Skip to main content
Engineering in Life Sciences logoLink to Engineering in Life Sciences
. 2023 Feb 28;23(4):e2200039. doi: 10.1002/elsc.202200039

Membrane inlet—ion mobility spectrometry with automatic spectra evaluation as online monitoring tool for the process control of microalgae cultivation

Malcolm Cämmerer 1, Thomas Mayer 1, Carolin Schott 2, Juliane Steingroewer 2, Ralf Petrich 3, Helko Borsdorf 1,
PMCID: PMC10071569  PMID: 37025189

Abstract

The cultivation of algae either in open raceway ponds or in closed bioreactors could allow the renewable production of biomass for food, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, or chemical industries. Optimal cultivation conditions are however required to ensure that the production of these compounds is both efficient and economical. Therefore, high‐frequency analytical measurements are required to allow timely process control and to detect possible disturbances during algae growth. Such analytical methods are only available to a limited extent. Therefore, we introduced a method for monitoring algae release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the headspace above a bioreactor in real time. This method is based on ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) in combination with a membrane inlet (MI). The unique feature of IMS is that complete spectra are detected in real time instead of sum signals. These spectral patterns produced in the ion mobility spectrum were evaluated automatically via principal component analysis (PCA). The detected peak patterns are characteristic for the respective algae culture; allow the assignment of the individual growth phases and reflect the influence of experimental parameters. These results allow for the first time a continuous monitoring of the algae cultivation and thus an early detection of possible disturbances in the biotechnological process.

Keywords: algal biotechnology, classification methods, ion mobility spectrometry, Limnospira platensis, process monitoring


Abbreviations

CPC

C‐phycocyanin

LOD

limit of detection

MI

membrane inlet

IMS

ion mobility spectrometry

OD

optical density

OTR

oxygen transfer rate

UV‐Vis

Ultraviolet‐Visible spectroscopy

1. INTRODUCTION

The sustainable, industrial use of algae and their cell ingredients for the production of valuable compounds and active substances is a promising alternative to fossil raw materials and synthetically manufactured products [1]. Pharmaceutically relevant active ingredients and nutritionally highly effective substances such as the polyunsaturated ω‐3 fatty acids [2], natural colorants such as phycocyanin [3, 4] and chlorophyll [5], and highly potent antioxidants such as astaxanthin [6], lutein or zeaxanthin are examples for products of microalgae biotechnology. The growth in the markets for these products is driven by both regulatory changes and growing interest from consumers in natural and healthy products [7, 8, 9, 10]. In addition, the cultivation of microalgae offers benefits compared to standard agricultural production as cultivation can take place on non‐arable land and promises higher yields. The downstream processing of microalgae to yield the products is, however, often time consuming and expensive which can prevent these products from being economically viable [11]. It is therefore important to maximize the growth rate, culture cell density, and product content of the algae through careful strain selection and control of the growth conditions. Any disturbance to the culture not only reduces the product yield but can also lead to greater downstream purification costs to ensure a hazard free product. It is therefore important to closely monitor the culture to prevent losses. Consequently, such biotechnological processes require extensive process monitoring and control [12]. Most of the analytical techniques used for this purpose are off‐line procedures that require sample collection, sample preparation, or dilution of sample. A summary of analytical techniques that are frequently used to monitor biological processes is presented in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Summary of analytical techniques currently used to monitor bioreactors

Analytical Information Advantages Disadvantages Reference
Gas sensors (e.g., Respiration Activity Monitoring System RAMOS) Partial pressure of gases (O2 and CO2) Can calculate oxygen transfer rate (OTR) which correlates with specific growth rate No specific information (sum signal describing metabolic rate) [1314, 2223]
Electrochemical culture medium sensors Enzyme modification leads to signal relating to concentration of a specific compound (e.g., ethanol) Rate of production of specific product through enzyme modification (targeted analytics) Enzyme modification affected by temperature and pH [15, 16, 17, 18]
Absorption based optical sensors

Extinction proportional to concentration at low concentration (e.g., proteins or pigments).

Attenuation of signal due to scattering can also be measured.

Cell concentration can be determined as well as qualitative information regarding photoactive compounds Sample preparation or dilution required at higher cell concentrations. [1921, 24]
Scattering based optical sensors Scattered light caused by cells Online measurements of cell concentration possible Disturbances by adsorption or cell agglomeration [25, 26, 27]
Fluorescence based optical sensors Fluorescence from specific compounds in the medium or organism Specific product information

Sample preparation or dilution may be required at higher cell concentrations

Correction factors may need to be applied

[28, 29, 30, 31, 32]

PRACTICAL APPLICATION

Ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) in combination with a membrane inlet (MI) was successfully introduced as tool for online monitoring of micro algae cultivation. The developed method bases on algae release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the headspace above a bioreactor in real time. The practical benefit is the possibility for predicting the optimal harvest time in systems with varying conditions such as open raceway ponds. Furthermore, early detection of possible disturbances permits the user to check the system before the product yield reduces. The ion mobility spectra are recorded every 10 min and the resulting three‐dimensional data matrix is evaluated using principal component analysis (PCA). Therefore, the developed procedure can be automated and integrated into biotechnological processes.

The oxygen transfer rate (OTR) is widely used to study the growth of microbial or plant cell cultures [13]. In phototropic algae cultivation the production of oxygen through photosynthesis is affected by the light intensity. The OTR can therefore be used to estimate the specific growth rate [14, 15, 16]. The concentration of the substrate, for example, glucose in a photomixotrophic cultivation, or the product of the cultivation, for example, ethanol, in the culture medium can also be effectively used to characterize a cultivation. This is achieved using amperometric or potentiometric sensors with enzymes immobilized on their surface [17, 18]. Specific non‐enzymatic sensors have also been developed to minimize the influence of number of factors, including temperature and pH, which can effect enzymatic sensors [19]. Whilst specific sensors such as these can provide useful data, bioreceptor (e.g., enzyme) based sensors are targeted to measure the quality of a specific compound dissolved in the culture medium [20]. Optical sensors can provide a wide range of targeted data as well as non‐targeted information relating to pigments (visible spectroscopy), biomass (light scattering), and other molecules (infrared spectroscopy) [21].

Ultraviolet/Visible spectroscopy (UV‐Vis) can be used at fairly low cost to determine the concentrations of substrates, metabolites, and products. UV‐Vis spectroscopy can also be used to estimate the concentration of C‐phycocyanin (CPC) or its purity [31]. Unfortunately, turbidity is a problem [30] meaning that as the cell concentration increases, the accuracy decreases. The fluorescence of CPC can also be used to determine its concentration but this method is also best applied to low concentrations [28, 29]. As Raman spectroscopy is more robust to sample turbidity [32], it is an alternative, if more expensive way, to characterize a wide range of substances with minimal sample pre‐treatment. However, the Raman effect is weak and, as with other optical methods, a complex matrix with multiple components leads to complex overlapping spectra [33]. The sample matrix is not only complex due to the substance but also as a result of the wide range of metabolites produced during the cultivation.

Another possible approach is the detection of algae release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the headspace above a bioreactor. The VOC profile can provide useful information about the metabolic processes that are taking place [33] and with a suitable analytical technique these signals can be resolved to minimize signal overlap. Due to the effect of the metabolism on the VOC profile, their study may offer the required information regarding changes to cell concentration. For example, it has been shown that the VOC profile of Limnospira platensis (L. platensis) [34] is influenced by the level of illumination [35]. VOCs released from the liquid have obviously a clear relationship with growth conditions. However, it is notable that few other features, like the varying physicochemical conditions of the liquid media may influence the presence and the composition of VOCs in the headspace of the photobioreactors.

The study of volatile metabolites is usually accomplished using gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry [36, 37]. This is not only an expensive and complex analytical technique but also a time‐ consuming step. This form of analysis can be made more economically viable by exchanging the mass spectrometer for an ion mobility spectrometer [38, 39]. Ion mobility spectrometers are typically used to detect volatile and semi‐VOCs such as explosives for security purposes and the military [40]. The instrumentation is relatively small, low power and can be used at atmospheric pressure using ambient air as the gas supply. Ion mobility measurements are based on drift velocities of ion swarms derived from sample molecules. Since the measurements are made on ions, the formation of these ions from neutral sample molecules is a first and controlling event in this method. Ionization of samples also occurs in air at ambient pressure using radioactive ionization sources, photoionization, or Corona Discharge ionization [41]. The ions are injected at a given time interval of a few microseconds via an electronic shutter into the drift region with typical lengths ranging between 5 and 15 cm. The ion packet moves as a swarm toward a detector down a voltage gradient and through a gas flow, either air or nitrogen, in a direction opposite to that of ion motion. The ion swarm has characteristic drift velocities, which provide the basis for ion separation through differences in mass and structure. Although ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) is able to provide automated, cost‐effective, and stable characterization of VOC profiles, the measurements are significantly affected by humidity in the gas sample [42, 43]. The use of gas chromatography limits the problems caused by high humidity. However, it also limits the sample volume, and therefore the limit of detection. The use of a membrane inlet is another method, which has been shown to allow the analysis of high‐humidity samples using IMS [44, 45]. Membrane inlet (MI)‐IMS is, therefore, a simple and effective method to study the VOC profile of a humid gas sample.

This study concerns the use of a custom build MI integrated into an ion mobility spectrometer to allow the automated, in‐line characterization of the VOC profile of a bioreactor. The response of the MI‐IMS system to changes in cell density and light intensity was then studied to analyze the effectiveness of this technique. The question was whether characteristic and reproducible signal patterns can be detected in the different growth phases, so that deviations from this pattern can be used as an indicator for possible disturbances during the cultivation due to algae associated parasites, nutrient limitation, or technical malfunction. For optimizing and testing our process analytical technology, the cyanobacterium L. platensis was cultivated several times with comparable results between cultivations and test locations.

The cultivation of L. platensis is not only of interest as a renewable source of proteins and fatty acids but also due to the biological activity of compounds produced by L. platensis [46], including compounds with anti‐oxidant and anti‐cancer activity [47]. Phycocyanins, linked to the proteins, are the main pigment found in L. platensis. Phycocyanin (approximately 15% of the protein matrix) is an antioxidant which is used as an ingredient in various products developed in the cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries. It is also used as a colorant in the food industry. Therefore, the commercial production of L. platensis growths throughout the world and an available analytical monitoring system would also have a high practical relevance here [12].

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Bioreactor

L. platensis PCC7345 was obtained from the Pasteur Culture Collection (PCC, Paris, France). Pre‐cultures of L. platensis were maintained at 30°C in 250 ml shaking flasks, which were illuminated for 18 h per day with an LED lamp (PGLE 18 RBW, Venso EcoSolutions AB, Sweden). The intensity of the lamp was adjusted to match the conditions used in the bioreactor. These pre‐cultures were rediluted with fresh modified Zarrouks culture medium twice a week so that the optical density at 750 nm (OD 750) was between 0.2 and 0.6. The OD 750 of the pre‐culture was measured before dilution in the main reactor to ensure a starting OD 750 of 0.11 ± 0.01. The culture medium was prepared according to [48] with the following composition (L−1): 12.0 g NaHCO3 (99.5%, VWR Chemicals, Darmstadt, Germany), 0.5 g K2HPO4 (99%, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), 2.5 g NaNO3 (99.9%, VWR Chemicals, Darmstadt, Germany), 1.0 g K2SO4 (99.5%, VWR Chemicals, Darmstadt, Germany), 1.0 g NaCl (99%, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), 0.2 g MgSO4ˑ7H2O (99%, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), 0.04 g CaCl2ˑ2H2O (99%, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) and 100 μl Hunters trace element solution [49].

The 850 ml culture was cultured in a 1 L Duran GLS80 Laboratory Bottle (DWK Life Sciences GmbH, Wertheim, Germany). The culture medium was maintained at 30°C and stirred at a rate of 300 min−1. The culture was aerated with purified air at a rate of 100 ml min−1, which was fed directly to the MI (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Schematic of experimental setup.

Chlorella vulgaris SAG 211‐11b was obtained from the Sammlung von Algenkulturen Göttingen (SAG, Göttingen, Germany). The organisms were cultivated in Bristol Modified Medium (BMM) [50]. The four stock solutions (10 ml L−1 mineral salt solution, 10 ml L−1 nitrate solution, 10 ml L−1 phosphate solution, and 1 ml L−1 trace element solution) were mixed in a 1 L volumetric flask and filled up with distilled water for preparation of 1 L of BMM. The pH was adjusted between 6.6 and 6.8 with sodium hydroxide or hydrochloric acid. After that, the mixture was transferred into a 1 L Schott bottle and autoclaved at 121°C for 20 min.

Each cultivation was carried out at least three times at each site (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research in Leipzig and at the Technical University in Dresden) and the online measurements were taken at each cultivation (compare chapter 3.1).

2.2. Membrane inlet

The membrane cell for transition of sample molecules from the humid reactor gas stream into the inlet gas stream of ion mobility spectrometer was made from stainless steel. Both sites of the membrane module have identical channels with the following dimensions: radius 0.5 mm, depth 1 mm, width 1 mm, and length 112 mm. The exchange surface was 112.8 mm2. The gas streams were guided in counterflow principle through the membrane module. The gas flow from the bioreactor was pumped using a membrane pump (3003 series, Gardner Denver Thomas, Inc., Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany) with 100 ml min−1 and the sample gas stream into the ion mobility spectrometer was sucked by the spectrometer´s internal pump with 10 ml min−1. A 127 μm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membrane (J‐Flex Rubber Products, Nottinghamshire, UK) was used. The membrane cell was heated to 70°C using a PWR220T‐35 Series Power Resistor (20 Ohm, 35W).

2.3. Ion mobility spectrometry

In drift time IMS, ions produced are separated according to the time taken to travel to the detector. Firstly, a packet of ions is generated by opening the ion gate for a short period of time, in our case 100 μs. The ions are accelerated towards the detector as a result of the electric field applied to the drift tube and reach a consistent and ion specific drift velocity. The ions are retarded by collisions with the neutral gas present in the drift tube. This means that ions are separated according to their mass, charge, and collision cross section [39, 40].

The drift time, td , taken to reach the detector at a length, L, from the ion gate is characteristic for each individual ion for a particular electric field, E. This means that each ion can be assigned a characteristic ion mobility, K. Alternatively this can be standardized for the IMS operating temperature and pressure to calculate the reduced ion mobility, K 0, as shown in [51].

td=LEK=LEKoToTppo (1)

An alternative method to standardize the measurement is to normalize the drift time against the drift time of a well‐defined peak. The largest peak in an ion mobility spectrum is typically the reactant ion peak that results from the ionization of existing air components and transfer their protons to the target analytes in subsequent reactions. In positive polarity IMS this ion is a protonated water cluster, (H2O)nH+. As seen in [52], when the drift time is normalized against that of the reactant ion peak (arise from ionized air constituents), all instrumental factors cancel out. The relative drift time, trel , is independent of instrumental factors which leads to a lower standard deviation in the measurement [41].

trel=tdIontdRIP=KoRIPKoIon (2)

The measurements were performed with a Smellmaster 2 ion mobility spectrometer (IFU GmbH Privates Institut für Analytik, Frankenberg, Germany) equipped with a Tritium (3H) ionization source. The following operational conditions were applied for the measurements: ionization source: Tritium (50 MBq); shutter opening time: 100 μs; length of drift tube: 56 mm; drift voltage: 2470 V; polarity of ions measured: positive; drift gas: air with 340 ml min−1; drift tube temperature 80°C, pressure: ambient (950–1050 hPa). The spectra were taken and stored by the Smellmaster 2 every 10 min. Data analysis of these spectra was performed using custom scripts written in Python. More detailed information about the program and the corresponding scripts can be found in the Supporting Information.

2.4. Offline analytics with photometry

Offline photometric measurements were taken 5–6 times per day using a Dr. Lange CADAS 200 spectrometer (Dr. Bruno Lange GmbH, Berlin, Germany). A sample (<4 ml) was taken from the reactor and diluted to ensure an OD 750 of less than 0.2 before the OD 750 was measured in a 1 cm quartz cuvette. Fresh culture medium was added to the reactor to ensure the volume of the culture was not changed. The OD 750 was measured 6 times (algae resuspended between each measurement) and a complete spectrum (400–900 nm) was taken to allow the pigment content to be estimated. The OD 750 has been shown to be related to the dry weight (cx) of the algae using the formula shown in Equation (3) [53].

cxg/L1=0.86·OD750 (3)

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Pattern of ion mobility spectra depending on growth phase and reproducibility

A series of ion mobility spectra from samples, which were taken from the headspace above the bioreactor during the cultivation of L. platensis, is shown in Figure 2. The reactant ion peak can be seen at a relative drift time of 1 (see Equation (2)) as well as a small peak at lower relative drift times which was consistently observed, both when sampling the headspace above the algae and when flushing the ionization region of the ion mobility spectrometer with filtered air. The seven characteristic peaks marked in Figure 2 were identified by comparing the measurements taken during cultivation to the blank measurements of the cultivation medium. These peaks were observed at levels greater than the limit of detection, LOD, (3 x the background signal noise) and also seen to vary in intensity over the course of a cultivation. As these peaks were greater than the LOD, they could be easily identified using the Python function, scipy.signal.find_peaks. In general, the peaks in the middle (c, d, and e) increase in intensity during the growth phase whereas peak g increases sharply as the cell concentration in the culture reaches a maximum. It is clearly shown that the ion mobility spectra and thus the composition of the VOCs change over the course of the cultivation. Each phase of cultivation shows significant pattern in ion mobility spectra. Before the experiment started, the ion mobility spectra of pure culture medium were taken. This ensured that no contamination was present as contamination of the culture medium, for example as a result of ineffective cleaning of the reactor between experiments, led to a signal in the ion mobility spectrum which differed from the typical blank spectrum.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Ion mobility spectra over the course of an algae cultivation of L. platensis. Seven peaks identified as relevant (peaks a–g with the corresponding relative drift times).

The stability of the MI‐IMS system was demonstrated by comparing the ion mobility spectra taken from cultivations of L. platensis performed at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research in Leipzig and at the Technical University in Dresden. Both research groups used an identical equipment including bioreactor, sampling position, MI, and coupling to the ion mobility spectrometer. The peak positions of peaks a–g were accurately reproduced when sampling the headspace above identical L. platensis cultures using two Smellmaster 2 ion mobility spectrometers. These results can be found in the Supporting Information (Figure S1). The pattern of peaks also varied in a similar manner with peaks c, d, and e rising during the growth period and peak g rising sharply at the end of the cultivation. The similarity in the changes in peak intensity over the course of an 8‐day cultivation can be observed. This shows that, independent of the location, user and instrument used, IMS can reproducibly track the changes in the VOC profile of a microalgae cultivation.

The intensities of the seven relevant peaks over the course of cultivation can be seen in Figure 3A and compared to the cell concentration determined from the OD 750 (Figure 3B). Comparing peak d to the OD 750 measurements, the maximum intensity is reached just before the growth curve levels out and enters the stationary phase (marked pink). This trend is mirrored by peaks c and e to a lesser extent. These three peaks all show a strong light dependence. Peaks c, d, and e rise when the culture is illuminated and growing (days 0–5 in white marked areas) and then drop when the illumination is turned off (gray marked areas). Finally, a new peak, peak g, is observed as the cultivation reaches a maximum cell concentration at around day 6. This peak continues to increase as the cell concentration starts to decrease.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

The maximum peak intensities of seven peaks (A) and changes in the extinction measured at 750 nm (B) over the course of an L. platensis cultivation. Gray bars show the times when the illuminations was turned off (8 h per day). The pink bar shows the stationary growth phase. Correlation of the intensity of peak d to OD 750 (C).

These trends in peak intensities were consistently observed across different cultivations performed under identical conditions. The cultures all started with an OD 750 of 0.11 ± 0.01 and an increase in cell concentration was observed until day 5. The maximum cell concentration was then reached between day 5 and 6 before a decrease in cell concentration was observed. The maximum intensity of peak d was consistently measured on day 5 or 6 and was normally observed just before the maximum cell concentration was achieved. This indicates that peak d is a marker for the growth rate and when the maximum cell concentration has been reached. The intensity of peak g was seen to rise in all cultures from the onset of the stationary growth phase into the cell death phase. The presence of peak g above a threshold value can, therefore, be used in process control to bring an end to the cultivation as the culture has now started to die.

Changes in peak intensity can be used to approximate the cell concentration in the growth phase. The intensity of peak d rises in the first days of cultivation. In Figure 3C it can be seen that the intensity of peak d also correlates with the OD 750 (R 2 > 0.95). This correlation shows both that peak d is an important peak in the peak pattern associated with growth, but also that the MI‐IMS based system works effectively at low cell concentrations. This is in contrast to other online sensors such as scattered light sensors. These sensors are used to measure the growth of a culture; however, they normally require higher cell concentrations to show a clear correlation between the sensor signal and the cell concentration. The backscattered signal is often disturbed by absorption or cell agglomeration [27].

A student's parametric t‐test was performed to check whether the intensity changes of peaks a–g were significant changes over the growth phases. The results of this can be found in Table S1 of the Supporting Information. For this purpose, the experimental data of 4 independent cultivations were evaluated. We compared the changes in intensity of separate peaks a–g over the cultivation with that at the begin of the experiment (start time). As can be seen from Table S1 (Supporting Information), the differences of peak intensities can be considered as statistically significant.

Whilst microalgae share similar metabolic pathways, a simple proof of concept to test the suitability of IMS for measuring the VOCs produced by microalgae was to sample the headspace above two different microalgae cultivations. As seen in Figure 4, the ion mobility spectra of L. platensis (Spirulina) and C. vulgaris (Chlorella) differ significantly from each other. Peaks a–g can clearly be observed in the two ion mobility spectra of Spirulina between relative drift times of 1.2 and 1.6. By contrast, the major peaks in the two ion mobility spectra of Chlorella occur before 1.2. This shows that the ion mobility spectrometer has sufficient resolving power to differentiate the VOC profiles of two different microalgae. Although this work focuses on using IMS as on online monitoring tool for the process control to maximize production, these results show the potential for using IMS to detect contaminations, such as grazers, in a cultivation.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Ion mobility spectra taken on the first and fourth day of cultivation of L. platensis (Spirulina) (black) and C. vulgaris (Chlorella) (blue).

As a result of these investigations it could be shown that (1) different microalgae cultivations lead to fundamentally different spectra. (2) The intensity ratios of the peaks within the ion mobility spectra significantly vary over the course of an algae cultivation. (3) The cultivation of the same species of microalgae yields identical and reproducible ion mobility spectra and comparable intensity courses during cultivation.

From these results, some general practical conclusions can be drawn for the application of IMS with respect to information about the bioprocess: (1) When selected peaks reach their maximum intensity, the maximum growth rate is reached. (2) The peak intensities (in particular at low cell concentrations) correlate with cell concentration. (3) A drop in all growth‐related peaks without new peaks normally reflects the day/night cycle. (4) The appearance of new peaks in the ion mobility spectrum indicates change in cell functions, for example, nutrient limitation or lysis.

3.2. Principal component analysis

While individual peaks can be correlated effectively with changes in the cell concentration, it has already been shown that certain peaks, for example, peaks c–e, correlate strongly with each other. In addition, there are over 1000 data points within the ion mobility spectrum corresponding to relative drift times between 0.7 and 3. A peak is therefore made up of multiple data points which, under ideal conditions, lead to a gaussian peak shape in the spectrum. This leads to two different strategies to process the data to maximize the number of data points used in the analysis and minimize the influence of signal noise. The data can be modeled using a combination of multiple gaussian peaks with fixed relative drift times. Alternatively, principal component analysis (PCA) can be used to identify the peaks which correlate with each other and build principal components (PC). In both cases, all data points after the reactant ion peak are included in the data set. This means that, for each spectrum, the intensity measured at over 1000 relative drift time points is evaluated as opposed to the maximum intensities of, in this case, seven peaks. In the gaussian peak model, the data matrix is compared to a model built using peaks with a specific center point and width. This allows the noise in the measurement of the intensity to be reduced and, in this case, seven more reliable data points to be generated for each spectrum in the time series. Using PCA, the dimensionality of the data set is reduced from more than 1000 x number of spectra in the time series (**** x ****) to a data set of, in this case, **** x 4. Reference data are then used to link either the 4 PC Vectors or the seven peaks from the gaussian model to a recommendation for the process control.

A custom Python code was written using the sklearn package (see Supporting Information). The standard scaler was used before passing the data to the PCA for analysis using with four PC. PCA was used in this work to analyze the spectra from six cultivations. Four different cultures (1–4) were performed under identical conditions whilst two additional cultures (5 and 6) experienced low‐level illumination over the first day of the cultivation and thereafter high‐level illumination (60% → 200% intensity compared to cultures 1–4). A growth phase was observed in all six cultures over multiple days followed by a short stationary phase and period of cell death (as seen in Figure 5A). The initial expectation was therefore that the first PC would represent the growth phase due to the large change in cell concentration and therefore VOC production over multiple IMS spectra. Furthermore, the second PC was expected to represent the stationary / cell death phase due to the presence of a new peak, peak g.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Results of PCA showing the scores for PC 1 and 2 for IMS spectra taken in cultures 1 to 4 when the cell concentration was rising (A) and when the cell concentration was falling (B). The color‐coding is normalized over the complete data set. The variation in PC 1 scores with respect to time for the individual cultures is also shown (C). The contribution of peaks a–g to the PC scores is graphically represented (D) by multiplying the PC Vector with the mean intensity for each data point.

As seen in Figure 5A and B, both of these expectations were realized. PC 1 scores increase from −30 to 25 as the cell concentration increases. During this time, only a minor variation in PC 2 scores can be observed. As the cell concentration starts to drop, PC 2 scores increase from −10 to 30. Furthermore, variation in PC 1 scores due to the light source being turned on and off can also be observed in Figure 5C. Although the change in PC1 for Culture 1 in Figure 5C was different to the other cultures with respect to time, it can be seen in Figure 5A that the data points for low cell concentration (colored green) are reasonably tightly grouped. If we assume that, the production of VOC is linked to the cell concentration and the stage of growth, then it is reasonable to allow a small variation in the PC1 level with respect to time. The variation in PC 1 scores is caused by the influence of peaks c, d, and e, as shown in Figure 5D. High peak intensities for peaks c, d, and e lead to a high PC 1 score. It was previously shown that these peaks are associated with growth and their intensities decrease in the absence of light. As PC 2 is associated with negative growth, it is logical that peaks c–e are correlate negatively with PC 2. In addition, peak g, which was previously linked to cell death, correlates positively with PC 2.

These results can be used as a basis for process control. New spectra taken can be characterized using the PC transformation obtained from the training data set. The process control system can then give recommendations or automatically trigger control events. (1) If PC 1 rises and PC 2 remains constant, the culture is growing and the cell concentration is increasing. Therefore, no changes in the system are necessary. (2) If PC 1 reaches maximum and PC 2 remains constant, the culture achieved maximum cell concentration and the practical recommendation is: Harvest or add more culture medium. (3) If PC 2 increases, the cell concentration is decreasing. The recommendation from process control system would be: Harvest, add more culture medium or check for contamination. (4) If PC 2 is strongly negative, there is an unknown system status and the user is prompted to check the system.

3.3. Influence of light on cultivation

Illumination is essential for the phototrophic growth of the algae cultures. In all the cultures presented, L. platensis uses the carbonate ions in the culture medium as a carbon source to produce sugars from photosynthesis which then allow growth. As already shown, the absence of illumination leads to a reduction in peak intensities in the IMS spectra and also a reduction in PC 1. It should not however be assumed that higher levels of illumination lead to increased growth rates. Above a species‐specific maximum level of illumination, the photosystems in Arthrospira sp. are saturated and the rate of growth does not increase. Furthermore, under intense illumination, concentrations of CPC decrease [54, 55, 56], which harms product yields of this high‐value antioxidant. In the case of laboratory experiments, the level of illumination is carefully controlled. Industrial scale microalgae cultivations, however, rely on the sun to provide illumination. Depending on the construction of the reactor this could lead to the level of illumination being either too high or too low. As low illumination reduces the growth rate, a system, which shades the reactor when the illumination is too high, provides the optimum growth conditions without the additional cost of artificial illumination. This shading system would require process control, which could be automatically controlled using the level of illumination and the current cell concentration for a bioreactor with known dimensions. All these parameters are necessary, as the microalgae shade themselves. This means that even at constant illumination levels, microalgae experience different levels of illumination depending on the cell concentration. Alternatively, changes in the VOC profile as a result of over illumination can be used for process control.

Cultivations 5 and 6 were therefore performed under low and high levels of illumination and the changes in the IMS spectra and PC scores were observed. As seen in Figure 6A, increasing the level of illumination leads to an increase in the growth rate of cultures 5 and 6. As a result, peaks c–e are significantly more intense when comparing the IMS spectra in Figure 6B. Peak f is also observed under high illumination leading to a new pattern of peaks. This new pattern of peaks, peaks c, d, e, and f correlated, is seen in PC 3 and shown in Figure 6D. The change in PC 3 scores can therefore be used to track periods of extreme illumination as PC 3 changes rapidly as a result of the increased illumination. This almost instantaneous response to high illumination is shown in Figure 6C and leads to a new process control recommendation: Shade culture when PC 3 < −5.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Effect of varying the level of illumination on the extinction at 750 nm (A), the IMS spectra measured after 2 days (B) and the PC 3 scores. The contribution of peaks a–g to the PC 3 scores is graphically represented (D) by multiplying the PC 3 Vector with the mean intensity for each data point. In cultures 5 and 6 the initial illumination was 60% (relative to culture 1–4). The illumination was increased after 1 day to 200%.

The presence of peak f, and obviously a change to the metabolic processes under high illumination, could result from the degradation of CPC for use as a nitrogen source. Further investigation is however required to determine if the addition of a further nitrogen source to the culture medium prevents peak f from forming and allows high levels of growth without CPC degradation under high illumination.

4. CONCLUDING REMARKS

IMS equipped with a MI is a promising technology to allow reliable and accurate process monitoring and control of microalgae cultivations. The VOCs can be automatically sampled when the IMS is coupled in‐line and data acquisition occurs every 10 min with zero “hands‐on” time required from an operator. This high frequency of measurement allows process control to occur in a timely manner. The automated, cost‐effective and stable VOC spectra acquired from MI‐IMS can then be used to characterize the condition of the cultivation and provide recommendations for the process control. PCA was performed on a training data set of 6 cultures and the first three PCs could be used to determine: if the culture was growing; if the maximum cell concentration had been reached; if the cell concentration was decreasing and if the level of illumination was too high. This application of a single sensor system to provide multiple process control signals sets MI‐IMS apart from the analytical techniques listed in Table 1. When applied to commercial production, process control using MI‐IMS can be used to increase yields, aid detection of contaminations and allow optimization of growth rates.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supporting information

Supplementary Figure 1. Comparison of IMS‐spectra from two cultivations of L. platensis performed on identical equipment at different locations

Supplementary Table 1: Results of statistical analysis

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the Sächsische Aufbaubank—Förderbank—(SAB) using funds provided by the European Union and the Free State of Saxony (Application Numbers: 100352241, 100352242, and 100352243, Approved: 09.05.2019).

Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Cämmerer M, Mayer T, Schott C, Steingroewer J, Petrich R, Borsdorf H. Membrane inlet—ion mobility spectrometry with automatic spectra evaluation as online monitoring tool for the process control of microalgae cultivation. Eng Life Sci. 2023;23:e2200039. 10.1002/elsc.202200039

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Spolaore P, Joannis‐Cassan C, Duran E, Isambert A. Commercial applications of microalgae. J Biosci Bioeng. 2006;101:87. 10.1263/jbb.101.87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ward OP, Singh A. Omega‐3/6 fatty acids: alternative sources of production. Process Biochem. 2005;40:3627. 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.02.020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Shanthi G, Premalatha M, Anantharaman N. Potential utilization of fish waste for the sustainable production of microalgae rich in renewable protein and phycocyanin‐Arthrospira platensis/Spirulina. J Clean Prod. 2021;294:126106. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126106 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Pinto LFR, Ferreira GF, Beatriz FP, et al. Lipid and phycocyanin extractions from Spirulina and economic assessment. J Supercrit Fluids. 2022;184:105567. 10.1016/j.supflu.2022.105567 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Talapatra N, Gautam R, Mittal V, Ghosh UK. A comparative study of the growth of microalgae‐bacteria symbiotic consortium with the axenic culture of microalgae in dairy wastewater through extraction and quantification of chlorophyll. Mater Today Proc. 2021. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.227 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Liu J, Sun Z, Gerken H, et al. Chlorella zofingiensis as an alternative microalgal producer of astaxanthin: biology and industrial potential. Mar Drugs. 2014;12:3487. 10.3390/md12063487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lupatini AL, Colla LM, Canan C, Colla E. Potential application of microalga Spirulina platensis as a protein source. J Sci Food Agr. 2017;97:724. 10.1002/jsfa.7987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Gershwin ME, Belay A. Spirulina in Human Nutrition and Health. 1st ed. CRC Press; 2007. 10.1201/9781420052572 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mahmoud MMA, El‐Lamie MMM, Kilany OE, Dessouki AA. Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) supplementation improves growth performance, feed utilization, immune response, and relieves oxidative stress in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) challenged with Pseudomonas fluorescens. Fish Shellfish Immun. 2018;72:291. 10.1016/j.fsi.2017.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Rosas VT, Poersch LH, Romano LA, Tesser MB. Feasibility of the use of Spirulina in aquaculture diets. Rev Aquac. 2019;11:1367. 10.1111/raq.12297 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Grima EM, Belarbi EH, Fernandez FGA, et al. Recovery of microalgal biomass and metabolites: process options and economics. Biotechnol Adv. 2003;20:491. 10.1016/S0734-9750(02)00050-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Elisabeth B, Rayen F, Behnam T. Microalgae culture quality indicators: a review. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2021;41:457. 10.1080/07388551.2020.1854672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Socher ML, Lenk F, Geipel K, et al. Phototrophic growth of Arthrospira platensis in a respiration activity monitoring system for shake flasks (RAMOS (R)). Eng Life Sci. 2014;14:658. 10.1002/elsc.201300156 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Steingroewer J, Haas C, Winkler K, et al. In: Pavlov A, Bley T, eds. Bioprocessing of Plant In Vitro Systems. Springer International Publishing; 2018. 10.1007/978-3-319-54600-1_7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Schugerl K, Hitzmann B, Jurgens H, et al. Challenges in integrating biosensors and FIA for on‐line monitoring and control. Trends Biotechnol. 1996;14:21. 10.1016/0167-7799(96)80910-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Vukojevic V, Djurdjic S, Ognjanovic M, et al. Enzymatic glucose biosensor based on manganese dioxide nanoparticles decorated on graphene nanoribbons. J Electroanal Chem. 2018;823:610. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.07.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Naresh V, Lee N. A review on biosensors and recent development of nanostructured materials‐enabled biosensors. Sensors‐Basel. 2021;21:1109. 10.3390/s21041109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Pinyou P, Blay V, Muresan LM, Noguer T. Enzyme‐modified electrodes for biosensors and biofuel cells. Mater Horiz. 2019;6:1336. 10.1039/C9MH00013E [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Pons MN, Le Bonte S, Potier O. Spectral analysis and fingerprinting for biomedia characterisation. J Biotechnol. 2004;113:211. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.03.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Chen TF, Wong YS, Zheng WJ. Purification and characterization of selenium‐containing phycocyanin from selenium‐enriched Spirulina platensis. Phytochemistry. 2006;67:2424. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Abd El‐Baky HH, El‐Baroty GS. Characterization and bioactivity of phycocyanin isolated from Spirulina maxima grown under salt stress. Food Funct. 2012;3:381. 10.1039/C2FO10194G [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Anderlei T, Zang W, Papaspyrou M, Buchs J. Online respiration activity measurement (OTR, CTR, RQ) in shake flasks. Biochem Eng J. 2004;17:187. 10.1016/S1369-703X(03)00181-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Suresh S, Srivastava VC, Mishra IM. Techniques for oxygen transfer measurement in bioreactors: a review. J Chem Technol Biot. 2009;84:1091. 10.1002/jctb.2154 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Beutel S, Henkel S. In situ sensor techniques in modern bioprocess monitoring. Appl Microbiol Biot. 2011;91:1493. 10.1007/s00253-011-3470-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Soerjawinata W, Kockler I, Wommer L, et al. Novel bioreactor internals for the cultivation of spore‐forming fungi in pellet form. Eng Life Sci. 2022,22,474–483. 10.1002/elsc.202100094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lira‐Parada PA, Tuveri A, Seibold GM, Bar N. Comparison of noninvasive, in‐situ and external monitoring of microbial growth in fed‐batch cultivations in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biochem Eng J. 2021;170:107989. 10.1016/j.bej.2021.107989 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ude C, Schmidt‐Hager J, Findeis M, et al. Application of an online‐biomass sensor in an optical multisensory platform prototype for growth monitoring of biotechnical relevant microorganism and cell lines in single‐use shake flasks. Sensors‐Basel. 2014;14:17390. 10.3390/s140917390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Bastien C, Cardin R, Veilleux E, et al. Performance evaluation of phycocyanin probes for the monitoring of cyanobacteria. J Environ Monitor. 2011;13:110. 10.1039/C0EM00366B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Chang DW, Hobson P, Burch M, Lin TF. Measurement of cyanobacteria using in‐vivo fluoroscopy ‐ Effect of cyanobacterial species, pigments, and colonies. Water Res. 2012;46:5037. 10.1016/j.watres.2012.06.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Gregor J, Marsalek B. A simple in vivo fluorescence method for the selective detection and quantification of freshwater cyanobacteria and eukaryotic algae. Acta Hydroch Hydrob. 2005;33:142. 10.1002/aheh.200400558 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Lee T, Tsuzuki M, Takeuchi T, et al. In‐vivo fluorometric method for early detection of cyanobacterial waterblooms. J Appl Phycol. 1994;6:489. 10.1007/BF02182403 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Zamyadi A, Choo F, Newcombe G, et al. A review of monitoring technologies for real‐time management of cyanobacteria: recent advances and future direction. Trac‐Trend Anal Chem. 2016;85:83. 10.1016/j.trac.2016.06.023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Milovanovic I, Misan A, Simeunovic J, et al. Determination of volatile organic compounds in selected strains of cyanobacteria. J Chem. 2015;2015:1–6. 10.1155/2015/969542 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Nowicka‐Krawczyk P, Mühlsteinová R, Hauer T. Detailed characterization of the Arthrospira type species separating commercially grown taxa into the new genus Limnospira (Cyanobacteria). Sci. Rep. 2019;9:694. 10.1038/s41598-018-36831-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Nader C, Cella H, Lopes RG, et al. Effect of different cultivation conditions on the production of volatile organic compounds by the microalgae Arthrospira platensis and Chlorella sp. J Appl Phycol. 2022;34:203. 10.1007/s10811-021-02641-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Schugerl K. Progress in monitoring, modeling and control of bioprocesses during the last 20 years. J Biotechnol. 2001;85:149. 10.1016/S0168-1656(00)00361-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Schulz S, Dickschat JS. Bacterial volatiles: the smell of small organisms. Nat Prod Rep. 2007;24:814. 10.1039/B507392H [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Langejuergen J, Wagner C, Beutel S, et al. Non‐invasive monitoring of bacterial growth and auto‐induced protein production in a bioreactor with a closed‐loop GC‐IMS. Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom. 2015;18:9. 10.1007/s12127-014-0163-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Vautz W, Franzke J, Zampolli S, et al. On the potential of ion mobility spectrometry coupled to GC pre‐separation ‐ A tutorial. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1024:52. 10.1016/j.aca.2018.02.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Borsdorf H, Eiceman GA. Ion mobility spectrometry: principles and applications. Appl Spectrosc Rev. 2006;41:323. 10.1080/05704920600663469 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Borsdorf H, Mayer T, Zarejousheghani M, Eiceman GA. Recent developments in ion mobility spectrometry. Appl Spectrosc Rev. 2011;46:472. 10.1080/05704928.2011.582658 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Borsdorf H, Fiedler P, Mayer T. The effect of humidity on gas sensing with ion mobility spectrometry. Sensor Actuat B‐Chem. 2015;218:184. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.04.102 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Izadi Z, Tabrizchi M, Borsdorf H, Farrokhpour H. Humidity effect on the drift times of the reactant ions in ion mobility spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2019;91:15932. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Spangler GE, Carrico JP. Membrane inlet for ion mobility spectrometry (plasma chromatography). Int J Mass Spectrom. 1983;52:267. 10.1016/0020-7381(83)85048-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Zhou QH, Wang WG, Cang HW, et al. On‐line measurement of propofol using membrane inlet ion mobility spectrometer. Talanta. 2012;98:241. 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Furmaniak MA, Misztak AE, Franczuk MD, et al. Edible cyanobacterial genus Arthrospira: actual state of the art in cultivation methods, genetics, and application in medicine. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2541 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Shanab SM, Mostafa SS, Shalaby EA, Mahmoud GI. Aqueous extracts of microalgae exhibit antioxidant and anticancer activities. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012;2:608. 10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60106-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Ragaza JA, Hossain MS, Meiler KA, et al. A review on Spirulina: alternative media for cultivation and nutritive value as an aquafeed. Rev Aquac. 2020;12:2371. 10.1111/raq.12439 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Hutner SH, Provasoli L, Schatz A, Haskins CP. Some Approaches to the study of the role of metals in the metabolism of microorganisms. Proc Am Philos Soc. 1950;94:152. [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Ip P‐F, Wong K‐H, Chen F. Enhanced production of astaxanthin by the green microalga Chlorella zofingiensis in mixotrophic culture. Process Biochem. 2004;39:1761. 10.1016/j.procbio.2003.08.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Tabrizchi M. Temperature effects on resolution in ion mobility spectrometry. Talanta. 2004;62:65. 10.1016/S0039-9140(03)00401-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Vautz W, Bödeker B, Baumbach JI, et al. An implementable approach to obtain reproducible reduced ion mobility. Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom. 2009;12:47. 10.1007/s12127-009-0018-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Franke S, Steingröwer J, Walther T, Krujatz F. The Oxygen paradigm—quantitative impact of high concentrations of dissolved oxygen on kinetics and large‐scale production of Arthrospira platensis. ChemEngineering. 2022;6:14. 10.3390/chemengineering6010014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Kumar M, Kulshreshtha J, Singh GP. Growth and biopigment accumulation of cyanobacterium spirulina platensis at different light intensities and temperature. Braz J Microbiol. 2011;42:1127. 10.1590/S1517-83822011000300034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. del Rio‐Chanona EA, Zhang D, Xie Y, et al. Dynamic simulation and optimization for Arthrospira platensis growth and C‐phycocyanin production. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2015;54:10606. 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03102 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Xie Y, Jin Y, Zeng X, et al. Fed‐batch strategy for enhancing cell growth and C‐phycocyanin production of Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis under phototrophic cultivation. Bioresour Technol. 2015;180:281. 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1. Comparison of IMS‐spectra from two cultivations of L. platensis performed on identical equipment at different locations

Supplementary Table 1: Results of statistical analysis

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Engineering in Life Sciences are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES