Abstract
Dibutyl phthalate (DBP) is a phthalate ester used as a plasticizer, and solvent. Studies using rats consistently report that DBP exposure disrupts normal development of the male reproductive system in part via inhibition of androgen synthesis. However, studies using xenograft models report that in human fetal testis DBP exposure is unlikely to impair testosterone synthesis. These results question the validity of the rat model for assessment of male reproductive effects caused by DBP. The adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework was used to evaluate the available evidence for DBP-induced toxicity to the male reproductive system. Three relevant biological elements were identified: 1) fetal rats are more sensitive than other rodents and human fetal xenografts to DBP-induced anti-androgenic effects, 2) DBP- induced androgen-independent adverse outcomes are conserved among different mammalian models and human fetal testis xenografts, and 3) DBP-induced anti-androgenic effects are conserved in different mammalian species when exposure occurs during postnatal life stages.
The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the US EPA.
Keywords: AOP, phthalates, DBP, testosterone, male reproductive
Introduction
Dibutyl phthalate (DBP) is used as a plasticizer in cellulose plastics, solvent of dyes, a softener in adhesives, lacquers, varnishes and printing inks, and it also has wide usage in cosmetics [1–3]. DBP also had limited use in polyvinyl chloride plastics during the 1970s and 1980s, but it is no longer used for this application [4]. DBP enters the environment during its use and production but can also be released from materials containing DBP as it is not covalently bound to plastic polymers [1, 2]. The largest source of DBP exposure to humans is food [2, 5, 6]. Inhalation and dermal exposure to DBP can also occur, but exposure through those routes is considered minimal [1, 2]. Within the human population, children (ages 0 to 11 years) have the highest exposure to DBP [1, 7] Phthalates are metabolized by gut lipases to monoester metabolites, which are considered the bioactive form of phthalate compounds [1, 2]. Experimental studies have shown that DBP metabolites such as monobutyl phthalate (MBP), can reach the developing fetus [1, 2, 8, 9], and phthalate metabolites have been measured in amniotic fluid in both animals and humans [10].
Previous reviews/evaluations of the available epidemiological, toxicological, and mechanistic evidence conclude that DBP exposure can result in adverse responses in the male and female1 reproductive systems [5, 8–11]. Epidemiological studies suggest that DBP exposure is associated with altered reproductive functions in adult men and androgen disruption in the developing human male fetus [11]
Most of the available toxicological evidence on DBP-induced effects in the male reproductive system comes from experimental studies using rats, an animal model considered informative of male reproductive toxicity [12, 13]. Experimental studies have shown that exposure to DBP, and other similar phthalates during pre- and postnatal life stages can affect the male reproductive system [10, 14, 15]. Gestational exposure effects include agenesis and malformations of the male reproductive system (e.g. cryptorchidism and hypospadias), reduced androgen production/levels, alterations in markers of fetal androgen production (e.g. reduced anogenital distance [AGD], nipple retention, and decreased reproductive organ weight), delayed preputial separation, and reduced fertility [2, 8–10, 16]. Studies using adult animals have also shown that male reproductive effects such as decreased testis weight, sperm production and tubular atrophy appear to be conserved in the mouse, rat, and guinea pig, but not in hamsters [1, 2, 17]. While the responses to phthalate exposures in the male reproductive system appear similar to those elicited by known androgen receptor antagonists, phthalates do not appear to interact with the rodent or human androgen receptor [18, 19]. Evidence from gestational and/or early postnatal exposure studies suggests that young animals are more sensitive to phthalate-induced testicular injury than adults [12, 14, 20–22].
Studies using fetal testis explants or xenografts2 into rat or mouse hosts were designed to evaluate the human fetal testis response to phthalates, characterize the mechanisms by which these and other types of compounds can affect the development of the male reproductive system, and identify potential species-specific differences [23, 24]. These studies report decreased responsiveness for testosterone-dependent male reproductive outcomes during the masculinization programming window3 [5, 22, 24, 25]. Although concerns in the experimental design used for human ex vivo and xenograft studies have been identified (see discussion section), overall their findings present a contrast to the associations reported in several epidemiological studies and have called into question the validity of the rat model for assessment of human male reproductive effects associated with gestational phthalate exposure [23, 25].
Evaluation of the mode(s) of action (MOA) for chemical-induced adverse effects can help identify experimental models most relevant to human health, and inform the susceptibility of the types of effects that may occur during specific life stages [9, 23, 26, 27]. A qualitative analysis of the mechanistic evidence was performed to evaluate the human relevance of effects reported in animal models. Mechanisms/pathways that are conserved across species and experimental models are considered relevant to human health [26, 28, 29]. Thus, the analysis presented here was focused on a qualitative comparison of the available evidence from in vivo, ex vivo, xenograft, and cell culture models to determine species concordance of key events4 and adverse responses activated with DBP exposure.
Mechanism of action for DBP-induced male reproductive effects.
The mechanisms by which DBP exposure leads to alterations in the development and function of the male reproductive system has been evaluated by authoritative organizations and various research groups5. Analyses of the mode(s) of action for DBP-induced male reproductive effects has also relied primarily on evidence obtained from rat experiments (E.g. [8, 12]). A brief description of the established pathways by which DBP and other similar phthalates cause adverse effects in the male reproductive system is presented below. This narrative relies on previous analyses/reviews of the mechanisms by which DBP and other phthalates cause adverse effects in the male reproductive system.
Effects resulting from exposure during gestation
Gestational development of the male reproductive system is mediated by hormones produced in Leydig cells [LC] during the masculinization programming window [30]. Testosterone regulates development of both internal and external genitalia while insulin-like growth factor 3 (INSL3) regulates the initial descent of the testis to the scrotum [13, 31]. Exposure to DBP, and other phthalates that target the male reproductive system, interferes with Leydig cell functions and results in decreased expression of steroidogenic enzymes and testosterone production, and reduced INSL3 levels (see supplementary Figure 1) [8, 12, 32]. This in turn leads to an inhibition of androgen-dependent development of the male reproductive system resulting in agenesis and malformations such as hypospadias and cryptorchidism. These findings are supportive of epidemiological studies which report an association between DBP exposure and decreased AGD [11], a morphological marker considered indicative of androgen levels during the masculinization programming window [10, 33].
Gestational phthalate exposure has also been shown to affect Sertoli cell development, functions, and interactions with germ cells. These effects may result in altered spermatogenesis in postnatal mature life stages (see supplementary Figure 1) [34, 35]. These androgen-independent effects in the seminiferous cord are not associated with changes in Leydig cell function, and testosterone and INSL3 synthesis [24]. Since Sertoli cells are required for germ cell proliferation and development, phthalate-induced decreases in Sertoli cell numbers leads to lower germ cell numbers [15]. DBP-induced effects in fetal Sertoli cells include decreased cell proliferation and differentiation, abnormal cytoskeletal arrangement, cytoplasmic alterations, and disrupted functions and contact with germ cells [22, 36, 37]. Phthalate-induced alterations in Sertoli cell function/development have been hypothesized to alter male fertility by promoting germ cell effects such as increased formation of multinucleated gonocytes (MNGs) and germ cell death [38].
Overall, phthalate-induced effects from gestational exposure results in altered or incomplete development of the male reproductive system. DBP-induced outcomes reported in experimental studies using rats include decreases in reproductive organ weights, disrupted androgen production, reduced AGD, increased incidence of malformations such as hypospadias and cryptorchidism, agenesis of the prostate, epididymis and vas deferens; retention of thoracic areolae or nipples, degeneration of the seminiferous epithelium; interstitial cell hyperplasia of the testis, reduced Sertoli and germ cell numbers, and infertility [8, 32, 37, 39].
Effects resulting from exposures during postnatal life stages
Exposure to phthalate esters such as DBP or diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) during early postnatal and sexually mature life stages has been shown to affect normal homeostasis of the male reproductive system and alter reproductive organ development and function. Experimental studies also report that peripubertal individuals are more susceptible to DBP and other diortho phthalate ester-induced effects in the male reproductive system [34] [12, 14, 21, 22, 40].
The hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and associated hormones play an important role in the development and function of the male reproductive system (see supplementary Figure 2). The hypothalamus initiates production of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), which in turn stimulates the anterior pituitary to produce luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) [41]. LH activates Leydig cells to produce testosterone, which directs growth and maturation of the male reproductive system ([31, 42]). FSH and testosterone activate Sertoli cells, which interact with germ cells to promote spermatogenesis. Testosterone produced by LCs and inhibin produced by Sertoli cells also initiate a negative feedback mechanism which regulates GnRH, LH, and FSH production in the hypothalamus and anterior pituitary [43]. During sexually mature life stages the hormones produced in the pituitary-gonadal axis continue to regulate normal Sertoli and Leydig cell functions and spermatogenesis [42].
Phthalate-induced effects observed in pubertal or sexually mature animals include decreased reproductive organ weights, degeneration of seminiferous tubules, delayed puberty, germ cell apoptosis, and reduced fertility [14, 34, 40, 44]. Evidence from cell culture studies suggests that Leydig cell and Sertoli cell development and functions are directly affected by phthalate esters such as DBP [12, 40, 45]. Downstream effects of disruptions in LC functions and decreased testosterone production/levels include reduced weight/size of the testis, urethra and accessory reproductive organs [34]. Downstream effects of Sertoli cell disruption include reduced physical and metabolic support of germ cells, resulting in germ cell damage and reduced steroidogenesis [34, 40]. Phthalate-induced disruption in SC functions is also evidenced by altered production/levels of inhibin and Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)6. These findings from experimental studies are consistent with epidemiological studies which report a robust association between DBP exposure and altered semen parameters in men [11]. Finally, since testosterone plays an important role in normal Sertoli cell functions [15, 24], phthalate-induced inhibition of testosterone production in Leydig cells can indirectly target Sertoli cells.
Methods
Literature search and screening
The objective of the literature search and screening was to compare DBP-induced mechanisms that are well established in the rat with other mammalian experimental models, including studies using human fetal testis xenografts. The literature search and screening are described in detail in the supplementary materials. Briefly, experimental and mechanistic studies were identified from four online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Toxline, and Toxic Substances Control Act Test Submissions 2.0). Non-date-limited searches with no language restrictions were applied. The initial search was conducted as early as March 2012 and was followed by literature search updates every 6−12 months through September 2018. Literature search results were screened and housed in the U.S. EPA’s Health and Environmental Research Online (HERO) database. Database searches were supplemented by manual searches of citations from regulatory documents. The Population, Exposure, Comparators, and Outcome (PECO) criteria used to screen the literature are also available in the supplementary materials.
Ex vivo studies that expose human fetal testis tissue cultures to DEHP or its metabolite mono (ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP) were also included in this analysis as DBP and DEHP target the male reproductive system via the same proposed mode of action [2, 10, 12, 16]. Ex vivo studies using DEHP or MEHP were identified from literature reviews on phthalate-induced male reproductive effects in various experimental models including human fetal testis xenografts and ex vivo tissue cultures [22–25].
Publications that met PECO criteria went through a full text review to select studies for data extraction and development of a literature inventory. As recommended by U.S. EPA’s Framework for Assessing Health Risk of Environmental Exposures to Children and the World Health Organization International Programme on Chemical Safety, the available mechanistic and toxicological studies and endpoints that inform the mode of action for DBP-induced male reproductive effects were evaluated according to the life stage of exposure [26, 27, 46, 47]. This approach was applied to account for biological differences, including endocrine, cellular and molecular, and functional aspects that are specific to each life stage. Examples include differences in Leydig cell populations in the developing fetus versus adults [48], differences in cellular targets (e.g. Sertoli cells have been hypothesized to be primary cellular target of phthalate-induced toxicity during postnatal stages [21, 40]), and the role of the pituitary gonadal axis in the development and function of the male reproductive system during gestation, puberty, and sexually mature life stages [13, 30]. Studies that did not report the age or life stage of the test model were not considered for information extraction, inventory development, and further review. Gestation studies that did not expose animals during critical organogenesis stages in the development of the male reproductive system (starting at approximately gestation day (GD) thirteen in rodents and gestational week 6 in the marmoset [13, 49, 50]) were not considered for further analysis. Studies that exposed animals during both pre- and post-natal life stages were not considered for analysis as it is not possible to ascertain whether effects reported can be attributed to chemical-induced alterations during gestation, peri-puberty or sexually mature life sages.
Literature inventory
Studies that met the criteria described above after full-text review were incorporated into a database/inventory used to facilitate the evaluation on individual key events and concordance analysis of effects conserved across species. The inventory was developed in Microsoft Access and exported to Microsoft Excel, and captures the following information from the studies: the U.S. EPA HERO database identification number for each reference, list of authors, publication year, and publication title; test compound, exposure route and duration; the sex, species and strain, and age/life stage at exposure and endpoint evaluation of the test organisms; the sample sizes for exposure group and endpoint testing; a succinct description of the exposure outcomes; and the key events informed by each endpoint reported in the study (see supplementary mechanistic effects database). Three distinctions were applied to the available studies when considering the age/life stage of exposure: gestation, peri-puberty, and sexually mature. Whenever a study provided the age, but not the life stage of the test organisms estimates reported in the U.S. EPA Review of the Reference Dose and Reference Concentration Processes7 [51] were used to obtain an approximation of the life stage equivalent to the reported age of exposure.
Application of the MOA-AOP framework.
The available mechanistic and toxicological evidence was organized and evaluated in concordance with the framework and levels of biological organization used for Mode of Action (MOA) analysis for non-cancer effects and development of Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOP)8 [27, 29, 47, 52]. The available evidence on DBP-induced effects in the male reproductive system was organized according to the following levels of biological organization: molecular target(s), cellular response(s), tissue/organ response(s), and organism response(s). Molecular initiating events, key events, and adverse outcomes identified in previous mechanistic and MOA evaluations were incorporated into the framework (see [8, 53]. Outcomes considered indicative to each key event are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. As recommended in U.S. EPA 2005, the analysis described here was focused on the concordance of key events and adverse responses across species to obtain clarification on issues raised by human xenograft studies and the relevance of animal studies to human health [54].
Table 1:
Key event | Endpoints considered informative of key events |
---|---|
Molecular level interactions | |
Leydig cells | Molecular level interactions between DBP metabolites and potential receptors involved in cell signal transduction in Leydig cells. |
Sertoli cells and germ cells | Molecular level interactions between DBP metabolites and potential receptors involved in cell signal transduction in Sertoli cells and/or germ cells. |
Cellular effects | |
Leydig cells | Histological effects: Leydig cell aggregation and/or altered tissue distribution, ↓ Leydig cell number, ↓ Leydig cell endoplasmic reticulum, alterations in cell cytoplasm [38, 44]. |
Functional changes: ↓ steroidogenic enzyme mRNA or protein levels and/or activity, ↓ testicular or serum testosterone levels, ↓ testicular testosterone production, ↓ INSL3 mRNA and/or protein levels [8, 10, 12, 38]. | |
Phenotypical changes indicative of reduced LC function: ↓ AGD, ↑ incidence of nipple retention [10, 34, 39]. | |
Sertoli cells and germ cells | Germ cell effects: ↑ number of multinucleated germ cells (MNGs), ↓ germ cell numbers, ↑ germ cell death [8, 22, 38]. |
Sertoli cell effects: Altered Sertoli cell development and interactions with germ cells, ↓ Sertoli cell numbers, changes in mRNA/protein levels of testicular genes indicative of Sertoli cell function during gestation16 [22, 24, 38, 39]. | |
Organ effects | |
Urethra | Incomplete/abnormal development: ↓ organ weight/size, delayed preputial separation [16, 22]. |
Accessory reproductive glands | Incomplete/abnormal development: ↓ organ weight for accessory reproductive organ weights (e.g. epididymis, seminal vesicle, prostate, etc.), malformed epididymis, prostate, and/or seminal vesicle [15, 16, 22]. |
Testis | Incomplete/abnormal development: ↓ organ weight, ↓ gubernaculum development. [1, 38] |
Histological effects: Changes in seminiferous cord diameter (or seminiferous tubule dilation), incomplete or malformed seminiferous tubules, ↑ incidence of Sertoli cell only tubules, ↓ epidydimal-ductular cross sections, interstitial cell hyperplasia, [34, 38, 39]. | |
Organism effects | |
Loss of reproductive functions assessed in adult animals | ↓spermatogenesis, ↓ fertility, sperm abnormalities, ↓sperm counts [10, 34, 38]. |
Malformations: urethra | Increased incidence and/or severity of hypospadias [10, 14]. |
Malformations: testis | Increased incidence and/or severity cryptorchidism, increased incidence of other malformations (e.g. fluid filled testis) ([10, 38]. |
Table 2:
Key event | Endpoints considered informative of key events |
---|---|
Molecular level interactions | |
Leydig cells | Molecular level interactions between DBP metabolites and potential receptors involved in cell signal transduction in Leydig cells. |
Sertoli cells and germ cells | Molecular level interactions between DBP metabolites and potential receptors involved in cell signal transduction in Sertoli cells and/or germ cells. |
Cellular effects | |
Leydig cells | Histological effects (e.g. hyperplasia, altered cell number) [22, 44]. |
Functional changes: ↓ steroidogenic enzyme mRNA or protein levels and/or activity, ↓ testicular or serum testosterone levels/production [3, 14, 24]. | |
Phenotypical changes indicative of altered LC function: ↓AGD in animals exposed during early postnatal life stages [22]. | |
Sertoli cells and germ cells | Germ cell effects: ↓ germ cell numbers, ↑ germ cell death, altered markers of germ cell maturation and spermatogenesis17 [3, 22, 38]. |
Sertoli cell effects: Altered Sertoli cell development and germ cell attachment/interactions, cytoskeletal alterations, changes in mRNA/protein levels of testicular genes indicative of Sertoli cell development and functions18 [22, 34, 40, 126] | |
Organ effects | |
Pituitary gonadal axis | Alterations in organ weights and production/levels of FSH hormone, LH [34, 44, 150]. |
Accessory reproductive organs | Incomplete development, ↓ organ weight/size [3, 14, 44]. |
Testis | Incomplete development, reduced organ size: ↓testis weight [34, 44]. |
Histological effects: seminiferous tubule alterations, ↑ incidence of germinal epithelium atrophy or Sertoli cell only tubules [1, 3, 22, 44]. | |
Organism effects | |
Loss of reproductive functions | ↓ fertility19, ↓ spermatogenesis or markers of spermatogenesis, ↓ sperm count and sperm motility, ↑ sperm abnormalities [22, 44, 126]. |
Results
Summary of male reproductive effects from exposures during gestation (Figure 1, Table 3).
Table 3.
Key event | Evidence from animals | Evidence from human fetal testis xenografts or ex vivo tissue cultures | References |
---|---|---|---|
Molecular interactions | |||
Leydig cells | Molecular target for DBP/MBP has not been identified. | Molecular target for DBP/MBP has not been identified. |
|
Sertoli cells or germ cells | Molecular target for DBP/MBP has not been identified. | Molecular target for DBP/MBP has not been identified. | |
Cellular effects | |||
Leydig cell effects | Rat studies consistently report that DBP/MBP exposure alters LC development and function. One study in rabbits reports supportive evidence. Most mouse studies report no exposure related effects. One study in marmosets reports no exposure related effects. | Evidence obtained from human xenograft and explant studies suggest lower sensitivity to DBP-induced LC effects. | Rat (see reviews cited above and supplementary database); rabbit [67]; mouse [65]; [66]; [63]; [64]; [73]); marmoset [68]; human xenograft or explant [59–63] |
Sertoli cell and/or germ cell effects | Rats, rabbits, and mice studies report GC and SC effects. E.g. ↓ SC numbers, altered SC cytoskeleton and SC-GC interactions, impaired GC development, and ↑ GC apoptosis | Evidence obtained from human xenograft and explant studies suggest exposure resulted in GC and SC effects. | Rat (see reviews cited above and supplementary database); rabbit [67, 151]; mice [56, 63–65, 73, 151]; marmoset [68]; human xenograft [56, 60, 62, 63, 66] |
Organ effects | |||
Urethra | Rat studies reporting altered development resulting in malformations. One study using marmosets and one study in rabbits reported no exposure related effects |
No available evidence. | Rat (see reviews cited above and supplementary database); marmoset [68]; rabbit [67] |
Accessory reproductive organs | Rat studies consistently report altered and delayed development of accessory male reproductive organs. One study in rabbits reports supportive evidence. Mouse and marmoset studies and human xenograft studies report no exposure related effects. |
Yes. Human xenograft studies evaluated accessory reproductive organ weights in rodent hosts suggest lower sensitivity to DBP-induced LC effects. |
Rat (see reviews cited above and supplementary database); rabbit [67]; marmoset [68]; human xenograft [37]; [61] |
Testis | Rat studies consistently report altered or delayed testis development. One study in rabbits reports supportive evidence. Majority of mouse studies report no exposure related effects. One study in marmoset reports no exposure related effects. |
No available evidence. | Rat (see reviews cited above and supplementary database); rabbit [67]; mice [65, 73, 77, 122]; marmoset [68] |
Organism effects | |||
Reproductive functions | Rat studies report decreased sperm production, increased sperm abnormalities and reduced fertility. One study using rabbits reports alterations in sperm parameters. One study in marmosets reports no exposure related effects. | No available evidence. | Rat (see reviews cited above and supplementary database); rabbit [67]; marmoset [68] |
Molecular interactions: Leydig cells and seminiferous cord (Sertoli cells and germ cells).
Many experimental studies have attempted to identify the molecular target(s) for DBP in Leydig cells, or in the seminiferous cords (i.e. germ cell and Sertoli cells) [24]. To date, a molecular target for DBP or its bioactive metabolite has not been identified. Activation of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPAR) has been proposed as a potential target for DBP [34, 55], and human fetal testis tissue cultures exposed to MEHP for three days display increased PPARγ mRNA levels [56]. However, the fetal rat testis does not express PPAR-responsive genes after exposure to phthalate esters, and gestational treatment with a PPARα or PPARγ−specific ligands failed to reproduce effects consistent with phthalate-induced responses in the male reproductive system [24, 57, 58]. The available evidence from experimental studies suggests that PPARs are not involved in phthalate-induced male reproductive effects.
Cellular effects: Leydig cell development/functions
Evaluation of the available studies using different mammalian experimental models or human fetal testis xenografts or explants suggest that Leydig cell responsiveness to DBP, MBP, or MEHP varies according to species (see Table 3). Unlike effects observed in gestational exposure studies using rats, ex vivo and xenograft studies using human fetal testis report no significant effect on Leydig cell functions. Studies from two independent groups using human fetal testis explants report that MEHP exposure did not affect basal or human chorionic gonadotropin, 22R-hydroxy-cholesterol, or LH – stimulated testosterone synthesis [59, 60]. Furthermore, MEHP exposure did not affect mRNA levels of INSL3, the cholesterol transporter steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) or the steroidogenic enzymes P450scc, or P450c17 [60]. Human fetal testis xenograft studies from two independent groups report that host animal exposure to DBP or MBP did not affect hCG-stimulated serum testosterone levels [61, 62]. Additionally, DBP had no significant effect on basal mRNA levels of the steroidogenic enzymes: CYP11A1, CYP17A1, or Scarb1 in human fetal testis xenografts [63]. Nevertheless, Heger et al. 2012 reported that DBP exposure lead to a ~80% decrease in INSL3 mRNA levels, while Mitchell et al. 2012 reported a ~30% reduction in testosterone, but these effects were not statistically significant [22].
Various in vivo studies using other mammalian models also report different results from those observed in the gestational rat studies. In vivo and ex vivo studies using various strains of mice report no significant change (or in some cases an increase) in basal testosterone concentrations and mRNA levels of steroidogenic enzymes, and no changes in AGD [24, 63–66]. However, a study using mouse fetal testis explants reported MEHP exposure lead to reduced responsiveness to LH-stimulated testosterone production [64]. The observations made in rat studies are supported by an experiment using Dutch-Belted rabbits which reported that gestational exposure to DBP decreased basal serum testosterone, but had no significant effect on gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH)-induced testosterone production [67]. A study on marmosets reported no significant effects on serum testosterone after gestational exposure to DBP [68].
Cellular effects: Seminiferous cord (Sertoli cells and germ cells)
An evaluation of the available evidence on effects in the seminiferous cord suggests that responses to DBP or MBP are conserved across species (see Table 3). Cellular and histopathological changes observed in the seminiferous cord include changes in the development, functions, and interactions between germ cells and Sertoli cells. In rats, these effects have been shown to result in reduced numbers of germ cells and sperm production [34, 38].
Germ cell effects such as increased cell death and formation of MNGs occur independently of DBP-induced alterations in testosterone production [12, 24], and appear to be conserved across species including rats, mice, and human fetal testis xenografts and explants. One in vivo study using marmosets reported that exposure to MBP during gestation had no statistically significant effects on germ cell or Sertoli cell numbers, but undifferentiated germ cell clusters were noted in 33% of the exposed animals [68]. Formation of MNGs, an effect that is observed in rats after exposure during late gestation [8, 69, 70], has also been observed in studies where human fetal testis xenografts were treated with DBP [62, 63, 66], and in several mouse strains exposed to DBP or MEHP [63, 66]. In vivo studies using rats have also observed that gestational exposures to DBP results in a decrease in the total number of germ cells [20, 69, 71]. These findings are supportive of the results from a study using human fetal testis xenografts which reported that exposure to DBP for 21 days caused a decrease in the total number of germ cells and the number of undifferentiated germ cells [66]. However, a human fetal testis xenograft study performed by a separate group reported that DBP exposure for 24 to 72 hours had no significant effect on germ cell numbers [63]. Studies which expose human, mice, and rat fetal testis explants, or in vivo mice to MEHP report decreased germ cell numbers and increased germ cell apoptosis [56, 60, 64, 72].
DBP-induced responses in Sertoli cells also appear to be conserved across species including rats, mice and human fetal testis explants and xenografts. In rats these effects are characterized by a reduction in number of Sertoli cells and alterations in their cytoskeleton, disrupted interactions between Sertoli cells and germ cells, and a decrease in AMH production [22]. In mice, exposure to MEHP or DBP was associated with decreased Sertoli cell numbers and reduced AMH protein levels [64, 73]. Studies using in vivo mice or human ex vivo tissue cultures report no DBP or MEHP-induced alterations in Sertoli cell numbers, but AMH levels were decreased in both species [60, 64, 72]. Furthermore, a study using human fetal testis xenografts reports that DBP exposure was associated with decreased mRNA levels of the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR)9 [62].
Organ effects: Development of the testis, urethra, and accessory reproductive organs.
The analyses of the available studies that use different mammalian in vivo experimental models and human fetal testis xenografts or explants suggest that DBP (or MEHP)-induced responses on androgen-dependent development of the male reproductive system varies across species (see Table 3). In rats, and in one study using rabbits, gestational exposure to DBP was shown to inhibit testosterone-dependent development of the testis, urethra and accessory male reproductive organs [8, 67]. Evaluation of the available mouse studies that expose animals to DBP during gestation suggest that responses may be strain specific: Qin et al. 2017 and Gaido et al. 2007 respectively observed that C57BL/6 mice displayed decreased testicular weight [73] and increased seminiferous cord diameter [65], while NTP 1995 reported no significant changes in testis weights in B6C3F1 mice [65]. These discrepancies in responses may have also been due to differences in experimental design as the Qin et al. 2017 and Gaido et al. 2007 studies exposed animals during gestation only whereas the NTP 1995 study exposed animals during gestation and postnatal life stages. A study in marmosets [68] reported that exposure to MBP had no significant effects in the weights of the testis or accessory reproductive organs. Two studies using human fetal testis xenografts grafted into castrated mice reported no significant DBP or MBP-induced effects in the seminal vesicle weight of the host animal [61, 62], whereas in castrated animals grafted with rat fetal testis DBP exposure resulted in decreased seminal vesicle weight [61].
Organism effects: Malformations (hypospadias and cryptorchidism), and loss of fertility.
Analysis of the available evidence from experimental studies suggests that DBP-induced male reproductive effects at the organism level are also species-specific for some outcomes (see Table 3). In rats, gestational exposure to DBP is associated with increased incidence of cryptorchidism and hypospadias and reduced reproductive functions such as decreased sperm production and increased sperm abnormalities [8, 9]. These observations are supported by a study in rabbits which reported decreased sperm concentration and ejaculate volume, and increased abnormal sperm after gestational exposure to DBP [67]. However, a gestational study using marmosets reported that MBP exposure did not have a significant effect on the incidence of cryptorchidism or hypospadias, or on spermatogenesis in adult animals [68]. Studies using other animal models have not evaluated outcomes indicative of changes in fertility.
Summary of male reproductive effects from exposures during postnatal life stages (Figure 2, Table 4).
Table 4.
Key event | Evidence in animal in vivo, xenograft and cell culture models | References |
---|---|---|
Molecular interactions | ||
Leydig cells | A molecular target for DBP/MBP has not been identified. | |
Sertoli cells or germ cells. | A molecular target for DBP/MBP has not been identified. | |
Cellular effects | ||
Leydig cell effects. | In vivo and cell culture rat studies consistently report that DBP/MBP exposure alters LC development and functions. Two studies in non-human primates (rhesus monkeys and marmosets) report evidence of altered LC development and functions. Most of in vivo studies using mice report effects that are consistent with observations made in rats. All cell culture studies using immortalized mouse cells or dog primary LCs report altered LC functions. | Rat (see reviews cited above and supplementary database); marmosets [59]; rhesus monkeys [121]; mice in vivo [77, 94, 95, 125]; mice cell culture [45] [97–100, 152]; dog cell culture [101] |
Sertoli cell and/or germ cell effects. | Rat in vivo and cell culture studies report alterations in SC cytoskeleton, functions, SC-GC interactions, and GC maturation. One in vivo study using marmosets, one xenograft study using rhesus monkeys, and all available mouse in vivo and cell culture studies report evidence of SC and GC effects. |
Rat (see reviews cited above and supplementary database); mice [17, 77, 83, 92, 94, 95]; marmosets [68]; rhesus monkeys [121] |
Organ effects | ||
Pituitary gonadal axis | Majority rat studies report alterations in LH & FSH levels. One study using rabbits reports increased hypothalamic GnRH levels while three mouse studies report no exposure related effects. | Rat (see reviews cited above and supplementary database); rabbits [67]; mice [77, 94, 95] |
Accessory reproductive organs. | Rat studies report alterations in accessory reproductive organs weights and histopathology. One study in rabbits, and one xenograft study using non-human primates report supportive evidence for effects in seminal vesicle and prostate. Majority of mouse studies report no exposure related effects. | Rat (see reviews cited above and supplementary database); rhesus monkeys [121]; mice [77, 94, 122–124] |
Testis. | Rat studies and most of the mouse studies report decreased weight and histopathological effects. One study in guinea pigs reported decreased weight. Syrian hamsters and one rabbits were not responsive. However, histopathological observations were observed in rabbits. |
Rat (see reviews cited above and supplementary database); Guinea pigs and Syrian hamsters [17]; mice [17, 77, 83, 94, 123, 125]; rabbits [67]. |
Organism effects | ||
Reproductive functions. | Rat studies report adverse effects on sperm parameters. One study in Guinea pigs and one study using rabbits report alterations in sperm parameters. Majority of mouse studies report alterations in sperm parameters and fertility. | Rat (see reviews cited above and supplementary database); Guinea pigs [17]; mice [77, 94, 122–125, 127]; rabbits [67]. |
Molecular interactions: Leydig cells and seminiferous cord (Sertoli cells and germ cells).
As described above, experimental studies have attempted to identify a molecular target for DBP in the testis. Two studies evaluated the potential role of DBP exposure during post-natal life stages on PPARα and γ functions. Zhang et al. (2014) exposed primary Sertoli cells obtained from peripuberal Sprague-Dawley rats to 100 μM DBP or MBP and reported that cells treated with DBP displayed increased protein levels and DNA binding of PPARα [74]. These results should be interpreted with caution as Zhang et al. 2014 observed PPARα-related effects in DBP-treated cells, but MBP exposed cells were not responsive [74]. Furthermore, Sertoli cells are not normally exposed to DBP as it is metabolized in the intestines and liver and absorbed almost entirely as the monoester metabolites [1, 2]. In peripubertal rats DBP exposure lead to a mild increase in PPARα responsive genes and only one of two assayed PPARγ responsive genes was affected by DBP exposure [75]. Overall these findings suggest that PPAR activation may play a role in DBP-induced effects in the testis after postnatal exposure, however additional studies would help determine whether these nuclear receptors play a critical role in phthalate-induced male reproductive toxicity.
Cellular effects: Leydig cell development/functions
Evaluation of the available evidence from experimental studies on postnatal exposures to DBP suggests that Leydig cell effects are conserved across species (see Table 4). Most of the available studies using rats report that oral exposure to DBP during postnatal stages results in altered Leydig cell functions. Peripubertal rats exposed to DBP had reduced testicular and serum testosterone levels [76–80], altered expression of steroidogenic enzymes [78, 81], and increased expression of AT1, a cellular stress marker expressed in Leydig cells [82]. However, two studies using Wistar rats reported no changes in serum testosterone in adult animals (PND90) after exposure during lactation [66], or increased testicular testosterone in peripubertal animals exposed for seven days [83]; and three studies using peripubertal Sprague-Dawley rats report no effects in testicular testosterone after exposure for seven [84] or twelve [85] days, or eight weeks [86]. The study by Alam et al. 2010 [84] also observed that acute exposure to DBP (3, 6, or 24 hours) decreased the testicular mRNA levels of steroidogenic enzymes and testosterone concentration. In sexually mature rats DBP exposure resulted in decreased testosterone levels, but this response appeared to vary according to the duration of the experiment. In Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats DBP treatment for 14 or 15 days lead to decreased serum testosterone levels [87–89], but in Sprague-Dawley rats shorter exposures (3, 6, or 7 days) resulted in increased or no significant effects on serum testosterone [79, 90]. In-vivo findings on DBP-induced alterations in Leydig cell development/functions are supported by in vitro studies using primary testicular cells obtained from pre-weaning, peripubertal and sexually mature Sprague-Dawley rats, which report that treatment with DBP or MBP decreased androgen production [91, 92] and mRNA levels of genes associated with steroidogenesis as well as lipid and cholesterol metabolism [91, 93]. The discrepancies observed in rat studies using young animals represent an uncertainty in the available evidence and do not appear to be due to strain differences or other experimental design features. Although a majority of the available rat studies appear to suggest that DBP exposure alters Leydig cell functions, additional experiments may be necessary to identify variables which may contribute to the different responses described above.
The majority of in vivo and cell culture studies using mice provide supportive evidence that DBP- induced Leydig cell effects are conserved across species. An in vivo study using four-day-old C57BL/6J mice reported decreased AGD and serum testosterone after exposure to DBP for 14 days [94]. A follow up study by the same group also reported that although early life stage exposure did not alter serum testosterone levels in adult animals, treated animals had increased numbers of Leydig cells and reduced testicular mRNA levels of the steroidogenic enzyme CYP11A1 [95]. However, a subchronic toxicity study using B6C3F1 mice reported that exposure to DBP for 13 weeks had no significant effect on serum testosterone levels [77]. These differences in response could have been due to experimental design features such as the age of the experimental animals used: NTP, 1995 initiated exposure to DBP at post natal day 42 (PND42) while the Moody et al. 2013 began treatment on PND4. Cell culture studies using immortalized Leydig cell lines obtained from various mouse strains including C57BL/6J and BALB/c mice provide further evidence that DBP exposure can disrupt normal Leydig cell functions. In MA-10 and MLTC-1 cells generated from C57BL/6J mice, exposure to MBP or DBP resulted in reduced steroid hormone production and decreased mRNA levels of steroidogenic enzymes and INSL3 protein [45, 96–98]. These findings are supported by a study using TM3 Leydig cells generated from BALB/c mice where exposure to DBP was associated with an inhibition of LH-stimulated steroidogenesis [99]. Interestingly, two studies using MLTC-1 cells report that treatment with low concentrations of MBP (between 0.1 and 1 μM) caused a significant increase in steroidogenesis and in mRNA levels of steroidogenic enzymes and INSL3 protein [98, 100].
In addition to evidence obtained from experimental studies using rats or mice, in vivo studies using Dutch-Belted rabbits and marmosets also report that exposure to DBP during peripubertal life stages was associated with decreased serum testosterone levels [59, 67]. However, when sexually mature rabbits were exposed at the same level, there were no significant changes in serum testosterone [67]. These observations are consistent with previous analyses which conclude that earlier life stages are more sensitive to DBP-induced effects in the male reproductive system [12, 34, 40]. In neonatal marmosets, DBP-induced decrease in serum testosterone was observed after short term exposure for 5 hours [59]. When animals were exposed for 14 days there was an increase in Leydig cell volume, but no changes in serum testosterone. According to the study authors the increase in Leydig cell volume may have been due to elevated LH levels resulting from the initial decrease in steroidogenesis caused by MBP exposure [59].
Finally, studies using primary testicular cells or xenograft tissue transplants provide further supportive evidence suggesting that exposure to DBP during early postnatal life stages alters Leydig cell functions. A xenograft study using testicular tissue obtained from sexually immature rhesus macaques, reported that exposure to DBP for 14 or 28 weeks decreased mRNA levels of INSL3 and steroidogenic enzymes [59], and in primary testicular cells isolated from sexually mature dogs, treatment with DBP resulted in decreased INSL3 levels and testosterone production [101]. Overall, the available evidence suggests that DBP exposure during, early postnatal, peripubertal, and sexually mature life stages can affect Leydig cell development and functions on several mammalian species.
Cellular effects: Seminiferous cord development and functions
Evaluation of the available experimental evidence suggests that DBP-induced effects in seminiferous tubules are conserved across various species (including rats, mice, and rhesus macaques) (see Table 4). As described below, most of the available experimental studies report that DBP targets Sertoli and germ cell development and functions.
Evidence from in vivo studies using rats exposed at different ages and life stages consistently report that DBP alters normal cellular development and functions in the seminiferous cords. In peripubertal Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats, exposure to DBP lead to increases in germ cell death, reduced number of spermatogenic cells [75, 79, 84, 102–104], as well as decreased testicular Zn levels10 [77, 83], and alterations in gene mRNAs associated with germ cell development and spermatogenesis [78, 81]. These studies also report that DBP exposure caused alterations in mRNA levels of genes indicative of Sertoli cell functions [75], increased apoptosis and histopathological malformations of Sertoli cells such as alterations in cytoskeleton and increased vacuolation11 [79, 84–86, 102–104], and reduced the number of Sertoli cells [76, 78]. Most of the available studies report that exposure to DBP also affected seminiferous cord structure and functions in sexually mature rats, but three studies report no significant effects after exposure [79, 88, 105]. In Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats treatment with DBP lead to decreased testicular Zn levels [106–108], reduced the number of germ cells [89, 106–113], and altered markers of Sertoli cell function and spermatogenesis [87, 107–110, 112, 114, 115].
In vitro studies using primary cells isolated from rat testis provide supportive evidence of observations made in in vivo studies. In primary Sertoli cells or Sertoli-germ cell co-cultures isolated from peripubertal Sprague-Dawley rats, exposure to MBP or DBP caused increased germ cell detachment, reduced viability, and increased expression of genes associated with apoptosis [116, 117]. In primary Sertoli cells, exposure to DBP or MBP lead to reduced cellular membrane integrity and cell viability [85, 117–119], increased permeability of Sertoli cell tight junctions and decreased mRNA and protein levels of tight junction proteins [85, 120], alterations in inhibin B mRNA and protein levels [85], and disruption of vimentin filaments and collapse of the cellular cytoskeleton [74, 103].
Most in vivo and cell culture studies using other mammalian models provide evidence that is consistent with observations made in rats both in vivo and in vitro. In peripubertal mice of various strains DBP exposure reduced germ cell numbers [17, 94], decreased Sertoli cell proliferation, and altered expression of AMH and other markers of Sertoli cell development and function [94]. Similar observations were made in rhesus macaques testis xenografts isolated from six-month-old animals in which exposure to DBP lead to a decrease in Sertoli cell numbers [121]. However, unlike the response observed in mice, DBP did not affect AMH or other markers of Sertoli cell maturation in the macaque xenografts, but the same study also reported decreased numbers of spermatocytes and spermatogonia when host animals were exposed to DBP [121]. Testicular Zn levels were decreased in peripubertal mice exposed to DBP for 7 days [83]. However, one study using B6C3F1 mice reported increased testicular Zn levels after DBP exposure for 13 weeks [77]. The observations from in vivo and xenograft studies on DBP-induced effects in germ cells are supported by cell culture studies using mouse GC-2 cells, a spermatocyte cell line isolated from BALB/c mice. Treatment with DBP reduced GC-2 cell viability, increased endoplasmic reticulum (ER) damage, and activation of ER-mediated autophagy [92]. One study using four-day-old marmosets exposed to DBP for fourteen days reported no significant changes in germ cell numbers [68], but studies that used rats or mice and exposed animals to similar DBP doses and durations (ten to twenty one days) report significant effects on Sertoli cells and germ cells [79, 85, 88, 94, 105, 107]. This suggests that marmosets may be less responsive to DBP-induced germ cell effects. However, McKinnell et al. 2009 is the only study that has evaluated outcomes informative of seminiferous tubule effects in marmosets, and additional experiments using different exposure durations are needed to fully characterize DBP-induced responses in this species [68]. Overall, the available evidence suggests that exposure to DBP during peripubertal and sexually mature life stages affects seminiferous tubule development and cellular functions in at least three different mammalian species.
Organ effects: Hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis
Few in vivo studies have evaluated the potential effects of DBP exposure in the pituitary gonadal axis. The available evidence suggests that DBP-induced alterations in various pituitary hormones may be species-specific. However, the available evidence is variable and the direction of DBP-induced changes does not appear consistent from one study to another (see Table 4).
Several studies using Sprague-Dawley rats have reported DBP-induced alterations on serum LH levels. However, the magnitude and direction of these hormonal responses varies across studies. In both peripubertal and sexually mature animals, exposure to DBP for 12, 15, or 30 days resulted in decreased or increased serum LH levels [76, 79, 85, 88]. Studies in which animals were exposed for shorter periods of time (ranging from 3 hours to 6 days) report no effects or minor (non-statistically significant) decreases in serum LH [84, 90]. The contrasting observations amongst the studies cited above may have been due to variety in experimental design such as exposure durations and/or differences in responsiveness in young versus sexually mature animals.
In rats, DBP exposure resulted in altered serum FSH levels, but the direction of the induced changes appeared to be due to biological differences amongst strains and/or life stages. In peripubertal Sprague-Dawley rats, exposure to DBP increased serum FSH levels [79, 85] while in sexually mature animals, treatment with DBP lead to a decrease in serum FSH in Wistar rats [87, 89], but no effect in Sprague Dawley rats [79].
Studies using rabbits and mice suggest that these two species appear to be insensitive to DBP-induced effects in the hypothalamus and pituitary. Two studies using neonatal C57BL/6J mice reported that DBP exposure for 3, 10 or 17 days had no significant effect on serum LH [95] or FHS [94, 95], while a 13-week exposure study using B5C3F1 mice reported no response on pituitary histopathology [77]. In peripubertal and sexually mature Dutch-Belted rabbits, exposure to DBP for 8 to 12 weeks did not alter gonadotropin releasing hormone serum levels [67].
Organ effects: Accessory reproductive organs
In rats, most of the available studies report that exposure to DBP during peripubertal or sexually mature life stages results in alterations in the development and function of the accessory male reproductive organs. Postnatal exposure to phthalates, including DBP, has been shown to cause effects such as decreased epididymis, prostate, and seminal vesicle weight; delayed preputial separation; and structural degeneration of the epididymis and vas deferens (see Table 4, and supplementary mechanistic effects database) [14, 44].
Most of the available studies using other mammalian models report that exposure to DBP also results in altered accessory reproductive organ weight. However, mice appear to be less responsive. One study using mice reported decreased preputial gland weight [95] in exposed animals, but the same group observed no treatment related effects in seminal vesicle or prostate weights. Additional studies by other research groups note that when mice were treated with DBP during peripubertal life stages no effects were observed in prostate, epididymis, and seminal vesicle weight [122, 123]. In DBP-treated Dutch-Belted rabbits, accessory reproductive organs were decreased in peripubertal animals while sexually mature animals were not responsive [67]. These observations in rabbits are supported by a xenograft study which reported that mice implanted with testis tissue from six-month-old Rhesus macaques and exposed to DBP had decreased seminal vesicle weights [121].
Organ effects: Testis weight
In rats, postnatal exposure to phthalates has been shown to cause adverse testicular effects [34, 44]. Most available rat studies report that Sprague Dawley, Wistar, and F344 rats exposed to DBP had decreased testis weight and increased incidence of adverse histopathological outcomes such as seminiferous tubule degeneration, and elevated numbers of apoptotic cells; see supplementary mechanistic effects database (see Table 4, and supplementary mechanistic effects database).
Studies using other mammalian models do not present consistent evidence on DBP-induced alterations in testis weight (see Table 4). In peripubertal Syrian hamsters12 and marmosets, exposure to DBP had no significant effect on testis weight or histopathology [17, 59, 68]. Experimental studies using peripubertal mice report an exposure-related decrease in testis weight [17, 83, 94, 124] and increased seminiferous tubule atrophy [17, 125]. However, several studies by other groups report no effects on testis weight and histopathology, and in some cases increased testis weight [77, 122, 123, 125]. Studies that report no significant effect on testis weight generally use sexually mature animals, and exposed animals for longer periods of time (ranging from 14 to 133 days) than studies that observed decreased testis weights (ranging from 7 to 56 days). In peripubertal Guinea pigs and in peripubertal and sexually mature New Zealand white rabbits, DBP exposure was associated with histopathological alterations in the seminiferous tubule [17, 67]. These findings are supported by a study using Rhesus macaque xenografts obtained from six-moth-old animals, which reported that DBP exposure increased the incidence of Sertoli Cell Only tubules13, and decreased grafted testicular tissue weight [121].
Organism effects: Loss of reproductive function
Evaluation of the available experimental evidence suggests that DBP-induced loss of reproductive functions is conserved across various species. As described below, most of the available experimental studies report that DBP exposure causes alterations in sperm parameters and fertility measures (see Table 4).
In rats, postnatal exposure to DBP has been consistently shown to disrupt/alter markers of male reproductive fertility [22, 44, 126]. Effects observed after peripubertal and sexually mature life stages include disruption in spermatogenesis, decreased sperm numbers and concentration, reduced sperm motility, and increased sperm abnormalities (see supplementary mechanistic effects database).
Most of the studies that use other mammalian species (including mice, guinea pigs, and rabbits) report outcomes that are consistent with observations made in rat experiments. Studies using C57BL/6J or Pzh:Sfis mice report that exposure to DBP during peripubertal life stages lead to delayed spermatogenesis, increased sperm abnormalities, and decreased sperm count and motility [94, 122, 124, 125]. In sexually mature Pzh:Sfis mice, DBP exposure was associated with decreased fertility and percent pregnancies [127]. However, evaluation of the available studies also suggests that susceptibility to DBP-induced effects on male fertility may also vary according to strain. In CD-1 and B6C3F1 mice, DBP exposure did not affect sperm motility, concentration, or incidence of abnormalities [77, 123]. The variability in responses observed amongst mouse strains could be due to toxicokinetic differences, but additional studies are needed. DBP-exposed guinea pigs during peripubertal life stages had decreased numbers of spermatocytes, spermatids, and spermatogonia [17], whereas an in vivo study using peripubertal and sexually mature rabbits reported increased sperm abnormalities, but no effects on other sperm parameters or mating behavior [67].
Discussion and conclusions
Comparisons across species: gestational exposure related effects
Based on the evaluation of the evidence from gestational DBP exposure studies rats appear to be more sensitive to DBP-induced anti androgenic effects than other mammalian models including human xenografts and ex vivo fetal testis tissue cultures. In vivo and xenograft studies using fetal mice as a model organism report various phthalate-induced male reproductive outcome which are like those observed in rats, but mice did not appear to be responsive to DBP exposure levels shown to cause changes in testosterone synthesis and downstream effects in fetal rats (see Table 3). In general, androgen-independent outcomes such as seminiferous tubule and germ cell effects have been observed in both rats and mice. In vivo and ex vivo studies using several strains of mice exposed to DEHP or dipentyl phthalate (DPP) during gestation provide mixed results: while several studies reporting effects consistent with those seen in the fetal rat [128–133], others observe no changes in androgen production or levels [64, 134, 135]. Additional studies are needed to determine whether these diverse responses to phthalate-induced anti-androgenic effects in the mouse model are due to strain differences or other experimental factors.
As discussed above, several studies have evaluated androgen-dependent and -independent effects of phthalate exposure on human fetal testis explants as well as in vivo xenografts (see Supplementary Figures 3 and 4). In both models, exposure to DBP or its bioactive metabolite MBP did not affect testicular testosterone production. Previous reviews and analyses of the human fetal testis xenograft and explant studies conclude that humans appear to be refractory to DBP or MEHP-induced inhibition of androgen synthesis [24, 25]. However, several issues have been identified in these studies and should be considered in a hazard and/or mode of action evaluation:
In experiments that use human fetal testis ex vivo cultures, the potential variation in androgen synthesis by the individual tissue explants could affect the statistical power of the study [33, 39].
The results obtained from the serum testosterone assay used in Mitchell et al. (2012) appeared highly variable. This has been attributed to the inherent biological variability of the samples, the small sample size (n = 3 to 13 individuals) used in the study, and possible technical difficulties [22, 33, 39].
Although the fetal rat xenografts were responsive, a comparison with rat studies suggest that the methods used to measure testosterone levels in the Mitchell et al. 2012 xenograft study may not be as sensitive as those used for in vivo experiments [22].
The age of the human fetal testis tissue used in the xenograft studies does not match the period of peak testosterone production during the masculinization programming window14. This has raised concerns about the responsiveness of this test model [33, 39].
However, human fetal testis explants and xenografts do appear to be sensitive to known disruptors of testicular androgen synthesis. Hallmark et al. 2007 used ketoconazole, an established inhibitor of testosterone synthesis15, as a positive control and reported that human fetal testis explants exposed to this agent displayed decreased basal and hCG-stimulated testosterone production. Furthermore, the xenograft study by Spade et al. 2014 also treated human fetal testis xenografts to abiraterone, a selective and irreversible CYP17A1 inhibitor [136], and they observed decreased serum testosterone in the exposed host animals. These findings suggest that the ex vivo and xenograft models are responsive to known disruptors of androgen synthesis and raise confidence in the strength and biological plausibility of effects reported in these studies.
Evaluation of effects that occur independently of phthalate-induced disruption in androgen synthesis (i.e. germ cell and Sertoli cell outcomes) suggests that adverse responses observed in the seminiferous tubule after gestational exposure are conserved across mammalian models including human fetal testis xenografts and ex vivo tissue incubations. In vivo studies using rats, rabbits, and mice report that exposure to DBP resulted in similar adverse responses including increased incidence of MNGs and germ cell apoptosis, decreases in germ cell and Sertoli cell numbers, and alterations of Sertoli cell cytoskeleton and Sertoli-germ cell interactions (see Table 3). An in vivo gestational exposure study using marmosets, however, reported no adverse germ cell or Sertoli cell effects. Studies using human fetal testis xenografts or ex vivo tissue cultures report androgen-independent outcomes that are consistent with effects observed in rats, rabbits and mice. Overall, the available evidence suggests that androgen-independent adverse responses are conserved across species, including human fetal testis xenografts and ex vivo tissue cultures. Experimental models such as the fetal rat or mouse are therefore considered informative of potential human responses in the seminiferous cord after gestational exposures to phthalates such as DBP.
Comparisons across species: postnatal exposure related effects
Evaluation of the evidence from DBP studies that expose animals during postnatal life stages suggests that androgen–dependent outcomes are conserved across species. Most of the available studies in which peripubertal and sexually mature rats were exposed to DBP report LC-related effects such as decreased testicular and serum testosterone levels, reduced Leydig cell numbers and mRNA levels of genes associated with steroid synthesis (see Table 4). Similar outcomes were reported in in vivo studies using rabbits, mice, and marmosets where exposures to DBP also lead to reduced testicular and serum testosterone levels, AGD, and expression of steroidogenic enzymes. These findings are supported by cell culture experiments using dog-, mice-, or rat- derived primary or immortalized cells, which report that exposure to DBP or MBP lead to reduced LC viability, altered expression of steroidogenesis-related genes, and decreased basal or stimulated testosterone production (see Table 4). Furthermore, a xenograft study using rhesus monkeys reported decreased mRNA levels for INSL3 and genes associated with steroidogenesis and reduced accessory reproductive organ weights in host animals. As noted above several studies using rats or mice reported contradicting evidence on DBP-induced effects on Leydig cell functions. In some cases (e.g. exposures in sexually mature rats) these discrepancies appear to be due to experimental design differences. Although the majority of the available studies suggest that DBP exposure disrupts Leydig cell functions these discrepancies represent a source of uncertainty and additional studies are needed to provide clarification.
Androgen-independent adverse outcomes also appeared to be conserved across species. In rats and mice exposure to DBP was associated with altered Sertoli cell development and functions, reduced germ cell numbers and disruptions in spermatogenesis. These findings are supported by mouse and rat cell culture studies that report increased Sertoli and germ cell damage after DBP treatment. A study in marmosets observed alterations in germ cell number, but these effects were not statistically significant. However, a xenograft study using young (six-month-old) rhesus monkeys reported that DBP exposure lead to disrupted spermatogenesis, and reduced Sertoli cell numbers and proliferation. Finally, in vivo studies that evaluate reproductive functions report reduced male fertility in DBP-exposed rats, mice, guinea pigs and rabbits.
Several studies have also evaluated the potential role of DBP exposure on LH and FSH production and levels, but the available results are highly variable. This represents a data gap in the proposed MOA. Future studies need to address the potential impact of DBP exposure on hypothalamic and pituitary functions.
Conclusions
Analysis of the mechanistic and toxicological evidence on DBP-induced male reproductive effects suggests that:
Fetal rats are more sensitive than other mammalian vertebrates (including human fetal testis xenografts and ex vivo tissue cultures) to DBP-induced disruption in LC functions and effects that occur downstream of decreases in testosterone levels.
However, adverse responses in fetal rat testis which are not regulated by testosterone (i.e. seminiferous cord effects) are conserved across species, including human fetal testis xenografts and ex vivo tissue cultures.
Both androgen-dependent and -independent outcomes are conserved across most mammalian species when exposures occur during postnatal life stages.
Use of the AOP framework served as a practical tool for the evaluation of mechanistic and toxicological evidence generated from a variety of evidence sources including whole animal, cell culture, and human ex vivo and xenograft experimental models. In the analysis presented here, application of the AOP framework and inclusion of life stage considerations facilitated a transparent analysis for consistency and concordance. Development of a database/inventory also simplified the navigation and analysis of a large and complex number of studies.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge our U.S. EPA colleagues Jeff Nathan, Swati Gummadi, Andrew Greenhalgh, and Carolyn Gigot for their assistance in information extraction and inventory development; and James Weaver, Susan Makris, Glinda Cooper, and Jamie Strong for their guidance and advice on the interpretation of evaluation of mechanistic and toxicological studies. Ingrid Druwe, Earl Gray, Ravi Subramaniam, and Kris Thayer provided comments and suggestions during internal (U.S. EPA) review of this manuscript. Special thanks to Sanh Kin Diep for supporting this project.
Footnotes
Declaration of interest: none
Effects seen in the female reproductive system include adverse pregnancy outcomes, reduced reproductive organ weights, and alterations in reproductive hormone levels/production [77,137,138,139,140]. However, additional studies are needed as limited amount of dose response data precludes comparisons on the sensitivity of female reproductive responses relative to males. In utero and post-natal effects on female reproductive development and subsequent fertility are not reviewed herein.
Fetal testis explants consist of in vitro tissue incubations exposed to phthalate, or their active metabolites. Xenografts consist of fetal testis tissue implanted to an immuno-compromised rodent model which is exposed to phthalates or their active metabolites [22].
During the masculinization programming window, testosterone and INSL3 production by human fetal Leydig cells is stimulated by placental human chorionic gonadotropin [141, 142]. The mechanism for stimulation of steroidogenesis in the rat is different as rats do not produce chorionic gonadotropins, and it has been proposed that it may be mediated by autonomous or paracrine factors [141].
Key event: “an empirically observable precursor step that is itself a necessary element of the mode of action or is a biologically based marker for such an element” [54].
AMH is produced by immature Sertoli cells and it is used as a marker of gonadal development [143]. Inhibin is a glycoprotein produced by Sertoli cells that regulates FSH secretion from the pituitary [43].
Although the World Health Organization (WHO)-International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS)-MOA and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)-AOP frameworks are similar in the identification and analysis of key events following modified Bradford-Hill criteria [29], AOPs are chemical agnostic whereas MOA analyses are intended to inform health assessments of individual (or groups of) chemical(s) [52].
FSHR is primarily expressed in Sertoli cells and initiates FSH-regulated development and functions such as Sertoli cell proliferation and metabolic activities necessary for germ cell survival and differentiation [144].
Decreased testicular Zn levels is an effect considered indicative of germ cell loss and seminiferous tubule damage after phthalate exposure [34, 40].
Sertoli cell vacuolation is a common early morphologic injury that precedes germ cell degeneration. Vacuoles may also represent spaces where germ cells are missing [145, 146].
Although Gray et al 1982 [17] observed that Syrian hamsters were not responsive to DBP-induced changes in testis weights, the same study reported animals were responsive to oral exposure to DEHP (see Gray et al. [17] in Supplementary mechanistic effects database).
Sertoli cell only tubules are seminiferous tubules with no developing germ cells. They are considered a histological marker of reduced semen quality and infertility in human males [35, 147].
In humans, the masculinization programming window corresponds to gestational weeks (GW) 8 to 14, with peak testosterone production occurring around GW 11 and 12 [141]. The age of the human fetal testis samples used in the xenograft studies was: 14–20 GW in [61]; GW 10–24 in [63]; GW 16–22 in [62]; and GW 14–20 in [66]. Since the data are presented as averages from all exposed individuals it is not possible to determine whether age played a role.
Ketoconazole is an antifungal agent known to inhibit CYP17 activity resulting in decreased testicular and adrenal androgen synthesis [148, 149].
Antimullerian hormone (Grinspon and Rey 2010; Matuszczaket al. 2013)
Sorbitol dehydrogenase, succinate dehydrogenase, aldose reductase, lactate dehydrogenase, flavin adenine dinucleotide, β-glucuronidase, γ-glutamyl transferase, acid phosphatase (Evans 2009; Foster and Gray 2013; Fukuoka et al. 1990; Kobayashi et al. 2002), and micronutrient (Zinc, Fe, Cu, etc.) and monosaccharide levels (Boekelheide et al. 2005; Cao et al. 2009; Jones and Connor 2000; Leichtmann-Bardoogo et al. 2012; Tvrda et al. 2015).
Transferrin, ferritin, and celluroplasmin (Leichtmann-Bardoogo et al. 2012; Reiset al. 2015), antimullerian hormone (Grinspon and Rey 2010; Matuszczaket al. 2013), inhibin B (Grinspon and Rey 2010; O’Connor and de Kretser 2004).
Fertility measures from animal studies should be interpreted with caution as laboratory models such as rats and rabbits are less susceptible to fluctuations in sperm parameters than humans (Mangelsdorf et al. 2003; Sharpe 2010).
References
- [1].Kavlock R, Boekelheide K, Chapin R, Cunningham M, Faustman E, Foster P, Golub M, Henderson R, Hinberg I, Little R, Seed J, Shea K, Tabacova S, Tyl R, Williams P, Zacharewski T, NTP center for the evaluation of risks to human reproduction: Phthalates expert panel report on the reproductive and developmental toxicity of di-n-butyl phthalate, Reprod Toxicol 16(5) (2002) 489–527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].NTP, NTP-CERHR Monograph on the Potential Human Reproductive and Developmental Effects of Di-n-Butyl Phthalate (DBP), in: N.I.o.E.H.S.-N.T. Program (Ed.) 2003, pp. i-III90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].NICNAS, Dibutyl phthalate. Priority existing assessment – Chemical report No. 36, Australian Government. Department of Health. National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme, Sydney, Australia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- [4].ATSDR, Toxicological profile for di-n-butyl phthalate, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA, 2001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].CPSC, Toxicity review for di-n-butyl phthalate (Dibutyl phthalate or DBP), U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- [6].U.S. EPA, America’s children and the environment, Washington, D.C., 2013. [Google Scholar]
- [7].Frederiksen H, Aksglaede L, Sorensen K, Skakkebaek NE, Juul A, Andersson AM, Urinary excretion of phthalate metabolites in 129 healthy Danish children and adolescents: estimation of daily phthalate intake, Environ Res 111(5) (2011) 656–663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].U.S. EPA, An Approach to Using Toxicogenomic Data in U.S. EPA Human Health Risk Assessments: A Dibutyl Phthalate Case Study (Final Report), Washington, DC, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- [9].Makris SL, Euling SY, Gray LE, Benson R, Foster PM, Use of genomic data in risk assessment case study: I. Evaluation of the dibutyl phthalate male reproductive development toxicity data set, Toxicol Appl Pharmacol (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].NASEM, Application of systematic review methods in an overall strategy for evaluating low-dose toxicity from endocrine active chemicals, Consensus Study Report, The National Academies Press, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering Institute of Medicine, Washington, D.C., 2017, p. 180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Radke EG, Braun JM, Meeker JD, Cooper GS, Phthalate exposure and male reproductive outcomes: A systematic review of the human epidemiological evidence, Environ Int 121(Pt 1) (2018) 764–793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].NASEM, Phthalates and cumulative risk assessment: The task ahead, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, DC, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- [13].Foster P, Gray LE Jr., Toxic responses of the reproductive system, in: Klaassen CD(Ed.) McGraw- Hill Education, New York, NY, 2013, pp. 861–906. [Google Scholar]
- [14].Hotchkiss AK, Rider CV, Blystone CR, Wilson VS, Hartig PC, Ankley GT, Foster PM, Gray CL, Gray LE, Fifteen years after "Wingspread"--environmental endocrine disrupters and human and wildlife health: where we are today and where we need to go, Toxicol Sci 105(2) (2008) 235–259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].David RM, Proposed mode of action for in utero effects of some phthalate esters on the developing male reproductive tract, Toxicol Pathol 34(3) (2006) 209–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].UNEP W, State of the science of endocrine disrupting chemicals - 2012, United Nations Environment Programme and the World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- [17].Gray TJB, Rowland IR, Foster PMD, Gangolli SD, Species differences in the testicular toxicity of phthalate esters, Toxicol Lett 11(1–2) (1982) 141–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Foster PM, Mode of action: impaired fetal leydig cell function--effects on male reproductive development produced by certain phthalate esters, Crit Rev Toxicol 35(8–9) (2005) 713–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Foster PM, Mylchreest E, Gaido KW, Sar M, Effects of phthalate esters on the developing reproductive tract of male rats, Hum Reprod Update 7(3) (2001) 231–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Barlow NJ, McIntyre BS, Foster PM, Male reproductive tract lesions at 6, 12, and 18 months of age following in utero exposure to di(n-butyl) phthalate, Toxicol Pathol 32(1) (2004) 79–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Hu GX, Lian QQ, Ge RS, Hardy DO, Li XK, Phthalate-induced testicular dysgenesis syndrome: Leydig cell influence, Trends Endocrinol Metab 20(3) (2009) 139–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Albert O, Jégou B, A critical assessment of the endocrine susceptibility of the human testis to phthalates from fetal life to adulthood, Hum Reprod Update 20(2) (2014) 231–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Habert R, Muczynski V, Grisin T, Moison D, Messiaen S, Frydman R, Benachi A, Delbes G, Lambrot R, Lehraiki A, N’Tumba-Byn T, Guerquin MJ, Levacher C, Rouiller-Fabre V, Livera G, Concerns about the widespread use of rodent models for human risk assessments of endocrine disruptors, Reproduction 147(4) (2014) R119–R129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Johnson KJ, Heger NE, Boekelheide K, Of mice and men (and rats): phthalate-induced fetal testis endocrine disruption is species-dependent, Toxicol Sci 129(2) (2012) 235–248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Habert R, Livera G, Rouiller-Fabre V, Man is not a big rat: Concerns with traditional human risk assessment of phthalates based on their anti-androgenic effects observed in the rat foetus, 24(14) (2014) 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].U.S. EPA, A framework for assessing health risk of environmental exposures to children, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC, 2006, pp. 1–145. [Google Scholar]
- [27].I. WHO, Harmonization project document no. 4: Part 2: IPCS framework for analysing the relevance of a non-cancer mode of action for humans, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- [28].Seed J, Carney EW, Corley RA, Crofton KM, Desesso JM, Foster PM, Kavlock R, Kimmel G, Klaunig J, Meek ME, Preston RJ, Slikker W Jr., Tabacova S, Williams GM, Wiltse J, Zoeller RT, Fenner-Crisp P, Patton DE, Overview: Using mode of action and life stage information to evaluate the human relevance of animal toxicity data, Crit Rev Toxicol 35(8–9) (2005) 663–672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Meek ME, Boobis A, Cote I, Dellarco V, Fotakis G, Munn S, Seed J, Vickers C, New developments in the evolution and application of the WHO/IPCS framework on mode of action/species concordance analysis, J Appl Toxicol 34(1) (2014) 1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Scott HM, Mason JI, Sharpe RM, Steroidogenesis in the fetal testis and its susceptibility to disruption by exogenous compounds, Endocr Rev 30(7) (2009) 883–925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Evans TJ, Ganjam VK, Reproductive anatomy and physiology, in: Ramesh CG(Ed.) Elsevier, Inc., London, UK, 2011, pp. 7–32. [Google Scholar]
- [32].Wilson VS, Blystone CR, Hotchkiss AK, Rider CV, Gray LE Jr., Diverse mechanisms of anti- androgen action: Impact on male rat reproductive tract development, Int J Androl 31(2) (2008) 178–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Lioy PJ, Hauser R, Gennings C, Koch HM, Mirkes PE, Schwetz BA, Kortenkamp A, Assessment of phthalates/phthalate alternatives in children’s toys and childcare articles: Review of the report including conclusions and recommendation of the Chronic Hazard Advisory Panel of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 25(4) (2015) 343–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Martino-Andrade A, Chahoud I, Reproductive toxicity of phthalate esters, Mol Nutr Food Res 54(1) (2010) 148–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Estill MS, Krawetz SA, The Epigenetic Consequences of Paternal Exposure to Environmental Contaminants and Reproductive Toxicants, Current environmental health reports 3(3) (2016) 202–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Kleymenova E, Swanson C, Boekelheide K, Gaido KW, Exposure in utero to di(n-butyl) phthalate alters the vimentin cytoskeleton of fetal rat Sertoli cells and disrupts Sertoli cell-gonocyte contact, Biol Reprod 73(3) (2005) 482–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Sharpe RM, Skakkebaek NPE, Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: mechanistic insights and potential new downstream effects, Fertil Steril 89(2 Suppl) (2008) e33–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Howdeshell KL, Rider CV, Wilson VS, Gray LE Jr., Mechanisms of action of phthalate esters, individually and in combination, to induce abnormal reproductive development in male laboratory rats, Environ Res 108(2) (2008) 168–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].CPSC, Chronic Hazard Advisory Panel on phthalates and phthalate alternatives (with appendices), U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- [40].Boekelheide K, Johnson KJ, Richburg JH, Sertoli cell toxicants, in: Skinner MK, Griswold MD(Eds.) Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2005, pp. 345–382. [Google Scholar]
- [41].Dent MP, Carmichael PL, Jones KC, Martin FL, Towards a non-animal risk assessment for anti- androgenic effects in humans, Environ Int 83 (2015) 94–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Rezk BM, Sikka S, Chapter 59 - Developmental and reproductive disorders: Role of endocrine disruptors in testicular toxicity, in: Gupta RC(Ed.) Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2011, pp. 903–912. [Google Scholar]
- [43].O’Connor AE, de Kretser DM, Inhibins in normal male physiology, Seminars in Reproductive Medicine 22(3) (2004) 177–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Ge RS, Chen GR, Tanrikut C, Hardy MP, Phthalate ester toxicity in Leydig cells: developmental timing and dosage considerations, Reprod Toxicol 23(3) (2007) 366–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Clewell RA, Campbell JL, Ross SM, Gaido KW, Clewell Hj III, Andersen ME, Assessing the relevance of in vitro measures of phthalate inhibition of steroidogenesis for in vivo response, Toxicol In Vitro 24(1) (2010) 327–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Makris SL, Thompson CM, Euling SY, Selevan SG, Sonawane B, A lifestage-specific approach to hazard and dose-response characterization for children’s health risk assessment, Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 83(6) (2008) 530–546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Boobis AR, Doe JE, Heinrich-Hirsch B, Meek ME, Munn S, Ruchirawat M, Schlatter J, Seed J, Vickers C, IPCS framework for analyzing the relevance of a noncancer mode of action for humans, Crit Rev Toxicol 38(2) (2008) 87–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Wen Q, Cheng CY, Liu YX, Development, function and fate of fetal Leydig cells, Semin Cell Dev Biol (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Gassei K, Schlatt S, Testicular morphogenesis: comparison of in vivo and in vitro models to study male gonadal development, Ann N Y Acad Sci 1120 (2007) 152–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Li LH, Donald JM, Golub MS, Review on testicular development, structure, function, and regulation in common marmoset, Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 74(5) (2005) 450–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].U.S. EPA, A review of the reference dose and reference concentration processes, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC, 2002, pp. 1–192. [Google Scholar]
- [52].Edwards SW, Tan YM, Villeneuve DL, Meek ME, McQueen CA, Adverse outcome pathways-organizing toxicological information to improve decision making, J Pharmacol Exp Ther 356(1) (2016) 170–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Howdeshell KL, Rider CV, Wilson VS, Furr JR, Lambright CR, Gray LE, Dose addition models based on biologically relevant reductions in fetal testosterone accurately predict postnatal reproductive tract alterations by a phthalate mixture in rats, Toxicol Sci 148(2) (2015) 488–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].U.S. EPA, Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC, 2005, pp. 1–166. [Google Scholar]
- [55].Rouiller-Fabre V, Guerquin MJ, N’Tumba-Byn T, Muczynski V, Moison D, Tourpin S, Messiaen S, Habert R, Livera G, Nuclear receptors and endocrine disruptors in fetal and neonatal testes: a gapped landscape, Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 6 (2015) 58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Muczynski V, Cravedi JP, Lehraiki A, Levacher C, Moison D, Lecureuil C, Messiaen S, Perdu E, Frydman R, Habert R, Rouiller-Fabre V, Effect of mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate on human and mouse fetal testis: In vitro and in vivo approaches, Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 261(1) (2012) 97–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Hannas BR, Lambright CS, Furr J, Evans N, Foster PMD, Gray EL, Wilson VS, Genomic biomarkers of phthalate-induced male reproductive developmental toxicity: A targeted RT-PCR array approach for defining relative potency, Toxicol Sci 125(2) (2012) 544–557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Boberg J, Metzdorff S, Wortziger R, Axelstad M, Brokken L, Vinggaard AM, Dalgaard M, Nellemann C, Impact of diisobutyl phthalate and other PPAR agonists on steroidogenesis and plasma insulin and leptin levels in fetal rats, Toxicology 250(2–3) (2008) 75–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Hallmark N, Walker M, McKinnell C, Mahood IK, Scott H, Bayne R, Coutts S, Anderson RA, Greig I, Morris K, Sharpe RM, Effects of monobutyl and di(n-butyl) phthalate in vitro on steroidogenesis and Leydig cell aggregation in fetal testis explants from the rat: Comparison with effects in vivo in the fetal rat and neonatal marmoset and in vitro in the human, Environ Health Perspect 115(3) (2007) 390–396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Lambrot R, Muczynski V, Lecureuil C, Angenard G, Coffigny H, Pairault C, Moison D, Frydman R, Habert R, Rouiller-Fabre V, Phthalates impair germ cell development in the human fetal testis in vitro without change in testosterone production, Environ Health Perspect 117(1) (2009) 32–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Mitchell RT, Childs AJ, Anderson RA, van Den Driesche S, Saunders PTK, McKinnell C, Wallace WHB, Kelnar CJH, Sharpe RM, Do phthalates affect steroidogenesis by the human fetal testis? Exposure of human fetal testis xenografts to di-n-butyl phthalate, J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97(3) (2012) E341–E348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Spade DJ, Hall SJ, Saffarini C, Huse SM, McDonnell EV, Boekelheide K, Differential response to abiraterone acetate and di-n-butyl phthalate in an androgen-sensitive human fetal testis xenograft bioassay, Toxicol Sci 138(1) (2014) 148–160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Heger NE, Hall SJ, Sandrof MA, McDonnell EV, Hensley JB, McDowell EN, Martin KA, Gaido KW, Johnson KJ, Boekelheide K, Human fetal testis xenografts are resistant to phthalate-induced endocrine disruption, Environ Health Perspect 120(8) (2012) 1137–1143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Lehraiki A, Racine C, Krust A, Habert R, Levacher C, Phthalates impair germ cell number in the mouse fetal testis by an androgen- and estrogen-independent mechanism, Toxicol Sci 111(2) (2009) 372–382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Gaido KW, Hensley JB, Liu D, Wallace DG, Borghoff S, Johnson KJ, Hall SJ, Boekelheide K, Fetal mouse phthalate exposure shows that gonocyte multinucleation is not associated with decreased testicular testosterone, Toxicol Sci 97(2) (2007) 491–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].van Den Driesche S, Walker M, McKinnell C, Scott HM, Eddie SL, Mitchell RT, Seckl JR, Drake AJ, Smith LB, Anderson RA, Sharpe RM, Proposed role for COUP-TFII in regulating fetal Leydig cell steroidogenesis, perturbation of which leads to masculinization disorders in rodents, PLoS ONE 7(5) (2012) e37064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Higuchi TT, Palmer JS, Gray LE Jr., Veeramachaneni DN, Effects of dibutyl phthalate in male rabbits following in utero, adolescent, or postpubertal exposure, Toxicol Sci 72(2) (2003) 301–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].McKinnell C, Mitchell RT, Walker M, Morris K, Kelnar CJH, Wallace WH, Sharpe RM, Effect of fetal or neonatal exposure to monobutyl phthalate (MBP) on testicular development and function in the marmoset, Hum Reprod 24(9) (2009) 2244–2254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Ferrara D, Hallmark N, Scott H, Brown R, McKinnell C, Mahood IK, Sharpe RM, Acute and long- term effects of in utero exposure of rats to di(n-butyl) phthalate on testicular germ cell development and proliferation, Endocrinology 147(11) (2006) 5352–5362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Euling SY, White LD, Kim AS, Sen B, Wilson VS, Keshava C, Keshava N, Hester S, Ovacik MA, Ierapetritou MG, Androulakis IP, Gaido KW, Use of genomic data in risk assessment case study: II. Evaluation of the dibutyl phthalate toxicogenomic data set, Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 271(3) (2013) 349–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Jobling MS, Hutchison GR, van den Driesche S, Sharpe RM, Effects of di(n-butyl) phthalate exposure on foetal rat germ-cell number and differentiation: identification of age-specific windows of vulnerability, Int J Androl 34(5 Pt 2) (2011) e386–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Chauvigné F, Menuet A, Lesné L, Chagnon M, Chevrier C, Regnier J, Angerer J, Jégou B, Time-and dose-related effects of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and its main metabolites on the function of the rat fetal testis in vitro, Environ Health Perspect 117(4) (2009) 515–521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Qin Z, Tang J, Han P, Jiang X, Yang C, Li R, Tang M, Shen B, Wang W, Qin C, Zhang W, Protective effects of sulforaphane on di-n-butylphthalate-induced testicular oxidative stress injury in male mice offsprings via activating Nrf2/ARE pathway, Onct 8(47) (2017) 82956–82967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Zhang X, Liu W, Yang H, Tan L, Ao L, Liu J, Cao J, Cui Z, Inhibition of PPAR alpha attenuates vimentin phosphorylation on Ser-83 and collapse of vimentin filaments during exposure of rat Sertoli cells in vitro to DBP, Reprod Toxicol 50 (2014) 11–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Kobayashi T, Niimi S, Kawanishi T, Fukuoka M, Hayakawa T, Changes in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-regulated gene expression and inhibin/activin-follistatin system gene expression in rat testis after an administration of di-n-butyl phthalate, Toxicol Lett 138(3) (2003) 215–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Bao AM, Man XM, Guo XJ, Dong HB, Wang FQ, Sun H, Wang YB, Zhou ZM, Sha JH, Effects of di-n-butyl phthalate on male rat reproduction following pubertal exposure, Asian J Androl 13(5) (2011) 702–709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].NTP, NTP technical report on the toxicity studies of dibutyl phthalate (CAS No. 84–74-2) administered in feed to F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice, in: N.I.o.E.H.S.-N.T. Program (Ed.) Research Triangle; Park, NC, 1995, pp. 1–G5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Ryu JY, Lee BM, Kacew S, Kim HS, Identification of differentially expressed genes in the testis of Sprague-Dawley rats treated with di(n-butyl) phthalate, Toxicology 234(1–2) (2007) 103–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Ward JA, Studies of age-related testicular and reproductive endocrine toxicity of di-n-butyl phthalate in rats, Department of Environmental Health fo the College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 1990, p. 204. [Google Scholar]
- [80].Zheng SJ, Tian HJ, Cao J, Y.q. Gao, Exposure to di(n-butyl)phthalate and benzo(a)pyrene alters IL-1β secretion and subset expression of testicular macrophages, resulting in decreased testosterone production in rats, Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 248(1) (2010) 28–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Ryu JY, Lee E, Kim TH, Lee YJ, Lee J, Lee BM, Kwack SJ, Jung KK, Han SY, Kim SH, Kacew S, Kim HS, Time-response effects of testicular gene expression profiles in Sprague-Dawley male rats treated with di(n-butyl) phthalate, J Toxicol Environ Health A 71(23) (2008) 1542–1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Güllen Ünal S, Take G, Erdoğan D, Göktas G, Sahin E, The effect of di-n-butyl phthalate on testis and the potential protective effects of resveratrol, Toxicol Ind Health 32(5) (2016) 777–790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Oishi S, Hiraga K, Testicular atrophy induced by phthalic acid monoesters: Effects of zinc and testosterone concentrations, Toxicology 15(3) (1980) 197–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Alam MS, Ohsako S, Matsuwaki T, Zhu XB, Tsunekawa N, Kanai Y, Sone H, Tohyama C, Kurohmaru M, Induction of spermatogenic cell apoptosis in prepubertal rat testes irrespective of testicular steroidogenesis: A possible estrogenic effect of di(n-butyl) phthalate, Reproduction 139(2) (2010) 427–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Hu Y, Wang R, Xiang Z, Qian W, Han X, Li D, Antagonistic effects of a mixture of low-dose nonylphenol and di-n-butyl phthalate (monobutyl phthalate) on the Sertoli cells and serum reproductive hormones in prepubertal male rats in vitro and in vivo, PLoS ONE 9(3) (2014) e93425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Chen X, An H, Ao L, Sun L, Liu W, Zhou Z, Wang Y, Cao J, The combined toxicity of dibutyl phthalate and benzo(a)pyrene on the reproductive system of male Sprague Dawley rats in vivo, J Hazard Mater 186(1) (2011) 835–841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Aly HAA, Hassan MH, El-Beshbishy HA, Alahdal AM, Osman AMM, Dibutyl phthalate induces oxidative stress and impairs spermatogenesis in adult rat, Toxicol Ind Health 32(8) (2015) 1467–1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].O’Connor JC, Frame SR, Ladics GS, Evaluation of a 15-day screening assay using intact male rats for identifying antiandrogens, Toxicol Sci 69(1) (2002) 92–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].El-Beshbishy HA, Mariah RA, Al-Azhary NM, Aly HAA, Ozbak HA, Baghdadi HH, Influence of lipoic acid on testicular toxicity induced by bi-n-butyl phthalate in rats, Food Chem Toxicol 71 (2014) 26–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [90].Heng K, Anand-Ivell R, Teerds K, Ivell R, The endocrine disruptors dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and diethylstilbestrol (DES) influence Leydig cell regeneration following ethane dimethane sulphonate treatment of adult male rats, Int J Androl 35(3) (2012) 353–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [91].Li L, Chen X, Hu G, Wang S, Xu R, Zhu Q, Li X, Wang M, Lian QQ, Ge R, Comparison of the effects of dibutyl and monobutyl phthalates on the steroidogenesis of rat immature Leydig cells, BioMed Res Int 2016 (2016) 1376526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92].Zhang J, Jin S, Zhao J, Li H, Effect of dibutyl phthalate on expression of connexin 43 and testosterone production of leydig cells in adult rats, Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 47 (2016) 131–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [93].Harris S, Hermsen SA, Yu X, Hong SW, Faustman EM, Comparison of toxicogenomic responses to phthalate ester exposure in an organotypic testis co-culture model and responses observed in vivo, Reprod Toxicol 58 (2015) 149–159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [94].Moody S, Goh H, Bielanowicz A, Rippon P, Loveland KL, Itman C, Prepubertal mouse testis growth and maturation and androgen production are acutely sensitive to di-n-butyl phthalate, Endocrinology 154(9) (2013) 3460–3475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [95].Bielanowicz A, Johnson RW, Goh H, Moody SC, Poulton IJ, Croce N, Loveland KL, Hedger MP, Sims NA, Itman C, Prepubertal di-n-butyl phthalate exposure alters Sertoli and Leydig cell function and lowers bone density in adult male mice, Endocrinology 157(7) (2016) 2595–2603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [96].Wang YB, Song L, Cui LB, Hong X, Zhang ZD, Wang XR, Monobutyl phthalate inhibits steroidogenesis by downregulating steroidogenic acute regulatory protein expression in mouse Leydig tumor cells (MLTC-1), J Toxicol Environ Health A 70(11) (2007) 947–955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [97].Hu Y, Dong C, Chen M, Chen Y, Gu A, Xia Y, Sun H, Li Z, Wang Y, Effects of monobutyl phthalate on steroidogenesis through steroidogenic acute regulatory protein regulated by transcription factors in mouse Leydig tumor cells, J Endocrinol Invest 38(8) (2015) 875–884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [98].Chen X, Zhou QH, Leng L, Chen X, Sun ZR, Tang NJ, Effects of di(n-butyl) and monobutyl phthalate on steroidogenesis pathways in the murine Leydig tumor cell line MLTC-1, Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 36(2) (2013) 332–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [99].Shen B, Wang W, Ding L, Sao Y, Huang Y, Shen Z, Zhuo Y, Wei Z, Zhang W, Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 rescues the oxidative stress induced by di-N-butylphthalate in testicular Leydig cells, Hum Exp Toxicol 34(2) (2015) 145–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [100].Hu Y, Dong C, Chen M, Lu J, Han X, Qiu L, Chen Y, Qin J, Li X, Gu A, Xia Y, Sun H, Li Z, Wang Y, Low-dose monobutyl phthalate stimulates steroidogenesis through steroidogenic acute regulatory protein regulated by SF-1, GATA-4 and C/EBP-beta in mouse Leydig tumor cells, Reprod Biol Endocrinol 11 (2013) 72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [101].Pathirana IN, Kawate N, Tsuji M, Takahashi M, Hatoya S, Inaba T, Tamada H, In vitro effects of estradiol-17β, monobutyl phthalate and mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate on the secretion of testosterone and insulin-like peptide 3 by interstitial cells of scrotal and retained testes in dogs, Theriogenology 76(7) (2011) 1227–1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [102].Alam MS, Andrina BB, Tay TW, Tsunekawa N, Kanai Y, Kurohmaru M, Single administration of di(n-butyl) phthalate delays spermatogenesis in prepubertal rats, Tissue Cell 42(2) (2010) 129–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [103].Alam MS, Ohsako S, Tay TW, Tsunekawa N, Kanai Y, Kurohmaru M, Di(n-butyl) phthalate induces vimentin filaments disruption in rat sertoli cells: A possible relation with spermatogenic cell apoptosis, Anat Histol Embryol 39(3) (2010) 186–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [104].Nair N, Dose-dependent short-term study of di-n-butyl phthalate on the testicular antioxidant system of Wistar rats, Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22(3) (2015) 2196–2204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [105].Kondo T, Shono T, Suita S, Age-specific effect of phthalate ester on testicular development in rats, J Pediatr Surg 41(7) (2006) 1290–1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [106].Foster PM, Lake BG, Thomas LV, Cook MW, Gangolli SD, Testicular effects and zinc excretion produced by various isomers of monobutyl-o-phthalate in the rat, Chem Biol Interact 34(2) (1981) 233–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [107].Srivastava S, Singh GB, Srivastava SP, Seth PK, Testicular toxicity of di-n-butyl phthalate in adult rats: Effect on marker enzymes of spermatogenesis, Indian J Exp Biol 28(1) (1990) 67–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [108].Zhou Y, Fukuoka M, Tanaka A, Mechanisms of testicular atrophy induced by di-n-butyl phthalate in rats. Part 3. Changes in the activity of some enzymes in the Sertoli and germ cells, and in the levels of metal ions, J Appl Toxicol 10(6) (1990) 447–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [109].Fukuoka M, Tanimoto T, Zhou Y, Kawasaki N, Tanaka A, Ikemoto I, Machida T, Mechanism of testicular atrophy induced by di-n-butyl phthalate in rats. Part 1, J Appl Toxicol 9(4) (1989) 277–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [110].Fukuoka M, Zhou Y, Tanaka A, Ikemoto I, Machida T, Mechanism of testicular atrophy induced by di-n-butyl phthalate in rats. Part 2. The effects on some testicular enzymes, J Appl Toxicol 10(4) (1990) 285–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [111].Fukuoka M, Kobayashi T, Hayakawa T, Mechanism of testicular atrophy induced by di-n-butyl phthalate in rats. Part 5. Testicular iron depletion and levels of ferritin, haemoglobin and transferrin in the bone marrow, liver and spleen, J Appl Toxicol 15(5) (1995) 379–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [112].Ikemoto I, Machida T, Tanaka A, Kotera S, Mikuriya H, Shirai T, Appearance of LDH-X activity in rat serum after acute and subacute testicular damages, Jpn J Fertil Steril 35(2) (1990) 247–252. [Google Scholar]
- [113].Tanino M, Ikemoto I, Tanaka A, Enzyme levels in rat testis damaged experimentally with dibutyl phthalate, Jikeikai Med J 34(2) (1987) 245–252. [Google Scholar]
- [114].Erdos Z, Pearson K, Goedken M, Menzel K, Sistare FD, Glaab WE, Saldutti LP, Inhibin B response to testicular toxicants hexachlorophene, ethane dimethane sulfonate, di-(n-butyl)-phthalate, nitrofurazone, DL-ethionine, 17-alpha ethinylestradiol, 2,5-hexanedione, or carbendazim following short-term dosing in male rats, Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 98(1) (2013) 41–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [115].Fukuoka M, Kobayashi T, Zhou Y, Hayakawa T, Mechanism of testicular atrophy induced by di-n-butyl phthalate in rats. Part 4. Changes in the activity of succinate dehydrogenase and the levels of transferrin and ferritin in the Sertoli and germ cells, J Appl Toxicol 13(4) (1993) 241–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [116].Gray TJB, Beamand JA, Effect of some phthalate esters and other testicular toxins on primary cultures of testicular cells, Food Chem Toxicol 22(2) (1984) 123–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [117].Yu X, Hong S, Moreira EG, Faustman EM, Improving in vitro Sertoli cell/gonocyte co-culture model for assessing male reproductive toxicity: Lessons learned from comparisons of cytotoxicity versus genomic responses to phthalates, Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 239(3) (2009) 325–336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [118].Hu Y, Li DM, Han XD, Analysis of combined effects of nonylphenol and monobutyl phthalate on rat Sertoli cells applying two mathematical models, Food Chem Toxicol 50(3–4) (2012) 457–463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [119].Wang H, Wang J, Zhang J, Jin S, Li H, Role of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in DBP-induced apoptosis of testicular sertoli cells in vitro, Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 53 (2017) 145–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [120].Zhang YH, Lin L, Liu ZW, Jiang XZ, Chen BH, Disruption effects of monophthalate exposures on inter-Sertoli tight junction in a two-compartment culture model, Environ Toxicol 23(3) (2008) 302–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [121].Rodriguez-Sosa JR, Bondareva A, Tang L, Avelar GF, Coyle KM, Modelski M, Alpaugh W, Conley A, Wynne-Edwards K, França LR, Meyers S, Dobrinski I, Phthalate esters affect maturation and function of primate testis tissue ectopically grafted in mice, Mol Cell Endocrinol 398(1–2) (2014) 89–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [122].Dobrzyńska MM, Tyrkiel EJ, Hernik A, Derezińska E, Góralczyk K, Ludwicki JK, The effects of di-n-butyl phthalate on the germ cells of laboratory mice, Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig 60(4) (2009) 317–324. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [123].Lamb J, Chapin R, Teague J, Lawton A, Reel J, Reproductive effects of four phthalic acid esters in the mouse, Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 88(2) (1987) 255–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [124].Dobrzynska MM, Tyrkiel EJ, Gajowik A, Three generation study of reproductive and developmental toxicity following exposure of pubescent F0 male mice to di-n-butyl phthalate, Mutagenesis 32(4) (2017) 445–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [125].Jiang XP, Tang JY, Xu Z, Han P, Qin ZQ, Yang CD, Wang SQ, Tang M, Wang W, Qin C, Xu Y, Shen BX, Zhou WM, Zhang W, Sulforaphane attenuates di-N-butylphthalate-induced reproductive damage in pubertal mice: Involvement of the Nrf2-antioxidant system, Environ Toxicol 32(7) (2017) 1908–1917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [126].Perobelli JE, The male peripubertal phase as a developmental window for reproductive toxicology studies, Curr Pharm Des 20(34) (2014) 5398–5415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [127].Dobrzyńska MM, Tyrkiel EJ, Pachocki KA, Developmental toxicity in mice following paternal exposure to di-n-butyl-phthalate (DBP), Biomed Environ Sci 24(5) (2011) 569–578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [128].Furr JR, Lambright CS, Wilson VS, Foster PM, Gray LE Jr., A short-term in vivo screen using fetal testosterone production, a key event in the phthalate adverse outcome pathway, to predict disruption of sexual differentiation, Toxicol Sci 140(2) (2014) 403–424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [129].Fiandanese N, Borromeo V, Berrini A, Fischer B, Schaedlich K, Schmidt JS, Secchi C, Pocar P, Maternal exposure to a mixture of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) causes reproductive dysfunction in adult male mouse offspring, Reprod Toxicol 65 (2016) 123–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [130].Doyle TJ, Bowman JL, Windell VL, McLean DJ, Kim KH, Transgenerational Effects of Di-(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate on Testicular Germ Cell Associations and Spermatogonial Stem Cells in Mice, Biol Reprod 88(5) (2013) 112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [131].Pocar P, Fiandanese N, Secchi C, Berrini A, Fischer B, Schmidt JS, Schaedlich K, Borromeo V, Exposure to di(2-ethyl-hexyl) phthalate (DEHP) in utero and during lactation causes long-term pituitary-gonadal axis disruption in male and female mouse offspring, Endocrinology 153(2) (2012) 937–948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [132].Liu X, He D, Zhang D, Lin T, Wei G, Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) increases transforming growth factor-beta1 expression in fetal mouse genital tubercles, J Toxicol Environ Health A 71(19) (2008) 1289–1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [133].Wu S, Zhu J, Li Y, Lin T, Gan L, Yuan X, Xu M, Wei G, Dynamic effect of di-2-(ethylhexyl) phthalate on testicular toxicity: epigenetic changes and their impact on gene expression, Int J Toxicol 29(2) (2010) 193–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [134].Do RP, Stahlhut RW, Ponzi D, Vom Saal FS, Taylor JA, Non-monotonic dose effects of in utero exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) on testicular and serum testosterone and anogenital distance in male mouse fetuses, Reprod Toxicol 34(4) (2012) 614–621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [135].Wang Y, Yang Q, Liu W, Yu M, Zhang Z, Cui X, Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate Exposure In Utero Damages Sertoli Cell Differentiation Via Disturbance of Sex Determination Pathway in Fetal and Postnatal Mice, Toxicol Sci 152(1) (2016) 53–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [136].Vasaitis TS, Bruno RD, Njar VC, CYP17 inhibitors for prostate cancer therapy, J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 125(1–2) (2011) 23–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [137].Salazar V, Castillo C, Ariznavarreta C, Campon R, Tresguerres JA, Effect of oral intake of dibutyl phthalate on reproductive parameters of Long Evans rats and pre-pubertal development of their offspring, Toxicology 205(1–2) (2004) 131–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [138].NTP, Final report on the reproductive toxicity of di-N-butyl phthalate (CAS no. 84–74-2) in Sprague- Dawley rats in: N.I.o.E.H.S.-N.T. Program (Ed.) Research Triangle; Park, NC: 1991. [Google Scholar]
- [139].Gray LE Jr., Laskey J, Ostby J, Chronic di-n-butyl phthalate exposure in rats reduces fertility and alters ovarian function during pregnancy in female Long Evans hooded rats, Toxicol Sci 93(1) (2006) 189–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [140].Ema M, Miyawaki E, Kawashima K, Effects of dibutyl phthalate on reproductive function in pregnant and pseudopregnant rats, Reprod Toxicol 14(1) (2000) 13–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [141].Scott HM, Mason JI, Sharpe RM, Steroidogenesis in the fetal testis and its susceptibility to disruption by exogenous compounds, Endocr Rev 30(7) (2009) 883–925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [142].Grinspon RP, Rey RA, Anti-mullerian hormone and sertoli cell function in paediatric male hypogonadism, Hormone research in paediatrics 73(2) (2010) 81–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [143].Stukenborg JB, Kjartansdottir KR, Reda A, Colon E, Albersmeier JP, Soder O, Male germ cell development in humans, Hormone research in paediatrics 81(1) (2014) 2–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [144].George JW, Dille EA, Heckert LL, Current concepts of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene regulation, Biol Reprod 84(1) (2011) 7–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [145].Creasy DM, Maronpot RR, Giri DK, Testis, seminiferous tubule -vacuolation, 2014. http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/nnl/male_reproductive/testis/setubvac/index.htm. [Google Scholar]
- [146].Creasy D, Bube A, de Rijk E, Kandori H, Kuwahara M, Masson R, Nolte T, Reams R, Regan K, Rehm S, Rogerson P, Whitney K, Proliferative and nonproliferative lesions of the rat and mouse male reproductive system, Toxicol Pathol 40(6 Suppl) (2012) 40S–121S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [147].Wohlfahrt-Veje C, Main KM, Skakkebaek NE, Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: foetal origin of adult reproductive problems, Clinical endocrinology 71(4) (2009) 459–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [148].Vasaitis TS, Bruno RD, Njar VC, CYP17 inhibitors for prostate cancer therapy, The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology 125(1–2) (2011) 23–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [149].Pont A, Williams PL, Azhar S, Reitz RE, Bochra C, Smith ER, Stevens DA, Ketoconazole blocks testosterone synthesis, Archives of internal medicine 142(12) (1982) 2137–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [150].Reis MM, Moreira AC, Sousa M, Mathur PP, Oliveira PF, Alves MG, Sertoli cell as a model in male reproductive toxicology: Advantages and disadvantages, J Appl Toxicol 35(8) (2015) 870–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [151].Saffarini CM, Heger NE, Yamasaki H, Liu T, Hall SJ, Boekelheide K, Induction and persistence of abnormal testicular germ cells following gestational exposure to di-(n-butyl) phthalate in p53-null mice, J Androl 33(3) (2012) 505–513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [152].Wang YB, Song L, Cui LB, Hong X, Zhang ZD, Wang XR, Monobutyl phthalate inhibits steroidogenesis by downregulating steroidogenic acute regulatory protein expression in mouse Leydig tumor cells (MLTC-1), Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A 70(11) (2007) 947–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [153].Matuszczak E, Hermanowicz A, Komarowska M, Debek W, Serum AMH in physiology and pathology of male gonads, Int. J. Endocrinol 2013 (2013) 128907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [154].Abou-Haila A, Fouquet JP, Tulsiani DR, Characterization and immunolocalization of beta-D- glucuronidase in mouse testicular germ cells and spermatozoa, Exp. Cell Res 247 (1) (1999) 48–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [155].Kobayashi T, Kaneko T, Iuchi Y, Matsuki S, Takahashi M, Sasagawa I, Nakada T, Fujii J, Localization and physiological implication of aldose reductase and sorbitol dehydrogenase in reproductive tracts and spermatozoa of male rats, J. Androl. 23 (5) (2002) 674–683. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [156].f [Google Scholar]
- [157].Evans GO, Section 10.3: Other endocrine glands, Animal Clinical Chemistry : A Practical Handbook for Toxicologists and Biomedical Researchers, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, 2009, pp. 226–242. [Google Scholar]
- [158].Cao W, Aghajanian HK, Haig-Ladewig LA, Gerton GL, Sorbitol can fuel mouse sperm motility and protein tyrosine phosphorylation via sorbitol dehydrogenase, Biol. Reprod 80 (1) (2009) 124–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [159].Jones AR, Connor DE, Fructose metabolism by mature boar spermatozoa, Reprod. Fertil. Dev 12 (7–8) (2000) 355–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [160].Leichtmann-Bardoogo Y, Cohen LA, Weiss A, Marohn B, Schubert S, Meinhardt A, Meyron-Holtz EG, Compartmentalization and regulation of iron metabolism proteins protect male germ cells from iron overload, Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab 302 (12) (2012) E1519–E1530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [161].Tvrda E, Peer R, Sikka SC, Agarwal A, Iron and copper in male reproduction: a double-edged sword, J. Assist. Reprod. Genet 32 (1) (2015) 3–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [162].Reis MM, Moreira AC, Sousa M, Mathur PP, Oliveira PF, Alves MG, Sertoli cell as a model in male reproductive toxicology: advantages and disadvantages, J. Appl. Toxicol 35 (8) (2015) 870–883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [163].Mangelsdorf I, Buschmann J, Orthen B, Some aspects relating to the evaluation of the effects of chemicals on male fertility, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol 37 (3) (2003) 356–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [164].Sharpe RM, Environmental/lifestyle effects on spermatogenesis, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci 365 (1546) (2010) 1697–1712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.