As a general theory, the benefits of probiotics to human health and the prevention of disease are promoted by metabolites, which include antimicrobial compounds, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), organic acids, and bio-actives. Probiotics are subject to investigation in clinical settings as a therapy for many diseases, in particular inflammatory diseases. Research on the health-promoting effects of probiotics is still ongoing with many recent advances made in uncovering probiotics’ roles in the modulation of the gut microbiota; anti-oxidation, anti-inflammation, and curing of protozoal diseases have been reported [1,2]. Yet, the mechanism behind this modulation has still not been fully determined. Postbiotics, an area of research linked to probiotics, was recently redefined by the International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) as “preparation of inanimate microorganisms and/or their components that confers a health benefit on the host”. A wide range of postbiotic compounds such as proteins, exopolysaccharides, SCFAs, lactic acid, dopamine, serotonin, histamines, and vitamins have been postulated to induce positive effects on gut microbiota, intestinal barrier function, and inflammatory response [3]. Due to the complex nature of host–microbiome interaction and the process of bacterial metabolism, there is still a need to investigate the molecular and biological mechanism of metabolic by-products of probiotics. Furthermore, the term ‘probiotic’ is extending to include more probiotic species next to the well-known lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria; such species are commonly referred to as next/new-generation probiotics (NGPs). NGPs have a promising effect in the amelioration of inflammatory diseases, metabolic syndrome, and obesity [4,5].
This Special Issue, “Probiotics and Their Metabolism”, presents the findings of three research papers and one review on the health benefits of some probiotics and their metabolites. Bacteria develop different metabolic pathways when they grow in mono-culture or co-culture environments. The studies currently available in the literature do not fully elaborate on how the metabolic pathways differ when bacteria grow in mono- and multi-culture environments. This is due to the challenge of modeling the growth medium, however. In a study by Ulmer et al. [6], a synthetic growth medium was developed to monitor the growth of dairy starter culture (Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus in mono- and co-cultures) and amino acid production. The results showed that amino acids release was not the same in mono- and co-cultures. The histidine levels were higher in the co-culture and there was a depletion in isoleucine and arginine.
Polyamines intake is associated with health-promoting effects and dietary intake of polyamine is not related to carcinogenesis [7]. Latilactobacillus curvatus KP 3–4 isolated from fermented Japanese product (Kabura-zushi) was found to be able to produce abundant levels of putrescine extracellularly, which suggests the probiotication of a novel food product with Latilactobacillus curvatus KP 3–4 isolate as a polyamine-producing strain [8]. P75, a Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG-derived protein, is a bioactive probiotic metabolite. In a study by Kang et al. [9], P75 carried on Bacillus spores stimulated a wide genomic response in HT-29 cells which are involved in biological processes such as epithelial cell development. In the review study, it was shown that Limosilactobacillus reuteri displayed a strain-dependent ameliorative effect on metabolic syndrome, gut dysbiosis, the gut–brain axis, and hepatic disorders. This is characterized by the metabolites of Limosilactobacillus reuteri, which include reuterin, exopolysaccharides, surface proteins, reutericyclin, and organic acids [10]. The future studies should be focused on conducting clinical trials to investigate the biological effect of combining different probiotic strains and their metabolites. In addition, there is still a gap in understanding the probiotic and NGP candidates–pathogenic bacteria interaction and how probiotics/postbiotics can disrupt the expression of virulence factors in the human gut, which are controlled by the mechanism of quorum sensing (QS) and the bacterial cell-to-cell communication that is induced by chemical molecules (auto-inducers).
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our deep gratitude to all of the authors and reviewers featured in this Special Issue who made major contributions to the issue.
Conflicts of Interest
The editors declare that there are no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Hill C., Guarner F., Reid G., Gibson G.R., Merenstein D.J., Pot B., Morelli L., Canani R.B., Flint H.J., Salminen S., et al. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014;11:506–514. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tegegne B.A., Kebede B. Probiotics, their prophylactic and therapeutic applications in human health development: A review of the literature. Heliyon. 2022;8:e09725. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Salminen S., Collado M.C., Endo A., Hill C., Lebeer S., Quigley E.M., Sanders M.E., Shamir R., Swann J.R., Szajewska H., et al. The International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of postbiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021;18:649–667. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00440-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dudík B., Greifová G., Bilka F., Bílková A. Next generation probiotics: An overview of the most promising candidates. Epidemiol. Mikrobiol. Imunol. Cas. Spol. Pro Epidemiol. A Mikrobiol. Ceske Lek. Spol. JE Purkyne. 2022;71:48–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chang C.J., Lin T.L., Tsai Y.L., Wu T.R., Lai W.F., Lu C.C., Lai H.C. Next generation probiotics in disease amelioration. J. Food Drug Anal. 2019;27:615–622. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2018.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ulmer A., Erdemann F., Mueller S., Loesch M., Wildt S., Jensen M.L., Gaspar P., Takors R. Differential Amino Acid Uptake and Depletion in Mono-Cultures and Co-Cultures of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus in a Novel Semi-Synthetic Medium. Microorganisms. 2022;10:1771. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10091771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hirano R., Shirasawa H., Kurihara S. Health-promoting effects of dietary polyamines. Med. Sci. 2021;9:8. doi: 10.3390/medsci9010008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hirano R., Kume A., Nishiyama C., Honda R., Shirasawa H., Ling Y., Sugiyama Y., Nara M., Shimokawa H., Kawada H., et al. Putrescine production by Latilactobacillus curvatus KP 3-4 isolated from fermented foods. Microorganisms. 2022;10:697. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10040697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kang S.J., Kim M.J., Son D.Y., Kang S.S., Hong K.W. Effects of spore-displayed p75 protein from Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG on the transcriptional response of HT-29 cells. Microorganisms. 2022;10:1276. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10071276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Abuqwider J., Altamimi M., Mauriello G. Limosilactobacillus reuteri in Health and Disease. Microorganisms. 2022;10:522. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10030522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]