Background
Many chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies are being developed to treat various cancers. Five such therapies have been approved by regulatory agencies for blood cancers unresponsive to other treatments, such as B-cell acute lymphoid leukemia [1], B-lymphoma (diffuse large B-cell [2] and mantle cell lymphoma [3]), and multiple myeloma [4]. These therapies must be subjected to robust quality controls to ensure the safety of each batch and the final product. Considering high inter-donor or patient variability, a quality control strategy would help the Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) manufacturers to optimize and standardize their manufacturing processes, guaranteeing their reproducibility [5]. We need to quantify the potency of CAR T-cells using validated assays and good laboratory practices (GLP) before entering into pilot clinical trials (phase 3) to register for the ATMP.
The European Medicine Agency (EMA) defines potency as the measure of biological activity (target-specific cytotoxicity of CAR T-cells) using a bioassay, based on the attribute of the product (target antigen), which is linked to the relevant biological properties (cytotoxicity and related effects). Biological activity is the specific ability or capacity of a product to achieve a defined biological effect [6].
CAR T-cells activate when their extracellular domain comprising a single-chain fragment variable (scFv) antibody recognizes the target cell surface antigens. The signal travels through the transmembrane domain to the intracellular CD3-zeta costimulatory domain (mainly CD28- or 4-1BB-derived domains). This TCR-like activation induces proliferation, cytokine secretion, and cytotoxicity.
To date, measuring cytotoxicity is the preferred assay to assess CAR T-cell potency, although standardized assays are currently unavailable. The 51Cr-release assay remains the gold standard to assay cytotoxicity; however, it is hazardous and almost untransferable due to 51Cr radioactivity [7]. We need to develop alternative potency assays to quantify parameters such as transgene expression, proliferative capacities, phenotype (memory vs. effector), exhaustion phenotype, the release of lytic granules (perforin or granzyme A/B), or cytokine secretion that reflect CAR T-cell cytotoxicity.
Activated immune cells degranulate and release cytolytic enzymes. This process involves the fusion of the granule membrane with the cytoplasmic membrane of the immune effector cells, resulting in surface exposure of lysosomal-associated proteins present inside the lytic granules, such as CD107a glycoprotein-1 (LAMP1). Membrane expression of CD107a represents a surrogate marker of cytotoxicity of activated and degranulating immune cells. The relationship between CD107a expression and cytotoxicity has been well established in NK cells [8–10]. CD107a flow cytometry and microscopy are used to study the cytotoxicity of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) [7, 11].
CAR T-cells can be activated using reagent-coated beads, target tumor cell lines, antigen-presenting cells (APC) [12], artificially engineered APC [13], or cell membrane-derived vesicles [14]. In this study, we developed a rapid, simple, efficient, and inexpensive assay to characterize our Interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein (IL-1RAP)-CAR T-cells [15]. We used a cell-free target, recombinant IL-1RAP (rIL-1RAP) protein coated on a substrate (96-well plates), to evaluate the cytotoxicity of IL-1RAP-CAR T-cells.
Materials and methods
Healthy donor blood samples and cell lines
We collected blood samples anonymously from healthy donors at the French Blood Center (Besançon, France) and isolated fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using Ficoll Hypaque density centrifugation (Lymphocyte separation medium, Eurobio). The donors provided written informed consent, and the study was conducted according to the ethical guidelines (Declaration of Helsinki) and approved by the local CPP-Est (France).
We cultivated K562, CCL-243™, ATCC®), and Mono-Mac-6 myeloid (ACC-124™, DSMZ®, Germany) cell lines in complete medium (RPMI1640, 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, and 100 µM penicillin/streptomycin) at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
Lentiviral construct, supernatant production, and ex vivo T-cell transduction
The CAR lentiviral construct (pSDY-iC9-IL1RAPCAR-∆CD19) (Fig. 1A) contains a procaspase-9 suicide gene safety switch, a ΔCD19 cell surface marker, and the IL-1RAP-CAR scFv sequence linked to two costimulatory domains (4-1BB and CD28) and one signaling domain (TCR-ζ). Lentiviral supernatant production has been previously described [15, 16].
We sorted healthy donor T-cells from PBMCs and activated them using CD3/CD28 microbeads (Dynabeads® CD3/CD28 CTS®, Gibco, Life Technologies). We transduced the T-cells on day 2 by adding a suspension of 105 cells (without human serum (HS)) to each well containing 150 µl of concentrated IL-1RAP lentiviral supernatant (LvSN) in a 24-well plate. CAR T-cells were then expanded until day 9 in TexMacs™ medium (Miltenyi Biotec), supplemented with 350 IU/ml IL-7 and 56 IU/ml IL-15 (Miltenyi Biotec), 8% human serum (French Blood Center, Besançon, France), and 100 µM penicillin/streptomycin (Eurobio) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 (Fig. 1B).
The transduction efficiency was established by staining CD19 with an allophycocyanin (APC)–conjugated anti-CD19 antibody (clone LT19) and CD3 VioBlue (Clone REA613) (Miltenyi Biotec) and analyzing the transduced cell using flow cytometry (BD Canto II).
IL-1RAP protein production and coating
The recombinant protein was developed and produced by Diaclone SAS (Besançon, France). The human IL-1RAP extracellular domain sequence ([Ser21 to Glu359], accession number: Q9NPH3.2) followed by a C-terminal Histag was cloned into an expression vector optimized for expression in mammalian cells. The cloning was validated by Sanger sequencing. The expression vector was transfected into CHO cells for 14 days. Purification was performed using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) with nickel Sepharose resin.
The purified product was suspended in PBS (pH 7.4, 155 mM NaCl, 8 mM Na2HPO4, and 1.8 mM KH2PO4) and sterilized using 0.2 µm filters. The purity of the final product was evaluated using SDS-PAGE. We first validated our rIL-1RAP by comparing it with the rIL-1RAP from two other suppliers (Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, USA, and ACROBiosystems, Newark, USA) using ELISA with anti-IL-1RAP monoclonal antibodies (B-L43 and B-R58) (Diaclone, Besançon, France).
The IL-1RAP protein suspended in PBS (Gibco™, Thermofisher; France) was coated overnight at different concentrations (0.01 − 10 µg/ml) on the surface of a 96-well plate (Falcon® 24-well Clear Flat Bottom TC, Corning, France) (Fig. 1C).
CD107a degranulation assay
We analyzed the results for CD107a staining with anti-CD107a-PE (BD Bioscience), anti-CD3-Pacific Blue (Miltenyi Biotec), anti-CD19-APC (Miltenyi Biotec), and anti-CD8 FITC (Diaclone) antibodies for each CAR T-cell using flow cytometry (BD Canto II, Becton Dickinson, le Pont de Claix, France). Nine days after production, we added CD107a-PE antibody to 105 cells before stimulating the CAR T-cells with coated IL-1RAP protein or co-cultured living tumor cells (K562 and/or Mono-Mac-6) for 5 h at an effector:target (E:T) ratio of 1:5 in 96-well plates. We included a negative control (human serum albumin 4% (Albunorm™, Octopharma) or the medium alone (TexMACs™, 350 IU/ml IL-7, and 56 IU/ml IL-15)) for every experiment. The cultures were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2, and for an additional 4 h in the presence of the secretion inhibitor monensin (BD GolgiStop™, BD Biosciences).
IFNγ ELISA
Culture supernatants (from the CAR T-cell co-cultures with tumor cells or rIL-1RAP) were assessed for IFNγ secretion after 6 h of co-culturing (105 CAR T-cells or T-cells at 0.5 × 106 cells/ml) using the human IFNγ ELISA kit (Diaclone, Besançon, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistical analysis
Graphical and statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad software 8.0.2 by ANOVA statistical test.
Results
Production of IL-1RAP-CAR T-cells
Our IL-1RAP-CAR LvSN transduced primary T-cells efficiently (49.93 ± 8.39%, n = 3, Fig. 1D and E) in an ex vivo production process (using IL-7 and IL-15 cytokines). The CD4/CD8 ratio in LvSN-transduced IL-1RAP-CAR T-cells is similar to that in the untransduced/cultured T-cells (7.56 ± 2.82% vs. 5.16 ± 2.45%, respectively, n = 3) (Fig. 1E).
Coated rIL-1RAP stimulates IL-1RAP-CAR T-cells, inducing cytotoxic degranulation
The purified rIL-1RAP was first validated at different coating concentrations (0, 0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 µg/ml) for CD3 + /CD19 + (transduced cells) and compared with the recombinant proteins from two other suppliers using CD107a staining (Fig. 2A). The rIL-1RAP was comparable to the recombinant proteins from the suppliers at different purification stages (Fig. 2B (left)). We observed a significant dose–effect (p < 0.05, n = 3) at 0.01 µg/ml and a plateau at 5 to 10 µg/ml (Fig. 2B (right)). For quality control experiments (CD107a degranulation or IFNγ assays), we used a single concentration of purified rIL-1RAP (7.5 µg/ml).
To verify whether IL-1RAP-CAR was constructed successfully and degranulated upon recognizing the coated rIL-1RAP, we indirectly checked transgene expression using ΔCD19 cell surface staining. Both transgenes are separated by a T2A sequence that allowed stoichiometric protein expression. We thus analyzed the level of CD107a in different CD19 expressing subpopulations of transduced T-cells (Fig. 2C (left)) co-cultured with varying concentrations of coated rIL-1RAP. We noted a significant difference between CD107a staining of IL-1RAP-CAR T-cells and untransduced T-cells starting at 0.1 µg/ml of rIL-1RAP independent of the CD19 transgene expression level. We also observed a positive correlation between the CD107a expression and CD19 cell surface staining in CAR T-cells (Fig. 2C (right)).
Finally, we showed that CD107a cytotoxic degranulation of CAR T-cells and untransduced T-cells after co-culturing them with rIL-1RAP (36.22 ± 18.61 vs. 1.32 ± 0.26%, respectively, n = 3) was comparable to when they were co-cultured against living Mono-Mac-6 cell line (26.58 ± 3.44 vs. 4.01 ± 1.5%, respectively, n = 3) (Fig. 2D).
Control co-cultures with IL-1RAP− K562 cell line or in the presence of albumin from human serum (HSA) did not induce cytotoxic degranulation. Gating of CD8− (i.e., CD4+) or CD8+ subpopulations showed the same results.
Induced IFNγ secretion by IL-1RAP-CAR T-cells after co-culture with coated rIL-1RAP
We showed that the coated rIL-1RAP induced a maximum IFNγ secretion at a concentration of 0.1 µg/ml in CAR T-cells, which was significantly more than the IFNγ secretion by the untransduced T-cells (p > 0.05, n = 3), with a plateau at 0.5 µg/ml (Fig. 3A). The coated rIL-1RAP comparably assesses the CAR T-cell potency as a co-culture with living IL-1RAP cell surface antigen (undetectable vs. 3557.00 ± 1559.05 pg/ml and 756.66 ± 230.89 vs. 4166.66 ± 2420.3 pg/ml for IL-1RAP protein and the Mono-Mac6 line, respectively, n = 3) does. Specific IFNγ secretion was confirmed by the absence of secretion when cells were co-cultured with HSA or only the medium (Fig. 3B).
Discussion
Assaying CAR T-cell functionality before using them clinically is essential to ensure the efficacy and safety of the drug. Implementing and standardizing such analytical assays can be difficult if cell lines are used, compromising their reproducibility. Thus, there is a need to develop a manageable, simpler, and easily reproducible method for antigen-specific stimulation of CAR T-cells. To explore CAR T-cell potency and cytotoxicity, well-characterized target cells (e.g., tumor cell lines) are used. However, cultures, especially multiple passages, may affect the health and behavior of the cells, affecting their transcriptomic activity and protein expression. We would require large-scale production and testing of cell lines, which would need to be cryopreserved. An aliquot would be defrosted each time we need to assay the CAR T-cells. Moreover, mistakes or an inversion of the cultured cell lines are unavoidable.
We hypothesized that a simple recognition interaction with the cognate antigen would stimulate CAR T-cells. Thus, we explored the use of a target antigen coated on plastic as an alternative to using cell lines expressing target antigen for studying CAR T-cell-specific stimulation and cytotoxicity. We demonstrated that the target of our third generation IL-1RAP-CAR T-cell-rIL-1RAP human protein coated on a plastic well plate—interacts and stimulates similarly the CAR T-cells just like the Mono-Mac-6 IL-1RAP+ cell line, which is known to stimulate the genetically modified IL-1RAP T-cells [16].
After engaging with the antigen, the T-cell receptor (TCR) forms an immune synapse to recruit and reorganize various membrane proteins [17] in a bullseye structure. As a result, the intracellular actors mobilize to restructure the cytoskeleton. This polarizes the endosomal compartment to form lytic granules and cytokine vesicles that activate the cytotoxic function [18]. In CAR T-cells, while the classical bullseye structure is maintained, the CAR-mediated synapses display a non-classical structure that is rapidly triggered after CAR-antigen interaction without the need for microtubule polarization. The CAR-mediated immune synapses induce cytotoxicity faster than the conventional TCR-mediated immune synapses [19, 20]. This explains why a coated protein target can stimulate a CAR T-cell without forming true physiologic immunologic synapse and can be used in an in vitro functional assay.
This technique could be helpful in transcriptomic, metabolic, or phenotypic studies of CAR T-cells. It limits the interference of nucleic acids present in target cell lines and analysis bias linked to the presence of residual tumor cells. It also avoids contamination by eliminating the need to sort CAR T-cells from the co-cultured cells [21]. Sorting cells using flow cytometry or purification columns can phenotypically alter or activate them.
In conclusion, with our IL-1RAP-CAR T-cells model, we demonstrated that a rIL-1RAP protein coated on a substrate could substitute cell lines as a target for CAR T-cells in cytotoxicity assays. This work demonstrates that this assay can be used for research practices and most importantly for QC delivery regarding potency of final CAR T-cell products, avoiding use of living cell line targets and allowing rapid results. However, the coated target protein needs to be validated at a GLP level before using it in clinical practice to test CAR T-cell potency.
Abbreviations
- APC
Antigen-presenting cells
- ATMP
Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product
- CAR
Chimeric antigen receptor
- CTL
Cytotoxic T lymphocytes
- EMA
European Medicine Agency
- E:T
Effectors:targets
- IFNγ
Interferonγ
- LvSN
Lentiviral supernatant
- PBMC
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)
- (r)IL-1RAP
(Recombinant)interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein
- ScFv
Single-chain fragment variable
- SD
Standard deviation
- TCR
T-cell receptor
Author contribution
• Conceptualization and study design: MNdR, WW, MG, MD, CF.
• Methodology, experiments, and data analysis: MNdR, WW, MG, CN, RT, LB, RH, MD, CF.
• Original draft and figures: MNdR, WW, MG.
• Recombinant Protein production: PED, CJ, PD.
• Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: MNdR, WW, MG, MD, CF.
• Overall supervision and research funding: MD, CF.
All authors reviewed the manuscript and contributed towards improving the paper.
Funding
This work was supported by the Association Nausicaa Combat sa Leucémie (nonprofit association, loi 1901 FR, Gift 2017–03, 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021); Cancéropôle du Grand Est, 2020; Association Semons l’espoir (nonprofit association—loi 1901 FR, Gift 2020–21); Ligue contre la Cancer, Comité du Doubs Montbeliard (Gift 2020–21); the MiMedi project funded by BPI France [grant no. DOS0060162/00]; the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund of the Region Bourgogne-Franche-Comte [grant no. FC0013440]; and French Blood Center, Grants 2018, 2019; EU project T2EVOLVE [grant no. 945393].
UMR1098 RIGHT is a member of the OPALE Carnot Institute.
Data availability
Raw datasets used during the current study are stored and available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
CF: consulting: Gilead. Research grant: Daiichi Sankyo
CF and MD : founders and shareholders of CanCell Therapeutics WW, CN and MNdR: employees of CanCell Therapeutics
P-EB, CJ, and PD: employees of Diaclone SAS
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Mathieu Neto Da Rocha and Melanie Guiot contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.Maude SL, Frey N, Shaw PA, Aplenc R, Barrett DM, Bunin NJ, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(16):1507–1517. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1407222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Neelapu SS, Locke FL, Bartlett NL, Lekakis LJ, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(26):2531–2544. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang M, Munoz J, Goy A, Locke FL, Jacobson CA, Hill BT, et al. KTE-X19 CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(14):1331–1342. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1914347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Munshi NC, Anderson LD, Jr, Shah N, Madduri D, Berdeja J, Lonial S, et al. Idecabtagene Vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):705–716. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lipsitz YY, Timmins NE, Zandstra PW. Quality cell therapy manufacturing by design. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(4):393–400. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.(EMA) EMA. Guideline on potency testing of cell based immunotherapy medicinal products for the treatment of cancer. 2016.
- 7.Kiesgen S, Messinger JC, Chintala NK, Tano Z, Adusumilli PS. Comparative analysis of assays to measure CAR T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Nat Protoc. 2021;16(3):1331–1342. doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-00467-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lorenzo-Herrero S, Sordo-Bahamonde C, Gonzalez S, López-Soto A. CD107a degranulation assay to evaluate immune cell antitumor activity. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1884:119–130. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8885-3_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Alter G, Malenfant JM, Altfeld M. CD107a as a functional marker for the identification of natural killer cell activity. J Immunol Methods. 2004;294(1–2):15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2004.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Aktas E, Kucuksezer UC, Bilgic S, Erten G, Deniz G. Relationship between CD107a expression and cytotoxic activity. Cell Immunol. 2009;254(2):149–154. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2008.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Olivo Pimentel V, Yaromina A, Marcus D, Dubois LJ, Lambin P. A novel co-culture assay to assess anti-tumor CD8(+) T cell cytotoxicity via luminescence and multicolor flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods. 2020;487:112899. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2020.112899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dirar Q, Russell T, Liu L, Ahn S, Dotti G, Aravamudhan S, et al. Activation and degranulation of CAR-T cells using engineered antigen-presenting cell surfaces. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(9):e0238819 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Neal LR, Bailey SR, Wyatt MM, Bowers JS, Majchrzak K, Nelson MH, et al. The basics of artificial antigen presenting cells in T cell-based cancer immunotherapies. J Immunol Res Ther. 2017;2(1):68–79. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ukrainskaya VM, Rubtsov YP, Pershin DS, Podoplelova NA, Terekhov SS, Kalinin RS, et al. Antigen-specific stimulation and expansion of CAR-T cells using membrane vesicles as target cell surrogates. bioRxiv 2021.03.18.435976. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 15.Warda W, Larosa F, Neto Da Rocha M, Trad R, Deconinck E, Fajloun Z, et al. CML hematopoietic stem cells expressing IL1RAP can be targeted by chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T cells. Cancer Res. 2019;79(3):663–75. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Warda W, Da Rocha MN, Trad R, Haderbache R, Salma Y, Bouquet L, et al. Overcoming target epitope masking resistance that can occur on low-antigen-expresser AML blasts after IL-1RAP chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy using the inducible caspase 9 suicide gene safety switch. Cancer Gene Ther. 2021 doi: 10.1038/s41417-020-00284-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Garcia E, Ismail S. Spatiotemporal regulation of signaling: focus on T cell activation and the immunological synapse. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(9):3283. doi: 10.3390/ijms21093283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Padhan K, Varma R. Immunological synapse: a multi-protein signalling cellular apparatus for controlling gene expression. Immunology. 2010;129(3):322–328. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03241.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Davenport AJ, Cross RS, Watson KA, Liao Y, Shi W, Prince HM, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells form nonclassical and potent immune synapses driving rapid cytotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(9):E2068–76 . doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716266115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Watanabe K, Kuramitsu S, Posey AD, Jr, June CH. Expanding the therapeutic window for CAR T cell therapy in solid tumors: the knowns and unknowns of CAR T cell biology. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2486. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xhangolli I, Dura B, Lee G, Kim D, Xiao Y, Fan R. Single-cell analysis of CAR-T cell activation reveals a mixed TH1/TH2 response independent of differentiation. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2019;17(2):129–139. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2019.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Raw datasets used during the current study are stored and available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.