Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2023 Mar 2;15(3):e35708. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35708

An Accessory Muscle Originating From the Hyoid Bone and Inserting Into the Sternocleidomastoid Muscle

Philippe C Breda 1,, Cristian Trache 1, Udo Schumacher 2, Thomas Graf von Rothenburg 3, Arne Böttcher 1
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC10065356  PMID: 37009382

Abstract

Irregular bellies and insertions into neck muscles have been described in the literature. To the best of our knowledge, a right accessory muscle originating from the hyoid bone and inserting into the sternocleidomastoid muscle has not been reported to date. Here, we report the case of a 72-year-old male patient with an irregular muscle originating from the lesser horn of the hyoid bone and inserting into sternocleidomastoid muscle fibers. 

Keywords: surgical anatomy, neck dissection, digastric muscle, sternocleidomastoid muscle, accessory belly, irregular muscle

Introduction

Surgical landmarks have to be borne in mind for any operation. Before the intervention, knowledge of anatomic variations is paramount for every surgeon as it might prevent severe complications. Irregular bellies and insertions into neck muscles have been described in the literature [1-5]. To the best of our knowledge, a right accessory muscle originating from the hyoid bone and inserting into the sternocleidomastoid muscle has not been reported to date. We describe our recent findings in a patient to alert surgeons to this rare variation in neck anatomy.

Case presentation

A 72-year-old male patient diagnosed with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma of the right palatine tonsil (cT1 cN1 cM0, p16+, HPV serotype 16+) underwent transoral tumor resection and modified radical neck dissection (levels I-V) on the right side, as approved after interdisciplinary tumor board consultation. Preoperative imaging included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the neck and computed tomography (CT) of the neck, chest, and abdomen. After standard presurgical preparation, we commenced a modified radical neck dissection on the right side, with a hockey stick incision reaching from the mastoid tip to the cricoid cartilage followed by lifting the skin-platysma flap. The external jugular vein was dissected, ligated, and pulled outward. During dissection toward the submandibular gland using monopolar cautery, and ligation of the facial vein to identify the posterior belly of the digastric muscle, we detected an irregular muscle (width 1.2 cm; length 5.8 cm) originating from the lesser horn of the hyoid bone and inserting into sternocleidomastoid muscle fibers in an aponeurotic manner (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Intraoperative site in the right neck: presentation of the accessory muscle (arrow) extending from the hyoid bone to the upper sternocleidomastoid muscle.

Figure 1

EJV, external jugular vein; FV, facial vein; M, metastasis; SCM, sternocleidomastoid muscle; SG, submandibular gland; SHM, sternohyoid muscle

One might have confused it with the posterior belly of the digastric muscle. After further exploration of the situs, we identified the regularly developed posterior belly of the digastric muscle underneath the accessory muscle. In addition to the intraoperative site (Figure 1), the location and route of the detected muscle could also be seen in a preoperative CT staging scan (Figure 2), a three-dimensional (3-D) CT reconstruction (Figure 3), and postoperative ultrasound scan of the patient's neck (Figure 4).

Figure 2. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan of the neck (axial view).

Figure 2

Arrow, accessory muscle; asterisk, hyoid bone

Figure 3. 3-D computed tomography reconstruction (coronal view).

Figure 3

3-D, three-dimensional; arrow, accessory muscle in the right neck; asterisk, corpus of the hyoid bone

Figure 4. Ultrasound image of the right neck displaying the extent of the entire accessory muscle.

Figure 4

Arrow, accessory muscle; SCM, sternocleidomastoid muscle; asterisk, corpus of the hyoid bone

Discussion

In the late nineteenth century, supernumerary bellies of the sternocleidomastoid muscle were described in postmortem anatomic examinations [6]. In this case report, we demonstrate a unique finding of an entire accessory neck muscle. During neck dissections, the surgeon was geared to the assumed location and route of important muscles such as the sternocleidomastoid and digastric muscles and the topography of neural and vascular structures. These structures, especially digastric and sternocleidomastoid muscles, facial veins, extra-lymphatic structures, mylohyoid muscle, and hypoglossal nerve, serve as landmarks during neck dissection [7]. Irregularities of these landmarks during neck surgery might be confused with a mass or lymph node in preoperative imaging. Therefore, surgeons should be aware of anatomic variations of neck muscles during imaging interpretation and differential diagnosis of neck masses. The occurrence of an accessory muscle, as described in this report, should be borne in mind during neck dissection to prevent damage to neurovascular structures or inadequate oncological management of levels IB, IIA, and IIB.

Conclusions

Intraoperative identification of the digastric muscle is an important step during neck dissection. The irregular accessory muscle described here is an interesting variant, and head and neck surgeons should be aware of muscular variations when dissecting the neck. As it can mimic surgical landmarks, accessory muscles in levels IB, IIA, and IIB must not be mistaken for the posterior belly of the digastric muscle to prevent damage to important structures and maintain anatomical orientation during surgery.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Ethikkommission der Ärztekammer Hamburg issued approval 2022-300230-WF. I can provide a written statement of the ethics comittee (Ethikkommission der Ärztekammer Hamburg) in the German language, which says that no ethics comittee votum or institutional review board (IRB) counseling is necessary for this case report.

References

  • 1.Anatomical variations in the digastric muscle. Hsiao TH, Chang HP. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2019;35:83–86. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anatomic study of complex anomalies of the digastric muscle and review of the literature. Sargon MF, Onderoğlu S, Sürücü HS, Bayramoğlu A, Demiryürek DD, Oztürk H. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 1999;75:305–313. doi: 10.2535/ofaj1936.75.6_305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Variation of the sternocleidomastoid muscle: a case report of three heads and an accessory head. Heo YR, Kim JW, Lee JH. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020;42:711–713. doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02388-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Duplicated posterior belly of digastric muscle and absence of omohyoid muscle: a case report and review of literature. Zhao W, Liu J, Xu J, Wang H. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37:547–550. doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1374-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Supernumerärer Bauch des Musculus sternocleidomastoideus in der Richtung des hinteren Bauches des M. digastricus maxillae inferioris und abwärts von diesem zum Os hyoides. Gruber W. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01932417 Archiv f Pathol Anat. 1885;102:538–539. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Accessory belly of digastric muscle presenting as a submandibular space mass. Bonala N, Kishan TV, Sri Pavani B, Murthy PV. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015;71:0–8. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2015.06.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Surgical landmarks of the head and neck. Lingeman RE, Shellhamer RH. Laryngoscope. 1966;76:1042–1056. doi: 10.1288/00005537-196606000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES