In the published article, there was an error in Figure 3 and Figure 4 as published. In the published article, the edges between nodes were not visible (Figure 3) and the figure/text was blurry (Figures 3, 4). The corrected Figure 3 and Figure 4 and their caption appear below.
Figure 3.
Differential network analysis between BADS avoidance and activation groups shows different correlations between genera. (A) Network analysis of the top 50 genera showing the highest variation between the two conditions and visualized the results (degree, betweenness centrality, closeness centrality; p > 0.05). Network specific hub nodes are shown in bold font. (B) The differential network shows the different correlations between genera (Fisher exact test, p-adj < 0.1 BH adjusted); if genus annotation was not available, phylum and family are shown.
Figure 4.
Functional profiling analysis of oral microbiota based on BADS. Functional profiling between BADS avoidance and activation groups (A) alpha diversity (Shannon index) and (B) beta diversity (Aitchison distance). (C) Average functional profiles with an abundance >1% are shown. (D) Lysine degradations different abundance between the two conditions (ANCOM-BC, q = 0.0692).
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.