 5), and the filament interface was nearly identical to WT. The L245P protomer is also nearly identical to the WT protomer under this ligand condition (Fig. 7D). Thus, IMPDH2-L245P can adopt a canonical compressed structure in the presence of GTP. However, under conditions that support uniform compression and inhibition of the WT enzyme, the mutant remains in an ensemble of partially compressed states.
Discussion
Maintenance of purine pools is critical in the central nervous system, where purine-based nucleotides and nucleosides have additional functions as second messengers, neurotransmitters, neuromodulators, and trophic agents (43–46). Purine nucleotide and nucleoside pools can be maintained by either salvage pathways or de novo pathways, but brain tissue relies primarily on salvage over de novo biosynthetic pathways (47). Genetic deficiencies in salvage pathway enzymes result in increased flux through the de novo purine synthesis, leading to the neurodevelopmental disorder Lesch-Nyhan syndrome (48–51). The phenotype of this syndrome, including variably expressed generalized dystonia, motor disability, and cognitive disability, resembles phenotypes in cases of IMPDH2 variants (32). In this study, we show that these IMPDH2 variants all display insensitivity to allosteric inhibition by GTP, supporting the hypothesis that increased activity in the de novo purine biosynthetic pathway and subsequent perturbation of purine pools may lead to neurodevelopmental phenotypes.
Like IMPDH2, mutations in the gene for the other human isozyme, IMPDH1, also cause disease, in this case the retinal diseases Leber congenital amaurosis and retinitis pigmentosa (33–37). Like the IMPDH2 mutations characterized here, a subset of IMPDH1 mutations cluster near the allosteric domain or inter-domain hinge, and disrupt GTP inhibition (9, 14). Importantly, four of the five IMPDH1 mutations that disrupt GTP regulation prevent IMPDH1 from adopting the compressed conformation, which we proposed as the mechanism of GTP dysregulation. We anticipated that the IMPDH2 mutations studied here would have the same effect but were surprised to see that in each case we could measure, GTP appeared to cause compression of IMPDH2 in low-resolution negative stain micrographs (Fig. 4). Because these enzymes all retain high activity levels in the presence of GTP, this result suggests that contrary to prior models, compression of IMPDH2 alone is not sufficient for allosteric inhibition.
IMPDH2-L245P structures provide insight into the seeming contradiction of the enzyme retaining WT activity in a compressed conformation. We found that the canonical extended and compressed states are virtually identical to the WT structures under the same conditions, including the binding of GTP to inhibitory allosteric sites. However, the conformational variability of filaments in different ligand states varies significantly. Active WT IMPDH2 is in an ensemble of structural states with different numbers of compressed and extended protomers within octamers giving rise to multiple bent conformations, and only a minority (17%) of octameric filament segments were classified as symmetrically extended (13). By comparison, the vast majority (73%) of L245P octamers are symmetrically extended, suggesting that one effect of the mutation is to rigidify the enzyme in the extended state. Conversely, under high concentrations of GTP, WT IMPDH2 octamers are uniformly compressed, while only a minority of L245P octamers (13%) are fully compressed, the majority being in an ensemble of bent conformational states that resemble the active WT ensemble. That is, what appeared in low resolution negative stain micrographs to be the compressed conformation was revealed to be an ensemble of partially compressed conformations using higher resolution cryo-EM approaches. Thus, L245P appears to disrupt GTP regulation by shifting the conformational equilibrium away from the inhibited, compressed conformation (Fig. 8).
Whether a disrupted conformational equilibrium underlies the GTP regulation defect for other IMPDH2 disease mutants remains to be determined, although our results suggest that some of the point mutations may work through different mechanisms. For example, S160del was the only mutation that disrupts filament assembly, which may play a role in its dysregulation. Because the seven mutations do not all lead to the same structural phenotypes at the level of polymerization or conformational state (Fig. 4), it will be important to characterize each one to elucidate mechanisms of disease for each. Understanding individual mechanisms of dysregulation may also provide insight into variation in the onset and severity of disease phenotypes.
Additionally, two mutations at residue 113 appear to cause IMPDH2 to be constitutively in a compressed conformation in the absence of GTP. These mutations raise the question of how compressed IMPDH2 retains full WT levels of activity and suggests that compression alone is not sufficient to inactivate the enzyme. The G113E and G113R variants, therefore, may serve as a useful tool for dissecting previously unappreciated mechanisms of regulation of IMPDH2.
Assembly of IMPDH2 into filaments exacerbates the reduction in GTP sensitivity of the disease mutations. We have previously established the role for polymerization in reducing sensitivity to GTP inhibition, which increases the working range of the enzyme under conditions of elevated purine nucleotide demand (13, 14). When filament assembly was blocked, all of the point mutants partially restore sensitivity to GTP inhibition, although not to WT levels (Fig. 5). The sensitivity to GTP inhibition of S160del, which itself prevents filament assembly, was not restored by introduction of our engineered non-assembly mutation Y12A.
Our results suggest potential therapeutic approaches that might be considered for treating patients with IMPDH2-associated developmental defects. The mutations are gain of function, allowing high levels of IMPDH activity at otherwise inhibitory concentrations of GTP. One approach might be the use of known IMPDH inhibitors, to reduce the activity of the enzyme (52–54). Alternative approaches that target IMPDH2 assembly into filaments might also prove effective in some cases; for example disrupting IMPDH2-L245P filament assembly reduces the IC50 for GTP into a more physiologically relevant range and might reduce activity sufficiently to be therapeutically useful. Future work investigating the treatment of IMPDH2 associated defects using inhibitors in cell-based systems and model organisms may prove fruitful.
In both IMPDH1 and IMPDH2, disease-linked mutations in and around the Bateman domain result in the same type of biochemical defect affecting the nervous system. In the case of IMPDH1, this defect results in the degeneration of photoreceptors, possibly due to their unique dependence on IMPDH1 for ATP and cGMP (55–59). Imbalance of nucleotide pools in photoreceptors leads to photoreceptor death (60–62). In the case of IMPDH2, the defect results in neurodevelopmental disorders. In both cases, the dysregulation of IMPDH disrupts the delicate balance of purine pools in the nervous system.
Materials & Methods
Exome sequencing and Sanger validation of the IMPDH2 variants
After informed consent, genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples of the proband with the L245P variant and both parents. Exonic sequences were enriched in the DNA sample using the IDT xGen Exome Research Panel V2.0 capture combined with xGen Human mtDNA Research Panel v1.0 (Integrated DNA Technologies, Iowa, United States), and sequenced on a NovaSeq 6000 sequencing system (Illumina, San Diego, CA) as 100-bp paired-end runs. Data analysis including read alignment and variant calling was performed with DNAnexus software (Palo Alto, CA) using default parameters, with the human genome assembly hg19/GRCh37 as reference. Variants were filtered out if they were off-target (intronic variants >8bp from splice junction), synonymous (unless <4bp from the splice site), or had minor allele frequency (MAF) >0.01 in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) or in our in-house exome database. The IMPDH2 and LRP1 variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing in the affected individual, and were not found in either parent. This work was done at Hadassah Medical center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Genetic testing of the individual with the K238R variant was done as clinical trio exome sequencing through Invitae. This work was done at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.
Recombinant IMPDH expression and purification
Purified IMPDH protein was prepared as described previously (12–14). Briefly, IMPDH2 variants were cloned into a pSMT3-Kan vector with an N-terminal 6xHis-SMT3/SUMO tag. Constructs were transformed into BL21 (DE3) E. coli and cultured in LB at 37°C to an OD600 of 0.9. Overexpression was induced with 1mM IPTG for 4 hr at 30°C. Cells were collected by centrifugation. Cell pellets were resuspended at 4°C in lysis buffer (50 mM KPO4, 300 mM KCl, 10 mM imidazole, 800 mM urea, pH 8) with a dounce homogenizer, and the cells were lysed with an Emulsiflex-05 homogenizer. Lysate was cleared by centrifugation, and 6xHis-SMT3/SUMO tagged IMPDH2 was initially purified by Ni affinity chromatography using either a HisTrap FF column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) on an Äkta Start chromatography system or a handpacked HisPur™ Ni-NTA resin (Thermo Scientific), eluting with 50 mM KPO4, 300 mM KCl, 500 mM imidazole, pH 8. Fractions containing IMPDH2 were treated with 1 mg ULP1 protease (63) per 100 mg IMPDH for 1 hour at 4°C to cleave the 6xHis-SMT3/SUMO tag. Following cleavage, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and 800 mM urea were added to inhibit polymerization. Protein was concentrated using a 30,000 MWCO Amicon filter and applied to a Superose 6 column pre-equilibrated in gel filtration buffer (20 mM HEPES, 100 mM KCl, 800 mM urea, 1 mM DTT, pH 8) using an Äkta Pure FPLC system. Peak fractions were concentrated using a 10,000 MWCO Amicon filter, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored in single use aliquots at −80°C.
IMPDH activity assays
Protein aliquots were diluted in assay buffer (20 mM HEPES, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, pH 7.0) and pre-treated with varying concentrations of ATP, GTP, and IMP for 15 minutes at 25°C in 96 well UV half-area transparent plates (Corning model 3679). Reactions (100 μL total) were initiated by addition of varying concentrations of NAD+. NADH production was measured over time in increments of 1 minute for 15 minutes by absorbance at 340 nm using a Varioskan Lux microplate reader (Thermo Scientific) at 25°C. Absorbance was correlated with NADH concentration using a standard curve. Specific activity was calculated by linear interpretation of the reaction slope for a 4 minute window beginning 1 minute after reaction initiation. All data points reported are an average of 3 measurements from the same protein preparation. Error bars are standard deviation. Fits for activity assays were calculated using the Hill-Langmuir equation V = Vmax * [S]n/((K0.5)n + [S]n) and IC50 was calculated using a modified Hill equation V = Vmin * (Vmax − Vmin)/(1 + (I/IC50)hill(64).
Negatively stained electron microscopy
Samples were applied to glow-discharged continuous carbon EM grids and negatively stained with 2% uranyl formate. Grids were imaged by transmission electron microscopy using an FEI Morgagni at 100kV acceleration voltage and a Gatan Orius CCD. Micrographs were collected at a nominal 22,000x magnification (pixel size 3.9 Å).
Electron cryo-microscopy sample preparation and data collection
Samples were applied to glow-discharged C-flat holey carbon EM grids (Protochips), blotted, and plunge-frozen in liquid ethane using a Vitrobot plunging apparatus (FEI) at 4°C, 100% relative humidity. High-throughput data collection was performed using an FEI Titan Krios transmission electron microscope operating at 300 kV (equipped with a Gatan image filter (GIF) and post-GIF Gatan K3 Summit direct electron detector) using the Leginon software package (65).
Electron cryo-microscopy image processing
Data collection parameters are summarized in Supplemental Table 3. Movies were collected in super-resolution mode using Leginon, then aligned and corrected for beam-induced motion using Motioncor2, with 2x Fourier binning and dose compensation applied during motion correction (65, 66). CTF was estimated using CTFFIND4 (67). Relion 3.1 was used for all subsequent image processing (68, 69). Each dataset was individually processed but using approximately the same previously published pipeline (13, 14).
Particles from a subset of 100 micrographs were manually picked from each dataset, extracted, and classified in 2D to generate templates for autopicking. Particles were autopicked using these templates, extracted with a box size of 400 Å, with 4x binning, and classified in 2D to remove junk. For initial 3D refinement, a previous IMPDH filament reconstruction (EMD-20742 for the dataset with GTP, or EMD-20687 for the dataset without GTP) was low-pass filtered to 40 Å and used as an initial reference to align the particles at the filament assembly interface.
As described previously, two different locations along the D4-symmetric IMPDH filament may be used as symmetry origins–the center of the octameric filament segment or the center of the filament assembly interface (13, 14). Briefly, binned particles were initially aligned to a low-pass filtered IMPDH filament volume centered on the desired symmetry origin as a reference in an initial round of 3D auto-refinement, given a large offset range of 25. Helical segments were processed as single particles. Helical symmetry was not applied. After initial binned refinement, particles were un-binned and re-extracted with a pixel size of 0.843 Å, followed by 2D classification. Selected particles were submitted to 3D auto-refinement with D4 symmetry imposed. Remaining heterogeneity was removed with subsequent rounds of 3D classification.
CTF refinement and particle polishing were performed to refine per-particle defocus and per-micrograph astigmatism. Partial signal subtraction of the poorly resolved particle ends was performed on either the filament assembly interface or the octameric filament segment to boost resolution of the centered region. To this end, a mask was applied over either the central eight catalytic domains of the filament assembly interface or over the eight monomers of the octameric filament segment, and signal outside of the masks was subtracted. The resulting map was auto-refined in 3D. 2D and 3D classification with skip_align was performed to remove residual heterogeneity.
Model building and refinement
Structures of human IMPDH2 filaments in the extended conformation (PDB 6U8N for the octamer-centered reconstruction and PDB 6U8E for the interface-centered reconstruction) and the compressed conformation (PDB 6U9O for the octamer-centered reconstruction and PDB 6U8S for the interface-centered reconstruction) were used as templates for model building. Templates were rigid-body fit into the cryo-EM maps using UCSF Chimera, and phenix.real_space_refine was used for automated fitting employing rigid-body refinement, NCS constraints, gradient-driven minimization and simulated annealing (70). Outputs from real-space refinement in PHENIX were inspected and manually adjusted with semi-automated fitting in ISOLDE and manual fitting in Coot (71, 72). This process was repeated iteratively, improving Molprobity statistics and fit to density. Refinement statistics are summarized in Supplemental Table 3. Structure figures were prepared using UCSF Chimera (73).
Supplementary Material
Table 3:
hIMPDH2-L245P extended filament interface | hIMPDH2-L245P extended filament segment | hIMPDH2-L245P compressed filament interface | hIMPDH2-L245P compressed filament segment | hIMPDH2-L245P bent filament segment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ligands | ATP, IMP, NAD+ | ATP, IMP, NAD+ | GTP, ATP, IMP, NAD+ | GTP, ATP, IMP, NAD+ | GTP, ATP, IMP, NAD+ |
PDBID | 8FOZ | 8G8F | 8FUZ | 8G9B | N/A |
EMDBID | EMD-29357 | EMD-29848 | EMD-29482 | EMD-29863 | EMD-29870 |
Data collection and refinement | |||||
Magnification | 105,000 | 105,000 | 105,000 | 105,000 | 105,000 |
Voltage (kV) | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
Electron exposure (e − /Å 2 ) | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
Defocus range (μm) | −1.71 – −0.27 | −1.71 – −0.27 | −1.74 – −0.28 | −1.74 – −0.28 | −1.74 – −0.28 |
Pixel size (data collection) (Å) | 0.4215 | 0.4215 | 0.4215 | 0.4215 | 0.4215 |
Pixel size (reconstruction) (Å) | 0.843 | 0.843 | 0.843 | 0.843 | 0.843 |
Micrographs (no.) | 2,648 | 2,648 | 2,967 | 2,967 | 2,967 |
Initial particles (no.) | 1,893,802 | 1,893,802 | 1,421,990 | 1,421,990 | 1,421,990 |
Final particles (no.) | 152,170 | 54,304 | 89,981 | 26,540 | 91,716 |
Symmetry imposed | D4 | D4 | D4 | D4 | Cl |
Map resolution range, Relion postprocess (Å) | 2.06 – 3.37 | 2.63–4.59 | 2.13–4.10 | 3.05–5.21 | 2.76–5.91 |
Resolution, Relion postprocess (0.143 FSC) (Å) | 2.1 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 3.0 |
Resolution, density modified (0.5 FSC ref ) (Å) | 2.0 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 2.7 |
Model refinement and validation | |||||
Initial model (PDB ID) | 6U8E | 6U8N | 6U8S | 6U90 | N/A |
R.m.s. deviations | |||||
Bond lengths (Å) | 0.0083 | 0.0136 | 0.0109 | 0.0164 | N/A |
Bond angles (°) | 0.80 | 1.25 | 1.01 | 1.27 | N/A |
MolProbity score | 1.17 | 2.05 | 1.31 | 1.84 | N/A |
Clashscore | 2.94 | 7.63 | 4.61 | 10.84 | N/A |
C-beta deviations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | N/A |
Rotamer outliers (%) | 1.31% | 1.87% | 1.17% | 0.60 | N/A |
Ramachandran plot | |||||
Favored (%) | 99.47% | 93.61% | 97.92% | 95.85% | N/A |
Allowed (%) | 0.53% | 5.98% | 2.08% | 3.99% | N/A |
Disallowed (%) | 0.00% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.15% | N/A |
Significance Statement.
Point mutations in the human enzyme IMPDH2, a critical regulator of nucleotide biosynthesis, are linked to neurodevelopmental disorders, such as dystonia. Here, we report two additional IMPDH2 point mutants associated with similar disorders. We investigate the effects of each mutation on IMPDH2 structure and function in vitro and find that all mutations are gain of function, preventing allosteric regulation of IMPDH2 activity. We report high resolution structures of one variant and present a structure-based hypothesis for its dysregulation. This work provides a biochemical basis for understanding diseases caused by IMPDH2 mutation and lays a foundation for future therapeutic development.
Acknowledgements
We thank the patients and the family of the patients for participating in the study. We thank the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Cryo-EM Center at the University of Washington for electron microscope use. This work was supported by the US National Institutes of Health (R01GM118396 and S10OD023476 to J.M.K., T32GM008268 to A.G.O., and F31EY030732 to A.L.B.), and the German Research Foundation (DFG 458949627; ZE 1213/2-1 to M.Z.).
Footnotes
Classification
Biological Sciences/Biochemistry
Data availability
The coordinates are deposited in the Protein Data Bank with PDB IDs 8FOZ (interface-centered extended hIMPDH2-L245P), 8G8F (octamer-centered extended hIMPDH2-L245P), 8FUZ (interface-centered compressed hIMPDH2-L245P), and 8G9B (octamer-centered compressed hIMPDH2-L245P). The cryo-EM maps are deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank with IDs EMD-29357 (interface-centered extended hIMPDH2-L245P), EMD-29848 (octamer-centered extended hIMPDH2-L245P), EMD-29482 (interface-centered compressed hIMPDH2-L245P), EMD-29863 (octamer-centered compressed hIMPDH2-L245P), and EMD-29870 (octamer-centered bent hIMPDH2-L245P).
References
- 1.Jackson R. C., Morris H. P., Weber G., Enzymes of the Purine Ribonucleotide Cycle in Rat Hepatomas and Kidney Tumors. Cancer Research 37, 3057–3065 (1977). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mayer D., et al. , Expression of key enzymes of purine and pyrimidine metabolism in a hepatocyte-derived cell line at different phases of the growth cycle. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 116, 251–258 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jackson R. C., Weber G., Morris H. P., IMP dehydrogenase, an enzyme linked with proliferation and malignancy. Nature 256, 331–333 (1975). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Natsumeda Y., Ikegami T., Murayama K., Weber G., De Novo Guanylate Synthesis in the Commitment to Replication in Hepatoma 3924A Cells1. Cancer Research 48, 507–511 (1988). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Glesne D. A., Collart F. R., Huberman E., Regulation of IMP dehydrogenase gene expression by its end products, guanine nucleotides. Mol Cell Biol 11, 5417–5425 (1991). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jain J., et al. , Regulation of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase type I and type II isoforms in human lymphocytes. Biochemical Pharmacology 67, 767–776 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dayton J. S., Lindsten T., Thompson C. B., Mitchell B. S., Effects of human T lymphocyte activation on inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase expression. The Journal of Immunology 152, 984–991 (1994). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Scott J. W., et al. , CBS domains form energy-sensing modules whose binding of adenosine ligands is disrupted by disease mutations. J. Clin. Invest. 113, 274–284 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Buey R. M., et al. , Guanine nucleotide binding to the Bateman domain mediates the allosteric inhibition of eukaryotic IMP dehydrogenases. Nat Commun 6, 8923 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Labesse G., et al. , MgATP Regulates Allostery and Fiber Formation in IMPDHs. Structure 21, 975–985 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Buey R. M., et al. , A nucleotide-controlled conformational switch modulates the activity of eukaryotic IMP dehydrogenases. Sci Rep 7, 2648 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Anthony S. A., et al. , Reconstituted IMPDH polymers accommodate both catalytically active and inactive conformations. MBoC 28, 2600–2608 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Johnson M. C., Kollman J. M., Cryo-EM structures demonstrate human IMPDH2 filament assembly tunes allosteric regulation. eLife 9, e53243 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Burrell A. L., et al. , IMPDH1 retinal variants control filament architecture to tune allosteric regulation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 29, 47–58 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ji Y., Gu J., Makhov A. M., Griffith J. D., Mitchell B. S., Regulation of the Interaction of Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase with Mycophenolic Acid by GTP. Journal of Biological Chemistry 281, 206–212 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gunter J. H., et al. , Characterisation of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase expression during retinal development: Differences between variants and isoforms. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 40, 1716–1728 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Thomas E. C., et al. , Different Characteristics and Nucleotide Binding Properties of Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase (IMPDH) Isoforms. PLoS ONE 7, e51096 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Carcamo W. C., Calise S. J., von Mühlen C. A., Satoh M., Chan E. K. L., “Molecular Cell Biology and Immunobiology of Mammalian Rod/Ring Structures” in International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology, (Elsevier, 2014), pp. 35–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Calise S. J., et al. , Glutamine deprivation initiates reversible assembly of mammalian rods and rings. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 2963–2973 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Duong-Ly K. C., et al. , T cell activation triggers reversible inosine-5’-monophosphate dehydrogenase assembly. Journal of Cell Science, jcs.223289 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Juda P., Šmigová J., Kováčik L., Bártová E., Raška I., Ultrastructure of Cytoplasmic and Nuclear Inosine-5’-Monophosphate Dehydrogenase 2 “Rods and Rings” Inclusions. J Histochem Cytochem. 62, 739–750 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ahangari N., et al. , Nuclear IMPDH Filaments in Human Gliomas. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology 80, 944–954 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Natsumeda Y., et al. , Two distinct cDNAs for human IMP dehydrogenase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 265, 5292–5295 (1990). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Senda M., Natsumeda Y., Tissue-differential expression of two distinct genes for human IMP dehydrogenase (E.C.1.1.1.205). Life Sciences 54, 1917–1926 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Peng M., et al. , Proteomics reveals changes in hepatic proteins during chicken embryonic development: an alternative model to study human obesity. BMC Genomics 19, 29 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Konno Y., et al. , Expression of human IMP dehydrogenase types I and II in Escherichia coli and distribution in human normal lymphocytes and leukemic cell lines. Journal of Biological Chemistry 266, 506–509 (1991). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nagai M., et al. , Selective Up-Regulation of Type II Inosine 5’-Monophosphate Dehydrogenase Messenger RNA Expression in Human Leukemias1. Cancer Research 51, 3886–3890 (1991). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Collart F. R., Chubb C. B., Mirkin B. L., Huberman E., “Increased IMP dehydrogenase gene expression in solid tumor tissues and tumor cell lines” (1992). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 29.Peterson J., Akizu N., Simonet J., Foster M., O’Reilly A., Enzyme polymerization in nucleotide biosynthesis. The FASEB Journal 34, 1–1 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lynch E. M., Kollman J. M., Webb B. A., Filament formation by metabolic enzymes—A new twist on regulation. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 66, 28–33 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Simonet J. C., Burrell A. L., Kollman J. M., Peterson J. R., Freedom of assembly: metabolic enzymes come together. MBoC 31, 1201–1205 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zech M., et al. , Monogenic variants in dystonia: an exome-wide sequencing study. The Lancet Neurology 19, 908–918 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bowne S. J., Mutations in the inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 1 gene (IMPDH1) cause the RP10 form of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Human Molecular Genetics 11, 559–568 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kennan A., Identification of an IMPDH1 mutation in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (RP10) revealed following comparative microarray analysis of transcripts derived from retinas of wild-type and Rho−/− mice. Human Molecular Genetics 11, 547–558 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wada Y., et al. , Screen of the IMPDH1 Gene among Patients with Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa and Clinical Features Associated with the Most Common Mutation, Asp226Asn. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46, 1735 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Grover S., Fishman G. A., Stone E. M., A novel IMPDH1 mutation (Arg231Pro) in a family with a severe form of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology 111, 1910–1916 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bowne S. J., et al. , Spectrum and Frequency of Mutations in IMPDH1 Associated with Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa and Leber Congenital Amaurosis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 47, 34 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fernández-Justel D., et al. , A Nucleotide-Dependent Conformational Switch Controls the Polymerization of Human IMP Dehydrogenases to Modulate their Catalytic Activity. Journal of Molecular Biology 431, 956–969 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gu J. J., et al. , Inhibition of T lymphocyte activation in mice heterozygous for loss of the IMPDH II gene. J. Clin. Invest. 106, 599–606 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gu J. J., et al. , Targeted Disruption of the Inosine 5ʹ-Monophosphate Dehydrogenase Type I Gene in Mice. Mol Cell Biol 23, 6702–6712 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kuukasjärvi A., et al. , IMPDH2: a new gene associated with dominant juvenile-onset dystonia-tremor disorder. Eur J Hum Genet 29, 1833–1837 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yan W., et al. , Heterozygous LRP1 deficiency causes developmental dysplasia of the hip by impairing triradiate chondrocytes differentiation due to inhibition of autophagy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 119, e2203557119 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Deutsch S. I., Long K. D., Rosse R. B., Mastropaolo J., Eller J., Hypothesized Deficiency of Guanine-Based Purines May Contribute to Abnormalities of Neurodevelopment, Neuromodulation, and Neurotransmission in Lesch-Nyhan Syndrome. Clinical Neuropharmacology 28, 28–37 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Frizzo M. E., et al. , Activation of glutamate uptake by guanosine in primary astrocyte cultures. Neuroreport 12, 879–881 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rathbone M. P., et al. , Trophic effects of purines in neurons and glial cells. Progress in Neurobiology 59, 663–690 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Long H., Cameron S., Yu L., Rao Y., De Novo GMP Synthesis Is Required for Axon Guidance in Drosophila. Genetics 172, 1633–1642 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rosenbloom F. M., Inherited Disorder of Purine Metabolism: Correlation Between Central Nervous System Dysfunction and Biochemical Defects. JAMA 202, 175 (1967). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Seegmiller J. E., Rosenbloom F. M., Kelley W. N., Enzyme Defect Associated with a Sex-Linked Human Neurological Disorder and Excessive Purine Synthesis. Science 155, 1682–1684 (1967). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lesch M., Nyhan W. L., A familial disorder of uric acid metabolism and central nervous system function. The American Journal of Medicine 36, 561–570 (1964). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rosenbloom F. M., Henderson J. F., Caldwell I. C., Kelley W. N., Seegmiller J. E., Biochemical Bases of Accelerated Purine Biosynthesis de Novo in Human Fibroblasts Lacking Hypoxanthine-Guanine Phosphoribosyltransferase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 243, 1166–1173 (1968). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wood A. W., Becker M. A., Minna J. D., Seegmiller J. E., Purine Metabolism in Normal and Thioguanine-Resistant Neuroblastoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70, 3880–3883 (1973). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Franklin T. J., Cook J. M., The inhibition of nucleic acid synthesis by mycophenolic acid. Biochemical Journal 113, 515–524 (1969). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sintchak M. D., et al. , Structure and Mechanism of Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase in Complex with the Immunosuppressant Mycophenolic Acid. Cell 85, 921–930 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Liao L.-X., et al. , Highly selective inhibition of IMPDH2 provides the basis of antineuroinflammation therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wong-Riley M., Energy metabolism of the visual system. EB, 99 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Country M. W., Retinal metabolism: A comparative look at energetics in the retina. Brain Research 1672, 50–57 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Arshavsky V. Y., Burns M. E., Photoreceptor Signaling: Supporting Vision across a Wide Range of Light Intensities. Journal of Biological Chemistry 287, 1620–1626 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Luo D.-G., Xue T., Yau K.-W., How vision begins: An odyssey. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 9855–9862 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Palczewski K., Chemistry and Biology of the Initial Steps in Vision: The Friedenwald Lecture. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 55, 6651 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sharma A. K., Rohrer B., Sustained Elevation of Intracellular cGMP Causes Oxidative Stress Triggering Calpain-Mediated Apoptosis in Photoreceptor Degeneration. Current Eye Research 32, 259–269 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Du J., An J., Linton J. D., Wang Y., Hurley J. B., “How Excessive cGMP Impacts Metabolic Proteins in Retinas at the Onset of Degeneration” in Retinal Degenerative Diseases, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology., Ash J. D., et al. , Eds. (Springer International Publishing, 2018), pp. 289–295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Charish J., “cAMP and Photoreceptor Cell Death in Retinal Degeneration” in Retinal Degenerative Diseases, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology., Bowes Rickman C., et al. , Eds. (Springer International Publishing, 2019), pp. 301–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mossessova E., Lima C. D., Ulp1-SUMO Crystal Structure and Genetic Analysis Reveal Conserved Interactions and a Regulatory Element Essential for Cell Growth in Yeast. Molecular Cell 5, 865–876 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Volpe D. A., Hamed S. S., Zhang L. K., Use of Different Parameters and Equations for Calculation of IC50 Values in Efflux Assays: Potential Sources of Variability in IC50 Determination. AAPS J 16, 172–180 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Carragher B., et al. , Leginon: An Automated System for Acquisition of Images from Vitreous Ice Specimens. Journal of Structural Biology 132, 33–45 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zheng S. Q., et al. , MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat Methods 14, 331–332 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Rohou A., Grigorieff N., CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. Journal of Structural Biology 192, 216–221 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Scheres S. H. W., RELION: Implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. Journal of Structural Biology 180, 519–530 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Zivanov J., et al. , New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Afonine P. V., et al. , Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 74, 531–544 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Croll T. I., ISOLDE: a physically realistic environment for model building into low-resolution electron-density maps. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 74, 519–530 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Emsley P., Cowtan K., Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60, 2126–2132 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Pettersen E. F., et al. , UCSF Chimera? A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The coordinates are deposited in the Protein Data Bank with PDB IDs 8FOZ (interface-centered extended hIMPDH2-L245P), 8G8F (octamer-centered extended hIMPDH2-L245P), 8FUZ (interface-centered compressed hIMPDH2-L245P), and 8G9B (octamer-centered compressed hIMPDH2-L245P). The cryo-EM maps are deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank with IDs EMD-29357 (interface-centered extended hIMPDH2-L245P), EMD-29848 (octamer-centered extended hIMPDH2-L245P), EMD-29482 (interface-centered compressed hIMPDH2-L245P), EMD-29863 (octamer-centered compressed hIMPDH2-L245P), and EMD-29870 (octamer-centered bent hIMPDH2-L245P).