ABSTRACT
The crosstalk between viral infections, amyloid formation and neurodegeneration has been discussed with varying intensity since the last century. Several viral proteins are known to be amyloidogenic. Post-acute sequalae (PAS) of viral infections is known for several viruses. SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 implicate connections between amyloid formation and severe outcomes in the acute infection, PAS and neurodegenerative diseases. Is the amyloid connection causation or just correlation? In this review we highlight several aspects where amyloids and viruses meet. The evolutionary driving forces that dictate protein amyloid formation propensity are different for viruses compared to prokaryotes and eukaryotes, while posttranslational endoproteolysis appears to be a common mechanism leading up to amyloid formation for both viral and human proteins. Not only do human and viral proteins form amyloid irrespective of each other but there are also several examples of co-operativity between amyloids, viruses and the inter-, and intra-host spread of the respective entity. Abnormal blood clotting in severe and long COVID and as a side effect in some vaccine recipients has been connected to amyloid formation of both the human fibrin and the viral Spike-protein. We conclude that there are many intersects between viruses and amyloids and, consequently, amyloid and virus research need to join forces here. We emphasize the need to accelerate development and implementation in clinical practice of antiviral drugs to preclude PAS and downstream neurological damage. There is also an ample need for retake on suitable antigen targets for the further development of next generation of vaccines against the current and coming pandemics.
KEYWORDS: Amyloid, long COVID, PASC, post-acute sequalae COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, virus
Introduction
Viral infections are prevalent in humans and in an absolute majority of cases the consequent disease is mild and disease outcome is good. However, viral infections can potentially drive long-term disease [1] and in particular increase the risk of common degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease [2] associated with protein misfolding and amyloidosis. In this review we provide an overview of viral infections and viral proteins and molecular overlaps with amyloid diseases and amyloid proteins in humans. Corona viruses have been circulating among humans for a long time, probably for centuries but were first identified, isolated and classified in the 1960s. The common corona viruses (HCoV-NL63, HCoV-229E, HCoV-OC43 and HKU1) give rise to mild respiratory symptoms and, in the case of HKU1, gastrointestinal symptoms have been noted [3]. These viruses are in constant circulation in the human population, yet severe infection is extremely rare in immune responsive adults. More recently two novel corona viruses, SARS-CoV (years 2002–2003) and MERS-CoV (year 2012) have threatened to cause pandemics but were kept under control. Both these diseases were in the majority of cases respiratory diseases albeit some MERS patients also presented with gastrointestinal symptoms [4]. The novel corona virus, SARS-CoV-2, hit the world hard starting late2019. In March 2020 WHO declared that COVID-19 was to be characterized as a pandemic. In the early days of the disease outbreak, COVID-19 was portrayed as respiratory disease with many commonalities with previous outbreaks of SARS and MERS. However, it soon became evident that this novel disease hit multiple organ systems throughout the body [5] and in an autopsy study of German patients from the first months of the pandemic it was concluded that majority of the 26 studied patients also suffered from multiorgan failure [6], often connected to thromboembolism [7] and hyperinflammation [7].
COVID-19 is far from only a respiratory disease [8]. Although the most common site of virus entry is from the respiratory tract, there is evidence for virus replication in several other tissue types: renal, myocardial, neurological, pharyngal and gastrointestinal [9]. ACE2, the receptor for viral entry into host cells, is abundantly expressed in several tissues suggesting a route of direct toxic exertion of the virus onpancreatic insulin producing β-cells [10]. Systemic involvement such as immune response dysregulation (hyperinflammation and cytokine storms), haematological abnormalities (lymphopenia, neutrophilia, thrombocytopenia) and endothelial damage, leading up to immunothrombosis is also a common non-respiratory manifestation of SARS-CoV-2 infection [8]. Cardiac complications such as ischaemic myocardial injuries, arrythmias, and cardiac arrest are also noted as severe outcomes of COVID-19 infection [11]. Neurological symptoms such as anosmia and ageusia were early in the pandemic recognized as common and specific traits of COVID-19 regardless of severity of disease. Reviewing hospitalized patients for any neurological symptom one year into the pandemic revealed that one third experienced at least one of in total 24 neurological symptom described. Looking at symptoms stemming from the central nervous system shows that around one third of patients experienced fatigue and of age above 60 one third exhibited delirium and/or confusion [12]. Of the patients in the study, 1 in 50 hospitalized patients suffered a stroke. Renal, hepatic and endocrine injuries are frequently reported in association to COVID-19 hospitalization. A New York study showed that 36% of hospitalized patients during March 2020 developed acute kidney injury with the number elevated to 89% when looking only at patient requiring mechanical ventilation [13]. A meta-analysis looking for hepatic complications found abnormal liver function in 19% of COVID-19 patients with a clear increase in severe cases [14]. Diabetes is associated to higher risk of severe COVID-19. However, COVID-19 also imposes a risk of insulin resistance [15] normally associated to type 2 diabetes. In addition, many of the endocrine glands express the ACE2 receptor as well as the protease TMPRSS2 that enables viral entry to the cell, making them a target for direct viral infection [16]. Among other, both the thyroid and both male and female reproductive glands have been reported to be affected during SARS-CoV-2 infection [17].
Post-acute sequalae (PAS) as result of viral infection
Viral infection can cause permanent injury in the host to various degrees and by different mechanisms. As examples can be mentioned Herpes viruses that inflict chronic infection on the host by incorporating its DNA into the chromosomal DNA in the nuclei of the host cell [18]. It will hence be dormant in the infected cell and ancestral cells. Other viruses, such as Polio [19] and Rubella [20], can during the acute infection cause irreparable and debilitating damage.
Post-acute sequalae (PAS), on the contrary, is a term used for symptoms that occur for the first time after the acute infection is healed and virus particles no longer can be detected by PCR [1]. PAS has been described for a large number of viruses, such as Ebola, Epstein-Barr virus, Zika virus, tick-borne encephalitis virus, and possibly also influenza (for comprehensive lists see [1] and [21]). PAS has also been reported for SARS and MERS but notably not been described for any of the four above mentioned common corona viruses (HCoV-NL63, HCoV-229E, HCoV-OC43 and HKU1).
Previous corona pandemics SARS and MERS have been connected to PAS and a recent review of these state that 20–30% of those hospitalized with SARS or MERS were not back to full working capacity one year after admission from hospital [22]. Looking closer at long-term effects of SARS and MERS demonstrate that a large portion of survivors exhibit pulmonary abnormalities that persist after the acute infection has diminished. Chest X-ray follow up 32–230 days after recovery showed that 38% of MERS patients exhibited lung fibrosis and/or pleural thickening [23]. Of Hong Kong university hospital health care workers affected by SARS (mean age 36 years), 24% had decreased lung capacity 1 year after recovery and 28% had abnormal chest X-rays [24]. Long-term follow-up of a different SARS patient cohort (health care workers from Peking general hospital) reveal that the vast majority of patients fully recover during the following one to two years [25]. However, this follow-up study of healthcare workers that were infected by SARS at Peking general hospital in 2002 demonstrates that around 5% still have interstitial pulmonary changes detectable in CT scan after 15 years [25].
Mental health disturbances and chronic fatigue syndrome were followed up among SARS patients in Hong Kong 4 years after recovery, and 40% of the patients were reported to have active psychiatric illness. The CDC criterion for chronic fatigue syndrome was fulfilled for 27% of the patient group [26]. Similar results were reported in a 12 months follow-up of MERS patients in South Korea where around 40% of patients were reported to show symptoms of Chronic fatigue syndrome while depression and PTSD were reported in 20–30% of survivors of MERS [27].
Long COVID/PASC
The nomenclature for PAS after infection with SARS-CoV-2 is not standardized but WHO has defined the condition as ‘a condition that occurs in individuals with a history of probable or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, usually 3 months from the onset of COVID-19 with symptoms that last for at least 2 months and cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis’. This condition is often referred to as long COVID or PASC. Over half of patients (56%) that have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 have at least one symptom of long covid at 6 month follow-up and the outcome cannot be correlated to severity of the acute disease [28]. Both neurological and psychiatric symptoms, lung abnormalities and chronic fatigue have been reported as PAS of COVID-19 (PASC). However, the list of symptoms exceeding this is extensive. Neurological, psychiatric, fatigue and respiratory symptoms each are reported in approximately 20% of cases, on par with SARS and MERS. In addition, a plethora of symptoms from the digestive tract and cardiovascular system as well as movement disabilities, hair and skin lesions are present in 6–17% of cases (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Organs and tissues affected by systemic and localized amyloidosis are in many instances overlapping with those afflicted by acute COVID-19 and PASC.
The amyloid connection – causation or just correlation?
Protein processing, misfolding, and aggregation cause degenerative amyloid diseases. These diseases can manifest in most organs of the body and are dependent on the aggregating amyloid protein being specific for each disease (Table 1). Listing organs involved in amyloid diseases [29] side by side with those affected by COVID-19 [5] and PASC [30] it is easy to see there are many commonalities (Figure 1). But correlation is not always causation. We therefore decided to look closer at molecular associations and pathways of both amyloid proteins encoded by the human genome and amyloid forming proteins of viral origin.
Table 1.
Human amyloid fibril proteins and their precursors. Table is modified from [29]. Proteins are listed in groups as full-length protein in fibril, fragments in fibril, and endoproteolytic products from precursor proteins.
Fibril protein | Precursor protein | Tropism | Target organs | Full length functional protein in fibril | Fragments of functional protein in fibril | Endo-proteolytic processing required for amyloidogenesis* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aβ2 M | β2-microglobulin, wild type | Systemic | WT: Musculoskeletal system; Mut: ANS, tongue, heart | X | ||
AApoAII | Apolipoprotein A II, variants | Systemic | Kidney | X | ||
AApoCII | Apolipoprotein C II, variants | Systemic | Kidney | X | ||
AApoCIII | Apolipoprotein C III, variants | Systemic | Kidney | X | ||
ALECT2 | Leukocyte chemotactic factor-2 | Systemic | Kidney, primarily | X | ||
ACys | Cystatin C, variants | Neurologic | CNS, skin | X | ||
ALac | Lactoferrin | Localized | Cornea | X | ||
AL | Immunoglobulin light chain | Systemic | All organs, usually except CNS | X | X | |
AH | Immunoglobulin heavy chain | Systemic | All organs except CNS | X | X | |
ATTR | Transthyretin, wild type and variants | Systemic | WT: Heart mainly in males, lung, ligaments, tenosynovium; Mut:PNS, ANS, heart, eye, kidneys, leptomeninges | X | X | |
AApoAI | Apolipoprotein A I, variants | Systemic | Heart, liver, kidney, PNS, testis, larynx (C-terminal variants), skin (C-terminal variants) | X | X | |
ALys | Lysozyme, variants | Systemic | Kidney, Gastrointestinal | X | X | |
AαSyn | α-Synuclein wild type and variants | Neurologic | CNS, ANS | X | X | |
ATau | Tau wild type and variants | Neurologic | CNS | X | X | |
APrP | Prion protein, wild type and variants | Neurologic | WT: CJD, fatal insomnia; Mut: CJD, GSS syndrome, fatal insomnia, PNS | X | X | |
AKer | Kerato-epithelin TGFB1 | Localized | Cornea, hereditary | X | X | |
AA | (Apo) Serum amyloid A | Systemic | All organs except CNS | X | X | |
AApoAIV | Apolipoprotein A IV, wild type | Systemic | Kidney medulla and systemic | X | X | |
AGel | Gelsolin, variants | Systemic | PNS, cornea, Kidney | X | X | |
AFib | Fibrinogen, α, variants | Systemic | Kidney, primarily | X | X | |
ABri | ABriPP, variants | Neurologic | CNS | X | X | |
ADanb | ADanPP, variants | Neurologic | CNS | X | X | |
Aβ | Aβ protein precursor, wild type and variants | Neurologic | CNS | X | X | |
ATMEM106B | Transmembrane 106B (TMEM106B) | Neurologic | CNS | X | X | |
AMed | Lactadherin (MFG-E8) | Localized | Ageing aorta, media, elastic arteries | X | X | |
ACal | (Pro)calcitonin | Localized | C-cell thyroid tumours, Kidney | X | ||
AIAPP | Islet amyloid polypeptide | Localized | Islets of Langerhans, insulinomas | X | ||
AANP | Atrial natriuretic peptide | Localized | Cardiac atria | X | ||
APro | Prolactin | Localized | Pituitary prolactinomas, ageing pituitary | X | ||
ASom | (Pro)somatostatin | Localized | Somatostatinomas | X | ||
AGluc | Glucagon | Localized | Glucagonomas | X | ||
APTH | Parathyroid hormone | Localized | Parathyroid tumours, Ageing parathyroid glands | X | ||
ASPC | Lung surfactant protein | Localized | Lung | X | ||
ACor | Corneodesmosin | Localized | Cornified epithelia, hair follicles | X | ||
AOAAP | Odontogenic ameloblast-associated protein | Localized | Odontogenic tumours | X | ||
ASem1 | Semenogelin 1 | Localized | Vesicula seminalis | X | ||
ACatK | Cathepsin K | Localized | Tumour associated | X | ||
AEFEMP1 | EGF-containing fibulin-like extracellular matrix protein 1 (EFEMP1) | Localized | Veins, Aging associated | X | ||
Ains** | Insulin | Localized | Iatrogenic, local injection | X** | ||
Aenf** | Enfurvitide | Localized | Iatrogenic, local injection | X** | ||
AGLP1** | Glucagon-like peptide 1 analog | Localized | Iatrogenic, local injection | X** | ||
AIL1RAP** | Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein | Localized | Iatrogenic, local injection | X** |
*not including signal peptide processing.
**iatrogenic provided by injection of medical products.
Proteins that cause amyloid diseases in humans
In humans 42 proteins are classified as amyloid proteins or protein precursors of amyloid fibrils [29] (Table 1 and examples below). In addition, some of these proteins are also associated with intracellular aggregates and there are proteins which appear to only form intracellular inclusions upon aggregation [29]. It is notable that the amyloid proteins in human disease are of highly diverse sequence, fold, and function. The molecular initiation events and driving force for amyloidosis appear to be rather different for different diseases and proteins.
There are also mammalian and more specifically also human endogenous proteins where amyloid formation plays a vital functional role [31]. Storage of peptide hormones in secretory granules [32] and Zona Pellucida protein of oocytes that form amyloid which play several vital roles in the early stages of fertilization [33] are two representative examples.
Systemic amyloidosis
AA – AA amyloidosis or secondary amyloidosis is caused by chronic inflammatory diseases such as lupus, Sjogren’s syndrome, and Rheumatoid arthritis. These chronic inflammatory diseases render 1000-fold higher expression of the acute phase hepatic SAA1 protein than under normal conditions [34,35]. Hereditary familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), occurring due to mutations in the MEFV (pyrin) gene, results in lower expression of active IL-1Beta. This is suggested to result in elevated responsiveness to proinflammatory interleukins, mainly IL-1 sensitivity rendering IL-6 upregulation and thereby overexpression of SAA1 acute phase activation protein [36]. As a secondary consequence of this chronic inflammation an amyloid fibril seed forms by continuous SAA1 overexpression and proteolytic processing thereof, with can progress to AA amyloidosis. AA amyloidosis predominantly affects the kidney and can progress to a systemic amyloidosis in several organs including the heart [37].
AFib- Fibrinogen, the precursor of blood clot response protein, also employs extracellular protein fibre formation as a vital part of haemostasis and to enable wound healing [38]. Fibrinogen is composed of three separate protein subunits making heterotrimers that dimerize into a hexameric oligomer. Fibrinogen is synthesized in the liver at a very high rate and is secreted to circulation. Fibrinogen is an amyloidogenic protein. Familial amyloid disease that originates from point mutations in fibrinogen alpha-chain renders aggregation prone folding intermediates or degradation intermediates [39]. Mutant protein is however not found in circulation suggesting a rapid accumulation of the alpha-subunit as AFib amyloid in the kidney [40]. Frame shift mutations render a truncated form with a common amino acid sequence that forms amyloids [41]. The fibrinogen alpha-chain peptide 148–160 (KRLEVDIDIKIRS) formed amyloid fibrils whereas the shorter 148–157 peptide did not [42]. Notably no wild type fibrinogen is found deposited within familial amyloid deposits of AFib.
ATTR – Transthyretin (TTR) is a plasma protein synthesized mainly in the liver and the choroid plexus. TTR is a transport protein of thyroxine and retinol in blood plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. Transthyretin amyloidosis of wild type TTR can cause cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) in elderly patients and hereditary forms of TTR amyloidosis such as familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) at younger ages [43]. ATTR fibrils accumulate and encircle normal cells causing restrictive cardiomyopathy and/or neuropathy. FAP renders loss of sensation in hands and feet that progress to the autonomous nervous system affecting the GI-tract, blood pressure and heart rate. Symptoms of restrictive cardiomyopathy in ATTR-CM ultimately result in heart failure.
Localized amyloidosis
AIAPP - Type II diabetes is manifested by impaired glucose regulation. Long term disease is associated with dysfunctional insulin production from the pancreas. Type II diabetes is intimately linked to amyloidosis of the protein hormone IAPP in the islets of Langerhans in insulin producing beta-cells [44], the same cell that produces IAPP. The IAPP-fibrils appear to disrupt the beta-cell secretory pathway, puncture the cell and encapsulate the islet in masses of amyloid fibrils.
Neurodegenerative amyloidosis
Aβ and ATau - Alzheimer’s disease is a double amyloidosis of the brain where the neuronal Aβ peptides accumulate as extracellular senile amyloid plaque and cerebrovascular amyloids and where the microtubule associated protein tau accumulates as neurofibrillary tangles inside neurons as well as in glial cells [45]. Tau fibrils are also associated with chronic traumatic encephalopathy, Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CBD) and hereditary disorders such as Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and Picks disease. These amyloidogenic processes result in neurodegeneration, cognitive decline that ultimately cause dementia.
APrP – Prion diseases are caused by misfolding and aggregation of the prion protein (PrP) which manifests as different diseases including Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) and hereditary diseases such as fatal familial insomnia (FFI) and Gerstmann – Sträussler – Scheinker syndrome (GSS). In prion diseases, protein aggregates, sometimes in the form of amyloid fibrils, composed of misfolded PrP which can be transmissible [46]. Prion diseases can hence be acquired through contaminated materials resulting in iatrogenic CJD and ingested through prion infected food from cattle manifesting in variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) and by cannibalism causing Kuru.
AαSyn- Parkinson’s disease (PD), Lewy body dementia and multiple system atrophy are associated with Alpha-synuclein (αSyn) fibril formation. In PD αSyn fibrils accumulate in and around dopaminergic neuronal cells causing depletion of the substantia nigra and loss of motor function. PD is however a systemic disease with significant CNS-gastric transfer of αsyn aggregates via the autonomous nervous system [47]. PD is multifactorial with many risk genes involved in endosomal trafficking, autophagy and mitochondrial function [48]. Aggravated risk for disease can involve many pathways.
SOD-1, TDP43, FUS, C9orf72 – Amytrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease causing severe motoric and autonomous neurological impairment. While ALS, nor its culprit proteins are classified as an amyloidosis or amyloid proteins the disease is a protein misfolding disorder. Sporadic disease appears associated with misfolding, aggregation and fibril formation of TDP43. Hereditary forms of ALS are associated with mutations in the genes coding for superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD-1), fused in sarcoma (FUS), and C9orf72 [49]. The latter gene results in translation of extensive dipeptide-repeat poly-peptides that readily forms fibrils. ALS is hence associated with intracellular amyloid fibril formation of either of these four proteins albeit there are many more genes implicated in this complex disease [49].
Endoproteolysis as a mechanism for amyloidosis
Of the 42 amyloid proteins associated to amyloid diseases in humans, only 16 proteins are associated with full-length protein being deposited as amyloid fibrils [29] and 9 of these are often found co-deposited in the form of full-length protein and fragments thereof (Table 1). The overwhelming majority of amyloid proteins are hence processed. Several amyloid proteins are pre-processed during maturation e.g. IAPP which is processed during production of the mature IAPP protein. For many proteins it is not established if processing occurs after misfolding and aggregation, i.e. by a post aggregation proteolytic shaving process which may offer a selection process for efficient fibril polymorph propagation [50]. For TTR both full-length protein and C-terminal fragments of TTR (~aa 50–127) is found in ATTR deposits. The ATTR fragments have been proposed to originate from plasmin-cleaved TTR [51].
For a substantial number of amyloid proteins, 26 of 42, endoproteolysis of the amyloid precursor proteins is a prerequisite to produce the amyloid protein. In the absence of known genetic mutation this happens in age-associated amyloidosis for AApoAIV in cardiac and kidney amyloidosis (Apolipoprotein AIV), ATMEM106B in ageing brain, ASom in ageing pituitary (Somatostatin), AMed in ageing aortic vessel (lactadhederin), AEFEMP1 in ageing venous vessels, and ASem1 in ageing seminal vesicle (Semenogelin 1). In Alzheimer′s disease, Aβ is produced by endo-proteolysis from AβPP by BACE-1 (β-secretase) and Presenilins’ in γ-secretase in the notorious amyloidogenic pathway (Figure 2 top.). SAA1, which is overproduced during inflammation, is endoproteolysed by cathepsin B released from macrophages [52] and neutrophil elastase released from neutrophils [53] (Figure 2 middle). Furthermore endoproteolysis is a prerequisite for amyloidosis in inherited diseases for ABri and ADan in British and Danish dementia (Bri2) [54], AGel in Finnish familial amyloidosis (gelsolin) [55]. It is also likely that the endoproteolysis occurs for AFib mutations in fibrinogen amyloidosis [40] (Table 1).
Figure 2.
Endoproteolysis is a common and often required pathway for amyloid formation of natively folded and functional proteins.
Note: Top: The amyloidogenic Aβ peptide, a part of the trans-membrane domain of Amyloid-β precursor protein (AβPP), is cleaved by membrane bound β- and γ-secretase and exported to the extracellular space where it accumulates, deposits as amyloid fibrils and form senile plaques and CAA abundant in Alzheimer’s disease.
Middle: Serum amyloid A (SAA) is a globular, α-helix rich acute phase protein that is highly elevated during inflammation. Inflammatory cells such as macrophages and neutrophils release proteases that cleaves the helical protein into smaller peptides, enabling it to expose amyloidogenic sequences that form amyloid fibrils found as deposits in kidney as well as other organs.
Bottom: SARS-CoV-2 Spike-protein expressed during COVID-19 infection and mRNA vaccination. When cleaved by neutrophil elastase, it will expose amyloidogenic sequences and form fibrils with the potential to inhibit fibrinolysis of formed clots and potentially cause endothelial damage and/or cross-seed amyloidogenic host protein.
Driving forces for protein folding and avoidance of misfolding in humans
Amyloids in the mammalian context is most often, and rightfully so, considered to be detrimental alternative misfolded protein structures. Many disorders are interlinked with amyloid formation of endogenous proteins in humans and 42 proteins have to date been identified as involved in pathological amyloid formation in humans (Table 1) and several more are involved in inclusion formations [29]. Since these diseases are almost invariably lethal there is a constant evolutionary pressure driving mammalian proteins into well-performing folding machines. The folding of the polypeptide chain into a native structure that shields hydrophobic elements from interaction with the surrounding environment is in itself an effective prevention against protein aggregation and consequently, a majority of structured proteins need to be partially or fully unfolded in order to attain an amyloid structure fold [56].
Evolution spanning from prokaryotes to mammals has premiered the insertion of gatekeeper amino acids, that is, residues that have the specific role of interrupting aggregation prone regions and at the same time promote rapid and productive folding [57,58], most often these gatekeepers are prolines or charged residues. In addition it is well established that several amyloid associated diseases are tightly linked to single point mutations in the primary structure of the culprit protein and that the point mutation renders a protein that forms amyloid more readily than the wild type protein due to decreased stability of the folded state [59,60]. There are many β-sheet rich proteins in mammals and strategies by which the boundary β-strand is protected against intermolecular interaction include the formation of β-barrels and β-sandwiches, shielding of the β-strand by α-helix or loop and excessive twist of the last β-strand [61].
The mammalian genome, in contrast to viral genomes, is not sterically constrained and hence can allow for amino acid diversity between different domains within one protein as a strategy to prevent the in-register alignment of β-strands that is prevalent in β-sheet amyloid structure. The higher the amino acid diversity the lower the propensity to form amyloid where 70% or more sequence identity promotes co-aggregation whereas less than 30% sequence identity demises the probability to form aggregates [62]. Not only are the aggregating proteins themselves important players in the evolution directing away from protein aggregation and amyloid formation. A whole army of folding defenders, the chaperones and isomerases, are present in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes [57].
Chaperones acting on the unfolded polypeptide chain in close proximity to the ribosome are particularly important in the aspect of preventing amyloid formation as their mode of action is to prevent undesired interactions between nascent unstructured polypeptide chains. Although chaperones in general do not target a specific client protein but rather hydrophobic stretches or clusters of any protein there is a strong preference for interaction with polypeptide stretches that are flanked with gatekeeper residues as described above [57]. There is also evidence for co-evolution of chaperones and their client proteins in both prokaryotes [63], yeast [64] and mammalian cells [65].
An additional feature of proteostasis in humans is the notion that there is a high correlation between protein expression rate and the propensity for that protein to aggregate [66]. This appears to be an important determinant steering away from amyloid formation and is mirrored by the fact that the most common systemic amyloidoses in humans are AA amyloidosis and AL amyloidosis. These diseases are intimately coupled to severe overexpression of the culprit proteins SAA and amyloidogenic IgG light chain respectively. Proteostasis being overwhelmed is likely during ageing which is the main risk factor for all sporadic amyloidoses. Proteostasis collapse because of ageing has been demonstrated using C. elegans [67]. The importance of maintained protein homoeostasis to avoid age-related amyloid formation was recently reviewed [68] and further supports the conclusion that the interplay between intrinsic factors in the culprit protein (e.g. primary structure and secondary structure elements) are in an intricate and delicate balance with extrinsic factors (such as protein expression levels and molecular chaperones) in the strive to avoid amyloid formation in a dynamic system.
Evolutionary aspects of the virus proteome
The evolutionary pressure that drives mammalian proteins away from the amyloid formation cascade does not exert the same power on viruses. Synthesis of proteins and maintenance of protein homoeostasis are energy demanding and hence costly for the protein producing organism. Therefore, all living organisms from prokaryotes to mammals benefit from maintaining a high rate of productive folding while viruses do not have to bother about the cost for protein production since someone else, namely the hijacked host cell, is paying the bill.
The prevailing strategy for viral replication is quantity rather than quality. Viruses are short-lived and the purpose of each individual viral particle seizes to exist once a new host cell is infected. The successful generation and transmission of one single virus particle will upon infection of the next host cell generate 102-105 or more new virions before the typical burst of the host cell in multicellular organisms [69]. Consequently, the evolutionary pressure for high productive folding rates can be assumed to be far lower than for mammalian proteins.
The size of the viral genome is however highly restricted to allow for the packing of the nucleic acid into the capsid. One strategy used by predominantly RNA viruses to expand the number of proteins that can be coded by the genome is the use of open reading frame (ORF) shift, where initiation of translation at the ribosome at the first, second or third base in the triple codon will give three different proteins from essentially the same stretch of RNA [70]. While this is beneficial to enable more proteins to be produced from the limited amount of genetic material, it might abrogate the possibility to avoid the introduction of amyloidogenic stretches in the proteome since this would require simultaneous optimization of the distinct proteins that are coded by one genome stretch.
Most viral capsids are composed of numerous identical or only a few different protein variants [71] and the prevailing folds of capsid proteins are rich in β-sheet [72]. The correct assembly of the capsid is often dependent on the presence of scaffolding proteins [73] or the viral genome which is used as folding scaffold for the proteins [71]. In a sense this can be considered an equivalent of the chaperone systems employed by all genera of life. Viral proteins produced but not assisted by these mechanisms may run rouge and start to misfold and/or misassemble.
Once the viral particle has been successfully formed it needs to be robust and sturdy to withstand the often harsh environment it needs to pass to travel between hosts. The proteins hence would benefit from being stable in its receptor binding property if that is the task or be able to interlock with fellow capsid proteins if that is the assigned function. It was recently demonstrated that there is a positive correlation between stability of the core of a globular protein and the propensity of that protein to form amyloid [74]. We hypothesize that a stable capsid or receptor-binding protein might enforce the ability to form amyloid. At the same time the viral capsid needs to be unstable enough to disassemble and unleash its nucleic acid cargo once a new host has been infected. Because of this delicate balance, virus capsids are metastable and dynamic [75] including the formation of assembly intermediates of few proteins that pack tightly together and further adhere to each other as the virion matures [76]. This means that several homologous proteins with high propensity to form β-sheet could be tightly interlinked with each other, potentially providing an excellent breeding ground for forming amyloid seed nuclei that may act as promoters of amyloid fibril formation.
There are several implications beyond those of protein stability and interaction entities of virus infection and protein production in the infected cell. High production of extrinsic proteins causes overload of the cellular proteostasis mechanisms of the host cell. The viral proteins may not have the correct gatekeeper residues that make them selected by some chaperone systems [57]. If on the other hand the chaperone system of the host cell do recognize the virus encoded proteins, there will not be enough chaperone activity in the cell to cope with both the endogenous cellular proteins and those exerted by the intruder. This overwhelming chaperone system may be a risk factor (albeit indirect) for misfolding disease. On the other hand, viruses and host organisms can co-evolve. The prokaryotic chaperone GroEL was identified as a T4-phage assistant protein for sustained infection in E.coli. The phage genome encodes a substituent co-chaperone, Gp31, that replaces GroES thus allowing for the bulkier virus proteins to fit into the chaperonin complex [77]. Another important global aspect of virus protein production in the context of protein aggregation and amyloid formation is that the viral proteins will not take into account the delicate balance of protein expression level and aggregation propensity that is prevailing in the host [66].
Amyloidogenic viral proteins
In summary there are several mechanistic indications that viral proteins may be amyloidogenic. But how common is it to find virus derived proteins that form amyloid? Here we summarize some of the known virus derived amyloids coinciding with neurological long term outcomes.
SARS-CoV-2 is a positive-sense single stranded RNA virus. It comprises four structural proteins that build up the envelope that protects the RNA and comprise several open reading frame (ORF) proteins [78]. The virus that causes COVID-19 was first described in 2019 and COVID-19 was declared a pandemic in March 2020. COVID-19 has to date (March 2024) caused more than 6.8 million registered deaths globally. The disease was first considered a respiratory disease but it was soon evident that infection caused symptoms from many parts of the body, head to toe [5] (Figure 1). The burden of long-term complications and residual symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection, known as long COVID or post-acute sequelae of COVID (PASC) is also heavy on society and on those who suffer from such consequences [28].
Amyloid formation of several SARS-CoV-2 proteins has been reported. Two ORF proteins, ORF6 and ORF10, were predicted to be amyloidogenic [79]. The prediction was confirmed experimentally using synthetic peptides and the resulting amyloid was toxic to the neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y [79]. The nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 and in particular the low complexity domain (that is, domain rich in glycine, serine, glutamine, and tyrosine) has been demonstrated to form amyloid fibrils and that the amyloid formation propensity is accelerated by the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA [80]. The SARS-CoV-2 Spike-protein (Wuhan strain) has been shown to be highly amyloidogenic. Several sequences from Spike-protein that in silico were predicted to be generated by elastase cleavage were also predicted to be amyloidogenic. Seven synthetic 20 amino acid long peptide sequences in full-length SARS-CoV-2 Spike-protein formed amyloid fibrils at neutral pH when incubated at 37°C [81]. Peptides from Spike-protein sequences 192–211, 601–620 and 1166–1185 were particularly amyloidogenic. Furthermore, co-incubation of full-length Spike-protein and the immune response protease neutrophil elastase resulted in proteolytic processing of the Spike-protein which then formed fibrillar clusters (Figure 3) [81]. This result indicated a plausible mechanism by which Spike-protein amyloid can be generated during infection (Figure 2, bottom) or as response to vaccination. The resulting amyloid fibrils impaired plasmin mediated fibrinolysis in an in vitro experiment, demonstrating that amyloid fibrils from Spike-protein may have bearing on the microclot complications seen in severe and long COVID [81] (Figure 2, bottom).
Figure 3.
TEM micrographs of (on top) full length Spike-protein (Wuhan strain) after co-incubation with neutrophil elastase at 37°C for 24 h. The in silico predicted peptide 192–211 of SARS-CoV-2 Spike-protein, incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The resulting fibrils are straight, twisted and rod-like [81].
Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 has generated a cascade of novel Spike-protein variants since the beginning of 2021 [82]. Point mutations and differential processing by endoproteolysis are known to have large impact on amyloidogenicity for many human amyloidogenic proteins, e.g. the difference between Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42 where the 42 amino acid long peptide is much more amyloidogenic than the 40 amino acid long alloform and an increase of Aβ1–42/Aβ1–40 ratio is connected with increased risk for Alzheimer’s disease [83]. SAA is cleaved at several sites and this generates peptides with different amyloid forming propensity [84,85]. The prion protein is highly expressed in all neuronal cells but still sporadic CJD is extremely rare. On the other hand, single point mutations in the prnp gene renders almost 100% penetrance of prion disease in the carrier [86]. Hence point mutations in the Spike-protein can potentially influence the amyloidogenicity both by altering protease recognition sites and by modulating amyloidogenic stretches in the primary sequence of the protein.
Influenza A is an RNA virus that is categorized into subtypes based on the two proteins present on the surface of the envelope, hemaglutinin and neuraminidase. Influenza A viruses cause seasonal flu in humans and variants of H1N1 and H1N5 gave rise to the avian flu and swine flu respectively. Pb1-F2 protein is an accessory protein expressed from the alternative+1 reading frame of the genome and is thought to contribute to elevated disease severity by increasing the inflammatory response. The recombinant expressed 90 amino acid long Pb1-F2 protein has been shown to form amyloid in vitro as well as in experimentally infected cells [87]. It was also recently shown that PB1-F2 amyloid in Influenza A infected mice correlated with proinflammatory protein signals and respiratory symptom severity [88]. Influenza A non-structured protein 1 (NS1) is a 26 kD unstructured protein that suppresses the host cell immune response and hence increase the virulence of the virus. This protein can also from amyloid in vitro [89].
Zika virus is a positive-sense RNA virus. Zika virus disease is in most cases an asymptomatic or very mild disease. However, the virus can cross the placenta if infection is active during pregnancy and cause microencephaly and other neuronal developmental issues in the foetus. It can also cause Guillian Barré syndrome, an acute autoimmune disorder that causes peripheral polyneuropathy and muscle weakness that also can affect the respiration musculature as well as the heart [90].
The proteome of the Zika virus is expressed as one single polyprotein that is threaded back and forth across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and finally cleaved into several distinct proteins by host cell peptidases and viral proteases [91]. The Capsid protein is the first protein to be expressed and it is attached to the ER membrane by the N-terminal stretch called the capsid anchor (CA) comprising 18 amino acids. Synthetic CA has been shown to form cytotoxic and haemolytic amyloid fibrils in in vitro experiments and was suggested as one mechanistic explanation for the neuropathologic events reported for Zika virus infection [92]. Zika virus infections can have lethal neuropathological congenital effects associated with CNS development [93] but can also manifest as neurological acute and PAS in certain adults [94].
Varciella Zoster virus (VZV) is a double stranded DNA virus belonging to the family of Herpes viruses. Primary VZV causes chicken pox (varicella) in children. Prior to vaccine roll-out in 1995, it is estimated that 95% of the adult population had been affected by chicken pox during childhood. The virus will remain dormant in neurons in the ganglia of cranial nerves, at the dorsal root and in the autonomic nervous system. If the virus is reactivated in adults, it will cause shingles (herpes zoster). This reactivation can occur several decades after initial infection and an estimate of one third of all individuals primarily infected with VSV will encounter at least one episode of reactivation [95]. VZV reactivation is in most cases coupled to a transient yet painful malady of skin and peripheral nerves. Postherpetic Neuralgia, a state of chronic pain remaining several months after the acute symptoms of reactivation have past, is seen in 20–30% of patients and up to 2% still suffer from this after several years [96]. In Switzerland an estimated yearly incidence of 1 in 100 000 in normal population reactivation of VZV resulting in CNS infection was found. Of these, meningitis or encephalitis with severe residual symptoms or deadly outcome in almost 30% [97]. In addition, VZV can cause vascular disease that manifests as ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke [98].
Recent data shows that VZV uses amyloid formation as a strategy to prevent the host cell from employing apoptosis as means of protecting the host organism [99]. The virus ORF20 protein RHIM forms amyloid in complex with the apoptosis signalling human ZBP1 protein and thereby blocks the apoptosis signal to reach its target.
Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) is another double-stranded DNA virus from the herpes virus family. The virus is very common and contagious and it is estimated that two thirds of the world population has a latent HSV-1 infection acquired during childhood [100]. HSV-1 latency is found predominantly in the trigeminal ganglia [101] and will cause episodic cold sores in the vicinity of this facial nerve typically in mucosal tissue such as mouth and lip or eye socket as result of anterograde spread from neurons to epithelial cells [102]. A more serious outcome of latent infections of herpes viruses is that they are the dominating cause of aseptic meningitis and encephalitis and especially HSV-1 is connected to encephalitis with poor outcome [103].
HSV-1 also employs the strategy of engaging parts of its proteome, the ICP6 protein, in formation of heterogeneous amyloid complexes to prevent apoptosis signalling [104]. A recent in silico screen of the entire proteome of HSV-1 revealed that there are additional amyloidogenic polypeptide regions encoded by the virus and that indeed a peptide derived from HSV-1 glycoprotein K formed amyloid fibrils in vitro [105].
Several recent studies from research settings in Taiwan, South Korea and Sweden demonstrate an increased risk of dementia after Herpes Simplex, herpes zoster ophthalmicus or Varicella Zoster infection [106–110] with hazard ratios spanning from 1.1 to 2.4 compared to non-infected controls. The direct causal effect of the virus infection on disease progression of dementia was corroborated by the rescue effect, up to 90% lowered risk of dementia, observed in the infected group treated with anti-viral drugs at time of acute infection compared to the infected but untreated group [108–110]. HSV-1 DNA has also been found in Aβ-amyloid plaques in autopsied AD patients as well as in Aβ-amyloid plaques of non-AD controls. However, the co-localization of HSV-1 DNA with Aβ plaques was much higher in AD (72% of DNA associated to plaques) compared to non-AD (24% of DNA associated to plaques) [111]. Indeed, the HSV-1 virion surface can catalyse the amyloid formation of Aβ1–42 amyloid fibrils [112] (Figure 4). Recent data demonstrate that both HSV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 can induce amyloid formation in cerebrospinal fluid from several proteins associated to neurodegenerative diseases [113].
Figure 4.
There are several mechanisms by which amyloids and viruses co-operate.
Amyloid formation of host encoded protein can be catalyzed on the surface of the virion [112]. Host amyloid coating the surface of the virion can activate macrophages and induce phagocytosis that in turn mediates the generation of amyloid seeds by macrophage proteolytic activity and further amyloid spreading [122]. Virus-derived vesicles (SVPs) can be loaded with amyloid content and target cell receptors leading to efficient and specific release of amyloid protein cargo to nascent host cells [131].
Human immune deficiency virus (HIV) – The HIV virus is a lentivirus comprising an enveloped single-stranded positive-sense RNA. The RNA will be converted to DNA upon infection and the viral genome will be incorporated in the host cell genome. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) is established as a secondary disorder of HIV infection, especially in HIV patients lacking adequate antiviral treatment [114]. While HAND appears different from Alzheimer’s disease, recently Aβ and HIV viral proteins gp120 [115], and most recently p17 [116] have been shown to form amyloid fibrils in brains of HAND patients. Mechanistically it is interesting to note that HIV infection is mediated using the gp120/gp41 protein system which correspond to the function of the Spike-protein of corona viruses. A fusion-inhibitor based on the C-terminal sequence of gp41, called enfuvirtide, is used clinically to prevent fusion of the HIV-virus with human cells [117]. Iatrogenic amyloid fibrils at the injection site composed of the 36-amino acid long peptide enfuvirtide was recently reported [118] (Table 1). Hence the HIV proteome contains three amyloidogenic proteins, gp120, p17 and gp41 which may have implications for the spectrum of disease phenotypes from HIV infections including HAND.
Interactions between human amyloids and viruses
There are many mechanistic interactions between human amyloids and viral particles [119]. Some interactions are beneficial for viral entry and spread while others demonstrate protection of the potential host against the intruding virion.
Amyloid fibrils enhance viral infection
Several proteins found in semen have been shown to dramatically increase HIV infection [120,121]. Prostatic acidic phosphatase, seminogelin-1 and seminogelin-2 are all part of the coagulum in semen and in the process they are proteolytically cleaved to form peptide fragments that form amyloid in the seminal plasma. The native function of the amyloid fibrils is yet not fully understood. However, these amyloid fibrils have been observed to attach to the surface of sperm heads and thereby triggering macrophage engulfment and activation of neutrophils. Based on this it has been suggested to be an important part in sperm selection as well as prevention of immune response to sperm in the female reproductive tract [122]. When HIV virus interacts with semen-derived amyloid to increase viral infectivity, a similar mechanism is observed. The amyloid enhances the transport of the virion across the mucosal barrier and also triggers macrophage engulfment, leading to viral infection of macrophages and also CD4+ T-cells [120]. These cells can then further mediate the infection to the novel virus recipient (Figure 4).
Similar to HIV, Ebola also has a sexually transmissible route that can give rise to male-to-female sexual transmission months after recovery from Ebola infection [123]. A pivotal role for the semen derived amyloids has also been described for these transmission events [124]
Both in the case of HIV-transmission and Ebola transmission above, the virion is assisted by the amyloid fibrils to cross epithelial membranes and enter the novel recipient. Once inside the host the virus triggers the host immune response and the virus together with the amyloid fibril is engulfed by macrophages. This mechanism not only mediates the virus infection between individuals but potentially also the spread of amyloid fibrils between organs or between cells and cell types in one organ in the same individual. Fibrils of α-synuclein have been demonstrated to enhance viral transduction into cells by concentrating the virions on the surface of amyloid particles in solutions [125]. The amyloid structure will further assist the transfection of cells using its intrinsic affinity for the cell membrane. Hence, the amyloid particles collect the virions and serve it to the cells. This is promoted by addition of chitosan, a positively charged glycosaminoglycan, or poly-Lysine, a positively charged amino-acid polymer, during fibril preparation, indication that charge can be an important parameter in the mechanism [125].
Viruses enhance amyloid spread
The involvement of extracellular vesicles (EVs) as mediators of misfolded proteins is currently heavily researched and is an obvious candidate in the search for the route of spread of misfolded, aggregated and amyloid-structured proteins. The literature is not conclusive regarding whether the vesicles are cell type specific or not [126]. Some suggested pathways of EV mediated uptake of cargo into cells are mediated by specific host-EV surface protein dockings that appear to be highly specific [127].
Viruses and virus-derived vesicles have been shown to be efficient means of transfer of protein cargo between host cell and recipient cell [128,129]. The protein cargo is internalized inside the membrane surface of the vesicle or virion and transferred to the next cell via fusion of membranes.
Virions can in some sense be regarded as highly complex extracellular vesicles and as such could also be considered as mediators of protein cargo. However, the virion is in general tightly packed with nucleic acid, hence internalization of extra load of amyloid protein is not plausible. However, several viruses are capable of promoting subviral particles (SVPs) that essentially comprise the viral protein capsid proteins attached to membrane or lipoprotein surfaces but lack the nucleic acid [130]. In Hepatitis B infection such nucleic acid free particles are present at a ratio of as many as 100 000 SVPs to one virion and in Hepatitis C a ratio of 1 to 1 000 000 has been observed [130]. Recent studies demonstrate that extracellular vesicles exhibiting VSV glycoprotein on the surface dramatically increased the cell-to-cell transfer and infection of yeast prions and the sequence and structure unrelated mammalian scrapie prions [131] demonstrating this might be a mechanism unbiased for sequence and structure of the transferred amyloid. Additionally, EVs decorated by SARS-CoV-2 Spike-protein drastically increased transfer of the EV cargo comprising aggregated and seeding competent Tau protein [131].
Endogenous viruses, that is the presence of viral genome that has been inserted in the mammalian germline during evolution, have many similarities in protein composition to exogenous viruses that we encounter in our everyday life. Endogenous viruses are kept under close guard by several protective mechanisms [132]. However reactivation can occur and is associated to neurodegenerative and autoimmune disease as well as cancer and chronic inflammation [133]. Also such reactivated endogenous viruses have been shown to recapitulate the mediation of amyloidogenic proteins that has been demonstrated for Spike-protein and VSV-G coated EVs [134], implying that SVPs may be a general mechanism for promoting intrahost amyloid spread (Figure 4).
Neutrophils are recruited to site of infection as part of the immune response during viral infection. Neutrophil elastase will be released to disarm the intruding virions by shedding their host receptor binding proteins. However, the elastase can also generate amyloidogenic peptides from both host proteins and virus proteins. Furthermore, Neutrophil elastase possibly remaining from Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have been found in amyloid deposits of several different systemic amyloidoses [135]. The amyloid per se triggers NETosis and the resulting neutrophil elastase has the capacity to digest the triggering amyloids into smaller species, generating toxic oligomers that are presumably also efficient seeds for further recruitment of proteins that are amyloidogenic, albeit still in solution [136]. Hence the system will be stuck in a vicious circle.
COVID-19 sequelae with similarities and possible connections to virus derived amyloid
Systemic amyloidosis
A cytokine storm during COVID-19 infection will render SAA1 being severely upregulated rendering risk for AA amyloidosis [137]. A recent paper reported on a case of suspected COVID-19 acceleration of a rare dual AL and AA amyloidosis with notable hepatic deposition. The SAA1 i.e. the AA precursor protein is synthesized in the liver and could be triggered by COVID-19 infection and associated with AL-amyloid seeds [138]. This case would strengthen the hypothesis of AA amyloidosis is a factor causing systemic complications after COVID-19 disease [139].
Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis, ATTR-CM, was discovered in two studies of post-mortem patients after COVID-19 and either the disease appeared worsened by the infection or was more prevalent in COVID-19 deaths [140,141]. In one patient myocardial inflammation was concomitant in with ATTR-CM [141]. ATTR-CM is common in elderly patients making it likely that the disease outcome could be worsened. Deposition of ATTR occurs systemically but is most prevalent in peripheral nerves for familial disease and in the heart for wild type amyloidosis. The latter is a significant issue for ACE2 mediated SARS-CoV-2 Spike-protein association as ACE2 expression is confined to the endothelial cells of the arteries, arterioles, and venules of the heart and kidney to regulate Renin-Angiotensin I-II conversion rendering high blood pressure a risk factor for COVID-19 death. ATTR accumulates surrounding the cardiomyocytes depriving the heart from normal function. Vascular association of SARS-CoV-2 infection is likely detrimental and a possible worsening of ongoing ATTR amyloidosis [142]. Systemic amyloidosis patients (AL and ATTR) showed excess mortality when suffering from COVID-19 compared to otherwise healthy individuals [143].
Type II diabetes
There is highly elevated risk for Type II diabetes after COVID-19 infection [144]. Recent data support invasion of SARS-CoV-2 in exocrine pancreatic cells in autopsied patients [145]. Pancreatic localized IAPP amyloidosis known to be associated with type II diabetes offers a putative link between beta-cell proteostatic challenge due to SARS-CoV-2 replication or cross-seeding of IAPP from SARS-CoV-2 amyloidogenic proteins which could exacerbate IAPP amyloidosis and elevated incidence of the disease.
Neurological diseases
A recent meta-data mining study found correlations between 45 viral exposures with elevated risk for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), generalized dementia, vascular dementia, Parkinson’s disease (PD), and multiple sclerosis (MS) [2]. A wide variety of neurological disease symptoms have been described associated with post COVID-19 infection [146]. The risk ratio was significantly elevated for memory impairment and AD, peripheral neuropathy and paraesthesia; episodic disorders (migrane, epileptic episodes), movement disorders (abnormal movements); mental health disorders (depression, anxiety and stress); sensory disorders (hearing loss, vision impairment); neurological impairment (dizziness). Many of the above neurological disorders can be associated with microclots or vascular impairment due to cerebrovascular disorders (ischaemic stroke and tia) being elevated. We briefly summarize some reported associations below.
Alzheimer’s disease
In a rather unique study comparing brain MRI of people pre-pandemic and after exposure of early strains of SARS-CoV-2 detected elevated cognitive decline, degeneration and brain atrophy in COVID-19 patients compared to controls [147]. In other studies, Aβ aggregates were found in young patient brains from COVID-19 infected patients [148]. These studies and several more have associated COVID-19 with New-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease [149]. Cross-seeding of amyloidogenic SARS-CoV-2 proteins and Aβ and tau are mechanisms worth to consider as an explanation for this correlation. Herpes reactivation in COVID-19 also merits suspicion in that the severe effects of herpes reactivation causing aseptic meningitis and encephalitis [103] as well as increased risk of dementia [106–110] may come into play.
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease is exceptionally rare. It affects 1–2 people per million per year worldwide [150]. It is therefore rather surprising that there are several case reports that connect Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease with COVID-19 infection [151–155]. The mechanism is currently not known but cross-seeding of amyloidogenic SARS-CoV-2 proteins and PrP is a possible mechanism for this putative association.
Parkinson’s disease
Parkinsonism has been reported as a significant PASC symptom and suggested increased incidence of PD after COVID-19 infection [156]. While the mechanistic connection is not established there are putative links from a pathology perspective. A post-mortem case report presented a 76 years old PD patient with prolific SARS-CoV-2 Spike-protein aggregates in brain and the heart [157]. No evidence for N-protein was detected and these aggregates were therefore ascribed to protein products from mRNA vaccination coding for Spike-protein production. The patient rapidly deteriorated following vaccination. Cross-seeding of amyloidogenic SARS-CoV-2 proteins and αsyn and tau are potential mechanisms to explain this observation.
Amytrophic lateral sclerosis
For ALS there has been reports of accelerated disease after COVID-19 infection [158]. The mechanism is currently not known but as in the previous examples cross-seeding of amyloidogenic SARS-CoV-2 proteins with SOD-1, TDP43, FUS, C9orf72 proteins can be considered in addition to proteostasis challenge and cellular trafficking disruption.
Vascular and cerebrovascular amyloidosis
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a prevalent pathology in amyloidosis. Eight amyloid proteins, Aβ, ATTR, ADan, ABri, ACys, APrP, AGel, AMed [159,160] (Table 1), are known to form amyloid in CAA and can cause vascular dementia. These vascular deposits are associated with accumulation of ApoE, Serum amyloid p component (SAP) and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) which are amyloid associated proteins and glycans [161] which together severely impairs the vasculature increasing the risk for haemorrhagic stroke. Hence COVID-19 with associated risk for vascular pathology may worsen the risk for vascular damage in a CAA affected patient.
Amyloidogenesis, abnormal blood clotting and fibrinolysis in COVID-19
Disorders discussed throughout this review are driven by complicated overlapping mechanisms. Haemostasis, amyloidogenesis, and SARS-CoV-2 viral infection conceptually merge how viral and human amyloids facilitated by a carnival of endoproteolytic processes can affect human health.
The association of blood clotting disorders in COVID-19 patients is established. The majority (>90%) of COVID-19 patients in an IUC multicenter study very early in the pandemic, suffered from different coagulation abnormalities and a high number of the patients developed life threatening complications due to thrombosis [162]. The symptoms from long-COVID/PASC are also closely linked to fibrinolytic disturbances with persistent amyloid-like fibrin thrombi [163]. Blood coagulation and fibrinolytic processes are regulated by proteolytic processing and is affected by viral infections. Likewise, amyloidogenic protein production as discussed above, is mediated by a vast range of endoproteolytic events. The key protein in coagulation processes is fibrin(ogen). Fibrinogen is composed of three separate protein subunits making heterotrimers that dimerize into a hexameric oligomer (Figure 5 bottom). Fibrinogen is synthesized in the liver at a very high rate 1-5 g/day rendering a high concentration (3 mg/ml) in blood plasma. This high expression of fibrinogen is further elevated during inflammation and in COVID-19 infection [164].
Figure 5.
Blood clots formed by thrombin processing of fibrinogen to fibrin recruiting blood platelets in a polymerizing fibrous web. The process of fibrinolysis is regulated by several proteins ultimately affording active plasmin as the proteolytic enzyme to digest insoluble fibrin and, hence resolving the clot. The normal process is shown on the left side of the clot in the figure. If fibrin on the other hand is generated from fibrinogen by thrombin (possibly even without thrombin) in the presence of amyloid seeds the fibrin can form misfolded fibrin (fibrinaloid) which cannot be digested by plasmin (right side of the figure). In addition to seeding misfolding of fibrin, amyloid fibrils are inactivating and activating proteins involved in fibrinolysis: tPA, vitronectin, α2-antiplasmin, and plasmin. Hence, there are many associations between fibrinolysis and amyloid disease as discussed in the main text.
For coagulation and fibrin formation to be initiated thrombin cleavage of pro-protein processing occurs by cleavage of fibrinogen alpha and beta chains to convert fibrinogen to insoluble fibrin. Fibrin is thereafter cross-linked by FXIII by covalent cross-linking to stabilize the clots [40]. Fibrin is degraded by a process called fibrinolysis. Fibrinolysis is initiated by tPA-binding to fibrin which activates plasmin from the precursor plasminogen locally to degrade the fibrin clot (Figure 5, left).
Work on systemic amyloidoses have linked acquired blood coagulation and fibrinolysis disorders with amyloid disease [165]. AA and AL amyloidosis were associated with acquired blood coagulation deficiency by lack of activated FXa [166], von Willenbrand factor (vWF) [167], and factor V (FV) [168]. In addition to the acquired deficiencies that can manifest as coagulation disorders, it was implicated that the fibrinolytic system was activated in amyloidosis. AL and AA amyloidosis patients had elevated levels of circulating plasmin-α2-anti-plasmin (PAP) and increased plasmin generation indicating activated fibrinolysis [169]. The biological role for activation of the fibrinolytic system in amyloid disease was hypothesized to work as a protective system for removal of misfolded protein aggregates including amyloids [42]. It has been shown that tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) is activated through the interaction with amyloid structures. This included synthetic amyloid fibrils of a fibrin/ogen-peptide and Aβ resulting in plasminogen cleavage and release of active plasmin in vitro [42]. This would render free plasmin to digest aggregated misfolded proteins. Taken together these data suggested less efficient coagulation and increased fibrinolysis in systemic amyloidosis [165]. Iatrogenic tPA-mediated severe haemorrhagic strokes was recently implicated as a combinatorial side effect of the novel Aβ-protofibril targeting Lecanemab antibody [170]. The progression and the extent of the haemorrhage of the afflicted patient were rapid. The adverse clinical trial death was possibly associated with tPA over activating plasmin formation locally by Aβ-CAA engagement of tPA. The mechanism of tPA binding to amyloid fibrils could in patients with normal tPA levels render the fibrinolytic system impaired. Competition of tPA captured on amyloid fibrils rather than on fibrin can result in active plasmin mislocalization. In COVID-19 fibrinolysis appears to be impaired in its capacity of plasmin degradation of amyloidotic fibrin clots [163]. Misfolded plasmin-resistant fibrin in COVID-19 plasma is referred to as fibrin amyloid or fibrinaloid [163]. It was observed in COVID-19 patients that plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), vitronectin, plasminogen, and tPA were elevated and fibrin clots formed from COVID-19 patient plasma showed altered fibrin network structures with elevated cross-linking and shorter fibrin fibres [164].
Vitronectin is also known as plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) binding protein and has a functional role in the innate immune system and maintenance of thrombosis and fibrinolysis [171]. Vitronectin is proteolytically degraded by thrombin, elastase and plasmin. Proteolysis reduces its ability to stabilize PAI-1. Hence its degradation pathway switches between being antifibrinolytic (bind PAI-1 and stabilize its inhibitory role) and profibrinolytic (promoting plasminogen activation). Vitronectin is a common protein associated with amyloid deposits [172]. Impairment of vitronectin pathways could exacerbate a fibrin-clotting process. Vimentin, just as vitronectin, is a common component of amyloid fibril deposits in amyloidosis [40]. Vimentin has been identified as an attachment factor for SARS-CoV-2 entry to endothelial cells [173]. This association was shown to be directed by the SARS-CoV-2 Spike-protein implicating direct protein-protein interactions on the path towards amyloid formation.
Fibrin is also involved in atherosclerotic plaque formation. Whereas no wild type fibrin sequence has been found in familial AFib fibrin-amyloids, in atheroscleorosis [174] amyloid deposition is a common component of atherosclerotic plaques where the main amyloid component is composed of wild type ApoA-I amyloid fibrils [175]. Atherosclerotic plaque is a complex structure of lipids co-aggregated with many amyloidogenic proteins: fibrinogen, transthyretin, ApoA-IV [176], and amyloid associated proteins serum amyloid P component (SAP) and vimentin [177]. This strengthens the hypothesis that fibrin(ogen) is an aggregation prone protein and a key player regarding its abundance of substrate for formation of pathological clogged vasculature in conjuncture with apo-lipoproteins that are notorious for amyloid deposition (Table 1) [178]. There are proteomic overlaps between atherosclerotic plaque and fibrinaloid microclots found in COVID-19 patients, e.g. Apolipoprotein C-II, ApoA-II, SAA, are amyloidogenic components in the microclots [179]. Insoluble microclot compositions from COVID-19 patients have been further shown to comprise Coagulation Factor XIII, plasminogen, fibrinogen alpha-chain, a2-antiplasmin, von Willebrand Factor, C-reactive protein, SAA-4 and complement component C7 [180]. Taken together all these vicious liaisons suggest that SARS-COV-2 Spike-protein in combination with inflammation, impairment of blood-coagulation and fibrinolytic systems compose the perfect environment for amyloid and protein aggregation formation (Figure 5). This process may be the associated with thrombotic events reported in COVID-19 patients [142].
Concluding remarks
As we have outlined in this review there are many phenotypic, biologic, and molecular overlaps between viral infections and amyloidosis. The proteopathic overlaps are concerning and are reminiscent of the early discussions on the strange nature of prions as infectious agents that goes back to the Gajdusek Nobel Prize in 1976. The Nobel committee press-release stated: ‘The possibility that further diseases in the brain e g different forms of presenile dementia, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and multiple sclerosis possibly may be caused by infectious agents is the subject of continuous studies … . Even if much knowledge remains to accumulate concerning slow infections in the brain of the type described it is clear today that these infections are caused by agents of a completely new type, which initiate a pathologic process of hitherto unknown kind. This implies that the definitions of diseases, which may potentially be of infectious origin have to be markedly widened’ [181].
Never before have so many people been subjected to a totally novel virus in such short period of time as during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The current situation, in wake of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, makes us wary of the amyloidogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 proteins, especially the Spike-protein [81]. Following the developments of clinical features during the COVID-19 pandemic and reviewing the literature of interactions between viruses in general, and SARS-CoV-2 in particular, we conclude it highly plausible that viruses play a role in the development several amyloid related diseases. In many instances with several years spanning between active viral infection and disease presentation.
We also emphasize that amyloidogenic routes may play a vital role in long COVID/PASC as well as debilitating vaccine side effects [182,183], hence mandating an awareness for those in contact with patients as well as basic scientists with interest in protein misfolding and amyloid formation. We cannot yet grasp the long-term consequences of the pandemic since too short time has passed. However, we can enhance the efforts of developing anti-viral treatments and, in parallel, molecular diagnostics and treatment protocols for those suffering from these conditions. The phenotypic overlaps between COVID-19, PASC, and undesired effects of Spike-protein based vaccines with those found for systemic amyloidosis, cardiac and neurologic disease may have a common molecular backdrop and mandates further investigation in the intersection between virology and amyloid research.
Acknowledgments
Our work is supported by the Swedish research council 2019-04405, the Swedish Brain Foundation ALZ2019-0004, ALZ2022-0004 and Konung Gustaf V and Drottning Victorias Stiftelse.
Funding Statement
The work was supported by the Hjärnfonden [ALZ2019-0004]; Hjärnfonden [ALZ2022-0004]; Konung Gustaf V:s och Drottning Victorias Stiftelse Vetenskapsrådet [2019-04405].
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
References
- [1].Choutka J, Jansari V, Hornig M, et al. Unexplained post-acute infection syndromes. Nature Med. 2022. May 01;28(5):911–923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Levine KS, Leonard HL, Blauwendraat C, et al. Virus exposure and neurodegenerative disease risk across national biobanks. Neuron. 2023. Jan 11. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.12.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Kanwar A, Selvaraju S, Esper F.. Human coronavirus-HKU1 infection among adults in Cleveland, Ohio. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4(2):ofx052. Spring. 10.1093/ofid/ofx052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Assiri A, Al-Tawfiq JA, Al-Rabeeah AA, et al. Epidemiological, demographic, and clinical characteristics of 47 cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease from Saudi Arabia: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013. Sep;13(9):752–761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Wadman M, Couzin-Frankel J, Kaiser J, et al. A rampage through the body. Science. 2020. Apr 24;368(6489):356–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Elezkurtaj S, Greuel S, Ihlow J, et al. Causes of death and comorbidities in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Sci Rep. 2021. Feb 19;11(1):4263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Webb BJ, Peltan ID, Jensen P, et al. Clinical criteria for COVID-19-associated hyperinflammatory syndrome: a cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020. Dec;2(12):e754–763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Gupta A, Madhavan MV, Sehgal K, et al. Extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19. Nature Med. 2020. Jul 01;26(7):1017–1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Puelles VG, Lütgehetmann M, Lindenmeyer MT, et al. Multiorgan and Renal Tropism of SARS-CoV-2. N Engl J Med. 2020. Aug 06;383(6):590–592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Qi F, Qian S, Zhang S, et al. Single cell RNA sequencing of 13 human tissues identify cell types and receptors of human coronaviruses. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020. May 21;526(1):135–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Sahranavard M, Akhavan Rezayat A, Zamiri Bidary M, et al. Cardiac complications in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Iran Med. 2021. Feb 1;24(2):152–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Misra S, Kolappa K, Prasad M, et al. Frequency of neurologic manifestations in COVID-19. Neurology. 2021;97(23):e2269. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Hirsch JS, Ng JH, Ross DW, et al. Acute kidney injury in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Kidney Int. 2020. Jul 01;98(1):209–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Mao R, Qiu Y, J-S H, et al. Manifestations and prognosis of gastrointestinal and liver involvement in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. Jul 01;5(7):667–678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Drucker DJ. Diabetes, obesity, metabolism, and SARS-CoV-2 infection: the end of the beginning. Cell Metab. 2021. Mar 2;33(3):479–498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Lazartigues E, Qadir M, Mauvais-Jarvis F. Endocrine Significance of SARS-CoV-2’s Reliance on ACE2. Endocrinology. 2020;161(9):bqaa108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Clarke SA, Abbara A, Dhillo WS. Impact of COVID-19 on the endocrine system: a mini-review. Endocrinology. 2022;163(1):bqab203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Morissette G, Flamand L. Herpesviruses and chromosomal integration. J Virol. 2010;84(23):12100–12109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Quarleri J. Poliomyelitis is a current challenge: long-term sequelae and circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus. Geroscience. 2023. Apr 01;45(2):707–717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Naeye RL, Blanc W. Pathogenesis of congenital rubella. JAMA. 1965;194(12):1277–1283. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Hirschenberger M, Hunszinger V, Sparrer KMJ. Implications of innate immunity in post-acute sequelae of non-persistent viral infections. Cells. 2021. Aug 19;10(8):2134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].O’sullivan O. Long-term sequelae following previous coronavirus epidemics. Clin Med (Lond). 2021. Jan;21(1):e68–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Das KM, Lee EY, Singh R, et al. Follow-up chest radiographic findings in patients with MERS-Cov after recovery. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2017. Jul-Sep;27(3):342–349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Hui DS, Wong KT, Antonio GE, et al. Long-term sequelae of SARS: physical, neuropsychiatric, and quality-of-life assessment. Hong Kong Med J. 2009. Dec;15(Suppl 8):21–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Zhang P, Li J, Liu H, et al. Long-term bone and lung consequences associated with hospital-acquired severe acute respiratory syndrome: a 15-year follow-up from a prospective cohort study. Bone Res. 2020;8(1):8. DOI: 10.1038/s41413-020-0084-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Lam M-B, Wing Y-K, MW-M Y, et al. Mental morbidities and chronic fatigue in severe acute respiratory syndrome survivors: long-term follow-up. Arch Internal Med. 2009;169(22):2142–2147. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Lee SH, Shin HS, Park HY, et al. Depression as a mediator of chronic fatigue and post-traumatic stress symptoms in Middle East respiratory syndrome survivors. Psychiatry Investig. 2019. Jan;16(1):59–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Di Gennaro F, Belati A, Tulone O, et al. Incidence of long COVID-19 in people with previous SARS-Cov2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 120,970 patients. Intern Emerg Med. 2022. Nov;30:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Buxbaum JN, Dispenzieri A, Eisenberg DS, et al. Amyloid nomenclature 2022: update, novel proteins, and recommendations by the International Society of Amyloidosis (ISA) nomenclature committee. Amyloid. 2022. Nov;29(4):1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Davis HE, McCorkell L, Vogel JM, et al. Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations. Nature Rev Microbiol. 2023. March 01;21(3):133–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Rubel MS, Fedotov SA, Grizel AV, et al. Functional mammalian amyloids and amyloid-like proteins. Life (Basel). 2020. Aug 21;10(9):156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Maji SK, Perrin MH, Sawaya MR, et al. Functional amyloids as natural storage of peptide hormones in pituitary secretory granules. Science. 2009. Jul 17;325(5938):328–332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Hewetson A, Do HQ, Myers C, et al. Functional amyloids in reproduction. Biomolecules. 2017. Jun 29;7(4):46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Brunger AF, Nienhuis HLA, Bijzet J, et al. Causes of AA amyloidosis: a systematic review. Amyloid. 2020. Mar;27(1):1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Sorić Hosman I, Kos I, Lamot L. Serum amyloid a in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a compendious review of a renowned biomarker [Review]. Front Immunol. 2021. Feb 19;11:631299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Alghamdi M. Familial Mediterranean fever, review of the literature. Clin Rheumatol. 2017. Aug;36(8):1707–1713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Tateishi Y, Yamada Y, Katsuki M, et al. Pathological review of cardiac amyloidosis using autopsy cases in a single Japanese institution. Pathol Res Pract. 2021. Nov;227:153635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Weisel JW, Litvinov RI. Fibrin formation, structure and properties. Subcell Biochem. 2017;82:405–456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Benson MD, Liepnieks J, Uemichi T, et al. Hereditary renal amyloidosis associated with a mutant fibrinogen alpha-chain. Nat Genet. 1993. Mar;3(3):252–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Chapman J, Dogan A. Fibrinogen alpha amyloidosis: insights from proteomics. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2019. Sep;16(9):783–793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Garnier C, Briki F, Nedelec B, et al. VLITL is a major cross-beta-sheet signal for fibrinogen Aalpha-chain frameshift variants. Blood. 2017. Dec 21;130(25):2799–2807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Kranenburg O, Bouma B, Kroon-Batenburg LM, et al. Tissue-type plasminogen activator is a multiligand cross-beta structure receptor. Curr Biol. 2002. Oct 29;12(21):1833–1839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Liz MA, Coelho T, Bellotti V, et al. A narrative review of the role of transthyretin in health and disease. Neurol Ther. 2020. Dec;9(2):395–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Milardi D, Gazit E, Radford SE, et al. Proteostasis of islet amyloid polypeptide: a molecular perspective of risk factors and protective strategies for type II diabetes. Chem Rev. 2021. Feb 10;121(3):1845–1893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Scheltens P, De Strooper B, Kivipelto M, et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 2021. Apr 24;397(10284):1577–1590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Collinge J. Mammalian prions and their wider relevance in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature. 2016. Nov 01;539(7628):217–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Borghammer P, Just MK, Horsager J, et al. A postmortem study suggests a revision of the dual-hit hypothesis of Parkinson’s disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2022. Nov 30;8(1):166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Abeliovich A, Gitler AD. Defects in trafficking bridge Parkinson’s disease pathology and genetics. Nature. 2016. Nov 10;539(7628):207–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Mathis S, Goizet C, Soulages A, et al. Genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a review. J Neurol Sci. 2019. Apr 15;399:217–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Schonfelder J, Pfeiffer PB, Pradhan T, et al. Protease resistance of ex vivo amyloid fibrils implies the proteolytic selection of disease-associated fibril morphologies. Amyloid. 2021. Dec;28(4):243–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Mangione PP, Verona G, Corazza A, et al. Plasminogen activation triggers transthyretin amyloidogenesis in vitro. J Biol Chem. 2018. Sep 14;293(37):14192–14199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Yamada T, Liepnieks JJ, Kluve-Beckerman B, et al. Cathepsin B generates the most common form of amyloid a (76 Residues) as a degradation product from serum amyloid a 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1995.Tb03538.x. Scand J Immunol. 1995. Jan 01;41(1)):94–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Silverman SL, Cathcart ES, Skinner M, et al. The degradation of serum amyloid a protein by activated polymorphonuclear leucocytes: participation of granulocytic elastase. Immunology. 1982. Aug;46(4):737–744. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Garringer HJ, Murrell J, D’adamio L, et al. Modeling familial British and Danish dementia. Brain Struct Funct. 2010. Mar;214(2–3):235–244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Solomon JP, Page LJ, Balch WE, et al. Gelsolin amyloidosis: genetics, biochemistry, pathology and possible strategies for therapeutic intervention. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2012. May-Jun;47(3):282–296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Uversky VN, Fink AL. Conformational constraints for amyloid fibrillation: the importance of being unfolded. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004. May 6;1698(2):131–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Rousseau F, Serrano L, Schymkowitz JW. How evolutionary pressure against protein aggregation shaped chaperone specificity. J Mol Biol. 2006. Feb 3;355(5):1037–1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Beerten J, Jonckheere W, Rudyak S, et al. Aggregation gatekeepers modulate protein homeostasis of aggregating sequences and affect bacterial fitness. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2012. Jul;25(7):357–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Hammarstrom P, Jiang X, Hurshman AR, et al. Sequence-dependent denaturation energetics: a major determinant in amyloid disease diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002. Dec 10;4(Suppl 4):16427–16432. 99 Suppl. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Mead S. Prion disease genetics. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006. Mar;14(3):273–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Richardson JS, Richardson DC. Natural beta-sheet proteins use negative design to avoid edge-to-edge aggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002. Mar 5;99(5):2754–2759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Wright CF, Teichmann SA, Clarke J, et al. The importance of sequence diversity in the aggregation and evolution of proteins. Nature. 2005. Dec 8;438(7069):878–881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Kadibalban AS, Bogumil D, Landan G, et al. DnaK-Dependent accelerated evolutionary rate in prokaryotes. Genome Biol Evol. 2016. Jun 3;8(5):1590–1599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Alvarez-Ponce D, Aguilar-Rodriguez J, Fares MA. Molecular chaperones accelerate the evolution of their protein clients in Yeast. Genome Biol Evol. 2019. Aug 1;11(8):2360–2375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Lachowiec J, Lemus T, Borenstein E, et al. Hsp90 promotes kinase evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2015. Jan;32(1):91–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Tartaglia GG, Pechmann S, Dobson CM, et al. Life on the edge: a link between gene expression levels and aggregation rates of human proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 2007. May;32(5):204–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Santra M, Dill KA, de Graff Amr, et al. Proteostasis collapse is a driver of cell aging and death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019. Oct 29;116(44):22173–22178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Verma K, Verma M, Chaphalkar A, et al. Recent advances in understanding the role of proteostasis. Fac Rev. 2021. ;10:72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Milo R, Phillips R. Cell biology by the numbers. New York, NY: Garland Science, Taylor & Francis Group; 2016. [Google Scholar]
- [70].Firth AE, Brierley I. Non-canonical translation in RNA viruses. J Gen Virol. 2012. Jul;93(Pt 7):1385–1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Mateu MG. Assembly, stability and dynamics of virus capsids. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2013. Mar;531(1–2):65–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Chapman MS, Liljas L. Structural folds of viral proteins. Adv Protein Chem. 2003;64:125–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Sevvana M, Klose T, Rossmann MG. Principles of virus structure. In: Bamford D, Zuckerman M, editors. Encyclopedia of virology. Fourth ed. Oxford: Academic Press; 2021. pp. 257–277. [Google Scholar]
- [74].Langenberg T, Gallardo R, van der Kant R, et al. Thermodynamic and evolutionary coupling between the native and amyloid state of Globular proteins. Cell Rep. 2020. Apr 14;31(2):107512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Johnson JE. Virus particle dynamics. Adv Protein Chem. 2003;64:197–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Canady MA, Tihova M, Hanzlik TN, et al. Large conformational changes in the maturation of a simple RNA virus, nudaurelia capensis omega virus (NomegaV). J Mol Biol. 2000. Jun 9;299(3):573–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].van der Vies Sm, Gatenby AA, Georgopoulos C, et al. Bacteriophage T4 encodes a co-chaperonin that can substitute for Escherichia coli GroES in protein folding. Nature. 1994. Apr 14;368(6472):654–656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Wu C, Liu Y, Yang Y, et al. Analysis of therapeutic targets for SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of potential drugs by computational methods. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2020. May;10(5):766–788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Charnley M, Islam S, Bindra GK, et al. Neurotoxic amyloidogenic peptides in the proteome of SARS-COV2: potential implications for neurological symptoms in COVID-19. Nat Commun. 2022. Jun 13;13(1):3387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Tayeb-Fligelman E, Cheng X, Tai C, et al. Inhibition of amyloid formation of the Nucleoprotein of SARS-CoV-2. bioRxiv. 2021. Mar 18.
- [81].Nyström S, Hammarström P. Amyloidogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. J Am Chem Soc. 2022. May 25;144(20):8945–8950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].GISAD . hCoV19 variants 2023 [cited 2023. Jan 31]. Available from: https://gisaid.org/hcov19-variants/
- [83].Breijyeh Z, Karaman R. Comprehensive review on alzheimer’s disease: causes and treatment. Molecules. 2020;25(24):5789. [cited. 10.3390/molecules25245789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Westermark GT, Sletten K, Grubb A, et al. AA-Amyloidosis: tissue complement-specific association of various protein AA subspecies and evidence of a fourth SAA gene product [Article]. Am J Pathol. 1990;137(2):377–383. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Rennegarbe M, Lenter I, Schierhorn A, et al. Influence of C-terminal truncation of murine Serum amyloid a on fibril structure [Article]. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Appleby BS, Shetty S, Elkasaby M. Genetic aspects of human prion diseases. Front Neurol. 2022;13:1003056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Chevalier C, Al Bazzal A, Vidic J, et al. PB1-F2 influenza a virus protein adopts a beta-sheet conformation and forms amyloid fibers in membrane environments. J Biol Chem. 2010. Apr 23;285(17):13233–13243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Chevalier C, Leymarie O, Sedano L, et al. PB1-F2 amyloid-like fibers correlate with proinflammatory signaling and respiratory distress in influenza-infected mice. J Biol Chem. 2021. Jul;297(1):100885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].Shaldzhyan AA, Zabrodskaya YA, Baranovskaya IL, et al. Old dog, new tricks: influenza a virus NS1 and in vitro fibrillogenesis. Biochimie. 2021. Nov;190:50–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [90].Health NIo . Guillain-Barré syndrome fact sheet NINDS.NIH.gov: nIH; 2022. [cited 2022 dec 29]. Available from: https://www.ninds.nih.gov/guillain-barre-syndrome-fact-sheet
- [91].Mohd Ropidi MI, Khazali AS, Nor Rashid N, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum: a focal point of Zika virus infection. J Biomed Sci. 2020. Jan 20;27(1):27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92].Saumya KU, Gadhave K, Kumar A, et al. Zika virus capsid anchor forms cytotoxic amyloid-like fibrils. Virology. 2021. Aug;560:8–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [93].Chimelli L, Melo ASO, Avvad-Portari E, et al. The spectrum of neuropathological changes associated with congenital Zika virus infection. Acta Neuropathol. 2017. Jun;133(6):983–999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [94].Munoz LS, Parra B, Pardo CA, et al. Neurological Implications of Zika virus infection in adults. J Infect Dis. 2017. Dec 16;216(suppl_10):S897–905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [95].Harpaz R, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Seward JF, et al. Prevention of herpes zoster: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2008. Jun 6;57(RR–5):1–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [96].Watson P. Postherpetic neuralgia. Am Fam Physician. 2011. Sep 15;84(6):690–692. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [97].Becerra JC, Sieber R, Martinetti G, et al. Infection of the central nervous system caused by varicella zoster virus reactivation: a retrospective case series study. Int J Infect Dis. 2013. Jul;17(7):e529–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [98].Nagel MA, Cohrs RJ, Mahalingam R, et al. The varicella zoster virus vasculopathies: clinical, CSF, imaging, and virologic features. Neurology. 2008. Mar 11;70(11):853–860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [99].Steain M, Baker M, Pham CLL, et al. Varicella zoster virus encodes a viral decoy RHIM to inhibit cell death. PLOS Pathog. 2020. Jul;16(7):e1008473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [100].WHO . Herpes simplex virus. Fact sheets: WHO; 2022. [Google Scholar]
- [101].Croen KD, Ostrove JM, Dragovic LJ, et al. Latent herpes simplex virus in human trigeminal ganglia. Detection of an immediate early gene “anti-sense” transcript by in situ hybridization. N Engl J Med. 1987. Dec 3;317(23):1427–1432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [102].McGraw HM, Awasthi S, Wojcechowskyj JA, et al. Anterograde spread of herpes simplex virus type 1 requires glycoprotein E and glycoprotein I but not Us9. J Virol. 2009. Sep;83(17):8315–8326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [103].Lee GH, Kim J, Kim HW, et al. Herpes simplex viruses (1 and 2) and varicella-zoster virus infections in an adult population with aseptic meningitis or encephalitis: a nine-year retrospective clinical study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021. Nov 19;100(46):e27856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [104].Shanmugam N, Baker M, Sanz-Hernandez M, et al. Herpes simplex virus encoded ICP6 protein forms functional amyloid assemblies with necroptosis-associated host proteins. Biophys Chem. 2021. Feb;269:106524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [105].Singh VK, Kumar S, Tapryal S. Aggregation propensities of herpes simplex virus-1 proteins and derived peptides. An in silico and in vitro Analysis ACS Omega. 2020. Jun 9;5(22):12964–12973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [106].Chen VC, Wu SI, Huang KY, et al. Herpes zoster and dementia: a nationwide population-based cohort study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2018. Jan/Feb;79(1):16m11312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [107].Tsai M-C, Cheng W-L, Sheu J-J, et al. Increased risk of dementia following herpes zoster ophthalmicus. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(11):e0188490. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [108].Tzeng N-S, Chung C-H, Lin F-H, et al. Anti-herpetic medications and reduced risk of dementia in patients with herpes simplex virus infections—a nationwide, population-based cohort study in Taiwan. Neurotherapeutics. 2018. Apr 01;15(2):417–429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [109].Bae S, Yun S-C, Kim M-C, et al. Association of herpes zoster with dementia and effect of antiviral therapy on dementia: a population-based cohort study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021. Aug 01;271(5):987–997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [110].Lopatko Lindman K, Hemmingsson E-S, Weidung B, et al. Herpesvirus infections, antiviral treatment, and the risk of dementia—a registry-based cohort study in Sweden. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Transl Res Clin Interventions. 2021. Jan 01;7(1):e12119. 10.1002/trc2.12119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [111].Wozniak MA, Mee AP, Itzhaki RF. Herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA is located within Alzheimer’s disease amyloid plaques. J Pathol. 2009. Jan;217(1):131–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [112].Ezzat K, Pernemalm M, Pålsson S, et al. The viral protein corona directs viral pathogenesis and amyloid aggregation. Nat Commun. 2019. May 27;10(1):2331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [113].Christ W, Kapell S, Mermelekas G, et al. SARS-CoV-2 and HSV-1 induce amyloid aggregation in human CSF. bioRxiv. 2022. Sep 15. 508120.
- [114].Clifford DB, Ances BM. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013. Nov;13(11):976–986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [115].Fulop T, Witkowski JM, Larbi A, et al. Does HIV infection contribute to increased beta-amyloid synthesis and plaque formation leading to neurodegeneration and Alzheimer’s disease? J Neurovirol. 2019. Oct;25(5):634–647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [116].Zeinolabediny Y, Caccuri F, Colombo L, et al. HIV-1 matrix protein p17 misfolding forms toxic amyloidogenic assemblies that induce neurocognitive disorders. Sci Rep. 2017. Sep 4;7(1):10313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [117].Joly V, Jidar K, Tatay M, et al. Enfuvirtide: from basic investigations to current clinical use. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010. Nov;11(16):2701–2713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [118].Naujokas A, Vidal CI, Mercer SE, et al. A novel form of amyloid deposited at the site of enfuvirtide injection. J Cutan Pathol. 2012. Feb;39(2):220–221. quiz 219. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2012.01865_2.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [119].Michiels E, Rousseau F, Schymkowitz J. Mechanisms and therapeutic potential of interactions between human amyloids and viruses. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021. Mar 01;78(6):2485–2501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [120].Munch J, Rucker E, Standker L, et al. Semen-derived amyloid fibrils drastically enhance HIV infection. Cell. 2007. Dec 14;131(6):1059–1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [121].Roan NR, Müller JA, Liu H, et al. Peptides released by physiological cleavage of semen coagulum proteins form amyloids that enhance HIV infection. Cell Host & Microbe. 2011. Dec 15;10(6):541–550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [122].Roan NR, Sandi-Monroy N, Kohgadai N, et al. Semen amyloids participate in spermatozoa selection and clearance. Elife. 2017. Jun 27;6:e24888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [123].Thorson A, Formenty P, Lofthouse C, et al. Systematic review of the literature on viral persistence and sexual transmission from recovered Ebola survivors: evidence and recommendations. BMJ Open. 2016. Jan 7;6(1):e008859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [124].Bart SM, Cohen C, Dye JM, et al. Enhancement of Ebola virus infection by seminal amyloid fibrils. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018. Jul 10;115(28):7410–7415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [125].Kirti S, Patel K, Das S, et al. Amyloid fibrils with positive charge enhance retroviral transduction in mammalian cells. ACS Bio Sci Eng. 2019. Jan 14;5(1):126–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [126].van Niel G, Carter DRF, Clayton DRF, et al. Challenges and directions in studying cell–cell communication by extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022. May 01;23(5):369–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [127].Mathieu M, Martin-Jaular L, Lavieu G, et al. Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication. Nat Cell Biol. 2019. Jan;21(1):9–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [128].Mangeot P-E, Dollet S, Girard M, et al. Protein transfer into human cells by VSV-G-induced nanovesicles. Mol Ther. 2011. Sep 01;19(9):1656–1666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [129].Meyer C, Losacco J, Stickney Z, et al. Pseudotyping exosomes for enhanced protein delivery in mammalian cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017. ;12:3153–3170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [130].Vaillant A. HBsAg, subviral particles, and their clearance in establishing a functional cure of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. ACS Infect Dis. 2021. Jun 11;7(6):1351–1368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [131].Liu S, Hossinger A, Heumuller SE, et al. Highly efficient intercellular spreading of protein misfolding mediated by viral ligand-receptor interactions. Nat Commun. 2021. Oct 19;12(1):5739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [132].Geis FK, Goff SP. Silencing and transcriptional regulation of endogenous retroviruses: an overview. Viruses. 2020;12(8):884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [133].Küry P, Nath A, Créange A, et al. Human endogenous retroviruses in neurological diseases. Trends Mol Med. 2018. Apr 01;24(4):379–394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [134].Liu S, Heumüller S-E, Hossinger A, et al. Endogenous retroviruses promote prion-like spreading of proteopathic seeds. bioRxiv. 2022. May 06. 490866.
- [135].Stone PJ, Campistol JM, Abraham CR, et al. Neutrophil proteases associated with amyloid fibrils. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993. Nov 30;197(1):130–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [136].Azevedo EP, Guimaraes-Costa AB, Torezani GS, et al. Amyloid fibrils trigger the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), causing fibril fragmentation by NET-associated elastase. J Biol Chem. 2012. Oct 26;287(44):37206–37218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [137].Sinha N, Thakur AK. Likelihood of amyloid formation in COVID-19-induced ARDS. Trends Microbiol. 2021. Nov;29(11):967–969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [138].Russe-Russe JR, Abramowitz C, Pellegrini JR, et al. COVID-19 exposure unmasking systemic amyloidosis with hepatic predominance. Cureus. 2022. Nov;14(11):e31092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [139].Galkin AP. Hypothesis: aA amyloidosis is a factor causing systemic complications after coronavirus disease. Prion. 2021. Dec;15(1):53–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [140].Menter T, Haslbauer JD, Nienhold R, et al. Postmortem examination of COVID-19 patients reveals diffuse alveolar damage with severe capillary congestion and variegated findings in lungs and other organs suggesting vascular dysfunction. Histopathology. 2020. Aug;77(2):198–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [141].Bois MC, Boire NA, Layman AJ, et al. COVID-19-associated nonocclusive fibrin microthrombi in the heart. Circulation. 2021. Jan 19;143(3):230–243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [142].Mizurini DM, Hottz ED, Bozza PT, et al. Fundamentals in Covid-19-associated thrombosis: molecular and cellular aspects. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021. ;8:785738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [143].Lewis E, Fine N, Miller RJH, et al. Amyloidosis and COVID-19: experience from an amyloid program in Canada. Ann Hematol. 2022. Oct;101(10):2307–2315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [144].Banerjee M, Pal R, Dutta S. Risk of incident diabetes post-COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim Care Diabetes. 2022. Aug;16(4):591–593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [145].Stein SR, Ramelli SC, Grazioli A, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection and persistence in the human body and brain at autopsy. Nature. 2022. Dec;612(7941):758–763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [146].Xu E, Xie Y, Al-Aly Z. Long-term neurologic outcomes of COVID-19. Nat Med. 2022. Nov;28(11):2406–2415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [147].Douaud G, Lee S, Alfaro-Almagro F, et al. SARS-CoV-2 is associated with changes in brain structure in UK Biobank. Nature. 2022. Apr;604(7907):697–707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [148].Priemer DS, Rhodes CH, Karlovich E, et al. Abeta Deposits in the neocortex of adult and infant hypoxic brains, including in cases of COVID-19. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2022. Nov 16;81(12):988–995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [149].Wang L, Davis PB, Volkow ND, et al. Association of COVID-19 with new-onset Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;89(2):411–414. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-220717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [150].Klug GM, Wand H, Simpson M, et al. Intensity of human prion disease surveillance predicts observed disease incidence. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013. Dec;84(12):1372–1377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [151].Young MJ, O’hare M, Matiello M, et al. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in a man with COVID-19: sARS-CoV-2-accelerated neurodegeneration? Brain Behav Immun. 2020. Oct;89:601–603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [152].Tayyebi G, Malakouti SK, Shariati B, et al. COVID-19-associated encephalitis or Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease: a case report. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2022. Feb;12(1):29–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [153].Olivo S, Furlanis G, Buoite Stella A, et al. Rapidly evolving Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in COVID-19: from early status epilepticus to fatal outcome. Acta Neurol Belg. 2022. Jul 19:1–4. doi 10.1007/s13760-022-02023-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [154].Bernardini A, Gigli GL, Janes F, et al. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease after COVID-19: infection-induced prion protein misfolding? A case report. Prion. 2022. Dec;16(1):78–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [155].Ciolac D, Racila R, Duarte C, et al. Clinical and radiological deterioration in a case of creutzfeldt-jakob disease following SARS-CoV-2 Infection: hints to accelerated age-dependent neurodegeneration. Biomedicines. 2021. Nov 19;9(11):1730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [156].Ali SS, Mumtaz A, Qamar MA, et al. New-onset parkinsonism as a Covid-19 infection sequela: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022. Aug;80:104281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [157].Mörz M. A case report: multifocal necrotizing encephalitis and myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination against COVID-19. Vaccines. 2022;10(10):1651. [cited. 10.3390/vaccines10101651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [158].Li X, Bedlack R. COVID-19-accelerated disease progression in two patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve. 2021. Sep;64(3):E13–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [159].Yamada M. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy: an overview. Neuropathology. 2000. Mar;20(1):8–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [160].Wagner J, Degenhardt K, Veit M, et al. Medin co-aggregates with vascular amyloid-beta in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2022. Dec;612(7938):123–131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [161].Alexandrescu AT. Amyloid accomplices and enforcers. Protein Sci. 2005. Jan;14(1):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [162].Helms J, Tacquard C, Severac F, et al. High risk of thrombosis in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Intensive care Med. 2020. Jun;46(6):1089–1098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [163].Kell DB, Laubscher GJ, Pretorius E. A central role for amyloid fibrin microclots in long COVID/PASC: origins and therapeutic implications. Biochem J. 2022. Feb 17;479(4):537–559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [164].Whyte CS, Simpson M, Morrow GB, et al. The suboptimal fibrinolytic response in COVID-19 is dictated by high PAI-1. J Thromb Haemost. 2022. Oct;20(10):2394–2406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [165].Hammarstrom P. The bloody path of amyloids and prions. J Thromb Haemost. 2007. Jun;5(6):1136–1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [166].Mumford AD, O’donnell J, Gillmore JD, et al. Bleeding symptoms and coagulation abnormalities in 337 patients with AL-amyloidosis. Br J Haematol. 2000. Aug;110(2):454–460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [167].Kos CA, Ward JE, Malek K, et al. Association of acquired von Willebrand syndrome with AL amyloidosis. Am J Hematol. 2007. May;82(5):363–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [168].Emori Y, Sakugawa M, Niiya K, et al. Life-threatening bleeding and acquired factor V deficiency associated with primary systemic amyloidosis. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2002. Sep;13(6):555–559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [169].Bouma B, Maas C, Hazenberg BP, et al. Increased plasmin-alpha2-antiplasmin levels indicate activation of the fibrinolytic system in systemic amyloidoses. J Thromb Haemost. 2007. Jun;5(6):1139–1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [170].Reish NJ, Jamshidi P, Stamm B, et al. Multiple cerebral hemorrhages in a patient receiving lecanemab and treated with t-PA for stroke. N Engl J Med. 2023. Jan 4;388(5):478–479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [171].Y-C S, Riesbeck K. Chapter 33 - Vitronectin. In: Barnum S, and Schein T, editors. The complement FactsBook. Second ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press; 2018. pp. 351–360. [Google Scholar]
- [172].Winter M, Tholey A, Kruger S, et al. MALDI-mass spectrometry imaging identifies vitronectin as a common constituent of amyloid deposits. J Histochem Cytochem. 2015. Oct;63(10):772–779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [173].Amraei R, Xia C, Olejnik J, et al. Extracellular vimentin is an attachment factor that facilitates SARS-CoV-2 entry into human endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022. Feb 8;119(6). doi : 10.1073/pnas.2113874119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [174].Rocken C, Tautenhahn J, Buhling F, et al. Prevalence and pathology of amyloid in atherosclerotic arteries. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006. Mar;26(3):676–677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [175].Westermark P, Mucchiano G, Marthin T, et al. Apolipoprotein A1-derived amyloid in human aortic atherosclerotic plaques. Am J Pathol. 1995. December 01;147(5):1186–1192. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [176].Liang W, Ward LJ, Karlsson H, et al. Distinctive proteomic profiles among different regions of human carotid plaques in men and women. Sci Rep. 2016. May 20;6(1):26231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [177].Stakhneva EM, Meshcheryakova IA, Demidov EA, et al. A proteomic study of atherosclerotic plaques in men with coronary atherosclerosis. Diagn (Basel). 2019. Nov 7;9(4):177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [178].Das M, Gursky O. Amyloid-forming properties of human apolipoproteins: sequence analyses and structural insights. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;855:175–211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [179].Kruger A, Vlok M, Turner S, et al. Proteomics of fibrin amyloid microclots in long COVID/post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) shows many entrapped pro-inflammatory molecules that may also contribute to a failed fibrinolytic system. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022. Sep 21;21(1):190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [180].Pretorius E, Vlok M, Venter C, et al. Persistent clotting protein pathology in long COVID/Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) is accompanied by increased levels of antiplasmin. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021. Aug 23;20(1):172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [181].Nobel_Prize_Outreach . The nobel prize in physiology or medicine;1976. [cited 2023 Mar 14]. Available from: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1976/summary/
- [182].Guo W, Deguise J, Tian Y, et al. Profiling COVID-19 vaccine adverse events by statistical and ontological analysis of VAERS case reports [Original Research]. Front Pharmacol. 2022. Jun 24;13:13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [183].Fraiman J, Erviti J, Jones M, et al. Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults. Vaccine. 2022. Sep 22;40(40):5798–5805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]