Abstract
Frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs), discovered in the last few decades for homogeneous catalysts and in the last few years also for heterogeneous catalysts, are stimulating the scientific community’s interest for their potential in small-molecule activation. Nevertheless, how an FLP activates stable molecules such as CO2 is still undefined. Through a careful spectroscopic study, we here report the formation of FLPs over a highly defective CeO2 sample prepared by microwave-assisted synthesis. Carbon dioxide activation over FLP is shown to occur through a bidentate carbonate bridging the FLP and implying a Ce3+-to-CO2 charge transfer, thus enhancing its activation. Carbon dioxide reaction with methanol to form monomethylcarbonate is here employed to demonstrate active roles of FLP and, eventually, to propose a reaction mechanism clarifying the role of Ce3+ and oxygen vacancies.
Keywords: CeO2, frustrated Lewis pair, CO2 activation, dimethyl carbonate, monomethylcarbonate
1. Introduction
Frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs) consist of a Lewis acid (LA) and a Lewis base (LB) with sterically hindered ligands that prevent these species from neutralizing each other.1,2 Historically discovered in 19423 and first named in 2010,4 FLPs were first limited to homogeneous catalysis but accessed recently for heterogeneous catalysis.1,2,5−8 In particular, CeO2 has been shown to form FLPs between two adjacent Ce3+ (LAs) and an O2– (LB) separated by an oxygen vacancy at a distance of ∼4 Å.9,10 This particular condition was shown to occur only when the surface Ce3+ concentration (>30%) ensured clustering of Ce3+–VO–Ce3+ over CeO2(101) planes.11 CeO2 FLPs improved the reactivity of alkenes and alkynes,9,10 syngas,12 and recently CO2.13,14 Considering the latter case, CO2 activation over heterogeneous catalysts occurs through an acid–base interaction with the catalyst surface, inducing the bending of the CO2 double bond and making the C atom more electrophilic.15 Zhang and co-workers predicted as CeO2 FLPs could activate CO2 through formation of bidentate carbonate, hence improving CO2 conversion toward olefins and cyclic carbonates.14 Nevertheless, the mechanism on how the FLP site activates CO2 remains unclear. Indeed, the presence and activity of FLP are very difficult to be observed since it mainly consists of missing oxygens on a catalyst surface well-known for its properties of oxygen storage and mobility.16 For this reason, an improved CO2 conversion at high temperature over Ce3+-rich CeO2 to FLP is not straightforward. To disclose details on the CO2/FLP interaction, we investigated the monomethylcarbonate (MMC) formation reaction from CO2 and CH3OH. MMC is the intermediate leading to the formation of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) through the direct reaction of CO2 and CH3OH, an environmentally friendly process due to its potential toward CO2 mitigation.17−22 This is indeed an ideal case study for studying CO2/FLP interaction since it implies CO2 whole incorporation in a new molecule (CH3O(CO2)-) at a moderate temperature (≈150 °C), which prevents CeO2 oxygen mobility, i.e., reducing the surface-to-bulk FLP mobility. Moreover, MMC formation represents the most challenging reaction step since it implies CO2 activation. As first formulated by Jung and Bell,23 the reaction usually exploits both acid and base Lewis sites over an amphoteric catalyst such as ZrO2, CeO2, or their solid solutions. Several studies showed that the presence of oxygen vacancies, induced by Zr doping of CeO2, could promote CO2 activation through carbonate formation and directly improving DMC production.24−28 Considering that pure CeO2 oxygen vacancies formed over (110) planes were predicted to form more easily bidentate carbonates however, the presence of Ce3+ in CeO2 was also directly related to catalyst deactivation.29−31 Recently, Li and co-workers reported that FLP at CeO2 improved DMC formation.32 The catalytic tests indicated a higher DMC yield for the highly reduced ceria (Ce3+ ≈ 19%), while density functional theory (DFT) modeling predicted that the Ce3+-to-CO2 charge transfer decreased the CO2 activation energy. To further investigate and clarify the role of FLP toward CO2 and CH3OH activations, we here compared MMC formation over four CeO2 samples with modulated defectivity and Ce3+ concentration, aiming to differentiate CO2 conversion between defects and FLP presence. Microwave-assisted sol–gel synthesis was employed to prepare defective CeO2 samples containing a relevant amount of Ce2O3 and Ce6O11, allowing ca. 35% of surface Ce3+ at a moderate temperature (150 °C). FLP formation was confirmed through X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) as well as Raman and infrared (IR) spectroscopies. CO2 and CH3OH activation over Ce4+/Ce3+ and FLP sites was monitored by XPS, IR, and ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectroscopies. Eventually, a reaction mechanism involving CO2/CH3OH and FLP sites is hypothesized.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Microwave-Assisted Preparation of Ceria Catalysts
CeO2 catalysts were prepared by microwave (MW)-assisted sol–gel synthesis adapted from a conventional protocol.33,34 Briefly, 1.0 g of (NH4)2[Ce(NO3)6] was dissolved in 14.5 mL of a solution containing an excess of urea (approximately 0.12 g/mL). The mixture was placed in a glass vial and heated in a monomodal MW reactor (Anton Paar Monowave Microwave 300) up to 120 °C for 1 h. The selected irradiation protocol was set to work with free power (max. 850 W) to reach the working temperature in the fastest way, maintaining 800 rpm of stirring. Urea degradation to ammonia decreased the pH solution, allowing CeO2 precipitation. The formed precipitate was recovered by means of centrifugation (1 min, 26,000 rpm) and dried for 24 h at 100 °C. The obtained yellow powder was then divided into two batches, named MW(100) and MW(650), which were dried under air for 8 h at 100 °C or calcined at 650 °C for the same time, respectively.
To investigate the possible effect of MW on the catalyst properties, a reference material was prepared by conventional sol–gel synthesis, referred to as conv(650).33,34 In this case, the 14.5 mL mixture containing the (NH4)2[Ce (NO3)6] precursor (1.0 g) and the urea excess was refluxed under stirring (approx. 100 °C, 600 rpm) for 8 h; then, the precipitate was washed with boiling deionized water, dried at 100 °C overnight, and finally calcined at 650 °C for 8 h.
2.2. Catalyst Characterization
Specific surface areas (SSAs) of CeO2 samples were determined by applying the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method to the absorption/desorption isotherms of N2 at –196 °C obtained with a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 physisorption analyzer. The adsorption/desorption isotherms were measured over a wide range of relative pressures (10–3 < p/p0 < 1). Pore size distribution was calculated applying the NL-DFT (N2, –196 °C, carbon, slit pores model) method. All of the samples underwent an activation step to remove physisorbed species from the surface while avoiding irreversible changes of the surface or the solid structure. Each sample was studied after outgassing under vacuum at 400 °C (heating ramp of 5 °C min–1) for 5 h (residual pressure as low as 10–4 mbar).
Powder X-ray diffractograms (PXRDs) were measured with a PW3050/60 X’Pert PRO MPD diffractometer from PANalytical working in Bragg–Brentano geometry, equipped with a Cu Kα1/2 X-ray source. Catalysts were measured at room temperature with a spinning zero background Si crystal sample holder, in the 10–100° 2θ range. Lattice parameters, peak intensity, and profile were refined using the Rietveld method implemented in Fullprof software.35 To prevent air contamination, PXRDs after oxidation and reduction treatments were collected in the transmission mode on sealed glass capillaries (ø = 0.3 mm) at BM31 Beamline of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) using monochromatic 46 KeV (≈0.270 Å) incident radiation.
High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) was employed to achieve morphological and structural information of all of the CeO2 samples with a side entry Jeol (Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) JEM 3010 UHR (300 kV, LaB6 filament). The samples were deposited on a Cu grid coated with a lacey carbon film. All digital micrographs were acquired by an UltraScan 1000 camera, and the images were processed by Gatan digital micrograph (Pleasanton, CA). Particle size distributions of MW(100) and MW(650) catalysts were obtained by counting a statistically representative number of particles for each sample (>350 for MW(100), >250 in the case of MW(650)). The mean particle diameter (dm) was calculated as
where ni is the number of particles of diameter di.
Differences in the CeO2 structure potentially arising from the preparation methods were investigated by means of a statistical analysis of the interplanar spacings measured on the Fourier transform (FT) of all high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) images collected for each sample. To build the spacing distribution, expressed as percentage (%), a statistically representative number of measured spacings for each sample (260 for MW(100), 335 in the case of MW(650), and 273 for conv(650)) was considered.
Fourier transform IR spectra were collected in the transmission mode using a Bruker Vertex 70 spectrometer equipped with an MCT detector in the 4000–600 cm–1 range with 2 cm–1 resolution. Samples were pressed in self-supporting pellets (ca. 10 mg/cm2) and placed in quartz IR cells suitable for thermal treatments in a controlled atmosphere and for spectra recording at room temperature (RT) and nominal liquid nitrogen temperature (LNT). Before IR measurements, catalysts underwent an activation meant to clean the catalyst surface leaving an oxidized/reduced state. In both cases, the followed protocol consisted of different steps listed here: (i) outgassing and heating the catalyst at 5 °C/min from RT to 150 °C under vacuum, (ii) heating from 150 to 400 °C (5 °C/min) under static 100 mbar of O2 to prevent CeO2 self-reduction via oxygen depletion from the surface, (iii) holding at 400 °C for 30′ changing the O2 atmosphere 3 times, and (iv) cooling under O2 until 150 °C and then evacuating. The reduced catalyst (hereafter referred to as MW(100)-red) was prepared in situ starting from the oxidized catalyst (hereafter referred to as MW(100)) just before each characterization measurement. Briefly, a pellet of MW(100) after its activation was kept in the quartz IR cell where it was heated under vacuum to 150 °C for 60 min, employing a dedicated homemade setup for activation of samples in a controlled atmosphere, i.e., avoiding any exposure to air. The pellet was then exposed to pure H2 (static, 100 mbar) at 150 °C for 30′, changing the H2 atmosphere three times. The sample was then evacuated at 150 °C for 30 min and cooled down to room temperature under vacuum.
CO, CO2, and CH3OH interactions were investigated by exposing the cleaned pellet to the molecules, with pressures of 3, 100, and 40 mbar, respectively. Spectra were treated using Bruker OPUS spectroscopy software, while CO fit was conducted using CasaXPS software, by applying a linear background and describing bands with a pure Lorentzian function.
Diffuse reflectance UV–vis spectra were collected in a Varian Cary 5000 spectrophotometer, equipped with an integrating sphere with the inner surface coated by Spectralon (the same material used as the white reference). The powders were placed in a quartz bulb cell, allowing thermal treatments. Pretreatments and CO2 interaction were performed in the same way as for the IR measurements.
Quasi-in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were carried out in an ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) spectrometer as described elsewhere.36 The spectrometer is equipped with a variable-pressure reactor allowing thermal/gas treatments of the catalyst in a controlled atmosphere and consequent transfer to the XPS analysis chamber without exposing it to air. An online differentially pumped mass spectrometer was installed in the reactor to verify potential CO production. The Al Kα line (1486.6 eV) of a dual-anode X-ray source was used as incident radiation. Survey and high-resolution spectra were recorded in constant-pass energy modes (44 and 22 eV, respectively). The C 1s peak of adventitious carbon was used as the reference for the binding energies. Catalyst activation followed the same procedure described above for IR measurements, with the only exception being operation in a flow (not static) gas atmosphere. Moreover, CO2 and CH3OH interactions with the MW(100)-red surface have been investigated at 30 and 150 °C. To minimize beam damage (see Supporting Information Section 2.1), Ce 3d peaks were measured as the first region with 30′ time/scan. Spectra fitting was performed with CasaXPS software. Due to the complex peak shape, fitting of the Ce 3d region is not straightforward. In this work, Ce 3d peak fitting was conducted applying thoughtful constraints to the peak position, full width at half-maximum, and the area following Paparazzo guidelines.37 In particular, six peaks were used for Ce(IV)O2 and four for Ce2(III)O3, named ν, ν″, ν‴, u, u″, u‴ and ν0, ν′, u0, u′, respectively, constraining their positions to a fixed spin–orbit splitting (Δs-o) of 18.5 eV. Gaussian–Lorentzian (50:50) functions were employed for describing the peak shape; the full width at half-maximum was fixed between spin–orbit couples, while the peak’s area was constrained with to respect the intercomponent peak intensity ratio, i.e., Iνn/Iun = 1.5 ± 0.1 (n = 0, ′, ″, ‴). Background was described using the spline Shirley function, while the Ce3+/Ce4+ ratio was calculated as
The O 1s region was fitted with two components (pseudo-Voight band shape) using the linear background.
Raman spectra were recorded at room temperature using (i) a Renishaw micro-Raman System 1000 with He/Cd laser (Kimmon) emitting at 325 nm and (ii) a Renishaw micro-Raman System 1000 with Ar+ laser (Spectra Physics) with 514 nm emission. Spectra were collected on self-supporting pellets contained in a homemade cell composed of a suprasil-quartz cuvette (Hellma, 2 mm optic path) sealed to a quartz tube, allowing thermal treatments. Samples were pretreated following the same activation procedure as described for the IR spectra.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Textural, Structural, and Morphological Properties of Catalysts
The CeO2 catalyst prepared by conventional synthesis (conv(650), Section 2.1) presented a low SSA (8 m2/g Table S1), while PXRD analysis revealed the presence of large crystallites in the cubic phase (Figure S1c, JCPDS file number 34-394). On the contrary, MW-assisted synthesis (MW(100) and MW(650)) allowed the precipitation of CeO2 in the cubic polymorph with much smaller crystallites (Figure S1a) and higher SSA (43 vs 75 m2/g) (Figure S2).
The results of the HR-TEM analyses carried out on both MW(100) and MW(650) catalysts are summarized in Figure 1, whereas the characterization of the conv(650) reference sample is reported in SI Section 1 (Figure S3).
Figure 1.

HR-TEM representative images of (a) MW(100) and (b) MW(650) and (c) corresponding particle size distributions (red and blue, respectively). Insets: FT of the images shown in (a) (red box) and (b) (blue box). Statistical distribution of the interplanar spacings, expressed as percentage (%), for MW(100) (d), MW(650) (e), and conv(650) (f). Instrumental magnification: 500,000×.
Overall, the MW(100) is composed of small crystalline nanoparticles, with a square shape (Figure 1a), and homogeneous in size as revealed by the particle size distribution (Figure 1, red columns), where a large fraction of nanoparticles (>65%) has size between 2.5 and 5.0 nm, which results in a mean particle diameter dm of 4.1 ± 1.2 nm. The subsequent calcination at 650 °C (Figure 1b) induced an increase of the particle size (Figure 1c, blue columns), resulting in a dm = 8.1 ± 2.2 nm. Conversely, the SSA, average pore size, and cumulative volume increased to 75 m2/g, 63 Å, and 0.08 cm3/g, respectively, after calcination at 650 °C (Table S1), possibly due to the removal of CO2 trapped in inner closed pores in MW(100) becoming accessible open pores in the MW(650) sample, hence increasing the SSA and the cumulative pore volume. Indeed, the presence of trapped CO2 in the MW(100) catalyst and its removal in MW(650) were further confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy measurements reported hereafter. Nevertheless, in agreement with PXRD results, the thermal treatment preserved the crystal structure, as demonstrated by the presence of the diffraction fringes in the HR-TEM images collected on the MW(100) and MW(650) samples. Indeed, the spacings among the diffraction fringes, obtained from the measurements of the distances in the Fourier transform (FT) of the images, revealed the presence of the (111), (200), and (220) interplanar spacings of cubic CeO2 (JCPDS file number 34-394) in all samples (Figure 1d–f). Depending on the preparation method, different relative abundances of these planes were observed. In particular, as shown in Figure 1d, the MW-assisted preparation leads to the following trend as for the relative abundances: (111) (64%) ≫ (200) (16%) ≫ (220) (3%), whereas the calcination at 650 °C of the same sample (Figure 1e) produced a strong decrease of (111) (33%), which anyway remains the most abundant, accompanied by an increase of both (200) (27%) and (220) (15%, more pronounced). The preparation by conventional heating led to intermediate relative abundances between those obtained for MW(100) and MW(650) (Figure 1f).
Moreover, besides the normal fringes due to the CeO2 cubic fluorite-like phase, other phases related to defective ceria have been detected and their relative abundance has also been reported for each sample in Figure 1. More in detail, the analysis of the FT of the images reveals the presence of 15, 24, and 13% of the (101) interplanar spacing of substoichiometric hexagonal Ce2O3 (JCPDS file number 23-1048) on MW(100), MW(650), and conv(650), respectively. The trend observed indicates that defective ceria particles are formed during preparation with the synthetic procedure, but their relative abundance is promoted by the final calcination at 650 °C of the MW-irradiated material. Interestingly, the (200) interplanar spacing due to the substoichiometric Ce6O11 monoclinic phase (JCPDS file number 32-196) was detected only in the case of MW(100). This feature can be ascribed to the effect of MW irradiation during the preparation.
3.2. Surface Oxygen Vacancy Formation
After having determined the basic structural and textural properties of the three samples, the Ce3+ content and catalyst defectivity characterizations are hereafter investigated to discuss the frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) formation.
As described in the SI (Section S2), the FTIR spectra of the four activated samples showed that the activation procedure led to clean CeO2 surfaces with isolated hydroxyl groups hereafter discussed for CH3OH and CO2 adsorption. However, a few important insights into the catalyst’s electronic and textural properties were obtained: (I) the presence/absence of the ν3(CO2)as band in MW(100) and MW(650), respectively, associated the SSA and cumulative pore volume increase after calcination (Table S1) to the opening of closed pores containing trapped CO2;38 (II) the Ce3+ 2F5/2 → 2F7/2 electronic transition band was observed at 2127 cm–1 in MW(100) and MW(100)-red (Figure 2c), indicating the presence of Ce3+ in the two samples, being more abundant in the latter than in the former;39−41 and (III) a drastic decrease of IR transmitted light after MW(100) reduction, suggesting the formation of VO (Figure S4a), also confirmed by the observation of the Ce3+/Ce4+ charge transfer at 500–800 nm (CT) in the UV–vis spectrum (Figure S4b).42,43
Figure 2.

Raman spectra of conv(650) (dark cyan line), MW(650) (dark blue line), MW(100) (black line), and MW(100)-red (red line) measured with (a) 514 nm and (b) 325 nm laser. Details of the CeO2 F2g band for the four catalysts and position are reported in the inset of panel (a). Quartz signal from the measurement cell is marked by *. (c) Baseline-corrected Ce3+ 2F5/2 → 2F7/2 electronic transition region. FTIR raw spectra are reported in Figure S4.
A deeper insight into the catalyst defectivity and the Ce3+/Vo presence was obtained through Raman measurements, by exploiting two different laser sources (514 and 325 nm). In particular, the 514 nm source allows a precise identification (position and FWHM) of the F2g mode, while the latter enhances defect signals, being in resonance conditions with such species.44 Conv(650) presented a single sharp band at 464 cm–1 associated with the Ce–O F2g mode, confirming a not-defective CeO2 catalyst (Figure 2a). The full width at half-maximum (FMHM) band increased, and the position of this band downshifted in MW(650) < MW(100) < MW(100)-red, in line with the trends on particle sizes and Ce3+/VO concentrations. Since a smaller particle size usually implies the presence of surface Ce3+ from coordinative unsaturated sites (CUSs), their straight association with FWHM broadening and F2g shift is not trivial. Following Lee et al.,45 we calculated the catalyst (bulk) stoichiometry with eq 1
| 1 |
where the oxygen deficit “y” is calculated as a function of the Grüneiser parameter “γ” (γ = 1.24 for CeO2) and the band shift “Δω” with respect to the original band frequency “ω0” (the frequency value for conv(650) was used).46 Considering band position estimation error, the value for the oxygen deficit in MW(650) (y = 0.005) can be neglected, associating the F2g broadening and shifting (Table S2) to a direct contribution of smaller particle size and excluding any Ce3+ role. On the contrary, MW(100) already presented a considerable amount of Ce3+ (as also observed by the IR Ce3+ band and further on quantified by XPS; see Table S3), which is reflected by an oxygen deficit value of 0.01. Upon reduction (MW(100)-red), since the same crystallite size is retained (Figure S6) and a similar band broadening is measured (Table S2), the shift of the F2g position could be directly related to the different Ce3+ abundance (y = 0.02). The F2g band was the only one observed on conv(650); conversely, the microwave-prepared samples, i.e., MW(100/650), presented a wealth of bands, all indicating a local distortion of the ideal cubic CeO8 environment (Figure 2a). The bands at 252 and 404 cm–1 are related to second-order transverse acoustic vibrations previously associated with the CeO2(111) surface longitudinal and transverse Ce–O stretching.47 Their intensity increases from MW(100) to MW(650), in line with the higher surface-to-bulk ratio contribution. Parallelly, we observed two more bands at 590 and 1172 cm–1 associated with second-order transverse and longitudinal optical transitions, respectively. The I590/IF2g ratio is more clearly observed in the UV–Raman spectra (Figure 2b) and it is often reported as CeO2 defect-meter. However, its quantitative evaluation was not possible due to the convoluted presence of quartz signals from the Raman cell, confirmed by the band at 808 cm–1. Nevertheless, it was qualitatively observed that the surface defectivity increases from conv(650) to MW(650), reaching and being the highest for MW(100) samples. Moreover, with resonant-Raman (Figure 2b), we clearly distinguished a band at 489 cm–1 in the MW(100) samples. The band was previously associated with Ce3+ in the second coordination sphere of an oxygen vacancy,47 hence indicating a higher concentration of VO in these samples, in line with the major F2g Ce3+-induced shift and Ce3+ 2F5/2 → 2F7/2 electronic transition observed in Figure 2a,c, respectively.
To selectively quantify Ce3+ formed at the catalyst surface, XPS spectra were collected after CeO2 oxidation and reduction at the same temperatures exploited in the previous measurements. Important differences around 885 and 905 eV, where the most intense transitions of Ce3+ are located, have been observed in MW(100) and MW(100)-red.37 The two spectra, as well as all of the other spectra reported hereafter, were fitted by ten components, six associated with Ce4+ transitions and four with Ce3+.37 After a careful evaluation of Ce3+ induced by beam damage (see SI Section 2.1 and Figure S7), we observed that 14% of Ce3+ was already present on MW(100) (Figure 3c), in agreement with the presence of the Ce2O3 phase observed by TEM (Figure 1), while Ce3+ increased to 35% after H2 treatment (Figure 3a). Even if the Ce3+/Ce4+ ratio has often been evaluated also from O 1s spectra, other surface species observed by IR spectroscopy might contribute to this spectral region. We then described the O 1s region considering two contributions: a first one at 529.7 eV related to the lattice CeO2 oxygen (OL) and a second one at a higher energy (≈531 eV), namely, Oβ, potentially originating from a complex convolution of all of the other species, i.e., OH(Ce4+), OH(Ce3+), CO3=, and O close to VO (OVo).48−50 Since both C 1s (Figure S8) and ex situ IR spectra collected under the same activation conditions did not show an important variation in carbonates and hydroxyl species (the latter actually decrease after reduction, Figure S4b), we can associate the increase of Oβ in MW(100)-red O 1s spectra (Figure 3b) with a variation of oxygen electronic configuration, i.e., an increase of the surrounding VO.
Figure 3.
Ex situ (a, c) Ce (3d) and (b, d) O (1s) XPS experimental spectra (red circles) and best fit (black line) of (c, d) MW(100) and (a, b) MW(100)-red. Ce4+/OL and Ce3+/Oβ components are indicated by yellow and gray bands, respectively.
3.3. On the Nature and Strength of Ce3+–VO Sites
After having exploited both bulk and surface-sensitive techniques to probe Ce3+ and defect sites, CO chemisorption at LNT (nominal temperature of −193 °C) and monitored by IR spectroscopy was employed to investigate the first surface-layer oxidation state and geometry and to qualitatively evaluate surface Ce3+ abundance. As described in SI Section 2.2.1, the CO stretching vibration is influenced by the electron-donor/-acceptor behavior of the surface. First of all, CO interacting with hydroxyl groups was not observed in any of the catalysts, as shown by the unaltered ν(OH) band after CO adsorption (Figure S9). This implies that the OH might have a basic character and/or are not accessible to the CO probe. IR spectra collected at increasing CO partial pressure at LNT over conv(650) (Figure 4a) showed a single band at 2154 cm–1, indicating the presence of nondefective Ce4+ sites and a weak band at 2101 cm–1 associated with 13CO contribution since ν(13CO–Ce+4)/ν(12CO–Ce+4) ≈ 0.976.51 Moving to MW(650) (Figure 4b), an extra band at higher wavenumbers (≈2171 cm–1) is observed, related to Ce4+ coordinative unsaturated sites (CUSs), i.e., kink and edge sites.39,52,53 CO adsorption over MW(100) (Figure 4c) shows (I) a band at 2181 cm–1 related to CUS sites, blue-shifted with respect to MW(650), suggesting sites with a higher degree of unsaturation/stronger Lewis acidity; (II) a main band at 2159 cm–1 related to platelike Ce4+ sites (and its satellite 13CO contribution at 2108 cm–1); and (III) a weaker band at 2131 cm–1 assigned to CO–Ce3+, in agreement with its back-donating character and literature results.39,53 Eventually, MW(100)-red gives rise to a different situation (Figure 4d), not only in terms of spectra components but also in terms of their intensities (spectra were collected on the same pellet, so intensities are quantitatively comparable). In particular, the spectra obtained on the reduced sample undergo a substantial decrease in intensity in the full mid-IR range (Figure S5a). Moreover, CO predominantly interacted with less defective Ce4+ (2154 cm–1), with a minor contribution of more defective sites (2177 cm–1), and the Ce3+/Ce4+ intensity ratio increased by three times (Figure S10), highlighting the higher abundance of reduced metal sites. Due to their consumption, Ce4+ CUS sites originating the 2181 cm–1 band in MW(100) then act as precursors for the reduction of Ce4+ to Ce3+ at 150 °C in H2. Moreover, CO interaction with the MW(100)-red Ce3+ sites occurs at a lower coverage with respect to MW(100), suggesting a stronger interaction in the former compared to the latter.
Figure 4.
Difference IR spectra of CO increasing partial pressure at LNT over (a) conv(650), (b) MW(650), (c) MW(100), and (d) MW(100)-red. The CO partial pressure increases from the gray to the colored line. The spectrum of the material prior to interaction with CO has been subtracted. For the sake of brevity, the IR band assignment has been omitted in the main text and is reported in the SI.
3.4. CH3OH and CO2 Activation over Ce3+/VO and FLP
The evaluated surface and bulk Ce3+ content and the defectivity confirmed that MW(100)-red presented sufficient Ce3+/VO sites on its surface to hypothesize the formation of FLP. However, Ce3+/VO clusters should be clustered over CeO2 (110) planes to affect small-molecule activation, e.g., CO2 adsorption as a reactive carbonate.9,14 Methanol and carbon dioxide absorption was then studied by FTIR to corroborate this point. Since their adsorption over CeO2 catalysts is well documented in the literature, the band assignment is thoughtfully described in SI Sections 2.2.2 and 2.2.3. After methanol adsorption (Figure 5a) over the CeO2 samples, besides the formation of the usual methoxide species (terminal, bibridged, and tribridged, described in SI section 2.2.2), we observed a band located at 1073 cm–1 over the MW(100)-red sample (Figure 5a red line), associated with a methoxide group bridging two Ce3+ atoms without interacting with the VO (b′-OCH3), as sketched in Figure 5 (blue panel). Indeed, the CeO2 reduction process is well-known to cause a blue-shift of b-OCH3 ν(CO) due to different charge delocalizations over the methoxide oxygen atom, i.e., Ce3+ polarizes and delocalizes less than Ce4+, causing an increase of the C–O bond order and shifting ν(CO) to higher energies.54 Moreover, MW(100)-red presented a lower m-OCH3/b-OCH3 intensity ratio than the ideal one (2:1) as occurs for the other catalysts, unveiling a preferential reduction of (100) and (110) faces, where b-OCH3 are more stable. The preferential reduction of (110) planes, coupled with the observed CO–Ce3+ strong interaction (see Section 3.3) and the high Ce3+ concentration (>30%), confirmed Ce3+–VO clustering over the desired plane to form frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs).55 It is noteworthy that the Ce3+ electronic transition at 2127 cm–1 was not modified by methanol adsorption (Figure 7c), suggesting, as confirmed below by XPS (vide infra), that b′-OCH3 formation did not modify the cerium oxidation state.
Figure 5.
Difference IR spectra of (a) 3 mbar of methanol and (b) 100 mbar CO2 RT adsorption over conv(650) (dark cyan line), MW(650) (dark blue line), MW(100) (black line), and MW(100)-red (red line) catalysts. The spectrum of the material prior to interaction with CH3OH/CO2 has been subtracted. Sketched methoxide and carbonate species formed over CeO2 are shown in blue and purple panels, respectively. CH3OH and CO2 atoms are shown in gray, Ce3+ in red, and oxygen vacancy with black squares. The carbonate nomenclature, based on the number of cerium ions binding each carbonate oxygen atom, was taken from Vayssilov et al.;56 the apostrophe is here used to indicate carbonates considering Ce3+ presence. Full-range IR spectra are reported in the SI for the sake of clarity in Figures S12 and S14.
Figure 7.

(a) Difference IR spectra of conv(650) (dark cyan line), MW(650) (dark blue line), MW(100) (black line), and MW(100)-red (red line). Spectra of each CO3–CeO2 component have been subtracted. CH3O-MW(650) (gray line) and CO3-MW(650) (brown line) components are shown for clarity. (b–e) FTIR spectra evolution of adsorption of methanol (3 mbar) over (b) conv(650), (c) MW(650), (d) MW(100), and (e) MW(100)-red previously exposed to 100 mbar of CO2. Adsorption time evolution goes from the gray line to the colored line. The full range of the as-measured spectra is reported in Figure S18.
Parallelly, after CO2 and 13CO2 adsorption (carefully described in SI Section 2.2.3), on the basis of a direct comparison with the most recent literature,56 we restricted the formed carbonates to four bidentate species (named after Vayssilov et al.56) sketched in Figure 5 for clarity (purple panel). Moreover, on MW(100)-red catalysts, we observed that CO2 adsorption caused a (I) consumption of Ce3+ electronic transition at 2127 cm–1, suggesting a Ce3+/CO2 electronic interaction (Figures 7a, S14d and S15b); and (II) a higher carbonate-to-bicarbonate ratio with respect to the other catalysts (Figure 5b), indicating, as rationalized hereafter, an increase of the 1.21′ carbonate associated with the higher Ce3+/VO content.
The Ce3+/CO2 electronic interaction was further confirmed by comparing UV–Vis (Figure S17a) and XPS spectra of MW(100)-red before (purple line) and after (dark red line) interaction with CO2 (Figure 7a,c). Both measurements showed a decrease of (I) Ce3+/Ce4+ CT (Figure S17a) and (II) Ce3+(3d) peaks after CO2 adsorption at RT and 30/150 °C, respectively. Moreover, the CO signal detected during CO2 interaction in the latter measurement (Figure S20) did not show any significant variation. In addition, O 1s XPS peaks (Figure S17b) showed that OL and Oβ signals did not undergo a considerable variation after CO2 adsorption, suggesting that the latter did not modify the O electronic reconfiguration that occurred after reduction (vide supra), meaning that the formed carbonate did not fill the VO, as instead previously hypothesized.24
Through these observations, it is deduced that the Ce3+/CO2 electronic interaction must then occur through the formation of a negatively charged carbonate, allowing Ce3+-to-CO2 charge redistribution, preventing VO occupation (Figure 6). Even if by IR measurements it was not possible to isolate a single carbonate between the four reported in Figure 5, coupling IR with UV–Vis and XPS results, we observed that the b-CO3=/hCO3– ratio increased parallel to the Ce3+ content in the order MW(100)-red > MW(100) > MW(650) > conv (650). Considering then that (I) only one of the four carbonates identified in Figure 5 implied CO3= formed over Ce3+/VO; (II) bidentate carbonate abundance increased with the Ce3+ content; (III) Ce3+ fingerprints, i.e., the IR 2127 cm–1 band, Ce3+/Ce4+ UV–Vis CT, and Ce3+(3d) peaks have been consumed after CO2 adsorption; and (IV) VO/CO2 interaction was not observed by O 1s spectra, we can hypothesize that the carbonate 1.21′ concentration increased with the Ce3+ content reaching the highest concentration over MW(100)-red. Indeed, this bidentate carbonate would allow Ce3+-to-CO2 charge redistribution without filling the oxygen vacancy. Moreover, it is noteworthy that this carbonate species, hypothesized by combining the experimental IR data of this work with theoretical results reported in the literature, perfectly matches that expected in the case of CO2 adsorbed over FLP sites (Figure 6).14,56
Figure 6.
Sketched CO2 (brown) and CH3OH (green) reaction over the CeO2 surface with Ce4+ (black), Ce3+ (red), VO (red squares), and FLP (blue circle) to form MMC.
To verify the effective CO2 and CH3OH activation over FLP, we exploited their reactivity to form monomethylcarbonate (MMC), by studying the CO2/CH3OH chemical interaction with the CeO2 surface previously saturated with methoxide (CH3O–CeO2) or carbonate (CO3–CeO2) species, respectively. The presence of Ce3+ alone should indeed hamper MMC formation,29,30 while clustered Ce3+/VO forming an FLP is expected to improve the CO2 reactivity.32 A preliminary comparison between CO3-MW(650) and CH3O–MW(650) (taken for simplicity as reference spectra) and the spectral differences of CO3–CeO2 after CH3OH adsorption (Figures 7a and S19a) indicated a consumption of b-CO3= and hCO3– species and formation of methoxide vibrations. The spectra time evolution (Figures 7b–e and S19b–e) confirmed that the intensity of CO3= and hCO3– bands located at 1300, 1364, and 1576 cm–1 decreased. Carbonate consumption was followed by the formation of m-OCH3 and t-OCH3 modes at 1034 and 1103 cm–1 (Figures 7b–e and S20) and at 2804 and 2812 cm–1 (Figure S19 b–e), respectively (see Table S5 for a detailed band assignment). The former intensity rapidly decreased, while the latter increased. Besides the m-OCH3 → t-OCH3 interchange, we observed the appearance of different bands at around 1195, 1333, 1454, 1600 cm–1 (Figures 7b–e and S20) and 2887, 2956 cm–1 (Figure S19 b–e), indicating the formation of MMC (see Table S5 for a detailed band assignment). The kinetic evolution of the bands indicates that m-OCH3 reacts with CO3= species to form MMC, while Ce4+–O sites available after m-OCH3 consumption are covered by t-OCH3 species.19 In parallel to MMC band formation, we observed the growth of three bands at around 1360, 1630, and 2942 cm–1 related to formate (HCOO–).56 The appearance of formate species can be related to methanol dehydrogenation and to the parallel ceria reduction.57−61 It is noteworthy that both HCOO– and MMC bands’ formation kinetics (Figures 7b–e and S10 b–e) and their final intensities (Figures 7a and S19a) were very similar for all of the samples. As will be clarified hereafter, the absence of differences between the samples is associated with the Ce3+ content, which was reduced through 1.21′ carbonate formation.
To monitor Ce3+–VO evolution during CO2 and CH3OH adsorption sequence, XPS spectra were collected at 30 °C (Figure 8b,d). Ce3+ peaks decreased after CO2 adsorption (Figure 8b dark red line) and increased upon interaction with CH3OH (Figure 8b blue line). While the former was described above and associated with Ce3+ partial reoxidation due to 1.21′ carbonate formation, the latter can be associated either with Ce4+ reduction caused by methanol-to-formate oxidation or with MW(100) beam damage (see SI Section 2.1).59−61 Since both effects were observed, it is difficult to ascribe Ce reduction to one of them.
Figure 8.
Ex situ (a, c) Ce3+ FTIR 2F5/2 → 2F7/2 band and (b, d) Ce 3d XPS experimental spectra of the MW(100)-red catalyst (red line) after interaction with (a, b) CO2 (dark red line) followed by CH3OH (blue line) and (c, d) CH3OH (orange line), followed by CO2 (yellow line). Most Ce3+ fingerprints are indicated with arrows.
While the formed carbonates did not show major changes in the reactivity with methanol, the reverse interaction, i.e., CO2 interacting with a surface rich in methoxide species, showed a different behavior. As for the previous case, a qualitative analysis of the difference spectra obtained upon CO2 adsorption over CH3O–CeO2 samples (Figures 9a and S22a) indicated consumption of methoxide species (1103, 1034, 2804, and 2812 cm–1) and parallel formation of carbonates (1300, 1364, and 1576 cm–1), MMC (1195, 1333, 1454, 1600, 2887, and 2956 cm–1), and formates (1360, 1630, and 2942 cm–1) (see Table S5 for the detailed band assignment).19,55,56 The spectra evolution of the four samples (Figures 9b–e and S22b–e) indicated a rapid formation of carbonates, in line with their quick adsorption kinetic.19 Carbonate adsorption is however limited by the slower rise of MMC and formate vibrations parallel to the consumption of m-OCH3. While in the previous scenario (i.e., CO2 adsorbed over CH3O–CeO2) relevant differences were not observed, in this case, the spectra difference (Figures 9a and S22a) and their kinetic evolution (Figures 9b–e and S22b–e) indicated major variations coupled with the Ce3+ content. First, conv(650) and MW(650) were very similar, indicating that the different surface defectivity did not affect the MMC formation rate. Contrarily, on MW(100) and MW(100)-red, the spectra evolution presented mostly carbonates in the former and more MMC in the latter. The differences in the MMC formation are clearly observable from the difference spectra where the CH3O–CeO2 spectrum was subtracted (Figures 9a and S22a). We clearly observed that MMC was almost absent in MW(100), confirming that the low Ce3+ content (≈14%) poisoned the reaction.29,30 Following these results, MW(100)-red with Ce3+ >30% should present an even lower intensity of MMC. Conversely, we observed a qualitatively higher concentration of MMC (Figure 9a) together with the consumption of b′-OCH3 species (1073 and 2789 cm–1) and a decrease of the Ce3+ 2F5/2 → 2F7/2 electronic transition (Figures 8c and S22a). These indirectly suggested a Ce3+ oxidation upon CO2 adsorption at CH3O-MW(100)-red. Additionally, Ce(3d) XPS spectra (Figure 8d) showed (I) a partial increase of Ce3+ bands after CH3OH adsorption (orange line) and (II) a Ce3+ partial consumption after subsequent CO2 adsorption (blue line). These results confirmed that Ce3+/CO2 interaction occurred even on a methoxide-rich CeO2 surface since formation of b′-OCH3 did not oxidize Ce3+ species. Additionally, the agreement between XPS and Ce3+ 2F5/2 → 2F7/2 IR transition confirmed that the latter could be used to qualitatively monitor the cerium oxidation state during reactions as we recently showed.62 FLP allowed then the parallel presence of polarized 1.21′ carbonates and b′-OCH3. The former possesses a more electrophilic carbon, while the latter is characterized by a highly polarized oxygen, overall resulting in an improved MMC formation (Figure 6). On the other hand, no differences were observed in MMC formation when CO2 was adsorbed first (Figure 7) since Ce3+ oxidation prevented further b′-OCH3 formation, hence hindering any reactivity differences. Notably, since methanol dehydrogenation occurs on Ce4+ sites, while the reverse reaction takes place on Ce3+, the presence of formate vibrational modes depends on the Ce3+ content. In line with this, formate species were observed on conv(650) and MW(650), whereas they were not detected on MW(100). In contrast, MW(100)-red presented formate vibrational modes, suggesting that the FLP site might have an active role in methanol dehydrogenation as well.
Figure 9.

(a) Difference IR spectra of conv(650) (dark cyan line), MW(650) (dark blue line), MW(100) (black line), and MW(100)-red (red line). Spectra of each CH3O–CeO2 component have been subtracted. CH3O-MW(650) (gray line) and CO3-MW(650) (brown line) components are shown for clarity. (b–e) FTIR spectra evolution of adsorption of CO2(100 mbar) over (b) conv(650), (c) MW(650), (d) MW(100), and (e) MW(100)-red previously exposed to 3 mbar of CH3OH. Adsorption time evolution goes from the gray line to the colored line. The full range of the as-measured spectra is reported in Figure S21.
4. Conclusions
In conclusion, CO2 conversion to MMC was investigated over four CeO2 samples with different defects and Ce3+ contents. The defectivity was observed to increase as conv(650) < MW(650) < MW(100) ≈ MW(100)-red, while Ce3+ increased as conv(650) ≈ MW(650) < MW(100) < MW(100)-red. The four samples presented different SSAs, which affected their spectroscopic transparency, however, without presenting a correlation with CO2 and CH3OH activations. Contrarily, the presence of defects without Ce3+ (MW650) improved the surface reactivity toward MMC with respect to a sample not presenting defects (conv(650)). The parallel presence of defects and Ce3+ <30% (MW(100)) hindered MMC formation, indicating that isolated Ce3+ sites do not favor the reaction. On the contrary, in the case of defects and Ce3+ >30% (MW(100)-red), MMC formation was higher than in MW(100) and associated with the presence of frustrated Lewis pairs. FLP formation was logically concluded after having observed (I) Ce3+ ≈ 35%, (II) Ce3+–VO-rich (110) planes, (III) formation of b′-OCH3 after CH3OH adsorption, and (IV) abundant 1.21′ carbonate upon CO2 adsorption. Moreover, Ce3+ consumption following CO2/FLP interaction indicated the formation of a polarized 1.21′ carbonate where the carbon atom is more electrophilic. Contrarily, CH3OH/FLP interaction occurs without Ce3+ consumption through the formation of b′-OCH3, where the oxygen atom is more nucleophilic. A mechanism describing 1.21′ carbonate and b′-OCH3 parallel formation and interaction is proposed. Additionally, a possible role of FLP in methanol dehydrogenation to formate species was suggested. The involvement of FLP in the formation of formates will be further investigated in the future. Lastly, we reported that the Ce3+ IR band occurring at 2127 cm–1 can be easily used to track the Ce oxidation state.
Acknowledgments
D.S. is grateful to Dr. S. Morandi for scientific discussion and Dr. Dinkai Chen for support with XPS measurements. Dr. D. Stoian and Dr. V. Van Beek from SNBL Beamline BM31 (ESRF) are acknowledged for support during PXRD measurements.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.2c22122.
All of the raw IR and XPS spectra (PDF)
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Stephan D. W. Frustrated Lewis Pairs: From Concept to Catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 306–316. 10.1021/ar500375j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stephan D. W.; Erker G. Frustrated Lewis Pairs: Metal-Free Hydrogen Activation and More. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 46–76. 10.1002/anie.200903708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown H. C.; Adams R. M. Studies in Stereochemistry. I. Steric Strains as a Factor in the Relative Stability of Some Etherates of Boron Fluoride. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1942, 64, 2557–2563. 10.1021/ja01263a009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- McCahill J. S. J.; Welch G. C.; Stephan D. W. Reactivity of “Frustrated Lewis Pairs”: Three-Component Reactions of Phosphines, a Borane, and Olefins. Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 5056–5059. 10.1002/ange.200701215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Welch G. C.; Juan R. R. S.; Masuda J. D.; Stephan D. W. Reversible, Metal-Free Hydrogen Activation. Science 2006, 314, 1124–1126. 10.1126/science.1134230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pérez M.; Mahdi T.; Hounjet L. J.; Stephan D. W. Electrophilic Phosphonium Cations Catalyze Hydroarylation and Hydrothiolation of Olefins. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 11301–11304. 10.1039/c5cc03572d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stephan D. W. The Broadening Reach of Frustrated Lewis Pair Chemistry. Science 2016, 354, aaf7229 10.1126/science.aaf7229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stephan D. W.; Erker G. Frustrated Lewis Pair Chemistry: Development and Perspectives. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6400–6441. 10.1002/anie.201409800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang S.; Huang Z. Q.; Ma Y.; Gao W.; Li J.; Cao F.; Li L.; Chang C. R.; Qu Y. Solid Frustrated-Lewis-Pair Catalysts Constructed by Regulations on Surface Defects of Porous Nanorods of CeO2. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15266 10.1038/ncomms15266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang Z. Q.; Liu L. P.; Qi S.; Zhang S.; Qu Y.; Chang C. R. Understanding All-Solid Frustrated-Lewis-Pair Sites on CeO2 from Theoretical Perspectives. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 546–554. 10.1021/acscatal.7b02732. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nolan M.; Parker S. C.; Watson G. W. The Electronic Structure of Oxygen Vacancy Defects at the Low Index Surfaces of Ceria. Surf. Sci. 2005, 595, 223–232. 10.1016/j.susc.2005.08.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huang Z. Q.; Li T. H.; Yang B.; Chang C. R. Role of Surface Frustrated Lewis Pairs on Reduced CeO2(110) in Direct Conversion of Syngas. Chin. J. Catal. 2020, 41, 1906–1915. 10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63627-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lim C. H.; Holder A. M.; Hynes J. T.; Musgrave C. B. Roles of the Lewis Acid and Base in the Chemical Reduction of CO 2 Catalyzed by Frustrated Lewis Pairs. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 10062–10066. 10.1021/ic4013729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang S.; Xia Z.; Zou Y.; Cao F.; Liu Y.; Ma Y.; Qu Y. Interfacial Frustrated Lewis Pairs of CeO2 Activate CO2 for Selective Tandem Transformation of Olefins and CO2 into Cyclic Carbonates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 11353–11357. 10.1021/jacs.9b03217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Álvarez A.; Borges M.; Corral-Pérez J. J.; Olcina J. G.; Hu L.; Cornu D.; Huang R.; Stoian D.; Urakawa A. CO2 Activation over Catalytic Surfaces. ChemPhysChem 2017, 18, 3135–3141. 10.1002/cphc.201700782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Montini T.; Melchionna M.; Monai M.; Fornasiero P. Fundamentals and Catalytic Applications of CeO2-Based Materials. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 5987–6041. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamboli A. H.; Chaugule A. A.; Kim H. Catalytic Developments in the Direct Dimethyl Carbonate Synthesis from Carbon Dioxide and Methanol. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 323, 530–544. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang M.; Xu Y.; Williams B. L.; Xiao M.; Wang S.; Han D.; Sun L.; Meng Y. Catalytic Materials for Direct Synthesis of Dimethyl Carbonate (DMC) from CO2. J. Cleaner Prod. 2021, 279, 123344 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123344. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jung K. T.; Bell A. T. An in Situ Infrared Study of Dimethyl Carbonate Synthesis from Carbon Dioxide and Methanol over Zirconia. J. Catal. 2001, 204, 339–347. 10.1006/jcat.2001.3411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tamboli A. H.; Suzuki N.; Terashima C.; Gosavi S.; Kim H.; Fujishima A. Direct Dimethyl Carbonates Synthesis over CeO2 and Evaluation of Catalyst Morphology Role in Catalytic Performance. Catalysts 2021, 11, 223 10.3390/catal11020223. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Santos B. A. V.; Pereira C. S. M.; Silva V. M. T. M.; Loureiro J. M.; Rodrigues A. E. Kinetic Study for the Direct Synthesis of Dimethyl Carbonate from Methanol and CO2 over CeO2 at High Pressure Conditions. Appl. Catal., A 2013, 455, 219–226. 10.1016/j.apcata.2013.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xie S.; Bell A. T. An in Situ Raman Study of Dimethyl Carbonate Synthesis from Carbon Dioxide and Methanol over Zirconia. Catal. Lett. 2000, 70, 137–143. 10.1023/A:1018837317910. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jung K. T.; Bell A. T. An in Situ Infrared Study of Dimethyl Carbonate Synthesis from Carbon Dioxide and Methanol over Zirconia. J. Catal. 2001, 204, 339–347. 10.1006/jcat.2001.3411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu B.; Li C.; Zhang G.; Yao X.; Chuang S. S. C.; Li Z. Oxygen Vacancy Promoting Dimethyl Carbonate Synthesis from CO2 and Methanol over Zr-Doped CeO2 Nanorods. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 10446–10456. 10.1021/acscatal.8b00415. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stoian D.; Medina F.; Urakawa A. Improving the Stability of CeO2 Catalyst by Rare Earth Metal Promotion and Molecular Insights in the Dimethyl Carbonate Synthesis from CO2 and Methanol with 2-Cyanopyridine. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 3181–3193. 10.1021/acscatal.7b04198. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tomishige K.; Furusawa Y.; Ikeda Y.; Asadullah M.; Fujimoto K. CeO2-ZrO2solid Solution Catalyst for Selective Synthesis of Dimethyl Carbonate from Methanol and Carbon Dioxide. Catal. Lett. 2001, 76, 71–74. 10.1023/A:1016711722721. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu B.; Li C.; Zhang G.; Yan L.; Li Z. Direct Synthesis of Dimethyl Carbonate from CO2 and Methanol over CaO-CeO2 Catalysts: The Role of Acid-Base Properties and Surface Oxygen Vacancies. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 12231–12240. 10.1039/c7nj02606d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen L.; Wang S.; Zhou J.; Shen Y.; Zhao Y.; Ma X. Dimethyl Carbonate Synthesis from Carbon Dioxide and Methanol over CeO2versus over ZrO2: Comparison of Mechanisms. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 30968–30975. 10.1039/c4ra03081h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Aresta M.; Dibenedetto A.; Pastore C.; Cuocci C.; Aresta B.; Cometa S.; De Giglio E. Cerium(IV)Oxide Modification by Inclusion of a Hetero-Atom: A Strategy for Producing Efficient and Robust Nano-Catalysts for Methanol Carboxylation. Catal. Today 2008, 137, 125–131. 10.1016/j.cattod.2008.04.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Aresta M.; Dibenedetto A.; Pastore C.; Angelini A.; Aresta B.; Pápai I. Influence of Al2O3 on the Performance of CeO2 Used as Catalyst in the Direct Carboxylation of Methanol to Dimethylcarbonate and the Elucidation of the Reaction Mechanism. J. Catal. 2010, 269, 44–52. 10.1016/j.jcat.2009.10.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Marciniak A. A.; Henrique F. J. F. S.; de Lima A. F. F.; Alves O. C.; Moreira C. R.; Appel L. G.; Mota C. J. A. What Are the Preferred CeO2 Exposed Planes for the Synthesis of Dimethyl Carbonate? Answers from Theory and Experiments. Mol. Catal. 2020, 493, 111053 10.1016/j.mcat.2020.111053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li L.; Liu W.; Chen R.; Shang S.; Zhang X.; Wang H.; Zhang H.; Ye B.; Xie Y. Atom-Economical Synthesis of Dimethyl Carbonate from CO2: Engineering Reactive Frustrated Lewis Pairs on Ceria with Vacancy Clusters. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202214490 10.1002/anie.202214490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trovarelli A.Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials; World Scientific, 2002; Vol. 2. [Google Scholar]
- Manzoli M.; Menegazzo F.; Signoretto M.; Cruciani G.; Pinna F. Effects of Synthetic Parameters on the Catalytic Performance of Au/CeO2 for Furfural Oxidative Esterification. J. Catal. 2015, 330, 465–473. 10.1016/j.jcat.2015.07.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rodríguez-Carvajal J.Recent Developments of the Program Fullprof Newsletter in Commission on Powder Diffraction (IUCr); International Union of Crystallography, 2001.
- Luo W.; Zafeiratos S. Tuning Morphology and Redox Properties of Cobalt Particles Supported on Oxides by an in between Graphene Layer. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 14130–14139. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03595. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Paparazzo E. Use and Mis-Use of x-Ray Photoemission Spectroscopy Ce3d Spectra of Ce2O3 and CeO2. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2018, 30, 343003 10.1088/1361-648x/aad248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Batool T.; Bukhari B. S.; Riaz S.; Batoo K. M.; Raslan E. H.; Hadi M.; Naseem S. Microwave Assisted Sol-Gel Synthesis of Bioactive Zirconia Nanoparticles – Correlation of Strength and Structure. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2020, 112, 104012 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bozon-Verduraz F.; Bensalem A. IR Studies of Cerium Dioxide: Influence of Impurities and Defects. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1994, 90, 653–657. 10.1039/FT9949000653. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Binet C.; Badri A.; Lavalley J. C. A Spectroscopic Characterization of the Reduction of Ceria from Electronic Transitions of Intrinsic Point Defects. J. Phys. Chem. A 1994, 98, 6392–6398. 10.1021/j100076a025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y.; Bi F.; Wang Y.; Jia M.; Tao X.; Jin Y.; Zhang X. MOF-Derived CeO2 Supported Ag Catalysts for Toluene Oxidation: The Effect of Synthesis Method. Mol. Catal. 2021, 515, 111922 10.1016/j.mcat.2021.111922. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guo M.; Lu J.; Wu Y.; Wang Y.; Luo M. UV and Visible Raman Studies of Oxygen Vacancies in Rare-Earth-Doped Ceria. Langmuir 2011, 27, 3872–3877. 10.1021/la200292f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schilling C.; Hess C. Real-Time Observation of the Defect Dynamics in Working Au/CeO2 Catalysts by Combined Operando Raman/UV-Vis Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 2909–2917. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b00027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wu Z.; Li M.; Howe J.; Meyer H. M.; Overbury S. H. Probing Defect Sites on CeO2 Nanocrystals with Well-Defined Surface Planes by Raman Spectroscopy and O2 Adsorption. Langmuir 2010, 26, 16595–16606. 10.1021/la101723w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee Y.; He G.; Akey A. J.; Si R.; Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M.; Herman I. P. Raman Analysis of Mode Softening in Nanoparticle CeO2−δ and Au-CeO2−δ during CO Oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 12952–12955. 10.1021/ja204479j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McBride J. R.; Hass K. C.; Poindexter B. D.; Weber W. H. Raman and X-ray Studies of Ce1–xRExO2–y, Where RE=La, Pr, Nd, Eu, Gd, and Tb. J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 76, 2435–2441. 10.1063/1.357593. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schilling C.; Hofmann A.; Hess C.; Ganduglia-Pirovano M. V. Raman Spectra of Polycrystalline CeO2: A Density Functional Theory Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 20834–20849. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b06643. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- de Oliveira Jardim E.; Rico-Francés S.; Coloma F.; Ramos-Fernández E. V.; Silvestre-Albero J.; Sepúlveda-Escribano A. Superior Performance of Gold Supported on Doped CeO2 Catalysts for the Preferential CO Oxidation (PROX). Appl. Catal., A 2014, 487, 119–129. 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.09.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- López J. M.; Gilbank A. L.; García T.; Solsona B.; Agouram S.; Torrente-Murciano L. The Prevalence of Surface Oxygen Vacancies over the Mobility of Bulk Oxygen in Nanostructured Ceria for the Total Toluene Oxidation. Appl. Catal., B 2015, 174–175, 403–412. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.03.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen A.; Yu X.; Zhou Y.; Miao S.; Li Y.; Kuld S.; Sehested J.; Liu J.; Aoki T.; Hong S.; Camellone M. F.; Fabris S.; Ning J.; Jin C.; Yang C.; Nefedov A.; Wöll C.; Wang Y.; Shen W. Structure of the Catalytically Active Copper–Ceria Interfacial Perimeter. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 334–341. 10.1038/s41929-019-0226-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hadjiivanov K. I.; Vayssilov G. N. Characterization of Oxide Surfaces and Zeolites by Carbon Monoxide as an IR Probe Molecule. Adv. Catal. 2002, 47, 307–511. 10.1016/S0360-0564(02)47008-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bazin P.; Saur O.; Lavalley J. C.; Daturi M.; Blanchard G. FT-IR Study of CO Adsorption on Pt/CeO2: Characterisation and Structural Rearrangement of Small Pt Particles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 187–194. 10.1039/b414159h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Binet C.; Daturi M.; Lavalley J. C. IR Study of Polycrystalline Ceria Properties in Oxidised and Reduced States. Catal. Today 1999, 50, 207–225. 10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00504-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Siokou A.; Nix R. M. Interaction of Methanol with Well-Defined Ceria Surfaces: Reflection/Absorption Infrared Spectroscopy, X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, and Temperature-Programmed Desorption Study. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 6984–6997. 10.1021/jp991127h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Badri A.; Binet C.; Lavalley J. C. Use of Methanol as an IR Molecular Probe to Study the Surface of Polycrystalline Ceria. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1997, 93, 1159–1168. 10.1039/a606628c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vayssilov G. N.; Mihaylov M.; Petkov P. S.; Hadjiivanov K. I.; Neyman K. M. Reassignment of the Vibrational Spectra of Carbonates, Formates, and Related Surface Species on Ceria: A Combined Density Functional and Infrared Spectroscopy Investigation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 23435–23454. 10.1021/jp208050a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobs G.; Keogh R. A.; Davis B. H. Steam Reforming of Ethanol over Pt/Ceria with Co-Fed Hydrogen. J. Catal. 2007, 245, 326–337. 10.1016/j.jcat.2006.10.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wu Z.; Li M.; Mullins D. R.; Overbury S. H. Probing the Surface Sites of CeO 2 Nanocrystals with Well-Defined Surface Planes via Methanol Adsorption and Desorption. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 2224–2234. 10.1021/cs300467p. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mullins D. R.; Robbins M. D.; Zhou J. Adsorption and Reaction of Methanol on Thin-Film Cerium Oxide. Surf. Sci. 2006, 600, 1547–1558. 10.1016/j.susc.2006.02.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Beste A.; Mullins D. R.; Overbury S. H.; Harrison R. J. Adsorption and Dissociation of Methanol on the Fully Oxidized and Partially Reduced (1 1 1) Cerium Oxide Surface: Dependence on the Configuration of the Cerium 4f Electrons. Surf. Sci. 2008, 602, 162–175. 10.1016/j.susc.2007.10.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Matolín V.; Libra J.; Škoda M.; Tsud N.; Prince K. C.; Skála T. Methanol Adsorption on a CeO2(1 1 1)/Cu(1 1 1) Thin Film Model Catalyst. Surf. Sci. 2009, 603, 1087–1092. 10.1016/j.susc.2009.02.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Salusso D.; Mauri S.; Deplano G.; Torelli P.; Bordiga S.; Rojas-buzo S. MOF-Derived CeO 2 and CeZrO x Solid Solutions: Exploring Ce Reduction through FTIR and NEXAFS Spectroscopy. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 272 10.3390/nano13020272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






